HomeMy WebLinkAbout13-Planning
- -
> CI-R OF SAN BERNARDIQ, - REQUA- FOR COUNCIL ACQON
Frank A. Schuma
From: Planning Director
Dept: Planning
Date: August 8, 1985
Subject:
Amendment to Traffic Consultant
Contract for Verdemont Area Plan
Study
Mayor and Council Meeting of
August 19, 1985, 9:00 a.m.
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
November 21, 1983
September 11, 1985
Council allocated $15,000 for the preparation of
traffic and seismic studies for the completion of
the Verdemont Area Plan.
Council approved contract with Greer and Co. for the
traffic analysis for the Verdemont Area Plan EIR,
(Resolution 84-96), ($8,850).
Council approved a first amendment with Greer and Co.
for the alignment and preliminary design of the
Meyers Road extension, (Resolution No. 84-347),
($3,300).
March 5, 1984
Recommended motion:
That the Mayor and Council amend the consultant contract with Greer and
Company for the purpose of analyzing the Planning Commission recommended
land use alternative for the Verdemont Area Plan.
~.
Signature Frank A. Schuma
Contact person:
Frank A. Schuma
Phone:
383-5057
5
Supporting data attached:
Yes, Staff Report
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source:
Finance:
Council Notes:
'7.._n,::,,,,~
^___-'_ .__'- .._ J =<
-
_ .l.-
Clff OF SAN BERNARDlio - REQU.&T FOR COUNCIL ~ON
STAFF REPORT
Subject: Amendment to Traffic Consultant Contract
for Verdemont Area Plan
August 8, 1985
Backg round:
The contracted consultant services with Larry Greer and
Company for the Verdemont Area Plan Traffic and Circulation
Analysis involved evaluation of four land use alternatives
for the Environmental Impact Report.
On April 9, 1985 the Planning Commission recommended a land
use alternative that differed significantly from the alterna-
tives previously analyzed. The difference respected a
request from CalMat Company -- a large property owner in the
area -- that its holdings west of Cajon Boulevard be desig-
nated for industrial purposes rather than mineral resource
zone, which would allow mineral extraction. CalMat maintains
that the area is unsuitable for extraction due to its isola-
tion created by the various railroad and flood control
improvements.
Planning staff has
ingness to pay for
above modification.
Company agreeing to
contacted CalMat Company as to its will-
the additional analysis required for the
Exhibit wA. is a letter from CalMat
underwrite such an expense.
Exhibit .BW is a letter proposal from Greer and Company
outlining the expenses anticipated for the additional analy-
sis. The additional amounts in the letter are not applica-
ble, as such, staff has edited the letter proposal.
Reqnest.:
The Planning Department staff requests that the Mayor and
Council approve the amendment of the contract between Greer
and Company to allow for analysis of an additional land use
alternative for the Verdemont Area Plan. The consultant
proposes to provide said services for $1,480. The amount
will be reimbursed directly to the City by CalMat Company.
7.._n~"'4
o
CalMatCo
'0
&-III4f-((ff~
o
.\~.
3200 SAN FERNANDO ROAD/P.O. BOX 2950/LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90051/12131 258-2777
July 16, 1985
Mr. Frank Schuma, Planning Director
City of San Bernardino
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Re: Verdemont Area Plan
Dear Mr. Schuma:
Reference is made to your letter dated July 8, 1985
relative to the Planning Commission's action on April 9, 1985
in recommending an industrial use for our property.
This letter authorizes you to proceed with your traffic
consultant, Larry Greer & Co., to perform the additional analy-
sis necessary to complete the area plan's circulation element.
It is my understanding that the cost to perform this work will
be approximately $1,500. Should it appear that the cost will
exceed this amount by more than $250, I would request that you
notify me so we can make a decision as to whether we wish to
proceed with the study.
.,-
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
~B~~
Vice President, Properties
GRB/sac
(_'_..h i
!,~
y~
! '
. .
,
.m,.....~.I'.m fi'1 p :- ,'.
. I. '.
,.
~
,
,
! ,~
!
; ;....
v
JUL 1:; 1~n:;
;
i v. . ,
V! .
I ..
i ..~_._.._..
o
'0 6r#t~1;
4095 East La Palma Avenue, Suite L
Anaheim, California 92807 .
(714) 630-9230
,.
ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
June 12, 1985
oom,@r~ owm rID
JUN'17 1985.
. ~.
, . ; ~ ' .:' ,
","
"
el'rv I'" '.P" ,'" ......".'.T"ENT
.. ~r..u.u.~,.1t.._, I"'\n 1M
SAN BERNARDINO, CA
Mr. Ronald Running
Senior Planner
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Planning Department .
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, California 92418
";'.
RE: Verdemont Area Plan Contract Addendum (107-01)
, .
Dear Mr. Running:
It is our understanding that the Verdemont Citizen Advisory Committee has
developed and agreed upon an additional land use alternative for the Verde-
mont Area Plan. Based on our phone conversations and an examination of the
land use alternative, we are pleased to submit this contract addendum to
analyze the additional alternative and to prepare the traffic and
circulation section of the Area Plan.
As specified in ou~ a~eement (Resolution No. B4-96) for traffic consulting
services in connection with preparation of the traffic and circulation
analyses for the Verdemont Area Plan, our analyses invol.ved the forecasting
of traffic for four land use alternatives. The agreement and resolution
also specifies that we will prepare a screencheck draft traffic and
circulation analysis report. As you are aware, to-date we have completed
the work necessary for the draft EIR.
Additional work, over and above that specified in the original agreement,
will be required to analyze a fifth alternative.
We have estimated the cost to conduct the analyses of a fifth alternative
at $1,480. This includes the necessary staff time required to conduct the
additional analYsis and prepare the addendum for the EIR in letter report
form.
As we ~ave discussed during the course of the project, you are anticipating
that an additional circulation plan report be prepared for the selected
land use alternative for inclusion in the Area Plan. Basically, the circu-
lation plan report would be a summary of the traffic analysis report in the
Elk. The circulation plan report, however, would discuss specific traffic
and circulation elements of the selected land use plan. Since the Citizen
Aovisory Committee has selected an alternative land use plan that was not
included in the EIR, additional work will be required to prepare the circu-
lation plan report of the new alternative. The extra work necessary
o
..F}:':;.~F
./L~;'/ :~
F.":"~.._
C.,!'.._
V.G._
~.L.__
~.Q.-
J.C._
l~.::.._
~:L~. __
~. ~~. --
~~.;". --
S.'::._
C.~._
("," -
~....s.__
V.K_
F:L[ __
[;.~;J." o.
7
Mr. Ronald Running . c:>
Proposal - .Verdemont Area Plan Addendum
June 12, 1985 - Page 2
o
, .
involves a re-write of the traffic analysis in the EIR to reflect the
traffic and circulation impacts of the new land use alternative.
We have estimated the cost of the additional work to prepare the circu-
lation plan for the selected land use alternative at~ This amount
represents work over and above that necessary to analyze the fifth land use
alternative. Accordingly, we are prepared to complete the project for a
not-to-exceed amount of ~ including direct expenses billed at 115
percent of actual cost. "I,~ . .
We are prepared to conduct the analysis of the fifth alternative, prepare
the addendum for the EIR and prepare the circulation plan report ulion
authorization from yourself. We are looking forward to our continuing work
on thi s project. If thi s letter proposal addendum meets your approval,
please have a copy of thi s 1 etter proper ly executed and returned for our
record files.
Respectfully submitted,
GREER & CO.
~~ ~~It-~.
Robert A. Kilpatrick
Transportation Engin~ef
Larry E. Greer, P.E.
Pri nci pa.1
RAK:LEG:pkf
Enclosures
APPROVED BY:
Name
Tltle
Authorized to Approve Agreements for:
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date:
o
./