Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-Planning CIR OF SAN BERNARD~ - REQU.Qr FOR COUNCIL AC~ON Frank A. Schuma From: Planning Director Subject: Declaration of Impaction - Levying of Developer Fees for the San Bernardino Unified School District Dept: Planning Date: May 13, 1985 Synopsis of Previous Council action: None Recommended motion: That the request to establish interim school facilities financing ordinance be referred to the Legislative Review Committee. WA~ Signature Frank A. Schuma Contact person: Frank A. Schuma Phone: 383-5057 Supporting data attached: Yes, Staff Report Ward: City-wide FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Source: Finance: Council Notes: LI CIR OF SAN BERNARDlio - REQUaT FOR COUNCIL AC~ON STAFF REPORT Subject: Declaration of Impaction - Levying of Developer Fees for the San Bernardino Unified School District On April 16, 1985 the San Bernardino Unified School District adopted a declaration of impaction for school facilities located within the City of San Bernardino and surrounding unincorporated properties and is requesting that the Mayor and Council concur with the District's findings of impaction and require the collection of a fee in the amount of $1,827 per single-family unit and a fee of $1,663 for each multiple family unit. The City of San Bernardino, in the past, has worked in cooperation with the school districts in implementing the school impaction fees in the following manner prior to issuance of building permits. The developer must pay the respective school district the amount determined for reso- lution of school impaction. The school district then issues a receipt to the developer which is submitted to the City at the time building permits are issued. In no case has the City ever collected any money from developers on behalf of a school district. ,.0 00 San Bernardino City Unified School District E, Neal Roberts, EdD., Superintendent Harold L. Boring, EdD., Assistant Superintendent, Administrative UC:".D. - ADMIN. OFF. 1985 HAY -8 PM 3: 56 o y-_....... H" There's No Better Place To Learn 'l11e Honorable W. R. (Bob) HolClCllb, Mayor, and ~s of the San Bernardino City Camcil, and City 1Idmini.strator City of San Bernardino, CA 92418 SUB:JEX:T: Declaration of Impaction May 7, 1985 'l11e Notification of Conditions of OIrercr<:M:ting of the San Bernardino City Unified School District is suDnitted to you for your cq:proval. Every effort has been made to validate the construction data with the San Bernardino City Planning DepartDent. Enclosed you will find a copy of the Declaration of Inpaction and Certification of Minutes fran the Board Ireeting of April 16, 1985, with attacllllents. Please notify this office when this item will be on your agenda. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, J ~'\ ~/ /: Ij~v~;j ~ L. IlORIOO, Pd. D.U Assistant Superintendent' 1Idmini.strative Services H!B:rh Enclosures e ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION (714) 1il llH 777 North F Street . San Bernardino. CA 92410 . (714) o SAN SERNONO CITY UNIFIED SCHO DISTRICT CEFlTIFlCATION OF l'JINUTES o The Board met in regular session on the 15th dayof meeting place thereof. The meeting was called to order at 5: 30 o'clock P.pri 1 p. m. , 19 85 . at the usual Members present: H. UrOlm, M. Brown, Fa\~ke, Grossman, Neiqel, Obershal.~ Members absent: Di az The adoption of the following resolution and order was moved by Member Fa,:/ke . . and seconded by Member r,1. Brown . and a vote being taken, the said resolution and order was adopted by the following votes of members present at that time. AYES: Members H. Brown, M,. Brown, Fa\1ke, Srossman, Neigel, Obersha\.! NOES: Members None ABSTENTIONS: Members None SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DECLARATION OF IMPACT WHEREAS, for some time past there has been a continuing and substantial. increase in population within the boundaries of the San Bernardino City Unified School District, located in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County, to the extent that the school facilities of this district have become over- crowded; and WHEREAS, that population growth has manifested itself in an increase in student population of the schools of the San Bernardino City Unified School District; and WHEREAS, the student popul ation has exceeded the capacity of the school s I normal housing ability; and ~ WHEREAS, in the absence of assistance in the form of financial contributions or dedications of land from the developers of such new residential developments, this district would not have financial resources adequate to provide proper educational facilities for all the children residing in this district; and WHEREAS, Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970; added to Statutes of 1977, Chapter 955) Division 1, Title 7 to the Government Code, makes: provision for financial or other assistance by developers to a school diStrict if the governing board of the school district has made a finding that conditions of overcrowding exist in one or more attendance areas of the district and if such finding includes the additional information specified in Government Code Sect ion 65971; o o o o NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND DETERMINED that, pursuant to Government Code Section 65971 an<! related oi'ciinanccs of jurisdiction in ~Ihich the District is located, this Governing Uoal~ makes the following finding~: 1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in many of the schools in the San Bernardino City Unified School District; the capacities and enroll- ments by grade 1 eve 1 s are descri bed in Table 1, and the attendance areas are depicted on the maps included as Table 6. 2, The facts underlying this Board's conclusion that conditions of overcrOl~ding exist in the above-mentioned attendance areas include the fo 11 owi ng: a. For the purpose of this finding, this Board assumes that scheduling and classroom allocation will be done in such a way as to make the most efficient use of classrooms and related facilities, which will be available over such period, consistent with the district's standards for classroom loading, needs for special use facilities and special education, b, The maximum number of pupils. that could be enrolled in the schools without a substantial reduction in the quality of the program is indicated as the Functional Maximum Capacity in Table 1. For the purposes of. this finding, this Board.makes the same assumption which it made for the purposes of the finding in subparagraph a above. 3. All reasonable methods of mitigating the overcrowding have been evaluated and subject to the conditions set forth in Table 4, and no feasible method for reducing such conditions exist. 4. The finding set forth in Section 3 above is subject to[the condition that, if a responsible developer enters into an agreement with the district by executing an agreement and providing such security for the performance of such agreement as the district may require, then such agreement shall be deemed by thi s Governing Board to be a feasible method of mitigating conditions of overcrowding caused by the specific development to which such agreement relates for so long as such agreement rema ins in effect. . . 5. The construction of additional, permanent school facilities (in- cluding, in addition to classrooms, facilities to house administra- tive, recreational and other functions necessary and desirable to support and supplement classroom operations) is the only long term solution to conditions of overcrowding in the District's schools. Financial or other support from developers supplied pursuant either to agreements of the type mentioned in Section 4 above or to the above mentioned provisions of the. Government Code and City of San Bernardino and County of San Bernardino Ordinances can, at best, provide only temporary and partial relief from conditions of over- o o o o , crowding caused by new residential development. Until additional, permanent school facilities are constructed, conditions of over- crowding will continue to exist, notwithstanding partial relief from such developer support, and such conditions will worsen in time due to the temporary nature of the relief provided by developer support. 6, The San Bernardino City Unified School District hereby requests the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino to concur with the District's findings of impaction and require the collection of fees from builders/developers. 7. Tables 1 through 6 are presented as a part of the findings of impaction, IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Secretary of this Board deliver certified copies of this resolution to the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino. I, E, NEAL ROBERTS. Secretary of the Governing Board of the San Bernardino City Unified School District hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly msde, adopted and entered In the Bosrd minutes of the Governing Board of the San Bernardino City Unified School District on the 16th dsy of ,A,pri 1 ,19 85. Dated: April 17 , 1985 n.~.llli./- ~U-12 (R.... 10183) Secretary, Board of Education Adenda Item 4,1 .,0-. o o o . . \ I : School Impaction and Implementation of land Dedication or Developers' Fees (Prepared by Administrative Services Division) The housing boom" in numerous a~~s within the. School DistriCt boundaries has caused the actual and projected enrollment to exceed the functional maximum capacity in certain school attendance areas. The February 19, 1985 report to .the Board of Education showed more than 14 schools were at, or had surpassed, . their functional capacity. On March 19, 1985. a Student Generation Report ' indicated that .the average new house was producing .78 students and multi- residences were providing an average of .71 students each. It is in order at this time for'the Board of Education to: . 4.1 '. 6:30p;m. 1. determine whether or not overcrowding, which will impair the normal functioning of educational programs, exists or will exist in one or more attendance areas within the district, and 2. assess reasonable methods of mitigating the conditions of over- crowding if overcrowding does or will exist.' -3.. . . ," , ., i', :0 o o ;0 Board of Education Meeting April 16, 1985 After a series of reports by the District Administration, including studies and surveys of housing developments, a notification of condition of over- crowding is hereby proposed pursuant to Government Code Section 65971. Following a Public Hearing on this matter, and if the Board of Education concurs with the Administration's report, a declaration of school impaction is in order. A Notification of Condition of Overcrowding will then be submitted to the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino. Impacted Schools The recommendation to file this Notification of Condition of Overcrowding is based on infonRation contained in Table 1. Maps of school boundaries are shown as Table 6. . TABLE 1 IMPACTED SCHOOLS Overcrowding will exist due to the occupation of newly constructed dwelling .units creating enrollment in excess of the capacity in many of the schools of the District. . Functional Maximum Schoo I Capaci~ Barton 399-432 Bradley 699-930 California 426-492 Del Rosa 789-888 Emnerton 606-672 *Kenda 11 336-369 Kimbark 276-342 *Lincoln 636-702 *Lytle Creek 516-582 *Monterey 639-738 *Mt. Vernon 516-582 Muscoy 576-642 NNllIrk 519-618 11/2/84 Enrollment 1985-86 Prel iminary Projec!l~n Student Preliminary Growth Per Projections & Housing Plans Housing Plans *** 301 316 736 738 426 487 869 851 589 607 277 309 281 288 706 811 550 563 629 695 544 602 552 601 465 475 177 493 14 752 59 546 232 1,083 305 912 950 1,259 1,001 1,289 18 829 6569 229 924 602 601 550 1,025 -4- .c' 0 0 Board of Education Meeting April 16, 1985 North Park 546-579 554 589 *Oehl 606-672 447 453 *R 11 ey 606-672 624 692 *Roosevelt 729-762 813 863 Thompson 576-609 543 572 *Urbita 273 278 314 Wann Springs 543-774 581 641 Shandin H11ls 964 872 959 Cajon 2,476 1,925 1,883 S8HS 2,331 2,201 2,373 SGHS 2,918 2,605 2,530 o 383 852 836 695 863 175 747 3 263 Plus housing plans at non-impacted schools 74 388 235 876 . 673 .1,632 713 2,596 52 2,427 375 2,905 850 * School attendance area totally in City ** This capacity excludes. space set aside for libraries, cafetoriums/multiuse rooms, spe~ial education.programs, bilingual education, ~sic, chapter 1 and 2 programs, school improvement programs, and desegregation and inte~ration programs. *** As of 4/4/85 Student Generation In the opinion of the San. Bernardino City Unified School District and based upon current data as presented in Table 2, each new dwelling unit produces a student yield of .78 for single family.units and .71 for multi family unit. TABLE 2 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD Elementary Intermediate High School Student Generation Factor Single Family Unit 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 -5- o o o Board of Education Meeting April 16, 1985 Multi Family Unit 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 Generation by School Student generation worksheets of newly constructed and/or proposed housing units identifying potential student enrollments are an Appendix to this report. Table 3, Student Growth Per Housing Plans, summarizes the develop- ments and proposed student enrollments per school attendance area. The figures indicated are based upon housing information collected through March, 1985. The detailed analysis for each development is. found in the Appendix. TABLE 3 STUDENT GROWTH PER HOUSING PLANS Column 2 of this table gives the total number of known housing developments .under construction, ready for occupancy or proposed. Column 4 shows the Student Generation Yield based upon the type of dwelling. School Attendance Area Number of Developments Number of Lots/Units Type SF=Single Family MF=Mul ti-Family Student Generation Yield El ementary Ba rton 2 348 MF 177 2 28 MF 14 1 115 MF 59 5 455 MF 232 5 598 MF 305 4 1,098 MF 560 6 830 SF 390 4 1,034 MF 527 13 1,004 SF 472 2 36 MF 18 2 11 MF 6 6 452 MF 6. Bradley California Del Rosa Emmerton Kenda 11 Kenda 11. Kimbark Kimbark L1 ncol n Lytle Creek Monterey -6- . 0 0 0 0 Board of Education Meeting April 16, 1985 NeljQJark 4 726 MF 370 NeljQJark 4 383 SF 180 North Park 5 481 MF 245 North Park 1 41 SF 19 Oehl 1 750 MF 383 Riley 1 6 MF 3 Thompson 2 373 SF 175 Urbita 2 146 MF 74 Warm Springs 3 432 MF 220 Warm Springs 1 29 SF 14 Intermediate Shandin Hills 18 3,454 MF 381 Shandin Hills 24 2,258 SF 292 High School Cajon 17 3,339 MF 301 Cajon 24 2,258 SF 404 SBHS 12 577 MF 52 SGHS 29 3,385 MF 301 SGHS 3 402 SF 72 TOTAL 6,252 . . Within the boundaries of the San Bernardino City Unified School District, there are approximately 944 single family units, 1,003 multi-family units ready for occupancy and approx1mately.2,938 units in various stages of construct1on. In addition, there are 5,076 un1ts wh1ch have rece1ved tentat1ve map approvals from the C1tyand County of San Bernard1no. -7- . o o o o Board of Education Meeting April 16, 1985 Mitigation In attempting to alleviate the problem created by student growth, the District has considered reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding as indicated in Table 4. TABLE 4 Overcrowding Mitigations A statement of .a possible mitigating condition is presented followed by a response in our attempt to meet that condition. 1. Agreements between a developer and the affected school district whereby temporary buildings will be leased to the District for an interim period, or whereby temporary buildings owned by the School District will be used. Response: No agreements currently exist between developers and the District for buildings to be leased to the District and the District does not have temporary buildings that are not currently in use. 2. Availability of funds, the use of which would not impair the normal functioning of educational programs. Response: There are no District funds available which would not impair the normal functioning of educational programs. 3. Use of funds which could be made available from the sale of surplus property. Response: The District does not have surplus real property to sell. The sale of surplus personal property generates income that is earmarked for replacement of obsolete equipment. 4. Use of School District Property for temporary buildings. Response: The District has property that can be used for placement of temporary buildings but has no funds to lease additional temporary classrooms. 5. Use of other schools in the District where overcrowding does not exist. Response: Attendance boundary changes have been accomplished. School capacities have been studied and increased to a maximum capacity designated as the functional maximum. .A closed intermediate school has'been reopened at great expense as an elementary school site. Two sites are currently under lease to the County Schools Office for special programs. These students ~- . o o o o Board of Education Meeting Apri 1 16, 1985 would otherwise be served by the District. The District also has a closed high school site. Extensive restoration and repair must take place prior to reopening this site. It is estimated that this project would involve a two year process and cost $2,500,000.00. 6. Double or staggered sessions. SB 813 has mandated a longer instructional day per year for the current and next two years. Double or staggered sessions would require a reduction in the amount of time the student spends in class. Teachers would be unable to prepare special instructional materials before class because of the daily move. These circum- stances would cause the educational level provided students to be greatly reduced. Additionally, a reduction of instructional time now would result in loss of funds. Students would be on the streets during predawn and afterdark hours in order to attend double or staggered sessions. Funds are not available to provide additional transportation. Double or staggered sessions would additionally overload existing facilities, i.e. cafeteria, restrooms and workrooms. 7. Continuous school programs as authorized by Education Code Sections 37600 et. seq. Response: The San Bernardino City Unified School District currently operates two continuous (year round) school programs at the elementary level. In order to mandate additional year round schools, the District must comply with all legal requirements which could delay the availability of classrooms under the process for up to two years. In the meantime, students would not be housed. Additional costs would be incurred for food service, transportation, utilities, administrative staff and other support staff such as school nurses, counseling staff, attendance office personnel, library staff, speech therapists, school psychologists, clerks and custodians. 8. Use of available bond revenues to the extent authorized by law. Response: Response: There are no new bond revenues available at this time. Proposition 13 has removed bonding ability from school districts. 9. Use of facilities in other districts. Response: Facilities are not available in the districts bordering the San Bernardino City Unified School District. 10. Use of interdistrict attendance agreements. -9- . o o o o Board of Education Meeting April 16, 1985 Res~onse: The San Bernardino City Unified School District had interdistrict agreements affecting 92 students coming into and 149 students going out of the District during the 1983-84 school year. We anticipate a similar number for the current year; however, these a9reements are generally for specific reasons and would not be practical for most students. 11. Filing of appropriate notices of overcrowding with the appropriate agencies within the attendance areas subject to overcrowding. Response: Upon Board adoption of a Resolution to Declare a Condition of Overcrowding, Notices will be filed with the City and County of San Bernardino. Classroom Cost In considering reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding, the District concludes that there is no feasible method for reducing the conditions of overcrowding except additional temporary classrooms. Table 5 shows the basic installation cost of portable classrooms. TABLE 5 Estimated Cost to Install Temporary Classrooms 1. Modular Classrooms. Telephone Quotations March, 1985 Annual Rent - 1st Year Annual Rent.. 2nd Year Annual Rent - 3rd Year Delivery/Setup Annual Rent - 4th Year (plus est. CPI 4.5%) Annual Rent. 5th Year (plus est. CPI 4.5%) Removal Charge Misc. . Skirt, Ramp, Earthquake TOTAL Insco (24 x 40t $7,200.00 7,200.00 7,200.00 1,400.00 7,524.00 7,863.00 800.00 2,300.00 $41,487.00 2. Restroom Facilities Annual Rent. 1st Year Annual Rent - 2nd Year Annual Rent - 3rd Year Steelgard (12 x 48) est. only $12,285.00 12,285.00 12,285.00 -10- . o o o Board of Education Meeting April 16, 1985 Delivery/Setup Annual Rent - 4th Year Annual Rent - 5th Year Removal Charge Misc. - Skirt/Ramp TOTAL o -0- 12,838.00 13,415.00 -0- -0- $63, 108 .00 3. Classrooms: Utilities, Site Preparation a. Electrical: For electrical, Fire Alarm, Intercom - $25.00 per linear foot (minimum 150 ft.) plus $125.00 for Breaker and Enclosure $ 3,875.00 b. Site Preparation: (1) Paving and Walkway (2) Leveling and Grading (3) Sprinkler Repair/removing and replacing fence Minimum Expense/Classroom 4. Restroom: Utilities, site development (one per nine classrooms) Water, sewer, plumbing Electrical Architect Fees State Fee/Plan Check Inspection Fee TOTAL Classroom Cost Summary Temporary Classroom 1/9 Temporary Restroom Utilities/Site Preparation Classroom 1/9 Utilities/Site Prepara- tion Restroom Architect Fees State Fees Inspection Fees Furniture/Carpeting Subtotal -11- 2,500.00 6,375.00 5,500.00 1,000.00 2,300.00 480.00 800.00 $10,080.00 $ 41,487.00 7,012.00 6,375.00 1,120.00 2,300.00 480.00 800.00 7,350.00 $ 66,924.00 o o o o Board of Education Meeting April 16, 1985 Inflationary Fa~tor 5.0% TOTAL 3,346.00 $ 70,270.00 Using the formula established by County Ordinance No. 2409, Section 61.065 of L X C = fee per dwelling unit; ~ where L equals the number of students generated by each dwelling unit, C equals the cost of leasing one temporary classroom (including utilities, furnishings, and restroom facilities not constructed with permanent foundations) for a period of five years, and S equals the number of students per classroom, which shall be thirty, unless information provided by the school district indicates otherwise. Single family units .78 X 703270 = $1,827 o .71 X 703~70 = $1,663 Multi-family units Public Hearing It is in order at this time to call upon the public for comments about the conditions of overcrowding, The Declaration of Impaction and the collection of fees from housing builders and developers, as reported above. Resolution Following the Public Hearing, if the Board of Education concurs with the report, then a Declaration of School Impaction is in order by adoption of the following resolution: -12- o o o o Board of Education Meeting April 16, 1985 SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DECLARATION OF IMPACT WHEREAS, for some time past there has been a continuing and substantial increase in population within the boundaries of the San Bernardino City Unified School District, located in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County, to the extent that the school facilities of this district have become over- crowded; and WHEREAS, that population growth has manifested itself in an increase in student population of the schools of the San Bernardino City Unified School District; and WHEREAS, the student population has exceeded the capacity of the schools' normal housing ability; and . WHEREAS, in the absence of assistance in the form of financial contributions or dedications of land from the developers of such new residential developments, this district would not have financial resources adequate to provide proper educational facilities for all the children residing in this district; and WHEREAS, Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970; added to Statutes of 1977, Chapter 955) Division 1, Title 7 to the Government Code, makes provision for financial or other assistance by developers to a school district if the governing board of the school district has made a,finding that conditions of overcrowding exist in one or more attendance areas of the district and if such finding includes the additional information specified in Government Code Section 65971; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND DETERMINED that, pursuant to Government Code Section 65971 and related ordinances of jurisdiction in which the District is located, this Governing Board makes the following findings: 1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in many of the schools in the San Bernardino City Unified School District; the capacities and enroll- ments by grade levels are described in Table 1, and the attendance areas are depicted on the maps included as Table 6. 2. The facts underlying this Board's conclusion that conditions of overcrowding exist in the above-mentioned attendance areas include the following: a. For the purpose of this finding, this Board assumes that scheduling and classroom allocation will be done in such a way as to make the most.efficient use of classrooms and related facilities, which will be available over such period, consistent with the district's standards for classroom loading, needs for special use facilities and special education, -13- o o o o Board of Education Meeting April 16, 1985 b. The maximum number of pupils that could be enrolled in the schools without a substantial reduction in the quality of the program is indicated as the Functional Maximum Capacity in Table 1. For the purposes of this finding, this Board makes the same assumption which it made for the purposes of the finding in subparagraph a above. 3. All reasonable methods of mitigating the overcrowding have been evaluated and subject to the conditions set forth in Table 4, and no feasible method for reducing such conditions exist. 4. The finding set forth in Section 3 above is subject to the condition that, if a responsible developer enters into an agreement with the district by executing an agreement and providing such security for the performance of such agreement as the district may require, then such agreement shall be deemed by this Governing Board to be a feasible method of mitigating conditions of overcrowding caused by the specific development to which such agreement relates for so long as such agreement remains in effect. 5. The construction of additional, permanent school facilities (in- cluding, in addition to classrooms, facilities to house administra- tive, recreational and other functions necessary and desirable to support and supplement classroom operations) is the only long term solution to conditions of overcrowding in the District's schools. Financial or other support from developers supplied pursuant either to agreements of the type mentioned in Section 4 above or to the above mentioned provisions of the Government Code and City of San Bernardino and County of San Bernardino Ordinances can, at best, provide only temporary and partial relief from conditions of over- crowding caused by new residential development. Until additional, permanent school facilities are constructed, conditions of over- crowding will continue to exist, notwithstanding. partial relief from such developer support, and such conditions will worsen in time due to the temporary nature of the relief provided by develoPer support. 6. The San Bernardino City Unified School District hereby requests the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino to concur with.the District's findings of impaction and require the collection of fees from builders/developers. 7. Tables 1 through 6 are presented as a part of the findings of impaction. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Secretary of this Board deliver certified copies of this resolution to the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino. -"- o o o o APPENDIX STUDENT GENERATION WORKSHEETS SCHOOL IMPACTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF LAND DEDICATION OR DEVELOPER'S FEE Administrative Services April 16, 1985 Report to the Board of Education April 16, 1985 o SAN BERNARnINOQ-Y lTNl"IF,n SCHOrOI<:T~JCT STrDE~T r,E~EP.ATION ~ACTOR SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA: (1) Barton TRACT/C.U.P. 83-28 Pumalo/Arden Serrano Int. 83-28 Pumalo/Arden (I) San GorRonio 83-28 Pumalo/Arden .*SF - Single Family ~rr. 1',,1 ti Fa!D11v LOTS/UNITS 20 328 IT\ _ T_ft.~paA ~~~nn' Student enrollments proiected from the following generation factors: ~* 51' M1' E 0.47 0.51 TYPE MF MF I 0.13 0.11 S 0.18 0.09 Total . 0.78 0.71 Page 1 0 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD 10 167 E I 2 36 . S 2 30 o SAN BERNARnINO()rv lTNIFIEn SCHOOI~~IcT STUDENT r.ENEFATION l'ACTOR Page 2 0 ~CHOOL ATTENDANCE AREA: (1) Bradley TRACT/C.U.P. 83-105 84-22 Curtis Int. 19-105 84-22 (I) San GorRonio 83-105 84-22 LOTS/UNITS Student enrollments pro~ected from the following generation factors: ~* E I S Total S~ 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 M1' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD E I S TYPE .*SF - Single Family MF - nulti Family 7 14 MF 14 7 M1' 2 2 1 1 o SAN BERNARnIN TY UNUn:n :;CHll J J.:-'11< J.l~ J. Page J 0 STUDENT r.ENERATION l'ACTOR TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS Student enrollments pro~ected from the following generation factors: Tvpe* E I S Total - SF 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 MF 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD E I S SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA: (1) California TYPE California/19th 115 MF 59 (I)Shandin Hills California/19th 13 (I)Cajon HS California/19th 10 .0. SF _ Single Family MF - 1',,1 t1 Fmil,. (T _ TmnA~~.A ~~~nnl o SAN BERNARnINO STUDENT r.ENEllATtON l>ACTOR .!.:"'1~ J..l.J. SCHOOL ATTE~'IlANCE A~EA: (1) Del Rosa TRACT/C.U.P. 83-119 83-84 83-92 83-67 83-32 Golden Valley 83-119 83-84 83-92 83-67 83-32 (1) San Bernardino HS 83-119 83-84 83-92 83-67 83- 32 .*SF - Single F811111y MF - ~'nlti F_11y UN lk'lt:Jl ~t:t!(I( rage "0 LOTS /UNITS 64 328 14 24 25 Student enrollments pro~ected from the following generation factors: ~* E I S Total SF 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 MY 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD TYPE E I S !ofF 33 MF 167 MF 7 !ofF 12 MF 13 7 36 2 3 3 6 30 1 2 2 c lTNP'tF,n SCHOO SAN BERNARnINO sTtmENT r.E~F.RATION ~ACTOR SCHOOL ATTE~~ANCF. A~EA: (Ii Emmerton TRACT/C.U.P. Base Line/ Sterling/ McKinley West of School 83-30 Arden south of Highland across from school 84-21 Curtis Int Base Line/ Sterling/ McKinley West of School 83-30 Arden south of Highland across from school 84-21 ,"SF _ Single Family }IF - !'1I1 ti Family !~T"l: ll~T rage J 0 Student enrollments proiected from the following Reneration factors: ~* E I S Total Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 M1' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD LOTS /UNITS 168 TYPE MF 30 MF 192 MF 100 MF 108 MF E I S 86 15 98 51 55 18 . o SAN BERNARnINO ~ lTNUIEn RcHOOI~~ICT RTllDENT r.ESEFATION l'ACTOR Page 60 SCHOOL ATTENnANCF. A~EA: Student enrollments pro1ected from the following generation factors: T\"'Oe* E I S Total - Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 M1' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION ltELD (I) Emmerton TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS TYPE E I S (1) San Gor2on1o H.S. Base Line/ 168 ' MF 15 Sterling/ McKinley West of School 30 MF 3 83-30 192 MF 17 Arden south of 100 /. MF 9 Highland across fran school 84-21 198 MF 10 *SF - Single Family ~!F - 11\11 ti Family o SAN BERNARDINOOn' lTNIFIETl SCHOOISTIUl;1' STUDENT GENEIlATtON l'ACTOR .l.CI.~C '0 (I) Shandin Hills Int 12824 57 11396 28 10644 19 12130 14 10649 6 11921 8 12051 32 (I) Ca10n H.S. 12824 46 11396 23 10644 26 12130 20 10649 8 11921 7 12051 44' ,..." - "'____....._...1 o SAN BERNARnINo()TY 1TNF1EJ1 SCHOOI1STIl!l;,[ STUDENT r.ENEllAT10N ~ACTOR Page to SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA: Student enrollments proiected from the following generation factors: ~* E I S "'ota1 Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 MF 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD (1) Kendall TRACT/C.U.P. 12896 LOTS/UNITS 254 TYPE MF E I S 130 Washington & Pine 161 SF 75 12872 121 SF 57 (I) Shandin Hills Int. 12896 28 . Washington & Pine 21 12872 16 (I) Cajon H.S. 12896 23 Washington & Pine . 29 12872 22 *SF - Sing1a Family MF" 1',,1 ti 1'8IIIily IT\ _ T____._~ ~_L__. -L o SAN B~;RNAKl)lN TY UN!"l!".1I :"ll.~\J IJJ.:"J PI, J.\.J rage 0 STUDE~T r,ENERATtON "'ACTOR Student enrollments oroiected from the following generation factors: SCHOOL ATTENn~~CF. AREA: Tvpe* E I S Total - Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 (I) Kimbark M1' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS TYPE E I S 10182 60 SF 28 10183 33 SF 16 10184-85 45 SF 21 12629 48 SF 23 12150-51 318 MF 162 11842/11845 147 SF 69 10455-56 191 Sl' 90 11038 23 SF 11 11842 27 SF 13 10600 34 SF 16 11291-96 222 SF 104 11977-81 168 MF 86 10439-40 28 SF 13 10457-58 97 SF 46 10983 49 SF 23 12146 248 MF 127 84-30 300 >W 153 .i'SF _ Single Family liF - ",,1 t1 Fail)' o ,*SF - Single Family }IF - 1',,1 ti Family SAN BERNARnINO 'l llNFU:" :'''t!\J1 ,~!~!",. STUDENT r.ENEFATION ~ACTOR rage .LO o SAN BERNAllnINOOrr lTNP'lE" SCt!()(O!.~.J' l~J. STlmENT r.E~ERATION vACTOR Page 10 Student enrollments pro;ected from the following generation factors: SCHOOL ATTENnANCE A~EA: ~* E I S Total Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 (0 Kimbark ~f1' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS TYPE E I S (I) Caion H.S. 10182 60 SF 11 10183 33 SF 6 10184-85 45 SF 8 12629 48 SF 9 12150-51 318 MF 29 11842/11845 147 SF 26 10455-56 191 SF 34 11038 23 SF 4 11842 27 SF 5 10600 34 SF 6 11291-96 222 SF 40 11977-81 168 MF 15' 10439""40 28 SF 5 10457-58 97 SF 17 10983 49 SF 9 12146 248 MF 22 84- 30 300 MF . 27 *SF - Single Family ~IF '" 11111 ti Family . c SAN ISt.KNAKlllN "11 UN t.. .Lr.JI. i'>>l.nu IJ.!........."\J.\,.I,. l'age o STlmENT r.E~1F.FAT10N l'ACTOR SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA: Student enrollments pro~ected from the following generation factors: !!E.!:,* E I S Total Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 HI' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 (n Lincoln STUDENT GENERATION YIELD TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS TYPE E I S 83-40 24 MF 12 84-106 12 MF 6 Arrowview Int. 83-40 1 84-106 1 (I) San Bernardino 83-40 2 84-106 1 .*SF - Single Fam~ly HF - 1'"1ti l'am1:v IT' _ T____~_~ ~_~__. . o SAN BERNARnINOTY IlN1"U:n SCH(OIl!~T~ H;) SnIDENT r.ENEIlATION ~ACTOR Page 0 Student enrollments oroiected from the following generation factors: ~* E I S Total Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 M1' 0.51 o.li 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD SCHOOL ATTENDANCE AREA: (I) Lytle Creek TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS I S TYPE E 84-62 84-85 Curtis Int. 84-62 84-85 (1) San Gorgonio B.S. 84-62 84-85 .*SF - Sir'lle Family MF - 1',,".:i Family 6 MF 3 5 3 MF 1 1 o SAN BERNARnINO Or lTNIFIEn ScHOOOSTlllCT STUDENT r.ENEIlATION l'ACTOR . ~..- - 0 SCHOOL ATTENDANCE AREA: (I) Montere.y TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS 83-71 28 83"-49 12 83-122 12 83-13 48 84- 72 48 84-99 304 Curtis Int. 83-71 83-49 83-122 83-13 84-72 84-99 (I) San r.oro:onio as 83- 71 83-49 83-122 83-13 84-72 84-99 ,*SF - Single Family HF - 1',,1 ti Family' Student enrollments ~rojected from the following generation factors: ~* E I ! Total. . SF 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 MF 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD TYPE E I S "l1' 14 MF 6 MF 6 MF 24 MF 24 MF 155 3 1 1 5 5 33 3 1 1 4 " 27 o SAN BERNARIlINOC)ry lTNIFIEIl SCHO(Oll~T~ 1~.1 STUDENT ~ENEJlATtON l'ACTOR l'aSiB 0 SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA: ( 1) Newmark , TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS 12955 95 129,56 119 12958 118 12957 51 84-78 580 83-47 8 84-57 114 84-76 24 . (I) Shandin Hills Int. 12955 12956 12958 12957 84-78 84-47 84-57 84- 76 ( I) Cafon H.S. 12955 12956 12958 12957 84-78 84-47 84-57 84-76 .SF _ Single Family MFa J~\1lt1 Family 'T - ~---_...._...1 ,,"_L _ _. Student enrollments proiected from the following generation factors: ~* E I S Total SF 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 M1' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD TYPE E I S SF 45 SF 56 SF 55 SF 24 MF 296 MP 4 MF 58 MF 12 , 12 15 15 7 64 1 13, 3 17 21 21 9 52 10 2 o SAN BERNARnINOTY lTNI~IF.TJ ScHcOlJ!ST~l(;T ~T1TDENT r.E~~ATION l'ACTOR SCHOOL ATTr.\~ANCE AREA: (ll North Park TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS 12481 41 12411 122 11407 204 11921 75 11026 44 84-91 36 (1) Shandin Hills .12481 12411 11407 11921 11026 84-91 (I) Caion HS 12481 12411 11407 11921 11026 84-91 ,*SF - Single Family HF - 1"111t1 1'aml1~' Student enrollments proiected from the following generation factors: ~* Sl' M1' E 0.47 0.51 TYPE I S - - 0.13 0.18 0.11 0.09 Total 0.7/l 0.71 Page 0 STUDE~'T GENERATION YIELD E 1 S (1) - ImDacted J, SF M1' MF }IF ~"' MF lq 62 104 38 22 18 5 13 22, 8' 5 4 7 11 18 7 4 1 o SAN BERNARnINO Ov lTNl~IF.Jl SCH()(Ol~T~ !l;'J' STUDENT r.ENEFATION l'ACTOR Student enrollments projected from the following generation factors: SCilOOL ATTENDANCE AREA: ~* 0) Oeh1 TRACT/C.U.P. Sl' M1' LOTS/UNITS E I 0.47 0.13 0.51 0.11 TYPE S 0.18 0.09 Total 0,78 0.71 Page 10 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD E I S 11922 SerrElno Int. 11922 (I) San GorRonio 11922 -*SF - Single Family MF - ~"lti Family 750 (I) - Impacted Scho 1 m' 383 83 67 o SAN Jlt:KNAKII1N 'l'Y UN1....!!';.. :;\,.;tHJ 1I1.:"I.1'<.L"'1 o - .-g- STUDENT GENEJlATtON l'ACTOR {l) Riley Student enrollments projected from the following generation factors: Tvpe* E I S Total - SF 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 XV 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD SCHOOL ATTE!mANCE AREA: TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS TYPE E 1 S 83-91 6 "fl' 3 Arrowview Int. 83-91 1 . (I) San Bernardino HS 83-91 o ,*SF. Single FlIIIIily MF - J1111ti Family , o SAN BERNARnlNO lJN~. U"" ""nu" STUDENT GENEllATION 'FACTOR ...,.a.......v... Page 0 TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS Student enrollments proiected from the following generation factors: I!E!,* E I S Total .SF 0.470.130.18 0.78 ~ 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD E I S TYPE CHOOL ATTENIlANCE AREA: (I) Thompson 10358 185 SF 87 12735 188 SF 88 Serrano Int. 10358 24 12735 24 (1) San GorRonio HS 10358 33 12735 34 ,*SF _ Single Family MF. !'u1 ti Family c SAN BERNARnINO<:)ty lJNIFIEP ScHO~lST~lCT STUDENT GENEIlATtON l'ACTOR Page 0 SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA: (1) Urbita TRACT/C.U.P. 85-9 12915 Curtis Int 85-9 12915 ( 1) San Gorgonio 85-9 12915 .SF - Single Family ~lF" 1~111 t1 Familr Student enrollments pro1ected from the following generation factors: Tvoe* E I S Total - SF 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78 KF 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71 STUDENT GENERATION YIELD TYPE E I S MF 60 MF 14 LOTS/UNITS 118 28 , , _ .____~_~ ft_~__. 13 3 11 2 , , , o SAN BERNARnINU n UNp.U:lI ~l;l!\Jl STUDENT r,ENEJlATION l'ACTOR t~l'( l\~J. Student enrollments oroiected from the following generation factors: SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA: Tvpe* - E 0.47 0.51 (I) Warm Springs Sl' M1' TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS TYPE 12468 104 ~ 84-69 168 ~fF 12813 29 SF 84-38 160 '{F' Curtis Int. 12468 84-69 12813 84- 38 (1) San GorRonio 12468 84-69 12813 84-38 *SF . Single Family ~',,1 ti Family _ y______~ ~_L__. NF lZ IT' I 0.13 0.11 S 0.18 0.09 Total 0.78 0.71 rage 0 E STUl'E!\'T GENERATION YIELD S 53 1\6 14 82 1 11 18 4 18 9 15 5. 14