HomeMy WebLinkAbout58-Public Works
'STY OF SAN BERNARINOhjREQ.I~;. NFO::'CO~NCIL A~ION
.From:
Dept:
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE
Subject:
Adoption of Negative Declaration &
Finding of Consistency with the
Circulation Element of the General
Plan Vacation of a Portion
of an East/West Alley between
"G" and "H" Street and between
Public
Public Works/Engineering
Date:
12-06-89
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
09-06-89 -- Director of Public Works/City Engineer and City
Clerk were authorized to proceed with proposed
vacation, and plan was approved.
5th and 6th Streets
Works Project No. 89-36
.
Recommended motion:
1. That the Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No.
89-36, Vacation of a portion of an East/West alley between
"Gll and llHll Streets and between 5th and 6th Streets, be
adopted.
2.
That a finding be made that the vacation of a portion of an
East/West alley betwen llGll and llHll Streets and between 5th
and 6th Streets, is consistent with tfAhe C' ulation E/~e At
of the General Plan. ~=_
Marshall Julian ~
Jim Richardson / ......... ~n re
cc:
~
Contact person:
Roger G. Hardqrave
Staff Report, Notice
Init.Studv.Nea. Dec.
Phone:
of Preparation,
& M"p Ward:
SO?S
Supporting data attached:
1
FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: IAcct. No,}
(Acct. DescriPtion)
Finance:
. Council Notes:
75-0262
Agenda Item No
51
cAy OF SAN BERNAR&O - REQUIsT FOR COUNCIL AC~ON
.
STAFF REPORT
The Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 89-
36 was recommended for adoption by the Environmental Review
Committee at its meeting of 10-19-89.
A 14-day public review period was afforded from 10-26-89
to 11-06-89. No comments were received.
We recommend that the Negative Declaration be adopted and
a finding made that the project is consistent with the Circula-
tion element of the General Plan.
.
.
12-06-89
75-0264
.
.
.
.
~REPARATION O~EGATIVE DECLARATION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
.
NOTICE
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration
for the following projects. The Environmental Review Committee
found that the project will not have a significant effect on the
environment on the basis of the Initial Study and mitigation
measures (If applicable).
~UBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 89-36 - Proposed vacation of a portion
of an east/west alley between "G" Street and "H" Street and bet-
ween 5th Street and 6th Street.
2. PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 89-38 - Proposed street/alley vacation
of remainder of "J" Street, north of Oak Street and south of
Lytle Creek Channel.
4. PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 89-35 - To widen Palm Avenue from Cable
Creek to Verdemont Drive.
5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-45 - To allow an indoor swap meet
within an existing vacant building located at 1675 North Mt. Ver-
non.
6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-43 - To construct an 817 square
foot fast food drive-thru restaurant on a 0.49 acre site located
at the northeast corner of Highland Avenue and Lincoln Drive.
7. WATER DEPARTMENT PROJECT NO. 89-3 - To construct an 8 foot by 50
foot water tank and a 3,000 gallon pneumatic pump northwest of
the terminus of Ridgeline Drive.
Copies of the Initial Study are available for public review at the
Planning Department, 300 North "0" Street, San Bernardino, CA
92418, and the Feldheym Library, 555 West 6th Street, San Bernar-
dino, CA. Any environmental comments you have should be received
in this office no later than 4:00 p.m., November 6, 1989. If you do
not respond in writing, we will assume that you have no opinions
and/or recommendations on the above projects.
SUBMITTED: October 24, 1989
PUBLISH: October 26, 1989
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
384-5057
CP
C7 NOPND1019
12-06-89
.
~
el. VeF SAN BE"AROINQ 'f";jJ',~
~ .. '"' ef ,..~.":: ~ -""~~.:".i~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT" l":~ij:,r.":=~"
INITIAL STUDy:~~~.!".-~~'~lo ;;~ 1\
.
Initial Study for Environmental Impacts
For PlAtJiI'c.. WorkS g"f- 3'
Project Number
Project description/Location Pro~~V~G4nON
t!J+:- a ~l!Jr-H"'N <J~ t2N OflS+-/l<Jesr aile" he-fweeN
"6" s'A.~ RAN<I "hi" Srrec+ .."""'" Ludlu',-'AJ s-til.
~~re~+ #AJd l. til. S-l-~~~
Date Oc-fo6er '9. /98'9
,
.
Applicant (s)
Prepared for:
~ t:rf ~N ~~Nan:l/IVO
+--.If or f'. bl/~ Works
3"'" AJ orH. "D" ~-f-r""7j ~ r!!! rbe>r
~t:;Al Ben.JtJrd,',.,o. CA- 92~/1!
,
Address
City, State
Zip
Prepared by:
"77M -r;.,kLtt"
Name
P/t:INN~r
Title
City of San Bernardino
Planninq Department
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
MISC:
IS PREPARATION
ke/9-1-89
.
.
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN B RNARDINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
""'"
BACKGROY~
Application Number:
Project Description:
PubHe. LLJ"l"ks <t"9-3b
Pr~",,/~ a//t!v 1.I....::a,t/"'A)
/
Location: Pt::'rfit:JAI o~ aAl eP!5+/MJ~$,I- a//e,/ he-hu_AJ "6-"
. ,
5',tr~e-f- #PAd /'1/" 5rr~r aNd helW~~Al 5't:!J.. S-/r~e..j. 4AJV ~ ~ S7-,
Environmental Constraints Areas: Ce"J/~( Cij(.., Ab~
/
(2..~ecle7.....tIW.f Ay~
General Plan Designation: C:f.(-~
Zoning Designation:
C-'-;
B. ~~IE~~NTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a
separate attached sheet.
1. Ea;.th Resources Will the proposal result in:
Yes
No
Maybe
a. Earth movement (cut and/or
fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or
more?
x
b. Development and/or grading on
a slope greater than 15'
natural grade?
x
c. Development within the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zone?
x
d. Modification of any unique
geologic or physical feature?
x
\...
~
PAGE 1 OF 8
REVISED 12/87
.
Yes No Maybe
.
.
e. So 11 erosion on or off the X
project site? ,
f. Modification of a channel, X
creek or river? ,
g. Development within an area
subject to landslides,
mudslides, liquefaction or X
other similar hazards?
h. Other? X
2. ~IR RESOURCES: Will the proposal
result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or
an effect upon ambient air X
quality? .
b. The creation of objectionable X
odors?
. c. Development within a high wind X
hazard area?
3. WATEB RESOURCES: Will the
proposal result in:
a. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff X
due to impermeable surfaces?
b. Changes in the course or flow X
of flood waters? .
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface X
water quality?
d. Change in the quantity or X
quality of ground waters?
e. Exposure of people or property X
to flood hazards?
f. Other? X
.
REVISED 12/87 PAGE 2 OF 8
..
.
.
.
4.
BIOLOGICAL R~SOURCE~:
proposal result in:
Could the
a.
Change
unique,
species
habitat
trees?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of plants or their
including stands of
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of animals or their
5. NOISE: Could the proposal result
in:
6.
REVISED 10/87
b.
Change
unique,
species
habitat?
c.
Other?
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
Exposure of people to
noise levels over 65
interior noise levels
dB?
exterior
dB or
over 45
b.
c.
Other?
LAND_~:
result in:
Will the
proposal
a. A change in the land use as
designated on the General
Plan?
b. Development within an Airport
District?
c. Development within ftGreenbeltft
Zone A,B, or C?
d. Development within a high fire
hazard zone?
e. Other?
Yes
No
.
x
x
X
x
x
X
x
x
x
x
X
Maybe
PAGE 3 OF 8
e.
.
.
.
7.
MAN-MADE HA~!!N>~:
project:
Will
the
a. Use, store, transport or
dispose of hazardous or toxic
materials (including but not
limited to oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
b. Involve the release
hazardous substances?
of
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
d. Other?
8. HOUSING: Will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing or
create a demand for additional
housing?
b. Other?
9. ~BA~~fQHTATION/CIRCULATION: Could
the proposal result in:
a. An increase in traffic that is
greater than the land use
designated on the General
Plan?
b. Use of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilities/
structures?
c. Impact upon existing public
transportation systems?
d. Alteration of present patterns
of circulation?
e. Impact to rail or air traffic?
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, hicyclists or
pedestrians?
REVISED 10/87
Yes
No
.
x
x
x
X
x
x
x
x
Maybe
x
X
x
x
PAGE 4 OF 8
.
.
.
.
g.
A disjointed pattern
roadway improvements?
Other?
of
h.
10. fUBLI~ SERVICES Will the proposal
impact the following beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service?
a.
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools (i.e. attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
b.
c.
d.
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e.
Medical aid?
f.
Solid waste?
g.
Other?
11. YIILITIES: Will the proposal:
a. Impact the following beyond
the capability to provide
adequate levels of service or
require the construction of
new facilities?
REVISED 10/87
1. Natural gas?
2. Electricity?
3. Water?
4. Sewer?
5. Other?
b.
Result in a
pattern of
extensions?
disjointed
utility
c.
Require the construction of
new facilities?
Yes
No
.
x
X
x
X
x
,
1-.
X
.
x
,
x
,
x
X
.
X
X
x
.
x.
X
/
Maybe
PAGE 5 OF 8
.
.
12.
13.
.
14.
.
REVISED 10/87
AESTHETI~:
a. Could the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic
view?
b. Will the visual impact of the
project be detrimental to the
surrounding area?
c. Other?
~Y~~URA~--FESQURCES:
proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Could the
b.
Adverse
impacts
historic
object?
c. Other?
physical or aesthetic
to a prehistoric or
site, structure or
Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
The California Environmental
Quality Act states that if any of
the following can be answered yes
or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the
environment and an Environmental
Impact Report shall be prepared.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number cr restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
Yes
.
x
X
x
,
x
,
X
No
Maybe
x
PAGE 6 OF 8
e.
.
.
.
Yes
No
Maybe
.
b.
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the
potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the
future.)
X
I'
x
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on
the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
x
,
x
,
C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(Attach sheets as necessary.)
q d. Ex/~fi,:? e;a&:!"Md!',;<)f.s- ;$AaP' be rt!!'-5~ru~
-/'or trh'hj{....,. ~.Mrr.t?t!fItfK", "".-vo' ~Aler VeA/c-tt;tM,..
/ ' ..,... I'
,;tU~:$S .
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 7 OF 8
.
.
.
.
D.
DETERMINA110N
On the basis of this initial study,
r-l The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
~ environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
.
o
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, although there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described above have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
o
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
.:::;;~ 11~IJ'1<<Y. .Ph"'l'I....~ ;?/ArIIItIE~
.
Name and Title
j:;.::::r
Date: Id -1'- K9
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 8 OF 8
.
..
.
.
.J T
. I
I
-.
STREE~.
l
,. I
I
I
,
.. ~.
...
i
.... '111
__.J.__
.~
ft., ."~.
,
......
'"
...
....,.
J
I '
I c, i . ."
, '1 "'! I~ .' I: .t.'.:"
I t I. I
" , " ;:0 , " 7 ~ , IS, ~ . 3 : ' _: '
~~////////~----_._---
f II ';"'~H'" IS' :':'7: II I "I 10 Ill; n';' Ii!#. ,..
. .... _. oo. ....-. I' I- . .' ._ _.,
, 'i!i Jf . ;:.' ~.: @;.. .::;, : (l~ ! . !~ :
..~~ .oo', ; .0-') i i :~., lUil'i" -.
..1.41- ~"'" j I 'I
~. I....... ...
.
.
'Ii
, oo'
.
.
'.
.
".
r-
.
,
-t -
srRaT-~
. .... -.".- . ..
,J
,I ofJ ... .
,u'
I L
,~ (" .1,..
')-j '0'
~ .'
"
i ,,~.
; !
2-.- I I.,
SPleuU
. 39
.
'0. .. ; .,. rj "'1 -5 I ~. I
(" ,
-- -'-1 .'>: '!:'.
.. ,'i. ~?(!.. I .... ; ~
.: .u, ,-' 1 . ,
..' j . . . --, '-1
IL.... -I ; I 1)':'-
4 ~; :II I
'.2 "I ~_ _. _ oM
. . J-Jf...., '~
"-')T.-.:J :
.
7"'
~
J'
.
'.
-~
,~~
"
I~
'2,,:,
,I
,
~
:t'1,
":~
~~
.
.~
I
.~.
.~-~ .
.,
-.
5l'4-
.
srRi'E Too J
...
I
L
.~--_.
".
r r
l
~
p
,
...
I
I
, . t
r
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
~- Ie NOAKa DIP,,",. ENT
BaINEEJUNG DlVlllIaN
JllIIJllL. ..1l.C1 ERTY .-c;TION
"1'L-.1- ~T / iIlLLEV YACIIflaN I
T7N ()F EAST / kI~r ItLL.e.~
1JErWEl!f1oI S, ~E S'r - b sr.
I S~ \'G"'sr. ~ -H'.sr.
....
.
'LAM 110.1 7
.-~.
:J