HomeMy WebLinkAbout18-Mayor's Office
.. ..
From: W. R. "Bob" Holcomb, Mayor
, .
CIT()OF SAN BERNARDIO - REQUEO' FOR COUNCIL ACON
REC'D -ADMIN. Otf. .
, Subject: Pilot Neighborhood Justice Center
1985 FES 21 AM 91 cst and Muscott.
Dept:
Date: 2/20/85
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
At the September 17, 1985 Council Meeting, the pilot neighborhood justice center
was discussed and approved in principle with an estimated annual fundin9 of
$20,000 from the County and $20,000 from the City.
Recommended motion:
Approve the funding and the pilot program from Police Salary Savings for the
remainder of this fiscal year and place in the Police Budget next fiscal year
(FY85/86)
Contact parson:
W. R. "Bob" Holcomb
Phone:
5051
Supporting data attached: yes
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
$20,000
Ward:
Sauroe: Police Budget FY 85, $5,000
~ / ~Y-8b, ~I~,OOO
Finance: .p3L-__ C J::... ~
Council Notes:
II.nann~ I'a~ M^ N:-
1'11'1 . I' ,
, .
. Ci8...M SAN BIRNARDIIo - REQUQT FOR COUNCIL AcOIoN
STAFF REPORT
Proposed action to establish a pilot Neighborhood Justice Center at 10th and
Muscott.
As an adjunct to our community-based policing projects. I would recommend the
establishment of a pilot Heighborhood Justice Center at 10th and ~~scotto This
center would operate in a manner similar to other centers that I have visited in
Houston, Texas and would provide neighborhood input on minor criminal matters
that could best be resolved in the neighborhood, rather than in our overcrowded
courts and judicial systemo
I have discussed the matter with both toe County Probation Office and the pre-
siding judge of the Juvenile Court. They both feel that the concept has merit.
Supervi sor Hammock has indicated that he would ask the Board of Supervisors for
half of the operational costs.
M
11.1 I ..1. ~. I J
. .
PR~ATION DEPARTMENT 0
,.............. --~ -..;
JERRY D. HILL
Chi.' County I'rohrion Offk:.,
-..
~ .i. . A ~
."' --~'':: : "-'- . ~
O .",','.
.' -".
,.. ;::.:" '.. . County of Sin Bernardino
~l.. ..' . ".c.. -,. r..- ~ ..... '. . 0,,-.. , , ~ . ::.;...-::..: ---
--...:......,......,.~.. -.-.-........-.........,-..........--- --
o
~ -
. - .
. ., ...~
.;.. .,4.,-
',; /'! ;;'
...,..-,
Ii1I 176 WOIt Filth Stroot
Son Bornordino. CA 92416.0460
CLAUDE T. MANGRUM
Aui.r.nr Chief Counry I'rob.tion Officer
February 4, 1985
o 236 Eolt MI. Viow
Borltow. CA 92311
o 13260 Control Avonuo
Chino. CA 91710
o 17780 Arrow 8oulovord
Fontono. CA 92336
o 1020 WOlt Sixth Stroot
Ontorio. CA 91762
o 14466 Civic Drivo
Victorvill" CA 92392
The Honorable W. R. "Bob" Holcomb
Mayor, City of San Bernardino
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Dear Mayor Holcomb:
In reI Neighborhood Mediation Center
This department, in cooperation with Councilman Daniel Frazier, Chief
Gonzales and City staff, has completed the work necessary to implement
the Neighborhood Mediation Center. The proposal has been written,
a copy of which is attached for your review.
To begin the program, it is necessary for the City to officially approve
the project and provide the funding previously agreed upon. The approval
or the City Council and the advancement or the city's portion of the
program funding should be forwarded to the Probation Department.
Sincerely,
Cel Judge Morris
Supervisor Hammock
Councilman Frazier
Chief Gonzales
"CO I I , r.....
;s" \-- ,--_. -. '-1..(,. 'r.
0''>/ "'r " ";'"
,....,. liT: (: 'V
~. n..u.. ..i) \.9
-=.-i FEa 512351J'-
S:\ M.,Y(.lTS OFFICE TO
c,;} 01 San Bernardino
!//;~~~~
JDH:sp
..,
~ .
00'
PROBATION DEPARTMENT 0
. ~ ,. ~... "" ~
____ _...____........-..:~ ~. .-...- . .~w......:...o....
o
. 0
,0 ","I
.,,;....0,
t... ;:;....:".. . County of San Bernerdino
- .....IJi""-_ F'~;-: - ''-' ....::..;. ~::
","-'t. I~Y-.;
~(".'.4
January 25, 1985
.,~ ,"f.", lJ 176 Wost Fifth Stroot
.~, ";,, :... Sin Bernardino. CA 9241&.0460
-,.1..1.. w
0 235 Elst Mt. View
Bor.,ow, CA 9231 I
0 1326D Control Avonuo
Chino, CA 91710
0 17790 Arrow Boulovord
Fontono, CA 92335
0 1020 Wo.t Sixth 5t,oot
Onto,io, CA 91762
0 14455 Civic Drive
Victorvill., CA 92392
JE RRY O. HI LL
Chief County "'o"',;on Officer
CLAUDE T. MANGRUM
Au;".", Chief County P,oINIrion Offiur
Honorable W. Ro .Bob. Holcomb
Ci tyHall
3DO North .D. Street
San Bernardino, CA 9241B
Dear Mayor Holcomb:
I am pleased to forward to you our final program proposal for the Neighborhood
Mediation Center. This project overview is designed to present our program
goals. objectives and a general operational format. Although, much more
specific than the rough draft presented to you last November, this overview
will allow for the needed program flexibility to further tailor the program
to the needs of the neighborhood it will serve.
As a member of the Advisory Board, your continued guidance and
assure the success of this innovative and significant project.
of this overview and comments as to any areas of concern would
appreciated 0
support will
Your review
be greatly
I
support 0
Officer
WAK:fld
rj~~
~f(rp' '>. '<:~.
~ (.(""'(.:.) \,."
V JAN 2C -:,'c-
1..,/..
M,,) i..'j~'S Or;'~E
~::\ ell) oj ~an e"ttllrJJ . .....
,/' no. ':',
/, A',.
:'l''!?--r- . \.
), ~\
".i \ \~
",., H
. .
0"
,
o
o
o
~
NEIGHBORHOOD MEDIATION CENTER
Project Overview
Neighborhood Justice Center
There exists in the community of San Bernardino, as in any city of sizeable
population, a large body of conflicts and problems between community residents
which are neither resolvable by the residents themselves nor appropriately
dealt with by the civil or criminal justice systems. These conflicts include,
but are not limited to, domestic disputes, landlord/tenant conflicts. student/
teacher conflicts, arguments between neighbors over various incidents or
situations, employee/employer disagreements and certain forms of harassment.
While some of these situations may involve violation of local ordinances or
even minor penal code violations. they are of a nature not significant to the
Justice System. Nevertheless, they are a source of stress for the parties
involved and for the community as a whole. Continuing unresolved. these
conflicts tend to deteriorate the social bonds of the community and can lead
to invidual incidents of violence or long-term damage to a neighborhood's
esteem and cohesiono
I
Historically, many of these interpersonal disputes occurring in communities
were settled within the extended family by religious figures or by an informal
community leadership structure. The declining influence of these institutions
has been a factor leading to the emergence of the Courts as the central
institution for dispute resolution. The adversarial process often neglects to
consider the complexities of interpersonal conflicts. addressing only guilt
or innocence, .winner- or -loser-. Our present system can do little to provide
guidance, instruct or model.
An innovative adjunct of the justice system offers a solution to many of these
problems. To that end the San Bernardino Probation Department is engaged in the
development and implementation of a Community Mediation Centero The center
which is scheduled to operate for twelve months as a pilot, demonstration
project is a cooperative venture of the County and City of San Bernardino.
Although new to the San Bernardino area, the mediation concept has been in
existence for approximately fifteen years through the United Stateso
'''' '"',
.
0"
Page Two
o
o
o
During a visit to Houston, Texas in 1984, San Bernardino Mayor Bob Holcomb was
impressed with the success of a conflict resolution project in that city. The
Mayor returned to San Bernardino with an interest in establishing a similar
project in his home cityo Initial meetings revealed a broad base of interest
and support from key individuals and agencies. These included, Presiding
Judge of the Juvenile Court, patrict Morris, City Councilman, Dan Frazier,
County Supervisor, Robert Hammock, Police Chief, Ben Gonzales and Chief Probation
Officer, Jerry Hill. Subsequent meetings further broadened the base of support
and led to the development of the project's advisory board.
The model chosen for this project is unique in several ways. The most impressive
is the fact that so many agencies have agreed to cooperate in a joint venture
for the good of the community.
Granted, not all legal matters can or should be handled through mediation or
alternative methods of conflict resolutiono
Nonetheless, most minor neighborhood
conflicts can be mediated without the need for Court or coercive action. Juvenile
cases are an exampleo The project will primarily address the problems of
juveniles within the target area, but will also include some minor adult offenders
and domestic disputeso The goal is to investigate the effectiveness of conflict
resolution as an alternative to more formal methods of processing complaints 0
This limitation in scope is necessary to assure reasonable success during the
.developmental stageso
The neighborhood is where the responsibility for conflict resolution should
first fall. Following in the shadow of success demonstrated by the San Bernardino
Police Department's Community Service Bureau, a project will be located at
1650 10th Street, San Bernardino 0 This location offers a central location in
a neighborhood that contains the resources necessary for the success of such
a community oriented programo Guidance for the program will be offered by a
project advisory board (composed of community and government leaders) and by
an experienced probation officer acting as project director.
Program Goals:
16 To introduce mediation as an alternative to traditional, sometimes
inappropriate methods of resolving conf licts.
,
.
~ge
Three
o
o
o
2. To interface with and involve the community in the mediation process.
3. To provide mediation skills training to community volunteers.
4. To encourage use of voluntary mediation methods by the community.
5. To act as a resource referral center.
Types of Disputes:
For the present juvenile and minor, adult or domestic cases, will be accepted
for mediation. The following recommendation will govern, 1) The general types
of disputes considered appropriate for mediation, 2) whether a dispute is
mediatable, 3) disputes to be excluded.
I. Disputes Appropriate for Mediation:
10 Neighborhood disputes involving at least one juvenile.
2. Minor criminal acts of adult offenders,ioe. shoplifting, vandalism,
harassment, trespassing, simple battery/assault.
3. Recovery of money and propertyo
40 Family disputes (especially parent/child).
II. Criteria for Determining Whether Dispute is Hediatable
The following criteria will be used to determine whether a particular
dispute is mediatable and should be accepted by the center:
1. The parties have a stake in resolving the mattero
20 The parties share some degreee of responsibility for the conflict.
3. Options exist for resolving the situation, ioeo a dispute exists and
there is room for compromise.
,
40 There is a likelihood that both parties will consent to participation
in med~ation.
50 There is a presumption that cases involving the potential for serious
violence are not mediatable.
6. Disputes with minor, if other criteria are met are media table in the
absence of parental objection. Parents will routinely be advised in
all cases. However, in no case will the Center provide services to
a child below the age of fourteen (14) without parental participationo
70 Parties must have had an ongoing relationship prior to the dispute,
e.g. neighbors, friends, relatives.
"'"
.
~~e
Four
o
o
o
III. Cases Which Will be Excluded.
1. Disputes involving s~rious violence or potential for serious violence.
2. Apparent psychotic or emotionally disturbed behavior on the part of
either part Yo
30 Severe imbalance of power between parties.
4. Disputes involving child or spousal abuse, sexual molestation,
substance abuse or disputes involving the use of weapons as a main
issue.
50 Questionable voluntary participation of any party.
6. Apparent abuse of the services of the Center.
7. Chronic delinquent behavior which is not amenable to mediation.
Bo Disputes outside of the target area.
9. Amounts of restitution which are high, unless parties have the means
or agree to alternative methods of payment. e.g. work for victim if
agreeable.
IV. Dispute Resolution Service
The choice of resolution method will be mediationo Mediation provides
for the parties to meet face to face with a mediator to work out a mutually
acceptable solution to their problem. The mediator leads the disputants,
but does not recommend nor interfere in the decision process. The aim of
the mediator is to help persons learn a more acceptable method of
resolving problems.
A. Mediators
Mediation sessions will be conducted by the Project Director and at
least one member of the community 0 It is anticipated that not more
than three mediators, as a panel, will mediate sessions.
Volunteers will be recruited from the target area. All volunteers
will be referred to the Probation Department's VIP Program for briefing
on the project and overall mission of the Probation Department 0
Community agencies, groups, and individuals will be encouraged to
recommend volunteers. Applications can be obtained from the
Project Director. Desirable qualifications for volunteers are
listed below:
.'
O.
Page Five
o
o
o
1. Applicants must live within the target areao
20 Must express a willingness to undertake a diU icult task without
monetary compensation.
3. Persons with prior volunteer experience working with juveniles
or in mediation are encouraged to apply.
4. Fluency in Spanish is desirable.
50 Degreed persons are encouraged to apply.
60 Applicant must have good verbal skills.
B. Training
Mediators will participate in at least ten (10) hpurs of mediation
skills training prior to leading a mediation sessiono Additional
training will be provided through direct supervision by the
Project Director.
C. Training Content
1. Overview of Neighborhood Mediation Center concept.
2. Meaning of mediation serviceso
a. Methods
b. Differences.
30 Listening and interviewing skillso
4. Role-play. modeling methods 0
5. Reflective counseling skillso
6. Steps to mediationo
ao Setting stageo
b. Defining issueso
,
c. Processing issues.
do Resolving the issues.
v. Policy Development
Procedures and policies will be routinely reviewed by the Project Directoro
Daily procedures will be modified as needed by the director: however, substan-
tive policies and procedures deviating from the scope and purpose of the
center will be discussed with Probation Administration prior to modification
or deletion of any part of this document 0 The Advisory Board will also be
consulted for guidance and advice prior to any changes in policyo
, I
O.
Page Six
o
o
o
VIo Referral Source
Referrals primarily will be accepted from the Police and Probation
Departments. Disputants must be identified as residing within the target
area. The target area is limited to the boundaries of the Muscott
Community Service Area (see Appendix A).
Referrals may be made in one of three ways:
1. Application for Petition if criteria is met (see criteria listing)o
2. Referral without Application for Petition by Probation or San Bernardino
Police Departmento
30 Referral from the Office of the District Attorneyo
4. Community agency or self-referral.
VII. Intake Procedure:
Ao Law enforcement/District Attorney/Probation CST referral.
10 Application for Petition:
ao Project Director receives case, records entry date.
b. Record check determines if case is acceptable.
co Both parents must agree to participate at intake.
do Parties sign agreement to voluntarily participate, cooperate
in mediation.
2. No Application for Petition:
a. Same as above, except no record check.
b. SBPD/CST explain program, hand out brochure. refer to mediation
center.
Co No factual basis for petition, but concern for defusing of tension,
etco Both disputants must agree to mediateo
30 Agency/Self-Referral:
ao Intake screening by Project Directoro (See II above - Criteria)
bo Both parties must agree to mediateo
c. Mediation session scheduled.
do Mediation agreement signedo
e. Follow-up.
f. Case closedo
.'
r'
~~ Seven
o
o
40 Referral Accepted:
a. Disputants advised of terms of mediotiono
b. Mediation is scheduled.
c. Mediation agreement signed by disputants.
do Follow-up by Center.
e. Follow-up sessions if neededo
f. Close case if all parties agree or if solution not foundo
5. Referral Rejected:
a. Psychotic/homicidal or emotionally disturbed party.
b. Obvious repeated misuse of Center by one of disputantso
c. One or both disputants refuse mediationo
d. Application for Petition returned to CST/SBPO without action.
e. Case closed.
VIIIo Overview of Case Processing
A. Referral
1. A dispute for mediation or an inquiry is submitted to the staff of
the mediation Center.
20 Intake information is taken by phone or in person. A determination
is made whether a dispute exists and is mediatableo
3. Each person involved is interviewed by phone or in person.
40 Mediation time and place are set up.
5. A letter or brochure is sent to all partieso
6. Mediator(s) are assigned and briefed on the case by the staffo
7. Mediators receive mediation session materials.
80 Mediation session is heldo
9. Mediators debrief, evaluate session.
10. Mediators return folder and agreement to Project Director.
80 Follow-Up
11. Staff follows up by phone (usually after 2-6 weeks)o
12. Additional sessions are arranged, if needed.
13. A permanent record of the referral and agreement is filed.
o
,
I' .
O~'ge Eight
o
o
o
IX. Role and Composition of the Advisory Board
Ao The Advisory Board serves to provide valuable support and guidance for the
project. It is a dynamic group that actively reviews and evaluates
program design and producto From the Advisory Board will come necessary
community resources and leadershipo The Advisory Board will assist in
modifying the project. as necessary through its developmental period to
tailor the program to best serve the interests of the community.
B. Prospective members of the Advisory Board will be named by County and
City Administration. The Board will consist of individuals who represent
both the interest of local government and the community. (See Appendix B)
C. The Advisory Board will meet at least quarterly to review program progress
and concerns.
X. Program Evaluation:
A. The nature of this program dictates that evaluation will be primarily
qualitative in nature.
B. Records will be kept of all cases reviewed by the mediation center.
C. Follow-up contacts will help establish the level of user satisfaction
and program effectiveness.
D. Areas of interest in evaluation of the program are:
10 Total number of referrals.
ao Number of rejections and reasons for rejection.
bo Number of cases successfully mediated.
co Number of cases failing to resolve through mediation and
reasons for failure.
2. Number of cases finding long term (six-months or more) resolution
through mediationo
30 User satisfaction with the programo
4. Agency satisfaction with the Program as a resource.
50 Other information as may be deemed' signif icant to overall Program
evaluation.
.
00
Self
Case Closed
QJI:,TIO;l CC:lTEfl 0
FlolI Chart
Rcft:rral
Sclf/Agcncy
(Li\\"I CnforcCI~ent)
, I
IIntakc
I'
o
A!Jency
La\"l Cnforcement
I.
J
Case Closed
Returned to
Agency/Law
Enforcement
I
1.lediation
SCheduled ;'10 A~reement
I -'
I I Ir.eturn to Lilli
I ,'1gcncv
:Case Closed I Enforcemcnt
Agreement lcase Closedl
Folloll-up
1st lJeel:
Fcllo\./-uP
8th l~eek
I
J Case Closed
"0 Ilediation
,
o
Organization
City of San Bernardino
City of San Bernardino
Superior Court
San Bernardino P.D.
San Bernardino County
J.JoD.P.
Housing Authority
Home of Neighboring Service
. Sickle Cell Organization
San Bernardino County Probe
o
o
o
APPEllDIX
ADVISORY BOARD
~
~
Wo R. Holcomb
ElIrnie Wilson
383-5051
383-5004
Dan Fraz ier
383-5378
Hon. Patrick J. Morris
3B3-Z374
Ben Gonzales
Larry Richards
383-5011
3B3-5011
Supv. Robert Hammock
Lou Reed
3B3-26l3
383-2613
Harry Carson
382-3580
Al Harkins
W. A. McCullough
Etha Johnson
BB4-l811
884-1811
8B4-36l0
Andrew Scott
885-3491
Carl Irby
684-0420
Jerry D. Hill
383-1593
II.
,.
o.
o
o
o
..=;,..J r-' -.-' .:I'-~ ~:'~~7'-'~!Vlll~'~'''':::::: t":;
A/;{fi t' 0 -. :. 'rr\ ".... =:,. ...o(,,",Nn~ N IJN 1"-1-
11';",_ ... (' _ \1....11
... "::'"7 1\ , ~ t:: :-
., 1\' :. :...... ... - :.:1 n , ~ ~;.
,,/ :.. ~ -:::.:- 0 I~ \1.,)4 c:t ~I % \1111" ;
,~/ f fi\ Ar _ i :: .. 1\" ",n, ~ t; J) >>'t oft
~ ..' ,1I.n I...... .t ... J-I 1\ I"
~...('/ f. ~ 111:'.'\[- ~. ,I ,.: flV~UI^: I)~ ~ 1 .-!". ~.' ..\, 1\:' 5 ~ ~ '::8
~ ; ... : ~ ; }; ,:.~' ~... ... n :: ":! ~ ;t... ~
, r ; of. :. ,:.. .....Jrl....~' ~ Q., ...:;. ^~ l' IN''I'~ I':. ~ ~ IJN .". .:s
~. kr". --: ,...." :'~..,: ~ :n?- ~ N';':'~"';~ -;:;:.~ ~
~,~lJ~~.~ i.,' -ivl ''''''''I:r : ~ ,;;: ~ ~ ^' Nb,....... :;: ~ N ,. '"" ~
./~,'fY / , ,: ~ ~ ~ 0)" ^' :;: ~f'.,. S ON ~
~~ '"", .'. ~ O)l"':"r. :-::! ! !: s ;: 1--~1o~1 ,1'''01 ~
-( Z" ~-- II':H:". ~ ~~... 'HU'jt.\ :1 1'''<< '~:A)V: l ~ ~ ~~ ~ D: tI USI_ !
:; 'i... ~ .. - :.- Z I.. t USlM 1 ~,... >
..J 0 I :;:)!:: ~ ..... o~ ... - .... ...... - l!....
if"~~. /'''~ ~ ::~" :,~ ~~.b.= ~ g.:, 7 : ...""w:~.... 1 z ~~~ ; .^y :::), ::
. ;: WI..!,)w...:I:-'" .1 ~ 00 t .! ~ _;: J.$ III '1'''' lW .-:
lIli -l ~;,,-,, I I'" !;- f ",N...1lI ""1" 0 snw YNwill 'I'll...
N f. L" J.$ :::'l! :i'D:l~n~ ~:;, ;rl~~ ~
, .'~ (~..r,7 -.. = g'lf,.)Ojr.~ 1::: ~ 't ~').ii;ii ~ :.l'i 4JQ)r u~ll) ~ :;;. ....._!.-f >4: i ~
" ;.r/ ~ ~ ... ..... NO',.,.. J I ,.:.. 1-..:;:' '" ,If ,~J -l ....-
~o( , .. ,It'., - ~I _ ~~. ..... t' n" t".~\U". o......~ .. ""v',' ~,,"7 '" v a:
. )f': _,q".; ...,.;i al"'O~IQ,^,' '.II'lfU)~i.:;.::....~ X 1;.. i i_"U...'^~W; '-1: NO\,IU~ l :i.I~ ~ ~ :~ 'O'..".~. ..,,,~
"J .'l'"O~ ___1-.....:].:. ,,"'1 ;"'NIO""'~II,"""JQI':' ~::. ;I~ ,. '~~''':~\J.w1J i r~o( ~ ~ ..'l:-:! s ........
" ,.. ~ :: .'". ' I"""""'"" J H .... IOU x U_OlJ 0.. ::: - :: JS :. ~hOI .....
,~ (, - f.! J:; J: JSUI01.t- ~' r'21:"1'!I~lJ~U:"l z ~ ;,.: ~.> ~ ~.
~ .y;'mcll Cl C ;0 ~.:: ";. .1":" 'S_II)d M]I.' '11,~:;;I. - - '" ,\ "),:" I'
~Y"I"''I'^lAf N i-- - ~... yU..y^.....sr,N II !I.( t : :lUA 1) ~ - m % ~.^lA~fm~ YINY^U.\NfIU i c: ot .oS-
MlINH1~ Co oYJIAI'U I' ;..., 0061 :~ - -,."ii:T':~I; ,.~~; ~ 'O.~ ~....,r
'~:'/...".":I:.:....I.'-:~.-r 1 III"O;!' )'.!- .'.-.... ..llll! i; ~,""l\Il'V'1 "') ~ tQ'...... :: ii'i"A'ij
f..,.....;..~.~l.....:~:, L'- ! , I I '11\ '.......h... ';~ r: I.... ~
. ,. . .. ~ .. I ~\ t;::';~. C:.': ~ .J' "'&13 ./ './1
.. '.~ ...... '1".\01) '': f ~ :I ~ :; J j.,! " c ( T II
IhN"': :. ~ :: ? : [ ;, l' .~.o j ru--. ii:: ;: I I
~i16' UO....,I." -!L!~ .. " .,.--.. _,' · ~
J.>III 1$ ,hYl~ .... ~, ........', ---.!'
~ ..z. ~ ~Z 0.. ,,, ~.-" ---" '--. ,,' \\ "
~ 4"'1 Z ~.. . /' ,... -.... 1~1 ~
.1... z ~I"II' 0 ~:. ,(j''' :' '11<.,' /' ~..-- 0 ~
." ....~ ' . ~ p, ,.;" r-'.o.<,,-, : (~ " ~ :;, ~ ~
,', %11 1'.._2': \~ ",' .r. "'''4''. CD I
'" .. I -, , / ~,\., '1 ~?..:;L ... I
o / 'I~:';; 3..1;'1 ..... -' _,. -....;o~ '\ . o:W( ~ :; ,.f.
..1:"-<:>,11, N... ;'I~' __\. ./ :'/" . t,:;; ~:;; s. g ~ ~ IOJ..
_. ~ .."'...~" ~ ~ 01 ~ ."e"'( L.'; v = '" \U:
,':';'A'p. . I """ C1'" . s~id~ to_. ~ . "I "if
;k ....:~ ~.., '. ~-' .,/ . ",'''0 I
__ ~ . "-"" \AN ~,,, I :<1~~" I r ^'I' e. N . .... ~ .... '
. '. ....r; mu-c..u..~.-! ......... \.\.. j ~. J .:: c Z ~. - - -
.- ".......... 1W ,0 f C ,lUll ~ ~ %
..... ~ ~.."..,. " ....... ,." , ~t" .:r . . . .:: -;:....,
f;; :7.'~''-~:'~'P::'':' ".: g) t...1. ""_ HU J s: ~ .'l / ..., ...i~ ! a...n : o,;f.... ~
: . [;.'L"T-.-;--.,'~-a;:orifPO/OC . i-i\..': .~ i:;:" - ~ tI
--'. -- - - -~ '" ct,l.. . ...Cl ' - V . ... ~ .! V ~ I
0.. :7.")' . ~ 2 ~ N.' u ! - i I
.... ,.".-. .,. :;) i"'lI!;' . :-. .... .
'. _ '. ~ _ __ ~ I Nil'''' ~ G.n.."" I: 'I
-" - \/'tli'h"o\i
,.~::: t
"
.
o 0
PROBATION DEPARTMENT
o
o
County 01 San Bernardino
JERRY 0 HILL
Chief COUntl' !>roba"ofl Off,ut
~ 175 Wes1 Fif1h Street
San Bt'Hlardmo. CA 9241~ 0460
CLAlJOE T MANGRUM
AsslSt."t Chi,., County Probllfion Officer
Ll 235 Eest Ml View
Barstow, CA 92311
[': 13260 Central Avenue
Chino. CA 91710
o 17780 Arrow BoulevBrd
Fontana, CA 92335
o 1020 West Sixth Street
Ontario. CA 91762
o 14455 Civic Drive
Victorville. CA 92392
.
December 3, 1984
Ben Gonzales
Chief of Police
City of San Bernardino
466 W. 4th Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Dear Ben:
Purusant to the agreement between this department and your city
concerning a pilot Neighborhood Justice Center at 10th and Muscott,
funds within the Probation Department have been designated to cover
the County's $20,000 portion of the estimated $40,000 annual cost.
SinCerelY'~
J
C
D. ill
County Probation Officer
JDH/PJL/js
cc: James
Judge
Koontz /
Morris
~6-\ .~-
;' \,., ,
. \
. .
/.
/,
.'
t., .
"-" . i.U '<,
.......:)~ 10~ E
f,14/'OR'S' ._~.( o?l'"
c. ~... . OFFICi: ,'>
D..", .... 'J
~. ~\:.
,'/;'.~~'