HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-Public Works
CITY OF SAN BERi\lARDINO ~ REQU~~;' ..oR3~OUNCIL ACTION
From: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE, Director
Dept: Public WorksfEngineering
Date: March 6, 1990
;~. E C'D. sribj~W'. ~~~~~~~g o~f N~~:~i;:e~~~ la~~~~on th:
.,.,. kc.'l Circulation Element of the General
. ~ 0-' "_' l";iti \
Plan- Vacation of a portion of
5th street between Dallas Avenue &
Meridian Avenue.
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Public Works Project No. 89-48
12-04-69 -- Director of Public Works/City Engineer and City Clerk were
authorized to proceed with proposed vacation of a portion of
5th street between Dallas Avenue and Meridian Avenue Plan No. 7966
was approved.
Recommended motion:
1. That the Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 89-48, Vacation of
a portion of 5th street between Dallas Avenue and Meridian Avenue be adopted.
2. That a finding be made that the Vacation of a portion of 5th street between
Dallas Avenue and Meridian Avenue, is consistent with the circulation element
of the General Plan
~cc: Marshall Julian, City Administrator
~ Jim Richardson, Deputy City Administrator
Roger G. Hardgrave
Contact person: 3L ff It L N Ll f
Q ~~UL, U C~ u
Supporting data attached: Initial Study, Neg Dec,
Phone:
Preparation
Map Ward:
5025
3
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. DescriPtion)
Finance:
Council Notes:
03-06-90
75-0262
Agenda Item NO~
CITY OF SAN BE~,.ARDINO - REQUEST ...OR. COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
The Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 89-48 was recommended for
adoption by the Environmental Review Committee at its meeting of 02-01-90.
A 21-day public review period was afforded from 02-08-90 to 02-28-90. No
comments were received.
We recommend that the Negative Declaration be adopted and a finding made that the
project is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
03-06-90
75-0264
NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO proposes to adopt a Negative
Declaration for the following projects. The Environmental
Review Committee found that the project will not have a
significant effect on the environment on the basis of the
Initial study and mitigation measures (if applicable).
PARCEL MAP NO. 13001
To subdivide one parcel consisting of approximately 0.62
arces into two parcels (10,800 square feet each) located at
the northwest corner of Belmont and Palm Avenues.
rUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 90-03
To vacate a section of Jefferson Avenue between Pepper and
Euclayptus Avenues.
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 89-47
To vacate a portion of Lugo Avenue between 4th Street and
5th Street.
~UBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 89-48
To vacate a portion of 5th street between Dallas and Meridian
Avenues.
Copies of the Initial study are available for public review
at the Planning Department, 300 north "D" street, San
Bernardino, CA 92418, and the Feldheym Library, 555 West 6th
street, San Bernardino, CA. Any environmental comments you
should have should be received in this office no later than
4:00 p.m., Februarv 2B. 1990. If you do not respond in
writing, we will assume that you have no opinions and/or
recommendations on the above projects.
Submitted:
Publish:
2/6/90
2/8/90
City of San Bernardino Planning Department
(714) 384-5057
nm2/5/90
DOC: Misc
NOTICENEGDEC
-.l
~l
0,
r
r,ITV OF SAN BERNAPOINO
PLANNING DEP ARTMEN I
INITIAL STUDY
L
Applicant(s)
Address
City, State
Zip
MISC:
ISPREPARATION
ke/9-1-89
'"
Initial study for Environmental Impacts
For 'PuIUJr WoLIC.S ~~'T" NO. R'l-IIS
Project NUmber
Project description/Location To VA~ATE A
'PO"-TtoN OF 5T". STIU:~ SE'1Wr;:E:N l>ALLAS "AI'])
MUu"LAN f'V(;.t>JIJf:'(:
Date .:tA"'lI.~R.V~, I'fCWO
Prepared for:
C-I'TY of SAIJ AIiIUJ^IU>I"'O
JJs.PAI2.T~E: I>IT 0 F PU&lc. WoIU:.$'
300 NoR:tM "1>" S"TlI2Se'T
SAw BalUlAIlbI"'o . c:.A '8.'1ti
.
Prepared by:
"PAtA.L G. ~.s
Name
ASS'LS'T" It Jo..lT 'PL..4'" IJ€ R.
Title
City of San Bernardino
Planning Department
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
~
""'"
CITY OF SAN BERh~RDINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROpND
Appl icat ion Number: 'f'\.l8L.lc. WoRJ=S fR.o.ncr Ale. gq -'fe
Project Description: ,0 VAc,AT"E. A (1oClON OF STU. ST~
BI::'TuJSSN l>AUAS ANb MEiUl>IAtJ Av~wu.ES
Locat ion: I"~ F~T OF S'N S'T~ N~TU OF FamfII.L BL.V.b. Au,!) ~S~
:bAIJ.AS A.,ll M.~lblAN AIJ~NIA.SS.
Environmental Constraints Areas: Neff LocATE!) (A111HIJ II-J'( ~fSIG#J"TE.l:>
E"'Vlla.O"'llII.~NTAL. (t,II)STRAI.:lT ~~.
General Plan Designation: e.G-'. geNE.IlAL Collll.MriR.C.IAL.
.
Zoning Designation: c.e-l J c:i-E~EAAL CDflI\~a.c.(AL
B. ~FVIBONM~NTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a
separate attached sheet.
l. Ea~~h Resources Will the proposal result in:
Yes
No
Maybe
a. Earth movement (cut and/or
fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or
more?
x
b. Development and/or grading on
a slope greater than 15%
natural grade?
x
c. Development within the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zone?
x
d. Modification of any unique
geologic or physical feature?
x
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 1 OF a
e. Soil erosion on or of~ the
project site?
f. Modification of a channel,
creek or river?
g.
Development
subject
mudslides,
other similar
within an area
to landslides,
liquefaction or
hazards?
h. Other?
2. ~IR RESOURCES: Will the proposal
result in:
a.
air
upon
emissions or
ambient air
Substantial
an effect
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Development within a high wind
hazard area?
3.
~ATEB___RESOURCES:
proposal result in:
Will
the
a. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces?
b. Changes in the course or flow
of flood waters?
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality?
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground waters?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards?
f. Other?
Yes
No
.
x
x
:x-
X
x.
x
x
x.
x
x
x
x
X
Maybe
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 2 OF 8
Yes No Maybe ~
.
4. BIOLOGICaL R~SOURCEp: Could the
proposal result in:
a. Change in the number of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of plants or their
habitat including stands of X
trees?
b. Change in the number of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of animals or their X
habitat?
c. Other? X.
5. NOISE: Could the proposal result
in:
a. Increases in existing noise X
levels?
b. Exposure of people to exterior
noise levels over 65 dB or
interior noise levels over 45 X
dB?
c. Other? 'X
6. LAND_ USE: Will the proposal
result in:
a. A change in the land use as
designated on the General X
Plan?
b. Development within an Airport
District? X
c. Development within "Greenbelt" X
Zone A,B, or C?
d. Development within a high fire X
hazard zone?
e. Other? X
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 3 OF 8
.,
Yes
NO
Maybe
""'"
7 .
MAN-MADE HA~~Jq)~ :
project:
Will
the
a. Use, store, transport or
dispose of hazardous or toxic
materials (including but not
limited to oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
x
b. Involve the release
hazardous substances?
of
x
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
d. Other?
x
X
8. HOUSING: Will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing or
create a demand for additional
housing?
x
X
b. Other?
9. 1'RA~~PORTATION/CIRCULATION: Could
the proposal result in:
a. An increase in traffic that is
greater than the land use
designated on the General
Plan?
x
b. Use of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilities/
structures?
x
c. Impact upon existing public
transportation systems?
x
d. Alteration of present patterns
of circulation?
e. Impact to rail or air traffic?
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
x
X
x
\..
..J
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 4 OF 8
10.
g.
~
Yes
No
Maybe
.
q.
A disjointed pattern
roadway improvements?
of
x
h. Other?
PUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal
Impact the following beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service?
a.
Fire protection?
x
X
b.
Police protection?
Schools (i.e. attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
x
c.
d.
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
x
X
X
X
e.
Medical aid?
f.
Solid waste?
Other?
11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal:
a. Impact the following beyond
the capability to provide
adequate levels of service or
require the construction of
new facilities?
b.
,c.
1. Natural gas?
x
X
X
2. Electricity?
3. Water?
4. Sewer?
x
X
5. Other?
Result in a
pattern of
extensions?
disjointed
utility
x
Require the construction of
new faCilities?
x
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 5 OF 8
"""'l
Yes
No
Maybe
.
12. AESTHETICS:
a. Could the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic
view?
x
b. Will the visual impact of the
project be detrimental to the
surrounding area?
x
X
c. Other?
13. ~P~~URA~--FESQURCES: Could the
proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic X
archaeological site?
b. Adverse physical or aesthetic
impacts to a prehistoric or
historic site, structure or X
object?
c. Other? X
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
The California Environmental
Quality Act states that if any of
the following can be answered yes
,or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the
environment and an Environmental
Impact Report shall be prepared.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
REVISED 10/87 PAGE 6 OF 8
r
Yes
No
Maybe
~
important examples ~f t~e
major periods of Callfornla
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the
future.)
x
x
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on
the environment is
significant. )
x
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
x
C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(Attach sheets as necessary.)
Cf <I. ~ .s'nI. STIlJ!ET ARE" To BE VA<,,,1'Eb flA,s tJEVE/C.. 'PJ:~N 'bEVE.lOPEb ArJ.bTHE(E~E.
:DoES Nt:ff" AcrE~ ~~y PRMENT ff.ffM1UJ of ClRn.,krION. A ~ON OF 5"rti.
STi.Ef!T E:lrI"E:'NtltNG- Eo\ST~C f"~ MElUlllArJ AVF-AJut;' wAr PREvINA.r1Jf
VAr,A.or~b 1b A PIt\V ItTE APAJl:f'ME,.jf' CoM'" &;V THAT Ht\,s c;.IIITGll THE srREEr
OA=' Fd~ p(l.\V'<rt:: 7&.I"m" CUAGE dtJl-Y. ST4I smEei C4U.L..h JJOi 8~ 'J)EJIELo~
-twiN K(" "~Y' ~ ll.Q1E" ~tJ .twLA.(" IWb ~tAJJ.
"'f1.l.e ~1.J'fr~c;. E.Ar€ME,,"S SMAL.L.. IlE ~S~EX:l ~j(, {LTll-tTY ElltDJiENCV
.
AN.h C1TtlEt?- VE;Mto.a.L.Alt. IJ""~".
~ ~
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 7 OF 8
r
"""
D.
DETERMINA1JON
On the basis of this initial study,
The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
.
~
D
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, although there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described above have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
D
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
AVIV'! ~A:crM ~ llib\lC I S:O~I&t P 1CU1YlL1
Name and Title
tJ#I~.) ~ - fJM~,
Signature
Date: IjdJ- / J 199. D
-.....
~
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 8 OF 8
r
,.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA
ITEM #
LOCATION
CASE "PW g,- ~W
HEARING DATE
'It.
10.
~uw lJLUlJl]L
I.""" J Lo S Ie::
I Ita J r:::J::::: Ie::
I'T "om Ib::
I .",UC[ I ~
V~
~/. .
AqA To BE
V^CI.TI&
T",
ST. II llC .,,,L.t'!'
~I
=ru Dr::
~G ST. 1_
LTO
T
I
I
JDD
"(''f
>
cd:
:.
"
I 57!' 'SrREIT
I ( I/ACA'17!0)
I
\lJ
~
~
:>
ct
~
Q
~
~
T
s,'
.L
1'10
~O\
rr.t^'
CI)
~
ct
A
FOOTHILL 'BoULEVAIU:>
(!2'-yu a~ d<;w'h.... .
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC ~~~ JCITV ENGINEER
Pr.p.r.d b!jl A. "DE,."BDc-T Sh..t
Ch.cK.d b!j: V. ^,~J~~c.I 10ft.
DATE: /1-0:2- 29
AREA VACATED SHOWN THUS 7~~
FILE NO.1 15".8c-2.92, PLAN NO.1 7 611
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PUBLIC NORKS OEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING OIVISION
REAL PROPERTY SECTION
~
~
~
~
q:
STREET / ALLEY VACATION I
t'enl...rlD N OF SrH .sr~~ ~~
!1ErWIEI!f!.N Z>ALL"'.s tltVIrNUE. AN/:)
ME~/b/~AJ AVENue