HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-Planning & Building Services CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
m: Michael E. Hays, Director Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 97-07, Development
Code Amendment No. 97-05 and Conditional Use
Permit No. 97-21; to change the land use
designation from IH, Industrial Heavy, to OIP,
Dept: Planning & Building Services Office Industrial Park, and establish a Children's
Services Center at 1499 South Tippecanoe Avenue.
Date: March 12, 1998 MCC Date: April 6, 1998
r
Synopsis of Previous Council Action: A '�
VAR
N/A
Recommended Motion:
That the Mayor and Common Council close the public,hearing and adopt the Negative Declaration,
adopt the resolution which approves General Plan Amendment No. 97-07, waive the first reading and
lay over the ordinance for final adoption, and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21, based on
the Findings of Fact and subject to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements.
Michael E. 'Ays
Contact person: Michael E Hays Phone: 384-5357
Supporting data attached: Staff Report Resolution, Ordinance Ward(s): 1
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A
Source: (Acct No ) N/A
(Acct Description)
Finance:
Council Notes: y
Agenda Item Nc ����
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 97-07, Development Code Amendment No. 97-05,
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Mayor and Common Council Meeting of April 6, 1998
Owner: Arthur & Phora Gerdes Applicant: Children's Fund
4431 Palm Avenue Bonnie O'Conner
Yorba Linda, CA 92886 Executive Director
714.779.9076 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92415
909.387.4059
REQUEST AND LOCATION: A request to amend the General Plan land use plan from IH,
Industrial Heavy, to OIP, Office Industrial Park; to amend the Development Code to include a
definition of"Children's Services Centers" as a conditionally permitted use within the OIP land
use district; and to establish a Children's Services Center on a 1.59 acre site located at the
southeast corner of Tippecanoe and Victoria Avenue, at 1499 S. Tippecanoe Avenue.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Children's Fund, a non-profit organization that serves San
Bernardino County, proposes to establish a Children's Services Center in the City of San
Bernardino. The center will assist children ages infant to 17 years who have been abused and/or
molested. Children's Fund works in partnership with Loma Linda University Medical Center
through use of its medical facilities and staff.
The center has two main components: an Assessment Center and an Evaluation Center. The
Assessment Center will be established first in the existing 5000 square foot office building for
the administration of medical and forensic examinations for the children. This component is
generally a weekday operation from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., although the facility will provide
services, as needed, on a 24-hour basis.
The Evaluation Center will provide sleeping facilities on a temporary basis until the children can
be placed in a long-term facility. The Center will include a kitchen and dining area for the
children, and a small outdoor play area. This component will be completed in Phase II through
demolition of the existing warehouse and construction of a new 7000 square foot building. The
children will be housed at other existing facilities until this Center is constructed.
Refer to the Planning Commission staff report (Exhibit 3) for further discussion.
KEY POINTS
• The proposed site is separated from surrounding industrial uses by Tippecanoe Avenue
and Victoria Avenue, and from adjacent residential uses by the railroad tracks. No
impacts to the surrounding uses are anticipated as a result of the change to the land use
designation or the establishment of this facility.
GPA No. 97-07, DCA No. 97-05 &
CUP No. 97-21
MCC 4/06/98
Page 2
• No impacts to the Children's Services Center by the surrounding industrial uses are
anticipated because although the adjacent IH district allows outside uses and activities,
the uses must be screened from view, and all potential impacts (noise, use of hazardous
materials, etc.) mitigated.
• The proposed use provides a service not found elsewhere in the City, consistent with
General Plan Policy 1.1.7 which addresses "... the provision of governmental
administrative, health, ... and other similar services ..."
• The use will be established in an office park setting, consistent with the Development
Code requirements for OIP.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: An Initial Study was prepared by LSA and
Associates and independently reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on January 8,
1998. No comments were received during the public review period which extended from January
15, 1998 to February 4, 1998. The ERC cleared the Initial Study to Planning Commission on
February 5, 1998, with a recommendation to adopt a Negative Declaration.
FINANCIAL IMPACT/COSTS TO CITY: The applicant paid all application processing fees.
There are no costs to the City.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: At their meeting of March 3, 1998, the
Planning Commission considered the request and recommended approval to the Mayor and
Common Council. Commissioners Hamilton, Lockett, Reilly, Schuiling, Suarez, and Thrasher
voted in favor of the motion; Commissioner Gonzalez was opposed; Commissioners Enciso and
Quiel were absent.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council:
1. Adopt the Negative Declaration;
2. Approve General Plan Amendment No. 97-07;
3. Approve Development Code No. 97-05; and,
4. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 based on the Findings of Fact and subject
to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements.
EXHIBITS: 1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Planning Commission Staff Report
4. Resolution
5. Ordinance
EXHIBIT "I"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING GPA-97-07 AGENDA
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT DCA-97-05 ITEM#
CASE CUP-97-21
LOCATION -
HEARING DATE 03/03/98
r
RO �
1
RnRRVI��
� I
i
/ -A J AMR LIH .
at �IlteeA I � � D,p � ` •�—T
C t Ri 1r • _
VICTORIA 1
VICTORIA
•
� MAR OT 'Rt
� sRIE�
S�
1 EII
I
.LIT.
NARRI.AR
MOfMTAU LAME -
• - N
10 FRW
. w E
sb
S
n
PW4.&ii PAGE 1 OF I
1 :
�r.
.,
il�� 307 x `� V �����►°'�-� � �`/
J.. I
EMIR
Ilia
I
e.
•► �E
� ��1a. b."•r.� `•,&�.�` •sb" Abe
•SLR � ..g 'e;,,�"C�.
a all
1 pp
R
EXHIBIT "Y'
SUND4ARY CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION
CASE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07,
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 97-05,
& CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-21
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: March 3, 1998
WARD: 1
APPLICANT OWNER
Children's Fund Arthur and Phom Gerdes
c/o Lloyd Zola 4431 Palm Avenue
385 North Arrowhead Avenue, 2nd floor Yorba Linda, CA 92886
San Bernardino, CA 92415
REQUEST/LOCATION
A request to amend the General Plan designation of an industrial parcel from IH, Industrial Heavy, to
OIP, Office Industrial Park, amend the Development Code to include a definition of "Children's
Services Centers" and allow them as permitted uses subject to a Conditional Use Permit within the OIP
land use district, convert an existing office building into a Children's Assessment Center, and construct
a new 5,000 square-foot building to serve as the Children's Evaluation Facility as Phase II of the
proposal. The site is located at 1499 South Tippecanoe Avenue in the IH, Industrial Heavy, land use
district.
CONSTRAINTS/OVERLAYS
Area of Potential Ground Subsidence and Moderately High to Moderate Liquefaction
EN IRONMENTAL FINDINGS
❑ Not Applicable
❑ Exempt
■ No Significant Effects, Proposed Negative Declaration
❑ Potential Effects
STAFF RECONEWENDATION
■ APPROVAL ■ CONDITIONS
❑ DENIAL
❑ CONTINUANCE TO:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07
Development Code Amendment No. 97-05
& Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98
Page 1 of 8
REQUEST AND LOCATION
The applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan designation of an industrial parcel from
IH, Industrial Heavy, to OIP, Office Industrial Park, amend the Development Code to include
a definition of "Children's Services Centers" and allow them as permitted uses subject to a
Conditional Use Permit within the OIP land use district, convert an existing office building into
a Children's Assessment Center, and construct a new 5,000 square-foot building to serve as the
Children's Evaluation Facility as Phase II of the proposal.
The site is located at 1499 South Tippecanoe Avenue in the IH, Industrial Heavy, land use
district (Refer to Attachment A, General Plan Land Use Designation and Location Map).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A non-profit organization, Children's Fund, proposes to occupy a vacant office building and
build a new 5,000 square-foot, 30-bed facility to establish a Children's Services Center at the
property referenced above. The facility is intended to aid children suspected of having been
sexually abused/molested and/or physically abused (ages infant to 17 years). The existing office
building will be remodeled to operate as the Assessment Center to provide professional medical
and forensic examinations for the children. The new building will operate as the Evaluation
Center with temporary sleeping facilities in order to be able to evaluate a child's needs and find
an appropriate long-term facility.
The Assessment Center is proposed as a weekday operation from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. while
the Evaluation Center is proposed as a daily 24-hour operation. The Evaluation Center is being
proposed as a second phase after the Assessment Center is in operation. The existing warehouse
will be demolished and replaced with a new 5,000 square-foot building. A Development Permit
Type II application will be submitted to the City for the new building as a separate project at
a later date (Refer to Attachment B, Site Plan).
SETTING/SITE CHARACTERISTICS
The subject site is located at a T-intersection fronted by industrial development. The parcel on
the northeast comer of this intersection is designated as OIP, Office Industrial Park while the
remainder of the properties fronting this intersection are located within the IH, Industrial Heavy,
land use district. The land north of the site and across Victoria Avenue is presently occupied
by the Support Services Center of the Loma Linda University Medical Center. The property
adjacent to the site on the east is used as a building contractor's storage yard. The properties
directly west and across Tippecanoe Avenue are occupied by two wholesale roofing suppliers.
The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad tracks are located directly south of the site. Further
south is a flood control channel, which runs parallel to the railroad tracks, and single-family and
multi-family residential units within the RMH, Residential Medium High, land use district. Also
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07
Development Code Amendment No. 97-05
& Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98
Page 2 of 8
within the RMH district to the south is an auto repair shop which is considered a legal
nonconforming use (Refer to Attachment C, General Plan Amendment Proposal).
The site is a triangular-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 1.59 acres. It is
presently developed with a 5,201 square-foot single-story office building, a 5,000 square-foot
metal industrial warehouse, and a parking lot. The land is relatively flat and screened from the
railroad tracks to the south by an eight-foot high hedge and chainkink fence.
BACKGROUND
The buildings on the site were constructed in 1978 as an office and warehouse. City records
indicate that the warehouse was last occupied in 1996 and the office building was vacated within
the last year.
Children's Fund is a non-profit organization that provides aid to all children within San
Bernardino County with various impairments (e.g. - abuse, neglect, poverty, etc.). Children's
Fund has been serving San Bernardino County since 1986 and presently has administrative
offices in the County of San Bernardino Administrative Building at 385 North Arrowhead
Avenue. The organization has been searching for a permanent home to establish a Children's
Services Center. Presently, a similar use is being operated in the City of Loma Linda within
donated lease space. Children's Fund intends to purchase the property upon project approval.
Development Review Committee
The project was reviewed by the Development Review Committee on November 20, 1997,
January 8, 1998, and February 5, 1998. The DRC cleared the project to Planning Commission
on February 5, 1998 with Standard Requirements. No comments were received from other
agencies.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
An Initial Study was prepared by LSA and Associates and independently reviewed by the
Environmental Review Committee on January 8, 1998. The study was noticed for public review
from January 15, 1998 to February 4, 1998. No comments were received. The ERC cleared
the Initial Study to Planning Commission on February 5, 1998 with a recommendation to adopt
a Negative Declaration.
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07
Development Code Amendment No. 97-05
& Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98
Page 3 of 8
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ANALYSIS & FINDINGS OF FACT
Existing Land Use Designation
The IH, Industrial Heavy, land use district is intended for the continuation and development of
heavy manufacturing industries in locations where they will be compatible with and not adversely
impact adjacent land uses [Development Code §19.08.010(2)(B)].
Proposed Land Use Designation
The OIP, Office Industrial Park, land use district,is intended to establish the Waterman Avenue
corridor and other appropriate areas as distinctive office industrial parks and corporate centers
serving City and regional needs with supporting retail/commercial services [Development Code
§19.06.010(2)0].
Findings of Fact
1. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan.
The proposal does not change the industrial characteristics of the site. By re-designating
the site to OIP, the uses that can be permitted on this site are limited to certain light
industrial uses within a fully enclosed structure. In addition, it is the objective of the
City to establish the Waterman Avenue corridor and other appropriate areas as distinctive
office industrial parks and corporate centers serving the San Bernardino community and
region pursuant to General Plan Objective 1.31.
2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare of the City.
The proposed amendment does not allow a use that changes the density or intensity of
the surrounding land uses. Children's Services Centers are administrative type uses
which benefit the community directly by providing aid to disadvantaged children. As
such, the proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health,
safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
3. The proposed amendment would maintain an appropriate balance of land uses in the City
The proposed amendment area will remain an "industrial" district. The OIP district is
intended for office industrial parks and corporate centers. No change to residential,
commercial, or any other type of designation is proposed. As such, the current balance
of land uses would not be affected.
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07
Development Code Amendment No. 97-05
& Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98
Page 4 of 8
4. The subject site is physically suitable for the requested OIP land use designation.
The property included in the proposed amendment meets the minimum requirements of
the development code in regards to lot size, access, and circulation. The change from
IH to OIP does not affect the physical characteristics of the site.
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT ANALYSIS & FINDINGS OF FACT
Presently, Children's Services Centers are not defined by the San Bernardino Development Code
and, therefore, not permitted anywhere in the City. Because OIP exists north of the site and the
operating characteristics of the proposed project are more compatible with the type of uses
permitted in the OIP district rather than the IH district, Staff believes a Children's Services
Center would better fit in the OIP district with Conditional Use Permit review and approval.
Proposed Text Addition
Addition to §19.02.050, DEFINITIONS (alphabetical order):
"Children's Services Center. A facility operated by a non-profit organization to
administer services to children suspected of having been neglected or abused. The
facility may include professional medical and forensic services, food, shelter, legal
assistance, personal guidance, and other similar services for children up to 17 years of
age; the facility may also include temporary sleeping quarters with a licensed foster care
professional to provide for children in transition from one foster home to another. "
Addition to §19.08.020 TABLE 08.01, INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS LIST OF PERMITTED
USES (alphabetical order):
LAND USE ACTIVITY CH OIP IL IH IE
"Children's Services Center; --- C --- ---
Findings of Fact
1. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan.
Refer to General Plan Amendment Finding #1.
2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare of the City.
Refer to General Plan Amendment Finding #2.
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07
Development Code Amendment No. 97-05
& Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98
Page 5 of 8
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS & FINDINGS OF FACT
The Conditional Use Permit is being required as part of the Development Code Amendment
which is proposed to allow "Children's Services Centers" as "conditionally permitted" uses
within the OIP land use district. In analyzing the Conditional Use Permit, the various
components and requirements of development within the OIP land use district have been
reviewed, including, but not limited to, parking, circulation, landscaping, and building design.
Findings of Fact
1. The proposed use is conditionally permitted within and would not impair the integrity and
character of the subject land use district and complies with all of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code.
The proposed use is conditionally permitted within the OIP land use district subject to
approval of the General Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment. The
Development Review Committee found the project to be in compliance with all of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code (Refer to Attachment D, Development
Code and General Plan Consistency Table).
2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan.
Refer to General Plan Amendment Finding #1.
3. The approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use is in compliance with
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 19.20.030(6)
of the Development Code.
As previously stated in the CEQA discussion, an Initial Study was prepared by LSA and
Associates and reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on January 8, 1998.
The study was noticed for public review from January 15, 1998 to February 4, 1998.
No comments were received. The ERC cleared the Initial Study to Planning Commission
on February 5, 1998 with a recommendation to adopt a Negative Declaration.
4. There will be no potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and
natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored.
An Initial Study was prepared by the applicant and reviewed by Staff and the
Environmental Review Committee on January 8, 1998. The project was found to have
no significant impacts upon the environment. Standard requirements were issued by the
Development Review Committee (Refer to Attachment F, Standard Requirements).
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07
Development Code Amendment No. 97-05
& Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98
Page 6 of 8
5. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are
compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the
proposed use is to be located and will not create significant noise, traffic or other
conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses
in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare
of the City.
Building & Design
Of the two existing buildings, the 5,201 square-foot office building will remain and be
remodeled for use as the Assessment Center while the 5,000 square-foot warehouse will
be demolished and replaced with a 7,072 square-foot building to be used as the
Evaluation Center. The total building lot coverage will be approximately 17.4%, well
below the 50% allowed in the OIP land use district. Both buildings will be required to
be architecturally compatible with one another (Refer to Attachment E, Conditions of
Approval). The project is proposed to be built in two phases. Construction of the new
building will be developed under Phase 11 of this proposal and will be submitted as a
Development Permit Type II application.
Hours of Operation & Staffing
The Assessment Center is proposed as a weekday operation to be open from 8:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m. However, it is anticipated that the Center may open after hours to deal
with emergency situations. The Evaluation Center, on the other hand, is proposed as a
24-hour operation.
Fifty-five children per month are anticipated to be served by the proposed facility. To
provide for these numbers, the Assessment Center will be staffed by six (6) employees
at any one time with up to fifteen (15) professionals present during
interviews/investigations. The Evaluation Center will be staffed by four (4) to six (6)
child care specialists at any one time and will have sleeping facilities for up to 30
children. Due to the nature of the proposed facility and characteristics of the
surrounding heavy industrial uses, no impacts on adjacent properties are anticipated.
Landscaping
A minimum landscaping of 15% of all surface parking/drive aisle areas is required to be
landscaped pursuant to Section 19.24.060(6) of the Development Code. The project
proposes well over 30% landscaping to provide a pleasant atmosphere for the children
and employees.
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07
Development Code Amendment No. 97-05
& Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98
Page 7 of 8
Parking
Pursuant to Section 19.24.040 of the Development Code, "Off-street Parking Standards",
the proposed use is required to have a minimum of thirty-three (33) parking spaces,
including two handicapped stalls. The parking was configured using "General Office"
parking standards at one space for each 250 square feet of the Assessment Center (20
spaces) and "Nursing home" parking standards at one space for each 6 beds (5 spaces),
plus one space for each employee at the Evaluation Center (6 spaces for a maximum of
6 employees at any one time), and one space for each staff doctor or supervisor (2 spaces
for estimated 2 doctors/supervisors). Thirty-seven parking spaces are proposed in
compliance with the Development Code requirements.
Screening
An eight-foot high hedge exists along the southern boundary to provide screening from
the railroad tracks, flood control channel, and residential properties to the south. In
addition, several large trees exist along Victoria Avenue to provide shade and a pleasant
separation from other surrounding industrial uses. Because of the substantial screening
and nature of the proposed use, it will not conflict with or preclude development of new
industrial uses within the vicinity.
Traffic & Circulation
Due to the nature of the proposed use, the Traffic Engineering Division found no
significant impacts. Sidewalk improvements and handicap path of travel access from the
street to the buildings have been incorporated into the proposal. All approaches and
drive aisles will be required to meet minimum Engineering requirements (Refer to
Attachment F, Standard Requirements). In addition, the site fronts onto Tippecanoe
Avenue which is considered a primary arterial street with substantial capacity and direct
freeway access.
6. The subject site is physically suitable for the type/density/intensity of use being proposed.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the project being
proposed as identified by the project's compliance with parking, landscaping, access,
circulation, and refuse requirements issued by the Development Review Committee as
shown on Attachment D, Development Code and General Plan Consistency Table, and
as discussed in Finding No. 5.
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07
Development Code Amendment No. 97-05
& Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98
Page 8 of 8
7 There are adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities
and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health
and safety.
All agencies responsible for reviewing access and providing water, sanitation, and other
public services have had the opportunity to review the proposal. None have indicated
an inability to serve the project. As such, the proposal will not be detrimental to the
public health and safety.
CONCLUSION
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07, Development Code Amendment No. 97-05, and
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 are consistent with the City of San Bernardino General Plan
and meet all of the required Findings of Fact for approval. An Initial Study was prepared and
a Negative Declaration is recommended in compliance with CEQA guidelines.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the Mayor and Common
Council:
1. Adoption of the Negative Declaration (Attachment G), and
2. Approval of General Plan Amendment No. 97-07, Development Code Amendment No.
97-05,and Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 based on the Findings of Fact incorporated
into this report and subject to the Conditions of Approval (Attachment E) and Standard
Requirements (Attachment F).
Respectfu mitted,
MICHAEL E. HA ire
ctor of Planning and Building Services
G STAVO J. ROMO, Assistant Planner
ATTACHMENTS: A - General Plan Land Use Designation and Location Map
B - Site Plan
C - General Plan Amendment Proposal
D - Development Code and General Plan Consistency Table
E - Conditions of Approval
F - Standard Requirements
G - Initial Study
ATTACHMENT "A"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING GPA-97-07 AGENDA
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT DCA-97-05 ITEM#
CASE CUP-97-21
LOCATION HEARING DATE 03/03:
�-1
r
RO �
1
RIVtRVIsr
MEN
o
L 1
'law WRIviApop"a
1 I
a
/ AMa L 1H .
AIL.-J 1
r if t
s N100�
o fT Ilr , _ {...
4 ` s ��• ►s� � v
f 1
,VICTORIA
VICTORIA
0 or
RAROT St
� s � 1
Lj
Lew
- �oauN f
soh
f
A L ITT LADS p
n
L_
a
"N al"m
MOf►1TAU LANE
N
10 FRW
AIR
CaLART
� S
n
�S�a°ww'�'ilwo PWit 11 PAGE t OF 1
1 1
�r.
is
•q t �
i
N
�:�e (� ;;ice ��� •d
uP• -'�� RAW
man
ma
y
Romer rx `�'-
rr
�� iq�
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 ATTACHMENT "C"
Development Code Amendment No. 97-05
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Proposed General Plan Amendment From IH to OIP
Existing General Plan Land Use Designations
IH, Industrial Heavy RMH, Residential Medium High
® OIP, Office Industrial Park RU-1, Residential Urban
"•; PFC, Public Flood Control
®
•
CR-3, Commercial Regional (Tri-City/Club)
Not to Seale N
,• s w • F r ♦- - -
0��-T: y::�J�:'Ca•7�T.C??:�t7J7.'.:Cy-i.(:+:Y.::t:�fa^... ...•. ..__.+.u.r.�
0.
OL
........3..'i ..4.
O riY- s'C
— =�j:+:i:,:;: — i0iOkQ 1.l.Jl?c.;fj==::'•J=':':
.........+)ti +:i s< {J.�i::C+ Q .U.(>
ICJ: ' 3Q:.��,'Q":�i:•:Ctj: •'.
� :+:)i::(�ii:3F.'!i:- —;l7?�.• :'�a +;>-' I i0e�iQ;::{sC)e 17:.:Clir::0e�'•;:k;.:Q•. 3C
:.�ii::l '•� iii:Ocr :i0i:i:r:i:; �3sc'�c���):sG� I ''Ci�'�•O' '•'.i:'•O:•'•:O�•..
sic Ci"c:- •iEri:C= •`�� i+:i���:Q::,� r'•i.::i:t� I 'O:•':i{:•,:ir.•••;•.>`i. ��?;�
iO::iii:�:� =='t; :' :�'c� : 'Oe�:il7�.(:G)�:{i; > t 7:i r O?0= .'..,:.',,•;
��:—:3Cic�i�ii�)e> jiC {iE:c :�—:3Q' •�=r'•i' ��sr�e � 'a';;:0,•�• �4:��.:Q•.
ft Q: .:Q.i•:Q : ��::1•
eee-L-EY AY
r•. .'r'• iii":;ai'`i:l; i":��i`'i�i=•:��:::+:i•-cti'•'., •:•.. 4,'..''•'..:i•�
C.
EiiC�.r` t'Ji:�iQ. il) 'iii:'Y<I)1(+)l' ':Ci::2 J.:�::J;.:G.Q ii=:' :.,•..
�c:::,1•:!13i =!':iis!ii —.iQiL:iC7i"'Q=.:(i+�l'=FJ:>:•: ' +;4,, % y. .O,•••,.C?=r�'i
.iJ. ifl. �,l•;..:l•?'.',J�?=:CJ'.':Q:::{•G•,:: � •:1�:'�;1:}•:::t7:3=:='••'
�= =".; •=�. ;., to�. • ;. �,• ,z ='c•,:.•.=o:^•Q=':;:�:-
:i1 iQ-P, r v�'i:t:( •.••:t:>: .�{rr:• 2,L•,
taii E57 :Qi Qi r ;:!::::;_+:; ::? :!;;.: ;;..<�...:Q: ::O:.:c:l:r..:
Vic:—:i0'— % `7�i=' T9R!i1—/tyE— — — — —— —
:='•'ii+:��'''��''+''
ir:)44 :i•?i:i:..:Ci .:(1?=:iO: :Oe':+e)•::f:+ I .:9 :' —J:�iO't: i '�:. ::<:.r..: .r.:0::?{:r.fj;'•;j ::•'�:{
V-1 .:r.r.5,,.�?•..;,:.
>:,:C3:i:,:�:>:r.:t:�'':�•: -:iJ:is;''.•;i,�.,:C:{:=.:C+c)-.30e: :O 1 ::).�.:....:• �.. �:Q��iGi�,...� . .0:•'�a•,)7,.p)i
::i >:-
..L• .J: � O::-:ir3:: :.l•)c:i(if3i= :r::'� �:i.'.i0:'.:r%: :ti:r:•ti::i�;••lit..<J�...•
a.. _).:.t..r::t}: is i Ji:—i 9i:—iii:CiC)c:i(ik)c:i(7i: Z,= •t 'Y' ;�::'i.s..'.:rJe.:.:0='� ''�•':O's)i':Oc
{:. - :f :ti i i:'rfiii)'titiY:'iCZ:..;ry; i s0....0.�{•:•.4i[?a: }?.tJ[�c?<7c} O ic30:={s0=7sC:rJiL?'r�JcF:iO:. ' 7�CN:Y�'•'
hcri�3i:i�'•:!?{?c)r.Y i::—.i0i).i '•:i:•:r' I
. : . ......... ...
.. ... .. .. . . ...... . .
; Eo i3E iix iii >!i ii3i iiii 5ii iiiEE' c
011 Pi Lo
I 112
IRS
Errli EEi:•�: � rr' I \ �
an
/ EEEi ..Rii SM XU In 3":309 30! m \
^iitl'' ldta. „rli:
5 \\ \
r �
eEliiEE EEiiE�i iEij�ii iii�Ei ��� .10• I N
! ?Eiii m ru tr rx R °—` I
.... to eii�ii i to sari xet N I \ i
ei H3-sue - -
w..._i;i \
i .'ii:• i'• V7 Ill N N O tNy
•75M i•.itl'.. iiCit
iEl—h Eisiio Firm: Exlt�ii E»I ......EE ii iEiiliEi rk EEiilii iE Ei'S3ti? till
::tu..
i.5 tl
::
I ...... ....... ...... ...................... .....::••EiiEE
55.. EiRi:• °Eeiie ...r'ioEe.. o a:°.ii'rr• i3 ri ei o:iia.. i c. m\.b a 4
Actual Land Use: 000- Vacant Land 107 -Warehouse 113-Light industrial 710 -Undefined
363 -Service Station/Auto Repair 510. SFR $22-Two SFR•s 536-Duplex
$40 - Triples S41 - Ouadptex 546 -5 10 14 unite
ATTACHMENT D
DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY TABLE
GENERAL. PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07,
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 97-05,
& CONDITIONAL USE PERNUT NO. 97-21
1499 SOUTH TIPPECANOE AVENUE
Categoa Proposal Development Code General Plan
Use Children's Conditionally Conditionally
Services Permitted in OIP' Permitted in OIP
Center
Setbacks:
From
Tippecanoe
Avenue 40 ft. 20 ft. minimum N/A
From
Victoria
Avenue 33 ft. 10 ft. minimum N/A
Side yard 27 ft. 10 ft. minimum N/A
Rear yard 27 ft. 10 ft. minimum N/A
Landscaping >32% 15% minimum N/A
Lot Coverage 17.4% 50% maximum N/A
Parking No. 37 (2 HC spaces) 33 (2 HC spaces min.) N/A
'Subject to approval of GPA-97-07 & DCA-97-05.
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07
Development Code Amendment No. 97-05
& Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98
Page 1 of 3
ATTACHMENT E
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
GENERAL, PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07,
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 97-05
& CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-21
1499 SOUTH TIPPECANOE AVENUE
1. Within two years of this development approval, commencement of construction shall
have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if after
commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the
permit/approval shall become null and void.
Project: GPA 97-07, DCA 97-05 & CUP 97-21
Expiration Date: Two years from effective date (M.C.C. approval)
2. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration
date and for good cause, grant a one time extension of time not to exceed 12 calendar
months. The review authority shall ensure that the.project complies with all current
Development Code provisions.
3. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the
applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in defense of the matter. Once
notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its
officers, agents, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and
attorney's fees which the City may be required by the Court to pay as a result of such
action,but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his or her obligation under
this condition.
4. A Development Permit Type B shall be submitted for Phase H of the proposal, the
Children's Evaluation Facility, within one year of issuance of a final Certificate of
Occupancy for the Assessment Center. Any change of more than 10% to the auproved
plans for Conditional Use Permit No 97-21 shall require submittal of a new Conditional
Ilse Permit application.
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07
Development Code Amendment No. 97-05
& Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98
Page 2 of 3
5. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plan(s) approved by the
Planning Commission or Mayor and Common Council. Minor modification to the
plan(s) shall be subject to approval by the Director through a minor modification permit
process. Any modification which exceeds 10% of the following allowable measurable
design/site considerations shall require the refiling of the original application and a
subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing review authority if applicable.
a. On-site circulation and parking, loading and landscaping;
b. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and structures;
C. Reconfiguration of architectural features, including colors, and/or modification
of finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approve
theme; and,
d. A reduction in density or intensity of a development project.
6. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied
or no change of use of land or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new business
commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued
by the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the
Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed
with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy. The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and
completion of all terms, conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended
use by this permit.
7. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development
Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property
Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and
grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air
pollution; glare control; exterior lightning design and control; noise control; odor control;
screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and, vibration control.
Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer
because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied
with. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts or meter
cabinets shall be architecturally screened by wall or structural element, blending with the
building design and include landscaping when on the ground.
General Plan Amendment No. 97-07
Development Code Amendment No. 97-05
& Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98
Page 3 of 3
8. Both buildings shall be architecturally compatible in design, colors, and materials.
9. A minimum of thirty-three (33) on-site standard parking spaces, including two required
handicap stalls, shall be provided and maintained at all times. Thirty-seven (37) stalls
have been approved for this project. If at any time the applicant wishes to delete any or
all of the additional spaces provided, a minor modification application will be required
to be submitted and approved by the Planning and Building Services Department. Wheel
sups are prohibited.
10. Signs are not a part of this =royal. Applicant must submit a sign permit application
and obtain approval from the Planning Division prior to obtaining any building permits
for signs.
11. The existing chainlink fence separating the two buildings and phases of development shall
remain locked at all times. The proposed site for Phase II shall not be used for storage,
parking, or any type of occupancy until the Development Permit Type II has been
approved and-a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued for the new building.
12. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the
following City departments or divisions and public agencies:
a. Building Services Division
b. Public Works/Engineering Department
C. Fire Department
d. Water Department
e. Public Services Department
L Parks and Recreation Department
ATTACIIAMNT "F"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS case No.: GPA No. 97-07, DCA
No. 97-05 & CUP No. 97-21
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Hearing Date: 3/3/98
Page 1
1. Submit plans prepared by a Registered Building Architect or Civil or Structural Engineer.
2. Submit State of California Title 24 Energy Calculation Forms for non-residential
buildings including a signed compliance statement.
3. Submit floor plan of existing structure. Label all uses and existing materials of
construction.
4. Submit four (4) complete sets of construction plans including:
(Five (5) complete sets for expeditious review).
a. Copy of conditions. (3)
C. Energy Calculations. (3)
5. Permit required for demolition of existing building(s) on site.
6. Submit a plan of the heating, ventilating or air conditioning system. (Clearly identify the
location and rating of the equipment and the sizes and material of all ducts, registers and
the location of all fire dampers.) Show means of providing mechanical ventilation, as
required by the Uniform Building Code, for each office space.
7. Show compliance with Title 24 for disabled access.
8. Fire Sprinklers required if any alteration occurs.
Plans for fire sprinklers shall be submitted to Fire Department and approved prior to
installation. No building inspections shall be performed beyond "framing and
ventilation" until fire sprinkler plans are approved.
9. City of San Bernardino named as certificate holder for Worker's Compensation
Insurance.
10. Assessor's Parcel Number: 0281-102-11.
11. Contractor's City license.
12. Contractor's State license.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS case 7-0 & C No. o. 97- 1 DCA
No. 97-05 & CUP No. 97-21
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Hearing Date: 3/3/98
Page 2
13. Other: Plan Check time is approximately 3 weeks for tenant improvements. Expeditious
Plan Check time is approximately 10 working days. Contact Development Services at
(909) 384-5071 for possible expeditious plan check.
14. Contact Development Services for Plan Check fee prior to Plan Check submittal.
Additional 25% Plan Check fee required for expeditious review.
15. Separate submittal required for Children's Evaluation Facility.
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER
CASE NO: CU_ AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION
FACILITY
APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: EIS OF TIPPECANOE AVE. SIS
FUND VICTORIA AVE.
♦ NOTE TO APPLKA Where separate Engineering plans are required, the applicant is
responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They
may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans.
1. Drainage and Flood Control
a) All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public
drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements
shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
b) Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to
maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge
Permit Requirements.
c) The City Engineer, prior to grading plan approval, shall approve an
Erosion Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due
to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of
construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be
immediately built upon.
2. Grading and Landscaping
a) If more than 1' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/grading and
drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a
grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in
strict accordance with the City's Grading Policies and Procedures" and
the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City
Engineer.
Page 1 of 8 Pages 2WIP98
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER
CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION
FACILITY
APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: EIS OF T/PPECANOE AVE. VS
F_ VICTORIA AVE.
b) If more than 5 trees are to be removed from the site, a tree removal permit
conforming to the requirements of Section 19.28.090 of the Development
Code shall be obtained from the Department of Planning and Building
Services prior to issuance of any grading or site development permits.
c) If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond
will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with
Section 7012(c) of the Uniform Building Code.
d) A liquefaction evaluation is required for the site. This evaluation must be
submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any
grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction
evaluation shall be incorporated in the grading plan.
e) An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible,
this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to
all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See
"Grading Policies and Procedures").
f) A refuse enclosure constructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing
No. 508. The minimum size of the refuse enclosure shall be 8 feet x 15
feet, unless the Public Services Department, Refuse Division, approves a
smaller size, in writing.
g) Retaining walls, block walls and all on-site fencing shall be designed and
detailed on the On-site Improvement Plan. This work shall be part of the
On-site Improvement permit issued by the Department of Public
Works/City Engineer.
2&1998
Page 2 of 8 Pages
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSMITY ENGINEER
DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER
CASE NO: CU_ AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION
FAC/UTY
APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: EIS �Rn NOE AVE. S/S
F_
h) The on-site improvement plan shall include details of on-site lighting,
including light location, type of poles and fixtures, foundation design,
conduit location and size, and the number and size of conductors.
Photometry calculations shall be provided which show that the proposed
on-site lighting design will provide 1 foot-candle of illumination uniformly
distributed over the surface of the parking lot during hours of operation
and 0.25 foot-candles security lighting during all other hours.
i) The design of on-site improvements shall also comply with all
requirements of The California Building Code, Title 24, relating to
handicap parking and accessibility, including retrofitting of existing
building access points for handicap accessibility, if applicable.
j) A handicap accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public
way to the building entrance. All pathways shall be paved and shall
provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet. Where parking overhangs the
pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6 feet.
k) The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5 copies to the
Engineering Division for Checking.
1) An easement and covenant shall be executed on behalf of the City to
allow the City to enter and maintain any required landscaping in case of
owner neglect. The Real Property Section for execution by the property
owner and shall ensure that, if the property owner or subsequent owner(s)
fail to properly maintain the landscaping, the City will be able to file
appropriate liens against the property in order to accomplish the required
landscape maintenance. A document processing fee in the amount of
$200.00 shall be paid to the Real Property Section to cover processing
costs. This easement and covenant shall be executed by the property
2/9/1998
Page 3 of 8 Pages
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER
CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION
FACILITY
APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: VS OF TIPPECANOE A VE. S(S
FUND VICTORIA AVE.
owner prior to plan approval unless otherwise allowed by the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer.
3. U tilities
a) Design and construct all public-utilities to serve the site in accordance
with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility,
including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV (Cable TV
optional for commercial, industrial, or institutional uses).
b) This project is located in the sewer service area maintained by the City of
San Bernardino therefore, any necessary sewer main extension shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and
Procedures" and City Standard Drawings.
c) Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as
required.
d) A street cut permit, from the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, will
be required for utility cuts into existing streets where the street is not
being repaved as part of the required improvements.
e) All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either
side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Section
19.20.030 of the Development Code.
f) Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated
at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer, except
overhead lines, if required by provisions of the Development Code to be
undergrounded. See Development Code Section 19.20.030.
Page 4 of 8 Pages ?/9x1998
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSMITY ENGINEER
DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER
CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION
FACILITY
APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: E(S OF TIPPECANOE AVE. S(S
FUND VICTORIA AVE.
4. Phasin
a) If the project is to be developed in phases, each individual phase shall be
designed to provide maximum public safety, convenience for public
service vehicles, and proper traffic circulation. In order to meet this
requirement, the following will be required prior to the finalization of any
phase:
b) Improvement plans for the total project or sufficient plans beyond the
phase boundary to verify the feasibility of the design shall be complete to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer,
c) A Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering
Division, Fire, and Planning Departments indication what improvements
will be constructed with the given phase, subject to the following:
d) Dead-end streets shall be provided with a minimum 32 foot radius paved
width;
e) Drainage facilities, such as storm drains, channels, earth berms, and
block walls, shall be constructed, as necessary, to protect the
development from off-site flows;
f) A properly designed water system shall be constructed which is capable
of providing required fire flow, perhaps looping or extending beyond the
phase boundaries;
g) Easements for any of the above and the installation of necessary utilities
shall be completed; and,
Pale 5 or 8 Pages ZW1998
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC W1 ENGINEER
DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER
CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUA77ON
FACILITY
APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: ES OF TWECANOE AVE. SJS
FUND VICTORIA AVE.
5. Street Improvement
a) Construct sidewalk adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard
No. 202, Case "A" (6'wide adjacent to curb).
b) Construct Handicap Ramps in accordance with City Standard No. 205 at
all curb returns within and adjacent to the project site. Dedicate sufficient
right-of-way at the comer to accommodate the ramp.
c) Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 204, Type II,
including Handicap by-pass. Remove existing driveway approaches that
are not part of the approved plan and replace with full height curb & gutter
and sidewalk.
d) All Curb return radii shall be 25 feet minimum.
e) Install Street Lights adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard
Nos. SLA and SL-2.
6. Reguired Engineering Permits
a) Grading permit (If applicable.).
b) On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see
Planning and Building Services), including landscaping.
C) Off-site improvements construction permit.
Z V1998
page 6 of 8 Pages
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSMITY ENGINEER
DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER
CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION
FACILITY
APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: EIS OF TIPPECANOE AVE. S(S
FUND VICTORIA AVE.
7. Acolicable Engineerina Fees'
a) Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 4% and 4%,
respectively, of the estimated construction cose of the off-site
improvements.
b) Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except
buildings - See Planning and Building Services) - 2% and 3%,
respectively, of the estimated construction costa of the on-site
improvements, including landscaping.
c) Plan check and inspection fees for grading (If permit required) - Fee
Schedule available at the Engineering Division Counter.
d) Drainage fee in the approximate amount as follows based on $0.405 per
square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of impervious lot area
(estimated as 85% of the net lot area), then $0.139 per square foot of
remaining impervious lot area or fraction thereof:
EST. IMPERVIOUS AREA SF TOTAL FEE
i Not Applicable 0
ii) 26,554 $4,489
TOTAL $4,489
'All Fees are subject to change without notice.
=Estimated Construction Cost for Off-Site improvements Is based on a list of standard unit prices on file with
the Department of Public Works/City Engineer.
a Estimated Construction Cost for on-Site improvements Is based on a list of standard unit prices on file with
the Department of Public Works/City Engineer.
Page 7 of 8 Pages ?,/9H998
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSMITY ENGINEER
DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER
CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION
FACILITY
APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: ES OF TIPPECANOE AVE. S/S
FUND VICTORIA AVE.
e) Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of $4.938 . Based on 306
trips per day @ $16.137 per new trip generated by the project. The City
Traffic Engineer shall determine exact amount at time of application for
Building Permit for Phase II.
f) Sewer Connection fee in the approximate amount as follows based on
$229.15 per 3,000 square feet or fraction thereof:
BLDG AREA SF TOTAL FEE
i Not Applicable 0
ii) 7,072 $687
TOTAL $687
g) Sewer inspection fee in the estimated amount as follows based on $19.32
per connection:
NO. OF CONNECTIONS TOTAL FEE
i Not Applicable 0
ii) 1 $19.32
TOTAL $19.32
h) Street or easement dedication processing fees in the amount of 2$ 00.00
per document.
Page 8 of 8 Pages ?./9H998
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FIRE DEPARTMENT p
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Case: nef P
Date: 1- 7 .
Ll t c Reviewed By:
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
Provide one additional set of construction plans to Building and Safety for Fire Department use at time of plan check.
Contact the City of San Bernardino Fire Department at(909) 384-5388 for specific detailed requirements.
The developer shall provide for adequate five flow as computed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Minimum fire flow requirements shall be based
on square footage,construction features,and exposure information supplied by the developer and MM be available adz to placing combustible
materials on site.
WATER PURVEYOR FOR FIRE PROTECTION:
`The fire protection water service for the area of this project is provided by:
San Bernardino Municipal Water Department-Engineering (909) 324-5391
❑ East Valley Water District-Engineering(909) 888-8986
❑ Other Water Purveyor: Phone:
PUBLIC FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES:
Public fire hydrants are required along streets at intervals not to exceed 300 feet for commercial and multi-residential areas and at intervals not
to exceed 500 feet for residential areas.
Fire hydrant minimum flow rates of 1,_5000 gpm at a 20 i minimum residual pressure are required for commercial and multi-residential areas.
Minimum fire hydrant flow rates of 7;U00 gpm at v'ffpsi minimum residual pressure are required for residential areas.
Fire flow requirements may be met from the combined flow of two adjacent fire hydrants. Fire flow requirements may be adjusted,as deemed
appropriate by the Fire Department,based on individual site specific conditions and available mitigations.
Fire hydrant type and specific location shall be jointly determined by the City of San Bernardino Fire Department in conjunction with the water
purveyor. Fire hydrant materials and installation shall conform to the standards and specifications of the water purveyor.
O Public fire hydrants, fire services, and public water facilities necessary to meet Fire Department requirements are the developer's financial
responsibility and shall be installed by the water purveyor or by the developer at the water purveyor's discretion. Contact the water purveyor
indicated above for additional information.
ACCESS:
O Provide two separate,dedicated routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shall be paved,all weather.
O Provide an access road to each building for fire apparatus. Access roadway shall have an all-weather driving surface of not less than 20 feet
of unobstructed width.
O Extend roadway to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of all single story buildings.
O Extend roadway to within 50 feet of the exterior wall of all multiple-story buildings.
5. Provide'NO PARKING'signs whenever parking of vehicles would possibly red ce the clggara a of a ass rpadw s to less than the required
width. Signs are to read 'FIRE LANE-NO PARKING -M.C.Sec 15.16'. W 1' h /�pa Y-. 1'� ��,, /b
❑ Dead-end streets shall not exceed 500 feet in length and shall have a minimum 40 foot ra ius maround.
❑ The names of any new streets(public or private)shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval.
SITE:
❑ All access roads and streets are to be constructed and usable prior to combustible construction.
O Private fire hydrants shall be installed to protect each building located more than 150 feet from the curb line. No fire hydrants should be within
40 feet of any exterior wall. The hydrants shall be Wet Bartel type,with one 21/2 inch and 4 inch outlet, and approved by the Fire Department.
Fire hydrants shall be designated as a'NO PARKING' zone by painting an 8 inch wide,red stripe for 15 feet in each direction in front of the
hydrant in such a manner that it will not be blocked by parked vehicles.
`BUILDINGS:
Address numerals shall be installed on the building at the front or other approved location in such a manner as to be visible from the frontage
street. Commercial and multi family address numerals shall be 6 inches tall,single family address numerals shall be 4 inches tall. The color
of the numerals shall contrast with the color of the background.
O Identify each gas and electric meter with the number of the unit it serves.
Fire Extinguishers must be installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is 2A 10B/C. Minimum
distribution of fire extinguishers must be such that no interior part of the building is over 75 feet travel distance from a fire extinguisher.
❑ Apartment houses with 16 or more units,hotels(motels)with 20 or more units,or apartments or hotels(motels)three stories or more in height
Allbe equipped with automatic fire sprinklers designed to NFPA standards.
All buildings, other than residential, over 5,000 square feet,.shall be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system designed to NFPA
standards. This includes existing buildings vacant over 365 days.
—8 Submit plans for the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction of the system.
❑ Tenant improvements in all sprinklered buildings are to be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of construction.
Provide fire alarm(required throughout). Plan must be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of installation.
Fire Department connection to(sprinkler system/standpipe system)shall be required at Fire Department approved location.
Note: The applicant must request,in writing,any changes too Fire Department requirements. G /,
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: / �ay /' rr, ��//'.I/ I'�'''tt✓� /`GI d /C.8 L/ A�'�AS'f
2 �4/ N L Ii�� j
4-Z-,/-: 12-
FPO 170111.90
A44�) !€�I -tD G-I I 45L)s M I"TTG-0
11-1,em A5 SAN BERN ARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
Review of Plans:63(7A el 1 -01 'DC-A 7'L^,C2 w p -Z I Date Compiled: �7
Owner/Developer: A RiW£ ?t 1o4-1A SAS &AAZ Compiled By: �J a✓
Type of Project: "1�- � s 56 P-\&a5 Gl--*-'� Number of Units:
Location.'5E Cou&F, O>r -rI P?6GA�loF �'VtCT IZ/A da!� 1 4-q i( Tl K A C6 Ay6
:'CATER DEPARTMENT ENCINEERINC:
Contact: "?)k LJ- b6pi Phone: 5e4 Fax' -X?e 4SS--!5Z-
Note: All Water Services are Subject to the Rules&Regulations of the Water Department.
13 Size of Main Adjacent the Project:12 S it- iJ V A t W"' Ti?JAZ .Jo
"! 7 i�GFM
o Approximate Water Pressure:��1 Elevation of Water Storage:/�9�T Hydrant Flow®20 psi:
❑Type, Size, Location,and Distance to Nearest Fire Hydrant: � t.J�STl�►ME�
'T ?
ZA
❑Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter.
❑Off-site Water Facilities Required.
❑ Area Not Served by San Bernardino Municipal Water Department.
X Comments: V7iet✓
✓AT'ER QUALITY CONTROL:
Con//tact: I/J .tJI.lE�� Phone: �e-r7 Fax: � �1' -753Z—
WI P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection.'-Z Wrw—l c,
0115o'uble Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. 1V16A-r1o„1
❑ Backflow Device to be Inspected Before Water Service can be Activated.
❑ No Backflow Device Required at This Time.
r'"VIROI\Tr1ENTAL.CONTROL/INDUSTRIAL WASTE:
i CAS--G0
Phone: "3c,;54 S50-7 Fax: � �
Contact: V t O A
Note: No Brine Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed, Unless Holding and Hauling is Provided for the Brine. All Interceptors
ill be a 1200 Gallon Capacity with a Sample Box Included.
Z rial Waste Permit Requir d. �
❑ Grease Interceptor Required. ❑ Sand/Oil Interceptor Required. ❑ No Issues at this Time.
❑ Pre-treatment Required.
CFWER CAPACITY INFORMATION.,
Contact: ►IC I lvo ater 83 Phone: 35gef 5 o93 Fax: �Z S
Note: Proof of Payment Must be Submitted to the Building&Safety Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit.
❑ No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. q
1 Sewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the Water Department for Gallons Per Day, Equivalent Dwelling Units:
❑ Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building.Permit. .\
Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: ( 7 o7 Z;�Z) \ . 1 J ' 767 Ge--D n G •
SMREQt113.FRM t2AM
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING & BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
300 NORTH 'D'STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418 (909)384-5057
AGENCY COMMIENT SHEET
NOVEMBER-4, 1997
PROJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.97-07, DEVELOPbffiV`r CODE
AMENDMENT'NO. 97-05 &°CONDITIONAL USE PERM:NO. 97-2I
DESCRIPTION: A request to change the'General Plan desigaatioa of a parcel front III,
Industrial Heavy, to OIP, Office.Industrial Park, construct a new 5,000 square-foot chddren's .
evaluation facility, establish a children's services center, and amend the Development Code to ''
allow children's services centers as permitted uses subject to conditional use permits within the
OIP land use district.
LOCATION: 1499 South Tippecanoe Avenue (APN: 0281-102-11).
FROM: :Gustavo J. Romo
THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED W1TH THE CITY.PLULNNING AND
BUILDING. DEPARTNT.`PLEASE REVIEW THE ENCLOSED
INFORMATION AND RETURN THIS SHEET;WITH YOUR COQ
AND/OR`RECOMMENDATIONS VnTBIN 21'DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS
FORM. IF WE RECEIVE NO COMMENT, WE WILL ASSUME NO`
CONCERNS. KEEP THE ATTACHMENT FOR YOUR FIDES IF YOU SO
DESIRE. This project will be reviewed by the DRC on NOVEMBER 20, 1997,a
THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS APPLY TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM(S):
1
I 1 /1rrbQM�c� l� tv"Ak 56 WE iAJ A4M ; IF *1 ^ublmscE ; IF Ab AueAi &*zwva
W� OQiVE AIS4r A.4 Cw4p4u�- e•kwt& Al 5rga*o 5t1'.
CPJT cr 64ut S9&20ed-41P RKYemk A7 7P'I-SSYY 7a bsr*LWN kw7e &&,me j
�D I�cYCu
A004" (,dOW 14 fAut ti=(,
�� PIA��K St�1U!�cd b X 0/f7
(SIGNATURE) (AGENCY) (DATE)
CITY OF SAN BERNARD7NO PARKS, RECREATION is COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
Case:
Date•
Reviewed By: '(,
GVENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
(u] Comercial Industrial and Multi-Unit
Assessment District
[ ] Residential
[ ] Purpose, Guidelines and submittal procedure
[ j Irrigation and Landscaping Plans. Services
[ ]
Department e city (9 9� B38r4�-51170 or 384-5314 iotoradsps�citia y detailed
requirements.
SPECIFIC RBQIIIREME]'rS: - O [E C IE OM[5
[ j Maintenance of landscape areas D
[X] Planter Areas JAN 13 1998
[x] Interior Planter Areas
[ ] Irrigation Systems CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
EX] Setback Areas DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING &
[A] Slope Areas BUILDING SERVICES
(k] Ground Cover and Bedding Material
( ] irosion Control
[ ] Need Control
PLAINT NATSRIALS
[ ] Plant list and climatic conditions
( ] Street Trees
( ] Plant Material Size Requirements and Ratios
XNSPECTION AMID OTHER R.EQUIRffiENTS
[k j Irrigation System
[ ] Landscaping
[k] 8ardccape Items
[ ] Street tree Specifications
[x] Arborist Report
[ ] Removal or destruction of trees
( ] Screening Requirement (City, Dev.Code)
Note: The applicant mint request, in writing, any changes to the Parks, Recreation and
Community Services requirements. Additional information -
S
n
Ms:ij
ATTACHMENT "G"
INITIAL STUDY
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 97-05
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-21
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A request to convert an existing industrial
facility into a Children's Services Center on a property located at 1499 Tippecanoe Avenue
(southeast comer of Tippecanoe Avenue and Victoria Avenue), including a General Plan
Amendment to change the project site from Heavy Industrial(IM to Office Industrial Park
(OIP), and a Development Code Amendment to add a definition of"Children's Services
Center" to the Development Code and to permit a Children's Services Center in the OIP,
subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The project will be implemented in two phases. The
first phase will include conversion of an existing office building, improvements to the
existing parking area,and enhancement of onsite landscaping. The second phase will consist
of removing an existing warehouse building and construction of a new 5,000 square foot
building.
Date: January 13, 1998
Applicant:
Children's Fund
385 North Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, CA
Prepared by:
Lloyd Zola
LSA Associates, Inc.
3403 10th Street, Suite 520
Riverside, CA 92501
The Environmental Review Committee independently reviewed, analyzed and exercised judgement in making the
determination on the above-referenced Initial Study on February S. 1998 pursuant to §21082 of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
1
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 2 of 15
January 13, 1998
INITIAL STUDY
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97-07
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 97-05
CONDITIONAL USE PERNUT NO. 97-21
INTRODUCTION
This Initial Study is provided by the City of San Bernardino for General Plan Amendment
97-07, Development Code Amendment 97-05; and Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21. It
contains an evaluation of potential adverse impacts that can occur if the General Plan
Amendment, Development Code Amendment, and conditional use permit were to be
approved.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial
Study when a proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency, and
is not exempt from CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study'is to determine whether or not
a proposal,not exempt from CEQA,qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not
an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)must be prepared.
The following components constitute the Initial Study for General Plan Amendment 97-07,
Development Code Amendment 97-05, and Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21:
• Project Description
• Site and Area Characteristics
• Environmental Setting
• Location Map
• Conclusion/Environmental Determination
• Environmental Impact Checklist
• Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures.
The combination of these components constitute the complete Initial Study.
2
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 3 of 15
January 13, 1998
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Children's Fund, a non-profit organization dedicated to the welfare of San Bernardino
County's youth proposes to develop a Children's Services Center within the City of San
Bernardino at 1499 South Tippecanoe Avenue(southeast corner of Tippecanoe and Victoria
avenues). The 1.59-acre site,which was previously developed as an industrial facility. Both
onsite buildings are currently vacant. The site consists of an office building and a warehouse
building,parking areas, and landscaping. Children's Fund proposes to convert the former
industrial facility into a Children's Services Center by modifying the interior of one existing
building on site,demolishing a second existing building,constructing a new building within
the footprint of the existing one, and providing improvements to the site's parking and
landscape areas.
The Children's Services Center encompasses one lot,which is irregular in shape,having a
diagonal easterly property line. The site has.approximately 450 feet of frontage along
Victoria Avenue,and 310 feet of frontage along Tippecanoe Avenue.
The Children's Services Center will consist of two components: an Assessment Center and
an Evaluation Center,which will be operated as separate units on the site. The children who
will be served at the proposed Children's Services Center have been victimized, and are not
children who have done anything wrong themselves. They will range in age from infant
through 17, predominantly between the ages of 7 and 16.
Assessment Center
The need for an Assessment Center in San Bernardino County was identified several years
ago by County Children's Services, a division of the Department of Public Social Services.
The Assessment Center which will be operated at this site has served San Bernardino
County's children from temporary quarters donated by Loma Linda University Children's
Hospital since 1994, and is in need of a permanent home. The Assessment Center provides
professional medical and forensic examination for children who are suspected of having been
sexually abused or molested. In its proposed permanent home,the Assessment Center will
also be able to accommodate exams for children who are suspected of having been physically
abused. According to the applicant, because the Assessment Center is a multi-agency
collaborative effort, victimized children are able to tell their story one time,with all of the
professional entities that need to be involved included in a single procedure. The applicant
has further stated that, in addition to providing an advantage for the traumatized child, the
Assessment Center also puts the law enforcement community in a much better position to
successfully prosecute those who committed the abuse or molestation.
The Assessment Center is anticipated to serve 55 children per month. Staffing will be six
(6)employees at any given time,with up to fifteen(15)professionals present on site during
an interview/investigation.
3
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 4 of 15
January 13, 1998
Evaluation Center
The second component of the Children's Services Center is an Evaluation Center. The only
comparable facility in San Bernardino County is the recently opened Cooper Home in Apple
Valley. Because County Children's Services would like to see a 25-to 30-bed Evaluation
Center contiguous or in close proximity to the Assessment Center, Children's Fund has
proposed a 30-bed Evaluation Center facility for the project site.
The Evaluation Center will provide assessment and temporary placement for abused children
(other than sexual abuse)who have been removed from their homes, and need to be given
the time it takes to conduct an extensive evaluation of the child's needs in order to find an
appropriate"match''for longer term placement.
The Evaluation Center will be staffed by professional child care specialists,who will provide
24-hour medical, social, and psychological assessments, as well as support in a home-like
atmosphere. There will be four(4)to six(6) employees present at any give time within the
Evaluation Center.
The Assessment Center will typically operate during weekday business hours -- Monday
through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. However, during an emergency, children may be
brought to the Assessment Center at any time. The Evaluation Center,because it provides
temporary placement,will operate seven days per week,24-hours per day.
It is proposed that the interior of the westerly building will be modified to house the
Assessment Center as soon as possible following approval of the proposed project.
Demolition of the easterly,warehouse building and construction of a new building to house
the Evaluation Facility will occur as soon as practical thereafter.
SITE AND AREA CHARACTERISTICS
The project is located on the site of an abandoned industrial facility, and is bordered by
industrial parcels to the east and west. To the east,immediately adjacent to the project site,
are two industrial warehouse buildings, for construction material storage and the general
storage for the United Parcel Service. Area characteristics to the west of the project site
include two industrial warehouse buildings housing Ford Wholesale Roofing Supplier and
ABC Roofing Supply at the northwest corner of Tippecanoe Avenue and AT&SF Railroad.
Just southwest of the project site, at the comer of Tippecanoe Avenue and the AT&SF
Railroad, is a vacant parcel that is zoned CR-3. The AT&SF Railroad divides the project
site from the land uses to the south. The area to the south is zoned RMH, Residential
Medium-High. Uses in this area consist of an Auto Repair Service, which is a legal non-
conforming use for this area, and single family residential. The area to the north is
designated OIP,and consists of the Loma Linda University Medical Center Support Service
Center at the northeast corner of Tippecanoe Avenue and Victoria Avenue. Uses in the
4
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 5 of 15
January 13, 1998
center include the medical center patient business office,Loma Linda Mercantile Receiving,
and AHS Laundry.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project site was previously developed for industrial use, and contains no significant or
sensitive environmental features. The site is not located within an area susceptible to any
environmental hazards as identified in the General Plan.
CITY CONTACT
Gustavo J. Romo,Assistant Planner
City of San Bernardino
Department of Planning and Building Services
300 North"D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Phone: (909)384-5057
5
`Z w IH Ford Wholesale IH ABC Roofing Supply
w Roofing Supplier
3
r
o Tippecanoe Avenue
d — - — - — - — - - - - - - — - — - — - — - — - - - — - — - — - — - — -
o 179.41' I
I
h 50 i 9
o 50' ' ` f
o
o � I
O2
o' c
I
1
n I
0
I
I
I o
I z
N i � 0 c w
CD
CD
n
I cr
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 7 of 15
January 13, 1993
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY
for
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97-07
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 97-05
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-21
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ON THE BASIS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY,
■ The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
❑ The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
although there will not be significant effect in this case because the mitiga-
tion measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGA-
TIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
❑ The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and
an ENVIRONMENTAL M PACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMIVIITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
Gustavo J. Romo, Assistant Planner
Name and Title
g�-
Signa Date
7
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 8 of 15
January 13, 1998
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS "Yes" and"Maybe"answers are explained at the .
end of this checklist under"Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation
Measures." "No" answers are explained on this checklist. See Attachment "A"
Preliminary Environmental Description Form,where necessary. (SECTION 6
Yes No Maybe
1. Earth Resources: Will the proposal result in.
a. Earth movement(cut and/or fill)on slopes of 15%or
more based on information contained in the Prelimi-
nary Environmental Description Form No.D.(3)? X
b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than
15%natural grade based on review of General Plan
HMOD map,which designates areas of 15%or
greater slope in the City? X
c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Stud-
ies Zone as defined in Section 12.0-Geologic
&Seismic,Figure 47,of the City's General Plan? X
d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical
feature based on field review? X
e. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Stud-
ies Zone as defined in Section 12.0-Geologic
&Seismic,Figure 53,of the City's General Plan? X
f. Modification of a channel,creek or river based on
review of USGS Topographic Map(Name)
San Bdno_Nn_ Q is ran 1 ?
g. Development within an area subject to landslides,
mudslides,subsidence or other similar hazards as
- identified in Section 12.0-Geologic &Seismic,
Figures 51, 52,and 53 of the City's General Plan? X
h. Development within an area subject to liquefaction
as shown in Section 12.0-Geological&Seismic,
Figure 48,of the City's General Plan? X
i. Other? X
2. Air Resources:Will the proposal result in:
8
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 9 of 15
January 13, 1998
Yes No Maybe
a. Substantial air emissions or an effect upon ambient
air quality as defined by South Coast Air Quality
Management District,based on meeting the thresh-
old for significance in the District's"CEQA Air
Quality Handbook?" X
b. The creation of objectionable odors based on infor-
mation contained in Preliminary Description Form,
No.G.(3)? X
c. Development within a high wind hazard area as
identified in Section 15.0-Wind&Fire,Figure
59,of the City's General Plan? X
3. Water Resources:Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns,or the
rate and amount of surface runoff due to imperme-
able surfaces that cannot be mitigated by Public
Works Standard Requirements to contain and convey
runoff to approved storm drain based on review of
the proposed site plan? X
b. Significant alteration in the course or flow of flood
waters based on consultation with Public Works
staff? X
c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of
surface water quality based on requirements of Pub-
lic Works to have runoff directed to approved storm
drains? X
d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground water? X
e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards as
identified in the Federal Emergency Management
Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map,Community
Panel Ntunber 060281 Q=-fl,and Section 16.0-
Flooding,Figure 62,of the City's General Plan? X
£ Other? X
9
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 10 of 15
January 13, 1998
Yes No Maybe
4. Biological Resources: Could the proposal result in:
a. Development within the Biological Resources Man-
agement Overlay,as identified in Section 10.0-
Natural Resources,Figure 41,of the City's General
Plan? X
1. Change in the number of any unique,rare or
endangered species of plants or their habitat
including stands of trees based on information
contained in the Preliminary Environmental De-
scription Form No.B.(1)and verified by on-site
survey/evaluation? X
2. Change in the number of any unique,rare or
endangered species of animals or their habitat
based on information contained in the Prelimi-
nary Environmental Description Form No.E.(8)
and verified by site survey/evaluation? X
3. Impacts to the wildlife disbursal or migration
corridors? X
b. Removal of viable,mature trees based on site sur-
vey/evaluation and review of the proposed site
plan? (6" or greater trunk diameter at 4'above the
ground). X
c. Other? X
5. Noise: Could the proposal result in:
a. Development of housing,health care facilities,
schools,libraries,religious facilities or other noise
sensitive uses in areas where existing or future noise
levels exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A)exterior and an
Ldn of 45 dB(A)interior as identified in Section
14.0-Noise,Figures 57 and 58 of the City's
General Plan? X
b. Development of new or expansion of existing indus-
trial,commercial or other uses which
generate noise levels above an Ldn of 65 dB(A)
exterior or an Ldn of 45 dB(A)interior that may
affect areas containing housing,schools,
health care facilities or other sensi-
tive uses based on information in
the Preliminary Environmental De-
scription Form No.G.(1)
and evaluation of surrounding land
uses No.C.,and verified by site
survey/evaluation? X
10
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 11 of 15
January 13, 1998
Yes No Maybe
c. Other? X
6. Land Use: Will the proposal result in:
a. A change in the land use as designated based on the
review of the General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning
Districts Map? X
b. Development within an Airport District as identified
in the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone
(AICUZ)Report and the Land Use Zoning District
Map? X
c. Development within Foothill Fire Zones A&B,or C
as identified on the Development Code Overlay
Districts Map? X
d. Other? X
7. Man-Made Hazards: Based on information contained
in Preliminary Environmental Description Form,No.
G.(1)and G.(2)will the project:
a. Use,store,transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic
materials(including but not limited to oil,pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)? X
b. Involve the release of hazardous substances? X
c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? X
d. Other? X
8. Housing: Will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing as verified by a site sur-
vey/evaluation? X
b. Create a significant demand for additional housing
based on the proposed use and evaluation of
project size? X
c. Other? X
9. Transportation/Circulation: Could the proposal,in
comparison with the Circulation Plan as identified in
Section 6.0-Circulation of the City's General Plan and
based on the conclusions of the City Traffic Engineer
and review of the Traffic Study if one was prepared,
result in:
11
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 12 of 15
January 13, 1998
Yes No Maybe
a. A significant increase in traffic volumes on the road-
ways or intersections or an increase that is signifi-
cantly greater than the land use designated on the
General Plan? X
b. Use of existing,or demand for new,parking facili-
ties/structures? X
c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? X
d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? X
e. Impact to rail or air traffic? X
f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles,bicyclists or
pedestrians? X
g. A disjointed pattern of roadway improvements? X
h. Other? X
10. Public Services:Based on the responses of the re-
sponsible agencies or departments,will the proposal
impact the following beyond the capability to provide
adequate levels of service?
a. Fire protection? X
b. Police protection? X
c. Schools(i.e.,attendance,boundaries,overload,
etc.)? X
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X
e. Medical aid? X
f. Solid Waste? X
g. Other? X
11. Utilities: Will the proposal:
a. Based on the responses of the responsible Agen-
cies,Departments,or Utility Company,impact the
following beyond the capability to provide ade-
quate levels of service or require the construction
of new facilities?
1. Natural gas? X
12
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 13 of 15
January 13, 1998
Yes No Maybe
2. Electricity? X
3. Water? X
4. Sewer? X
5. Other? X
b. Result in a disjointed pattern of utility extensions
based on review of existing patterns and proposed
extensions. X
12. Aesthetics:
a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any
significant or important scenic view based on
evaluation of the view shed verified by site survey/
evaluation? X
b. Will the visual impact of the project create aesthet-
ically offensive changes in the existing visual set-
ting based on a site survey and evalua-
tion of the proposed elevations? X
e. Other? X
13. Cultural Resources: Could the proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site by development within
an archaeological sensitive area as identified in
Section 3.0-Historical,Figure 8,of the City's Gen-
eral Plan? X
b. Alteration or destruction of a historical site,struc-
ture or object as listed in the City's Historic Re-
sources Reconnaissance Survey? X
c. Other? X
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be
answered yes or maybe,the project may have a significant effect on the environment and
an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Based on this Initial Study:
13
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 14 of 15
January 13, 1998
Yes No Maybe
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self sustaining
levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal com-
munity,reduce the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate im-
portant examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory? X
b. Does the project have the to the disadvantage of
long- term,environmental goals?(A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief,definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into the future.) X
c. Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited,but cumulatively considerable? (A project
may impact on two or more separate resources
where the impact on each resource is relatively
small,but where the effect of the total of those im-
pacts on the environment is significant.) X
d. Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human be-
ings,either directly or indirectly? X
B. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(SECTION 7)
1. Earth Resources
h. The existing buildings within the project were constructed in recognition of onsite conditions,and
provide adequate protection from liquefaction hazards. The new building that is proposed within
the project site will be constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code and local
ordinances,thereby providing adequate protection.
5. Noise
a. The proposed Children's Services Center will be subject to noise from vehicles traveling
along Tippecanoe and Victoria avenues, as well as from railroad operations on the track
forming the site's southerly property line. Because the existing rail line is a local service
spur, its use will be intermittent, and speeds will be slow, minimizing noise impacts. In
addition,noise will be mitigated up to 15 dB by standard building construction. As a result,
significant impacts are not anticipated.
14
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study
Page 15 of 15
January 13, 1998
6. Land Use
a. The proposed Children's Services Center use is not currently described in the General Plan
or the City's Zoning Ordinance. As part of the project application, a General Plan
Amendment from 1H to OIP is proposed. The project application also requests that
"Children's Services Center"be added to the list of uses permitted within the OT district
subject to a Conditional Use Permit.
7. Man-Made Hazards
a. Because medical exams are among the proposed activities for the Children's Services Center,
the facility will generate small amounts of medical wastes,similar to,but in smaller volumes
than would result from a typical doctor's office. The disposal of medical wastes is highly
regulated by the State of California,and the Children's Services Center will be required to
comply with all applicable regulations.
15
1 RESOLUTION NO.
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 97-07 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN
3 BERNARDINO.
4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
5
SECTION 1. Recitals
6 (a) WHEREAS, the General Plan for the City of San Bernardino
7 was adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by Resolution No. 89-
8
159 on June 2 , 1989.
9
(b) WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared on January 8, 1998
10
and reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee who determined
11 that General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 would not have a significant
12 effect on the environment and therefore, recommended that a
13
Negative Declaration be adopted.
14 (c) WHEREAS, the proposed Negative Declaration received a 21
15 day public review from January 15, 1998 through February 4, 1998 in
16 compliance with the California Environmental Act (CEQA) and local
17
regulations and no comments from the public were received relative
18
thereto.
19 (d) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed
20
21 public hearing on March 3, 1998 in order to receive public 22 testimony and written and oral comments on General Plan Amendment
23 No. 97-07, a proposal to change the General Plan Land Use
Designation from IH, Industrial Heavy, to OIP, Office Industrial
24
25 Park, for a parcel of land located on the southeast corner of
26 Tippecanoe Avenue and Victoria Avenue, at 1499 N. Tippecanoe
27 Avenue, and fully reviewed and considered the Planning Division
28
1
1 staff report and the recommendation of the Environmental Review
2 Committee.
3 (e) WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council held a noticed
4 public hearing and fully reviewed and considered proposed General
5 Plan Amendment No. 97-07 and the Planning Commission and
6 Environmental Review Committee recommendations and Planning
7 Division Staff Report on April 6, 1998.
8 (f) WHEREAS, the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 97-07
9 is deemed in the interest of the orderly development of the City
10 and is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the
11 existing General Plan.
12 SECTION 2 . Environmental Determination
13 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the Mayor
14 and Common Council that the proposed amendment to the General Plan
15 of the City of San Bernardino will have no significant effect on
16 the environment and the Negative Declaration heretofore prepared by
17 the Environmental Review Committee as to the effect of this
18 proposed amendment is hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted.
19 SECTION 3 . Findings
20 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of the
21 City of San Bernardino that:
22 A. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the
23 General Plan in that it does not change the industrial
24 characteristics of the site or area and the amendment is
25 consistent with Objective 1. 31 relating to the establishment
26 of appropriate areas of the City as distinctive office
27 industrial parks.
28 B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public
2
1 interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City
2 in that the permitted uses would be conducted within enclosed
3 structures and the proposed designation does not change the
4 land uses which are presently on the site or allow new land
5 uses which are otherwise prohibited.
6 C. The proposed amendment would not affect the balance of land
7 uses within the City in that the proposed amendment area will
8 retain industrial uses as well as related office uses.
9 D. The amendment site is physically suitable for the requested
10 OIP, Office Industrial Park land use designation in that the
11 site meets the minimum requirements of the development code in
12 regards to lot size, access, and circulation. The change from
13 IH to OIP does not affect the physical characteristics of
14 these parcels.
15 SECTION 4 . Amendment
16 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that:
17 A. The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of San
18 Bernardino is amended by changing one parcel of land (APN:
19 0281-102-11) from IH, Industrial Heavy, to OIP, Office
20 Industrial Park. This amendment is designated as General Plan
21 Amendment No. 97-07 and its location is outlined on the map
22 entitled Attachment A and further described in Attachment B,
23 copies of which are attached and incorporated herein by
24 reference.
25 B. General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 shall become effective
26 immediately upon adoption of this resolution.
27 SECTION 5. May Notation
28 This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be
3
1 noted on such appropriate General Plan maps as have been previously
2 adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common Council and which are
3 on file in the office of the City Clerk.
4 SECTION 6. Notice of Determination
5 The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of
6 Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino
7 certifying the City's compliance with California Environmental
8 Quality Act.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
1 RESOLUTION. . .ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07 TO
THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
3
adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
4 Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the
5 day of , 1998, by the following
6
vote, to wit:
7 Council Members AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
8
ESTRADA
9
LIEN
10
ARIAS
11
SCHNETZ
12
DEVLIN
13
ANDERSON
14
MILLER
15
16
City Clerk
17
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day
18
of , 1998.
19
20 JUDITH VALLES, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
21
Approved as to form
22 and legal content:
23 JAMES F. PENMAN,
City ttorney
24
25 By:
26
27
28
5
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 97-07 ATTACHMENT "A"
-0 SAN BERNARDINO
Cab) s90 Z77. 7s
SO So .9P ^�
W ^
Par. 2 y b
w y O
a
Q ro 1.89 AC. A0 L
V
6 L.ae.e.Q
3 N nr
h av
Par. I
a
12 a
m
19 AC.
M
O
co
a
E
E m rn
a.Is
Ig e39. O
uj— VICTORIA
U ... .; Par.3 CK
4E '! :•:pc• 13 1.14 AC. Q
Y04.YB Y0 7045
''O fo 104031
MAP 804-36-105
0
A 8x
i
Parcel Map No. 5049, P.M.45/89-90
Parcel Map No. 4639, PM.43/89-90
Pnr Parcel Mao No.4138. P.M.38/76-77
ATTACHMENT B
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07 - PROPOSED AMENDED PARCEL:
Assessor Parcel Number: 0281-102-11
1 ORDINANCE NO.
2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING CHAPTERS
19.02 AND 19.08 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (DEVELOPMENT
3 CODE) REGARDING CHILDREN'S SERVICES CENTERS.
4 THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
5 SECTION 1. Section 19 .02.050, DEFINITIONS is amended to
6
add a definition of Children's Services Center (see Attachment 1-A,
7
Development Code page I-9, a copy of which is attached hereto and
8
9 incorporated herein by reference) .
SECTION 2. Section 19. 08. 020, Table 08. 01 INDUSTRIAL
10
DISTRICTS LIST OF PERMITTED USES is amended to add a new item
11 (6) Children's Services Center, as a conditionally permitted use
12 in the OIP land use district, and renumber the remaining items
13 sequentially (see Attachment 1-B, Development Code page II-128, a
14
copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
15
reference) .
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
1 ORDINANCE. . .AMENDING CHAPTERS 19.02 AND 19.08 OF THE SAN
2 BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (DEVELOPMENT CODE) REGARDING CHILDREN'S
SERVICES CENTERS.
3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted
4 by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
5 meeting thereof, held on the day
6 of , 1998, by the following vote, to wit:
7 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
8 ESTRADA
9 LIEN
10 ARIAS
11 SCHNETZ
12 DEVLIN
13 ANDERSON
14 MILLER
15
16
CITY CLERK
17
18 The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this day
19 of , 1998.
20
21 JUDITH VALLES, Mayor
22 City of San Bernardino
23 Approved as to form
and legal content:
24 JAMES F. PENMAN,
25 City torney
26 By:
27
28
2
ATTACIMENT 1-A
BASIC PROVISIONS - 19.02
Children's Services Center. A facility operated by a non-profit organization to administer
services to children suspected of having been neglected or abused. The facility may include
professional medical and forensic services, food, shelter, legal assistance, personal guidance,
and other similar services for children up to 17 years of age; the facility may also include
temporary sleeping quarters with a licensed foster care professional to provide for children in
transition from one foster home to another.
(2' . The City of San Bernardino.
Clinic. A place for outpatient medical services to human patients.
Club. An association of persons (whether or not incorporated) organized for some common
purpose, but not including a group organized primarily to render a service customarily carried
on as a business.
Clustered Subdivision. A subdivision development in which building lots are sized to conform
to the "footprint" of the structures and sited closer together than conventional development,
usually in groups or clusters, provided that the total density does not exceed that permitted under
conventional zoning and subdivision regulations. The additional land that remains undeveloped
is preserved as open space and recreation land. Private development easements around the
structures are permitted for inclusion of private landscaping, pools, spas, yards, etc.
Combination Residence/Office Use. A structure used for a residence and an office where no
major external structural alterations or additions are made and no advertising is permitted except
for up to a 3 square foot attached sign identifying the name of the occupant or business.
Commercial Vehicle. A vehicle customarily used as part of a business for the transportation
of goods or people.
Commission. The Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino.
Community Apartment. A development in which an undivided interest in the land is coupled
with the right of exclusive occupancy of an apartment located on the land.
Community Care Facility. Consistent with Health and Safety Code (Section 1267.8) the
intermediate care facility shall include provisions for developmentally disabled habilitative -
nursing or congregate living.
Conditional Use/Development Permit. A discretionary entitlement which may be granted
under the provisions of this Development code and which when granted authorizes a specific use
to be made of a specific property, subject to compliance with all terms and conditions imposed
on the entitlement.
Condominium. A development consisting of an undivided interest in common for a portion of
a parcel coupled with a separate interest in space in a residential or commercial building on the
parcel.
Construction Commencement. The start of construction of substantial site and structural
I-9 5/91
ATTACHMENT 1-B
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS - 19.08
C. EE (INDUSTRIAL EXTRACTIVE) DISTRICT
This district is intended to promote the mining and processing of the City's
mineral resources in the Cajon Creek, Lytle Creek, and Santa Ana River areas,
while ensuring their compatibility with adjacent land uses. Additionally, this land
use district provides for the development of interim uses including, but not
limited to lumber yards, outdoor storage, plant nurseries, recreation (non-
structural), etc., which do not impair the long term ability to extract and process
mineral resources.
19.08.020 PERMITTED, DEVELOPMENT PERMITTED AND
CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES
The following list represents those primary uses in the manufacturing/industrial zoning districts
which are Permitted (P), subject to a Development Permit (D) or a Conditional Use Permit (C):
TABLE 08.01
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS LIST OF PERMITTED USES
MC 888 1/6/94
LAND USE ACTIVITY CH OIP IL III IE
1. Accessory structures/uses typically appurtenant to a D D D D D
principally permitted land use activity;
2. Agricultural Production-crops; — — — D D
3. Agricultural Services; D — D D —
4. Assembling, cleaning, manufacturing, processing, D D' D D —
repairing or testing of products including automotive
related (except dismantling) and welding and excluding
explosives, conducted entirely within an enclosed
structure except for screened outdoor storage areas;
5. Assembling, cleaning, manufacturing, processing, repair D — — D —
of products, research, storage, testing or wholesale land
uses (except explosives) with a portion of the operation
(other than storage) occurring outside of the enclosed
structure:
A. Outside land uses in the CH and IH districts C — — C —
within 150 feet of a residential land use district;
6. Children's Services Center; — C — — —
U-128 2/94
CHILDREN'S FUND
PHOTO ESSAY
February 26, 1998
Prepared for:
Children's Fund
/lz
�o f�'
CHILDREN'S FUND PHOTO ESSAY
February 26, 1998
Prepared for:
Children's Fund
385 North Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, California 92418
1
Photograph 1: View of Future Children's Assessment Center with
Future Children's Evaluation Center in background.
�� ..,iii
A R Y
"'/gyp
k
11-
•�^•.� � 5� � ,�igiYt3' 'gym F
,w aW„ �'.'�.. Ali 2N✓ ,+'�>m', HPo -a44 µaw., Efl
Wa4o
« �H
t �
�r
Y 4
�r 2xr
Photograph 2: View of southwest corner of Future Children's Assessment Center,
runoffgutter and parking lot to be repaired.
2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND)
ISA Existing Building (to Remain)
Conversion to Children's Assessment Center
� 4
If
W
fi .....
m
_
X71»4
Y
k
S r a
a+i
r�r
Photograph 3: View of southeast corner of Future Children's Assessment Center with
Victoria Avenue in background. Entrance and parking lot to be repaired.
wil
a
1 ..
yT /a
yq
s
Photograph 4: View of southeast corner of Future Children's Assessment Center with Tippecanoe
Avenue and Ford Wholesale Company Roofing Suppliers building in background.
2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND)
ISA Existing Building (to Remain)
Conversion to Children's Assessment Center
e
AI
R ,
0
ay
y , a
N,
Photograph S: View of entrance between Future Children's Assessment Center(on left)and
Future Children's Evaluation Center(on right). Roadway between buildings to be repaired.
sE
1 f
3
f
n s a
1.
Photograph 6: Rear view of Future Children's Centers and parking lot.
2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND)
ISAFuture Children's Centers
. :
g,y K
i
.f.
1 ;, r
Photograph 7: View of northwest corner of Future Children's Evaluation Center(existing building to
remain during Phase I development but eventually will be removed and replaced with a new one).
x:
3
i A
I `'
PW
s
3 f jj
E
§ 3
i
'
Photograph 8: Looking eastward, showing southwest corner of Future Children's Evaluation Center,
existing fence and gated parking lot.
2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND)
ISAFuture Children's Evaluation Center
�T v.
x
a .
Photograph 9: View facing southeast corner at entrance of site showing southwest corner of
Future Children's Evaluation Center fence and parking lot.
2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND)
ISAFuture Children's Evaluation Center
E
�Y
Photograph 10: AT&SFRailroad and Tippecanoe Avenue intersection
located south of the Future Children's Centers.
K,
y v
Photograph 11: View of the AT&SF Railroad and drainage easement south of the Future Children's
Centers. Fencing exists in vegetation in left side ofphotograph.
2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND)
ISARailroad South of Future Children's Centers
1
sk �
�---
0
9 f
x &
+�* Photograph 12: Rear view of Future Children's Centers.
IIIN tir
+rr
hs<
,Y 1.
9R
ON
Photograph 13: Rear view of the Future Children's Centers.
Razor wire to be removed,fencing to be repaired and site to be cleaned.
2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND)
Fencing Along South Side
ISA of Future Children's Centers
M
�s
Photograph 14: View of Tippecanoe Avenue and Ford's Wholesale Company Roofing Suppliers.
Photograph taken from rear of Future Children's Assessment Center parking lot.
s
1.
i 3.
Photograph 15: View of Tippecanoe Avenue and Victoria Avenue
taken from the northwest corner of the Future Children's Assessment Center.
2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND)
MALand Uses Along Tippecanoe Avenue
9
eeq .j r
Y a
a.+
ills
*�** Photograph 16. View of Loma Linda Support Services Center
to
taken from the intersection of Tippecanoe Avenue and Victoria Avenue.
Photograph 17: View of Loma Linda Support Services Center taken from the intersection of Tippecanoe Avenue
and Victoria Avenue. Future Children's Centers shown in right side ofphotograph.
2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND)
MALand Uses Along Tippecanoe Avenue
3
Photograph 18: View of small parking lot of Loma Linda Support Services Center.
Victoria Avenue and Future Children's Centers in background.
e ,
m�<
i
y
ti
a'
d
e
Photograph 19: Easterly view of Victoria Avenue.Loma Linda Support Services Center located in right of
photograph. A sidewalk will be installed on the south side of Victoria Avenue;the distance from the curb to the
closest tree is 4Y2 feet.
2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND)
ISALand Uses Along Victoria Avenue
IyI�»Ff
4,
s»
Photograph 20: View of Victoria Avenue and the AT&SF Railroad crossing.
Loma Linda Support Services Center located in background.
1 i
5
k
s'
..H
Photograph 21: View of Victoria Avenue and the AT&SF Railroad crossing.
Loma Linda Support Services Center buildings and parking lot located in background.
2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND)
ISALand Uses Along Victoria Avenue
i
0
0
W I (JI
I
i
i
i
W
� V
0
� y
0 y
1Oc
o � v� I
� zQ
r
CC
o �
2W
sj
�n
i
I ,
W }
Q �
a
x
yi
Z
W
a
z
Y
J �
W
►
0
s
Q �
g
Myr
sol
l
l
SY�
l
jYe•
i
E
t�
O
►
1�
6
g
8
7
r
r
r
j{{V
w
a
w
t
f
�sY¢
{
TIC-
Z
a
i
t
r
� a
s
Y
2�
8
n
E
I
�p
F � w
0
r
rn
6N O
DDDDD
C.U.P.
CHMDRENS FUND /
CH&D/TENS SERVICES CENTER
' 3
cn D
rn �
rn
� D Z
c � C
rn
D I
1
I �\
rn I
r �
i x
t
I
i
i
x
x
HIME8 • PETERR8 • JEPSON ARCMECIA M
3 b 0 8 • L a CAD I L L A C A V C N U C
C08TA MC $ A , CALIPONMIA 04426
(714) d4o - 0644 PAX (714) 640 - 7166
ARCHI T' LECTURC d PLANNI NO
1
� o
O C I T Y O F
s Y
�fl an bernardino
NEED 1*1
R A C H E L C L A R K
C I T Y C L E R K
April 7, 1998
Barbara O' Conner, Executive Director
Children' s Fund
385 N. Arrowhead Avenue, 2nd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92415
Dear Ms . O' Conner:
At the meeting of the Mayor and Common Council held on April 6,
1998 , the following action was taken regarding the request to amend
the General Plan land use plan from IH, Industrial Heavy, to OIP,
Office Industrial Park; to amend the Development Code to include a
definition of Children' s Services Center as a conditionally
permitted use within the OIP land use district; and to establish a
Children' s Services Center on a 1 . 59 acre site located at the
southeast corner of Tippecanoe and Victoria Avenues, at 1499 South
Tippecanoe Avenue :
The hearing was closed; the Mayor and Common Council
adopted the negative declaration and the resolution which
approves General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 ; said ordinance
was laid over for final adoption; and Conditional use
Permit No. 97-21 was approved, based on the findings of
fact and subject to the conditions of approval and
standard requirements .
If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact this office .
Sincerely,
AL
Rac 1 G. Clark
City Clerk
RGC: lh
cc : Planning & Building Services
Arthur & Phora Gerdes
P . O . 8 0 X 1 3 1 8 S A N 8 E R N A R D I N 0 C A 8 2 4 0 2
3 0 0 N O R T H D S T R E E T S A N B E R N A R D I N O
C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 4 1 8 - 0 0 0 1 ( 8 0 8 ) 3 8 4 - S 0 0 2
(8 0 8) 3 8 4 S 1 0 2 F A X - ( 8 0 8 ) 3 8 4 -S 1 5 8
T D D/T T Y - ( 9 0 9 ) 3 8 4 -5 5 4 0