HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-Public Works
-
-
---
-
ci~~ OF SAN BI!RNARDIN~ i-I!Q'tfEST RpORoCOUNCIL AliTION
From:
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE ..,-~.~, -1\'"'1-'''1 '-'::-.<" Adoption of Negative Declaration'
:'.c~ u. v... 'SlibJllCt: Finding of Consistency with the
Public Works/Engineerihg: J'J'l -7'" n= 34 =~~~~:~:n ;r~;~ y;~ ;;P~;i~o
- 93/94 - Public Works Project
6-06-90 No. 90-04 .
Dept:
Dete:
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
01-03-89 -- Resolution No. 89-3 approved adopting the 1988/89
to 1992/93 Capital Improvement Program.
06-04-90 --Luncheon work shop held to discuss Capital
Improvement Program and bond proceeds.
Recommended motion:
1. That the Negative Declaration for Public Works Project
No. 90-04, Five Year Capital Improvement Program for FY
89/90 - 93/94, be adopted.
2. That a finding be made that the Five Year Capital
Improvement Program for FY 89/90 - 93/94 is consistent
with the General Plan.
cc: Marshall Julian
a<pt3.d-
Contact person:
Roger G. Hardgrave
Staff Rpt., Notice of
Init.Study,Neq.Dec.,
Phone:
Preparation,
Map Ward:
5025
Supporting data attached:
All
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: NIA
Source: (Acct. No.)
I Acct. DescriDtion)
Finance:
Council Notes:
Aaenda Item NO.-1..P
.'CITY=oF SAN BERNARDIN~- REQ~ST FOR COUNCIL dlON
STAFF REPORT
The Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No.
90-04 was recommended for adoption by the Enviromr.ental Review
Committee at its meeting of 2-8-90.
A 21-day public review period was afforded from 2-15-90
to 3-7-90. No comments were received.
We recommend that the Negative Declaration be adopted
and a finding made that the project is consistent with the
General Plan.
6-05-90
75.0264
~.
~"
\""I .
PREPARATION OF ATIVE DECLARATION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
. ,;",,"'"
'\,.-
..~.......
\
J
NOTICE. OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration
for the following projects. The Environmental Review Committee
found that the project will not have a significant effect on the
environment on the basis of the Initial Study and mitigation
measures (If applicable).
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-61 - To change the use of an
existing residential building into an alcoholic recovery center.
The .91 acre site is located at 1133 and 1135 North "0" Street
and is designated CO-l, Commercial Office, General Plan land use
designation.
REVIEW OF PLANS NO. 90-02 - To construct a 306 stall parking lot
on a site encompassing 6.5 acres in the IL, Industrial Light,
General Plan land use designation located at the westerly ter-
minus of Cooley Avenue, northwest of Cooley Court.
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 90-05 - To install an underground storm
drain in Meyers Road, between Little League Drive and Meyers
Creek.
J PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 90-04 - Five Year Capital Improvement
program for the City of San Bernardino for the years 89/90 -
89/94.
REVIEW OF PLANS NO. 89-89 - To add 5,057 square feet of retail
lease space to an existing 1,700 square foot mini-market to
create a 6,757 square foot retail strip center on a 0.46 acre site
located to the immediate southwest of 1-215 at 841 south Inland
Center Drive in the CG-l, General Commercial, General Plan land
use designation.
Copies of the Initial Study are available for public review at the
Planning Department, 300 North "0" Street, San Bernardino, CA
92418, and the Feldheym Library, 555 West 6th Street, San
Bernardino, CA. Any environmental comments you have should be
received in this office no later than 4:00 p.m., March 7, 1990.
If you do not respond in writing, we will assume that you have no
opinions and/or recommendations on the above projects.
SUBMITTED: February 13, 1990
PUBLISH: February 15, 1990
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
384-5057
CP
C7 NOPND2890
.r.
Applicant(s)
Address
City, State
Zip
MISC:
ISPREPARATIOH
ke/'-l-811
- .
CCTY QF SAN a~.RNAPOINO
~ING OEP'~TMENl'
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study for Environmental Impacta
For 1'''.' Ie WM.tl ........,.,. &ilia 9r"--Pf
Project HWll.ber
Project description/Location::IJlf ~ Vl!!1A.
~~~TA~jW :r~:~r'::::'~;1lt~-:;"ft~~
Oate .3AIll4.AIt.V :l3.,mO
Prepared for:
~rrv oF _aLl ."~~AI~
--L-rM<<IoI~"- .'.L1~. \JOIItK~
:: ~~3~ ~~4IA
.; Prepared by:
_1lAU.L t;.. S/'1or.a.S
Hame
ASSISrANT l'LAt.lUE~
Title
.
City of San Bernardino
Planninq Department
300 H. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA '2418
"
"I""
""
'.
.
,
A. BACKGROy'~
Application Number: 'IlrL'RUl!. W-kS 'PlIf^ Lc cT" Nt'}. Cfo-o'l-
Project Description: S VENt. cAltlT4L ~t#ItlN<<...~
_~M 'cvrV"'D - ''l'l~ I'ttttlf
Location:
(!.ITV W lJIa I.D_~ "THlOtlGIll!l~T SHI ~. "'ARIl1.~
Environmental Constraints Areas:
IJ 14
I
General Plan Designation:
U/A
,
Zoning Designation:
AJ/A
I
B. i~B~~HrAL~PACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a
separate attached sheet.
1. lJI.~h Resources Will the proposal result in:
Yes
No
Maybe
a. Earth movement (cut and/or
fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or
more?
x
b. Development and/or grading on
a slope greater than 15'
natural grade?
c. Development within the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zone?
x
x
d. MOdification of any unique
geologic or physical feature?
x.
'"
REVISED 12187
....
PAGE 1 OF a
'~
\
J
~.
--
e. SOil erosion on or off the
project: dt:e?
f. Modification of a channel,
creek or river?
g.
Development:
subject
mudslides,
other similar
within an area
to landslides,
liquefaction or
hazards?
h. Other?
2. 6l1LBUQ2~: Will the proposal
result in:
Substantial
an effect
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
a.
air
upon
emissions or
ambient air
c. Development within a high wind
hazard area?
3.
~I___RESOURCES:
proposal result in:
a. Change. in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces?
Will
the
b. Change. in the course or flow
of flood waters?
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality?
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground waters?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards?
f. Other?
h-rl.
~I
Y..
Ro
.
)(.
x
x.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 2 OF 8
,.......
4.
BIOLOGIC6M.JJi91l~g"t Could the
pcopo..l result ~nt
a. Change in the number of any
unique, rare or endangered
specie. of plant. or their
habitat including stand. of
tree.?
b.
Change
unique,
specie.
habitat?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of animals or their
c. Other?
5. NOISE: Could the proposal result
in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
b.
Exposure of people to
noise levels over 65
interior noise levels
dB?
exterior
dB or
over 45
c. Other?
6.
~_.Jlll:
result in:
Will the proposal
a. A change in the land use as
designated on the General
Plan? ,
b. Development within an Airport
District?
c. Development within wGreenbeltW
Zone A,B, or C?
d. Development within a high fire
hazard zone?
e.
Other?
Ye.
No
.
x
)(
)(
x
x.
x
x
....
Mile
x
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 3 OF 8
'..,/
,..'"
.~
Ye.
No
M.,....
~I
I
.
7.
___MAD. RAJ6JtPJ I
PJ:oj ec~ I
Wlll
~h.
..
0.., s~or., ~r.n.por~ or
dispo.. of h.z.rdou. or toxic
m.~eri.ls (including but not
limited to oil, pe.ticide.,
chemic.l. or r.di.tion)?
'X
b. Involv. the rel....
h.z.rdou. sub.t.nces?
of
x.
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
x
d. Oth.r?
8. RQY~I Will the propos.l:
a. Remove existing housing or
create a demand for additional
housing?
b. Other?
x
9. rMlf~fORTATIQ~~ATION: Could
the proposal r.sult in:
a. An increase in traffic that i.
greater than the land u.e
design.ted on the General
Plan?
x.
b. Ose of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilities'
structures?
x
c. Imp.ct upon exi.ting public
transportation .yst.ms?
d. Alt.ration of present p.ttern.
of circul.tion?
x
x
e. Impact to rail or air traffic?
f. Increased s.fety hazards to
vehicle., bicycli.t. or
ped..trian.?
)(
x
REVISED 10/87
PAGE ~ OF 8
~~
-
J"'..;.--
Y..
No
.... .
~,
A di.jointed pattern
roadway improvements?
b. Otber?
9-
-'
.
of
x
i~C SERVICES Will the proposal
impact the followin9 beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service?
10.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
rire protection?
police protection?
Schools (i.e. attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
><.
)(
x.
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
Medical aid?
x
x.
X
Solid waste?
9. Otber?
11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal:
a. Impact the followin9 beyond
the capability to provide
adequate levels of service or
require the construction of
new facilities?
1. Natural 9as?
2. Electricity?
3. Water?
x
4. Sewer?
)(.
X
><
5. Other?
b.
Result in a
pattern of
extensions?
disjointed
utility
x
c.
Require the construction of
new facilities?
x
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 5 OF 8
Ye.
t. jbe
12.. AJ:S'1'RftIar
a.
Could the propo.al result in
the obstruction of any scenic
view?
b. Will the visual impact of the
project be detrimental to the
surrounding area?
c. Other?
13.
~~r~~~~QURCES:
proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Could the
Adverse
impacts
historic
object?
c. Other?
b.
physical or aesthetic
to a prehistoric or
site, structure or
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
The California Environmental
Quality Act states that if any of
the following can be answered yes
or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the
environment and an Environmental
Impact Report shall be prepared.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining level.,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
No
.
x
x
x
'X
l
REVISED 10/17 PAGE 6 OF 1
1mpo~~an~ example. of the
..jo~ pe~1od. of Cal1fo~n1a
h1.~o~y o~ pr.hi.to~y?
Doe. the project have the
potential to achieve sho~t
term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental
goal.? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the
future. )
Does the project have impacts
which are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on
the environment is
significant.)
Does the project have
environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
C. DISCUSSION OF .ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(Attach sheets as necessary.)
-rill; ~ VEAIt.. eAP''rAL :rMP~El"I.eNT PLa<,llIl'\'S A ~lrI-"'I\Ie. ......
SlMrII\l('; FwI!lIf)G 'AtIo.cmEs ~ C.AP"'AL "IJII.PRJWEA~,," f'R~Jr~ !AI
".., ."......
,. ~~
,
b.
c.
d.
TM& C,,-v.
Y..
No
~.
1Ia. .
.
x
x
x
)(
EAc.M l''''''"1EOT ,.. "'Ala "lilV:.RN'\ WILL. U .!lAA..TlfeT To SHVI"-DNMMrlI-
'UV~IJ AtlDa...,o ACo:r~c:r ~L 4..),. PUN APPru.vAL llV~E MAYa.
.a.lJ\ ~M8N ~"~IJc:.tL_
REVISED 10117
PAGE 7 OF a
"
,r
'10,...
~
( ',",
v
("~t.
"
)
C. Di.cu..ion ot Environmental Evaluation and K1tiqation
K...ure. (contin.d)
Jolll. S4ME f'lltd:fEc:rS M.,,"V :n.VOL.V~ '1IU!r Mf)\JE,f/\.I:IJT of
~j(, "RIA/IJ /0.000 CJ48rc. VMbS oF EAaH. TllAOI'
.
f"R.,o:rE:c::TS 1.o)1t.l.. BE UVl&JQ) ON A" :I:~WIbC.At\L B4SCS
~ "~\A'T~ I\III'!'I61morJ AtAf'o.sEh.
1... SofoI\4 SOl!.. ~1O..s M.AY 0"'" :I)WZIJl)G. f'ltb:I'"Ec::T' ~-
10tJ. 11{~ w/u IW! ~G<<ra BY~.., EIlJ>SION CO,sr'Il.9L PLIIN
fOL ~ ArttaECTJ' WIlES WI"'~ OJ(. ~ ~lop.J IS LlI:E.LV.
~ i1:RM SDSroIJ colllf~L. ~14I:E~1 $l.Ldl1U ~.fl~
OA. SLoP~ 3TASU.1VmON WIU..IIG %"'cu.'~ 1'-1 N./.. ~.
311.. ~ ~E. '" .s~CE f!lAN-oFF MAV "rf'lLI:T' .Df.I.E
"1"0 ~lU\l::rto~ Of" :rJl\f~~eA"/.::' SI4/t.F"("'~j U".."SL,
'1)iLr ~At€ IS .71-lSIG~'FICIUoIT ANll WII..L BE. J)I~ wro
e<tST"l~ :z>bINI\G-& .sYS't'E"S.
11r-cl. Co~~iION of=' foJEW PuBUc. ltl.LlL.Jm,J(pS . (J~,
.. ..
WlbE:NIAlGo ...",,h ~I\a\IINGo ~o~ MAY ft~SlAL"1" IN LocQL
~CAarES .'" T~Af=FIe. 7JlESE. :lkfJAcrs WIU... 8E
.s~U;J) OM A ~,;c::r-8V- f~CT g~~ ~NA
""tllt;.AT/oNS' .DICt.~:b IAI'TlIE AtaaCCT t:l6r~N
~EIf.E APAt.o"~IATS. ~E t"1.I.MuL..n\\fa F-Ff:IrL'T OF
~ It" P@GAAM 0'" ~ff'/C WILL. NO"r BE Su;,.}l$"tC:ANT'.
. . -. -:...-'.....-
.~ -..,
r.....,
~I
D.
DE'l'BRMIl!M'lsat
on the ba.i. of this initial .tudy,
~The p~opo.ed p~oj.ct COULD NOT have a .iqnificant effect on the
~ envi~onaent and a NEGATIVI DECLARATION will be prepared.
.
The propo.ed project could have a siqnificant effect on the
O environment, althouqh there will not be a siqnificant effect in
this case because the mitiqation measures de.cribed above have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
O The propo.ed project MAY have a siqnificant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY or SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
~ C. ;f()I':jT($OM.~~';' . PIUPC.rfAl... A-JHJu,ce
Name and Title I
~.f.;.~
Date: ,.J. - Y - 90
REVISED 12117
PAGE 8 OF 8