HomeMy WebLinkAbout49-Planning
.
CIT~OF SAN BERNARDIIO - REQUEO FOR COUNCIL ACTJN
From:
Frank A. Schuma
Planning Director
Subject:
Change of Zone No. 86-9
Dept:
Planning
Mayor and Council Meeting of
June 2, 1986, 2:00 p.m.
Date:
May 23, 1986
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Previous Planning Commission action:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on May 20, 1986, the
following recommendation was made:
The application for Change of Zone No. 86-9 was recommended for
denial.
Vote: 5-1, 3 absent.
Recommended motion:
To approve, modify or reject the findings and the recommendation
of the Planning Commission.
~~
Signature Frank A. Schuma
Contact person:
Frank A. Schuma
Phone:
383-5057
Supporting data attached:
Yes, Staff Report
Ward:
7
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source:
Finance:
Council Notes:
AnM'" I+.~ ~In ~r.
.
c
, CiTY OF
...
SAN
o
BERNARDINO
o
PLANNING
~
DEPARTMENT """
SUMMARY
7
<,/?O/Rf..
7
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WARD
~
&LI
:I Change of Zone No. 86-9
APPLICANT' raig E. De
3780 Camellia Drive
San Bernardino, CA 92404
OWNER' Same as above
~
::)
2
a:
....
cr
&LI
~
The applicant requests approval to change the land use zone
from R-1-7200, Single-Family Residential to R-3-l200, Multiple-
Family Residential.
Subject parcel consists of .30 acre located on the easterly
side of Sepulveda Avenue between 25th and 21th Streets within
the northerly central portion of the City.
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION
Subject Single-Family Res. R-1-7200 Med. Density Res. 8-1
North Single-Family Res. R-1-7200 Med. Density Res. 8-1
South Single- Family Res. R-3-l200 Med. Density Res. 8-1
East Single-Family Res. R-1-7200 Med. Density Res. 8.1
West Single-Family Res. R-1-7200 Med. Density Res. 8-1
GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC DYES FLOOD HAZARD DYES OZONE A ( gg YES )
HAZARD ZONE ~NO ZONE QgNO OZONE B SEWERS ONO
HIGH FIRE DYES AIRPORT NOISE I DYES REDEVELOPMENT DYES
HAZARD ZONE IX] NO CRASH ZONE IXJ NO PROJECT AREA all NO
~ o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z 1XJ APPROVAL
~ APPLICABLE E FFE CTS 0
WITH MITIGATING - 0
zen MEASURES NO E.I.R. tc CONDITIONS
&LICl) o EXEMPT o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO II.Q 0
::IZ II.~ DENIAL
Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
OQ WITH MITIGATING j!2 0 CONTINUANCE TO
Q:Z MEASURES en2
:;ii: 0
Z III NO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS U
&LI SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E.R. C. &LI
EFFECTS MINUTES Q:
NOV. It II RIVIIIO JULY '"I
tKY
l
~ c ~ ~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~
CASE roz m. 86-9
OBSERVATIONS
7
5/20/86
?
""
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
1. The applicant requests approval to chanze the zone of a parcel
encompassing approximately .30 acres from R-1-7200, Single-
Family Residential to R-3-1200, Multiple-Family Residential
District on tae east side of Sepulveda Avenue between 25th
and 27th Streets.
2. The site is designated Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling
units per acre) on the City of San Bernardino General Plan.
Said General Plan designation is delineated from approximately
400 feet north of Highland Avenue to 27th Street (on both the
east and west sides of Sepulveda Avenue). The zoning district
to the north, west and east of the site is R-1-7200. Property
to tae immediate south of the project is zoned R-3-1200, Multiple-
Family Residential.
3. The encroachment of multiple-family residential development from
the south is apparent. The applicant has indicated that they
intend to develop residential unit/units on the rear portion of
the parcel. The lot measares approximately 50 x 258.5 feet in
width and depth respectively. The R-3-1200 zone under Section
19.12.030(B) and (C) of the San Bernardino Municipal Code
specifies a minimum width of sixty feet and the minimum depth of
one hundred and thirty-five feet. The parcel in question is
nearly a third of an acre in size, however, the measurement is
long and linear as are other parcels within the neighborhood;
the parcel is thus, underutilized at the present time, since
the existing house and yard occupy about half of the site.
The Review of Plans application and support data must be sub-
mitted to the Planning Department in order to determine if any
additional residential development is appropriate on said
parcel per the R-3-l200 development criteria.
4. At the regularly scheduled meeting of t.he Environmental
Review Committee held on May 1, 1986, a negative declaration
was recommended for Change of Zone No. 86-9.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above observations, Staff recommends adoption of ~he
negative declaration and approval of Change of Zone No. 86-9.
Respectfully Submitted,
FRANK A. SCHUMA,
Planning Director
MI~~~;'Pianner
<:(
Q
~
..J
2
l.LJ
(f)
I.-
,......
\.,.,
'.,,"';
..........
,..)
~.s,+'
,
..... @
~ @
~ R-I-1~
f' I::~ [ @
, @
II) ~.l'f
~.
~ R-\-1;\co
le~1 I @ ?lQ. @
Rd.
- 1<-'3- \.?llO
~ J~~ I @ @
~.
- R-~-I~
t. 5,~\e @
~ fO,ii"v @5)
'S ~~
I~\~ r @ R-~-,~
- Hlut'- @)
~ filf.l'
~,..
f4/l'i.~'
l= @R-3-I;)oo R-~-I~ R-3-- \~
~
, @
~ (ad.) R-~-l~ @ @
, @
0 @ R-8--I:)(lQ
10
- 25th
I
c
I'"'"
'-'
"\
......"
:J
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA
ITEM #
LOCATION
CASE C. Z. //86-9
HEARING DATE OS/20/86
7
~.S
- ""' "-, ""I - . U
10,000,000 IH ~ ~.,
.. t.
. ~
"I
30M ~
-
~
o
~ .....
~
~'l
rt)
ft-I ft-, IIt-S-ZOOO
~.,
"': 800'
~L
~
lOT" IT
CROSSTOWN ~
. eil. · ~l:JtJ
,-, ,< ~" [] ffiB
I tIE ., BBi
"-
CROSSTOWN FRWT.
R'I R.'
~.
R-'
R.'
E
R -I
R'I
R-I ..;
I ~-I 11!il~
;1 ~-I I~~
I ~-I 1fii1!\ R-I I
l Il-S IS! R.3 R.3
I T 18 ~n T
I C-I IC' ~u c.;,
R-I R.'
,.. ..
c
R.I . . IH
R.t R-t
R"Z :
.
w
R-3 R.3 R.3
( .,,~-l'
,'" I
,,~~..~ I
0,) ~~
... ...~
Cot. '\'
co,)")
~.l
110"
R.
c.3
C.
C'3
.~~;IGm"L;~ .
ft"l All
R'3
AVE.
A-P
.It. .......... "0
_T...
A-P
R'o
L
R-! R-I AP
R'I
", R'I R'o
",
R'3 nIT R'3
C
CiTY OF
C 0
SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
~
DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WARD
8
')/20/86
1
APPLICANT:
City of San Bernardino
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Thirty-four various
owners, List Attached
I&J
3
Change of Zone No. 86-11
OWNER:
~
:)
2
a:
"-
cr
I&J
a:
ct
Applicant requests to zone 29.4 acres of land included within
the corporate limits of the City through annexation number 339.
The proposal is to establish a C-M. Commercial Manufacturing
zone.
Subject parce~ ~re bounded on the east by Tippecanoe Avenue,
on the south by the 1-10 freeway, on the west by Orchard Drive
and on the north by the previously existing San Bernardino
Corporate boundary.
PROPERTY
~ubJect
EXISTING
LAND USE
S~ngle-J:o'am.
& Vacant
Comm. under
Commercial
Comm. IRes.
Comm. under
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION
ZONING
Res.
Horth
South
East
West
None Industrial
develop. C-M General Industrial
C-2 & C-M (Lorna Linda) General Commercial
Res. (County) Light Industrial
develop. C-M General Industrial
GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC DYES FLOOD HAZARD I!Q YES OZONE A SEWERS !Xl YES
HAZARD ZONE roNO ZONE oNO OZONE B oNO
HIGH FIRE DYES AIRPORT NOISE / DYES REDEVELOPMENT DYES
HAZARD ZONE IX! NO CRASH ZONE RJNO PROJECT AREA !Xl NO
.J o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z ~ APPROVAL
;! APPLICABLE E FFE CTS 0
-
WITH MITIGATING ti 0 CONDITIONS
ZU) MEASURES NO E.I.R.
I&J(!) o EXEMPT o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO 11.0 0 DENIAL
2Z 1I.j5
Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ~2
00 WITH MITIGATING 0 CONTINUANCE TO
a:Z MEASURES (1)2
:;ii: 0
ONO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 0
Z I&J
I&J SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E.R. C.
EFFECTS MINUTES II:
NOV. ,.., REVIIID JULY I".
'XY
-
c
,~
'-'
---
....I
:)
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE C:OZ NO 86-11
OBSERVATIONS
'8
'i/10/86
?
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
1. TIle applicant requests approval to zone a 29.4 acre parcel of land
recently annexed to the City (Annexation No. 339) to C-M, Commer-
cial Manufacturing. The subject property was formerly zoned
residential and commercial in the county and is partially
developed with single-fam~ly residences on approximately 22 acres;
the remaining 7.4 acres adjacent to the 1-10 Freeway are vacant.
The subject property is located north of the 1-10 Freeway, south
of the former San Bernardino corporate limit, east of Tippecanoe
Avenue, and west of Orchard Drive.
2. Land uses and zoning surrounding the site include: 246.5 acres
zoned C-M, Commercial Manufacturing under development as the
Tri-City Corporate Center to the north and west; C-2 and C-M
in the City of Loma Linda to the south; Commercial and Residential
zoned R-l, Single Family Residential and C-3, General Commercial
in the unincorporated county to the east.
3. The proposed zoning is consistent with the San Bernardino
General Plan which designates the site and surrounding properties
for Commercial and Industrial uses.
4. Included in this property is Tract 2743, recorded in 1944. The
residences in this subdivision would become non-conforming uses
under the C-M zone. Chapter 19.66 of t he San Bernardino Municipal
Code specifies the following relative to non-conforming uses.
These provisions include: .
additions and alterations may be made with the approval
of the Planning Commission through the presentation of
a petition of 75% of the property owners within 500 ft;
it is done following the procedures of the Variance
chapter; and the Common Council approves.
reconstruction of any destruction caused by fire or
Act of God, not in excess of 50% of the replacement
value, may be permitted
once the use is discontinued for a period exceeding 180
days, it may not be reestablished unless done so in
conformance with the provisions of the district in
which it is located
5. Tne residential tract of homes is an isolated residential
development. The surrounding uses anJ Jevelopments, the Tri-
City redevelopment area to the north and west are consistant with
the General Plan designation of General Industrial.
6. The proposed zoning will have no adverse impact on existing
traffic arterials or circulation in the vicinity.
ceo
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE COZ NO. 86-11
I
.....I
OBSERVATIONS
8
5/20/86
3
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
7. At the Environmental Review Committee meeting on May 1, 1986,
a recommendation for a negative declaration for Change of
Zone NO. 86-11 was issued.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the observations contained herein, Staff recommends
adoption of the negative declaration and approval of Change of
Zone No. 86-11.
Respectfully Submitted,
FRANK A. SCHUMA,
Planning Director
~~-~"-
i> PA SEN, Associate Planner
.
-c
iQ r? ~ '""". IT 1\{7 [[l 0'1
bill ~ ~:! :: 'l \,1 !.5 U!J
MAY 1 G 1986
(.:Zoo 8 (0 - 0...') ""\
1c
CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENi
SAN BERNAIft)IND. CA
~.A,ckJ I ~ s Qc 111 \ 'SS iON ~\.;: Wl ~ e.S
1\\AY lSr1i~ '
'v;/
As A e~5(~iVl ANO 1i1o(Z..~ llY\PORiANTLY A
1Ari2.~~, OF T~~c QH-I LDe.ft-J ! e.GSiDlrJ~ AT 2.<::\74 /
SEPuLJ~Z)A (1. '3'~00qLY U ~6~ '1ov Ie Dt;,.)Y
1tiE LC/J(; C.t<At-.J~~ R.~~V6~"--tO f'b{<... '2.~ol ~PvLJfDAAt.h~,
- _ iHf:.e..E Ae.t; AL'?..G.AOY t0Jmf;r2..CUS (Vll;LTl-
DW~LU!01) U 10 li.") ON 1Hf Soc,~1-I t:f.jO O+:'~fvLVfoA
W~ It[-!. AODS Tz; Ar--J ALfUA'i)'Y QC)r0~f:s'r-tl)$ ~~R.Y
NM_l2..ouJ ST~Ei,(Fgc01. ~l~~LI\I\..'1) tJOR-T14 To 2.gtl5T,
':', ?AI2..ILI~Dr0Tt-tE EA6,SiD~ I"':J K~STR\CTC.D)
APAR-iIY\C,I0T'S HAvE ~N 50\LT Ot0 TrlG ~Ol<:ttl
({\.:Jo OF- Sf:Pl.)LJ~A l.f'oJ -rtt~ LA'S\ 1:5 012- G: 'iE:A?-S
,A~O\r+~y Ce.fATW A SU9\-\T INc..~ASG IN
IQ..AFF IC-- A~v ADDfo ~Ot~f ~ ~) A'!Jo ItJsiAe,ILlT'I
C/-Jlt\-A...- f/-.)1) OF THE A\)~t-JuE...
.I ~EAl..\(.C;; TH E l.mpcR..,p.rJc..f; 0 F
t'Y\\.iLn-D~LlIJ0 UrViTSl2JU'T Am OPG'os.~OTD THE
TJ:::tA- OF AOD!'()g{H~1Y\ It-JrO r~ fQ.Amf-I..uCe\L
OF A P~DC:IYlliEl'I S!t-J~Lb ~\CrYIG ~ICttl60e.\-lDOD.
1t-1IS Ie,,",,- Ct-lA~LE .It= AC?PR.ovfJ)WCIJLD FC~\iG{L
'-t 1 )
. D~PtZESS S If.)qU; tAm Id ~-SllXrvCE VALIX'j/ All 0
~lct.:LD tf...:c.cvl2A~E CTf-\~R- LAr-.)DOu..:;f,jE~S y.,J. iT}!.
LAt2qE LOT<J I 0 'S~f iL 7..C~E L t+A~~ S 1 t-l AT We (j LO
AL-LOlL THEM 1D 1)C'It'll::' C)f\mE TJ-\ 109. .
B.y' AOf){~~ APAI2-TmC;~IS Tc AI2
c.:
~ ~
rr> (Ii') f? IT'I\
". ~ U l: 'l \g rn
MAY 1 G 1986
c.;z.. ~ (0 - '\ ,') '""\
CITY PlANNING DEPARTMENi
SAN BERNAfI{lINO. CA
. 1c ~,A~kJlr--:S QCtr1\'SSiON ~\<;;W1~K.S
,'\\AY lS ni~ '
'~I
As A e~Si~,vi AND t1~O(LE liV\PORi.a,vTLY A
1Ari2.~~1 OF Tv.;c Ql-tl L1>l2.frJ J e.~SiDlrJ~ AI 2.474 /
SE P u dE0 A- (1. '3'T~O rJ q L.. Y U e..6~ '10 tJ T C DG'tJ Y
-{HE lctV~ Ct-lA~~G" Rt;;~\JG~'-tO fbi<- lCool ~PvLJfDAAI,'G.
..... ~ _ 1HE:~E A~ ALREAOY t0JmErL.OvS M.L;LTl-
DW~LU~S U 10 lT~ ON 1H( 'SDI..-"TI-I f~o O~~fUlVfOA
. \!Ji-t ItH- Aous T.:; At-J AL1UADY c'Or0qE:SrcD$ ~f:~Y
. N A2.lZ.ouJ ST~ET, (FRom ~ l~l-l L..a~'V tJOg.T\-f To 2-Stl'ST,
.:, ?AI2..ILI~DrJ Tt-tf: ~.MI SCOE I -'j KESTR leT!:.\))
APAR-TIY\t;:.r0TS l-'A\Jf fuN 5UlLT Ot0 Tr1G WoR.-n4
C/-JO OF- 'Sf:PlJUkOA Lr0 JttE LA"';)! 5 el2. G: '1E:Ag.5
A~o \" r+,;Y Ce.f'An.D A SU<9\-\1 INC-gGASG IN
Il2-An: Ie.., A~v ADDfO lJor~f ~ ~l AtJo IlJsiAe,ILlT'I
Cw '/t-\A.-r (1-:1) OF THE AVEt-:J0C
.I ~EA1..\t.<:: TH ~ lJy\pc/2.,ANC-6 0 F
t'YIvLn-D~Llif-')c7 UrViTSI~U'T AM OP?os.~oTc THE
IlEA OF AODrt)6z{H~1Y\ ItJrC) rt"1G fl2-ArYIG"-!)JCf'..\L
OF A P~DerYIl\EL'{ SrtV~U; ~\OrY1G ~14tl60e.\-lDOD.
11-1 IS LC10'- CtJA~~El1.~ A~piov{J)iWClJlD FC~\ib!l.
. DE:?(Z.E'SS S IlJqU; FAmiLY ~-sIDEI\JCE VALlX<S, A~ 0
t( Ct; La t ~C.C\JRA<'::tE C T!-1'2.R- L A/-.JO OlA2I0E P..S 't-i iT \-l-
LAQgE LOT<-J 10 'S~G\L LC~E (t+A~~S lltAr WCrJLO
A~Lot~ Tt1EM 1D 'DC'IMt" C)t:\rY\E TJ-l109. .
'B.y Ao.f){t-.:.~ APAIl-T(YIf-~TS To AI>2
,
c
l'""'-
V
:)
\
......",/
('
AU2cADY l::.STAf)UC,E"t) tAN DSCA\)~ C1= S 1t0t1 LE"
r,Am IUt Hcm~s, YO\..' -rAIL.: A\0A'f. Tt+-E (SS0Jc...:;
. OF WHAT AI'T~A(T~O rY1 V~LF A~D Cn~E.1L tlCrY'E-
. t)V"<I;ILS Tc Tt-IG t0E19r\60e~OD/THA\ ~E109
. TttG r~IVAQ..'1' ANo ~~f\) ITY A~o ':)TABlLlty
OF A Q.LO':.G K", I. rVf\~l-\eo~{-looD,
(. IV\:..E Aq A I r.j I SllZoj.J~ L'< () 12.<q G Y c u
. 1c CO~S.IDErc. {HE t)NfA~c~A5U; CC/IJ'SE~\.)6.~CE~
. Of=" AlL~W It-J~ A l.o/..J~ C\-lA~qf:. r(0 1HI<':) ~'N D
. 01= tJE:l~H~.e.HbOD.'vJ(iliO()' TTJ {t-lE tH IL.D~,()
. L0 ILL ~ SAFER- fQ.cm We I/0C.e.t=A~ IN T{2AFFIt.
p.~o AIJ~ Tt-\~ S~AP.>ILlry 1.~ Trt~ ~l4t\80e.~acO
. Lv \ U.. ~rYlA uJ. l' HAt-.) \::'.. Yo \) Fe 12.. I t+G T I rY\~ 1A\Cl;"10
10 ~AD -Y1-i1'S G:TTtll:...
S ff.,)c..E. ~ L '{
~'id k ~
~de~ ~,-/~t24-
~SIDI~9 AT 2A14.c;;)~(J~~O Ac E.
, .
~
--.
__ :J c... '"!- ~ (,,- '-\. -. \
~7J~ ~ . 6)f,;/,r(;, . ;
cv~o ./' I
.n. /J . r
O/.)U. tL-1 ~ "
0/ ~ cd --ro G.--. -
" / ,j /; {.k-y ~o.-e.
~/I ~tc::(./..........~
,1 ,( I
.' -
{fff21~ iJ~ -:
;;-S-8G ~.t.,l~
4..f't-' .
..
.00 ffi@rnnWffi 00
MAY 19 1986
an rck;.:.....; i..~.AA.MSIT
SM -~ CA
..
C'-
r"
i...-
.........
......J
~ \
,
"-,,,I
II
\\
v
2649 Se~J1:lveda Ave.
San Bernardino, Ca.
92404
lay 13, 17e6
City tlan~ing Commission
City of San Bernardino
City Hall
300 i;orth D Street
San Bernardino, Ca 92418
Subject: Change of Zone No. 86-7
Dear Corrmissicners:
I am a resident, and a property owner in the 2600
block of Sepulveda Ave. I wish to_object, strongly" to
a change of zoning for the property located at 20U1
SepulvedR Ave.
The c~nge in zon.ng is requested in order that
apartll'.ents (Eul ti-purpose units) Il'.ay be built at that
location. We are an ~rea of small s,ngle family homes
which are mostly owner occupied. Fifty foot lots are
just too sll'.all to accomodate apartrr.ent buildings, or
multi family residences as you choose to call them.
Sepulveda is a very narrow street and the increase
in traffic would create serious safety problems for the
many small children who live in the ne~ghborhood. I
feel that we would ha.ve a constant traffic "jam" around
the entrance to lot number 2601. Surely, instead of
strangling us, the city can find more suitable lane for
those promoters who wish to do this kind of building.
".
Thank You for considering my protFst.
fDl~~~uwm{ID
MAY 16 1986
Sincerely,
vr;d;::!~nwLJ
Cl'" "."AiITMENT
Sf ...",'........;....."
SAN BERNARDINO. CA
.
c
.~"
t..""2- ~<.r..... ~ -<
{~/ .5-1:)-'D~
I2~(p: r;;' .
r-() : r LJ. E.= /J L A;t.i,.1/ &/,/ 6- C . .,-<. L, l~ [sO W ~ rnt
{ c.. /< r (,)/I4.A11 S S j W
MAY In 1986
~~'UM~~~
.~ 19$19.
W..a cvu.. ~J;t~ ~~
~ ;yu- ~ ~.~
~ ~ ~ :2.~u/~ .41;
.--jJ~ (}#d :L /f/~ _120-- ~
~.
2t6z.. ~ ~4V~ ~~.
.Ai-,___lIb (UL7 aT ;zb~ ~
ti;)J.~~~~ tUk;t;=
41ijJ.~k ~. . C-~4 ~.
~)~t ~1./
~e~
d.? r (l <
,-':.e<i'~ cY' I'::~~~
c
i ,.......
-..)
.
-c
""'
'-'
o
," ~ -0<.0-0"
'--
.,
"",/
~\
2686 Sepulveda
San Bernardino, CA
92404
I'Iay 12 J 1986
Planning Department
San Bernardino City Hall
300 North D Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Gentlemen:
We are opposed to chgn~iDZ land use zoning from R-1-7200 to R-3-1200
at 2601 Sepulveda.
This street is alreRdy oVer-run with vehicles, some of which use it as
a raceway. Only a couple of weeks ago the crepe ~le tree in our
neighbor's yard was destroyed by a speeding auto.
Also, from Highl~nd Avenue to 24th street on Sepulveda, there are 7
apartment buildings on the east side, 4 on the west side, plus 1 small
apartrrent in back of a large house. At the intersection of Sepulveda at
27th Street there is an Olive Crest Horre for boys which creates more
traffic.
We have lived at this address since 1953. Slowly but surely our
residential area has been infiltrated by apartment after apartment. Ii' this
street is classified as residential, why are landowners allowed to build
apartment complexes in every block; There are too many cars on this street
now. Another apartment certainly won't improve that situation.
Sincerely ,
~r ;,./ .J~t C
1::/ (( , ,-i.,..;tD,-
Vivian Lester
Adrian Lester
srAFF
RO:J NG
F.A.S
D./.,
v.B,
A.L.
O.~,'~. .-
E.G..__
G.G.~._
K.M._
M.C.__
M.r.__
tI....~._
R.!t_
S.W._
V,R _
'=- ~' ;-;;' n' "n,' r:I' rID
' ~rr.l h I\WII~; , '.'
rn"'O ".,"". L' ~! l5 . n
~ l.~ ~../ ~w' . u
nJ
M~' 13 ~
CITY f.tAi~joilr:G ll6'ARlp ,
SAN w-IIIIJNlI. .
-
/==
LZ_
c p~
" t:r.. ~(g - "\ . ~0: .
. /~~/'J~
.
(
-
c?&n "~-I CbJ7':f
~ ;;;;L~~
<0~;.J~
3c1b~ D~,
&aw1 ~ et:--~
~~d' o~-
% (tg d.~-r.&.d
~ cd... C}-(i, 0 171 (Oot.' df..e~~ a-r-e
~~ ~tVz-~'
sY ~..e Ak";/:b ~ .L.(
.,.---
9JI ~d ~440 ~dM &>"1
~...- ~.6>-aP d/-to,-;~..:b--.
~ ~~~~~~~.-
.~~?~~.
~ . c: cz{!- ~~, ~dv~
~ cr+ ~da-6re
~ ~,
C73:~v~um~
00 ~ '11 ..
. '1";"-'
_. . ,0 81 ":t'~ --."
Dr,! ;," '.. ;'.,,! ,"". lID .
,P , .,..' ,- "~
",,,: ,:... '." c' !_:::J
. -- . :., ,--:
MAY 14 1986 '
UPlM;;, ,'F,'" '
.fAN Bf;ll1lAR&j:;,O.: ~~NT
...
"""" 0
v
II 9~ ;.
.. 8: ,.
.e IU :.
.ct e: ,
I .....-...----..
.,. <!I~ :.
;;;
I
. .
~ .
c
.
.
'--'I
'.
~- .
L;.
.
\J:
II:
ill:
..:
ill"
.
.~
ee ~
~ .
(!,., .
e~
~::!
Ell!
@:
<!II!
-"
j.
l.' ~@~: . ~
-' ~
N '" ~ I e
'" '" c..J u
.
'" .....
;0
'!' ., ..
o
-
-
\
i
-
~
1IA
r
~~~
...
~
r
%
-
''l!
t
\
:.)
,
C
,
...
-
II
-
%
)C
III
-
-
JI
lP
~
. .
t.I
~
...:tJ.uu-
~
..
-~,
"',
,"
'(
'.
Go;"
.,'
L
.
--..,
..
-
II
!
:
..
..-.
..
..:.--
..
__....'r\ _
.
, ~
...fIl!.";
..
:.....a_:...
1
c
o
-..,
-....J
PLANNt-JG DEPARTMENT
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
LOCATION
CASE c 7 /186-11
HEARING DATE OS/20/86
I
..
M-I ~
M-I
M-I
CoM
CoM
"0'
'0'
I
I
.
C \..\tlO~
\..O"~ )
M-I
M-I
M-I
M-I
M-I
M-I
CoM
CoM
H IPITALITY LN.
CoM
INTERSTATE ~
,
-
AGENDA
ITEM #
8
.-:-
1"=80 I
U
M.I
1!t1E.RS1/>.1E.
-
'-
c
"
,)
...;
~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~
APPLICATION FOR
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. ~h- r
....
""'"
~
Craig E. Swalla and
OWNER: Deborah J. Swalla APPLICANT: Owner
ADDRESSJ780 Camellia Dri ve ADDRESS:
San Bernardino. CA 92404
TEL' (714) 887-8677 TEL:
( EXISTING ZONE' )( PROPOSED ZONE: ) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
R-1 R-3 R-1 & R-3
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ~~OE~T5i (~?TACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY)
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. - -
The Sou th 50 feet of Lot 32. ARROWHEAD HEIGHTS. as per plat
recorded in Book 19 of Maps. page 5. in the office o~ the
Recorded of said County
2601 Sepul veda. San Bernardino 92405
REASON FOR CHANGE OF ZONE REQUEST:
to add ren tal uni ts to property.
SUBMITTALS: OJ PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT OR GRANT DEED
fJ APPLICATION (3 COPIES) U 500 FT. PROPERTY OWNER'S MAP (EXHIBIT A)
[) MAP OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (10 COPIES, FOLDED UI LETTER OF CERTIFICATION (NOTARIZED)
TO 8 V2"xll")
iJ PRELIM INARY ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPT ION UI LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION (NOTARIZED)
FORM
tJ GUMMED LABELS (2 SETS) UI TRANSPARENCY OF MAP
/.. -"_7 ..0~ -'2 DATE: J../- Z>-<alo
SIGNATURE OF J( lAP. M-,h( .A JAI, '/, DATE' j- 5- 8(0
LEGAL OWNER (S) (
DATE:
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED:
DATE APPLICATION ACCEPTED: E.RC. MEETING
( ) P.C. MEETING
OAPPROVED ODENIED M/C.C. MEET ING
....
n'l._ MAR,I'I.
-
""'
)
c
Craig & Debbie Swal~
3780 Camellia Drive
San Bernardino, CA 92404
City of San Bernardino
Mayor and City Council Members
May 30, 1986
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
This letter is to appeal decision of the Planning Commission
on May 20, 1986, regarding Zone Change 86-9. We feel we did
not receive fair consideration. At the meeting on May 20,
our zone change was considered along with Zone Change 86-8.
Our lot is almost twice the size of that lot and the two are
no where near each other. These should be considered separately.
We feel our zone change should be passed as per the Planning
Departments recommendation. Our lot measures 50' X 258k'.
Although our lot is slightly narrower than standard R-3 lots
it is very deep. The existing house is at the very front of
the lot and more than half" of the land is unused. This is also
characteristic of the surrounding lots. Many of the backyards
are full of weeds and debris causing an extreme fire hazard.
Most of the houses in this neighborhood are being rented and
the backyards are unkept. By changing our zone to R-3 we can
therefore build some units to the rear and utilize our property.
Under the current building codes we could only build a couple
units and we would be required to provide on site parking, there-
fore this should not cause any more traffic than is already there.
The lots to the South are zoned R-3 and we feel this would be unfair
to deny our request. The logical place to end the R-3 zoning
would be at a corner not in the middle of a block.
Unfortunately, people who do not oppose this zone change don't
wri te letters and do not take time to come to City Council meet-
ings. So as we see it, out of 139 homeowners who received the
letter regarding this zone change, only 5 people opposed it. That
means 134 do not oppose it. Out of the five that oppose it, one
person lives on another street, one lives two doors north, and
three live accross the street. I went to talk to these people
and explain what we wanted to do was not build apartments as th~
automatically think when they think R-3, but to build a couple
one bedroom units with on site parking. I detected a tone of
jealousy as one man stated" They are going to let all these people
change their lots to R-3 and ours will never be changed because
our lots are only 135' deep."
We are residents of San Bernardino and own several rentals. All
of which we are very proud. We recognize the need for clean, well
kept rentals and we feel by adding units to this lot it will be to
the best interests of this neighborhood and San Bernardino.
YO}lrs.tr y, L ~~
of 2601 S4ulveda #~f