HomeMy WebLinkAbout19-Economic Development Agency
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FROM: Gary Van Osdel ~>t.
ExecutlVe Dlfectt fi 0 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA PLAN
~ AMENDMENT - REINST ATE EMINENT DOMAIN
.}?_^-IEo:_______~_~X}_~__2_QQ~________ ------------------ ----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
Svnopsis of Previous Commission/Council/Committee Action(s):
On February 20, 2003, Redevelopment Committee Members Anderson, Suarez and Estrada unanimously voted to
recommend to the Community Development Commission that a joint public hearing be scheduled with the Mayor and
Common Council for amendment to the State College Redevelopment Project Area plan.
On April 7, 2003 the Community Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino approved a resolution setting
a date and time, May 19, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. for a joint public hearing to consider an amendment to reinstate eminent
domain and adoption of a Negative Declaration.
(in April 7, 2003 the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino approved a resolution setting a date
and time, May 19, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. for a joint public hearing to consider an amendment to reinstate eminent domain
and adoption of a Negative Declaration.
On May 19, 2003, the Community Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino approved a motion to
reschedule the joint public hearing with the Mayor and Common Council to June 2, 2003 at 7:00 p.m.
_______4_______~___.____._____~____.___._..___..__________+.___._.____~_________+~___._________..____________________n__________________________.._________________.___-------------
Recommended Motion(s):
OPEN JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
CLOSE JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
(Community Development CommissionlMavor and Common Council)
IF WRITTEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS ARE PRESENTED
MOTION A: THAT THE HEARING BE CLOSED; THAT WRJTTEN OBJECTIONS TO THE 2003 EMINENT
DOMAIN AMENDMENT BE CONSIDERED; AND THAT WRJTTEN FINDINGS BE PREPARED
IN RESPONSE THERETO AS APPLICABLE AND BE PRESENTED AT THE NEXT REGULAR
MEETING.
OR
(SEE NEXT PAGE)
------------------------------------------..-------------------~-----------------_.----_.---_.----------._-------------------------------------------------------------.---
Contact Person(s):
Project Area(s)
Gary Van OsdellMike Trout
State College
Phone:
(909) 663-1044
Ward(s):
5 and 6
Supporting Data Attached: Ii! Staff Report "'" Resolution(s) "'" Ordinance"'" Map(s) "'" LetterslMisc.
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS Amount: $ N/A
Source:
N/A
SIGNATURE:
Budget Authority:
N/A
_4'-
ry Van asdel,
Executive Director
__________________________________.~_____..____.______.___d.._______..._____._________________________________._____________u_____.._____...._______________.._________.____________..______u._____
._____________.___________________________________________..________._____...____________________________________________________________________________..____________0---..---..
P:\Clerical Sen-ices Dcpt\Margaret ParkeMgenda\CDC 2003\03-06-02 State College Public Hearing.doc
COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Meeting Date: & 11ft, 103
Agenda Item Number: / c;
IF NO WRITTEN ORAL OBJECTIONS ARE PRESENTED
MOTION B: THAT THE HEARING BE CLOSED; THAT SAID RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED AND THAT
SAID ORDINANCE BE LAID OVER FOR FINAL ADOPTION
RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, MAKING A FINDING THAT CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT BURDEN THE
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA OF THE STATE COLLEGE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT,
APPROVING THE SECTION 33352 REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL ON
THE 2003 EMINENT DOMAIN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE
STATE COLLEGE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, APPROVING THE 2003 EMINENT DOMAIN
AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE ST ATE COLLEGE
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE 2003 EMINENT DOMAIN AMENDMENT TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE ST ATE COLLEGE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
..............................!'.tl.\l.!!lPI'J.~.gl'l:r.~~.Q!:1~.I:r.Y..~.q:............_.._......................_............................-........................"''''...''.
.>.
...____________.._d_______.__________________.______.__..____________________..__________________..._____..________u__...__.______...._____._._______..___________.__.------.------
P:\Cleri,al Services DepI\Margarcl ParkerlAgenda\CDC 2003\03-06-02 Slate College Public Hearing.doc
COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Meeting Date: 06/0212003
Agenda Item Number: ~
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ST AFF REPORT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------_...-----------------~---------_.---------------------
Joint Public Hearinl! - State ColIel!e Redevelopment
Project Area Plan Amendment - Reinstate Eminent Domain
BACKGROUND:
With the improving local economy, the Agency is seeing increasing development interest throughout
the City. The State College Redevelopment Project Area, established on April 27, 1970 and
encompassing approximately 1,800 acres, is an area in which there is great interest. In recognition of
these trends, it is important for the Agency to have a variety of tools available to assist
redevelopment. One of the most effective tools for redevelopment is the power of eminent domain.
However, the power of eminent domain in the State College Redevelopment Project Area expired on
January 1, 1999.
On March 18, 2002, the Mayor and Common Council authorized the initiation of an amendment to
the State College Redevelopment Project Area Plan to re-establish the power of eminent domain over
only those properties that are within non-residential land use districts in the General Plan or are
currently being used for non-residential purposes. The proposed amendment (referred to as the "2003
Amendment") would reinstate the power of eminent domain until the end of the Redevelopment Plan
or approximately 7 years from now. No resident homeowner or apartment resident or residential
occupant will be displaced by the 2003 Amendment. No plans exist at the present time which may
result in the purchase or condemnation of any commercial or industrial use properties.
On July 24, 2002, Agency Staff conducted a public information workshop to present the proposed
amendment, explain the process, and answer questions from attendees. This workshop was
announced by mailed notice to owners of land in the redevelopment project are of the State College
Redevelopment Project and to all occupants of property - both commercial and residential. Six
people attended the workshop.
On April 7, 2003, the Mayor and Common Council and Community Development Commission of the
City of San Bernardino formally scheduled a joint public hearing for May 19, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. to
consider a proposed amendment to the redevelopment plan reinstating eminent domain and adoption
of a Negative Declaration.
On April 17, 2003, mailers were sent to residents, businesses, organizations, and property owners
within the State College Redevelopment Project Area concerning the public hearing set for May 19,
2003 at 7:00 p.m.
On April 29, 2003, mailers were sent to residents, businesses, organizations and property owners
within the State College Redevelopment Project Area concerning the change of date for the public
hearing to June 2, 2003 at 7:00 p.m.
_________________..____________________________________________.________.____~___._.___.__._.._n__.____.______--------------......--------------------------------...----------------
p:\Clerical Services Dept\Margarcl ParkeMgenda\CDC 2003\03-06-02 State College Public Hearing,doc
COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Meeting Date: 06/0212003
Agenda Item Number: -W-
Economic Development Agency Staff Report
State College Redevelopment Project Area Plan Amendment
Page 2
CURRENT ISSUE:
Section 33352 of the Community Redevelopment Law ("CRL") states that when the Agency submits
an amendment to the redevelopment plan to the Mayor and Common Council ("Council") for
adoption, the Agency must also submit a report entitled the Report to Mayor and Common Council
("Report"). For a redevelopment plan amendment, the contents of the Report are only those portions
warranted by the proposed amendment. The purpose of this Report is to provide, in one document,
all information, documentation, and evidence regarding the 2003 Amendment to assist the Council in
its consideration and in making various findings and determinations that are legally required to adopt
the 2003 Amendment. This report to Mayor and Common Council has been prepared in accordance
with all requirements of Section 33457.1 and 33352 of the CRL.
During the joint public hearing the Commission and the Council will consider the information
presented by the Agency Staff and consultants regarding the Report and the 2003 Amendment.
Testimony and comments of interested members of the public will also be received. If one or more
written objections are presented to the Council before or during the joint public hearing on June 2,
2003, a written response to such written objections must be prepared and considered before the 2003
Amendment may be adopted.
By adopting the attached resolution of the Community Development Commission at the conclusion of
the joint public hearing, the Commission will approve the Report and the proposed eminent domain
amendment and authorize Agency Staff to transmit the Report to Mayor and Common Council and
the 2003 Eminent Domain Amendment to the Mayor and Common Council.
ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT:
An Initial Study has been prepared which indicates that no significant affect on the environment will
occur as a result of the adoption of the 2003 Amendment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration is
proposed under the California Environmental Quality Act for the 2003 Amendment. A de mininus
finding is also proposed as the 2003 Amendment will not have any adverse affect on wildlife or
wildlife habitat.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Based on contracts entered into with consultants for this amendment, the costs will total $29,379.
Funds for this activity have been approved and budgeted.
___.__.___________________.______________.___________~___..___________.._-*___-*0___________________-*_.________________________________d_________________________________--_.-
P:\Clerical Services Dept\Margaret Parlu:r\AgendaICDC 2003103-06-02 Slate College Public Hearing_doc
COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Meeting Date: 06/02/2003
Agenda Item Number: UL
Economic Development Agency Staff Report
State College Redevelopment Project Area Plan Amendment
Page 3
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That the Community Development Commission and Mayor and Common Council adopt Motion A or
Motion B.
t, Gary Van Os
\ {r\.) ,.
EXHIBITS:
I. Redevelopment Project Area Map
2. Text ofthe Proposed 2003 Amendment
3. Report to the Mayor and Common Council
4. Copies of Written Objections Received by May 22, 2003
5. Negative Declaration and Initial Study
6. Resolution of the Community Development Commission
7. Ordinance of the Mayor and Common Council
8. Certification of Mailing and Copy of Newsletter
9. Certification of Notice and Copy of Notice
p:\Clcrical Services Dept\Margarel Parker\Agenda\CDC 2003\03-06-01 Slale College Public Hearing,doc
....---.-----------------------.------.------------------------------------------------------------..----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Meeting Date: 06/02/2003
Agenda Item Number: Jt;ll
.,", 8
(CotPV
ORDINANCE NO.
2
3
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE 2003 EMINENT DOMAIN
AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE STATE
COLLEGE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
4
5
6
7
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino ("City") is a charter city and municipa
corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California'
and
9
10
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino ("Agency") is
public body, corporate and politic, organized and existing under the California Communi
Redevelopment Law, Division 24, Part I of the California Health and Safety Code (Health
Safety Code 9 33000 et seq.) ("CRL"); and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council of the City ("Common Council"), b
adoption of Ordinance No. 3067, approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Stat
College Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, the Common Council has subsequently adopted amendments
Redevelopment Plan for the State College Redevelopment Project as follows:
11
12
13
\4
15
16
17
18
\9
20
(i)
(i)
(i)
Common Council Ordinance No. MC-560; and
Common Council Ordinance No. MC-725; and
Common Council Ordinance No. MC-925; and
21
22
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for the State College Redevelopment Project a
adopted by Common Council Ordinance No. 3067 and as amended by Common Counci
Ordinance No. 560, and as further amended by Common Council Ordinance No. 725 and a
further amended by Common Council Ordinance No. 925 is referred to herein as th
23
24
25
26
27
"Redevelopment Plan"; and
28
4846-7818-0608.\
.c::/.,.,lni: 11.'1('l jrnrn
I
..., 8
~
,'~ .
2
WHEREAS, the Common Council has initiated proceedings for the adoption of the 2003
Eminent Domain Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan (the "2003 Amendment"); and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan delineates the redevelopment project area for th
State College Redevelopment Project (the "Project Area"); and
WHEREAS, the 2003 Amendment does not propose to modify the boundaries of th
Project Area but rather proposes to amend the Redevelopment Plan to extend the Agency'
eminent domain authority with respect to all non-residential portions ofthe Project Area until th
fortieth (40th) anniversary of the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, as originally approved b
Common Council Ordinance No. 3067; and
3
4
5
6
7
9
10 WHEREAS, the Common Council consented to hold a joint public hearing with th
II Community Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino (the "Commission"), as th
12 governing board of the Agency, with respect to the 2003 Amendment, at which hearing any an
13 all persons having any objections to the 2003 Amendment, or the regularity of any prio
14 proceedings concerning the 2003 Amendment, would be allowed to appear before th
15 Commission and the Mayor and Common Council and show cause why the 2003 Amendmen
16 should not be adopted; and
l7 WHEREAS, notice of the joint public hearing of the Commission and Mayor an
18
Common Council with respect to the 2003 Amendment and the Negative Declaration prepare
therefore in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") was given i
19
20
accordance with applicable law; and
21
WHEREAS, the joint public hearing of the Commission and Mayor and Commo
Council was duly held on June 2, 2003; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the passage of this Ordinance have occurred an
been taken in accordance with applicable law;
22
23
24
25
//1
1//
//1
26
27
28
4846-7818-0608.1
.(n'"n1. 11.1.() inun
2
:'0'. 8
2
NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0
SAN BERNARDINO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
3
SECTION 1. The purposes and intent of the Common Council with respect to the 2003
4
Amendment is to extend the time limit on the Agency's exercise of eminent domain authori
with respect to certain non-residential portions of the Project Area thereby protecting an
promoting the sound redevelopment of the Project Area and the general welfare of th
inhabitants of the City by providing a method of property acquisition through the potential use 0
eminent domain in order for the Agency to be able to assemble parcels and attract redevelopmen
interest by insuring its ability to deliver property for redevelopment purposes.
SECTION 2. The Common Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. All facts set forth in the above Recitals are true and correct.
5
6
7
9
10
II
12
b. The Common Council has previously found and determined in Ordinance No.
3067 that the Project Area is a blighted area, the redevelopment of which is necessary t
effectuate the public purposes declared in the CRL. The Common Council hereby further find
and determines that (i) such findings and determinations set forth in Ordinance No. 3067 ar
final and, (ii) the 2003 Amendment does not add territory to the Project Area or make any othe
revisions to the Redevelopment Plan that affect these previously-made findings
determinations, (iii) such previously made findings and determinations remain valid
effective, and (iv) no further finding or determination concerning blight in the Project Area i
required for the 2003 Amendment.
c. The Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 2003 Amendment, will assist wi
the redevelopment of the Project Area in conformity with the CRL and in the interests of th
public peace, health, safety, and welfare.
d. The adoption and carrying out of the 2003 Amendment is economically sound an
feasible.
e. The 2003 Amendment is consistent with and conforms to the General Plan ofth
City including but not limited to the Housing Element ofthe General Plan.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4846-7818-0608. I
,,11?m1 11-10 imm
3
2
3
4
5
6
7
>. 8
9
10
\l
\2
13
14
15
16
17
\8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
f The carrying out of the 2003 Amendment will promote the public peace, health
safety, and welfare of the City and would effectuate the purposes and policies ofthe CRL.
g. The condemnation of real property, as provided for in the Redevelopment Plan a
amended by the 2003 Amendment, is necessary to the execution of the Redevelopment Plan an
adequate provisions have been made for payment for property to be acquired, if any, as provide
bylaw.
h. The Common Council, in Ordinance No. 3067, found and determined that th
Agency has a feasible method and plan for the relocation of families and persons displaced fro
the Project Area, if the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan should result in the tempor
or permanent displacement of any occupants of housing facilities in the Project Area. Th
Common Council finds and determines that (i) such findings and determinations set forth i
Ordinance No. 3067, are final and conclusive; (ii) the 2003 Amendment does not add territory t
the Project Area or make any other revisions to the Redevelopment Plan that affect thes
previously-made findings and determinations; (iii) such previously-made findings an
determinations remain valid and effective; (iv) the implementation of the Redevelopment PI
pursuant to the 2003 Amendment will not result in the displacement of any person or househol
residing in a dwelling unit in the Project Area by exercise of eminent domain; and (v) no furthe
finding or determination concerning the foregoing is required for the 2003 Amendment.
\. The Common Council, in Ordinance No. 3067, found and determined that ther
are or are being provided in the Project Area, or in other areas not generally less desirable i
regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities, and at rents or prices within th
financial means of the families and persons displaced from the Project Area, if any, decent, safe
and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to the displaced familie
and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. The Common Counci
finds and determines that (i) such findings and determinations set forth in Ordinance No. 3067
are final and conclusive; (ii) the 2003 Amendment does not add territory to the Project Area 0
make any other revisions to the Redevelopment Plan that affect these previously-made finding
and determinations; (iii) such previously-made findings and determinations remain valid an
4846-7818-0608.1
5/22/03 II :30 jrrun
4
2
effective; (iv) the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to the 2003 Amendmen
will not result in the displacement of any person or household residing in a dwelling unit in th
Project Area by exercise of eminent domain; and (v) no further finding or determinatio
concerning the foregoing is required for the 2003 Amendment.
3
4
5
Families and persons shall not be displaced following the adoption of the 2003
J.
6 Amendment prior to the adoption of a relocation plan pursuant to California Health and Safet
7 Code Sections 33411 and 33411.1, and dwelling units housing persons and families of low 0
>_ 8 moderate income shall not be removed or destroyed prior to the adoption of a replacemen
9 housing plan pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Sections 33334.5, 33413, an
10 33413.5.
11
The time limitation on commencement of eminent domain proceedings containe
k.
12
in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 2003 Amendment, is reasonably related t
projects to be implemented in the Project Area and to the ability of the Agency to eliminat
blight within the Project Area. The 2003 Amendment does not amend or affect any other tim
limitations or amend or affect the limitation on the number of dollars to be allocated to th
13
14
15
16
Agency that are contained in the Plan as amended by the 2003 Amendment.
SECTION 3. The Common Council hereby approves the 2003 Amendment:
Subparagraph f of paragraph 2 of Section D of the Redevelopment Plan
amended to read as follows:
17
18
19
20
"[EDITORS NOTE: SECTION D. URBAN RENEWAL POWERS TO B
EXERCISED TO ACHIEVE PLAN OBJECTIVES...j
21
22
[EDITOR'S NOTE: 2.
Acquisition and Clearance... j
23
f. The Redevelopment Agency may acquire, purchase, lease, obtain option, 0
otherwise acquire any interest in real property, and any improvements on it by an
means authorized by law, including by gift, grant, exchange, purchase
cooperative negotiations, lease, and any other means authorized by law includin
the use of eminent domain for purposes of redevelopment in the Project Area a
authorized by law. Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding sentence, th
Redevelopment Agency shall not acquire by eminent domain any property withi
the Project Area on which as of the date when the Redevelopment Agenc
transmits its written offer to acquire such property to the owner thereof i
accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, or other applicable law
24
25
26
27
28
4846-7818-0608.1
5/22/03 11 :30 imm
5
2
3
4
5
6
7
,. 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
person or persons reside, nor shall the Redevelopment Agency acquire by eminen
domain any property which is either designated under applicable General Plan 0
zoning regulations as residential property.
With regard to the time period to exercise the Redevelopment Agency's power 0
eminent domain within the Project Area, the Agency shall not initiate lega
proceedings to acquire an interest in real property by the exercise of the power 0
eminent domain after April 27, 2010.
The Redevelopment Agency is not authorized to acquire real property in th
Project Area owned by a public entity, which does not consent to suc
acquisition. The Redevelopment Agency may transfer real property which it h
acquired from another public entity to private ownership before th
Redevelopment Agency completes land disposition within the entire Project Area
provided however that the Redevelopment Agency and such private owner shal
have first entered into a participation agreement relating to the redevelopment 0
such property.
The Redevelopment Agency shall not acquire real property on which an existin
building is to be continued on its present site and in its present form and us
without consent of the owner, unless (1) such building requires structura
alterations, improvement, modernization or rehabilitation, or (2) the site or lot 0
which the building is situated requires modification in size, shape or use, or (3) i
is necessary to impose upon such property any of the standard, restrictions an
controls of the Plan and the owner fails or refuses to participate in the Plan b
. .., "
executmg a partiCipatIOn agreement
[EDITOR'S NOTE: end text of amendment to Redevelopment Plan reinstating eminen
domain powers of the Agency]
SECTION 4. The Common Council designates the Redevelopment Plan, as amended b
the 2003 Amendment as set forth in Section 3 of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "Amende
Plan"), as the official redevelopment plan for the State College Redevelopment Project
SECTION 5. Prior to the opening of the joint public hearing at which this Resolution i
approved, the Common Council received an "Initial Study", as this term is defined in th
California Environmental Quality Act, which was prepared for the Redevelopment Agency 0
the City of San Bernardino regarding the 2003 Amendment The Notice of Intent to Adopt
Negative Declaration has been published as of May I, 2003 in The Sun and the Notice of Inten
was distributed for public comment to all responsible agencies and other interested persons b
United States Mail and was posted with the Clerk of the County as of May 2, 2003 for a perio
4846-7818-0608.1
5/22/03 11:30 jrnm
6
2
3
4
5
6
7
., 8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of 20 days. The public comment period ended on May 22, 2003 and no written comment fro
any public agency of other interested person was received during such period of time. Th
Common Council has independently reviewed the Initial Study. In its independent discretion, th
Common Council hereby finds and determines that the Initial Study adequately describes th
2003 Amendment and accurately identifies and assesses all of the potentially significan
environmental effects or impacts associated with the implementation of the 2003 Amendment.
The 2003 Amendment does not present any significant environmental affects. The Commo
Council hereby finds and determines that there are no significant environmental effect
associated with the implementation of the 2003 Amendment, and the Common Council hereb
adopts a Negative Declaration for the 2003 Amendment. The Common Council acknowledge
that the State College Redevelopment Project was established prior to the enactment of th
California Environmental Quality Act and therefore no Program Environmental Impact Repo
(EIR) exists for the State College Redevelopment Project. In the absence of a Program EIR, th
Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino prepared an Initial Study to determine i
the proposed reinstatement of eminent domain would have any significant environmental effect
and whether an EIR should be prepared for the 2003 Amendment. Based on the Initial Stud
regarding the 2003 Amendment and the other information as submitted to the Common Counci
during the public hearing at which this Resolution was adopted, the Common Council hereb
finds and determines that no environmental impact report is required under the Californi
Environmental Quality Act - CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.) for th
adoption of the 2003 Amendment or the Ordinance approving and adopting the 2003
Amendment. The Common Council further finds that when considering the Initial Study and th
2003 Amendment as a whole that there is no evidence before the Common Council that the 2003
Amendment will have potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources on the habitat 0
which the wildlife depends. Accordingly, the Common Council hereby directs the City Clerk t
cause a Notice of Determination to be filed with the County Clerk for the Negative Declaratio
for the 2003 Amendment as hereby approved upon the adoption of this Ordinance approving th
2003 Amendment. Concurrently with the filing of the Notice of Determination for the 2003
4846-7818-0608.1
5122103 II :30 jmm
7
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
..
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Amendment, the City Clerk shall also submit to the County Clerk a Certificate of Fee Exemptio
under Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section 753.5(c).
SECTION 6. The Common Council hereby authorizes and provides for the City of S
Bernardino's expenditure of money provided for the in the Amended Plan.
SECTION 7. The Agency is hereby vested with the responsibility for carrying out th
Amended Plan in accordance with the provisions thereof and of applicable law.
SECTION 8. The Common Council hereby declares its intention to
complete any proceedings necessary to be carried out by the City under the provisions of th
Amended Plan.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall comply with the applicable procedures of the C
with respect to the adoption of this Ordinance, including the transmission of a copy of thi
Ordinance to other public entities, if such be required.
SECTION 10. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portio
of this Ordinance, is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of an
court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainin
portions of this Ordinance. The Common Council hereby declares that it would have adopte
20
this Ordinance and each, section subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of thi
Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses
phrases, or portions of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 11. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Ordinance to b
transmitted to the Agency.
SECTION 12. The City Clerk shall certifY to the passage of this Ordinance and shal
cause the same to be published as required by law.
21
22
23
24
/1/
/1/
//1
//1
/1/
25
26
27
28
4846-7818-0608.1
5/22/03 II :30 jrnm
8
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
>.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE 2003 EMINENT DOMAIN
AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE STATE
COLLEGE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
meeting thereof, held on the
day of
Council Members:
,2003, by the following vote to wit:
Absent
Abstain
Navs
Aves
ESTRADA
LONGVILLE
MCGINNIS
DERRY
SUAREZ
ANDERSON
MC CAMMACK
Rachel G. Clark, City Clerk
18
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
day of
,2003.
19
20
21
Judith Valles, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
22
Approved as to form and Legal Content:
23
By:
24
25
26
27
28
4846-7818-0608.1
5/22/03 11 :30 jmm
9
~
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
ST ATE COLLGE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
I, Mike Trout, whose business address is at the City of San Bernardino Economic Development
Agency, 201 North "E" Street, Suite 301, San Bernardino, CA 92401-1507, do hereby certify that
the notice for the Joint Public Hearing on the Proposed 2003 Eminent Domain Amendment to
the State College Redevelopment Plan (attached as "Exhibit A"), for the State College
Redevelopment Project Area, was mailed, via first class mail, to all property owners, residents,
business owners, community organization representatives, and interested persons in the area of
the State College Redevelopment Project Area as shown on the attached copy of the mailing list
(attached as "Exhibit B") at the United States Post Office, in San Bernardino, California on
Apy// ,;l 7 ,2003.
1 certify under penalty of peIjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
DATED: ~y;j ~tJ ,2003
~~
Mike Trout, Project Manager
City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency
Attachments: Exhbit A - Public Meeting Newsletter/Notice
Exhibit B - Mailing List
P:\ACOOUI1Iing Dept\Mike\S~e College, Jow Public Hearina; Certificarion ofMallini Affidavit-doc
_.....- .
~..,
.r.xn1D1t: A
**FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - NOY,A PUBLIC DOCUHEHT U,c'
);~?!3" :\~?~;? -"7t"~~E ':'/'S"~''':' "'~':'~~f'r'c~;"':'~'
'.,' 'CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO :'C1TY CLERK'S OFFICE ,.,-,_.~-",."
',., RECORDS & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
" .....~
,~
AGENDA ITEM TRACKING FORM
Meeting Date/Date Adopted: (,' II C/ 0_'1 Item No.
r f
Resolution/Ordinance No. 111C - I ('f ("
, -
Effective Date: 7-1 7 - 0 3
Vote: Ayes:! - 7
Abstain; ,Q--
Date Sent to Mayor: 6 -(7 - 0 '3
Date of Mayor's Signature: G.-I? ~03
Date Summary Sent to Attorney: 6--- (7 - 0 -'}
Date Published: G ,- .J.3-0 2,
Meeting Type: D.d~.t- L9j'
Continued FronnITl& Item No. '
/9
Ordinance Urgency: Yes
Termination/Sunset Date:
, /'J
Nays: <=--'----
Absent:
.C2--
Date of Clerk's Signature:
0-1 J"-a3
{, --I f-o'''S
Date Returned from Mayor:
Date Summary Returned from Attorney:
(;-/7-03
Date Seal Impressed:
../
Exhibits Complete & Attached to Resolution/Ordinance:
Rem i nder Letter Sent:
Reminder Letter Sent:
Rem i nder Letter Sent:
Request for Council Action & Staff Report Attached: Yes
Notes: if~J;/ / PL- - ~;; ~/ ~i0
To Wh~
~~med:
11? _ .
Date Sent for Signature:
Expiration Date:
Copies Distribut
No
Ready to Fi Ie:
Date:
00CtJMEf'fl: tOCA noN:
FOaIo45I~ IIern Trac:kinI Form -cc FomI No. 111. UIR u,xIMtd: lV0411996