HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-16-2002 Minutes
MINUTES
MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
JOINT REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 16, 20()2
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
This is the time and place set for a joint regular meeting of the Mayor and Common
Council and Community Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino.
Pursuant to Resolution No. 2002-228, the City Clerk or her designee shall appear in the
Council Chambers at 8:00 a.m. on the first and third Mondays in the months of
October, November and December, 2002, and shall continue each Mayor and Common
Council meeting to 1 :30 p.m. that same day.
The joint regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council and Community
Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino was called to order by
Mayorj01airman Valles at 1:37 p.m., Monday, December 16, 2002, in the Council
Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California.
Roll Call
Roll call was taken by City Clerk Clark with the following being present:
Mayorj01airman Valles; Council MembersjConunissioners Estrada, Longville,
McGinnis, Derry, Suarez, Anderson, McCarnmack; City Attorney Penman, City Clerk
Clark, City Administrator Wilson. Absent: None.
1. Closed Session
Pursuant to Government Code Sections:
A. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(a):
Jaime Alvarez, et aI. v. City of San Bernardino - United States District
Court Case No. CV 00-03048;
Stubblefield Construction Company, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et
aI. - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. SCV 252058;
In Re Bankruptcy of CYSA-South San Bernardino Soccer Foundation -
Case No. RS 02-18493MG;
1
12/16/2002
San Bernardino Redevelopment Agency v. William H. Cooper - San
Bernardino Superior Court Case No. SCVSS 67622;
David M. Sanborn v. Avila Construction, et al. - San Bernardino
Superior Court Case No. SCVSS 078410;
Daniel Cravens v. City of San Bernardino, et al. - San Bernardino
Superior Court Case No. SCVSS 076715.
B. Conference with legal counsel - anticipated litigation - significant
exposure to litigation - pursuant to sulxlivision (b) (1), (2), (3) (A-F) of
Government Code Section 54956.9: Cypress Inn Mobilehome Park and
VanRossum claim.
C. Conference with legal counsel - anticipated litigation - initiation of
litigation - pursuant to su\xlivision (c) of Government Code Section
54956.9.
D. Closed Session - personnel - pursuant to Government Code Section
54957.
E. Closed session with Chief of Police nn matters posing a threat to the
security of public buildings or threat to the public's right of access to
public services or public facilities - pursuant to Government Code
Section 54957.
F. Conference with labor negotiator - pursuant to Government Code
Section 54957.6:
(1) Fire negotiation issue
G. Conference with real property negotiator - pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8.
City Attorney Pernnan announced that the following additional cases would be
discussed in closed session:
Michelle P. Arroyo v. City of San Bernardino - United States District Court
Case No. CV02-8967 ABC.
Under Agenda Item 1.B., significant exposure to litigation:
A number of claims involving former police officer VanRossum, including:
Ellen Marie Treas, Angela Vandiver, Rosalind Brook~, and Linda Welsh.
2
12/16/2002
Reading of Resolutions & Ordinances
Deputy City Clerk Hartzel read into the record the titles of all the resolutions and
ordinances on the regular agenda of the Mayor and Corrunon Council and Cormmmity
Development Commission.
InvocationjPledge of Allegiance
The invocation was given by Dr. David Tinoco of St. Paul's United Methodist Church,
followed by tl1e pledge of allegiance, led by Johnny Creenwood of Anderson School.
2. Appointments
There were no commission appointments.
3. Presentations
Jon Dorm, President and CEO, Plarmed Parenthood of Orange and San
Bernardino Counties, introduced several San Bernardino youth who participated
in the first International Youth Day Conference on August 12, 2002, to learn
about the importance of international family planning.
Mayor Valles and Police Chief Zimmon presented a resolution of recognition to
Lieutenant Larry Neigel on the occasion of his retirement after serving 32 years
with the City's Police Department.
Detective Michael Potts, an employee of the San Bernardino Police Department
since 1979, was presented with the Third Quarter City of San Bernardino
Customer Service Award in recognition of the professional way he conducts his
investigations, treating all persons with fairness, respect, and dignity. It was
noted that Mr. Potts is highly respected both as an officer and a professional by
his supervisors, colleagues, civilian staff, and the public.
David Pruitt, Executive Assistant to the Mayor, read the names of the following
individuals who were presented a service pin award by Mayor Valles in
recognition of their many years of dedicated service to the City:
Name
Anwar Wagdy
Thomas Marek
Charles Moore
Department
Development Services
Human Resources
Parks, Recreation & Cormmmity
Services
Public Services
Public Services
Police
Police
Years of Service
15
10
10
Ruben Martinez
Maurice McKnight
Josephine Foster
Kyle Lundy
10
20
25
10
3
12/16/2002
4. Announcements
Announcements were made by the Mayor, Common Council, elected officials,
and a representative from the Olamber of Commerce regarding various civic,
cormnunity and Olamber events and activities.
5. Waive full reading of resolutions & ordinances
Council Member/Commissioner Anderson made a motion, seconded by Conncil
Member/Commissioner Suarez, that full reading of the resolutions and
ordinances on the regular agenda of the Mayor and Cormnon
Council/Corrununity Development Commission be waived.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Council
Suarez,
6. Council Minutes
Council Member/Commissioner Anderson made a motion, seconded by Conncil
Member/Commissioner Suarez, that the minutes of the following meeting of the
Mayor and Cormnon Council/Corrununity Deyelopment Commission of the City
of San Bernardino be approved as submitted in typewritten form: November 4,
2002.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Council
Suarez,
7. Claims & Payroll
Council Member/Commissioner Anderson made a motion, seconded by Conncil
Member/Commissioner Suarez, that the claims and payroll and the authorization
to issue warrants as listed on the memorandum dated December 5, 2002 from
Barbara Pachon, Director of Fianance, be approved.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Council
Suarez,
4
12/16/2002
8. Personnel Actions
Council Member/Cormnissioner Anderson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Suarez, that the personnel actions as submitted by the
Chief Examiner dated December 10, 2002, in accordance with Civil Service
rules and Personnel policies adopted by the J\fayor and Common Council of the
City of San Bemarctino, be approved and ratified.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez,
Anderson, McCanunack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
9. ORD. MC-1135 - An Ordinance of the City of San Bernardino amending
sections of Municipal Code Chapter 14.04 regarding granting of utility
franchises. FINAL READING
Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McCanunack, that said ordinance be adopted.
Oniinance No. MC-I135 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez,
Anderson, McCanunack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
10. RES. 2002-385 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City
of San Bernardino authorizing the execution of a Professional Services
Agreement between Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith and the City of San
Bernardino to represent the City in the case of Pravin D. Patel v. City of
San Bernardino, et al.
Council Member/Commissioner Suarez made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Anderson, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2002-385 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez,
Anderson, McCanunack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
11. Approve Local Appointments List (See Attached)
Council Member/Commissioner Anderson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Ccnnmissioner Suarez, that the Mayor am Conunon Council approve
the Local Appointments List of all regular and ongoing boards, commissions,
and committees and direct the City Clerk to send a copy of the List to the
Fedlheym Library for posting pursuant to Government Code Section 54973.
5
12/16/2002
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry,
Anderson, McCanunack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Council
Suarez,
12. RES. 2002-380 - Resolution of the City of San Bernardino authorizing
extension of the existing purchase orders to H & H Citrus Inc. and Scott
Tractor Service in the aggregate for a maximum of $140,000 to perform
weed abatement services for Fiscal Year 2002/2003.
Council Member/Commissioner Anderson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Suarez, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2002-380 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez,
Anderson, McCanunack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
13. RES. 2002-381 - Resolution authorizing the execution of a Fund Transfer
Agreement with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for
the Santa Fe Depot Area Plan located at 1170 W. 3'd Street and
authorization for the Director of Finance to amend the Fiscal Year
2002/2003 budget.
Council Member/Corrunissioner Anderson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Suarez, that said resolution be adopted; and that the
Director of Finance be authorized to amend the Fiscal Year 2002,12003 budget to
appropriate $324,800 in grant Account No. 123-701-5504-7349. $268,800 is
being reimbursed from the Caltrans Community Based Transportation Planning
Grant; $42,000 of matching funds are being reimbursed from EDA (tracking
number 033-6500); and $14,000 of matching funds are being reimbursed by
Development Services General Fund budget by moving $14,000 from Account
No. 001-190-5502 to Account No. 001-190-5193 (grant match).
The motion carried and Resolution No. 2002--181 was adopted by the following
vote: Ayes: Council Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis,
Derry, Suarez, Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
14. RES. 2002-382 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City
of San Bernardino awarding a contract to Laird Construction Co., Inc. for
pavement rehabilitation on Lexington Parkway from Hallmark Parkway to
cul-de-sac; Saratoga Way from Georgia Boulevard to Ha1hnark Parkway;
Shenandoah Way from Hallmark Parkway to cul-de-sac; Georgia Boulevard
from Gannett Parkway to Saratoga Way; and Gannet Parkway from
Georgia Boulevard to Halhnark Parkway, per Plan Drawing No. 10510.
6
12/16/2002
Council Member/Commissioner Anderson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Suarez, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2002-382 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
15. Authorize staff to proceed - formation of Landscape Maintenance
Assessment District - California Street & 16th Street area (Tract No. 13822)
Council Member/Commissioner Anderson made a motion, seconded by COImcil
Member/Commissioner Suarez, that the Director of Development Services and
the City Clerk be authorized to proceed under SBMC 12.90, with the
establishment of a Landscape Maintenance Assessment District in the California
Street and 16th Street area, within Tract No. 13822, to be known as Assessment
District No. 1029.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Council
Suarez,
16. RES. 2002-389 - Resolution of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the
execution of a lease agreement with The Rock Church and World Outreach
Center, for use of vacated portions of Waterman Avenue, south of Caroline
Street, north of Union Pacific Railroad.
City Attorney Penman questioned whether the issue regarding access to a nearby
auto repair shop business had been resolved; more specifically, whether the City
would be creating a land-locked parcel.
Staff provided a copy of the settlement agreement; and Mr. Penman noted that
according to the plot map there are apparently two ingresses and egressses to
this particular piece of property, and the owners, Robert and Bonnie Jennings,
had a prescriptive easement over part of the property being developed by The
Rock Church and World Outreach Center. The Rock Church and World
Outreach Center paid the Jennings $37,500 for them to sign a quit claim deed
and a release for all claims for prescriptive easements and any other claimed
easement in favor of the 383 Caroline Street as against property of The Rock.
He stated that this resolved the issue as to whL'lher the City would be creating a
land-locked parcel; which is not the case because there is still an ingress and
egress on Caroline Street.
Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McCammack, that said resolution be adopted.
7
12/16/2002
Resolution No. 2002-389 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
MembersjCormnissioners Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez, Anderson,
McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner Estrada.
17. RES. 2002-386 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City
of San Bernardino authorizing termination of the City's participation in a
contract with the cities of Colton, Lorna Linda, Recllands, Rialto, and the
County Fire Department and to transfer full responsibility and ownership of
the air truck to remaining participants.
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack made a motion, seconded by
Council Member/Corrnnissioner Anderson, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2002-386 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Cormnissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
18. RES. 2002-387 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City
of San Bernardino authorizing the Purchasing Manager to issue a purchase
order to Principal Decision Systems International (PDSI) in the amount of
$41,838.41 for Te1estaff Staffing Automation System, Aelher Mobile
Government Systems in the amount of $14,400 to link the current Fire
Sunpro Records Management System (RMS) software to Te1estaff, and
Hewlett Packard Company for the server to run the Te1estaff Program in
the amount of $3,739.00.
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Suarez, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2002-387 was adopted by thl.' following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Cormnissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
19. RES. 2002-388 - Resolution of the City of San Bernardino approving a side
letter to Resolution No. 99-155, Resolution implementing a Memorandum of
Understanding between the City of San Bernardino and employees in the
Police Safety Unit represented by the San Bernardino Police Officers'
Association, and superceding Resolution 2001-364.
Council Member/Cormnissioner Anderson made a motion, seconded by Cmn1cil
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2002-388 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
8
12/16/2002
20. RES. 2002-383 - Resolution of the City of San Bernardino authorizing
replacement of the 911 Public Safety Answering Point Telephone System
and the workstation monitors in the Public Safety Dispatch Center.
Council Member/Commissioner Anderson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Cormnissioner Suarez, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2002-383 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
21. RES. 2002-384 - Resolution awarding a purchase order to W. Wood and
Associates for comprehensive maintenance of landscape and irrigation for
the San Bernardino Soccer Complex for a period of December 1, 2002
through June 30,2003.
Council Member/Commissioner Anderson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Suarez, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2002-384 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Cormnissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
22. Approve funding - 4th of July Parade and Celebration at Arrowhead Credit
Union Park
Council Member/Commissioner Suarez made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Cormnissioner Derry, that the recommerdation of the Ways and Means
Committee for funding in the amount of $45,700 to cover costs connected with
the 2003 4th of July Parade and Celebration at Arrowhead Credit Union Park, be
approved.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Members/Cormnissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Council
Suarez,
23. Set budget workshop - Monday, 9:00 a.m., January 13, 2003 or January
27, 2003 - Economic Development Agency Boardroom - to review Fiscal
Year 2002/2003 City and Economic Development Agency budgets
Council Member/Commissioner Longville requested that the budget workshop
be held on January 27, as she would be unable to attend on January 13.
9
12/16/2002
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack made a motion, seconded by
Council Member/Cormnissioner Suarez, that the Mayor and Common
Council/Community Development Commission set a budget workshop for
Monday, January 27, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. in the Economic Development Agency
Boardroom to review the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 City and Economic
Development Agency budgets.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Council
Suarez,
24. Resolution of the City of San Bernardino authorizing and directing the
execution of an agreement for the extension of sewer services in
unincorporated territory relative to the San Bernardino County Animal
Shelter at 19777 Cajon Boulevard. (Continued from December 2,2002)
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack made a motion, seconded by
Council Member/Commissioner Anderson, that the matter be tabled.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Council
Suarez,
25. An ordinance of the City of San Bernardino amending San Bernardino
Municipal Code Section 15.24.050 Maintenance requirements for multi-
residential, commercial, and industrial properties. FIRST READING
Council Member/Cormnissioner Suarez made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Longville, that said ordinance be laid over for final
adoption.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry,
Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Council
Suarez,
26. Public hearing - General Plan Amendment No. 02-01 - change land use
designation from RMH, Residential Medium High, to CG-l, Commercial
Genera1-1.12 acres located on the east side of Tippecanoe Avenue between
Gould and Davidson Streets
RES. 2002-390 - Resolution of the City of San Bernardino adopting General
Plan Amendment No. 02-01 to the General Plan of the City of San
Bernardino, to amend the General Plan Land Use Designations from RMH,
Residential Medium High, to CG-l, Commercial General, for 1.12 acres
located at 1155 and 1623 East Gould Street and 1158 East Davidson Street.
10
12/16/2002
-. ----.... ,-----------,-_._._--~~-~.~---.~,~-'---_."..,-_._-~.- ..
Mayor/Olainnan Valles opened the hearing.
City Planner Valerie Ross provided an overview of the staff report, stating that
staff supported this amendment and was recommending approval.
Pursuant to Resolution No. 2000-279, City Clerk Clark administered an oath to
Mr. Robert Stewart, 10535 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA, that he would
provide true and honest testimony. Mr. Stewart thanked staff for their
assistance in working with him on this project.
No public corrunents were received.
Council Member/Commissioner Suarez made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Anderson, that the hearing be closed; and that said
resolution be adopted.
The motion carried and Resolution No. 2002-390 was adopted by the following
vote: Ayes: Council Members/Commissioners Longville, McGirmis, Derry,
Suarez, Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: Council
Member/Commissioner Estrada.
27. Public hearing - General Plan Amendment No. 02-06 - change land use
designation from RL, Residential Low, to RS, Residential Suburban -
approximately 3.02 acres at northeast corner of Olive and Ohio Avenues
Mayor/Olainnan Valles opened the hearing.
Valerie Ross, City Planner, provided an ovelTiew of the staff report, stating that
staff was recorrunending that the Mayor and Council deny the request.
No public corrunents were received.
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack made a motion, seconded by
Council Member/Commissioner Anderson, that the hearing be closed; and that
General Plan Amendment No. 02-06 be denied based upon the Findings of Fact
in the Planning Commission staff report.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez, Anderson,
McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner Estrada.
28. Public hearing - Development Code Amendment No. 02-02 - modify
parking requirements for restaurants
II
12/16/2002
An ordinance of the City of San Bernardino amending Section 19.24.040 of
the San Bernardino Municipal Code (Development Code) related to parking
requirements for restaurants. FIRST READING
Mayor/Chairman Valles opened the hearing.
City Planner Valerie Ross stated that this was a request to modify parking
requirements for sit-down restaurants. Currently, the Development Code
requires one parking space for each 35 square feet of public seating area, plus
one space for each 200 square feet of all other gross floor area, with a minimum
of 10 spaces. The proposed amendment would require one parking space for
each 100 square feet of gross floor area, with a minimum of 10 spaces.
Pursuant to Resolution No. 2000-279, City Clerk Clark administered an oath to
Mr. Art Pearlman, that he would provide true and honest testimony. Mr.
Pearlman expressed his endorsement of this amendment, stating that with regard
to the HUB Project in particular, it would allow them to place restaurants within
the HUB Project that they would not have been able to under the old provisions
and still meet parking requirements.
No other public comments were received.
Council Member/Commissioner Suarez made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Anderson, that the hearing be closed; and that said
ordinance be laid over for final adoption.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez, Anderson,
McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner Estrada.
29. Public hearing - appeal Planning Commission's determination - Conditional
Use Permit No. 02-10 & Variance No. 02-07 - proposed Wendy's
Restaurant - southeast corner of Rosewood & Tippecanoe Avenues
Mayor/Chairman Valles opened the hearing.
City Planner Valerie Ross advised that this was a request to establish a 2,900
square foot drive-thru, fast-food restaurant at the southeast corner of Tippecanoe
and Rosewood Avenues. The site is designated CG-l, Commercial General,
and is located in the Freeway Corridor Overlay District at the 1-10 Freeway and
Tippecanoe off-ramp. The Freeway Corridor Overlay District requires a 50-
foot building setback and a 25-foot landscape setback--the 25 feet being within
the 50 feet.
12
12/16/2002
She stated that the variance requested by the applicant was to allow the drive
aisle, parking, and refuse enclosure within the 25-foot landscape setback and a
portion of the building within the 50-foot setback.
Ms. Ross stated that at its meeting on August 22, 2002, the Planning
Commission followed staff's recommendation and adopted the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program, approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 02-10, and approved Variance No. 02-07, allowing
the refuse enclosure to be located within the 25-foot freeway landscape setback
and allowing a portion of the building within the 50-foot freeway setback.
However, the Commission denied Variance No. 02-07 to allow parking within
the 25- foot freeway landscape setback.
Ms. Ross referred to a memorandum dated December 11, 2002, to the Mayor
and Council from Deputy City Attorney Henry Empefio, wherein he noted that
staff's findings in support of the variance were on the weak side. She stated that
staff concurred with that; however, they were trying to find a way to make the
project work; therefore, the recommendation that the parking be removed from
within the freeway 25-foot landscape setback and placed elsewhere. She added
that the applicant had indicated that he had a reciprocal parking agreement with
the adjacent Denny's restaurant and staff thought because of that they could lose
the parking spaces that were along the southern portion of the site and use
adjacent parking. She stated that staff did not believe that the shape of the
parcel precluded the applicant from meeting the code requirements.
Ms. Ross advised that the Director of Development Services had done some
research and found that the typical site that Wendy's looks at is approximately
one acre or 43,560 square feet, with 40-50 parking spaces. This site has the
same size building, but it only has half the acreage or square footage of the lot
and approximately half the parking.
She stated that staff agreed with the applicant that this is an attractive site, as
there is a high volume of traffic in the area which would support a fast-food,
drive-thru restaurant. Ms. Ross also indicated that several similar projects are
pending that are watching this one to see what decision is ultimately made.
Ms. Ross stated that the staff report contains two recommendations for Council 1
Commission consideration. One is denial of the appeal, which then upholds the
Planning Commission's determination; or approval of the appeal based on the
revised Findings of Fact. Either option would include the Conditions of
Approval and the Standard Requirements. A third option would be to amend
the Development Code pertaining to the freeway corridor overlay.
Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis stated that he was originally very
excited that a Wendy's was coming to this area of San Bernardino; however,
after looking at the project relative to size and space and the need to encroach
13
12/16/2002
on the freeway setback, he thought it would he more trouble than it is worth to
try and squeeze it onto this property. He expressed concern that other
developers would then be asking to squeeze other projects on other pieces of
property and they would have this project to point to as a precedent. He stated
that he was not going to support the project as proposed.
City Attorney Penman advised that there had been some misinformation about
this project. One of the pieces of misinfornlation was that if the City granted
this variance it would open the door for a number of other variances. He
referred to Development Code Section 19.72.060 Precedents, wherein it states:
"The granting of a prior variance is not adrrussible evidence for the granting of
a new variance." He pointed out that if the CounciVCommission granted this
variance today, it cannot be used as evidence to grant some other variance at the
next Council meeting, or two months from now, or a year from now; therefore,
that issue is moot.
J'v1r. Penman advised that Section 19.72.010(1) of the Development Code states
that: "Variances from the terms of this Development Code shall be granted
only when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property,
including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict
application of this Development Code deprives such property of privileges
enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical land use districts."
The Planning Commission's justification for the variance, that this parcel was
subdivided prior to the City's adoption of the freeway setback requirements in
1991, was not a special circumstance, applicable only to this property, but
applied to almost all parcels in the City located within the Freeway Corridor
Overlay District. Therefore, the previous two variances granted by the Planning
Commission do not have sufficient legal justification. However, the shape issue
is pertinent.
J'v1r. Penman then referred to J'v1r. Empefio'~ memorandum of December 11,
which states: "After reviewing the facts further with Planning Division staff,
we advised the Mayor and Common Council that a trapezoidal shape (a
quadrilateral figure with two parallel sides) of the parcel is a special
circumstance applicable to this property upon which findings can be made to
suppott the granting of all three variances. This trapezoidal shape makes this an
irregularly shaped parcel of land where most lots in this vicinity are either
square or rectangular in shape. Planning Division staff has informed us that the
majority of the existing parcels in the City are either square or rectangular in
shape. The unusual shape of a parcel of land has been considered as the special
circumstance supporting the granting of a vari,mce by the Planning Corrunission
on only a few occasions."
14
12/16/2002
Mr. Penman concluded by stating that it was the opinion of the Attorney's
Office that the shape of the parcel provided a legal basis for granting the appeal
and approving all three variances.
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack stated that it was important for
the public to understand that the developer owns this particular piece of property
and he cannot go out and buy another piece of property for the same price. She
stated that if there was a legal basis to approve the variance, she did not believe
the Council/Commission had the right to deny the property owner the ability to
develop this piece of property; especially when the proposed development has
the potential of creating hundreds of thousands of dollars in sales taxable
revenue.
Council Member/Commissioner Longville stated that she knows Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis really does his homework, and she respects
his opinion greatly when he says he has problems with a certain development.
She agreed that she would like to see a smaller restaurant on the property;
however, in light of the fiscal hardships that the City will be facing in the next
several years and the need to generate adequate revenues, to deny the City
twenty or twenty-five thousand dollars per year in sales tax off of a high volume
restaurant would not be in the best interests of the public.
No public comments were received.
Pursuant to Resolution No. 2000-279, City Clerk Clark administered an oath to
Mark Sandoval, owner of the property, that he would provide true and honest
testimony. Mr. Sandoval stated the he appreciated the help he had received
from staff. He stated that after being turned down by the Planning Commission
he and his architect had tried to lay it out to fit a shoe store or some other store
on the property; however the 25 feet of freeway landscaping was a big
detriment, and it was hard to lay anything out with that kind of setback
requirement.
He pointed out that City code requires 15 percent commercial landscaping in
this area; however, if he did the landscaping as the freeway corridor overlay
requires, it would be 35 percent landscaping, which is more than double the
code. He stated that what they have planned right now, with the variance for
six parking stalls in that area, they are still at 21 percent, so they are still highly
landscaped, and their plan is to make something attractive along three sides.
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack made a motion, seconded by
Council Member/Commissioner Derry, that the hearing be closed; and that the
Mayor and Common Council grant the appeal and approve Conditional Use
Permit No. 02-10 and Variance No. 02-07, based on the Revised Findings of
15
12/16/2002
Fact (Exhibit 7) and subject to the Conditions of Approval and Standard
Requirements (Exhibit 3, Attachments C and D).
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Members/Corrunissioners Longville, Derry, Anderson, McCammack.
Council Members/Commissioners McGinnis, Suarez. Absent:
Member/Corrunissioner Estrada.
Council
Nays:
Council
R30. Public Hearing - affordable Senior Citizen Rental Housing Home Grant &
Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) - TELACU Senior Housing
Development San Bernardino II, Inc. - 4th and H Streets
RES. CDC/2002-42 - Resolution of the Community Development
Commission of the City of San Bernardino (1) acknowledging receipt of a
Summary Report relating to the proposed 2002 Mfordable Senior Citizen
Rental Housing Home Grant and Disposition and Development Agreement
by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino,
California (Agency) and TELACU Housing - San Bernardino II, Inc., a
California Non-profit Corporation (Developer), 750 West 4'h Street, Central
City North Redevelopment Project Area and (2) authorizing the transfer by
the Redevelopment Agency of the parcel located at 750-752 West 4'h Street
to the Developer - Central City North Redevelopment Project Area.
(R30A)
RES. 2002-391 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City
of San Bernardino (1) acknowledging receipt of a Summary Report relating
to the proposed 2002 Affordable Senior Citizen Rental Housing Home
Grant and Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California (Agency)
and TELACU Housing - San Bernardino II, Inc., a California Non-profit
Corporation (Developer), 750 West 4th Street, Central City North
Redevelopment Project Area and (2) authorizing the transfer by the
Redevelopment Agency of the parcel located at 750-752 West 4th Street to
the Developer - Central City North Redevelopment Project Area. (R30B)
Mayor/Olainnan Valles opened the hearing.
Maggie Pacheco, Director of Housing and Community Development, stated that
the architect was available to review with the Council the new senior housing
project proposed for the corner of 4th and H Streets. She advised that the
Agency was asking for the Council' s/Corrunission' s approval to transfer a parcel
at 750 West 4th Street and to grant TELACU a grant in the amount of $362,000
for the provision of public improvements.
16
12/16/2002
Pursuant to Resolution No. 2000-279, City Clerk Clark administered an oath to
Greg Villanueva, architect for the project, that he would provide true and
honest testimony. Mr. Villanueva provided a very descriptive overview of the
configuration of the project and the scope of the improvements, and also
presented several artist renderings of the prop,:>sed project.
Council Member/Commissioner Suarez made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Derry, that the hearing be closed; and that said
resolutions A and B, be adopted. (Note: The motion was subsequently
amended.)
Council Member/Corrunissioner McCammack asked whether the units would be
rental units.
Tom Provencio, representing the owner, TELACU, advised that they are
federally subsidized rental units with the rent generally ranging from $300-325
per month. He stated the tenants will only be asked to pay 30 percent of their
income toward the rent, so the rest of it would be offset by a project rental
assistance contract that TELACU will have with HOD.
Ms. McCammack noted that in the CC&Rs ()n page 57 it stated that only one
member of the family has to be 62 years of age or older. She questioned how
the developer was going to prevent it from becoming a regular apartment
complex as opposed to strictly a senior complex.
J'v1r. Provencio stated that it would be a deed restricted facility by HOD, so for
40 years, at a minimum, it would be restrictLu to seniors 62 years of age and
older.
Ms. McCammack pointed out that the CC&Rs did not say that.
Maggie Pacheco, Director of Housing and Community Development, advised
that there were a couple of provisions to cover this. She noted that on page 4 of
the DDA, the senior citi7.eIl household is defined, and as long as one member of
the household is 62, even if the spouse is 55, assuming they meet the income
standards, they would be entitled to live on the premises. In addition, this
project was approved by the Planning Comrni~sion subject to the CUP, and the
CUP states a minimum of 60 years of age. She stated it would also be by deed
restriction, that the CUP would impose that restriction on the project.
Therefore, there are two layers of covenants on the project.
Discussion ensued regarding how many people could live in one unit and
whether or not there was anything to prevent gTandj:ments who are raising their
grandchildren from living in the complex.
17
12/16/2002
___~.__.,__~.."~_.,,_._'___~___.~~.___._;_'__....__.,__._.__~__________.".~..___.._.___,_____.. ~__.._.____.__,__"_"~M__.___.____...__ ___.___,_'______
Ms. Pacheco stated that the civil code reads that only one member of the family
has to be 62. If there was a grandchild involved, she thought it would be a
management policy issue.
Mr. Provencio stated that they really don't have issues when it comes to
children that are living with the seniors, they have never really encountered that,
and it has been TELACU's policy that they've always had seniors 62 years of
age and older. Upon further questioning, he did admit that based on the
CC&Rs there was really nothing to preclude such a situation.
Both Mr. Provencio and Ms. Pacheco stated that only two people could live in
one unit and this would be addressed in the rental agreement with the
management company.
Council Member/Commissioner LongvilJe expressed her endorsement of
TELACU and inquired as to their occupancy rates. Mr. Provencio replied that
all of their projects are 100 percent occupied and many of them have waiting
lists.
Council Member/Commission Anderson noted that when TELACU first came to
the City they had a wonderful project, but through the commissioners who are
on the RDA--Mr. Suarez, Ms. Estrada, and herself--many items were added that
gave beautiful ambiance to this facility. In particular, she was very concerned
with the lighting and that the lighting be a major source of ambiance for these
facilities.
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack reiterated her concerns regarding
the fact that the DDA and the CC&Rs did not have language requiring that the
rental agreement limit the occupancy to two people.
Marie Phillips, Housing Consultant from HUD, stated that the HUD occupancy
requirements limit occupancy to two people, which could be a spouse or a child.
However, typically people in this income group do not have a child living with
them. She stressed the point that there couldn't be three people in one of these
units by the HUD occupancy requirements, so for the 40 years of the HUD
program it would be limited to two people.
Ms. Pacheco stated that if that was the case. and if there was no prohibition
from HUD's standpoint, she did not see a problem with expanding the definition
in the DDA commencing with Section 1.15 with regard to defining senior
housing and senior citizen, so they could talk about limiting the occupancy.
Ms. McCammack stated this would give her a greater level of comfort, and that
in exchange for the almost $400,000 worth of value, it would be a fair thing to
do for the taxpayer, and if staff could do that she would be prepared to support
the motion.
18
12116/2002
^'-_.-----~--_.__._._---_._- . .
Ms. Phillips pointed out that the City is protected anyway, because everywhere
in the agreement it says that whatever the HUD rules are, they will supercede
anything anyway, for at least the first 40 years.
Ms. Pacheco concurred that this was true, but did not see a problem with
incorporating the occupancy requirements in the DDA, since the HUD
regulatory agreement is a 40-year covenant and the City/Agency is asking for a
55-year covenant. She inquired whether TELACU would have a problem with
this and Mr. Provencio replied in the negative.
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack stated that she hoped the maker
of the motion would be willing to amend the motion to include an occupancy
requirement in the DDA.
Council Member/Commissioner Suarez am.:nded his motion, seconded by
Council Member/Commissioner Derry, that the hearing be closed; that said
resolutions A & B be adopted; and that language be added to the DDA limiting
the occupancy of each unit to two people. (Note: The vote was taken after
further discussion.)
Senior Assistant City Attorney Carlyle pointed out that the Attorney's Office
had not signed off on either the City resolution or the Commission resolution,
because notwithstanding all of the protection that one can put into a senior
housing agreement, as had been pointed out, if you had a grandparent taking
care of a grandchild, two people altogether, that would be permitted in this
development. And if that grandchild becomes somewhat unruly, or all of a
sudden you have three or four units that have that type of situation, then you
don't have the same type of senior pristine housing that one envisions for
something like this.
Mr, Carlyle continued, stating that the irony is that under California law, such
an arrangement would be permitted. The federal law attempts to restrict that;
however, if there was ever a court case, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has
historically been more liberal in allowing this type of arrangement than has the
California State Supreme Court. So while there might be an initial comfort
level that these are HUD funds and HUD documents, the fact of the matter is
that should it get challenged in federal court, the likelihood of success by the
challenger is greater than it would be in state court. So the Attorney's Office
did not sign off because they did not want to give the impression that this
arrangement is ironclad, for it is far from it. He indicated that he had talked to
Special Counsel Sabo and he concurred that it is doubtful if it ever got
challenged that it would withstand scrutiny.
City Attorney Penman stated that the CounciJiCommission should not be under
any illusion as to what this project is--it is a low income, high density apartment
19
12116/2002
------r---...---~..---.---~
complex. He stated he had no doubt that the people who are promoting it will
do everything they can to make sure it is occupied by seniors for the first 40
years; however, there is no legal way to do that. If the situation develops where
there are not enough senior applicants to fill the property, HUD has the
authority to waive that requirement as long as the people who move in are low
income; and in 40 years this apartment will become another Arden Guthrie. He
added that CC&Rs mean very little if they are challenged in court, so the
Council/Commission should understand that when they vote "yes" they are
casting a vote to build another low income, high density, HUD-financed
apartment complex in the City of San Bernardino; and no one should vote on
this project with the illusion that the safeguards are sufficient to make sure it
will stay a senior housing project.
Council Member/Corrunissioner Longville stated that it made no sense to talk
about this 75-unit project without looking where it is going and what the City is
spending in this area to bring the downtown into a desirable area to live. She
noted that a lot of money has been spent looking at the downtown revitalization
to try and breathe some new life into the downtown, and as far as she could see
demographics indicate that the senior population is not going to decrease in the
near future.
Ms. Longville stated that some people may choose to look at San Bernardino
through the eyes of the past, fearing everything will tum into Arden Guthrie,
but she could not do that. She stated that she has to be optimistic and recognize
that some things can be a catalyst, and she thinks this project can be a catalyst
and a very desirable place for senior citizens. It is what senior citizens are
looking for--something close to public facilities and close to services, with a
school and library and other senior facilities in the area--ard she strongly
disagreed that this will be an Arden Guthrie in 40 years.
No public comments were received.
Senior Assistant City Attorney Carlyle reiterated tillt whatever document is
entered into between the Agency and the developer is subordinate to whatever
decision HUD makes, and whether HUD makes the right decision today, they
can make the wrong decision the next day, or next month, or next year, and that
is the concern that the Attorney's office has been trying to express. HUD can
supercede at any time.
The motion carried and Agency Resolution No. CDQ2002-42 and City
Resolution No. 2002-391 were adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez, Anderson.
Nays: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack. Absent: Council
Member/Corrunissioner Estrada.
20
12/1612002
...-----------.--..T-----.--.--..--------.---...
R31. Public hearing - Disposition and Development Agreement - Agency owned
land in the Verdemont Area, south of lrvington Avenue, aka Glazier,
Tentative Tract Map No. 15407
RES. CDC/2002-43 - A Resolution of the Community Development
Commission of the City of San Bernardino approving and authorizing the
Agency Executive Director to execute a Disposition and Development
Agreement (DDA) by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
San Bernardino and Century Crowell Communities, LP and Olive Crest,
LLC (GFR Enterprises, Inc.) (the "Developers") for development of the
Agency property located south of Irvington Avenue, east of Palm Avenue
(AKA: TT#15407 Glazier) ("The Site"). (R31A)
RES. 2002-392 - A Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the
City of San Bernardino (1) acknowledging receipt of a Summary Report
relating to the Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the
Redevelopment Agency (Agency) and Century Crowell Communities, LP
and Olive Crest, LLC (GFR Enterprises, Inc.) ("Developers"), and (2)
authorizing the sale by the Agency of the site. (R31B)
Mayor/Olairman Valles opened the hearing.
Maggie Pacheco, Director of Housing and Conununity Development, stated that
the Agency was requesting approval to sell the property known as the Glazier
land or Tentative Tract No. 15407 to CenturY Crowell and Olive Crest at fair
market value, and provided an overview of the scope of the proposed project.
Ms. Pacheco advised that there was a change to one of the provisions in the
agreement, stating that on page 23 of the agreement there is a section that refers
to mitigation agreement and a school impact fee. She stated that the Agency
purchased this land from the City of San Bernardino and the land was part of the
CFD default that occurred a few years ago. As a result of that default
provision, this particular site is exempt from the payment of school fees--
essentially, the school fees have already been pre-paid by the City.
Therefore, instead of the school impact fee that this project would normally be
assessed by the San Bernardino Unified School District, the Agency has asked
the developer to pay the City an in lieu school fee. The amount negotiated with
the developer is the sum of $6,732 per unit for a total of $720,324. This is over
and above the purchase price of the site and the $720,324 will go to the City as
the in-lieu of fee and would be utilized by the City to begin establishing the
Verdemont fire station truck fund.
No public comments were received.
21
12/16/2002
Council Member/Commissioner Suarez made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Corrunissioner Anderson, that the hearing be closed; and that said
resolutions A & B, be adopted.
The motion carried and Agency Resolution No. CDq2002-43 and City
Resolution No. 2002-392 were adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
MembersjCorrunissioners Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez, Anderson,
McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner Estrada.
R32. Public hearing - consider review of the Implementation Plan (AB 1290)
RES CDC/2002-44 - A Resolution of the Community Development
Commission of the City of San Bernardino, the governing body of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, approving a certain
Implementation Plan Review Report for the various redevelopment project
areas of the City of San Bernardino (2002). (R32)
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack advised that she would abstain on
this matter because she owns property in the Uptown Area.
Mayor/Chairman Valles opened the hearing.
No public comments were received.
Council Member/Commission Derry made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Corrunissioner Longville, that the hearing be closed; and that said
resolution be adopted.
The motion carried and Resolution No. CDq2002-44 was adopted by the
following vote: A yes: Council MembersjCommissioners Longville, McGinnis,
Derry, Suarez, Anderson. Nays: None. Abstentions: Council Member/
Corrnnissioner McCammack. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner Estrada.
R33. Public hearing - reallocate Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funds for Downtown "E" Street Median Project - award construction
contract for Old Towne Streetscape Plan
Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
Bernardino authorizing execution of a contract to International Pavement
Solutions, Inc. for the construction of the Downtown "E" Street Median
Project.
Mayor/Chairman Valles opened the hearing.
22
12/16/2002
Mayor/Chairman Valles explained that when the City embarked on the planning
for the "En Street Median Project, much of the engineering and planning was
done in-house, which saved the City a great deal of money. However, due to
current budget constraints, the City needs to be extremely prudent, and she had
asked the Development Services staff to scale down on the median project. She
stated she had not asked staff to scale down on the Old Towne housing target,
since that project has a momentum going ,md she thought the City should
proceed with that.
Deputy Director/City Engineer Casey stated that staff could look at ways to
accomplish the Mayor's request and find ways to divide the project into
segments, phasing them in as funds permit.
Council Member/Commissioner Longville expressed her support of the Mayor's
desire to scale back, stating that she was going to suggest that perhaps the
CounciVCorrunission should look at the CDBG funds and how they might need
to be reallocated at the budget workshop in J alluary. She stated that she was not
prepared to allocate money today, prior to having the budget workshop.
There were no public cormnents.
Council Member/Commissioner Longville made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McCammack that the matter be continued until after the
CounciVCorrunission budget workshop and after they have had an opportunity to
take a look at the prognosis of what the state's budget is going to look like.
Mayor/Chairman Valles asked Ms. Longville if she wanted to continue the
entire item, and she answered in the affirmative.
Council Member/Corrunissioner McCammack stated that she was prepared to
continue the item regarding the median, but she thought the $100,000 set aside
to do some of the major cleanup should not be stalled. She stated that her
biggest concern was that part of the money that was going to be used was
coming out of the cleanup efforts to reduce blight at Arden Guthrie. She
expressed her desire that Ms. Longville amend her motion to continue only the
matter relative to the median; however, Ms. Longville said she could not
support that.
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack withdrew her second.
Council Member/Commissioner Derry seconded the motion.
City Clerk Clark asked for clarification as to whether they wanted to continue
the matter to a date specific.
23
12/16/2002
Council Member/Commissioner Longville amended her motion, seconded by
Council Member/Commissioner Derry, that the matter be continued to the
budget workshop scheduled for January 27,2003.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Suarez, Anderson,
McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner Estrada.
R34. RES. CDC/2002-40 - Resolution of the Community Development
Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopting the
Economic Development Agency's Annual Statement of Investment Policy for
the Year 2003.
Council Member/Commissioner Suarez made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Estrada, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. CDC/2002-40 was adopted by the following vote:
Council Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis,
Suarez, Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Ayes:
Derry,
R35. RES. CDC/2002-41 Resolution of the Community Development
Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, approving
amendments to Exhibits "A", "B-1", "B-2", "B-3", "C-19" through "C-
21", "C-32" through "C-34", "C-44" through "C-46", "C-52" through
"C-54", and Sections 6, 17, and 32; addition of Exhibits "C-57" through
"C-69"; and deletion of Exhibits "C-12" through "C-14", "C-22 through
"C-24", and "C-29" through "C-31" of the Personnel Policies and
Procedures for all employees of the City of San Bernardino Economic
Development Agency.
Council Member/Commissioner Longville made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Suarez, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. CDC/2002-41 was adopted by the following vote:
Council Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis,
Suarez, Anderson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None.
Ayes:
Derry,
36. Public Comments
Chelsea Lock, 3238 Roberds Avenue, San Bernardino, CA, a member of the
Blair Park Youth Neighborhood Cluster Association, thanked the community for
responding to the needs of children in the Fifth Ward (they supplied over 70
children with a full Christmas), thanked Coun~il Member/Commissioner Suarez
for his donation of 19 bicycles, and invited Mayor Valles to a wrapping party.
24
12/16/2002
37. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 8:26 p.m. The next joint regular meeting of the
Mayor and Common Council and Community Development Commission is
scheduled for 1:30 p.m., Monday, January 6,2003, in the Council Chambers of
City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California.
RACHEL G. CLARK
City Clerk
'I
By:~~~- E 4/
Linda E. Hartzel
Deputy City Clerk
No. of Items: 37
No. of Hours: 4.5
25
12/16/2002
_~.~________~_______,_..__._.,.____~~___~.___"_.,,_._________n __.__.____ ___ ____.__~___.__