HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-Public Works
., .
CITY OF SAN BERNACDINO
File No. 15.30-256
- REQUEST FCQ COUNCIL ACTION
Date:
3-14-89
Adoption of Negative Declaration
& Finding of Consistency with
the Interim Policy Document --
Vacation of a 270' Long Section
of "J" St.,bet. Oak Street and
Lytle Creek Flood Control Channel
Public Works Project No. 89-~
granted to proceed and plan approved.V--
From:
ROGER G. HARDGRAVEREC'O.-AOt<:IN.OFSubject:
Public Works/EnginJ~!~ 1(; r.M 8 38
Dept:
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
10-24-88 -- Authorization
Recommended motion:
1. That. the Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 89-4,
vacation of a 270' long section of "J" Street, located between Oak
and Lytle Creek Flood Control Channel, be adopted.
2. That a finding be made that vacation of a 270' long section of "J"
Street located between Oak Street and Lytle Creek Flood control
Channel is consistent with the Interim Policy Document.
cc: Jim Robbins
Jim Richardson
Supporting data attached:
Roger G. Hardgrave
Memo, Staff Report
and Neaative Declaration
Phone:
5025
Contact person:
Ward:
1
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: Waaes on W.O. 01266
Source: (Acct. No.) 001-302-53157
Acct. Descri tion
Street
Finance:
Council Notes:
A",,._......... I.......... f\1^
1J~
CITY OF SAN BERtORDINO - REQUEST OR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
The Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No.
89-4 was recommended for adoption by the Environmental Re-
view Committee at its meeting of 3-02-89.
A 14-day public review period was afforded from 3-9-89
to 3-22-89. No comments were received.
We recommend that the Negative Declaration be adopted
and a finding made that the project is consistent with the
Interim Policy Document.
3-14-89
75-0264
.
,
o ALE NO. IS,3o-25b
MEMORANDUM
.
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
-
To Gene Klatt
Assistant City Engineer
Subject Environmental Review of Public Works Projects
From Ann Larson-Perbi x
Senior Planner
Date March 6, 1989
Approved
Date
At its meeting of March 2, 1989, the Environmental Review Committee recommeded
adoption of a Ne9ative Declaration for the following Public Works projects:
~PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 89-2 - To vacate an existin9 alley located
~ween Wall Avenue and Sepulveda Avenue, approximately 150 feet south
of Baseline Street.
2. PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 89-3 - To vacate a 370 foot long unnamed
frontage street, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, east of
Elmwood Road.
~ PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 89-4 - To vacate a .270 foot long section of
~ Street, located between Oak Street and Lytle Creek Flood Control .
Channe 1 .
4. PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 89-6 - To vacate a 299 foot long section of
Lugo Avenue, north of 4th Street and east of Sierra Way.
These Initial Studies (see attached) will receive a 14 day public review from
March 9, 1989 to March 22, 1989. Any comments received during the review
period will be addressed by the Plannin9 Department and the comments and
responses will be sent to you within a week of the close of the public review
period. After that, you must schedule the projects before the Mayor and
Common Council for adoption of the Negative Declaration. Please include the
Initial Study with your request for Council Action form. The Planning
Department will file the Notice of Determination after adoption of the
Negative Declaration and a copy of the Notice will be sent to you.
6)-} ...:1,; ~" I::. I'
A/v\/YV V.lA..--} .//1 I - .vl'} ))J/)t.,
nn Larson-Perblx
Senior Planner
cp
C3 MEMOPWP32
....-ei~.,
" .-.....
. :;'./v
,
..a"~'." ,/"'} ....;(~J(. {. ;F~':':, '.:.:
. .' ,-'.. ." .....'..,,-
';". ..;J
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY
-
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO.
TO VACATE APPROXIMATELY TWO HUNDRED SEV
"J" STREET, LOCATED BETWEEN OAt( STRE
LYTLE CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL
MARCH 2, 1989
PREPARED FOR:
Public Works Department
City of San Bernardino
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
PREPARED BY:
James P. Mulder
Planninq Department
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 89-4
The applican~ requests environmental clearance to vacate 270
feet of IIJII street between Oak street and Lytle Creek flood
control channel in a PF and IL land use designation with R-l
and C-M underlying zoning.
The project site
rounding by Lytle
IIJII street to the
to the west. The
is an undeveloped and unpaved street sur-
Creek flood control channel: to the north,
south, vacant land to the east and a school
site is relatively level.
~
.
0 ("\
r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO "
I PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT CHECKLIST
~ ~
, . """"ll
A. BACKGROY~
Public Works Project No. 89-4
Application. Number:
Project Description: To vacate 270 feet of "J" Street
Location: Located between Oak Street and Lytle Creek flood
control channel.
Environmental Constraints Areas: Liquefaction zone.
General Plan Designation: Pf, Public Facilities, and IL, Industrial
Liqht, under City's adopted Interim Policy Document.
zoning Designation: R-l, Single-family Residential and CM,
Commercial Manufacturing
B. ~MVIBONM~FTA~-IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a
separate attached sheet.
1- EaJ~h Resources Will the proposal result in:
Yes No Maybe
a. Earth movement (cut and/or
fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or x
more?
.
b. Development and/or grading on
a slope greater than 15' x
natural grade?
c. Development within the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies x
Zone?
d. Modification of any unique x
geologic or physical feature?
lio.. ~
PAGE 1 OF 8
REVISED 12/87
r-
.
t""1
",
Yes
No
Maybe
"'"
e. Soi~ erosion on or off the
project site?
f. Modification of a channel,
creek or river?
x
x
g.
.
Development
subject
mudslides,
other similar
h. Other?
within an area
to landslides,
liquefaction or
hazards?
x
x
2. 6lB_RESQQ~: Will the proposal
result in:
a.
Substantial
an effect
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
air
upon
emissions or
ambient air
x
x
c. Development within a high wind
hazard area?
x
3.
~A~B___RESOURCES:
proposal result in:
Will
the
a. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces?
b. Changes in the course or flow
of flood waters?
x
.
x
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality?
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground waters?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards?
f. Other?
x
x
x
x
~ ~
REVISED 12187' PAGE 2 OF 8
.
..
o
Maybe
""
,.
4.
BIOLOGICAL R~~URCE~:
proposal result in:
Could the
a.
change
unique,
species
habitat
trees?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of plants or their
including stands of
b.
Change
unique,
species
habitat?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of animals or their
c. Other?
5. NOISE: Could the proposal result
in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
b. Exposure of people to exterior
noise levels over 65 dB or
interior noise levels over 45
dB?
c. Other?
6.
LAND USE:
result in:
Will the proposal
a. A change in the land use as
designated on the General
Plan?
b. Development within an Airport
District?
c. Development within "Greenbelt"
Zone A,B, or C?
d. Development within a high fire
hazard zone?
e. O.ther?
"'-
REVISED 10/87
()
Yes
No
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
~
PAGE 3 OF 8
,
.
-
y
No
Maybe
""
. .
7.
MAN-MADE- HAj~FP~:.
project:
Will
the
a. Use, store., transport or
dispose of hazardous or toxic
materials (including but not
limited to oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiationl?
x
b. Involve the release
hazardous substances?
of
x
x
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
x
d. Other?
8. HQY~: Will the proposal:
a.
Remove
create a
housing?
existing housing or
demand for additional
.x
x
b. Other?
9. 1'M~i'QBTATIQ~~ATION: Could
the proposal result in:
a. An increase in traffic that is
greater than the land use
designated on the General
Plan?
x
b.
use of existing,
new, parking
structures?
or demand for
facilitiesl
x
c. Impact upon existing public
transpolt~tionsystems?
d. Alteration of present patterns
of circulation?
x
x
x
e. Impact to rail or air traffic?
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
x
REVISED 10/87
~
PAGE 4 OF 8
\..
,
.
o
Maybe
""
,.
g.
A -disjointed pattern
roadway improvements?
of
h. Other?
10. i~~_SERVICES Will the proposal
impact ,the following beyond the
capability .to provide adequate
levels of service?
a.
Fire protection?
Police protection?
b.
c.
Schools (Le. attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
d.
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Medical aid?
f.
Solid waste?
g. Other?
11. YI1LITIES: Will the proposal:
a. Impact the following beyond
the capability to provide
adequate levels of service or
require the construction of
new facilities?
1. Natural gas?
2. Electr icity?
3. Water?
4. Sewer?
5. Other?
b.
Result in a
pattern of
extensions?
disjointed
utility
c.
Require the construction of
new facilities?
lr...
REVISED 10/87
()
Yes
No
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
~
PAGE 5 OF 8
. .
, -
o
Maybe
"""
~
12. AES'l'HE'Ujdl
a. Could the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic
view?
b. Wip. the visual impact of the
. project be detrimental to the
surrounding area?
c. Other?
13.
Could the
~P~1~~_-F~QURCESI
proposal result inl
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Adverse
impacts
historic
object?
c. Other?
physical or aesthetic
to a prehistoric or
site, structure or
b.
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
ll..
The California Environmental
Quality Act states that if any of
the following can be answered yes
or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the
environment and an Environmental
Impact Report shall be prepared.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
REVISED 10/87
o
Yes
No
x
x
x
x
x
x
~
PAGE 6 OF 8
I
.,
o
o
,
Yes
No
Maybe
""
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of
time-while long-term impacts
will endure well into the
future. )
x
x
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on
the environment is
significant. )
x
.
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
c. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(Attach sheets as necessary.)
x
.
~
'"
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 7 OF 8
".. ,).
ENVIRONMENTAL EV ALUA TION AND MIT\(~ TION MEAS~ES
-
9.d.
The portion ot "J" street proposed to be vacated is not a
through street and deadends at Lytle Creek tlood control
channel. Additionally, the subject site is unimproved and is
not used tor public access. However, the Engineering Depart-
ment has indicated that a 20 toot wide access easement will
be reserved along the east side ot "J" street to provide
access to a parcel, located at the southeast corner of the
Lytle Creek and "J" street, which would otherwise become
landlocked by the street vacation.
.
.
~
.
.
o
o
, ~
D. DETERMI~b11~
On the basis of this initial study,
o
The propo.e~ project COULD NOT have a si9nificant effect on the
environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the
~ environment, although there will not be a significant effect in
~this case because the mitigation measures described above have
been added-to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
O The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
. environment, and an ENVIRONMEl.rrAL Il!PACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
_Ann I..LAASrlYl- fJ..o./\bIX/).eNlI01.
Name and Title
a ~.~) dMA on - ff?lAi~
Signature
Date: 1i)o./)akf:.', /1.{?
,
rlcul 11 e-'\,
~
\..
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 8 OF 8
..
''- -&.=-~-- 3 . 1t .......-.
. - -.~". . .~t..-L- ~..":"-:..."::-- ....._...~.... .
'. "'-.-. -' ". " -- ......... "':,--- -- .
- ~.~'=l'~ -"'-..0::. .. :"." .~..~. "'-. - l'
-.- -_7-:-" .~:.. "'.'-... . 'IP"W.W. . 'II k ...
- - - - 0.. ...--:..~.; _ _.
___. MEA TO" -_:..~-..:i".. __ ._~..:-_'
__ _.. ....\fIUA1SD _ "
i. ;S.~dl
_-::..~__ EJ ~-==:_- ,
~ i 1 .~
_~_"'.L.. __.l..3I..LMJ _ __,IF""
. -:'~,'" ...... ,.......:...~~ .;:"
.,.......,... ;,' .~. ,:~~ ~..'~~~ ~".."'... x" ..
. ., ...~,~-. '.~ ..:. ...,... .~:..,..,~"...,
. ~~' ..,.~..... ~:.. ,:... ....,~ {', ~>'"~~
.,~ .",......... .,t@",.'\.:\,........
. ,'", ,.... " ... ~ "~':\ ~
I . ....~..,..~ ,;~~~ 12. ~~.~ "'~~~'
I ....', ~.,'"..-' '.,.. "~... ~...~""'7...
.~~~~: ..+,,~~"..,:-.,.,....~.. '\i:.-.~....-"...
" :-.'-....'..:-...ir....~......,'-::...~, ....~... ,...~'. ..." 0"''''
! ..... .....;...,~.~.. ~.~:.v,-:.'.~,.. ~..~:~~.,~\..
... ... "';:'.. .'\..~.,.:..;.Jr" ..... . ..' "
,,, ..., . ,.'\" t#-r--... '. " "
.' ,._-t...'."','. ~~
,,~ ,';". ,: :..,v ......,... :.', .,.'. ,\.
.....,. .'~. -........ ", ". '""~"
. ,. .".r: ,., .". "',~ "
~~c:.." ':., ~~. ~ :"-~.,',, ~ '" ;-~,,~.,:
...... ~,,":, '@'" ,.'.; ~~"
:-' . ',,~'\.""'" J'" ..; ~':' ~'~"'~
.. ',,' ,~..'~. Aa ,.,." .'.' '
~:-.' "....,....':\, ':\' , .'. ".., "'-. '
.,,~: ""'-':'-', ' ,".,
'I ~~~~:":-'''~~~':' ':' ',.'",""
, 31 ~. "~~"'" ~"~'" . ~"_--: ~"
". '" ~' .... -- '. I
,...' ,,' "."\ .:'\".........- " ..
. ..... ." "-~~"'--'. ',' ~ I
I '~~~~"~~~'~;~.~.~:"....:...: .
.""'~"~\~,,,, . ~:. .~;. ~~,. ' .
~~"\ ~,.~, ""." '''~ '
~ '~~"'''\~.,: 10' ":~",~ ~
"~",,:.,, ,.',.,,,.~~~ 'J
~. ~. ~~ ,"'~x" ""'''',,~, ~. I
. ,~~ ~~~~~~~"s''\.'''':,~~~ !
J. ~~,~.:~..~ ~,~::--~~~x...~,~,. ,'~ :..
~ ~"~~~":':;;':.M I"'b'~;'~ '--~.sr' ...~'
~~1MMTI7L1""ilt. ~']11
1.
.' .)'
"'i..:'.
:' :'~~' ;.
-~.;.;..
--
~I":'
:~:.,..
;'i~':~,~;:'
.:...~:.:
~.~ii~;~
:'~~~~';'
. ....
. . '~:' ,..
..;
...
...
. t
I
~ LYTlE
_e____e_
(ji)
~
CREEl',
..--.-..-
. - "iCUOOL..
'.
t ...
----.--~ t
I "
,
---'..
..
~::~......
-~.."'............
_.'.
w..
,. I ,.a : 1~ ; 1-':'
~UHK~~ -H-l-\.
I:
.,. '."T..'
...~- --t------
I
.
,
P"A.IC!
,
I
7 : e I ~
,
I
'0
,
1'L.,~'U+. _ _~__'_;_......~ :
- - .: - .. .- ~ .. - "1 - - -t - - . {
, 1 I _'
, .
I '
:-rElA~T' 199_
& 4 ~ I 2
,
."
II
_._-
~ ~
5:16
. IT
. -'!.- :-
. ..
~ UIIS
;.~ . ~i""1
.
;:!'"
-----
. ---.
-.- -,
_...:..._--
.....
._ .e__..
Voi -__
.It __
.. ...,
CO
..
,
~-=-~-:
:~ ,
~~ I ';'t
,
...
"
~
. ..
~
--:..a.._";"._.
~.-
.
.
. ~
" ,I
el2.S
., ,it. ,.....,.
fiil ~;:-.\-
r 51- i 'i:
i L..I....._
.
~
~
:.
..
~
,
~
.1\1
-~
~...
III
M
4
"
,
~
671
J r: . '-
CITY OF SAN BERNHRDINO
PUBl.IC HORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
REAL PROPERTY SECTION
DI ECTOR OF PUB ORKS /CITV :::lGINEER
Pr.p.nd b!ll L. FOGASSY '';'.
Ch.clC.d b!l 1 V.NsJr:.au
DATE I 09-30-88
AREA VACATED SHOWN THUS ~~
FILE "0.115.30-256
PLAN NO.1 7603
Sh..t
1 of 1
STREET I ALLEY VACATION I
PORTION OF "J" STREET, NORTH OF
OAK STREET
PlAblic Uc)rk..r
f'~- 'f