HomeMy WebLinkAboutEmergency Item
RESOLUTION NO.
2
3
4
5
6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO OPPOSING THE
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION'S DESIGNATION OF THE ROUTE 30
CORRIDOR FOR TWO-MILE INTERCHANGE SPACING.
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration, Region Nine
Office, has made the determination that the Route 30 Corridor
would not be considered urban even in the forecast year 2010;
and
7
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration has made the
8
9
10
11
12
13
determination that the Route 30 corridor interChange spacing
should, as a result, be restricted every two miles; and
WHEREAS, the areas along the Route 30 corridor in San
Bernardino County are significantly urbanized: and
WHEREAS, the Southern California Associated Governments
has forecast a significant increasing growth of urbanization
14 within the corridor; and
15
WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino has passed local
16 1/2 cents sales tax measure which will provide a majority
17 funding for the construction of the proposed Route 30 corridor;
18 and
19
WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino's local planning
20 along Route 30 has been developed in cooperation with the
21 affected cities, based on one-mile interchange spacing for many
22 years: and
23
WHEREAS, to change the interchange spacing from one mile
24 to two miles now would severely impact local agency circulation
25 and growth patterns; and
26
WHEREAS, the initial study has indicated unacceptable
27 traffic
two-mile
volumes will occur around the proposed
28 interchanges;
~:-;r'. ,
/-:.,., ~,
,
~..-
T/";;-/ }./
__ ~'::/1/c.
il
NOW,
.EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, t.uat the Mayor and Common
Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby opposes the Federal
1
2
3
4
5
6
Highway Administration's designation of the Route 30 corridor
for t~o-mile interchange spacing; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Common Council
of the City of San Bernardino further recommends the Route 30
plan to reflect one-mile interchange spacing for the Route 30
corridor throughout San Bernardino County.
7
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
8
9
10
11
adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
Bernardino
at a
meeting thereof, held on the
day of
, 1990, by the following vote, to
wit:
12 Council Members:
';.
AYES
NAYS
ABSTAIN
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ESTRADA
REILLY
FLORES
MAUDSLEY
MINOR
POPE-LUDLAM
MILLER
City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is
approved
this
hereby
day of
, 1990.
w. R. HOLCOMB, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Approved as to form
and legal content:
JAMES F. PENMAN
City Attorney
"
/'
By: ~ 4-...~
/,
I
'/
/]
'7
i
,
.~> l..\......-1-.\,...~
_.~. ..:;, ~ .. ~
f
J.
iSnarh nf &uptruil1nrl1
<!tnuntg nf &an .tmarbinn
~\AHu
-I~
~'ll",,1-
.
JON D. MIKELS
SUPERVISOR SECOND DISTRICT
JUDITH S. GILBERT
~XECUTIVE ASSIST ANT
D1CKSIE SPOLAR
FIELD REPRESENT A TIVE
VIVIAN R. NULL
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE
MARJORIE F. STAMM
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE
CORRESPONDENCE VIA FAX
March 1, 1990
Dear City Manager:
At the February 26, 1990, meeting of the Board of Supervisors, I
asked for a resolution opposing the Route 30 designation as
Rural Freeway, which would result in a two-mile spacing
requirement for off-ramps. On March 15, I am attending a Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) meeting to protest this
designation.
I intend to present the Board's resolution, along with all city
resolutions, opposing the two-mile spacing at that meeting. I
would appreciate your City Council's consideration and
concurrence of a similar resolution at your next City Council
meeting.
Please fax a copy of your approved resolution to my San
Bernardino office no later than March 14, 1990. Our fax number
is (714) 387-4558.
V?:k'~
~. ~IKELS
County Supervisor
Second District
JDM: jg/lem
Enclosure
"
San Bernardino County Government Center. 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, Fifth Floor · San Bernardino, CA 92415.0110 · (714) 387.4833
Rancho Cucamonsa District Office' Foothill Communities Law and Justice Center' 8303 Haven Avenue . Ra~cho Cucamonga, CA 91730 . (714) 945-4297
Wrightwood District Office' 6025 Park Drive (Street Address) . p, O. Box 1954 (Mailmg Address) . Wflghtwood, CA 92397 . (619) 249.5232
.:....~,_ .....:..,,:,~ '...;~ ~ "';'r"I ~ ...)~ ~~
,# i.
...
.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY
ADMINISTRATION'S DESIGNATION OF THE ROUTE 30
CORRIDOR FOR TWO-MILE INTERCHANGE SPACING
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration, Region Nine
office, has made the determination that the Route 30 Corridor
would not be considered urban even in the forecast year 20101 and
WIII!llU1lAC, t.he Federal II!~h'W'aY' AdmiJ'l.i.st.rat.ieft has made t.he
determination that the Route 30 corridor interchange spacing
should, as a result, be restricted every two miles, and
WHEREAS, the areas along the Route 30 corridor in San
Bernardino County are significantly urbanized: and
WHEREAS, the Southern California Associated Governments has
forecast a significant increasing growth of urbanization within
the corridor, and
l
WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino has passed a local l/2
cents sales tax measure which will provide a majority funding for
the construction of the proposed Route 30 corridor, and
WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino's local planning along
Route 30 has been developed in cooperation with the affected
cities, based on one-mile interchange spacing for many years1 and
WHEREAS, to change the interchange spacing from one mile to
two miles now would severely impact local agency circulation and
growth patterns: and
WHEREAS, the initial study has
traffic volumes will occur around
interchanges1
indicated unacceptable
the proposed two-mile
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of San
Bernardino Board of Supervisors hereby opposes the Federal
Highway Administration's designation of the Route 30 corridor for
two-mile interchange spacing1 and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County of San Bernardino
Board of Supervisors further recommends the Route 30 plan to
reflect one-mile interchange spacing for the Route 30 corridor
throughout San Bernardino County.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of San
Bernardino County, State of California, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: