HomeMy WebLinkAbout47-Planning
~
- - -
-
d::.-v OF SAN BERNARONO - REQOST FOR COUNCIL AJrION
Frank A. Schuma
From: Planning Director
Subject:
Appeal of Tentative Tract
No. 13172 and Conditional Use
Permit No. 85-72
Mayor and Council Meeting of
June 2, 1986, 2:00 p.m.
Dept:
Planning
Date:
May 22, 1986
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Previous Planning Commission action:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on May 6, 1986, the
following action was taken:
The applications for Tentative Tract No. 13172 and Conditional
Use Permit No. 85-72 were denied.
Vote: 4-2, 3 absent.
The Negative Declaration for environmental review was also denied.
Recommended motion:
That the hearing on the appeal be closed and the decision of the
Planning commission be affirmed, modified or rejected.
~!VYL
Signature Frank A. Schuma
Contact person:
Frank A. Schuma
Phone:
383-5057
Supporting data attached: ~
Yes, Staff Report
Ward:
5
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source:
Finance:
Council Notes:
"non';o I.o~ ~In 41
..............- ~ - ~
-
-
.--C I [_________" c
,
:1 '
LJL L L ENGINEERING
\f'
ill
l
-,
"'-"
:)
CIVIL & ENVIRONr.1ENT AL ENGINEERING
ASSOCIA TES
LAND PLAt~N;!\:G AI\:D SURVEYlt;G
May 12, 1986
00 rn@rn~wrn (ill
MAY 12 1986
Mayor and Common Council
City of San Bernardino
City Hall - 300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
CITY PLAjijNING DEPARTMENT
SAN BERNARDINO. CA
Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract 13172
and Conditional Use Permit No. 85-72 on May 6, 1986
We respectfully request that the San Bernardino City Council reverse
the action of the Planning Commission in denying the above project.
We believe the Planning Commission acted more out of frustration with
the unique development issues of the site than in opposition to the
proj ect .
The Planning Commission had heard the project on March 18, 1986, and
acted to refer it back to the Environmental Review Committee for
evaluation of a traffic study. The report was already being prepared
by Basmaciyan-Darnell, Inc. at the request of Cable Lakes and in
response to input from the Engineering Department, Traffic Section.
The report was submitted on March 31, 1986, and approved by the
Engineering Department and it was then subsequently accepted by the
Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on April 17, 1986. At this
meeting, the Fire Department representative, per instructions from
Fire Chief Jerry Newcomb, found that the secondary access requirement
had been met and this was supported by the City Attorney's office.
The ERC acted to reaffirm the Negative Declaration that was originally
issued on February 13, 1986.
Based on the acceptance of the report by the ERC, we felt that !he
requirement had been met per the Planning Commission's direction to
staff of March 18, 1986. Staff had recommended approval of the
project at that hearing and again on May 6, 1986. At the last hearing
the Planning Commission further discussed the secondary access road
issue and at that point the City Attorney's office explained a recent
revision to Ordinance number 18.40.160 "Provision for ingress and
egress" which gave the Fire Chief the authority to waive the fully
improved and dedicated secondary access. It was explained that the
Fire Chief was satisfied with the secondary access roads to botb
Little League Drive and Cable Canyon Road and with the conditions
..
225 E. Airport Dr. . P.O. Box 6087, San Bernardino. California 92412 . Phone (714) 884-8804 or (714) 825-9582
550 West Vista Way. Meirose Center. Vista. California 92083 . Phone (714) 758-3680
c
..
-.
-
-
- - -
'""
v
-.
......."i
:J
MAYOR ANO COMMON COUNCIL
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
May 12, 1986
Page Two
requiring maintenance and financial contributions for off-site road
improvements. At that point, a Planning Commission member felt that
such a determination should be in writing from the Fire Chief. The
City Attorney's office then explained that the acceptance of the
secondary access by the Fire Chief could either be in writing or at a
public hearing but were not stipulated in the ordinance that it had to
be in writing. Because of the many delays and continuances, we
questioned the need for such a written statement inasmuch as the Fire
Chief is a member of the ERC and their meetings, according to staff,
are public meetings. It seemed like there would be another
continuance.
The only other issue discussed that evening was regarding a change in
a staff recommendation from their earlier support on March 18, 1986,
when they required an ~age of 1000 square feet with no units less
than 900 square feet. They changed their requirement to requiring
that all dwellings contain at least 1000 square feet of 1Floor area.
The Project contains 25% of the homes with an area of 900 square feet
with an overall average of over 1075 square feet per unit. This is
the same ratio and floor plans that were approved by the City for the
first phase of this project, Tentative Tract 12756. When we were
asked by the Planning Commission, we reaffirmed our committment to
these floor plans with respect to floor areas.
Shortly thereafter, a sudden motion for denial and a quick second,
with no following discussion, was passed on a 4 to 2 vote. The maker
of the motion said that he was burned out, the project was so cumber-
some and so many problems (the hour was late and we were near the end
of the evening agenda).
We were amazed and shocked by their sudden action as we believe there
was little consideration given for staff recommendations on the access
issue nor for the concessions by my client in attempting to resolve
these "problems" over the last several months.
The site was previously approved for a mobile home park and we were
merely upgrading this project for permanent single family detached
resideni!es.
c
,......
'-'
.:)
,)
MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
May 12, 1986
Page Three
In conclusion, we
of. this matter.
client.
respectfully request your favorable reconsideration
If there are any questions please call me or my
Very truly yours,
C M ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
~?=~
Stephen L. Pleasant
SLP:bb
cc: Cable Lakes Association
3931 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 113
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(714) 955-0224
~City Planning Department
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
..
c
c
:)
...)
"I=t:Ct\I....... ._.-, ,!", ......, CP\:
r\_....... ,,-1..\. crl
May 7, 1986
'E6 riAY -7 ? 4 :30
Mayor E. Wilcox
City Council Members
300 IT. D. Street
. San Bernardino, Ca.
00 rn@rn~wrn [ill
MAY 13 1986
Dear Mayor and Councilmen;
CITY PlANNir~G DEPARTMENT
SAN BERNARDINO. CA
Your recent decision to amend the Municipal Code 18.40.160
should be reversed. This letter is therefore asking for that
reversal and an appeal of that change.
A project presented to the planning department commission
last evening, May 6, 1986 (Cable Lakes TT 13172) was unnecessarily
burdened with trying to comply with this code in an unsatifactorily
way to the commission and to the public opposing llI1d making comments
to the project. I believe City officials should review code changes
only when it benefits the general public, not just for the benefit
of an individual project. I further feel code changed by adding Fire
Chief places him in the dubious position of individual litigation
based on his decision to exempt a project from the code in regard to
development standards for secondary access.
I fully appreciate your desires to aid developers to build in
our city, but we reserve the right to ask you not to at the opense
or risk of human life in that future development. a~s"
I respectfully request you review your decision and conclude
that the original code was drafted and adopted to secure the health,
safety, and welfare of all citizens.
..
:z::;-~
Mrs. Helen Kopczynski
8150 Cable Canyon Road
San Bernardino, Ca. 92407
887-1833
~
..
cc: Cynthia Grace
Deputy City Attorney
'CITY OF SAN BEIQIARDINO 0- MEMORANDUh<
To
Planning Commission
Tentative Tract No. 13172
and Conditional Use Permit No. 85-72
From Planning Department
Subject
Date May 6, 1986
Approved Item No. 13, Ward 5
Date
Owner: C.C. San Bernardino, Inc.
3931 McArthur Blvd.,
Suite fl1l3
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Applicant: Cable Lakes Associates
3931 McArthur Blvd.
Suite fl1l3
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Engineer: C.M. Engineering Associates
P.O. Box 6087
San Bernardino, CA 92412
.
This application was continued from the Planning Commission
meeting of March 18. 1986, in order for the applicant to
prepare a traffic study to be submitted to the Environmental
Review Committee.
Tne City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed the submitted traffic
study and the study cleared the Environmental Review Committee
meeting of April 17, 1986. The applicant has met with Staff
in regards to minor inherent problems with design and lot
layout within the tract map which has been and can continue
to be resolved administratively and should not delay the process-
ing and approval of the requested tract map and conditional use
permit. The City Engineering department submitted a memo to the
Planning Department Staff commenting on the submitted traffic
study. That memo is attached for the Commission perusal.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Tentative Tract No. 13172 and Conditional
Use Permit No. 85-72 be approved based upon the findings of fact,
observations and submitted traffic study and subject to all
original and revised conditions and standard requirements.
Respectfully Submitted,
~
FRANK A. SCHUMA,
Plannin irector
-
co::;
r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
:J
DEPARTMENT ""'
SUMMARY
'"
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WARD
13
3/18/86
5 ~
APPLICANT'
a e a e ssoc.
3931 MacArthur Blvd.,
11113
~ewport Beach, CA 92660
Same as above
l&.I
(I)
<t
()
Tentative Tract No. 13172 &
Conditional Use Permit No. 85-72
OWNER,
t;
l&.I
::l
a
""
a:
.....
<t
l&.I
a:
<t
The applicant requests approval to establish a 454 small lot subdivision
(patio home) in the PRD-7, Planned Residential Development 7 units per acre
(pending a zone change from MHP, Mobile Home Park zone)
....
Subject property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 76 acres and having a frontage of approximately 3,655 feet
on the northeasterly side of Frontage Road and being located approximately
2,670 feet northwesterly of the centerline of Little League Drive.
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION
Subject Vacant PRD-7u Residential 8-14 u/ac
North Vacant, Flood Cont. Channel "0" Open Space ~l
South Freeway (I-215) Freeway
East Vacant PRD-7u Residential 8-14 u/ac
West Vacant "0" Open Space
GEOLOGIC I SEISMIC DYES FLOOD HAZARD ~YES OZONE A ( DYES )
HAZARD ZONE !Xl NO ZONE ONO IX! ZONE B SEWERS IX! NO
HIGH FIRE @YES AIRPORT NOISE I DYES REDEVELOPMENT DYES
HAZARD ZONE DNO CRASH ZONE [i) NO PROJECT AREA UlINO
..J o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNI FICANT Z [iJ APPROVAL
<t APPLICABLE E FFE CTS 0
~ WITH MITIGATING - UlI
Zen MEASURES NO E.I.R. ~ CONDITIONS
l&.I(!) o EXEMPT o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO II..C 0
:1iZ II..ffi DENIAL
z- SIGN IFICANT EFFECTS
OC WITH MITIGATING ~2 0 CONTINUANCE TO
o:Z MEASURES en2
:;:iL 0
z iO NO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ()
I&l SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E.R. C. l&.I
EFFECTS MINUTES 0:
NOV. 1111 "EVIIED JULY 1..1
'KY
.
--
-
CITY OF SAN SER
ARDINO PL NNING DE? ARTMENT
CASE
OBSERVATIONS
TT 1117'J ~nd
rlJP Nn RC\_7?
AGENDA ITEM 1 ':\
HEARING DATE ':\ /1 R / RI'>
PAGE .
1. The applicant is proposing to establish a 452-unit
planned residential development on approximately 76
acres located on the north side of Frontage Road
approximately 3,655 feet northwesterly of Little League
Drive in the PRO-7, Planned Residential Development f,one
at 7 units to the ac're.
The development plan and tentative tract map which is
being proposed is subsequent to a request for a change
of zone which was approved at the Planning Commission
meeting of November 19, 1985.
3. The proposal before the Commission is to create a 460
lot, 454-unit single-family detached development with
lots ranging in area from 4,000 square feet to 7,000
square feet.
2.
..
'--
4.
'.
Six separate lots are sho~wn as being open space area.
The map indicates that 13.6 acres or 18% of the site is
set aside for common usable open space. The PRO zone
requires 25% be devoted to common usable open space. In
the past, the Commission has granted single family PRO's
to maintain a minimum of 18% usable common area by
considering part of the private yard area within the 25%
open space. No amenities are designated within the
common recreational area such as pools, spas, tennis
courts, etc. A conditien of approval is attached
requiring a plan of the common open space be submitted
to the Planning Department for Review and approval.
The floor plans submitted with the application for the
Conditional Use Permit indicate that there will be four
plans to be considered for this project. A description
of these plans are as follows.
"
5.
EJ..an .lio... Bedrooms Baths Aua Stories
A 115 2 1.5 1,000 1
B 115 2 1.5 900 1
C 112 2 2 1,200 1
D 112 3 2 1,250 2
As indicated above, Plan B is a two-bedroom unit of 900
square feet. A minimum area established by Code is
1,000 square feet for single-family detached homes in
the R-l zone. with the process of a Conditional Use
Permit, consideration is to be made in determining
L ~....~ 1 H-n ~~"h ..h_ ft.., ,,~. ~._~ rnh_ ,~~.._
.
c
..J
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNINc~sEDEr~!M~1nd
OBSERVATIONS AGENDA I~~~ Nn 1~~ 77
HEARING DATE ,ll RfRI'.
PAGE
tract approved adjacent to the subject site was for
similar size lots and identical housing type. By virtue
of that projects approval (Tentative Tract No. 12756 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 84-37 for 120 single family
lots) would establish the compatibility with adjacent
property. As in the conditions of approval for
Tentative Tract 12756, a condition is attached requiring
the minimum average area of a single family residential
unit be 1,000 square feet as required by code.
6. Three hundred forty-two of the 454 units or 75 percent
of the units are proposed to be 2 bedroom homes. Having
75 percent of a single family development is not in the
norm of development practice as evident in the state
College- Verdemont area. Staff from the department of
Building and Safety state that typically a maximum of
ten percent of the units for a single family development
are two bedroom units. The total number of units for
both tracts forming the entire Cable Lakes project will
be 574 units. Of the total, 434 (75%) are two bedroom
units. The feasibility of such a mixture of units in
this location doesn't seem to be very marketable. Staff
would recommend to the Commission to limit the mix of
two bedroom units within the latest tract (tract No.
13172) to 10%.
7. The footprints of the proposed home sites as shown on
the development plan will maintain a 5 foot sideyard
setback and a 10 foot minimum rear yard setback. A
variable front yard setback is desired to soften the
monotony of uniform front yard setbacks. A standard
requirement as in Tentative Tract No. 12756 is requiring
such variable front setback.
8. Internal circulation for the project is created through
a loop system of 50-foot wide public streets. Access to
the site will be via three entry points on Frontage
Road. In conjunction with Tentative Tract No. 12756,
there will be a total of five access points on Frontage
Road. Two streets will also provide reciprocal access
from Tract No. 12756 and 13172.
9. The subject tracts are within the High Fire Hazard area.
Which besides structural standards which mitigate
property loss due to fire, the site also requires a
secondary means of access for emergency evacuation
purposes. Presently, Frontage Road extends north from
the site and becomes a dead end. The "City" has made an
application to the Real Property Division of the Public
~-
,
COO
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE
--J
OBSERVATIONS
TT Nn
r.lIP Nn
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
1"117? "nd
RE;_/?
1)
)/]8/86
. I. .
Works Department for the creation of an assessment
district for the extension of Frontage Road to Cable
Canyon Road approximately 3/4 mile north of the site.
The property owners affected by the Frontage Road
extensions are in agreement with the assessment
district.
10.
Approximately 18% (13.6 acres) of
common usable open space. No
indicated on the site plan. A
requiring a site plan indicating
amenities.
the site is devoted to
exact amenities are
condition is attached
types and placement of
11. The elevations do not indicate the type of roofing
material which is contemplated for the development. Due
to the fact that the site is within the high fire hazard
area, a non-curobustible type of roofing material is
required. Staff has attached a condition requiring a
mixture of non-combustible roofing materials to be
utilized throughout the development.
12. A condition of approval for Tentative Tract No. 12756
was modified at the meeting of the Mayor and Common
Council whereby rather than having a minimum of 1,000
square feet area for the units, it reads that the unit
sizes would range from 900 to 1250 square feet with the
average unit size to 1000 square feet. A similar
condition is attached to keep consistency throughout the
project site.
13. The elevations of the homes proposed are identical to
those approved in the adjacent tract No. 12756 that they
will have an exterior building material of stucco and
the proposed roofing material, although not noted on the
plans, would need to meet the requirements of the Fire
Department being that the proj~ct site lies within the
High Fire Hazard Zone.
14. At their regularly scheduled meeting of February 13,
1986, the Environmental Review Committee recommends a
negative declaration.
~~
j
~
-
.
-
'-
-
'-'
""""
~~o .....
,
-'
~
,. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT No
FINDINGS of FACT AGENDA IT~~P No
HEARING DATE
PAGE.
""
1117'7 "nd
R'\-7?
13
111R/RIl
'\
~
~
"'l
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13172
1. Once recorded, each lot within the tract will have
frontage on a dedicated street.
2. The design of the proposed subdivision will not conflict
with known easement acquired by the public at large.
3.
The design of
are not likely
and water will
the subdivision and type of improvements
to cause serious health problems as sewer
be improved.
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-72
1. The proposed density of 6 units per acre is in
accordance with the present general plan designation of
4-7 units per acre and is in keeping with the proposed
alternatives for the Verdemont Study now underway. The
applicant has further written a statement precluding
himself or any future development from receiving
benefits of a density bonus.
2. A total of 908 covered parking spaces are being provided
in two car garages per unit. Additional guest parking
spaces are provided in the driveways of each unit.
t,
3.
The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the proposed development. All setbacks, parking
requirements and lot coverage must meet City Municipal
Code requirements pursuant to planned Residential
Developments.
4.
The use is deemed desirable and with an increase in
proposed average floor area to that of 1,000 square
feet, the construction would be more compatible with the
few homes that exist in the area and with the
development standards of future residential development
in the area.
"-
~
NOV. "'0
c
....,
-.J
"'-,
v
'-"
~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT Nn 1117? ~M~
CONDITIONS r.m' Nn R~-7?
AGENDA ITEM 11
HEARING DATE 1/1 R / Rfi
\.. PAGE fi ~
1.
A landscape maintenance district or another type of
maintenance arrangement acceptable by the City shall be
established for the tract prior to recordationil,ooo
The minimum unit size shall not be less than ~~-square
feet.w~~fl--aft-a~~~a~e--a~ea~o~-~~ee--~qua~e-~e~-%~-~he
eYe~a~~-de~e~epmeft~.
Commission
A plan shall be submitted to the Planning~ep8Ttment
prior to recordation of the final map depicting the type
and placement of recreational amenities within the
common open space.
Modify -----2.
Modify -----3.
4.
A peripheral wall plan to match that which was required
for Tentative Tract 12756~ minimum six feet in height
and earthen berm and solid decorative wall.
A variety of roofing materials to include: s~at~ red
tile, and high relief composition shingle shall be used
in combination throughout the development.
Modify ------5.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the observations and findings of fact and subject
to conditions and standard requirements attached hereto,
staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract No. 13172 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 85-72 and the adoption of the
recommended Negative Declaration.
Respectfully SUbmitted,
FRANK A. SCHUMA,
EDWARD GUNDY,
er
..
c
..---
'-'
:)
-
.....;
.>
r
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE TT No. 13172 and
CUP NO. 85-72
AGENDA ITEM 13
HEARING DATE 3/18T80
PAGE 7
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
"'-
~
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
TT NO. 13172 and
CUP NO. 85-72
date of approval by the Planning Commission and/or Planning Department.
However, if no development has been i niti ated at the end of the 24-month
time period the approval shall expire. Additional time may be approved
by the Planning Commission upon request of the applicant prior to expira-
tion of the l!.t-month time period. Expiration Date: Marchl8. 1988
1
2
.....
MAY '14
shall be in effect for a period of 24 months from the
COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR P.R.D.
a.
The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the
tract maps. The CC & R's shall include liability insurance and methods
of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private
roads, and exterior of all buildings. The CC&R's shall also include
a statement that no radio frequency antenna shall be included within
the complex except for central antenna systems.
No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a cor-
poration, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has
been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned
or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the
common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment
power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with
authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually
avai lable features of the development. Such entity shall operate under
recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all
owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to
meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded
CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by
the City as conditions to approval. The developer shall submit evi-
dence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of,
the Commission prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not
apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
b.
c.
Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to
such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the com-
mon areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting
membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities.
Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways,
shall be provided for in the CC&R's.
The CC&R's shall contain wording prohibiting the storage or parking
of trailers, boats, campers, motor homes, and similar vehicles outside
of the specified common areas.
d.
e.
-"
~R._ !ORM _ ~
c
"....,
'-'
-
-...-I
-""","
....,.-1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE TT NO. 13172 and
CUP NO. 85 72
AGENDA ITEM 11
HEARING DATE 1/1 R / Rf.
PAGE 8'
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
lIo...
~
..,
3 PARKI NG:
a. This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of __ parking
spaces.
b. All parki ng and dri vi ng ai s 1 es sh all be surf aced with two inches of AC
over a suitable base or equivalent as approved by the City Engineer.
Parking spaces shall be striped and have wheel stops installed at least
three feet from any building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway.
c. Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across an alley
from property zoned residential, a solid decorative wall six feet in
height shall be erected and maintained along the property line so as to
separate the parking area physically from the residentially zoned pro-
perty, provided such wall shall be three feet in height when located
within the required front or street side yard setback. Where no front
or street side yard is required, such wall shall be three feet in
height when located within ten feet of the street line. Said wall
shall be located on the north , south , east , west or
peri phera 1 property 1 i nes. --
d. Whenever an off-street parking area is located across the street from
property zoned for residential uses, a solid decorative wall or equiva-
lent landscaped berm not less than three feet in height shall be
erected and maintained along the street side of the lot not closer to
the street than the required depth of the yard in the adjoining resi-
dential area. No fence or wall located in the front setback shall
obscure the required front setback landscaping. Said wall shall be
located on the north , south , east , west , or
peripheral property lines.
All parking areas and vehicle storage areas shall be lighted during hours
of darkness for security and protection.
Recreational vehicle storage areas shall be screened by at least a six-foot
high decorative wall with screened gates.
4
There shall be provided for each unit, within the garage or carport, or
other specifically designated area, a loft or other usable storage area
with a minimum of 150 cubic feet in addition to standard utility storage.
Traffic bumps provided on the interior private roads shall be subject to
the City Traffic Engineer's approval.
-5-
A commercial-type drive approach, as shown on Standard Drawing No. 204 or
equivalent, shall be constructed at each entrance to the development.
Location and design shall be subject to approval of the Engineerin~.
Di vi s ion. "
\...
~
MAY 84
B.A FOR" A
- --.
-
c
"'""'
v
"'""'
~
"
,..)
r
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
....
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
CASE TT No. 13172 and
CUP No. 85-72
AGENDA ITEM 13
HEARING DATE 3/18/86
PAGE q ~
......
~
Prior to issuance of any building permit, access rights shall be granted to
the City for the purpose of allowing access over the private drives within
the project for all necessary City vehicles including fire, police, and
refuse disposal vehicles, and any other emergency vehicles. The documents
covering this matter shall be prepared by the owner and approved by the
Planning Department.
All refuse storage areas are to be enclosed with a decorative wall.
Location, size, type and design of wall are subject to the approval of the
Planning Department and Division of Public Services Superintendent.
6
Energy and noise insulation shall comply with all state and local require-
ments.
7
LANDSCAPI NG:
a. Three copies of a master landscape plan shall be submitted to the
Planning Department/ Park and Recreation Department for review and
approval. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the
f 0 11 owi ng:
1) Size, type, and location of plant material proposed.
2) Irrigation plan.
3) Such other alternate plants, materials and design concepts as may
be proposed.
4) Erosion control plans.
.;
b. Tree varieties and exact locations will be determined prior to planting
by the Director of the Park and Recreation Department or his/her
designee. A minimum number of one-inch caliper/IS gallon,
multibranched trees shall be planted within the parkway for each of the
following types of lots, as per the City's specifications:
1) Cul-de-sac lot -- one tree;
2) Interior lot -- two trees;
3) Corner lot -- three trees.
c. To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, sur-
faces of all cut slopes more than five feet in height and fi 11 slopes
more than three feet in height shall be protected by planting with
grass or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding 15 feet in vertical
height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten
~ ~
MAY 84 s.R. rORM A
c
-
--
-
'-
-
....I
"
.....J
,
"'Ii
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE TT NO. 13172 and
CUP NO. 8~-72
AGENDA ITEM 13
HEARING DATE --3,118/86
PAGE 10--- ~
"'Ii
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
...
~
_--L
9
~
.....
MAY 84
feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to'exceed 20 feet on centers;
or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants
selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and
climatic conditions of the site:
Trees 10%, 15 gallon; 40%, 5 gallon; 50%, 1 gallon.
Shrubs 20%, 5 gallon; 80%, 1 gallon.
Ground cover 100% coverage.
Three copi es of the 1 and scapi ng plan refl ecti ng the above requi!'rements
and placement of street trees (if required) shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Planning Department and the Park and
Recreation Department.
d. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with an irrigation
system approved by the Park and Recreation Department.
e. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the
responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual
ownersh i p.
f. All grading and drainage facilities, including erosion control planting
of graded slopes, shall be done in accordance with a grading plan
approved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained
prior to any grading being done.
4,000
All lots shall have a minimum area of square feet, a minimum depth of
80 feet, and a minimum width of 40 feet, (~ feet on corner lots). In
addition, each lot on a cul-de-sac or on a curved street where the side lot
lines thereof are diverging from the front to rear of the lot, shall have a
width of not less than 40 feet measured at the building setback line as
delineated on the tract map.
Where lots occur on the bulb of the Cul-de-sac, a mInImum lot depth of
feet wi 11 be permitted. I f the proposed depth is less than feet, a plot
plan must be submitted to demonstrate that a buildable lot area is possible
and to justify the lesser depth.
Variable front building setback lines of at least 18 feet and averaging
20 feet, and side street building setback lines ls-feet shall be delineated
on the final tract map. All garage entrances on a dedicated street shall
have a minimum setback of 18 feet.
Perimeter walls and walls required along the rear of all double frontage lots
shall be designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as
tree planter wells, variable setback, decorative masonry, columns, or other
such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face.
~
a.R. FORM A
c
-
-
c
:)
')'"
"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
"'\
CASE TT 13172 and
CUP NO. 8'0-72
AGENDA ITEM 13
HEARING DATE 3/18~
PAG E 11
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
"-
r
_R
"-
MAY e~
~
"'l
The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval of the visual or
engineering design of the proposed wall.
11
When graded slopes occur within or between individual lots, the slope face
shall be a part of the downhill lot. Exceptions to this requirement must
be approved by the City Engineer.
Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required by the City Engineer
in order to reduce the amount of bare soil exposed to precipitation.
Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be required
(if applicable).
13
Any clubhouse, swimming pool, spa, putting green, picnic areas or other
amenities shall be installed in the manner indicated on the approved site
plan.
14
During construction the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a
portion of the periphery of the tract site to minimize wind and debris
damage to adjacent properties. The type of fencing shall be approved by
the City Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and
dust control.
15
No roof-mounted equipment shall be placed on any building unless screened
as specifically approved by the Planning Department (except for solar
collection panels).
Within 75 feet of any single-family residential district, the maximum
height of any building shall not exceed one-story or 20 feet unless the
Commission determines that due to unusual topographical or other features,
such restrictive height is not practical.
16
All utility lines shall be installed underground subject to exceptions
approved by the Planning Department and the City Engineer.
17
No certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to compliance with these
Standard Requirements as well as all provisions of the San Bernardino
Municipal Code.
~
$.R. FORM A
c
--
'-'
,....-.."'"
v
,
)
,.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
'"
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
CASE TT 13172
and CUP 85-72
AGENDA ITEM 13
HEARING DATE U6/86
PAGE
\.
,.
~
'"
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Project Description:
Conditions Date:
Prepared By:
Page of
Reviewed By:
pages
Owner/Applicant:
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate
Engineering plans are required, the
applicant is responsible for
submitting the Engineering plans
directly to the Engineering Division.
They may be submitted prior to
submittal of Building Plans.
All requirements previously submitted (copy attached) continue
to apply as modified except as follows:
a) Item 28 - The requi rement for a traffic study has been
satisfied and, therefore, no longer applies.
b) Item 29 Improvements along Frontage Road near little
league Drive shall consist of improvements proposed per
Tentative Tract No. 12756 plus any advance warning signs or
devices as determined to be needed by the Traffic Engineer.
c) The Subdivider shall record Tract No. 12756 or dedicate the
proposed secondary access by separate instrument prior to
approval of this tract.
d) If Tract No. 12756 is not constructed prior to approval of
this map, Subdivider shall bond for completion of the
required secondary access to little league Drive.
e) No occupancy of this tract will be allowed until the
secondary access is constructed by Subdivider and accepted
by the City.
r"
\...
~
~
CITY OF SAN BER~ARD~NO
ST ANDfJ~AD REQU~AEMlEb\~TS
CASE TT 13172 and
CUP 85-72
AGENDA ITEM 13
HEARING DATE 5/6/86
PAG E 13
,
ENGINEERING DIVISION
""
Pr.ojcct Description: Tent. Tract No. 13172
li....ll.r. 85- 452 lot rUD on Frontaqs;--!~
.ll..LILrif !.Htle [eaque Dr.
GilllaOl=tloons= Da te: 2-19-136
Prepared BY:J1jiG ReV-fewed By:__
Page of pages
..lhRre'r/Applicant: Campeau Corp.
.
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate
Englneerlng pTans are required, the
applicant is responsible for
submitting the Engineering plans
directly to the Engineering Division.
They may be submitted prior to
submittal of Building Plans.
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
18. Payment of all applicable Engineering fees.
Engineering Division for schedule of fees.
Contact
19. Submittal of a grading/drainage plan conforming to all
requirements of Title 15 of the Municipal Code, including
submittal of a satisfactory soils investigation containing
"ecommendations for grading, prior to issuance of a grading or
building permit.
~,;
20. All drainage from the' development shall be directed to an
approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper
drainage facilities and easements shall be pt'ovided to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
21. Design and construction of all public utilities to serve the
site in accordance with City Code, City Standards and
requirements of the serving utility.
22.
Design and construction of all required public improvements to
conform to the ultimate planned cross section (such as street
widening, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, handicap
ramps, and others) in accordance with the Hunicipal Code, City
Standards and the requirements of the City Engineer.
Dedication of sufficient right-of-way along adjacent streets to
provide the ultimate master-planned width or as determined by
the City Engineer.
23 .
\.
.J
10,. Ikv
.
--
..
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
'-.J
)
~
ST ANDARD RlEQU~RlEMlENTS
CASE TT 13172 and
CUP 85-72
AGENDA ITEM 13
HEAR.ING DATE 5/6/86
PAGE
r
ENGINEERING DIVISION
'"
Project Description: Tent. Tract No. 13172
& CoUoP. 85-720 452 10fPDD on Irontit(l~r(r:-
N/W of Little Leaqllc Dr. ~---
Cvndei"lc'hms Da te': 2-19-U6
Prepared by: MHG ReviewC(j[)y:
Page of pages
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
~,
24. A final map based on field survey will be required.
25. Comply with all recommendations of the County Flood Control
District regarding protection of the site from Cable Creek.
26. Applicant shall prepare a hydrology study to address on-site
flows as well as off-site flows which traverse the site. If
drainage structures are indicated as needed by the bydrology
study as approved, the applicant shall design and construct
same.
27. Re9.ui red Dedi ca ti on
a) Interior Streets Centerline to R/W line = 25'.
Dedicate both halves.
b)
Frontage Road
side ( 2' 0 f
Centerline
(existing).
Centerline to R/I~ line = 30' easterly
additional dedication required).
to R/W line = 18' westerly side
c) Dedicate sufficient right-of-way to accommodate handicap
ramps, knuckles and cul-de-sacs per City Standards.
28' A traffic study will be required to address the following
i te m s :
a) Total trip generation and distribution due to the prol1oscd
development.
b) Projected traffic volumes both existing and at build-out
along Frontage Road, little League Drive and Palm Avenue.
Propose mitigations, if appropriate.
\..
.J
10" sky
- -
,
C
CITY Or-
/'.-.....,
SAN BERr\1ARDINO
CASE TT 13172 and
CUP 85-72
AGENDA ITEM 13
HEARING DATE ~, 5/6/86
- PAGE 15
ST ANDARD REQU~rr:gEt\flENTS
r
"
Project Description: Tent. Tract No. 13172
& C. U. P. 85-72. 452-Yot PUD on Ir.ontag~_(d '_
!!LW of Cit t 1 e League Dr.
lJenEllttons Date: 2-19-86
Prepared by: MWG Reviewed-by:
Page of pages
c) Traffic safety at the loops in the Frontage Road, at both
Little League Drive and Palm Avenue with mitigations:
Frontage Road requires 35 mph design speed and minimum 250'
radius.
d) Traffic area circulation plan both existing and proposed.
e) Investigate and address potential hazard to futul'e
residents of this development from freeway traffic
acci denta 11y runni ng off the freeway. Propose mi ti g11 tion
if appropriate.
f) Address provisions for secondary access to Cable Canyon
Road.
29. Requi red Improvements
a) Interior Street Centerline to curb face = 18'.
Improve both sides with curb and gutter, side\lalks,
street lights, signing, striping and paving. T.I =
5.0.
b) Frontage Road Centerline to curb face = 20' (easterly
side). Construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, street
lights, paving, signing and striping. 1. 1. = 6.5.
c) Construct handicap ramps at all curb returns within and
adjacent to the si te per Std. No. 205.
d) Construct flood control and storm drain improvements per
recommendations of the County Flood Control District and
the approved drainage study.
e)
Construct street and traffic improvement as recommended in
the approved traffic study per Item No: 5 above.
f)
Extend City's se\'ler sY$tem to serve the development as
approved by the Clty Englneer.
\.
.I
UHU akY
.. -
-
CITY Or- SAN BERNARDINO
CASE TT 13172 and
COP 85 72
AGENDA ITEM 13
HEARING DATE 5/6/86
PAGE 16
ST P.~NDAt1D RlEQU~R!E~~IENTS
,
.
'"
Project Description: Tent. Tract No. 13172 &
C.U.P. 85-72. 452 101-"uU on Frontaqclf~. ---=
N/W of Little League Dr.
€Ondltlons Uate: 2-19-86
Prepared By: MWG Reviewed By:
Page 4 of 6 pages
30. Applicant shall pay the City $70,000 as this tract's fair share
of the cost of construction of the Frontage Road extension from
its existing terminus northwesterly of the site to Cable Canyon
Road.
31. No more than 50% of the lots should be occupied prior to
completion of the extension of the. Frontage Road as described
above.
32. A composite grading and drainage plan will be required for the
site. A soils investigation and a geology study will be
required to support the grading design.
33. Requi red Permi ts
a) Grading permit
b) Construction permit for off-site improvements
c) Construction permit for on-site improvements (except
building)
34. App1 icable Engineering Fees
a) Checking fee for final map
b) Plan check and inspection fees for grading
c) Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements
d) Plan checkand inspection fees for on-site improvements
(except buildings -- see Building and Safety)
e) Fee for applicant's 'fair share of cost of extending
Frontage Road ($70,000).
"
..4
10') sky
...........
r.
, CITY OF
-0 0
SAN BERNARDiNO
-)
""'"
STANDARD REQU~REME~jTS
CASE TT 13172 and
CUP 85-72
AGENDA ITEM 13
HEAfllNG DATE 5/6/86
PAGE ....l7
\..
j
'""
,
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Project Description: T<:I11:. TI"act No. 1317,
C.!J.P. 85-72. 1\52 lot PUD on frnntaqe I~d.
N/W of Little League Dr.
Gomht1'01~S Oil te:
Prepa re d By: t1\~G
Pa ge 5. 0 f 6
2-19-B6
Reviewed
pages
By:
f)
Electrical energy fee
electrical energy for a
acceptance by City.
35. All new utilities to serve the site shall be installed
underground. All existing overhead lines within or adjacent to
the si te shall be rel oca ted underground. except 66KV or grea ter
electric power.
to pay cost of street light
peri od of 4 yea rs from da te of
36. Building setback lines, including those due to flood control
channel, and/or earthquake faul ts shall be shotln on the final
map.
37. If the project is developed in phases, each individual phase
shall be designed to provide maximum public safety, convenience
for public vehicles, and proper traffic circulation. If
phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted for
review and approval of the City Engineer.
38. Improvement Completion
a ) Street, sewer, ani drainage i.rrprovement plans for the entire project
or for each individual phase, as approved, shall be carpleted, subject
to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to re=rdation Qt the final
map.
b) If the required improvements are not completed prior to
recordation of the final map, subdivider shall post proper
bonds and execute an improvement agreement wi th the Ci ty
to guarantee completion of all public improvements within 2
years of recordi ng of the fi nal .map.
c) Required Bonds
1. Faithful performance bond
1001 of the cost of off-
si te improvements
2. Labor and materials bond -- 501 of the cost of off-
site improvements
~ .~
- -
C
CITY
OF
SAN
c 0
BERNARDiNO
7'::)
,
ENGINEERING DIVISION
CASE Tr 13172 ani CUP 85-72
AGENDA ITEM 13
HEARING DATE 5/6/86
. PAGE .lL__ ~
,
Project Descri!Jtion: Tent. Tract No. Dl72
C.U.P. 85- . '52 lot I'UIJ on [IOlll"lj'I:-mr.-
~~f I ittle 1~1QllP Or.
~ndil~t-~on,s Date: ?-l~-I1G
Pre pa red BY:j1\oJG Rev 1 e we d Oy:
Page 6 Ol' 6 pages
STANDARD REQUJRE~JJENTS
'\...
3. Warranty bond
25% of the cost of off-site
i mproveme n ts
4. Maintenance bond
$100.00 per lot
s. Grading bond
$2.00 per cubic yard of cut or fill,
whichever is greater ;,
~
("
-
Si
1ERN~NO CITY WATER OEr"""ITMEN
STA'Pr6ARD REQUIREMMs
J
E"=!....C- \.\.h...1\'tS 12..N~5 BS -,;'3
Review of Plans: # C'~ I? - 'h ~: \o<b Date:
Location: ~~~ '""-~\'=> ~~ ~".......~ .~. ~ \....tl.l,,":--\..eA~pproved:
Type of Construction: _6 -G~-L- \){,~ Denied:
Owner/Developer: ~,,'o'v:? ~~~~., Continued:
ENGINEERING: Name: d ,.;;(C;"""7~~./' Date: /1-;;;?5- 1<',,;-
119 P.S.!. NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME _. __ ,._ _ __ _"'\
IXI Size of Main Adjacent to the Project ~Wg~U~AL T~SMISS ION MAINS WILL BE o/>QBIRED ,TO: S~RVE _,!Hh !
I . ~
GO Pressure Regulator Suggested on Customer's Side on the Meter. UNKNOWN AT THIS TIJ.lg-," - 985
!Xl Comments: NOli 27 1
=
..,.....'Il... ... .
**THIS DEPARTMENT SHOULD BE CONTACTED AS TO PROCEDURE ON THE O~4~~.. CA
Ii(! Subject to the rules & regulations of the Water Department in effect at the time of application for water service.
-. -
WATER QUALITY CONTROL OEPARTMENT: Name: PRED FIt/f"/Yl/T/1//I1
}1(
)(.
Date:
I! ~,S-/i!'J
I I
D
D
R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection.
Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection.
Air Gap Required at Service Connection.
No Backflow Device Required.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICER: Nam~ ~/~ ~
D Industrial Waste Permit May Be Require~nvironmental Control Officer.
D Grease Trap Required by Environmental Control Officer.
D No Regenerative Water Softeners May Be Installed Without Prior Approval of the Environmental Control Officer.
pi!! Approved by Environmental Control Officer.
Date:
/I /2..6 I rr
I I
SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: Name: ~ t- ~ Date: \\ \:L
D No Sewer Capacity Charge Applicable at This Time.
X Sewer Capacity Right Must Be Purchased from the Redevelopment Agency or the Mayor's Office in the Amount
of Gallons Per Day. Sewer Capacity Rights 4S J C'C\~C' \~ 'l'\~
Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day:
~ C-,:) ...V"--.e.:-.... 'i(~..S~- x. \ I:: oQC'C''-~ '(,c..~ ~{~~- '-\5'1... c::c~~~
'( \~t-~."
And/or:
)( Proof of Purchase Must Be Submitted to the Water Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit
D This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All Fees Will Be Determined by Their Departrmmt
=216 5/85
.
c
,.....
'-
o
...,0",
,
.......-
March 3, 1986
Mr. Frank Schuma
Planning Department
300 N. "0" street
San Bernardino, Ca.924l8
Dear Mr. Schuma;
The granting of a negati ve declaration to the Cable Lake-Campeau Corp.
project TT# 13172 - puD# 85-63 should be rescinded and the requirement
for an EIR should again be reviewed by the Planning Dept., and I re-
spectfully submit ~ reasons for believing an EIR is still necessary.
1. The engineering department states they will do a traffic study
and without an EIR the public is prevented from voicing their concerns,
reviewing the study, and if necessary, asking for mitigating measures
to be implemented before the approval of project.
2. Fire protection mi!ttt be inadequate given the distance from the
nearest station at College and Kendall and Frontage road being the
only road available to project site. Is the city financially able
and willing to build another station to service the fast developing
Verdemont area? What would be the mitigating measure for fire
protection? "
3. Applicant was granted approval of previous project TT# 12756,
Which abuts this projectand I wonder Why applicant is not handling
both as a single project. Will ther be two separate inside walls?
No one connecting street to both projects? Will there be open Space
in one - not the other? Are any amenities being provided? Swimming
pool or spa? Pl~gr'oun!i area? Extra storage area for these smaller
than average units?
4. Project site is in a flood plain and at one time was zoned open
space for a logical reason, but by approving zone changes and allowing
homesites you will be attracting people to the area and thereby
placing their lives and property in jeopardy. If there is a way to
mitigate this hazard the IIR will expose the methods for all to
rewiew. Merely s~in9 standard engineering practices fails to
-
c
," -,
'-' -..I
page 2 - Cable Lake..{:Blllpeau Corp. TT#13172 - PUD# 85-63
r)
"'~~
en1ighte~ of us as to the adequacy of flood control and eliminates
the pUb1(g<from reviewing these standards.
5. CElJA requires an agency to determine that a project may have a
significant effect on the environment if it will cause sUbstantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirect1~.
Significant is governed by the determination of whether PECPL'
care about the effect and regard it as an adverse change.
The attached sheets are reproduced from C&JA,-Appendix G. Please review
this checldist and ask yourselves if these questions have been addressed
to the satisfaction of C&JA" either by Planning staff or applicant.
,;
CEl)A is a law of this state and one of the few the general pUblic has
at its disposal to use for effective mitigation without the necessity
of private individuals going into the process of litigation to
illlp1ement this docUlllent for the benefit of everyone.
I appreciate your re-consideration and the opportunity to comment.
J"lZ' r~~~L
(Mrs.) Helen KopCzyns]i
8150 Cable Cyn. Rd.
San Bernardino, Ca.92407
714-887-1833
c
r--
V
:)
\
,J
APPENDIX G
'"1
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
,v)
A project will normally have a significant effect on the environment if it will:
(\v)
(a) Conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community where" ;
located; [xl
(b) Have a substantial, demonstrable negative aesthetic effectj
(. (e) Substantially affect a rare or endangered species of animal or ?lant l'~ the hac;:a,y)
of the species;
(d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fisc_ ~':)
wildlife species;
(e) Breach published national, state, or local standards relating to s"lid waste or line
control;
(f) Substantially degrade water quality;
(g) Contaminate a public water supply;
(h) Substantially degrade or deplete ground water resources;
(j) Interfere ~ubstantially with ground water recharge;
(j) Disrupt or adversely affect a prehistoric or historic archaeological site or a prc~Nt'
of historic or cultural significance to a community or ethnic 0r social group; -"r i
paleontological site except as a part of a scientific studyj
(k) Induce substantial growth or concentration of populationj-
(t) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the eX;5ting tralb
load and capacity of the street system;
(m) Displace a large number of people;
(n) Encourage activities which result in the use of large amounts of fuel, water, 0
energy;
(0) Use fuel, water, or energy in a wasteful manner;
(p) Increase substantially the ambient noise leveI"s for adjoining areaSj
(q) Cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation;
(r) Expose people or structures to major geologic hazards;
(s) Extend a sewer trunk line with capacity to serve new development;
(t) Substantially diminish habitat for fish, wildlife or plants;
304
c
;
,
,
.
~)
~)
~
.!
,.
I: .~)
here i: i
\)
,. 1)-' l.,' -
, -"." )
1
.
.
y fish d
t
, or Iittef
j
I
,
I
i
propeni
oup; or I
!
19 tra~f~~
I
-vater, i
I
~
.
I
-
c
:)
\
,...J
Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community;
Crea te a potential public health hazard or involve the use, production or disposal
of materials which pose a hazard to people or animal or plant populations in the
area affected;
Conflict with established recreational, educational, religious or scientific uses of
the area;
Violate any ambient air quality standard, contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation, or expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations.
Convert prime agricultural land to non-agricultural use or impair the agricultural
productivity of prime agricultural land.
Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans.
r
1
"
:t
1
I
305
rei
"- -~
-
~ EN"INE~RIN"
~.,. ......
,)
'0./
CIVIL & FNVIf10f,JMLNfAl. FW~,r"JF:EnIUG
ASSOCIATES
LAND PLANNING AND $IIRVEYINfl
March 27, 1986
Ii) r.:' "', ;:, " i:;; iR tn\
Ub i . 'l., "t.! ts \!J
APR 2 1986
W.O. No. 08-85-26
cm PLr\ii;:..Ji llfr:~;:';MENT
SAN BERNAROlltO. CA
City of San Bernardino
Planning Department
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Attn: Mr. Frank Schuma, Planning Director
Re: Cable Lakes, Tentative Tract 13172 and C.U.P. No. 85-72
Dear Mr. Schuma:
We are forwarding for your file, at my client's request, our findings
which responds to the "Appendix G, Significant Effects" list A through
Z from CEQA, that was provided in Mrs. Helen Kopczynski's letter of
March 3, 1986. We make these responses only because of her questions
to you in her letter.
As you know, per the Planning Commission hearing of March 18, 1986, m~
client is having the traffic analysis expanded to include the issues
addressed in the letter to you, dated March 18, 1986, from Ms. Cynthia
Grace, Deputy City Attorney.
If you have any questions in this regard, please call me at (714)
884-8804.
Very truly yours,
ASSOCIATES
. ----...,.
Stephen L. Pleasant
SLP:bb
cc: Campeau Corporation
c/o Mr. Rege Ratan
225 E. Airport Dr. . P.O. Box 6087, San Barnardlno, California 92412 . Phona (714) 884-8804 or (714) 825-9582
550 West Vista Way. Melrose Center. Vista, California 92nB~ . Phone (714) 758-3680
.
t":
-
v
-'"',",
v
,
"J
RESPONSES TO FINDINGS
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13172
(a) CONFLICT WITH ADOPTED ENVIRONMENTAL PlANS AND GOALS OF THE COMMUNITY
WHERE IT IS LOCATED
Project is consistent with the Verdemont Area Plan and Master EIR.
(b) HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL, DEMONSTRABLE NEGATIVE AESTHETIC EFFECT
The project is proposed with provisions for recreation, open space,
landscaped berms and orderly development pattern, consistent with
PRO Standards and the Verdemont Area PI an and therefore does not
have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect.
~...
(c) SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECT A RARE OR ENDANGERED SPECIES OF ANIMAL OR PLANT OR
THE HABITAT OF THE SPECIES
No significant effect based on site specific review and the overall
Verdemont EI R.
(d) INTERFERE SUBSTANTIALLY WITH THE MOVEMENT OF ANY RESI DENT OR MIGRATORY
FISH OR WILDLIFE SPECIES
No adverse impacts.
(e) BREACH PUBLISHED NATIONAL, STATE OR LOCAL STANDARDS RELATING TO SOLID
WASTE OR LITTER CONTROL
Meets local requirements for residential development.
(f) SUBSTANTIALLY DEGRADE WATER QUALITY
The project will be connected to offsite public water and sewer
systems consistent with City, County and State requirements.
(g) CONTAMINATE A PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
See (f).
(h) SUBSTANTIALLY DEGRADE OR DEPLETE GROUND WATER RESOURCES
See (f).
(i) INTERFERE SUBSTANTIALLY WITH GROUND WATER RECHARGE
Site is not located in a recognized groundwater recharge area.
(j) DISRUPT OR ADVERSELY AFFECT A PREHISTORIC OR HISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGI CAL
SITE OR A PROPERTY OF HISTORIC OR CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE TO A COMMUNITY
OR ETHNIC OR SOCIAL GROUP; OR A PALEONTOLOGICAL SITE EXCEPT AS A PART
OF A SCIENTIFIC STUDY
Not identified on the site.
(k) INDUCE SUBSTANTIAL GROWTH OR CONCENTRATION OF POPULATION
Growth is consistent with and as projected by the Verdemont General
Plan and as previously approved for projects for the same number of
dwelling units on the site.
(l) CAUSE AN INCREASE IN TRAFFIC WHICH IS SUBSTANTIAL IN RELATION TO THE
EXISTING TRAFFIC lOAD AND CAPACITY OF. THE STREET SYSTEM
(1) Consistent with land use and population projections as planned
.
c
--
~
r"',
:J
~
by the Verdemont General Plan.
(2) Adequate traffic studies and updates have been made.
(3) Project will be phased based on market conditions over a
period of up to six to seven years.
(4) Assessment District is being formed to implement the area cir-
culation system for which this project sponsor is contributing
fair share.
(5) Traffic impacts are analyzed in conjunction with the City
staff identifying the short and long term mitigation measures
including signing, widening, guard rails and realignment to
the satisfaction of the Department.
(m) DISPLACE A LARGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE
Site is now vacant, no population displacement will occur.
(n) ENCOURAGE ACTIVITIES WHICH RESULT IN THE USE OF LARGE AMOUNTS OF FUEL,
WATER, OR ENERGY
Energy consumption for this residential project is planned for the
area.
(0) USE FUEL, WATER, OR ENERGY IN A WASTEFUL MANNER
Project location is adjacent to freeway which provides quick access
to employment areas in the general area.
(p) INCREASE SUBSTANTIALlY THE AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS FOR ADJOINING AREAS
No abutting residential development in the area. Noise impacts
will be mit i gated from freeway and Frontage Road, by a berm and
wall.
(q) CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL FLOODING, EROSION OR SILTATION
Project sponsor has worked many years with the County Flood Control
District to meet their requirements for flood hazard mitigation
measures, including construction of a new levee and upgrading of an
existing abutting levee, etc.
(r) EXPOSE PEOPLE OR STRUCTURES TO MAJOR GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
The site is not within or crossed by any known faults as identified
by the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Act. Local requirements will
be met for the site through the review of the grading plan.
(s) EXTEND A SEWER TRUNK LINE WITH CAPACITY TO SERVE NEW DEVELOPMENT
Project will extend the sewer trunk line. Sewage treatment capac-
ity rights have been obtained for the site.
(t) SUBSTANTIALLY DIMINISH HABITAT FOR FISH, WILDLIFE OR PLANTS
No adverse impacts.
(u) DISRUPT OR DIVIDE THE PHYSICAL ARRANGEMENT OF AN ESTABLISHED COMMUNITY
The project site is situated between the 1-15 Freeway to the south-
west and Cable Creek to the northeast. Residential densities are
consistent with the Verdemont Area General Plan.
(v) CREATE A POTENTIAL PUBLIC HEALTH HAZARD OR INVOLVE THE USE, PRODUCTION
OR DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS WHICH POSE A HAZARD TO PEOPLE TO ANIMAL OR
~..
c
c
~.,
"'-"'\
......;
-...,I
PLANT POPUlATIONS IN THE AREA AFFECTED
No hazardous waste materials will be generated by this residential
project.
(w) CONFLICT WITH ESTABLISHED RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL, RELIGIOUS OR
SCIENTIFIC USES OF THE AREA
On-site recreational parks are provided by the project and fees
paid to the school district to offset any impacts.
(x) VIOLATE ANY AMBIENT AIR QUAL ITY STANDARD, CONTRI BUTE SUBSTANTIALLY TO
AN EXISTING OR PROJECTED AIR QUALITY VIOLATION, OR EXPOSE SENSITIVE
RECEPTORS TO SUBSTANTIAL POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS
Project will not contribute significant air quality impacts.
Intensity is as previously approved for the site.
(y) CONVERT PRIME AGRICULTURAL LAND TO NON-AGRICULTURAL USE OR IMPAIR THE
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY OF PRIME AGRICUlTURAL LAND
The site has never been used for agricultural uses and is not con-
sidered as prime agricultural land.
(z) INTERFERE WITH EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS OR EMERGENCY EVACUATION PLANS
Freeway is adjacent to the project site and together with the on-
site circulation system and Frontage Road extension, will not
interfere with emergency response plans.
"
-
ftTY OF SAN BERRARDINO a. MEMORANDU~
DAVE ANDERSON, Principal Planner
To Planning Department
Subject Cable lake Traffic Study, Tract 13172
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE, Dir.
From publ ic Works/Ci ty Engi ne
Dne April 21, 1986
File No. 13.90
Approved
Date
We have completed the review of the Cable lake Traffic Study.
The Engineering Division, per discussion with Assistant City
Engineer Gene Klatt, take the following position:
1. Accept the study as presented.
2. Further study the long-range Frontage Road alignment by
the City, and coordinate with Park and Recreation
Department with regard to a future alignment extension
east of little league Drive.
3. Technically prefer the general corridor of Alternative D
and E as discussed in the report.
4. Discard the recommended alignment of "Tee" intersecting
Little league Drive, primarily due to lack of roadway
system continuity.
5. Condition the developer to develop a short-range
detailed traffic management plan including, bl4.t not
limited to, signing, marking and installation of
flashing beacons on Frontage Road west of little league.
6. Recommend the Planing Department to incorporate the
study of Frontage Road alignment in the Verdemont Study.
HARDGRAVE
f Public Works/City Engineer
PHl:pa
00 lE@~llWrn lID
APR 221986
CHY ('LANNING DEPARTMENT
SAN BERNARDINO, CA
1,('/
elf I' Oil fH..::M1>>V.
'_.."..
,,".,..'
IVII:.IVIVnf\I""UUIVI
)
~"",I I I vr ~"'n UL.nJ~"'nulI"V ~~,
(.-
-
To
FRANK A. SCHUMA
Planning' Director
Tentative Ma~ 13172/85-72
From CYNTHIA GRACE
Deputy City Attorney
Date March 4, 1986
Subject
700.30, I~O.lf
Approved
Date
The Planning Department has prepared a suggested finding that
"the proposed tentative map is in conformance with the State
Subdivision Map Act and the City Subdivision Ordinance." ~
The proposed subdivision must comply with Section 18.40.160
(copy attached) which requires that every subdivision have at
least two routes for ingress and egress and that each route
shall be dedicated to the public and have a paved width of
twenty-four feet.
At its February 17, 1986 meeting, the Common Council directed
the City Attorney's Office to prepare an amendment to Section
18.40.160 which would give the Fire Chief discretion to waive
the development standards for secondary access, with a
procedure for appeal to the Common Council (secondary access
for traffic circulation would still be mandatory). This
amendment should be available for the Council meeting of March
17, 1986, and will require environmental review.
Until such an amendment is adopted and until such a waiver has
been granted, subject to appropriate findings, the suggested
finding that nTract 13172 complies with the City Subdivision
Ordinance" is premature.
tL~ ~/P"~
CYNTHIA GRACE
Deputy City Attorney
--
RHP:dp
cc Mayor
Planning Commission
City Administrator
Fire Chief
Cable Lake Association
C'TY Oil TH.::;M;oV.
-
-
,
a;ry OF SAN BERtORDINO -0 MEMORANDUM.:)
To FRANK A. SCHUM
Planning Director
Subject Tract No. 13172, Item No.2, Planning
Commission Agenda of March 18, 1986
From CYNTHIA GRACE
Deputy City Attorney
DMe March 18, 1986
Approved
Date
700.30
The following conditions are suggested to provide the
assurance that Chief Newcombe thinks is necessary in order to
make the finding that Frontage Road will meet the secondary
access requirements. The following conditions are also
necessary to support the findings of ~e Environmental Review
Commi ttee.
1. An easement for s~reet purposes shall be obtained from
adjacent property owners along the northern extension of
Frontage Road, for emergency access prior to recordation of
any phase of the Final Map. Developer shall maintain said
easement in a manner acceptable to the Fire Chief.
2. Prior to recordation of any phase of the final map, the
developer shall provide additional improvement bonds to assure
that the street utilized as the connectors to the secondary
means of access in Tract 12756 shall be fully improved in the
event Tract 13172 is developed prior to Tract 12756.
3. Prior to recordation of any phase of the final map, the
traffic analysis shall be prepared by the subdivider to
address the following items:
a. Total trip generation and distribution due to the
proposed development.
b. Projected traffic volumes both existing and at build-
out along Frontage Road, Little League Drive and Palm Avenue
and propose mitigations, if appropriate.
c. Traffic safety at the loops in the Frontage Road, at
both Little League Drive and Palm Avenue with mitigations:
Frontage Road requires 35 mph design speed and minimum 250
feet radius.
d. Traffic area circulation plan both existing and
proposed.
e. Prior to recordation of any phase of the final map,
the developer will enter into an agreement to comply with
mitigating measures developed as a result of the traffic
study.
c,ry ON rHI-=-~~.
-- -.
c
c
F'....,
.:)
-...I
Frank A. Schuma
March 18, 1986
Page 2
4. The developer shall, within thirty days of approval by the
Planning Commission or the Mayor and Common Council, deposit
with the City the sum of $20,000 for the purpose of
engineering design for Frontage Road or other off site
improvements. The developer shall also deposit with the City
the sum of $50,000 prior to recordation of the first phase of
the final tract map for the purpose of Little League Road
improvements.
~~~--
CYNTHIA GRACE
Deputy City Attorney
CG:dp
cc Planning Commission Chairman
Planning Commission Members
City Engineer
Fire Chief
Mike Grubbs
Ed Gundy
Peter Liu
,
~''''~'''''.''-
,.~~. -~ ~:t:*"~ti:fT'>'" . . ;....J'.
.....i'..........
\G'" .._'~
~~~~. '1t~.~ !~:/~~
?-t,.:;;:.*-....,":'Io",.
. . ,,',-"
~ .'..........~.tt;~......
"
.__.-.y,~,.........._~......... -~"" .._.......~..,.. ...~r..:..
",.
'..J
i~ .
i.-(,-"" :}
...... : ;& j ~j
;, .
,: .... .' . .~
-
:i
'.::l
SUBDIVISIONS
('
rounding of the property lines or a corner cutoff as established
, by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. (Ord. 3847
fi 10.50 (h), 7-9-79.)
1
j
18.40.150 Alleys.
All the alleys shall be not less than twenty feet in width.
Intersecting alleys shall have a corner cutoff or radius of not
less than twenty feet. (Ord. 3847 fi 10.50 (i), 7-9-79.)
.,
. :.
. -.
18.40.160 Provision for ingress and egress.
A tentative map, final map, tentative parcel map, or parcel
map shall provide for at least two different routes for ingress
and egress. Such routes shall be dedicated to the public, shall
have a minimum paved width of 24 feet, and shall conform to
all standards contained in this section. The purpose of these
routes is to permit accessibility of fire fighting and other
public equipment and to permit orderly emergency evacuation.
Upon a specific finding that the public health, safety, and
welfare do not require such access, under the circumstances of
that particular application, the Commission or the Mayor and
Common Council may approve any such map with only one
route in either of the following circumstances:
A. The property is outside the high fire hazard area; or
D. An existing street provides only one route for ingress and
egress, not more than 2000 feet of street extension is
required, and the parcel map creates not more than two
residential lots, one of which the applicant represents will
be occupied as his or' her primary place of residence.
(Ord. MC-167, 6-7-82; Ord. MC-40, 4-6-81;Ord. 3847 ~ 10.50
(j),7-9-79.)
j
';
\
..'1
.
~.
f
'J.
.'
"
,;
,
.
"'.~
..'1;
'!- ~
".~
...
.'
18.40.170 Width ofstreets.
The width of all streets dedicated in conformity with
this title shall be determined by the standards set forth in
this chapter. The basis for all street, highway and road
design shall be the lane. The wid th of land shall be related
::;..
l~:,
fJ
.
~
.c-: l
",,',!!
'~~il
.q~
~...~
(San Bernardino 5.83)
1016
, ~~
;1;/~;~lt~\t:i:~71" /;~';.'~~';:.:' '; .;,:'::~. /~".i':
~~\1f.n;;;'''~'\.' ..,..- :J'il ~ ,~,,'l~':. ~....' ~l., ",:.:<:"
" ,~.A....{.:...'li.. 'Jl.~ ';';'-.l.r."" ..tl~;-~r ,.'~'~'~' ;, tl..' ,.
_.' ~.P!\f,,' , 'f1':;~~;:;,1;~~"'~I' ~';.i~'\'I; . '.'i"~:
't'~~~~~'~ J.;.. 1...l.l:~'tI"I~~.f':t,~..tiJ: .~;-i';:6:tJ. ~"'.
1.;:r-,~,,'1 "C' "ji' ....,.'i,.'~ " ,"V;"'.' : :..'~' . ,:"-'"
r;';. f~4t" (;~~.~..'t~ ;~cAj;:~t/~:i:f~1).\i':"'\~ ;'~ . ~:1 :
.' ' . :,l!.~ :,r"",\, ,., .: ;J.>;~~;,."~,,,:~,t.If"ii'!,t4.".'''-:''~ ....'...:-~~~
.~.......'._..~~...Ai.,....___"",..._....~,~__"-'<d2~~"'.~.,...
c
o
I
,
. ,.
~ ,,:: ',': ),I,:I,: ii'!i
~ z ~,! j:~i ~ lli!l:il!lli~;1 I,
~ '$' .:il! i:!ti;,' ....u.c, ll~q
~e, """:1 ~ ! ! ! I' i'l
>iJ< I ';"nll'I'., !. "......
:> ;? v,.. I .. .
I!!!!I '" fIi > ~.'. ' . .~..,
~u 1~!.
~
"z
~:oc~
~~
~o
"";
~d
8
\
\
,.~
"
\
r-\
"
',i
/ t. J
" I
~.~
I
"
'. ~.
" .
,
0 ~I
1
,j
!I
,"
. III
~I
i
!u
r~
I,
'~
~
"\
-
c
'""'
"-'
~.
;~c., .
h:'
"'. - - -;
~......
.-~.: e
..
>
~
..
~
/J'-:. i
rl'. ( r;
";1<'". ,..
~-i. ~
--r- ._- -
~
-'lit
I 3~
i> U ~
II
j
! ~ ~
i oD
. -<
~ U
-+- I
I .IJ-..... t
"""
......,
...t.....'>
-
,"to.
....
I
\.Q ""' ....)
to
r--~
~:)
.CI
<=>
z:
l-
U
~
I-
IU
>
~
~
J"
'-'
.-
<(
:a
"
c
S
~
i>
~
i
+--
J...---
...-...
,.~
"'"
11
!L
.j',
I,
I .t~
~'.' -'
~
~
~
.
~
.-+
I
j
-
......"
'-'
1- ~'
\.0 ~-; ~.~)
tn -
,...... -
~ro
- a.
.;>
o .
r:V
I-
~
IU
>
~
r
r:
ILl
f-
.".- -..'.~
I
.""......
<
I
~
.
I I
-~
2
~IL
t .9If
.1 a~ .
>J- ~
-<
u ~
t' i 0 .. ~
I d.. J~ ~
I ,
---t ~. .....
.,V-.....
-
~
~
"
Ii
-k-
'-"
il
II
>:
!
'''I
'-'"
.....,,,j
Il.J
>
t;c
t--
z:
f-
...,.- .~y
- -
c
,->.-~.~., t
v.: :.
~. "
:-""-' -,,'
.. _--.:..-;r-'"I>
, . / L,
,......
\"".I
'...
"
~~
,'l)
,
-'
~
'-"
m
Q..
.,
.,;
'LW
I-
<
,
~
Ul
II)
"
C
~
~
d
"1 .~.~ .... , .. ' ,
i "
. ~
A-
I D
--.f--'- 'I
r"
I I
;- t I ..
I I I >>
~ I :1 ; :1
~ L__...l ~.
II J
, I III
i 9 ....
I &: 10
l' I <
L u.* 0
>--. .iJ-,gr ~
~- ---
c
I'""
~
.::)
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATION
CASE T.T. 1113172 [, C.U.P'1185~72
HEARING DATE 05/06/86
R-I- 20,000
R -1- 21/2 ACRES
~
AGENDA
ITEM #
13
10..
'~
R-I-2V..C.
R-I-IACRf
"Oil