HomeMy WebLinkAbout53-Building & Planning
CITeOF SAN BERNARDI. - REQU&6T FOR COUNCIL AC'FN
Frank A. Schuma
From: Planning Director
Subject: Appeal - Tentative Tract No. 13274
Dept: Planning
Mayor and Council Meeting of
May 19, 1986, 2:00 p.m.
Da~: May 7, 1986
Synopsis of Previous Council ection:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on April 22, 1986, the
following action was taken:
The application for Tentative Tract No. 13274 was unanimously
recommended for approval based upon findings of fact and subject
to the conditions and standard requirements listed in the staff
report dated April 22, 1986.
The Negative Declaration for environmental review was also approved.
Recommended motion:
That the hearing on the appeal be closed and the decision of the
Planning Commission be affirmed, modified or rejected.
-
Frank A. Schuma
Contact person:
Frank A. Schuma
Phone:
383-5057
Supporting data attached:
Yes, Staff Report
Ward:
6
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Sou rce:
Finance:
Council Notes:
75-0262
Agenda Item No. ~
1m l!;l!Jp;U I:J l.!> U!J
. Mlol1986 .
CITY f~,.".:: ;:::r,iRTMENT
5'.. ," ""~"'''O r.A
M u:';"c"f~y' }>lanning Division
City of San Bernardino
)00 N D St
San Bernardino Ca 92418
. .
April 2) 1988
2090) ~ajon Blvd
nEC~ C' '''an ,,;!t,:;nardino Ca 92407
"V; ,."V ') "10 "1
GIJ :::;1 -.... t~ 'J .1
Gentlemenl
Negative appeal is herein registered against your proposal
(Item 11 A +entative Tract No 1)274 (?lanning Commission Agenda.
April 22,1986. .
A. This proposal affects my ) parcels of land, IE, 0267-q11 -21
0262-201-09 and 0262-201-10 (jointly owned by myself, Eileen S
Arnold and daughter Sheila K Arnold).
B~ Proposal is to change my 'life style' at a time when I am
in my 8~h year, living on a fixed income which is now just
adequate. To suddenly be thrust into city life with all of
its mythical benefits, which incudes increased taxation which
I won't be able to afford) increased service expenses(which I
can't afford) plus the projection into living in city life
environment which I've avoided all my life.
C. Proposal for annexation into the city was made according to
) notices to me indicate that request was made by a single
property owner, not resident in this area. Infact there has
been no permanent resident in this specific area(exclusiveof
the,' hamlet of Muscoy,' except myself for over 15 years.
D. This is the second proposed upheaval of my life style. It hap-
pened in 1956v wbp.n,Shandin Hills pushed the only two long-t1me
residents off !endall Drive to make way for a beautifying Golt.
Club. The two reS1uents were myself owner of Erewhon Ranch,
and A~@ Lyons who owned the Circle DiamondRanch.After 30 yearS
they (Shandin Hills Vevelopment) finally built the uolf
Course (not even on the side of the hill upon which our
Ranches existed.)
C. The result was that my whole life style was disrupted as was
my dau~hte~ schooling all of which was unnecessary since tor
apP~oX1mately Some )0 years that land lay IDLE.
What I have written is purely the personal affects of this proposal.
What you should take a look at is the ~IRE HAZARD to a .
populated area, the ~LOOD CONTROL INADEQUACY- the ODIrEROUS STENCH-
from the DOG ~OOD rACTORY . The product may be DRY DOG ~OOD, but the
cooking or processing of the ENTRAILS of slaughtered animals is what
provides the odor. During summer, it is necessary to close all doors,
a~a windows. It is not possible to sit outside in the evening or have
a barbecue. As for the Railroad tracks along Santa Fe. Only one
passenger train (Amtrak) travels this route per day, but all day and
all night, the freight trains loaded with cars, tractors. etc shunt
back and foth resulting in all the walls of the houses Shaking and
Sonic booms (from the dog factory) which crushes all their ~efuse
nightly and the glare of a big searchlight which operates nightly
are not going to be acceptable to ~enants who believe they are moving
into a RESIDENTIAL area. This place is definitely a Commercial Industrial
area and one that is needed and one that rural loving tenants will
put up with in order to enjoy the privacy that city life does not
guarantee. ~. , ~Sineere~!, . Eilee/'l ~.d . Shei~_a".Arn~~~ :;,,/'
I . Lth. ,.J?O J.-.<:t?,( .,. /" "_r"7" h ' ,; 7,.-:'7':-. '
4
.
....----.
.... , ) .
.
.
.
.\,;.-...- .
'.--.... .
,
-,-..
"
CITY OE~SAN BERNARDINO
300 NORTH "0" STREET. SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 92418
- <
'''H~''_''
EVLYN WILCOX
Mey",
Member' of the Common Council
Esther Estr.d.. . . . . . . . . . . . . Firat Ward
Jack R.llly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Ward
R.lph Hern.ndu . . . . . . . . . . . Third Ward
Steve Mark. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Ward
Gordon Qulel . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fin" Ward
Din F,uler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sixth Ward
Jack Strlc.kle' . . . . . . . . . . . .51"enth Werd
April 29, 1986
McKeever Engineering
647 North Main Street, Suite 2-A
Riverside, CA 92501
~,
Dear Sir or Madame:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on April 22, 1986,
the following action was taken:
The application for Tentative Tract No. 13274, to establish a
289 lot single-family residential subdivision in the R-1-7200
Single-Family Residential and C-M Commercial-Manufacturing
zones on approximately 72.8 acres located at the northwest
corner of June Street and Cajon Boulevard and extending
westerly to the northern terminus of Bronson Street, was
approved based upon findings of fact contained in the staff
report dated April 22, 1986 and subject to the conditions and
standard requirements listed therein.
According to the San Bernardino
18.20.120., the following applies
tive tract map:
Municipal Code,
to the filing of
Section
a tenta-
"The decision of the Commission shall be final unless appeal-
ed to the Mayor and Common Council in writing. The written
appeal shall be submitted to the office of the City Clerk
within ten days from the date of the meeting."
.~,
." ....
...
I'
i . ·
I
.
.
.
.
.
McKeever Engineering
April-29, 1986
Page 2
If no appeal is
provisions of the
of the Commission
filed pursuant
San Bernardino
shall be final.
to the previously mentioned
Municipal Code, the action
Respectfully,
FRANK A. SCHUMA
Planning Director
mkf
cc: Engineering DiVision
JMC Development and George Shiroma
5316 E. Chapman Avenue, 1201
Orange, CA 92669
;'
~,
Ii
)
.
'"
~
-,
:1
J
1
:j
}1
-. I
.
:1
"
-
1
,j
.
.
CiTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WA D
11
4/22/R6
6
APPLICANT: JMC Deve opmen t
5316 E. Chapman Ave., #201
Orange, CA 92669
OWNER: George Shiroma (Trustee)
5316 E. Chapman Ave., #201
Orange, CA 92669
laJ
~ Tentative Tract No. 13274
o
The applicant requests to establish a 289 lot, single-family residential
subdivision in the R-1-.7200 zone and C-M, Commercial-Manufacturing zone.
t;
laJ
J
(J
1&1
B:
.....
4
laJ
~
Subject property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximatley 72.8 acres located at the northwest corner of June Street
and Cajon Boulevard and extending westerly to the northern terminus of
Bronson Street.
PROPERTY
Subject
EXISTING
LAND USE
Vacant
North
Vacant
ZONING
C-M & R-1-7200
South
East
West
Single-Family Res.
State College Ind. Park
Vacant & Devil Canyon
an
County R-1
M-1A
County/Open
GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC
HAZARD ZONE
DYES
(jJ NO
DYES
IikNO
HIGH FIRE
HAZARD ZONE
..I
~
Z(I)
1&1"
2Z
Z-
OO
a:Z
>i&:
Z
LLl
o NOT
APPLICABLE
o EXEMPT
~NO
SIGNIFICANT
EFFECTS
NOV. 1911 RlVIUD ~ULY I".
IKY
GENERAL: PLAN
DESIGNATION
General Ind. & Low-Med
Densitv Residential
General Industrial
Density ~esidential
Low-Med Density Res.
Light Industrial
Low-Med Density Res.
DYES
SEWERS ~ NO
FLOOD HAZARD QYES OZONE A
ZONE 0 NO &'IZONE B
AIRPORT NOISE / 0 YES
CRASH ZONE ~NO
o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT
E FFE CTS
WITH MITIGATING
MEASURES NO E.I.R.
o E.I.R. REOUIRED BUT NO
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
WITH MITIGATING
MEASURES
o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
SEE ATTACHED E.R. C.
MINUTES
Z
o
ti
&&.0
&&.ei
~2
(1)2
o
frl
a:
REDEVELOPMENT DyES
PROJECT AREA ~NO
1QI APPROVAL
1QI CONDITIONS
0 DENIAL
0 CONTINUANCE TO
.
'CITY OF SAN BE~DINO PLAtNING DEPARTMENT
CASE 1'1' NO 11274
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM ; 1
HEARING DATE I./??/R"
PAGE
1. The applicant is proposing to subdivide 72.8 acres into
278 lots located on the westerly side of Cajon Blvd.,
and north of June Street. The existing zoning for the
site is C-M, Commercial Manufacturing, (2.4 acrea)
adjacent to Cajon Blvd., and the remaining portion of
the project (70.4 acres) site is zoned R-1-7200, Single-
Family Residential, minimum lot size is 7200 square
feet.
2. The General Plan designates the site for general
industrial types of land uses adjacent to Cajon Blvd.,
and low-medium density residential, 4-7 units per acre
for the remaining portion of the project. Therefore,
the proposed development, as requested, conforms to the
City's Gene!al Plan. Lot No.1, which fronts onto Cajon
Blvd., is 2.4 acres in area and is proposed to be a
commercial development for the overall. tract. The
remaining lots will be for single-family homes and will
meet the minimum requirements of the R-1-7200 standards
for lot area, depth and width. In phase 2 of Tract
13274, lots 2 thru 9 and portions of 13, 14, 15, 16 and
17 are within the existing C-M zone. The applicant is
aware of this and will be submitting an application for
a change of zone to realign the legal description of the
R-1-7200 and C-M z.one boundary to conform to ':chat
boundary established within Tract 13274 as proposed.
Said zone change request is a conditon of approval of
the tract map.
3.
The overall development is proposed in 7 phases; Phase 1
being the commercial lot adjacent to Cajon Blvd.,
comprised of 2.4 acres, Phase 2 consists of 10.0 acres
and will be comprised of 39 units with a density of 3.9
units per acre, Phase No. 3 will have 13.5 acres
comprised of 53 units with a density of 3.93 units per
acre, Phase No 4. will consist of 12.9 acres comprised
of 53 units for an overall density of 4.1, units per
acre, Phase No. 5 having 10.6 acres and 44 units will
have a phase density of 4.15 units per acre, Phase No.6
with 13.1 acres and 44 units will have a phase density
of 3.36 units per acre and the final phase, NO.7, will
have 10.3 acres and 44 units with a phase density of
4.27 units per acre. With all 7 phases complete, the
overall density of the entire project will be 3.82
units per acre in conformance with City's General Plan
designation of low medium density of 4-7 units per acre.
I
. i
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT NO. 13274
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
11
4/22/86
1
4. To the south lies existing single-family developments
that have been constructed within the unincorporated
area of San Bernardino County. Several streets within
these single-family tracts presently stub into the
proposed development. The proposed tract has been
designed to allow a circulation pattern in and out of
the unincorporated area. Those streets that are going to
provide ingress, egress of the tract are Acapulco, San
Benito, Carmelina, Don Diego, Vermont and Bronson
Street.
5. To the west of the site lies the Devil Canyon Diversion
Channel a 100 foot right-of-way for Pepper/Linden
Avenue. Pepper/Linden Avenue is presently indicated on
the City's General Plan within the circulation element
as a proposed major arterial. No access has been
proposed for access onto Pepper/Linden Avenue.
6. Within the development are proposed landscaped, open
space lots. These lots will be utilized for both
recreational activities as well as having a secondary
function as drainage retention basins during heavy storm
conditions due to the lack of drainage facilities to
the south. These lots are designated as lettered lots.
Lot "A" being located within phase 2 on the north side
of June Lane, Lot "B" being within phase 3, located on
the south side of "B" road, Lot "C" being indicated
within phase 5 on the north side of "C" Road between,,"E"
Court and "D" Road. These retention basins are'- to
capture runoff from the roadways and hold the runoff
for a short period until the runoff percolates into the
ground. Some runoff will be released back to a roadway
to allow proper drainage from the site in heavy storm
conditions. These retention basins, as proposed, are
presently being worked out as to details by the
applicant through the City Engineering Department. Said
retention basins/open space areas will be maintained by
an assessment district which will be established for the
tract.
7. At the northern terminus of "F" Court in phase 6 and the
northern terminus of "G" Court of phase 7, the cul-de-
sac right- of- way is extended to the rear lot line of
the adjacent single-family lot. Staff has been in
contact with the applicant's engineer concerning this
matter to which the applicant has agreed to a one foot
holding strip to disallow vehicular movement from the
cul-de-sac to the rear yard of the adjacent parcel.
Such a condition is attached as a condition of approval.
.'\..
..
. .
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT NO. 13274
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM 11
HEARING DATE 4/22/86
PAGE
8. Both 60 and 50 foot wide streets are proposed within the
development. Besides the residential streets to the
south of the project, access to the proposed single
family development will be provided from June Street as
well as an eastern extension of road wAw north of Lot
No.1. Both Road wAw and June Street will have access
.to Cajon Blvd.
l'
'\.
,.. .
CITY OF SAN BE~DINO PLA~ING DEPARTMENT
CASE '1"1' NO. 1'1774
FINDINGS of FACT
AGENDA ITEM ! 1
HEARING DATE 1.{n.'a6
PAGE
1. The proposed 278 lot subdivision conforms to the n'lnlmum
R-l-7200 lot development standards relative to width,
depth and area.
2.
The proposed 278 lot subdivision conforms to
standards of the subdivision map act and
subdivision ordinance.
the ntinimum
the City's
3. The site is adequate in area and size to accommodate the
proposed subdivision and meets the minimum development
standards.
4. Each lot will front onto a publicly dedicated street
when fully developed.
RE!:QilllEllDAnllli
Based upon the observations and findings of fact and subject
to the conditions and standard requirements attached hereto,
Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract No. 13274.
Respectfully Submitted,
FRANK A. SCHUMA,
Planning Director
/' /'
-- . ........ /' .
-':::?:.__ _:-::_~~_":.:-:J_..__.::..':..~------_.
EDWARD GUNDY,. Senior Planner
1>
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT NO. 1'1774
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM 11
HEARING DATE 4/77/P.F.
PAGE
r
1.
2.
3.
A one foot holding strip e-hall be established between
the terminus of "G" Court and the rear lot line of lot
No. 202 and the terminus of "F" Court and the rear lot
line of lot No. 227, both lots being in Phase 6 of tract
13274.
Prior to recordation of the tract map, a zone change
shall be approved both by the Mayor and Common Council
to reestablish zone boundaries for the C-M and the R-l
7200 ~o align with the boundaries as establiEhed by
Tract 13274 separating the C-M from the R-1-7200 zoning.
The approval of Tentative Tract No. 13274 shall be valid
for a per iod of 24 months. Ex temd on of time may be
granted with written request of such extension, thirty
days prior to expiration of the map. Tentative Tract
No. 13274 shall expire on April 22, 1988, unless further
extensions of time are' requested and granted.
4.
Prior to issuance of building permits, review of overall
site plan indicating placement of homes on individual
lots with setbacks, floor plans and elevations shall be
submitted for approval by the Development Review
Committee, aE required in Title 19 of the San Bernardino
Municipal Code.
All lots fronting onto cul-de-sacs and/or knuckles shall
have a minimum of 40 feet frontage.
5.
6.
A landscape n.aintenance district shall be created for
the maintenance of the retention basin/open space areas
prior to recordation of the final map.
7.
A one foot holding strip shall be maintained adjacent to
the rear lot line of the residential lot lines and the
proposed Pepper/Linden Avenue right-of-way.
"
8.
A landscaping plan
shall be submitted to
and approval prior
district.
of the open space retention/basins
the Planning Department for review
to creation of the assessment
.
. ..
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
.
.
CASE TT No. 1)274
STANDARD
REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
11
4/22/86
7
,
""'"
RESIDENTIAL DEVELDPMENT
1 TT NO. 1)274
shall be in effect for a period of 24 months from the
date of approval by the Planning Commission and/or Planning Department.
However, if no development has been initiated at the end of the 24-month
time period the approval shall expire. Additional time may be approved
by the Planning Commission upon request of the applicant prior to expira-
tion of the 24_month time period. Expiration Date: April 11. lQllll
COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR P.R.D.
"-
MAY '.4
a.
The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the
tract maps. The CC & R's shall include liability insurance and methods
of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private
roads, and exterior of all buildings. The CC&R's shall also include
a statement that no radio frequency antenna shall be included within
the complex except for central antenna systems.
b.
No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a cor-
poration, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has
been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned
or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the
common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment
power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with
authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually
available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under
recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all
owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to
meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded
CC&R's sh all permi t enforcement by the City of provi s ions requi red by
the City as conditions to approval. The developer shall submit evi-
dence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of,
the Commission prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not
apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
c.
Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to
such dwe 11 i ng unit or lot, either (1) an undi vi ded interest in the com-
mon areas and facilities, {)r (2) a share in the corporation, or ~oting
membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities.
d.
Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways,
sh a 11 be provi ded for in the CC&R' s.
The CC&R's shall contain wording prohibiting the storage or parking
of trai lers, boats, campers, motor homes, and simi lar vehicles outside
of the specifi ed common areas.
e.
~
S.R. FORM A
PAG[ I OF 5
~
~
.
.
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE TT NO. 13274
11
4/22/86
8
STANDARD
REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
~
,
Prior to issuance of any building permit, access rights shall be granted to
the City for the purpose of allowing access over the private drives within
the project for all necessary City vehicles including fire, police, and
refuse disposal vehicles, and any other emergency vehicles. The documents
covering this matter shall be prepared by the owner and approved by the
Planning Department.
All refuse storage areas are to be enclosed with a decorative wall.
Lncation; size, type and design of wall are subject to the approval of the
Planning Department and Division of Public Services Superintendent.
Energy and noise insulation shall comply with all state and local require-
ments.
2
LANDSCAPI NG:
a. Three copies of a master landscape plan shall be submitted to the
Planning Departmentl Park and Recreation Department for review and
approval. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the
foIl owi n g :
1) Size, type, and location of plant material proposed.
2) Irrigation plan.
3) Such other alternate plants, materials and design concepts as may
be proposed.
4) Erosion control plans.
b. IreI' varieties and eXilct locations wi 11 be determined prior to planting
by the Director of the Park and Recreation Department or his/her
dpsignel'. A minimum number of one-inch caliper/IS gallon,
multibrdnched trees shall be planted within the parkway for each of the
fullowing types of lots, as per the City's specifications:
I) Cul-de-sac lot -- one tree;
2) Interior lot -- two trees;
3) Corner lot -- three trees.
c.
~,
To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, sur-
faces of all cut slopes mlre than five feet in height and fill slopes
more than three fed in height shall be protected by planting with
grdSS or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding IS feet in vertical
hei ght shall a 1 so be planted wi th shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten
\..
.J
MAt 84
'_R FORM A
PAGE 3 OF ~
r
~
.
.
.
.
.
r
CASE TT NO. 13274
.....
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD
\.
REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
II
4/?1If!(,
Q
~
.....
,
J
-,,---
_:2..-
6
fep.t on centers; or trees, spaced at not to 'exceed 20 feet on centers;
or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants
selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and
climatic conditions of the site:
Trees 10%, 15 gallon; 40%, 5 gallon; 50%, 1 gallon.
Shrubs 20%, 5 gallon; 80%, 1 gallon.
Ground cover 100% coverage.
Three copies of the landscaping plan reflecting the above requirements
and placement of street trees (if required) shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Planning Department and the Park and
Recreation Department.
d. 51apes required to be planted shall be provided with an irrigation
system approved by the Park and Recreation Department.
e. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the
responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual
ownersh i p.
f. All grading and drainage facilities, including erosion control planting
of graded slopes, sh a II be done in accordance wi th a gradi ng plan
auproved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained
prior to any ~rading being done.
7,200
All lots shall have a minimum area of square feet, a minimum depth of
JOo feet, and a mi ni mum wi dth of.60_ feet, (-6.6... feet on corner lots). \ n
addition, each lot on a cul-de-sac or on a curved street where the side lot
line'. therpof are diverging from the front to rear of the lot, shall have a
wi lith of nut less than 60 feet measured at the bui ldi ng setback Ii ne as
delineated on the tract map.
Wherp lots occur on the bulb of the Cul-de-sac, a minimum lot depth of 100
feet fli 11 be permi Her!. I f the proposed depth is less than 100 feet, a plot
pl an must be submi tted to demonstrate that a bui Idable lot area is possible
and tn justify the lesser depth.
Vari ahle front bui lding setback lines of at least l.Il- feet and averaging
.?_~_ feet, and side street building setback lines 15 feet shall be delineated
on the final tract map. All garage entrances on a dedicated street shall
have a minimum setback of 18 feet.
Per'mder walls alld walls rpquired dlollg the redr of all double f,'ontage lots
shall be designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as
tree planter wells, variable setback, decorative masonry, columns, or other
such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face. ~
\...
S.A. FORM A
PAGE 4 OF ,
MAY 84
~
.
.
.
.
.
,.
CASE TT NO. 13274
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
""
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
\...
AGENDA ITEM II
HEARING DATE 4/22/86
PAG E 10
,.
The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval of the visual or
engineering design of the proposed wall.
When graded slopes occur within or between individual lots, the slope face
shall be a part of the downhill lot. Exceptions to this requirement must
be approved by the City Engineer.
_~__ Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required by the City Engineer
in order to reduce the amount of bare soil exposed to precipitation.
7
9
10
11
-12-
""
MAY 841
Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be required
(if applicable).
Any clubhouse, swimming pool, spa, putting green, picnic areas or other
amenities ~hall be installed in the manner indicated on the approved site
plan.
During construction the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a .
portion of the periphery of the tract site to minimize wind and debris
damagf' to adj acen t propert i es. The type of f enci ng sh all be approved by
the City Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and
dus t r:ontro 1.
No roof-mounted equipment shall be placed on any building unless screened
as specifically approved by the Planning Department (except for solar
collection panels).
Within 75 feet of any single-family residential district, the maximum
height of any building shall not exceed one-story or 20 feet unless the
Comni~sion determines that due to unusual topographical or other features,
such restrictive height is not practical.
All utility lines shall be installed underground subject to exceptions
apprqvpd by the Planning Department and the City Engineer.
No c.>rtificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to compliance with these
Standard Requirements as well as all provisions of the San Bernardino
Municipal Code.
Y>
....
s.... FOIIM A
PAGE $ t;1f $
..
, .
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE
TT NO. 13274
11
4/22/86
11
STANDARD
REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
'"
E.IiLIHE.,ERIH!LD.Ul.SlQH
Project Description I.lllllA11.lHL_____
I.u.l:.l__Hil.&._13ZIL2B.L.sflL_1.il.t.s_ ./Ul.u.t
.s..1il.ll_ilLCAjilll_.e l~il.&._j_.I.Jtll.ll_.s.t.r.ll.ll.t__ -
Date: ______ 04-11.4=1l~__________.____
Prepared By:-MMG_ Reviewed By:____
Page __1-___ of __J____ pages
Applicant:-IMC_O.ll~.lllil~m.llll.t________
HQIE._ID__~ff1.I.c~HI~ Where separate
Engineering plans are required. the
applicant is responsible for submit-
ting the Engineering plans directly
to the Engineering Division. They
may be submitted prior to submittal
of Building Plans.
SI~HOARP_RE.QllIR,EM,EMI.s
13. Payment of all applicable Engineering fees. Contact Engineering
Division for schedule of fees.
14. Submittal of a grading/drainage plan conforming to all require-
ments of Title 15 of the Muntcipal Code. including submittal of a
satisfactory soils investigation containing recommendations for
grading. prior to issuance of a grading or building permit.
15. All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved
public drainage facility. If not feasible. proper drainage
facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer.
16. Design and construction of all public utilities to serve the site
in accordance with City Code. City Standards and requirements of
the serving utility.
17. Design and construction of all required public improvements to
conform to the ultimate planned cross-section (such as street
widening. curb and gutter. sidewalk. street lights. handicap
standards and the Requirements of the City Engineer.
18. Dedication of sufficient right-of-way along adjacent streets
provide the ultimate master-planned width or as determined by
;-.+u ~ftft'ft66~
to
t h e..J
\..
1811 ..,
~)
~
.
.
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS
CASE TT NO. 13274
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
11
4/22/86
12
ElLB.EillllBfMfHI.S
p on .Qn.il .ll~L__
I.t.il~.LH.ll..._13.21.L2.a2__.sEB_L.ll1.L.f!_rLe~
.sJA~_.lll_~.ilj.lln_Hl.ll~..._.f!_llln~_.s1L~~1___
Date:____ 04-Q!=.a~___________
Prepared By:-HKG_ Reviewed By:____
Page _ 2 of 7 pages
E
19
.
A fInal map based on field survey will be required.
Drainage and Flood Control:
a) All necessary drainage and flood control measures
shall be subject to the requirements of the City
Engineer, which may be based in part on the recom-
mendations of the San BernardIno County Flood Con-
trol District. The developer's Engineer shall
furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and
flood control.
20.
b) Proper facIlities for disposing of sprIng water
from known sources or If discovered during con
structlon shall be provided to protect. proposed
building foundatIons.
c) A drainage study shall b~ prepared for the site.
Any drainage Improvements Identified as needed to
protect this site be designed and constructed at
the subdivIders expense as approved the the City
Engineer.
dl Temporary detention basins shall be constructed on-
sIte to attenuate flows exiting the sub-dIvIsion to
90~ of existing flows. Basin design shall be
approved by the CIty Engineer. Sub-divider shall
provide for perpetual maintenance of the detention
basins through either a~ assessment dIstrict or an
assocIation of homeowners.
21. RequIred Improvements and DedIcatIons:
al All publIc streets within and adjacent to the dev-
elopment shall be Improved to Include combination
curb and gutter, sidewalk, paving, ornamental
street lights, signIng, strIping and' pavement
markIngs as roqulred by the City EngIneer.
It.. tky
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Project Description Tentative
----
l.tAs:..t_.u.lL.--11Zl.!-2B~L.SE1L-1..lU.s_B_nJl.s
Sid e 0 f !;AJJl1LBl!l~BJ.u.JULS.t.I:JlJl.t__
Date: 04-04=~
Prepared By: MWG Reviewed By:
Page 3 of. 7 _ pages
b) The structural section for all streets shall be de
signed and submitted to the City Engineer for ap
prova1 using a TI assigned by the City Engineer and
nil R value obtained on the subgrade after rough
grading by a recognized soils testing lab. All
streets shall have a minimum AC thickness of 2-1/2
inches.
c) All driveway approaches shall be constructed to
City standards or as may be approved by the City
Engineer.
d) Street sIgns and other regulatory signs shall be
installed at the sub~divider's expense as required
by the City Engineer. Written approval from the
Fire Department will be required for all new street
names.
e) Curb returns and corresponding property line
returns shall be provided at the intersection(s)
(20-foot radius for most streets).
f)
^ handicap ramp shall be constructed at the inter-
soction(s) and the necessary right-of-way dedicated
to accommodate the ramp as required by the City
Engineer.
All oxisting public or private improvements or
utilities which Interfere with new construction
shull bo relocated at the sub-divider's expense as
approved by the City Engineer and .the Owner of the
1.1.'oject.
g)
\.
~
"" Iky
~
.
'.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE
"'1 t-10 1J274
ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
11
4/22/86
1/~
~
NGINEERING DIVISION
"
Project Description IenlA11~~_-____
IL~kt-H~__1121!_2~2-~fB__Lgt~_!_~~~
~~~~f_~lgn_Bl~g~!_I~n~_~1L~~t___
Date: 04~a~______________
Prepared By:-HKG_ Reviewed By:____
Page __A-___ of 7 pages
h)
Construct
needed by
necessary
all drainage
the approved
easements.
improvements indicated as
drainage study and dedicate
i) Extend City's sewer system to serve the subdivision
as directed by the City Engineer.
j) For the streets listed below, dedication of ade-
quate street right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the
distance from street centerline to property line
and placement of the curb line (C.l.) in relation
to the street centerline shall be as follows (for
the streets marked * the existing improvements
shall be removed and replaced to the dimensions
noted):
~tu.eL.NAm.e
B....iL..IU...l
C...L.(Ft. )
"A" Road, "C" Road,
Don Diego Street, June
Street, Bronson Street
30'
20'
All other Interior Streets
25' (min)
18'
Cajon Boulevard
44'
32'*
Pepper-linden*
50'
N/A
*Pepper-linden Avenue shall be left in a natural
condition. A IS-foot wide, gated access ease-
ment from "A" road shall be provided at a location
acceptable to the City Engineer.
....
~
I'" thy
~
,
.
,
CITY
OF
SAN
.. .
BERNARDINO
.
..
"\
CASE
TT NO. 13274
STANDARD
'"
REQUIREMENTS
11
4/22/86
I ~
~
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
.,
Project Description Ten!!!l~~______
IxA~t-H~-1JZI!_Za~__~EB-L~t~_B__~~A1
~~-~_CAl2n-al~_B-1~~_~tLe~t___
Date: 04-04-86
Prepared By:~_ Reviewed By:____
Page __i-___ of 7 pages
~NGINEERING DIVISION
22
.
Grading:
a) Each parcel shall be graded to drain to a public dedicated
street. alley. or drainage faCility. If this is not feas-
Ible. proper drainage facilities and easements shall be
provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
bJ All slopes shall be contained within the lower parcels
affected by the slope. In some Instances. this require-
ment will necessitate the use of retaining walls or slope
easements on adjacent property.
c) Slope planting with an irrigation system to prevent ero-
sion shall be provided as specified by the City Engineer.
d) A composite site. grading and drainage plan will be re-
quired. If the quantity of earthwork exceeds 5.000 cubic
yards. the grading shall be designated "Engineered
Grading" and shall be supervised In accordance with UBC
Section 7014(c) and a grading bond ln the amount of $2.00
per cublc yard of dlrt or fl11. whichever ls greater. wl11
be requlred.
eJ Tomporary dust and eroslon control measures shall be maln-
tained at all tlmes durlng constructlon. Permanent dust
and erosion control measures. satisfactory to the City
Engineer. shall be In place prlor to acceptance of any
graded areas.
23
Ut1litles:
a)
Each parcel shall be provided with
sower facl1itles so it can be served
agency provldlng such servlces ln the
separate water and
by the City or the
area.
b)
A sewer
parcels
nearest
backflow preventlon device Is ~equlred for all
with buildlng flnlshed floors lower than the
upstream manhole rim of the serving sewer main.
""
~
It" ._,
_C_.c.'.L":'~'_~'-'-'-'_--"':"__'L.~' ~..,,,,
r
.
.
CITY
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
OF
SAN
. .
BERNARDINO
l>
.
""'"
l
,.
CASE TT NO. 13274
I]
4/n/Rf..
ill ..
\0..
r
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
"'"
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Project Description Tent~!lve_____
I..r.il.s;.t._N.Q..._13.Zll-2..lI.~.EB-1..Q.t.L.!_lt.e~
Si~~_.l2f-t.il.i.an_~~_!_IYn~_~.t~~.t___
Date: 04-04-a6
Prepared By:~_ Reviewed By:
Page _~___ of 7 pages
c) Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be
constructed at the developer's expense.
d) Sewers within private streets will not be maintained by
the City but shall be constructed to City standards and
Inspected under a City Public Works Inspection permit.
el Utility services shall be placed underground and easements
provided as required.
f) All existing overhead utilities shall be placed under-
ground In accordance with Section 18.40.380 of the City
Code and shall be so Indicated upon the Improvement plans.
24. Improvement Completion:
a) Street, sewer, and drainage Improvement plans for the
entire project shall be completed, subject to the approval
of the City Engineer, prior to the recordation of the
final map.
25
.
b) If the required Improvements are not completed prior to
recordation of the final map, an Improvement security
accompanied by an agreement executed by the developer and
the City will be required.
Required Engineering Permits:
a) Grading permit
b) Construction permit for on-site and off-site Improvements.
.
\0..
~
.." Ik,
...
A
.
..
.
.
'.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
""'
CASE
TT NO C 1771.
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
11
1./?7/p.~
1:
~
"'"
Ili..
,
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Project Descr1pt10n Ien1A!lx~
I.t.ac t No &.-13274 2 B.JLSElL1..gn_J__:rl.u.!
~e of CAj~B Blvd~-1UDe Stree!___
Date: 04-04-86 _
Prepared By: MWG Rev1ewed By:____
Page 7 of _-I-~ pages
26
.
Applicable Eng1neer1ng Fees:
a) Plan check and Inspection fees for grad1ng.
b) Plan check and 1nspect10n fees for on-site and off-s1te
1mprovements.
c)
Energy fee to pay cost of street l1ght energy for a per10d
of 4 years after acceptance.
\...
~
,... tk,
.', "
r
~
.
.
.
"
-j
I
'l':~
'~!1
c.
:'lil
~~
...' ~.
.: ,.
--::-;
'11'7112
a m~l~~ 1l
~ ..............-
.......
-'.
= .:a....1r ~
.. .................Ii
~ ~r'~~'r ..
:. .....,...::- ~
i ...... ...
-?
4.-
~.
/'
10
IJ'
~.
\:&
."
i.
.,
Ii
'J>
~
......... ~
' . _a-ao. -.
s ........ ~
I !
~ f
"
.
-f
::0
l>
o
-f
-
01
I\)
......
~
.. ~tI'"..,
:
r
.,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA
ITEM #
LoeA TION
CASE _'1'.'1'. 1113271,
HEARING DATE 04/22/86
11
~
L~
M-IA
---
~--
I
." \ ........ ,
__-.i; t:f~:' )__ - /'
<'!<"~SITE /
\ .
EMERSON
..
..
:>
"
IT.
.-
E~EMt:NTARY
IC"OO~
.AT
!IT
U
II
II
HIT
AT II