The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About31-City Administrator - -- CITY OF SAN BERt' 'lRDINO - REQUEST l )R COUNCIL ACTION From: Marshall W. Julian Subject: Recommendation of funding sources for street improvements from bond proceeds and authorization to proceed with work Oept: City Administrator Date: February 13, 1990 Synopsis of Previous Council action: July 11, 1989 Mayor and Common Council approve Budget for FY 89-90, which includes designated street improvements which are federal-aided projects December 7, 1989 Approved the use of bond proceeds and use of tax increment funds for designated street paving and street improvement projects included in FY 89-90 Budget. February 5, 1990 On Council Agenda but returned for language clarifi- cation and addition, of other streets/projects/programs previously discussed by the Mayor and Council Recommended motion: Motion No. 1 That the funding of the construction/reconstru streets designated in Exhibits 1-8 be approvec Allocation bond oroceeds ($499,000), from CMO proceeds ($796,808), from Tax Exempt Residual ($202,958) and from the General Fund ($55,14~, treets ion 3) Motion No. 2 That it be found that the streets indicated by a double asterisk, while not within redevelopment Project Areas, are adjacent and tributary to such Areas, of direct bene- fit to said Areas, and it is appropriate that rede lop- ment funds be utilized for the work/07 ~ MOTIONS CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE Contact person: Marshall W. Julian Phone: 5122 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $1,553,912 Ward: Ci ty-wide RDA - $499,000 CMO - $202,958 REO - $796,808 GEN - $ 55,146 Supporting data attached: Yes Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct, DescriPtion) Finance:~ D~ Council Notes: Aoenda Item No. - =ll -- Recommendation of funding sources for street improvements from bond proceeds and authorization to proceed with work Page 2 February 13, 1990 Recommended motion: (Continued) Motion No. 3 That it is hereby found and determined that the construc- tion and reconstruction work necessary for the street projects listed in Exhibits 1-8 will require application of asphaltic and other materials ranging in thickness from 1 1/2 to 5 inches and that the useful life of the improvement, in all cases will be well in excess of three years; and be it further determined that the work can be performed by City Forces. Motion No. 4 That the Director of Public Services be directed to pro- ceed with the street improvements listed in Exhibits 1-8 and to seek bids for the cold-planing of such streets as may be necessary in connection with the improvement thereof. Motion No. 5 That staff be directed to take the necessary steps to transfer funds to the appropriate accounts. CITY OF SAN BERf.. ~RDINO - REQUEST 10 ')R COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT The street improvements set forth on the attached lists are those which, in the op1n10n of the Director of Public Services are in need of priority repair/reconstruction. Each street has been viewed with respect to sources of funding, and the dollar-amounts have been assigned in accordance with the perrnissable use of those dollars. The recommended action before you, and the funds proposed for expenditure, are included in the separate hand-out which you have received, entitled SUMMARY OF BOND PROCEEDS AND ADDITIONAL FUNDING. Also included in the SUMMARY are other expenditures and encumbrances approved to-date by the Mayor and Council from these funds. Attachment MAJOR ARTERIES - ALL WARDS Northpark Blvd: Electric to "H" St Perris Hi I I Rd: Pacific north to Flood Cntrl "H" St: 6th St to 9th St Arden: Highland to Pacific 5th St: Sterl ing east to City Limits 6th St: Sterl ing east to City Limits Harrison: 35th St to 40th St Court St: "0" St to "E" St 3rd St: "I" St to 2nd St 5th St: Victoria west to City Limits Mt Vernon: 21st St to Cajon Pacific: Central to Orange Pacific: Arden to Flood Control Pepper: Spruce to 6th St Arrowhead: Mi I I to 3rd St University Blvd: 215 Fwy to Col lege Mi I 1St: "E" St to Waterman Gi Ibert: Waterman to 207' e/o Cedar "0" St: Rialto to 2nd St Rialto: "I" St to Mt Vernon Rialto: Arrowhead to "E" St 40th St: Waterman to Sierra Wy 4th St: Waterman to Sierra Wy "E" St: Mi I I to Orange Show Rd "I" St: Rialto to 3rd St Orange Show Rd: Redlands Blvd: Hunts Ln to Waterman 6th St: "H" St to "G" St LOCATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ll. 12. 13. 14. *15. *16. *17. *18. *19. *20. *21. *22. *23. *24. *25. ~26. *27. *28. * Wi I I require Header Cut or Ful I Width Cut ** Benefits RDA project area GEN REO REO REO RDA-SE RDA-STC RDA-SE CMO CMO RDA-UPT CMO 710 ** RDA-STC CMO ** RDA-SE RDA-UPT RDA-SE RDA-SV CMO TONNAGE 1,690 660 650 775 480 360 730 170 1,135 435 300 420 750 250 2,385 ** 2,125 2,650 ** 1,280 315 1,235 410 575 2,120 385 590 * * 1,200 300 25,085 "Exhibit 1" FUNDING REO REO REO REO GEN GEN REO GEN REO GEN PROJECT COST $ 53,053.00 20,824.00 20,523.00 24,407.00 15,180.00 J 1 ,363.00 23,039.00 5,374.00 35,860.00 13,763.00 9,466.00 13,264.00 23,637.00 7,898.00 90,174.00 73,165.00 97,521.00 49,315.00 12,042.00 45,715.00 13,981.00 23,934.00 19,657.00 69,660.00 12,645.00 19,732.00 39,989.00 11,300.00 $856,481.00 WARD 1 LOCATION TONNAGE FUNDING PROJECT COST 1. Redick: Arrowhead to Pershing 65 $ 2,062.00 2. Pershing: Cluster to Hi Ida 220 6,987.00 3. Garner: 7th St to Vine 40 1,258.00 4. Perris: 6th St to 9th St 390 12,353.00 *5. Vine: Mt. Vernon to Davidson 270 CMO 11,037.00 6. Doo I i tt Ie: Mi II to Dead-end 310 9,753.00 7. Mt. View: Rialto to 2nd St 240 7,583.00 8. 7th St: Arrowhead to "E" St 410 13,000.00 9. 8th St: Arrowhead to "E" St 410 13,000.00 10. 7th St: Waterman to Sierra Way 560 17,703.00 * 11. Crescent: 7th St to 6th St 120 CMO 4,980.00 3,035 $99,716.00 * Wi I I require Header Cut or Ful I Width Cut The rest of the streets unmarked will be financed by REOs. "Exhibit 2" - --- -- ~ -- ---- --- .. WARD 2 I_OCA T ION TONNAGE FUNDING PROJECT COST *1. 10th S.... "0" St to "G" St 760 RDA-UPT $26,465.00 I. 2. 16th St: Waterman to Dead-end 385 REO 12,165.00 3. 17th St: Waterman to Cu I de Sac 250 " 7,938.00 4. 13th St: "0" St to Arrowhead 145 " 4,576.00 5. 16th St: uEn St to Arrowhead 365 " 11,609.00 6. 01 i ve: Waterman to Mt View 510 " 16,181.00 7. 16th St: "H" St to "G" St 145 " 4,583.00 *8. 13th St: Sierra Way to Mt View 150 CMO 5,882.00 *9. Berkley: Base line to 13th St 155 CMO 6,071.00 10. Stoddard: 16th St to 15th St 125 REO 3,902.00 2,990 $99,372.00 * Wi II require Header Cut or Fu II Width Cut "Exhibit 3" --- LOCATION 1. Lugo: Central to Dead-end 2. Eureka: Mi II to Esperanza 3. Etiwanda: Meridian to Pepper *4. Blood Bank Rd: "E" St to Entrance 5. Steele Rd: Wier Rd to Industrial Rd 6. Commercial Rd: Waterman to Steele Rd 7. Adell: Inland Center to "H" St 8. Co I lege: Crescent to "H" St 9. Huff: "H" St to I1GI1 St 10. Crescent: Mi II to Co I lege 11. Sierra Wy: Central to Dead-end 12. Benedict: Arrowhead to Sierra Wy 13. Hi II crest: Arrowhead to Sierra Wy ~ -- -- WARD 3 TONNAGE PROJECT COST FUNDING 280 130 295 230 210 305 145 120 235 245 510 195 195 $ 8,840.00 4, 123. 00 9,302.00 9,132.00 6,631.00 9,650.00 4,576.00 3,813.00 7,435.00 7,728.00 16,087.00 6,184.00 6, 1 84 .00 CMO 3,095 $99,685.00 * Wi I I require Header Cut or Ful I Width Cut The rest of the streets not marked will be paid by the REOs "Exhibit 4" WARD 4 LOCATION *1. Mt View: Electric to 40th St 2. Dumbarton: Marshal I to Cui de Sac 3. Eureka: Mountain to Conejo 4. CI if ton: Central to Orange 5. V i I I a Court: C I i fton to Cu I de Sac 6. Pepper Court: CI if ton to Cui de Sac 7. 01 ive Tree Court: CI if ton to Cui de Sac 8. Li I I ian Court: CI if ton to Cui de Sac 9. Orange: Central to Fisher *10. Sepulveda: 40th St to Sierra Way 11. Pershing: 48th St to 50th St 12. Sierra Road: 49th St to 54th St 13. 50th St: Leroy to Sepolveda 14. 52nd St: Leroy to Sepulveda TONNAGE 455 100 165 250 105 105 105 105 170 605 180 300 ~45 140 FUNDING PROJECT COST CMO $17,676.00 3,161.00 5,229.00 7,981.00 3,315.00 3,315.00 3,315.00 3,315.00 5,381.00 22,973.00 5,679.00 9,497.00 4,?.77.00 4,421.00 CMO 2,930 $99,835.00 The rest of the streets not marked will be paid by REOs. * Wi I I require Header Cut or Ful I Width Cut "Exhibit 5" -- --- WARD 5 LOCATION TONNAGE 1. "F" St: 34th St to Dead-end 350 2. Acacia: Sequoia to 48th St 235 3. "E" St: Sequo i a to 48th St 235 4. Electric: Northpark to Bartlett 180 5. Marshall Blvd: Miramonte to Little Mtn 380 6. Turri I I: 28th St to Col ima 215 7. Oakwood: M i ramonte to T urr i I I 90 8. 29th St: Miramonte to Turri II 90 9. Garner: Col ima to Oakwood 95 10. Crescent: 30th St to Marsha I I 220 11. Stoddard: Sequoia to 49th St 170 12. "0" St: Sequoia to 49th St 170 13. Mirada: "I" St to Lincoln 90 1~. Mayfield: 44th St to 48th St 315 15. Electric: 44th St to 48th St 295 3,130 All streets funded under the REOs. "Exhibit 6" -- - PROJECT COST $11,052.00 7,440.00 7,440.00 5,681.00 12,015.00 6,787.00 2,866.00 2,866.00 3,010.00 6,977.00 5,381.00 5,381.00 2,857.00 9,95~.OO 9,302.00 $99,010.00 LOCATION 1. Herr i ngton: 13th St to 14th St 2. Garner: 17th St to Cu I de Sac 3. Ramona: Basel ine to 11th St 4. Herrington: Basel ine to 11th St 5. 15th St: "JIl St to Massachusetts *6. 10th St: Mt. Vernon to Western 7. Concord: Cabrera to Cui de Sac 8. Wilson: Baseline to 11th St 9. Hancock: Basel ine to 11th St 10. 11th St: Medical Center to Madison 11. Colorado: Cal ifornia to Evans 12. Magnol ia: "~,, St to "J" St 13. Hanford: Colorado to State 14. 27th St: Cal ifornia to Gardena 15. Pico: 14th St to 15th St -- WARD 6 TONNAGE 130 40 125 125 260 485 175 125 120 190 550 110 30 470 110 FUNDING CMO 3,045 All but one street to be funded under the REOs. * Wi I I require Header Cut of Ful I Length Cut "Exhibit 7" --- ---- ...,. PROJECT COST $ 4, 121 .00 1,295.00 3,969.00 3,972.00 8,244.00 18,912.00 5,574.00 3,972.00 3,814.00 5,982.00 17,382.00 3,462.00 952.00 14,867.00 3,471.00 $99,989.00 '-- WARD 7 LOCATION 1. Blythe: Byron to Amanda 2. Kenwood: 39th St to Avery 3. 17th St: Arden to GUiherie 4. Dumbarton: 18th St to Cui de Sac 5. 18th St: Dumbarton to Guthrie 6. Newcomb: 17th St to Cui de Sac 7. Mc Kinley: 17th St to Cui de Sac 8. Hudson: 17th St to Cui de Sac 9. 39th St: Valencia to Kenwood 10. Cedar Avenue: Lynwood to Holly Vista 11. Lawrence: Lynwood to Holly Vista 12. Casa Lorna: Lynwood to Holly Vista 13. Harrison: Lynwood to Holly Vista 14. Newport Avenue: Lynwood to Holly Vista 15. Alameda Avenue: Lynwood to Holly Vista 16. Holly Vista: Cedar Avenue to Golden Avenue 17. Broadmoor: Sonora to Ralston 18. 8roadmoor: 39th St to Avery 19. 39th St: Parkside to Broadmoor 20. Avery: Parkside to Broadmoor 21. Ralston: Broadmoor to Parkside All streets funded under the REOs. -..... ~ TONNAGE PROJECT COST 175 75 295 155 235 105 105 105 215 120 120 135 155 140 155 390 85 85 100 100 100 $ 5,579.00 2,359.00 9,347.00 4,883.00 7,485.00 3,317.00 3,317.00 3 , 317 .00 6,782.00 3,816.00 3,816.00 4,262.00 4,-923.00 4,421.00 4,924.00 12,365.00 2,708.00 2,708.00 3,165.00 3,165.00 3,165.00 3,150 $99,824.00 ;ity of San Bernardino INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM , 9002-1908 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Common Council FROM: Marshall W. JUlian, City Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF BOND REFINANCING DATE: February 16, 1990 COPIES: ------------------------------------------------------------- Due to the time which elapsed since "bond proceeds" were first discussed, the uncertainties as to the exact amount being derived from each source, permitted uses, etc., it was felt that a chart/matrix would be the best vehicle for keeping track of this information. Some of the figures will be repetitious to you, since you have already taken action on certain expenditures. The revenue-source portion of the matrix is separated into two categories: (1) The funds realized from the sources first discussed in September/October 1989; and, (2) RDA Tax Allocation funding of more recent date. Expenditure categories have been developed to group like- types of costs for accounting purposes. The extensions and sub-totals indicate costs-to-date and remaining unallocated funds. The attached sheets contain brief descriptions of the types of projects in each category and some detail regarding expenditureslencumbrances to-date. As previously outlined by Bond Counsel and the City Attorney's Office, the great majority of the funding must be expended on tangible "things" and permanent improvements, as opposed to maintenance, services and personnel. We have been able to fund certain personnel requirements because of money freed-up in the General Fund. The expenditure figures in the matrix include costs involved in the two Council Agenda Items scheduled for the February 19, 1990 meeting for Streets and Equipment. The "Unallocated" amounts are those available for additional projectslprograms, etc. to be approved by the Mayor and Council. Additional priorities established by the Mayor and Council can be tied into the chart and available funding, based on timing and the purposes for which the unallocated funds may be used under the redevelopment law. There are more A ()Q/7/CVV<:~'l L 3G ~. I -3/ INTEROFFICE MEMOID. JUM: 9002-1908 SUMMARY OF BOND REFINANCING February 16, 1990 Page 2 "projects/programs" than there are funds, and "projects/programs" are both short and long-range in terms of priority. There have been no definitive cost estimates made. However, staff is prepared to proceed with such work, once an order of priority is determined. In addition to (or supplementing) the list of "projects/programs" included with the Agenda backup, there are several projects ln the City's Capital Improvement Program which also deserve review for possible financing. The Mayor and Council mayor may not be prepared to make a decision at the meeting on February 19th regarding a numeric- al prioritization of "projects/programs." If not, a "shirtsleeve" workshop is suggested wherein you would be able io iscuss your priorities in greater depth. ~ ' RSHALL W ~ULIAN City Admi 'strator MWJ/md ORIGINAL AMOUNT PROJECTS BLIGHT PROGRAM - CLEAN-UP BLIGHT PROGRAM - ABATEMENT BEAUTIFICATION - CLEAN-UP BEAUTIFICATION - LANDSCAPE STREETS CITY EQUIPMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PARKING STRUCTURES BUILDINGS/DEMOLITION BRIDGES LAND CITY PERSONNEL RDA OBLIGATIONS UNALLOCATED ORIGINAL AMOUNT SUBSEQUENT AMOUNT PRCJECTS BLIGHT PRCGRAM - CLEAN-UP BLIGHT PROGRAM - ABATEMENT BEAUTIFICATION - CLEAN-UP BEAUTIFICATION - LANDSCAPE STREETS CITY EQUIPMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PARKING STRUCTURES BUILDINGS/DEMOLITION BRIDGES LAND CITY PERSONNEL RDA OBLIGATIONS OROJECT MATRIX CMO - TAX INCREMENT - BOND PROCEEDS FEBRUARY 16, 1990 ----------AVAILABLE FUNDING - ORIGINAL SOURCES------------- STATE #1 STATE COLLEGE COLLEGE TAX-EXEMPT CMO GENERAL TAX INCR BOND PROC CMO RESIDUAL MORTGAGES FUND TOTA L 2,398,654 4,747,181 2,950,000 600,000 490,000 645,000 11,830,835 82,600 o 82,500 o o 1,549,608 462,842 100,000 o 2,398,654 o o 447,195 o 97,099 460,555 600,000 436,808 462,842 100,000 55,146 2,398,654 447,195 -0- 4,650,082 1,844,003 -0- 53,192 6,689,936 142,659 --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- -----.---.--. --------------------- AVAILABLE fUNDING- SUBSEQUENT SOURCES --------------------- #2 ST ATE SOUTH COLLEGE TRI-CITY VALLE NORTHWEST SOUTHEAST UPTOWN HOUSING HOUSING BOND PROC BONO PROC BOND PROC BOND PROC BOND PROC BOND PROC TAX INCR BOND PROC TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6,010,532 5,482,455 2,588,425 2,200,860 4,987,681 1,285,170 6,030,000 2,889,217 31,374,340 1,000,OCO 1,000,000 o J 39,989 277,087 34,825 401,901 o o o 411,614 1,250,455 o o , ,662,059 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UNALLOCATED SUBSEQUENT AMOUNT 5,598,918 4,232,000 2,548,436 1,200,860 4,610,594 1,200,345 5,030,000 2,389,217 29,310,370 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL UNALLOCATED AMOUNT ORIGINAL AMOUNT SUBSEQUENT AMOUNT , 6,689,936 28,310,370 35,000,306 ----------- ----------- ,LIGHT PROGRAM - CLEANUP This category represents heavy debris removal, items such as the removal of trees, accumulated trash and debris. As of this date $1,000,000 has been appropriated for this category. The amount of $100,000 was allocated for the Christmas Cleanup Program. BLIGHT PROGRAM - ABATEMENT This category includes programs other than removal; items such as programs to upgrade residential areas once'regular cleanup occurs. An allocation of $82,500 has been made for a park patrol program. BEAUTIFICATION - CLEANUP This category represents structure cleanup. BEAUTIFICATION - LANDSCAPING This category represents items which enhance the condition of areas through landscaping. As of this date no allocations have been made in this category. STREETS This category represents street maintenance and street construction. As a result of certain restrictions in connection with the use of CMO, Tax Increment and Bond Proceed funding sources, the matrix distribution is recommended. The CMO residual, Mortgages and General Fund areas are the least restricted and should be used for street maintenance outside of project areas. The project matrix summarizes existing and proposed allocations for street purposes as recapped below: Proposed projects which are within redevelopment areas. $ 97,099 39,989 277,087 84.825 $ 499,000 Proposed projects where use of Tax-Exempt CMO funds are permissible. 202,955* Approved replacement of Local Transportation Matching Funds Tax- Exempt CMO funds. 257,600* Proposed projects where CMO Residual and Mortgages Funding must be used. $ 600,000 196.808** 796,808 796,808 Proposed replacement ~f 1989/90 General Fund street Maintenance and Capital Improvement funds. 240,000** Proposed Projects where General Fund monies must be used. 55.146 $2,051,509 * These items make up the $460,555 amount Tax-Exempt CMO category. **These items make up the $436,808 proposed use amount in the Mortgages category. CITY EOUIPMENT This category represents City equipment which benefits the city as a whole. The amount of $462,842 has been allocated to date in this category. This amount consists of the following: $269,642 General Fund equipment budgeted 1989/90 fiscal year. Graffiti removal equipment Fire Equipment Police Equipment High Pressure Washer Abatement Equipment Uniforms in 52,500 31,400 28,400 1,200 75,700 4.000 $462,842 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN This category represents capital date $100,000 for renovations allocated. improvements to existing structure. To to the Council Chambers has been PARKING STRUCTURES This category represents structures needed for parking throughout the city. Thus far nothing has been allocated. BUILDINGS/DEMOLITION This category represents new building construction, preparatory demo- lition and ancillary improvements. No funds have been allocated in this category to-date. BRIDGES This category includes bridge maintenance and construction. No funds have been allocated to-date. - .... -- ~ LAND This category represents land acquisition. No allocations have been made in this category to-date. CITY PERSONNEL This category represents additional City amount of $447,195 has been allocated Expenditures consist of the following: personnel expenditures. The to-date in this category. $156,312 32,035 23,070 21,528 175,000 27,500 11. 750 $447,195 6 Dispatchers 1 Dispatch Supervisor 1 Typist Clerk III 1 Typist Clerk II 7 Police Officers (6-months) 2 Police Assistant (6-months) 1 Police Records Clerk (6-months)