The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-Public Works - ~I'fy 'OF SAN BERNARD~O - REQUWt NpOR' COUNCIL AC_ From: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE Subject: Adoption of Negative Declaration & Finding of Consistency wi th Interim Policy Document-Vacation of a portion of Atlantic Avenue West of Palm Avenue Pu i Works Project No. 89-9 Dept: Public Works/Engineering Date: 5-1-89 Synopsis of Previous Council action: 02-20-89 Authorization to proceed granted and plan approved. 04-17-89 Resolution of intention to order the vacation was adopted. ~;:; " i",j f'rl r:> '-';'~ l::,:) I 'J." .,;- ;",' ::'; . ":It ',J ''''1 ~.. Recommended motion: 1. That the Negative Declaration for vacation of a portion of Atlantic be adopted. (... ' (1) Public Works Project No. 89-9, Avenue, west of Palm Avenue, 2. That a finding be made that the vacation of a portion of Atlantic Avenue, west of Palm Avenue, is consistent with the Interim Policy Document. cc: Jim Robbins Jim Richardson Supporting data attached: Roger G. Hardgrave Staff Report, Initial Study, Neqative Declaration. Map Phone: 5025 , -----1- Contact person: Ward: 1 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Waqes on W.O. 01266 Source: (Acct. No.) 001-302-53157 Finance: Acct. Oeser; tion Street Vaca Council Notes: 75-0262 Agenda Item NO.-9----- - ~ - ~ OF SAN BERNARDI~ - REQU~ FOR COUNCIL Ac110N STAFF REPORT The Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 89-9 was recommended for adoption by the Environmental Re- view Committee at its meeting of 4-06-89. A l4-day public review period was afforded from 4-13- 89 to 4-26-89. No comments were received. We recommend that the Negative Declaration be adopted and a finding made that the project is consistent with the Interim Policy Document. 5-1-89 ... -- -~ ,.<<""- '-: CIT F SAN BI NARDINO pLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY """I r PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 89-9 TO VACATE A PORTION OF ATLANTIC .. AVENUE WEST OF PALM AVENUE ' PREPARED FOR: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PREPARED BY: SCOTT WRIGH'l' PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 300 NORTH "D" STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418 -~ f '\....,1'... CIT F SAN NARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 89-9 The proposal is to vacate a portion of the north side of Atlantic Avenue immediately west of Palm Avenue. The area to be vacated is 20 feet wide and approximately 150 feet long. The proposed vacation will not be executed until the subject portion of Atlantic Avenue is replaced by the construction of state Highway Route 30. The vacated area will.tevert back to the underlying fee owner. . ,.- .....''"'''- , ENVIRONMENTAL EV ALUA TION AND MITIGATION MEASlEfES 9.d. The proposed street vacation in and of itself will not alter present patterns of circulation. Any changes in circulation patterns will occur as a result of highway construction, not as a result of the proposed vacation. No mitigations are necessary. 11.c. The proposed street vacation will not require the cons- truction of new utility facilities because all existing utility easements will be reserved. PCAGENDA:I.S.PW89-9 r CITY OF SAN BERNARD~NO "'" PLANNING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT CHECKLIST .... ~ r "" A. BACRGROYlID PUBLIC WORKS 89-9 Application Number: Project Description: To vacate a portion of Atlantic Avenue west of Palm Avenue . Location: A 150 foot long portion of the northerly side of Atlantic Avenue immediately west of Palm Avenue .Environmental Constraints Areas: -- General Plan Designation: Local street Zoning Designation: B. ~FVI~ONM~NTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1- Ea~th Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth movement (cut andlor fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or x more? b. Development andlor grading on a slope greater than 15' x natural grade? c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies x Zone? d. Modification of any unique x geologic or physical feature? . .... ~ . \......... ".... '- :) REVISED 12/87 :J PAGE 1 01' 8 . "'..... ........., """ -...) Maybe """lII - r e. Soil erosion on or off the project site? f. Modification of a channel, creek or river? g. Development subject mudslides, other similar within an area to landslides, liquefaction or hazards? h. Other? 2. ~IR RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in: a. air upon emissions or ambient air Substantial an effect quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Development within a high wind hazard area? 3. Will the WATEB___RESOURCES: proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters? e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards? f. Other? \.. REVISED 12/87 'Yes No x x x x x \ J x x x x x x x x ~ PAGE 2 OF a . r' o "; ....; """ r '-' Yes No Maybe ~ 4. BIOLOGICAL R~~URCE~: proposal result in: Could the a. Change unique, species habitat trees? in the number of any "rare or endangered of plants or their including stands of x b. Change unique, species habitat? in the number of any rare or endangered of animals or their x x c. Other? 5". NOISE: Could the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? x b. Exposure of people to exterior noise levels over 65 dB or interior noise levels over 45 dB? x x c. Other? 6. LAND_ USE: result in: " Will the proposal a. A change in designated Plan? the land use as on the General x b. Development within an Airport District? x c. Development within "Greenbelt" Zone A,B, or C? x d. Development within a high fire hazard zone? x x e. Other? ~ ~ REVISED 10/87 PAGE 3 OF 8 '. ,. "...., - ......... 7. MAN-MADE HAjhW~: project: Will the a. Use, store, transport or dispose of. hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b. Involve the release hazardous substances? of c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? d. Other? 8. RQYSING: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? b. Other? 9. ~RANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION: Could the proposal result in: a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? b. Use of existing, new, parking structures? or demand for facilitiesl c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? e. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? \... REVISED 10/87 Yes No x x x x x x x x x x x ).... Maybe - .., x ~ PAGE 4 OF' ... - .. - .\ I""' .-'.....\ '-' -' ..I , Yes No Maybe ~ g. A disjointed pattern roadway improvements? h. Other? 10. ~UBLI~_SERVICES Will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Fire protection? b. . Police protection? c. d. g. Schools (Le. attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Medical aid? f. Solid waste? Other? 11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal: a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? .... . REVISED 10/87 b. 1- Natural gas? 2. Electricity? 3. Water? 4. Sewer? 5. Other? Result in a pattern of extensions? disjointed utility c. Require the construction of new facilities? of x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x .-J PAGE 5 OF a .. - - .. - ... - /""" . .~ . , ....... -- V -I ~ . Maybe ..... Yes No 12. AESTBETI~: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic view? x b. will the visual impact of the project be detrimental to the surrounding area? x c. Other? x 13. ~9~1~~--FESQURCES: proposal result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Could the x b. Adverse impacts historic object? physical or aesthetic to a prehistoric or site, structure or x c. Other? x 14. Mandatory Pindings of Significance (Section 15065) "" The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate ~ REVISED 10/87 PAGE 8 OF 8 - - . . - -- - .~.,." "'...'" :;; "- -' '-/ r No Maybe ..., Yes important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) x x c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x x C. DI~CUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) \.. .J REVISED 10/87 PAGE 7 OF a - ....... - - - - ~. . , ,-<..... "...... '-1 :-J ~ -....I , ~ D. DETERMINA1!~ On the basis of this initial study, o The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. (Zl o ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA Ann Larson-Perbix, Senior Planner Name and Title (2V1/YV d()/i4M - P.R1i ~, Signature Date: (}~ f 1) rq?l li.. ~ REVISED 12/87 PAGE 8 OF 8 - .. - . . ~. 1..1 '-' 1,0 3 .... -.- .... - .<......'\ I 3d1 I I I I \III ::J Z W ~ !So,. --------------- J.f ->. It) . ,(\\ \I ~O' ~"J b '\.I 1.,4-'7 ~tq 5 5'1 AL-L-E.Y b . + tl1'Y to.MI,. l.J",<< ~. .. ._, _. ~ -.Ov_ oS'o_ S ""'" 1"", ,..~ Iy/ ~Jf lc,......~ ~ Sheet 10ft ~ ~ , I(l 0.. ~ ~ I I I . Q 'oQ '() N "~1: ATLH.JrlC 1aVI . AREA ,.0 ee YACATE-D CITY OF SAN BERNAJlDINO PULIC WONtS DEPNtTMENT ENQDEEAING DlVlSlaN AEItIL P"OfIEATV S.CTlaN STREET I ALLEY v~,",ION . It l'01trlOH OF' ATLAN11C! AVINU"1 was"" o~. ~"LM AVE-HlJ..' . ....... .. ('"'" . '- - '-" o ....... - - - ".... -....) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATION CASE HEARING DATE "ATTO'l S1l\TE HOSPITAL R.I R-I PATTOlO STATE HOSPITAl. C.lA 11-1-10,800 C'SA -- C-u c-sa c-sa C'S" R-S . . PRO Z4 R-S R'S It. - It-I ~ .I"'" ~l . .' '. - . ". .... .. .~ Ri Ri R~ R~ PW 89-9 ...... .- R-I - i C-SA It-I '-" R-S-ZOOO ", -, -, HWY. "Iw " , '" -, , , R- S' 3000 DoQ . R-I f. .':=.:-' ,1-1 -- R-I R-I R-I .. .. a.. ... ... -- AGENDA ITEM '# .., C-SA It-2 I I .' .. I .. .. It-2 --- I I _.~_.... " " " " " I, '. " . " I I I ",I L--4---- I -- .-~: ~;;,,; .' HWY. II n