HomeMy WebLinkAboutR11-Redevelopment Agency
-
R~VELOPMENT AGENCY.~EST FOR o,MMISSION/COUNCIL A~ION
. From: GLENDA SAUL
-
Subject: NICHOLSON PARK REPAVING
'-t: Redevelopment Agency
Date:
JUNE 10, 1986
Synopsis of Previous Commission/Council action:
In April, 1984, the Mayor and Common Council approved $30,000 for architectural/engineering
services for Community Center.
On May 23, 28, 30 and 31, 1985, the Mayor and Common Council considered funding for the
Community Center but took no action.
On May 31, 1985, the Mayor and Common Council approved $30,000 in funding for three (3) year
recreation program.
On August 19, 1985, the Mayor and Common Council approved construction funding in the amount
of $400,000 for Nicholson Park Community Center.
On November 4, 1985, the Mayor and Common Council awarded construction contract for Nicholson
Park Community Center to Duncan Construction.
(SYNOPSIS CONTINUED TO NEXT PAGE...)
Recommended motion:
(MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL)
Redevelopment Committee Recommendation:
<:::e to approve supplemental funding in the amount of $2,868.00 and the reprogramming of excess
funds under the Nunez and Delmann Heights basketball court resurfacing in the amount of
$6,332.00 (for a total of $9,200) to finance the repaving of Nicholson Park.
Contact person:
GLENDA SAUL/KEN HENDERSON
Phone: 383-5081
Supporting data attached:
YES/STAFF REPORT
Ward: 3
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $ 2.868
FY 1985'86 Contingency Account
Project: N I A
No adverse Impact on City:
Date:
IIl'-ncil Notes:
.........
Agenda Item No.
/1
,.-
'-
r
'-
r
'-
-
c
o
o
SYNOPSIS (Continued from first page...)
On November 4, 1985, the Mayor and Common Council approved supplemental
funding in the amount of $48,809 for additive alternates 3, 4, 5, 6, and 10.
On May 19, 1986, the Mayor and Common Council approved the reprogramming of
CDBG funding in the amount of $16,165 for the purchase of equipment for
Nicholson Park Community Center.
1088L
6/86
:J
-
-
-
, CI1C OF SAN BERNARDIO - REQUEC1 FOR COUNCIL ACON
........
c
c
75-0264
STAFF REPORT
Staff received a supplemental funding request from the Parks, Recreation and
Community Services Department with reapect to the repaving of Nicholson Park
that is necesaary as a result of construction and the deteriorated condition
of the original pavement.
The Mayor and Common Council has previoualy approved $8,000 in general fund
revenues for the repaving project. However, as the attached memorandum
indicates, the bid price is $17,200, requiring $9,200 in additional funding if
the repavement project is to go forward.
On June 5, 1986, the Redevelopment Committee considered this item and voted to
recommend to the Mayor and Common Council that the supplemental funding
request be approved as submitted.
Staff recommends that the supplemental funding be appropriated from CDBG funds
remaining in the Nunez and Delmann Heights basketball resurfacing projects
($6,332) and $2,868 be taken from the FY 1985/1986 Contingency Account in
order to complete the project.
1088L
6/86
~1Io.:
:..0
,,~'l\\lNT Act'4-,,;.
l S ~ ~
, ~ ~%
CN [?
\..:-~.. i_$> ~~
-
. .
c
o F g[) N B ERN ~ D
INTEROlfICE MEMORAND~
8605-705
I N 0
C I T Y
,-.
'-
TOl
KEN HENDERSON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FROMl JOHN A. KRAMER, RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT
SUBJECTl NICHOLSON PARK REPAVING
DATEl
(6717)
May 22, 1986
COPIESl
MAYOR EVLYN NILCOXl JACK MATZER, CITY
ADMINISTRATOR; DEAN MEECH, PURCHASING AGENT; ANNIE
RAMOS, PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES
I request that the appropriation for the Nicholson Park
parking lot repaving be augmented by $9,200 to cover the cost
of this proJect. The $9,200 is recom.ended to come from
contingencies, keeping in .ind that the aspha't work at Nunez
Park and Delmann Heights Center are complete with combined
savings of $6,332.
l!ak~~!,!QlJ~!1
c
This proJect was originally informally estimated In late
January. Three estimates were submitted, ranging from
$12,600 to $15,590. The proJect required a formal bid due to
the estimates received. At this time, the proJect was also
re-evaluated and the specifications were upgraded. The
upgrading consisted principally of removing the existing
asphalt In the proJect area, due to Its significantly
deteriorated condition, and sol I compaction. Original
Ip.clflcatlons called only for an overlay.
The proJect wal formally bid on May 2 with bid openings on
May 16. Only one bid wal received of $17,200. The Ipecifi-
cations were reviewed by Publ ic Workl who estillated the work
at $'8,700. Based on this factor, I am recommending to
Purchasing Agent Dean Meech that the bid be accepted contin-
gent upon the approval of the additional fundi.
Please feel free to contact lie if any additional information
i I r u i r
-
RINTENDENT
JAK/pw
r
"""'
-
:J
ROUTINa ,
GS / T:fJ
SL ~
:~ ~
BL~
LV .:L..e,C
MW
CCTO"#.
--
-
_~ I
ORIG. ~/<-/
ROUTE COPY v"