Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout15-Planning ""'1'1 'I , , CI~ OF SAN BERNARDQo - REQUIOT FOR COUNCIL ACQoN From: Frank A. Schuma Planning Director Planning March 18, 1985 Subject: Appeal of Tentativ Tract No. 12756 and Conditional U Permit No. 84-37 Mayor and Counci Meeting of April I, 1985, 2:00 p.m. Dept: Date: Synopsis of Previous Council action: Previous Planning Commission action: At the meeting of the Planning Commission on March 6 1985, the following action was taken: ' The applications for Tentative Tract No. 12756 and Conditional Use Permit No. 84-37 were unanimously approved. The Negative Declaration for environmental review was also approved. Recommended motion: That the hearing on the appeal be closed and the decision of the Planning Commission be affirmed, modified or rejected. Q /L O-Jy\ Signature Frank A. Schuma Contact person: Frank A. Schuma Phone: 383-5057 5 Supporting data attached: Yes, Staff Report Ward: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Sou ree: Finance: Council Notes: 75.0262 Agenda Item No /~, I I t'I'IIJI.II' '..1 Q o. 0 8150- Cable Canyon Road San Bernardino, Ca 92407 o RECEIVED-CITY CLERr; '85 liAR 12 AlD :28 l;jarch 11. 1985 Frank Schuma. Director City of San Bernardino Planning Department )00 North "D" Street San Bernardino. Ca. 92418 I' . _." -.(,"V' Re IW*Elctll~7S6: (APPEAL) Attn. Ronald Running. Senior Planner and Ed Gundy ". Dear Mr. Schumal This appeal is being filed against the negative declaration of Tract #12756, C,U. Permit 84-)7. Campeau-Cable Lakes Associates approved by the City Planning Commissioners at the March 6, 1985 meeting, ~y appeal is based on information that there are sensitive biotio resources known to appear on the property, These sensitive plants have been verified. specificallYI ERIASTRUM DENSIFOLUM, ssp, sanotorum and, in addition, the site is potential habitat for Chorizantes Leptoceras. as indicated in the Verdemont Area Plan Environmental Im~ctReport, Both plants are candidates for species ae tllreatened-.or .endangned ( CNPS . 1984) for. f"d.~) ,., "'t1Jlj"lIil't-. _"""""~\~'f"'1'l; recommended by the U,S, Fish and Wildlife and California Department of Pish and Game. In view of these facts. I respectfully request the City of San Bernardino receive comment from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife, California Fish and Game services as to the negative declaration, and request that this project not be allowed to proceed until a full biological survey has been obtained. ~lt:~~ Helen Kopczynski . 1..I.lUlll~ ill' J.. III (I Q\MPEAU 0 . ~ ~)0 tt v CORPORATION CAUF<?RNIA . ~ ; . \', . . RI:CE'VEO-mr CLER,: 3931 MACARTHUR BLVD. SUITE Ill/NEWPORT BEACH..CA 92660/114-955:02'2 '85 MAP. 12 A9 :41 Man:h 8, 1985 'fPl r::;I ,'~.. M " ~" ~ 8 I~ k: 1< ,.J; Ie ~. ..: t ,J " !~ L ~ " ~ ' : ,;;- LJ MAR 1 n ~'.i.;;; ,." H..,J l,. -. , ';". ;~- ., .~ . ". '.:-'"'' ,,:,.~.. t ... _II:.;. ;. ., Mayor and u.....,OIl Council City of San Bernardiro City Hall - 300 N. "On street' San Bernardiro, california 92414 Re: cable lake TraCt 112756, C.U. Permit N:>. 84-37 for 114 units . by Cable r.akf! Assoc:i.iites. . . . . ~ , Gentlanen: o r '-'~';~Gl ":;....-'\' ~ ..,' --_._.- , . .--- 1'-'. --.. i . :.1.. ____, : , .~-j .... ..-., 1. ~.: ;~. ~:.~.= 1 : Ll~ ..____; . I . .,- ;". --_._.. j .~':. ' .1 ~~-._ i , ---- ' L """---'" On March 6, 1985, the Planning Cam1i.ssion awroved the aIDve Tract and C.U. Pemli.t subject to certain conditions. We, Cable lake Associates, are concerned al:lout a feM of these conditions as they affect us adversely. 'lberefore, we wish to arr-' for your revieM of these oonditions in accordance with section 18-64-010 of the city ordinance. BllCKGRXJND INFOIlMATICN - '!he project site was previously appmved for II'Obile b::Ires on private streets at 6 units per acre. - '!he present tract is for the same 6 units per acre density fxaD snall lot (4,000 sq. ft.) subdivision on ~lic streets. - '!he zone change for PRO 7 units per acre was awroved on Februiu:y 4, 1985. In the ~; ng part, we wish to state the reasons as to why the specific conditioo are ~Uf?oLiate. '!he staff report dated March 6, 1985 is attached herewith, and referred to in our foregoing ...............ts. , PLl\NNING DEPAmMENr <XHlITIalS 1) Condition 2 - page 6 Staff ~lll...ndati.on -'Dlis conditi.on inlx>ses mi.nimJm 1,000 sq. ft. floor area for each unit. Applicant's Ra:}uest - We request that this condition be changed to v" state that ~ 1,000 sq. ft. per mit be nquired. I "'" 'I o o o o Mayor and CCJmDn Council March 8, 1985 Page Tw:l ; . . we feel that this rcu.A"'.ended condition is inappropriate' for the following reasons: . a) As exp1iUned an page 1 of the attached sf::aff report - '!he project is surrounded with the existing land uses of vacant lands, pet cemetazy, freliMa.y and flood control dwInel. - '!he surroundi.nq zoning is MHP ~e Hanes), open space and R-3 - 3,000. . - General Plan designation of surroundi.nq lands are 8 to 14 U/;c and open space. . '.l1le2:efore, we feel that the proposed tract at 6 U/;c density allowing a small lot subdivision is ~i.ble with the surrounding area. b) The project is distinctly separated with an extensive open space b.1ffer zone of the flood control property and it has no physical or p1.anni.nq relationship with the lands beyond flood cx>ntrol area. c) '.ftle project is zoned PRO 7 units per acre which has been i.nt:ended for a smaller than R-l lots and units smaller than the cxmventional R-1 zone. Tract map was sulrnitted concurrently with the zone change to make this intentions clear. d) Mininun 1,000 sq. ft. floor area applied only to R-l zoned areas and the council did not put such a requiranent an other zones. e) It is iDpJrtant housing and plarming objectives of both, the city's general plan and the proposed Verdem::mt area plan, that the housing sOOuld be of various types and sizes to serve the needs of different age and incnne group. '.ftle ~_....sed project provides variation between 800 sq. ft. - 2 bedrocm houses to 1,250 sq. ft. bedrocm rouses. we feel this variation is necessary for Plarming and Marketing reasons. f) Present mi.ninun 1,000 sq. ft. requirement is related to 7,200 sq. ft. large lot$. OUr project has 4,000 sq. ft. lot$ intended for proportionately smaller units than the conventional houses an 7,200 sq. ft. lot$. . q) '.ftle present plan is substantially ungraded frail the previws1y appmved lIDbile ~ project on private streets. """'''', '" o o o Mayor and a.........., c:ountO March 8, 1985 Page 'nlree 2) Par~ 2 - page 5 Staff. Findings - Ret:lUirBnent 'l\<<l car garages per unit for all the units in the project. APPlicant's Request We request that reference be changed to 171 pUking spaces in qaraqes. '1hi.s wuld pennit ~le 98:@3eS for half the ury.ts / and s~le. gan!ges on the retllIi.ning, plus additional parking . on the driveways. ---. - PR) Zone (19-18-140 Ordinance) requires a mi.ninun of one covered and unoovered parld.ng space per dwelling unit. - In fact, even R-1 zone (19-56 ordinance) only one parld.ng in garage or carport. '.d1erefore, as per the city's oxdinance, rone of the above zones require that parking space has to be in garages. 3) Paraqraph 3 - Paqe 6 Staff R=ul"..ooations .1 < . , , The staff is recx:mnending a swinming p:x>l and spa within the ./ proposed park. .. APPlicant's :Request We request that this J:........lIlendation be rejected for the foll.owi.ng' reasons: - The project provides already 3.5 acre paJ:k site for approximately 310 people. '1hi.s alDUI1ts to 4 times the park required under the city General Plan. - ~ are asked to pay for the rnaint:enance of this 3.5 acre park. 1ldditional 8Wi.nming p:x>l and . spa is unnecessary b1rden on Haneawners. - We feel that if these facilities will. be used only by the ~ and they lIIOuld pay the cost of these facilities, including the maintenance, then the Hc.mecwners sOOuld be provided with the option on what facilities they wuld like to use in their paJ:k. - As indicated by the existinq projects, the single family ~ do rot tern to use swinming p:x>l facilities in \.A.a'I'LlU areas. I""""' ,. o o o Mayor and u......... ~ Mu:ch 8, 1985 Page Four : 4) Pa.rIt dedication to the city 'l!1e proposed 3.5 acre park in the project would be maintained by a land~ maintenance district to be fo.",..Il. As a result . of this method and considering' th&t all the stteets are plblic there will not be. any li::mecwner' s AsSoc:i.ation required. 'J.tIerefore, we would like to -'lMiCllte the proposed park to the city. In clDeinq. we t:hBnk the Mayor and u.....uu Council for its CXIlSideration of our above requests for the ~ to the planninq camdssion l.........,eD3ations. .- --. t%vly f.; .",.j ,.., L Ratan Rege DiJ:ector of. Land Developnent RR:ran , J. I'''''''A ,,, o o o. o 300 ~ORTH "0" STREET, SAN BERNAROINO. CALIFORNIA 9241B W.R. "BOB" HOLCOMB Mlyor Members of the Common Council Robert A. Caltaneda . . . . . . . . . First Ward JlCk Reilly. .......... . . . Second W.rd Ralph H.rnandlz . . . . . . . . . . . Third Ward Steve MukS .. . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Ward GordonQulel............. FlfthW.rd Dan Frazle, ....... 0.'.... .SlxthW.rd Jack Strickler . . . . . . . .. . . . .5w.nth Ward March 18, 1985 J. E. Bonadiman and Associates P.o. Box 5852 San Bernardino, CA 92412 Dear Sir or Madame: At the meeting of the Planning Commission on March 6, 1985, the following action was taken: The applications for Tentative Tract No. 12756 and Conditional Use permit No. 84-37, to establish a 120 unit single-family detached subdivision on substandard size lots with a common recreational facility in the PRD-7U Planned Residential zone at seven units per acre on property consisting of approximately 20 acres having a frontage of approximately 1,568 feet on the north side of Frontage Road and being located approximately 1,100 feet westerly of the centerline of Little League Drive, were approved based upon findings of fact contained in the staff report dated March 6, 1985 and subject to the conditions and standard requirements listed therein, with the following modification: Conditions: 6. Delete ent~re condition. According to 18.20.130., tract map: 8The decision of the Commission shall be final unless appealed to the Mayor and Common Council in writing. The written appeal the San Bernardino Municipal the following applies to the filing Code, Chapter of 'a tentative S1 o o J. E. Bonadiman and Associates March 18, 1985 page 2 I"'" , o. o shall be submitted to the office of the City Clerk within ten days from the date of the meeting.- If no appeal is filed pursuant to the previously ~entioned provisions of the San Bernardino Municipal Code, the action of the Commission shall be final. SCRUMA Director ~f CCI Building and Safety Dept. Engineering Division Cable Lake Associates 3931 McArthur Boulevard, 1113 Newport Beach, CA 92660 . ".. I o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE WARD 4 3-6-85 5 LLI ~ o Tentative Tract ~. 12756 and Conditional Use Pc:mlt No. 84-37 APPLICANT: J.E. Bondamin & Assoc. P.O. Box 5852 San Bernardino, C'A 92412 OWNER: Cable lakes Association 3931 MacArthur Blvd. I t Beach C'A 92660 ti LLI ::) o '" a:: " 4 W a:: 4 Subject prcro.erty is an irrep,u1arly-shaped parcel of land consisting of apProximately 20 acres having a frontage of approximately 1,568 feet on the north side of Frontage Road and being located aporoximately 1,100 feet westerly of the centerline of Little League Drive.. The proposal is to establish a 114-tinit single-family detached subdivision on substandard size lots with coomm recreational facility in the planned residential develO!X\1f!Il.t at 7 units per acre. ( R-3-3000 MHP GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Residential 8-l4u/ac. Open Space Freeway Residential 8-l4u/ac, Residential 8-l4u/ac. PROPERTY Subject North South East lles t EXISTING LAND USE Vacant flood Control Channel Freeway Pet CEmetary Vacant ZONING PTID-7/u "0" - Open Space GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC DVES FLOOD HAZARD DVES OZONE A ( SEWERS DVES ) HAZARD ZONE ~O ZONE oNO OZONE 8 EXNo HIGH FIRE IKJvES AIRPORT NOISE / DVES REDEVELO!'MENT DVES HAZARD ZONE DNO CRASH ZONE :mNO !'1l0JECT ARU XltNO -' o NOT D POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z U APPROVAL ~ APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0 WITH MITIGATING - ~ Z(I) Mt:ASUIlU NO [.I.R. ~ CONDITIONS LL1(!) o EXEMPT D E.I.Il. IlEQUIIlED BUT NO LL.O D 2Z LL.~ DENIAL Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 00 WITH MITIGATING ~:I 0 CONTINUANCE TO Q:Z MUSURES (1):1 s:ii: ~NO 0 Z o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 0 LLI SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E. R. C. LLI EFFECTS MINUTES Q: NOV. 1911 REYIIED ~ULY 1111 ... I'"'''' o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 12756 & OBSER"ATIONS CUP R4-~7 y,,", I '. ~~~~?:GI1~~E \ "-R~ PAGE ? 1. The applicant is proposing to establish a 114-unit planned residential development on approximately 20 acres located on the north side of Frontage Road approximately 1,568 feet west of little league Drive in the PRD-7, Planned Residential Development zone at 7 units to the acre. 2. The development plan and tentative tract map which is being pro- posed is subsequent to a request for a change of zone which was approved at the Planning Commission meeting of January 22, 1985. Prior to the approval of thi s change of zone, the Mayor. and Common Council determined that the project, even though it lies within the high fire hazard area and only has one means of access into the site, does not require two means of access as Code requires for developments within the high fire hazard area. Additionally, the Mayor and Common Council waived the requirement for a focused' EIR to discuss the issue of traffic and emergency evacuation impact for not providing a dedicated secondary means of access to the site thereby issuing a Negative Declaration for the project. 3. The proposal before the Commission is to create a 115-10t, 114-uni.t single-family detached development with lots ranging in area from 4,000 square feet to 5,625 square feet. 4. lot "A" is desi gnated as bei og a recreati. ona 1 amenity area wi thi n the center of the development. The submitted site plan indicates that 18 percent of the site wi 11 be devoted to common open space. In the past, the Commission has granted single-family PRD's to maintain a minimum of 18% usable common area by considering part of the private yard areas. within the 25% open space. No amenities are designated within the common recreational area such as pools, spas, tennis courts, etc. A condition of approval is attached requiring a plan of the common open space be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 5. The floor .p1ans submitted with the application for the Conditional Use Permit indicate that there will be 4 plans to be considered for this project. A description of these plans are as follows: Plan Bedrooms Ba th s Area Stori es A 2 1.5 1,000 1 B 2 1.5 800 1 C 2 2 1,200 1 D 3 2 1,250 2 1'''11'1 'I ' I o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 12756 & OBSER\IATIONS CUP 84 ~7 Y,", I. ~~~~~:G 11~~E ~-I\-R~ PAGE ':\ As indicated above, Plan B is a two-bedroom unit of 800 square feet. The minimum area established by Code for single-family developments is 1,000 square feet in the R-1 zones. With the pro- cess of a Conditional Use Permit consideration is to be made in determi ni ng compati bi lity wi th the surroundi n9 area. Thi s is predomi nant1y an area of R-1 1-acre and R-1 21/2 acres zoni ng. Larger estate type homes would be expected to be constructed within this zoning area. Single-family homes have been typically established of having a minimum floor area of 1,400 square feet. Consideration of the area of homes existing and those that are potentially to be built in this area. An 800 square foot home is not considered compatible and could deter the economic development of the area. It is Staff's opinion that the minimum unit size for this project be raised to meet the minimum established under the R-1 zones and thereby be more compati b 1 e wi th the homes of the area. Directly adjacent and to the north of the site (opposite the flood control channel) lies R-1-2~ acre zoning Which is vacant for the time being. In time, these lots will begin to develop on these estate sized lots with typically large homes. A development of a project Whereby nearly 30 percent of the housing is for 800 square feet can have a negative impact on the future development of the area. 6. Internal circulation for the project is created through a loop system of 50-foot wide public streets with two cul-de-sacs. Access to the site wi 11 be vi a two entry poi nts on Frontage Road. The site falls within the High Fire Hazard Area which requires two means of dedicated ingress/egress, and as previously mentioned in Observation No.2, the Mayor and Common Council have waived a dedicated secondary means of access (Frontage Road being the pri- mary means of access). The secondary means of access being pro- posed is private roadway on top of the proposed improved flood control channel back-out to Little League Drive approximately 25 feet from the intersection of Little League Drive and Frontage Road. At the ends of each of the two cul-de-sacs are flag lots in order for the developer to retain his unit count and density. Staff has concerns with squeezing the narrow lot on cul-de-sac ends in this manner. Lots on straight streets have sufficient area in front of the lot for one additional vehicle space for guest parking. In the cul-de-sac bulbs with tight lot frontages there will be insuf- ficient distance between driveways to park one vehicle. In cases such as this that vehicle Which would typically park in front of the unit would now be required to park in front of another unit on the throat of the cul-de-sac. This would cause a cumulative displacement of vehicles down the street. I I jji I'~.. II' " o 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 12756 & OBSER"ATIONS . CUP 84-37 Y "" I. ~~~~~:G 16~~E ~-6-85 PAGE {" Flaq lots are typically found in hilly terrain and not on flat terrain such as the subject site. Staff recommends that a typical "pie shaped" lot be placed at the end of these cul-de-sac's rather than the flag shaped lots. A conditjon has been attached requiring such shaped lots if the Commission desires such lots. 7. The surrounding land uses are a proposed mobile home park to the north of the site zoned MiP (Mobile Home Park), the flood control .. channel to the east ("0" - Open Space), the Gateway Pet Cemetary to the south (R-3-3000) and the Barstow Freeway to the west. 8. The previous tract that was approved for this site had a sound study prepared for the then approved mobile home subdivision. Within that sound study, a mitigation measure was made that for those lots adjacent to Frontage Road, a wall 7.5 feet in height must be constructed in order for an inside and outside 45 CNEL and 65 CNEL respectively, be maintained. The applicant is proposing a combination 7-foot berm and 6-foot masonry wall (total 13 feet in height) adjacent to the frontage road right-of-way. 9. A combination 3-foot wall and 3 feet of wrought iron atop this wall is being proposed adjacent to the SBCFD Channel. Staff is in agreement with this wall material. The submitted elevations of the homes proposed indicate that they will have an exterior building material of stucco and the proposed roofing material, although not noted on the plans, would need to meet the require- ments of the Fire Department being that the project site lies within the High Fire Hazard Zone. 1'1"11"1' " o 0 O. 0 r- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT'" CASE TT 12756 & FINDINGS f ~ACT . . cUP 84-37 O. AGENDA ITEM 4 '. HEARING DATE 3-6-85 \0... PAGE 5 .... r .., FINDINGS OF FACT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12756 1. The proposed tentati ve tract map is in conformance wilth the State Subdivision Map Act and the City Subdivision Ordinance. 2. Once recorded, each lot wi thi n the tract wi 11 have frontage on a dedicated street. 3. The desi gn of the proposed subdi vi si on wi 11 not confl i ct wi th known easement acquired by the public at large. 4. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious health problems as sewer and water will be improved. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84-37 , 1. The proposed density of 6 units per acre is in accor~ance with the present General Plan designation of 4-7 units per acre and is in keepi ng wi th the proposed alternatives for the Verdemont Study now. underway. The applicant has further written a statement precluding himself or any future development from receiving bene- fits of a density bonus. 2. A total of 228 covered parking spaces are being provided in two car garages per unit. Additional guest parking spaces are pro- vided in the driveways of each unit. 3. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development. All setbacks, parking requirements and lot coverage must meet City Municipal Code requirements pursuant to Planned Residential Developments. 4. The use is deemed desirable and with an increase in proposed mini- mum floor area to that of 1,000 square feet. The construction wou1 d be more compati b 1 e wi th the few homes that exi st in the area and with the development standards of future residential develop- ment in the area. .... NOY. ."0 ... . "". ,. 000 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PlANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 12756 & CONDITIONS cUP 84-37 AGENDA ITEM 4 HEARING DATE 3-6-85 . PAGE 6 1. A landscape maintenance district or another type of maintenance arrangement acceptable by the City shall be established for the tract prior to recordation. 2. The minimum floor area for the proposed units shall not be less than 1,000 square feet. 3. A plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department depicting the type and pl acement of recreati ona 1 ameni ti es wi thi n the COlll11On open space and shall as a minimum include recreational equipment, swimming pool and spa. The common open space shall maintain a minimum of 18 percent of the project site. 4. A three-foot block wall wi th additi ona 1 three feet of wrought iron shall be placed on the northerly property line adjacent to the . flood control channel. 5. A site plan of the footprints of each of the units be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Revised floor plan be submitted at the same ti me i ndi cati ng mi ni mum area of the units to be 1,000 square feet. , Delet ------6~--;taA~a~~-D~~e-~ha~e~D-~et~-~ha~~-~e-e~ta~~~~he~-at-the-eRg~-ef ea€h-€Y~-~e-~a€-~th~R-the-~eve~epmeAt-~athe~-thaR-the-p~epeseg f~a~-~et~,--~he-f~Ra~-ma~-~ha~~-~ef~e€t-~Y€h-ehaRges-p~~e~-t9 ~e€e~~at~eR-ef-the-~a~~-map, . RECOMMENDATION Based upon the observations and findings of fact, Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract No. 12756 and Conditional Use' Permit No. 84-37 and the acceptance of the previously adopted Negative Declaration by the Mayor and Common Council. Respectfully submitted, FRANK A. SCHUMA Planning Director 11111.111 III CITY QF SAN BERNARDI~O ( STANDARD REQUIREMENTS CASE 'IT 12756 & CUI" 84- :n AGENDA ITEM 4 'HEARING DATE 3-6-8~ PAGE 7 , ..., RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 1. TTl2756 & CUP 81+-37 shall bein effect for a period of 24months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission and/or Planning Department. However, if no development has been i niti ated at the end of the ~.:month time period the approval shall expire. Additional time may be approved by the Planni ng Commi ssion upon request of the applicant prior to expira- ti on of the .1.4-month ti me peri od. Expi rati on Date: March 6, 1987 . 2. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR P.R.D. ( a. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract maps. The CC & R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, and exterior of all buildings. The CC&R's shall also include a statement that no radio frequency antenna shall be included within the complex except for central antenna systems. b. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a cor- poration, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by the City as conditions to approval. The developer shall submit evi- dence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the Commission prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. c. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the com- mon areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities. d. Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided for in the CC&R's. e. The CC&R's shall contain wording prohibiting the storage or parking of trailers, boats, campers, motor homes, and similar vehicles outside of the specified common areas. \... MAY'.. ~ U. 'OIl" A PA8E 101'1 "",.. " CITY OF SAN B NARDIN . CASE 11 12756 & CIlP 84- "17 AGENDA ITEM -_4 . HEARING DATE ~f.-R~ PAGE 8 ( STANDARD REQUIREMENTS ,. 3. PARKING: ( a. This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of parking . spaces. 228 b. All parking and driving aisies shall be surfaced with two inches of AC over a suitable base or equivalent as approved by the City Engineer. ~arking spaces shall be striped and have wheel stops installed at least three feet from any building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway. c. Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across an alley from property zoned residential, a solid decorative wall six feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the property line so as to separate the parking area physically from the residentially zoned pro- perty, provided such wall shall be three feet in height when located within the required front or street side yard setback. Where no front or street side yard is required, such wall shall be three feet in height when located within ten feet of the street line. Said wall shall be located on the north , south , east , west or peripheral property lines. d. Whenever an off-street parking area is located across the street from property zQned for residential uses, a solid decorative wall or equiva- lent landscaped berm not less than three feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the street side of the lot not closer to the street than the required depth of the yard in the adjoining resi- dential area. No fence or wall located in the front setback shall obscure the required front setback landscaping. Said wall shall be located on the north , south , east , west , or peripheral property lines. All parking areas and vehicle storage areas shall be lighted during hours of darkness for security and protection. 5. Recreational vehicle storage areas shall be screened by at least a six-foot high decorative wall with screened gates. There shall be provided for each unit, within the garage or carport, or other specifically designated area, a 10ft or other usable storage area with a minimum of 150 cubic feet in addition to standard utility storage. Traffic bumps provided on the interior private roads shall be subject to the City Traffic Engineer's approval. A commercial-type drive approach, as shown on Standard Drawing No. 204 or equivalent, shall be constructed at each entrance to the development. L?c~t!on and design shall be subject to approval of the Engineering 01 VI SI on. 4. ~ ... IJI. 'ORM A PAGE I OF' MAY 8. _1.1.1I11!.__.ll"j 11'1 cn:y OF SAN B NARDINO CASE IT 12756 [" l.;lli" b4-j/ AGENDA ITEM ...i._ .HEARING DATE 3-6-SS- PAGE 9 ( ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS ~ ~ 6, Prior to issuance of any building permit, access rights shall be granted to the City for the purpose of allowing access over the private drives within the project for all necessary City vehicles including fire, police, and refuse disposal vehicles, and any other emergency vehicles. The documents covering this matter shall be prepared by t~e owner and approved by the Planning Department. All refuse storage areas are to be enclosed with a decorative wall. Location, size; type and design of wall are subject to the approval of the Planning Department and Division of Public Services Superintendent. Energy and noise insulation shall comply with all state and local require- ments. . I, 7. LANDSCAPING: ( a. Three copies of a master landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department/ Park and Recreation Department for review and approval. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1) Size, type, and location of plant material proposed. 2) Irrigation plan. 3) Such other alternate plants, materials and design concepts as may be proposed. 4) Erosion control plans. b. Tree varieties and exact locations will be determined prior to planting by the Director of the Park and Recreation Department or his/her designee. A minimum number of one-inch ca1iper/15 gallon, multibranched trees shall be planted within the parkway for each of the following types of lots, as per the City's specifications: 1) Cul-de-sac lot -- one tree; 2) Interior lot -- two trees; 3) Corner lot -- three trees. c. To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, sur- faces of all cut slopes more than five feet in height and fill slopes more than three feet in height shall be protected by planting with grass or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding 15 feet In vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten II... MAY 14 ~ t.R. 'ORM A PAHIOfS I """ OF SAN BE ARDINO . IT 12756 {,. CASE LUl:" l)4-3/ ( ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM it. I;lEARING DATE ~-6-8S PAGE 1-0 ~ "" 8. 9. 10. \0. MAY 84 feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to exceed 20 feet on centers; or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site: Trees 10%, 15 ga1'lon; 40%, 5 gallon; 50%, 1 gallon. Shrubs 20%, 5 gallon; 80%, 1 gallon. Ground cover'100% coverage. Three copies of the landscaping plan reflecting the above requirements and placement of street trees (if required) shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department and the Park and Recreation Department. d. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with an irrigation system approved by the Park and Recreation Department. e. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownershi p. f. All grading and drainage facilities, including erosion control planting of graded slopes, shall be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engi neer. A gradi ng permit shall be obtai ned prior to any grading being done. 4,000 All lots shall have a minimum area of square feet, a minimum depth of 80 feet, and a mi ni mum wi dth of .40 ~eet, ( 55 feet on corner lots). 1 n addition, each lot on a cul-de-sac or on a curved street where the. side lot lines thereof are diverging from the front to rear of the lot, shall have a width of not less than 40 fpet measured at the building setback line as delineated on the tract map. Where lots occur on the bulb of the Cul-de-sac, a minimum lot depth of feet will be permitted. If the proposed depth is less than ____feet, a plot plan must be submitted to demonstrate that a buildable lot area is possible and to justify the lesser depth. Variable front building setback lines of at least 18 feet and averaging 20 feet, and side street building setback lines l~eet shall be delineated on the final tract map. All garage entrances on a dedicated street shall have a minimum setback of 18 feet. Perimeter walls and walls required along the rear of all double frontage lots shall be designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as . tree planter wells, variable setback, decorative masonry, columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face, j III fORII A PAIlE 4 Of . . 111111" III CITY OF SAN B NARDIN . CASE TT 12756 & CUP !S4- j I AGENDA ITEM It ,HEARING DATE 3-6-85 PAGE .ll . STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 11. ~ 12.' ~ 14. . 15. 16. 17. . .. \... MAY 84 .., The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval of the visual or engineering design of the proposed wall. When graded slopes occur within or between individual lots, the slope face shall be a part of the downhi 11 lot. Excepti ons to thi s requi rement must be approved by the City Engineer. Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required by the City Engineer in order to reduce the amount of bare soil exposed to precipitation. Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be required (if applicable). Any clubhouse, swimming pool, spa, putting green, picnic areas or other amenities shall be installed in the manner indicated on the approved site plan. During construction the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a portion of the periphery of the tract site to minimize wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. The type of fencing shall be approved by the City Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and dust control. No roof-mounted equipment shall be placed on any building unless screened as specifically approved by the Planning Department (except for solar collection panels). Within 75 feet of any single-family residential district, the maximum height of any building shall not exceed one-story or 20 feet unless the Commi ssi on determi nes that due to unusual topographi ca 1 or other features, such restrictive height is not practical. All utility lines shall be installed underground subject to exceptions approved by the Planning Department and the City Engineer. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to compliance with these Standard Requirements as well as all provisions of the San Bernardino Municipal Code. ~ .._. fOI\lI A PAIEICI'I "'''I'' ,,~"" ITV OF SAN BEOARDINO (). . . STANDARD REQUIREMENTS . CASE TT 12756 & CUP 84-17 AGENDA ITEM "- HEARING DATE 1-F. R~ . PAGE 12 I ~ Drainage and Flood Control: a. All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be sub- ject to the recommendations of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (reference their letter dated 07/31/84) and the requirements of the City Engineer. The developers Engineer shall furnish' all neces~ary data relating to'drainage and flood control. b', The development is located within a .Zone A"1 on the Federal . Insurance Rate Haps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer. Certificate of flood proofing- on all lots will be required from the developer's Engineer. . . c. Proper facilities for disposing of spring water from known'sources or if diSCoVered during construction shall be provided to protect proposed buil di ng founda ti ons. . d. All drainage from the development shall be directed to a public dedicated street, alley, or. drainage facility. If this is not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. fees to be paid to the City Engineer prior to recordation of the Final Map: a. An electrical energy fee for street lights for a period of 48 months. Little League Drive b. The development will use ~~-Street for access; therefore, a fee for the proportionate share of the cost of the future project to extend the frontage road will be required. The fee will be $625 per acre. c. The developer shall be assessed a fee for future traffic si gna 1 sat Palm Avenue and Kenda 11 Dri ve based upon tri p generation data @ $7.00/trip. ~ Street Improvements and Dedications: a. All public streets within and adjacent to the development shall be improved to include combination curb and gutter, sidellaH, paving, ornamental street lights, and appurtenances as required by the City Engi neer. \.. . . ~ I ''''" 'I , CITY OF SAN NARDIN STANDARD REQUIREMENTS CASE TT 12756 & CUP 84-37 AGENDA ITEM 4 HEARING DATE 3-6-85 PAG E 13 -' - ------.-.-. ---.--.....-.--..-....-.--.-----. . b. The structural section {or all 'streets shall be designed and submitted to the City Engineer for approval using a TI ass i gncd by the City Engi neeI' and an R va 1 ue obta i ned on the subgrade after rough grading by a recognized soils testing lab. All streets shall have a minimum ~C thickness of 2-1/2 inches. c. All driveway approaches shall be constructed to City standards or. as may be approved by the City Engineer. , . d.. Street signs and other regulatory signs shall be installed at ~he developer's expense aSJequjred by .the City Engineer. e. Curb returns and cOl'responding property line returns shall be provided at the intersectio'n(s) (20,.foot radius forall streets). f. For the'streets listed. below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way' (R.U.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line. (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as .: . -follows (for the streets marked * the exi sting. improvements . . shall be removed and replaced to the dimensions noted): Street Name R.W.(ft,l 30 25 C.L.(ft. ) 20 18 b. Each parcel shall be graded to drain to a pub1 ic dedicated street, alley, or drainage facility. If this is not feasible, proper drainage facilities and casements shall be provided to the s!ltisfaction of the City Engineer. c. All slopes shall be contained within the lower parc~ls affected by the slope. In some instances, this requirement will . n'ecessitate the use of retaining walls or slope casements on adjacent property. . d, Slope planning ~lith an irrigation system to prevent erosion shall be provid~d as specified by the City Engineer. . """" I CITY OF SAN B NARDINO TT 12756 & . CASE CUP 84-37 AGENDA ITEM 4 HEARING DATE 3-6-85 . PAGE 14 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 21. Utilities: a. Each parcel shall he provided vlith'separate water and sewer facilities so it can be served by the City. Said facilities must be extended from Little Le'ague Drive at no cost to the City. b. A sewer backflow prevention device is-required for all par- cels with building finished floors lower than the nearest up- stream manhole rim of the serVing sewer main. c. Sewer main extensions required.to serve the site shallbe constructed at ~he'developer's expense. .d. Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as required. e. All existing 'overhead utilities shall be placed underground in accordance. with Section 18.40.3BO of the City Code and shall be so indicated upon the improvement plans for the . streets.' . . 22. If the project is to be developed in phases, each individual phase shall be designed to provide maximum public safety, convenience for public service vehicles, and proper traffic circulation. In order to meet.this requirement, the following will be required prior to the finalization of any phase: a. Completion of the improvement plans for the total project or sufficient plans beyond the phase boundary to verify the feas.ibility of the design to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. b. ^ plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Oivision, Fire, and Planning Departments 'indicating v/hat improvements will be constructed ~lith the given phase, subject to the follovling: (1) dead-end streets shall be provided with a minimum 32- foot radius paved turnaround area, (2) ha1f-~lidth streets shall have a minimum 211-foot paved width, (3) street improvements beyon~ the phase boundaries, as necessary to provide secondary access, III 'I"~. I (.) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS CASE TT 12756 & CUP 84-37 AGENDA ITEM 4 HEARING DATE 3-6-8'; PAGE 1 '; --.. ~._-. - --~-- (4) drainage facilities, such as storm drains, channels. earth berms, and block wall s, as necessary, to protect the development from off-site flows, (5) a properly designed water system capable of providing required fire flO\1, perhaps 100,1[\9 0'1' extending beyond the phase boundaries, . (6) easements for any of the above and the installation of necessary utilities, and Dele Ie -:<~- -- - -lA- ~t..;..oo.- to _.the-...p.b.a.~ il1g - ~e.q.u.i.r.eJll.lln.ts.- s1a~.d...ab..a.'LC..._a_.d2ili.wLt>:.!1. ---- aRe_~~~~~f_~ccoss_~oad~~~ll_be-P~Q~ided_IDr_jJ~ teta~_~~~~___~~o_~~~~_~oad~~tiQQ_~uall_coDsjS~~_iL~t f~*C_~ee_w4~t..~~~4~~~-t~ic~~,+~~~~a-9-~~~~~ee-~~u~ . . 'S.t!o-u'l-def'- -GfT -ea€-R--5-i-OO-.- --1- t_.:l._.r.ec.omIllQtlde.d.. .J;ha...t._th.e. _pa \Ie mc.n.t....ha 6e51~~<~~~FY6;ee_~A~~~_lllatltl~~_.J;ha...t._it-C~11_bc_~Ji7Prl 1n-_~~e_~_~~~a~~_~;f~~~Fa~-~tiotl-~~-a-i~e-Sir~t--_J~ ~~~eftt_~~~~_~~54~_t9_a~t_i_~_j~~_o~e.r_ta~_1C_~ ~~~~~_~_~~ffie_~flu~_~~~~F~~-t~~-'t~eet-~i~Q~-~ 'C~~. I i '. :j .' , 'i I , \.. o ( .; I] ( ~;r--~ a ~) 111 ! I o I I ,.....--- r' '\ I , I'. I ~ I ~ I I ! I ( , L_ _.J I ~. 1 ~ ~; ii:* ~ . .e.,QIt o. 16 & ~ d II' ~ .. ~ I""'" II o ,c. I') 1 7 CD Q.. J o o ( ( , .. I ; - !\lff; I t UJ.; . I i . .' ~i ~ ~ 3t . .h ! @~ .. I N- )l. I j i ~ \ II j'1 .. ~ ~~ ~ I ..J<- , ~u ,,17'".... 1"'1" 1 ". o o I- . . . o < I Ii S ..;-- f il i I +- ~. o I ~ . ~ ..>'-...... ...--.-4 .. I ~ .. t $ a ~ 1 j ~ ~Ol lID " .< .. 0 ""I" 'Id' o . o IlJ > ~ . o . . -tfd__- - - < ~ ... !S .. o i " I ~ ~ ~ I ~ i1 . R , -< .+- i! (.) f .O-,U. f I'''''' o o ; . o . , ~!1~! I . II:lll s ~. ~ ~ I:~;II i .!. I. ,8 ~ :l g I~~:t ;! : ~ ';: i::ii i~ I I !I'! i ! '1 I ~i ~i!;h ~l ~. . 'P". . ! ':I!.1 !t.!CI a;i:.,\: ! b!~~. . I~...r i i!i;:! ~. =-11'-, 0'.1... 'j ;ii.I~; ~.i:l.i! l:C I ill';l L- ",11'1 r-. ,"r.:. · ,till W..... .'. , Ill':; I'" ~ : i:!11! I~~i ... -.. ~ .j' Z ~ . .. I'Jllll :1 .\' ..- 'l,,,, ~t /~l /. .' ~ . . .' . . . . .: ! I .= : .! i' , '2'" ' -, i . ~;: I ' , I , .: :J. .,,: .t<j -:' ,I . . - . ~ . . , , .- . ". .: I . . a; 1. ~, -: .' "! , , . .' (~ . . .' . , . , .' ., . . . " .... .1 . ~ ,.ii ", . . . i , .. ..; ., -, , _I: " . ' - - . . . - . . - - - - . ..' ~ , :. ' : ., :' 'j I I I I . . ..Ir . " --:r. . . .R . .: , .. I ..: -; -=: ., . ~~.)j. -....... ~ ''''tu "IUIU ..,,~.., I....n".. I 1 - .- , ; o lJ . ~ . - - - . ~ ~ . . ( co 1ft .... N .... ( d z t- o c a:: t- w > - ~ ~ z W t- , '" /1; I/, Ii ~r' o I'"'' 'I ' o ~ .- . ~~ r"i . ! ~\0- ~ ' . .~;.. . ~rl~-'- :\~(~, ;v 'Af\1 or;:"; I . UI-lo{"'"",,-----------\ '. ~ ~ ~C'~~ 1 ~' ....' S I I ~ " :~~\ . ~ ~y: I / i t \j~, :L~ ~\ ~...: I \'\?~ y \ ..-'.\! I 1 r,\\ .--: . 1\ - ' . B' ~~ .J; y),-t, I .tL../tlLU ~ ~~'" I , ...... 1--....::..., '.. tl 1 ji,o ;: ., .7- ,tr'., i ,::::::;; , ' I h"LO I ~cl::li "" ~. .~, . ".~ '. "..~ ~, ' -rf. ~.,.... - <..,~,. I" ""I. '. ,t-r. I "-'. ~ \.. I:cl.i' -.J " , ' ^ . f~"'1--;' I, 'J.:!~'- ~l A , fG.~ /J - '--~"~~W: : nB I .:tdJ \ ;tjj] /tf5; __ l,,'\\ ;, i ~h ~ ir:=.r I"'" !r-~ fz J hJ7''\' . .... .~ fI):ij .~~- ,"- r ( tt{, ~ w' c:xl! f!~ ,].."--,,3'-,J' , ~." \,l.'- ~I~ I' .~ ,0iI..~i-I":jr-I.-'-' == ('.' \::;::{':! ... ):.~} I'" ...L r I ""':z ~ ;:;'/ ~ r~lf.i ,.i ~ . I y;., ~ i /110 ,~1;JJ:-+.---i . I ;{'1: "'"If.' :r' ' , . . %, :::r.:!>-~;i JI.[;!,.Jj :~!;J ft; I ~ : " ~ J." 'f!" " .. ~' . /~~ ':J[: f0~fb! .. ' ~:,e.~~Hr1, '~"_' .-"---v-- ~ ' ~ . ---+'--.--l h0 '.' · ~E)I!,~~~);~11 ' tdj":'r JJ r'r-Il .- IL~ ...I- J '-"J"'i/~,"/-(, .: t:dJ. ~ -,- ~ l f'~'--., f ..~ - h , -..~-_/ ; ,. '" ~ ii- '0 1::1 ~I CD, . . .' ., .;f ..;:'" . I ... :1\ :1 l;1 1 1 1 lu, .1 :t-,':,"',,:,,"r" ','1 ~. ->., ~: (- j~t~.: ",~4'd"t a/ t,,~ :2 " ~f;"", )' .~' ~".:. ~~):~;i? iil"""" ~;:> ,:::~~:~, p. ~~;-- f :'t. > t" :i '-;-, , "'. ,," "-..,- , _"";;)0,,,. ~,. - h.' ::..~ \.; ,r'., .:',.', t :.:~~~ ,:' ...~ ," ,- . 'J ~t~~tfil!~ . .U., ~," -' ..t.\.~ .-....... .)1'.~, "'"t. "',"'f~ ".". k' "'.' Q .... 1&1 U. 4(' 11:" > ....1 1&1 r II: '.' ~ U) II) ... (II o z 1&1 > .... 4( .... Z 11\ ... , . "::':1~"':~~'" "_'J-i._ , .. ~ . , , ~, " . ,,,....' \.'L"- :: ~ , - ~ - ~ ~ I . . I 5 . ~ ij ~ . . . I . . I . I . . . . I ~ . . 1 ~- :!' : ... .... $ .. - , ~ - ~ .. .-... :.,,<4~...;. ~ . ",,!1.l"I'r1 . , -; ~ I.t;~ . ",.-J..~:"M. -, IJJ"I" tL II ! il i .1 ~ " 1 . I' ~J Ii ., ,'," _ ';"~~7 ~;~1~ :;~~~ .,~~".74 ~';:l~~~~ I':'i'.~l;\i' i~;i;;<'ir~J;. ~~'~t:.~,.y:< ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . - - - !II ~ \J "';:_'/~:. ~ I .. I I . . - ,11 - 1"'1"'1. " o o o. . o ,... CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ ,... AGENDA .., ITEM # LOCATION CASE T T #127')6 E. r. T1 P ftfl4- "H HEARING DATE ,,/6/85 4 .... ~ ~ R -1- 2 '/2 ACRES i'.w) "'= 800' "0. R-I-2\i; ACRES 2 "0.