HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-12-2003 Jt Adj Reg Mtg Minutes - MCCMINUTES
MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
JOINT ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 12, 2003
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
BOARDROOM
This is the time and place set for a joint adjourned regular meeting of the Mayor and
Common Council and Community Development Commission of the City of San
Bernardino from the joint regular meeting held at 1:30 p.m., Monday, June 2, 2003, in
the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California.
The City Clerk has caused to be posted the order of the adjournment of said meeting
held on Monday, June 2, 2003, and has on file in the Office of the City Clerk an
affidavit of said posting together with a copy of said order which was posted at 11 :45
a.m., Tuesday, June 3, 2003, on the City Hall breezeway bulletin board.
The joint adjourned regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council and
Community Development Commission was called to order by Mayor/Chairman Valles
at 5:49 p.m., Thursday, June 12, 2003, in the Economic Development Agency
Boardroom, 201 North "E" Street, San Bernardino, California.
Roll Call
Roll call was taken by City Clerk Clark with the following being present:
Mayor/Chairman Valles; Council Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, Derry,
Suarez, Anderson, McCammack; City Attorney Penman, City Clerk Clark, City
Administrator Wilson. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis.
1. Budget deliberations -Fiscal Year 2003/04 -Discussion & possible action -
Proposed City and EDA budgets
Mayor/Chairman Valles stated that today's workshop would include an
overview of the proposed Economic Development Agency (Agency) and City
budgets, a brief presentation relative to the State's budget, and comments from
Police Chief Zimmon regarding the proposed Police Department budget. She
advised that the second budget meeting would be a presentation of the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP); and the third and fourth workshops would be used
to zero in on ways to balance the budget, with the Council Members presenting
their ideas for budget reductions .
6/12/2003
EDA Bud et
Gary Van Osdel, Agency Executive Director, advised that the projected
resources for the Agency are approximately $59 million, of which 95 percent is
for pre-obligated expenditures. A discretionary amount of approximately 5
percent, or a little less than $3 million, is designated for operation of the
Agency.
He stated that due to the anticipated raid by the State on the Agency budget, and
in an effort to trim the budget as much as possible, staff was proposing that two
positions not be funded.
Mr. Van Osdel advised that State Senator Brulte has come up with an idea
which would direct approximately $1.2 billion of permanent funding from cities
for State government. The formula equates to $16 per capita, which would be a
$3 million hit for San Bernardino. If approved, the assumption is that most
cities that are in the same situation as San Bernardino, would be forced to go to
the Redevelopment Agency to make those payments.
Barbara Lindseth, Director, Administrative Services, advised that the total
Agency budget this year is $59,849,446, which is a little over $300,000 less
than last year.
Ms. Lindseth distributed and provided an overview of the following Economic
Development Agency budget documents for fiscal year 2003/04:
• 2003-04 Fiscal Year Budget
• Tax Increment Fund Projections as of May 1, 2003
• Bond Proceeds as of May 1, 2003
• Cash Flow Analysis Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund as of May 1,
2003
• Cash Flow Analysis -Tax Increment State College Project Area As of May
1, 2003 (Note: This document consists of 11 separate project areas/2 pages
each)
• Community Development Block Grant Appropriation Report
City Budget
Fred Wilson, City Administrator, advised that staff knew mid-year that booking
fees and state-mandated reimbursements would not be in the budget, and when
added to the increase in PERS costs of about $3 million, it gives a pretty good
idea of the budget challenge the City is now facing.
2 6/12/2003
He stated that staff also knew mid-year that the City was facing a $7 million
deficit in the General Fund. At that time the Mayor, working with the Council
and department heads, began looking for ways to generate more revenue and
reduce expenses. Over the next four to five months, as a result of implementing
efficiency improvements and revenue enhancements, the City realized a
decrease in the deficit from $7 million to $4 million.
Mr. Wilson also mentioned the proposed per capita fee of $16, which would
result in a permanent reduction to the City's budget of $3 million. He added
that staff knows that over the next couple of years there will be some real
budget problems, including an increase in PERS rates, due primarily to what
has happened with the stock market.
Barbara Pach on, Director of Finance, provided an overview of the Preliminary
DETAIL BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004, Section 1, Budget Message;
and Section 2, Budget Summaries.
She noted that the City has almost $103 million in total estimated available
funds, with a beginning fund balance for fiscal year 2003/04 of $9,747,300-
over $1.5 million more than anticipated. She stated that the budget reserves
remain at $6,761,700; however, to keep the reserves we have to fund a deficit
of $4,049,400.
Ms. Pachon pointed out that property taxes and sales tax have continually
increased; in fact, County of San Bernardino sales tax has increased more than
any other county in the state, with a projected 4.5 percent increase. She advised
that Edison had petitioned the Public Utilities Commission for a rate decrease,
which had not been factored into the budget. If approved, however, the
decrease would be about 13-15 percent, or a loss of $1.2-1.4 million in
revenue; and although the City will be able to reduce its electric expenditure,
the savings will not offset the revenue loss the City will experience.
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada noted that in years past the loudest cry
has come from Little League; however, this year they will be second compared
to potholes. She stated that it would be helpful to know what the past
commitment has been relative to streets/potholes and what is being projected for
this year.
Mayor Valles stated that the next budget workshop would cover the Capital
Improvement Program, including streets. She noted that all local cities are
aware of the growing needs in the street department, and the fact that they are
upside down in meeting those needs.
3 6/12/2003
It was also noted that there have been large increases to the Worker's
Compensation Fund expenditures.
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada stated that it is not uncommon to hear,
"cut the staff, " and she stated that she would like to see staffing levels of the
City over the last ten years, as well as the increase in population, as she believes
we are down to bare bones.
Mr. Wilson stated that those figures had been compiled for the years 1991 to
2002. He stated that in 1991 the City employed 1,062 employees, compared to
the present figure of 967. In addition, in 1992 the Parks, Recreation and
Community Services Department had 90 employees, compared to 54 employees
in 2002, even though the City has 31 percent more parks than in 1992.
Ms. Pach on advised that the library gets some of their money from state library
monies, which have been significantly reduced this year, with an even greater
reduction predicted for next year. Therefore, in order to balance the library
budget they had to take a reduction of approximately $195,000.
City Attorney Penman advised that for some time there have been discussions at
City Hall and the Library Board relative to submitting to the voters for their
consideration whether or not they would be willing to support a library tax to
help fund the library, such as the cities of Pasadena and Moreno Valley have
done . He noted that it would not pay the full amount of the budget and would
take a two-thirds vote under Proposition 218 to approve it. He stated that some
cities have approved it on the first vote, others have approved it on a second or
even a third vote; however, he did not know whether the Council wanted to put
such an item on this November's ballot or not.
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada stated that during the town hall
meetings she hoped the Council members would receive input from their
constituents and residents on how to address these growing needs. She stated
that it was possible the City might end up with more than one proposed tax at
some future election-that she would hate to start discussion on any one of these
potential tax ideas at this stage of the game, even though she knows that in order
to put anything on the ballot there is a timetable to adhere to.
Ms. Estrada stated that first, the community needs to be educated on the fiscal
condition of the City, and then bring them along in terms of the solutions on
how to address those needs. She added that although libraries and Little League
and all these things are very, very important issues, the citizens need to be given
an opportunity to prioritize as well, and she hopes this will come from the town
hall meetings.
4 6/12/2003
Council Member/Commissioner Mccammack stated that at the meeting held
Tuesday evening the majority of the attendees discussed in depth what would
turn a city around so that the revenues would be there long term, and the
discussion relied heavily on having the town improve its image, which has been
the goal of this Mayor and Council for quite a few years. Eventually the
discussion came around to the fact that everybody basically needs to take
personal responsibility not only for their own property, but their next door
neighbor's property, if the neighbor is not doing the job.
The discussion circled around to the resultant increase in property values, which
then in turn would increase the property tax that the City derives, etc. Although
the Council member made an effort to bring the conversation back to what the
residents would suggest doing to make the changes necessary to balance this
year's budget, no one was really interested in stepping forward and proposing to
cut this or increase that.
Mayor Valles stated that the point made by Mr. Penman was a valid one-that
all these mandated costs by the federal government and by the state government
fail to realize that it's at the City where we take the cut and it's at the City
where we create the economic engines for the country. She stated that she has
learned that development and owners come to cities that show a commitment to
libraries, to the arts, to children, and to activities for children; therefore, she
felt validated because the City is on the right track.
Council Member/Commissioner Longville pointed out that Assembly Bill 1412
recently passed through the Assembly, with most legislators signing on (both
Democrats and Republicans), and she believes it will move through the Senate.
The bill would allow, by a simple majority vote, for a city to increase sales tax
one-half percent as long as it is going for the General Fund, but would require a
two-thirds vote if it is going for a special fund. She noted that if it gets to the
governor's desk and is signed, the voters will then have to make this choice.
Police Chief Zimm.on -Overview of Preliminary Police Budget
Garrett Zimmon, Chief of Police, provided an overview of projected Police
Department expenditures for fiscal year 2003/04. He stated that some of the
larger increases to expenditures were the result of increased Worker's
Compensation expenses, Charter Section 186 projected cost increases, and the
PERS costs, which are being passed on by the State to the department. He
pointed out that during the mid-year budget review it appeared that the Police
Department would be about $360,000 in the red; however, due to cost controls
within the department they have reduced that amount down to zero, or even a
slight surplus for the department.
5 6/12/2003
2. Set public hearing -Resolution adjusting various fees -June 30, 2003
Mayor/Chairman Valles advised that the information relative to the adjustment
of fees was included with the Interoffice Memorandum from Fred Wilson, City
Administrator, to the Mayor and Common Council dated June 12, 2003,
regarding Budget-Balancing Options, which had been delivered to the Mayor
and Council and other staff immediately prior to this evening's meeting.
Council Member/Commissioner Suarez made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Estrada, that the Mayor and Common Council set a
public hearing for Monday, June 30, 2003, at 6:00 p.m. in the Economic
Development Agency Boardroom to consider adjusting various fees.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Member/
Commissioners Estrada, Longville, Derry, Suarez, Mccammack. Nays: None.
Absent: Council Members/Commissioners McGinnis, Anderson.
Prior to adjournment, Council Members/Commissioners Estrada and Mccammack
announced the dates and times of the upcoming town hall meetings in their wards.
3. Adjournment
At 8:01 p.m. the meeting adjourned. The next joint regular meeting of the
Mayor and Common Council and Community Development Commission is
scheduled for 1:30 p.m., Monday, June 16, 2003, in the Council Chambers of
City Hall, 300 North D Street, San Bernardino, California.
No. of Items: 3
No. of Hours: 2.25
6
By :
RACHEL G. CLARK
City Clerk
k E ~
Linda E. Hartzcl
Deputy City Clerk
6/12/2003