Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19-City Attorney ~ITY OF SAN BEOIARDINO I:).... MEMORANDUU To MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL From RALPH H. PRINCE City Attorney Subject Proposed Rialto Tire Burning Power Plant Date July 7,1986 Approved Date 700. 1 As you know, on June 30, 1986, the South Coast Air Quality Management District declined to issue operating permits for the proposed tire burning power plant in South Rialto based upon a study indicating particular emissions from the incinerators could lead to a health risk for residents in the area. Garb Oil and Power Corporation can appeal the decision to the District Hearing Board within ten days from June 30, 1986. Susan Durbin, Deputy Attorney General, contends that pursuant to Section 21166 of the California Environmental Quality Act, a lead agency or responsible agency has the authority to require a supplemental or subsequent EIR, even after an EIR or negative declaration has been issued. If new information of substantial importance is discovered which was not known and "could not have been known" at the time the original EIR or negative declaration was issued. A "test burn" was recently conducted at a site in Oregon and demonstrated that carcinogens would be emitted which would pose a substantial health threat to people residing in the Inland Empire. Such a subsequent EIR is not mandated by CEQA but is discretionary with the lead agency or responsible agency. Since the law was amended in January 1986, the "off-set" requirements of the emissions of dangerous particulates applies to all emissions. Public Resources Code Section 21167Cb) proscribes a statute of limitation of 30 days to challenge an improper environmental assessment. The City of Rialto issued its negative declaration concerning the proposed tire burning plant on January 8, 1985, pursuant to Section 21108 of the Public Resources Code. Therefore, the statute of limitations to challenge the negative declaration has expired. " RHP:ca cc: Mayor Director of Planning Clry Oil rHI=-~" /J,.,,~ J IiM. vrr-I/q