HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-Planning
I""" '"
cl-Q- OF SAN BERNARDIC)o - REQUEOr FOR COUNCIL AcQoN
Frank A. Schuma
From: Planning Director Subject: Appeal of Conditional Use Permi t
No, 85-12
Dept: Planning
Mayor and Council Meeting of
Date: March 19, 1985 April 1, 1985, 2:00 p,m,
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Previous Planning Commission action:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on March 6, 1985, the following
action was taken:
The application for Conditional Use Permit No, 85-12 was unanimously denied,
Recommen<:led motion:
That the hearing on the appeal be closed and the decision of the Planning
Commission be affirmed, modified or rejected,
Signature Frank A. Schuma
Contact person:
Frank A. Schuma
Phone:
383-5057
4
Supporting data attached:
Yes, Staff Report
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source:
Finance:
Council Notes:
75-0262
Aaenda I tem No~
/'
/-5':
I' '''1'1 r' "
~
o
0,
o
Pacific .
Scene, Inc.
.
March IS, 1985
~
. ~
<& <21
~ %.
~ ~
.10 ~
? '
G
'G
Mayor and Common Council
City of San Bernardino
City Hall
300 North -D- Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Dear Gentlemen:
Pacific Scene, Inc., by this letter, is hereby appealing the deci-
sion of the Planning Commission on March 6, 1985, which disapproved
Conditional Use Permit No. 85-12. Pacific Scene, Inc. believes
the decision should be appealed and the project approved under
the following circumstances:
1) A reduction in units to 118 units on the 5.44 acres.
2) A parking ratio of 1.33 spaces per 1 unit.
3) A building setback of 60 feet will be maintained from the
condominium project adjacent to the front of the project.
4) A landscape buffer will be provided along the block wall
adjoining the condominium project.
5) The trash enclosure will be moved away from the wall of
the condominium project.
6), The building facing Parkdale Drive will be reduced to one
story in height.
7) A building setback of 75 feet will be maintained from the
single family residences on the North property line with
a heavy landscape buffer included along the North property
line.
8) Floor plans will range from a one bedroom/one bath of 550
square feet to a two bedroom/two bath of 760 square feet.
9) The proposed shall be rented/leased to those persons 55
years of age and older for perpetuity. A covenant shall
be recorded with the land prior to the issuance of building
permits, which would limit the age of occupants of these
units to not be less than 55 years of age. The covenant
shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to
recordation for review and approval.
937 VIA LATA, #100, COLTON, CALIFORNIA 92324
(714) 370-1550
1'1"1'1 'I
t
o
o
0,
o
Letter to Mayor and Common Council
March 15, 1985
Page 2
In conclusion, we feel that the seniors project will be very com-
patible with the neighborhood versus a conventional apartment pro-
ject, which could be approved on the property for 79 units without
prior consent/consideration of the physical layout of the neighbor-
hood or the people who are living there today.
Prior to our ~earing on March 6, 1985, we held the following meetings
with the Planning Department and neighbors:
January 31, 1985 - Meeting with Dave Anderson - Planning Department.
He informed us that a density of 24 units and 1 to 1 parking was
acceptable to the City for this type of seniors project.
February 6, 1985 - Submitted our site plan at 24 units per acre (132
units) and a 1.3 to 1 parking ratio.
February 11, 1985 - We met with the Calvary Baptist Church diaconate
to discuss our project at the church to the west of our property.
We received a favorable response with a final vote of approval to
be on March 3, 1985 with the entire congregation.
February 14, 1985 - Dave Anderson of the Planning Department came
with us to visit a similar concept of .Senior Apartments" in San
Dimas. This project was at 38 units per acre, and we felt he was
impressed with the nature of the project. At that time, ~e also
gave him a comparison of the requirements other cities have re-
garding senior apartments.
February 2Q, 1985 - We sent a packet of information to the 135t
residents within the 500-foot radius of the property describing
the project in detail and invited them to hear us present the
project at the church on February 28, 1985.
February 28, 1985 - We met with the community and had about 25-30
people in attendance. We had good questions and concerns which we
responded to and, in general, had a favorable response.
March 3, 1985 - We met with the Calvary Baptist Church and presented
our project to the entire congregation. We received approval for
the 132 units.
- .".
-,'
111,'1111
,
o
o
0,
o
Letter to Mayor and Common Council
March 15, 1985
Page 3
March '4, 1985 - We met with Phil,Arvizzo, Ed Gundy, and the condo-
minium owners at their residence on Parkdale. After working out
many of the considerations described above, we received approval
from the condominium owners for 118 units on the site.
March 5, 1985 - We met with our architect and he informed us that
we could still meet all the concerns of the neighbors (i.e. 60 foot
setback, one story on Parkdale, trash enclosure, and landscape
buffer) and rework the site plan ~o have 126 units on the project.
March 6, 1985 - We presented the project to the Commissioners and
mentioned that we had met with the neighbors and the church. We
informed the commission of our meeting with our architect and asked
for 126 units on the site. This is where we feel the crux of the
matter rests. We expected the members of the condominium project
to speak in,favor of 118 units and we would have been open to
agree with them. Subsequently, the Commissioners did not give us
the opportunity to decrease our number of units to 118. We would
have been willing to do this if the opportunity were to have arisen.
By the time this appeal reaches the Council for your April 1, 1985
hearing, Pacific Scene, Inc. will have accomplished the following:
1) Revised the site plan to meet all the specifications of the
staff report except for those items mentioned in this letter.
2) Held a meeting again with the condominium owners to show them
our revised plan and receive their approval.
3) Held a meeting with the neighborhood in general and Calvary
Baptist Church to show the revised site plan and receive
approval.
4) Spoken with the Planning Department and other city officials
regarding our proposal for approval to the Council on April 1.
1985.
We have included various backup information for your review, and
we would like to answer any questions you may have by reaching us
at (714) 370-1550.
'0
,
JllllllI ,..t
o
0,
Letter to Mayor and Common Council
March 15. 1985
Page 4
Thank you for your consideration regarding our proposal.
Sincez:ely,
1?f-'lnOn,J? J1i, '
Br~~J1~
Project Manager
BPG:dw
o
,',
;lO
8\ rn
(")
~ ~
rn
0
- I
(")
U\ :::4
,-<
-0 ..0
.I>- ',-
g rn
::0
-r.
:.-..
11111111'L~ 'I
o
II
D [g@rn O~[g
" : -71985
o
0,
BURKE. LESTER & ASSOCIATES
ARC:HITECTUIlE ANll PLANNING
23025 YLL CREEK UGI.>>tA ..u.a. CALJRWM 121$3 (l14) 710-11I2
Comparison: Senior Citizen Apartments
Parking Ratio Density Unit Size S'.F. Recreation Building S.F.
Hemet .6 ,s/u 40 uta 460-680 3200 S.F.
San Dimas .67 s/u 38 uta 460-680 1600 S.F.
Ontario .66 s/u 40 uta 460-680 1200 S.F.
Rialto .8 s/u 41 uta 460-680 1200 S.F.
San Bernardino 1.3 s/u 24 uta 550-760 3200 S.F.
Quality advantages for San Bernardino Project:
Larger floor plans
Wood on exterior elevations
Larger recreation facilities
Better site and entry design
IlHJ.llr.u
o
@
o
0,
o
Pacific
Scene, Inc.
February 14, 1985
Calvary Baptist Church
3701 North Sierra Way
San Bernardino, CA 92405
Dear Gentlemen:
It is a pleasure that Pacific Scene, Inc. - the 1984 National
Builder of the Year - has the opportunity to provide a first-
rate senior citizen project on the property adjacent to your
church on Parkdale Drive. The type of development proposed will
permit a viable and productive living environment for senior
citizens in a well-established neighborhood and is described in
detail in the following pages. Also enclosed is a description
of how the project, known as parkdale Ridge, will remain a living
environment solely for senior citizens in the years to come.
We at Pacific Scene, Inc. are very happy to present our project
to you on Monday, February 18, 1985 and we look forward to your
support of our senior citizen project.
Sincerely,
~
Project Manager
BPG:dw
937 VIA LATA, #100, COLTON, CALIFORNIA 92324
(714) 370-1550
o
~"",
w
I'"'''' "
o
0,
o
Pacific
Scene, Inc.
February 20, 1985
.
Dear Neighbor:
Pacific Scene, Inc. - the 1984 "National Builder of the
Year" - would like to invite you to attend an informative
meeting regarding the development of senior citizen housing
on the 5.4 acres of vacant land between the Calvary Baptist
Church and the condominiums/junior high school on Parkdale
Drive in the City of San Bernardino.
The concept envisioned is an exciting one, which Pacific
Scene feels will be a great asset and very compatible to
the community and existing neighborhood. Please find a
more in-depth description of our project and our resume
enclosed for your information.
We look forward to seeing you in the Fellowship Hall at
the Calvary Baptist Church at 7:00 p.m., Thursday, February
28, 1985.
Sincerely,
~G1~
Project Manager
BPG:dw
937 VIA LATA, 11100, COLTON, CALIFORNIA 92324
(714) 370-1550
IJI"I" . I
.
o
o
o
o
PARKDALE RIDGE:
QUALITY LIVING FOR ACTIVE SENIORS
INTRODUCTION
Pacific Scene, Inc., as a matter of philosophy, has always placed
a special emphasis on service to the communities in which we live.
The company in the past has focused its housing development efforts
primarily towards first-time homebuyers under age 65. However, in
recognizing both an emerging market and our responsibility to serve
the WHOLE community with quality affordable housing products, Pacific
Scene has devoted more than two years to researching and developing
new concepts and designs for retirement housing. We have worked
closely with nationally recognized experts in the field of geren-
tology, psychology, seniors architecture, marketing, and property
management to create the retirement community concept which we are
calling parkdale Ridge in the City of San Bernardino. Today, in
many of our markets, we are implementing the Parkdale Ridge concept
to create new, high quality, retirement communities for our active
seniors clientele. Presented below is the general concept of "Park-
dale Ridge" and the socio-economic basis for these exciting new
communities.
CHANGING DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
The population of the U. S. is aging. Census statistics indicate
that in 1980, there were 25.5 million people 65 years of age or
older, representing 11.3 percent of the total U. S. population.
By the year 2030, the Census Bureau predicts that the number of
people in this group and their proportional representation in the
population will more than DOUBLE. Perhaps even more significant,
the income for this segment of the population is expected to in-
crease at a faster rate than any younger age group.
With low and presumably stable birth rates expected to continue at
least into the next century, America's population will "age" drama-
tically. The often ignored group called "senior citizens" are thus
becoming an increasingly.important and powerful social, political,
and economic force in our society.
While the total population is expected to increase by 40 percent
between 1980 and 2030, the number of persons aged 65 and over is
projected to increase by more than 100 percent (from 26 million to
55 million). People over the age of 75 are proportionally the
fastest growing age group in America. The number of people aged
85 and over will be four times what it is today, by 2030. Senior
citizens now represent one-quarter of all individuals over the age
of 25. By 2030, they will represent almost one-third of this group.
Figures 1 through 4 and Tables 1 and 2 illustrate these dramatic
population trends.
. .
.
,'0
o
Table One
,
o
IU11r' II
15
o
POPllLAnOM PllQJECTlOIlS (SERIES II), TOTAL AIl0 15-1'LllS, 1_ l"lQ I
\11-"-.
IkM
--
~
"'- fit
,. AI_ M_.... 11- ... -- ... 1GIl....
-...----- 222.1B 24.127 ILl Ill, 111I I" 11. 141
~------ m. lID 27.. 11.7 11. 012 Il.za I.
1110.._______ 2U.5U a. 124 12.1 ILIII 17.12' 141
111!.________ 25Z. 7!11 II. tOl 12.4 12._ lI,7!t 14.
-..------ ZIll.37I ILlD 12.2 12. 717 ".1115 I5ll
.
ZDD5....______ 117. lID 32,C3l5 12.1 12. 114 11,5U ISI
21110___ _ m.m ..,137 12.7 u.m 20.151 141'
ZD15..________ Zl3.154 31.511 1&.0 II,Ia3 23. '56 I.
2aZO.________ ao. lIS -'102 1l.1 11,411 2\.634 144
211Z5._____.._ "742 ID,I2O 17.2 20._1 lIO,D5I 144
ZD:IO...._ _____ -~ 55,1124 ILl 22.3!t 32, 124 141
2D35._ ______ ... .. IUIl5 ILl 22.Q4 33.371 14.
2DAO..__ __~_ _tOIl 54.115 17.1 ILIII nIDI I!Z
ZDl5..__ ______ JU.ll54 54.lIII n.. ZLm l2. 114 15J
:D5O..__ ____ mom 55.- 17.1 22.1lU D..a w
I c-_H ,_ lItl _I eo- ..... . ....__ _.._ ~ .... .... _ color) a ..lIh.." I. tIIo C,.,,,.I
.....anon ..cortI....... ,...... _ft.r I taM I. 1ft. ,..... II 0fW1tc!Dtt: we 111,,"'".2.1 or '-:IfI C1DDULlUafl
......... ,_", "" III \IIlluarlL 0.-1"'" _ <ar-o) -PII" by 1Il1 .- f_ \II. PIIIf_"" ......
.. "- or..... CIM88 ~ Il"IWft.
Source: U.S. Senace Spec~p.l Coccitcee on A3;ns, 1981
Table Two
PiGlEcnu TIEIICIS IIITllIM TIlE IWI.IIS ME llIIlIUP. 1IlI-a5e
r--1Il
SoI_...
2IIIID-ZS
1I7WlllIO
-.-. &.........-----....--------
U to 7...___.___________..___.___
75......_______.._______
..,...._--------------------
..U...M..__.._._...._____.._________
U ..14._._.._.._..__..._....__....________
7S.. ....__........_..._..___......._..__..__._...._
a..-.....______..__....______________
..... ..-.-.-.--..-------------------
41111.._._____.____._________._..._.._..
:s to ....____._______________..._____
.........--------..-----..........-------
+...
+n.1
+5l.,
+fL.1
+35..
"I..
+55.0
+61.1
+<<1.1
..Zl.i
-sa. 0
..1111.4.
+411. 0
+n.1
....1.1
~.
+64.0
+7!.I
..... I
+a,
..!7.~
.,1...
-D.'
~n..
Source: ~.S. Senc~e Spec~a1 Cu--;=~ee Qn ~gin2, 1981
...
".0
J
A
IU"" U'
5i%e and Proportion of Future U.S. Elderly Population
(Number In populatlon bar refers to the percent of the tOtal population.)
55'
sol
Nu:nber 45
In 40
MWlono
.
o
o
FiRure One
~
18.:l~
j IS.87,
J
I
1 t.,.,.. 12.7~
,_. J2.2~
1111'41
30
2S
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
Projected Number of Elderly People
1980 - 2So! MlDlon 20 I 0.34.8 MIIUan
1990-29.8 MWlan 2020-45.1 MIUlan
2000-31.8 MlWan 2030-55.0 MlIUon
s.u.: c- o....u s.r- a PNtft\toM In -s,.".:anm ~ -.Jutr lU2.
Source: Warner, 1983
22
o
.
'.
,,0
o
o
Fillure Two
Ptojcaed Growth of Elderly Population Age Groups, 1980-2030
Percent
of 1980
Level
300
280
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
Source:
1980
Year
1990
I
.
/
.
/
/
. /
/ """
'-
~.
/..
~,/
.-
.;.-.-.-..-..... /
.-' /.
-' /.
""""
"""
--
2000
2010
2020
1''''' " ,
23
o
,
.
85+
75-84 .
65.74
-Total
population
2030
e.
U.S. Oe;)artment of Health and.Human Services. Health Care nnancing AdmInistration.
"Long-Term eare: aacKground and Fuwre Directions" (":an:.iary 19B1),;:I. n.
I ""I'~'I" "
.'.
:0
,
o
o
24
O'
Fhure Three
,
~1S.T.m ad ~ '900~~
MilIiQrzs
21
.
11
an . -. ..1820 510
14
12
Source: u.s.. Senate Special Committee on Aging, 1981.
.
'.
..0
o
o
Fhure Four
Age-Sex Population Pyramids for, the
United States: 1900, 1940, 1970
iAtllDO
-
I.,,,,
.....
,.......
I
II"MO
I
I
-
at'"
CI ..'" I
I
-
-""
I
-
:at'-
r-
7.0 USA... 10 U .. 0 '.0 2JI U U LD U 7.0
-..-
Source: Cutler and Rerootyan. 1975'
rlU11I,,, 1.1
-
o
..
.
~..,
r.j.IlIIl".;..,u" I
.
o
o
o.
o
INCREASING SENIORS INCOME
.
Income levels for. seniors are also on the rise'. In 1979, approxi-
mately 20 percent of the nation's elderly households had annual in-
comes of $20,000 or more. Sources for this income included social
security, private pension systems, and interest income from personal
investments. n addition, nearly 75% of all seniors own their own
homes free and clear. This creates substantial equity which can
mean additional income upon sale of the home. Many senior house-
holds also receive economic support from their children, which does
not show up in the censu.s income statistics.
,
In summary, senior citizens as a group are today increasing in num-
bers, more financially secure, and living longer, healthier, more
active lives than in years past. Many will choose to live in their
own homes or apartments immediately after retirement, but there will
come a time for most, probably in their 70's, when a quality retire-
ment community such as Parkdale Ridge will become an attractive
alternative.
MOTIVATION FOR SELECTING AN ACTIVE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY
As mentioned, most seniors will choose to live in their own homes
immediately after retirement. However, studies indicate that a
senior household will be motivated to move from their home at some
point as a result of some fairly common reasons. The principal
reasons cited include: 1) decreasing health of one or both spouses;
2) death of a spouse; 3) encouragement from children; 4) advice of
a physician; 5) a desire to eliminate the work involved in main-
taining the individual home, and; 6) a desire for greater security.
Traditionally, active seniors wishing to move for one of these
motivating reasons have had limited choices.
Nursing homes are an unacceptable choice to active seniors since
they are often viewed as warehouses for the dying. Moving in with
one's children is also a choice but for whatever reason, good or
bad, is not popular in American society. Senior apartment living
is the third option that presents many opportunities which the
senior citizen finds as a positive housing alternative - i.e.,
being close to shopping, religious institutions, recreational
activities (parks, golf courses). and other fQatures inside the
senior apartment community which are described in detail later in
this description.
Thus, Parkdale Ridge from Pacific Scene provides the active senior
with an acceptable and highly desirable housing option. Parkdale
Ridge recognizes and caters to their independence while at the same
time provides the security, social interaction, and freedom from
household responsibilities which come with maintaining an indivi-
dual home.
.
.n
L
IlUUI' l' ,
o
o
o.
o
PARKDALE RIDGE RETIREMENT LIVING CONCEPT
In formulating the Parkdale Ridge concept, Pacific Scene started
with the basic premise that we wanted to create a product which was
superior to others in the seniors retirement market. To gather
market data, we have toured many existing seniors projects through-
out the United States. Our conclusions regarding most of the exis-
ting products in the market are that many have an institutional
character, require large up-front cash endowments from prospective
tenants, provide very small individual living quarters (250-350 sq.
ft.) and, in general, do not have the qualities necessary to create
a "pride of occupancy" feeling for their seniors residents. Sur-
prisingly, despite these. undesirable aspects, many of the projects
surveyed have lengthy waiting lists of prospectiv~ tenants. .
In contrast, the parkdale Ridge retirement living concept offers a
quality residential resort-style environment for active seniors
through sensitive design, gracious amenities, and a strong manage-
ment philosophy which fosters the residents' pride in residing in
the project. In short, residents will be proud of their "home" at
parkdale Ridge.
The fOllowing is a summary of the amenities included with the Park-
dale Ridge development:
- The location is carefully selected, based upon market analy-
sis. Most projects are in close proximity to commercial
activities, personal services, and medical care. Many
projects are in fact located within walking distance to
major shopping areas, hospital, churches, and public
transportation. Parkdale Ridge meets all these criteria.
- Site layouts for all projects take into consideration the
particular aesthetics of each specific site. However,
attempts are made to configure all projects. around a
central recreation/community center. Our studies indi-
cate this to be a preferable layout since it promotes
project security, the social interaction of residents,
and efficient construction.
- Parkdale Ridge includes 1- and 2-bedroom suites, which
are fully self-contained including kitchens, baths, and
substantial storage. Square footages for the units are
550 square feet for the I-bedrooms and 760 square feet
for the 2-bedroom residences.
- The inviting, tastefully furnished commons area of Park-
dale Ridge is the focal point of the project. The com-
mons area is specifically designed to encourage social
interaction among the residents. It is meant to be the
"action spot" which gives the community its vitality and
character. Activities located in the commons area in-
clude the entry, foyer, kitchen, card room, mail room,
library, lounge, offices, and restrooms.
I""" '"
o
1
o
o.
o
,. ,.'
- Plush courtyard and.grounds landscaping will create a
park-like atmosphere for the enjoyment of project resi-
dents. Water features such as fountains are included
to enhance the parkdale Ridge feeling. Plots are avail-
able for those who wish to gar~en. In addition, two
shuffleboard courts are available for residents to use
at any time. There is also a swimming pool and spa,
and barbeques scatter the project.
- Ther& is no entrance fee in a'Pacific Scene project.
The only special requirement for residents is that
they be fully ambulatory and require no specialized
medical or nursing care. Resideqts pay one monthly
rent which covers the rental of their unit and access'
to all of Parkdale Ridge's amenities, social events,
and services.
A 9-12 passenger mini-van will be furnished to pro-
vide transportation for residents to medical appoint-
ments, shopping trips, planned recreation events, and
special activities.
- A full-time property manager/social director will be
living on site to assist project residents, supervise
other staff, and to handle leasing activities.
- The project is completely surrounded by a security fence,
and entrance is only permitted where security gates are
located and residents have a gate card to gain entrance.
SUMMARY
In conclusion, Pacific Scene is proud and excited about parkdale
Ridge in San Bernardino. It offers a gracious lifestyle for the
increasing number of active seniors who wish to shed home owner-
ship responsibilities and yet maintain their personal independence.
The quality of location, design and management offered by Parkdale
Ridge promises to make them the preferred address in active seniors
housing over the next few years. We look forward to the challenge
of maintaining the Pacific Scene standard of excellence in this
expanding and vastly needed housing product.
""'""
IUHI"[!J' .,'
.0.
,
o
o.
o
CERTIFICATION OF PARKDALE RIDGE
AS AN ACTIVE SENIOR COMMUNITY
In order to entrust to the City of San Bernardino that .Parkdale
Ridge" will. become and remain a viable, active senior citizen
community, Pacific Scene proposes the following be added to the
Conditional Use Permit document prepared by the City of San Ber-
nardino: .
1) The project approved must rent only to those persons
of the age of 55 years old or greater for a period
running as long as the Conditional Use Permit is in
effect.
2) The monitoring, screening, and lease-up must be
handled by the said owner of the property or an
affiliate company as long as the Conditional Use
Permit is in effect.
3) On an annual basis from the date of final notice
of completion of the said project, the owner or
an affiliate company must provide the City of San
Bernardino all rent rolls, leasing information,
and/or "Certification of Age" statement (Exhibit
"A") as signed by the tenants prior to occupancy.
Pacific Scene, Inc. agrees that both the Conditional Use Permit
document and these restrictions, Items #1, 2, and 3 mentioned
above, which the City of San Bernardino is preparing, be re-
corded as a covenant running with the land on the date that
building permits are issued to the owner.
In conclusion, this procedure will ensure that the City of San
Bernardino has the power to monitor the project by certified
documentation in the following ways:
1) That the conditional use permitted on the site is
followed, per the City of San Bernardino require-
ments.
2) The project is monitored as and will remain as
senior citizen rental housing in the future to
those persons of the age of 55 years old or
greater.
-
o
- ..
I''''''''''.''''
,
o.
o
o
EXHIBIT -A"
EXAMPLE OF A
CERTIFICATION OF AGE
I, , hereby understand that, in order
to rent an apartment at parkdale Ridge in San Bernardino, Cali-
fornia, I must be of the age of 55 years old or greater by the
date of occupancy in the said project. It is understood that
by signing this "Certification of Age", I presently am or will
be 55 years old or greater at the time I occupy any rental suite
at the Parkdale Ridge Apartments. .
Authorized Signature
Date
~p. I.':J rr1 ..... .
If .l.'~. J, ........ A ~
~~ ~ .~
I ~,I-,. · ~o. A I-~
" . -,(.1. o:';!..... ~ T.
.. I · !'-Icr..tr-G ~ \,j .
. -.n:::3 ~ :'l:1..-l...... .',,!: I
~ .....!!.,,:.... ....t. ~'I
."'" '6" .... .
- . A .~.
!1 _1..0
~ r. :; . '.~'
1 'To . .
. ilI.~
.J
~..-
,,-
...,!. 0 ~__" '., 'IO!. ~
. ,,. · r ~ :t-;;:"'III: Pfll"~~ ~'
FJ:' J f.i' L ~ I,U. ~ ~.~
__ . .1.::./. 1=1 ~-_. . , . \:J
_I~..... '. ... ~.-
- -u::Ij-r ~. ~. IloJ' ~' .
. ,I\: 4 ^ ~~~...'r.l >V
'{. .' ~/~~~<<: q'J~
o~ ..m~L1'
~.~ ('1 :~ A 0 ~4~~
.., . :!).. - -:. (?-
( ~... . .....,. ~ ~ 0
:00:' ....
(T:t.' ....L ""'. i'
~~~~~'-I(B
("1 ~ fl.. ..LiS I .
. I )= - (~). ( . \
( I ~r: .!J'
'!-, .~ 11 r
- iL' . I
~. ;1
:r
... '-I
~
I,J
r-i
'-T .... 0
::/(.:.0_ 0 , ~ ~il! : .
. ---
=',
o
-.. JIiItIN!.'
. . .
"~ . Till .1(61 ,
"a ...~
,
.
.t:.\..J-
~ ~
All
:eEl
, i...!.
3~ .
I!l.lll
I
-I;
...
-i" '
~
, r--
:;:J
.I~l"l""':''-'
-.......
ttr.J
-
-
.. .".., Iff .. _ _
Rr ~ r.r~ ~
41 0' 18
" . f ^ A I~' ,Q
~
~~; · r ~
I~ 'I J Q
. ~. r.'\
\!) We
. (t""'; .. ~ ~
: r -= ~
^ ,.
. . .....- .......
'i'I": ~)JL- ~ _
L::J-'~ o'~~
4 ,:..~~:J' rot<t':I(:; i
....-. A A . ~
o~
",J L
of .. .. ~t:>
I-
~ .f!). t ~.
t;"'.r ~.
. fl.," L f .;,.
. ~.. ..
. -
" rr:: I A :9~
~ I:j,^ ':' L
;..{.;J " . . ~
- ~ ~.... '0:-, a~
_._' 't'
..iA~Cf'fI",)
. ~-
or,,-:
~ "
~...' I:'. ~I
.
(
-
-
01'_....
,
./
CONDO liTE
.....
o
SCHOO
"I_~
-...
1Mo)
-'
-
ftAnllnAI C nAIVF=
~
1'"'1''' '''' "
~oo
o
o
o.
o
calvaRY Baptist; ChURch
3701 SI€lllla WJ.Y . SAn 8€llnJ.1l0mo. callrOllnlA 9240~
.
(714) 682.2564
March 2, 1985
Dear Members of Calvary:
Recently, the Diaconite was approached by Pacific Scene, Inc; of San Diego
concerning the development of the property to the east of the Church. It is
their desire to develop an active senior citizen's complex. It would
include apartments of one and two bedrooms, a community-recreation center,
pool and gardening areas. It would also have security gating and a van to
transport the tenants of the complex.
The development proposed would consist of 132 units, which is 24 units
per acre. All of the structures are two story, but are set back thirty
feet from the respective property lines. It will include 84 two bedroom
units and 24 single bedroom units. The two bedroom are 760 square 0 feet,
with the one t~droom being 550 square feet.
Pacific Scene made a presentation to the Diaconite on February 18, 1985.
The Church is involved because of convenants signed and recorded when we
sold the propertyoin 1979. At that time we required a twenty-five foot
setback and limited the land to 79 conventional multi-family units.
However, to develop the appropriate senior citizens complex Pacific Scene
has requested an increase of units in their plans.
The Diaconite investigated the design of the buildings with an architect
and checked on other developments done by Pacific Scene. They also checked
the reputation of the company. Also investigated was the ability of the
Church and the City eo insure that the proiect would remain a senior citizen's
complex and not be changed to conventional apartments at later date.
The City and Church have boch been working on appropriate language in
permits and agreements that will keep the development a senior Citizen's
Complex. The past work of the developer and their continuing development
has shown to be positive.
Therefore, the Diaconite is recommending to the memberso,of Calvary Baptist
that they approve the authorization allowing for increased units to 132
as long as they are for the appropriate senior citizens project and that
the twenty-five foot easement on multi-story buildings around the respective
property lines remain.
Mr. Bradley Griggs of Pacific Scene will make a presentation and answer
any questions at the business meeting of March 3, 1985.
~
~'",
JL
-
._.
.,J
II',,!" II
'-
..
o
,
ME9IO TO .F2E
.
o
Meeting
Conversation ~ Phone No. 363.-539/
Time -l :4:; p,tt location CfT''! II/it L
,
Representing:
/()/U 111/i1S -!3/>./r./. /EO/. 5.. i?
(">-"I'/("l'::,j'~/' fc=>t't'-K-. Tl"("rI?)
.
Date'
W.O.
~ob i1.c. t:1.J-i: (httli C'J(' .
. '/I.?f :l-<-(ii'SEPt'l.~i 1..SJ)11
SJ,,: ti.~A.'r1,/;)IA.!(~
3k/bs
,
Record of:
Name: .
ELLIS
.,--.. ,>
:::::>/-1 I ", L /' V
I
IP~l To2. 0sr.
S'fr}7 Ie
t-
. /.
I!h,~/', ,,-/.)
<"'r
/'<;"dt i. IS'
/ r'/;,.....' I.. t71.'S,
!." /.T......i
T /..1 (
, .-
~"IJ;
. . .
/j"{ III{'(
I A' I;',~' j</bJ'i, '
!.!.'/-~ 'I...~::.il/' ,o.T.,
/;{~ .I ..()1 /r;
~-; ..
.--~_l-/~ ..
". ( K r t.
.
./. ,'"
r ", r---
rrl t/rV('-r'i. 'j
?~" I),,'
"f I( tN:'r'-
.- ,.
01 C'7< /( r'
/S
?-c 'I /. Ill. 't ii,' 4 (':.L!! os 7.
/
/{.... ,,,' ,I j' r; -r (.",' Ii J rJA..) /i Ie '.c
/ to -n..
/A \ f" ~,i '--:." i;'C Co I Ht:u't'
1}""-('-'7 .f
.. . r- I -~.
f
'I 116
S'&(.~,,,
'TIC "(."7 i 'c-:.-- ,I A . t' ,.,
Ko"
(.":'~:;
o
\""9';"
By
/'
--- ..
: ".....--
/
II ll.lr ;)1.1 .1"
f
"
,
ME&O TO FI2E
.
o
~
Record of:
.
Date
W.O.
J.ob De~c.
~/?/tf~
/ '
Meeting ~
Conversation ,..-- Phone No.
Time Location
.,
Name:
Representing:
;:,~:<~;:::j, ,;'j4~:3i.f ~ Z'~~';'?
2t~,
~LA",..-" -c : ~ 1.~/J.:./IL~~4 ]..I:h. Ed,~E~..
~.L4t /3;.,...,.".A>......r.:1./.J: ;O..:,L;;:~ fJ-sh/
~J;..z;-,,:.., '1'//"~LJ /' .-l1.L./nlL1. .5".,,-./.01') Ps/
/~"'1r..A~ _,,:,, IizW~J'i.~d h dY"41~l.";" ./~
r', .L .." 4-
..'.J'.I.LlA..,.. i..A,,)~t~ o~ /t.. A-I'lA./"'''" .~_ -t-1/OJ..f'..f..NH.AA-'f..
/~;!;F;'~:L:L 7';:::'. :;j;;;~ ~ //pAU~:;:;~~::AnA~/~_
c:/~~ ~~ ~~-I-il':A-::~e.~'~~.,()'
~AhAn /..;4f'".cL k ../L.7A) .
/ I C7 .
~A1t?"'/ ././h,a...., ~b. .AL.L;'~P4~.L .by ~~.
71-,:7)::-:;,:: ~~: ;~~~ -:i/~.
/.J.I.h~ .It ~ ~~",.b'lr~ 'P 7'/' //,( ~AJ~"""?'.r-
. ././.-11./.t!;...
~'
~L~ .
By
-
U JIJIJI 'U_J_ _111._
00-- f1) r>.J'I.,':7IrJ"'W/(~) '~I19
". (1;1;' ~ eJ' UN ''T9 ~
o
~~
~
l'j1t?..,. ~
.
~,t...C7I~~~ ~) (PI 1/-1f!, ~~~ if'F ~. ~~'!
~ E!IIJ'I..Ql,J~ w/,e,) ~ A" VNI~ ~1r"'''' ~.p, I ~~ .,.
"" (12)' -.;1 lJN"J!li"
~!J/IIl/esa;
J '
.
(I)~ ~ ~(?I? .~ F. 0~:z,aP ~
~ - ~ S J(::zJJ~ 11/~ ~.~ '''/~H ~
..,~ .r ~
~1/ 0 ~~.F. 11~/6~ ~
VICINITY MAP
~tf) ~ ~
20"
,~Il
~ '-< ,
,
1\1 . '. . -'I
"~
. ",...~~ ::;& ~
1'2."
t 'Z
f
~ ~ "'-
{ < ~ r
,c: ~'1lf
\U
, III .~
?i
\U i
~ ~
j
I
~1Il I . I
e7 fN? ~ P$f eo
t116HW1t(~ .
""'" , ,
o
o
o.
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 3OONORTH"O"STREET.SANBEllNARDlNO.CALIFORNIA 92418
W.R. "BOB" HOLCOMB
Mayor
Members of the Common Council
Robe,t A. Castaneda. . . . . . . . . Flr't Ward
JaCk Reilly. .. ... ..... . . . Second Wlrd
Ralph Hernandez. . . . . . . . . . . Third Ward
SteVtl Marks. . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Ward
Gordon Qulel ..... . .. . .. . . FlfthW.rd
Cln FrlZler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sixth Ward
Jack Strickler. . . . . . . . . . . .Seventh Ward
"
March 19, 1985
Pacific Scene, Incorporated
937 Via Lata, Suite '100
Colton, CA 92324
Dear Sir or Madame:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on March 6, 1985, the
following action was taken:
The application for Conditional Use permit No. 85-12, to permit a
132 unit senior citizen apartment complex in the R-3-3000
Multiple Family Residential zone on property consisting of
approximately 5.4 acres having a frontage of approximately 200
feet on the north side of Parkdale Drive and being located
approximately 490 feet east of the centerline of Sierra Way, was
denied.
According to
19.78.070., the
use permit:
"The decision of the Commission shall be final unless appealed in
writing to the Mayor and Common Council. The written appeal
shall be submitted to the office of the City Clerk within ten
days from the date of the Commission's decision. The Common
Council, after receipt of the appeal, shall conduct a public
hearing and may either approve, modify or reject the decision of
the Planning Commission."
the San Bernardino Municipal Code, Section
following applies to the filing of a conditional
If no appeal is filed pursuant to the above provisions of the
I t JIJ~I ~"il.' J 1I1. ill
o
o
o.
o
Pacific Scene, Incorporated
March 19, 1985
Page 2
San Bernardino Municipal Code. the action of the Commission shall
be final.
FRANK A. SCHUMA
Planning Director
mkf
cc: Building and Safety Dept.
Engineering Division
Neal T. Baker Enterprises
1464 East Highland Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92404
IIIITt1i T
.-'''-''-'',-,'., ",--,-",~"",,,",,---~,~.-,........L.O---,,--...,......,...,.,....,,,.-~...Q--....._,.. ,.~.~...._.- ,.............:>"'-._''''"'''---~~."......--
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
C":\ p n r \ ,r": r .\\ r"l /'r',~. r'l":.'~)'\~\,,!r:
.) Ij ',' '. ", . t, ' I \
n. : ~ I. IJ \ -:' -', ,: \..} ',1 I ';-.-". : ':1 U
'<!:: '<~.;.'J d \,.1 U i;;l ''''; t.llf \.\ Ll L
AGENDA ITEM 6
HEARING DIITE i-b-ts:,
WARD ___ ._- .
'.1'/1I-U~. ,"_."'.:",~',,'..r ". ~"'e.;I'~"',~...~-"",-;~, ~hog,~_.._:"..;.........~'oIC'''.''''''''~-''''~'''"':Ai',':...;':
"'~~..;-..,.,:\ .,._.<'.-.>.,"'....,~~'.......7'.'.'~"..,i,'.:-'JCI_.,.H>'>' ,..1.;.__...... ---.;."'.......... ...."..-,:nc ~..... ..':"_....,.Z'...,.,..-~_,..
-;!I;',.,'~-t__.c. ',....~".."." "...,_."'......"...._'__"..., . >. .c....'.. ,_. *:;,... ,.'- -c.', ,..c.... ,'," .~"."""....''"' ,."". ............"""-10:"" ".'.~,....' '.n....'. . ......" . ..-,-.-."..~'^"".I.'...---.,',':......-.........,"-,. ~..,.~.,....
I'J
(f)
q
o
~
IJJ
::>
('1
III
r',-
l.:!..
....
i:~l
,.J
[I"
1..~..
<..:
~
Conditional Use Permit No. 85-12
APPLICANT, Pacific Scene, Inc.
937 Via Lata Suite 100
Colton, CA 92324
OWNER Neal T. Baker
1464 E. Highland Avenue
__. San Bernrrr.:din.2..........CA 92404
_.__ .__....- ~._,_---._ ........-._._.. _._. - no __." .__
Subject property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 5.4 acres having a frontage of approximately 200 feet
on the north side of Parkdale Drive and being located approximately
490 feet east of the centerline of Sierra Way. 'The applicant requests
approval of a condi tional use permit under authority of Code Section
19.78.020(10) to permit a 132-unit senior citizen apartment complex
in the R-3-3000, 11ultiple-Family Residential Zone.
-
EXIS'rING
___.1" AN Q...!L~~____
Vacant
Single-Family Residences
Single-Family Residences
Schools, condos .
Church
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNAII0r'.L__
Residenti.al 15-36 u/acre
Residential 4- 7 u/acre
Residential 4- 7 u/acre
Residential 15-36 u/acre
Residential 15-36 u/acre
Pfl~p_ERE
Subject
North
South
East
West
_. ZO~J1t<J.G___
R-3-3000
R-1-7200
R-1-7200
R-1-7200, R-3-l200
R-1-7200
rGEO~OG~.~- SEISM-I~ D YES-' C~LOOD HAZAR~-~~;oZONE D C SEWERS
HAZARD ZONE orno ~ ZONE lKkNo OZONE 8
-_._--~~_. -..--------..
OHIGH FI;~---- DYE:] GIRPORT ~OI~/.O YE~
HAZARO ZONE fiNO CRASH ZONE KllNO
---.- .
..J DNOT D POTENTIAL SIGNI FICANT 7- APPROVALw/modification
...... APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0
I- WITH MITiGATING - ~
-,.. MEASURES NO E.I.R. ti CONDITIONS
.- (I)
We> 0
c(.:"" D EXEMPT D EI.R. REQUIRED BUT NO U. -~ D DENIAL
f'';'~ ...,;- l\. W
;.~ ::~ SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
Of') -.:r: ~..
WITH MITIGATING ~ .,~ D CONTINUANCE TO
c.: ~~ CI)~
MEASURES ~.
>ii: ~NO 0 --~_.'-
.." D SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 0
'-- ,.... LoJ
f,;l SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E.RC. a::
EFFECTS MINUTES
----------,.-.-------
~Y;~-)
DNO
DYES
XX} NO
REDEVELOPMENT
PRO.IECT AREA
-.
-
,\.. ......_.__.'''''~.,~.'~~~~_.-.,~;.;r.-'~.................-~-'.....-...,-.-. ...J
NOli. 19a1 Rf,VISEO ,JULY 1982
SKY
~.-
.J
11..lUJU=..u'
..o-~'".._. ....o----~,..--
CiTY OF SAN BER~\~AnDINO PLP.I\%\~;NG DEt:.. t.:-iTMdfr
. CASE C.D.P. No. 85-12.
((, "">. r',~;o. Qi".\ 1-""'" rr ", "\\ n '\ .. ,.;." '1 """., r, n (('<,
( \ .'1 ..... I . . ) \ ,.!. " II I ~ t:( \\'\. , \ I '.
" ;, "''<', ...... ~-~ '>.,' .1/..1.., . U~' jU'\'\ ,i ......,...
! /1 .: .U ", ,') :: _..' "_,c,,,,"'.: '~.... j . '. ".,,' ,:
\,..,. L.. \'.:." .r....bJ U \j L, \.i H \'.c.,.'/ \J ~.~,
AGENDA ITEM _lL__._
HEARING DATE 3/6/85
____, ._.__,f.'~g,L?. _= =_
._"....___.~....-.."'.~.._ '.".'l,", ..'___ .._....-.......,_.~,. .___.___ - .''''~.-..'',___.
.",<<...'-<<'<o....,...'....,._~a<.._,....., ".....~......,.~..~..,,,,.,~'_.:, .~..,..,. "... .,.......~~.._,__.. .",...,.. .. ........,..~~,.......'~,. -,. ~,_.......-_...__...._._._'.... '-"~'.
1. The applicant is proposinp, to construct a 132-tmit senior citizen
project 011 approximat'ly 5.44 acres located on vacant land on the
north side of Parkdale Drive, east of Sierra \vay.
2. The zoning on the 5.44 acre parcel is presently R-3-3000, which would
yield a density of 14 units per acre for standard rnultiple-fmnily de-
velopment. TI1e proposed 132-unit senLor citizen project is being
developed at 24.26 units per acre. The R-3-3000 zone would permit
development at 76 units. . 'TIle proposed develofXllent is 56 m:>re units
than is permissable by zoning or in increased density of 42 percent.
3. The project is proposed to be developed with 48 one-bedroom units of
550 sqUc'l.t:'e feet each and 84 two-bedrooms of 760 square, feet each.
~-
4. The site plan indicates the proposal will have 176 spaces provided
parking spaces on site exceeding the requirement for senior citizen
parking of 88 spaces. For all intents and purposes, this project is
a senior citizens apartment complex as being there is no specific
amenity on site which states that the project will be utilized ex-
clusively by senior citizens. In previous applications for like and
sinri.lar uses, they have been proposed at 3 and 4 stories with elevators
because of the fact seniors will be liying on-site. This development
i~ being d~veloped ~s a standard apartment complex, having two stories
Wlth 66 unHs up,;ta~rs an(1 no elevators, yet is beil1G restricted to
ambulatory seniors.
5. lne floor plans submitted indicate that each unit will be supplied
with kitchens and there will be no centralized meal area as typically
found in seJ!ior citizens projects.
6. The amenities being provided are a recreation building, shuffleboard
area, pool and jaccuzzi and 11 gardening area. These will be centrally
located within the project.
7. Access to the site will be provided via a 30-foot wide driveway as the
primary entrance point adjacent to the condonri.nium development to the
east of the site. This driveway will have security entry system.
However, consideration should be given in this security entrance for
guests arriving finding that the person they are to see is not at home.
There is no provision for an escape lane provided. In such an event a
m:>torist would need to back into Parkdale Drive giving potentially
hazardous traffic situations. Arother gated ddveway will be provided
on the west adj,:"ent to the existing church site. Both driveways provide
accsss to Parkdale Drive only. ..
8. The development will have a 1.ooping drive system comprised of 30-foot,
211-foot and 20-foot wide driveways. The driveway on the west side of
buildings one throup;h three is 20 feet in width, the carport adjacent
to and west of building avo would require a 28-foot back up from those
covered spaces as established by policy of San Bernardino Fire Depar1J1lent.
'-
-
1''''''''1' II'
~-"'-"-"-"~"'--"""-'-" ..-0,,,..-...-.:..-..---- 0.....-..--......-".
C"l'V 0" .,.. 'S I' '" I I '';-1'',', 'f r--.. .." n() ,^ L A l' .. "'\ 'G D"'"1"' 1\ RT!', ~""'''I'r
' -,I i- r\~'J L.2':i;'U~!w~~.Ai'~. \]) j.."j\jfIJii\i', f=.)..\ ,iVlt:~f\J
CASE ~. U . P. No. 65.::12__
/;.'\ i ' to.;, ''''''-0-' r"-"I'\ f! f ',' ,..J 11'; r". r1 \.r>.
" \1 " ): ,-. : " 1,.,..-,,~ ',\ .'! ,I!'" : ' : ( ~ '.,.\ f. " ,_
\. 'I \. " .",\,. ,., "", , .. .
'< }j.' 1; "\. t";.'.' if.\ . . \ ,j ",.'.' j ", '.
'.,.> L. ,,' \:,.' Lc_ ,I" b ~/ /.,. \.l u j,.. tJ \-J ,..)
AGENDA ITEM 6
HEARING DATE ~6fQ5
PAGE 3.
_, _,.',,, "'L',._ .... ~ ............_,...... .......~.."",._...........__<-.~~,.--....,_.
.......'T.......,."..._".. ..__........,..-..........__..v. .,..~...,.... .'4_<_......-...."""'''''.....<>0... ...,...........e_. h...._-..',.......
'~f'.~c-:. . ._,.,_.,.~..,._ ..."'....,........<u>.-'_c..,.,,___,......... -.,............^",_.'_~....~_'. c....a.-...'.' ",>,_~""""_,,,"',. ....,.~. ..'_'". ......_ "., ....._~...,._....
Also, this \vould be the case wherever a perpindicular parking space backs
to a curb on the opposite side of the drive. 'TI1erefore, the 28-foot wide
drive 1M:lUld be required for those carports along the north proper~y line
of the project, and those carports adjacent to and west of buildings seven
and eight.
9. In addition to the ~J1n('nities mentioned in observation number 6, the site
will contain 57 percent landscaping and \vill have meanderinr; sidewalks
throughout the development. A six-foot block perimeter wall is being
proposed adjacent to property lines.
10. The surrounding land uses are that of a church to the west (R-1-7200),
single-family residE'Dtial to the north (R-1-7200), a l2-umt condo project
to the south and east (R-3-l200), a school to the east (R-1-7200) and
single-fanJily residential to the sout11 across Parkdale Drive (R-1-7200),
11. The applicant has submitted written material describing the project
proi'~)sed (to be knovln a~; Parkdale Ridr;e). 'fiJis written material is
attached [or the Conmission to review in iLS consideration of the
project.
12. The real issue before the Cotrrnission is, is the project compatible
with its surrounding land uses? To the north and south of the site
lies sinp;le-fmnily zone developed with single-family residential homes.
The existing homes have a dendty of approximately 4.5 units per acre.
'TIle proposed devcloplJ12nt has a dm . ity of 24 units per acre which is
nore than 5 time,; the density of the surroundinn- single-family homes.
The twelve-uni.t condoolinium project southeast of the subject site has
a density of 7.18 units per acre. The proposed project is nearly
3.3 times greater than the density of the condominium project.
13. The General Plan desi.gnation for the area is for 15-36 units per acre.
The proposed project conforms to the density of the General Plan, however,
the develo~nt pattern of the area is towards a lesser density than
that indicated on the General Plan.
14. Traffic potential for the project wuld not be that substantially
different than that of a 75-unit (2 bedrooms each) apartment complex
being that there would be 152 parking spaces required for such a project
compared to 176 spaces proposed.
IS, In consideration of a lesser density of the project, if the site had a
density of 18 units per acre th1.t would be an increase of 28.5 percent
which w:>uld be close to what w:>u1d be peulli.tted for a density bonus in
providing affordable housing by state mandate. At 18 Units per acre,
98 units could be developed on the site. Using the same percentage of
,_ unit mix that w:>uld provide 37 one-bedroom units and 61 t1M:J-bedroom
units thereby requiring 178 parking spaces for a senior' citizens
apartment complex. Staff contends that this alternative ,vould serve
i.
-
-~'.,.'
--
I' "ill' ,!!!'j"
,CrfY~ OF SAN EiER~lDINO P~Ji'NG DEP/;~RTMENT
CASE C.U.P. No. 85-12
C':: I':~') C";, ry' r?':)~. /lr\ ,.....'., [j' (0' \ r\ n (~
'i . i 'I, ...., ...'..... t .:.,,,, ," '} ! 1.'/\.\ Ul ( ) .;, :,'.i '. ........\
,'!., "., ')" .! \ '" " 'IJ \,10.' I
".-;../ l:-..:::}" \~~.::.'- L.:.~':l \1 /...1" \J,' .. ;.. / '\oJ ~":':;~
,.~.._..". "~..".._---",-,,....,",-
AGENDA ITEM 6 .,.._
HEARING DATE 3/6/85,__
PAGE _4._____..
...,_...._.,........__..""..,....._.._-...._-"'"._---'....._--...."""_.'~.,."".,.,._,,_.~~-._-~...
.v.,f'\.._....'...".. .,.,....._.._.....~_.'...........--_.."-... ..-.,....." ....____ ._....'"._,,_........, ~:._".,~_....,..'.... ,-" .._............._.__. ._
both the developer in providing the housinz. needed for this se~nt of the
corrrnunity and will still be nearly as compatible as possible to that of
what the present zoning (R-3-3000) would permit as a maxill1lDn density rnage
and still servc the best interest. of the land uses in the irrmediate area.
16. Senior citizens comple..xs are pennitted within the AI', C-l, C-2, C-3 and
C-4 Zones. Within the R-3 zones, the only category which is pEmnitted
Hithin the Code is rest homes. What the applicant is proposing is to
provide an apar1:n1ent complex which is pemitted by zoning but to grant
higher density by 42% and waive 64 parking spaces being that the project
will exclusively be utilized by active senior citizens, 55 years and older.
.~
"
;0-'_0-.--
....
1'''111'
o
o
o
o
"'-il'l"N:(kl\'" ,>...,.r~ ;;;;:'....~__-,."l'_..... "..~"""-~',.,...;"";., ".;.:ao""-" ......., "'!-..,;,;,~,-~"",,-"~u'a"m;':..~',' ," . ,<","'':'''~Y.'''~,''~_:~-;''''..;~'':'' ..V:..'...""""'.....,~.:';r."'.V..$.'..~ ~'. .....'!'""-~:~
C;C:'~'l? . "'''',f::- ("'} ".J F.~.<..f...,r. "I }, r 'j':' n:, f!.4I"':' r;""n ,\ I", (t....t:: ~ r.." 1"~ rrt !',.... \ ,_.' ,\ f"."',....\rl~ '''r.; ,-' .'\'.
i ~ \ U~.. \r;)~~"\I~.':J t.J.l;.:,.II'~k,i(~.i~.~tJa~J~.J ~. L~""~fJ'JuJl1~',;~? lld~';.~ .:' .J'~ I ij'"d~;.G",j ~ I~
CASE C. U-:R.., 1,1._85:.lL_
~;;~~(yr~"lr e~~~~~G 16f~AE -176785--
PAGE _._~. ____ __._
..3.,....,.~':.-...~."",H..~..';_:.,.oIi."'l:~.,i.."_'.,<: -., ....Ot~,.".-<'...,,<:...;. -',
~i'-" n n, : f'I ri.'- . n ~\ q ((,. .~ (...._.;..~.
."" [llJ.\f! ,. )) U. 1 .., ,,)
I. ! I ' .- ....','.;., l
, \, L.> J \{'"'' <,~
P
(".';)'11'
~,:'. U
,"~J.!'.f"'o.ll.::;l.".". ~:rUiM"'-;.~ .0"7,;. '''j,.""..'..": ~;~.: ,""'.'.:' ;''':' ',,'.
~:.,.c.;:'
,.~ " .:. .-
';,""""'~':"',"
:.;.;'; ~~ ;..:,'
,r .;:-~.;ra""~,~'..::"'-;~" ",".~-:'
.' ',:J. ~;......,.:"~' 't:.:,~,;,; " .\ ..'. ~,...-lIl':"..h;'i;~ '. .';~, ;~"--_<"". ...,"'.-" '.:; """"'-. . ,!.,;,,'~~~f~~:_;., ';,"'<':"."" ,....... ,-:,:",< ,:". ."~',,_'l,.,,, '__.~",':'.:'S<~""',l:;~4;.:..~
1. At the proposed demli.ty of 2Lf units per acre for the. project, the
complex would be incompatible with the surrounding land use:; being
that there is a condominium project of 7 units per .acre abutUng
the site and single-family development of 4.5 units per acre to the
north and south of the site. If the project was developed at 18 units
per acre, it \\Quld be trOre in canpliance with the R-3-3000 zoning
designation.
2. Acceptable access is being provi.ded to the site for residential uses.
There Hill be 176 parking spaces provided for the project which is
greater than the 88 spDces requ.ired for the senior citizens project
yet less tbcm the 240 required nurriber of parking spaces if developed
as a standard apartment cOllTj)lex.
'-
3. 11le floor areas proposed for. the units are substantially less than
those residentL'll uses c..xisting in the area. The condominiums adjacent
to the project site are greater than 1,000 square feet per unit. The
higher density and th-, lesser area pe,: unit may cause detrimental
impact to the economic value of the properties in the area.
4. The traffic impact: tn t.he area would be neady the same if it were
a condurninitnn project: or an aparbnent project. The size and shape
of the site is sufficient in area to successfully accomroc1ate any
fonn ot multiple housing needs.
;l
:ll"-..."W......~tIiIriW~
.~r;;.";.;,Jt,.~,~.;-~_..jfj
-r':~....~~_..;____.
~. ...J.;......iIClW'".
1111lW "'L" 1I.1
.6rr~:'-OF SAN'-iiC:t~1i'\~.~Dl~J6 Pi~'J~.&~NG [)~J.~~~Ar-{TMEN~r
CASE C.lL:P. No. 85-12
~, ,." "\ /.> ',.;-' ,., r', "-,'c.", ['\ ,.... . . :: {/;",,-. r ,. n ('.,7""', ,
' . ~ .\.. 'y ,j'" .\,. 1
' -.' '.",. " ' I'" I " ""
.. ..' , ~, "';" . I 1 , ' -. L
\;)7 ~)) U \ j L~:J U u U \::-..:J iJ \J 'C.e,J
AGENDA ITEM ~
HEARING DATE 3/6/85 __
6 .
PAGE ___._
,.__._."..".,.._...,...._..,.~",..._""'..,..,.~--~...,"...."..,~' ..~'..'..~',-.-...........'..., ....~._,..".__.........._-
-.----- ~-"._. ....". ....--,.,
'-
'--
-""''"-_..~_...-.. ..,.
._~.__..w__. .....__...~'.... ..~"'______,~_.__.".,,__.... ......."..,.....
1.
The density of the project shall not excecd 18 units per net acre.
A revised site plan shall be f;ubmitted to the Planning Deparbnent
for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
2.
All driveway widths established by Municipal Ordinance by the Fire
Department by policy for health and safety reasons shall be adhered
to.
3.
Structural setback shall be 25 from all property lines as established
by the recorded covenant.
4.
The proposed shall be rented/leased to those persons 55 years and older
for in perpetuity. A covmnnt shall be recorded with the land prior to
issuance of building nenllLts which would limit the age of occupants of
these units to be not less than 55 years of age. The covenant shall
be submitted to the Planning Department prior to recordation for review
and approval.
RECOM1ENDATTON
Staff reconmends, based upon the observ:lt:ions and the findings of fact,
that the sClior citizens apartment complex as proposed by Conditional
Use PenIlLt N:J. 85-12 be approved at a density of 18 units per acre
rather thrn the proposed 24 units per acre and that all other development
standards of an aparbnent complex project be adhered to in doing so.
Respectfcl11y submitted,
FRANK A. SCHUM!\.
Planning Direc tor
/
/.
C. - r-.
/, I ///.
//".,./........(
// ,(~.:' '/,- ',.-,.: V wJ/ I,
, '.' I,. ....." , '.." . '-'.:'f'
mMARD L. -GlJND~ '/ .. ,
Senior Planner
tJ
.(!].---"
,'j .
,
i'
. I
I' ...... ,~ ,
.
t'"'
'-
o
o
o
r"c'~;~:V"'''~~;F~-''SA~j '''i~'~2!i~L~3[:'~:1U;i~~J~')~'m.'----:::;~~: ;;:-;;:~-
-.. V,....t. r. ~II'~~ 1\[',".'"")' ~'~".., "''',. ~"lr',,:-:""r\ ,.,',",.'\....1"''''/;..'1> AC NDA ITEM 6
,,-<,' 1\\,,\1'''1/'' "Ill' "..,n L'll'I,..,<..I, ,'" Ii ...::: --.-..--
.e~ ~~:.,~:~~::~:~~~_~~',::'~~~,~~::~'~.U.~~~U..~:W ':~ .:..~~.~. . ,,~~..~,:~:IN~. .~~6~ _ ~,~~:~:;:~,.
If'1''><J>:<.l'!.~:l-.;,,,,_-.,~..-,,~......-n:',',,',"'''''''.''-,VY'~,,'., ,'.~"'~- ""..<:~.,"'!.r '~'''.C''';''''''''~IJI!.1''', ',. .~.r~'.'"'-<',,"''';-,s... ,';';"'~'~""}_,.,-.:,...~._,.:,:.- .r.; \"")t.~~~.d!2'Sr,<~~"-,,,~.,:t,--_~'r.~
RESl DENT! AL DEVELOPMENT
----------_._--
1. C.D.P. No. 85-12 shall be in effect for a period of 12 months from the
date of approval by the Planning Commission and/or Planning Department.
However, if no deve10pmeni has been initiated at the end of the 12-month
time period the approval shall expire. Additional time may be approved
by the Planning Commission upon request of the a;;Jlicant prior to expira-
tion of the 12:month time period. Expiration Ddte: March 6. 1986.
COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR P.R.D.
a. The Covenants, Condit.ions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the
tract maps. The CC & R's shall include liability insurance and methods
of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private
roads, and exterior of all buildings. The CC&R'S shall also include
a statement that no radio frequency antenna shall be included within
the complex except for central antenna systems.
b. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a cor-
poration, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has
been formed ~/ith the right to assess all properties individually owned
or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the
common areas and common f aci 1 iti es in the development, such assessment
power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with
authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually
available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under
recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all
owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to
meet. changing cost.s of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded
CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by
the City as conditions to approval. The developer shall submit evi-
dence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of,
the Commission prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not
apply to land dedicated to the City for public'purposes.
c. Every owner of d dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to
such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the com-
mon areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting
membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities.
d. Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways,
shall be provided for in the CC&R's.
e. The CC&R's shall contain wording prohibiting the storage or parking
of trailers, boats, campers, motor homes, and similar vehicles outside
-L' th, ':"lfl'd:_'_~ "'''"_ __ _
MAY '04
.S.R. FORM A
..PACE I OF 5
o
I ' "'~'
o
o
o
(-' r;i:'f",r""iJi i'-"i;:;;/:. L:~""-l3 i;:~:;,~"[~;-\rf.~ niu';: :;"tJ"'''~''~-'~:::E~P~~:~~;. NO~ ~85-l2
......'..,...,f-' [' r,',,')f.\. f'.,'.',"" ~""""",':.'.(~ ''''''''")::'''',\/''''''''\,'''''''>(",':,' AGEND:'\ ITEM 6
i~j) M . ,\,\.:.j ", .1:,1 1~ ':'-', ....{f l~-l'!': .' ,..~j , I-~ ,.1. II ;-" ' 3/h/'
~.~,~::~~,~~,!:.tl,!'~':" .,.... ,.':.',"~~".;::',:~,W::.~\)~~~,U,~~~,.,r,:~~:) ,.,._,^.,.~,E~:~:J~"~~~~~!~=-
2.
'-
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
'-.--
;'''~'''''"---",,.','..~'._'_-''' ~~ _'...,,', ." ,~,..."","",l.~'~':'.""'.\t.". .", ,> . ..~."~.~..,,.....' .... :.".........'....;~h"...'-.,..,,,:_.,. '00' .\""-.;...:t".i,,.;.;:o""'~_!.>r..-"''''''U' ...."
PARKING:
a. This development shall be required to maintain a mlnlmUm ofnunher of
parking spaces. as required for a standard apartment complex
b. All parking and driving aisles shall be surfaced with two inches of AC
over a suitable base or equivalent as approved by the City Engineer.
Parking spaces shall be striped and have wheel stops installed at lea~t
three feet from any building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway.
c. ~~enever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across an alley
from property zoned residential, a solid decorative wall six feet in
height shall be el'ected and maintained along the property line so as to
separate the parking area physically from the residentially zoned pro-
perty, provided such wall shall be three feet in height when located
within the required front or street side yard setback. \,'nere no front
or street side yard is required, such wall shall be three feet in
height when located \~ithin ten feet of the street line. Said wall
shall be located on t.he north , south , east , west or
peripheral__,_. property lines.
d. Hhenever an off-st.reet parking area is located across the street from
property zoned for residential uses, a solid decorative wall or.equiva-
lent landscaped herm not less than three feet in height shall be
erected and maintained along the street side of the lot .not closer to
the street than the requi red depth of the yard in the adjoi ni ng resi-
dent.ial area. No fence or wall locat.ed in the front setback shall
obscure the required front setback landscaping. Said wall shall be
located on the north , south , east , west , or
peri pheral___ properTy-Ii nes. -- --
All parking areas and vehicle storage areas shall be lighted during hours
of darkness for security and protection.
Recreational vehicle storage areas shall be screened by at least a six-foot
high decorative wall with screened gates.
There shall be provided for each unit, within the garage or carport, or
other specifically designated area, a loft or other usable storage area
with a minimum of 150 cubic feet in additi'on to standard utility storage.
Traffic bumps provided on the .interior private roads shall be subject to
the City Traffic Engineer's approval.
A commerci a I-type dri ve approach, as shown on Standard Drawi ng No. 204 or
equivalent, shall be constructed at each entrance to the development.
Location and design shall be subject to approval of the Engineering
Di vi si on.
"
MAY 84
,S.R. fORM A
,PAGE 2 Of 5
"..-
4.....
_'-"'fo":"'.""~_
~
'11.JI.11"...tI"'I.1'"'
000 0
(""'Cg~(Vw'O'll~;~~'~;~:,~'~i'"~"[D, k:'b"~'~\1!:\~i,.)'D:,i)".~' . '-::'~~'~U;"'l:~~;:;~~'~
"."".'-"". r \1' "') [\ '. .,~",,~ r'"""...,....'.'.l ",.".u""''''f' ',1""" ~rr"(,,, t,GENDA ITEM ..2.........__
~,~ t! r: t)f~:1 JII\~t -"~lJJ' '1 ,.~,.:<f( 'I',: li:y<<(....U\1 :/"lIi \d p '~'" 3"6:'18
e.:~:.~~"..~::v:,~- _..~.....<:. Il :.:.,,~"...~..'~~..~,~~.,":=~:: .~.~,~ ~)~".=~,,:,~/~~I~,~w~~.~~~,~.-=~
ialf,.',:MO:" ,"".,....-....'....l'lltC'"'.. .,-..' -1n~',~'.,,,' ';. ,,,."_',,,,,",I';,'.~ '.....~,.: ,~.t,__,~"".~C1....',Q:;,~\';'''t.,'<<':~'''-:...1N'._ ..j,;.. ,-"","....:A.fI!'.. iIn.:.',,'-'" ..'.: "~,.1,~' , . .'~-,-U't:.~r~'.", ",,,,\jl',~,,'..V" ~.;.-:--.
8.
Prior to issuance of any building permit, access rights shall be granted to
the City for the purpose of allowing access over the private drives within
the project for all necessary City vehicles including fire, police, and
refuse di sposal vehicles, and any other emergency vehicles. The documents
coveri ng thi s matter shall be prepared by the owner and approved by the
Planning Department.
All refuse storage areas are to be enclosed with a decorative wall.
Locati on, si ze, type and desi gn of wall are subject to the approval of the
Planning Department and Division of Public Services Superintendent.
I.
'~
9.
Energy and noise insulation shall cor;;.:ly wi .:;1 all state and local require-
ments.
10.
LANDSCAPI NG:
'--
a. Three copies of a master l~ndscap~ plan shall be submitted to the
PI anni ng Department/ P ark and Recy'eati on Department for revi ew and
approval. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the
foil owi n g :
1) Size, type, and location of plant material proposed.
2) Irrigation plan.
3) Such other alternate plants, materials and design concepts as may
be proposerl.
4) Erosion control plans.
b. Tree varieties and exact locations will be determined prior to planting
by the Di rector of the Park and Recreati on Department or hi s/her
designee. A minimum number of one-inch caliper/IS gallon,
multibranched trees shall be planted within the parkway for each of the
following types of lots, as per the City's specifications:
1) Cul-de-sac lot -- one tree;
2) Interior lot -- two trees;
3) Corner lot -- three trees.
c.
To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, sur-
faces of all cut slopes mor.e than five feet in height and fill slopes
more than three feet in height shall be protected by planting with
grass or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding 15 feet in vertical
height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten
~l--
MAY 84
i.
"'._....__"_......~~:.,.,',."\'J..~,..i,r'''';~_...1!.iIt~
?'"~.,.".,,..~-
~t_."....~._.'..-.-..-
, S.R. fORM A
. 'PAGE 5'Of!S
,
o
I'"'''' "
o
o
o
:.,iA:~:t, ": '-_',')II\'~~,i;!~- "
"'",.""'i,-r"'.:r~~;,
. ";'.---r.,_.~.{,_...,'J:.1!ft:"':":'''''A~,'_''''''-''.<.I':<f''''',,,,,"-, :>;,'-:'.:v. .....
~.-"'-l:l'>'"".....v:M"~_;noQ'..~....,,....,.......,.. .
(...'...."..'."....
.~,,~. ......-., --'
errv
,
f'f.'i::
~:j 1
Clo !' "J'
..;.;,);/~~
~')"..,--~r'>.'..._u l\"'''''~)h-''nf'''[.'
~.,:;) L::. ~ I \1 t.; <J I~'Oi ~ u fl.t) J ~ ~:j '~J
CASE C.D.P. No. 85-1?=-.-
: t,~.,.,'':.~ n r\ IJr:~ "r ;...,t~-.:};. l',;r_,j~.-'.ff...), n rHw.......~T~..~. ,-1; :::l"",. f'IL.'-..~c,('f.-t.. AGENDA ITr 'I~ 6
i~)~' C,.I;,;'H Il...."i.':j) I';-I,~\\,'>,l:'(',!/'!,"',';,.>.,,:;" 11",< ,. ,.'.. ------..-~=
~.,,: .~~:,~~,:.:~.:.,~~~::,~.~, ,..~. u .~_~.:_:.,:~:,:~:::~..~:: .....~ ~_~.,:~,:,~~.).. ~_,."~~~,::1,1::>,,~~?~ .-j6.~L~::::~-.--:....
:u.J.>i<<-_r._......","..-VI,......,.~>6I<-......,.,;.';oI.>Il.:,or.~"j.,',.;...,.t._.,...,.'r'-'...'.,.....
';':;;'-'. >';"','-.' :~'.'~ .... .~""'w..c.;,,,..., ,...~_.",.;.......'.;r.._)._~~.....~<...",.....~:P...'..i"": ~., ....._~. .1'>-'.;
11.
12.
13.
'--
14.
15.
16.
17.
\.......
MAy'Ei~"
The developer shall obtain Planning Department. approval of the visual or
engi ncer! I1g design of the proposed wall.
When grJded slopes occur within or betl~een individual lots, the slope face
shall be a part of the downhill lot. Exceptions to this requirement must
be approved by the City Engineer.
Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required by the City Engineer
in order to reduce the amount of bare soil exposed to precipitation.
Camp 1 i ance with all recommend a ti ons of the Geology Report sh all be requi red
(if applicable).
Any clubhouse, SVlimming pool, spa, putting green, picnic areas or other
amenities shall be installed in the manner indicated on the approved site
plan.
Dur! ng constructi on the Ci ty Engi neeI' may requi re a fence around all or a
portion of the periphery of the tract site to minimize wind and debris
damage to adjacent properties. The type of fencing shall be approved by
tbe Cit.y Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and
dust control.
No roof-mounted equ i pment sh all be placed on any bull di ng un 1 ess screened
as specifically approved by the Planning Department (except for solar
collection panels).
Within 75 feet of any single-family residential district, the maximum
beight of any building shall not exceed one-story or 20 feet. unless the
Commission determines that due to unusual topographical or other features,
such restrictive height is not practical.
All utility lines shall be installed underground subject to exceptions
ap,lroved by the Planning Department and the City Engineer.
No certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to compliance with these
Standard Requi rements as well as all provi si ons of the San Bernardi no
Muni ci pa 1 Code.
i,
__.,.;....'~__~____~..-,.'..,__.._~I "~.-'1__ ....
..,....,._.'"1...,...._.;",....,_""__
--'..-,"~
,'S"~. FOiCM A
~ PAGE 5 Of 5
II.l.,ll" '"
(Sll~rv''''Ob= "~i::~'~~'-[~~~'i]~2~i"~;")~rrj'oO"~~-::-~.P. No. (Q~~;-
"'''', ~;'I" Q 1\ nee,''''' t... !j"').r:'")
'-:- '. I; '" ',-,\ , ii' ~\ f',; : ~.
,,,;,) U " "~\,,I) ,''\.U \t~)
I..";.>;r-('~ir"!t'" ~GF--"i?t!'.,,:,,:. t;r;<'o>"'i~\ nr-......~
: -~!1...1\.'.~. .,~I;,..,~ir"h:'j::il.'\liJ<...~ II .::;)
I, w.l'!UIJ _'r~''',.:~iJ U"".''''I~''''I.~.~,!",1J '-..I t '-J.
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
6
3/6/85_
11
----,.-;a~,.......-..."""'."'Il<_lJ_..'-_.r"';on...""'....._.....,..'.O:I:r;"i'......
-c.-"",:l.'..'1l:,...,...,1o&.,...-__.,.....~~:'''''''..r-,,..'..'. :.';' "'~W""''' 'iI:\:oo......~."..,..:.~,:~...........'Qo::r:'.~. ....".,.-...,~~,.~.;~""_~..-'. ,-,,,--,"".l
:.',.,' ".,~...___.."",~.' ,~.,'.>""'_' :_... ,..... '>\...' .-,n' -,,,...\P~--......-.......__......__...~.,,'-.. ,.-.......-.-........--.....
f'._
ENGINEERING DIVISION:
1. All grading shall be done in compliance with Title 15 of the Munici-
pal Code and the requirements of the City Engineer. The site/plott
grading plan submitted for a building permit shall contain sufficient
ground elevations (both existing and proposed), building pad and
finished floor elevations, grading slopes, and gradients to define
the amount of grading to be done and the means of draining the site.
2. All drainage from the development shall be directed to a public
dedicated street, alley, or drainage facility. If this is not
feasible, proper draina~e facilities and easements shall be pro-
vided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
,-.
3. Proper flood protection meo':ures shall b(' provided to the satis-
faction of the City Engineer. All plans necessary to accomplish
this requirement shall be completed by the developer's engineer
and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
4. The development is located within 200 feet of an existing sewer
m'lin, therefore, it shall be connected to the sewer system and
shall be so shown on thc plans prior to issuance of a building
permit.
5. Street Improvements and Dedications:
a. Improvement plans shall be completed by the developer's
engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
b. Any work to be done within City right-of-way shall be done
in accordance with City Standards or as approved by the
City Engineer and shall be shown on the plans prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
'-
....'- ,~
...
-
-.
1885 sky
. 'J
I' "'Ii!liI!!lI I" _1
o
o
o
P ARK!2AL~.-!U l2..GE._ RETI HEt1EN_T__ 1. I VI!l~_CONCE:~'T
In formulating the parkdale Ridge concept, Pacific. Scene started
'-
with the basic premise that we wanted to create a product which was
superior to others in the seniors retirement market. To gather
market data, we have toured many existing seniors projects through-
out the Unit€,d States. Our conclusions regarding most of the exis-
ting products in the market are that many have an institutional
character, require large up-front cash endowments from prospective
tenants, provide very small individual living quarters (250-350 sq.
ft.) and, in general, do not have the qualities necessary to create
a "pride of occupancy" feeling for their seniors residents. Sur-
prisingly, despite :hese undesirable aspects, many of the projects
surveyed have lengthy waiting lists of prospective tenants.
In contrast, the parkdale Ridge retirement living concept offers a
quality residential resort-style environment for active seniors
through sensitive design, gracious amenities, and a strong manage-
mnnt philosophy which fosters the residents' pride in residing in
the project. In short, resident.s will be proud of their "home" at
Parkdale RicJge.
The following is a summary of the amenities included with the park-
dale Ridge development:
'-
The location is carefully selected, based upon market analy-
sis. Most projec1c; are in close proximity to commercial
activitiC's, perso ,1 services, and medical care. Many
projects are in fact located within walking distancq to
major shopping areas, hospital, churches. and public
transportation. parkdale Ridge meets all these criteria.
Site layouts for all projects take into consideration the
particular aesthetics of each specific site. However,
attempts are made to configure all projects around a
central recreation/community center. Our studies indi-
cate this to be a preferable layout since it promotes
project security, the social interaction of residents,
and efficient construction.
_ Parkdale Ridge ;ncludes 1- and 2-bedroom suites, which
are fully self-contained including kitchens, baths, and
substantial storage. Square footages for the units are
550 square feet for the I-bedrooms and 760 square feet
for the 2-bedroom residences.
_ The inviting, tastefully furnished commons area of park-
dale Ridge is the focal point of the project. The ~om-
mons area is specifically designed to encourage soc~al
interaction among the resi.dents. It is meant to be the
"action spot" which gives the community its vitalit'f and
character. Activities located in the commons area 1n.
''-. clude the entry, foyer, kitchen, card room, mail room,
library, lounge,.offices, and restrooms.
jl
o
!
,
I
I
\ I
\ I
II
\ I
II
l
I
I
, I
I'
II!
, t.
"
I!
: I
\ I
i 1
, ,
i I
:l!
'Ii
",
;i
:1
'\
.
I
'I
II
,I
.I
Ii
I
"'''''''''~_'.",>,",'~_'~'' ..._,~,:~.,~~ ,:'!"':"'_ ~~....~'~t"."'<'l" ,~~""4__,,,,,:''''',~.11 !'->~r~ ;';:"'~,~'_~_'J.:,~~~,~~;..._~~ .,.~~~~ '.... ..,.'.'. '.'~ ~":"";~'~:'-""'~.:.~"'.: .
"
...""..'.:J'I'1.r.....""':.::::- ;?::::"'>-=:--"-'~~_'~.~~:T""~.~,,,,r.7
:J
1
~.
]
]
.]
:]
]
] .'
]
"J ,-
,-"
1
J
J
:I
.]
.~
J
J ~
:1
11111111 'I' I"
o
o
o
o
- Plush courtyard and grounds landscaping will create a
park-like atmosphere for the enjoyment of project resi-
dents. Water features such as fountains are included
to enhance the Parkdnle Ridge feeling. Plots Dre avail-
able for those who wish to garden. In addition, two
shuffleboard courts are available for residents to use
at any time. There is also a swimming pool and spa,
and barbeques scatter the project.
- There is no entrance fee in a Pacific Scene project.
The only special requirement for residents is that
they be fully ambulatory and require no specialized
medical or nursing care. Residents pay one monthly
rent which covers the rental of their unit and access
to all of Parkdale Ridge's amenities, social events,
and services.
- A 9-12 passenger mini-van will be furnished to pro-
vide t,ansportation for residents to medical appoint-
ments, shopping trips, planned recreation events, and
special activities.
- A full-time pro.~rty manager/social director will be
living on site to assist project residents, supervise
other staff, and to handle leasing activities.
- The project is completely surrounded by a security fence,
and entrance is only permitted ~here security gates ~re
located and residents have a gate card to gain entrance.
Sm1t1ARY
---'-
In conclusion~ Pacific Scene is proud and excited about parkdale
Ridge in San Bernardino. It offers a gracious lifestyle for the
increas ing number. of active senior.s who' wish to shed ho'ne owner-
ship responsibilities and yet maintain their personal independence.
The quality of location, design and management offered by Parkdale
Ridge promises to make them the preferred address in active seniors
housing over the next fe"1 years. We look forward to the challenge
of maintaining the Pacific Scene standard of excellence in this
expanding and vastly needed housing product.
j,
"
0"
o
1
.I
J
j
1
..f
I
j
'-
1
"
1
]
J
.,
I ~.
OJ
'"
o
o
Clm'flJ'JC!I'i'lON OF Pi\H:;n7IT,g HIlleE
N; lItl ACTIVE SENJO'. C011t'HJ:H'j',{
o
In ()rdc~:r. to (~nt:L~\1st. to the City of SilT) Bernard:i.no thnt t'Pi1l7kc1alc:
Hidqe t1 \,,r:i..ll become: and relllain (l viablc"., iJet ive senj or eit :tzen
(:om[""nity, Pacific Scene propoc:cs the followin(j be acIdee) to the
CondiLio:1al Ur:e Permit cJocu;ucnt prc'parcd by the City of San Her--
narc1:i.no:
1) 'l'be project approved must rent onl~' to tho~;c pe:csons
of the age of 55 years old or granter for a period
running us long as the Conditionnl.Use Permit is in
effect.
2) The monitoring, screening, and lease-up must be
J1i1nc11rxl by the [;aiel OHner' of tbe propel:ty or an
affiJiaLe cornpdny as lon,) as the Conuitional U~;e
I'(!rroi_t i.s in E~ff(;ct.
3) On an annual basis from the date of final notice
rd. completion of t.1H~ ::;ai(1 pro:ject, t'he O\'!!JC:)~ o:c
<in affilii"tc c:ornpin,y mm:t provie]e Uw City of Sun
Bcr.n(J~~diTlo till r(~nt rollf:~, leasing inforlnat:ion,
ilnc1/or "Certific.clt.ion of Ago" statement. (Exhibit:.
Ilh") ,as sigr)(~d by i:llC tUl"lJuts prior to Ot:(:Up~11CY~
Pile:, r ic Se(~ne, Inr.. il9r('e~; tlwt both th(, Condit:i on,~, 1. Use Perm:; t
c10CUlll'::llt ilIl,l tlle~;t' restrictions, :Uem:.; in, 2, and 3 Hicntione:d
ubove, which the Cit.y of Sill) ,,,,rn,n-dino i" prupilrinD, be re-.
cordecl i1r: a covenCtnt running "Iith .the lan'l on the elate thi.lt.
building permits Dre issued to the owner.
In conclusion, thi~; procedure ~1i.ll ens\u'e thnt the City of San
Burnnrclino has the powor to monitor the project by certified
cloclm,p.nt.at::i.on in the following ways:
1) 'i'hut th" condit io!", 1. use permit.t.ed on the site is
fo110w8'. per tbe City of Snn Bernardino require-
ment!;.
2) ~~e project i~ monitored as and wi.11 remain as
senior citizen rentill housing in the future to
those persons of the age of 55 yenrs old or
gr~'ilter .
j,
;:
;:
'.
..
0
1
1
]
I
J
]
]
]
]
]
'--
J
:]
:tl
j
]
''}
"
]
J
'1 ~-
'}
'.
_ II
o
EXIIIllIT "/I"
o
EXAMPLE OF /I
CER'l'IFIC/lTI2~_OF AG~
I'"'' '"
o
I, ' hereby understand that, in order
to rentan- apartment-~tP~irkdale Ridge in San Bernardino, Cali-
fornia, I must be of the age of 55 years old or greater by the
date of occupancy in the said project. It is understood that
by signing this .Certification of Age", I presently am or will
be 55 years old or greater at the time I occupy any rental suite
at the Parkdale Ridge Apartments.
Authorized Sigl:'clture----
k
Date
.J
l'I"I"_!!Ill I" _.
.",
~a Parkdalc Homeowners AOciation
172-194 E. Parkdale
San Bernardino, CA 92404
Phone 882-2229
o
o
'-.
February 25, 1985
(.,
Planning Commission
City of San Bernardino
San Bernardino City Hall
300 North "D" street
San Bernardino, California 92418
Gentlemen:
We have received your Notice of Hearing for Conditional Use
Permit No. 85-12, copy of which I attach for your identifi-
cation.
'~
Your notices, however, were not received until Saturday,
February 23, 1985. The hearing date is set for only a few
das later, on March 6, 1985. This does not give us suffi-
CiCllt time to investigate the application and determine ex-
actly what is being planned. We need time for investiga-
tion and preparation.
It is respectfully requested that the hearing date be con-
tinued to some suitable future date, not less than three
weeks later.
Sincerely yours,
VILLA PARKDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
.~. ? 1 ) g
By: ~ 7--'"
;/fi tLt .7., -~--<J
AL~EN REID, President "
/ -......
AR:DE
Attachment
'-'-
j,
,
I'"~
o
o
o
r
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATION
CASE r \I P JlR'i_ 1?
HEARING DATE ?'/fi/R'i
""
J
,-
'0
. e:Jlm R.' 1~t:J~~ R-TI I
R-3<<O~Q':=~ 3 ~S~
T ~BR~~~I~ ~B~
R-I ll: ::l~ ~m;J ~~ ~.~; .
. ~ N ;:l 1'1-3 ., ST
.C-3A ..:., I " 1ZlL...rt-.LJ i'l-
I C-3A I ~~ C-3A
~ ~;~. ~",-" '
.. H R-3 ~ '. R-I
R-I
-, . ~ :1t..
R-3
R-3 > ~ R-I
;; ~
~ .
~ 1'l-3
~
M)
,"=800'
iA C-3A
R-I
I
. R-I
J BEl-'
z
..
"
or
...
~
;<
. ~
~ R'.',
~~
~
.~.:"~ Oi "_.
R-I