HomeMy WebLinkAbout15-Development Services
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL AcQ~l G1NAl
From: James Funk, Director
Subject: Resolution approving Agreement for Professional
Services with the Keith Companies, Inc. to Provide
Sewer Line Capacity Evaluations, including Field
Flow Tests and Recommendations for Upgrades and
Improvements to Sewer Lines at Various Locations in
the City - CIP Nos. SW04-21, SW04-36, SW05-01,
SW05-02, SW05-05, SW05-06 and SW05-07.
Dept: Development Services
Date: November I, 2005
File No. 3.7420,2.7464
3.7465,3.7466
3.7469,3.7470
3.7471
MCC Date: November 21,2005
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
Aug. 15,2005 The Mayor and Common Council approved FY 2005-2010 Five Year Capital
Improvement Program (CIP)
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
~~!::~~
Contact Person: Byron Montalvo, P.E., Sr. Civil Engineer
Phone:
5263
Staff Report, Maps, Resolution,
Supporting data attached: Attachment A ( Agreement) and
Attachment B ( RFP )
Attachment C (Consulant's Proposal)
Ward:
I, 2 and 6
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $ 43,844.00
Source: (Acct. No) 245-365-5504-7420; 245-365-5504-7464; 245-365-5504-7465-245-365-5504-7466;
245-365-5504-7469; 245-365-5504-7470; 245-365-5504-7471
Acct. Description: Sewer Line Improvements - 2005-2010 CIP
Finance:
Council Notes: RV50. 2C05J3~4
~
Agenda Item No. ~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report
Subiect:
Resolution approving Agreement for Professional Services with the Keith Companies, Inc. to Provide Sewer
Line Capacity Evaluations, including Field Flow Tests and Recommendations for Upgrades and
Improvements to Sewer Lines Situated at Various Locations in the City - CIP Nos. SW04-21, SW04-36,
SW05-01, SW05-02, SW05-05, SW05-06 and SW05-07.
Back!!:round:
On August 15, 2005, the Mayor and Common Council adopted the FY 2005/2010 Capital Improvement
Program (CIP). The CIP contains a total of 23 sewer lines to be replaced or paralleled in FY 2005/06. Of
those 23 projects, staff has identified 7 projects in need of additional study to determine if these 7 sewer line
improvements should be constructed and/or alternative recommendations for upgrading should be
implemented. The sewer improvements are listed in the City of San Bernardino Wastewater Collection
System Master Plan (WSMP) prepared by Psomas.
Due to the complexity of these seven sewer projects it is necessary to employ a consultant to review the
available information, perform independent flow tests, and perform pipe capacity evaluations using hydraulic
analysis and modeling techniques.
The Keith Companies, Inc. (TKC) will create a hydraulic model for the sewer pipes to be studied based on
the as-built plan information and flow monitoring data. The H20 MAP sewer modeling software will be
utilized. The model will be run for the peak flow conditions. Results will be compared against the City
design and analysis criteria for depth of flow and velocity. Deficiencies will be identified and reviewed with
City Staff. Based on the hydraulic analysis and modeling results, TKC will assist the City in determining the
recommended improvements. Recommendations may include confirming the WSMP master plan
recommendations or providing alternate or new recommended improvements.
The City-funded projects to be studied by the engineering consultant are as follows:
1. SW04-21 - Virginia Street - Replace approximately 719 feet of existing 8-inch sewer main with 12-
inch sewer main in Virginia Street between "1" Street and "H" Street.
2. SW04-36 - "1" Street - Design replacement of existing sewer main in "I" Street between 1 ih Street
and 2151 Street with new sewer.
3. SW05-01 - ih Street - Replace or parallel approximately 2,830 linear feet of 12-inch sewer main with
15-inch sewer main and 30 linear feet of 18-inch sewer main with 24-inch sewer main from Mt.
Vernon A venue to Harris Street.
4. SW05-02 - Harris Street - Replace or parallel approximately 423 feet of 18-inch sewer main with 24-
inch sewer main in Harris Street from ih Street to 400 feet south.
5. SW05-05 - Industrial Parkway - Replace or parallel approximately 334 feet of 12-inch sewer main
with 15-inch sewer main in Industrial Parkway near Cajon Boulevard to Lexington Way.
2
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report (Continued)
6. SW05-06 - Tippecanoe Avenue - Replace or parallel approximately 442 linear feet of 24-inch sewer
main with 30-inch sewer main in Tippecanoe Avenue from Base Line Street to 9th Street.
7. SW05-07 - Colorado Street - Replace or parallel approximately 2,785 linear feet of 8-inch sewer
main with lO-inch to 12-inch sewer main in California Street from Base Line Street to Colorado
Street; in Colorado Street from California Street to Magnolia A venue south of Hansford Street from
Colorado Street to Grand Street, and Grand Street from cul-de-sac to Evans Street.
Requests for Proposals (RFP) for Professional Services were sent to 11 civil engineering firms. Four (4)
firms responded to the RFP. Proposals were received from the following consultant entities:
Company Location
Transtech Engineering, Inc. San Bernardino
Willdan San Bernardino
Tetra Tech Inc. San Bernardino
The Keith Companies Irvine
Interviews were scheduled with the three (3) responding firms with the highest Phase I review scores.
A selection committee interviewing the three (3) consultant firms consisted of: Development Services
Deputy Director/City Engineer Mark Lancaster; Engineering Manager/Field Engineer Michael Grubbs;
Senior Civil Engineer Byron G. Montalvo and Engineering Associate Robert Sepulveda.
The reviewers/evaluators selected the team of The Keith Companies, Inc. (TKC) based on their
qualifications, completeness of the proposal, understanding of the project, and other criteria established in
the City Council's approved evaluation criteria and rating system.
The Keith Companies, Inc. is a multi disciplinary company offering specialized services in such disciplines
as Civil Engineering, Land Planning, Water Resources, Environmental Services, Construction Management,
etc.
TKC has evaluated many existing wastewater collection systems for various agencies in southern California.
Their studies have included flow monitoring, model analysis and development of future flows in order to
make recommendations as to improvements required.
The Keith Companies, Inc. has recommended that the flow measurement be conducted for a full 14 days, 24
hours per day, instead of 9 days, 24 hours per day as specified in the RFP. The Keith Companies, Inc. has
agreed to complete the additional flow measurements at no extra cost to the City.
3
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report (Continued)
The team's response to the RFP and the evaluation interview conducted by City Staff demonstrated
experience with similar projects and specific knowledge of the required work.
Proposed fees for services were as follows:
Company Proposed Fee
Transtech Engineering, Inc. $ 47,640.00
Tetra Tech $ 88,436.00
The Keith Companies $ 43,844.00
Financial Impact:
Sufficient Funding for this project IS available III the following accounts III the 2005/2006 Capital
Improvement Program Budget.
SEWER LINE CAPACITY EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDED UPGRADES AND
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
CIP LINE DESCRIPTION TOTAL ACCOUNT ESTIMATED
NUMBER COST NO. DESIGN FEE
"Virginia St." - Replace approximately $85,000.00
SW04-21 719 feet of existing 8" sewer main with (Design and 245-365-5504-7420 $ 4,100.00
12" sewer main in Virginia St. between Construction)
"I" St. and "H" St.
" I St." - Design replacement of $800,000.00
SW04-36 existing sewer main in "I" St. between (Design and 245-365-5504-7464 $ 9,000.00
1 ih St. and 21 5t St. with new sewer. Constructi on)
4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report (Continued)
SEWER LINE CAPACITY EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDED UPGRADES AND
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
CIP LINE DESCRIPTION TOTAL ACCOUNT ESTIMATED
NUMBER COST NO. DESIGN FEE ,
"7T11 St." - Replace or parallel
approximately 2,830 linear feet of 12- $1,042,300.00
SW05-01 inch sewer main with 15-inch sewer 245-365-5504-7465 $11,000.00
main and 30 linear feet of 18-inch (Design and
sewer main with 24-inch sewer main Construction)
from Mt. Vemon Ave. to Harris St.
"Harris St." - Replace or parallel $225,000.00
SW05-02 approximately 423 feet of 18-inch (Design and 245-365-5504-7466 $ 3,500.00
sewer main with 24-inch sewer main in Constructi on)
Harris St. from ih St. to 400 feet south.
"Industrial Parkway" - Replace or
parallel approximately 334 feet of 12- $121,700.00
SW05-05 inch sewer main with 15-inch sewer (Design and 245-365-5504-7469 $ 3,100.00
main in Industrial Parkway near Cajon Construction)
Boulevard to Lexington Way.
Tippecanoe Ave. Replace or parallel $285,700.00
approximately 442 linear feet of 24-
SW05-06 inch sewer main with 30-inch sewer (Design and 245-365-5504-7470 $ 3,600.00
, main in Tippecanoe Ave from Base Construction)
Line St. to 9th St.
5
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report (Continued)
SEWER LINE CAPACITY EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDED UPGRADES AND
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
CIP LINE
NUMBER
SW05-07
DESCRIPTION
"Colorado St". Replace or parallel
approximately 2,785 linear feet of 8-
inch sewer main with lO-inch to 12-
inch sewer main in California St. from
Base Line St. to Colorado St; III
Colorado St. from California St. to
Magnolia Ave south of Hansford St.
from Colorado St. to Grand St., and
Grand St. from cul-de-sac to Evans St.
CIP
BUDGET
AMOUNT
$769,500.00
(Design and
Construction)
ACCOUNT
NO.
245-365-5504-747\
ESTIMA TED
DESIGN FEE
$9,544.00
TOTAL NOT-TO EXCEED FEE $ 43,844.00
~
,
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution.
6
r--------------------------------------------------------------.--------------------------------------------------l
I I
I I
I I
, I
,
City of San Bernardino, California
Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering
Sewer Improvements
For
VIRGINIA STREET
At
"f' Street & "H' Street
PROJECT
LOCATION
j:';Til
~-~ i-
t
r:.
> :i
,:~. _. If
~ -~Ii:
J:JTIH ST
T
.~
J,),',E ~.
';1
". r--:
@2002 T~ornas Br~)s Maps
~
VICINITY MAP
N. T. s.
r----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
City of San Bernardino, California
Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering
Sewer Improvements
For
TIPPECANOE A VENUE
At
Baseline Street & 9th Street
PROJECT
LOCATION
\~:20b2Thcmas Brcs ~aps.
~
VICINITY MAP
N. T. S.
r----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------,
I
I
I
I
City of San Bernardino, California
Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering
Sewer Improvements
For
"J" STREET
At
5th Street to Spruce Street
PROJECT
LOCATION
'" to ~1'1
'"
g
z ~
~ > ~
~~
w
2 SPRUCE
BUS
~ ~rRUC~
"
Iii 5TH '5'i
~TN(;"AlI ';.1
~2001 Th,omas Bros. Map
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------~
VICINITY
MAP
N. T. S.
r----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------l
I I
I I
I I
I I
i City of San Bernardino, California !
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering
Sewer Improvements
For
SPRUCE STREET
At
fIr' Street to "t' Street
\1
PROJECT
LOCATION
to ~1'1
ST
1%
I::r:\/
~~, I~ z ~~.
"lNE ST ~
W 5it
BIJS
5rllUGt
~IN6"NI 51
@2001 Th~mas Bras Maps
~
VICINITY MAP
N. T. S.
r----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
City of San Bernardino) California
Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering
Sewer Improvements
For
INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
At
Lexington Way
PROJECT
LOCATION
~
VICINITY MAP
N. T. S.
r----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------l
I I
I I
I I
I I
i City of San Bernardino, California !
I I
I I
: Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering :
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sewer Improvements
For
HARRIS STREET
At
6th Street to 7th Street
PROJECT
LOCATION
z
i~
6111
5T
\1
SPRUe!:
5T
III 5T'H ~
z
~
VICINITY MAP
N. T. S.
r----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------l
I I
I I
I I
I I
City of San Bernardino) California !
Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering
For
Sewer Improvements
COLORADO STREET
At
California Street & Magnolia Ave
PROJECT
LOCATION
~
=
"'ll..1'.:~
-.. II'
, t:.:.HE
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
r----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------l
I I
I I
I I
I I
! City of San Bernardino) California !
I I
I I
: Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering :
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I !
Sewer Improvements
For
7 TH STREET
At
Mt Vernon Ave to Harris Street
PROJECT
LOCATION
~
8TH
7TH
\1
8[6
';rRUCt
"
\;I 5TH ~
~ l..G~l\Il :'1
@2001 Th~mas Bros_ Maps
VICINITY MAP
N. T.S.
RESOLUTION NO. t 0) [f2> Y
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COU:\'CIL OF THE CITY
8 OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING A
SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH THE KEITH
COMPANIES, INC. TO PROVIDE SEWER LINE CAPACITY EVALUATIONS,
INCLUDING FIELD FLOW TESTS AND TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
UPGRADES AND IMPROVEMENTS OF SEWER LINES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SW04-21, SW04-36, SWOS-Ol, SWOS-02, SWOS-
05, SWOS-06 AND SWOS-07, (CITY FUNDED PROJECTS).
9
10
11
12 including field flow tests and to make recommendations for upgrades and improvements of
13
SECTION 1. THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC., 19 Technology Drive, Irvine, CA
92618, is competent, experienced and able to perform the sewer line capacity evaluations,
sewer lines at various locations in the City of San Bernardino, SW04-21, SW04-36, SW05-01.
14
15
SW05-02, SW05-05, SW05-06 and SW05-07, (City Funded Projects) per Agreement for
Professional Services, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment A, for the not-to-
16
17
18
exceed amount of $ 43,844.00. Pursuant to this determination, the Purchasing Manager is hereby
authorized and directed to issue Purchase Orders for said services to said firm. The Mayor is
19 hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement on bchalf of the City
20
21
SECTION 2. The authorization to execute the above referenced Agreement is rescinded
22
23
24
25 III
26
if it is not executed within sixty (60) days of the passage of this resolution.
27
28
YlD. I ~
II/.U~5'
1
2
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERl'iARDINO APPROVING A
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. TO PROVIDE
SEWER LINE CAPACITY EVALUATIONS, INCLUDING FIELD FLOW TESTS AND
3 TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR UPGRADES AND IMPROVEMENTS OF
SEWER LINES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF SAN BERi'\'ARDINO,
4 SW04-21, SW04-36, SWOS-OI, SWOS-02, SWOS-OS, SWOS-06, SWOS-07, (CITY FUNDED
PROJECTS.
5
6
7 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
8 Common Council of the City of San Bemardino at a meeting thereof, held
9 onlhe day of
10 Council Members:
11
ESTRADA
12
13 LONGVILLE
14 MC GINNIS
15 DERRY
, 2005 , by the following yote, to wit:
NAYS
ABST AIN ABSENT
AYES
16 KELLEY
17
18
19
20
21
JOHNSON
MC CAMMACK
Rachel Clark, City Clerk
day of -;-2005.
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
22
23
Judith Valles, Mayor
City of San Bemardino
24 Approved as to
25 form and legal content:
26
JAMES F. PENMAN,
27 ~~Y~~p~
28
ATTACIBIEYf "A"
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Agreement for Professional Services to provide sewer line capacity evaluations, including field flow tests
and to make recommendations for upgrades and improvements of sewer lines at various locations in the City
of San Bernardino, SW04-21, SW04-36, SW05-01, SW05-02, SW05-05, SW05-06 and SW05-07, (city
funded projects).
This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2005, by and
between the City of San Bernardino, California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City"
and the keith companies, inc. hereinafter referred to as "Consultant."
WITNESSETH:
A. WHEREAS, City has need for Civil Engineering Services; and,
B. WHEREAS, Consultant is competent, experienced and able to perform said services; and,
C. WHEREAS, Consultant has provided the most advantageous and best proposal for the provision
of such services;
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall perform those services specified in the Request for Proposal (RFP), dated August 8,
2005, to provide Civil Engineering Services for sewer line capacity evaluations, including field flow
tests and to make recommendations for upgrades and improvements of sewer lines at various
locations in the City of San Bernardino, SW04-21, SW04-36, SW05-0 I, SW05-02, SW05-05, SW05-
06 and SW05-07, (City-Funded Projects) and Consultant's proposal dated August 29, 2005, all of
which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachments Band C. The flow tests have been
increased from 9-day periods on a 24-hour basis to two (2) full weeks or 14-day periods on a 24-hour
basis.
2. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The services of Consultant are to commence after the City has authorized work to start by issuance of
a Notice to Proceed. This Agreement shall expire one year from the date of this Agreement, unless
extended by written agreement of the parties.
3. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE
Consultant shall complete all work product and design in conformance with City of San Bernardino
Standard Specifications and Standard Drawings.
4. CHANGES/EXTRA SERVICES
A. Performance of the work specified in the Proposal is made an obligation of Consultant under
this Agreement, subject to any changes made subsequently upon mutual written agreement of
the parties. Any change, which has not been so incorporated, shall not be binding on either
party.
5. COMPENSATION
A. The City shall reimburse the Consultant for actual costs (including labor costs, employee
benefits, overhead, profit, other direct and indirect costs) incurred by the Consultant in
performance of the work, in an amount not to exceed $43,844.00, except that reimbursement
shall not include courier services, mileage or reimbursement for travel to the City to attend
meetings or conduct the activities. Actual costs shall not exceed the estimated wage rates and
other costs as set forth in the Proposal. See Attachment D for Consultant's cost breakdown
attached and incorporated herein.
B. Said compensation shall not be altered unless there is significant alteration in the scope,
complexity or character of the work to be performed.
Any adjustment of the total cost of services will only be permitted when the Consultant
establishes and City has agreed, in writing, that there has been, or is to be, a significant
change.
C. The Consultant is required to comply with all Federal, State and local laws and ordinances
applicable to the work.
6. PA YMENT BY CITY
A. The billings for all services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted monthly
by Consultant to City and shall be paid by City within thirty (30) days after receipt of same,
excepting any amounts disputed by City. City retains the right to challenge all or any part of
an invoice. All tasks as specified in Proposal shall be completed prior to final payment.
7. SUPERVISION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICES
A. The Director of Development Services of City or his designee, shall have the right of general
supervision over all work performed by Consultant and shall be City's agent with respect to
obtaining Consultant's compliance hereunder. No payment for any services rendered under
this Agreement shall be made without prior approval of the Director of Development Services
or his designee.
2
8. COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS AND AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES
ACT
Consultant hereby certifies that it will not discriminate against any employee cr applicant for
employment because of race, color, religion, sex, marital status, national on gin or disability.
Consultant's hiring practices and employee policies shall comply with applicable Federal, State and
local laws. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Recruitment and
recruitment advertising, employment, upgrading and promotion.
9. TERI\'IINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice in the
event of substantial failure of the other party to perform in accordance with the tenllS of this
Agreement. Each party shall have twenty (20) days following date of such notice within
which to correct the substantial failure giving rise to such notice. Consultant hereby
covenants and agrees that upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, Consultant
will preserve and make immediately available to City, or its designated representatives,
maps, notes, correspondence, or records related to work paid for by the City and required for
its timely completion, and to fully cooperate with City so that the work to be accomplished
may continue. Any subsequent use of such incomplete documents shall be at the sole risk of
the City and City agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Consultant from any claim, losses,
costs, including attorney's fees, and liability arising out of such use.
B. This Agreement may be terminated for the convenience of the City upon thirty (30) days
written notice to Consultant. Upon such notice, Consultant shall provide work product to City
and City shall compensate Consultant in the manner set forth above.
C. Following the effective date of termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the
Agreement shall continue until all obligations arising from such termination are satisfied.
10. CONTINGENCIES
In the event that, due to causes beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of
Consultant, Consultant fails to meet any of its obligations under this Agreement, and such failure
shall not constitute a default in perforn1ance, the City may grant to Consultant such extensions of
time and make other arrangements or additions, excepting any increase in payment, as may be
reasonable under the circumstances. Increases in payment shall be made only under the "changes"
provision of the Agreement.
II. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Consultant shall act as an independent contractor in the performance of the services provided for
under this Agreement. Consultant shall furnish such services in its own manner and in no respect
shall it be considered an agent or employee of the City.
3
12. ASSIGNMENT OR SUBCONTRACTING
Neither this Agreement, nor any portion thereof, may be assigned by Consultant without the written
consent of City. Any attempt by Consultant to assign or subcontract any performance of this
Agreement without the written consent of the City shall be null and void and shall constitute a breach
of this Agreement.
13 NOTICES
All official notices relative to this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed to the following
representatives of Consultant and City:
CONSULTANT
Mr. Robert S. Reid, P.E., President
The Keith Companies
19 Technology Drive
Irvine. CA 92618-2334
CITY
Mr. James Funk, Director
Development Services Department
City of San Bernardino
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
14. RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTIES
Upon termination, or completion of all work under this Agreement, Consultant will transfer
ownership and title to City of all programs, reports, documents, plans and specifications.
15. INDEMNITY
Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold CITY, its officers, employees and agents harmless from
and against any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, proceedings, judgments, losses, damages,
injuries, penalties, costs, expenses (including attorney's fees) and liabilities, of, by, or with respect to
third parties, which arise from Consultant's negligent performance of services under this Agreement.
Consultant shall not be responsible for, and City shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless
Consultant from and against, any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, proceedings, judgments,
losses, damages, injuries, penalties, costs, expenses (including attorneys' fees) and liabilities of, by or
with respect to third parties, which arise from the City's negligence. With respect to any and all
claims, demands, suits, actions, proceedings, judgments, losses, damages, injuries, penalties, costs,
expenses (including attorneys' fees) and liabilities of, by or with respect to third parties, which arise
from the joint or concurrent negligence of Consultant and City, each party shall assume responsibility
in proportion to the degree of its respective fault.
16. LIABILITY/INSURANCE
Consultant shall maintain insurance policies meeting the minimum requirements set forth herein. All
insurance maintained by the Consultant shall be provided by insurers satisfactory to the City.
Certificates evidencing all insurance coverage required herein shall be delivered to the City prior to
the Consultant performing any of the services under the Agreement. All insurance certificates
required herein shall name the City as an additional insured and provide for thirty (30) days written
notice from the insurer to the City prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance policy of the
Consultant.
4
A. ERRORS & OMISSIONS - The Consultant shall maintain errors and omissions insurance
with a combined single limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per
occurrence.
B. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY AND AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE - The
Consultant shall maintain comprehensive general liability and automobile liability insurance
with a combined single limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per
occurrence.
C. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE - The Consultant shall maintain worker's
compensation insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all workers
employees by the Consultant.
17 . VALIDITY
Should any provision herein be found or deemed to be invalid, this Agreement shall be construed as
not containing such provision, and all other provisions which are otherwise lawful shall remain in full
force and effect, and to this end the provisions of this Agreement are declared to be severable.
18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement represents the entire and integrated understanding between the parties hereto and
supersedes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, representations, understandings and
Agreements, whether written or oral, with respect to the subject matter thereof. This Agreement may
be amended only by written instrument signed by both parties.
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date shown
,'elow,
THE KEITH COMPANIES INC.
Date:
by:
Signature
Print Name/Title
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
by:
Judith Valles
Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Date:
ATTEST:
Rachel Clark, City Clerk
Approved as to form
and legal content:
James F. Penman
City Attorney
By v~jI~
/ / /
6
ATTACHMENT B
San Bel'nar ino
;;.-..
City of San Bernardino
Development Services Department
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
TO
PROVIDE CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR
.~,-
SEWER LINE PIPE CAPACITY EVALUATIONS
AND
RECOMMENDED UPGRADES AND IMPROVEMENTS
TO SEVERAL SEWER LINES SITUATED AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
WITHIN
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ISSUED ON: AUGUST 8. 2005
DUE ON: AUGUST 29. 2005
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of San Bernardino (City) intends to engage the services of a consulting
engineering firm (Consultant) to provide sewer pipe capacity evaluations, including field
flow tests and to make recommendations for upgrades and improvements of sewer lines
situated at various locations within the City of San Bernardino. These sewer lines are
part of the City of San Bernardino Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
SEWER LINE LOCATIONS
Se ment 10
SW04-21
SW04-36
SWOS-01
SWOS-02
SWOS-OS
SWOS-06
SWOS-07
* Sewer lines recommended for improvements in the Psomas (WSMP) Report.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Location Project Description
Virginia S1. Replace approximately 719 feet of existing 8" sewer main with
12" sewer main in Virginia S1. between "I" S1. and "H" S1.
"I" S1. Design replacement of existing sewer main in "I" S1. between
17th S1. and 21 sl 5t:-with new sewer
7tn S1. Replace or parallel-approximately 2,830 linear feet of 12-inch
sewer main with 1S-inch sewer main and 30 linear feet of 18-
inch sewer main with 24-inch sewer main from M1. Vernon Ave.
to Harris S1.
Harris S1. Replace or parallel approximately 423 feet of 18-inch sewer
main with 24-inch sewer main in Harris S1. from ih S1. to 400
feet south -
Industrial Pkwy Replace or parallel approximately 334 feet of 12-inch sewer
main with 15-inch sewer main in Industrial Parkway near Cajon
Boulevard to Lexinqton Way
Tippecanoe Ave Replace or parallel approximately 442 linear feet of 24-inch
sewer main with 30-inch sewer main in Tippecanoe Ave from
Base Line S1. to 9th S1.
I Colorado S1. Replace or parallel approximately 2,785 linear feet of 8-inch
sewer main with lO-inch to 12-inch sewer main in California St.
from Base Line S1. to Colorado St; in Colorado S1. from
California S1. to Magnolia Ave south of Hansford S1. from
Colorado S1. to Grand St., and Grand St. from cul-de-sac to
Evans St.
2 of 7
II. BACKGROUND
Psomas prepared a Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (WSMP), in 2002.
In the report, Psomas provides recommendations for sewer line improvements
throughout the city, based on land use information, population projections, and data
obtained from a temporary flow monitoring study. The hydraulic modeling software used
for the study was the H20MAP SEWER 2.5.
The report lists deficiencies found as a result of peaked situations in the sewer system,
and provides recommendations and related costs for either replacing or paralleling
existing sewer mains. Costs estimates were based on costs as of January 2002 for the
Inland Empire.
The City is seeking a qualified consultant to review the available information, perform
independent flow tests and pipe capacity evaluations and make recommendations
regarding the cost effectiveness of the listed sewer line improvements.
III. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Services to be performed related to the above listed sewer lines include, but are not
limited to the following:
. Review the information available in the City's Master Plan for the listed sewer lines.
. Review/study the existing and calculated flow capacity for the listed sewer lines.
. Review/study the proposed improvements and cost estimates presented by the
Psomas Report for the listed sewer lines.
. Perform a field evaluation of the'1isted sewer lines and identify any potential
construction constraints.
. Review available plans, maintenance records and proposed improvement cost
estimates for the listed sewer lines.
. Conduct flow tests at selected manhole locations for the listed lines. The flow tests
should be conducted for a minimum 9-day period on a 24-hour basis.
. Consultant may conduct the flow monitoring study using the same manhole locations
of the Psomas study, but may expand the number of locations at the City's approval.
. Establish high, average'and low flow periods from the recorded data.-Flow tests must
be conducted by a qualified sub-contractor.
. Based upon the review of available information and the flow monitorIng study, assist
the City in determining whether or not the improvements recommended in the
Psomas report should be implemented and/or provide alternative recommendation for
upgrading the listed sewer lines.
. Meet with the City's Engineering and appropriate Water Department personnel to
discuss the preliminary improvement recommendation.
. Prepare final report providing improvement/upgrade recommendations and updated
cost estimates for each sewer line.
IV PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
3 of 7
A. Six (6) copies of the proposal shall be submitted to the following:
City of San Bernardino
Department of Development Services
Division of Public Works
ATTN: Mr. Byron G. Montalvo, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer
300 North "D" Street, 3rd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Proposals shall be received in hand by this Division up to the hour of 5:30 P.M.
on Mondav. AUQust 29. 2005.
B. Responsive proposals will include, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Responsive proposals will present a Scope of Services that includes at a
minimum the above described services and any other tasks necessary for
the evaluation of the sewer lines. The sewer line evaluations and
improvement recommendations will be used to prepare plans, specifications
and cost estimates for the listed sewer lines.
2. . Identify the professional, technical and support staff that will be performing
the work associated with the proposed scope of services. Short resumes
may be included, but extensive resumes should be limited to key personnel
only.
3. Include a timeline indicating project milestones for the delivery of the final
report. ....
4. Include a list of similar projects recently completed by the Consultant,
identifying the location, date, agency and contact person name, and
address and phone number.
5. Previous obligations with other projects (related to time and availability of
staff) .
6. Name of sub-consultants or sub-contractors to be used for specific aspects
of the project, including a summary of previous working arrangements on
similar types of work.
7. Statement of local preference eligibility, including identification of any office
located in the City of San Bernardino and the number of employees
stationed at the office, the number of employees doing business inside the
City limits, and a copy of your firm's City of San Bernardino Business
License.
,
8. Items, actions or information the Consultant expects to be provided by the
City.
4 of 7
9. Any comments or suggestion that the Consultant believes necessary to
improve the finished project or to comply with the requirements of this RFP.
10. Separate sealed envelope. Fixed fee or not-to-exceed fee for the work
required by this RFP, together with an hourly rate sheet applicable to this
project for classifications above, including all materials and expenses, shall
be submitted in a separate sealed envelope. Please note that the City will
not payor compensate for travel time, courier services, mileage or
reimbursement for travel to the City of San Bernardino to attend meetings
or conduct the activities necessary to complete tasks required to be
performed as part of consultant services.
The fee proposal shall include the total fee and a separate fee breakdown
for the individual segment 1.0. This is necessary for cost tracking within the
City's Capital Improvement Program.
V. SELECTION PROCESS
The selection process will be based on a point system and will consist of three phases as
follows:
1. First phase selection shall consist of an evaluation by staff (including the
Development Services Director, City Engineer, and Senior Engineer/Project
Manager) of proposals based on the above items identified in Section IV B (except
No. 10). An additional five (5) points will be given to City of San Bernardino based
consultants. In order to be deemed as "City of San Bernardino Based Consultant,
the company shall have an office with a minimum of two (2) owners or employees
doing business inside the City limits and shall possess a City Business License.
The three (3) consultants with the highest points will continue to the interviews. A
maximum of 100 points can be achieved in this phase of the selection process.
The three consultants with the highest numerical scores will be invited to continue
with the second phase of the selection process.
2. Second phase of the selection process will consist of staff evaluation of a
presentation by the three consultants with the highest numerical score from the
first phase selection. The interview will be detailed questionSc'on this specific
project, including, but not limited to, personnel, schedule, project staging, and
knowledge of the project. Five (5) points of local preference will also be awarded
in this phase of the selection process for Consultants that meet the requirements
identified in paragraph 1 above. A maximum of 100 points can be achieved in this
phase of the selection process.
3. The third and final phase of the selection process will consist of staff submitting a
final package to the Mayor and Council for consideration approval. Final scores of
the top three consultants will be submitted to the Mayor and Common Council with
a recommendation to award an Agreement for Professional Services to the
consultant with the highest numerical score. However, the Mayor and Common
Council have the prerogative to award an Agreement for Professional Services to
any of the top three consultants or reject all proposals.
5 of 7
4. If the Mayor and Common Council award an Agreement for Professional Services,
the selected consultant will be requested to execute an Agreement for
Professional Services (draft copy attached). Failure of the consultant to execute
the Agreement within 60 days of approval by the Mayor and Common Council will
void the approval.
VI GENERAL
This "Request for Proposal" does not commit the City to award a contract, pay any costs
incurred in the preparation of a proposal in response to this request, procure or contract
for any services. All proposals submitted in response to this request will become the
property of the City and may be used by the City in any way deemed appropriate. The
City reserves the right to accept or to reject, in part or in its entirety, the response to the
request for proposal if such action is deemed to be in the best interest of the City.
Any contract entered into as a result of this proposal shall be considered to include the
items of work detailed in this proposal unless specifically deleted in the proposal at the
request of the City.
VII PAYMENT
The Consultant that is recommended by Staff and approved by Mayor and Common
Council shall attend a preliminary meeting to establish the start date and resolve other
issues. Once the Notice to Proceed has been given, the Consultant can submit for
payments. The City will release funds at percentages with receipt of preliminary and final
reports. No payment shall be given above the percentage of completed work accepted
by the City. The City shall hold 15%~of the total cost for 360 calendar days after
acceptance of the final report by the City. _or 45 calendar days after the City issues a
Notice of Completion for the project, whichever occurs first.
Any request for additional information or clarification should be submitted to Mr. Byron G.
Montalvo, P.E. Public Works, at (909) 384-5263.
A IT ACHMENTS: Liability/Insurance Requirements
Draft Copy of Agreement for Professional Services
LIABILITY I INSURANCE
REQUIREMENTS
Engineer shall maintain insurance policies meeting the minimum requirements set forth
herein. All insurance maintained by the Engineer shall be provided by insurers
satisfactory to the City. Certificates evidencing all insurance coverage required herein
shall be delivered to the City prior to the Engineer performing any of the services under
the Agreement. All insurance certificates required herein shall name the City as an
additional insured and provide for thirty (30) days written notice from the insurer to the
City prior to cancellation of any insurance policy of the Engineer.
6 of 7
A. ERRORS & OMISSIONS The Engineer shall maintain errors and
omissions insurance with a combined single limit of not less than One
Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence.
B. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY AND AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE The Engineer shall maintain comprehensive general
liability and automobile liability insurance with a combined single limit of not
less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence.
C. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE The Engineer shall
maintain worker's compensation insurance in accordance with the laws of
the State of California for all workers employees by the Engineer.
If additional information is needed, please contact Mr. Byron Montalvo at (909) 384-5263.
Sincerely,
BYRON G. MONTALVO, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
BGM:pm
7 of 7
hA
,
.. ...
;~~~ 6-
.........,
_.~.,
":tI......I..
. ,..:' -
. ~"-\.. ~-.,
:.'" ... .. ;:i~.
..r ::.
't'
\
L;.'
......'
.... ,~
'tl'~
",'..... .-
~.
~..~
, ~_' ,," c" I ~ 01:
.~~- ~~ ~ .~ q. - ,
!:
~:
~~-'
~~.
~
r~
~
~r~~
~/'<.
459
The Keith C8"'1]oanl8S TKC
19 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
(I
Prcpt'lsal In PH'\ ide c:1\il Engineering Services
\ arioll' St'Wt" [ in" F'il't C1l'acil\ E\ aJuations. Upgrades and [I11Plt1\ "Int'J1l'
The KP.'th CompanieS ~
Table of Contents
Table of Contents......... ... .......... .., ........ ... ............... .......... ........... ... ...... ....... .... ... ... ........ i
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING ................................................................................. 1
PROJECT APPROACH ..................... ..... ............. ........ ........................................ ....... 2
KEY DESIGN ISSUES .................................................................................. 3
SCOPE OF WORK .....................................................................................................5
1. Data Collection and Review.................................................................... 5
2. Flow Testing............................................................................................5
3. Hydraulic Analysis ..................................................................................5
4. Prepare Report .........................................................................................6
5. Meetings .................................................................................................. 6
PROJECT TEAM ........................................................................................................7
ORGANIZATION CHART............................................................................ 7
RES UMES ................. ................ ....... ..................... ..... ....... ...... .......... ........ ..... 8
SUBCONSUL T ANT PROFILE................................................................................ 15
Key Personnel......................................_,......................................................... 16
COMPANY PROFILE .............................................................................................. 17
REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... 19
BUDGET .. ..... ..... ...... ....... .... ... ....... ......... ........................ ..... ........ ....... ......... .... ... ....... 22
SCHEDULE.. ........ ........... ............................. ........ ............................. ......... .............. 23
INSURANCE .... ....... ........... ..... ........ ..... .... ........ ..... ...... .... ... ...... .... .... ....... '" ... .... .... ... 24
t-'l~"t~t':....ill(l r'r('....idl. '".-:i\ i; 1'.!1:::1;l'l'li:l.~ "':...'i \ i,- ::')
The Ke'tn COrT1penoes n<'C
\, dJil-'lb ~-~('\\('1 LIlli.: !';rl" ,_'.,ir,;,.'i:\ F\Jiu,J:ii_':h \
..:J.'" .! :,1';;'1, '\, !1il 1,1.:-..
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING .
In 2002, Psomas prepared a Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (WSMP).
The report provides recommendations for sewer line improvements throughout the
City. The recommendations were based on hydraulic modeling analyses based on
land use information, population projections, and data obtained from a temporary
flow monitoring study.
The improvements recommended in the report were due to deficiencies found in the
existing sewer collection system as a result of peak flow conditions. The report
provided recommendations and related costs for either replacing or paralleling the
existing sewer lines. Cost estimates were based on costs as of January 2002 for the
Inland Empire.
The purpose of this study is to review the available information, perform independent
flow tests, and perform pipe capacity evaluations for the listed improvements from the
WSMP. New recommendations are to be made as to the costs effectiveness of the
listed sewer line 'improvements. The improvements to be evaluated are listed below. It
should be noted that all but one of the improvements were recommended in the WSMP
by Psomas. ~his would be the 7th Street sewer line replacement or parallel pipe.
SC\\ Ct' Linc Improwmcnt I,ocations
Segment Location - Project Description
ID
SW04-2 ] Virginia Street Replace approximately 719 ft of existing 8-inch sewer main with 12-
inch sewer in Virginia St. between ''I'' St. and "H" St.
SW04-36 "I" Street Replace of existing sewer main "I" St between 17'h St and 21" St with
new sewer
Replace or Parallel approximately 2,830 feet of 12-inch sewer main
SWOS-OI 7lh Street with IS-inchs sewer, and 30 feet of existing IS-inch sewer main with
24-inch sewer from Mt. Vernon Avenue to Harris SI. -
SWOS-02 Harris Street Replace or Parallel approximately 423 feet of 18-inch sewer main
with 24-inch sewer in Harris St from 7th St to 400 feet south.
Industrial Replace or Parallel approximately 334 feet of 12-inch sewer main
SWOS-OS Parkway with IS-inch sewer in Industrial Parkway near Cajon Boulevard to
Lexington Way
SWOS-06 Tippecanoe Replace or Parallel approximately 442 feet of 24-inch sewer main
Avenue with 30-inch sewer in Tippecanoe A venue from Base Line St to 9lh St
Replace or Parallel approximately 2,78S feet of 8-inch sewer main
with IO-inch to 12-inch sewer main in California St from Base Line St
SWOS-07 Colorado Street to Colorado St: in Colorado St from California St to Magnolia A venue
. south of Hansford St from Colorado St to Grand St, and Grand St
from cul-de-sac to Evans St.
P 1459 1 8/29/05
Proro~al tu PnJ\'idl' C'ivil Fngin~>crinp. SL'n-ices
\'ari()u~ S~'\\ t_'1 L.int' Pipe: (~,-'pa(it: F\-.1hIJtiiJn-s. l :pgrJJe" 211Li [mpI()\ t"ll1f!ll~
Tne KeIth Cornpente!i -n<"C
PROJECT APPROACH
The Keith Company's approach will focus on adhering to a clearly defined scope,
establishing and achieving specific project goals, and assembling the most qualified
team members. We have completed many wastewater capacity studies and capital
sewer pipeline replacement designs. Our past experience has shown that it is
important to obtain accurate information regarding existing underground facilities
and investigate thoroughly alignment alternatives to choose the most cost effective
and efficient alignment and construction methodology.
TKC has identified several goals for this project. These goals will provide direction
in planning, coordinating, and preliminarily designing the proposed facilities to
effectively accomplish the scope of services defined in this proposal. Specific
project goals include:
. Thorough and accurate collection and interpretation of plans of existing
facilities.
Full utilization of current resources, data and experience to produce a quality
document in a timely manner.
.
.
Comprehensive evaluation of alternatives.
Provide the most cost effective and efficient recommendations.
Provide accurate and comprehensible repeJrt and exhibits.
Meet or precede the project schedule.
Maintain frequent and quality communication with the City of San
Bernardino.
Maintain frequent and quality coordination with other agencies involved.
.
.
.
.
.
While the scope of services and project goals provide general direction, the overall
success of the project lies in our Project Team's ability to complete the required tas~s
and achieve the goals established. TKC's team will be directed by a project principal
with extensive experience in these types of projects. The project principal will
ensure that there is frequent and effective communication with the project team
members and the City of San Bernardino.
1'1459 2 8/29/05
~
l!!!!!j
Pr()rl"allt~ Pr('\'lJt~ Ci\'il Engll1t'ering ~l'J"\i(t'~
\';Hic\u~ Se\\er Line Pire (,JpJlit\- [Ll111Jli\'n~, l p,s.rJJt'''' ,llld ]mrll'\t'I1l,'rH~
The Keoth CompenelS ~
KEY DESIGN ISSUES
As part of our approach to the project, TKC understands the importance of
understanding the key issues that are related to the project. The success of this type
of project is associated with the project team's ability to foresee issues or identify
procedures that will have a direct impact on the quality of the deliverable, as well as
the schedule and budget. Tetlemer has identified a few of these key issues in
preparation of this proposal. They are briefly described below.
Understanding of Flows and Flow Monitoring Locations
TKC understands that to appropriately perform any sewer flow assessment analysis
such as the one proposed herein, a firm understanding of the existing flow conditions
is absolutely essential. As-built plans and interviews with operations staff will be
vital sources of information to determine the flows into and out of the specific sewer
reach to be studied. Identification of all branch sewer laterals and service laterals is
needed so that proper manhole flow monitoring locations can be selected. In order
for the flow monitoring data to provide meaningful data, careful consideration must
be given to the locations and duration of modeling. The durations identified in the
RFP will be reviewed for each site to determine if other duration recommendations
are required. Consideration must also be given to manhole accessibility and traffic
control.
Existing Condition Assessment
Other factors will need to be considered other than just the hydraulic limitations to
make the best recommendations for improvements. Factors such as maintenance and
repair issues will need to be addressed. Maintenance records will be reviewed and
operational staff will be interviewed to gain a firm understanding of the existing
conditions of each of the sewer improvement reaches.
Accurate Flow Monitoring
In addition to selecting the appropriate locations for monitoring, the monitoring data
will need to be accurate and interpreted correctly. The monitoring efjuipment will
need to be calibrated correctly and checked after installed to be sure that the
equipment is not clogged and reading the measurements properly.
Hydraulic Analysis
Utilizing the flow monitoring data correctly and performing a reliable hydraulic
analysis is critical to making proper recommendations. TKC's hydraulic analyses
will be performed using MWHSoft's H20MAP Sewer modeling software. Model
input data for the physical sewer parameters will based from the as-built sewer plans.
The input data and results will be reviewed with City staff.
PI459 3 8/29/05
iii
Propn<;;al It) Pr()\'idt' Ci\'il Fnt.illl'l'rin~ SL'n-icl'~
\-;.nious Se\~ er 1.int" Pipe C:,q-"<ll."it}, F\';.duatil)n~, L rgraJe~ and lmpro\ elllcnl~
The KeIth Comp8n.e~ T1<'C
QAlQC
As with any project, TKC understands the need for QNQC to meet the high
standards of quality and develop accurate and meaningful recommendations.
Management will be heavily involved in the project to check the progress frequently
to ensure the integrity and reliability of the study.
PI.t59 4 W29.'05
II
Pn)r()~al tn PI0\idt~ Civil Englllt'eriTlt, Sc>nilt'''o:
\'ariou~ St!\'"er lint' rlipt> (:apacit: r\aluJti011s. L:rgr.hll'" JnJ !mrr('\'I'J1l(-'nt~
The Keltr'l Compen.ee ~
SCOPE OF WORK
1. Data Collection and Review
A. Obtain and review the information available in the City's Master Plan
for the listed sewer lines.
B. Obtain, review, and study the existing and calculated flow capacity
for the listed sewer lines.
e. Review proposed improvements and cost estimates presented by the
Psomas Report for the listed sewer lines.
D. Perform a field evaluation of the listed sewer lines and identify any
potential construction constraints.
E. Review available plans, as-built plans, maintenance records, and
proposed improvement cost estimates for the listed sewer lines.
F. Interviews with City operation staff to determine existing conditions
and supplement information in the maintenance records.
2. Flow Testing
A. Prepare a flow monitoring plan to be reviewed with City staff. As
stated in the RFP, the same locations used in the WSMP m~y be used
for this study, but the City may request the number of locations to be
expanded. Monitoring locationswlll be shown on 11 x 17 drawings,
or atlas maps, for the City's review prior to installing monitoring
equipment.
B. Conduct flow tests for selected location from the approved monitoring
plan. The flow tests are assumed to be for 9-day periods on a 24-hour
basis. This duration will be reviewed and other parameters may be
recommended on a site by site basis. Flow testing will be performed
by Downstream Services, Inc.
e. Flow test data will include average flows, high flows, and low flow
periods.
3. Hydraulic Analysis
A. Based on the as-built plan information and flow monitoring data,
TKC will create a hydraulic model for the sewer pipes to be studied.
The H20MAP Sewer modeling software will be utilized. The model
will be run for the peak flow conditions. The results will be compared
against the City design and analysis criteria for depth of flow and
velocity. Defi~iencies will be identified and reviewed with City staff.
Modeling results tables and model node diagrams will be provided to
the City.
PI459 5 8/29/05
Iii
Pn'posal [() Pro\ idt' Ci\il Fnf,illt.'crinf: S~jr\i~'l>'
\'arious Se\\'t'f Line FiFt.' C~lpJ(jty l:\'JIlldlillI1S. L'pgr.iJl'~ dIlLi Inlph'\ ('illt'Il!:-,
The Ke'th Campen,... I TK"C
B. Based on the modeling results, TKC will assist the City in
determining recommended improvements. Recommendations may
include confirming the previous report's recommendations or
provided alternate or new recommended improvements.
4. Prepare Report
A. A report will be prepared that will describe the data, assumptions,
results, and recommendations for each of the sites to be studied. The
report will include tables and figures to best illustrate the conclusions.
The figures will be 11 x 17 and provided in color that will clearly
show the existing sewer and sewer improvement locations and limits.
B. A cost estimate will be prepared for each recommended improvement.
The costs will tabulated with unit prices shown.
C. Draft copies of the report will be submitted to the City for review and
comment. It is assumed that two (2) draft report submittals will be
needed prior to the final report completed. City review times are
assumed to be two (2) weeks.
5. Meetings
A. Meetings will be necessary to appropriately complete the project. For
budgetary purposes a total of three (3) meetings is assumed, each for a
duration of two (2) hours. The thr~e meetings will include a project
kickoff meeting, progress review and improvement recommendations
meeting, and report review meeting. The kickoff meeting will be used
to establish project goals, schedule, lines of communication, and
points of contact. The second meeting will include appropriate staff to
discuss preliminary improvement recommendations. The third
meeting will be held to discuss City's review comments and
modifications to the report.
P 1459 (, 8/29/05
i~~ll)(l"'.ll t1" J'rl'\ lltr' (:l',Jll-x~,~i!h'I'..;nF ~('n ;,-t'~
\ ,!i-i,'u'- ~t'\\-l:'] l..llh' [lip._- (~~.!p~i,_it\ r\~ilu~dli.1l1".l 1";:;,:,;\"" .:;~~~ :i~ir'~ .t "j ,,~..
The Ke.th Cornpe<"l,es TK'C
PROJECT TEAM
ORGANIZA TION CHART
.
CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO
Jeffrey Dunn, PE
Robert S. Reid, PE
Upon notice to proceed on this project, the project team will be fully available to_
spend the necessary time on this project for a successful completion and meet the
schedule as illustration on the proposed project schedule provided.
PI459 7 8/29/05
Pr"':'1'~1",i! I \ 11rl~\'1,jt (-,i\ ij [11,~in~'(,1 inF ~L'l \ ll\~'"
\, dr],\U' ~\'\\L': l,i;h j-'lPt' (.Jp,i....-it\ r\~tlll~Hj;.\.n5, lp,?::,fdLll'" all~i !t1Jr'ri..\\C]~lCJH~
The Ke.m Compl!!lnl6S n<c.
RESUMES
Robert S. Reid, P.E. - Principal-In-Charge
MBA/1986/Business/University of Michigan
BS/1984/Mechanical Engineering/University of Michigan
1 992/Professional Civil Engineer/CA #C049624
1 989/Certified Public Accountant/CA #5217 I E
Qualifications: Mr. Reid has 20 years of diversified experience in water
resources engineering and consulting for the public sector. He is responsible for
managing all phases of water resource projects including conceptual planning,
feasibility studies, facility design, and construction management. Mr. Reid has also
been responsible for evaluating numerous water distribution and wastewater
collection systems, and has developed facility plans to meet projected future needs.
These plans have involved major infrastructure projects related to water
transmission, treatment, and storage facilities, and wastewater collection facilities.
Education:
Registration:
Mr. Reid has extensive experience with preparing preliminary and final designs as
well as providing construction management services for water distribution and
wastewater collection facilities. He has managed design teams and construction
inspectors for a wide array of projects which include water reservoirs, water booster
pump stations, pressure-reducing stations, wateLand wastewater flow monitoring
stations, wastewater lift stations, force mains, and pipelines. He has been directly
responsible for the design and construction support for over 100 miles of capital
water and sewer pipelines with over 50 miles of these pipelines located along
existing roadways.
Improvement District No.6, Sewer Collection Study; Aliso Viejo, California
(Moulton Niguel Water District): Project Engineer for a wastewater collection
system facility master plan for the 6,000-acre improvement district known as Aliso
Viejo. This project included the collection of sewage generation data for different
types of land use, the review of the existil1g and proposeqcollection systems, the
identification of potential deficiencies, and the evaluation of system modifications to
correct over-loaded sewer mains.
Irvine Center Drive Water and Sewer Relocations; Irvine, California (Irvine
Ranch Water District): Project Manager responsible for the preliminary design
report, final design, and construction support services for the relocation of 1,800
linear feet of IS-inch diameter sewer trunk line and 1,400 linear feet of 18-inch
diameter water transmission pipeline. The project was coordinated with the
preparation of the street widening plans. The roadway remained open to traffic
during all phases of construction.
P1459 !l 8/29/05
ll\'il~)...,dl\ !'r;)IH.ll'\ I',:; !'i~.~:lH'..';ir:;':<\.'1\1...:e"
The Ke.tn Companoee -n<c
\,!;il''J''~~C\'-.': ~]1> l'ql( .Q",l i~\ F\cl!~:;ll]('n~ L'rglJdl"~i.lh~ Irnl'r,-l\L'11lt:'!I!"
IRWD Capital Improvements, Trabuco and Jeffrey Roads and Bryan A venue;
Irvine, California (Irvine Ranch Water District): Principal-in-Charge of design,
and preparation of plans and specifications, as well as coordination with the agency
and other consultant groups. The project included the design and preparation of
detailed plans for 12,800 feet of 12-inch domestic water pipeline along with a
pressure-reducing station; 2,900 feet of 30-inch pipeline, 9,200 feet of 12-inch
pipeline, and 800 feet of 8-inch pipeline of reclaimed water; and 1,300 feet of 18-
inch and 6,700 feet of IS-inch sanitary sewer line.
Jeffrey Road Reclaimed Water Pipeline and Trunk Sewer; Irvine, California
(Irvine Ranch Water District): Principal-In-Charge of providing engineering
services for the project that extended from Irvine Center Drive to Trabuco Road. The
trunk sewer and reclaimed water pipeline project encompassed approximately 9,000
feet of each pipeline, including crossing the Metro Link railroad tracks and the
Interstate S rights-of-way. The initial portion of the project required close
coordination with the city of Irvine's Jeffrey Road Grade Separation Project.
Additionally, various water and sewer facilities associated with the grade separation
construction project were relocated. The scope of services included the preparation
of a preliminary design report; evaluating environmental concerns and identifying
necessary measures to mitigate impacts of the construction; performing necessary
geotechnical investigations; obtaining permits; and the preparation of construction
plans and technical specifications. This project included close coordination with
Caltrans, the city of Irvine, and The Irvine Com.f~ny.
Joint Regional Treatment Plant Effluent Pipeline; Laguna Niguel, California
(Moulton Niguel Water District): Project Manager responsible for the design,
construction inspection, and staking for a 24-inch ductile iron secondary effluent
disposal pipeline at the A WMA Joint Regional Treatment Plant. The pipeline was
routed through a regional park and in close proximity to a dam. Various alignment
studies were performed to minimize the impact to the park guests, the dam, the trees,
and landscaping. Aerial photography was used to generate base maps. The project
required coordination with the State of California Department of Harbors, Beaches-
and Parks.
Katella Smart Street, Domestic Water Main Relocation, Phase 2; Anaheim,
California (City of Anaheim, Public Utilities Department): Project Manager
responsible for preparing the preliminary design report and final design plans for
replacing approximately 2, 100 linear feet of an existing 6-inch diameter asbestos
cement pipe CACP) and 2,100 linear feet of a 12-inch diameter cast iron pipe with a
single 12-inch diameter ductile iron pipe. These domestic water improvements were
a part of the overall infrastructure improvements to transform Katella A venue, which
is a central arterial access, into a "Smart Street." All existing laterals and services
were reconnected to the new 12-inch water main. This project included extensive
utility research and was bundled with additional street and storm drain
improvements.
PJ459 9 8129/05
Fn1r'('l>...11 t,~ j \t i\ JIlt' ~'i \ i! En::,! !h''.. nng ~t~l\il. e~
\'~! r iYlj" "\"\\-~'!- 1 inc ! "]rl' \_ :lp.il- i~.\ "'Jlu.ltinl)S_ L.rgrdJl'~ ~Hld I mr"-"'- ll11,'J1t~
The Keith Cornpenle6 ~
Jeffrey T. Dunn, P.E. - Project Manager
Education:
BS/1995/Civil Engineering/California Polytechnic University,
Pomona
1998/Civil Engineer/California #58455
American W ater Works Association
Orange County Water Association
Qualifications: Mr. Dunn has a wide variety of experience in water resource
planning and engineering involving domestic water, reclaimed water, and sewer
facilities. His planning experience includes more than 24 facility master-planning
projects, as well as computer network modeling and analysis, and preparation of
urban water management plans. His planning projects have included developments
as large as 35,000 acres and over 12,000 residential dwelling units. Ranging in size,
he has designed over 2,700 pipe networks and modeling projects for domestic,
reclaimed, and sewer systems. Other experience includes planning and design of
water, reclaimed water, and sewer pipelines; pump station analysis and design;
pressure-reducing stations; reservoir storage analysis; and construction support
services.
Registration:
Affiliations:
Baseline, Archibald, and Hellman Sewer Analysis; Rancho Cucamonga,
California (Cucamonga Valley Water District): Project Manager currently
responsible for a hydraulic sewer analysis for three sewer improvement locations
based on the current sewer master plan. The proJect consists of flow monitoring,
model analysis, development of future flows, and making recommendations as to
improvements required.
Kraemer Boulevard Sewer Repairs; Placentia, California (City of Placentia):
Project Engineer responsible for preparing the plans for repair of ten- and twelve-
inch sewer mains in five locations. Mr. Dunn's tasks included research of utilities.
base map preparation, plan and profile of repair locations. repair details, and
construction notes.
Garden Grove Festival Sewer Capacity Analsysis; Garden Grove, California
(Gary Coursey & Associates): Project Engineer for performing a sewer capacity
study on the existing sewer system within the City of Garden Grove. City standards
and requirements were utilized, with reviews with the City staff. Flow monitoring
was performed which included a flow monitoring plan to be approved by the City. A
network model analysis was performed using the flow monitoring data to determine
capacity of existing sewer to accommodate a new commercial development.
Utility Plan for Former Marine Corps Air Station, EI Toro; Orange County,
California (Irvine Ranch Water District): Project Manager responsible for the
preparation of a utility plan for the domestic water, reclaimed water, and sewer
collection facilities required to serve the proposed Orange County Great Park. The
Great Park Plan includes approximately 3,400 new homes, 2.9-miJlion-square-feet of
PI459 10 8/29/05
FH'r'\),,-.il t,l J'r'l\ j\.-;l' ~ ;\;\ f l-',:...,'n:~:'ll:'.~ l...~(:'r\ i~-t:,....
\'~ltl-."l> Se'\\l, 1 Ill! ! T';- \_:,:~1,1~1t\ ~..\ ,dU:lt](~ll~ L l"'.SJ.l'-!t''- __,.." I, ';'\ I~,' j~'~
The Keoth Cornplln..,e T1<'C
commercial and industrial space, central park, sports parks, golf courses, educational
facilities, transit-oriented district, and habitat preserve. Regional water and reclaimed
water hydraulic network analyses were performed, including extended-period
simulations to determine facility sizing, as well as storage and pumping
requirements. Project costs were provided and a funding plan was developed for the
formation of water and sewer improvement districts.
Vista Del Verde Village III, Master Water/Sewer Plan; Yorba Linda, California
(Yorba Linda Water District): Project Engineer responsible for the preparation of
the Water and Sewer Facilities Master Plan document. Tasks included coordination
with the Yorba Linda Water District to determine design and development
requirements. Other tasks included writing of the report document, preparing
exhibits, and hydraulic model analyses of the Water and Sewer Systems Master
Plans.
Vista Del Verde Village IV, Master Water/Sewer Plan; Yorba Linda, California
(Yorba Linda Water District): Project Manager responsible for the preparation of
the Water and Sewer Facilities Master Plan document. Responsibilities included
coordination with the District as well as the Metropolitan Water District. Other tasks
included writing the report document, preparing exhibits, and hydraulic model
analyses of the Water and Sewer Systems Master Plans.
Sub-Area Master Plan, Planning Areas 1 & 2; Irvine, California (Irvine Ranch
Water District): Project Manager responsible for the preparation of a Sub~Area
Master Plan for domestic water, wastewater, n6ncpotable water, and telemetry
systems to serve approximately 4,600 dwelling units in Planning Areas I and 2
within the city of Irvine's sphere of influence. A regional sewer study was performed
for two of the District's large-trunk sewer systems. Domestic and reclaimed water
network analyses were performed, as well as a Zone 3 and 5 Storage Zone analyses.
The hydraulic analyses included extended-period simulations where pumping
capacities and water-age characteristics were investigated. .
Sub Area Master Plan, Planning Area 6; Irvine, California (Irvine Ranch
Water District): Project Manager responsible for the preparation of a Sub-Area
Master Plan for domestic water, sewer, and non-potable water to serve
approximately 4,500 dwelling units within Planning Area 6 of the city of Irvine's
sphere of influence. The SAMP included a storage analysis for the domestic and
reclaimed water systems to determine proposed reservoir sizes and locations.
Additional tasks for the SAMP included preparing probable opinion of estimated
construction costs for the proposed water and sewer systems separated by IRWD and
developer- funded facilities.
Sub-Area Master Plan, Planning Areas 58, 8A, 9A, and Spectrum 8; Irvine,
California (Irvine Ranch W,ater District): Project Engineer for the preparation of a
Sub-Area Master Plan for domestic water, wastewater, non-potable water, and
telemetry systems to serve approximately 12,350 units in Planning Areas 5B, 8A, 9,
9A, and Spectrum 8 of the city of Irvine's sphere of influence. A regional sewer
P 1459 II 8/29/05
FrC'p\~",d h~ f'r\n'idl' ~, 1\11 Engineering Scn 1(t...."
\'Jril'lb S:"\\l'J i i:l..- !-'il"c CJp~l(lly l-\..l]llJtic~n<., l:rgrdl..k', .:llJ llllrr,.;\t'm:'nt~
The Kel~h Cornpenel5 ~
study was performed of the existing trunk sewer systems to determine capacity for
the new sewer flows. The regional sewer study included nearly 70% of the entire
district. GIS data v"as utilized to develop land uses information and sewer tributary
areas.
Springbrook Estates Off-Site Sewer Study; Riverside, California (Springbrook
Investments, LP): Project Manager for off-site sewer engineering services.
Springbrook Estates included the development of 184 acres in the Highgrove
Community of Riverside, as well as off-site sewer from the project along Spring
Street to Iowa A venue, then south to Palmyrita A venue where it joins the City of
Riverside's existing sewer system.
Tonner Hills Water and Sewer Facilities Plan; Brea, California (Nuevo Energy
Company): Project Engineer responsible for the Water and Sewer Master Facility
Plan for the Tonner Hills development, a master-planned community of
approximately 823 acres owned by Nuevo Energy Company. Water and sewer
service was provided by the City of Brea. The project consisted of the addition of
two reservoir tanks and pump stations to the City's water distribution system. Close
coordination was required with the City's Distribution Master Plan document. The
sewer collection included one lift station and force main along with the gravity
sewers that connect to the existing collection system.
Vista Del Verde Village III, Bastanchury Sewer Pipeline; Yorba Linda,
California (Yorba Linda Water District): Project Engineer responsible for the
preparation of the preliminary design report and 'construction documents for
approximately 800 feet of ten-inch gravity PYC sewer. The sewer profile design
required the ability to go under an existing 60-inch diameter storm drain facility and
36-inch water transmission main. Coordination was necessary with other consultants
to determine tie-in points to a new 60-inch diameter manhole located in the middle
of an intersection.
Irvine BoulevardlLambert Road Sewer Capital Facilities; Irvine, California
(Irvine Ranch Water District): Project Manager responsible for preparing the
preliminary design report and final design of the sewer pipelines in Irvine Boulevard
and Lambert Road within the city of Irvine. The project included the de-sign of 2,751
linear feet of 12-inch PYC sewer pipe and 3,646 linear feet of IS-inch PYC sewer
pipe. Due to the nature of traffic on Irvine Boulevard. the alignments were carefully
studied to not only avoid other utilities, but to consider traffic control during
construction and maintain the most number of travel lanes open as possible. The
project involved coordination with several other consultants to ensure all design
requirements and pipe clearances were met.
PI459 12 829/05
"l '_'.,
Ii' \-;r-'-.. \_,~;',,;,,::.. r\J!l;~l:i,~:;s_ l.pgrdl.it" dlhi 11l1rr\-~\-l'I11l'n:"
The KeIth Cornpen..,e TKC
l-'I'I'j~\~"d 1, i'l \ :\:l ~ i\:' ~_",:-]ll"t i-l;~~~ '<'I\:.'"l""
\, ~: li._; ~ "
Adelina Pirijanyan, EfT - Assistant Engineer
Education: BS/2003/Civil Engineering
Registration: 2002/EITI16736
Qualifications: Ms. Pirijanyan, prior to graduating and receiving her Bachelor
of Science degree in Civil Engineering, had interned in the water resources industry
for a few years and gained valuable experience. Since earning her degree, she has
worked as an assistant engineer on projects such as wastewater treatment plants, a
portable aeration plan, GIS sewer line update for City of Santa Monica, Trunk Sewer
Mapping for Orange County Sanitation District, master planning, computer network
modeling, domestic water pipeline design, gravity sewer, force main design, and
reclaimed water pipeline design. Her pipeline design projects have included plan and
profiles for pipe diameters up to 24-inches. Her software experience includes
H20NET, H20 MAP SEWER, GIS ARC INFO, and AutoCAD.
Trunk Sewer Mapping; Orange County,California (Orange County Sanitation
District): Associate Engineer assisting the project engineer and team members with
the preparation of an electronic map of Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD)
sewer system, Trunk Sewer Mapping: Project included mapping of OCSD owned
and maintained sewers, data collection of sewer information, compiling data into a
database and connecting the database to the map of the sewers. The final product was
a GIS map of the OCSD sewer system. Hard copies of these maps were also created,
similar to the Thomas guide.
Moorpark Wastewater Treatment Plant 5.0 MGD Expansion; Ventura County,
CA (City of Moorpark): Aide Project Engineer with design of Moorpark Expansion
of Wastewater Treatment Plant
OCSD WDR CMOM 02-04 Compliance Portable Aeration Plan; Orange
County, CA (Orange County Sanitation District): Prepare a GIS map of the
bodies of water in Orange County. The map contained bodies of water data (area,
depth, location, size, etc. . .) to be used in creating an Aeration Plan for the Orange -
County Sanitation District, to meet water quality standards set by Regional Water
Quality Contrel Board.
OCSD WDR CMOM 02-04 Compliance, Tustin Area Spill Control (Orange
County Sanitation District): Research Sanitary Sewer Overflow/Capacity,
Management, Operation and Maintenance (SSO/CMOM) regulations.
GIS Sewer Data Update; Santa Monica, CA (City of Santa Monica): City of
Santa Monica's Sewer system was previously created in GIS; however their data set
had errors and new line work needed to be added. Updated their GIS data and
mapped the additional sewer lines. The project included running multiple queries to
identify missing links and errors using Arc Info and Microsoft Database.
Water and Sewer System Master Plan; Banning, California (City of Banning):
Associate Engineer responsible for the hydraulic and sewer analyses, model
P 1459 13 8/29/05
PrnpnsJI to Provide (l\il Fngilwering S~],\l(e,
\'ariou~ Sl..'\\cr LiTle Pipe I..JaJ,.kity E\-JluJripns. L'pgradl''' ~llld Jmrru\Clnt'l1b
The KeIth Compen.es Tl-<"C
calibration, planning and report preparation for the Water and Sewer System Master
Plan.
Headlands Domestic Water and Sewer Hydraulic Analysis; Dana Point,
California (City of Dana Point): Associate Engineer responsible for the hydraulic
and sewer analyses, model calibration, planning and report preparation for the water
system master plan.
Sewer Area Study for Golden Valle)' Ranch; Santa Clarita, California (City of
Santa Clarita):
Associate Engineer responsible for the sewer analyses, model calibration, planning
and report preparation for the Sewer System Master Plan.
URP 12 and 13 Hydraulic Analysis; Irvine, California (City of Irvine ):
Associate Engineer responsible for the hydraulic analyses, model calibration,
planning and report preparation for the Water System Master Plan.
PI459 14 8/29:05
E2
I.
Pn'posallt1 Pru\"idt' Ci, il EnginL'c1inS Sl'nil-L')
Y3riLJu~ Sewer Line Pipe (:apdcil: E\a!uJti{'n~. l;pgraJt'~ and Imrr()\t'1l1t'l1t..,
The Ke~h CompanteS n<c
SUBCONSUL TANT PROFILE
Downstream Services Inc. is full service company providing efficient and consistent
inspection, installation, maintenance, and repair of all wet utilities since ] 996.
Downstream Services is an industry leader in handling, storage, and delivery of
digital information. Downstream Services utilizes the latest technology available to
the wastewater industry. Advanced technologies enable Downstream to gather and
deliver high quality digital inspection data for our clients, and to required
specifications.
Downstream provides the following services:
. F]ow Monitoring
. CCTV Sewer Inspection and Cleaning
. Storm Drain Maintenance
. Storm Drain Repair and Slip Lining
. Storm Water Filter Sales and Service
. Municipa] Repairs and Emergency Response
. Underground Utility Installation
Downstream maintains full time facilities for maintaining, servicing, repairing
equipment, and fabricating required components. Most repairs are conducted in
house resulting in minima] equipment down time.
· Downstream Services understands that every sewer is unique. We take into
account flow hydraulics, silt level, accessibility, and surcharge. Downstr~am
uses the best meter for each individual application. Our inventory of meters
include Sigma, ISCO, and F]owDar technology.
· Downstream also has a full fleet of CCTV and Cleaning trucks that may be used
to facilitate flow monitoring projects by cleaning lines prior to install if needed.
We place a sediment retention too] in the upstream manhole to prevent
sedimentation of submerged sensors to ensure continuous uninterrupted data.
. A complete manhole inspection is conducted for every site. Deliverab]es of this
inspection will include digital video clips, still photo's and brief condition
assessment of the manhole.
PI459 15 8/29/05
F'] ('plJ'..al tn Pnn-idc Ci\-i1 Lngint'cring SCf\-lCl"
\~lrlL'LI~ Sewer l.ine Pipe ('~tpJcity F\-~1111~ltilln<;. l rgI'Jdl'~ 2nJ Imrrl_~\l.'Pll.'nt;..
Th~ Ke.th Cornpenee TI<"C
Key Personnel
Wilma Roberts offers 25 years of experience in construction and general engineering. In a
variety of management positions and as principal and co founder of Downstream Services
inc. Mrs. Roberts is responsible for day to day operation and executive administrative duties.
Victor Roberts is the founding principal and Vice President of Downstream Services Inc.
Victor is responsible for overseeing day to day operations including financial and asset
management. He posses extensive knowledge of the laws and regulations governing general
engineering, contracting, and the treatment and disposal of hazardous materials.
Jake Jacobson as Principal in Charge offers] I years of experience in the environmental
industry. Mr. Jacobson holds the responsibilities of Business/Project development, ensuring
adequate assets are available, including trucks, equipment, and personnel. Jake will also
monitor, project cost, and overall progress.
Richard Delgadillo as Project Manager brings 2] years of experience in the wastewater
industry. Richard has managed WW collection systems, and WWTP Maintenance
operations as a municipal employee. Richard has also worked as a project manager in the
private sector managing flow monitoring and condition assessment projects in Southern
California, Las Vegas, Reno, Phoenix, and Hawaii. His responsibilities include business
development, project management, and technical training.
Dave Johnson is the Field Superintendent and project coordinator. His responsibilities
include CCTV inspection crew management, field data recording, chain of custody
sampling, reporting of spills, protection of property;' and general employee training. He also
maintains certification in HAZWOPER, confined space entry, 1st aid, and CPR.
Downstream Services has never had an injury due to confined space entry with Dave as
Safety Coordinator.
Maggie l\1innamon as Manager of Information Systems will oversee data administration
and quality control. Ms. Minnamon possesses extensive experience in electronics, and
computer systems. Ms. Minnamon will facilitate the processing and refinement of by field
personnel as quality control manager. Her responsibilities include data processing, delivery
preparation, development and maintenance of database, and data warehousing.
PI459 16 8/29'05
Pror(),,~d h' Pro\ iJe \.. 'i\'il Englnl'ering Sel \il-L'~
\T,nious Se\\l'r Li11I.' [_llJ1t' CJrJ(ity E\,dudtio!ls_ L"pgrades JIll..1 Imprl)\emt'l1t<.,
The KeIth Con-,pen.es TK'C
COMPANY PROFILE
Established in 1983, The Keith Companies (TKC) provides integrated planning,
engineering, and design services for private and public sector projects. TKC is proud
to provide comprehensive consulting services to an array of clients and strives to
respond to client expectations by providing them with paramount service today and
into the future.
With approximately 850 professionals, TKC operates from 17 divisions throughout
Arizona, California, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon, Texas, and Utah. The company
offers specialized services in the following disciplines:
· Civil Engineering
· Land Planning
· Surveying & Mapping
· Site Acquisition
· Water Resources
· Environmental Services
· Cultural Resources
· Construction Management
· Electrical Engineering
· Mechanical Engineering
· Fire Protection
.
Chemical/Process Engineering
Instrumentation/Control Systems Integration
Power Plant Commissioning and Startup Services
Power Plant Operations, Training, and Plant Documentation Services
Power Plant Manpower-Services
.
.
.
.
TKC's clients benefit from the synergy created from the multi-disciplinary team
approach that combines particular talents and experience to achieve client goals. The
firms technical excellence, creativity, and unparalleled client responsiveness spans
across all disciplines. Behind the successes of every TKC project stands dedicated
relationships between our staff and client and agency representatives. Exceptional
service is TKC's trademark. The firm is committed to the philosophy that to provide
the best planning, engineering, and design services requires an intimate
understanding of the processes and continual and personal communication. From
electronic data collection and GPS technology to automated design through
scheduling and project close-out, TKC uses modern technology and resources to
deliver a product with minimal costs in a timely manner.
1'1459 17 8/29/05
Pl'opn~dl (() pr(nidt' Ci\"il Engineering Seryict.?s
\aTlous Se\\L'f luw Pipe Capdcil\ ha!uatIom. ['phead", and! I11prc1\,'11)'-l1l'
Tr11! KeIth Compan~e TK"C
TKC believes in setting and continually meeting the highest possible standards when
it comes to the stability which clients require, these include individual relationships
and technical proficiency. The firm is known for its meticulous selection of
personnel, and dedicates itself to finding qualified people and creating an
environment in which they can thrive. By developing professionals who combine
specialized skills with broad-based knowledge as well as management skills, the
TKC staff is able to manage projects through teamwork to achieve the most
beneficial results for its clients. TKC professionals are your most valuable resource
for providing creative, cost-sensitive solutions in an ever-changing environment.
PI459 18 8129/05
~
1a!!J
PIOPl1',;ll ro Pro\'H.it> Ci\"il Engint.:'cring St'n ices
\'Jri\"'\u~ Sewer l.lnt' Pipe> Capdcit~, F\aluJ.Tl(\T1S, t'pgrJde~ Jnd lmpn'\"l-'lTIt'T1r....
The Keith Comper'\Ies T1<'C
REFERENCES
Irvine Ranch Water District Wide Reservoir Storage Analysis
Irvine Ranch Water District
Michael Hoolihan, P.E.
15600 Sand Can)'on Ave.
Irvine, CA 92618
(949) 453-5553
A water storage analysis was performed for IRWD's potable and non-potable water
systems to update their current Water Resources Master Plan. The project consisted
of incorporating and utilizing IRWD's GIS data, which included demands and water
facility information. Pressure zone service areas were identified and used to develop
storage service areas. USGS data was utilized to develop the pressure zone service
areas. For each water system, the demands were calculated and totaled by storage
areas out to Year 2025, in five year increments. Surpluses and shortfalls were
analyzed to determine recommendations for new storage or operational adjustments.
Updated tables and exhibits were created for use in preparing a revised Chapter 5 of
the Water Resources Master Plan Update.
Jeffrey Road Reclaimed Water Pipeline and Trunk Sewer
Irvine Ranch Water District
Steve Mallo)', P.E.
15600 Sand Can)'on Ave.
Irvine, CA 92618
(949) 453-5570
Engineering services were provided for a 30-inch diameter trunk sewer and a 30-inch
diameter reclaimed water transmission main project that extends from Irvine Center
Drive to Trabuco Road. The project encompasses approximately 9,000 feet of each
pipeline, including crossing the Metro Link railroad tracks and the Interstate 5 rights-
of-way. The District divided this project into two construction packages. The first
package will be constructed with the City of Irvine's Jeffrey Road Grade Separation
Project. In addition to the two pipelines, responsible for the design of the relocations
of various water and sewer facilities associated with the grade separation
construction project. The second construction package included the remainder of the
pipelines and required routing the two pipelines through Caltrans' rights-of-way with
a portion being open cut and the remainder utilizing a bore-and-jack under Interstate
5. The scope of services included the preparation of a preliminary design report;
evaluating environmental concerns and identifying necessary measures to mitigate
impacts of the construction; obtaining permits; and the preparation of construction
plans and technical specifications. Close coordination was required with Caltrans
and the City of Irvine.
Irvine Center Drive Water and Sewer Relocations
Irvine Ranch Water District
PI459 19 8/29/05
Propl~sall{l Pro\"ldf' Civil Engilll'(lring Scnil..-es
\'lHi\.HJ' Se\\'cr I.int' Pipe l~,\pJcity 1'\Jluariun>, l'pgrddt...., ..ind Il11plt\\l~nlt'llt~
The Kelt;h CompanIes T1<C
Al Dyson, PE
15600 Sand Canyon Ave.
Irvine, CA 92618
(949) 453-5595
Prepared preliminary design report and final design, and provided construction
support services for the relocation of I,SOO linear feet of a IS-inch diameter sewer
trunk line and 1,400 linear feet of an IS-inch diameter water transmission pipeline in
the City of Irvine. Existing pipelines remained in service while new pipelines were
constructed. Projects were coordinated to coincide with street widening plans.
Roadway remained open to traffic during all phases of construction.
Northern Sphere Area Construction Management Program
Irvine Ranch Water District
Billy A. Stewart
15600 Sand Canyon Are.
lrrine, CA 92618
(949) 453-5610
TKC's Tettemer division is currently serving as the Construction Program Manager
for five District designed construction projects and six ICDC development projects
situated within The Irvine Company's Northern Sphere Area. Duties include review
of shop drawings; coordination between the District, ICDC and affected agencies;
attending weekly and monthly progress meetings; respond to "Requests for
Information" (RFIs); review daily reports, change orders and progress payment
estimates; coordinate survey and testing subconsultants; preparation of final as-built
plans; and other tasks as directed by the District.
East Orange Utilities Study; Orange County, California
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO)
Kim Koeppen
12 Civic Center Plaza, Rm. 235
Santa Ana, CA 92701
(714) 834-2556
ICDC owns a large area of property that is located within the City of Orange's sphere
of influence. The portion of this property east of State Route 241, the Foothill
Transportation Corridor, has been divided into two planning areas, called East
Orange Area I and East Orange Lake Village. The majority of East Orange Area I is
currently within the boundaries of Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD). A small
portion of East Orange Area I and all of the proposed East Orange Lake Village are
currently within the boundaries of Santiago County Water District (SCWD). IRWD
and SCWD have both expressed a willingness and desire to provide municipal water
and wastewater services to at least portions of the same development areas. It is
LAFCO's responsibility to determine the best service provider to these new
development areas. To assist the Orange County LAFCO in determining the most
PI459 20 8/29/05
Prt1Pl,.,al rU Pro\'idL' Ci\ jl Lllgllld.Tin; SCr\ ices
\'ariou~ S~)\"'-E'r l.inl' Pipl' \.-:.lpdlil~ 1:\aluJrJ('l~~ t pgrJ~h:.... ~jllj ll~~rrC\t'J11t'llh
The KeJt;,h Compen.es TK'C
appropriate provider, Tettemer was retained to objectively review the probable
engineering and financial implications of the various service provider options.
Buck Gully, Linda Isle, and Carnation Pump Station Rehabilitation
City of Newport Beach
Michael J. Sinacori, PE
3300 Newport Blvd.
Ne~~port Beach, CA 92658
(949) 644-3342
TKC's Tettemer division was responsible for the design of a buried 400 gpm duplex
pump sewer lift station to replace an existing 50 year old Buck Gully station in the
city of Newport Beach. The project includes the demolition of the existing station,
installation of a new below grade dry well and partial wet well structure, roof slab
over existing wet well, and retaining wall, upgrades to electrical controls and
SCADA system, site drainage and grading, and other associated improvements. For
the Linda Isle and Carnation pump stations, the improvements included new
electrical and instrumentation facilities housed in above grade architecturally
aesthetic enclosures, new access hatches, force main bypass facilities, and associated
hardscape improvements.
1'1459 21 8/29/05
a."~"':
..~C_
~n ilo
Proposal to rn.~\idt' Ci\il E!1~I!h'L'lll1g ~t';-\ itl'~
V,Hiou~ St:.'wer Lint' Pire CclP,kity rLdu~i!i'~llS. LpgraJes and Imrn.I'd.'l1H'l1t"
Th~ KeIth Compenee n<c
BUDGET
City of San Bernardino
Various Sewer Line Locations Pipe Capacity Evaluations and
Proposed Man-Hours Budget
TKC !\Ian-Hours
Assist
Principle-in- Project Engmeer! Total TA
Task Descriotion Charge Manager CADD Starf Man-Hours
I Data CollectIon and Review 8 12 20
2 Flow Testing I 8 8 17
~-
3 Hydraulic Analysis 2 16 60 78
_._._._-~_.- -~---
4 Prepare Report 4 24 32 60
~-
5 Meetings --. 6 6 12
. Total 13 62 112 187
PI459 22 8/29/05
"0
C
l1l
I/)
Cll
"0
l1l
"-
OJ
C.
:J
"0
o Cll
C-g
.- Cll
'EE
~ E
... 0
Cll u
al Cll
cO::
l1l"O
en C
- l1l
o C
ZOo
(3:;
:J
IV
>
w .r::;
~ "e
.u i.i:
l1l
C.
l':l
U
Cll
c.
ii:
Cll
c
:J
...
Cll
~
Cll
en
1;;",
,,-
~N
.0
"'",
u..~
N
~
'"
~
<Xl
~;:::
'"
"
C~
"'-
....,~
- -ui"
N
N
I/)
....
C
Cll
E
Cll
>
o
...
c.
.5
<Xl
~
N
l
I
J
.
~
WN
.0 ~,
Ev
",-
u~
"', ,
0....
"N
;::;
I I :
II i
~~
!I
i j
I '
, ,
r9i r
I .11 i
.... I 'C~..
~! Q i t'-_.J
,-O'M V l
~,:;~~ ~~---'
UO.
O~
---<-u:,-
N:
m:
o
~
~
M
~,
05:-:
.0 <0'
E,;:::
"'~
>'0'
0:("')1
z_,
;:?:
M
N
01
<0:
~'
(3
'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ e e ~ ai
o 0 a ~ N
c
o
:2
~ ~
.f:
.f:
t
'"
(jj
'L() l() LO l()
o 0 0 e
fry ;::::: (3 r-...
25 25
,~
: a ;t
:2
c
o
:2
'"
~
v
~
25 25 T""
~ ~ ~
c
o
:2
c
o
:2
'"
E
'"
z
""
'"
'"
f-
:;:
'"
;;
'"
cr
'0
'-g ~ ~ en
: ~ .~ g ~ ~
e~-u-cncQ)
c.. C;; E!!: ~ :2
B~o~'~~
Q) :t::: U ~ ~ Cl>
.2 ~ ~ ;: u O'lo~
'Ou16o>.
z ~ 0 u:: I Q:
'"
""
'"
'"
f-
ro
E
'"
x
w
'"
c
o
Vi
E!
~
ro
c
Q;
x
w
'"
!:
'0
'"
'"
o
.
I
I
I
,L
I
~
'"
E
E
"
00
ti
'"
"e-
c..
'"
c
o
Vi
E!
~
~
'"
E
E
"
(fJ
to '" to
000
M <3 M
N M
N
rj
I i
I
I
<0 lO <D <D
o 000
M a ;::::: M
~ ~ N
~
.t
~
~ ;t ~
;.t
.f:
'"
o
~
N
l() IJ') <D <0 (0 W <.0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
:= ;; ~ s
u
N
~
N
~
c
~ .f:
J:
c
o
:2
c c
o 0
:2 :2
c
o
:2
c
o
:2
'"
III
'"
0,
o
a:
J';o
C5
2
J';o
C5
2
'"
:;
'0
'"
.r::;
U
(fJ
J';o
'1)
'"
a.
'"
U
~'"
"'0
:;:-
",a>
(fJ!C'!
alex>
005
ri:2
'" ..
,-'"
0-
~ '"
c..o
""
rti a.
f- (fJ
"rii t
o 8.
'0 "" '"
5 '" cr
~ 0 ~
C/) -g u:
E ~ OlE 8 'E
.g u: c .g ~ .g
00 :;: ~ 00 :;: 00
'todQ1(1)ot!Q)od
8. Q) .~ ~ ~ .~ Q)
~ ~ Q: .Q)>_ ~ oc ~
Q) Q) ~ Q) Q) ~ Q)
1;; a: C5 cr a: C5 a:
a.
'"
a:
""
'"
o
~ ~
LL 0
Proposallo Pro\'ldc Ci\'il Englncering St') \ He,
Various Se\'d:?r Llne Pipe Cdpacit \ F\ JluJt i('lb. lpgL1J['" Jnd ! I1IFry.. <,'111'. i <..
The Kerth Cornpenlee ~
INSURANCE
Clienlll: 5791
KEITHCOMP
A CORD_
0'" Tf jMMJOON"Y1
12128/0<4
THIS CERTIFICATE 1$ ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTifiCATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND. EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
PflODUCEfl:
Dealey, Renton & Associates
p, O. Box 10550
SentI AnI, CA 92711-0550
714427-6810
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSUREO
INSURER'" Hartford fir. Ins. CO.
INSURER e American Automobile Ins. Co.
INSURER c XL Specialty Insurance CO.
INSURER 0
The Keith Companies. Inc.
dba Keith Enginuring, Inc.llrvine
19 Technology Driye
Irvine, CA 92618-2334
INSUREfiE
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAV'E BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REOUCED BY PAID CLAIMS
N'R TYPE OF IfrrlSUItANCE POlICT NUMBER ~~1tl~~~~ ~~ 1f;.x,:Jo~IN LIMITS
TR
A GENERAL LlAB1LIT\' 57CESOA 1665 12/31/04 12131/05 EACH OCCURRE"lCE '1,000,000
)L_E..,:!oll.AERCLAL GENE~~ ~lA.BtUTY ._~~R~_[)~_~~_~~"~. ~..!.~__ __~t.l.9.!M9.9_._~__
._-_.~ CLAII,4SM....OE .~ OCCUR INDP, CONTRACTORS _ ME~!~P_l!:'~~_~~_~~~~! --- '1~000 _.__._ ---
X CONTRACTUAL INCLUDED PERSCN....l&A2JVIJl;JL:RV '1,000,000
X BFPD,XCU GENERAL AGGREGATE s21000,O~O
.~E.~l AGGRE~~ liMIT A"':'~~~S PER . ~~~E>U_~T_~_.._~_?~~'-9~_...~~ .~~)>>-QQIQQQ_____ --
POLICY X ~~g X coe
A ....UTOMOBILE LIABILITY 57UENTL0698 12131/04 12131/05 COMBlfrrlED SlfIIGlE l''-'IT
X AN'!'AUTO 'E....CCIl1er>1i '1,000,000
All mVNED AoJTCS BOOIL'!' INJURY
:PI"pe~~1 ,
SCHfDL;lEO....L,TOS
X HIRED AUTOS BOOllYll'\oJURY
X (1'1"KC1Cle"11 5
NO"l_Q\lYNEO AUTOS
PF/OPERT'< OA'.vGE .
rpl!I.U;";::l'nI,
GARAGE lIABILITY ."UTOONLY fA ACC.DENT ,
._" Af\lYAUTO OTt-IER Tt-IAN ~_!"C_C__~ --.--------_..
"UTOONlY AGe; ,
EXCESS UABILITY EA(:HQCCURRENCE .
OCCUR ClAI"'5MA~E AGGREGATE .
,
DEDUCTIBLE ,
RETENTION . ,
B WORKERS COfrIIPEIoIS... TlON ....HD WZPB0927777 12/31/04 12131/05 X we STATU. OTH.
TORY LIMITS ,.
EMPLOVERS' LI...BILlTY E lEACH ACCIOE...T $1,000,000
E L DISEASf ,EAEMPlO"'EE $1,000,000
E l DISf.,I,Sf. POllCYlltrll'T ,1000000 -
C OTHER Professional DPR9406588 12131/04 12131/05 $1,000,000 per claim
Liability 52,000,000 annl "99r,
DESCRIPTION Of OPERATION$llOCATIONSNEHlClES/EXCLUSIONS "'OOEO BY ENOORSEMENTISPECLAl PROVISIONS
General Liability policy excludes claims arising out of the performance of professional
services.
Evidence of coverages in force
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
CANCELLATION
ADOI1lONAlIHSURfO :IHSURER LEn"ER
FOR PROPOSAL USE ONLY
SHOULD AHYOf' THE ABOVE OESCRIlIfO ,"OUCESBE CNilCfUEO BEFORE THE EllPIl\A'OCIH
DATE THEREOf. THE ISSUING INSURER W1Ll........XJPM...lL3D OATSWRITT(N
NOTlCETOtl1E CERTIFICATE HOt.OERNAMED TO THE lEFT, e..............u-.xx
__.~nmr.IIXJII..Jl:IUII.XftJlnJl:~DD:
ACORD 25-5 (7/9111 nf 1
<il ACORD CORPORATION 1988
IfM117397
II
PI459 24 8/29/05