Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout60-Planning ciTY OF ........a..~ ;......,. .... COUNCIL MTIOII General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 FrCNn: Larry E. Reed, Director Su~~: To change the land use designation from RL to RS on a site on the south side of ~: Planning and Building Services Ohio Avenue between Olive and Walnut Avenues. D~: Mayor and Common Council Meeting of July 2, 1990 Synopsis of Prwious Council ~ion: The site was designated RL, Residential Low with the adoption of the General Plan on June 2, 1989. At their meeting of April 17, 1990, the Planning Commission failed to pass a motion to recommend the adoption of a Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 to change the land use designation from RL, Residential Low to RS, Residential Suburban on 22.5 acres of land on the south side of Ohio Avenue between Olive Avenue and 'Walnut Avenue. Adopt resolution, - f;t:-;o .v - .. "., = - "- - -: :! .~ ",..~. ~,; -0;. . W 1>> ... Ci ~ ...".. =-~... - - ::r. <:;) (.., .." .;.:} :" Recommended motion: 4 ~~/ Signature Contllc:t penon: Larry E. Reed/Valerie Ross Supponing data ..uadl8d: Staff Report Phone: 384-5057 WII'd: 5 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Not Aoplicable Source: (Acct. No.! (Acct. DescriDtionl Finlllce: Council NotIII: 7r..G262 Agenda Item NO~ . CITY OF SAN -.l...NO - MQUUT .&. COUNOIL ACTION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT : General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 Mayor and Common Council Meeting July 2~1990 REOUEST The proposed amendment is to change the land use designation from RL, Residential Low to RS, Residential Suburban for two parcels of land on the south side of Ohio Avenue between Olive Avenue and Walnut Avenue (APN's 261-082-01 and 02). See Attachment 1 for the proposed amendment site and its location. BACKGROUND During the public hearing process for adoption of the General Plan, the applicant requested that the site be designated RS, Residential Suburban (4.5 dwelling units per gross acre). The Planning commission and the Citizen Advisory Committee recommended that the site be designated RL, Residential Low (3.1 dwelling units per gross acre). The Mayor and Common Council concurred and the site was designated RL with the adoption of the General Plan on June 2, 1989. ENVIRONMENTAL The Environmental Review Committee reviewed the Initial Study prepared for the proposed amendment and recommended a Negative Declaration. The Initial Study is included with the Staff Report to the Planning Commission labeled Attachment 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At their meeting of April 17, 1990, the proposed amendment was considered by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing. A motion was made and seconded to adopt the Negative Declaration and to amend the General Plan as proposed, but the motion failed by the following vote: Motion - Lopez . . . . . . For Second - Cole . . . . . . For Lindseth . . . . . . Against Jordan . . . . . . Against Sharp . . . . . . Against Stone ...... Against Clemenson ...... Against. Corona ...... Absent 75-0264 o o Paqe 2 General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 Mayor and CQmmon Council Meetinq June 18, 1990 ThePlanninq CQmmission members were concerned with density, flooding and biological issues. The site was not designated RS, Residential Suburban as requested by the same applicant durinq the General Plan adoption proce.. as per the recQmm8ndation of the Planning CQmmission. Some of the Commissioners felt that unless there was new information to support the RS, designation, they had thoroughly discussed this site before and could not support the hiqher density. The Planning Commission felt that the lower density of RL, Residential Low was more appropriate due to the biological concerns which are related to the floodinq issue. It has not been resolved whether future development will be required to construct a storm drain or a concrete lined channel or to leave the channel in a natural state. staff supported the RS designation during the General Plan adoption process because the site is bordered by existinq RS develOPments on three sides. Staff supports the RS designation now for the same reason and also because there is additional RS designated land to the north (on the property considered for the State Water Project). Staff has determined that RS is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the General Plan. The CQmmission was also concerned about the integrity of Bailey Creek based on potential riparian habitat. Permits will be required from the california Department of Fish and Game prior to project development. Conditions of approval will be required with project development pertaining to improv_ents, setbacks, maintenance, etc. of the stream channel. This could affect actual density but will be required regardless of the desiqnation. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OPTIONS 1. The Mayor and Council may adopt the Negative DeClaration- and approve General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 based on the (i~dinas in the resolution. The Mayor and Council may deny General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 because the higher density of RS, Residential Suburban could impact the stream channel and cause irreversible damage to the riparian corridor. \.~. , " o o Page 3 General Plan Amendaent No. 89-3 Mayor and Co_on Council Meeting June 18, 1990 REcOMMENDATION Statf reco_ends that the Mayor and Co_on Council adopt the resolution which adopts the Negative Declaration and approves General Plan Amendment No. 89-3. Prepared by: John R. Burke, Assistant Planner tor Larry E. Reed, Director, Department ot Planning and Building Services LER:JRB/sd Attachment: 1 . Proposed Amendment 2 - Statf Report to the Planning C~ission (inClude. Initial study) M&CC:GPA89-3 o o RESOLUTION NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 vdetermined that General 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPl'ING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ADOPl'ING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 89-3 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: (a) The General Plan for the City of San Bernardino was adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by Resolution No. 89- 159 on June 2, 1989. (b) General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 to the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino was considered by the Planning Commission on April 17, 1990, after a noticed public hearing. The Planning Commission recommended denial and their concerns have been considered by the Mayor and Common Council. (c) An Initial Study was prepared on February 5, 1990 and reviewed by who Environmental the Review Committee Plan Amendment No. 89-3 would not have a significant effect on the environment and therefore, recommended that a Negative Declaration be adopted. (d) The proposed Negative Declaration received a 21 day public review period from February 22, 1990 through March 14, 1990 and all comments relative thereto have been reviewed by the Planning commission and the Mayor and Common Council in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and local regulations. (e) The Mayor and Common Council held a noticed public hearing and fully reviewed and considered proposed General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 and the Planning Department Staff Report on July 2, 1990. 1. . o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (f) The adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 is deemed in the interest of the orderly development of the city and is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the existing General Plan. SECTION 2. Neaative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the Mayor and Common Council that the proposed amendment to the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino will have no significant effect on the environment, and the Negative Declaration heretofore prepared by the Environmental Review Committee as to the effect of this proposed amendment is hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted. SECTION 3. Findinas BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of the city of San Bernardino that: A. The change of designation to RB, Residential Suburban for the proposed amendment will change the land use map only and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan. B. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. C. All public services are available to the study area. Any development permissible under the RB, Residential Suburban designation proposed by this amendment would not impact on such services. IIII IIII 2. . o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D. The proposed amendment is to redesignate 22.5 acres of land from RL, Residential Low to RB, Residential Suburban so the balance of the land uses within the city will be minimally impacted. E. The amendment site is physically suitable for the requested land use designation. Anticipated future land use has been analyzed in the Initial Study and it has been determined that project specific mitigation measures will be sufficient to eliminate any environmental impacts. SECTION 4. Amendment BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that: (A) The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino is amended by changing approximately 22.5 acres located on the south side of Ohio Avenue between Olive Avenue and Walnut Avenue from RL, Residential Low (3.1 dwelling units per gross acre) to RB, Residential Suburban (4.5 dwelling units per gross acre). This amendment is designated as General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 and its location is outlined on the map entitled Attachment 1 and is more specifically described in the legal description entitled Attachment 2, copies of which are attached and incorporated herein by reference. (B) General Plan Amendment No. 89-3 shall become effective immediately upon adoption of this resolution. IIII IIII IIII 3. o o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 SECTION 5. ~D Notation amendment affected by it shall be noted on such appropriate This resolution and the General approved Plan maps as have been previously adopted and by the Mayor and Common Council and which are on file in the office of the City Clerk. No~ic. of Determination SECTION 6. is hereby directed to file Department Determination with the County Clerk of the Bernardino certifyinq the City's compliance preparinq the Neqative Declaration. IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII 15 I I I I 16 IIII 17 IIII 18 IIII 19 IIII 20 IIII 21 IIII 22 IIII 23 IIII 24 IIII 25 IIII 26 IIII 27 IIII 28 4. The Planninq a Notice of County of San with CEQA in . o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION.. .ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIROJIMBNTAL IJIPACT AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AIIBHrImNT NO. 89-3 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foreqoinq resolution was duly . adopted by the Mayor and COlIIIIIon Council of the city of San Bernardino at a aeetinq thereof, held on the 2nd day of July, 1990, by the followinq vote, to wit: council Members AXH NAYES ABSTAYN ESTRADA REILLY FLORES MAUDSLEY MINOR POPE-LUDLAM MILLER city Clerk The foreqoiD9 reeolution is hereby approved this day of , 1990. W.R. BolcOJDb, Mayor city of San Bernardino Approved a. to fora and leqal content: JAMES F. PENMAN, city A torney .L By: IIII II IIII IIII IIII 5. elT OF SAN SER ARDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 89-3 TITLe~PM.ENT I ,,: I I RL .' ~ ~ RS ~. ~7 t I.'~'~ ,... o 0, ATTACHMENT.:..! CIT F SAN BE RDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 89-3 TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 'DIe ll...tl lNIl:cly 1/4 Of Block ~, Of Ixvingtal Ianr:llUllS Water (" I~.~' _ per plat X~ in IloCIk 3 Of ..., Il8IJI 9, lWWwo.~ Of Aid QUlty, ~_ foll~: BIgimin!J at a point in tba Nart:herly 1Jna Of Aid Block 55, l.ocllt.s ~ t.t' un tba a...u - ~~ly -....._ lUllS tbI a..:tl 'Jr--~ly .....4._ Of Aid J)"1dt1 tt.IOe liutcly alcIrl; the a...tI...:ly lina ot. Aid Block 55 to the a."u ....ly ........-. tbllU.41 tt.IOe SciUI:2m'ly alcn; tbI ......-ly 1Jna of Aid Block 55 to a point lIidway .bWfI M'l tba "'11' .-ly ......... lUllS tba scut!II at: 1lIt'1Y "-.-. of Aid Block 551 ~at riiIbt ~ -~y alCDIJ tbI EIIIbtrly lUllS ~ly ~ u.r- Of Aid Block 55 to a p:WIt lll1~'Y b1tb18IIl the -......qr-ly lUllS lI....~ly line of Aid tll"Ck1 t:balC6JUtl~ .~. tbI ~tl.-t.ly lUllS SCllJtbarly center lines Of Aid Block 55 to the point of 8Ig1nnbr,J. Said tract of llUllS is ccnsistin; of all of I.Clt 2 lUllS partia'IS of lots 1 lUllS 3 of said Block 55 ATTACHMENT 2 o o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO' PLANNING OEPARTMEI'tT AGENDA ITEM 4 HEARING DATE 4/17/90 General Plan 1\i'leIldrnellt 89-3 APPLICANT:QIe Forty Seven Limited P~ ship 501 North Placentia Avenue OWNER: P\1l1ert:al, CA 92631 (Same as applicant) III 3 a i c ..... 4 III a: 4 To charw:Je the General Plan land use OesilJrlatian iran RIo, Residential !ow to as, Residential SUI:m'ban at a 22.5 a(%e site located on the Balth side of ati.o Avenue bettlll!en Olive ani WalnUt Avenues. EXISTING PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION SUbject Vacant RIo Residential !ow North Vacant RIo Residential !ow South Residential RS Residential S\1burl)an East Residential RS Residential S\1burl)an West Residential RS Residential SUburban GEOLOGIC I SEISMIC DVES FLOOD HAZARD lID YES IiIZONE A ( iii VES ) HAZARD ZONE iJNO ZONE ONO OZONE B SEWERS ONO HIGH FIRE I!IVES AIRPOltT NOISE I DYES REDEVELOPMENT DVES HAZARO ZONE DNO CRASH ZONE RlNO PROJECT AREA ~NO ~ o NOT o POTENTIAL. SIGNIFICANT Z Iii) APPROVAL APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0 WITH MITIGATING - 0 ZII) MEASURES NO E.1.R. tc CONDITIONS III CD o EXEMPT o E.I.R. REOUIRED BUT NO ...Q 0 :lZ ...Z DENIAL Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ~. OQ WITH MITIGATING 0 CONTINUANCE TO a:Z MEASURES (1):1 >iL 0 z iii NO o SIGNIFICANT EFFEers fd III SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E.R. C. EFFECTS MINUTES a: NOV. I'" RIVIII. ""LV.... ATTACHMENT..:/. IKV L o o . ." '. CITY OF SANIIBINA1DNOPUlNINQDEP~: , ",,' CASE GPA sg;;3 ' ' " . 'S AGENDA ITE.. '4 HEARING DATE 4~~~/90 REQUEST The applicllnt requuts tm.-t the lllnd use designation be chllnpd froa aL, RuideJltial I.o1If to RS, Residential.SubU,rban on 22.5 acreS of lllnd in the Vet'duont area of the City (see Exhibit C 1 . LO~TION The propo_d amend1umt ,si,te is ;Located on the south side of Ohio Avenue between Olive Avenue and Walnut,Avenus. (see Exhi,bit, B) . The sit. consists. of two parcels (AasHsor 'Parq:el Nl.DIb$. 261,-082-01 !'f'd 02):' both of which are rectan- . gular in sha~. ' . BACKGROUND During the public hearing process for adoption of the General Plan, the appli~nt:requested that the site be designated RB, Residential Suburban., The Planning ColD1Iission recOllllllended that the site be design..ted RL, Residential Low. The Mayor and Common Council concUrred and the site was designated RL, Residential Low with the adoption of the General Plan on June 2, 1989. MUNICIPAL CODE AND t:1I!NlnlllT. PLAN CONFORMANCE MUNICIPAL CODE Not applicable. GENERAL PLAN This request is to change the General Plan land use designa- tion. e'!J\T.TFORHIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUJ\T.TTY AC'r (CEOA) STATUS An Initial Study was prepared by staff and presented to the Environmental Review committee (ERC) on February 15, 1990 (See Exhibit A). The ERC found that no significant impacts would result'from the proposed amendment and recolllJllended a Negative Declaration. The proposed Negative beclaration was advertised and available for public review from February 22, 1990 to Mar9h 14, 1990. No, comments were received during that period. Il-f/;'!'""'" i1' , . .. CITY OF SANBEANARrJINQ PlANNING DEPARTMENT . . .' .~.. . CASE GPA 89-3 ~I8NS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE p 4 4/17/90 ANlI.T.YSIS SITE CHARACTERISTICS The 22.5 acre site consilllts of vacant land located on the south. side of Ohio Av.e betlleen OlLve Avenue and Walnut Avenue. The site sl.. genUy. frOll the no~we.t to the .OUtheast at approxbatfly n. Th4t .ite i.located in the Biological Resource ~ OVer. l.e,y' Di.tdct, High Wind and High Pire Hazard 10.., the Grilenbelt21one, and PloOd Zone A. The amencfaent Illite i. travu....))y Bailey creek, a natural drainage COurH i Which. flOWll from Bailey Canyon, originating in the moun"inous area to the north. ; SURROUNDING ~ To the west, east, and .outh of. the propo.ed project are existing single family. re.idential 'su))divi.ions, ,each de- signated by the General, Plan asRS, ReaidentialSuburban and havinq a minimum lot size, of 7200 square feet. To the northeast are vacant par,els with a land use de.ignationof RS, Re.idential Suburba$ and to the northwest are vacant parcels with a land use :desiqnation of RL, Residential Low. The area northeasterly of the site is being cOlUJidered by the State Department of water ,Resources . for the Devil Canyon Second Afterbay. PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATION The existinq land use delllignation for the Subject site is RL, Residential ,Low which pet-its single family residences with a minimum lot size of 10,$00 square feet. The maximum density is 3.1 dwellinq units Per qross acre. Development of the site at the current all~able maximum density would yield 69 units maximum. The RS,Residential Suburban land use de- signation permits sinqle'family residence. with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet, and a maxt.um density of 4.5 dwellinq units per qroslll acre. Develop-.nt of the site at the proposed allowable m.ximum density would yield 101 units maximum. This increase ~n density would result in an incre- mental increase in the'types of impacts associated with residential development (i.e. traffic, drainaqe, gradinq, etc.). These impacts are not expected to be significant. BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE. GPA 89-3 AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PA 4. 4/17/90 Future development will be required to provide the necessary service. to serve the project a. well a. the Verdemont . development fee which is a.....ed on a per unit basis which will generate funds for off.ite improvements. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY Development of the site under the proposed RS, Residential Suburban land use designation will be compatible . with exi.ting re.idential use. to the west, east and south. The . objective of the RS de.ignation is to "promote the develop- .ment of single-family, detached' units in a higblqual.ity. suburban setting." (General Plan Objective 1.11) DeVelopment attheRS density (4.5du per ~cr..) is in conformity with the .goals~ obj!!lctives and policie~ of: the General Plan. ENVIRO~NTAL The amendment site is located in the High Wind and Qigh Fire Hazard Zones. Future projects will be conditioned so as to reduce the potential hazards of development in these zones. The site is traversed by Bailey Creek which is shown as an interaittant stream on. the U.S. Geologic Survey, San Bernardino North 7.5 minute quadrangle .A biological assessment was conducted for future infra.tructure projects in the area. The section of Bailey Creek that crosses the site was determined to be of little significance although upstream Bailey Creek supports a lush and very significant riparian community. Any proposed disturbance of Bailey Creek will require a permit from the California Department of Fish and Game, at which time appropriate mitigation measures will condition the project. A cultural resource assessment was conducted as the site is in an area of archaeologic resource concern. No cultural resources were located during the field survey of the site. The area in and adjacent to the Creek bed is within the 100 year flood plain. The stream, as it now stands, is not adequate to contain the flows from a major storm and overflow of the site can be expected. The stream bed will have to be modified prior to development of a residential project. The City Public Works Department is proposing to construct a storm drain from the existing concrete channel which is across Walnut Avenue from the site northwesterly to the mouth of Bailey Canyon. ... .. - . o o CITY OF SAN' BERNARDINO' PLANNIN8Dd~ , ," ,- CASE GPA s;.:3..,...-- - -; 2'1A&1~ 5Y"ft.IIftQ . : ~ -,', j 4 4(t7/90 AGENDA ITEN HEARING DATE p. The possible traffic generated in an RS, Residential Suburban deaiqnaUd area when fully developed will be 46' greater (Average Day Traffic (AD'l') of 1010 va an AD'l'of 690) than in an RL,Re8idential Low, area. The City Traffic Engineer advise. that the existinqand planned .treet network in the vicinity will be sufficient to handle such an increase. FINDIN(;S , I I ~e "proposeR land use ,d..-igqation of RS, Residential Suburban is nq~lf,i* c:onH:ic~ ~d.~~.' ~oa~8~,i,,~bjective. and policies of ,the,,~~ral,,;~an.'I' l ,'," 11 " '" t '. The pro~sec:iam,endJllent, will not, btj diatrimental to the public interest, health', safety, convenience, or welfare of ' the City. All public services are, or will be, available to the site. ' The subject parcels are physically suitable for the requested land use designation and anticipated development. The proposed amendJllent is changing the density use so the balance of land uses within the minimally impacted. CONCLUSIONS of residential city will be The proposed amendment is in conformance with the goals, objectives and, policies in the General Plan. It is compatible with the land uses to the west, east and south of the s,ite ~ 'The 'land use deSignation change to RS, Residential Suburban with its permitted uses will not create an adverse impact on the environment. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPAR1'MENT ' CASEGPA 89-3 ' ~IONS . .. '>.. .. , < < , . '. ... ~ AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE ~1l!1"n1lMJlNDA't:IOR staff recolllll8nds that the Plal1Jl~Jlg clmaieaion make a recOll- mendation to the Mayor and Coma01l Council that: 1. A Negative Decl8J:ation be'adopted, in' accordance with section 2108,0.1 of CEQA for. the proposed amendment. I ': 'f,tle ~J;1er~l p.lan;Land Use lIap be changed from RL, :a.llicfent,1.al Lo" to.1r:~idential Subur~, for the soutlf l!i;\.:dia of OhiO' 'AV~ between Olive Avenue and ~' Walnut Avenue (APNs261-082-01 and 02). ,-'.... 0"1 . ~., ':"..,,-! ,-"t, !;,;:U'-' Larry E. Reed Director, Planning' Building Services Department ~<~~ Assistant Planner Attachments: A - :Initial StUdy B - Proposed AMendment Map C - Location Map PCAGENDA:GPA89-3 4 . ;~ I I Applicant(s) Address City, state Zip l MISC: ISPRlPARATION ke/9-1-89 . ITY OF SAN BERN DINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY Initial study for Environaental Iapacts For 8.M - , eAw ~-~..+ S'f-.3 Projeat: ... r Date ;::;"J>>..~""'1 5".. 1'It!> . .' Prepared for: ~ ~~k~~~"~~ ..ft/p JW.4a :I -{~ tt::M . "26.~J Prepared by: 77.... ~U1r Naae Pt-w.r Title Ci ty of San Bernardino PlanniJl9 Depat1:llent 300 N. -D- Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 ATTA-, ttM eN...~ o o PR.c:fEcr. OE~I2IPT.IOAJ : 7ik.l'r~ p'r:rj&.+ /s k 4.-.,Nd ~e. c::Ji'y~ GeNe,./ P/~",) Ld~ tlfs~;lfr fr:> c:A.r"".,e ~e /I,-r' ~ d~~"#.Ir~ ~~.- AL (1l_;d~Nf,;./ L.cw) ~ ~.s(~ Su6ur~,.))/ -!'or ~ ~jte ~,.-hrd I#,.} Me ~u~ ~,d~ .."c C)Juo AVeN"'~ hdw~'N ~ve htrMUe aNA' tva/~IA-f AvtfJUue. 7l1e ~M C6N~/".s:r.s ~r fiuo f:74r~e/s.l Ao~ rt!"e~M~ /Ai s~e I ~/.bMt; ""'1"'t!'X/M"..-nef 22. S- aqes (" <RS~SerS pt'rcel NUMJ~/'~ 26/-0g2.-01 ..~O2.). ~e HL ~;r_n':'" jPer"",,.-r.s ~'"Nf'~ ~....,:.y &!well,P1 u......,~..s _r 4 .......~~;t7 ~ S. / dwt!"/h.., UA//Ts 'p~r "rt!'$s a~~ lAd Ale ~ S d,.,~:-J ft!"004'"/:.s :s-~/~ ~-'f dwel/;~1 .e.w,J5r .-r-... ~,~,;ty ~..,c ~ 1> dwelllMp ~,~s r'er ?,r~.r:s 4~/'r!:. /he r're:v~~ :rrre /5 ""iJltCdd-/ ~.,,/~ 7 ,~A~..., tJ,~ l'I~w~r /0 .,Ne :S<<A~~ ~ -I-- ""'~)(I--..re.f 7~. '-+H'/'''''''''.../' ,-/ ~s /~'eJ M//// A"&:'~ ~e ~""~'\W..vT D~,.i(e ~/re: -,Cor ~;Mfk ~,;y re;s/e/e"v/'-;..,' V~e ..7" "'" ,N'IA)(I;"_ ~,jly 4r 9. '!> dl4Je//,~ kN;f-s ,p'''' ,?n:PIII_ a.:.~ o 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKL.IST ~..~-~ A. BACKGROUND Application Number: G-aJe,.../ p/tW AAA-.J~f- 1$"-~ Project Description: M ~& ""= &=-v~,~ L~ M{,~ blW;~' ~~N +1rt::>N\. R.L I ll~id'AlI-,i~ teA) -h::, R '5/ 12_",.u.I.iJ SU~N,.JJIAJ . Location: 7A~ 2.2. S ~re ~;,tc /$ /tv'...."'-' ~N ~ $M.tHA. sieic. or: Ollio ,4-fl'lVlAe. beh.u.-Al C'Ai,e ArlI(yIU. ~ w,,/>>uI- ""'_e. Environmental Constraints Areas: f3,'t!J~-' Ilt1'lfMl~ M_'-Jfr->>t!:J~J.y DlMr1G.+-; 11/," Wi'AJd/ I-I~ 6rl:/ 6,..",dJeIl- Zt:we: C/ J'l4ltlld' 7_.../!: A General Plan Designation: IJL - .Re'~ .k:oAl Zoning Designation: Il. -/-/4 "8~ . B. ~B~NTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1. Ea~h Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or more? -A- b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15' natural grade? c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies. Zone? 'f. x d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? x . REVISED 12/87 PAGE 1 OF 8 o o r Yes No Maybe e. Soil erosion on or off the project site? f. Modification of a channel, creek or river? x g. Development subject mudslides, other similar within an area to landslides, liquefaction or hazards? x X . h. Other? 2. MLRBSOURCES: Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial an effect quality? air upon emissions or ambient afr x b. The creation of objectionable odors? x c. Development within a high wind X hazard area? - 3. ~B---RB~OURCES: proposal result in: Will the a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? x c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters? e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards? f. other? x )< '" REVISED 12/87 .... x x x )( ~ PAGE 2 OF 8 , o """IIIl Yes No Maybe 4. BIOLOGlCAL....BJj!QURCES: Could the proposal result in: a. Change in the number of any unique, rare or endangered . species of plants or their habitat including stands of X trees? . b. Change in the number of any unique, rare or endangereCl species of animals or their X habitat? c. Other? X 5. NOISE: Could the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise X leve.ls? b. Exposure of people to exterior noise levels over 65 dB or interior noise levels over 45 X dB? . c. Other? ,X 6. bYi> USE: Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the land use as designated on the General X Plan? b. Development within an Airport X . District? . c. Development within "Greenbelt" X Zone A,B, or C? d. Development within a high fire X hazard zone? e. Other? X , ... ~ REVISED 10/87 PAGE 3 OF 8 7. MAN-MADE HAJ~:;: project: Will the a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not liaited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b. Involve the release hazardous substances? of c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? d. Other? 8. HOUSING: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? b. Other? 9. 1E6~ORTATION/CIRCULATION: Could the proposal result in: a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking facilities/ structures? c. Impact upon existing public transportation.systems? d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? e. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? REVISED 10/87 Yes 'X . No x x )( x , x X x . x . x , X . Maybe x PAGE 4 OF 8 g. \ h. A disjointed pattern roadway improvements? Other? of 10. PUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? b. c. a. Fire protection? Police protection? Schools (i.e. attendance, boundaries, overload, ete.)? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Medical aid? f. Solid waste? g. Other? 11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal: a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? REVISED 10/87 1. Natural gas? 2. Electricity? 3. Water? 4. Sewer? 5. Other? b. Result in a pattern of extensions? disjointed utility c. Require the construction of new facilities? Yes No x X . x )( x x X , X )( x X X . x )( . Maybe 'f. 1- PAGE 5 OF 8 o o Maybe ..., , 12. AESTBETI~: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic view? b. Will the visual impact of the project be detrimental to the surrounding area? c. Other? 13. ~P~1~L--R!SOURCES: proposal result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Could the Adverse impacts historic object? c. Other? b. physical or aesthetic to a prehistoric or site, structure or 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) \... The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate REVISED 10/87 Yes No x . x , X . x X , 1- --oil PAGE 6 OF iI o o r Yes No . Maybe ., important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x x .. x , )( I C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) :l. -P. 4-1 3. h.~. -rk f'I'"'~i'''''~ ~~~....::S;';wvt!"_1!Id ~y ~,./~ C.r~~k / a A/6,tJ,""/ d~....:...y,- L:",ur~" uJ J,,'cM. dU.;';n~ .fJ/~U1~ .f!r.--.. Euu'/.ey C4AJyAJAI,. ~rJ1/' ",.../.,Mt; /'N -.t-Ae ""'--"'""~~-< tltrt!!'A -1-6 -Hre Af"".-I-tt. 7j,~ .v..h-./ drw/......fP. I'Ah"C~ /:5' AJdT- ad~u~t!: 7b t:~ ~/~ ~e ~~ / /b..u"'!. +~Nt .,Me CdAJJ/~.... 1fI,v#....AI ~e ~ue..JI- c.,c a ,....."t/6r ...~,.......... . duer"f'C"hk:J ..,u.~Y'--< -t~f! ~;.te' .:.,AJ be t!:~,.""-~. 7Ae /Ye>""d ..z:usur..,vt::€. -4:("...,:v,:".......nsh-.;w -,r-"'" ~~r ~ 4r-- :sA&>UJ~ -I1I""~e ~ ~ REVISED 10/87 PAGE 7 OF 8 o pr.ojectnwer GP4 '1/'1-3 Date 2~~ c. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures. (contined) r-"';"e.AJ~ e:J"c.fl., ~,;.Le ~"...., WI'.}I"AJ 4fIJd ~~L-H- 1b .~ ~r"'/ A'r..,.,~'--", , ~""'u~e: as Ze.AJe. ......A',.~, ~v4/'/+ ~ /~ y_r C1C/er~bu.J. Ol'!ueir-'->> ~~ ~l!!': ,s,;Le -kr ~;eI4tHr:...t' U.c, ....,,'1/ Y1r~"~ ~ .8_.../<7' Cr~d he Nt --',;,:;Oat:::i bd-h ~-~I'Ie ,AIIII ~....4__....." ~~ ~"-T ,7l ~/// ,be. Cr~.Ak ~ yI' l''''''''y'''u, #1,.-/~"",~// ~~!S ~-=I r91Mi-e'_~ ......,,/ "--~"""~~;"N~ ~.,c "-".",,u6-f" "'''''!f ...-f ,,{x,~P.. E~~~n~ f)rrl-M1_J+ ~""Al !Sub....?......ff-. .;~"'..,... d~tJe/o/.--Jf- ~~ 7'Ae -5'?'e w/I/ 4f1ll!5Ure ~ ~e ~~e .I'~ 4r,.J.p/J",.~ /)~ -.. AAJ~f.,4,;./ ~ h:,.,....-J::r. , . , 7he ~~r.M :.:r'r....:V ....~""',..._-.h- M.N'I/,b~ ""S~..,.........." .fbr 4A1y n-~/d'e'llJhOl' '~f/e/o'p_4V'f -.d <fire IlHT'I- Ye"'~~ ~ d.....AJ,..,"r. '2.. t:: the n~'A'.J.. .,s~ ,,~ L.-.~ ...:OJ ~c... ,. h"J. /AJ;/oJe! h,24~ 11/'-'. :>;--dctd r~;._~s "r -" ,b~ ~e Bu,,'/d',.:V? ~ ~J~7 Pr...,t,Nl.n- U""../IJ ,sui>,.._-rr d~vek,li>M.-#- Cl1!-' ~~ $/k ~,,'I/ , ....,.- , .- M".A.uM''Z~ ~.... At:>~~W Allza-'!s- P4~~ ...u~ , It.."," WIM/S _ "'/Alf /S #I dev..~ ~rAl Y'-tjA"/__ ~ ~ dIM,s,,;/V. " J.f.<2.b A..; s~ - .l.-ve, ~e $/;.<e / 's . ';'-nRVer4~ .01/ B..-"k7 Cr...~1c. _ /A,."$ ~ /"$ ,. ~ Q.s 4ft b/u~-A:Ue .~k-~, D.-J -Hte tI.S.tS.S. S.tMJ BuA.ld.n6l'A.J~ /J",r-/to 7.!>' ,?,.--;-...,k.. A .b,.;""""~", I o Pr,ojectA1mber ~A ff"-3 bate ZlVo C. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measure. (contined) d.J.~~AN-..J-I- fAJd$ /AJAJl.r~~ hy -J.Ite. //1' 0'& -(..:?N ~erNal"di}.Jo Pu~hi: UhrJ-s 1)$nAri-~ .,cor ~iI~ r"1""-~/ "N./,..~h-~,u.';'re ~"'1J'~~H "'~I ~ V~~A1'fdNi- A~. ~Ne ~~ h J~~;d. , ' ,',.,d~~.4' ~e BA'/~ Cr_J. .:S'~ (J,..v~. -rAe ~' r WI!!> f'r~--" h"" 7i',nw .N'J-~~ ~""'u~..#-.s .:1Mc...., d4';"'~ No~,J"r I"'~'P. 7:A~ /r:,~", - " A.",.;I')" Cr,e,e :S"".,t...,..- Or4l,JJ ,iU<FI~ ,'~ 7b ~AI-r~vL a , r'->>IXrtd-,. ,1r~~201'J./ dA~We/ 44-. ~~ ~~~ ~A.lrre.J.e t::.k,MAle./ N_r ~ .cD,..~er ~ P.h/_-I- Ave~e 4.vd gel_"",/- Av'AJu~ _"'-.ry ~e ~"sn-~ M../una/ ~~ ,d.,we/ A/""~~f 7'b ~e ~..t: ~ B..uNy /A~7~~ ".;Aere "" d~;'.5 k6'~ MJ,.Y/ k /c.c6~. -rAe z"'~rh#AJ ..,L B.s.-Ny Cr--e ~A'/&A , ;I-;:."er_... ~e -s,;t.e .~ 64PA g"-3 /~ JI4....~ ~~r I .,o~ ""'e oCXisn-iy C=A.lc::"rek ~"YI"2'u~ .::kAlAJe/. 7h,~ s,..c;I,;,w C1'f'!" &"~y Creek. ":,,, Me dr/No;'-" I~sr 4IfAJ":.,e;:.:- ,,,L /drh:",v .n<!' AiI,,~ .cred._ e?hfI-,A 'V'~#e..-- Me a-t!"'e-i:. s"'J1-v~~ ""' /""$h -.d very . '/I, , '. ~ A . ~JfA//~'~A.Jr rlJ2iLri".s;J ~L:JA/1tAilUAJ'. _ "., L:?4!!:rA*"'~ IVJ// , , be r'S,.",;"'e.J' ,t",..",,_ ~ Ce:U~+i:>rAJ~ .t:lr - -,~1":S!:...,1- qrC p;~ ~ 6=-~ -k:.r dAJY ~"r"'.&'-" ~':'-,,-"~e ,0 ~ B4,A?7 Creek, 1r"'o/'n~~ _,~,.z.h:.-.u w/;I be r~""';"'-' ~ ~ ~;"'e o proj ect Number GP.4 "Oq-.3 . ~ate zQ'9t? c. Discussion of Environaental Evaluation and Mitigation Me.sure. (contined) 6. a. ne. Ar?"""'~--~ .Dh:6/~ , . v ~u'~.$ &f ck. y.... "ju ~ /p...,a' U'4e de~?-nQ.u ,L'.?r #r~ ,su~~d -s,;/e +"M..... 12 L. - 1Zt!"~/:dAc/~ L..o~4/ /q! ~~ '!"jfu..:,.~ ..c..-r N'",:.v/A.r~ k~ :!fI'"/~e. ~ 12 ~- l2e~/~A/h;./ ~~m.r~, ? 20Q '151''''''-- -A=-r -"""N/~"'H'" /o,t. "'2.~. Bu,Y-..1- doC Ale ~~e ...r- ~e ~u"t!!4A/f- c:::7~M.J*~ """',tIIIf k~'''.~''~ ~~~..., o.,c " 3. J 4~~:"; L..W,,;6- ,J:Jer ~ /"dS'< .e:u;r~ ~,AJJ/d? 'Y',;'-b/ 69 LiAJ~;L~ AAA~;'AllIiIfIN11.. BLJ,./'J~~,.~ t::I~ Ate. ~/;,Le a~ -M~. 1<e":5,:ddWh~ 5#k."h-1J MA)(J>W'-' ~~",... d -F ~!> d""e&~ ~/;tf 'per '?'''''--- .eU.r~ I.U""'~/.e:( y;~/e/ .10/ ktIv~h- A44..Ja.:....~.. "/Ae ....~.r~1Wlk~'-.", /Nc.re;H~ /:.v ....~~1'a r~~~/h~ ~c_ ~~ r'''')l-~e.I' /A,,~r~4i!! ;:U d"'AH''''~'- (?~ /~r~..~~ .,tl-A~"', rp^"",~ 1-~:' y,. e~;\. &1r<!'!. A./e:>~ <~~ ,10 k <6/f,v,,",4;''-J,.,t: t?~ve",~ u..c.d,r ~ .R5 ~.;~ '1~';""; ",/7/ 6e ....~.L.,k AHYA e )(/5"'-:''- Ud'$' *' ..He UJe.;S-f. ~r- 0""""" 50.,.~ 6.~ d the ~~~ ~/k /s /~&d~ M;/;,J#/;U :tile #~ hi-e. It'a'24rd 2'cw~ ""Ad &=.--.d_# ZaAJe. 13 ~ ~e &~".6/1 ~_vN/h;...c Prd~e'c.hve." ,s:."c...ttk,p."" ;::""'1,..-... 5~",,.d R".-:"..~.--.-~.r /1"""6-' "'7 ~e f3w'/d;~ 4tId .:5"",'?t Pr",lM4IJ.J. '1--'".) :SN~~J -"t- r''fJ~ d<;tJ~k;;"'-"JI- bVj,~ rr~'~ "M;f?/e_--/..-h""; ""~ #e ,?~j,eH .Pr~'r- ....,d M,A /-'l;e #"'ZA""/ o proj ect Number GPA 'iJ9- 3 . ~ate Olf.:? c. piacu..ion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Meaaure. (continec:l) z.,^,~ ~rehvd,r#~ IAJ//I r~~",:e Aa,l,,4i'r~ /~_uk k> PAl /;"'~~,4~ k~/. , 9. a. f)~I/I'!/~--.".;/- a,c ~ ~7'e 'u-Jer Me r'o/ - ~ /-*' _e ~; ...A.~^, e:>~ R -s' - &-~d..w~ 5~rJw.J w/JI r~~M# /'u ~ ,?#wer~;"AJ ~ P~/h;'-'p h:a.,,"*c -"ve ~ /~t/e/ eF~ ft:> k ?t!!!AI~~ ~- & ~~ u.-:;l~r ~ e)Q~ivr I2L - L~~k::I.vh'4l k>i'V ~$/'~;"N. ~-,;/."",. *' #e. c"i/.", 7/-.,-ht;c r~:U_r. ~/$ /A/er-'~'" "'~ ~ / . . ... ~~ _. <-- k...Je 4/?.b/;4c-H- /# ~ ~ <w~7- ,MP' ,p',--""''''' ~/red A/eke:>r* ,iJ k v/:"'/~'7 .,,c & I"~~ uu// hAl'e ~ ~r-~.;t., ~ ~/e ~ -5 hf-Ar /iver~e /AI ,40....,.;.;:<:: ?ntI$I..willlJ r_...pt,~ ~ ~e A4I"''''''''',t' '" ,,{I{,s A~:..d: , , /"5. A. 7Ae d"'-~e./ ~'':;';'~~ ,~ ~,-./-- ",A/ 4.AJ , , ifI/"t!!JI:I .L!J.,e' ~~AJ ~r 4reA4~~~ re!JilurL.e~ A4: -~~-' ..67 Hie &~..tr.-J. ".I Cu~ ?~- .~ a~~~..-.r-l- ~~ C4~~--' 4,- ~ -'$/~e. .6.., 0ckr de. /I1kNd;. ..K~--' A1",,~. /~~. AI", CN/k",~ '~ ,. re-1N:Iurc.es ~re ~/04.lp du,,:"" 1'7fe t4;,-h' ~N",?" ~~ Ik ~~'evf "."7" . , '. .. ....: o N....,... 0....'.. . . . -. "::.. ': '., ~ ._.._---:'.>:.:~:. .. . >,\\' "', ".". ...'-t,:_. : :...... "'- "I'~" . .J_ ',~ ~ .--.-~.:, ........"". '....;.. . ". ,,'. :' ~"'. " . ........,...~.~ ~S.I:rE;: ~.. ~ ~.: '.. ..,~ . ',;, VICINITY MAP :';-:-<2- .-' ... '.. . .:-...~;:,;~ . )J8 - ,J "\ ._. ~ . > . :.... ''l" - ~.' , . 1\ , it._._....F.-~-!.. ';?: ..;;"'.....~l,. .... ".'\i:1\r:.: -, .' . - 1-PlC'_cMC.(.. ,:', '. . , , ., ~..,' ";!L\I~. "7 J.. ~'ir-o':''''I~' ~'\l''' ~,.~ \ . ..~ ~".''':'irWojt'Y.\ i t~. Sf. '~,.:r'" 'b~ 'i~ Il, 6' ~', ..' '. ..~... .. I"'a~" '~. ~"" .']? ~tJ"ilit)(...~..11Ji' :0. l'~" .... :':=-1 ~ ~r 1, ..... m.. V .~ ,_.~~- !'I'" /NftA . 6'.., ~..&t" ... '\:. c-.... .i1i '!~ "'~'~ I,:,."", ,,' Ar~.'" r:~ I .;' #1J.l' It .' 1""1 "i;?;. J' .. ~ ~" ~. ,.J;: '~"'T""",...t. "~"1I1'1.;1M!" , .. IJ:/:tf~ .. .:: ~ ".r;i ~. ~rt!>f!" -.. . '-ii*~: b~~~;;~ ~l ~i.\;i ! ""' 'IM[t.f,~~~ ,&. L~' ~1; . " ,;~ ; 'i~, ~ " .~;/ ~~;\i!it~~ ~ I~~~' i '.:~' If '" ~.-!~. .,:!!, . l "'.,' · ~:\ " .,,1., : y' '.' ..t :~tr\ r I \i.. :':"'1:\1:!,! ,;Hl, . i :. iJ~' '. r....1t..aIo.. \!1:'~"\: -:- ./, :.f'l~j'z \'\;:!i;t ":i, ;~ '~l~,I~i:"'::;:;lil'; l:': - " ..:to........ ," ._ I.' ! 1 . " ;. ,.., -::-, .;.,,' : :,; ~ ~ ~ .,.,} i, .,. ~[. . TC ., ~ ; . :v . . .' '.iN .ij<' :;,......: '..~I"~:I. .. ........::'.1.. -. . .' :., l."\.;~l~":>l!f~; .... j.t: ';-1'. "':'.:.' ... -:I..... , fU l' ..' i""li~.>""'''';'':' . !. '-t ''''i ~. .....' . .,.~ .. \ \. ': ,,". .....)~::..:_ I .:' .., ....,~.. '. 1.",.liJo."".~....."", _ .1'1 ", ;...... ", &f"'t IlAi n .If r; I \..'...,...~;r; .,..".,,;..._ : ..~. to ~\..; '. '". t ',',' " ~ "/f'" . ,.' '-"'"" '.' -.;..' -r;,...-\, '"' TV. ''('1' ~ ~"'.>.:'tM.. __"_,..;~'.''':.''L.l'l'''''' !, . · ",;.;:r .... ..'I ..... " :, ~..c:.. .. t... ~ ~ . :~ ..~~._,;. ,'.','.:" '. ...,,'\. ." '. L .,' I'u .', ~'.::t~~' ~ i~ '\' ~ r ~/ ;'~,;;:i. . ~::;~(\\\\ " . ....... -.J.;J 1111l:D:' '. .." . . , .' .,". ' .. '\ ~' " . IIr, I ~.. " ....~ ~O 11 ." . H" :, .:; ;'c.n :;:' ~ .....~ : ~ ~..~'.:l ~ )0'''' ,", (,'-IS f\ tJ.... ;In. ~I" ~. IJ~ . 0 .~C>> ~; i"'::: :\' .:,..', "i\ \: ..,,~. It =~.\' 14 t ~ 1. ,3M l; . 0- '.: CO~ . ":~"".:.' ~ .\~'r''''~''.';~,.. ';/r. .... M . ... I: ;~, 11 ...::" I( .. ~ '" t - ) .. .' ,,"'. To . . .. '..... " ,1< III If ., .... "'. _ .,.,' . . . , {.~~..j;f_... ,~l:~" 44-Pt\.. >1 ...:;: :: :It, .i,.,., .;'.) +...s . . ) . '''.' 'i' .....~f.. ',' . '."~ "(~-I~f .'~;~.11 t1 ).t'..\1 "I: , ":,:' ., ..:,:;~ ~~~~I,~~SI)':::.::':'~:'ili\~.~ '\ .'. ,r""..;', :k'<';,:\;{:,:'::';':~ _;~-.Il~,' . .~. '0:, ~' ~ ~ t.1!' ~:] ~\ .... . \ ' '..: ;.;;l"t~ . .' t'''''''p\lj' I . ;; Ct . ... ~ ;".... . I..tr "I;'~' ~ .. \. , . ,..,.,.. ,I-.~, II , . . '.l' ~ Y!:3'S' . a".. Clt ~ .. ...- :;1<.. N J..:" ,I; ~r.h!;,.: ':.. I I .' 'I~ jL. r". . l' 'i, '. ,. '. ,I' ...,!, . . t._~ ,.. .,'. _ ~ _'- '. _ ,,'-'-\ ,:' ::.1: ,.j" . r...~; .:. ! r w .. !; Ii!""~' /:/i' t '! "i i i t ..~t ..' ,.~.: . . "... '\. I I i II. .5 13 I 'l:I I Ie. ! I see ~ N" * " ~ \. ~.:-'- ;,~. . :~:.i~ .'~ .' 1t.. t. ..""V l\\ ~ r; " 'rtl! : .(:~: 'it,: 'Y:;\";' i' :e..,.. .', . 1~'\..~I,j~...,~ '4,. ~\ 1111 .l J _ .~1.~",. .,.... ,> . 'I'" .'~ - . I I '" '" ~..~ WI \ ~.. !I.). . .. ,r I .... I" . ..,.'. , (~:.~~ ~~,. ~ (>~ '~~ :",l ,.~. ~~~_~ ~ "'1: r 5: ., 'I'" ~:l:;t~~i\.l.:..'... <" i) '.. . . \..:0.. <<.. ' \.. I j. f.' ',.J" ' .. '.t . 1 ~ . t.: if" W[,!b it r' "It,," "'..., ,"" ' ..... . I . ,\. . ". :.",.st '1,,1"" l:UI . --b '~}~ ...!:'oo.:n..c:e'.~'. >.. ,. .".,". ::'~.":":';i,I:"~' . "' ~7,. ,1' ....- A 'c ~ ^ It I"t.I 'VL~"""'" ...% ,':\. ~I~,l....~. '-. . ! .. '5 t"...:.t<." 0 'tit ...~....\ . .. I ~. i;. . ,I" ',',;'~'" ,- . .Ii.l_,l.", ,. . i' ~ ~ r , .'" ~6i' ; ~~ "'..:"'. \lj ..... t'q '..... "', " · :.......'( ." .it";~ ~~t t:. r I ' lll"t ......of. ',$.,.'(,'f,; !1 .). ':I""'~l ~ ,;::,':~!U'H j"':~. JQll,:: 1 , i.; ~to;.....,,:,\ i I<~.~ . ~ . ~ ..: .' j. ~ .~ '. 'ft':' . ~ . l~;~" "~'jJ~;::.. ~. ' ~ ':\."')r:Q !&.~ .... - r...~ · .... .. . .,1. ~,~.(~.:" . ',f' :~ nil. a-1f.~ ''$. '.G.~ . .~.A'. ' 'C. ,0' '.. a.~:7..tl ~'., ... .~. ;Ii :'.1',:..' \~< ~" "if,. "j' ,I" :1"1 :o-r".. 'oil' ~'f ~~ le~ ~""~.:.' ...~rl'o~.~f i; ~':'- .1,1., ~I~ ....;. . I 1\',1; · . '~"'fr-'~T. -:.. ~~. · ~:S.' "v.: ,'~ . ,..... "I :,\!...,,',I;- r .: !'I(~ J'lL:\...~......'-:7-I..",-, ~ 's ':.: "'!.... .9"\;'~ .. ' 1.1 . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA -x:~ E. ;tN'rf/<J~€.er . , Name and Title s~~ d)--16-90 ~.v&~"", /l.4t/.uoe. Date: ... ~ REVISED 12/87 PAGE 8 OF 8 '. .. CIT OF SAN BE ARDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. ~ TITLE I oil. I I G.ll, I , I RL I ~ ~ t I":"..e .... t! ! ATTA4e...T .- I' - 1 , o . . o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM # LOCATION CASE GPA 89~3 4 HEARING DATE 4l17Iqn k:. ..~ , - 1 -- " . o June 29, 1990 Michael Lindseth, Chairperson Planning Commision City of San Bernardino 300 North D Street San Bernardino, California 92401 Re: project no.90-13 Dear Mr. Lindseth ...,."" _/" I wish to file this appeal on the project known as 90-13 (Rodgers Bindery B1dg ) on the Development Review Committee and Envirnnmenta1 Review Committee of June 21, 1990. The facts are stated in the attached letter from Richard . Gonzalez. These are a few of the items I am concerned about, but not necessarily all that I have. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. Please feel free to call if you have any questions relating to this matter. ~~ Chns Saldecke 1155 Harris Street San Bernardino, California 92411 (714)888-9880 encl. hu ~, . , . o June 29, 1990 Michael Lind.eth, Chairperson Planninq Comaission ' City ot San Bernardino 300 N. "0" street San Bernardino, california 92401 Dear Mr. Lindseth: I wish to appeal the approval by the Pevelopment and Bnvironmental Review Comaittee of items 90-13 on June 21, 1990. The ~round. for the appeal are based on ..rious violations of the San Bernardino Municipal Code reqarding building construction. , No member ot the Buildinq and Satety oepart:l\etlt, was pre.ent at the June 21st meeting. The chairman, Mr. M:crot:9Ol1ery, indicated the oOlNlli ttee was not interested in building-safety issues at that time. As you know, no testimony was allowed at any of the prior planning oomaisaion meeting'S of May 24, June 5, nor June 19 of 1990. Consequently, no testimony regarding- building and satety matters has been heard at any ot the notioed hearings. Furthermore, the oommittee totally ignored its own voluminous reports Which reoolDlDended a flat dentalot both items 90-5 and 90-13 For, the record, I would like to i!lfo~ you I am A Certified Building Inspeotor (lCBO #11725), a Certified Building Ofticial (CABO #973) and a lioensed General $uilding-Contractor #524326. I inspected the building- on April 15, April 20, April 28, 1990. I also took piotures beg-inning- with the Apr1l 20th visit. The building is within eyesight of my home and I was merely ourious at fir.t about the oonstruction. When it became obvious to me that the local Sun Newspaper was missing parts to the whole story, I personally purchased the Superior Court doe, uments of April 9, 1990" and the Planning Department Staff reports on items 90-5 and 90-13. I also interviewed various members of City staff. I personally examined the "approved" structural plans on May 29, 1990 at the Building Department. These plans were "approved" by Willdan and As.ooiates on March 23, 1990. I submit my findings to you in the hope that the City does not adopt any liability to itself nor establish a, pattern of permitting unsafe or illegal oonstruotion in our area. . . o M7: .x.1ndseth POoqe 2 The approved plans: 1. "waive footing and foundation inspections. II The Uniform Building Code 19.8, Section 305(e), requires foundation inspection and does not permit any waiver. 2. . The plans lacked .a structural wet stamp from tile structural Engineers - STB.. 3. The plans lacked any plumbing, mechanical.or electrical specifications or drawings. .4. The plans were "apprOVedll March 23, but by this time all the structural concrete hOod been poul"ed. W. cannot know if the special inspectors supplied by the builder saw the same set of plans. 5. The Uniform Building Code, Table 5-A, prohibits any openings for this type of building less than five feet from any property line, ie: A door on Waterman Avenue is not permitted. 6. There is no report of roof sheathing nailing inspection in any of the documents. Th.is is one of the most crucial required inspections as the roof diaphragm holds up the concrete panels. 7. The plumbing system uses plastic sewer drain and roof drain material. '1'his in no longer permitted under California Plumbing Codes as of 1990. 8. On Karch 5, 1990, the special inspector noted that "the chord bar is 2 feet below the roof ledger and we have no reinforcinq at the ledger". This appears to be the most serious flaw in the building. The structural details in the plans 00.11 for very exact positioning of reinforcing steel vis-a-vis anchor bolts, and the roof ledger stack. A medium sized quake will in all likelihood damage the shear value of the concrete wall panels. This would result in a root collapse at the perimeter. As you know, this permit proce.s is complioated because the builder started without approved plans and pBrlllits. The city cannot easily let. building permit be is.ued now as it would accrue many unseen liabilitie.. I would like very much to present an outline which will permit the City to oversee a legal proces which will ensure that this buildinq is made safe. I would gladly do this in spite .,;.'. '" . o Mr. Lind.eth Page 3 that this building i. made safe. I woUld gladly do this in spite ot any negative thOUght8 I .ay have about the appearanoe, use, or looation of the building. The PUblio inter.st and safety oan only beas8ured if we underatandthi. bUilding needs TLC from Engineers, Planners and craftsmen and le..pressure from political sources. regards, .ichard Gon~ 2!519 York Court San Bernardino, CA. , - , ORA~. COAST TITLE COM~ 1060 E. ~.......t, SUite 200 Ooltal, no.,"~ 92324 (714) 82! 8800 UHlATB PREL1MIIIllRf -... ,. IlIlte: JIIDJIIry 3, 1990 II:I1niq DIwel-1--L 501 N. P1.acmtia fU1l.ert:cn, califomia Att8nticn: DI!lv8 YaD:' No. 'DU.4193-1 ~cJ.. No. &-39849-4 DIlted as of l)oo(J 1-9(" 21, 1989 at 7:30 A.M. / In respcll_ to the aIxMt refCWXllld ~ tar a policy of title inammce, the i1'BD:8r h..tl..II:..i ..........t.. that it J.a pt'lIIlU1d to u.., or --.... to be 1-P"I, as the date b.....4:, a Pblicy or Pol i<:lu. of Title rr.mmce d88crUlin1 the 1an:i and the estate or intez:8t thereJn ~ set forth, ir&.Irin;J ~ lCIBS midllllly be SUBt:ained bJr _ of IqI ~, u.n or <<'e"~...,.natlilbclwn or ref........d to as an ~...d ....... below or nat -1'- trcII Cll:r._+ pINUant to the printed Sdlecllles, OlrlditialS and st:ipul.at:lal8 of saJ4 policy toms. '!he printed '8l'-...,I..icI1s and _'n....... traR the ="'4...".. of saJ4 l'blicy or pnl"cl.es lIJ:8 set forth in -". 1 and ~". 1 (ClClI1l:.iDBl) ..ll...~. n-pi_ of the Pblicy faEDI IIhcW.d be z:eIld. 'D1ey lIJ:8 available traR the office 1obic:h ..-~ this .LClIA&t. I '1bis ..~t (and artf "w' d.. or __~ a b8z:8t0) J.a i_" 80lely far the pID.~ of faciUtat:ilJ,J the f-1IlnCe of a p;\l1iCf of title iJwurance and no ,....hility is --- .. bInby. If it 18 ~ that. ,....hil:lty be 1 prior to the i -l8hCe of a policy of title i:n8urance, a Bi1DJr or ~tJBtt IIbcul.d be requested. _~J ~_~ Title Officer '!he fClDl of policy of title imurance ClOI1t8tIpla.t. bJr this ..........L is: "A SUbdivi8ial QJarantae'I '!he estate or intenst in the land baz:8inafter desc::ril:led or r.t~.......d to CXMllt8CI bJr this ~L 18: A Fee Title to saJ4 estate or intenst at the date b...6Of J.a WBted in: KHaG 1BYBtoHII!Nl', IR:., a califamia a....~..:Um f?A "-~ . ,,:::\ . . o Order No. 8-39849-4 'lhe land ref~uad to in this ~L is situated in the state of Clllifomia, Cbmt.y of Ben BRrIu:c:tirlo and is ~ as follQWIJ: 'l'Entativ. 'l'.rllct 14193-1 'lhe ~ly 1/4 of Block 55, of IrYingtal Iand and Water .-._..~l.Y, as per plat r--dld in.Book 3 of 1IiIIB, pega 9, X.O....~ of aid O:lunty, de8c:dJ:led as fallOWB: BlIqinniJq at a p:Unt in tba Nl:lirtbEly 1Jne of aid Block 55, l.......a:L.4 "'~~ I:letwc tba ....11 ---"----1y 00:lIIlI~ and tba ....tJ -r-1y ............ of aid R1~1 thence 1,.......1y alq tba L.tb..:ly 1.Jna of -.td Block 55 to tba "II -rterly o.A.IL.16L ~I ~ SclUtmrly aJAIaJ.t:b8 1J,,~"'1y 1.Jna of aidBlodk 55 to a point lIli~ utUIIIl tba ~ 11 .....,T71y ......i.&. .... t:b8 sa"'l MIbelrly ......... of aid Blode 551 thInoa at ril#Jt ... -~ "\ly alq tba ----vly... 11Ut...ly center l.jnes of lIlUd Block 55 to a p:dnt "Ait'lT!IJY IittIMm tba --"-1'rly ... 1IlIIIteIrly line of aid Blodtl tbmoe ....tbolt'ly a1ag 12Iia IlAtl..rly and Sclut:Mrly CII'It:er lines of said Blode 55 to tbe point of BegimiJq. said tract of land is cons1.st:irq. of all of IDt 2 and partiCI'Is of IDt:s 1 and 3 of said Block 55 . . At the date bIII:eof ~~ iaw to CXlVm:~ in altiiticn to the E,..,A i...... and ExclusiaJs in said policy fa1:m wculd be as fC'1lCi"'9: A. Seccni:Inst:allmmt Gm.....l and Splt'i.1 Tax8I far tba f18cal yec' 1989- 1990, $224.156, 0Cde Ana 007010, " i T'r. PaJ:cal No. 0261-082-02, ExIIIpt:i.cn $ncne.' B. 'lhe lien of SlWl-al t:uIls, if arFf, --- Ict pnwuant to tbe ~ of lil,,,,...H""'\ 75, at seq. of the aII.___ and Taxaticn QUa of the state of Clllifomia. . c. Prior to tbe recardatic:It of tbe IBp of 14193-1, all a....._.L and del.inlpmt t:uIls, lx:nSlI and .-- .., if arFf, IIU8t be paid. D. U the _ of 14193-1, x........&. l:IIit:wen lIu'ch 1, 1990 and No. . ...'" .1, 1990, it will be r- T I r>y to pest a 'n.x Ilen:I with tba Cbmt.y of Ben a.u.cti.no, Cab ell' QIrety, priCll' to 1:........dJn;J. P18IIse o...4-A.. this office pr1ar to IId::Iaittinq aid b:nl. 1. Rights of the publio in and to arFf pc:IC'tial of said land lyin} within arFf lawfUlly .......1 tllhM dL........, reeds ell' ~. 2. A deed of tr:ust to ..:una an iJv'-H"Att-l of $ 1,200,000.00, and any ot::her amunt.s payable under tba ~ ttoo4....t, t........dI.d New. 17, as IrIstruaB1t No. 89-435168, of Official a-...~. Dated: 'huBtar: 'l'J::ustee: 1lEnef1ciaJ:y: New. 10, 1989. Jfr:nWJ D8V'tl.. L, Inc., a no1i~ o............cat1cn. ~_..- o:..t Title o.-,.~.y. PialMr BlInk. (Affects this and ot::her .............ty) PB:tld PQlicy Rate: "A SUtldivisicn ~ J!:nc1.c8un8: Plats . ( o SOiEDULE 1 CAUfORNlA U\ND TInE .\SSOClATlON STANDMD COVERAGE POlICY - 1. The following mailers _e expressly excluded from Ihe coverage of Ihis policy and lhe Company will nol pay loss or damage. COSIS. attorneys' fees or expenses which ariie by reason of: 1. (al Ivly law. ordinance or governmental regulalion (including bul nol limiled 10 building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulalions) reslricting. regulating. prolu'biling 01 relaling 10 (illhe occupancy. use. or .enjoymenl of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvemenl now 01 hereafter erecled on lhe land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which Ihe land is 01 was a part; or (ivl environmental protection, or Ihe effect of any violalion of lhese I_s. ordinances OIIO_nmenlal regulations, except to the extenllhal a notice of enforcemenl lhereof 01 a nolice 01 . defect. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation 01 alleged violalion affeding Ihe land has been recorded in Ihe public records al Dale of Policy. (bl Any go_nmenlal police power not excluded by (al above. excepllo Ihe exlenl thaI a notice of Ihe exercise thereof or a nol;ce 01 a defed, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting Ihe land has been recorded in Ihe public records al Dale of Policy. 2. Rights of eminenl domain unless notice of Ihe exercise thereof has been recorded in lhe public records al Dale of Policy. bUI nol exduding from coverage any laking which has occurred prior 10 Dale of Policy which would be binding on Ihe rights of a purchalier lor value wilhoul knowledge. 3. Deleds, liens, encumbr.nc;es, adverse claims or other matters: (al whelher or nol recorded in lhe public records al Dale of Policy, bul crealed. suffered, assumed or agreP.d 10 by Ihe insured c1aimanl; (bl nol known 10 the Company, nol recorded in lhe public records al Dale of Policy, bul known 10 Ihe insured daimanl and nol disclosed in wriling 10 lhe Company by Ihe insured c1aimanl prior 10 Ihe dale Ihe insured c1aimanl became an insured under thi. policy. (cl resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (dl anaching or crealed subsequent 10 Date of Policy; or (el resulting in loss or damage which would nol have been suslained if Ihe insured c1aimanl had paid value for Ihe insured mortga~e ur for Ihe estale or inleresl insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of Ihe lien of Ihe insured mortgage because of Ihe inability or lailure 01 the insured al Dale of Policy. or Ihe inability or failure of any subsequent owner of Ihe indebledness. 10 comply with Ihe applicable doing business laws of Ihe stale in "hkh the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenfOlceability of the lien of Ihe insured morlgage. or claim Ihereof. which arises oul of Ihe Iransaclion evidenced bor the insured morlgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credil proleclion or Irolh in lending law. In addition to the Exclusions, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Taxes or assessmenls which are not shown as existing liens by Ihe records of any taxing aulhority thai levies laxes or ..sessmenlS on real property or by the public recOlds. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in laxes or assessmenlS. or nOlices of such proceedings, whether or not shooon by the records of such agency or by lhe public records. 2. Ivly facls. rights. inlerests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection 01 the land 01 which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens 01 encumbrances. or daims thereof. which are nol shown by lhe public records. 4. Discrepancies. conflicts in boundary lines. shortage in area, encroachmenls. or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are nol shown by lhe public records. 5. (al Unpatented mining claims; (hI reservations or exceptions in palents or in Acts authorizing lhe issuance thereof; (e) water righls. daims or tille 10 waler. whether 01 not the malters excepted under (a). (hI or (cl are shown by lhe public realrds. AMERICAN lAND TInE ASSOOATlON 0WNEIt'S POlICY FOIM B - 1910 (MlENDED 1.17-70) SOiEDULE Of EXClUSlONS FIlOM COVEIlAGE 1. Any law. OIdinance or 1O_laI regulation (including but not limiled to building and ZIOOing OIdinances) restricting or regulating 01 prohibidng the occupancy. use or enjoyment 01 the land, or regulating the character. cnn.-ions or location 01 arry improoe_ now or hentllfter erected on the land. or prohibit/III a separation in ownerships or a reduction In the dimensions of area of the land. Of lhe effect 01 any violation 01 any such 1_, ordinance OlIO_tal regulation. 2. JUahts 01. eminent domain or governmental rights 01 police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records al Date 01 Policy. 3. Defeds. liens. encumbrances, adverse claims. or other matters tal created. suffered. assumed 01 asreed to by the inSUNd claimant; (hI not kncMn to the Comparry and not shoMI by the public records but known to the Insured dalmant either" Date of PGIlcy Of althe dale such claimant acquired an estate 01 Interest insured by this policy and not dItdosed in wrIlins by the I~ claimant to the Company prior to the date such i....ed claim.ant became an Insured hereunder. (c) resuIlIna in no loss or dunate to the insuNd dalrnant; (d) attach/n. or c...lled subsequent to Date of PofIcy; or (el ...sultilll in loss or clamase which would not "- been sustAined if the Insured daimant had paid value for lhe estlle or inlerest insured by this polley. FTC 3157-F (Rev 11.1-881 (e . SCHEDUlE 1 (Conlinued) AMEIIICAN UIND mtE ASSOCIAllON I.OI\N poucy. 1910 WITH ALTA ENOOllSEMI:NT FORM 1 COVERAGE (AMENDED .11-10) SCHEDUlE OF EXClUSIONS FROM COVEllAOE lhe following matters are expressly exduded from the coverage of this policy: 1. Any law, oldinance or governmental regulation (induding but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of land, orregulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensionl or area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law, oldinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of sum rights appears in the public records at Dale of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, enc:umbrances, adverse daims, or other matters (a) crealed, suffered, assumed or asreed to by the insured claiman~ (b) nol known to the Company and not shown by the public recolds but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or al the date such daimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired the Insured mortgap and not disdosed in writing by the Insured daimanllo the Company prior to the date such insured daimanl bec:arne ... insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attac:hinl or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or to the extent insurance il affc>>ded herein as to assessments for streel improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy). 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgase because of failure of the insured at Date of Policy or of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness to comply with applicable "doing business laws" of the state in which the land Is situated. AMERICAN lAND mtE ASSOCIATION L~ POLICY. 1917 WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVEllAOE (6117) EXClUSIONS FROM COVEIlAOE lhe following matters are expressly exc:luded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, oldinance or govemmental regulation (includinl but not limited to building and zoning laws,. oldlnances, or regulations) restricting. regulating. prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on lhe land; (ill) a separation In _'*Ship or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land II or was a part; or (Iv) environmental protection, or the effect of violation 01 these laws, onlinances or governmenlal regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enfon:ernentthereof or a notice of a defect, lien or enc:umbrance resulting from a violation or altesed violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public recoldl at Date of Policy. . (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise therof or a notice of a defect, lien or enc:umbrance resultinl from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recolded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recolded In the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from ~age any taking which has occurred prior to Dale of Policy which would be binding on the rightl of a purdlaser for value without knowledse. 3. Defects, liens, encumbtances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered. assumed or agreed to by the Insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded In the public reconls at Date 01 Policy, but known to the Insured dalrnantand not dildosed in writlnl to the Company by the Insured dalmanl prior to the date the insured dalmant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resuldnl in no 10. or damage to the Insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequenl to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insuoed mortgase over any statutory lien for servic:es, labor or material or the extent Insurance is affc>>ded herein as 10 assessments for streel improvements under constNC:tion or completed at date of policy); or (e) resulting in loss or dornase which would not have been sustained if the Insured dakNnt had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of Ihe insured mortgase because of the inability or falIure of the Insured at Date. of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable "doing business laws" of the state in whlc:h the land Is situaled. 5. Invalidity or unenforceabillty of the lien of lhe insured mortgase, or dalm thereof. which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the inlured mortsase and Is based upon usury or any consumer aedlt protection or truth In lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for servic:es. labor or materiall (or claim of priority of any ltatutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgase) artsinl from an improvement or wollt related to the land whidlls contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Polley and is not financed In whole or In part by proceeds of the Indebtednesl secured by the Insured mortlage whidl at Date of Policy the inlured hal advanced or II obIlpted to advance. FTC 3157-G (Rev 11-1-881 < - ce , I o SCHEDUlf 1 (Continued) AMERICAN lAND TInE ASSOClAT1ON RESlDENTW. TInE INSUIIANCE I'OUCY - 1979 EXClUSIONS In addition 10 Ihe exceptions ,in Schedule B, you are not insured againslloss, costs, attorneys' fees and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power. and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: land use improvements on Ihe land land division environmental protection. This exclusion does nol limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Co_ed Title Risks. 2. The right 10 lake the land by condemning it, unless a notice of taking appears in the public records on lhe Policy Date. 3. Tille Risks: thaI are created, allowed, or agreed to by you Ihal are known to you, but not 10 us, on the Policy Date - unless they appeared in the public records. Ihat result in no loss 10 you thaI first affect your title after the Policy Dale - Ihis does not limit Ihe labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks. 4. Failure 10 pay value for your litle_ 5. lack 01 a right: to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule ^ or in slreels. alleys. or waterways thaI touch your land. This exclusion does not limit lhe access coverage in Item 5 of Co_ed Title Risks. In addition 10 the Exclusions, you are nol insured against loss, cosls. attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: I. Any facls, righlS, inlerests or claims which are nol shown by the Public Records but which could be ascertained by making inquiry of parties in possession of the land. 2. Any liens or easements not shown by the Public Records. However, this does not limit the affirmative co_age in Item 8 of covered Title Risks. 3. Any lacts aboul the land nol shown by the Public Records which a correcl survey would disclose. Howe_, this does not limit the affirmative coverage in Item 12 of eo-ed Title Risks. 4. (a) Any waler rights or claims or title to water in or under the land; (b) unpatented mining claims; (c) reservations or exceptions in patenls or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. FTG 3157.11 (Rev 11-1.88) ~.ft. .. if 'i I r to' ,i "I to # lID .i i I!( 1 l!l... t tlf I Vi , 'l .-- .~ .... r:!4 .:. . . .... ~ . .-...--.(0 ......1 ( . . - . --- O' ~. r. ~. ... . i I, I . I I I. r I 1 I ! JI~ @--.t-'OI.Nf II ~r:-"- to "e "6 ~ ".. " l:. @ lIil" fBI' ll;ei @ I If. ~ .:J&t~ JiL- I . --\- W"LMlT ., I '--' @ ---f--- t.@ , ,. , , ~+ - g." 'J'. : i .~ I II lJ '" I I. 1~ : Itl)1 i .!II .! ~ .!! .. 1 F=l!Si "l~a~ ~~~&'" ~.... _ cc ;V! .. I" - e.!!! ~\: 1(:;; 3~ +.: .~ .. ,,' l:. . 'i' 0:.-::11 " @ -- -ill I L AvtHUE- -l-.- -- - 11 I 'I I I I I , ,;,. I 1"-- -.- - - .. 1. r .- I: I 1'1 I: I I: I 1'1 I..! "I 1,'0 I: I IIj I I: I III -:'_~.:-:l ~=_-: =-_~.:-_-::-: , -----------------, ~ I I I I I I 1 :1 III AV(NII(~-\..;I- ~ --; I r __r ~ ;\! . ~ . .. 6 @ ~ .. '" < .a' Ct ::J :lib \II:) ~: ~ if CJi'f ai' il n ~ :'lJ '"0' S:!.:. ~ m . II> ~ .. - CD :; - Cl ... 3 ... - S' = p' 0- '- :. .-: ll-:: - l!I-= g (I) c: P" $ = lS--= $'= - . CII o ,p qg . . c.o . g) fl