HomeMy WebLinkAbout19-Public Works
-
CITY OF SAN BER"ARDIN~REQU~~; l~~~s~OUNCIL ACTION
-
-
--
Date:
3-28-90
, Adoption of Negative Declaration
~J ,.;, - Subjllct:liU\ding of Consistency with the
Circulation Element of the G?~eral
Ylan - Construction of Sunset
Drive, between Caroline Street
and Redlands Boulevard
Public Works Prolect No. 90-06
From:
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE
Dept:
Public Works/Engineering
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
None.
Recommended motion:
1. That the Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 90-
06, construction of Sunset Drive between Caroline Street and
Redlands Boulevard, be approved.
2. That 11 finding be made that the construction of Sunset Drive
between Caroline Street and Redlands Boulevard, is consistent with
the Circulation Element of the General Ian.
cc:
Marshall Julian
Jim Richardson
Bob Temple
Signature
rt:
Contact person: Roger G. Hardgrave Phone:
Staff Report, Notice of Preparation,
Supporting 'data attached: Init. Study,Neg.Dec., Map Ward:
5025
3
FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: (Acct. No,)
(Acct. DescriPtion)
Finance:
Council Notes:
Aoenda Item No.
III
--
-
CITY OF SAN BER.....RDINO - REQUEST "',JR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
This project consists of extension of Sunset Drive from
Caroline Street to Redlands Boulevard and includes a traffic
signal at the intersection of Redlands Boulevard and Sunset
Drive.
The construction of a Sunset Drive freeway off-ramp is
being proposed by the Sunset Group to provide "a more direct link
from the freeway off-ramp to Caroline Street. The extension of
Sunset Drive, from Caroline Street to Redlands Boulevard, is a
logical extension and is supported by staff. It is not a
condition of approval of any current project, but we fully
expect that it will be a condition that the extension be
completed prior to any development adjacent to the proposed
alignment.
The project was originally expected to be funded
entirely by development. However, a request has been submitted
to RDA for funding assistance.
The Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No.
90-06 was recommended for adoption by the Environmental Review
Committee at its meeting of 3-1-90.
A 21-day public review period was afforded from 3-08-90
to 3-28-90. No comments were received.
We recommend that
and a finding made that
circulation element of the
the Negative Declaration be adopted
the project is consistent with the
General Plan.
3-28-90
75-0264
--
-
NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO proposes to adopt a Negative Declara"ion
for the following projects. The Environmental Review Committee
found that the project will not have a significant effect on the
environment on the basis of the Initial Study and mitigation
measures (If applicable).
PARCEL MAP NO. 11951 - To subdivide an approximately 14 acre
parcel into 4 parcels of varying size. The site is located on
the north side of 16th Street, approximately 190 feet north-
westerly of Hancock Street in the CO-l, Commercial Office l~nd
use designation.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-64 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14337 -
A proposal to construct a 36-unit condominium project as Ph~se
II of the existing 58-unit pine Ridge Condominium Project. The
2.85 acre site is located at 1974 Lynwood Drive, generally
situated 340 feet north of Lynwood Drive, west of Sterling
Avenue in the RM, Residential Medium land use designation.
,PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 90-06 - To construct street paving,
~ curbs and gutter, sidewalks, lights and related work on Sur.set
Drive between Caroline Street and Redlands Boulevard.
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 90-08 - To construct street improve-
ments (curb, gutter, sidewalk, etc.) on Palm Avenue and Ker.dall
Drive: a storm drain along Palm Avenue from Irvington Avenue to
Cable Creek: a box culvert on Cable Creek at Palm Avenue and a
traffic signal at the intersection of Palm and Kendall Drive.
Copies of the Initial Study are available for public review at ~he
Planning Department, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, CA
92418, and the Feldheym Library, 555 West 6th Street, San Ber-
nardino, CA. Any environmental comments you have should be
received in this office no later than 4:00 p.m., March 28, 1990.
If you do not respond in writing, we will assume that you have ~o
opinions and/or recommendations on the above projects.
SUBMITTED: March 6, 1990
PUBLISH: March 8, 1990
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
384-5057
~,
CP
l..--::.
C7 NOPND3190
--J
3-28-90
f
-
-
caT y vr ~;.\rt g~n...;.\nUH'''''
PLANNING DEPARTME~ .
INITIAL STUDY
l
Applicant (s)
Address
City, State
Zip
MISC:
ISPREPARATION
ke/9-1-89
Initial Study for Environmental Impacts
For ~S~lC. WOAok.S l"Ao~c:rIJO. 90-0'
Project Number .
proj ect description/Location "'0 C:O~S7'ltl.\c:."
STfl.Es.'T PM.,.,. c.a.U$ AliI) ~U. ,slbew,t,l.l<.S .~'E;lm>
A~ PilI -<<.I) vJ~ ON .s~e'T ~itlvl:' U-n,"6N .
C.AIi!.oLIN!! <>T'lI.liST AH~.R.CL.A"'z:,S ~I"""VAC.
Date F'EBQ.u.AIt.Y .,. 1'I'iO
.
Prepared for:
CfT"( OF SA'-l ne:fNARbINO
1>69AltTM5~ of Pv..8ue W61tkS'
:&00 !Jolenl "])" STIt.EET
SAt.! aE:~OIf,)O . CA <u.t+I~
.
Prepared by:
t>A w.. c;. . S~GG-S'
Name
A~SLS'1""HT "LA"',lI~jII!..
Title
City of San Bernardino
Planninq Department
JOO N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
3-28-90
Eru tt:c Nli6 PIic. 3-IJfo
,
""'IIil
~~TY OF SAN BERN~..DINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
~ ~
A. BACKGROYllD
Application Number:
"PU.Buc:. woft~ -P1l~EeT NO. 90 -o~
Project Description: ~oNS'TR.u.,~"no~ eF Sl.I.lJSEOT ~R."'1i '-0 %I.ICLU..IlE
.9T/2..EET (JAoJl~G" cu.R.&.s ANb G-1A,Tn5AS J 's1J)f;WAL.U ) UG-Htt A~
~~"t'E. 'N01tJ:': .
Location: SUSCT l>flJ.Vg 1tF-'TWEE'" <:'A~Ll~F- sraEET A~h
f<,E.bLAr-lbS "Bol~J...~d).
Env i ronmental Const raints Areas: Coo 'YEAR. FLoOb 1't.A"" ANl>
HI6-IoI L.JClu.E"'ACT'ON .sUS~"T'/~Il.rrY AIt..E.A.
General Plan Designation: A.b'ol~lIJ~ ~e.c:eL.S CoG--I. GE~eML
.
c.oM.~I<.c..1I. L CA.T At.l~ \AI ~S..,. 0 F 0 F PftcPt>ss:>> ST'aE~ r.
Zoning Designation: C-G -I
B. ~NVIEONM~NTA~ IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a
separate attached sheet.
1. Ea~~h Resources Will the proposal result in:
Yes
No
Maybe
a. Earth movement (cut and/or
fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or
more?
x
b. Development and/or grading on
a slope greater than 15%
natural grade?
x
c.
Development
Alquist-Priolo
Zone?
within the
Special Studies
x
d. Modification of any unique
geologic or physical feature?
x
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 1 OF 8
~
-
,.
e. Soil erosion on or off the
project site?
f. Modification of a channel,
creek or river?
g.
Development
subject
mudslides,
other similar
within an area
to landslides,
liquefaction or
hazards?
h. Other?
2. ~IR_RESOURCES: Will the proposal
result in:
a.
air
upon
emissions or
ambient air
Substantial
an effect
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Development within a high wind
hazard area?
3.
~ATER RESOURCES:
proposal result in:
Will
the
a. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces?
b. Changes in the course or flow
of flood waters?
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality?
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground waters?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards?
f. Other?
\...
REVISED 12/87
Yes
No
Maybe
-.,
x
x
x
><
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
><.
X
~
PAGE 2 OF 8
~
4.
BIOLOGICbL R~SOURC~~:
proposal result in:
Could the
a.
Change
unique,
species
habitat
trees?
b.
Change
unique,
species
habitat?
c. Other?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of plants or their
including stands of
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of animals or their
5. NOISE: Could the proposal result
in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
b. Exposure of people to exterior
noise levels over 65 dB or
interior noise levels over 45
dB?
c. Other?
6.
LAND_ USE.:
result in:
a.
A change in
designated
Plan?
Will the
proposal
the land
on the
use as
General
b. Development within an Airport
District?
c. Development within "Greenbelt"
Zone A,B, or C?
d. Development within a high fire
hazard zone?
e. Other?
Yes
No
"""Ill
Maybe
x
x.
'X
x
x
x
x
><
REVISED 10/87 PAGE 3 OF 8
,.
Maybe
""'IIIl
7.
Will
the
MAN-MADE HAE~N>~:
project:
a. Use, store, transport or
dispose of hazardous or toxic
materials (including but not
limited to oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
b. Involve the release
hazardous substances?
of
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
d. Other?
B. BOUSING: Will the proposal:
a.
Remove
create a
housing?
existing housing or
demand for additional
b.
Other?
9. rRA~2FQBTATION/CIRCULATION: Could
the proposal result in:
a. An increase in traffic that is
greater than the land use
designated on the General
Plan?
b. Use of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilities/
structures?
c. Impact upon existing public
transpolt~tion systems?
d. Alteration of present patterns
of circulation?
e. Impact to rail or air traffic?
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
\..
REVISED 10/87
:es
x
No
x
x:
><
X
><
X
x
)<.
x
><
x
~
PAGE 4 OF 8
q.
h.
Yes
No
Maybe
A disjointed pattern
roadway improvements?
of
x
X
Other?
10. ~UBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal
impact the following beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service?
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Fire protection?
x
X.
Police protection?
Schools (i.e. attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
'X
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
x
><
'X
X
Medical aid?
Solid waste?
Other?
11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal:
a. Impact the following beyond
the capability to provide
adequate levels of service or
require the construction of
new facilities?
1. Natural gas?
'X
X
X
X
X
2. Electricity?
3. Water?
4. Sewer?
5. Other?
b.
Result in a
pattern of
extensions?
disjointed
utility
x
c.
Require the construction of
new facilities?
x
FlEVISED 10/87
PAGE 5 OF a
12. AESTHETI~:
a. Could the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic
view?
b. Will the visual impact of the
project be detrimental to the
surrounding area?
c. Other?
13.
CULTURAL RESOURCES:
proposai-result in:
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Could the
b.
Adverse
impacts
historic
object?
physical or aesthetic
to a prehistoric or
site, structure or
c.
Other?
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
The California Environmental
Quality Act states that if any of
the following can be answered yes
or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the
environment and an Environmental
Impact Report shall be prepared.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
Yes
No
x
x
X
><
><
X:.
"""'l
Maybe
REVISED 10/87 PAGE 6 OF 8
~
Yes
No
Maybe
"
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the
future.)
x
x
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on
the environment is
sign if icant . )
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
x
x
C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(Attach sheets as necessary.)
.15' 500 YEA,tL F'LPob PLAIN AN~ Hl&fl L.1~u.cf'Ad"IClN
111& A~ OF ST'AEET ee~~Tlo N 1.$ Loc:.A-rQ WlTMUil A Goo YEAIl F~
'l.A~N AN:b HI..", UQu.E.f"~C.TI6tJ .:!U.S<EPTlllt.tTY ZPNE. .:s1~CC T/'/€ ~
I.\.SA&-S IS Fo~ "jl'toAt'F Ie. FLOW I A<<.4!'SS Ill'll) ~1"'G 0,,]1..'( \/JITlIO<.(T" ANY
ST~u.~'TIlRAL. "J)EllEJ.DPMetJi, Me .s[G-Il[Flc.l.~T ~Alc:?r WILL. R.ESu.I.:r.
.
3a. AtuoltPTlON ft.A~ AtJ'b oSLlRP'Ac.s ~\AIlJorF
C.a~Cl4c.T/o,.I OF ~~ oSTl'UE'r PI""NlSo "tJb 1Ul.A-rell .:r~PEAMe.u;:
\.
~
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 7 OF 8
proj ect NUl\!' 'r
Date
C. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation
::3a. Measures (contined) .s1.lA.F~~ AR-EA.s WILL l:le:c.P.€ASe!:
"CUolt..PT/o'-J 1U.TS.S ANt> ;DJc.<.eASc WATeR.. RMoFF.
UOWEI/EIC. . ~ 7"0 -rttii $MAw.. AIlEA~NVOL.V~l) 'TJIL': WIU-
.
/J<fT Po&g A SI6NIFICI\NT J.M.p,.,c..T U AL.L P.wJo" 1.&lLU.. ..
J)1/C..EC.1'101I .n&TO errY SToil.M hc.AlIJ ~y.rnoMS.
Sa. ND\.S~ Ll!veLS
l>\UI.wc;. -rUt: OfoI!T~~Tu>>) P61ll0b .wI> AFTeL C.cII'IPLLrIJJlJ oF
THE ~''rJ N~U~ L.EJSU TO A~o'lJlNG- f/fCl'eLrlc'S lIJlt.L..
L.l/<.ELY :r.Nc.Il.EASc File,,", -rf.AFr:~ IUAGE'. .s1~Cc TilE
PItD/bSE'b .s-'Ruu.-r WILL SEleJJE, O/lt..'( AS AN A~n-f()J1AL,..
NOII.'TK - .s.u.."l"+1 c~Uh.l.c:..T.1a. .-re THe: AI&AS M"~o ((. E4~-
WesT 'THO~I.IoG-HFI\~E: J R.EbL.ANDS 1!!~L..€W~b) IT J.s
A.rnc.IP"'T€'~ THIt'!" "f'!fESE INQI,E",r&s IN 'TIU\F'F"IC NoISE
W'L.L. t!. W~1lI'N ACCE~AeL.E. UlJeLS A..b NttT ~Bu..L;T IN
A SLGNIr:tC.A>>T' ~f'AC.T "To .s~v...NJ)ltJG <:~R.c:.'AU-Y-
:belISN fiT!!;:;' ,b>PEf/t:r,".
ctd. ALTUs4Tlo~ ()F C.(k.~I&,,", PAf'{E/IJoIS
j1C. IkoI'tt$Eb 3r~~I:T' (j))JSTItU..C.T'/ON W,U- ~ESCAcr ItI
.
A ~.T" PosITLVE .:t'M.PA<=r To"llfE Mt.EAS EX/STING TlCAFFlc:.
~lR.cuJ,.HM~ PA'T'1E~/4S". "niLS IS 1lD.~ ~o ~HE. EVlbE/tIi
~atl ~~ "'Ii) rTlo"'AL (bNwEcrelt. "",ome;: IN""f)IIS FAST'
t:E\lE./.A'L~G- A ~~ -ro f,I; 1.. EV. "',(011 f1: Ie. <:OI>JtrEl'T1o,,", AN.j)
PRSEfIF'T A'-TEItJ.J(l(TWE. ()u'-r'l.E1'$ -rc -rillE ~A~ eASf'- WE>ST
.11.,1\ "'.A:!'W - ~'n4 "T'1Io~ov.s;. H f"Ml.& S .
, ~
D. DETERMI~h!JON
On the basis of this initial study,
~The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
~environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, although there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measureS described above have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
o
o
The proposed project ~~Y have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
f),)V\;t>1 i:Jl":J.l,~11 q, A'df\ I a~s-c'M - f~bK
Name and Title
()/Vvc _ d.-t J'J d)t - P.t-1j~:-
Signature
Date:
3-f-'7()
lio..
~
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 8 OF 8
CITY OF SAN BERNARr ''\10
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
Date
Adopted 6-2-89
Panel No. .I...1.
~.. ,.... Jj'
_r !/I
(,,~-III
1-'1;.4 r"'l
~.\
.1.
r
T
I .
.--.... '
.1-
I
i
c,(!." i ~ITE'"nl[
. .........
.
sr~f..
I ""'....000..
.
._neoo ! ! I
COOLE" '-UCMlMXI) 'T lit
-6
N
~l
1~
~~
~~
~~
3-28-90
\.
>
\
"
, "
"
,
'::"
""=========
%-..
~-~
~l
~! ~:
_LI___
- I~ - - -
==:0--
~
..z-;1F 7?"-P#'
0---:;;-;;).7 iii..: ..;/
.--7 ,,~'zr""
1\ '
" I'~'
Iii ~!n ~:~,!'
1~II~l'; \~'
II ': I~\t~. ~
1,.1' ~l; I
1';11 .1-
III ~ '
l\~\, \ ~.l~
\ 1\. \,,1\' . "i~
1\' ",~ \ ~\"
~i \\,I\'~ \"\\
\\"'\0\
----\i\ .......
\\t~ "
\
.::p.-~/
A "'
. ~~7M/IA.
$ ;~" *'~
~,~
\<::
~!~
j!!
I' .'E
~'I<
\ ~
\$
,~~
w""/
"",
w",,:,
AM
~~~ .~Ii ChJlfN.
w
>
e:::
~ 0
~
~'r~..t9
0 ~
, ~'"
'.
'1..
~
~
(': H"~'
II-
~\~ W
'\ (f)
Z
::>
(f)
~
-
~~
,~
~,
'h
~t'
" &~
~' It ,
,
.Il? t .1
;.~~~- :::
. \....... -..:>~~ "l<.:'l.
.; .... ",,&.0;>_ --:-,'"
- .:.::::..... -';...:~ ~.;,~~-t..
. ..> ", '6-
_n~ "-Z:
.,
o'
to/.
-"
<ii7
_li.r""
,,=="= ~
UJ
;::
..J
o
a:
<(
u
.'