The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About37-Water Department ,~ DATE 8/09/84 10/18/84 10/18/84 11/08/B4 11/08/84 11/08/84 12/17/84 12/17/84 -- -- RESERVE SEWER CAPACITY RIGHTS REPORT May 13, 1985 Bought Bought Sold - Devonshire Corp. Sold - John Winters Sold - Enrique Portillo Sold - Ignacio Gonzales Sold - Lonnie M. Dunn III Sold - AJJT. Builders & Newport Dev. 12/17/84 Policy Passed 12/21/B4 1/04/85 1/08/85 2/04/85 2/15/85 2/25/85 3/15/85 3/29/85 4/11/85 4/12/85 3/21/85 Sold - Vivian Macon Sold - Rodo1fo E. Robles Sold - Patrick McSherry Sold - Delta Development Sold - Ralph Affaitati Const. Co. Sold - J. Alfaro Sold - H. N. Ha Sold - J. Refold Dev.Co. Inc. Sold - Nickolas Reiter Sold - Ignacio Montano Sold - Virda Kelly Awaiting Application Fees Awaiting Applications Density Bonus - no applications RDA (800) LOMA LINDA (900) EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (800) SEWER CAPACITY RIGHTS 800- 700- 110- 21- 2- 1- 3- 35- 1- 2- 22.5_ 26.1- 1.6- I- I- 1.5- I- I- 1- 360.75 134- 655- TOTAL ISSUED 156.65 -0- -0- $ ( 984,000-) (1,845,000-) (1,689,900-) (1,660,290-) (1,657,470-) (1,656,060-) (1,651,830-) (1,602,480-) (1,601,070-) (1,598,250-) (1,566,525-) (1,529,724-) (1,527,468-) (1,526,058-) (1,524,648-) (1,522,533-) (1,521,123-) (1,519,713-) (1,518,303-) ,..... BALANCE 800- 1,500- 1,390- 1,369- 1,367- 1,366- 1,363- 1,328- 1,327- 1,325- 1,302.5- 1,276.4- 1,274.8- 1,273 . 8- 1,272.8- 1,271.3- 1,271lJ.3- 1,269.3- 1,268.3- 904 770 115 BALANCE 643.35 90B 719.35 Prepared April 3B, 1985 37.3 COMMlnEES AGRICUl lURE CHAIIIMA.... SUeCOMMlnn ON DEPAIITMENT OPEIIATlONS. RESUIlCH A"'O FOllEtGN AGIl'CUL TUllE Q:ongrM of tht tinirdt ~tk1tts !lOU.Bt of RqJrtstntatitJrs iIlDashington, B.~. 20515 36TH DISTR......oF CALIFORNIA G......GE E, BROWN, JR. 2256 HOUSE OFFICE BUilDING WASHINGTON. 0 C 20515 (2021225-61(11 OISTlIlCTOfflCES o 657 lACAOENA DRIVE COLTON. CALlfOllNIA 92324 (714) 825-2472 o 3600 liME STIIEET. SUITE 116 P_O Box 71 RIVEIlSIDE. CAlIFOIIH1A 92502 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (714) 686-8863 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT BOARD o OH'AIIIO. CAlIFDIlNIA April 19, 1985 (7141984-1705 Dear cxi ::0 m U1 (") m '"" '- -0 ., :;0 -" N U1 1 ;e --, ~ '-:-) ~ rTl W ;0 Ms. Shauna Clark City Clerk City Of San Bernardino P.O. Box 1318 San Bernard no, Fisca (GRS) ank you for your correspondence concerning President Reagan's Year 1986 Budget Proposal to eliminate General Revenue Sharing funds. The Fiscal Year 1986 budget process got off to a slow start this year. Even before President Reagan submitted his budget in February, the RepUblican Senatorial leadership was working on an alternative. when the FY 1986 budget finally does emerge, most domestic programs can expect reductions, partiCUlarly those which affect local communities. Key programs affected include General Revenue Sharing (GRS), housing assistance, public transit, employment and training, and most development programs. Under Reagan's proposal, federal aid to local communities would have decreased sharply--by 18 percent--in one year. As a share of the federal budget, federal assistance to cities and states has already declined by nearly half since FY 1978, with more reductions planned for the future. Gov. Deukmejian has already indicated that California cities and counties should not look to the state for relief. General Revenue Sharing (GRS) is the largest program for local communities which has been targetted. The cities and counties serving the 36th Congressional District receive nearly $30 million in GRS funds. Elimination or reductions in GRS could result in cuts in police and fire protection, capital improvements, human services, health, and sanitation, among others. You may be assured that I will oppose efforts to reduce or eliminate GRS. Again, I appreciate your sharing your thoughts with me, and hope you will continue to do so in the future. GEB:ew THIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE WITH RECYCL.ED FIBERS Cl, ....., -- ....- BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY for authority to increase rates charged by it for electric service. ) ) Application No. 83-12-53 ) (filed December 29. 1983) ) ) (U 338-E) NOTICE OF PROPOSED RATE INCREASE On December 28. 1984. the Commission issued an Interim Opinion in this case and established new base rates for customers of ~ Southern California Edison Company based on anticipated operat~ ::0 and financial conditions in 1985. In its opinion. the Commiss~ ::0 IT1 <"> m ,~- -;:; <~ I " also confirmed its recent statewide policy extending file the next base rate applications to three years. the time ~ Ui ,T] This po1tty :;? ,-j allows affected utilities to offset the impact of inflation on operating and maintenance expenses, financing costs, and for changes in utility plant. by means of "attrition" rate relief to be app1icap1e for those years between rate cases. The Commission directed that hearings be held in mid-1985 on the request of Edison for attrition rate relief for 1986 and 1987. The Company previously included in this case a request for an attrition allowance for 1986 to be developed through the Attrition Allowance Methodology. The attrition allowance proposed for 1986 has been updated to reflect more recent economic and operating conditions. and a request for an attrition allowance has been proposed for the first time for 1987. Edison is also proposing certain modifications to the methodology used to determine the attrition allowance. The following table reflects Edison's proposed increase in base rate revenues for 1986 and 1987 if Edison's proposals are adopted in full by the Commission: - 1 - 8, \,.c ,.... '."/ PROPOSED REVENUE INCREASE Customer Group Domestic Lighting - Sm. & Med. PvT. Large Power Agricultural & Pumping Street & Area Lighting TOTAL 1986 Revenue Increase Above Present Level ($ million) (~) 1987 Revenue Increase Above Proposed 1986 Level ($ million) (~) 51.0 60.5 53.4 5.2 1.3 171.4 3.5~ 3.5~ 3.5~ 3.5~ 1.9~ 3.5~ 32.4 38.5 33.9 3.3 0.8 108.9 2.2~ 2.2~ 2.2~ 2.2~ 1.2~ 2.2~ The actual amount of the attrition allowance for 1986 and 1987 will be determined in accordance with the methodology eventually adopted by the Commission and may be higher or lower in each year than presently estimated. Once the methodology is adopted, Edison will submit the actual rate levels for 1986 and 1987 to the Commission according to guidelines established by the Commission in this proceeding. REVIEW OF PROPOSED RATE INCREASE A copy of Edison's proposed rate increase and related exhibits will be furnished upon written request to Michael R. Peevey, Senior Vice President at the Southern California Edison Company, 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, Rosemead, California 91770. A copy of Edison's proposed rate increase may be reviewed at either the Commission offices or the offices of Edison listed below: Offices of the California Public Utilities Commission: State Building 350 McAllister Street San Francisco, CA 94102 State Building 107 South Broadway Los Angeles, CA 90012 -2- - .f" "', '"".... -- , Offices of Edison: 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead. CA 91770 100 Long Beach Boulevard Long Beach, CA 90802 1241 South Grand Avenue San;a Ana, CA 92705 . 10180 Telegraph Road Ventura, CA 93003 152 South Grand Avenue Covina. CA 91723 1700 East Tahquitz-McCallum Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 2885 Foothill Boulevard San Bernardino. CA 92402 321 West Main Street Visalia. CA 93261 Pebbly Beach Generating station Avalon, CA 90704 HEARINGS ON PROPOSED RATE INCREASE Evidentiary hearings on Edison's proposal are expected to begin June 17, 1985. Questions concerning these proceedings should be directed in writing to the Public Advisor, California Public Utilities Commission, 350 McAllister Street. San Francisco, California, 94102. Dated at Rosemead, California. this 16th day of April. 1985. / SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMP / Respectfully submitted. By - 3 -