HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-Public Works
CITY OF SAN
BERftARDINO~REQU~~; '~~~'~~NCIL ACTION
Dept:
Public Works/Engineering
!.,~ J", '":. '";-
1;.-.' _ ~_'_
._.l
Adoption of Negative Declaration &
a Finding of Consistency with the
Circulation Element of the General
Plan Vacation of portion of
Lugo Ave, North of 4th Street.
....~,......t', !'-H ~ ('l'-;:
From: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE, Director.:"- ;,..-'ce," 'o'S;'~ject:
Date:
March 22, 1990
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Public Works Project No. 89-47
09/18/89 --
Director of Public Works/City Engineer and City Clerk were
authorized to proceed with proposed vacation of portion of
Lugo Avenue, North of 4th Street, and amended Plan No. 7531 was
approved.
Recommended motion:
1. That the Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 89-47, Vacation of
a portion of Lugo Avenue, North of 4th Street, is adopted.
2. That a finding is made that the Vacation of a portion of Lugo Avenue, North
of 4th Street , is consistent with the circulation element of the General
Plan
~: Marshall Julian, City Administrator
Jim Richardson, Deputv City Administrator/Developm~nt
Contact person: Roger G. Hardgrave Phone:
Staff Report; Notice of Preparation
Supporting data attached: Initial Study, Neg Dee, Map Ward:
Addendum to initial study
FUNDING REOUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A
502')
1
Source: (Acct. No,)
(Acct. DescriPtion)
Finance:
Council Notes:
March 22, 1990
An.anrl~ hcm r\ln / ~
CITY OF SAN BERLARDINO - REQUEST. JR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
The Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 89-47 was recommended for
adoption by the Environmental Review Committee at its meeting of 2-01-90.
A 21-day public review period was afforded from 2-08-90 to 2-28-90. A letter was
received during that period from Frank Tracadas, 463 N. 'Sierra Way, objecting to
the proposed vacation and indicating that traffic studies, noise studies and air
quality studies needed to be done before the negative declaration could be
adopted.
His comments were brought before the Environmental Review Committee on March 15,
1990, and, after hearing from Mr. Tracadas, the committee determined that
evidence in the record supported the finding that the proposed vacation could not
have a significant impact on the environment and voted re-affirm its original
recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council that a Negative Declaration be
adopted. An addendum to the initial study was prepared addressing Mr. Tracadas'
concerns (attached).
We recommend that the Negative Declaration be adopted and a finding made that the
project is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
3-22-90
75-0264
NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF NEGATIVE DECTARATION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO proposes to adopt a Negative
Declaration for the following projects. The Environmental
Review committee found that the project will not have a
significant effect on the environment on the basis of the
Initial Study and mitigation measures (if applicable).
PARCEL MAP NO. 13001
To subdivide one parcel consisting of approximately 0.62
arces into two parcels (10,800 square feet each) located at
the northwest corner of Belmont and Palm Avenues.
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 90-03
To vacate a section of Jefferson Avenue between Pepper and
Euclayptus Avenues.
'~UBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 89-47
To vacate a portion of Lugo Avenue between 4th Street and
5th Street.
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 89-48
To vacate a portion of 5th Street between Dallas and Meridian
Avenues.
Copies of the Initial Study are available for public review
at the Planning Department, 300 north "0" street, San
Bernardino, CA 92418, and the Feldheym Library, 555 West 6th
Street, San Bernardino, CA. Any environmental comments you
should have should be received in this office no later than
4:00 p.m., Februarv 28. 1990. If you do not respond in
writing, we will assume that you have no opinions and/or
recommendations on the above projects.
Submitted:
Publish:
2/6/90
2/8/90
city of San Bernardino Planning Department
(714) 384-5057
nm2/5/90
DOC: Misc
NOTICENEGDEC
._-J
o:'.~:1
c"
3-22-90
,."...,~
--
CITY 01= SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY
Initial study for Environmental Impacts
For ~uc. Wo~ PlUmic=T" No. 8'r..lf1
Project Number
Project description/Location "tt> WlcA"TC A
f\6'I.:rlbol of 1..l.\.GoO Av~ Bl!:TW"F-tJ ."TII. AAlII
.!l'I'Il. STUa:'TS
Date ~AIJv..AR.V ~, I~qo
.
Applicant (s)
Prepared for:
c ITV or: S,I\ol R&R.N,I\lI.l:>(NO
~PAQ:TM&t\Ji nr: pt-.lle.. w~,..~
~ ~onw "n" S111~
SAil m::v.lACI NO I GA '1124151
Address
City, State
Zip
Prepared
'PA u.L.. Go .
Name
ASSISTANT
Title
by:
S~S
PLAIJNER.
City of San Bernardino
Planninq Department
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
MISC:
IS PREPARATION
ke/9-1-89
""'"
"ITY OF SAN BERN~i1DINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROytlD
Application Number: t'\.lBUC. Wo/U:.S 'PR.oJ"ec:r No. 1</-117
Project Description: 10 VAc.AT€. A POKrIoN OF /.J.lG-o AVE.1I1AE R.~TWE'F-t.J
lfo1N. Aw,)) S"TIl. .sTue.,-.s ,
Locat ion: llIE FIRST Af'fltDx'IM^TE 300 FEEi1" OF u.~o A~e.146 1I1oP-TH OF 4-m
S-r"~""1 AN,)) WI of .s1~IlJAV
Env i ronmental Const raints Areas: Jft~ Llt':IIJ.E:FACT"lnlJ Sv..s~PT'8'L.ITV
flftE.A
General Plan Designation: C.O-I I C'OI'\....e:~C.IAL. OFFlc.E!.
P/l(tncN of t'IC.OPOSEl> D!;;MCA1"IO!J Fon. ~1A.l..-])E~S"AG IN IUI HI&oH RE.SlbI"N1"1AL.
,
zoning Designation: c.o-r, COfo\M~I"1.. oFf'IC.';:.
,
B. ~FVIEONM~NTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a
separate attached sheet.
1. EaJth Resources Will the proposal result in:
Yes
No
Maybe
a.
Earth
fill)
more?
movement (cut and/or
of 10,000 cubic yards or
x
b. Development and/or grading on
a slope greater than 15%
natural grade?
x
c.
Development
Alquist-Priolo
Zone?
within the
Special Studies
x
d. Modification of any unique
geologic or physical feature?
x
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 1 OF a
e. Soil erosion on or off the
project site?
f. Modification of a channel,
creek or river?
g.
Development
subject
mudslides,
other similar
within an area
to landslides,
liquefaction or
hazards?
h. Other?
2. ~IR_RESOURCES: Will the proposal
result in:
a.
air
upon
emissions or
ambient air
Substantial
an effect
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Development within a high wind
hazard area?
3.
WATER RESOURCES:
proposal result in:
will
the
a.
Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces?
b.
Changes in the course or flow
of flood waters?
c.
Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality?
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground waters?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards?
f. Other?
Yes No
.
Maybe
l
x
x
x
x
x
x.
x
x
x
x
X
x
x
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 2 OF 8
-
~
Yes
No
Maybe
.
4.
BIOLOGICbL R~SOURCEp:
proposal result in:
Could the
a.
Change
unique,
species
habitat
trees?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of plants or their
including stands of
x
b.
Change
unique,
species
habitat?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of animals or their
x
X
c.
Other?
5. NOISE: Could the proposal result
in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
x
b. Exposure of people to exterior
noise levels over 65 dB or
interior noise levels over 45
dB?
c. Other?
x
X
6.
LAND_ USE:
result in:
Will the
proposal
a.
A change in
designated
Plan?
the land use as
on the General
x
b. Development within an Airport
District?
x
c. Development within "Greenbelt"
Zone A,B, or C?
x
d. Development within a high fire
hazard zone?
e. Other?
)(
X
REVISED 10/67
PAGE 3 OF 6
-
-
les
No
Maybe
.
7.
MAN-MADE HAEbFPp:
project:
a. Use, store, transport or
dispose of hazardous or toxic
materials (including but not
limited to oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
Will
the
x
b. Involve the release
hazardous substances?
of
x
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
x
X
d. Other?
8. HOUSING: Will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing or
create a demand for additional
housing?
x
x.
b. Other?
9. IRA~~rORTATION/CIRCULATION: Could
the proposal result in:
a. An increase in traffic that is
greater than the land use
designated on the General
Plan?
x
b.
Use of existing,
new, par king
structures?
or demand for
facilities/
x
c. Impact upon existing public
transportation systems?
d. Alteration of present patterns
of circulation?
x
x
e. Impact to rail or air traffic?
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
x
x
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 4 OF 8
-
"'"
g.
h.
Yes
No
Maybe
.
A disjointed pattern
roadway improvements?
of
><
X
Other?
10. FUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal
impact the following beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service?
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Fire protection?
X
'x.
police protection?
Schools (i.e. attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
x.
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
><
X
X
X
Medical aid?
Solid waste?
Other?
11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal:
a. Impact the following beyond
the capability to provide
adequate levels of service or
require the construction of
new facilities?
1. Natural gas?
2. Electricity?
x
3. Water?
x
X
X
X
4. Sewer?
5. Other?
b.
Result in a
pattern of
extensions?
disjointed
utility
x
c.
Require the construction of
new facilities?
x
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 5 OF 8
12. AESTHETICS:
a. Could the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic
view?
b. Will the visual impact of the
project be detrimental to the
surrounding area?
c. Other?
13.
Could the
CULTURAL RESOURCES:
proposal-result in:
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
b.
c.
Adverse
impacts
historic
object?
Other?
physical or aesthetic
to a prehistoric or
site, structure or
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
The California Environmental
Quality Act states that if any of
the following can be answered yes
or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the
environment and an Environmental
Impact Report shall be prepared.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
Yes
No
.
x
x
X
X
x
X
Maybe
"""
REVISED 10/87 PAGE 6 OF 8
Yes
No
Maybe
important examples ~f t~e
major periods of CallfornlA
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the
future.)
x
x
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on
the environment is
significant. )
><
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
x
C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(Attach sheets as necessary.)
.1.,. "TIlE: PAoPQ.SC f'fl.o::rfic.T IS \oI1"~If\1 A fll6-H UGlIAEFAc:TION ,slAoSCeP'TIBIL..liV AIl.~AJ
IIowEV€1t. plaiCE. THE. VAc.ATEb A~A IS-'T"o BE.. LCrIL..lZEb AS A PmE.!> J:l(UVB.rAY
Aol:t> AC'~' AAU Foe.. f'M.KlN~ ONL.Y IAl'THo....T /IA1Y :t>evE~ OF srxu.M"lIPJC:~
~o ,s1~N' ftc.A..rt" :tMPAt.TS l.Q11.L RE:su.I.:r.
3.& "TIlE: $T'1tECi" AAeA 10 Be VAc.A1e~ lAJlL.L.. aMAIN A PAVEb bfttllE.wAY INrrH ~o
C.W\II~ IN AGSo~N ~TES oR. SAAf'~c.E R.WJOFF. t!6~vSR.. i"HIO ~PoSE. eF
,
1l;e VAC.ATlON IS Felt bEVE.I.DPrI\EtJT of 'bIR.SC"rL.'( A.b:rAc::arr PAA.CEl.S w\1"1I Sr~T-
\U.Al.. A!>l>mo,.... A..u. A NEw u.~ PAfUc.I/IG AR.eo\ THill WIL.J.... b€~c:J:
.
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 7 OF 8
-
-
Project Number
Date
C. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation
Measures (contined) "'B"nlZP~/oN Q.,o;rSS At.A/) ltAlClUi~ fl.wjoF',
~ APPl!.oXI"'''ToE: 1.5 A~ PA."~D PAUWG- NlE.,., 1l0IlJEVEL- WILL
Ntrr PoSE. A ,Slli.., ~I<'.AI'J-r :rMPAC.:T oSl aJ C6 ~oFt= wrL.L. Ill&.
b\liE<..."TCl) "fo Pl.\.Buc. S1"RECTS AIJ.b INTO err\' 3TbfUol IlAAW.sVS'!'EII\f.
9.d. ~ VOIl'.......,.,tJ oF 111(5 1'o1Zt101J OF L......GO .s<r#=T MAV j)l!'~
So~ MIIlI/oo\AL. E'1<IS1'I~G- 1'"AAFf'IC. PAm:~S. f./cwEvE./t... PuE.'To
,
1'"fH~ f\l&o\ R. jtltl!lXl M IT\( J I "0 FEST 1JJES1'": OF .s IE tl R.A WI('( A ""MAE.
~lC.~ lot TI\E P/U/AN..<{ Tj(JlIU'/bl!TM'1e~ AR."r~Y Foil CARR..'fl~G NoctrU--.5OlCnI
VElilc.uL.A~ 'fll.AR=1e. I~ T!+f;: vo,a.\Shlf\'tt P~'T" AU" 'T"H6 PIl-oP01'Ej)
.
VACA"rlotJ I>llu.. ~AI/E NO ,SlG'/.lIf'ICAI-IT' :Do\PIlCT.
1ll€ g.::lSTtllG- ~~ SIlIll.L. Be rasu'Wb Fof? l.ttLI.I'tY)
~ENeY ANh o1llClt VeHlCAI..AIl. ~~.
~-
-
-PvJ 8?-'t-;
proj ect Nun. _~r
Date
C. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation
Measures (contined) AbDEJJhUM -'-0 .:t:/JI7'IAL STo.ViY:
fl.ESf'oNSE. "'-0 "T"(t.AfF/G NOISE Moll) Mil. Q""UTt' fJlNCEIWS OF
1J~16-IiOt>JU,.JG p/WpetCrY OW,Jert"'-o Pv.&Jc. wo~.s NO. 8'1-47
,
W.foJJbl~G -(0 THe O,.\E LE:1Tf:1L I!cl/.b. CraNce/W1 tJG -rHe:
I/Au,,-rION at: A p~altJ,J Or J.J.;G-O AV6/.JUE. 8E:rweetJ 't11I r S1!i.
S7'~TS .
"'t41E cITY of S'Af/ B€RIJ'Attbl,Jo 'PW!u<:" WOJl.I::=S/&J6-{~
. '
J>E.rr. '7R.Af'FI<:. E.N6-{tJEE{ # ~S ~€l/leW6..1> 'Ttte
~fl.f>fil.s'A 1- .r'lL V*l4IIN G- -rUt .soUfHe,(N lo/ZTl6~ oF"
~ AUGIJ"-C -ro Cfl-JEIIT€ A Cu-L-l>C-SAC. AWl>
JlEnl5e.MvI6..!:l -rijIT G4SEb ~ -(/{E ~w II 1>1" (AIIfi'lIt~
bAIL-V 111AtfflC of S60-/OOo OlLlES,S) Tl<.ArFlc. V~ O,J
lJJ.G-o M6IJut . MoD fSeCAa.Se of /He A!>S<Sl,IAATG WElWE
.
CA(11.C-IT'( O'F "f'f{c 1l~I>I>lI,JEr f.1AJOIl. e4Jr-u..\5JT ~.Jb
NoR::f/1":'Sw::rt.l -rRt.f(lc. #CT6ru.SS. i"H4T ~ s~lFIu.."1T
,
1"AAffk .:r""PKT U o\t.IT1oPm"Gb ~Nb /l'IAT NO C6M~6N.
SII)C. TRA1=F'C, S-rl.\..t.Y w/J..J.A~6 NcC6SSM~.:\(.
11-\6 Wl>> "TRto f'~1 Co VOLt<J.\b ON ~ MB'JII-E AJ.S 2)
P-bJ14.L-'TS IN M.ftJlPl.AL. All>/J; E L/5V61-S AJJll .:IW>Acrs -rtl
~""(?le:~ A/a.. Qv.ALl.T'i . 711.0.7" ~1l.E rJ6L.L. WI/tlI4tlje: 6t:
.
dB. L.€J.J6L f(o((.fA{l.t..J-y Ac.t:.ePr4Eu fcrl. ~l.
,&Nt) PIl4FGSJ"IO,JAL. ~{<iiS W'fHlI.J "B1.1.n.^l6SS W'TIl.lc:TS qf'(
{I.JlJJ We JJ6.I/G-NrrTID..., S. .:L1'\Pf'\c.,l> TO -rf?A'Pf/G) foJ()!.st:"
fiN.}) 141R...Ql()lu'1"Y 6'( /"Hl: pR.oP~S6.!:> ilACA7/0tJ -rnv.,r WIL./..
:E.e w l-rlll'" "" <<6P7'AALe /..-€IfELS '10 dE. CeIU"IOE!lEb CF fJ4N'SIGNlf~c.&.
E.<.C 3- 6-"7U CfL t./:~"'I
D.
DETERMINA, ~
On the b.sis of this initial study,
The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on thE
environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
.
1)(1
o
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, although there will not be a significant effect ir
this case because the mitigation measures described above havE
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
o
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
ttnY\ LI1 A SI7>:I -~.uht,lC'. $-I Nt \ ~ P lCU\ t\V\
Name and Title
~ ) daAA.btl - PP1~
Signature
Date:
(=j~.J)-, f. /99D
.
ReVlsec 12/87
PAGe 8 OF 8
r
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPfunMENT
AGENDA
ITEM #
LOCATION
CASE ---P.lJ g" -1#7
HEARING DATE
; ~"~I 1~!8bJ_
r ~\ , L.,. .1" / ~ I~~~;:l.l c ~~ {~L ~ ~..,. \ .
~J ",.J U r r '1111 .~ o~~~ -=
J I p~ I~II '!I~~~"~"~: ~ ....r.., .
;;; RMK r II~ I I-~- ...,~ I' ..
-r, r- I I IIcr1-i i ~
~ 1 " L- '-- r A#.f.A~1I ji r I ~
^ VA~.ll!.. . ~ T ~
1.-1' COU.T'I', 'I! ~
= N - 0'" i'=fi
/ CUTUl ~ GJ ~nTu I~..: -'t6""
V~\ r ~ . ) 1...': 'lo i
'Y CIT · III Vt' ", I .1 ,
~ Jb- ~ r"":1 · 51' 11'''' 1,
"l.- '..0, "Q;d~ : ,,11=' i
ZIb()( )l(rl\\i J I ~- -
~~ - I 0 ' ,."1- ',0 () ~I
'1 \\~:~I_ '", ;- nl~' ~f, J ~
" Jrp )<1:,~... ~~ tJH ,":.." 0
flY I .--1110. ~ "'"""" 1\ J <(
~ I~ s \ ~ a:: !! I
:t( D''*~'' c: t ~1I1 II W
~ ~:.:i" >ln~ In- i i'~ .. _.~~"~
!!l.....ol ,_ . {'(.n!!! / i
. '. ....'" L o!j ilK CHJ,OW I
,It V11J"-~ .<-....... -
,v
I --.
.
.
...J
~~
-
3-22-90
-
I
..J
I
~
~ 5'"
..,
STREET ~
'4 54
e~~ed
~
/
p'
...
':l 18 , , ~o
~
... ~.
~ J7
~
.6qe 5v "
C)
~ 2:.
~
...,
.2,
'0'
....,.
15 I " 17
~
~
~
q;
>-
q;
~
" 'ltO",.sED
D'.,CIITlcN 2 'V
/0 ~ 2' -I'~
. Por BI~5, RSIJ
~
,..,
16 ...
9 -
....
cr
>
8 27 ~
--
:-- ~
,<r: 7 ~
...
~ - 3
Q( ~
Ilt ..
... 6 S '"
;:;;
. 60'
...~
'" ;"
STREET "
... 411> <ll
,
....,
AREA To BE
VACATED
A~lENDEQ.:...
/:.. ~_:'. .1/ _ .- .,l .
/ (/~1.. ~ " '. / './ /'
DIIlSCTlJR' OF- pUIL:ic ~ORI<S' /CITV ENGINEER
PI'.p.I'.Cl II!!I L. FOGASSY Sh..t
Ch.ck.Cl II!! I V. "" H~.IJ 1 of 1
DAT. I QS- ~,... ""?".'
AR.A VACATIIl SHOWN THUS ~~~AI
~.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PULXC HORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
REAL. PROPERTY SECTION
FILE NO.1 /5. 311- 2.. PLAN NO.1 75'11
STREET I ALLEY VACATION I
PORTION OF LUGO AVENUE. NORTH
OF 4TH STREET
3-22-90
~