Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout31-Public Works I-II ~JTY: OF SAN BER9DINO - REQU~i~~: ~ o~?~~f~~8~CTION From: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE Subject: Increase of Verdemont Area Infrastructure Fee, from $6,976 to $7,699 Dept: Public Works/Engineering Date: 2-25-92 Synopsis of Previous Council action: 12-04-89 -- Ordinance MC 690 adopted levying an infrastructure fee for the Verdemont Area. 01-03-90 Ordinance MC 695 adopted extending effective date of Ordinance MC 690. 01-03-90 Resolution 90-2 adopted revising the amount of an infrastructure fee to be levied. 06-25-90 Resolution 90-253 adopted revising the amount of; the infrastructure fee to be levied, from $7,375 to $6,068, due to deletion of water system. 01-07-92 -- Resolution 91-9 adopted revising the amount of the infrastructure fee to be levied, from $6,060, to $6,976. 02-17-92 -- Public Hearing to consider increase of infrastructure fee from $6,976 to $7,699, continued to 3-02-92. Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed, and the resolution establishing the increase of infrastructure fee from $6,976 to $7,699, be adopted. cc: Shauna Clark Jim Penman Andy Green d~~ Signature Contact person: Gene R. Klatt Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Resolution Phone: , SIbs Ward: 5 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. Description) Finance: Council Notes: 75~0262 Agenda Item No. 3 / . TI ~iTY;OF SAN BER"-DINO - REQUEST eR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT In the adoption of the Verdemont Infrastructure Fee, pro- visions for revision of the fee, based on actual costs incurred, were included in the ordinance. In January of 1991, the fee was increased based on what had occurred in that year. Staff has completed the Second Amendment to the Engineer's Report and is recommending an increase in the fee from the present level of $6,976 to the proposed $7,699. The increase is based on actual construction costs, loan repayment for funds advanced for additional construction and adjustments based on the construction cost index published in the Engineering News Record. The increase is approximately a 9.4% increase and is less than last year's 15% increase. All area residents were advised that the fees would be adjusted and estimates placed the adjust- ment at 15% per year for the first three years and 10% per year for the next two. However, compliance with AB 1600 requires the adjustments to reflect actual changes in costs as reflected in the Engineer's Report. Staff recommends that the hearing be closed and that the resolution establishing the increased fee be adopted. Revised 2/25/92 75-0264 - I.... " II . . 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REVISING SECTION 1 OF RESOLUTION 90-2 RELATING TO THE AMOUNT OF AN INFRASTRUCTURE 3 FEE TO BE LEVIED FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino, California (the "City") has on January 3, 1990, previously adopted an Urgency Ordinance (MC-695) which established and authorized the levy of an infrastructure fee (the "Infrastructure Fee") for the purposes of funding the costs of certain Right-of-Way Improvements and Public Improvements, all as more fully described in the January Urgency Ordinance: and WHEREAS, in connection with its adoption of the January Urgency Ordinance, the City on January 3, 1990, also adopted a (Resolution 90-2) setting the amount of the Resolution Infrastructure fee: and WHEREAS, on June 25, 1990, Section 1 of Resolution 90-2 was amended by Resolution 90-253, revising the amount of Infrastructure fee: and WHEREAS, on January 7, 1991, Section 1 of Resolution 90- 253 was amended by Resolution 91-9 revising the amount of the infrastructure fee: and WHEREAS, the City deems it necessary to adopt this Resolution in order to provide for a revision to the amount of the Infrastructure Fee set in Resolution 90-2, as amended, by Resolutions 90-253 and 91-9, which revisions are attributable to the escalation of the infrastructure fee for Right-of-Way Improvements as defined in the ordinance. / / / / 1-08-92 RESO: REVISING SECTION 1 OF RESOLUTION ~U-2 AMOU~OF AN INFRASTRUCTURE FEE iltBE RELATING '1'0 THE LEVIED. 1 WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly advertised and held on 2 March 2, 1992, and the hearing closed after public comment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 3 4 5 6 hereby amended to read: 7 8 9 10 SECTION 1: Section 1 of Resolution 90-2, as amended, is "SECTION 1: Infrastructure Fee. The Infrastructure Fee as established pursuant to the Urgency Ordinance and set by Resolution No. 90-2 is hereby revised to set a fee in the amount date of this (601 days from the of $7,699.00 effective sixty 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution, per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, as said term is defined in the Ordinance. Said Infrastructure Fee shall also be subject to further increase pursuant to the terms of any subsequent resolutions to be adopted by the Mayor and Common Council as may be deemed necessary in the best interests of the City. Said fee makes NO provision for any part of the water transmission, distribution, storage or delivery system in the area defined and all water related fees shall be paid per established policy of the City of San Bernardino Water Department." SECTION 2. The Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino do hereby find and determine that the fee increase as provided in this Resolution does not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service or facility for which the fee is imposed. / / / / / / / / / / / / - 2 - RESO: REVISING SECTION 1 OF RESOLUTION 90-2 AMOUeOF AN INFRASTRUCTURE FEE. BE I ",I RELATING TO THE LEVIED. 1 2 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a , 1992, by the following vote, to-wit: 4 day of 5 Council Members: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ESTRADA REILLY HERNANDEZ MAUDSLEY MINOR POPE-LUDLAM MILLER meeting thereof, held on the AYES NAYS ABSENT ABSTAIN Rachel Krasney, City Clerk The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of Approved as to form and legal content: James F. Penman City Attorney By O~~> t.r~ o , 1992. W. R. Holcomb, Mayor Ci ty of San Bernardino - 3 -