Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout30-Finance Department CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: July 29,2003 Subject: Resolution approving and adopting the Final Budget for FY 2003-2004 And establishing the City's Appro- O R 1 G \ N A L priation Limit as required by Article XIII B of the California State Constitution. From: Barbara Pachon, Djrector of Finance Dept: Finance Synopsis of Previous Council action: July 25,2002 Resolution 2002-175 adopted (approving FY 2002-03 Final Budget and establishing the FY 2002-03 Appropriation Limit). June 12,2003 Council meeting to discuss FY 2003-2004 Budget. June 19,2003 Council meeting to discuss FY 2003-2004 Budget. June 26, 2003 Council meeting to discuss FY 2003-2004 Budget. June 30, 2003 Resolution 2003-144 approving the continuation of spending for the month of July 2003. July 21, 2003 Resolution 2003-208 approving the continuation of spending for the month of August 2003. Recommended motion: Adopt Resolution ~d,,/A-/~L / Signature Contact person: Barbara Pachon, Director of Finance Phone: ext. 5242 Supporting data attached: Ward: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Net Cost -0- Source: (Acct. No.) Various Department Accounts (Acct. Description) Finance: Council Notes: ~~ 2(:03,- 2Z-s Agenda Item No. 130 8/1/03 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Resolution approving and adopting the final budget for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 and establishing the City's Appropriation Limit as required by Article XIII B of the California State Constitution. BACKGROUND: General Fund: This year the City of San Bernardino faced many challenges in balancing the City's budget. The initial preliminary FY 2003-2004 General Fund projections prepared by the Finance Department indicated the City would have a shortfall in FY 2003-2004 of approximately $7.4 million. There were several major factors that contributed to this projected shortfall, which included increased Safety PERS rates, and the State Budget crisis. Several brainstorming meetings were held to discuss budget savings options and as a result of these pro-active measures the City was able to realize over $3 million dollars of budget savings. In the City's Preliminary Budget document the General Fund shortfall was reduced to $4,049,400. This shortfall assumed the budget reserve remained at the same funded level of$6,761,700. Throughout the month of June the Mayor and Council held several budget meetings to discuss various options for balancing the City's budget. In addition, Council members held various Town Meetings out in the community to not only inform the public of the budget situation but to also obtain ideas for solving the budget shortfall. As a result of the last two months of work on the budget, the City has been able to eliminate the $4,049,400 shortfall and have an excess of $698,500 to be used to off set some ofthe reductions from the State that will be coming. The City was able to accomplish this by being more aggressive and optimistic on the revenue projections for both FY 2002-2003 and FY 2003-2004 at the request of the Mayor, generate additional expenditure savings in FY 2002-2003 as a result of efficiency improvements, adjust various City fees, and implement various other budget reductions/revenue enhancements. Below is a brief summary of how the General Fund budget is proposed to be balanced: Preliminary Budget Projected Shortfall Additional FY 2002-2003 Revenues from 6/25/03 Additional FY 2003-2004 Revenues from 6/25/03 Revised Shortfall $(4,049,400) 288,800 297,500 $(3,463,100) Additional revenues from FY 2002-2003 Additional revenues for FY 2003-2004 Additional FY 2002-2003 expenditure savings Various reductions/revenue enhancements Total 686,500 396,000 1,100,00 1,979,100 $ 698,500 The additional revenues from FY 2002-2003 and increased revenues for FY 2003-2004 were provided to the Mayor and Council in a memo dated July 28,2003 from the Director of Finance. The revenue adjustments for FY 2003-204 are considered more on the optimistic side but are obtainable if the assumptions out lined in the July 281h memo occur. The additional expenditure savings from FY 2002-2003 are from a couple of Departments who generated more savings than originally anticipated as a result of additional vacant positions, positions not being filled as fast as anticipated, and reductions in overtime spending. The various proposed fee adjustments were provided to the Mayor and Council on the July 21 sl Council Meeting (Item #9) and the various other reduction/revenue enhancements are listed in the spreadsheet provided to the Mayor and Council on July 31 sl from the City Administrator. Capital Projects: Appropriations for capital project expenditures have not been included as part of the FY 2003-2004 Final Budget. Within the next few weeks, The Development Services Department will be bringing for approval to the Mayor and Council the 5-year CIP. At the same time that the 5 -year CIP is presented to the Mayor and Council for approval, there will also be a concurrent motion to amend the FY 2003-2004 Adopted Budget to appropriate the funds for the projects that are approved as part of the 5-year CIP. Other Funds: All other budgeted City funds are also included in this final adoption of the budget for FY 2003-2004. These funds were included in the Preliminary Budget document. There have not been any major changes to these funds from the Preliminary Budget but there have been minor adjustments for things like fee changes, electric cost changes, etc. To more accurately reflect the operational expenditures of Departments, changes were made to the way Workers Compensation, Liability, and Debt Service payments are budgeted in both the General Fund and other Funds. None of these changes impact any ofthe monies available for program operation or alter (increase or decrease) a Funds financial position. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Total General Fund revenues, transfers-in and beginning fund balance are budgeted at $116,651,300 for FY 2003-2004. Total expenditures and transfers-out total $109,191,100, leaving a projected General Fund Budgeted Reserve of$6,761,700 and $698,500 fund balance designated to help offset the State budget reductions once they have been fully worked out. From what the City has learned to date the State will not be paying the City its full VLF revenue budgeted for FY 2003-2004. The estimated amount that will not be paid is about $2.2 million and will be a loan to the State that will be paid back to Cities in FY 2005-2006. Since the City will not actually be paid the $2.2 million these funds probably can not be included in the Budget Reserve as they are now and will have to be removed and set aside in a separate reserve to be used after the funds are actually paid by the State. It appears that the booking fee reimbursement was reinstated back into the State budget. Once this is confirmed this revenue (about $689,000) along with the $698,500 discussed above can be used to reduce the impact of the VLF loan to the State on the City's Budget Reserve as well as off set some of the loss in revenue that it appears some Police Grants will have. Once all the details and final dollar amounts have been worked out, a report will be made back to the Mayor and Council. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution. Replacement Page, Revised 8/4/03 Agenda Item 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ~Q)\P\f Resolution No. RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO'S FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 AND ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT AS REQUIRED BY ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION. WHEREAS, the Preliminary Annual Budget of the City of San Bernardino for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 as amended and conditioned by orders of the Mayor and Common Council is attached to and incorporated herein as Exhibits A and B, and Schedules 1 through 13; and WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as proposed by the Initiative Measure approved by the people at the special statewide election held on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise specifically provided for said Article; and WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution, establish its appropriations limit for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at a regularly scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting and that fifteen days prior to such meeting, documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit shall be available to the public; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Bernardino wishes to establish the 22 appropriations limit for fiscal year 2003/2004 for the City of San Bernardino. 23 III 24 I I I 25 III 26 I I I 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO'S FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 AND ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT AS REQUIRED BY ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION. BE IT RESOL YED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That certain document entitled "2003-2004 Preliminary Annual Budget" as amended and conditioned by orders of the Mayor and Common Council, as attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibits A and B, and Schedules 1-13; is hereby approved and adopted as the 2003-2004 Budget of the City of San Bernardino. SECTION 2. That Position Control Resolution 97-244 be updated to reflect the changes in authorized positions that were incorporated in the FY 2003-2004 Preliminary Budget or were authorized by orders of the Mayor and Common Council during budget deliberations. SECTION 3. That Salary Resolution 6413 be updated to reflect the changes in authorized salary ranges that were incorporated in the FY 2003-2004 Preliminary Budget or were authorized by orders of the Mayor and Common Council during budget deliberations. SECTION 4. That it is hereby found and determined that the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for the City of San Bernardino for fiscal year 2003-2004 was available to the public in the Finance Department of said City at least fifteen days prior to this date. 21 22 in accordance with Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California is $198,378,712. 23 SECTION 5. That the Appropriations limit for the City of San Bernardino as established I I I 24 25 III 26 I I I 27 I I I 28 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO'S FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2 2003-2004 AND ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT AS REQUIRED BY ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION. 3 4 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and 5 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the day of 6 COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES 7 ESTRADA 8 LONGVILLE 9 MCGINNIS 10 DERRY II SUAREZ 12 ANDERSON 13 MCCAMMACK 14 15 16 , 2003, by the following vote, to wit: NAYS ABST AIN ABSENT CITY CLERK 17 18 19 20 21 The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved this _ day of ,2003. JUDITH V ALLES, Mayor City of San Bernardino Approved as to form and 22 legal content: 23 24 25 26 27 28 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FY 2003-2004 SUMMARY OF REVENUES. EXPENDITURES. AND TRANSFERS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED BALANCE ADDITIONS TOTAL DEDUCTIONS TOTAL BALANCE FUND 1 TITLE 7-1-03 REVENUESITRANSFER AVAILABLE EXPENSESITRANSFER DEDUCT 6-30-04 (001 GENERAL FUND' I 11822,6001 97,212,0001 7,616,7001116,651,3001105,747,4001 3,443,7001109191,100 I 7,460,200 I Seneral Fund estimated balance at 6/30/04 Includes the budget reserve of $6.761,700 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 105 LIBRARY 0 197,500 2,197,800 2,395,300 2,395,300 0 2,395,300 0 106 CEMETERY 0 187,000 48,500 235,500 235,500 0 235,500 0 107 CATV 0 75,000 463,400 538,400 538,400 0 538,400 0 108 ASSET FORFEITURE 797,800 410,000 0 1,207,800 711,800 0 711,800 496,000 111 AIR QUALlTY-AB 2766 176,400 229,100 0 405,500 106,200 181,500 287,700 117,800 124 ANIMAL CONTROL 0 1,184,600 386,000 1,570,600 1,570,600 0 1,570,600 0 132 SEWER LINE MAl NT 2,578,900 1,386,000 0 3,964,900 1,742,400 150,000 1,892,400 2,072,500 133 BASEBALL STADIUM 0 140,000 245,900 385,900 385,900 0 385,900 0 134 SOCCER FIELD COMPLEX 1,200 375,500 0 376,700 364,100 0 364,100 12,600 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUES 3,554,300 4.184,700 3,341,600 11,080,600 8,050,200 331,500 8,381,100 2,698,900 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS: '. 122 ARTICLE 8 - L TF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 SPECIAL GAS TAX 1,869,200 3,480,000 0 5,349,200 0 2,810,000 2,810,000 2,539,200 128 TRAFFIC SAFETY 0 650,000 0 650,000 0 650,000 650,000 0 129 112 CENT SALES & RD TAX 3,967,700 3,342,700 0 7,310,400 0 215,000 215,000 7,095,400 135 AB2928 TRAFFIC CONGESTION 214,800 360,000 0 574,800 0 0 0 574,800 241 PUBLIC PARK EXTENSION 0 0 37,100 37,100 0 0 0 37,100 242 STREET CONSTRUCTION (2,130,900) 7,211,500 0 5,080,600 0 0 0 5,080,600 243 PARK CONSTRUCTION 1,030,800 3,121,500 0 4,152,300 0 0 0 4,152,300 244 CEMETERY CONSTR 22,800 4,700 0 27,500 0 0 0 27,500 245 SEWER LINE CONSTR 5,308,600 473,000 0 5,781,600 0 100,000 100,000 5,681,600 246 INDIAN IMPROVEMENT 571,600 0 0 571,600 0 0 0 571,600 247 CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT 0 304,000 0 304,000 0 304,000 304,000 0 248 STORM DRAIN CONSTR 1,987,000 810,000 0 2,797,000 0 100,000 100,000 2697,000 250 TRAFFIC SYSTEM CONSTR 805,900 453,600 0 1,259,500 0 25,000 25,000 1,234,500 TOTAL CAPITAlc PROJECTS 13,647.500 20.:111.000 37,100 33.895.600 0 4,204.000 4,204,000 29,691.600 3SESSMENT DISTRiCT FUNDS; . 109 PARKING & BUSINESS IMPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 PARKING DISTRICT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 251 OTHER ASSESMENT DISTR (1,883,700) 51,200 0 (1,832,500) 51,200 0 51,200 (1,883,700) 254 LANDSCAPE DISTRICTS 1,248,500 529,800 0 1,778,300 0 0 0 1,778,300 257 CITY WIDE AD 994 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ASSESSMENT OISTRICT (635,200) 581.000 0 (54,:100) 51,200 0 . 51,200 (105,400) DEBT SERVICE FUNDS: ...... 305 AD 985 INDUSTRIAL PKWY 120,200 62,100 0 182,300 62,100 0 62,100 120,200 306 AD 987 VERDEMONT AREA 88,000 57,100 0 145,100 56,800 0 56,800 88,300 308 AD 987 VERDEMONTflMPRVLN 100 115,300 0 115,400 115,300 0 115,300 100 333 AD 5861 ORANGEWOOD EST. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 356 AD 356 NEW PINE AVE (568,400) 63,200 0 (505,200) 39,800 0 39,800 (545,000) TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS (360,100) 297,700 0 (62,400) 274,000 0 274.000 (336,400) ENTERPRISE FUNDS: . 501 EMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 527 REFUSE 1,250,000 18,482,000 65,000 19,797,000 16,893,200 2,381,200 19,274,400 522,600 TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 1,250,000 18.482,000 65,000 19,797,000 16,893,200 2,381.200 19,274,400 522,600 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: 621 CENTRAL SERVICES FUND 0 325,900 0 325,900 325,900 0 325,900 0 629 LIABILITY INSURANCE (3,632,400) 2,660,600 0 (971,800) 2,447,600 0 2,447,600 (3,419,400) 630 TELEPHONE SUPPORT 489,700 795,100 0 1,284,800 795,100 400,000 1,195,100 89,700 631 UTILITY FUND (611,200) 4,420,500 0 3,809,300 4,345,500 0 4,345,500 (536200) 635 FLEET SERVICES 379,800 5,155,700 0 5,535,500 5,155,700 300,000 5,455,700 79,800 678 WORKER'S COMP (7,840,300) 3,955,600 0 (3,884,700) 3,955,600 0 3,955,600 (7,840,300) 679 MANAGMT INFO SYSTEM 307,500 3,619,200 0 3,926,700 3,696,900 0 3,696,900 229,800 TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE (10,906,900) 20,932,600 0 10,025,700 20,722,300 700,000 21.422,300 (11,396,600) TOTAL ALL FUNDS I 18,372,2001161,901,000111,060,400 1191,333,6001151,738,300111,060,400 1162,798,700 128,534,900 I Replacement Page 814/03 Agenda Item #30 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 GENERAL FUND APPROVED FY 03-04 ESTIMATED REVENUE Property Taxes $ 7,955,000 Other Taxes 57,349,300 Licenses & Permits 6,713,500 Fines and Penalties 1,046,000 Use of Money & Property 1,598,400 Intergovernmental 15,102,200 Charges for Services 3,737,800 Miscellaneous 3,709,800 Total Estimated Revenues $ 97,212,000 Total Transfers In $ 7,616,700 TOTAL ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 104,828,700 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES Mayor $ 1,075,000 Common Council 424,300 City Clerk 1,189,500 City Treasurer 136,100 City Attorney 2,340,900 Code Compliance 2,873,600 General Government 9,534,200 City Administrator 547,600 Civil Service 227,000 Human Resource 362,700 Finance 1,187,900 Development Services 7,329,100 Fire 23,026,300 Police 44,003,700 Facilities Manaaement 3,711,100 Parks, Recreation, & Comm Service 5,279,300 Public Services 2,999,100 Total Estimated Expenditures $ 106,247,400 Total Estimated Expenditure Savings $ (500,000) Total Transfers Out $ 3,443,700 TOTAL ESTIMATED DEDUCTIONS $ 109,191,100 EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) AVAILABLE OVER DEDUCTIONS $ (4,362,400) 11,822,600 I 7,460,200 I 6,761,700 I 698,500 I I ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 1$ IESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 1$ IBUDGETED RESERVE. 1$ IBUDGET EXCESS I (DEFICIENCY) .* I $ 'The budget reserve is made up of $2,500,000 from FY 98-99; $1,627,400 from FY 99-00; $2,831,600 from FY 00-01and $2,870,900 from FY 01-02. Used ($3,068,200) of the reserve in FY 02-03 "The budget excess shown here will be used to help offset the impacts of the State budget reductions which the details are still being worked out. Any additional funds needed will have to come from the budget reserve which could be as much as $2 million due to the VLF loan to the State. 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL FUND REVENUE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL 1999-2000 2000-2001 ACTUAL ESTIMATE APPROVED 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 PROPERTY TAXES 4001 Current Secured 6.189,823 6,334,722 6,536.223 6,675,000 6.800.000 4002 Current Unsecured 416,816 372,253 390.014 391.000 390,000 4003 Pnor Taxes 397,955 358,346 353.987 360.000 370,000 4006 Supplemental 107,374 166,892 268,031 280,000 285,000 4005 Other 103,443 110,638 110.664 106,000 110,000 Total Taxes 7,215,411 7,342,851 7,658,919 7,812,000 7,955,000 OTHER TAXES 4221 Sales Tax 24,750,545 26,832,389 27,102.137 29.894,400 31,400,000 4224 Utility User Tax 15347,578 17.581,140 19,442.681 20,129.200 19.330.000 4201/14 Franchise Tax 2.027.707 2.091.595 2.591.949 2,237,900 2,631.300 4222 Transient Occupancy 1,954,536 2,272,819 2,439,186 2,548,000 2,625,000 4223 Prop. Transfer Tax 315,131 319,373 349.621 500,000 425,000 4225 Sales Tax Public Safety 543,494 604,185 593.361 625,000 650,000 4215 Tow Franchise 304,120 287,857 288.000 280,000 288,000 Total Taxes 45,243,111 49,989,358 52,806,935 56,214,500 57,349,300 LICENSES AND PERMITS 4301 Business Reqistration 4,160,764 4,060,375 4.288,966 4,625,000 4,780,000 4330 Buildina Permits 381 ,436 477,053 519.500 634.500 630,600 4331 Mechanical Permits 211,276 201,418 220,555 240,000 240,000 4362 On Site Inspection Fees 143,672 198,736 233,649 321,300 300,000 4363 On Site Plan Check 63,783 111 ,683 119,011 87,000 80,000 4361 Construction Permits 37,571 71,384 159,263 101,000 120,000 4342 EMS Membership 23,104 21,593 19,220 18,500 18.500 4336 Fire Code Permits 164,757 169,282 256,345 234.600 247,600 4337 Fire Plan Check 28,329 113,315 100,538 124,900 120,000 4351 Street Cut Permits 11,073 12,966 8,422 17,000 60,200 4333 Mobile Home Park Permit 28,205 28,076 28,624 33,000 32,000 4352 Misc Licenses & Permits 29,312 52,011 36,384 54,600 50,000 4303 Misc City Clerk Permits 25.914 9,419 7,932 8.000 7,000 4304 Misc Plannina Permits 23,115 20,128 23,329 20,000 21,500 4360 Grading Permits 2,710 5,352 6,101 .5,100 6,100 Total License & Permit 5,335,021 5,552,791 6,027,839 6,524,500 6,713,500 FINES AND PENALTIES 4420 Parkina Citations 434,930 729,974 596,172 780,000 902,000 4410 General Fines 132,343 113,910 138,052 136,000 140,000 4450 Fire Citations 794 2,621 1,475 400 1,000 4421 Vehicle Abatement Fines 2,215 1,656 1,641 3,000 3,000 Total Fines/Penalties 570,282 848,161 737,340 919,400 1,046,000 USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY 4505 Interest Earnings 853,477 1,605,411 1,126.289 650,000 650,000 4520 Land & Buildino Rental 300.545 324,382 354,186 404,100 400,000 4530 Parkina Rental Fee 56,625 40,110 37,632 45,100 40,000 4922-26 Sale of Property 138,503 83,473 60,975 66,500 460,400 4540 Vending Machine Commission 9,850 8,385 44,948 48,000 48,000 Total Money & Property 1,359,000 2,061,761 1,624,030 1,213,700 1 ,598,400 3 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL FUND REVENUE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE APPROVED DESCRIPTION 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 4603 Motor Vehicle In Lieu 8,980,522 9,908,062 10.625,365 10.890.500 11.850.000 4621 Bookina Fee Subvention 689,066 689,066 689,066 689.100 0 4622 ERAF Subvention 461,861 608,587 0 0 0 4670 CDBG Reimbursement 2,097,882 2,584,232 2.291,067 2,103800 2,403,800 4670 20% Reimbursement 42.800 84,100 40,800 177.800 40,800 4670 Tax Increment Reimbursement 268,257 74,900 12,300 12,300 12,300 4606 Homeowner's Exemption 159,565 152,700 102,721 155,500 155.500 4616 POST 135,206 235,319 257,607 162,900 185,000 4625 State-Mandated Costs 405,381 429,884 191,958 0 0 4673 Water Reimbursement 196.145 197,681 207,889 166,300 215,000 4671 SBIM Reimbursement 106,064 106,055 111,322 120,000 120,000 4615 Disaster Prep. Proqram 21,350 20,662 3,403 42,600 14,800 4607 Off-Hiahwav Vehicle Tax 3,634 3,969 4,916 5,000 5,000 4619 Mutual AidlDisaster Reimb. 180,220 53,179 153,020 260,000 100,000 Total Intergovernmental 13,747,953 15,148,396 14,691,434 14,785,800 15,102,200 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 4731 Plan Check Fee 206,231 192,596 258,126 309,200 295,900 4880 EMS User Fee 627,649 641,277 626.125 527,200 530.000 4798 Storm Drain Utility Fee 245,964 247.757 289,827 250.000 250,000 4815 Weed Abatement 238.511 247,861 209.782 340,000 300,000 4733 Buildina Demolition 577,621 298,410 381,954 650.000 400.000 4747 False Alarm Fee 86,040 93,552 76.532 66,300 65,000 4714 Plannina Develp Project 93,330 98.049 121,884 595.000 136,900 4305 Annual Alarm Permits 217,480 213,828 216,158 228,000 225,000 4743 Towinq Release Fee 157,395 129,669 99,420 111,000 110.000 4766 Buildina Permit Review 1,826 2,688 3,741 3,000 3,500 4719 HUD Buildinq Inspection 24,737 21,829 0 0 0 4720 Plan Review Fee 50,966 65,850 57,242 102,600 95,000 4782 Off Site Inspection Fees 36,189 106,078 72,040 118,000 85,000 4785 Non Subdivision Str Imp 9,309 18,392 2.081 500 500 4711 Subdivision 40,042 50,879 19.585 90,000 98.500 4718 Environmental 7,943 11,866 8,149 10,000 10,000 4735 Release Notice of Pendency 24,536 24.860 22.185 18,000 20.000 4863 Class Reqistration Fee 13.003 12,281 12,180 10,500 39,100 4780 Misc Develop Servs Charqes 16,596 23,314 33.142 14,500 20,000 4862 Park Enerav Fee 14.158 11.211 8,323 15.000 15,000 4707 Passport Fees 65,974 69.106 58.684 92,000 95.000 4702 Countv Contract 250,000 250,216 250,000 250,000 250,000 4864 Swimmina Pool Fee 57,326 60,106 54.047 57,000 89,700 4861 Proqrm/Facility Use Fee 22.592 18.531 21,078 31,000 49.600 4865 Non-Resident Fees 3.343 4.230 3,786 2,500 2,500 4710 Misc Planninq/Buildinq 38,556 42,784 26.304 62,000 60.000 4790-6 Sianal Maint/Energy 18,777 28,889 86,355 24,400 25,000 4802 Str Liqht Enerqy Fee 6,146 8,510 24,113 18,000 20,000 4701 Election Filina Fee 6,972 159 3,250 200 5,000 4810 Misc. Development Services 6,751 6,746 9,753 9,000 9,000 4705 Utility Collection Fee 56,106 20,211 74,719 86,700 87,000 4881 Paramedic Reimb Contract 35,354 72,775 194,647 259,000 259,000 4789 DS Records Archival Fee 0 0 0 0 13,200 4751 Fire Apartment Inspections 0 0 0 0 60,000 4752 Fire Wildland Inspections 0 0 0 0 13,400 Total Charges 3,257,423 3,094,510 3,325,218 4,350,600 3,737,800 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL FUND REVENUE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE APPROVED 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 MISCELLANEOUS 4906 Water Fund Contr. 1,581,166 1,733,392 1,835,252 1,905,000 1.905,000 4910 Admin Service Charqe 404,400 373,993 372,800 344,800 344,800 4901 Misc Other Revenue 418,775 68,387 39,920 266,900 300,000 4912 Off Track Bellinq 157,493 182,050 137,370 168,700 160,000 4741 Sale of Photos /Reports 90,580 104,867 111,266 132,000 149,500 4740-5 Police Misc. Receipts 772,805 721,585 773,295 756,900 757.000 4746 Property Auction 7,592 0 3,183 6,000 6,000 4911 Restitutions 7,597 7,270 26,607 25,500 25,500 4905 Litiqation Settlement 49,286 166,791 45,365 0 0 4904 Drunk Driver Reimburmt. 5.086 5,084 2,832 1,000 1,000 4928 Bookinq Fee Reimburmt. 16,843 16,797 15.605 17,000 16,000 4750 Investiqation Fee 11,955 10,236 15,495 13,000 13,000 4924 Damage Clain Recovery 73,606 28,024 40,062 22,000 32,000 Total Miscellaneous 3,597,184 3,418,4 76 3,419,052 3,658,800 3,709,800 I TOTAL GENERAL FUND I 80,325,385 I 87,456,304 I 90,290,767 I 95,479,300 I 97,212,000 I 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO OTHER FUNDS REVENUE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2003 - 2004 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL 1999-00 ACTUAL 2000-01 ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 105 LIBRARY FUND 4618 State Aid-Libraries 311,681 308,902 289,523 170,900 100,000 4850 Miscellaneous Receipts 13,834 12,549 13,411 14,500 29,500 4851 Library Fines 60,186 63,278 72,206 68,000 68,000 Total Library Fund 385,701 384,729 375,140 253,400 197,500 106 CEMETERY FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 25,635 28,502 26,394 25,000 25,000 4775 CemeterY Burial Fee 64,917 59,871 66,513 65,000 65,000 4776 Sale of Vases 2,228 1,415 1,586 2,000 2,000 4777 Sale Concrete Boxes 28,907 27,464 30,069 30,000 30,000 4778 Sale Cemetery Plots 51,334 49,340 67,001 65,000 65,000 4901 Misc. Receipts 0 2,000 2,000 0 0 Total Cemetery Fund 173,021 168,592 193,563 187,000 187,000 107 CABLE TV FUND 4922 Sale of Equipment/Services 127,170 121,933 98,211 83,000 75,000 Total Cable TV Fund 127,170 121,933 98,211 83,000 75,000 108 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 11,704 31,314 30,451 40,000 20,000 4672 Asset Forfeiture Federal DOJ 10,741 7,639 155,549 37,500 40,000 4927 Asset Forfeiture 213,494 297,615 311,346 750,000 300,000 4929 Asset Forfeiture-Drug/Gang 35,089 50,354 52,604 145,000 50,000 Total Asset Forfeiture Fund 271,028 386,922 549,950 972,500 410,000 109 PARKING/BUSINESS IMPROVMT FD 4302 Parkina/Business Improvement 138,836 131,284 33,177 0 0 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 971 819 339 0 0 Total Parking/Business Fund 139,807 132,103 33,516 0 0 110 PARKING DISTRICT FUND 4010 Special Assessment-Land 72,344 75,382 45,351 0 0 4011 Special Assessment-Phase II .3,598 20 0 0 0 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 448 25,113 (225) 0 0 4530 Rental Fee-Parkinq 2,407 2,244 10,753 0 0 4670 Economic Development Reimb. 145,094 0 0 0 0 . Total Parking District Fund 223,891 102,759 55,879 0 0 111 AIR QUALlTY-AB 2766 FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 7,524 7,497 6,142 6,100 6,100 4626 Rideshare Reimbursement 207,167 209,297 216,394 220,000 220,000 4901 Mise Receipts 0 812 1,138 0 0 4906 Water Department 7,606 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total Transportation Fund 222,297 220,606 226,674 229,100 229,100 1122 ARTICLE 8 - L TF o I o I 01 o I 01 124 ANIMAL CONTROL FUND 4320 Animal License 194,601 208,274 331,662 300,200 346,800 4352 Misc. License & Permits 1,960 1,456 1,836 5,000 5,000 4410 General Fines 11,999 10,144 47,759 48,000 48,000 4430 Animal License Penalty 35,208 51,114 63,067 40,000 40,000 4756 Animal Adoption Fee 20,114 22,920 28,515 30,000 30,000 4757 Contractee Shelter Fee 482,891 512,511 606,237 650,000 650,000 4758 Livestock Fee 270 0 140 300 800 6 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO OTHER FUNDS REVENUE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2003 - 2004 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED DESCRIPTION 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 4759 Apprehension Fee 12,908 17,670 17,770 20,000 20,000 4760 Board Fee 8,698 15.437 15,028 15,000 15,000 4761 Field Service Fee 1,471 2076 1.378 2,000 2.000 4763 Owner Release Fee 33,289 32,423 31,861 30.000 10,500 4764 Vaccination Fee 11,319 13,249 13.083 15,000 15,000 4901 Miscellaneous Receipts 16,063 78,369 1.853 1,500 1,500 Total Animal Control Fund 830,791 965,643 1,160,189 1,157,000 1,184,600 126 SPECIAL GAS TAX FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 20.899 53,285 50,079 40,000 40.000 4610 State Aid-2106 712,319 664,747 723,572 730,000 730,000 4611 State Aid-21 07 1,508,824 1,389,782 1.569,686 1,550,000 1,550,000 4612 State Aid-21 075 10,000 10,000 1 0,000 10,000 10,000 4614 Prop 111-Hiqhwav Users Tax 1,133,323 1,336,938 1,193,412 1,150,000 1,150,000 4945 Reimbursement 1,735 (1,370) 8,117 80,000 0 Total Gas Tax Fund 3,387,100 3,453,382 3,554,866 3,560,000 3,480,000 128 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 4440 CVC Fine 813,217 651,456 693,320 650,000 650,000 Total Traffic Safety Fund 813,217 651,456 693,320 650,000 650,000 1291/2 CENT SALES/ROAD TAX FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 134,682 132,000 134,589 100,000 100,000 4613 1/2 Cent Sales Tax 1,964,227 2,153,541 2,155,766 2,250,000 2,250,000 4945 Construction Reimbursement 6,291 15,000 81,000 0 992,700 Total 1/2 Cent Sales/Road Tax Fund 2,105,200 2,300,541 2,371,355 2,350,000 3,342,700 1131 SB 300 FUND o I o I 01 01 01 132 SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 118,654 123,022 113,442 110,000 100,000 4820 Sewer Line Maint 1,144,707 1,210,488 1,225,921 1,250,000 1,286,000 Total Sewer Line Maintenance 1,263,361 1,333,510 1,339,363 1,360,000 1,386,000 133 BASEBALL STADIUM 4520 Special Events Rental 88,805 78,165 10,000 0 0 4901 Baseball Team Lease Agreement 150,655 98,753 188,739 100,000 140,000 Total Baseball Stadium 239,460 176,918 198,739 100,000 140,000 134 SOCCER FIELDS 4520 Land & Buildinq Rental 0 0 0 103,000 140,000 4530 Rental Fee - Parkinq 0 0 0 105,000 160,000 4861 Proaram & Facilities Fee 0 0 0 90,000 75,000 4862 Park Energy Fee 0 0 0 500 500 Total Baseball Stadium 0 0 0 298,500 375,500 135 AB 2928 TRAFFIC CONGESTION FD 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 0 56,615 42,175 9,000 0 4635 AB2928 Proiect Reimb. 0 0 0 0 0 4635 Traffic Congestion Relief 0 1,328,273 473,633 361 ,700 360,000 Total AB 2928 Traffic Congestion Fund 0 1,384,888 515,808 370,700 360,000 242 STREET CONSTRUCTION FUND 4630 State Aid-Street Constr. 6,857 0 0 0 0 4658 Federal Aid-FAU 258,481 117.417 397,748 52,800 0 4945 Construction Reimbursement 138.929 58,700 12,916 17,600 5,080,600 Total Street Constr. Fund 404,267 176,117 410,664 70,400 5,080,600 7 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO OTHER FUNDS REVENUE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2003 - 2004 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL 1999-00 ACTUAL 2000-01 ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 243 PARK CONSTRUCTION FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 38,653 34.433 26,201 21,500 18,000 4901 Park Bond Money 0 0 0 642.400 2,803,500 4732 Park Development Fee 118,345 184,951 303,297 302,600 300,000 4945 Construction Project Reimb 10,000 0 0 0 0 Total Park Construction Fund 166,998 219,384 329,498 966,500 3,121,500 244 CEMETERY CONSTRUCTION FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 731 853 926 800 800 4778 Sale Cemetery Plots 2,929 2,925 3,731 3,900 3,900 Total Cemetery Constr. Fund 3,660 3,778 4,657 4,700 4,700 245 SEWER LINE CONSTRUCTION FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 158,782 316,881 248,770 190,000 170,000 4821 Sewer lateral Fee 799 446 2,876 2,500 3,000 4822 Sewer Connection Fee 130,728 231,223 290.404 344,000 300,000 Total Sewer Line Constr. Fund 290,309 548,550 542,050 536,500 473,000 246 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 18,820 19,658 23,505 20,000 0 Total Public Improvement Fund 18,820 19,658 23,505 20,000 0 247 CULTURAL DEVELOP FUND 4335 Cultural Devel. Constr. Fee 42,960 117.400 124.468 225,000 300,000 4505 Interest on Idle Cash (208) 3,065 493 3,500 4,000 Total Cultural Devel Const Fund 42,752 120,465 124,961 228,500 304,000 248 STORM DRAIN CONSTR FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 112,797 68,241 52,528 55,000 60,000 4818 Storm Drain Fee 354,283 416,515 472,014 619,300 500,000 4945 Construction Reimbursement 9,965 0 0 0 250,000 Total Storm Drain Constr. Fund 477,045 484,756 524,542 674,300 810,000 250 TRAFFIC SYSTEMS CONSTR FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 6,925 25,244 24,111 22,000 15,000 4658 Fed/State Aid-Street Construction 0 39,999 0 40,000 258,600 4803 Traffic Svstem Fees 143,319 281,243 187,912 602,900 180,000 4945 Street Construction Reimbursement 0 (11,158) 0 0 0 Total Traffic Systems Fund 150,244 335,328 212,023 664,900 453,600 1257 CITY WIDE AD 994 125,1531 103,257 I 62,866 I 30,000 I o I 527 REFUSE FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 0 36,373 33,583 20,000 20,000 4830 Commercial Rubbish 438.496 420,178 414,721 415,000 415,000 4831 Commercial Bin Rent 98,693 102,113 154,673 125,000 125,000 4832 Commercial Bin Service 6,567.453 6,689,026 6,847,829 6,900,000 6,950,000 4833 Commercial Special 539,118 540,749 587,726 560,000 580,000 4837 Automated Commercial Rubbish 41,868 39,779 18,980 12,000 12,000 4840 Residential Water Billed 6,981,359 7,113,228 7,286,966 7,500,000 7,550,000 4841 Residential "B" Accounts 539,837 547.432 528,629 590,000 590,000 4842 Residential Soecials 3.475 50 0 0 0 4843 Dino Bin Service 1,261,530 1,415,525 1,654,284 1,700,000 1,700,000 4901 Miscellaneous Other Revenue 116,869 160,100 200,609 659.400 540,000 4923 Sale Salvage Material 6,383 0 (257,889) 0 0 Total Refuse Fund 16,595,081 17,064,553 17.470,111 18.481,400 18,482,000 8 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO OTHER FUNDS REVENUE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2003 - 2004 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL 1999-00 ACTUAL 2000-01 ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROPOSED 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 1621 CENTRAL SERVICES FUND 247,626 I 269,037 I 324,1221 275,000 I 325,900 I 629 LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 4505 Interest on Idle Cash 185,196 392,162 234,850 200,000 200,000 4670 Economic Development Aqency 25,000 0 23,710 0 0 4897 Interdepartmental Receipts 1,822,700 1,644,500 1,628,500 1.949,100 2.460.600 Total Liability Insurance Fund 2,032,896 2,036,662 1,887,060 2,149,100 2,660,600 630 TELEPHONE SUPPORT FUND 4541 T eleohone Commission 31,887 9,172 11,164 11.200 10,000 4893 Water Dep!. Receipts 145,063 105,764 111.882 100.000 108,700 4670 Economic Development Agency 15,813 833 650 10.000 700 4897 Interdeoartmental Receipts 624,292 727,794 885.479 800,000 660,000 4903 Refunds and Rebates 20,707 32,030 16,708 10,000 15,700 Total Telephone Support Fund 837,762 875,593 1,025,883 931,200 795,100 631 UTILITY FUND 4897 Interdeoartmental Receipts 3,345,785 3,542,913 4,346,703 5,190700 4,284,500 4944 LED Reimbursement 0 0 878,950 0 136.000 Total Utility Fund 3,345,785 3,542,913 5,225,653 5,190,700 4,420,500 635 FLEET SERVICES 4670 Economic Development Agency 4,333 3,803 8,456 8,500 5,000 4896 Replacement Contribution 484,400 513,500 1,103,200 1,045,600 602,900 4897 Interdeoartmental Receipts 4,777,456 5,080,851 4,958,535 5.101,700 4,507,800 4901 Misc Receipts 0 705 (35,630) 53,500 40,000 Total Motor Pool Fund 5,266,189 5,598,859 6,034,561 6,209,300 5,155,700 1678 WORKERS' COMPENSATION FUND 4897 Interdepartmental Receiots 2,075,020 2.148,414 2,764,328 2,879,200 3.595,600 4906 Water Department 306,361 332,880 269,894 250.000 360,000 4901 Misc Receipts 15,000 16 0 0 0 Total Workers' Compensation Fd 2,396,381 ' 2,481,310 3,034,222 3,129,200 3,955,600 679 Management Information Services 4670 EDA Reimbursement 25,248 2,759 1,150 0 0 4673 Water Reimbursement 423,826 425,897 337.680 417.800 373.400 4897 Interdepartmental Receipts 2,682.000 2,918,500 3.322,000 4.079,800 3.245,100 4901 Miscellaneous Receipts 425 551 437 150.000 700 Total MIS Fund 3,131,499 3,347,707 3,661,267 4,647,600 3,619,200 IGRAND TOTAL I 45,714,511 I 49,011,909l 52,264,218 I 55,780,500 I 61,679,400 I 9 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DETAIL OF INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 TRANSFERS - IN TO GENERAL FUND: *From Special Gas Tax For - Street Maintenance - $2,320,000 Street Lighting - $470,100 *From Traffic Safety For - Police Costs *From 1/2 Cent Sales & Road Tax For- Administration *From Cultural Development Fund For - Funding Fine Arts and Civic and Promotional Costs *From Traffic Systems Constructions For- Administration *From Storm Drain Construction For - Administration *From Refuse Fund For - Administration - $1,826,200 Street Repair - $50,000 Lease City Yards - $464,000 Lease City Hall - $41,000 *From Sewer Line Construction For- Administration *From Sewer Line Maint For- Administration *From Telephone Fund For- Refund Reserve Excess *From Fleet Fund For - Refund Reserve Excess *From Air Quality - AS 2766 Fund For - Crossing Guards 50% Funding 80,000 Traffic Engineering Costs 60,000 Maint. & Fuel for Alternate Fuel Vehicles 41,500 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 10 2,810,000 650,000 215,000 304,000 25,000 100,000 2,381,200 100,000 150,000 400,000 300,000 181,500 $7,616,700 I CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DETAIL OF INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 TRANSFERS - IN I TO ANIMAL CONTROL FUND: *From General Fund For - Operating Costs TO CATV FUND: *From General Fund For - Operating Costs TO LIBRARY FUND: *From General Fund For - Operating Costs TO PUBLIC PARK EXTENSION: *From General Fund For - Park Facilities Improvements TO REFUSE FUND: *From General Fund For- Street Sweeping TO BASEBALL STADIUM *From General Fund For- Operating Costs TO WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND *From General Fund For- Operating Costs TO CEMETERY FUND *From General Fund For- Operating Costs TOTAL OTHER FUNDS IGRAND TOTAL TRANSFERS-IN 11 386,000 463,400 2,197,800 37,100 65,000 245,900 o 48,500 $3,443,700 I $11,060,400 I CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DETAIL OF INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 TRANSFERS - OUT FROM GENERAL FUND: *To Animal Control Fund For- Operating Costs *To CATV Fund For- Operating Costs *To Library Fund For- Operating Costs *To Baseball Stadium For- Operating Costs *To Refuse Fund For- Street Sweeping *To Workers Comp Fund For- Operating Costs *To Cemetery Fund For- Operating Costs *To Public Park Extension For- Park Facilities Improvements TOTAL GENERAL FUND FROM SPECIAL GAS TAX: *To General Fund For- Street Maintenance Costs - $2,320,000 Street Lighting Costs - $470,100 FROM TRAFFIC SAFETY: *To General Fund For- Police Costs FROM 1/2 CENT SALES/ROAD TAX: *To General Fund For - Administration FROM TELEPHONE FUND: *To General Fund For- Refund Reserve Excess FROM LIABILITY FUND: *To General Fund For- Refund Reserve Excess 12 $386,000 463,400 2,197,800 245,900 65,000 o 48,500 37,100 $3,443,700 I 2,810,000 650,000 215,000 400,000 o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DETAil OF INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 TRANSFERS - OUT FROM FLEET FUND: *To General Fund For- Refund Reserve Excess FROM CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT *To General Fund For- Fine Arts & Civic Promotional Costs FROM TRAFFIC SYSTEM CONSTR *To General Fund For- Administration of Fund FROM STORM DRAIN FUND *To General Fund For- Administration of Fund FROM REFUSE FUND *To General Fund For- Administration - $1,826,200 Street Repairs - $50,000 lease City Yards - $464,000 lease City Hall - $41,000 FROM SEWER LINE CONSTR FD *To General Fund For- Administration FROM SEWER LINE MAINT FUND *To General Fund For- Administration FROM AIR QUALlTY-AB 2766 FUND *To General Fund For- Crossing Guards 50% Funding Traffic Engineering Costs Maint & Fuel for Alternate Fuel Vehicles TOTAL OTHER FUNDS IGRAND TOTAL TRANSFERS-OUT 80,000 60,000 41 ,500 300,000 304,000 25,000 100,000 2,381,200 100,000 150,000 181,500 $7,616,700 I $11,060,400 I EXHIBIT A CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Common Council FROM: Fred Wilson, City Administrator SUBJECT: FY 03-04 Budget ReductionslRevenue Enhancements DATE: July 31,2003 COPIES: James Penman, City Attorney; Barbara Pachon, Finance Director Attached is a budget summary containing the recommendations for balancing the City's FY 03-04 Budget. The major changes in this document from the June 12 version is outlined in the attached spreadsheets and summarized as follows Additional departmental budget savings in FY 02-03 Revised revenue projections adjustments for FY 02-03 Revised revenue projections for FY 03-04 Revised deficit Proposed potential budget reductions Remaining projected balance 6/30/04 $1,100,000 $ 686,500 $ 396,000 [$1,280,600] $1,979,100 $ 698,500 As you know, the Assembly has adjourned after passing most of the Senate budget package to the Go"ernor. The Senate budget package contained the main budget bill (AB 1765) and various trailer bills that included the "Triple-Flip" (Bradley-Burns sales tax for property tax swap); a loan of the VLF gap "backfill" money to the state ($825 million estimate); and $250 million in cuts to Redevelopment agencies. While they passed the Senate version of most bills without amendment, there were some key alterations - the RDA cuts were lowered to $135 million, and the booking fee reimbursements ($38 million) were reinstated, lowering the overall local government hit by $153 million. The Senate will be asked to concur on these changes when they return August 18. We are still awaiting the details of the actual budget impacts. Preliminary information from the League of California cities indicates that the fiscal impact of the VLF "backfill" is approximately $2.2 million. Gary has indicated that the RDA hit will be approximately $1,200,000. The impact of the law enforcement hit is currently being determined by the Police Department. Their preliminary analysis shows that restoring the booking fee subvention will add $689,000 in additional revenue. The reduction in funding for the COPS Option program will cost about $81,000. Additionally, there may be a loss of funding for local street and road improvement ~r;l;7~ls soon as we have more details, we will let you know. af~~ City Administrator FA W /md Ul - C Gl E Gl (J C l'lI .c: c Gl Gl :l C Gl > Gl .. Iii c o .; (J :l '0 Gl .. - Gl Cl '0 :l::; ..oll. _ <0 l'lIS> C~ 0"" ..8 :S~ ~~ .. , C :l ,0' , E, 1<' ....1 Gl: z: I: I , Iii: I I ~~i~'~,~i '~~!~:~I~~ I._~_~_ .....~_~....:........-+--- +-.-.._---L o oio OiS' o CiD 0:0 ~.O.ll1.,O.I"'_: g g~I~Ui~i .q-...-'(O:C'?IN' M:~I ' I":i _1: i , I c;)' o 0; ~' c:al : _C'?I o 9i CI)'('\Ji CllIO "0,>- lll:lJ.. '5,~1 ~: (I): "-"" C> "I c: ~'~I gl_1 CD, QlI ~.g':8;g CO::l! I! I I Ci.c,N!MI '-E!C6iO!O ,_, _1>-: >-, ~ ~!~ ~. a.. EiSiS' ~ 1ij.l!lI.l!l' _ICl:c:,c:1 C QlIQlIQl '-,"01 Ei E "0, '-!_I_'~' .$:.,2: ~' ~: U ~:.2L:O:O~1 '0 c: CO CO ~I '-', Q): Q) Q) "'C1 Q..E!::J::I i :!:::'t) C:I c:::Xi .g ,:2. !J;, !J;lo:;, Ql,"O Ql, Ql' ClIi ~:~-~~~~ ..., o M ,0 ,>- :lJ.. ,.: 00:0000 o 0:010 0 0 lO I,()!O'V ,..... 0 r-: N,ol", NO ,I./') co r--,C'? N,C'? o o '0. '0 ~ ~ ~ "0 :.S ~ (5, en 'i:: c.: Q) .s 'Q,li (3 uQl o. ':c ,. co:: ~] Ql .!!l Ql > 03 ~ .!9i -0 U C) c:1 Q) o.Sc I~I ~ ~ ~ E 'Ql' 0. o.in"F l.d .2- g>iii _:::i !m :0 ~ "i I ~.EI: ~ ~ 2 ~ I I "0''<:1 ,;;: Cl tJ .... I ::>:.B 1 c 0. ,- S I~ .01 Cll''''1 0 ::> c ,QlI QlIE:c", >-e.!!! Ig;" glclgi CD .c U :J ~ ~! CD! "'....1 ~ ~ .9l -g 10' Cll:Cj_,lE 0 Ql.<: I-_el:.o "~IO ;. g> ~ , , Ol~ a>~ CD .c = Q) i5 :;:'-:"'10 C)co(6 tJ ,oiUj ~i ffi c: 1ii "- 10.1 QlI Ql',= :;:: c 0 ro, o'.c c: 0. .c.-- IE, 11./')1-1,,,,, E,g> in" Ql 1--1 N:-' VI: 0 -... OJ cCll: :f;R-'Oi.o::>'" ,'-Ql Ql C : i : 'C:' IV E ctl ,01 lool"OlQl ~:;::-5 i~' Ict~ ~~-g en CJ_ i"3'1 (f)! Q)! a.; x,U 0 .S ~ _ "0, c; E[ (01.19,..... ,- en ~ - (1)10, >. I ,0 en ~ 0- 0.<:':;::, Cll, >I 21 C ,_.. Ql a: U ~ i a.! ~ ,S i 0 : ~ ~ c:: ._!eno!~ :0)::';::;: U(1). Ul~ "01 ffii.9i"8- ~ en'CO g ~ en! O,"'Ci Q.; (/)1- :::: co, U - C'.l ~,~!o E ~I~ co ~!E ~'~ ,0, Q)!.E: 0 51.!!!: ~ co' ~ 0.. Q) c' :s:-I()..... v.I, 0 ro'a> C'.l E ',2 ci~' '" < C E ,- C Cll ... c;:: CI co 0 ~ c:' ~ ~ C : g g 'iij ,0 W ,_ 3 ~ ::> ,~ Ql ,"g, ~~:~! ~'-g g '(ii:a; 0 ~ .~. a:: o,~'::),~~~'a:: ~ iii. "E:c 'E "E "E c Ql Ql Ql Ql Ql Ql EE,E E E E ~'8,8 ~ ~l~ o c'c C C C c.,~ ~'~ ~ ~ E c'c C C C -Iwwwww crlQlQlQlQlQl o C ~ ::J ~ ~,~ 'iii,~ggggg ':;: ,!:1 > > > > > i5tB&!&!&!&!&! Cl C ~ F Q) ~ ii5 0000 iO 00,0,0 '0 o toO 0> :0. ciMLri~ ..q ~ L()!N:N ~ '<:1'1 0 0, 0' 0 0 iO' o. .-' "'! ~ 0 ai, cO, C'? ~ 'all (J)~ I'" .- I I I I I I I I 1 I I . : I I I I :~ :~ ~!b't i~'~'~'~ Et7 :EA I-----~. ' ~..._--_. , i c , E 'E en 10 ,g u; g fl l.!!l '", E E '~ '0 Ql Cll Cll Q) I&. ~a "'O:c en.~ 00 Q) Q) 1:5 (1) enQ. Q) ,E ;co ~ Q) C'.l j(1) !.=o ie '- E \J i ~ i5 I=~: Qj'~ .5 Co tJ iCll'1 12'" ,c E Q) ~r- 00) 1 'ro I~ 23 tJ o~ "'E .<: 0 c ~ - - C5 enl en - 't: Q) "0 u::> E -Ql '.... IQl E Q) . . -, I I c. C I .~ , u I Q) a. 1 1'- -~ '-~ Q),roco~ I It I en 0 'Q) en EIC5 '- 0 10 1 ro C/) g ~, I 11;) t (1)' en C ~ :: 1 g. ':g 'S> tn I ~ .19 I g I '- 8"- I 2"'0 I 1 ,~ co C 11;) I '- en ro Q) _ c ro en I I~ ,'" '51'''' ,t- ~ '1.<:1-5::> Ql ~ I::> I ICll - Cll~ ..~ c-'<:E 0 I i..o I ~ ClJI ~, E coQl QlI Cllo.l cl __ I.t: 1 , I' Ql >- Ql ~ '0 Cll I I ! "C ~ ~ ~ 1 c.9 J: E I .!a I oX 1 ~ Wi> 1 I c ::> -, ~ Cll'O tJ ~ , I i I I ro en1e (/)1 c:1 c..E 1 en I ro: (/) I E (I) :,. 'en' ' (/).c .2101 0 ~ I 01 (1)1~J Q) 10 Q,) 0 ic' 51 5 ~Cll cl ~ ul~I,~L5.s o.~: (1)1~ J:: '~ I 0 ~ I i,_ 0 co N Q) ro Z c I' - .J::. oX I C"') : 8Ig!~,~ ~i-g ~! t;1~:~ ~ ~'1ijI.~1 ~ 0 -g I lfa tJl"OI"'_Qlo::>~.o-_ ::>a.E,- ~ Clllll C I Cll Qll'c:l Cll 'E'~ Zlo' E g::: e >,=1 e >- '" 51 01 '.?:-, ~I'E '" '-I c "01-1 O'U ~ 5, Cll Ql ro tJ Ql -I CIl 'U 2 "0 ~ ~ I 0 -g U I tJ _ Ql '", I 0. 'I 0.:0 g $! ul U i '- ~ I ro ~ ,~, Q5 ;..:.' 0 ~ ~ ro 1 ~ 1 B ffi I '- Q) 1 C'.l Q5.g ; I .~ .E 0 rn U >.c en'*-ICI) Qj ,c"o,Q,).E ~ ~ ..c 1>>1 'iil 1:: 'Q) ;1ii::1~ g Q,) ~~ ro':" 0. Q,) .$':J.rn Q,).s (5.... [.:2 Cll .S ~ ~ 1 ~ Q) 1 U 'S> I c: (/) c: ~& 1 a; 1 ~' co : C ~ .S: Cis -;: "C Qi "OIQl ~E Cll Ql'ClQl c ...."0 '" Ql Ql c '" Ql Qi Gl .9 (/) (/) I D I ~ 0) .:; en ~'.~ ~ 0 .. C I ::J "E lEu 'm 'ffi.!"1 U Q) CO 1;) '-I "-:>. ro-' 1:: en OlD 0 >0.-- 1,- ~ CD "0 ,D 0' Ol ....., en (/) c 1 > 0 ro :.;::;: _I U co ..c ..0 a. Q)..al I'~ ,- I Q3 8,'::"i ~,~ ~Ol-[ K z c: ~15 & ~ ~IO ~. ~ ftil d:! I gJ m IW .$ 0 '~ ~ ~ I Q) .r; E .9 ~I t; 0 1 en .~ .:. ~ 0 cl 1 Q) ~ ,U Cll E 0 Ql ~ iU "" ,- .... >- Ql E :1:]' Cll Ql' tJ :J' - ClII 1 ~ 1 '" Q) I U) ~ E ~ (/) 1 Q) dt:: I ~ .s ~ :i; co 'c ~ O).~ ul "'Ql ....01 I .E I Ql I Q) Q) >. - Q,) c: .- Q) Q) C 0 :J IIC..o '" 1 U Q) E Q) -, co "'0 U C Q,) U (I) U ro U co '- '- (/) D.1 10- I ~ ~ I r?::J g I ~ "0 I cQl ::J .~ () ~ ~ ::J e>:3 ..c:: 1 ~ en, m"iil caE I I fl '-,"C'ro (/) C "0 __"'O~"C 0"0 U 0 co '- c g QlI.<: Ql al .Q 0';:( Ql, lE ::: c g Ql, Ql Ql 0 ::: -= tJ 1 '0' 1 GlI Cll ,_ a:: U a:: ~ U ~~w ~ ~.-:-.I:l:::~((_~~ ,~,E~_,~_riij 1 I I I ..0 1 l~ ,- ,Cll I; IQl l-g IQl iE IE 18 !~ i,!!l I~ . i , , I I '~I<h;~'~ I : I IMj cccc Ql,Ql Ql'Ql EIE E,E ,Ql,Ql Ql'Ql >>u> ~:o C 0 a. o.'~, a. E E' c E --w- >-: >- I >- tJltJ ~ tJ gg clg ,- ,- Ql,'- ~~6i~ 'w wa::'w I 'E :Ql E c C'Ql ,2 ,2 15 u u; C. ,.g.g:E Ql Ql'- a:: a:: rl Ql Ql c tJ tJ Ql '~ '~ :2 QlQl:t: rJ) rJ)'W :~ c Ql , > Ql a:: 'E Q) E Ql tJ C Cll .<: c W cccc Ql Ql Ql Ql ~,~~:~ Ui> >,> coo 0 ~:c.a.c. c'E E E w--- >- >- >- ~ g,g g g ,~ ,~ ,~ 6i~~~ a::www IC .Q ti ::> "0 Ql a:: 'Ql ItJ '2: Ql 'rJ) I I .,.1 I i I I I iui Ig ig ,"0 Ql .... Q) ~ - o ~ Ql Cl Cll a.. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitlelDescription: Continue Animal Control's day light savings "late -shift" for the entire year. Fund: Animal Control Fund 124 Department: Animal Control Division: 232 Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 7,500 Summary of Proposal: Continue for the entire year the day light savings "late-shift" schedule that is utilized during day light savings time. Proposal Implications (pros/cons): Pros- 50% of overtime is for emergency calls between the hours of 5 :00 p.m. and 8 :00 p.m. Continuing the late-shift for the entire year would reduce overtime and increase emergency response time. Cons- Responses to routine calls could be delayed due to the three hour reduction of one officer from the day shift. Account Numbers: Reduce 124-232-5015 by $7,500 BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal Title/Description: Obtain donations for pet food. Fund: Animal Control Fund 124 Department: Animal Control Division: 233 Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 2,500 Summary of Proposal: Animal Control will increase efforts in seeking out anddeveloping relationships with businesses that offer various types of pet food and are willing to donate food to the City's Animal Shelter. Proposal Implications (pros/cons): Pros- Donated food usually consists of a higher quality product, reducing the amount fed to animals. With increased donations, animal food costs could potientially be reduced by 25%. Cons- Many businesses that donate food require the Animal Control Department to pick-up the donations on short notice, thereby interrupting normal field operations. Account Numbers: Reduce 124-233-5111 by $2,500 . BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitIeIDescription: Use one-time payment from Gas Co. to balance the budget. Fund: General Fund 001 Department: City Admillistrator's Office Division: Revenue Account 001-000-4901 (miscellaneous revenue) Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 250,000 Summary of Proposal: As part of an agreement between the City and Southern California Gas, the Gas Company will be paying the City $250,000 during FY 03/04 for the use of a conduit in the Tippecanoe Bridge. The Gas Company plans to use this conduit as part of its project to install a major new gas pipeline to the Mt. View power plant in Redlands. This one-time revenue can be used as a budget balancing measure. Proposal Implicatiolls (pros/colis): Pros- Revenue helps reduce the deficit. Cons- Revenue is one-time only, and does not result in ongoing expenditure reductions. Also, iffor some reason the pipeline is not constructed as anticipated, the City would not receive this revenue. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal Titleffiescription: Use proceeds from sale of City property to EDA to fund City's grant match for Santa Fe Depot. Fund: General Fund 001 Department: City Administrator's Office Division: Revenue Account 001-000-4925 (sale of property) Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 385,400 Summary of Proposal: It is proposed that two (2) pieces of City-owned property be sold to the Economic Development Agency for housing purposes. The revenue received from the sale would be used to offset a portion of the City's necessary match for grants related to the Santa Fe Depot restoration project. The two properties are: - The piece located at Waterman and 4th Street - The piece located in the Verdemont area, near the Pet Cemetery (formerly considered as a possible location for the Verdemont Fire Station) The Agency anticipates using its Low-Mod Housing funds for this purchase. The purchase of the Waterman and 4th parcel is contingent upon City approval of a General Plan Amendment to rezone the parcel for residential uses. The Verdemont parcel is already zoned residential. Account Numbers: Increase revenue 001-000-4925 (sale of property) Proposal Implicatiolls (pros/cons): PROS: Revenue helps reduce the deficit. One-time revenues will be used to offset a one-time cost. CONS: General Plan Amendment is required for the Waterman/4th Parcel. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal Titlemescription: Audit Transient Lodging Tax (TOT) and Business Registrations. Fund: General Fund 001 Department.' City Clerks's Office Division: Business Registration Division Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 72,700 Summary of Proposal: Enter into a Professional Services Agreement, Software License Agreement, and Software Maintenance Agreement with Progressive Solutions, Inc. to provide revenue enhancement services (including business registration and TL T audits) and to install new business registration software that will provide further revenue enhancements Account Numbers: Increase TOT Revenue Increase Businss Registration Revenue Increase Other Professional Services Expenditure 001-000-4222 001-000-4301 001-033-5505 $50,000 $80,000 ($57,300) Net Savings $72,700 Proposal Implications (pros/cons): Pros Additional revenue for General Fund No "up-front" costs to implement the new software Software fees deducted prior to any contingency fees Allows the Business Registration Division to update their 1985 software to a Windows version New software will result in increased staff productivity New software will have automated cross referencing capabilities that will allow staff to efficiently implement AB990 and AB63 resulting in additional revenue Cons Revenue first applied to software fees resulting in a first year delay of additional revenue Businesses may object to vendor conducting audits on a contingency basis BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitlelDescription: Focus more of Code Compliance's resources on illegally parked vehicles Fund: General Fund 001 Department: Code Compliance Division: Parking Citation Revenue 001-000-4420 Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 30,000 Summary of Proposal: Direct Code Compliance Officers to focus more of their attention on illegally parked vehicles in residential areas. Proposal Implications (pros/cons): The revenue produced from this proposal would be hard to track as all money for parking tickets is collected by Facilities Management. Based on prior years' activities, an increase of $30,000 per year would be expected. If Code Compliance Officers are writing parking tickets, it will take time away from other activities; however, it will address illegal parking problems that exist in many areas. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal Title/Description: Reduce electrical costs for street lighting with energy saving upgrades; request change to rate schedule for street lighting. Fund: General Fund 001 Department.Facilities Management & Development Services Division: Development Services Street Lighting & Facilities Management Utilities. Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 110,000 Summary of Proposal: Reduce electrical costs for street lighting by approximately 10% by upgrading photocells; reorienting photocells; using timers; installing electronic ballasts; and using reflectorized street name signs. Energy savings of$108,000 (acct. #001-189-5606) will come from reduced street lighting costs following an initial outlay for digital electronic time clocks and installation charges for 100 locations that will cost approximately $23,000 (acct. #001-189-5111). This equates to a net savings of$85,000. An additional $25,000 of savings (to electric account 001-186-5606) will come as a result of lobbying the Public Utility Commission (PUC) to allow a limited non-light load on Street light or traffic signal meters. Currently, all Cities install three meters at every intersection in the city; one for the signal, one for the street lights, and one for landscape watering (timer). The timer takes less than one kWh per year to operate, and costs the city roughly $25 per month to be there. Last year, the PUC allowed outdoor lighting at ballfields and parks to have up to 15% of their load be non- lighting. This means if you have a ballfield with a concession stand, you can now have this on one meter, generating energy savings. Proposal Implications (pros/cons): PROS: Reduces costs, and saves energy. CONS: On the Street Lighting project, Development Services has done some research on costs of time clocks. We have also determined that we already have installed the most sensitive photo cells available so changing out these does not appear to be a cost effective option. There are some issues in regard to installation of additional circuits in locations where the intersection/safety lighting is tied to the same circuit as the street lighting. In these locations we would have to do additional work to provide for separation of circuits for the street lighting and safety lighting, so that street lighting could be on the timer and safety lighting would not be affected by an earlier turn oflights. This would result in additional staff costs and some equipment costs. Inasmuch as the locations for installation of time clocks are yet to be determined, it is not known how many of these situations we have. We will be meeting with our Street Lighting Div. staff and Facilities Mgmt. to discuss the details. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitIe/Description: Increase water baseline for City accounts Furrl:General Fund OJ:4.cuLlt::lL:Facilities Management D:i:v.isim: 0-;1 iMffi Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $10,000 Summary of Proposal: . 'Ih= City water" taEelire h:s S:ayed cx::nt.ar:t sin::E 1995. An in:::l:a3se ct. 30, 000 hundre:i a.Jbi.c feEt. (h:::f) 'wDuldsavetre Gene:al FUndcq:prox:i.rrat.ely $10,000 p3:"JB3r, hI 'wDuld Ba(Y1tr~ in::reas2 to tre Water" Iep:nt rrert:'s h.rl:33:. Reduce: 001-201-5608 001-321-5608 001- 381-5608 133-461-5608 $500 $1,000 $8,000 *$500 *Sa'\lirg> in S:a:lium resuls in a lovvertl:arEEer--mfrom tre Gereral FUnd Proposal Implications (pros/cons): P.t:t:s: Add:it:imal s:wir:g3 totre City. Cons: Prqx:sal h3s irrplic:ct:ic:ns fcrtre Water Iepartrrert:'s~. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitlefDescription: Lower electric expenditure budgets based on recently announced Edison rate reductions. Fund: General Fund 001 Department: Facilities Management Division: Savings in various General Fund supported departments. Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 453,600 Summary of Proposal: On July 10th, 2003, Southern California Edison announced that the Public Utilities Commission has approved $1.2 billion in rate reductions for Southern California Edison customers. The reductions range from 8% to 19% depending on customer group and are effective August 1,2003. Facilities Management estimates this translates into a savings of$453,600 for the General Fund in FY 03-04. Proposal Implications (pros/cons): Pros- Reduced energy costs for City Departments. Cons- None. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitlelDescription: Charge Water Department for benefits administration Fund: General Fund 001 Department: Finance Department Division: Revenue 001-000-4673 (Water Dept. Reimbursement Revenue) Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 25,000 Summary of Proposal: Charge the Water Department for the cost of administering employee benefits. Staff from both Human Resources and Finance provide support to the Water Department in this area, which is not currently included in the Master Services Agreement between the City and Water. This would require agreement with the Water Board. Proposal Implicatiolls (pros/colis): Pros: Additional revenue to the City. Cons: Proposal has implications for the Water Department's budget. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitlelDescription: Cancel Mowing Contract for 9 parks and ballfields Fund: 00 I Department: Parks, Recreation & Comm. SYres. Division: Parks (382) Net Potential Expenditure Savin2s and/or Revenue Increase: $ 21,900 Summary of Proposal: Resume mowing by park crews at 9 parks and ballfields. Proposal Implications (pros/cons): Pros: Reduce contract costs by $24,300 (includes 10% over contract for irrigation parts & installation) Cons: 1) Increase garage charges by $2,400 annually. (001-382-5601) 2) Reduce mowing frequency from every 7 days to 14 days in winter months (Nov. - Jan.) 3) Additional complaints from public about long grass and unkempt landscape areas due to need of more frequent edging and mowing.(Reduce 001-382-5506 by $24,300). Affected sites: Newberry Park Tom Gould Memorial Park Newmark Field Campo Santo Memorial Park Palm Field Guiterrez Field Sal Savaadra Field Colony Park Boys & Girls Club BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY - Proposal Title/Description: Aquatic Program 5% Budget Cut - Jerry Lewis Swim Center / All other Pools (Delmann Heights - MiII- Hernandez - Nunez) Fund: 0011 Department: PReS Division: 383 Net Potential Exoenditure SavinJ!s and/or Revenue Increase: $14,036.25 Summary of Proposal: 1. Jerry Lewis Swim Center -Savings of9 days (Mondays) 2. All other Pools (Delmann Heights - Mill- Hernandez - Nunez) - 9 day savings (Mondays) 3. Nunez Pool closure - 10 day savings (Pool repairs) Proposal Implications (pros/cons): 1. Jerry Lewis Swim Center: Close Jerry Lewis Swim Center on Mondays June 30, July 7-14-21-28, Aug 4-11-18-25: Savings of: 9 days: Staff Savings: 1 Pool manager 11-2 Sr. Guards - 7 Lifeguards - 1 Cashier - 1 Bag Checker Pool Manager II Sr. Guard Lifeguards Cashier Bag Checker 1 Pool Manager II X 9hrs X 10.50 per hr X 9 days = 2 Sr. Guards X 9hrs X 8.50 per hr X 9 days = 7 Lifeguards X 9hrs X 7.50 per hr X 9 days = 1 Cashier X 9 hrs X 8.00 per hr X 9 days = 1 Bag Check X 9 hrs X 6.75 per hr X 9 days = $ 850.50 $ 1377.00 $ 4252.50 $ 648.00 $ 546.75 $ 7,674.75 - 3,250.50 $ 4,424.25 Savings Unrealized Revenue Total Savings 2. All other pools (Delmann Heights - MiIl- Hernandez - Nunez) Close all other pools (Delmann Heights - Mill- Hernandez - Nunez) on Mondays June 30, July 7-14-21-28, Aug. 4-11-18-25. Savings of : 9 Days: Staff Savings: 1 Pool Manager I - 1 Sr. Guard - 2 Lifeguards - 1 Cashier at Dlemann - MiIl- Hernandez 1 Pool Manager I-I Sr. Guard - 6 Lifeguards -1 Cashier - at Nunez Pool Manager I Sr. Guard Lifeguards Cashier 1 Pool Manager I X 4.5 hr X 9.50 per hr X 9 days X 4 Pool = 1 Sr. Guard X 4.5 X 8.50 hr X 9 days X 4 Pools = 2 Lifeguards X 4.5 X 7.50 hr X 9 days X 3 Pools = 6 Lifeguards X 4.5 X 7.50 hr X 9 days X 1 Pools = 1 Cashier X 4.5 X 8.00 hr X 9 days X 4 Pools = $ 1,539.00 $ 1,377.00 $ 1,822.50 $ 1,822.50 $ 1.296.00 $ 7,857.00 - 546.50 $ 7,310.50 Savings Unrealized Revenue Total Savings 3. Add Nunez closure savings (July 1 through July 14) Savings of : 10 Days: Staff Savings: 1 Pool Manager I - 1 Sr. Guard - 6 Lifeguards - 1 Cashier - at Nunez Pool Manager I Sr. Guard Lifeguards Cashier 1 Pool Manager I X 4.5 hr X 9.50 per hr X 10 days = 1 Sr. Guard X 4.5 X 8.50 hr X 10 days = 6 Lifeguards X 4.5 X 7.50 hr X 10 days = 1 Cashier X 4.5 X 8.00 hr X 10 days X = Total Saving Savings Unrealized Revenue Total Savings $ 427.50 $ 382.50 $ 2,025.00 $ 360.00 $ 3,195.00 $ 3,195.00 - 893.50 $ 2,301.50 TOTAL SAVINGS (less realized revenue) $14,036.25 BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal Title/Description: Extended Leave of Absence for C.LD. Recreation Therapist Fund: 384 Department: Park, Recreation & Community Services. Division: Recreation Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 19,129 to $22,234 Summary of Proposal: Sarisa Hankins, Recreation Therapist is taking a maternity leave beginning approximately April 18, 2003. She has requested to take an extended leave of absence until January, 2004. She has been offered the opportunity to work part time before January. She has not made a decision on this. Proposal Implications (pros/cons): This savings is base upon the estimate that this staff would work no more than an average of 10 hrs/wk from Sept. 1 to Dec. 31, 2003. This would result in a savings of 42% of the salary for the position and 50% of the benefits. Pros: The savings in the budget is the only "pro" to this. Cons: The impact of this position being unfilled for this period would be to adversely affect the quality of programming at the C.LD. The C.LD. Advisory Council has expressed concerns in the past about improving the quality of C.LD. programs. The absence of this Key, trained full time staff will adversely affect the quality of the C.LD. program. Another impact would be the qreatlv increased workload on the C.LD. Director. This would adversely affect the efficient delivery of services to people with disabilities at the C:LD. IMPORTANT NOTE: If this did occur, the C.LD. would need to maintain a larger portion of part time salaries in order to have part time staff share the work load of the absent Recreation Therapist. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitIe/Description: Reduce Fish Plantings at Seccombe Lake Fund: General Fund 001 Department: Parks Recreation Division: Recreation (241-361-5706-1739) Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 14,400 Summary of Proposal: Currently there is an expenditure of$27,000 for fish planting at Seccombe Lake. The proposal is to reduce the number of fish plantings per year to four (4); i.e., Spring break, July 4th, Labor Day, and Christmas break. The average price of live fish is approximately $2.10 per pound. Planting 1500 pounds at each of the 4 times listed above will be $3,150 each or $12,600 total for the year. Proposal Implications (pros/cons): Previously we have dropped 2000 pounds offish six (6) to eight (8) times per year. This reduction in the number of times per year will revert to the original plan for planting fish at Seccombe Lake, when the program was first begun in 1980. The dates suggested above are times when the fishing crowds are the largest and will provide opportunities to youth to fish during their special times out of school, as well as providing time for others who are off work for holiday times. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitIe/Description: Consolidate Mill Center Operations Fund: General Fund 001 Department: Parks Recreation Division: Recreation 381 Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 12,000 Summary of Proposal: Proposal - Develop full operations at the Norton Gymnasium and Galaxy facility through transfer of resources from the Mill Community Center. Revenue Estimate/Cost Savings: $12,000 first year $17,000 second year Impact: Through a transfer of personnel from Mill Center to Norton, full time programming of both the Norton Recreation complex and Galaxy Ballroom can be accomplished including youth, adult, family and seniors fitness programs, league play and tournaments, and special events as well as business meetings, seminars and conferences at the ballroom site. Mill Center would be closed however the majority of current users of that facility would be able to travel to Norton Recreation complex for many new activities approximately 8 blocks away from Mill Center. Revenue estimate is calculated as follows: Current Mill Center staff and operational costs: Norton and Galaxy Ballroom staff and operational costs Savings. . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . New Revenue.. ...... ...... ... ....... ......... ...... ... ..... ......... Cost savings + new revenue.. ........ ........ ...... ... .......... ... Timeline: Beginning July 1,2003 $121,000 $ 116,000- $5,000 + $7,000 $12,000 Proposal Implications (pros/cons): Pros Enhanced programming opportunites at new site. Reduction in cost of operating Mill center Additional revenue through rental of Mill Center Cons Mill Center pool operations will occur w/o benefit of collaborating recreation center staff. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitlelDescription: Increase Recreation revenues through program enhancements Fund: General Fund 001 Department. Parks Recreation Division: Recreation - increases to program revenues Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 31,400 Summary of Proposal: ESTABLISH BIRTHDAY PACKAGE - Birthday activities for the public including games and prizes. $70 fee for 4-hour package including swimming and a $20 fee for a 2-hour package. Revenue estimate - $500 annually - Division 383 ESTABLISH DAY TRIPS AND EXCURSION PROGRAMS - Allow citizens to register for trips (i.e. trips and excursions that are 3 to 10 days long) to interesting locations in the state, outside the state and country; TripslExcursions are coordinated and offered by outside travel agencies. These travel agencies are willing to pay a finder's fee for customers we register; depending on the cost of the trips. Generally Travel Agents/Agencies are willing to pay $20.00 to $40.00 (per person) registered for each trip/excursion. Revenue estimate: $7,000+ annually - Division 383 ESTABLISH SATURDAY CAMP FACILITY - fee based program offered to provide structured supervised activities for youth. Fee $3 per day. Revenue estimate: $1,800 annually - Division 383 ESTABLISH A FEE BASED OFF-TRACK PROGRAM - fee based program offered Monday through Friday to provide structured supervised activities for youth off track. Fee $20 per week. Revenue estimate: $9,300 annually - Division 383 CONTRACT OUT TENNIS PROGRAM AT NORTON FACILITY - Contract out racquetball and tennis courts to a membership based racquet club for a monthly fee. Revenue estimate: $4,800 annually - Division 387 ESTABLISH A FEE BASED AFTER-SCHOOL PROGRAM - program offered Monday through Friday to provide structured supervised activities for youth after school. Fee $15 per week. Revenue estimate: $2,000 annually - Division 383 EXPAND YOUTH AND ADULT FEE BASED RECREATION CLASSES - Increase Youth Sports Fees from $20 to $30, offer a six weeks program instead of 10 weeks, expand practice sites to include the City's North End population and offer basketball four times per year. These adjustments to the Youth Sports should increase overall registration the first year to 1000 participants.($5 x 1200 participants = $6,000) Revenue estimate: $6,000 annually - Division 388 Proposal Implicatiolls (pros/colls): PROS: Increases revenues and provides recreational activities to residents. CONS: None BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal Title/Description: Reduce amount budgeted for part-time Dispatcher salaries Fund: General Fund 001 Department: Police Department Division: Dispatch Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 30,000 Summary of Proposal: The Police Department can reduce the budget for part-time Dispatcher salaries by $30,000 annually without reducing 9-1-1 service to the public or service to department personnel. This reduction is feasible as Dispatch is at full staffing with two overfill positions. Account Numbers: Reduce 001-221-5014 by $30,000 Proposal Implicatiolls (pros/coils): Pros: Budget savings of $30,000 annually. Cons: None as long as Dispatch maintains full staffing, including two overfill positions. If staffing levels decline due to vacancies and budget cuts, overtime costs would increase to cover essential dispatch positions. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitlelDescription: Reorganize Records Division Fund: 001 Department: Police Division: 222 Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ FY 2003/04 $109,500 Summary of Proposal: The Police Department is proposing the following reorganization of the Records Bureau: . The elimination of a majority of the current contract with Wackenhut, Inc. that provides employees to perform the scalUling of police reports into the document imaging system and staff the subpoena coordinator's position.($270,000). Wackenhut, Inc. will still be utilized for the jailer position which serves as the permits clerk. This position fingerprints mandatory narcotics, arson, and sex offense parolees. . The utilization of contract savings to add and fund the following additional full time city positions: (7) Records Technician trainee positions (existing classification) $160,500 ) (2) Police Transcriber positions (new full-time classification) $55,000 . As they are hired, employees filling new Records Technician trainee positions will replace Wackenhut employees one for one. . A reduction of $30,000 for part time Police Transcriber salaries. . A reduction of $25,000 in FY 03/04 for outsourcing of tapes for transcription to Steno Solutions. Proposal Implicatiolls (pros/coils): Pros: The Records reorganization supports the City's goal of enhancing public safety and improves operational efficiency in the scalUling of police reports into document imaging, the service of subpoenas, and the transcription of police reports. These changes correct a chronic problem of the recruitment and retention of part time transcribers and contract employees. The two full time transcriber positions will increase the availability of transcribers and reduce the dependency and cost of outsourcing transcription to meet peak workloads. Staffing changes will need to be approved by City Council to increase the police department's table of organization. (continued next page) (Records reorganization continued) The Records Technician trainee position provides an entry level position for employees who need to sharpen their clerical skills in order to quality for the Records Technician or other City clerical position. Cons: The City may need to meet and confer with the General Employee's Unit with respect to scanning and subpoena coordinator positions. These job duties were previously performed by Records Technicians prior to their outsourcing in FY 1997/98. Net budget saving will be reduced each subsequent year due to step increases and agreed upon General Unit salary increases that are greater than projected increased in Wackenhut contract. It will take six to nine months to fully implement the reorganization due to the time associated with recruitment, backgrounds, and hiring of City employees. BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitlelDescription: Reduce lease payments for patrol vehicles Fund: General Fund 001 Department: Police Department Division: Support Services Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 49,000 Summary of Proposal: $400,000 was budgeted in the Preliminary Budget for patrol vehicle leases. Based on information from Purchasing, lease payments will total $351,000 in FY 03/04 ($279,500 existing leases and $71,500 new lease). So, there will be savings of$49,000. There is no impact or change to the numbers of vehicles being leased as a result of this reduction Proposal Implications (pros/cons): Pros: Budget savings of $49,000 annually. (Reduce 001-220-5611) Cons: None BUDGET SAVINGS PROPOSAL SUMMARY Proposal TitlelDescription: Pilot Program- Interagency work from EDAlWater for pavment infrastructure repairs Fund: General Fund 001 Department: Public Services Division: Public Services Streets Net Potential Expenditure Savings and/or Revenue Increase: $ 10,000 Summary of Proposal: Obtain interagency work from EDA and Water Department to perform pavement infrastructure repairs. Street Division would bid on proposed annual maintenance service cuts, new service utility cuts, and main line street pavement restoration. Account Numbers: Increase Water Revenue Reimbursement Increase Public Services Materials & Net Savings (001-000-4673) $ 25,000 (001-402-5111) <$15,000> $10,000 Proposal Implications (pros/cons): Pros 1) Abolish high number of failed utility cuts. 2) Enhance paving capabilities and strategy. 3) Replenish materials line item 001-402-5111 contraction for FY 2003-2004. 4) Joint cooperative effort with Water Department. Cons 1) Unknown EXHIBIT B City of San Bernardino FY 2003-2004 Appropriations Limit Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (enacted with the passage of Proposition 4 in 1979 and modified with the passage of Proposition 111 in 1990) restricts the appropriations growth rate for cities and other local jurisdictions. The growth rate is tied to changes in the population and the change in California Per Capita Personal Income. On May 1, 2003 the State Department of Finance notified each city of the population changes and per capita personal income factor to be used in determining appropriation limits. Effective January 1, 2003, the change in the California Per Capita Personal Income is 2.31 % and the change in the City of San Bernardino's population is 1.41 %. Attached is the City's calculation for the permitted appropriations growth rate based on the above inforn1ation from the State. In accordance with state law, the FY 1986-87 appropriation limit is to be used as the base year in calculating annual appropriation limits thereafter. The City of San Bernardino's FY 2003-2004 Appropriation Limit is 2.7191 times the base year limit of $72,956,219 which equals $198,378,712. Total appropriations for FY 2003-2004, subject to the limitation (see attached) equal $67,453,000, which is $130,925,712 below the City's FY 2003-2004 Appropriations limit of$198,378,712. Z o < I- :::l o Q. Z :E c 0 a:: C,) <( Z Z'<tO ffi~< alMI- ZO:E ~~::J u. Z o 0 ~ < C,) a:: Q. o a:: Q. Q. <( W l- I- < 0::: ~ J: ..,.::::i ~ oz N 00 .... 0 .... N_ " 0::: Ql 'I- <Xi Cl .... M< " N 0- N " O_ M .... .... c N 00::: <Xi " 0 " No.. <Xi 0 lI'i w >-0 Ql M l: .... " N lI..o::: M It) Ql 0.. <Xi ..,. 0 ~ 0.. Ql ,.: M 0::: < .... ~ .... W 0.. ~ ~ .... .... l!) 0 0 C') ..,. " .... .... N .... C') C') '<l: C! C! C! N .... .... .... .... " II W ... I- " < .52 0::: 0::: '" C II II II 0 J: => l- I- i:; ~ U )( ::::i 3: '" < .... lI.. 0 0 Z Z 0::: .S! 0 Q;' .... l!) Cl .... => i= u ..,. 0 f"- Ol 'tl < " .... i= C') c .... '" '" 0 C! W f"- .c: iiZ to < u ii: .... .... l- N '" 0.. ..J C 'tl 0 '0 :J '" U ~ .c: 0::: C X ..J 0::: " 0.. '" :l!J E' < w a. 1:: U 0.. CO < '" 0 0 '" 0::: g- O 0 .... '" .... .... C') ~ w a - - N C (3 0 a C! rn z 0 0 .... z ~ .... .... .... 0 0 i= ~ '" + + 10 .... .... < w iI5 C') '<l: C > '- ~ .... X X ~ 2- '" ~ Q. ::::i z Q;' - t:- o u ~ .!;? 0 " ~ I- ~ '" ~ " ::J l- ii: .... 0 g. Z ..J .... 0 0 U :J 0 '" i= Q. W C '" < .:; ~ ., u '" .c- o::: '" llJ ..J E' to OJ ..J :J < ::J <{ c: 1:: 0 :J rn (J '" 0 '" 0 .c: U rn w g- o u r::: 0 I- ..J Z ~ a c: i= >< < ~ 0 Q co I- 0 (3 '" <{ w 0 C u iD ~ ~ E 0::: l- I- co J: '0 '" <{ 0::: :; ~ ~ Ql Ol ::::i iiZ ~ '" CI:l W '" ::::i co ::: .... z 10 to 0 > OJ 0 ::::i N.- O a. " M 0::: iI5 '" I- Z '" N (0 0 0 C/J .c: 0 CC! z < l!) ~ 0::: '- '- 0 0 ~ 0 0 Ol. 0::: '" g N N W 0.. Cl Q. W () , ~ >- N iiZ ...., I- a:: N f"- a. C ~ W 0::: W 0 0 W 0.. < W (9 W (9 I- 0 iiZ rn 0 ..,. ~ z Z N < l: > () 0.. a:: 0 .... <{ z <{ <{ 0 llJ 0.. 0 0 I N ~ '" I 0 lI.. 0::: 0.. , 0::: ~ () () () Z 0.. < M 0 W W Z W Z 0 0.. ..,. 0 0.. (9 0 (9 0 i= < 0 N 0 ..,. z i= z i= ::s ..,. ~ >- 0 < < <{ ::s 0 lI.. 0 0 M N I ..J I :J N 0 ..J ..; () :J () :J () ..; 0 ~ a.. a.. -J N 0 a:: 0 a:: 0 <{ 0 >- 0 0 0 N () a.. () a.. () N lI.. I- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALCULATION OF APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMITATION Fiscal Year 2003-04 Proceeds Non-Proceeds Budget of Taxes of Taxes Total Proceeds of Taxes Property Tax 7,955,000 7,955,000 Sales & Use Tax 31,400,000 31,400,000 Business License Tax - Revenue 4,780,000 4,780,000 Utility Users Tax 19,330,000 19,330,000 Transient Occupancy Tax 2,625,000 2,625,000 Sales Tax Public Safety 650,000 650,000 Other 713,000 713,000 From State Motor Vehicle In Lieu 11,850,000 11,850,000 Homeowners Exemption 155,500 155,500 Off Highway Vehicles 5,000 5,000 SB 90 Reimbursements Other 252,900 252,900 . Other Governments CDBG Reimbursements 2,403,800 2,403,800 SBIAA Reimbursement 120,000 120,000 Mutual Aid/Disaster Reimbursement 100,000 100,000 Water Department 2,120,000 2,120,000 Locally Raised Licenses & Permits 1,933,500 1,933,500 Franchise Fees 2,631,300 2,631,300 Charges for Services 3,737,800 3,737,800 Fines and Penalties 1,046,000 1,046,000 Other Miscellaneous Sale of Property 460,400 460,400 Other 1,804,800 1,804,800 Rents/Commissions 488,000 488,000 Subtotal 67,453,000 29,109,000 96,562,000 Interest Earnings 650,000 650,000 Total of these Funds 67,453,000 29,759,000 97,212,000 Other Funds Not Included 42,877,700 42,877,700 Grand Total Budget ..-. 67,453,000 72,636,700 140,089,700 --- Appropriations Subject to Limitation ** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - NOT A PUBLIC DOCUMENT ** RESOLUTION AGENDA ITEM TRACKING FORM Meeting Date (Date Adopted): y-Lj-03 Item # ?f-, Vote: Ayes \-2, i1-'l Nays.G-- Change to motion to amend original documents: W r>s""-".-rl;; Resolution # z-003~- .;)~.5 Absent ,:S (' '" ?c:uC'::' \ Abstain .b'- Inor> ~1 0lt',.1\ o'Y\ .r(, .:>f\ Reso. # On Attachments: ~ Contract term: Note on Resolution of Attachment stored separately: =- Direct City Clerk to (circle 1): PUBLISH, POST, RECORD W/COUNTY Date Sent to Mayor: 'i("'-(,,- 03 Date of Mayor's Signature: Date of ClerklCDC Signature: Date Memo/Letter Sent for Signature: '-- 60 Day Reminder Letter Sent on 30th day: 90 Day Reminder Letter Sent on 45th day: See Attached: See AIt,ched: See Attached: Request for Council Action & Staff Report Attached: Updated Prior Resolutions (Other Than Below): Updated CITY Personnel Folders (6413, 6429, 6433,10584,10585,12634): Updated CDC Personnel Folders (5557): Updated Traffic Folders (3985, 8234, 655, 92-389): Copies Distributed to: City Attorney ./ Parks & Rec. Code Compliance Dev. Services Police Public Services Water Notes: NullNoid After: - By: Reso. Log Updated: ~ Seal Impressed: ---- Date Returned: Yes /' No Yes No ./' - Yes No ./ Yes No / Yes No/ EDA Finance f"" Others: ~ml~. MIS BEFORE FILING, REVIEW FORM TO ENSURE ANY NOTATIONS MADE HERE ARE TRANSFERRED TO THE YEARLY RESOLUTION CHRONOLOGICAL LOG FOR FUTURE REFERENCE (Contract Term. etc.) Ready to File: _ Date: Revised 01/12/01