HomeMy WebLinkAbout15-Public Works
~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
File No. 9.021
\
From: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE
Subject: Adoption of 1996/97 to 2000/01
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
O,QIGINAL
Dept: Public Works/Engineering
Date: 04-16-97
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
06-10-90 Resolution No. 90-238 approved to adopt the 1989/90 to
1993/94 Capital Improvement Program.
04-06-92 Resolution No. 92-123 approved to adopt the 1991/92 to
1995/96 Capital Improvement Program.
04-07-93 Resolution No. 93-100 approved adopting the 1992/93 to
1996/97 Capital Improvement Program.
04-04-94 Resolution No. 94-87 approved adopting the 1993/94 to
1997/98 Capital Improvement Program.
04-03-95 Resolution No. 95-94 approved adopting the 1994/95 to
1998/99 Capital Improvement Program.
04-15-96 Resolution No. 96-95 approved adopting the 1995/96 to
1999/00 Capital Improvement Program.
Recommended motion:
Adopt resolution.
cc: Fred Wilson
Jim Penman
ADMLN.. O:f.i:<'lC2:.l
{A~
Signature
16 APR 97 m: OJ
Contact person: Roger G. Hardqrave
Staff Report,
Supporting data attached: Resolution & CIP
Phone:
5025
Ward:
All
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. Description)
Finance:
Council Notes:
Res 97- //3
5/5/ '11
75-0262
Agenda Item No. /5
,
l
.'
. CITYOP SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST POR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
The first Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for
of San Bernardino was developed in 1975/76. A new CIP
prepared during most of the intervening fiscal years.
attached program is a continuation of that practice.
the City
has been
and the
Projects are included in the CIP for which there is a
"reasonable expectation" that funds can be secured. The first
year, 1996/97, of the program represents those projects actually
included in the current budget. Projects listed in the
subsequent four years represent our best projection of available
funding. A listing is included at the end of each of the seven
categories of those projects proposed, but for which there is
not a reasonable expectation that funds will be secured. No
attempt has been made to prioritize those projects without an
identified funding source.
It should be emphasized that the CIP is a guideline, and
not a commitment. priorities and funding appropriations will be
reviewed annually in connection with adoption of the annual
budgets, and appropriate adjustments can be made.
Enactment of AB 1600 has provided additional impetus for
adoption of the CIP. This bill provides that a local agency
must have an adopted program in order to collect development
fees, and that the program be adopted at a public hearing.
A Notice of Exemption from provisions of CEQA has been
filed, as provided by Resolution No. 90-217.
We recommend that the CIP for 1996/97
adopted.
2000/01 be
04-16-97
75~0264