HomeMy WebLinkAbout44-Development Services
l~k~'^" . .-._'.'C .' .
,-#. ~":'1;'?'!"~"""" _.~
..
'_wp>^'
ORIGJNA[
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: James Funk, Director
Dept: Development Services
Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 05-02,
a request to change the land use designation of
approximately 1.3 acres from CG-3,
Commercial General, to RU-l, Residential
Urban and Amended Tentative Tract Map No.
16509 - to add a 1.3-acre park site and create 9
additional lots. The 1.3-acre site is located at
the southeast comer of Kendall Avenue and
the future extension of Campus Parkway.
Date: April 25, 2005
MCC Date: May 16, 2005
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
None
Recommended Motion:
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the Resolution and
approve Amended Tentative Tract Map No; 16509 based upon the Findings of Fact contained in
the Planning Commission Staff Report, subject to the Conditions of Approval (Attachment C) and
Standard Requirements (Attachment D).
VdJiw U.~
James Funk
Contact Person:
Aron Lian~. Senior.Planner
Phone: 384-5057
Supporting data attached: Staff Report
Ward: 5
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: N/A
Source: (Acct. No.)
Finance:
Council Notes: ~. ~~O5" --13)---
Agenda Item No. ~
5/ I~/DSW
<,~""'T""lT""'O"'" ffilll"'j;Y''' '~"n"'C'''' "" ""C'""'''T'~''I c",_ "", '''''''''''''~~~ " " "'-''''''' F
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST ,FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment No. 05-02, a request to change the land use designation
of approximately 1.3 acres from CG-3, Commercial General, to RU-l, Residential
Urban and Amended Tentative Tract Map No. 16509 to add a 1.3-acre park site and
create 9 additional lots. The 1.3-acre site is located at the southeast comer of
Kendall Avenue and the future extension of Campus Parkway.
OWNERS:
Robin Plaza, LLC
101 Main Street, Suite A
Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 430-0503
University Park, LLC
101 Main Street, Suite A
Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 430-0503
APPLICANT:
University Park, LLC
101 Main Street, Suite A
Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 430-0503
BACKGROUND
The applicant requests that the Mayor and Common Council approve General Plan Amendment
No. 05-02 to change the land use designation of approximately 1.3 acres, from CG-3, Commercial
General, to RU-l, Residential Urban and approve Amended Tentative Tract Map No. 16509 to
further subdivide two large lots to create 9 additional lots within the preViously approved
subdivision. Adding 1.3 acres to Tentative Tract Map No. 16509 under the proposed RU-l
designation will allow for creation of nine additiona1lots in another area of the project site,
consistent with the General Plan. The applicant proposes to construct a passive park on the 1.3-
acre site at the southeast comer of Kendall Avenue and the future extension of Campus Parkway
(Exhibit 1), at no cost to the City of San Bernardino. The park site will be included in the
Landscape Maintenance District for Tentative Tract Map No. 16509. Please refer to the Planning
Commission Staff Report (Exhibit B) for additional discussion.
At their meeting of April 19, 2005, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing and
received public testimony on this matter. After considerable discussion, the Planning
Commission made a motion to recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 05-02 and
Amended Tentative Tract Map No. 16509. Commissioners Brown, Coute, Heasley, Morris,
Powell and Sauerbrun voted 6 to 0 in support of the proposals. "Commissioners Durr and Enciso
were absent.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None. The applicant paid the General Plan Amendment and Amended Tentative Tract Map
filing fees.
.. ..Y.~~!:!:l!!lV"f,"~c".f.nr1"~.. "'~~;;r;i:nr-"'F.~''''~'~'j~(':~TCvu~lT~
RECOMMENDATION
::tW~'re7~'"W
!'::;""'Ji'<~'~'='::~<"_':'''~:'":'~:''~
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Co~ci1 adopt the Resolution and
approve Amended Tentative Tract Map No. 16509 based upon the Findings of Fact contained in
the Planning Commission Staff Report and subject to Conditions of Approval (Attachment C)
and Standard Requirements (Attachment D).
EXHIBITS
1. Location Map
2. Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 19, 2005
3. Resolution
--'?-.-r---- -'-~-r -'I --
..",
_.n._
EXHIIIT 1
CITY OF SAN BERNArmINO
PLANNING DIVISION
LOCATION MAP
LAND USE DISTRICTS
PROJECT: GPA 05-02
TT 16509
(SUB 05-04)
HEARING DATE: 5/16/05
NORTH
i.
it
I
\
'V
~
I
,
......,
, I I
California State University
San Bernardino
I I
~~"
,,;:: T''''''<<-<- llif'-'I'TT'~"~F -."'
----~"'"".-
-._----
EXHIBIT 2
SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION
CASE:
General Plan Amendment No. 05-02 and Amended Tentative Tract Map No.
16590 (Subdivision No. 05-04)
6
4/19/05
5
AGENDA ITEM:
HEARING DATE:
WARD:
OWNERS:
Robin Plaza, LLC
101 Main Street, Suite A
Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 430-0503
REQUEST/LOCATION:
University Park, LLC
101 Main Street, Suite A
Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 430-0503
APPLICANT:
University Park, LLC
101 Main Street, Suite A
Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 430-0503
General Plan Amendment:
An amendment to the General Plan to change the land use designation of one parcel, approximately 1.3-
acres, from CG-3, Commercial General to RU-l, Residential Urban land use district. Once the change in
land use designation and the subdivision amendment is approved. the applicant intends to construct a
public park on the 1.3-acres and dedicate the park to the City at no cost to the City. The applicant intends
to construct a public park on the 1.3-acres and dedicate the park to the City.
Amended Tentative Tract MaD:
To amend Tentative Tract Map 16590 to further subdivide two existing large graded lots to create an
addi~onal 9 lots within the previously approved subdivision. The applicant requests that the nine lots that
could be subdivided on the l.3-acre site be relocatecLwjthin Tentative Tract 16509.
The net impact on open space for Tentative Tract Map No. 16509 will be an increase of 1.3-acres in
publicly owned parkland. The 1.3-acre proposed park is located at the southeast comer of Kendall
. Avenue and the future extension of Campus Parkway.
CONSTRAINTS/OVERLAYS:
High Wind Area, Biological Resource Overlay, Itillside Management Overlay and Foothill Fire Zone
Area.
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS:
o Not Applicable
. AddendUm to Mitigated Negative Declaration, CEQA Section 15164
o No Significant Effects
o Potential Effects
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
. Approval
. Conditions
o Denial
o Continuance to
..
- <~,---
GPA No. 05-02
Amended 1TM No. 16509
Hearing Date: 4.19.05
Page 2
REQUEST AND LOCATION
The applicant requests approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA) under the authority of
Development Code ~ 19.50 to change the land use designation of one parcel, approximately
1.3 acres, from CG-3, Commercial General to RU-l, Residential Urban. The parcel is located
on the southeast corner of the intersection of Kendall Avenue and the future extension of
Campus Parkway (Formally Pepper Linden) (Attachment A).
The applicant requests approval of a General Plan Amendment for the property (APN 261-231-
06). The property is a 1.3 acre site located at the southeast corner of Kendall Avenue and
Campus Parkway. Campus Parkway is currently being constructed by the developer of
University Park and the City of San Bernardino as Capital Improvement Project Number SS04-
o I. The existing land use district for this property is CG-3 (Commercial General). The project
proposes to amend the General Plan and zone change this property to RU-l (Residential Urban).
The RU-l is intended to promote the development of detached and attached units, mobile home
parks, and small lot subdivisions as part of a planned residential development where the intent is
to consolidate lots to achieve maximum open space. The RU-l district allows a maximum
density of 8.0 units per acre. Portions of this property are subject to the Hillside Management
Overlay District (HMOD).
Based upon the slope analysis prepared in conformance with the HMOD, it is determined that a
maximum of nine dwelling units would be allowed on the 1.3 acre site.
The project proposes to process concurrently with the above-discussed GP A, an Amended
Tentative Tract Map for Tract No. 16509. Tentative Tract 16509 was approved by the City of
San Bernardino Planning Commission on May 6~'2003. The first unit of the Tract 16509-1
creating the first 31 lots was recorded on October 18, 2004. The amended Tract Map will
incorporate the property described above (APN 261-231-06) into the overall tract boundary. This
will add 1.3 acres to Tentative Tract 16509. The amended Tract Map will transfer the nine
allowable lots from the 1.3-acre site to locations within the currently approved Tentative Map.
Specifically, the nine lots will be located along Pear Street as indicated on the amended Tentative
Map.
It is proposed that the remaining property (AP 261-231-06) of l.3-acres on the soutlleast comer
of Campus Parkway and Kendall Avenue.will be placed into open space and a'Landscape
Maintenance District. The property will be landscaped into a park setting, which wilLbe
maintained by the Landscape Maintenance District (LMAD 1036). The applicant will remove the
existing structures on the property at the time of construction of the public park.
The applicant has graded the area of the Tentative Tract Map and graded the extension of
Campus Parkway. The completion of street improvements is scheduled for the September of
2005. '
-
o____~.
GPA No. 05-02
Amended TTM No. /6509
Hearing Date: 4./9.05
Page 3
SE'ITlNG/SITE CHARACTERISTICS
The project site, Assessor's Parcel Number 261-231-06 is situated at the southeast intersection of
Kendall Avenue and Campus Parkway. The site is situated along the east side of Kendall
Avenue. The site is topographically flat with a slope transition into a steep hillside at the eastern
extent of the property. The property is bounded on the east by the residential Tract 16509, on the
south by single family and multi-family residences, on the west by Kendall Avenue, and on the
north by the County Flood Control District Channel.
The site is currently used for a single-family residence and associated accessory buildings. The
eastern portion of the parcel is generally undeveloped and extends easterly towards a steep
hillside. Campus Parkway is currently being constructed along the northerly side of the parcel.
The surrounding land use to the east is the proposed residential development of Tract 16509 and
land use district RL, Residential Low. Surrounding the area to the west and across Kendall
Avenue are single-family residences within the RS, Residential Suburban land use district. On
the north, across the County Flood Control Channel are single and multiple family residences in
the RU -I district. The land uses to the south are a mix of single and multiple family residences
and a feed store within CG-3, Commercial General and RU-I, Residential Urban land use
districts.
BACKGROUND
The applicant (James R. Watson, Managing Member of University Park, LLC) was
approached by Councilman Cbas Kelley, with a'request that Mr. Watson see if there was
anything that could be done to clean up and enhance the intersection of Kendall Avenue and
Campus Parkway. Campus Parkway is under construction and will become a significant portal
to the University Park development and the California State University San Bernardino. To this
end, the applicant made contact with the property owner and negotiated for the sum of
$450,000 the purchase of the 1.3-acre property by the applicant. The applicant is now the
owner of the site.
Rather than develop the 1.3-acres with either commercial or residential uses, the applicant
proposes to develop the site as a publi~ park and develop two exiting large residential parcels
within the existing Tentative Tract Map 16590 with single family detached homes on lots with
a minimum lot area of 10,800 sq. ft.
The 1.3-acre property was analyzed by the applicant to determine the most appropriate use for
the property in order to accommodate the objects of Councilman Kelley and develop a viable
project for the applicant. It was determined that a General Plan Amendment to RU-I and the
development of the allowable nine lots would be the appropriate solution, a solution having
considerable recreation and open space benefits to the community.
..". .. =~iliT'P" '~~""'--'T~""lr. ~ .~..
....F^_~_=_. .
GPA No. 05-02
Amended 1TM No. 16509
Hearing Date: 4.19.05
Page 4
Following further discussions, it was concluded that if the tline lots could be placed within the
Tentative Tract 16509, the 1.3 acre site could be designed and utilized as a passive park. A
park setting would be a much nicer visual amenity for the approach into the University Park
project and the CSUSB. The applicant also volunteered to provide the initial funding for a
public art project.
The Development/Environmental Review Committee (D/ERC) reviewed General Plan
Amendment (GPA) No. 05-02 and Amended Tentative Tract Map No. 16509 application on
March 10, 2005, and moved it to the Planning Commission. At that meeting, Planning Staff
advised the applicant of an issue. relating to the' General Plan amendment. of leaving a single
parcel in the CG-3, Commercial General land use district, southerly of the applicant's parcel.
The applicant noted that. efforts have been made' to contact the owner of the property to discuss
various options and alternatives, but was unsuccessful. Planning staff has recognized the efforts
of the applicant and understands the uniqueness of this situation. Planning staff recognizes that
the abutting property to the south of the 1.3 acre site is an existing commercial use and will
probably not change. The commercial use of this property next to the proposed passive park,
as opposed to nine residentiallots/units, should not have an impact to the requested
application.
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
1. Is the proposed amendment internally cOll$istent with the General Plan?
Yes, the proposal is consistent with the General Plan policies as follows:
General Plan Policy 1.1.1 states: "Designate lands currently developed with
housing for continued residential, unless conversion to another use is provided for
by policies of this Plan."
General Plan Policy 1.7.4 states: "Permit the adjustment of the location of
designated commercial-residential boundaries to facilitate a mote uniform pattern
development and sufficient area to create economically viable uses." _
General Plan Objective 1.12 states: "Promote the development of single-family
detached and attached .., where the intent is to consolidate lots and achieve more
"
open space.
The change from the CG-3 district to the RU-1 district will enable the property 9wner
to develop a viable residential use of the nine dwelling units. The transfer of lots into
the interior of the appr;oved Tentative Tract Map and the development of additional
parkland for the City is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan.
,~"~CP~-
GPA No. 05-02
Amended TIM No. /6509
Hearing Date: 4./9.05
Page 5
2. Is the proposed amendment detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience. or welfare of the City?
No, the proposal would not pose any threat to the public health, safety'and welfare of the
City in that any residential development proposal would be required to comply with all
applicable provisions of the Development Code, Chapter 19.04, Residential Districts.
3. Does the proposed amendment maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the
City? .
Yes, the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan policies as described
in Finding No.1. The property is adjacent to other residential uses to the east, north,
west and south within residential land use districts. The proposed amendment is for
one parcel of 1.3 acres and does not adversely impact the balance of land uses within
the City.
The parcel would be designated to RU-l; nine residential units are the most that could
be developed on the site.
4. Is the subject parcel physically suitable (including, but not limited to, access,
provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of
physical constraints) for the requested land use designation and anticipated land
use development?
_ All agencies responsible for reviewing access, and providing water, sanitation and other
public services have all had the opportunitY to review the proposal, and none have
indicated an inability to serve the project based on the change in land use designation.
All required utilities and public services could adequately serve the site.
The proposed amendment area is bounded by developed, dedicated streets and existing
infrastructure suitable for residential development. All future development proposals on
the site must conform to .all applicable provisions of the Development Code for
setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements. .
AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
1. Is the proposed amended map consistent with the General Plan?
Yes, the proposed amended map with the addition of nine lots is consistent with t.be
General Plan and Development Code as shown in Table A below. The RL, Residential
Low land use district allows single-family residential units at a maximum density of 3.1
units per acre. The proposal is for an additional nine single-family residential lots. The
density of the amended development would be at 1.18 units per acre. All lots created
meet the minimum lot size, width and depth requirements.
O~~,""',"""" "
-, i '
. 'p ,",
GPA No. 05-02
Amended 17M No. 16509
Hearing Date: 4.19.05
Page 6
Development Proposal Code General Plan
Cate20rv .
Permitted Use: Single Family Pennitted Pennitted
Residential
Lot Size: 10,800 sa. ft. min. 10.800 SQ. ft. min. 10800 sa. ft.
Lot Width: 80 feet 80 feet, N/A
88 foot comer lots 88 foot min. comer lots N/A
Lot DeDth: 100 feet 100 feet N/A
Densitv: 1.18 3.1 3.1
Access: 2 standard means of 2 standard means of N/A
access access -
CONFOaMANCE TABLE "A"
DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN
2. Is the design of the proposed amended subdivision consistent with the General Plan?
Yes, the proposal is consistent with the objectives and policies of the General Plan as
follows:
General Plan Objective 1.10 states: "Promote the development of low-density,
large lot, high quality single-family detached residential units."
.
General Plan Policy 1.14.10 states: "Permit the development of residential units
based on the determination of the yield by the following categories of slope in the
"Hillside Management Overlay District":
General Plan Policy 1.14.11 states: "Permit the exclusion of parcel areas of15
percent natural slope or less along the external border of the HMOD at the base of
the hillsides, as determined by the preparation of a slope map by a lic~nsed civil
engineer (in accordance with Policy 1.14.30), from the density and development
, provisions of the section. Those areas excluded shall revert to the underlying zone
district density and development standard provisions."
The proposed amendment complies with the slope requirements and will enhance the
existing residential developments surrounding the site. The development of the site with
. ,
an upscale single-family residential neighborhood (including the addition of the park
feature at the comer of,Kendall Avenue and Campus Parkway) will be compatible with
the existing residential development to the south and west areas. This project will
promote and implement the objectives and policies of the General Plan.
~,~'~ ",,' .0
GPA No. 05-02
Amended TTM No. 16509
Hearing Date: 4.19.05
Page 7
General Plan Policy 9.1.4 states: "Provide a variety of park "experiences", including
those developed for intense recreational activity, passive open space enjoyment, and a
mixture of active and passive activities."
General Plan Policy 9.1.11 states: "Acquire and develop properties as mini-parks where it
is not possible to acquire sufficient acreage for neighborhood parks."
The applicant proposes to develop, construct and dedicate to the City a passive park to
include landscaping and irrigation, pathways, seating areas, pubic art and monUments,
and provide funds to California State University San Bernardino to develop a public art
project.
3. Is the site physically suitable for the type of proposed development?
Yes, the site of the proposed project is physically suitable for the proposed development
in that the division ofland is consistent with the Subdivision Map Act. The tentative tract
map conforms to the subdivision design standards specified by the Development Code in
that it meets the minimum lot size for the RL, Residential Low land use district. All of
the proposed lots will have access to a dedicated roadway and infrastructure that will
provide water, sewer, power, gas, telephone, and cable to the site.
~
t~
The westerly portion of the 1.3 acre site is topographically flat and very suitable for
development of a park as proposed by the applicant. The easterly portion of the 1.3-acre
site becomes relatively steep. The steeper portions of the 1.3 acre site will remain
developed and placed in open space to be dedicated to the City.
4.
. Is the site physically suitable for the propos!d density of development?
Yes, based on the topographic slope analysis, the site is physically suitable for the
proposed density of residential development as described in Conformance Table A above
and Table B below. This project complies with the density requirements pursuant to
Development Code Section 19.17 .060( 1), Hillside Management Overlay District and
General Plan Policy 1.14.11.
The project proposal is consistent with the HMOD requirements for the proposed units
and density of development as -illustrated in Table B below:
"TABLE B" - UNIT & DENSITY CALCULATIONS
HILLSIDE MANAGEMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT
1.31 ACRE PARCEL
"
--~~-
GPA No. 05-02
Amended TTM No. 16509
Hearing Date: 4.19.05
Page 8
Unit Calculation:
A
s
AI eel
reas lone Units low
1.14* N/A 8.0x 1.14 acre = 9.1 units
0 o to 15% 2.Ox 0 acre = 0.0 units
.05 15% to 25% 1.Ox 05 acre = 0.05 units
.06 25% to 30% .5x 0.06 acre = 0.03 units
.06 30%+ .1x 0.06 acre = 0.01 units
Total: 1.31 acres
9.2 units
Density Calculation:
Density: 159 units /134.3 acres = 1.18 density
(*) This hillside area is excluded from slope density requirements based on General Plan Policy 1.14.11.
5.
Is the design of the subdivision likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat?
":',71'
No, impacts are expected to be no different than those originally analyzed. The nine
residential lots will be constructed on lands that have been previously graded, and do not
offer valuable habitat. The passive park will be constructed on lands considered to have
poor quality of disturbed habitat. The impJicts to biological resources are expected to be
Jess than significant. The site is not within the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat critical
habitat area --
6.
Is the design of the subdivision likely to cause serious public health problems?
No, all lots proposed to be created will have access to a dedicated street. The design of
. the proposed subdivision meets all of the applicable requirements for the RL land use
district and Hillside Manllgement Overlay District and is unlikely to result in any serious
public health problems.
7. Will the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements conflict with any
easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within
the proposed subdivision?
No, the easements identified in the Preliminary Title Report relate to electrical lines and
other utilities. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not
conflict with these easements, because any existing easements would be abandon~d or
relocated as determined by the Public Works/Engineering Division through processing of
the Final Map. '
..
~-
GPA No. 05-02
Amended TTM No. 16509
Hearing Date: 4.19.05
Page 9
CONCLUSION
The proposal meets all the necessary Findings of Fact for approval of General Plan
Amendment No. 05-02 and Amended Tentative Tract Map No. 16509.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the Mayor and Common
Council:
1) Adopt the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
2) Approve General Plan Amendment No. 05-02 and Amended Tentative Tract Map No. 16509
based upon the Findings of Fact contained in this Staff Report and subject to Conditions of
Approval (Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attachment D).
Respectfully Submitted,
~~
James Funk
Director of Development Services
~~
Aron Liang
Senior Planner
Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C
Attachment D
Attachment E
Location Map
Tentative Tract Map
Conditions of Approval
Standard Requirements
Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration
,.
----n:;:r--C"..-T~.. ..
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNIIlIG DIVISION
LOCATION MAP
LAND USE DISTRICTS
PROJECT: GPA 05..02
TT 16509
(SUB 05-04)
HEARING DATE: 4/19/05
1J
NORTH
- I
~ l! fY;(/ \
: ~
~ I
... ..
...
.. .~
!. "
It \
I '"
I
f'f~ ~ I~
......,
\y?~.
CA.l..II'Oltlllll IT AT
UIIIVIIlIITV
..
.. ..
ATT ACHEMENT C
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
General Plan Amendment No. 05-02
Amended Tentative Tract Map No. 16590
(Subdivision No. 05-04)
1. This approval is for Tentative Tract Map No. 16509 to further subdivide two existing
large graded lots to create an additional 9 lots within the previously approved
subdivision.
2. The project applicant shall construct a public park on the 1.3-acres at no cost to the
City and dedicate the park to the City.
3. The developer/property owner agrees to make "park improvements" (subject to the
approval of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Director) with a dollar
value (including the cost of acquisition of the 1.3-acre park site) totaling a minimum
of six hundred and sixty thousand dollars ($660,000). Said "park improvements"
shall be made to the passive public park site (designated as Lot "0" on the
Amended Tentative Tract Map 16509) and include land acquisition, demolition,
clearing, grading, design, landscaping and irrigation, monument signing, funding
for public art, installation of public art, lighting, park furniture, pathways, and
natural open space.
4. The park improvements shall be maintained in a Landscape Maintenance District
(LMAD 1036) at the expense of the properties identified in Amended Tentative Tract
Map 16509. The park lot as shown on the Amended Tentative Map shall be dedicated
to the City. Said park improvements and dedication of the public park shall be
completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits for the last 20 homes in Tentative
Tract Map 16590.
5. All the Conditions of Approval from Tentative Tract Map No. 16509 and Conditional
Use Permit No. 03-06 shall. be applicable.
,
--~".',,"-~F_-''''J'-''~''-'-'--.~
A TT ACHMENT "D"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Development Services Department - Public Works Division
Standard Requirements
Description: Create 159 SFR Lots. 7 Commercial Lots and 15 ODeD SDace Lots
Applicant: Universi~ Park. LLC
Location: Northwest Corner of University Parkwav and NorthDark Boulevard
Case Number: General Plan Amendment ~o. O~2 and Tentative Tract MaD No.
16509 (Amended)
1. Draina2e and Flood Control
a} The applicant shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). These plans
shall be approved by the City Engineer, prior to issuance of any pennits
authorizing land disturbing activities. (Refer to the City's web page at
www.ci.san-bemardino.ca.us - Departments - Development Services -
Public Works for templates of these plans).
b} A "Notice ofIntent (NOI)" shall be filed with the State Water Resources
Control Board for construction disturbing 1 acre or more ofland.
c} Prior to issuance of a grading pennit, the City Engineer shall approve an
Erosion Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to contrQI erosion due to
water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction,
including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built
upon.
d} See Tentative Tract No. 16509 original approval for additional drainage
and flood control cQnditions.
2. Gradin2 and LandscaDin2
a} Pad elevations shown on the rough and/or precise grading plan shall not
vary more than 0.5 feet from the pad elevations shown on the tentJtive
tract map and approved by the Planning Commission. -
Project: Create 159 SFR Lots. 7 Commercial Lots and IS Ooen SDace Lots
Case No. GPA 05-02 and TIM 16509 (Amended)
Page 2 of 5
b) An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible,
this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to
all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See
"Grading Policies and Procedures").
c) One 4' x II' PCC pad at least 4" thick shall be provided in the rear or side
yard area of each lot for storage of recycling containers. The pad shall be
screened from public view and a 3' wide concrete walkway shall be
provid~d from the driveway to the pad. . All gates along the access way
shall have a clear width of 3'-6" minimum. A minimum clearance of 3
feet shall be provided around the pad.
d) Retaining walls, block walls and all on-site fencing shall be designed and
detailed on the On-site Improvement Plan. This work shall Depart of the
On-site Improvement permit issued by the City Engineer.
e) All walls shall be constructed of decorative block with architectural
features acceptable to the City Planner.
f) All fencing shall be shown and detailed on the on-site improvement plan.
g) Interior fencing material within 5 feet of the structure shall be either non-
combustible or I-hour fire rated. Vinyl fencing is not allowed within 5
feet of the structure.
.
h)
j)
i)
This project is located in the "High Wind Area." Therefore, all free
standing walls and fences shall be designed for a minimum wind load of
23 pounds per square foot of vertical surface, unless a lower value is
approved by the City Engineer~-
The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5 copies to the
Engineering Division for Checking.
The public right-of-way, between the property line and top of curb (also
known as "parkway") along adjoining streets shall be landscaped by the
developer and maintained in perpetuity by the property owner. Details of
the parkway . landscaping shall be included in the project's on-site
landscape plan, unle~s the parkway area is included in' a landscape
maintenance district, in which case, a separate landscape plan .shall be
provided.
A Landscape Maintenance District shall be implemented to maintain
landscaping within the following areas: All lettered lots including Lot
"0", unless otherwise approved by the Director of Development Services.
Lot "0" shall be improved by the Developer as a park and maintained in
perpetuity by a landscape maintenance district. '
All required maintenance districts shall be formed prior to Map recording.
Separate sets of Landscape Plans shall be provided for the Landscape
Maintenance District.
k)
1)
m)
n)
\.: .,
~-"'-' ,
\, I,d ~ .~ ,; ,
._~ ..
Project: Create 159 SFR Lots. 7 Commercial Lots and 15 Ooen Soace Lots
Case No. GPA 05-02 and TIM 16509 (Amended)
Page 3 of 5
0) Prior to sale of each parcel, the Developer shall provide the City's Real
Property Section of the Public Works Division with a signed copy of the
"Notice of Assessment District" disclosure for each property purchaser.
p) See Tentative Tract No. 16509 original approval for additional grading
and landscaping conditions.
3. Utilities
a) See Tentative Tract No. 16509 original approval for Utility conditions.
4. Maooin2
a) See Tentative Tract No. 16509 original approval for Mapping conditions.
s. Imorovement Comoletion
a) See Tentative Tract No. 16509 original approval for Improvement
Completion conditions.
6. Street Imorovement and Dedications
a) Dedicate sufficient right-of-way on Kendall Drive adjacent to Lot "0" to
provide a distance from centerline to right-of-way line of 50 feet.
-'w_
b) Construct curb & gutter, sidewalk and street lights along Kendall Drive in
accordance with City Standards.
c) Widen Kendall Drive adjacent to the site to match new curb & gutter.
Construct a transition sufficient for traffic and drainage to match the
existing west,:rly bound lanes of Kendall Drive
d) See Tentative Tract No. 16509 original approval for additional street
improvement and dedications conditions.
7. Phasin2
a) See Tentative Tract No. 16509 original approval for Phasing conditions.
8. Required En2lneerin2 Plans ,
a) The rough grading plan may be designed and submitted in combination
with the precise grading plan.
'. :': ,<, \
\,Y", ~ 'I>''';
- '.
Project: Create 159 SFR Lots. 7 Commercial Lots and 15 ODen Space Lots
Case No. GPA 05-02 and TfM 16509 (Amended)
Page4of5
b) All public improvement plans submitted for plan check shall be prepared
on the City's standard 24" x 36" sheets. Grading and on-site improvement
plans may be submitted on either 24" x 36" or 30" x 42" sheets. A
signature block satisfactory to the City Engineer or his designee shall be
provided.
c) After completion of plan checking, fInal mylar drawings, stamped and
signed by the Registered Civil Engineer in charge, shall be submitted to
the City Engineer for approval.
d) Electronic ftles of all improvement plans/drawings shall be submitted to
the City Engineer. The ftles shall be compatible with AutoCAD 2000, and
shall be submitted at the same time the fInal mylar drawings are submitted
for approval.
e) Copies of the City's design policies and procedures and standard drawings
are available at the Public Works Counter for the cost of reproduction.
They are also available at no charge at the Public Works Web Site
httD:/ /www.ci.san-bernardino.ca.us/site/pw/ default.htrn
9. 'ReQuired Enuneerin2 Permits
a) Grading permit (If applicable.).
b) On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see
Development Services-Building Division), including landscaping.
c) Off-site improvement cons~ction permit. '
10. Aoolicable Enuneerinl! Fees
a) All plan check, permit, inspection, and impact fees are outlined on the
Public Works Fee Schedule. A deposit in the amount of 100% of the
estimated fee for each set of plans will be required at time of ~pplication
for plan check.
b) The current fee schedule is available at the Public Works Counter .and at
htto:/ /www.ci.san-bernardino.ca.us/site/ow/default.htm
c) Please check with the development 'review section of the Public Works
Division at 909-384-5110 for current in-house plan check turn-around
times.
,
d) Expedited plan checking is available. A deposit in the amount of 150% of
the estimated plan check fee for each set of plans will be required at time
of application for expedited plan check.
"_ n r '(::j~v"ir-~'n""-"lN[ii ~~"-~~nnl
Project: Create 159 SFR Lots. 7 Commercial Lots and 15 Open Soace Lots
Case No. GPA 05-02 and TIM 16509 (Amended)
Page 5 of5
11. Additional Requirements - General
a) See Tentative Tract No. 16509 original approval for additional conditions
- General.
-~..-
,
"~ . , .', .. ," .
\,'" '.
- P~""v'-"'"~ '
City of San Bernardino
Addendum to Mitigated Negative DeclarationlUniversity Park
ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(CEQA GUIDELINE 15164)
FOR
AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 16509
(SUBDMSION NO. 05-04)
.
FOR APPROVAL OF THE REVISED TENTATIVTE TRACT MAP
16509 FOR UNIVERSITY PARK
,
1
"~,,"-
" "1"-
'~~'~". """,-'-'
City of San Bernardino
Addendum to Mitigated Negative DeclarationlUniversity Park
The City of San Bernardino, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality
Act, Public Resources Code section 21000, et seq. ("CEQA") has prepared this
Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15164. This is an Addendum to the
Environmental Assessment and Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the
University Park that the City adopted in June 2003. Prior to adoption of the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, an Environmental Initial Study had been prepared for the
University Park project. On the basis of this Initial Study, the City of San Bernardino
Environmental Review Committee found that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case
because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent.
A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. That Mitigated Negative Declaration
was certified by the City in June 2003.
The purpose of this Addendum is to document the review required for the revision of
Tentative Tract Map 16509, application to allow the subdivision of nine additional lots
within the proposed subdivision.
This development application is referred to as lithe Revised Project. II All mitigation
measures included in the June 2003 Mitigated Negative Declaration are incorporated into
this document by this reference.
The Revised Project consists of the addition of 1.31 acres to the approved Tentative Tract
Map 16509. The Revised Tract Map will incorporate the 1.31 acres (APN 261-231-06)
into the overall tract or subdivision boundary.
-~'.-
The Revised Project proposes to process a General Plan Amendment (GPA) for the
property (AP 261-231-06). The property is a 1.3 acre site located at the southeast comer
of Kendall Avenue and Campus Parkway. Campus Parkway is currently being
constructed by Campus Parkway, LLC and the City of San Bernardino as Capital
Improvement Project Number SS04-01. The existing land use district for this property is
CG-3 (Commercial General). The project proposes to amend the General Plan and zone
change thisproperty to RU-I, Residential Urban. The residential urban district is
intended to promote the development of detached and attached units, mobile home parks,
and small lot subdivisions as part of a planned residential development where the intent is
to consolidate lots to achieve maximum open space. The RU-I district requires a
minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. The RU-I district allows a maximum density of
8.0 units per acre. Portions of this property are subject to the Hillside Management
Overlay District (HMOD).
The Revised Project proposes to process concurrently with the above discussed GP A, a
Revised Tentative Tract Map for Tract No. 16509. Tentative Tract 16509 was approved
by the City of San Bernardino Planning Commission on May 6, 2003. The first unit-ot tbe
Tract 16509-1 creating the,first 31 lots was recorded on October 18,2004. This will add
1.3 acres to the Tentative Map 16509.
2
"""""":""';~"'i"",m'T" . 'If ""11'=[ ....lr ul" ]'
. ....~,.''f~'~.,." ., . ..,.. .
. City of San Bernardino
Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaratiori/University Park
The Revised Project proposes to revise Tentative Tract 16509 to further subdivide the
subdivision to create an additional nine lots resulting from the addition of AP 261-231-09
into the tract boundary. The nine lots will be created by I) subdividing two existing lots
within the approved Tract 16509 and 2) re-designing a few of the lots along Pear Street.
The two existing lots as currently depicted on Tract 16509 are approximately 1.0 acres'
(lot 150) and 2.2 acres (lot 123) in size. All of the lots within Tract 16509 will have a
minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet.
It is proposed that the remaining property (APN 261-231-06) of 1.3 acres on the
. southeast comer of Campus Parkway and Kendall Avenue will be placed into open space.
The property will be landscaped into a park setting which will be maintained by the
Landscape Maintenance District currently being formed (LMAD 1036). The existing
structures onthe property will be removed by the developer.
The City has determined that the proposed development will be substantially consistent
with the density and character of the University Area Land Use Plan and Design
Guidelines and its Land Use Map, and will be consistent with the goals, policies, and
objectives of the City's General Plan.
The City has compared the impacts of the Revised Project with those impacts analyzed in
the Environmental Assessment and Mitigated Negative Declaration, and finds as follows:
.
-~ ~-
,
3
'-i'~''''"''T~"C'~''''''''J.
lie "'",''''
~~,~,-'
.""."
City of San Bernardino
Addendum to Mitigated Negative DeclarationlUniversity Park
Aesthetics
Impacts are expected to be less than those originally analyzed. The Revised Project
proposes the subdivision of nine single family detached residential lots. Although these
lots could be located on the 1.31 acre site at the. comer of Kendall Avenue and Campus
Parkway, the applicant has chosen to place these lots within the existing approved
development. The 1.31 acre site will be developed by the applicant into a passive park.
The existing residence and accessory structures will be removed and most of the existing
trees on the site will be incorporated into the landscaping and passive park design. The
development of the passive park will have less of an impact on views in the area of the
project. Impacts are expected to be less than significant.
Amculture Resources
Impacts are expected to be no different than those originally analyzed. The residential
lots will be constructed on lands that have been previously graded, and do not contain
agricultural soils. There are no lands/soils on the site subject to the Farmland Protection
Act. Construction of the Revised Project will have no impact on the agricultural soils.
The impacts to agriculture resources are expected to be less than significant.
Air Oualitv
Impacts are expected to be less than those originally analyzed. The primary source of
pollutants in the City originates with vehicular operations. The previous analysis
considered the impacts associated with the construction of 153 residential lots. The
Revised Project proposes a creation of nine residential lots and parkland instead of a
commercial development. The daily traffic created by nine lots and a park is significantly
less than that generated by a commercial land use. The Mitigated Negative Declaration
also includes mitigation measures which will be implemented with the construction of the
Revised Project. It can therefore be expected that air quality impacts will be reduced, as a
result of fewer trips being generated by the Revised Project.
Biolos!ical Resources
Impacts are expected to be no differentthan those originally analyzed. The nine '
residential lots will be constructed on lands that have been previously graded, and do not
offer valuable habitat. The passive park will be constructed on lands considered to have
poor quality of disturbed habitat. The impacts to biological resources are expected to be
less than significant. The site is not within the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat critical
habitat area.
,
4
..."
~:'!:~mEit rf'T~.""",,?9'P'7'7';'l-~-.~-"~'''-'''''''~''~'"'''<Y'-'<~'~~- -
n~ -r'~"~
~ ~~
City of San Bernardino
Addendum to Mitigated Negative DeclarationlUniversity Park
Cultural Resources
Impacts are expected to be no different than those originally analyzed. The Revised
Project will be required to implement the mitigation measure included in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, should cultural resources be identified during earth moving
activities. Impacts to cultural resources are expected to be less than significant.
GeoI02V/Soils Resources
Impacts are expected to be no different from those originally analyzed. The basic
residential construction will not substantially differ from that considered in the original
Mitigated Negative Declaration. The same grading and building techniques will be
required, and all current Codes will be adhered to. All mitigation measures contained in
the Mitigated Negative Declaration will be implemented with construction of the Revised
Project. Impacts from Geology/Soils Resources can be mitigated to a less than significant
level.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
.
Impacts are expected to be no different than those originally analyzed. The City will
continue to review applications as individual businesses occupy the building, and these
businesses will be required to conform to City and regional standards regarding hazards
and hazardous materials. The impacts associated with man-made hazards are expected to
be less than significant. -'-
Hvdrolo2V / Water Qualitv
The proposed project has a potential to contribute to violation of water quality standards
through the discharge of storm water runoff from residential development. The
mitigation measures included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration shall be applied to
the Revised Project. Complying with the mitigation measures will ensure that potential
impacts to water quality will be reduced to a less than a significant level. .-
Land Use r Plannine
Impacts are expected to be no different than those originally analyzed. The Revised
Project will result in nine lots and parkland. The uses and standards contained in the
Hillside Management Overlay Districts will apply to the Revised Project, and the project
conforms to these standards. The amendment to the General Plan of the 1.31 acre site
from CG-3 to RU-I is consistent with the neighboring land uses. The impacts to l~d.11Se
are expected to be less than significant.
5
~V"""~"T'''"C'M"CT'~'-~M''-=- "
C~"~G~="C'C"~ C
City of San Bernardino
Addendum to Mitigated Negative DeclarationlUniversity Park
Mineral Resources
The project site is not located within a mineral extraction zone. No minerals resources
are known to exist on or adjacent to the project.
Noise
Impacts are expected to be no different than those originally analyzed. Both short term
and long term noise impacts have been evaluated previously. The general noise impact
associated with the site as a whole may be improved slightly by the construction of the
Revised Project, since fewer vehicular trips will occur as a result of the development of
residential lots and parkland. The mitigation measures included in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration will also be applied to the Revised Project. Impacts associated with noise are
not expected to be significant.
PODulation / HousiD2
Impacts are expected to be no different than those originally analyzed. The area of the
Revised Project area has been designated for residential development. Impacts to
housing are not expected to be significant.
Recreation
Impacts are expected to be no different than 11'1l>se originally analyzed. The residential
lots will be constructed on lands that have been-previously graded. The Revised Project
impact to recreation as a whole will be improved by the development of the passive park
and associated open space. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an
increase in the use of local or Regional Park or recreational facilities. No impact on
parks would occur as a result of the proposed project and no mitigation is required.
TransoortationlCirculation
Impacts are expected to be no different than originally analyzed. The proposed nine lots
for the project will generate approximately 90 average daily trips. Under the current
zoning (CG-3) of the 1.31 acres, it could be anticipated that a typical commercial
development on this site could generate approximately 1200 average daily trips. Impacts
associated with traffic from the Revised Project are considered less than significant.
Public Services
,.
.",,",
Impacts are expected to be no different from those analyzed. Fire, paramedic and pOlice
protection will still be required for the site. The Revised Project will be required to pay
school fees, as previously identified. There are no additional residential land uses
proposed which would generate a need for recreational facilities. as previously analyzed.
6
11 ~ ='~'ff0""'''"~'F~''''''''''''~'"''r'''"' .'
City of San Bernardino
Addendum to Mitigated Negative DeclarationlUniversity Park
Impacts to solid waste will be reduced from those originally analyzed due to the
elimination of the commercial land use designation. Impacts to electricity, natural gas,
domestic water and sanitary sewer will be substantially the same as previously analyzed.
Impacts to public services overall are expected to be less than significant.
Utilities / Service Systems
Impacts are expected to be no different from those analyzed. The Revised Project would
not require the construction of additional storm water drainage facilities than those
otherwise necessary for the development of the previously analyzed project nor increase
demand on treatment facilities. Implementation of the Revised Project would not affect
the ability of the storm drain system to serve the project site. Impacts to utilities/service
are expected to be less than significant.
Conclusion
The City finds that consideration ofthe Revised Project does not call for the preparation
of a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15162 or
Public Resources Code Section 21166, in that the Revised Project does not involve:
I) Substantial changes to the project analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration
which would involve new significant effects on the environment or substantially
increase the severity of previously identified impacts;
2) Substantial changes with respect to the Circumstances under which the project is
being undertaken which would involve new significant effects on the environment
not analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration; or
3) New information of substantial importance which would involve new significant
effects on the environment not analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration
which substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts.
,
~
7
i~I' ,', ,~--c'''"-'Tr_''''''T-'fi(~r-oc,,,r''--r'' er-'- -
H _, r^~",~~_.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
RACHEL G. CLARK, CM.C. . CITY CLERK
300 North "D" Street. San Bernardino. CA 92418-0001
909.384.5002. Fax: 909.384.5158
www.ci.san-bernardino.ca.us
8M
May 19, 2005
University Park, LLC
101 Main Street, Suite A
Seal Beach, CA 90740
Gentlemen:
At the Mayor and Common Council meeting held on May 16, 2005, the following action was
taken relative to General Plan Amendment No. 05-02, a request to change the l~d use
designation of approximately 1.3 acres from CG-3, Commercial General, to RU~I, Residential
Urban, and an amendment to Tentative Tract Map No. 16509 to add a 1.3-acre park site and
create nine additional lots at the southeast comer of Kendall A venue and the future extension of
Campus Parkway:
The hearing was closed and the Mayor and Common Council adopted Resolution
No. 2005-132 and approved amended Tentative Tract Map No. 16509, based
upon the Findings of Fact contained in the Planning Commission staff report dated
April 19, 2005, subject to the Conditions of Approval and Standard
Requirements.
. .
If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
~h..~
Rachel G. Clark, CMC
City Clerk
RGC:lls
cc: Development Services
Robin Plaza, LLC, 101 Main Street, Suite A, Seal Beach, CA 90740
CITY OF SAN BERNARDlNO
ADOPTED SHARED VALUES: Integrity. Accountability. Respect for Human Dignity. Honesty
._,,"",'W',,'"" 'T. - -y""n" '~("" --- ',=v'N~--'-"TT--'lT"IT"-"'-''''-''''''r''-~~.'iri<''Nr>'~'''-"," ---,-.--~~,-, y,~",,~'-"O" "
o
o
.
'F"r--~"=''''-
1
2
CO}rPY
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING GENERAL
3 PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 05-02 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF ,THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
4 FROM CG-3, COMMERCIAL GENERAL, TO RU-l, RESIDENTIAL URBAN, FOR
5 ONE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF KENDALL AVENUE
AND THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF CAMPUS PARKWAY.
6
7
8
9
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Recitals
(a) WHEREAS, the General Plan for the City of San Bernardino was adopted by the
10
11 Mayor and Common Council by Resolution No. 89-159 on June 2, 1989.
12 (b) WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 05-02 to the General Plan of the City of
13 San Bernardino was considered by the Planning Commission on April 19, 2005, at a noticed
14 public hearing, and the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval has been
15 considered by the Mayor and Common Council.
16
17
(c) WHEREAS, Amended Tentative Tract Map No. 16509 (Subdivision No. 05-04) was
considered by the Planning Commission to further subdivide two existing graded lots to create an
18
19 additional nine lots within the previously approved subdivision, and the Planning Commission's
20 recommendation of approval has been considered by the Mayor and Common Council.
21 (d) WHEREAS, Amended Tentative Tract Map No. 16509 (Subdivision No. 05-04) was
22 found to have minor changes requiring an addendum pursuant to the California Environmental
23
Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15164.
24
25
(e) WHEREAS, an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared on
26 April 5, 2005, and reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee and the Planning
27
28
Commission who both determined that General Plan Amendment No. 05-02 would not have a
significant effect on the environment and therefore, recommend that an Addendum to the
1
..~,~"~.
o
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
0 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 B.
24
25
26
27 C.
0
28
,-"
'"'" . " Un 00 ....... '""'='"'""'''-f~.".''a''''"<'~~''rr'''~'"'"''r'~''''''''''"'''ur~;::.:=n~'-
1
Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted in compliance with the California Environmental
2
Quality Act (CEQA) and local regulations.
3
(f) WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council held a noticed public hearing and fully
reviewed and considered proposed General Plan Amendment No. 05-02 and the Planning
Commission and Environmental Review Committee recommendations and Planning Division
Staff Report on May 16, 2005.
SECTION 2. Addendum to MitilZated NelZative Declaration
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the Mayor
and Common Council that the proposed amendment to the General Plan of the City of San
Bernardino will not have a significant effect on the environment, and the Addendum to the
Mitigated Negative Declaration heretofore prepared by the Environmental Review Committee as
to the effect of this proposed amendment is hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted.
SECTION 3. FindinlZs
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
Bernardino that:
A. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan in that it meets
General Plan Policy 1.14.13 (b), in that it permits the transfer of allowable units to
lesser slopes category according to the following limits: land area from which density is
transferred shall be restricted from future development.
The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare of the City in that any single family development will be
required to comply with all applicable provisions of the Development Code.
The proposed amendment would not impact the balance of land uses within the City in
that the proposed property is adjacent to other residential uses in the RU-I district and is
2
o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
o
o
_c. - __~~, 'joe ~~~""_H'_'_~~~"'__<'__ r-""'W--"" --~~--~--"~--.~ -------'^"--.--0r
consistent with General Plan Policy 1.14.13. The General Plan Amendment does not
adversely impact the balance ofland uses within the City.
In'the case of an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map, the subject parcel(s) is
physically suitable (including, but not limited to access, provision of utilities,
compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the
requested land use designation(s) and the anticipated land use development(s) in that all
required utilities and public services can adequately serve the site.
SECTION 4, Amendment
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that:
The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino is amended by
changing the land use designation from CG-3, Commercial General, to RU-l, Residential
Urban, for 1.3 acres located on the southeast comer of Kendall Avenue and the future
extension of Campus Parkway, This amendment is designated as General Plan
Amendment No, 05-02 and its location is outlined on the map entitled Exhibit 1, and
further described in Exhibit 2, copies of which are attached and incorporated herein for
reference.
General Plan Amendment No. 05-02 shall become effective immediately upon adoption
of this resolution.
SECTION 5. MaD Notation
This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be noted on such appropriate
General Plan maps as having been previously adopted and approved by the Mayor and
Common Council and which are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
3
" -<
o
1
2
3
4
5
6 III
7 III
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
o
o
"'<,.~~._"
1 .. '-,~~-' ".,.".,,,,, ,""""",."~,
SECTION 6. Notice ofDetennmation
The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the
County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino certifying the City's compliance with
California Environmental Quality Act in preparing the Addendum.
4
It
o
o
^^~
~-, ~ ~-,- .",- ^^^'^~~^^.,^~" ~^
1 RESOLUTION ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 05-02 TO
2 THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, TO AMEND THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM CG-3, COMMERCIAL
GENERAL, TO RU-I, RESIDENTIAL URBAN, FOR ONE PARCEL LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF KENDALL AVENUE AND THE FUTURE
EXTENSION OF CAMPUS PARKWAY.
3
4
5
"6
7 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
8
9
Council Members
10
11 ESTRADA
12 LONGVILLE
13 MCGINNIS
14
15
16 KELLEY
17 OHNSON
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
meeting thereof,
held on the
day of
, 2005, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES
NAYS
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
DERRY
18 MC CAMMACK
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 Approved as to form
and legal content:
26
27
28
City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
day of
,2005.
JUDITH VALLES, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
JAMES F. PENMAN
City Attorney
, j)
-~
5
"-"~"'" "" ""'"''''''''"''~''''' ""','
'.' """'Tl:r"'''ff'~'"'" ",,,"-~="'- "-'iV' ~<"-"'-=="'-'-"'1'f'~":",t""",,- ,
EXHIBIT 1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING DIVISION
LOCATION MAP
LAND USE DISTRICTS
PROJECT: GPA 05-02
TT 16509
(SUB 05-(4)
HEARING DATE: 5/16105
~
LEGEND:
I Proposed GP A
. from CG-3, Commercial General
to RU-I, Residential Urban.
'"
,)'f
/'
1J
NORTH
I
\
..V
I
,
.....,
. I I
California State University
San Bemardino
I I
I
~~"'" , ~ "T'~ ","""eN_"'_"~" ~T"'T'
o
8i~.,
'"":-.. ~
(C)l
I!!!!I tn
Cl
~ Cl
C"...r
c=:: -
l!!!!! ~
0 Z
<{
-,
Ic2
~ .,,'''"'"-~~. ~"'~r".T~' ~"~~'~~~"i'V'Tf:'::"'"''''
I~ I
'!
EXHIBIT 2
:t
; . . 1
: i J t. d.t
i I if ~ I I' I ~l:
i' l ! Iii i ~ . iI ~J;
11i~ !. wi tl i! i ~ II. Itb!
.~ 1'.1 1;' I i I. I i
.I~ i~i' 8; tli f P If' ;?
Ii... It I I !~I; ~ ~ . ; !: Ifit
if f I !I~ ;'1_ I 'I" !. Ii! .:i
II : : : I-Ii - II it, . ·
11= 1= tii. - r: ! il: . ~~
~ .11' q I qll:. '!.. I! I , . z;a
~ Iil:J le,BGd ~ II !! ! I Ie Iii Ii
I-'M
I
11
I I:
II',,; li!'1
I iW ilil.
I It "!il
CDI 'II ~~I'
;. 'II~!
."!i &
ill!! a
...,
ii7
>:x
~"
~li
=:i::;;:=~:i:i:i~:~:;:==i:==:::~~=:~:===~:m::i~~:::i:=:=:::::i~~=iiliir"
'mnll~"I~~m"P.llIglllmm"p.m"ng~"!lP:tmmngilglllp.UB!!~~~
bl.......na.W1..ffll.II.I!:~!!~!!!!!!!!HS!y!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!inl!!!!Hf'""
-,;;;fiiii;;ii;iiiiiutiiiiiiii,ijiiiiiiiii_ungm,ionLIimibi:ii;;;
A ; 1._....-...::::.........:&...........................0.................."'........
d
D
.
W\
o
t
.., m .__
0-'.-
Lt)
CD
,....
.
o
Zco
o
a..c1,
<(0
:EZ
t-S
00.
<(W
eel-
t-CI)
Wl-"lt
-0
>~M
-a:O
t-W.
<(0.0
t-WZ
ZCl)Z
W::>O
t-...J(j)
O<C-
WZ>
000
-m
zt::::>
ween
:EZ
<(8
i
II
-.
II
S
'2
4)
5 .
~~
'G ;:>
b"ii
e.,;:
e 5
:, < 0 "CI
., u....
" l:Lo en
l' ~.OM~
~ ~16-:
/ g,u::)
(Jil 2 e ~
..:l~.gg
-
I
- ~~.
- i
n
Gli
>> >-
'"",~'>C~>~~CCC'^'",'C' ..
..
='~~>---
o
i (\110 ('I)
~ ~
.. z
"": :'5
I ~1 ~ ~ I
II! !;~ iii .
j~"i
il ~ilu
I ...C1111~~
II ~UH
iG ~ c ~
II ~ ~
o
e
u
c:
u 0
Cj {;
-;-f
.- ::>
G- \
e'! ~\
e 6 ~~ ~~
< 0 ~ "~ \.
~ u or;; ~\ ,
I01~ ",
l~~" ~
~~cGg '"
. '~
o
.
~
--/ :tf
I
J.W IW 10'1(:1 filJOll./l I DHS-IOIr.J:lR-ftl ~ SlWflQ-1WUIrdlf dWt 11O.l OJ. .l~"O-lo- 1I"&!..,.tN11\sru U$ ,.....0\.-.. ~-___ "llt\UJJtOlIcl\:J
** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - NOT A PUBLIC DOCUMENT **
RESOLUTION AGENDA ITEM TRACKING FORM
Mooting Date (Date Adot' ~ I ~lll( Item # --#-- Rew!ution # f}o of' 13d--
Vote: Ayes Nays Abstain Absent-f' >-
Change to motion to amend original documents D Companion Resolutions
Null/Void After: days I
Resolution # On Attachments: D Note on Resolution of attachment stored separately: D
PUBLISH D
POST D
RECORD W/COUNTY D
By:
Date Sent to Mayor: 1:] ~ 1 g I () ( /"
Date of Mayor's Signature: 11~ 11) S ,/
Date ofClerk/CDC Signature: ~
Reso.LogUpdated: ~
Seal Impressed: ~
Reso. # on Staff Report W
Date Memo/Letter Sent for Signature:
1 sl Reminder Letter Sent:
Date Returned:
2nd Reminder Letter Sent:
Not Returned: D
I
Request for Council Action & Staff Report Attached:
Updated Prior Resolutions (Other Than Below):
Updated CITY Personnel Folders (6413, 6429, 6433,10584, 10585, 12634):
Updated CDC Personnel Folders (5557):
Updated Traffic Folders (3985, 8234, 655, 92-389):
/'
No By_
Nor- By_
No./' By_
No.L By__
NoJBy_
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
i
~
Copies Distributed to:
Animal Control D EDA D Information Services
City Administrator ~ ./ Facilities D Parks & Recreation
City Attorney lB' Finance D Police Department
Code Compliance D / Fire Department D . Public Services
Development s~e . es ~'/ I;: ;J ~umat0esources D /. wa. ter Department
Others: ------Lr~1S ~l~
I u---o
D
D
D
D
D
Notes:
Dateb /y,
Ready to File: _
Revised 12/18/03