Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
documents distributed
• DRURY R 410 1 i —Maii Via Email, Overnight Mail and Hand Delivery January 16, 2018 ■ Mayor R. Carey Davis and Honorable Members of the City Council Mayor's Office and Council Office 290 North D Street, 8th Floor r San Bernardino, CA 92401 E: Mayor@SBCity.org E: Council@SBCity.org Oliver Mujica, Planning Division Manager Chantal Power, Associate Planner San Bernardino City Planning Division 300 North D Street, 3rd floor San Bernardino, CA 92418 Mujica_ol@sbcity.org Power—Ch@sbcity.org Re: San Bernardino Logistics Center (Proj. No. ANZ1501) Initial Study I Mitigated Negative Declaration Request for Environmental Impact Report Dear Mayor Davis, Honorable Members of the City Council, Mr. Mujica and Ms. Power: I am writing on behalf of the Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union 783 and its members living in and around the City of San Bernardino ("LiUNA"), regarding the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") prepared for the Project known as the San Bernardino Logistics Center, Project Number ANZ1 501, proposed to be located north of Sixth Street and east of Sterling Avenue, near the northwest corner of Lankershim Avenue and Sixth Street in the City of San Bernardino. ("Project"). The Project would place a massive 450,000 square foot truck distribution warehouse on a 20 acre parcel in the middle of a residential community, surrounded on three sides by residential uses. The Project requires rezoning the Project site from residential to industrial zoning. The Project includes General Plan Amendment 14-09; Development Code Amendment 14-18, and Development Permit Type D (DP -D) 16-25. As discussed below, this juxtaposition of industrial uses adjacent to a residential neighborhood will result in very significant environmental impacts, including creating a cancer risk in the nearby residential community more than twenty times above the applicable CEQA significance threshold. Since the City prepared a mitigated negative • Comments of LIUNA Local 783 San Bernardino Logistics Center (Prof. No. ANZ1501) January 16, 2018 Page 2 declaration, finding that the Project will have no unmitigated environmental impacts, it did not properly analyze the Project's impacts, nor did the City impose all feasible mitigation measures. We have prepared these comments with assistance from three expert consulting firms, Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE), traffic engineer Daniel T. Smith, P.E., and wildlife biologist Dr. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D. Their expert comments are attached hereto and incorporated in their entirety. These comments create a fair argument that the Project may have adverse environmental impacts. The expert comments establish that there is a fair argument that the Project may have significant unmitigated impacts, including: 1. Significant unmitigated air quality impacts; 2. Significant unmitigated cancer risks: 3. Significant and unmitigated traffic impacts; 4. Significant and unmitigated greenhouse gas impacts; 5. Significant and unmitigated biological impacts. Commenters request that the City of San Bernardino ("City") withdraw the IS/MND and instead prepare an environmental impact report ("EIR") for the Project, as there is substantial evidence that the Project will have significant unmitigated impacts on the environment as discussed below. An EIR is required to analyze these and other impacts and to adopt feasible mitigation measures to reduce the impacts to the extent feasible. STANDING Members of LIUNA live, work, and recreate in the vicinity of the Project site. These members will suffer the impacts of a poorly executed or inadequately mitigated Project, just as would the members of any nearby homeowners association, community group or environmental group. Hundreds of LIUNA members live and work in areas that will be affected by air pollution and traffic generated by the project. Therefore, LIUNA and its members have a direct interest in ensuring that the Project is adequately analyzed and that its environmental and public health impacts are mitigated to the fullest extent feasible. LEGAL STANDARD As the California Supreme Court recently held, "[i]f no EIR has been prepared for a nonexempt project, but substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that the project may result in significant adverse impacts, the proper remedy is to order preparation of an EIR." (Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. (2010) 48 CalAth 310, 319-320 ["CBE v. SCAQMD"], citing, No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 75, 88; Brentwood Assn. for No Drilling, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 491, 504-505.) "The `foremost principle' in interpreting CEQA is that the Legislature intended the act to be read so as to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language." (Communities for a Better Environment v. Calif. Resources Agency (2002) 103 Cal.AppAth 98, 109 ["CBE v. CRA"].) Comments of LIUNA Local 783 San Bernardino Logistics Center (Proj. No. ANZ1501) January 16, 2018 Page 3 The EIR is the very heart of CEQA. (Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.AppAth 1184, 1214; Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.AppAth 903, 927.) The EIR is an "environmental `alarm bell' whose purpose is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached the ecological points of no return." (Bakersfield Citizens, 124 Cal.AppAth at 1220.) The EIR also functions as a "document of accountability," intended to "demonstrate to an apprehensive citizenry that the agency has, in fact, analyzed and considered the ecological implications of its action." (Laurel Heights Improvements Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 392.) The EIR process "protects not only the environment but also informed self-government." (Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.AppAth at 927.) An EIR is required if "there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment." (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080(d); see also Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927.) In limited circumstances, an agency may avoid preparing an EIR by issuing a negative declaration, a written statement briefly indicating that a project will have no significant impact thus requiring no EIR (14 Cal. Code Regs., § 15371 ["CEQA Guidelines"]), only if there is not even a "fair argument" that the project will have a significant environmental effect. (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21100, 21064.) Since "[t]he adoption of a negative declaration ... has a terminal effect on the environmental review process," by allowing the agency "to dispense with the duty [to prepare an EIR]," negative declarations are allowed only in cases where "the proposed project will not affect the environment at all." (Citizens of Lake Murray v. San Diego (1989) 129 Cal.App.3d 436, 440.) Where an initial study shows that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, a mitigated negative declaration may be appropriate. However, a mitigated negative declaration is proper only if the project revisions would avoid or mitigate the potentially significant effects identified in the initial study "to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and ... there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the public agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment." (Public Resources Code §§ 21064.5 and 21080(c)(2); Mejia v. City of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.AppAth 322, 331.) In that context, "may" means a reasonable possibility of a significant effect on the environment. (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21082.2(a), 21100, 21151(a); Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927; League for Protection of Oakland's etc. Historic Resources v. City of Oakland (1997) 52 Cal.AppAth 896, 904-905.) Under the "fair argument" standard, an EIR is required if any substantial evidence in the record indicates that a project may have an adverse environmental effect—even if contrary evidence exists to support the agency's decision. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15064(f)(1); Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.AppAth at 931; Stanislaus Audubon Society v. County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.AppAth 144, 150-15; Quail Botanical Gardens Found., Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal.AppAth 1597, 1602.) The "fair argument" standard creates a "low threshold" favoring environmental review through an EIR rather than through issuance of negative declarations or notices of exemption from CEQA. (Pocket A Comments of LIUNA Local 783 San Bernardino Logistics Center (Prof. No. ANZ1501) January 16, 2018 Page 4 Protectors, supra, 124 Cal.AppAth at 928.) The "fair argument" standard is virtually the opposite of the typical deferential standard accorded to agencies. As a leading CEQA treatise explains: This `fair argument' standard is very different from the standard normally followed by public agencies in making administrative determinations. Ordinarily, public agencies weigh the evidence in the record before them and reach a decision based on a preponderance of the evidence. [Citations]. The fair argument standard, by S contrast, prevents the lead agency from weighing competing evidence to determine who has a better argument concerning the likelihood or extent of a potential environmental impact. The lead agency's decision is thus largely legal rather than factual; it does not resolve conflicts in the evidence but determines only whether substantial evidence exists in the record to support the prescribed fair argument. (Kostka & Zishcke, Practice Under CEQA, §6.29, pp. 273-274.) The Courts have explained that "it is a question of law, not fact, whether a fair argument exists, and the courts owe no deference to the lead agency's determination. Review is de novo, with a preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review." (Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.AppAth at 928 [emphasis in original].) As a matter of law, "substantial evidence includes ... expert opinion." (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080(e)(1); CEQA Guidelines, § 15064(f)(5).) CEQA Guidelines demand that where experts have presented conflicting evidence on the extent of the environmental effects of a project, the agency must consider the environmental effects to be significant and prepare an EIR. (CEQA Guidelines § 15064(f)(5); Pub. Res. Code § 21080(e)(1); Pocket Protectors,124 Cal.App.4th at 935.) "Significant environmental effect" is defined very broadly as "a substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in the environment." (Pub. Resources Code, § 21068; see also CEQA Guidelines, § 15382.) An effect on the environment need not be "momentous" to meet the CEQA test for significance; it is enough that the impacts are "not trivial." (No Oil, Inc., 13 Cal.3d at 83 ) In Pocket Protectors, the court explained how expert opinion is considered. The Court limited agencies and courts to weighing the admissibility of the evidence. (Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.AppAth at 935.) In the context of reviewing a negative declaration, "neither the lead agency nor a court may `weigh' conflicting substantial evidence to determine whether an EIR must be prepared in the first instance." (Id.) Where a disagreement arises regarding the validity of a negative declaration, the courts require an EIR. As the Court explained, "[i]t is the function of an EIR, not a negative declaration, to resolve conflicting claims, based on substantial evidence, as to the environmental effects of a project." (Id.) CEQA requires that an environmental document include a description of the project's environmental setting or "baseline." (CEQA Guidelines, § 15063(d)(2).) The CEQA "baseline" is the set of environmental conditions against which to compare a project's anticipated impacts. (CBE v. SCAQMD, 48 CalAth at 321.) CEQA Guidelines section 15125(x) states, in pertinent part, that a lead agency's environmental review under CEQA: Comments of LIUNA Local 783 San Bernardino Logistics Center (Proj. No. ANZ1501) January 16, 2018 Page 5 ...must include a description of the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of the project, as they exist at the time [environmental analysis] is commenced, from both a local and regional perspective. This environmental setting will normally constitute the baseline physical conditions by which a Lead Agency determines whether an impact is significant. (See, Save Our Peninsula Committee v. County of Monterey (2001) 87 Cal.AppAth 99, 124-125 ["Save Our Peninsula"].) Recognizing that several projects may together have a considerable impact, CEQA requires an agency to consider the "cumulative impacts" of a project along with other projects in the area. (Pub. Resources Code §21083(b); CEQA Guidelines §15355(b)) If a project may have cumulative impacts, the agency must prepare an EIR, since "a project may have a significant effect on the environment if '[t]he possible effects of a project are individually limited but cumulatively considerable."' (CBE v. CRA, 103 Cal.AppAth at 98, 114; Kings County Farm Bur. v. City of Hanford (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 692, 721 ("Kings Co.") It is vital that an agency assess "`the environmental damage [that] often occurs incrementally from a variety of small sources ..."' (Bakersfield Citizens,) 124 Cal.AppAth at 1214.) Lead agencies must use their best efforts to find out and disclose all they reasonably can. (CEQA Guidelines § 15144.) If a precise technical analysis of an environmental impact is not practical, the -agency must make a reasonable effort to pursue a less exacting analysis. (Citizens to Preserve the Ojai v. County of Ventura (1985) 176 Cal.App.3d 421, 432.) As the California Supreme Court stated in CBE v. CRA, 103 Cal.AppAth at 114: Cumulative impact analysis is necessary because the full environmental impact of a proposed project cannot be gauged in a vacuum. One of the most important environmental lessons that has been learned is that environmental damage often occurs incrementally from a variety of small sources. These sources appear insignificant when considered individually, but assume threatening dimensions when considered collectively with other sources with which they interact. DISCUSSION A. The Project will have Significant Air Pollutant Emissions. The environmental consulting firm, Soil, Water, Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE), concludes that the Project will have very significant air quality impacts, far above applicable CEQA significance thresholds set by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). In particular the Project will create cancer risks more than twenty times above the SCAQMD's CEQA significance thresholds, due largely to the close proximity of the Project to a residential neighborhood. The Project will also generate nitrogen oxides (NOx) and greenhouse gas (GHGs) far above significance thresholds. As I Comments of LIUNA Local 783 I San Bernardino Logistics Center (Proj. No. ANZ1501) I January 16, 2018 Page 6 such, an EIR is required to analyze these impacts, and to propose feasible mitigation measures and alternatives to reduce or eliminate the impacts. Air districts' air quality thresholds are treated as dispositive in evaluating the significance of a project's air quality impacts. (See, e.g. Schenck v. County of Sonoma (2011) 198 Cal.AppAth 949, 960 (County applies BAAQMD's "published CEQA quantitative criteria" and "threshold level of cumulative significance"). See also Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources Agency (2002) 103 Cal.AppAth 98, 110-111 ("A 'threshold of significance' for a given environmental effect is simply that level at which the lead agency finds the effects of the project to be significant").) The California Supreme Court recently made clear the substantial importance that a SCAQMD significance threshold plays in providing substantial evidence of a significant adverse impact. (CBE v. SCAQMD, 48 CalAth at 327 ("As the [South Coast Air Quality Management] District's established significance threshold for NOx is 55 pounds per day, these estimates [of NOx emissions of 201 to 456 pounds per day] constitute substantial evidence supporting a fair argument for a significant adverse impact").) Since there is a fair argument that the Project's construction emissions exceed a CEQA significance threshold, an EIR is required to analyze and mitigate Project impacts. 1. The Project Will Create Significant Cancer Risks in the Nearby Residential Community Due to Diesel Engine Exhaust. SWAPE concludes that the Project will create cancer risks in the nearby residential community more than twenty times above the SCAMD's CEQA significance thresholds. The IS\MND erroneously concludes that the Project's cancer risks will be less than significant, but this is because the IS\MND fails to apply the proper cancer risk calculation methodology established by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ("OEHHA"), the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and by SCAQMD. SWAPE conducts detailed calculations using OEHHA methodology and concludes, "the excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) at the MEIR is approximately 230 in one million." (SWAPE, p. 17 (emphasis added)). The SCAQMD significance threshold for cancer risk is 10 in one million. Therefore, the Project will create a cancer risk in the adjacent residential neighborhood more than 20 times above the CEQA significance threshold. An EIR is required to analyze this risk and propose feasible mitigation measures. SWAPE suggests numerous mitigation measures that could reduce the Project's cancer risks, including requiring the use of a fleet of clean trucks, low -emission construction equipment, idling restrictions and many other measures. (SWAPE, pp. 17- 22). However, since the IS\MND erroneously concludes there is no significant risk, it fails to impose these feasible measures. Comments of LIUNA Local 783 San Bernardino Logistics Center (Proj. No. ANZ1501) January 16, 2018 Page 7 2. The Project will Have Significant Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Impacts. SWAPE concludes that the Project will generate significant nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions, above the SCAQMD's CEQA significance thresholds. NOx reacts in the atmosphere to create ground -level ozone, which is an extreme problem in the San Bernardino area. US EPA states that ozone has serious adverse health impacts: Ozone in the air we breathe can harm our health. People most at risk from breathing air containing ozone include people with asthma, children, older adults, and people who are active outdoors, especially outdoor workers. In addition, people with certain genetic characteristics, and people with reduced intake of certain nutrients, such as vitamins C and E, are at greater risk from ozone exposure. Breathing ozone can trigger a variety of health problems including chest pain, coughing, throat irritation, and airway inflammation. It also can reduce lung function and harm lung tissue. Ozone can worsen bronchitis, emphysema, and asthma, leading to increased medical care. https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/ozone-basics#effects. SWAPE concludes that the Project will generate 94 pounds per day (ppd) of NOx — almost double the SCAQMD CEQA significance threshold of 55 ppd. The IS/MND concludes that the Project will generate 53 ppd of NOx — just slightly below the significance threshold. However, SWAPE notes that the IS/MND made unauthorized adjustments to the air quality model without proper justification. In addition, the City's consultant failed to use SCAQMD's truck distribution model, instead using a model that has been rejected by SCAQMD (the "Fontana Study"). When SWAPE corrected these errors, the Project's emissions almost doubled to 94 ppd of NOx. (SWAPE, p.7). Maximum Daily Operational Emissions (Ibs/da Model NOx IS/MND 53.0 SWAPE 94.0 Percent Increase 77% SCAQMD Regional Threshold (lbs/day) 55 Threshold Exceedance? y�Vets An EIR is required to analyze the Project's NOx impacts and to propose feasible mitigation measures. Comments of LIUNA Local 783 San Bernardino Logistics Center (Proj. No. ANZ1501) January 16, 2018 Page 8 3. The Project Will Have Significant Greenhouse Gas Impacts. SWAPE concludes that the Project will generate greenhouse gases (GHGs) well above the SCAQMD CEQA significance threshold of 10,000 metric tons (MT/yr).per year. The IS/MND concludes that the Project's GHG emissions will be 9,946 MT CO2e/yr (Appendix A-1, p. 37) — just slightly below the 10,000 MT/yr threshold. However, SWAPE concludes that the GHG emission calculations use the same erroneous input data as the NOx calculations. When corrected, the Project's GHG emissions rise to 11,834 MT/yr— well above the CEQA significance threshold. (SWAPE, p.24). An EIR is required to analyze and mitigate the Project's GHG emissions. SWAPE suggests numerous GHG mitigation measures that should be required, including electric charging stations for cars and trucks, electrified forklifts, solar panels to generate electricity for the Project, and many others. Such measures have been required for other similar facilities and are therefore clearly feasible. B. The Project Will Have Significant Traffic Impacts. Traffic Engineer Daniel T. Smith Jr., P.E., concludes that the Project will have significant traffic impacts, and that the IS/MND's traffic analysis contains fatal flaws. An EIR is required to analyze the Project's traffic impacts and propose feasible mitigation measures. Mr. Smith questions the wisdom of placing an industrial use immediately adjacent to a residential community. (Smith, p. 2). The IS/MND erroneously contends that there is no inconsistency with zoning. However, Mr. Smith points out that this reasoning is circular. The Project site is currently zoned residential — like the adjacent area. The Project involves a re -zoning to render the site industrial. However, this "spot zoning" does not resolve the inconsistency. If it did, no project would ever be inconsistent with zoning. Mr. Smith concludes that the site is of inadequate size and design for trucks likely to be used in California. The truck bays are 60 feet in length, but California trucks can be 65- 69 feet in length. As a result, the bays are inadequately sized and must be redesigned. (Smith, p. 2). Mr. Smith concludes that the IS/MND's traffic analysis is fundamentally flawed by relying on the discredited "Fontana Study," rather than SCAQMD calculations methodology. Mr. Smith concludes, "As can be seen from the table, use of the modern SCAQMD rates results in about twice as many heavy trucks and twice as many of the heaviest trucks than use of the Fontana rates that were relied on in the IS/MND traffic analysis." (Smith, p. 3 (emphasis added)). In other words, the IS/MND undercounts the number of heavy trucks at the Project by half. Mr. Smith concludes that the Project will have significant traffic impacts at three intersections, and that mitigation measures proposed in the IS/MND may not reduce those Comments of LIUNA Local 783 San Bernardino Logistics Center (Proj. No. ANZ1501) January 16, 2018 Page 9 impacts to less than significant when traffic impacts are properly calculated. An EIR is required to analyze and mitigate the Project's traffic impacts. C. The Project May Have Significant Biological Resource Impacts. Wildlife biologist Dr. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D., concludes that the Project may have significant impacts on several special status species. An EIR is required to analyze and mitigate these impacts. Dr. Smallwood notes that the IS/MND concludes that kangaroo rats have been identified only 0.5 miles from the Project site, yet the IS/MND concludes that there are no kangaroo rates on the Project site. Dr. Smallwood disputes this conclusion, stating: Furthermore, 0.5 miles is not very far from critical habitat of San Bernardino kangaroo rat. Members of this species can easily traverse 0.5 miles, and could do under an hour. Using a thermal imaging camera at night, I have witnessed kangaroo rats traveling over long distances very quickly. Half a mile is not far away for dispersing kangaroo rats. (Smallwood, p.2). Dr. Smallwood concludes that there is a fair argument that kangaroo rats may use the Project site, and that further analysis is required to determine their presence. The IS/MND's biological analysis acknowledges that burrowing owls "could potentially be found on site." LSA Associates (2017:25). The study also concludes, "The project site features sparse vegetation and bare ground that may be suitable burrowing owl habitat." LSA Associates (2017:25). However, the IS/MND suggests a lower probability of burrowing owl use. Dr. Smallwood disputes this conclusion, finding, "Any biologist with even minimal experience with burrowing owls should conclude that this site is suitable burrowing owl foraging habitat. In my investigations, both day and night, the conditions on the proposed project site are ideal as burrowing owl foraging habitat (Smallwood et al. 2009, 2013, Smallwood 2016)." (Smallwood, p. 3). Dr. Smallwood notes that the a -bird database shows 15 burrowing owl siting within 500 meters of the Project site. One a -bird posting at a site only 400 m south of the project site included the note, "The best place to see this bird anywhere away from the Salton Sea." (Smallwood, p.4). Dr. Smallwood concludes that the IS/MND's analysis for burrowing owls is entirely inadequate given their likely presence. He notes that the IS/MND failed to comply with 38 out of 39 standards established by official California Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) guidelines for burrowing owls. Dr. Smallwood also concludes that mitigation for burrowing owl impacts are inadequate. The IS/MND only proposes 3 of 33 mitigation measures set forth by the DFW. These measures are feasible and must be implemented. Dr. Smallwood notes that 17 species of raptor and 11 other bird species have been identified very close to the Project site. Based on reliable databases, Dr. Smallwood concludes, "Based on habitat affinities and geographic range overlap, I tallied 56 special - status species as possibly or probably using the site for foraging, refuge, roosting, breeding, or for all purposes (Table 1)." (Smallwood, p. 2). San Bernardino Logistics center (Fro) January 16, 2018 Page 10 NO. ANCI 5Ul ) Dr. Smallwood concludes that there is a fair argument that the Project will interfere with wildlife movement in the area, which is not adequately analyzed in the IS/MND. Given the large number of special status species likely to exist on the Project site, Dr. Smallwood concludes that the Project may have significant impacts related to vehicle collisions with species. Dr. Smallwood notes that the Project will generate almost 1,500 vehicle trips per day, and that, Vehicle collisions have accounted for the deaths of many thousands of reptile, amphibian, mammal, bird, and arthropod fauna, and the impacts have often been found to be significant at the population level (Forman et al. 2003). It is likely project -related traffic impacts will far exceed the impacts of land conversion to a warehouse. But not one word of traffic -related impacts appears in the Initial Study — a gross shortfall of the CEQA review. (Smallwood, p. 11). Since the IS/MND fails to analyze the risk of vehicle collisions entirely, an EIR is required to analyze and mitigate this impact. Dr. Smallwood also concludes that the Project will have significant cumulative impacts with other similar projects in the area. Dr. Smallwood states: The Initial Study does not address the project's cumulative contribution to road morality caused by increased traffic volume on the region's roadways. At a minimum the cumulative impacts analysis should have considered other like -kind projects in the region. Table 3 lists some distribution warehouse projects in the region, including the predicted traffic increases associated with each project, so far totaling 87,234 additional daily PCE and 26,023 additional daily truck trips. Additional like -kind projects, are likely built, planned or underway in the region, and not included in Table 3. Cumulative impacts loom large due to crushing and collision fatalities of wildlife along many miles of roadway in the region. These impacts need to be addressed in an EIR. (Smallwood, p.12). These cumulative projects in the area will contribute to the cumulative impacts of the Project, not only for biological impacts, but also for air quality (NOx and Diesel Particulate Matter), greenhouse gases, traffic and other impacts. Comments of LIUNA Local 783 San Bernardino Logistics Center (Prof. No. ANZ1501) January 16, 2018 Page 11 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the IS/MND for the Project should be withdrawn, an EIR should be prepared and the draft EIR should be circulated for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA. An EIR is necessary to analyze the Projects significant adverse impacts on, cancer risk, ozone precursors (NOx), greenhouse gases, traffic and wildlife. The EIR must also propose all feasible mitigation measures and alternatives to reduce the Project's significant impacts. Given the location of the Project, surrounded by residential neighborhoods, the EIR should certainly consider alternate locations away from residential areas. Thank you for considering our comments. Sincerely, I; Richard Drury Lozeau I Drury LLP Counsel for LIUNA Local 783 ATTACHMENT A mma L S A FIGURE 2 N 0 100 200 FEET SOURCE: Goode Earth. 2014: ESRI Streetmap. 2013. Sart Bernardino Logistics Center Project Location ATTACHMENT B S YVA P E Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment 2656 291h Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg. (949) 887-9013 January 12, 2018 mha emann swa e.com Richard Drury Lozeau I Drury LLP 410 12th Street, Suite 250 Oakland, CA 94607 Subject: Comments on the San Bernardino Logistics Center Project Dear Mr. Drury, We have reviewed the March 2017 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and associated attachments for the proposed San Bernardino Logistics Center Project ("Project") located in the City of San Bernardino ("City"). The proposed Project is located on a 20.3 -acre parcel just north of Sixth Street and east of Sterling Avenue in the southeastern portion of the City of San Bernardino. The Project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change that will change both the existing General Plan Land Use designation ("Multiple Family Residential") and the existing zoning ("Residential Medium High") to "Industrial Light". The Project would result in the construction of one high cube logistics warehouse building with a maximum of 450,000 square feet including up to 20,000 square feet that could be designated for office space. The Project would also include two driveways along the southern boundary off of Sixth Street and an emergency only access point from McKinley Street. The conceptual site plan shows 32 loading docks along the southern side of the building with vehicle parking along the east and west sides of the warehouse building. An onsite retention basin would be placed in the southern portion of the site adjacent to Sixth Street. Construction of public improvements to the adjacent public roadways will consist of pavement widening, curb, gutters, and sidewalks. Our review concludes that IS/MND fails to adequately evaluate the Project's Air Quality and GHG impacts. As a result, emissions and health impacts associated with the construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. A Project -specific Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality, GHG, and health risk impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. 1 Air Quality Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The IS/MND relies on emissions calculated from the California Emissions Estimator Model Version CalEEMod.2013.2.2 ("CaIEEMod").' CaIEEMod provides recommended default values based on site specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project -specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.2 Once all of the values are inputted into the model, the Project's construction and operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated. These output files disclose to the reader what parameters were utilized in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions, and make known which default values were changed as well as provide a justification for the values selected.' When we reviewed the Project's CaIEEMod output files, we found that several of the values inputted into the model were not consistent with information disclosed in the IS/MND. As a result, the Project's operational emissions are greatly underestimated. A DEIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality. Incorrect Usage of Fontana Truck Trip Study for Fleet Mix The IS/MND relies upon an artificially low truck fleet mix percentage to model the operational emissions associated with the proposed High -Cube Warehouse buildings, and as a result, the Project's mobile - source emissions during operation are greatly underestimated. The Project's Final Traffic Impact Analysis Study (Appendix E) uses a truck fleet mix of approximately 20 percent, which was taken from the August 2003 City of Fontana Study Truck Trip Generation Study ("Fontana Study")'. Table A of the Traffic Impact Study demonstrates the vehicle mix used to model Project emissions (see excerpt below) (Appendix E, Table A, pp. 50). 1 CaIEEMod Model 2013.2.2 Website Archive, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/caIeemod/download-model- 2013 z CaIEEMod Model 2013.2.2 User's Guide, pp. 2, 9, available at: http://www.agmd.goyldocs/default- source caleemod users uideSe t2016. df?sfvrsn=6 ' CaIEEMod Model 2013.2.2 User's Guide, pp. 7, 13, available at: htt www.a md. ov�docs default- source.caleemod users uideSe t2016. df?sfvrsn=6 (A key feature of the CaIEEMod program is the "remarks" feature, where the user explains why a default setting was replaced by a "user defined" value. These remarks are included in the report.) ' "Truck Trip Generation Study." City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, August 2003, available at: http://www.fontana.org/Document :enterHome/View/622 Table A - Project Trip Generation A.M. Peak Hour I. Peek Hour Uses Units In Out Total I In Out Total High Cube Warehousel 450.0 TSF funit (Cars) LTnit (2 -Axle Trucks) T3nit (3 -Axle Trucks) F,ips,Unit(4+Axle Trucks) Iri sfiTnit Notal 0.065 0.003 0.003 0.009 0.080 0.023 0.001 13.002 0:004 0.030 0.088 0 QQ4 0.005 0.013 0.110 0.03`2 0.001 0_002 0.005 0.040 0.063 0.003 0.004 0.010 0.080 0.095 0.004 0:006 0.015 0.120 1337 0.058 0.078 0.207 1.680 Trip Generation (Cars) Trip Generation (2 -Axle Trucks) Trip Generation (3 -Axle Trucks) Trip Generation (4+ Axle Trucks) Trip Generation (Total) 29 1 1 4 35 11 1 1 2 15 40 2 2 6 50 14 0 1 2 17 29 2 2. 5 38 43 ? 3 7 55 602 26 35 93 756 Trip Generation (Gars) PCE Trip generation (2 -Axle Trucks) PCE Tnp Generation (3 -Axle Trucks) PCE Trip Genera ron (4= Axle Trucks) PCE Trip generation (Total) 29 2 3 12 46 11 2 3 6 22 40 4 6 18 68 14 0 3 6 23 29 4 5 15 53 43 4 11 21 76 602 52 88 279 10'2.1 Total PCE Trips + 46 22 68 23 553 76 ! 1021 Notes: TSF= lbousand Square Feet. t The trip generation is based on rates for Land Use 152 - "High Cube Warehouse- from the ITE Trip Gerrerutim, , 9th Edition. 4trip ips generation rates were conver4ed to ear and truck trips using the veiuicle mix included in the Fontana Truck Trip Generation Study. Truck tra ere converted to FCEs �a ing PCE factors included in the City's TIA Guidelines, dated June 2015. A 2.0 PCE factor was wed for 2- asle trucks. 25 for 3-ax.e trucks and 3.0 for 4- and more axie trucks was used. According to the table above, the Traffic Impact Study determines that the Project's vehicle fleet mix will consist of approximately 79.585 percent passenger cars and approximately 20.426 percent trucks. The use of the Fontana Study to determine the Project's mobile -source impacts, however, is incorrect according to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Staff, as it has limited applicability. As a result, the Fontana Study should not be relied upon to determine the Project's mobile - source emissions, specifically in regard to the High -Cube Warehouse building. As is disclosed in the IS/M.ND and associated appendices, the proposed Project will consist of one industrial warehouse building (IS/MND, p. 1). According to SCAQMD staff, the "Fontana Study, by itself, is not characteristic 5 This value was obtained by dividing the passenger car trip rate (1.337) by the total vehicle trip rate (1.68) to derive the fleet mix percentage for passenger cars ((1.337/1.68) x 100 = 79.58%). 1 This value was obtained by adding the 2,3, and 4 -axle truck trip rates (0.058, 0.078, 0.207) and dividing this number by the total vehicle trip rate ((0.343/1.68) x 100 = 20.42%). 3 i of high cube warehouses."' The SCAQMD also staff finds the following additional issues with the Fontana Study :8 (; • The overall trip rate is based on only four warehouses total, which includes two warehouses with zeros. In other words, the results of the Fontana Study were based on only two data points. As is disclosed in the Fontana Study, the daily trip rate was only based on data from a Target warehouse and a TAB warehouse.9 • The Fontana Study does not report any 24-hour daily truck trip rates. According to the Fontana Study, "Trip generation statistics for daily truck trips were not calculated because vehicle classifications counts could not be obtained from the driveway 24-hour counts."10 • The trip rates using the Fontana study are calculated based on a 20 percent truck fleet mix, which is inconsistent with SCAQMD's recommendation that agencies use a truck fleet mix of 40 percent. The use of a 20 percent truck fleet mix is not consistent with recommendations set forth by the SCAQMD for High -Cube Warehouses, and does not accurately represent the percentage of trucks that access a High -Cube Warehouse on a daily basis. Rather, the SCAQMD recommends that lead agencies assume a truck fleet mix of 40 percent for High -Cube Warehouses. According to Appendix E: Technical Source Documentation of the CalEEMod User's Guide, "in order to avoid underestimating the number of trucks visiting warehouse facilities," SCAQMD staff "recommends that lead agencies conservatively assume that an average of 40 percent of total trips are truck trips [(0.48*10 + 0.2*4)/(10+4)=0.4)]."11 If Project -specific data is not available, such as detailed trip rates based on a known tenant schedule, this average of 40 percent provides a reasonably conservative value based on currently available data. Since the future tenant is unknown, the tenant schedule is also likely not known; therefore, a 40 percent truck fleet mix should also be assumed for the proposed High -Cube Warehouse buildings. Specifically, the following fleet mix percentage should have been applied to the High -Cube Warehouse buildings proposed for the Project. "`Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage" Presentation. SCAQMD Mobile Source Committee, July 2014, available at: http:/Jwww.agmd.gov/docsidefault-source/cegajhandbook/hip-h-cube-warehouse-trio-rate- stud .-for-air- ualit -anal sis finaltrucktri stud msc072514. df?sfvrsn=2, p. 10 8 "Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage" Presentation. SCAQMD Mobile Source Committee, July 2014, available at: htt www.a md. ov docs default -source ce a `handbook hi h -cube -warehouse -tri -rate- stud -for-air ualit -anal sis finaltrucktri stud msc072514. df?sfvrsn=2, p. 10 9 "Truck Trip Generation Study." City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, August 2003, available at: http://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/Home/View/622, p. 35 " "Truck Trip Generation Study." City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, August 2003, available at: http:J/www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter_Home/View/622, p. 6 11 "Appendix E Technical Source Documentation." CalEEMod User's Guide, July 2013, available at: http://www.ai,qmd.gov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook hi h-cube-warehouse-trip-rate-study-for-air:guality- anal sis h ig h-cube-resource-caleemod-a pen dix-e. pdf?sfvrsn=2 pp. 15 E] Parameter IS/MND Mix Passenger Cars (LDA) Operational 2 Axle Trucks (LHD1, LHD2, MDV) Mobile Fleet Mix 3 Axle Trucks (MHD) 4+ Axle Trucks (HHDT) The "Operational Mobile Fleet Mix" percentages for trucks in the table above were adjusted to reflect a truck trip percentage of approximately 40 percent, which is consistent with recommended procedures set forth by SCAQMD staff for High -Cube Warehouses. This fleet mix more accurately represents the number of trips that are likely to occur in relation to the High -Cube Warehouse during Project operation. As such, an updated air quality analysis should be prepared in a DEIR that adequately assesses the Project's air quality impacts, assuming the correct fleet mix for the High -Cube Warehouse land use. Incorrect Truck Trip Length According to the Trip Type Information table in Appendix A-2 of the IS/MND, the CaIEEMod model used a truck trip length of 30 miles to estimate Project emissions (Appendix A-1, pp. 48, pp. 70, pp. 93). This, however, is not only inconsistent with the 40 -mile truck trip length recommended by the SCAQMD for High -Cube Warehouses, but is also inconsistent with trip lengths used for similar projects within southern California. As a result, the Project's operational mobile -source emissions are greatly underestimated. Similar to the proposed Project, the Kimball Business Park Project proposes to construct approximately 1,203,050 square feet of warehouse and light industrial/business park uses within the City of Chino. The Air Quality Impact Analysis for the Kimball Business Park Project derives a trip length of approximately 50 miles using recommendations provided by the SCAQMD. The Air Quality Impact Analysis states, "In the last five years, the SCAQMD has provided numerous comments on the trip lengths for warehouse/distribution and industrial land use projects (33). The SCAQMD asserts that the model -default trip lengths in CalEEModT' and the URBan EMISsions (URBEMIS) 2007 model (version 9.2.4) would underestimate emissions. The SCAQMD asserts that for warehouse, distribution center, and industrial land use projects, most of the heavy-duty trucks would be hauling consumer goods, often from the Port of Long Beach and Los Angeles (POLA and POLB) and/or to destinations outside of California. The SCAQMD states that for this reason, the CalEEModTm and the URBan EMISsions model default trip length (approximately 12.6 miles) would not be representative of activities at like facilities. The SCAQMD generally recommends the use of a 40 -mile one-way trip length,- .12 Therefore, at the very least, the Project's Air Quality Analysis should have used a one-way trip length of 40 miles, as is recommended by the SCAQMD. This conclusion is further supported by the SCAQMD's comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Waterman Logistic Center Project. The 12 Kimball Business Park Air Quality Impact Analysis, Urban Crossroads, available at: htt www.cityofchino.org/kovernment-services/community-development/environmental-documents SWAPE Mix 79.60% Passenger Cars (LDA) 59.14% 3.50% 2 Axle Trucks (LHD1) 6.92% 4.60% 3 Axle Trucks (MHD) 9.28% 12.30% 4+ Axle Trucks (HHDT) 24.66% The "Operational Mobile Fleet Mix" percentages for trucks in the table above were adjusted to reflect a truck trip percentage of approximately 40 percent, which is consistent with recommended procedures set forth by SCAQMD staff for High -Cube Warehouses. This fleet mix more accurately represents the number of trips that are likely to occur in relation to the High -Cube Warehouse during Project operation. As such, an updated air quality analysis should be prepared in a DEIR that adequately assesses the Project's air quality impacts, assuming the correct fleet mix for the High -Cube Warehouse land use. Incorrect Truck Trip Length According to the Trip Type Information table in Appendix A-2 of the IS/MND, the CaIEEMod model used a truck trip length of 30 miles to estimate Project emissions (Appendix A-1, pp. 48, pp. 70, pp. 93). This, however, is not only inconsistent with the 40 -mile truck trip length recommended by the SCAQMD for High -Cube Warehouses, but is also inconsistent with trip lengths used for similar projects within southern California. As a result, the Project's operational mobile -source emissions are greatly underestimated. Similar to the proposed Project, the Kimball Business Park Project proposes to construct approximately 1,203,050 square feet of warehouse and light industrial/business park uses within the City of Chino. The Air Quality Impact Analysis for the Kimball Business Park Project derives a trip length of approximately 50 miles using recommendations provided by the SCAQMD. The Air Quality Impact Analysis states, "In the last five years, the SCAQMD has provided numerous comments on the trip lengths for warehouse/distribution and industrial land use projects (33). The SCAQMD asserts that the model -default trip lengths in CalEEModT' and the URBan EMISsions (URBEMIS) 2007 model (version 9.2.4) would underestimate emissions. The SCAQMD asserts that for warehouse, distribution center, and industrial land use projects, most of the heavy-duty trucks would be hauling consumer goods, often from the Port of Long Beach and Los Angeles (POLA and POLB) and/or to destinations outside of California. The SCAQMD states that for this reason, the CalEEModTm and the URBan EMISsions model default trip length (approximately 12.6 miles) would not be representative of activities at like facilities. The SCAQMD generally recommends the use of a 40 -mile one-way trip length,- .12 Therefore, at the very least, the Project's Air Quality Analysis should have used a one-way trip length of 40 miles, as is recommended by the SCAQMD. This conclusion is further supported by the SCAQMD's comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Waterman Logistic Center Project. The 12 Kimball Business Park Air Quality Impact Analysis, Urban Crossroads, available at: htt www.cityofchino.org/kovernment-services/community-development/environmental-documents Waterman Logistic Center proposes to construct a 426,858 square feet of logistics warehouse buildings within the City of San Bernardino, similar to the proposed Project.13 The Waterman Logistic Center's Air Quality Study utilized an internal truck trip length of 24.11 miles in accordance with the Southern California Association of Government Heavy Duty Truck Model. The SCAQMD, however, finds issue with this trip length, stating that most industrial land use types haul consumer goods from the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles as well as locations outside the SCAQMD boundaries, including Banning Pass, San Diego County line, and Cajon Pass (see excerpt below). • Project site to Port of Los Angeles/Long Beach: 74 miles • Project site to Banning Pass: 38 miles • Project site to San Diego County tine: 55 miles • Project site to Cajon Pass: 24 mites • Project site to downtown Los Angeles: 60 mites As you can see in the excerpt above, the trip lengths from the Waterman Logistics Center project site to each of the locations listed by the SCAQMD are well over the 24.11 -mile trip length utilized in the Waterman Logistic Center, and most are well over the 30 -mile trip length utilized for the proposed Project. Using SCAQMD's recommended methodology, "Assuming that 50 percent of all delivery trips will travel to and from the project and the Port of Los Angeles/Long Beach, the use of 24.11 miles as an average internal truck trip greatly underestimates the air quality impact."14 Both of the proposed projects are located nearby each other. Therefore, if the SCAQMD concludes that the use of a 24.11 -mile trip length would underestimate the Waterman Logistics Center's operational emissions, then surely, the SCAQMD will also find the 30 -mile trip length used for the proposed Project to be inadequate, resulting in an underestimation of emissions. As is recommended by the SCAQMD, in order to ensure that the IS/MND conservatively evaluates the potential for air quality impacts, the Lead Agency should utilize a trip length that is reflective of the potential truck trips or limit the truck trip miles allowed to levels analyzed in the IS/MND. If higher truck trip miles are anticipated or required, the Lead Agency should update the Traffic Impact Study and Final CEQA document to disclose this impact to the public." Updated Analysis Indicates Increase in Pollutant Emissions In an effort to accurately estimate the proposed Project's operational emissions, we prepared an updated air model using the most recent CalEEMod version, CalEEMod.2016.3.1. Consistent with the SCAQMD, we assumed that 40 percent of the Project's High -Cube Warehouse vehicle trips would be "SCAQMD Comment Letter on the Mitigated Negative Declaration (RDEIR) for the Proposed Waterman Logistics Center, January 8 2015, available at: htt www.a md. ov docs default -source ce a comment- Iettersj2015/january/mndwaterman.rdf 14Ibid., p. 4. 11 Ibid., p. 4. Il made by trucks, and we applied the SCAQMD recommended fleet mix by axle type to the model for the proposed High -Cube Warehouse (LDA, LHDT1, MHD, and HHDT) (see table below). 16 SCAQMD Recommended Fleet Mix Vehicle Type Fleet Mix (%) Passenger Cars (LDA) 59.14% 4+ Axle Trucks (HHDT) 24.66% 3 Axle Trucks (MHD) 9.28% 2 Axle Trucks (LHDT1) 6.92% Total 100.0% Finally, we utilized a truck trip length of 40 miles to represent the anticipated truck traffic associated with the proposed Project's buildings. When correct input parameters are used to model emissions from the proposed Project, we find that the Project's operational NOx emissions increase significantly when compared to the IS/MND's model. Furthermore, we found that all the Project's operational NOx emissions exceed the SCAQMD's regional significance threshold (see table below). Maximum Daily Operational Emissions (lbs/day) Model _ NOx IS/MND 53.0 __._ SWAPE 94.0 Percent Increase 77% SCAQMD Regional Threshold (lbs/day) 55 Threshold Exceedance? Yes As demonstrated in the table above, when correct site-specific input parameters are used to model emissions, the Project's operational NOx emissions increase by 77 percent and exceed the SCAQMD's established threshold of 55 pounds per day (lbs/day). This analysis demonstrates that when the Project's operational emissions are estimated correctly, the Project would result in a significant impact that was not previously identified in the IS/MND. As a result, a DEIR should be prepared that includes an updated air pollution model to adequately estimate the Project's emissions, and additional mitigation measures should be identified and incorporated to reduce these emissions to a less than significant level." 16 "Appendix E Technical Source Documentation." CalEENIod User's Guide, July 2013, available at: htto://www.agmd.gov docs default -source ce a handbook hi h -cube -warehouse -tri -rate-stud -for-air- ualit - anal sis.hi h-cube-resource-caleemod-a endix-e. ft sfvrsn=2, pp. 15 17 See section titled "Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions" on p. 20 of this letter. These measures would effectively reduce operational NOx emissions as well as DPM and GHG emissions. 7 Diesel Particulate Matter Health Risk Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The IS/MND fails to adequately evaluate the potential health risk impact that the proposed Project would have on nearby sensitive receptors because (1) the IS/MND fails to adequately evaluate the Project's construction -related health risk; and (2) the IS/MND's operational health risk assessment (HRA) fails to follow the follow the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment's (OEHHA) guidance when estimating the total cancer risk. As a result, the Project's overall health risk impact is greatly underestimated and misrepresented. Our analysis, discussed herein, provides substantial evidence that when the Project's construction -related health risk impact is properly evaluated, and when an updated operational HRA is prepared using the most up-to-date guidance, we find that the proposed Project would result in a potentially significant health-related impact that was not previously identified in the IS/MND. As a result, until a proper construction and operational HRA is prepared that adequately evaluates the Project's health-related impacts, the Project should not be approved. As previously stated, the IS/MND fails to properly evaluate the construction -related diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions that will be emitted during Project construction. The IS/MND gives no justification for the omittance of a proper analysis of the Project's construction emissions, other than stating that "for the purposes of an HRA, short-term emissions are of concern for analyzing acute health impacts, and long-term emissions are of concern for analyzing chronic and carcinogenic health impacts" (Appendix A-3, p. 9). The IS/MND's assertion that short-term emissions are only used to evaluate acute health impacts is entirely incorrect. According to the SCAQMD, it is recommended that health risk impacts from short-term projects also be assessed. The Guidance document states, "Since these short-term calculations are only meant for projects with limits on the operating duration, these short-term cancer risk assessments can be thought of as being the equivalent to a 30 -year cancer risk estimate and the appropriate thresholds would still apply (i.e. for a 5 -year project, the maximum emissions during the 5 -year period would be assessed on the more sensitive population, from the third trimester to age 5, after which the project's emissions would drop to 0 for the remaining 25 years to get the 30 -year equivalent cancer risk estimate)".18 Additionally, OEHHA, the organization responsible for providing recommendations and guidance on how to conduct health risk assessments in California, provides guidance for cancer risk evaluation in short term projects. In February of 2015, OEHHA released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, which was formally adopted in March of 2015.19 The guidance document states that "local air pollution control districts sometimes use the risk assessment guidelines for the Hot Spots program in permitting decisions for short-term projects such as construction or waste site remediation" .20 Furthermore, the guidance documents recommends that that all short-term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive 18 h.ttp://www.aqmd.gov/docsZdefault-source/planninrisk-assessment riskass roc[unel5. df?sfvrsn=2, p. IX -2 19 "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: htt oehha.ca. oy air hot s .ots hots ots2015.html 20lbid, p. 8-17. receptors.21 Thus, the IS/MND should have conducted some sort of quantitative analysis of the Project's construction -related carcinogenic health risk impact and should have compared the results of this analysis to applicable thresholds. The SCAQMD provides a specific numerical threshold of 10 in one million for determining a project's health risk impact.22 Therefore, the IS/MND should have conducted an assessment that compares the Project's construction health risk to this threshold in order to determine the Project's construction -related carcinogenic health risk impact. By failing to prepare a proper construction HRA, the IS/MND fails to provide a comprehensive analysis of the sensitive receptor impacts that may occur as a result of exposure to substantial air pollutants. In order to evaluate the Project's operational health-related impact, the IS/MND uses the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) AERMOD program and the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program (HARP) software program to model the Project's emissions and evaluate whether mobile source DPM emissions resulting from Project operation would pose a significant health risk to nearby sensitive receptors (Appendix A-3, p. 11). According to the IS/MND, the 9 -year child cancer risk posed to nearby sensitive receptors from exposure to DPM emissions generated during Project operation is 1.5 in one million, while the 30 -year residential cancer risk posed to nearby sensitive receptors is 2.1 in one million, which are both below the SCAQMD's significance threshold of ten in one million (see excerpt below) (Appendix A-3, p. 13). Maximum Cancer Risk Location (risk per mullion) SGA -AID Threshold 10 9 -rear Child Risks 1.5 30- Y ear Residential Risks 7-1 SiLxnificant' T FAIaximum Chronic Risk (Hazard Index: } 1.0 3.3 x 10 Maximum Acute Risk (hazard Inde: 1.0 3.1 x 10-' Source: Compiled by LSA Associates, Inc_ (June 2015). 29 No No I The Hazard index is the unit -less ratio of the estintated to ng -teem level of exposure to a hazardous air pollutant (IiAP) for a potential maximum exposed ind ridual Ov EI} to its reference exposs€re le_keel_ 5C �AQ'%ID = South Coast Air Quality Management District As a result, the IS/MND determines that, "as the results show, all health risk levels to nearby residents are well below HRA thresholds. No significant health risk would occur from project -related truck traffic, and no mitigation is necessary" (Appendix A-3, p. 13). This conclusion, however, is incorrect, as the IS/MND's HRA fails to utilize early -in -life exposure factors recommended by OEHHA. The omission of early life exposure adjustments when calculating a project's health risk, however, has been shown to underestimate the lifetime exposure cancer risk for many carcinogens .23 In its Technical Support Document for Cancer Potency Factors report, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment's " "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: htt oehha.ca. ov air. hot s ots 2015 2015GuidanceManual..df, p. 8-18 zz htt www.a md. ov docs default -source ce a handbook sca :and -air- ualit -si nificance- thresholds. df?sfvrsn=2 23 "Review of EPA's Draft Supplemental Guidance For Assessing Cancer Susceptibility From Early -Life Exposure to Carcinogens." The Supplemental Guidance For Assessing Cancer Susceptibility Review Panel Of The EPA Science Advisory Board, March 2004, available at: htt s: osemite.eg-a•govfsab sab roduct.nsf 658FD14F8F94C7E385256FOA006C94E0 File sab04003. df 0 r ■ r (OEHHA) Air Hotspots Program determined that the lifetime cancer potency for carcinogens is underestimated when early -life susceptibility is not included in modeling, and therefore recommends r the use of specific adjustment factors to account for third trimester fetuses, infants and children's increased sensitivity to carcinogens, regardless of the mode of action.24 Furthermore, in response to the recommendations made in the U.S. EPA's Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Susceptibility from Early - Life Exposure to Carcinogens report regarding application of default age -adjustments to only mutagenic carcinogens, the EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) made the following recommendation: "Certain groups of non -mutagenic carcinogens with known modes of action serve as important examples in support of applying a default factor to non -mutagenic carcinogens when the mode of action is unknown. The Review Panel suggests that the Agency reconsider limiting the application of adjustment factors only to mutagenic agents and instead apply a default approach to both mutagenic and to non -mutagenic chemicals for which mode of action remains unknown or insufficiently characterized.'.zs As demonstrated above, the SAB recommends applying adjustment factors to carcinogens, regardless of the mode of action. As such, the HRA should have been conducted using early life adjustment factors to accurately assess the Project's health risk impact. Furthermore, by failing to conduct the Project's HRA using OEHHA methodology, the IS/MND fails to follow requirements set forth by the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD's AB 2588 & Rule 1402 Supplemental Guidelines state, "Facilities required to submit risk assessments to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) under the AIR Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB 2588) must follow the OEHHA [Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment] Guidelines pursuant to Health and Safety Code 44360(b)(2).,,26 As seen above, SCAQMD guidelines clearly state that projects within SCAQMD jurisdiction must comply with OEHHA guidance when determining a project's health risk. The San Bernardino Logistics Center Project is located in the City of San Bernardino, which is under SCAQMD jurisdiction. As such, because an HRA was prepared for the proposed Project, the HRA should have employed OEHHA guidance in order to accurately account for early -in -life exposure. Similarly, the California Air Resources Control Board (CARB) also states that OEHHA guidance should be used when assessing a proposed project's health- related impact. Specifically, CARB states, 24 "Technical Support Document for Cancer Potency Factors." OEHHA, May 2009, available at: httips://oehha.cq.g,ovZmedia/downloads/crnr/tsdcancerpotency.p_df, p. 51 " "Review of EPA's Draft Supplemental Guidance For Assessing Cancer Susceptibility From Early -Life Exposure to Carcinogens." The Supplemental Guidance For Assessing Cancer Susceptibility Review Panel Of The EPA Science Advisory Board, March 2004, available at: htt s: osemite.e a. oy sab sab roduct.nsf 658FD14F8F94C7E385256FOA006C94E0 File sab04003. df 26 AB 2588 & Rule 1402 Supplemental Guidelines, SCAQMD, p. 1, available at: http://www.agmd.pov/docs/default- source Plannin •risk -assessment ab2588-su lemental uidelines. df?sfvrsn=9 10 "The Act [AB 321 requires that toxic air emissions from stationary sources (facilities) be quantified and compiled into an inventory according to criteria and guidelines developed by the ARB, that each facility be prioritized to determine whether a risk assessment must be conducted, that the risk assessments be conducted according to methods developed by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), that the public be notified of significant risks posed by nearby facilities, and that emissions which result in a significant risk be reduced."27 As you can see from the excerpt above, CARB guidance reiterates that OEHHA methodology should be used when assessing a project's health-related impact. By failing to do so, the Project's HRA is inconsistent with requirements and guidance set forth by the SCAQMD and CARB. Finally, the HRA's failure to include early -life adjustment factors is not only inconsistent with OEHHA, CARB, and SCAQMD guidance, but it is also inconsistent with analyses conducted for other CEQA projects in the City of Los Angeles. For example, the HRA prepared for 11460 West Gateway Boulevard 18 project included the use of age-specific breathing rates when calculating the Project's excess cancer risk. Therefore, to demonstrate consistency with applicable guidelines and analyses conducted for other development projects within California, the HRA prepared for the San Bernardino Logistics Center Project should have also used adjustment factors when calculating the Project's cancer risk. In February 2015, OEHHA released updated health risk assessment guidelines that require adjustments for early -life exposure to carcinogens in risk calculations for specific age groupings that incorporate several age specific factors in the cancer risk calculations.29 By failing to follow guidance set forth by OEHHA, the HRA failed to apply correct age sensitivity factors (ASFs) for the infant and child age groups when calculating the Project's cancer risk. As a result, the potential excess cancer risk posed infants and children is not accurately represented or accounted for, and therefore, the HRA prepared for the proposed Project should not be relied upon to determine the significance of the Project's health-related impacts. Therefore, we maintain that an updated HRA must be prepared in a DEIR in order to adequately evaluate the Project's health-related impacts. Omission of Age Sensitivity Factors OEHHA was tasked with developing guidelines for conducting health risk assessments under the Air Toxics Hot Spots Program (Health and Safety Code Section 43360(b)(2)). OEHHA initially developed Technical Support Documents (TSDs) in 1999 and 2000 in response to this statutory requirement. Since 2000, they have revised and adopted TSDs in an effort to present updated methodologies that reflect scientific knowledge and techniques developed since the previous guidelines were prepared; in particular, to explicitly include consideration of possible differential effects on the health of infants, 27 https://www.arb.ca.gov/ab2588/overview.htm 28 11460 West Gateway Boulevard Health Risk Assessment prepared by Air Quality Dynamics, available at: htt clkre .laci .or onlinedocs 2017 17-0932 misc 1 11-06-2017. df 29 "Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessment." Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, February 2015, available at: htt : .oehha.ca. ov air hot spots/hotsp_pts20!5.html 11 children and other sensitive subpopulations, in accordance with the mandate of the Children's Environmental Health Protection Act (Senate Bill 25, Escutia, Chapter 731, Statutes of 1999, Health and Safety Code Sections 39669.5 et seq.).3o In 2009, OEHHA assessed the impact of cancer potency on age of exposure and concluded that, "The potency of carcinogens, and thus cancer risk, varies based on the lifestage at exposure... accounting for effects of early -in -life exposure requires accounting for both the increased potency of early in life exposure to carcinogens and the greater exposure on a per kg body weight that occurs early in life due to behavioral and physiological differences between infants and children, and adults".31 The guidance document continues on to explain that "in the absence of chemical -specific data, OEHHA recommends a default ASF of 10 for the third trimester to age 2 years, and an ASF of 3 for ages 2 through 15 years to account for potential increased sensitivity to carcinogens during childhood .1112 To address this issue, OEHHA released updated risk exposure guidelines requiring that Age Sensitivity Factors (ASF) be applied to early life exposures in the absence of chemical -specific data.33 These factors, as summarized in the table below, were incorporated into OEHHA's most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, which was formally adopted in March of 2015 (see excerpt be 10W).31 Table 8.3 Age Sensitivity Factors by Age Group for Cancer Risk Assessment Age Group Age Sensitivity Factor (untless) P Trimester 10 0<2 years .10 2<9 years 3 2<96 years 3 16<30 years 1 96-70 years 1 "Adoption of the Revised Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Technical Support Document for Cancer Potency Factors, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, June 1, 2009, available at: httos: oehha.ca. ov media downloads crnr tsdcancer otenc . df http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/"hot „s ots tsd052909.html 31 Technical Support Document for Exposure Assessment and Stochastic Analysis FINAL, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, August 2012, available at: https:Hoehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/tsdcancerpotency.pdf 3i Ibid., p. 8-4 33 Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, February 2015, available at: htt oehha.ca. ov media downloads crnr 2015 uidancemanual: df 34 "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf 12 Therefore, to provide an appropriate analysis of the increased sensitivity to carcinogens during early -in - life exposure, ASFs should have been applied to the Project's health risk assessment at the time the analysis was conducted. When estimating exposure and the potential for developing cancer over a lifetime, the use of age bins allows more refined exposure information to be used. 35 OEHHA recommends that the health risk impacts be calculated by each age group and then summed to estimate the potential cancer risk over a lifetime. The method used to estimate the Project's HRA significantly underestimates the residential lifetime cancer risk, as it fails to individually assess the infant and child cancer risks, and therefore provides an inaccurate and underestimated depiction of the cancer risk posed to nearby residential receptors. As such, prior to certification of the Project, an updated HRA should be prepared to include these updated values. Omission of Age -Specific Breathing Rates Not only does Project's HRA fail to apply ASFs when estimating the total residential cancer risk, but it also fails to use age-specific breathing rates for infants and children. Review of the Project's HRA demonstrates that the cancer risk for a 9 -year child and the cancer risk for a 30 -year resident were used to determine the significance of the Project's health-related impact (Appendix A-3, p. 13). By calculating the cancer risk in this way, the HRA foregoes the use of age-specific breathing rates, which are recommended by OEHHA and account for increased susceptibility to carcinogens at early -in -life exposure .36 By failing to include age-specific breathing rates, the HRA fails to account for the variability in infant and child breathing rates, and therefore, fails to adequately assess the health risk posed to these sensitive receptors near the Project site. As a result, we find the Project's health-related impact to be misrepresented and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. In August of 2012, OEHHA formally adopted the Technical Support Document for Exposure Assessment and Stochastic Analysis, which includes updated breathing rates for children and infants.37 Chapter three of this document discusses "age-specific breathing rates for use in health risk assessments for short- term exposure ... and for long-term daily average exposures resulting from continuous or repeated 8 - hour exposure." 38 OEHHA recommends the long-term daily breathing rates in Table 3.1 of this document (see excerpt below). 35 "Risk Management Guidance for Stationary Sources of Air Toxics Discussion Draft." ARB and CAPCOA, May 27, 2015, available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/toxicslrma/rma PuidancedraftOS2715.pdf, p. 12 36 https:/Ioehha.ca.gov/`medialdownloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf 37 http:Z/www.oehha.ca.govlair/hot spotsltsd082712.html 38 https:lloehha.ca.oovlmedialdownloadslcrnrlchapter32012.pdf p. 3-1 13 Table 3.1. Recommended Point Estimates for Long -Term Daily Breathing Rates Therefore, to provide an appropriate analysis of the health effects on infants and children, the 95th percentile breathing rates for infants and children should have been applied at the time the analysis was conducted. According to OEHHA guidance, breathing rates for the inhalation pathway are used in order to avoid underestimating the cancer risk to the public, specifically children. By failing to use age specific breathing rates when calculating the Project's total cancer risk, the Project's health risk impact is underestimated and misrepresented. These age specific breathing rates should be applied in an updated health risk assessment to accurately determine the potential cancer risk posed to infants and children residing near the Project site. Until an updated HRA is prepared, the Project should not be approved. Updated Health Risk Assessment Indicates Significant Health Impact In an effort to demonstrate the potential risk posed by construction and operation of the proposed Project to nearby sensitive receptors, we prepared a simple screening -level HRA. The results of our assessment, as described in the sections below, provide substantial evidence demonstrating that potential health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project may result in a potentially significant health risk impact. As such, a DEIR should be prepared to adequately evaluate the proposed Project's health risk impacts, and additional mitigation measures should be identified and incorporated into the Project design, where necessary. As of 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommends AERSCREEN as the leading air dispersion model, due to improvements in simulating local meteorological conditions based on simple input parameters .39 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA40 and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (CAPCOA)41 guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments ("HRSAs"). A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality 39 "AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model," USEPA, April 11, 2011, available at: htt www.eaa-govlttnlscramlguidancelclarification120110411 AERSCREEN Release Memo. df 41 "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: htt oehha.cL. ov air hot sots 2015 2015GuidanceManual. df 41 "Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects," CAPCOA, July 2009, available at: http:/Zwww.capcoa.org/w -content u loads 2012 03 CAPCOA HRA LU Guidelines 8-6-09. df 14 3` ! 0<Z 2<9 2<16 16<30 16<70 Trimester years years years years years Uk -da Mean 225 658 1 535 452 210 185 95th 361 1090 861 745 335 290 Percentile m Ida Mean 15.3 6.2 10.7 13.3 15.0 13.9 95th 23.4 11.2 16.4 22.6 23.5 22.9 Percentile Therefore, to provide an appropriate analysis of the health effects on infants and children, the 95th percentile breathing rates for infants and children should have been applied at the time the analysis was conducted. According to OEHHA guidance, breathing rates for the inhalation pathway are used in order to avoid underestimating the cancer risk to the public, specifically children. By failing to use age specific breathing rates when calculating the Project's total cancer risk, the Project's health risk impact is underestimated and misrepresented. These age specific breathing rates should be applied in an updated health risk assessment to accurately determine the potential cancer risk posed to infants and children residing near the Project site. Until an updated HRA is prepared, the Project should not be approved. Updated Health Risk Assessment Indicates Significant Health Impact In an effort to demonstrate the potential risk posed by construction and operation of the proposed Project to nearby sensitive receptors, we prepared a simple screening -level HRA. The results of our assessment, as described in the sections below, provide substantial evidence demonstrating that potential health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project may result in a potentially significant health risk impact. As such, a DEIR should be prepared to adequately evaluate the proposed Project's health risk impacts, and additional mitigation measures should be identified and incorporated into the Project design, where necessary. As of 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommends AERSCREEN as the leading air dispersion model, due to improvements in simulating local meteorological conditions based on simple input parameters .39 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA40 and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (CAPCOA)41 guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments ("HRSAs"). A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality 39 "AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model," USEPA, April 11, 2011, available at: htt www.eaa-govlttnlscramlguidancelclarification120110411 AERSCREEN Release Memo. df 41 "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: htt oehha.cL. ov air hot sots 2015 2015GuidanceManual. df 41 "Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects," CAPCOA, July 2009, available at: http:/Zwww.capcoa.org/w -content u loads 2012 03 CAPCOA HRA LU Guidelines 8-6-09. df 14 hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach is required prior to approval of the Project. We prepared a preliminary health risk screening assessment of the Project's health-related impact to sensitive receptors using the annual construction and operational PMlo exhaust estimates from our SWAPE CalEEMod model, attached to this letter for reference. According to Google Earth, the closest sensitive receptor to the Project site is located approximately 1 meter away. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we used a residential exposure duration of 30 years, starting from the infantile stage of life. We also assumed that construction and operation of the Project would occur in quick succession, with no gaps between each Project phase. The SWAPE CalEEMod model's annual emissions indicate that construction activities will generate approximately 501 pounds of DPM over the 441 -day construction period. The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation. &Farcy Hol, fbv 46 54 granw I day 1 hour SW55 apl, Rete � Lt ;5 ,c3C i 2 ftp t Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.005967 grams per second (g/s). The SWAPE CalEEMod output files also indicate that operational activities will generate approximately 537 pounds of DPM per year over the 28.8 -years of Project operation. Applying the same equation used to estimate the construction DPM emission rate, we estimated the following emission rate for Project operation. ,gro,m� 537 �� �3,4����ca 1 day 1 �agua� 0. 00773 iLrjs Fmt5s4lan Rate Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.00773 g/s. Construction and operational activity was simulated as a 20.3 -acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN, with dimensions of 409 meters by 201 meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of exhaust stacks on operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release. An urban meteorological setting was selected with model -default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single -hour DPM concentrations from the Project site. EPA guidance suggests that in screening procedures, the annual average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single -hour concentration by 10%.42 For example, for the Maximum Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor (MEIR) the single - hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 2.568 µg/m3 42 http://www.epa.goy/ttnZscramYguidance guide/EPA-454R-92-019 OCR.pdf 15 DPM at approximately 1 meter downwind. Multiplying this single -hour concentration by 10%, we get an annual average concentration of 0.2568 119/m3 for Project construction at the MEIR. For Project operation, the single -hour concentration at the MEIR estimated by AERSCREEN is approximately 3.327 pg/m3 DPM at approximately 1 meter downwind. Multiplying this single -hour concentration by 10%, we get an annual average concentration of 0.3327 pg/m3 for Project operation at the MEIR. We calculated the excess cancer risk to the residential receptors located closest to the Project site using applicable health risk assessment methodologies prescribed by OEHHA and the SCAQMD. Consistent with the construction schedule proposed by the IS/MND, the annual average concentration for construction was used for the first 1.2 years of the infantile stage of life (0-2 years). The annual average concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30 -year exposure period, which makes up the remainder of the infantile stage of life (0-2 years), the child stages of life (2 to 16 years), and adult states of life (16 to 30 years). Consistent with OEHHA guidance, we used Age Sensitivity Factors (ASFs) to account for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution.43 According to the updated guidance, quantified cancer risk should be multiplied by a factor of ten during the first two years of life (infant) and should be multiplied by a factor of three during the child stage of life (2 to 16 years). Furthermore, in accordance with guidance set forth by OEHHA, we used 95th percentile breathing rates for infants.44 We used a cancer potency factor of 1.1 (mg/kg -day) -1 and an averaging time of 25,550 days. The results of our calculations are shown below. The Maximum Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor (MEIR Activity Duration Concentration Breathing Rate (years) (µg/m3) (L/kg-day) ASF Cancer Risk Construction 1.20 0.2568 1090 10 Operation 0.80 0.3327 1090 5.1E-05 Infant Exposure Duration 2.00 10 4.4E-05 Operation Infant Exposure 9.4E-05 _ 14.00 0.3327 572 3 1.2E-04 Child Exposure Duration 14.00 Operation Child Exposure 1.2E-04 14.00 0.3327 261 1 1.8E-05 Adult Exposure Duration 14.00 Lifetime Exposure Duration 30.00 Adult Exposure 1.8E-05 Lifetime Exposure 2.3E-04 The excess cancer risk to adults, children, and infants at the MEIR located approximately 1 meter away, over the course of Project construction and operation are approximately 18, 120, and 94 in one million, respectively. Furthermore, the excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) at 43 "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: htt s: oehha.ca. ov media downloads crnr a4 2015 uidancemanual. df "Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics 'Hot Spots' Information and Assessment Act," June 5, 2015, available at: htt www.a md. ov docs default source tannin risk - assessment ab2588-risk-assessment- uidelines. df?sfvrsn=6, p. 19 "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: htt s: oehha.ca. ov media downloads crnr 2015 uidancemanual. df 16 the MEIR is approximately 230 in one million. Consistent with OEHHA guidance, exposure was assumed to begin in the infantile stage of life to provide the most conservative estimates of air quality hazards. The infant, child, adult, and lifetime cancer risks all exceed the 5CAQMD's threshold of 10 in one million. It should be noted that our analysis represents a screening -level health risk assessment, which is known to be more conservative, and is aimed at health protection.45 The purpose of a screening -level health risk assessment, however, is to determine if a more refined health risk assessment needs to be conducted. if the results of a screening -level health risk are above applicable thresholds, then the Project needs to conduct a more refined health risk assessment that is more representative of site specific concentrations. Our screening -level health risk assessment demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, when correct exposure assumptions and up-to-date, applicable guidance are used. As a result, a refined health risk assessment must be prepared to examine air quality impacts generated by Project construction and operation using site-specific meteorology and specific equipment usage schedules. A Project -specific DEIR must be prepared to adequately evaluate the Project's health risk impact, and should include additional mitigation measures to reduce these impacts to a less -than -significant level." Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Construction Emissions Our updated air quality analysis and health risk assessment demonstrate that, when Project activities are modeled and evaluated correctly, construction -related DPM emissions would result in significant air quality and health risk impacts. Therefore, additional mitigation measures must be identified and incorporated in a Project -specific DEIR to reduce these emissions to a less than significant level. Additional mitigation measures can be found in CAPCOA's Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, which attempt to reduce GHG levels, as well as reduce Criteria Air Pollutants such as particulate matter.47 DPM is a byproduct of diesel fuel combustion, and are emitted by on -road vehicles and by off-road construction equipment. Mitigation for criteria pollutant emissions should include consideration of the following measures in an effort to reduce construction emissions. Limit Construction Equipment Idling Beyond Regulation Requirements Heavy duty vehicles will idle during loading/unloading and during layovers or rest periods with the engine still on, which requires fuel use and results in emissions. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) Heavy -Duty Vehicle Idling Emissions Reduction Program limits idling of diesel -fueled commercial motor vehicles to five minutes. Reduction in idling time beyond the five minutes required under the regulation would further reduce fuel consumption and thus emissions. The Project applicant must develop an enforceable mechanism that monitors the idling time to ensure compliance with this mitigation measure. 4s http:/./`oehha.ca.gov/ilir hot s ots 2015 2015GuidanceManual. df p. 1-5 46 See section titled "Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions" on pg. 20 of this letter. These measures would effectively reduce operational DPM emissions, as well as operational NOx and GHG emissions. 47h.ttp: www.ca coa.or w -content u ioads 2010 11 CAPCOA-Quantification-Re .ort -9 -14 -Final. df 17 Require Implementation of Diesel Control Measures The Northeast Diesel Collaborative (NEDC) is a regionally coordinated initiative to reduce diesel emissions, improve public health, and promote clean diesel technology. The NEDC recommends that contracts for all construction projects require the following diesel control measures: 48 • All diesel onroad vehicles on site for more than 10 total days must have either (1) engines that meet EPA 2007 onroad emissions standards or (2) emission control technology verified by EPA49 or the California Air Resources Board (CARB)s0 to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85 percent. • All diesel generators on site for more than 10 total days must be equipped with emission control technology verified by EPA or CARB to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85 percent. • All diesel nonroad construction equipment on site for more than 10 total days must have either (1) engines meeting EPA Tier 4 nonroad emission standards or (2) emission control technology verified by EPA or CARB for use with nonroad engines to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85 percent for engines 50 horse power (hp) and greater and by a minimum of 20 percent for engines less than 50 hp. • All diesel vehicles, construction equipment, and generators on site shall be fueled with ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel (ULSD) or a biodiesel blend" approved by the original engine manufacturer with sulfur content of 15 parts per million (ppm) or less. Repower or Replace Older Construction Equipment Engines The NEDC recognizes that availability of equipment that meets the EPA's newer standards is limited." Due to this limitation, the NEDC proposes actions that can be taken to reduce emissions from existing equipment in the Best Practices for Clean Diesel Construction report.53 These actions include but are not limited to: • Repowering equipment (i.e. replacing older engines with newer, cleaner engines and leaving the body of the equipment intact). Engine repower may be a cost-effective emissions reduction strategy when a vehicle or machine has a long useful life and the cost of the engine does not approach the cost of the entire vehicle or machine. Examples of good potential replacement candidates include marine vessels, locomotives, and large 48 Diesel Emission Controls in Construction Projects, available at: htt www2.e a. ov sites roduction files 2015-09 documents nedc-model-contract-se cification. df 49 For EPA's list of verified technology: http:/Iwww3.epa.gov/otag/dieselYverification/verif-list.htm so For CARB's list of verified technology: htt www.arb.ca. ov diesel verdev vt cvt.htm " Biodiesel lends are only to be used in conjunction with the technologies which have been verified for use with biodiesel blends and are subject to the following requirements: http:/Zwww.arb.ca.gov/diesel/verdev/regZbiodieselcompliance."df "htt northeastdiesel.or df BestPractices4CIeanDieselConstructionAu 2012. df sshtt : northeastdiesel.or df BestPractices4CIeanDieselConstructionAu 2012. df construction machines.54 Older diesel vehicles or machines can be repowered with newer diesel engines or in some cases with engines that operate on alternative fuels (see section "Use Alternative Fuels for Construction Equipment" for details). The original engine is taken out of service and a new engine with reduced emission characteristics is installed. Significant emission reductions can be achieved, depending on the newer engine and the vehicle or machine's ability to accept a more modern engine and emission control system. It should be noted, however, that newer engines or higher tier engines are not necessarily cleaner engines, so it is important that the Project Applicant check the actual emission standard level of the current (existing) and new engines to ensure the repower product is reducing emissions for DPM.ss • Replacement of older equipment with equipment meeting the latest emission standards. Engine replacement can include substituting a cleaner highway engine for a nonroad engine. Diesel equipment may also be replaced with other technologies or fuels. Examples include hybrid switcher locomotives, electric cranes, LNG, CNG, LPG or propane yard tractors, forklifts or loaders. Replacements using natural gas may require changes to fueling infrastructure.56 Replacements often require some re-engineering work due to differences in size and configuration. Typically, there are benefits in fuel efficiency, reliability, warranty, and maintenance costs.57 Install Retrofit Devices on Existing Construction Equipment PM emissions from alternatively -fueled construction equipment can be further reduced by installing retrofit devices on existing and/or new equipment. The most common retrofit technologies are retrofit devices for engine exhaust after -treatment. These devices are installed in the exhaust system to reduce emissions and should not impact engine or vehicle operation.58 It should be noted that actual emissions reductions and costs will depend on specific manufacturers, technologies and applications. Use Electric and Hybrid Construction Equipment CAPCOA's Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures59 report also proposes the use of electric and/or hybrid construction equipment as a way to mitigate DPM emissions. When construction equipment is powered by grid electricity rather than fossil fuel, direct emissions from fuel combustion are replaced with indirect emissions associated with the electricity used to power the equipment. Furthermore, when construction equipment is powered by hybrid -electric drives, emissions from fuel 54 Repair, Rebuild, and Repower, EPA, available ot:htt s: www.e a. ov_verified-diesel-tech/learn-about-verified- technolo ies-clean-diesel#re air - ss Diesel Emissions Reduction Program (DERA): Technologies, Fleets and Projects Information, available ot:htt www2.e a. v/sites rod uction.files2015-09 documents,42 : 11001. df 56 Alternative Fuel Conversion, EPA, available at: htt s: www3.e a. ov ota consumer fuels aitfuels aitfuels.htm#fact 5' Cleaner Fuels, EPA, available ot:htt s: www.e a. ov verified -diesel -tech learn-about-verified-technolo ies- clean-diesel#cleaner 58 Retrofit Technologies, EPA, available at:htt s: www.eg a.9ov verified-diesel-techllearn-about-verified- technolo ies-clean-diesel#retrofit 59htt : www.ca coa.or w -content u loads 2010 11 CAPCOA-Quantification-Re ort -9 -14 -Final. df 19 combustion are also greatly reduced. Electric construction equipment is available commercially from companies such as Peterson Pacific Corporation,60 which specialize in the mechanical processing equipment like grinders and shredders. Construction equipment powered by hybrid -electric drives is also commercially available from companies such as Caterpillar61. For example, Caterpillar reports that during an 8 -hour shift, its NE hybrid dozer burns 19.5 percent fewer gallons of fuel than a conventional dozer while achieving a 10.3 percent increase in productivity. The NE model burns 6.2 gallons per hour compared to a conventional dozer which burns 7.7 gallons per hour.62 Fuel usage and savings are dependent on the make and model of the construction equipment used. The Project Applicant should calculate project -specific savings and provide manufacturer specifications indicating fuel burned per hour. Implement a Construction Vehicle Inventory Tracking System CAPCCA's Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures63 report recommends that the Project Applicant provide a detailed plan that discusses a construction vehicle inventory tracking system to ensure compliances with construction mitigation measures. The system should include strategies such as requiring engine run time meters on equipment, documenting the serial number, horsepower, manufacture age, fuel, etc. of all onsite equipment and daily logging of the operating hours of the equipment. Specifically, for each onroad construction vehicle, nonroad construction equipment, or generator, the contractor should submit to the developer's representative a report prior to bringing said equipment on site that includes:" • Equipment type, equipment manufacturer, equipment serial number, engine manufacturer, engine model year, engine certification (Tier rating), horsepower, and engine serial number. • The type of emission control technology installed, serial number, make, model, manufacturer, and EPA/CARB verification number/level. • The Certification Statement65 signed and printed on the contractor's letterhead. Furthermore, the contractor should submit to the developer's representative a monthly report that, for each onroad construction vehicle, nonroad construction equipment, or generator onsite, includes: " • Hour -meter readings on arrival on-site, the first and last day of every month, and on off-site date. 60 Peterson Electric Grinders Brochure, available at:http:ZZwww.petersoncorp.com/wo- contenlluploa.ds/peterson electric . rindersl.pdf 61 Electric Power Products, available at:htt www.cat.com en US rod ucts new ower-systems/electric-p-ower- generation.html 6zhtt www.ca coa.or w -content u loads 2010 11 CAPCOA-Quantification-Re ort -9 -14 -Final. df 63htt www.ca coa.or w -content u goads 2010 11 CAPCOA-Quantification-Re ort -9 -14 -Final. df 64 Diesel Emission Controls in Construction Projects, available at: htt ://www2. ep a.gov/sites/p rod uction files/2015-09/d ocu men tsn edc-model -co ntract-sep cification.p df 6s Diesel Emission Controls in Construction Projects, available at:htt www2.e a. ov sites roduction files 2015-09 documents nedc-mode(-contract-se cification. df The NEDC Model Certification Statement can be found in Appendix A. 66 Diesel Emission Controls in Construction Projects, available at:http.,J Jwww2.e a. ov s itesZp rod uction.files 2015-09 documents nedc-model-contract-se cif icati on.p df 20 • Any problems with the equipment or emission controls. • Certified copies of fuel deliveries for the time period that identify: o Source of supply o Quantity of fuel o Quality of fuel, including sulfur content (percent by weight). In addition to these measures, we also recommend that the Applicant implement the following mitigation measures, called "Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices, 1167 that are recommended by the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD): 1. The project representative shall submit to the lead agency a comprehensive inventory of all off- road construction equipment, equal to or greater than 50 horsepower, that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours during any portion of the construction project. • The inventory shall include the horsepower rating, engine model year, and projected hours of use for each piece of equipment. • The project representative shall provide the anticipated construction timeline including start date, and name and phone number of the project manager and on-site foreman. • This information shall be submitted at least 4 business days prior to the use of subject heavy-duty off-road equipment. • The inventory shall be updated and submitted monthly throughout the duration of the project, except that an inventory shall not be required for any 30 -day period in which no construction activity occurs. 2. The project representative shall provide a plan for approval by the lead agency demonstrating that the heavy-duty off-road vehicles (50 horsepower or more) to be used in the construction project, including owned, leased, and subcontractor vehicles, will achieve a project wide fleet - average 20% NOx reduction and 45% particulate reduction compared to the most recent California Air Resources Board (ARB) fleet average. • This plan shall be submitted in conjunction with the equipment inventory. • Acceptable options for reducing emissions may include use of late model engines, low - emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, after -treatment products, and/or other options as they become available. • The District's Construction Mitigation Calculator can be used to identify an equipment fleet that achieves this reduction. 3. The project representative shall ensure that emissions from all off-road diesel -powered equipment used on the project site do not exceed 40% opacity for more than three minutes in any one hour. • Any equipment found to exceed 40 percent opacity (or Ringelmann 2.0) shall be repaired immediately. Non-compliant equipment will be documented, and a summary provided to the lead agency monthly. 67htt www.air ualit .or ce a Ch3EnhancedExhaustControl 10-2013. df 21 • A visual survey of all in -operation equipment shall be made at least weekly. • A monthly summary of the visual survey results shall be submitted throughout the duration of the project, except that the monthly summary shall not be required for any 30 -day period in which no construction activity occurs. The monthly summary shall include the quantity and type of vehicles surveyed as well as the dates of each survey. 4. The District and/or other officials may conduct periodic site inspections to determine compliance. Nothing in this mitigation shall supersede other District, state or federal rules or regulations. When combined, the measures that we recommend in these comments offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower -emitting equipment into the Project's construction fleet, which subsequently reduces DPM emissions released during Project construction. A DEIR must be prepared to include additional mitigation measures, as well as include an updated air quality assessment to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce construction emissions. Furthermore, the Project Applicant needs to demonstrate commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval to ensure that the Project's construction -related emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible. Greenhouse Gas Incorrectly Estimated Project's Greenhouse Gas Emissions The IS/MND relies upon CalEEMod to estimate the Project's operational GHG emissions. Using the emissions estimates provided in the IS/MND's CalEEMod output files, the IS/MND compares the Project's GHG emissions to the SCAQMD's Tier 3 screening threshold of 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year (MT CO2e/yr) and determines that the Project's unmitigated GHG emissions would total 10,108 MT CO2e/yr, which exceeds the SCAQMD's established threshold (Appendix A-1, p. 36). Because the Project's GHG emissions exceed thresholds, the IS/MND recommends Mitigation Measure GHG-1 to reduce emissions below thresholds (IS/MND, p. 35). According to the IS/MND, by "simply utilizing high -efficiency lighting and standard water conservation measures throughout the facility" the Project's GHG emissions would be reduced to 9,946 MT CO2e/yr and would therefore result in a less than significant impact (Appendix A-1, p. 37). This conclusion, however, is incorrect, as it is based on a flawed analysis. As a result, we find the IS/MND's GHG analysis to be incorrect and it should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Table H of the IS/MND summarizes the annual baseline GHG emissions generated by the Project's proposed land uses (see excerpt below) (p. 33). 22 Table H: Long -Term Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Source Pollutant Emissions (AITh-r) Bio -CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH, 120 CO2e Construction Emissions (amortized over 30 years) 0 44 44 <0.1 0 44 operational Emissions Area Sources 0 <0.1 50.1 <0.1 0 <0-1 Energy Sources 0 5,798 5,798 0.2 0.1 5,823 Mobile Sources 0 4,637 3,529 01 0 3.531 Off Road Sources 0 55 55 <0.1 0 56 Waste Sources 79 0 79 4.7 0 177 Water Usage 30 359 389 3.1 0.1 478 Total Project Emissions Without Mitigation With Mitigation 109 106 9,785 9,635 9,894 9,741 8.1 7-8 0.1 0.1 10.108 9,946 Existing Entitlement (comparison only) 55 5.856 5,911 3.9 <0. i 6,005 Source: Tables Land L1, LSA Associates. Inc., April 2016b (Appendix A). Note: Number in bold indicate exceedance. of SCAQ-LID industrial GHG threshold. Numbers in table may not appear to add up correctly due to rounding of all numbers to two significant digits. Bio -CO2 = biologically generated CO; CH;= methane CO2 = carbon dioxide COae = carbon dioxide equivalent MVyr = metric tons per year NO = nitrous oxide N'Bio-CO: = Non-biolopcally generated CO2 As you can see in the excerpt above, according to the IS/MND, without implementation of mitigation, the Project would generate 10,108 MT CO2e/yr, which exceeds the SCAQMD's 10,000 MT CO2e/yr threshold for industrial projects. However, with implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1, the IS/MND estimates that the Project's GHG emissions would total 9,946 MT CO2e/yr, resulting in a less than significant impact. This conclusion, however, is incorrect, as the emissions estimates relied upon to come to this significance determination were take from CaIEEMod models that utilize incorrect input parameters (as discussed in the sections above). In an effort to determine the significance of the Project's GHG impact when correct input parameters are used to estimate emissions, we used the emissions estimates from the CaIEEMod model prepared by SWAPE and compared these emissions to the SCAQMD's threshold. When the Project's emissions are correctly modeled, we find that the Project's GHG emissions increase and would exceed the 10,000 MT CO2e/yr screening threshold (see table below). 23 r r Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions ` Emission Source Proposed Project Mobile Energy Area (MT CO2E) 4,973 — 6,201 0.01 Water 530 Off-road 56 Waste 195 Amortized Construction Emissions 41 Project Total Significance Threshold E;Ye Exceed? As you can see in the table above, when modeled correctly, we found that the proposed Project would generate 11,996 MT CO2e/yr, which exceeds the 10,000 MT CO2e/yr screening threshold. According to the IS/MND, implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would reduce emissions by 162 MT CO2e/yr, therefore, even with implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1, the Project's emissions would be approximately 11,834 MT CO2e/yr, which is still above the SCAQMD's screening threshold. These updated emission estimates demonstrate that when emissions are modeled correctly, the Project would result in a potentially significant GHG impact that was not previously examined or identified in the IS/MND. As a result, a DEIR should be prepared to include an updated model to adequately estimate the Project's GHG emissions, and additional mitigation measures should be incorporated, where necessary. Failure to Demonstrate Compliance with Executive Order S-30-15 and Senate Bill 32 The IS/MND not only fails to adequately estimate and evaluate the Project's GHG impact, but it also fails to demonstrate consistency with, and fails to take into account, the ambitious GHG reduction goals set by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in Executive Order S-3-05 and set by Governor Jerry Brown in Senate Bill 32 (SB 32). On June 1, 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger issued Executive Order 5-3-0568, establishing statewide GHG emissions targets to reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels by 2010; reduce emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020; and reduce emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on September 8, 2016 Governor Jerry Brown approved Senate Bill 32 (SB 32), which requires the state of California to reduce GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.69 SB 32 went into effect January 1, 2017, which precedes when the IS/MND for the proposed Project was drafted. Therefore, the IS/MND should have evaluated the Project's level of compliance with the emissions reduction goals set forth in both SB 32 and Executive Order S-30-15. Table I in the IS/MND "summarizes the extent to which the project would comply with the strategies to reach `ht t s: v www. ov.ca. onews. h ?id=1861 69 "The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update." CARB, January 20, 2017, available at: https://www.arb.ca. ov cc sco in Ian 2030s final. df 24 greenhouse gas emission reduction targets" (p. 34). However, Table I simply lists how the Project will comply with several measures listed in the Scoping Plan, and fails to demonstrate how these measures will result in any emissions reductions, if any. By failing to demonstrate consistency with the reduction targets set forth by Executive Order B-30-15 for 2030 and 2050, the Project may conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. As a result, the Project may have a potentially significant impact that was not previously addressed in the IVMND, and as such, a DEIR should be prepared. SB 3270 requires statewide GHG emissions to be reduced to 40 percent below their 1990 levels by 2030. 1990 statewide GHG emissions are estimated to be approximately Therefore, by 2030 California will be required to reduce statewide emission431 fss bon y 172OMMT 0Te (43 x 40%), which results in a statewide limit on GHG emissions of 259 MMTCOZe. 2020 "business -as -usual" levels are estimated to be approximately 509 MMTCO2e.72 Therefore, in order to successfully reach the 2030 statewide goal of 259 MMTCOZe, California would have to reduce its emissions by 49 percent below the "business -as -usual" levels. Additionally, by 2050 California will be required to reduce statewide emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. Therefore, by 2050 California will be required to reduce statewide emissions by 345 MMTCOze (431 x 80%), which results in a statewide limit on GHG emissions of 86 MMTCOze, as a result the reduction goals set forth in Executive Order 5-30-15. Thus, in order to successfully reach the 2050 statewide goal of 86 MMTCO2e, California would have to reduce its emissions by 83 percent below the BAU levels. This 49 percent and 83 percent reduction targets should be considered as a threshold of significance against which to measure Project impacts. Because the proposed Project is unlikely to be redeveloped 's impacts. A again prior to 2030, the 2030 and 2050 goals are applicable to any evaluation of the Project DEIR should be prepared to demonstrate the Project's compliance with these reduction measures specified in SB 32 and Executive Order 5-30-15. Specifically, the Project should demonstrate, at a minimum, a reduction of 49 percent below and 83 percent below "business -as -usual" levels in 2030 and 2050, respectively. It should be noted, however, that this reduction percentage is applicable to statewide emissions, which as described in the recent California Supreme Court case ruling Centerfor Biological Diversity et al. v. California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Newhall Land and Farming Company 2015 Cal. LEXIS 9478 (Newhall Case ),73 is not directly applicable to a project -level analysis. As a result, an additional analysis would need to be conducted to translate the new statewide targets into a project -specific threshold against which Project GHG emissions can be compared. A DEIR should be prepared to quantify any reductions expected to be achieved by mitigation measures, shown by substantial evidence that such measures will be effective and should demonstrate how these measures will reduce the emissions below the new 2030 and 2050 significance thresholds. 70htt s: le info.le islature.ca, ov faces billNavClient.xhtml?bili id=201520160SB32 71 htt www.arb.ca. ov cc/inventor data bau.htm 72 htt ener innovation.or w -content u loads 2015 04 CA Ca Re ort Mar2015. df . 73 htt www.courts.ca. ov o inions documents 5217763.PD 25 Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions Our updated CaIEEMod model and HRA demonstrate that when Project activities are modeled correctly, operational NO,, DPM, and GHG emissions would result in a potentially significant impact. Therefore, additional mitigation measures must be identified and incorporated in a DEIR to reduce these emissions to a less -than -significant level. The SCAQMD has previously recommended additional mitigation measures for operational NO,, and PM10 emissions that result primarily from truck activity emissions for similar projects. These measures would effectively reduce the Project's operational NO,,, and PM10 emissions as well as reduce operational GHG emissions. Measures recommended for the Waterman Logistic Center that are also applicable for this Project include74: • Provide electric vehicle charging stations that are accessible for trucks. • Require the proposed warehouse to be constructed with the appropriate infrastructure to facilitate sufficient electric charging for trucks to plug-in. • Limit the daily number of trucks allowed at the facility to levels analyzed in the IS/MND. If higher daily truck volumes are anticipated to visit the site, the Lead Agency should commit to re- evaluating the project through CEQA prior to allowing this higher activity level. • Design the site such that any check-in point for trucks is well inside the facility to ensure that there are no trucks queuing outside of the facility. • On-site equipment should be alternatively fueled. • Provide food options, fueling, truck repair and or convenience stores on-site to minimize the need for trucks to travel through residential neighborhoods. • Should the proposed Project generate significant emissions, the Lead Agency should require mitigation that requires accelerated phase-in for non -diesel -powered trucks. For example, natural gas trucks, including Class 8 HHD trucks, are commercially available today. Natural gas trucks can provide a substantial reduction in emissions, and may be more financially feasible today due to reduced fuel costs compared to diesel. In the Final CEQA document, the Lead Agency should require a phase-in schedule for these cleaner operating trucks to reduce project impacts. In addition to the mobile source mitigation measures above, the Lead Agency should incorporate the following on-site area source mitigation measures below, as suggested by the SCAQMD, to reduce the Project's operational NO,PM10, and GHG emissions during operation.75 Maximize use of solar energy including solar panels; installing the maximum possible number of solar energy arrays on the building roofs and/or the Project side to generate solar energy for the facility. • Limit the use of outdoor lighting to only that needed for safety and security purposes. 74 SCAQMD Comment Letter in Response to MND for the Waterman Logistic Center, January 2018, available at. http:Z/www.aqmd-gov/docs default -source ce a comment -letters 2015 'anuar mndwaterman. df 75 SCAQMD Comment Letter in Response to MND for the Waterman Logistic Center, January 2018, available at. htt : www.agmd.gov docs default -source ce a comment -letters 2015 'anuar mndwaterman. df 26 Install solar lights or light -emitting diodes (LEDs) for outdoor lighting. Require use of electric or alternatively fueled sweepers with HEPA filters. We also identified several additional mitigation measures which would further reduce the Project's operational GHG, NOx, and PM10 emissions. Additional mitigation measures that could be implemented to reduce emissions include, but are not limited to, the following:76 • Use passive solar design, such as: 77,78 o Orient buildings and incorporate landscaping to maximize passive solar; heating during cool seasons, and minimize solar heat gain during hot seasons; and o Enhance natural ventilation by taking advantage of prevailing winds. • Reduce unnecessary outdoor lighting by utilizing design features such as limiting the hours of operation of outdoor lighting. • Develop and follow a "green streets guide" that requires: o Use of minimal amounts of concrete and asphalt; o Installation of permeable pavement to allow for storm water infiltration; and o Use of groundcovers rather than pavement to reduce heat reflection.79 • Implement Project design features such as: o Shade HVAC equipment from direct sunlight; o Install high -albedo white thermoplastic polyolefin roof membrane; o Install high -efficiency HVAC with hot -gas reheat; o Install formaldehyde -free insulation; and o Use recycled -content gypsum board. • Provide education on energy efficiency to residents, customers, and/or tenants. Provide information on energy management services for large energy users. • Meet "reach" goals for building energy efficiency and renewable energy use. • Install solar, wind, and geothermal power systems and solar hot water heaters. • Include energy storage where appropriate to optimize renewable energy generation systems and avoid peak energy use. • Plant low-VOC emitting shade trees, e.g., in parking lots to reduce evaporative emissions from parked vehicles. • Use CARE -certified or electric landscaping equipment in project and tenant operations; and introduce electric lawn, and garden equipment exchange program. 76 http://ag.ca.govlobalwarmin df GW miti ation measures. df 77 Santa Barbara Air Pollution Control District, Scope and Content of Air Quality Sections in Environmental Documents, September 1997. 78 Butte County Air Quality Management District, Indirect Source Review Guidelines, March 1997, 79 See Irvine Sustainable Travelways "Green Street" Guidelines; www.ci.irvine.ca.us civica filebank blobdload.as ?BlobID=8934; and Cool Houston Plan,- www.harc.edu/Projects/`CoolHouston. 27 Finally, the Kimball Business Park Project Final Environmental Impact Report includes various feasible mitigation measures that would reduce on-site area emissions that are applicable to the proposed Project and include, but are not limited to: 80 • Increase in insulation such that heat transfer and thermal bridging is minimized. • Limit air leakage through the structure and/or within the heating and cooling distribution system. • Use of energy-efficient space heating and cooling equipment. • Installation of dual -paned or other energy efficient windows. • Use of interior and exterior energy efficient lighting that exceeds the California Title 24 Energy Efficiency performance standards. • Installation of automatic devices to turn off lights where they are not needed. • Application of a paint and surface color palette that emphasizes light and off-white colors that reflect heat away from buildings. • Design buildings to accommodate photo -voltaic solar electricity systems or the installation of photovoltaic solar electricity systems. • Installation of a photo -voltaic electrical generation system (PV system) capable of generating 565,000 kilowatt hours per year on the roofs of project buildings. The developer(s) may install the required PV system in phases on a pro rata square foot basis as each building is completed; or if the PV system is to be installed on a single building, all of the PV system necessary to supply the PV estimated electrical generation shall be installed within two years (24 months) of the first building that does not include a PV system receives a certificate of occupancy. When combined together, these measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower - emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduces emissions released during Project operation. A Project -specific DEIR must be prepared to include additional mitigation measures, as well as include an updated air quality analysis to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce operational emissions to below thresholds. Furthermore, the Project Applicant needs to demonstrate commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project's operational emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible. Sincerely, i Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg. 80 Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Kimball Business Park Project Final Environmental Impact Report, July 2016, available at: htt www.cit ofchino.or home showdocument?id=13244 Hadley Nolan 29 CL OD N T O T O N N T ccl 0 c C: Q c 7 O U c O L c c V O iC\l cz Q7 •ai R O O (� m J T c O co r D p� fn CL) cv = Q% L U m c CQ a) M m O N = 0cc O _c 0 cz P m c CO T VJ C's O O N O O W W cz U E O U) c0 G W W m U U) V V i cu U O L- CL a rn N O N O CV rl CM (1) N CD O O O N a d m 0 cr ami s L N LL c N } �, 0 o a) c O? a CL o z� rn N O N O CV R 4 - cu a 2 ca c O Z N c d E O U m c W cb m M _N a a 'N d CL ami s N Cl) c o V a ++ N i W ro .E yam, o V R U LCU i U CU -0 L ++ :.i o 0 o d 'o IL O c G �' •ru N OE c NE - CV n R 4 - cu a 2 ca c O Z N c d E O U m c W cb m M � I ƒ _6 \ / A \ / / § }§ �' ' C::)) :S �\ '~ �k :m Cr) :a :\ :ƒ :a J / � |m �2 7. � \ 6 j . ::. . . . . . . .. —f—f—f—f—f-7-- _ | | | | | | g U) § $cise |o |CD |a |[ |\ | - 9 o |] |R |� |m |2 |q _/ k \ ~ .o .o .a .& .m .o ~ 3 |� |� c 0 cl f® E | | | | | | @ ® m . . . . . . a ' S | | | | | | G 2 . . . . . . ' 2 \ f ..4..§..�..¥..§..�.. / E LU 0 \ 2 \ . . . . . . $ e 2 a k Ecoo :] : \ / ca cz f ƒ / / �� �� : 0 : :a :e E2 0 = %E 2 e :E :E :E :) :3 :ƒ / Z / / \ o \ 2 :2 :2 :2 :A �§ : » . % 2d b 0 E \ / E 2 a \ ® / / 2 U \ \ 2 3 2 ƒ \ ± , ..,..:..:..,..,..,.. / \ g \ m @ \ 7 m 2 ƒ / f 0 ± { % ƒ f \ / 2 % \ 0 \ § \ / \ I :U :c :m :e :� : n I I 2 o 0 o L o _ :2 :2 :© :� :2 : ( \ ° \ \ / / / c / \ / _ ( :§_ :% :S .i .I .. 0 S :R :§ :3 / / / / / / \ / / / \ / '2 / �j \ _0 @ 5 5 5 5 5 \ \ \ ƒ , 3 ° g - j t ) t § ] - = ® \ \ / :/ :/ :9 ;/ �j �G ƒ f ® w w w w w 2 % \ % o � -- ± ©=\ s= e e s/%± u u 2 g x 2 & ± 2 2 e m m m CO c o= e e> 5 a) -os g 0 0 0 0 2 CL 00 N T 00 T N a T N C7 O Q7 CU CL c+7 O N O W w co U c O L CU O W W m U 7 C C Q C 7 O U U) as O U O U) 0 C 0 co C m C m U) N C U cn U U) 0) O J O C 0 cu C CU CD C cis CO m ' O ' O ' r-- ' O ; O ' O ' O ' m ' O ' O ' O ' O ' O ' O ' O ; O p M' O O ' O O ' O ' O O O ' O � O , O ; O ; O , p , O , O ; O ; O ; O ; O ; O ; O M N �O - - �`---1---t---F---t--t--t---t--t--t--t--t--i---t--t--t--t--t--t'--t - - i I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 M I M I I M I I M I� I M 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I O I O I I O I I O 1 0 1 0 1 I I I I 1 1 I I M , a I m I N 19 I 1 7 I O 1 I O I O I I 1 I I I— I I I C , O I N 119 I I N I O 1 0 I O I O I O I 1 0 1 _M 1 0 1+- 10 10 10 Ir 10 10 1p 10 10 1p Ip Ip 1p 10 1 10 I Ip O , p 1 0 1 0 1 0 I M 1 0 I to 1 0 1 0 I 1 7 I N j M I N j N j j p I p 1 0 1 0 I I N 1' Im I Ir? I Ic? IM lo? 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I cp 1 I r 1 I r I oo I r I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I , I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I :c :c00 ' , ' , o E :¢ :% :Q :Q :Q z �� Q)''� c :~ C\j J , 0 , ; J ; J ' : ' z ' ' , CO ' CO ' m , , LL 1 O ,cn ,� ° a Q a w cy, 0' Q ' W W W W W'0 '° ' Q 0 ,.° ,a ,- ,� O ,� ,U o o' o o o :2 .0 r ami ami C C C C c CE E EE or ° a n Q 0-'0 'a 01 CT , o' -a7 , o ; � a)W W W W W , U ;O • 2 Q Q ;O ;O cu E V1 C O 0 cn E W O N G co Lq N T co O N N T N ca 0 ca S_ Q O U U) co O U L O 0 c a N ca CO �L O Iv It m N ca L O U U U O J O C cz C i O m C /cz� T V/ C'7 C6 O- N 70 O W W co U c 0 i 0 W W c0 U N O U O Z V 2 U N O U f— O U O m Z O U 6 m ro 0 F— N a. a �Lo � N W (- > `o N Ma LL L cm co O ' o co O M O' (h c P- N N 1 o Io 0 1 o Io 0 O o C - ---r---- n In n N 1 co O 1 T N ----r---- ccooIR C\l jr�T r'T I N i r Cl Lo In v IR m mI N T N� 1 N N 0 ,0 O o .0 0 I I co I N N N i p 7 6 10 O I I 1 0 co O I co N N o o c I co co 10 O I 0 1m ro o �0 0 - ---r---- I I10 w I N I co CR CD 0 ----r---- 1 n Io 0 ID I O 1 N N O O O I coI m co co r IT 10 w - -'-r---- I 0 0 I m M �o Io 0 N O O I co I °o O 1 C? 10 ui I M 1� N 10 m LO I co co ui cn 1 m Iv v L 1coO r co O rn O N N O O K N ' N m _oro a �o Xa W w c � o �o �a LL cliO ,V) O U O O z L., L N 0 O o ¢ U U L � O � T- EI L cm co O ' o co O M O' (h c P- N N 1 o Io 0 1 o Io 0 O o C - ---r---- n In n N 1 co O 1 T N ----r---- ccooIR C\l jr�T r'T I N i r Cl Lo In v IR m mI N T N� 1 N N 0 ,0 O o .0 0 I I co I N N N i p 7 6 10 O I I 1 0 co O I co N N o o c I co co 10 O I 0 1m ro o �0 0 - ---r---- I I10 w I N I co CR CD 0 ----r---- 1 n Io 0 ID I O 1 N N O O O I coI m co co r IT 10 w - -'-r---- I 0 0 I m M �o Io 0 N O O I co I °o O 1 C? 10 ui I M 1� N 10 m LO I co co ui cn 1 m Iv v L 1coO r co O rn O N N O O K N ' N m N r o 'o n .o ;CO n m _ co n (o c) CO o ON O ' a V rll�p . M . p U O n . LO 11N LO Ln a (D . V . , . O N- ---h----h----� ----� ----h---- r r 00 O Ia 10 IN m 0 o Io Io 10 I0 In N 0 ;0 10 10 10 Io c 1 T ____' ____' ____i ____i 0, 1 0 1 0 1 (O 1 LO 1 0 (O U I N I N I p I O 1 Mp R > >. poo co IO Ip 1 1M o I. 10 cc ____r____r____1 1 N N 1 ----r----r - - -- In IN r In 1 O 0 1(No IL IM Icoo Irmo Io Iv 1� (V X Yn ao o In 1 0 try Im Iao o� 10 7 C O Z 0 �•- IN Im 10 n� 1� I(O In Iv C + N l0 ----r----r----I r r----r----r---- 1(n IM Q C7 co M o L(O° (O N UO 0 1N I Ir co I I 1 0 O M M O (D M l ao N r N N N O _ O InO 1�O IN l0 CD Tro C Z o �?o 2 SCO i�rn i� ;o 'm r p _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _� _ _ _ _� N 0 O ; OO . O ' O . n . p n O E m O . O ; O ' o ' O ' N CO O 1 0 a I� 1 1 1 p I M 1 V 0 0 LO N O 1^ 1 1 M 10 po Io 1M 10 10 1 pOj 0 O d N 10C 1 1 0 1 O ; OV5 N (IS ev Lo R N C) f 0 1 n �� 1 00 l 0 (0 m X N 0 o I n I N I p f 0 I o N 0 0 o C Il1a CD 0 N io io i0 i� �6 o Lnm ----� ----r ----r----r----r---- 2 O m N I I I I CO(15 x0 Y 'mom In I 1 I I 1 O Z 1'L !L I 1 I 1 0 1 1 p i O + C7 n I 1 ____r____r____I r""""r---'r---' O � o m co N � f I 1 1 n rn M CO n N cq O ro p I � I v ao 1 p I I U T w .- N N N p aF Oo N Ip 1 0 1 0 ro oo Io In Ip l0 (O U) Io � 1 O I' I' 1- 0 m N 1 U M N I I 10 O 0 N ----1 1 1 I -"--r ----r ----�----r---- 0a f0 1M 1C to Io O J Co po In IM ir, Ip m O o 1 1cc:,) O E 7 XLL w O f I'- O Ip N N 10 x c l0 l0 10 to O ----r----r----r 'a ----r-_--r--_- 0 1 1 `O co n ! - 1 I 1 LO 1 10 1 I :a i 10 1 1 1 co N LL I I N 1 m I I N ____� r____r____r____ � ---- (n ul 1D n n n O 0 1 ,1 I o I o l o .-- (0 O y CO o 0 I p I O O I I N I O 0 0 N N N N N p f o I p 1 1 O o 1 o CO C M " O O m 1(6 1 I I u, N _ �, _ _ _ _ _ r -� _ �----r----r---- o IN f� IN 1 I N U U o(,� o I I I n 1 n 016 o 1co IN I� 1 I n LQ I'" 10 I 1 ai --'-' LLL - --- i ----i ---- r- r UJ to n n n x 0iO 1r I v IN I I LOO N o U z co 0 o 10 1 (� N N N C oCIO I 1(O fn 1 m` • 7 7 i u7 I� IL f0 (c C Q co -o •- a ri .� �.. ----r ----r --__r___-r----1 r ---- I U i (7 I f 1 N 1 0 1 •- I `� I I m N co i Q .- 1 0 I p l 0 1 1 I 0 � 0 I 1 I 1 cy I � I -:.- V I A N M >_ w v ; w C NHo N � O ' O ' I� ' O ' h aw 0 N O O G O'M 't` O �M , Co O U O a- UO � ;n'a :O 'M 'O NN 00 O N 0 N L ' O O O L CSI ----� ----� ----h----F----h---- O 0 OO 10 to Io Io Io 1cNo m clj Z o T. Z o to to to to In cl) o N Ip 10 Ip Io Io 0 � ----r--__r_---I 1 1 --'- N I I rr----r---- v o *— = 0u) to Ico Io) IO 10 w U p U coo IN IN to I� I°0'a >, (h 1 0 l 0 l 0 I M N 1 m O 1 1, I N I I Ir Lo Irl cl)c') c6 O G YU TO ID Ino co I� I� 0 I-° ~ O 10 1N Lo co IN n I � N Nr O ---- r----r..._�.---��... ^ IN IN I U O Q U p I (Nq I` COI Ir l 0 1 O N O m ' p O 1^O Imp IN 10 Irn moo Z C Z O IT I°) I� Io Io) uo co- .- I I 1 N O 1 I� co ...; - ... . NU O U o O o o co O 0 G fn , ' 0 ' 0 ' O t O M 'pp ' co _O m O m W O p O o� O N C) --------------- ----.r.'rr-.-.�-.r-..a.rr..r-. O N N� 1 I 1 I I Ip co o, 1O IM IV O N al- o O CL 10 00 10 Io Io to Io Cl) CO CV j O I0 10 1 ID o O __••f_• --f----1 10 1 f-...�..._i ..__ �cQ o .� r I 1 L� O O CN cz L� o0p 10 IN 107 l0 10 N LU wa lo N l0 to U N Ip 10 10 o I ru m----i _•--i ---- r -__•r ---- r --- - .:N O OC '��-. cm I Lo to LL U) co co wa o I 10 I I 1 N I I 1 I c __..�_.-'r---- r' ---I I w o 1� I I I _..-� --__ a o C O- m d '00 m 1`t loo to to p.H o 00 to In too 0 10 LO o 10 p cq (n N 10 IN Io IO Io CJ y 1 1 wo c:, I� lao Io Ip Io ka o O� �� oo Io I� 10 to to oo Io W x11 w 0 o Ip clj N I o l 0 0 O O U N l I I C I N C c p r---- r ----r---' �----�---- > O = o >0 I� I I 1 a I 1 O I LL C 1' co I I `Lcoo I I N O) I I I 1 1 N m 1 ----� ----� ----� ..--r----r---- O o C N o 10 IN Ian I I N o T CO O O Ido 10 1000 I 1 O 1 � O I(O 10 1o0 I O 1 co 1 1 O CO ----�----r----r----r----1 ---- O o N O U 1 I I I oM IN 10 IN I I n U o o 0 I o 1 N I co I I n Ioo 1 O O 10 I0 I Iof ----r----r----1 I r---- I O o LLj Lli x O I o I u I N I N Io Irn I Z c (1Y cu Z oo IN I co oo to I� I^ 1 I rn ' C) 0 vi 1 1 O I o I I m 1- co C O 4-C I I I 1 ----' - ---r----r----r----r ---- (D O i+ C7 O oN I N I ,-- I co 1 1 N I� In 10 (7 p Q D Ir 1 1 I 1 r�i 10 2 O o O 10 10 I I N - :: -. - OO .. • .: - • :: - • :: -. - :. - L w m m a ++ m O `� (1) �p o co '� ,L o w :2 E Q ' C O .._ c9 ' RS �_� N U C O O � ' v N acc O w 2i CL 00 N T 00 T N N p T Q T U Cts 0 cl co (6 L a (z Q to to O _� _� 0 _� +>'• >, (z Ir ICO IN IM I IN I Ir E �j � z -i o w '� i� iui iLO LO U > 1 o 1 1 1 t E3: O =3 z 1 1 I 1 ---r -- r-- r---� - - O C 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I N C7 :0 L Mj O U 0 I 1 1 I I I 1 0 1^ I^ 1� CO I o 1 0 1 0 1 0 .0 m W N N N N I N 1 1 r 10 1 i� ai O0) I N 1 �_ .7 1 O IN Ir CO r I - I� Ir a. m 1 1 1 I 1 I I (D ++ O N � I 1 1 I I 10 11, CO ICO Ir Ir 11� O O 1 N U r j W j N I C 1� U) U 1 o Io Io Ir I� O 1 I I I J 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I O I 1 I I 2 Q > 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 C 1 1 .2It i N C 1 ' 2' 1 0 m Vl .c O 1 1 1 ro iU M a �5 1 I U 1 1 (S$ CL I I U 1 I j T '^ vJ a) 1� 1 1 U a 1 C 1 CO) 1 iT I Y7 ' -0 i :E (a co in. : ..: co.... . Q. . 0 N 0 O w LLJ a) � co U C m O .0 O L L a , o m U N 0 - d0) � o aa) 70 O :a a c6 > co 2 W .. ... .. ... W a) (n (6 d z N , co O N tC t � D. T O N R � CL a d cn a c ''M^ c T Vvy T C c > C7 C3 a O O O U)CA m m Q Q Q O O O 3 ,^ O cu N = I -0 C O o� L O 0 d t C N O � O U)q:T CC N 75 Il co Ln N r O T O N N T N ca 0 N C'') O OD a) 0) (TS 0- C? C.0 O N 0 0 2 W W (10 U 0 O O W LU m U O '� CO 'O 'CO 'r Cl) 'O , V '� 'i 'N 'co '00 '00 2 '2 ' I U) co o U x_ . I x x I I x I I x ;o ;o ;O ;o ;o ;o ;o ;o ;o ;o ;o ;o ;o 13 1 > I= ;M I� O 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t V U 1 1 1 til N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 > 1 1 1 I 1 1 x 1x cx c 010 10 10 �0 J LL IJ IJ-�J- Q. O 10 10 IO IO N N N N I N 1 1 1 I 7 J 1 1 1 I 2 c0 I �o �o Ca. o m M O o M o 10) -r (4 1 (O 1 CO J ICO p0 c 1 1 1 1 1 1 C J --_L---L---L---L---L---L---L---L---L---L---L---L---L---L it '0) it it it ir- i i0) Ia ir, So =- iN --- '0 L-_ 100 1 IT 'v O C a i0) 1LO f0) II i0 '0) r� i0) I 10) i7 Co) IM iM 100 In N i S� t� iN 'M I iN ;o i o to ti)Ac G it I 1 I O - � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 � t1 O 1 1 O .O Cl) .O IO in p � I •c 1 1 N Z 1 > 1 O I O I O _�. I O 10 .a O 10 10 10 10 1 :4 1 I cli O 1 (p I— 1h Q 1 1 Cl) 1 I I 1 1 I 1 oz 1 I I I S t 1 i i --�'--�-_�'--+--i--�--i--�--i-- O 10 10 10 1C) 10 10 10 10 10 +O 10 10 10 S 10 I 10 O IO .O 10 10 10 .O 10 IO 10 .O 10 10 10 10 10 i 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 00 1 r I w 1 w 1^ 1 w I w 1 w 1 w I (D I 1 1 0 r I I I ; C • O 1 1 1 1 0) co C 1 1 1 m 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 of Q 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 'n 'a I D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -T--T__-T----T---T---7-----P---_�___-T..--P---T.....T__-T---T- M N I N I N r I T 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I C I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 O 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Q 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I m 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 1 Q 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T 1 l ID 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 � 1 0 l 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 IUD) 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I �C U 1 1 1 I V 1 1 1 1 CI CL i U 1� 1 1 1 1 1 l i 1 1 I 1� 1 1 1 t om 1 1 1 1 1 1 •� I LQ 1 I 1 0 1 I m 1 1 1 I m 1 1 1 1 1 WO l i 1 1 N 1 0 I l i I 1 1 l i 1 I 1� 0 1 a) 1 1 1 0 1 l 0 1 1 1 1 (U 1 1 1 E 1 I p 1-0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 I I 1Q) I cn 1 0 I (Ii I I I CL 1 I N 0 1 l 0 1 1 1 1 >- 1 I p 1 1 1 l 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 I p 1 1 l 1 1 1 t o 1 1 1 I W 1 1 pC_ O 1 0 1 1 1 i o Y 1 Z6 1 N p l i 1 1 1 I C 4 l 1 1 1 4 Q t I 1 d1 C I ro 1 L � 1> 1 S 1 -> (D I U 1 1 I C-) I X 1 1� 1 I U 1 1 I 1 1 t o I I o f 1 1� 1 1> 1> I p 1 �. : ~. I w. 1 0. : °C. : U) : ~. : C�� I LLQ I �. : ~. ' >. : a. : CL : Cc. A ¢. E m . Z;� 0 0 o o o ocz C co" i i . i i . i , d o o N N U C C C C C ; 16 U Q n 'U 'U 'U 'U 8 o) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0); 0) ; 0) ; 0) ; 0) " ;a ;-0;!E c0 , (6 JO 2 '2 ' I U) co o U x_ . I x x I I x I I x 1 1 I I �2 13 1 > I= ;M I� O 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t V 1 1 1 1 til N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 > 1 1 1 I 1 1 x 1x cx c 010 10 10 �0 J IJ IJ IJ-�J- Q. O 10 10 IO IO N N N N I N 1 1 1 I 7 J 1 1 1 I 2 I �o �o Ca. o m M O o M o 10) -r (4 1 (O 1 CO 1 CO ICO p0 c 1 1 1 1 1 1 C J I > 1 1 1 1 1 1 --+ - - I,- In 1F- I� I =- v 1 IT 1 Ia 1 IT 'v O C 1 1 1 1 0J 1 1 I I O o I O Io 1 0 Io 1 C) Io O to OL dr o ;o o o to ti)Ac G I I - � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t1 O O .O Cl) .O IO in p � I •c 1 1 N Z 1 > 1 O I O I O _�. I O 10 .a O 10 10 10 10 1 :4 1 I cli O 1 (p I— 1h Q 1 1 Cl) 1 1 Y j 1 1 1 1 oz 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 i i i I N O'(o T C I I E I I I 0 � 1 I 1 '1J�) � �, C") I 1 1 0 r I I I ; C • O o 0) co C . U . i (6 m o � • U Z ` 0 ;m of Q U d .:E D co o �n '(1) 'm 'n 'a M CL OD N MT W T N N r cu 0 N M O 0) N W a- 0 0 O 2 w w M U C O i a O w w cz U 7 C Q C O U Z5 c0 O U O CO 0 c c� C O m C cz C N U U) U O J O C L co L m c lcu VJ CG O N C R L- W N L- CL m U) N 6 21 C O n 00 N T 00 O N N ai (TS 0 N Ce) O O N O) co 0- (tS 7 C C Q C 7 O U ca O U L O U) O 0C w C O m C co i O C O U O U N O J O s= N C N m C: cz T co O N .O O 2 W W U c 0 m O w fo 14 o .0 ,nN , N N 0 O O r p U o o .o c ol0 10 o r 0 Z 0 ;o ;o 0 p ip o 0 , v 0 10 1oLn 0C Ln 2 U 0 to X00 00 0 10 1� T 1 1 OO ;0 ;N Ln N m oI C) 1� r o Io l0 c O0 1 1 LO 0 10 iN M 1 O 0 CQ z 10 10 ----L.___�____ I N O •p 'O O 0 O 0 0O U I o .0 .o c 4 0 m p I d d 0 ip ;OO C, N C, p I O ; 0 p 0 0 0 1 1� 4- __--f -"--F--"- n in o 10 10 0 0 1 1 10 I p O C O 0 0 O SLI d O 1 1 ----r----�---- >� 1 1 0 10 1)" O� ,..N 52 0 1p 100 00 19 0 I'L LL o 1 1 a v O— O l0 10 p o Io 1 o� t 0 � 0 o ;o Io mo ao I I ----r----r 1 1 No 0 l0 10 0 o j0 l00 -C.7E xa o Io IC3 0 W w----r----r---- 0 1' y ;p d� 0 ;0 ;0� 0� l0 l0o 0 0 0 ten. o 10 it ---- ----r----r ' 1 O 0 j0 Io 0 N 0 0 10 10 0 (n 0 i 0 ;O O ---r----r---- 1 O N N O O I O o U 0 ;0 X00 00 0 10 1ao m NI I I N l 0 1 °� o O o C) u� 0 �o X00 00 0 = 10 Ico 06 II ---- O----r ----r *' 0 ' 0 ;O,n 0 Ln 00 i O Ir o C ; 0 o �0 ++ 10 16 ai O� cm . O • N SO �iC _ .0 ~ W > fo 14 2 D.. 00 _N 00 T 0 N N T _N cz 0 N CO O T O 0) ca EL C'� CO O N a O 7-5W W cz U C O U) N O w _W co U (SY M S_ Q C O U c[S O U O CO O C 0 cz C O m ca U) i Q C O U U .0 O J O _C 0 ca P m C V c?) cri in o C) 'o 'n 'o n ON o 0 �0 O Cl) U o .O .in C) •0 .0 0 O o 10 Io 0 Z o Io Io 0 ----r----r ---- 2 CO 10 Io Io �0'° 0 Lo U o oo Io 00 00 j loo i i CV N N ----r---- r--•_ Q O 0 O O 6 OI O 1� N O O O O F- N----i ----i ---- 0 I O I O Ig I O O O I O I Lq N ZO O O O N Q O o O O 0 O Q o 0 0 b ;o ;0 0 m o .o .07u 0 I y O 1 I O cO o 10 10 to loo O0 N O I O I U O U O 2 O I O 1 IL 1 I In -U) 0 10 10 0 c� LU 00 0 �o �0 O o �0 �0 O O 0 j C n ---'r----r---- O I O 1 0 N ...N O IO 1p V osf LL a 0 0 10 0 1 'O O 1I� un O - ---r----r ---- oia o 10 Io 1 I 0 O 0 0 o 0 Io CD O O 00 d� 0 IcOo �C) 0 10 10 0 L 5j O 0 O O j t l O O O 0 O I A o O c ---- r ---- r ---- m0 O 0 0 1 1 Io I (D 10 IC `0 m 00 0 LL o I0 l 00 00 ----r----r---- i0 i0 ui N O 1 11 1 0 1 0 O 11 O0 I O 1 O O 00 O 1 0 1 0 I Ir r O r �! O ----r---- 0 0 ---- 1 1. l0 I d 1 0 1 0 ch d 0 M ++: U 1 i N 00 N 00 00 O r' Cl) � 01 ---- --- r --- - I x Q o 0 t o I X00 am �0 00 O Z O 1 O I M O C O U II Cl) M 7. ----r---- r---- Cl) O 0 l0 j0v 0� 0 o �o 00 ;r0 Cl) 0) CT ' -O ' Y �0 + N 6 U m = C ° ° > F in G a_ 00 N_ Ib O N N T C13 0 N CO 0 T 0 CA c>s N 0 U O Z v U 0 U 0 F- N 0 U 0 m Z N 0 U 0 CO =11 N X O ' M M O CC) CO O o CO O o , u7 N oto o I O I O O o 0 0 ----r---- o Im d o I o o o o o �(Do no o Iv v I o IID W o In r o Im o IT oo Irn rn o In n o 1m N 0 1� I o o o o ,0 0 o o o I V I N N n i0o N o Imo 0 o Ino 0 I I O I(D c) O I o o 0 0 0 1ooO ^o I m co r- - - _ I � 1 n I O I O o o I o I I m IM o I Lo o Zr 0 1`no 0 I of r---- I O I� d 0 loo oM O I l n p N o o I `n u' Irn rn m j w o I o o � o I I I m N l0 oo loo o0 Ino Imo 1 I 1 In n �0 0 �0 0 1 � M M N N �0 0 - ---r- - - - I In n Io 0 �0 0 o 0 > ¢ o ;O LL o o 'n O O ' O >Lq N 0 Cl) 0 0 Ln .. N , LLa o� 20 o 0 O d I- NO Z I O lo o o 0 �o I I o I o l 0 w X !L V o 1 0 l o o l0 o o w T 1 0 N N F= ---r----r---- - 1 1 0 N C) C) o o j j 0 O m o o co o 10 1 u� La LL F o o o 10 1 I 1 N 0 O 1 o U) loo 0 1 1 O 0 O 0 0 1� N Z U o ----� --- --- O 0 r� U o 0 0 .o 0 0 o o 0 0 ,o o O ro o 0 0 0 1 I OO Io low O o z Y�1lI C cc oo0 1 O I O I p0. I 1 I I CG _O ++ m Lo o t o t o T U O 2 Wa O O O o o 0 O N ` � d N Olt to o Io lov O I o o I o� cc =dI LL � C � o m m m O 0 00o Ck. C U mo 1 I ui 1 I 1 1 o j o j o v t5 o 0 a o1 o 1 0 O L W� o �o �0 +�+ n O ao> Vr > o U M +' I l v v o)� CL o o o o I o l o o 1 1Lq o o o o o m O ' M M O CC) CO O o CO O o , u7 N oto o I O I O O o 0 0 ----r---- o Im d o I o o o o o �(Do no o Iv v I o IID W o In r o Im o IT oo Irn rn o In n o 1m N 0 1� I o o o o ,0 0 o o o I V I N N n i0o N o Imo 0 o Ino 0 I I O I(D c) O I o o 0 0 0 1ooO ^o I m co r- - - _ I � 1 n I O I O o o I o I I m IM o I Lo o Zr 0 1`no 0 I of r---- I O I� d 0 loo oM O I l n p N o o I `n u' Irn rn m j w o I o o � o I I I m N l0 oo loo o0 Ino Imo 1 I 1 In n �0 0 �0 0 1 � M M N N �0 0 - ---r- - - - I In n Io 0 �0 0 o 0 > ¢ o ;O LL o o 'n O O ' O n O N 0 Cl) 0 0 Ln , I I o 0 O jo jo NO Z I O lo o o 0 O 0 I I o I o l 0 w V o 1 0 l o o l0 o o 1 0 O i 0 i N N F= ---r----r---- - 1 1 N C) o o j j 0 O m o o co o 10 1 u� M m F o o o 10 1 I 1 N O 1 o loo 0 1 1 O 0 0 0 1� N Z 111 o o o o ----� --- --- O 0 O :c ' O U o 0 0 .o 0 0 o o 0 0 ,o o O ro o 0 0 0 1 I F Io low o oa Y�1lI o jo joo cc oo0 1 O I O I p0. I 1 I I m Lo o t o t o o N L I I I I 2 Wa O O O o o 0 O 0 r - - - - r---- 1. ---- I 10 IN >U)O d N Olt o Io lov O I o o I o� cc =dI LL O ILq O to I� I I I I o t 10 0 o 10 l000 � o m m 0 00o Ck. p Ioo I`no mo 1 I ui 1 I 1 1 o j o j o ui t5 o 0 o1 o 1 0 O L W� o �o �0 0 n O I 1 1 I. > o o 1 o l 0 0 I l v v o)� CL o o o o I o l o o 1 1Lq o o o o o m u. I I ui I I ui O N o t o I o I I LoL, Oo to Ioo 0 00 1 I o o 0 0 o 10 Ir I I 1 I 11 o o o o 0 0 1 I O O O I I N 10 I 1 I I I a N M c� O o to 100 0 O O0 o0 Z o 0 0 O 0 1 I In 1 I i I o 0 I o l o o Cl) 0 o 0 o �o sono oo 0 0 1 I Co Cl) c c ,o ,� 10 m o Co _ :> I - 2 00 N_ 00 N N T O C� O N M O c7 T c� 0 N c O U 7 i Cb c O U c m 'l:� M N 0 M . O 0 O O co co � ON U m o to O O N O O z O O NO Z O In O In _ a 0 U o 0 T 0 0 N O O 1p LO Ln 70 n n m m N'--'r-'--r'''' 0 N U to U U10 co n co Lf) o o �� �c6 n z coo m z O N O 0 O . O . O O O O O O O O O 'Fa O O m O G 11 O 10 10 Goo Cl) 0 O j 0 j 0 O 1- c`to to UA N In Cnj o 0 N :0I00Ch N O I O o O O CO O O O a a Iv Ir` 1 1 O 10 10 y to v N >� N 52 co w -c :3CL O O wa o 0 > - N a12 O In Im 0 t-0 LLa � 0 7 0 10 I7 v � O ctlv o �o �0 I 1 I d I a O I o M I p 7 0 d 0 M 20 O a o CL 0 0 y 0 n I 1 1 I lri a)O O I u' I co Cl) L O o xd 0 0 W j 0 0 �0 �0 0 c-- C I I I 1 C)0CO I a Io 1 1 d 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 o 000 0 0 5o DCL p o p O La m N d N O O VO 0 U n O 0r': c O lfl l0 0 1 0 1 .n I 1 rn to Z ID to U v v C7 0 0 0 10 10 0 co co O 0 m m Z U 0 0 C7 0 lCD 0 0 ¢0 0 0 W o m Ir o ~ U O N 0 M . O 0 O O co co � ON ii c0 m m I I o O j0 j0 0 NO Z 1 0 1 0 O O i 0 O C 1 I o I� Ia) O 1 0 1 0 a m U 0 0 o loo IMo 0 T O I r I v O N OU oIrn m In N m oII` Iv 0 o �m i0 I I N'--'r-'--r'''' 0 CD 10 I CD U to d o I� I v 14 m o �� �c6 co Z I I OO O N O O O O O 0 O . O . O O O O O O m O O O 0 'Fa 1 1 o i� in to 11 O 10 10 Goo Cl) N � O j 0 j 0 O a 1 1 N In Cnj O t oa) o0 I00 N OM :0I00Ch N O I O o O O CO O Xa W Imo 1 o loo Iv Ir` 1 1 O 10 10 vi >� N 52 I M I O i o i O M O :3CL 0 I co l 0 0 "--r"--�---- 1 I O In Im 0 t-0 N CD � 0 0 10 I7 v a~ o �o �0 I 1 I d I a O I o M I p 7 0 d 0 M d C) Ilo loo e oo N0 04 x I I n m y 0 n I 1 1 I lri a)O O I u' I co Cl) > O I N I m N O 1 0 1 r LL LL 0 0 �0 �0 0 I I I 1 C)0CO I a Io 1 1 d O O 0 0 0 0 o 000 0 0 CO p o p O I m I r 1 1 O I N I r N m 00 1 CO CM 1r 1.n n U o 0 �0 0 I I I I 0 1 M 1 co 0 0 0 1 0 1 .n I 1 rn to Z o In 0 0 �0 �0 In 0 I 1 1 0 1rn II m I 1 0 C7 0 10 10 0 a o 0 �0 �0 I I m c 0 a) 0 m U 00 = > ~ C N O CL N O O M M r n o m O o ,0 o c N -_ U o Co,rn N r 0 O O ;� OD N '- Q. Q NOD z O 0oc O p oo p I 1 -- 10 II N N NO Z o 1 0 0 0 o Ip l0 0 to IO 0 0 r v 2 '•_- �----I r U p C o o U 1� 1 oO 10oM IoM 0 N F- "-•- O 100 lo 1C O ^ n O Imo d mC)rn m---'� ----r---- C 1-0 m o Co U m 0 I y. 1 uoi Q ON __._ 1- o 1n I'*N o IN 1(6 0) 0) U ^ 1 1 0) 00 U C m Z o c Co m 0 1� �^ in In m p U --- Z o In C5 Im 1, N CD CY) ON o p t'q Cu O U U o m O 0 0 o CD o C; O U _ o .0 ;O o O 0 o •• 0 m 0 ,0 'p 0 o .o :0 0 c�0 m 0 • •tet •� ..* .. . CO N0 v� 1- I O 1 I^ O a d IQ 0 1� CoCYo Io Io c CV 0 ti� ---- cL I0 Id o . C �C\l CZ a v o v o nv� 1 j "---f---- O I d' IU m LL O O ---- N N XC O I O I( N 1 Co o O Ioo 180 0M r C Ltla o 10N)p I-0 00 (� "mom a _-r"''r---- 1 �.. LL C\j._'2 0 I o o I Co Cl) LL �_ pro �_-- ;6O 10 O U Z,2 7 v --r----r---- N a~ O o O o 0 g O I^ I 0�IO IN Z5 --- O Io Io O • 0 m M OO 1� ---- X a o0 o 3 0 mO yW ' r ---- 0 o --- 0 g0Xa_ CoooaO O w 1I0 K0 pNjM Co �d CD 0 p 1 LL �O O I N I Co Cl) O N I O) N C --- CL 1 O I pCli O Io 1 r Co CO N O N y' 0v 0I I 1 0 O ____r_.._�---- C� CO 00 o0 N O I 1 Q O o O O C,"T10M or) CD na I o 10 O p 0 Im Ir N T O c - ---�----r---- N 0 Nv v O O p I I O 1_m I^ G , o M 0 IM Im w O Lli OC x CC)w Co U)l I o i p o M U v z° Co O ^ n wl �►.� ----r-'--Ir I I =I O p O x O O Co o l0 1°' C o rL+ ---- ci Z a) o Io I� LO (A = ? U in .OI I 10 o V Co p o 0-'-� ----� ---- i ai y = o o 2I +� C7 O o 1 p 10 0 0 C O '.:- p Ip IO p w al U+ w O N U m ts IN 0 al +c� U O cal C : 0 ' Y _I U 2 > 3 H w 2 CL 00 _N _00 0 N N T N cz N cr) O LO T t) co d ' °1N o co 0 ' N ' t`Of m N n N N O 0 CM O .N �M tV . V co N N o C) ON o 0 0 Z O O O eo C v ao U (D o w 0 o 0 v o V OcCC) 0 o 0 U 0 � � O (o 0 F N-- N N O N 00 ((D tfAo U to 0 O 1 I N Lq 7 I 1 V co (O 0 m N N Z -- v N O �cq �7 N O O O OC\j co 7 7 co O O co O O 0 O ' O O t O 0 O O O O t 0 t 0 O O F- h M N O) Q> N I1 Ir I(LO N NSC O C a -- T^' CL � N 0 I I CD x W a o In l0 M I 1 O C > p p =s wa o �o li d p to _ O m 1 I ----r ----r ---- C o N 0 N CL o o 0 O Im I I� O iNCL r LO 7 O 0 (Ort L m N N xa UC o 0 w j I I I I 0 C -- np m 0 co ,o Ja Xa LL O a j, I I co to N O N O O O M 0 > O o O O N co 0 m 0 o I � I : 0 o �o �0 Uo 0 0 I 1 N N co O 0 M N Z O O O co CM M cli o I v I m o N O ol)to 0 of LO M to M I I O m O O I(o 1v o 010 10 zT o m o ( o INn IC? m ~ O O i N I I I I U O ' m N o co 0 ' N ' t`Of m O o .(Dto O a U ' � N CM O .N �M tV . V t0 to o C) 0 C) j0 0 NO Z 1 0 1 0 O O 10 10 o � _ _ _ _ _ - - - I I o 1N in v o V o Io Io 0 '> o �o �0 0 N O O 1 0 1 7 V 0 1 cq V N N F O 1 I 7 I 1 V co N O 10 Iv v O O �cq �7 N O in OC\j co 7 7 co Z -------------- ' O ' O NO O 0 O ' O O t O 0 O O O O t 0 t 0 O O Fn O t 0 t 0 O I 1 I1 Ir I(LO N NSC O 0 O j •N- T^' CL o 10 10 0 I I : tO N o In l0 M I 1 0 N p p N wa o �o 0 Cl) 1 I ----r ----r ---- otn o Irn Irn o oma-.ai '52 O Im I I� O iNCL r LL O O o 10 i0 I I I I 0 0 10 Iv I " 1 m 2 0 0 Ir Iv UC a1- 0 o 0 0 I I I I np OIrn I� OC) IoM M co oo O ip iMp Xa O O O w j, I I co N I I > O 0 1 1 O 1 N 10 N I I .O� o I � I : o �o �0 Uo 0 tia I 1 C) I� 1a) to 1 1 O O 00 0 0 p 1 co o I O O O co o I v I m o N O Iv Iv of I I O I(o 1v n 010 10 to ( o INn IC? m O O i N I I I I N 1(0x Irn o N (0 O I I 7 Z N O � N � O N I I i:3 O I I\ I 1 1 cov O O r I I to O O N O o O M O I I CD 0 C :0 : N 70 O - s c 0 ca _ > 0 ~ C� 2 CL co LO N_ OD O N N T O c» 0 N M O (fl r O 1) co IL R:T !r M 5 ^ ,000) N N m to N N N U 00 co N o N 0 O O 0 O N O O ZID 1 0 1 0 O O ao C v m U o to 0 O ' N I^ 0 0 I I O U `> o to to o O 0 ((O (t0 U Lq Ui o io 'a a (0 (0 o 1 N n N n N N 0 O to m U � � ----r0 a1Oo Nr Iq O 11 (O (C m a n n z N N N N m O 7 V toZ co. O O O b O 0 0 m 0 o 0 6 0 0 m 0 0 m U? O N _m IL V N O C IL N 5asn 7 M M IL I I I I w °' =D j 0 0 m (O O( := N p p IT Ir0 N wa LL o �o brio (o to _ O O ----r----r---- I I O O N O N CL ~ co 0 0 0 l0 1 o r ;n° o LO I I I I L 0- x d N N O I O I N Cl) O O O I r I V O LLF o �0 �0 0 N p I 1 m p �r LL Cl) a O l0 IAC m N O O MO M V) j, O O N M 0 M 0 o 0 m N U 0 0 (V N LL co O 0 co M z o 0 M M U ' co ' 00 co O O 0 0 00 p co O 10O LO M LO M O I l M I O a O Iv Iv rn o `° m C) o m O m LL o U o 1L Cl) 1 ~ U O N ^ ,000) N N O aD O ' N ' n Of O O Cl m 0 O a U 'M 'N O N M ,V ,V (O co O 0 O O O NO Z 1 0 1 0 O o 10 0 ----r----r---- O ' N I^ V I I O U `> o to to o O N OU o io 'a a _ O ;O7 V N 6 0 1n IN 0 o 'r v t° � � ----r0 a1Oo Nr 1,---- 11 o 'o 'v a O O 00 V N Ocli m O 7 V toZ co. O ' o ' O O U o o �0 0 0 0 .O .0 0 .o ,o 0 0 m o .0 .0 0 m I I On O I O I Lo V N (O I I N_ N 2 O 10 10 C IL I I I I =D j 0 In 'o coM I I O( p p IT Ir0 N wa o �o brio 0 ----r----r---- I I > O 10) 10) co �N 0 l0 1 o r Iia 0 �o �0 0 I I I I p O I O I N Cl) O O I r I V O LLF o �0 �0 0 I 1 m p �r oI rn 1 0 In IpM Cl) O l0 IAC xd O O O W j, I 1 c6 N I 1 O 0 1 I O 1 M 1 N N > 1 I w LL o �o �0 0 Iito I 1 o I� I� d ' co ' O O 0 0 00 p co O 10O 00 00O co O I l M I N Iv Iv rn I I ---- m 0 1� 't O o , m I ao (o U o 1L Cl) 1 IR O O i N I I N CD I r 10 n xx o 10 to 10 0 1 ,n R Z O N O N :0 N I I I I C7 0 1� I^ 1n 1n v 0 o 10 I (n O N O O O Ci O 0 ... ' .:-:-:: c o a CD p Y ~ U = N N 0 N O O Cy 0 O •o M 'o 0 C? O � O O OD N ' O N o l0 I 10 I 0 Z N 0 10 l0 1 O O 1 0 o l0 0 Ib ----r----�---- Z v o 1 0 0 T- o to 1 l0 I 0 N U o O O C) l0 loo 00 0 I N (D O I 1= ---- -- r---'r" I I O U I 0 0 r O o 10 1rn U co V i 0 to Iv a F 1=1 C�CID o CD N 0 10 1TIn Z o co � f_ OU io o I rn O Cl) 10 I o0i [D M Io O 1 O I I u) Z v 10 N O m_ 0 00 ' Oa _ (ti O, 12 0 N 1 O N 7 ,o 0 ; 0 m I 0 .o CN d _---r---- 0 I 0 I io O o Io l0 loo Q N O 1 0 7 1 C. co 0 10 0 10 i+ 0 m 1 m 0 N i 0 N O Z x I O Io 10 100 1 r co T '---r----r---- N O I O t o N N 0o o 100 U OO C MC.52 LL L O 0 0 'o O v0 U 1� o .0 0 U) O 6 b O o ,O o o M 0 O m 1 o .0 0 O ----r 10 ----r 1r ---- 0 I l0 I LO 0 LO �� `O mo l0 I 0 0 xEL LLI > 0 Io I CV 00 1 c 0 I a~ a 10 0 100 00 Iia 1 10 O 1 0 ----r----r---- 10 1T r N O 0 O 1 0 l 0 O l a) l O l O O a) O O O 00 0 Io 100 CO, �o o to 0 N __--r----r---- mN 10 O C7 Ri 10 10 1 0 loo = U 0 10 0 w i 00 M 0 w �- O 1 0 C O - I ---r----r I ---- x OZ r-_ m t o l o v a) o y _ _ _ _i _ _ _ _ l0 100 00 -1 1co ---r----r---- 1 00 N C: 10 I O 10 1 0 v N ¢ I 0 10 U) 0 I 0 -co LL d i C Y N I U = > :0 0 F 1 C: O Co 1 0 Co O n oo I 10 0 U a o 10 0 U 10 0 2.IL 0 10 0 _I w 0 10 0 O j0 .5 I C15 P U. I m---'r---- I a) I a) o0 1 00 U) UO co I m C'7 N 1 I N Cl) I Cl) o LO _� 1 0 N 0 1 0 i 2 C --- - r -- -- 01 1 W x Nrl- I N cu 0 O NI N U �I 0 1 I L T it O 1 °C O 0 O > N O 0 10 C� 0 ai E r > f4 a W o 0 � a _ � > U a ~ UE LP) O M 5 N 0 , 0 , CV N 0 0 •o LO u�i• O � O O o l0 I 10 I 0 Z 0 10 l0 0 O 1 0 1 0 C ----r----�---- v o to 1 l0 I 0 N U l0 loo 00 0 (D O N 1= ---- -- r---'r" I I O U O o 10 1rn rn co 0 to Iv a F 0 10 1TIn N � f_ OU io o I rn I o0i [D O 1 O I I u) Z N O 0 00 ' Oa U O, O 0 O 0 0 ,o 0 ; 0 m 0 .o .0 d 0 I 0 I io u� o Io l0 loo 00 N O 1 0 1 0 0 a O 0 10 I u, u> 0 l 0 10 1p 1 m 0 m 000 c6N 0 0 x O Io 10 100 1 r co T '---r----r---- N O I O t o a) N 0o o 100 10.14. 7 OO C MC.52 LL L 0 10 1aCD 0 v0 10 1� ----r----r---- 1 O 6 O 10 10 1 IO 100 Ch o d F- 0 O I O 1 00 CD a 0 ----r 10 ----r 1r ---- 0 l0 I l0 I LO 0 LO �� 0 l0 l0 0 xEL LLI > 0 Io I IOC, 1 00 c I I o O 0 10 100 00 Iia 0 O 10 ICoo �0 ----r----r---- 10 1T r N O 0 O 1 0 l 0 O l a) l O l O O a) O O O 00 0 Io 100 CO, 1 1N N __--r----r---- O 0 10 10 1 0 loo m U O 0 l I O 00 M 0 0 co co - I ---r----r I ---- x OZ O 0 I O t o t o l o v a) o y 0 l0 100 00 -1 1co ---r----r---- 0 00 0 O 10 I O 10 1 0 v 0 O 0 ¢ 0 10 100 00 0 0) 0) C Y N U = > :0 0 F I G \1 N : OC) a NLn . 0 N O ' 0 ' N N _� C\ I . p H2.;; O U o O O . o . LO N 0 0 N ----h---- .- ' Oco Io ----i ----h---- r cv Z o0 O 1 p 00 O Oo Ip 100 O O O I o O Z O 1 0 1 0 0 N----r---- 0 l0 I0 0 1 _--_r____r____ T m , l0 T C=J roa 10 00 1 o v o w IoIt LO j, co l 0 Ic U o 100 100 0 o to Q --�-� ---- Y o to 000 N �. 1 1,6 tp ----I UO 10 M ON ----r---- g I 1 m 10 .a- U o 10 1 rn rn a O 0 100 1 ,n N 1 N ----i ---- F- 1 o I O Q O U N M co I o N OU ----j ___-r---_ >, o l0 o 0 l0 Io io 0 10 1 0 rn m Z _^ I N 10 N o 0 Io 1� N 7 O 1 _ --- '--- Z 'I UO N O �O _-_------I -__ iq U d (Dp O o O o N O U O , O . 0 O 0 ,p o o C:) O o C. 0 m .d o o .0 :0 a U ...*.... m o 0 0 0 h I p ---- ........... O O I o p l0 O ~ 1 1 O CO nj 2 O O 1 0 p In 10 10 0 1 0 1 O p C , O d 1 N 1 0 I O p O Lq N O ----f---- LL 1 1 1 IV v N �N s 10 n CO u? ----� ----� co (a = g X o 10 _0 O O N o I o I a y O o O O O w 0 1 0 p X2 0 100 1 0 0 0 0 0 o 00 m ----r---- Wa Io Io0 00 r r > U�1 _---r----r ---- N ca — I I 'o O I o I I tib 1 m� 0 10 loo 00 CL LL o O O 0 O -_--i ---- i i 0 Ip 10 o(O ___-r----r---- I la) �o aF Io o Io c o� o y 10 I'Ooo U I� CL CL 0 00 o U 1 1 1 p 0 o o I o •�_' I 1 I _ _ _ _r---- 0 o I� o J X� w �^ 10 0 10 o m'� Ion x Xd 0 o l0 oo 0 o I O Co 1 ---'r-'-- 0 10 10 po 70 �p I a '---r'---r---- m� 1 1 0 Io is v LL a 1 _>0 .O� O 1 0 1 0 0 O O LL o 'T Io Imo O o to m ----r Ip r CTJ U) N O (n 1 �, o o I p 0 0 o `r N r ---- ----r----1 1 I o C6 M 0 I M O O U) O 110 1 0" 0 Lr) O 10 1 0 0 N I N co p 1 1 0 0 o 0 r ----r ---- 1� IN N N l0 to I � 1 o o 0 0 o I U o 10 10 o o 0 1 0 0 co 0 ----r---. +�„ I co O 10 loo Ci LLJ W x C I N (n 1 - ---r---- co O zN 1 O w. X 0---1CD 10 U O 1 O O+ O 0 p l 0 1 0 0 0 op .. 1 O Ip I19O m0 O .0-0 ----r---- O 1 Im c6 O — U 0 'n to Lo ----r----r---- i O T N i y O m 10 _m o Io O C) i O 1 1 0 Io l0�* oa 0 I 0 ... Ir o Io 100 00 _ - --.---- co 0 10 100 O p L1_I •�cu p co CL d Q m O .. 0 :o :� m U w m - FO 0 a ro a s m m : Q) ;`0 0 M ++ U = > 1' �I 00 1p N 00 T O N T O C6 C6 i6 O N 0 O 5 W W cis U c O i IU O 73 W W_ CSS U ca c c Q c 7 O U cts O U L O (n O c 0 ca c O m c as O C N U U 0) O J O c 2 c0 c O m Cts 0 N tm cc O U U U i 2I m �o 0 ((m O O o O N 00 N U o � O 0 N O o I 10 0 C\lz o 0 10 0 0 ON 10 v ----r---- 0 o o 1 m IOU r� Oo d O0 00 O 1C0 CO __--r----r ---- Ir 1- ---'r--'- I � Oo loo o to I 'n LO U o C) 1 Cl)N Cl) O o O 0 In n 0 I- 1r Oo U 1 1 o la IM v m m io l0 0 O 0 1 N 1T N n Z 10 lc? rn 1 N O 1 0 Lo N F o O O m o .o d 10 1� e U o 10 l0 0 b 1-° 10 Iorn o [!] 0 1 0 1 o 0 10 0 N CL -' - - - _! O 1 0 O CL O :o O O LO N o o o0 In 1 r n r O 10 o wa I m >U I I :. N a l IL I I I I ----r---- F o m to o o In Ir n r 20 a 10 10 o 0 to 10 0 0 ca O 1 0 1 0CL ----r---- o o In 1 r n L Ej I I O I O O wa I I l0 o 10 0 0o T 0 1 a) O . y 2 oo 1 1 I I li a 10 1co ri I N r---' 1a 1 O V 1000 d O 0 00 t o lv_ v Io O o I 1 1 N N O O 10 Io O 1N r o 10 10 o 1 O O x ---- I ILO 'n O io iv v Ir r Z 1O O O m 1 17 1 N c"4 O O I O I O O c o m o U [L o U ¢ ;O ~ LO o 1 O 1 0 0 o D o m �00 LoO OD N;Lo O O o Ln O � O 0 N o to l0 0 ON z o o l0 l0 10 10 0 c __--r----r ---- o t o I o d loo o to Oo V o 10 10o 0o O IO 1N 04 N 1 1 o io l0 0 O 10 lc? rn C) 1 0 Lo N F ----r----r- '-- O o 10 1� e U o 10 l0 0 b o 10 Iorn [!] 0 1 0 1 o o Z - - - -' - - - _! N O O :o O O o O o O o m N I I I I a F IV o to n o 10 10 0 N CL O 1 0 1 0CL O I I I I l0 0o 0 t� 0 10 10o oo w° 0 10 1co ri ----r---- r---' > 'r? t o lv_ v o I 1 N m� O O O 10 Io O LLa o 10 10 o - ---r----r ---- io iv v O- o o o to l0 0 a�" 0 10 0 10 ----r---- r ---- o 10 11 I 10 d o LO o 1 O 1 0 0 o D o xa O W 10 Iv v y I I >o 0 0 I I to loo v - Io l� in 0 o 10 10 0 CL o 10 to 0 LL - ---r---- r- ' -- o i o 1 d) N O IO IDV 0� C O 10 10o oo IR 0 1 0 I ti ui I _ _ _ _ i O I O1 (1) cl) O o to In n () O 10 I N N 0 10 10 O ----r----r ---- I OI I O I N N x O l0 10 co z 0 1 0 1 0 O 0 o CD 1 0 1 ---o - - - - f - - - r ---- o to I n O 0 c co I 10 co O Ci O O O 10 10 o oc o ;a`> w � o a s c ' o 0 m = > ~ U N N W o : m Cn li N 0 OU O : Cn CI o N r- oo ;� r 0- o to 0 0 T N 00 10 O 00 z O O O T N N v 1 o 1 0 Co o ca OO T = p looN p N r U o I�co I r I - -r--'- N 1' C 0 oo I Cl) Cl) O I N N O r F- 7 C N C Q ,O 0o I r�i cn O I N N � m o In n I r r- z----L -'-- O N O O O C U L) o 0 ;o 0 as o m o .o 0 1 U o o In n O o Io 0 Cf) a ----�---- O C w no In n 0 r C\I 'a r� 1 0o Io 0 0 o 0LU ctt x a --- O O I0 LO 1 S�/E•S� V ! '5a U - CSS ----r-'-- 0_ o I r n C o g o 0 1 r r o l0 0 p 0 U aF 10 U No rog 1 o I� r O o l0 0 x IL 0 O I O O W T O o I C >0 I � - d 1 1 CCS C '- LL 1 r---- (ll ---- N10 V O V CSS I p O O O r Cf)O I N N 1 � Ir T O U I r 0 O io N 01. ----r---- 1 n W = C O i� r W ++ p: z o 0 U p p ----i---- U U (� 1 q co 1 O 7 O rn to 00 ++ i o N v ° U m 2 'm W V (L) C° o LLJ c> o ~ U cfl += a N N W 7 (0 In N T 00 O N T T (V W 0 N (Y) O N CU ca Ll O L- 0 O O Q CL L'7 TT A n .0 NO .O ' coi ' ' 0) o (h nv ;^a U CO �' cm a C� C v �v 1 0 ' 'o 0 N z O 1 O N 0 10 co C01 O ' = Rf 10 U O M N 1 N C 4' �; '� O 1 0 Lf) LO H 1 cm N - - V LO ' O 0 7 � O NO co E c N , O , m 12 m I IT v la O U (o eco o ((O0 (^oo m c m ' Ci z m v 'a - ---L- - - - O ' O �C� N 0 U m o 0 0 'O O O E I I I 1 O O 1 � T -O H Lo M 1 co Lo N W I010) C 1 cq 1 O ' o ' o ;o O I O a ' 'n 1 �U� N N 1 � xa. o to '� >`n 1 I o o � 1 1 1 1 3 ti CL o I o 1 CIO �v M �(h _O Y6 d F � r I r N I N Do 1 m �� L x co CD N' o' (00 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I r 1L w 0T c o I p I �m rn rn 1co LO >� 0 LL ii O 1 LO LO N 1 N 1 ' N N O N L 'LO U) 1 O I O O 1 O W OD co1 M O U N I N C c Ico � I^ co x 1 1 O° d•�• a� ,rn z a ui LO 1 0 'o 0 O —1 N 1 N CC � r 1 r O 10 ,a a m O.O .Z. [6 o rn m °' � m m m 1 co I � O L- 0 O O Q CL L'7 TT A .O ' coi ' ' 0) o (h .Lm0)'t co CO �' cm 0 C LO ; O Ui N N >CD ' 0 Rf i co • O co co �0) O M E C 4' �; '� a' LO Lf) LO Q �L6 co E c N , O , m 12 ;I ;rn -o-o o (o Z ((O0 (no c U m 0 to C> C:) ;o m -t-t- rn ,o tr I I I 1 CLca ~ T -O I I Lo Lo aU W I010) n O ' o ' o ;o MIOt(0 (O S > - I 1 U o , .o 1 I O , Oo , O � > 1 1 1 1 o Q 1 1 2 � 1 1 1 1 -0 a'O'rn ani co CD N' o' (00 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 00 O'o'O rn 'rn 'rn • CU O Ir 2 ..z L> 1 OA U ' 0 CD C U) co m• �'� 1 1 D d•�• a� m a a'; >>m U —1 Q • • (O 1 (D , O O.O .Z. [6 1 I � � •Z O L- 0 O O Q CL L'7 TT A .O y co 'O '(o cz Ll 0 N Y Y O • • • CL CL r > Lf) LO H p co E c ;I ;rn !L Z . Y .. Y . ,O U O 'o C> C:) ;o rn ,o O 0 aU o O ' o ' o ;o S > - I 1 U o , .o O , Oo , O O o Cl) ' ' In 2 1 U O'o'O rn 'rn 'rn O 2 L> 1 OA U ' 0 CD C U) W 0 ' OC) 1 1 1 1 1 U o Io .o (O 1 (D , O 1 I � � •Z t • vO (n • O U1 i (6 • R] • ID n : CL a : U_ O �Q :-I J C O • O O co 'Z � N O N N N CCS CL 17 co O N O W w cis U C O i a� O W w E U 2 CL 00 Ip CV _00 O N N T _O 4s c6 7 C a C O U Z5 cu O U L r.. 7 O In O C a cis i N m C CCS U) m c N U U U U O J O C cu C O m C Ci3 U) ,o ' O u7 _M O 'O ,O N o'o ; O O O 'O '0 N O U (O . O W 7.- 'V - ,p 'c0 O . N(6 N -h-O--h p ,(D LO ' O . O LO A OD 10 COco 00 I ----h"--h -'-'f- - I I O 0 O I o I O O N M IM IO 10 10 o C, 16 ID Z Io Io io O IO 10 10 tt1 -I --T- +v 1 10 >. LO p l U 10 Io ----r ----r ----}--- ' o 1 OIO O Ip 10 O 10 10 UN IN IO C:, IO IO 10 T O I0 10 l0 CD C\I � 1 1 CD IO Ir U 10 1 7 1� IN :DO Cn 0 1 0 1 p IC\J O � I CO 10) 1 0 C0 m -}__ O a - -r ----i--p C-74 O Ip 1� O U ---- I� IN 1� O t0 IT .2 �� I�� loco '6Cp O I O 1p Q O 10 Io O IO z to O 1 O I r I r ----- IO N O ----; ---- L.-- o ('' D I CD--'' In U ':0 O ' O O ' O = 10 I O O y..� f........*�..-.rp .. . ~ 1 11 10 -.}.- O ~ I 1 o Io 10 1 Q N lO-iN- COCO O ip IN 10 CID_ - 1r a 1 1 10 O ICA 0 I� Io O ----F----F----} - I I LO as CD 1<0 Io CO I Xa w o Io IN 10 O 0 I O l 0 CD 1 0 CD O 10 I 1 0 1 ppI = O 10 10 J ----r�---r---- }---- O 10 I O I I --I-o F-- ;>N zo I 1 I 1 1 Io Ir W Io N I 1 = N p N IC) I ____r____�____ J O 10 I O O �o O 10 I 1 0 10 10 'o foi a 1-- o 10 I o 1 0 0 N 10 (O 10 I ^ 1C) Io 10 I I Q O 10 1� «. ----I 1----1---'}.... *.. 10 Ir 0 Io ca 0 10 o Io IN 11Io 1;� w to 10 0 1 0 0 16 (O-O-Tp-�� N 1 ----r 10 10 {� n o ----r _---} __- '- 1 0 1 r 'a2 0 10 Io �' 3a 1 1 1 1 N 100 iN I ----r----r----} •-_ I 10 r Cj O t o 1 0 J N O 0 I 1 d 0 1 I 1 O 0 1 I 1 O I 1 0 0 ' o 0 1 I I I co 10 I Q Lr) '0 'Lf) 0m CON O U 1 IN 1N I - �Om 0 .o '`n d% C I I m 1 1ro 1 I0 0 W I ----------}---- � ...r...f.. Cl)LO C -�- 1 I I ' aNi Z x IO I 10 'o z � — .� O J 1 IT ;o ----I ---I r- r - } .. cn A ;r > a) o 1 IN I Io 10 0) N c Cc I I r 1 I o J p ;ami ; o L w •• :. . z _O _0) ,0 O m Iei = S_ W W� ; N Lr; ;z� , Z � M ZI I ■ 1 n 'O CY) L) to N O O o O oM O Ln N o O O N Ln trno t0 N cn t') p O O dN-iO------ O O I 1 r O CL Z o C) i 0 10 O 00 tDI O 1 0 1 C LC) ---- r---- F----- I _N =O O I O I N N r U oo �o to O O o to '0 0 N ---_ N O 2--__� �_-- U 1` o t o N OI n Ln C to yrr O F C7 I O 1 o I r O CtS N --_-1 ---- ---- t0 Q� o t o N O r to I N Oto (Sf m M I o 1 0 O Z i 1r - - - - - - - - L - - - - C Q N o o o U ' ' O o .o O o o , o O o C ,o 0 7 O ++++..... 1 U Lo m C:30)i oo ' Lo 2° o 0 1 0 O o O °-~ N 1to :o 0 U NLn ca 10 1L o Ln 1- O L X m w N o o t o N IO 10 O O 1 1 --"-r----i'---- I m u? 1 1 1 (N ca r i u_CL I 1 u CDm i 1 ----r----�---- O Ca O m 1 o v I o Lo to CSS (n � LL � Io to No O lo O N 1L O I C I ov to ILn io to U wIL T colo �o 1 0 j O o O (n U N 1 J li d I 1 ---- r----i'---- �' I o; to Io to �o C, o) 00 1 I rn o O o o N I ILLLo (p __--I-__-r---- � (] o loo � I o Io N r Cn Ui (Q U o io 0 o o (� N 1 1 I ' '-cu O CV x O ' 6 to to oM to to Z Ln 70 +�+ cc Z r -o �o Irn N 1 O O o - --r----�---- w w 1 O I I 1 0 I A O � i o I o N O o Uo o 0 1 _ 0 cc as 0 d y I 1 �• O I 1 c7 J 7j I=- L 1 O o )O 1 f`O m CY) Y Lo L 1 p + > I� ii z ' IN O ----L----� --__ o W NU (1 z j cu w a v a) n cm rc C) U N j J L 6 N ,i p p c UI) M w cn Cao Ln N T 00 T O N N r r N CO 0 N CU ^c� LL C'7 O O N 0 O 75 LU LU m U c O i CV 70 c0 G W W_ m U Q 0 U W 0 U 0 U) 0 c L M C L M� W C M U) L U Cl) U O J O C= "a Co C N m C M n O m n 0 N co O LD O O O rn n eT C) m f O o Lri Lo 0 O" 1 0 I Nm O O I V OO 7 z i 0 1 0 c O T Lo I O 10 1 O 1 , I 2 U a 00 to 'o O (� co O i o I N N O CV 10 10 1 1 I O i Op O N On a O I , N I O 1 O 0 L o Go O 1 N Lo v co O to to to 1 Lo co LA iO 1 NOD OD U T (D 1 I V n 0 h O o In W 1 I U o _ IS U ZO a '1"6 • U� D- .z° 2 y— � u N W a o �_� p o Cz J L u N O Q N � o O Y � m . a Z ; a 3: n m°' d ; Z j . N N— n o n 0 N CO ' p ' LQ V7 O o o o) oo co yr o U Lo ; m o .In uS Io �rn v O c11 i0 10 0 lo I O ; O O 1 , d oo� to �n o U oD p I O I N N N O 1 0 � O I ----r----i ---- - N I , N I O 1 O O v U O to to iO 1 NOD OD O to 0 h I'd ; In II N U o _ O O 1 I V n , 1 O U� CO 10 Ino N W N In � o O Y � m . a Z n m°' d ; Z j . N N— opo C .�.. C J L O Q Q F . ; a .. N CO O LO N CV 0) CO CL C? _O O N 0 O W W (15U E O U) N 0 7- w W cz U Cn aS O U O U) O C ca C CV m C a$ U) CV (U U U) r=. 0 J O C 70 c a� 00 s_ co CO W 0 ca CD Q O 6 A me m so co ;^ o U o .o d W4 Cp C5 .o N ON _00 O N o 1 C, o ' o N Z T dj � o C5 to I C C Q Iu d 7 N CO O LO N CV 0) CO CL C? _O O N 0 O W W (15U E O U) N 0 7- w W cz U Cn aS O U O U) O C ca C CV m C a$ U) CV (U U U) r=. 0 J O C 70 c a� 00 s_ co CO W 0 ca CD Q O 6 m co ;^ o U o .o C5 .o ON o 1 C, o ' o Z o to C5 to I Iu d = U , C3 Lf)1 co 100 loo o0 a C � ; 0 1 i C) U o LO m o to F o 10 n, O O 'LO � O O O 1p CD 0 1 O Z 1 N O 00 U 00 0 .o o O .o m o .o ~ 1 1 O IO,, to 'n N 00l0O o 0 0 I S O d cm I N V5 In cb Iv CZ Z> 00 too x oo I00 N 1 N > 1 1 N , U- , 1 N N loo EL 00 �� N 1 N N O 1 , 01)N 0 0 L a 0 1 0 00 w _a N goo , N C-" -} m > O 2 1 , ` - 0 I 0 C) U) cq 0 1 0 o to 6 m O 00 ,00 co o�,00 L IL" a)1 a NO x z oo l00 'oO 000 I 1 LO C7 0 0 ; o n In Ocu L_ 0) CD c m m E m c T- U cfl 7 00 lq N_ 00 T N N T Rf 0 N CO O 19 N N Z� Cu 0- T O N 0 O L LI Lg Cz U C 0 L cO G LU W IZ U o goo ;^ m N li O O •O .O O U o •o .0 0 I I o l0 l0 O o l0 0 ON o 0 o 10 10 0 0 ----r---- o to l0 r ---- Io Io 0 loo loo oo o'n v U Io �0 o Io Ioo 00 __--r---- r --- O to Im of F- ----r __--� ---- v N O o 1 0 l a) l0 I0 o o I o 0 O o O 00 Io Ioo 00 00 I 0 m 0 o 0 to l0 Io Io 0 F- 10 Im r- ----r----r---- 1= O --- o 10 ImO U l0 1m o l0 l0 0 b m to Io 0 to o 10 Io Io 0 0 z to l0 -------------- I I O NO O 0 o • o • o o O • O • O O m o o j0 jo 0 o l0 o I O I N a) H 10 0 O O 10 10Lo 10 IOO OLn OO O N I 1 O t o I o o 0 0 O :0 :0 O I O I N N IL • o • o O I 1 O O Lo 7 N O O o Oo l 01 Ioo l 0 1 n d I o u f q D O t O O x=2 a W i0 O o o I I N ----r ----r ---- N u) al I-- 1 1 O N Fm 2 on N I I o ti a 0 o ----r---- O I 1 I I r---- 1 0 10 ,n o O o N o a o d o Io IOcD 00 _- o O o I I N -r----r ---- I o I l0 ION N d oo '!1 jN 00 oo to Ioo 0o xd w m '---r---- ID Ioo N r---- I 1 I 1 00 N >o LL a t o I D ; I N ----r----r---- ----r----r---- I I N cl I I O o 0 :cl I t o o �CL I l0 I I l tom 0 0 m oo O U LL a I Imo �o ----r---- I I L6 r ---- I I 1 I o c ui w O N x O I l o a o z 0 o m I o0 O Lo I IO o Oo ----ro I I Lo ----r____ N 1 I Lo o O 1 IN --_-r----r ---- rn I L l o o n LL i 0 o o Ir Im I I � cm . N N C O Q 0 0 Oo 0 O C . E U . N fa 1 0 I c1i I I ai ID a3 ' N -o N O II U o c o F 1 1 _o cn �U °a m Q U ;m N O o • o • O O � O • O • O O l0 o l0 0 ON o Io to 0 z 0 o Io �0 __--r---- r --- v O o 1 0 l a) l0 I0 a) C', Ln O o O 00 Io Ioo 00 00 U O T 10 Im r- CO 1= --__r---- --- O O l0 1m In Uo to Io 0 � o to l0 0 0 o 0 0 F- ----�----r---- o o j0 jo 0 0 to l0 0 ro o 10 0 0 z -------------- I 1 N O O :0 :0 O U o • o • o O O O O .O .O •o •O O O m y -.rr}++ter}•.+�- i0 O O I 1 1 0 I al al I-- O 10 I O L, on N o O o 0 0 o O 10 IN N a 1 I jN 00 to loin out d O O O X w o t o I D ; I N N ----r----r---- 1 1 cl 1 1 :cl �CL LL a I 1 O ro o m I o0 O Lo m O O Oo jo joo ao EL 1 IN --_-r----r ---- N 3� O oo l o I a) to loin a) 0011' O Q 0 0 Oo 0 .00 w a �, m 0 1 0 I c1i I I N o II a) o 1 1 � I 1 I 1 L ----r---- r ---- I tclio 0 I O Cn o O __- -r----r ---- I I a) O l lom om U 1 Iro I I ul u? 0 I I m ui r ----r---- ---- I I a) a) x 1 lo.n0,n Oz I 1 loo 00 1 O o I Io I I ui O M 1 I I. I O IN Ioo o N 0 Q I I o n o r m I I � 1 I O O cmN cL C • }= U . E ca a7 a a N y -o y O OO on- c ~ iU U U) a q $ O \c2 A \ 0 \ \r- \ § / a ® \ / LL Gcz 7 / / \ R / / /co \ / / a / C/) / 2 \ / § / 0 / ----h---- § '_ \ ± 4 / ± a \ ± a \ ± $ \ ± G z \ / \ \ / \c2 c2oco co ---r�--- JcmOj 0 ). \ �\ � ----h---- § \ ----[---- \ W co o � }...�}..: » a) C13) ) / 'Z .6 5 IL 00 N T 00 T C) N N T cz 0 N c+') O OD N N O7 W d @ IDm ' co O V O M u> M Nr- O M 'O O O C) O ' O N O LO M LO U I M O 0 1 O c�J 1 O I M 1 CND z O 0 r M 0 0 I O t o n O 0co i0 'rcli m N I O 1 0 O O O 1 1� M( 1 0 1 0 T 1 J. N O i 0 v co to o ioto a = O co l0 rn U co j0 �O r 1rn O 10 ILLN o M 0 1 Ln r� io N O 1� O �O ;cV co �0 Ic CD m rn N O co o ai 0 O1q N 10 10 V 0 1 N l0 1 " V ~ I L ---- y y y .......... �� @ co 10 IN _ � 00 @ 0 2 OJ 71- O - :O I� " O Ca a 0 0 a LO Im C15 (M L---------- L" N LO :0 N ' 0 N N @ O N . j . f0 1 @ O s m a Z ' N 0 N @ O a ° 075 `6 0 @ _� N Q Q 2 cn; m ' In N co O 7 O Cl) _M N O f� C7 O O O U . N NO O O M 10 0 O 0co i0 'rcli m z O O 1 1� M( 1 0 1 0 n O J. N O i 0 O i... ----r----r---- V co j0 �O 10 0 o 1� O �O ;cV co ----r----r---- I n to O rn N O O �0 'ch O1q 1.0. 0 1 N l0 1 " V L ---- y y y .......... �N \ ^ 1 1 _ � 00 @ 0 2 "1. 1O 1 C-0G� O V C 1 0. � O " O Ca LO Im C15 (M L---------- 0 N N @ O N . j . f0 0 d z 7 8 CT N N Q w N T 00 T 0 N N T 76 Q N M O N N 0) cu CL 0 N 0 O 5 w w co U O i O W W m U O U U) ca O U O U) 6 0c W C m C M U) i N C N U U O J O C 0 M C i N m C y�I T O' d cu U o :o N N N N m 1 OI O ON O I O Z O 1 O O I O T I 1 LO U Im v Iv 1 O U ch I oo t� r- H r I i-L�• -o a ID � m c o E co N T 00 CDT N N T T co cl N 0 cO G LLI LU FZ U C 0 i N O 5 LJJ W U Q 1-� 0 U as 0 U 0 0 c ca C N Ib C ct3 i i Q� U 0 U CD O J O C 2 C75 C N m C cis cn N C J CU cu N C o6 =) ;0 0 N O O W N Cl) N O Lo ' O ' m le U c+) o ui o Lo of co rn 0 10 IO 0 0 I 1 o to 10 0 O o o to to 0 0 o O ; O G C, O 10 O a o ,v 1n I 1 IA l0 1v In V 10 M1 0 I <O In IA = U v No (`7 N 1 0 1 V c0 ----r----i---- I Ir cDI o o �o �v v U — —--r--—-s_---- I I r O I O 1 p v ao N O t� M U L 1 o 1 o 10 V 0o n n 10 I 1^ r- o ri o 1 N I 1 O I oD rn O (d Q C O N I o N fl O W 1 0 I m 0 L----'- - N a� o a) O .-OZ N N O s C Coo N z m r CL F N ID O a o CC H @ L 6 i (D J 0 O d; c a ;0 o 'n 0 M o ' 0 C.)O M UIn . le of 'o 'c_o rn 0 10 IO 0 0 0 l0 0 10 o O ; O G a 2itCDcn o ,v 1n I 1 IA = U N co N 1 0 I V 10 o �o �v v ----r----i---- I Ir cDI o N O U � l0 1m O v ao rl�I to 'n 0Cl) n I 1 -O N O 1 O I oD rn O (d Q C O 06 1 0 1 M 1 Q I cco a� o a) O .-OZ m r CL F N ID O a OD _N 00 O N N r ca 0 CO C C c O 0 U cu0 O U 7 O O N (Y) C O � 4 m Ca a i C U U .M O1 O J 1 O ® C 1 70 m C N m O c� CO _O I O N O W _W co U _o cO G LU w cu U m CL N LL 1 (-9 Z U 0 N O O U LL 0 J O) OD 3 0 IL m o` 2 O N N cz 0 co n N f0 O O O U ui ui N__ Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d a U o 0 d 0 N F O Cl)Cl) N N N j2 LO U) N ---- 0 Cl) f7 00 _ N N O m L6 Ln Z N O o 0 U o 0 0 m o 0 U o 0 N O C a -- N V R x a o ") 0 0 mLO N L� O co W O LO O u7 � o 0 0 O N ro Co� LO Ln x o 0 0 0 c --- a) Yo mCL LL -_ a d 0 o0 o0 m � O v v 0 0 x`o Cl) O N N Z r- 6 0 0 co co O 00 w O O N Q H C w C CT 0 o_ O CL LL `o m LL H U Q) ca O O LL J 3 � CL CO 2 Q) N = m Cal O EE z cu E z O R i � O m CL ++ C N O � � C E O. i+ 7 cu 0 - s w co O 4- cu ++ C r LL a) O Q O cr LU m CD E Z G—S1 W o D. a ~ O Q W _Q f+ > tT- CL O -- =� CD U- C DI n N f0 O O O U ui ui N__ Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d a U o 0 d 0 N F O Cl)Cl) N N N j2 LO U) N ---- 0 Cl) f7 00 _ N N O m L6 Ln Z N O o 0 U o 0 0 m o 0 U o 0 N O C a -- N V R x a o ") 0 0 mLO N L� O co W O LO O u7 � o 0 0 O N ro Co� LO Ln x o 0 0 0 c --- a) Yo mCL LL -_ a d 0 o0 o0 m � O v v 0 0 x`o Cl) O N N Z r- 6 0 0 co co O 00 w O O N Q H C w C CT 0 o_ O CL LL `o m LL H U Q) ca O O LL J 3 � CL CO 2 Q) N = m Cal O EE z z E z R CD ++ C N O � � Q C s w co O 4- cu ++ C r E W ': exC E a' LL. a) O Q O cr LU m a) a O Q cN. w E Z G—S1 W o D. a ~ O Q W _Q f+ > tT- N.— co w N T OD T N N T O 76 0 N M O N M N cu T N 0 O 73 w w ct3 U c O a� O w w FZ U c� 7 C C Q a C O U Z5 cz O U O CO 0 c cu C i O m C cU U) i 0 hL 6 2 a_ rn Ln N_ 00 0 N N_ T (1f N CE C 7 U) C 7 O U co O U L 7 O CO O c N co 0 i O O T ^0)''c^^ w vJ Q� N U (n U O J O C 2 cz C Iv m C 'c^z T VJ C N 0 O LU W ro U O N O w W cis U Q tm c6 N D C cu J r T 0 m O 'O 'O C 0 a. I co I O I I Q O "o O N O ca 00 N r a cn o1 p N . M V O LL I I I I I 0) j NCO Ico IN U '. 1 I Q O ; O i 0 IJ i I I j I 1 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , I , 1 , I , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 U 0- 0 1 n 1 N CD T I � I I 1 , I , 1 1 1 I 1 ' I 1 , I , 1 , 1 , 'N N O V n (n O � O N ' Cl) . al ; O U N N ; tl ; al s a� a O .0 O 21 E ;O t` CN7 N (O O O O N A O 0 aT d � LL °' T O f0 r O N O = aio '5 d o C 2 N IL O Z:2 =- O N O N O N y co C ^ C. d = (4 C 9 U � 1 _ C O N N Z v +, w ui N co O co ++ L U E L E E t 't O U -0 o o U U U) r Q� L L a T Q L- d ° o E c. y C N N O U °t N t l4 D CM cc E — N O M rn In N T OD T 0 N N T T p i\ N O N N 0) cu a. M m 0 N O 73 W W_ co U c O i Q) > O 2 W _W c0 U IC) � O j O . O , O . 00 . N . N ' N E 3 M �0 .o �� .n , .� :o U) Z ' N r ;N O U co —4-4-4-4-4--; - - U I 1 1 1 1 1 CO o c 1 100cz i > 1 t 00 IN I 10 1� 1 1 1� 1 10 I N 1 I O F- ca O 10 10 N 1 C7 I N IO 1 '"• IN 1 N 10 I N I 1 0 m Q 1 1 1 10 Ir I C 1 I 1 I I 1 _fn 1 1 1 1 1 I N z 1 1 1 1 1 1 C 2E 1 1 1 1 I 1 U O U) .. 4 ...� ...} ...�....} ...� . . U E c _0 O U) 0)O J W W_ t� O c (z O U N -0 cz _0 O c c,3 � Z m ; m co ca :� ' C) ' cc C p O C a> m -p c U U U E: E ; E p : E c : m �U ._ E E E U E R = ,: .� ,: ,co ;� m E o o Z .z .Z .z � a . m � � -0 p O;� U)O c E Z a) O O U) p Q 0 0 s : ; O — C U C U) c �E N C N N cn N — cU)i, O C i i i 07N N a N • N W W U O O O W O co coL •L In CIS co co ro •ca ao .ao C: •co 'ao •cu 'ao 'ao x i � U) C LL U- LL 0UX ' E E E E wE ; dC Q !? � Q O OO _ Oc� E 2 i : LLO cn ctnn O �: c - Q co 0 W W W u W 07_ W E E E c-7) U 'U'U U i -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 W W W p o V M M M M M N N N a);--] N O O O O O _U U U U co 0 0 c L L .c O L N � a. –J U O O O O O 6> > > > w O tL w rn N T co T C) N N r 17 Cl? O N O LLJw coU 0 O 70 ccO G W LU C E _A C 7 O U co 0 U O O C co C N m C c a) U 0 U N O 1 O C co C a) m C as co p . O . O . p . O . O . 0 . O . p . p . 0 ' O ' O ' U' O 'o 'o 'o 'o 'o 'O 'o 7 ; O ; O ; O ; O : O : O ; O ; O , O ; O ; O ; O . U . co N' a - - t---t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t - - 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 IM IM I ICO 1 IM I V 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 t o I o 1 I o I I o I o 1-0 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 0 I O 1 1 0 I I O I O I O M , a 1 O 1 N 1 N 1 I . 1 a I N I( I I 1 0 I O I O I O I O I N I O I O I to ,O Ir 10 10 10 Ir 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 I 10 I� I I p I r I p I N 1 0 1 0 I N I CM I N I N N 1 0 I I ICO I(',ILo I"t 1� 1 I('? I Cl? ICl? 1� I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 10 I(O 1 Ir I If Ia0 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I > >o o o E: E : E : E : E c ; c Q a� a� ' .H Q m ¢o 'F _ .Q'm E E E E E .li 6 g ' CT 10 W W W W W ; Q ; ; ' O co co ' O ' O O 'CC 'Cc N O 'O 'O 'O : (ED : OE i E U E U N Q 6 _ N ;0 E E E E EW; 0 �, a: X ' X ' X ' X ' X ' X X X ' X' U- ' n- ' SZ ° Q = W : W W CL a ) 'W 'w 5 :L :LD - 9 ro :a . .Q .� a) a) ,.fl i E m cn N O N N W CD N I- N O O CM (15 d T 0 N a O 75 W W FZ U O U) O LU w ca U 2 IL rn 1p N T 00 T N N r (0 L N E E 7 U) C 7 O U c� O U O CO 6 C nu C i N CO C cu CO L C U U O J O C cu C a> o] c cu U) C O .y E W E E X G O = V U L L cn O O U Cc O T = N of ;g 2 d In N O N N r _N co 0 N E E 7 C 7 O U ca O U 7 O CO O C c6 C N m C cz i C U C/) U U) 0) O J O _C cz c N 00 S_ cz U) O O N 70 O W W m U C O 0 cO G w _w co U m .n rn o M n m o N O 'LLOO 0)�vr Lo 'o n M (D U o �� "Oo � r LO — V co Cl) O jo j c Z '� IO 1 I o 1 1 I v CD I o� I(NJ I I In 11M U oo �N �r iT rco N l 1 ca 10 ON nI�---�Iv cit 0 114 jrn)T icnon ~ 1w oLq Ico co ov M N O r---- --'n r ---- r-- -_ to Im w I 1 v co v ca 0 1 LO Im I Iq j od iq Z 7 M ---- --- ON-- U 6 m ~ 1 I 1 Fes- o Ir it Io IOt ILO Ln RI oo �o I V �� V N 10 In la 10 LO a I I I NN (D in i0 Lo Lq a-- x �o �v �O �v Lv 10 T I ----r----r l0 l0 I I ---- > LO r--- I m 1 - to � o c) 0 0 0�aC) 1 I I LO �N m CL Ln ;o m Q ----r----r O ----r---- N 1 N I� I 7 m xa W 00 L000 1v r 10 ern �v 10 cn m I 10 1 1 j 0 I I I 1 to I n o a v I't 1 ----r'---�----r---- I T I cq O I 0 IrNi I 1 Io Inco N co O 10 0 1MICO0 M O 1 II 0 1 V r--- -1 --- - r----r O 1 I O Io I I I� I M Iv In c, v U O 10 C3 I00 Ir N --- -I I to x O r I at ILn oa r'---r---- I I 1`n IN I� 10 o n z coIn oo 1 N I Ir? la M I I rn I I 1 ----r----r ----r---- I 0 � c07 I I � N N LOO W 1 I m �0 I� I o r O M Q O w O M U W F— 2 0- _N 00 O N N T N Qi N E E C 7 O U ca O U t O CO O c N cz C Q a) CD m C) W cu Cl) C i (U C N U U .0 O J O c cis C CV m C cz U) Cl? CO O N 0 O 2E LU W cz U c O i a� O 2 W W cz U m o N L9 . O N �O �LoO O N O U O o Qcy) .Lo • c? O U • N^ p . co . n O . to . M . 7 M ----h----h----h--'- $ o O z Ir I I ---' -'-r----r----r- = o I I I c) I(o In Icoi n U o Q o0 Ir' Ir? I^ ui N 1 0 I I O N N ---- r---- r ---- (Oj o N-"-r O— coIn I� Iv co m o o m c\jrn o Ina) IMr (D a) ole ~ ro Lo O O m 1� M U o Nr-"-r"'-r---- 0.0 --''o In Icqc\l 1 1 v aD o Im c 6 o iso I�r In my Z I I - I cc) m m z o 10 Ir 10 Ico co ON Ico Ia O N O O .6p 0 m ; 'q m o N6 O B m IT Ip Io CL o u) N l Lo c) I r 1 0 I� 0 0 l a I n 1 Go o o n T 10 17 IO o Nut 1 1 I 0 o N Iv Irn ' ' O 1 in Wa c X d O O � O I V I I S 17 0 7 u W r 1 I O 1 0 > N ----r----r----r---- > N O p Bm o Ln I 1 0 1 io li a '.N 1 1 L I i i� i Lo c = 1 I� I ----r----r----r---- oY o O Ry I I 1 O V I I� 1 0 I N T �H d o g o d~ oo 1� I( Ic 1 0 L 6 O r I 1 N ''--i "'-i O i a 7 O O I^ I c\jN I N colI I W rCL w a 1� In Iv 1 0 1 0 1 0 G r > o 9 I I 1 ----� ----r ----r ---- •- r- rn� O o OD 1 i io c CL LL m� i I Iv I a tia ----r----r----r ---- N O O O I I I N o o Io o to I II c7 co N ON 1 1 I O O I O O LM O Ci o I I V 1I I ----r ----r ----r O o --- - U o IC) n p U Im Iv I o IcOo Iw In N o Iv I� Ivi m x - ---r----r----r --__ O O o I I I Z o x m 10 1� IN o V I r 1 1 0 O M O z 00 I� Ire 1� Ci cu voI`n di - ---r---- r ---- r ---- o (`3 oo1(D IN IN O O d Q 1 1 I v Slp �Cm to m o O � N fG of Io Iv Io I I `2 V t 1 o m a� m m c• m Q .� .s o : c2Lu m� O U ca ; a a) v aIrO I M v� a_ Cn N T R i O Q T N r - N c O T T . CL a o a� 0 CL E n =3 CO to 0 >, IT IOIN Ic+� N I I r- y O cE O 1 1 I I I I 0 r C) I -- Z _ I 1 I O -i - 1 I ILO U co 0 7 U r --- r---r---� N I I 1 1 I 1 0 I I I O O n I^ = O N I I^ I Z O I� m LL CIN IT IT" 0 (15---r— � O I O 1 I T -__ -r — M T u (n 1---j I I 1 O N N 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 co l (o c N r u N I O I^ O I O: N I N 1 I N I p I O U (n I I N1 N IaD I N Ir Ir J O J O i i 1 In R ■ c (D CL C15 ' ' ' c N fA 1 m c 12 1 0 I O Z N m m a - c IU E2; o ; i 0 0 1 c cis a IU I a I ZT ' I U N i O C6 I� I_ L to c0 > 1 i I � CL o s= O _ d ` -0 -t3 ++ Ul c4 U) O cc M = I I w a a c W E O Co + ` U O v z c cm o c L d C N fC cc � ;� c o m "' cu T U O t d y C� ro ' c fn 0 o i L C . p 2 U = T O w O > Q zT �' �o, O C 01 O V •ami a c ;a> � ;a = �+� —t 'a Q O C7 a L m LU W w �, �, o 0 0 O' 0 u U 'Q L E N Z ' U U U N N n N co ' v In Q Q Q CC cm 0 rn _N _co O _a" T ai CU 0 N N O co CU 0) CLS CL E E U) C O U co O O 0 C co C (D m C cz CO Q) U O U 0) O J O C co C cuoa> m C (ts co CY) O 'o O 'oo O m v =a Z5 ' ; ' M , ' co , M , 'VCO i` F— C cn C c , ; O ; ; O ; p ' O M o O ' CD cn 1 1 > m R1 0) ol X I x ' x ' x I X col 7 ' U ' m ' M O C n ' m > > > m a , a , a ' L O ;o 10 'o to O 0 1 0 N N tD� , , N IN , , IN cu Q f-'1 adU I I 10) I0O ) CD CD 1(6M 1,6 O s= 1 1 1 1 1 I _ I B mJ 1 1 a -_ �- -� �- �- -, O I O saw 'o 'O C5 c E I cz cz Z CL p ; OO 00 00 1 00- �� C; , O ; C , C5 11 O p E 1 1 C z I � i -�_ O l p I p 1 0 10 Q O 10 IO 10 10 I- Q L6 1 0 I - jL6 � M n Y E O Z 1 j N r Sa0 r N �'a) !M Co 7ao N�M1cqio S i i i i O ICOo i 1 1 V a U I I I I cn cu N IN�W ' I I cc • ' . . . : ... .. CC� o NCo E O ; U ' i o RS o . O U } 0 0 n c`u c W o a a u a L � U ; 07 : iTcu o c ' 7 '(9 m ,a ,Q („j 2 I S i i i i i 1 20- c6�� ;� ;� ;000 ' o 00 �o N o � ya- foo_ foo_ Lo_ Lo_ 10- ' , , ' co ;^ ;O 'CO co SCO ICC) ' 1 y C 0 O E Q N Q F- C m E CL W cu O X m E cu Z C) O ro L a '- 1 0 I r 1 T" Tyr- Irr 1'�e-' r�rj-T-_---7'___•_1____-T_-__-T_--.�..,-- I - 1 1 I 1 1 I Ir IM Ir IN IN N -�- ; 06 10 O i' U' , , , , Y ' 1 , L 'm U lY I N' m 1 1 , O , 1 co N 0 1 i ' ' N 1 , , , ' CO , a O 1 O ' ' ' '� 07 In , , rn , rn , W ' I Q 1 ,x o o m m a Q E ;1) C- . O ' o ; O ' � ; O ' O , O ' O O ' m v =a Z5 ' ; �iO z i` F— C cn C c c ;c c 0 U 0 ' CD cn 1 1 > m R1 0) ol X I x ' x ' x I X col 7 ' U ' m ' M O C n ' m > > > m a , a , a ' L O ;o 10 'o to O 0 1 0 N N tD� , , N IN , , IN cu Q f-'1 co cU .= o m v =a H �F- p p , ,p oU a X X x x I x > DI ' CD cn 1 1 > m R1 mU X I x ' x ' x I X I 0 Ip Ip Ip 10 1 J �J I J I J a h O ;o 10 'o to O 0 1 0 N N tD� , , N IN , , IN cu •� I I 10) I0O ) CD CD 1(6M 1,6 O s= 1 1 1 1 1 I _ I B I 1h 1 1 a -_ �- -� �- �- -, O I O saw 'o 'O C5 c E I cz cz Z CL p ; OO 00 00 1 00- �� C; , O ; C , C5 11 O p E 1 1 C z I > i -�_ O l p I p 1 0 10 Q O 10 IO 10 10 I- Q L6 1 0 I - jL6 � M n Y E O Z 1 j 1 E 1 1 i I C S i i i i O c w o i 1 1 V a U I I I I cn cu N ' I I cc • ' . . . : ... .. CC� o NCo E O ; U ' i o RS o . O U } 0 0 n c`u c W o a a u a L � U ; 07 : iTcu o c ' 7 '(9 m ,a ,Q („j OR ob Z^ O , (Op t0 �� CL j O op � M 'pUON O 1 N �N N E(ON) O O �On NO n ^ o . o ri of ID N----h---- Oj ,10 ----� ----h---- co C\I Z 1 � 1 1 C) I N I Z I 1 N ----I - I _T iV -_-•'-•-i---- T = U 1� v O to j° d Imp Icu Cc?, (10 0 �----�---- O p IC'ip co ' _ (0 -._- Ci U 00...-' r --- - E 1 . 0 o p r U I C C F O N N i _N p O I O 1 N I n __--ro -__ O F' I (o O 1° Ip m � O CO 0 O I r —0 O p i"co tp N N- O O 10-0I p . r Z 1 z o 16 1,6 __• -_ m O N ....� U U 0 o ..._' ._-. cn o ; o O 0 m y Co co° 12 N co I I _O I v vo c`7 j r N OO ;, IO N Q N a cD C6�° � N O O 06 j I ---i d0 1� ZZ Lo �--- O O---IO---i ■ .V C ON wa f0 o ! o o 7.t6 t2 1O 1, RCI co :7 N a� cis CL T T 0 N 70 O 2 W LU ca U c 0 e L Q) O 15 LU w U L N m C cu CO O C O U In U O J O C L co C L M� W riti vJ (D T N C O cc m Q, O CL m U) N 6 G N T OD T 0 N N T _O co 0 O E E C 7 O U cu O U D O U) 0 c I` N M O a) _o m CU O CTS CO _N O U In U .0 0) O J O c ca C (V m C ,M^ T U) C? C2 CD N 0 O LU w (15 U c O U) N O LU w_ co U N O U O N z v S U 0 U ro 0 cmO U _o m Z N O U 6 m ro a Un N IL IL :3 N x wa' C) ,D F N C',� LL d _O aF a- :3 : ca w (i T m a a LL N O 0 'U O O M G M O ' N N 0 . N N I Ito LO IM to �0 0 1 0 1M v O 1? O N N I to cn IM � C\1 CM r I� O O ' O O .o O .0 0 I I o la v co co M I o I co w I O I O O CD �0 0 ----r - - -- _0 1 0 I Cl) co M 1 c7 I N Irn I o co Im rn ID O W I o Iv v I OCl) ---- 0a) o Im m ----i - - -- N N N 0 1 O O I O - -'-r- - - - I 10 O 1� r 1 O O � O O co OD I IM O I(0 to I co co Iw to I� - ---r--- - I 1 LO N N (ND cm I I 0 ;O71 F LL cm O U O N z a 2 U O cuU 6 F O U 6 m Z cliO U 0 m c0 a LO N a N X CL wa +. N LL _oro 20 a Co x C1 LU > m a > O aCL LL O CO O O U O U x Oz O c, O T 1 G N Oi x 0 O CC i O C O »r. }' U 7 rL. C7 (C CU o Q C �I U a N � `U cc U M 0 'U O O M G M O ' N N 0 . N N I Ito LO IM to �0 0 1 0 1M v O 1? O N N I to cn IM � C\1 CM r I� O O ' O O .o O .0 0 I I o la v co co M I o I co w I O I O O CD �0 0 ----r - - -- _0 1 0 I Cl) co M 1 c7 I N Irn I o co Im rn ID O W I o Iv v I OCl) ---- 0a) o Im m ----i - - -- N N N 0 1 O O I O - -'-r- - - - I 10 O 1� r 1 O O � O O co OD I IM O I(0 to I co co Iw to I� - ---r--- - I 1 LO N N (ND cm I I 0 ;O71 F LL cm O U O N z a 2 U O cuU 6 F O U 6 m Z cliO U 0 m c0 a LO N a N X CL wa +. N LL _oro 20 a Co x C1 LU > m a > O aCL LL O CO O ' O ^O n O o •o co ----F--'-F-'-- ----i ----r---- o l o j a) ar 1 I O M O M O 0 t0 o IaoO W o iN C',----r----r---- CD to la co 0 l0 l0 0 O 10 Ir n O O cj <MG Oto j- vco 0 l0 l0 0 O I0 In11 O O i CD CD 1 I 1 Cj o to ILo U)) o �o io 0 O 1 0 I O O O j 0 j d d 0 10 1Oo 0a 0 10 IC00 D rn� `° ----r----r---- 1 I O 1 0 I co co O 0 10 10 O o io 10 0 - ---�----� ---- 1 I O10 IM M 0 1LO Lo O 10 10 0 0 10 �0 0 '- --r----r---- o j 1 o j a) a) O 0 I O o O a O 1 0 I N o N O ----r ----i ---- 0 1LO 0 iLO U) 1 0 0 o 10 i0 0 '- --r----r---- I 1 O t o 1 a) w O 10 10v 00 0 10 100 00 1 1 m to 0 I O 1 coo w0co 0 ID co M M o �o �0 0 - ---r----r---- I 1 0 Io Irn rn O 1 o N N O O O O O O I I I I 0 t o 1 r O 1 O 1 O Io to O o 10 0 0 cm a s O U O x Oz O c, O U 3 C7 y O CC N C O U o c� �I O ' O ^O n O o •o co ----F--'-F-'-- ----i ----r---- o l o j a) ar 1 I O M O M O 0 t0 o IaoO W o iN C',----r----r---- CD to la co 0 l0 l0 0 O 10 Ir n O O cj <MG Oto j- vco 0 l0 l0 0 O I0 In11 O O i CD CD 1 I 1 Cj o to ILo U)) o �o io 0 O 1 0 I O O O j 0 j d d 0 10 1Oo 0a 0 10 IC00 D rn� `° ----r----r---- 1 I O 1 0 I co co O 0 10 10 O o io 10 0 - ---�----� ---- 1 I O10 IM M 0 1LO Lo O 10 10 0 0 10 �0 0 '- --r----r---- o j 1 o j a) a) O 0 I O o O a O 1 0 I N o N O ----r ----i ---- 0 1LO 0 iLO U) 1 0 0 o 10 i0 0 '- --r----r---- I 1 O t o 1 a) w O 10 10v 00 0 10 100 00 1 1 m to 0 I O 1 coo w0co 0 ID co M M o �o �0 0 - ---r----r---- I 1 0 Io Irn rn O 1 o N N O O O O O O I I I I 0 t o 1 r O 1 O 1 O Io to O o 10 0 0 cm a s IHCID o ' n n o OO fV co o �o I O o Ln Ln 0 0 � )n ' O � M c+i 0 ' r; 1 ----1 ----' co I O 1 N- ---r---- I I T 1 r, __._' ____' ____ N�,Ccc-c O T I� Ol0 lOc7 0MO 1 I acu co ----r---- 0 ot O0 Ln h ui0 "--r'-'-r---o 1LO Ic(oin n� Io Io rnE IO 1,1- a MM1E l 01I N ---'r----OIU) LO .__r ----r---- 'O 1(00 (D(O M n Q o 10 10 to O Z I M m o l0 Io I o IN N Ir UC', -- OU U S com o O LO Q N N 1 c0 ro V 1� Cl) O 1 I IO Ip Q. COZ. 1 T I'DLf) N O I O 1 0 p O ----f---- a . O IO j0 p � inn N o 1Ln )n 1 1 ----F----F---- 1 co 0 1co �� 1 0 wa o �T rl� °cam o io l0� 00 �- m ----r---- x(L w I o o0 O 10 1� coo. T O co >U� ma O 1 p 1 >N ----r-_--r---- o to ca U) LL. a Cl) I M .:CL Io m 0 l 0 1 Q N i i - ---r---- LL a 0 1 0 10 0 I Oro N IN O ---- �° N In 0 O 0 10 1� 20 IN N I U - ---r---- o l0 1� o fn .� �O O 1N N ----r----r---- 0 � 0 1 m O 1m rn Cl) I 1 0 10 10 wa >, 0 r 1'- ca m xa 1 1 v o o 10 loo 00 Q ca ----r---- w ' o Lo 00 _ 1 a to O o 1 _ CD >o 0o I m 1 '-- r ---- r ---- c`u ma i 'p o 10 I- w C i LL 1 I �a O 1 Ir o to - LL O 10 co ---r- - -- Ip 0 C N IM i____r---- '- CO O I M o 0 N O 10 I) m 0 to o 0 10 Iw000 po p r____ I 0 N o to Ir r U �I O 1� - ----� ----i ---- =� Cn U 1 Cl? Cl)v l0 0 Q C) 10 1 O (0 O tIM M 1 I N N «. U O 100 1^ n --- -� - 0 1 0 t o 0 LI Q M ----i ----r---- x U I M O C3 10Ncli Ol In n Ix 10 1� a) 1 V O ZO o LO O L ---- r ---- +. p O 10 10 O � U) U' 0 Ico c0 1 0 O i r----r---- N o 1Lq N o° o Ip IN N 0 Cc o l 0 I p o 0 10 10 0 m O , N �L N O CE — o m M C U O m .0 0 M CL N r OD O N N T N C� C� C E CO C M O U c>3 O U L 7 O O C N O � N coN T a) !_ 0) co CZ U) d i C N U U .m O J O C co C O CD C Cf) T V/ CIS O N 0 O 5 w w co U s= O O O W W U C O C O � +r r, U 3 N L C: cm O c U cc a) i 0 M o 'o F in o 0 LO LQ Lo `n o O 'n n U O O N N a 1 1 O o 1 I d Z o I I 00 c2 p 1 I 00 °° x a 00 l I °° w I I n v oo loo loci oo > 1 0 I C) rn N 0 10 ILo II N 'o ----r----r- ' -_ 1 1 0 O m� O o 0 O I?a o to IC) rn ---'r----r-- -- ca I1 I N o O to Ir N O o I I r a� 0 10 10 0 lw to O o U I o t o o L 0 0 00 0 0 Q 0 o foo a 0 ccsI 1 1,4: n -^-r----r'--- Z -------------- I I N p N o 10 1 0 co O O p to IT to Ir r U o �o �0 0 Iia o m. ----r----r - - - - I 1 F in o 0 l 1 0 0 10 10 O O N 2 O 10 j 0 O a I I o to I d d �N o l0 l0v 00 c2 p Ip l00 00 °° x a 00 l I °° w I I n ----r---- r---- > 1 0 I C) rn 0 1 1 0 O m� O o 0 0 I?a 10 10 ---'r----r-- -- I1 I N O- m O 1 O N O o � l0 Ir r a� 0 10 10 0 ----r----r---- 0 0 to 1. 10 l0v m oar L 0 0 00 0 0 Q 0 0 wa ccsI 10 IGo 1 co -^-r----r'--- SS I 1 N p - o 10 1 0 co O p to IT to Ir r o �o �0 0 Iia ----r----r - - - - o N I o I a m O 10co 0 1 CD O D 0 t o I n7 0 o OO O O o O 1 1 N to IT - N 1 I I 1 o Io Ico W O o 1 0 Cl) U 1 O 1 0 1 � n C5 i0 �0 0 I 1 I 1 X o jo jrn rn 0(D O Ln toIo in 0 Z o 0 0 10 10 1 I I I 10 IN (j O I I N O o to 0 o l0 10 0 10 o 0 c ;o ;a) m a Y c � cu _ o ; ;; i i N r OD T O N N r rl- N O C7 T 0) Cl? O CV 70 O w w FZ U E O U) O w W M U L C� C E ''�^ vJ 0 U cis 0 U O U) 0 C L cu c O m CO co^ CO L U U) U i=. O 0) O J O c L co C L N m c as C) (D O N 0 0 U cm c m cri d 7% W N T Ib T Q N N T N co 0 c a N N N N O n Cl)n M U � m N N O N Z LO O to _ ttoo to Z 1 1 � 0 0 to 1 1 O coo M U C'i c° to 1C 1 O N Cl) co c o O IM IN 0 0 F- 0 N N N O m co fo U o 0 o n 000 0 000 m N to 0 Z �v N N N n O o O U O o o b 0 0 m N a o 0 Icnao Ir'co c v Lo n Z Lo N 6 g OD N LL 0) O 1- IL to y to v caN Lo Ln L Lo W Ln tD Lux a. a) to N I 1 LLa rn F am oo n O O 1 N 1 0 t0 m n T CL tp 2 mo as m x LL rn w co OD a L2 �o O I T 1 0 N 10 w O 10 O :aa LL ----r----�---- 1 1 rn rn Oo I I o U O M N o IN 10 o 0 0 l0 IT o V o R 0 (o to U u? to C) Iw Itn co m to 0 I N I O N x n n 0 CO t0 0 0 N N o I * Io (} o o O N N ¢ T v v CO a----r----r---- n co ch mo O M R rn� tT I I 0 co DfL 1� Io 0 10LL 1v ~ C) O c a p tp tp� N N O o ip t N N a n U o ttO;coo 0 a0o t� t� ro O 1 1 N Z 1 1 1 1 0I m I co C'i 7 1C 1 O N Cl) _. O IM IN () o 0 a 10 10 m O0 10) 1C) Un n U O In o .0 P. N m �v F 0 I I co n 1 i v 1v O-_- '- oo 10 O- ton p O O U o I N I n N a 6 Icnao Ir'co o Ir IcMo n Z 1v 1v OD 04O U 0 'm � I 1 i0) 1n F o n O O 1 N 1 0 t0 N O 17 I� tp 2 0 Io 1� CL 1 1 1 1 lcoo oto0 OD a L2 O I T 1 0 N 10 w O 10 O ----r----�---- 1 1 O I I > O M N o IN 10 N M W� 0 l0 IT u'a 1 I 1 I C) Iw Itn co 0 I N I O N It to 1 1 o I * Io � a 1 LO CL 0 I N 1 0 N xCL T o 10 10 O CO a----r----r---- n 1 1 1 1 mo o Icon Iano v rn� I I 0 co DfL 1� Io 0 10LL 1v v 1 I 1 I N O 1 N I tn0 CON O o Io Io 0 0 10 10 0 1 1 O I N I N N CD lCl) 1� I I co n o ui I 1 N M I 1 0 1- 1- m O Ico IN Ox Z O 0 10) IN N Ir 1 N 1 1 1 I o I 0 MI o 1m I0) tnn O o 10) 1- n n O 10 1N Cl) o I I `o 0)- c a a s a) = c p CEI.> p F U N n M n fh m O O O CD O to O Q ' n N O OD N N CV N is Ln O N----r----r---- O 00 O 1 1 r z cli Z I I � I I S uMi N v CD I I M 00 I N I T V O_ O O 10 10 0 as A 0 N_ O 'SOT - _ - n I I ----r----r---- U ono ON o Io i� o on on U o Ir Iv N LO LO O O CO tD O -ncli O toN co N O n T-- _ 1 0) 7 U o O I^ Iv OcNQi n U o N �ci �n ti o iNtn Wao o m ICD +•' Z N N Z O O 10 IV IV O - - - -- - - - -- - - - - O O cm U U O ` U U) cri m m O -- U .. .. -*...�t��.. L FSO- r o rn 0 O I I . o 1 1 ao 7 � (D to tr) oo I_ Ico _n O � � N O I I O CO a a o I o _- 6 ----� ----� ---- y 15 'o ca n �� 00 I� 1� N Xa to to t� o Ir IN W o o O i �j(- Io 10 0 Ln N m '--- 1 1 -_--r----r---- T S O .YN a> LO o In to 0 0) CZ .5� 0 I to I co m cma ca Ui LL d LL a o t") o 1 0 I i r ---- r---- 0— m n p— o Ip Io to O CL 00 n o o co 0° I o I m to U 4~ 0 �' ---- IT Iv ui I I o n :3 1 I o co m Iv Im a p xa ^ r` �E oo Ir to 0 J w m x o Io Io 0 O a ---- o o I I . ----1 ----� --- > o to - � y O o I o I n to 0 1 I m Ol CL 1 coo F: LL d O I o I S N t°'o too O I to 1 O o o N O LO po _ I Mp t o 0 0 O o Io Io 0 Cl? CO ---- ---r---- -�---- r ~ 1 f ci O N co N o O I O 0 N 1O O N �= U 0 0 0 o I p I too o N (p� .*�'' O 1 N O I IN N 0 1 I W 0 = O N oo O Z to to != 0 I n I^ 1 to I � ++ N N Z O IOD 1 O N O i lQ C7 v ri+ C7 op 10 1 co to O r r to 0 1 t0 I N v (+j X 0 M 1 tD 1 CD > v o o Io IN ti <0 a W o) m [S1 o a : `0 m O CC 0m - a Y m CSS M G IL N r OD r C) N N r N cd CN CC C 7 U) O U ca O U L 7 O U) O C N cd O F- (0 fll r m cz Cv c Cts U) d N C N U co U O J O c co E N m c co C? T 0 N 0 O 2 W W U C O i a� O W W cz U a� O U O N z M U m a O U m ho - N 0 6 m z 0 U 6 m N a. a NU� =3 N ca xIL Iua m Lo .? N O2 IL oro a� m� w ° >1 co a °' O Oa LL O U) O U O z M IL frn on LLo n cq cc N N 0) a) m � on Lo Lon (q lc N- - N O O O O 0 0 0 0 rn m O b N N O O O O M to N N W co m 0 o m LO Lf) co N N rn rn v v M l7 73 o m °C o H N O U O N z N CL CL Z5 N 3 N CO w IL > L1 .. N 'A2 i IL o� CL mo as x Ii w > ca9 LL O CO c U O o O U O 'MN '00 1 (O N U) o N O ) o x O c O U O C7 yir O CL N c O N 0 O c U ----r----r---- O I ao I 'n eh II rn 00 a O 1 N 1 rM 0 �0 �0 0 I I o In Iv N 0 j�� �Nm OO p Ir ILq lc '7 V 00 ----r----r---- O I 'n j v O O In Iv, N o i^r i�� o m 1 I O In 1� eo O Ir 10 n O I 1 O o tv Ir u� 0 1 O I ,- I I I 1 O IN 1•- O 1 1 N n in o I� to r 0 �o 10 6 I I O Im IOM N co O 1 cli O 1 0 M I ITTZ 1 I o to I00 OD I I CR to to 0 ui I I - ---r----r ---- I I o la Im v I I o °,° 0 �0 �0 0 I 1 C)100 v I I 0 Irn to rn 1 1 I 1 OI co I n 11LO 0)Lo o to l0 000 O O O O I I OC\j I O1 OD O O 1In co O IM0 IM O O I I N N I I o Io In N 0 lo 1 000 co O I I r N 1 I I I O 10 t o N O I D 1 n N 01 O I(D IM M O O N Cl) 1 I o): 0 : c a i Y c : o 0 _ :> v vI co 'LO '� o o O N ' O M O 'MN '00 1 (O N O o N O ) o ' �n ro ----r----r---- O I ao I 'n eh II rn 00 a O 1 N 1 rM 0 �0 �0 0 I I o In Iv N 0 j�� �Nm OO p Ir ILq lc '7 V 00 ----r----r---- O I 'n j v O O In Iv, N o i^r i�� o m 1 I O In 1� eo O Ir 10 n O I 1 O o tv Ir u� 0 1 O I ,- I I I 1 O IN 1•- O 1 1 N n in o I� to r 0 �o 10 6 I I O Im IOM N co O 1 cli O 1 0 M I ITTZ 1 I o to I00 OD I I CR to to 0 ui I I - ---r----r ---- I I o la Im v I I o °,° 0 �0 �0 0 I 1 C)100 v I I 0 Irn to rn 1 1 I 1 OI co I n 11LO 0)Lo o to l0 000 O O O O I I OC\j I O1 OD O O 1In co O IM0 IM O O I I N N I I o Io In N 0 lo 1 000 co O I I r N 1 I I I O 10 t o N O I D 1 n N 01 O I(D IM M O O N Cl) 1 I o): 0 : c a i Y c : o 0 _ :> G CL _N M T Q N N O D O E E C 7 O U cn cu 0 U L 7 O CO O C cu C (D m C ca U) i ly S_ U (0 U 0) O 1 O C 0 m F- 0) N m c cz U) N O N NC) 0 I` n U O O ;a(Oo to o .o I I oN z I t t0 l0 v o 0 2 U 0 0 �0 goo 00 00 o l0 I0,0 as io in c7 --r r ---- n Io Ieo o I t co m o o �o �� I O I co I I ao O o I Im rn U 10 I N N O f>) O 1 O O OD OD z I 1 I U 6 m � 1 1 F 0 i0 iLO to Lf) NO O O o 2 O lo 16 1 0 0 (L I I I in �o o I I o I a) aw NC) 1 o 100 ca xa 0 00 a0 w 0 l0 Ir0 10 Ir I 1 r---- r ---- o I I N 5:2 o Io jo jv Io a 0 CL o c L=s 10 10 I I " "i ----i---- _O w 0 1 0 I OD OD O 1 0 1 o o O o ----�---- r---- I 1 D� o io to 0 Io cu o O o 0 O o X d loI O N O w 0 l0 Ir T m a'-'-r'---r"-- a I I I I '0 o Io Ir" I I 11 ul 0 ,o ,� LL io c I I t I I I O N o I 0 I o O co O O O O o 1O co O o co o to lc?O I 1 '- OD0 I I I o I 1 1 i OU 0 O c 1 to 0 100 10 rn m I 1 I I C x O o o to Ic to io M Z 0 0 O o ; o o ----�----� ---- I I i N O o jo jrn rn = O o 1 0 1 0 O 0 O 1 O O O .r � a o ;o a`) E m U m � `o '> a 7- O N r 00 O N N T O (0 N O 00 Qi N O N 70 O W W co U C O O O LU w ca E E U) C O U c� O U L 7 O O C cz C N m C cis C N U U .U) 0) O J O C 2 co C U m C cz 0 C� 0 C, O r i C:) +� N tn: ' =I 0) U c .a > CD a O O O N ' N 11 O O n v O O O U o o .ro m I c I I 1 Z I I - ---r----r ---- I I V O 10nM 1t c) V o10Ioo 0 T o o Im a 1 ----r----r---- l0 10 p o N 0 l0 1N a0 10 10 E- O 10 1co 00 O I O 10 N p m 0 l0 12 N U 0 m m OO I 1 I I iG H 1 0 I 10 10 0 n 0 N 0 10 10 10 1 1 O a Lo I 1 z 2 0 1 0 I N p 00 Illy O to Ir T ----r----r---- a)u, '-N O I I Io IL tI7 o U) 'p)rG 0 O I p 10 O LLa- 0 10 10 0 - ---r----r---- 1 I CD a3 co 1 1 p co 0 0 1 o I 10 0 a� 10 ----r----r---- 7� � I 1 i0 OO co O X 0 10c) 0 O 0 N O a o 1 I N o W m I I D I I mo 0 loo Ir n o I o I co m IL � 0 10 10 0 ----r----r---- N 0 O 1 I 1 oI 10 10 O r: O 0 I p I m 0 m C p I I m t o I r T ----r----r---- o t Iv v O mto o 10 p 0 I10 U Ip 10 0 10 l0 0 S- ---r---- r---- N o I I o 1 r- CV) O o 1 0 I r I Z l n O p p 0 0 0 10 10 0 1 I I ;=I U o 10 Im ID 3 0 0 10 10 0 + C 00 0 l0 10 0 N U ' a� CD CD cC m > F y v = rn 1p N r 00 r 0 N N r cl T 0- N 0 O 15 W W cz U c 0 i 0 LU w ca U L CD EE 7 U) c 7 0 U as 0 U 0 U) 0 c 0 L cz C L N m C U) L U U 0) O J O C L ca Ma) W VJ _a) iz c ++ E c G CL N_ w 0 N N T O c0 0 CJD != M m mo ;m 0) O N O O 61 O O N O O O CV CV U . O o co co o ----hN--• I N O R I I I o I I0) rn v = lo0 1 1 O O U oo o V 10 0 Cl) co o'---r---- o Io Io OU m a o Iv ----r----r ---- 7 O I� F O I N N N O Io Ir o I� V o I I ro 0 O m a) N N Z I O N O 0 N o O 0 Co:N O � O O O CO o �0) I 1 c0 0 m I N Z 1 Cl) F- U� 0 0 1 M O I ^07 r N 2 O 1 0 1 C ILLo I I C) IM O Cl) N m O I r O r X d w O 1 0 O I o L I I o ro 1 I Lq O t o I N N li d I I I O I N N ----r---- I 0 t o 1 0 O CL 0 1 co co) 20 10 Io 0 I r 7N tL� 0 o Io 0 1 CD O 1 co Cl) t� W Ir Wn ui O o Io 0 ----r ----r ---- T d 1 I o 10 Ic(o 0 I a I---- 012 ,a 0 10 l N N ti IL o 10 1 0 0 Ia w N1000 C) 00 UIr-. r-0 io g o IC? Iw I N N o 0 - --r---- 1 c O I (Dco to0 U Im ro m CDC, I ----r---- I O I O1 0 O L xa to Io to 0 x W N I� U LO 2 z I I r---- a) I N N m _ 'a)� o I I I m o I I 1 07 O co C7 O tia N Cl) to Io irm 0 h I 0) I of ----r---- r---- N 1 O I a� N o I o I c a a m0)0 U o 'Mo U U O F 0 1 10) m - ---r- -- -r ---- I Q mo 'o ' ' O N O O O ' 7 O O . O n U'n o 0 .0) 0 0) I I o lo0 1 O oo o V o Cl) o Io Io m 10 10 c o ----r----r ---- n o Io Ir o I o0 I L n N o I I ro 0 O OI m a) ; ----r----r---- O O t o N U Co:N 0) o o �0) I 1 c0 0 m o 0 Z IoI0 CDN 0 O m N 1 o O I I o ro m Lq O t o I N N N O I O I N N lc� 0 t o 1 0 O CL 1 I I 11) 10 Io cl 7N 0 to loco 0 OM XCL O tISO o 'O W n ui ----r ----r ---- o 10 Ic(o 0 >`n 012 0 10 l N N ti IL o 10 1 0 0 ----r----r ---- C) 10) m io g o IC? Iw 0 ah o 0 10 Io c ----r----r---- j� CD O I o I u) 10 IO CO m CDC, O I O1 0 O L xa o Io to 0 co O W vi LO ca ----r---- I I r---- a) o Io Icoo m _ 'a)� o I I I m o I co tia 0 Io 10 0 ----r---- r---- o I o I d o to Ioo 1 1 r 'Mo O 0 1 10) m - ---r- -- -r ---- I O I IO 10) n O o I co I co co co U O o !9 I <o co 0 10 Iv e ----r---- r---- I 1 O 10 I N N x O to lm to 1 I n Z o 0 0 C? 10 10 Ci 0 r _ _ _ _ r o t o I v v (� O l 0 l Cl) (o Ol o I ch Co .n 0 o 0 Ln Io Io 0 m I I 0 o c o m m 3 a c _ ; p :> O ~ U W ■ r ` N_ co O N ■ N ca dj 0 N CC C U) I C 0 ' U co O U O I U) O r\ �20 N cu O i T N m N CZ cd U) 0 U cn U 0) 0 J O c ca C N m C rc^z T vJ O N O w _w Cz U C O (n a) C0 G w W CLS U H m O CO) 3 cn cu CD a c O cc 0) f+ C T 0 U O N Z 2 U N O U N F- N O m z O U m �a 1 N In ca ca N w 0- In 'rnC� La O � CIS a X d LU a m� U - 0 O Cn O U 0 Z O O cc T ZT N U �co Lo M M i cli i 1C\1 1 M IM T Ir W LI 00 ; LO 00 M t 1 M I2 c0 1 co ^ 1 � M 1 M U)---��'- IW 1 onj u1 1 co N 1 r co C7 1 ch 1 N I N 1(0 1 � 1 d 1 1 V O I O n In o Io I 1 CD Cl) Cl)� LO to v Iv I O 1 O L 1 m C\j 1 1 VN N n In o to 1 00 I CO rn I0 I I C? Cl) O I O I (D 1ID c ICO I In ' In I O Ip cn7 1co1 L �LO 0 Im c`7 1 (h � I V "i".. t6 � ZT � c C O E O C E E m U) c O E O Q Q 9 .n O co ' O ' M cu a. 0 N . ■ .. Y O • Q � a CL � F- p M E ;0 ;m a` .:..:. Z CJ 0- 0 O M O O � <Y ------- _ ' 0 U O a U O ;0 0 0 0 ~ �° v ;o ;o 1 O 1 I O ' O l0 O 1 0 i o coco I I ' U') 2 I Z U 0);C ;� o co ; co ; co O 2 U W U ' 0100 U) CO 0 cc) 1 1 I U 010,0 co l co � o 0 (6I(6'o o � •Z � O i (n • O � • L Cl) O • � • � Z) it • L a a) CL C U • U, •> ca - •Q •a i O • C • () • O • Z CU 2) ID .O .rr 1 7 rn N 00 O N N T io Q r - N O N N N c0 IL cX G Q� LL RT v M ' oO ' M o _ ' o . o o 'o 'o In -moo ui 0 C 0 0 1 0 t o m O I O 1 0 C; o o U v-+ to v co 1 co LO O In ooo t O lo I O o o io co+o co cn oo oo e2 � 1 m 0 O to 10 NTO �N f4 MjN Ir m o I o I o O O O In —10--4-- In 1 OO iLn iLO I = O I N I O O O O OD�o CO N t o I N D O i C', i 0 O 10 10 O O o --4 co cc) �m I N O10 IO = O I O I O J O O O vIo I� cm t 1 1 1 = o io io J o �o io -+o +M i M0 LO I p I N r 10 Ir o �o �o o+o+o CD �o eco N 1 Q 1 J r I O I r L +o + L;, I 1 _ 1 1 N CD I V 1 0 I J 4O 4 0)O O LO Q o ' o O 0 co 0) co J Ln In to O ' O ' O 'Z i ' 7 jc6 (L i 0- 03 03 > Q o o CD ii ' m O O N O Cr ��� I co 1 01 O N z r I r o to I N N = 1 T O 1 O ro n In p U �00m ca 00� 76 F- IqI Ln m 11 co _-r... rn 1� N O U O m0 OD m O 1 In z O I O ---_L---- 0 U o_ 1 l6 p t r N1 2 O 16 d _ 1 n �n 5N CSL V 17 x o Ip 1 1 N � r N 1 LL 1 _ 1 20 0- v Iv O 1 O 1 _ I n i� z� L V 1 V wa cc a----f--- � o to 1 1 1 �0 U 1 N NN Cl) O U) 1 6 1 O 031 0) O 1 O U m 1 co 1 1 LO LO n '^ O z v Ia LO 1� 1 o co U Q� a 16 1 � o Io N O In N ro m a m d m i m a is R -- R E U z ' z D a� rl 0 m I N O O . 0 'O 'DO N� N O O O 'o 'NCD p0j 1O I O O U . O . p T .m 'C - -r--- ' (0 to O O O l 0 ' N N O D V 1 0 ' O O z ,�0 O 1� N z 0p �O IN 0 0 1 M t o ' O I O , n 1 O ' O O �% -_--�_-_-i'--__ co I ' (V I , '---� ----F---- ov jo 'Ion oo 10 INc CN T- to 'rn ov to �� m _ (=j T I� to 'o O U oo �o Ir O N c+i I I -__-�F_-__ m Iri I o ' 0 1 ' 0 T N O _ coOI O ' O O cli O a ----r----�'---- O Ip 'CD n CD ' T 5 o C) ID coaD U o o o7 Io 01 F- to Ileo '" 1 I Ino ro O I(0o m 10 1In �rn N _� (� O -_-_r�lco I-- j 'ro to N 1 , Lo N ----r----F---- �oCC) ID I_ O U 0 jo 'rr`D n o to .(D ao o m 10 'c000 vM E z T_ �o Im Ic m o i o iii T co _L _ _ _ - z o Lo LO O 0 - U) U O U raj m o m YC .......... I , y .. ++fes+��a . .. U O h m I 1 0M I o 'Lo n F 1 1 O 10 �O U) O N N0 j0 I V C In 000 j0 b n W 2 10 'O O N NO 10 O n. 1 .0 0 F---- a ----r0 ' :N OM 10 ' n �'� m 10 'CD O co X� �' Oo LCo N O ! O I V V CM � C3 0p I O 1'r 7 n s? co LU 10 1 O r O xd wr cm lO ; o O I i ----1 I IL ----I ----r---- 0) O 1 L W 73 O i LL 1 ' lia 1 ' f7 N - - - - - - -F---- 1 ----r---- 1 �---- Nm c CT5 O cL I oro to �� 10 n o� y0 o to 10 10 n iT RY U) I0 CL 00 I V N 10 'O v O 2!- Oo 1t NO ;0 1 V v W , I a. T Io ICi 0 i ----r----i"---- I I 1 ' ----r----F---- I- No ccs N to ,rn 0 0 l 0 , O n O I O� I O O U x a. N O 1 o I p T O X d N o I O I V � ro 1 t ----r----�- LU T rop .-- 10 O G U -__ _ I ____--- (A >o I , d Q I I CY) O= a J LL i 1 LL 1 O ----r --- - ---i-- I L � 1 ----r----�---- _C N O 1 O In I O N 10 N Cl) I O ' O Of M 0p 10 �a 0 O U) 000 ;Op '0 po 10 �0 CNj 0 C6 Ip 0 0 0 o ----r'---i----- I 1 r F M MU O co O (OD o t o CD o 0 NC) (7 co 1 o co Lo rn r � to 1 0 1 Ln o �v m v U o I o o �o v io �v CO ----r----i ----- I 1 r ---- r o CV M y x , LO loo I^ �v Ln 1 ' Io Ln cp z0 0 10 o 10 I ri co Lr; O z 1 o �o L v OD v O Z 1 I O I O I In vi w ----r----i-- --- 1 W 1 � I , ----r'---i---- C7 lo Io 0 0 I - m C7 1 L 0 ' _ no jo �o o cr roio Io o U 1 0 � ca -- -1 ----L- Ip \O N N m CD I I Ln -Fu m 7 H o i rp I p I O / ^ z Y 1 I Ln Z6 N ED 1 I Ln L____L ____ z O 1 Iln O ^�CDC 0 U m G yM C) O z ' C �6 'D N s U '- z Lijo a. ro 'mom"m + Z) IL M W c ro w a) oDQ _ �_ m 0 f ca o c m a`��m 0 mo0 L CZ 1- r Cl. CE l6 . t [CC4 LO :=:D -J Q rn N T 00 T N N r r co 0 I- N O It N O co CL T 0 N 70 O 75 W W cZ U C O N O 2 W W C) i �C CC C U) C D O U W c0 O U Z3 O 0 c 0 M C O m C co U) C U U O J O C c0 C N Co C m CO 0 cu i Q lil OSW N O L N N CM M a - _N Cb O N N T Cz 0 CI) E E 7 U) C O O U Ca O U O T 0 C t>3 i O D] C RS CO i (ll c Cll U Cn O J 0 C 0 co c N 00 C CLS CO NO ' 0 , c N 0O O O CD T O0 ,o c 0 0 0 0 1 O I 1 I 1 I 1 I v U I I I U m I 100 c0 O O I ' N ca cli V N O — 1 0 cm l0 1 0 0 0 C5 l0 1C c N____rr-___ INCo 0 1 10) rn m 1 1 O O Z 1 to 0 N O U 0 m y ..�J o 1 I N O 10 0 0 0 0 Ip c0 a O 00 I 1 7N .cam 0 l0 1 y 01 cc, 10 T ov O I 1 0 X W a O 0 O O 1 p I D O .0 O I r '- I '---r--'-r---- LO 1 I I ED� I I IL tl I 1 1 I 0 m a� r ----r-___ I 0 I o 1 a� y 0 10 100 00 o to Ico 00 m ----r-"-r---- 1 0 I O I d d O to Iry o o 10 loo OO X CL LU m 0 Ia 100 0C, ; E E / � R U \ U \ U) § \ ƒ % E \ / 0) crjf \ / q % 7 & / / E ƒ § U) / / ƒ 5 2 ± / \ ƒ » \ 3 ± u d 'a @ 0 _4- O cu C .0 2 � CL . e .� / w k j \ U cn 2 cƒ J % m cE { / \ ¥ L= n / a % � / 4 % e / a / \ 0 g\ § 2 4% % c g cz ƒ 3 u — ' p J A ■ k @ J § m < ƒ / ƒ / :U:)) oo C6 'a @ 0 _4- O cu C .0 2 � CL . e .� / w 00 O C) CL °' N Lo c0 r ci M r, N T 0o T- O z m a O N N - - - co io � LL T U ca O-- O Crj i N �_ 0 m r7 r c M n c O cis LL N F- O C C F� 0 v v M M 0 ti C .� U 0co m Z coo r v Tr r co v C-- 0 0 � a' 3 .c U)a CES O U m ° a o 0 '5 F N Lo v � v 2 m w f a O O r N �- O CinLo � L cLf C N N L j a - - - - a) In d o a) In V c N N N m> .N rn� --- O 2 a _ N ^ LL f LL 4 - - - - _ C U o m a Lo o o cy Lo v c cn v U) �i D_oc\l L ---- Lo 04 LO ro E2 a m P J wa O o a ---- o O 0 m C a) _� > 3a m C RS U) Nll O � O) wo 110T N o o �o -Irit O Q 7 O .O 7 N Q 7 Cl?O O �--- Z Z Z O N O U 'l- c+i n ri ++ C wN co X p) N Of L L V U C: O i3 ---- co NN co cr LLI y E a �'— Q f-' ❑. aL N !- O 1p o � o i m = W. m C c E Q c EW Q ami E Q O ++ r 0 N n :• 0 � cu W W (Di �W W a� w s o LL ~ C/) ci i 0 O rco = � m �i r \ 6 \ \ 5 2 ± / \ \ » / ± \ 0 ƒ C\j/ n a \ /. 0 / \ / / � LL c a) k .0 £ � \ 2■ } / §� R k Q / � / R � = 2 \ 4)m �£ U § c 0 Q _� 0 � E / � 2 § Q / I U C: \/ ■ � C CU 0 9 0 7 -i Cl) § cn E u / 7 i ( \ E § C) / / \ 6 \ \ 5 2 ± / \ \ » / ± \ 0 M 4 - cu ■ % D � 0 2 m $ c @ E E 0 U � (D 2 c w ■ � q ■ C\j/ n a \ /. 0 / / / LL c a) k .0 £ � \ 2■ } / §� M 4 - cu ■ % D � 0 2 m $ c @ E E 0 U � (D 2 c w ■ � q ■ \ / a k ^ � \ �£ 2» f -7 4 §f ■ u j 7 i � \ § C) / 7 U \ w 2 5 2 \ R ■ a m E.� E = £ g N § ) — 3 ] - k = \ 0 2 — § b 0 M 4 - cu ■ % D � 0 2 m $ c @ E E 0 U � (D 2 c w ■ � q ■ r � a i 0 0 OD I N I N r 1 I Qj as i C O •O :fes O �O 'O :O .CkjO .O CD C\j t6 2z t2 C O U U - t--t--t--t--t--t - - t O 1 1 1 Cn I V I� ca 1 1 1 1 I 1 N `0 O cu I 1 I co 1 1 > 0 IO 10 10 j0 1 � ;O 10 N m N �o fo Io .a �a5 O co I M 0 T I N I N I N 1 ; O I )cz 0 Cl) O !] 1 1 1 ; ca a 1 1 i fn 1 1 1 j z O 1 1 1 1 1 1 o co - O N J0 5; W O C W _O Q O 70 CO _O 0 CD c cn a a ocis '> •o �o cz �> �> CO E o o z .z :z' : '_ U :z' U Un 7C3 0 U 0 0 .s :r of .2 .a C15E .a � 0 co a> 0 j 0 U Q o D U T U N a z d a�CO Qcn U)2 • •t ...r ...} ...r ...t ...r . . W�_ W 0 v cn E m cu — Q (nn U a> O O c (n U) U) in U 0 0 o �• w o °� m �co (n �; co :ca •`a N c N a) a) 00 LL LL LL 0 x o :o X � E E a) E s= c ca z - - U 0 O 0 U C T �cri 07 _ c n n 5 i W W W W E E E 0 c� LL ~ o o o 0 0 0 Ll ca cu X '� Zf O p m M (0 _O '� . fl .-0 _O _U _O Ei CO C3) M o W J U 0 C`3 % ca % >W 0 LL W 2 IL 0 0 T 00 T 0 N N T cz M tT ' ' ' • D1 ' , O ' , 0 ' • O ' . 0 ' • O ' O . 0 ' O .O 0 . O ' O 0 . O . 0 . . O • O Ln ' O ' O O O O O O O O O O O Z . O ' p O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O .O ,O ,O ,O ,O .0 M •N .may L_ t__t___t.___r__ I I I 1 i I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I IM 1 IM I I I IM I I I IM Id' IM 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I O I O I O I O I I I O I p 1 1 I O I O I O I p 10 l 0 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I M I I I M: 7 100 I N 1 1 I V I I N I I� 1� I O 0 l 0 0 I O 1 0 I O 1 0 1 0 1 0 I N I I O 1 0 I 1 Ln , O I r 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 *' 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I(O 1 IN 1 IN I I q N I — Ip IN Ip p ,p Ip I Ip I Ir ICO Id' IM Ip I Ir 1� Ip I IN l0 10 1� I� I C,5 I I (u 1 I I� I I Ir I I I r 1� I I r? I 1 (? I M I� 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 (107 (D 1(p I Ir I Ir Ic0 Ir I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 : : 5 , C c C C ' O O ' O O O E :a .a .a .a :% :z Q Q O :' Q Q Q 'O '5 LL . LU ' -O • U • 5 :'S • 5 • • ' � iS6 ZS Q ZT Q LLJ 'a 'a '- 'a O O PC 'O co • O O , (0O O O N O w O 0 0 0 0 :o Q Q U ' C ' C • C C • C ''� 7 - LLJ CL ' Q' Q' Q' Q' o , N -0 ' O . O . N . F- N ' O ' W ' LU ' ui ' LU ' Wa)LL . N ;; ; ; L.L ; ; ; ; LL ; ; . O i (z. m . O . m . Q .0 : U ' L L.L LL; 6=1 cr .o •� O O O O O � .ro L co E N O .y .E W O N c o co O N 1` O O N 0 , N M O M N N 0 W coOO "OpU Oc Cl O d o o _iO UN opO T O o l0 00 I 0 O 0 to O 1 0 0 O Cb Z O o O I O O O N Z O 1 0 O O O T O O 1 o O O0 O Z O N ----� ---- 1 ----r ---- N v 0 I co o 1O M m v o Cl)1IMo Cl) r U N i N N C)N i N N = a ca r Ir O O iQ -----_• M co O LO -' Cl)O U OD U ofOM N co (6 WNMOcq m UUt6 OOo 0 r _C N O LOIM c} I O O N O ----rM--_ N O F 0 �N Ir0 10 O N W RN �N ISO �cp+1 U O �+ � r r r _O m p �� r .�2 C O U N O N O O O N O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 .0 o U Oo Z;0 cu[0 O O O 0 O 0 C C m 6 U ......*........ I ......t-._...-. m +�. t6 1 000 I C07 c F 1 10) H N I� N � 000 1 co co I N co N w QC\l U) d ri 1 Cl) ui 2 u j ri ui N F.- O o � CL 1 I IL in U) N N I t` W I N CM 7 N V N W O I� C15c O L 2 O I O O <6 N L a0 Cl) O 10 00 O 7 N m O O N i WQ" N i N N 11d N N N XG. O --• - -• �/ O m ' ---i I ce--_ (D N CY)�� (� N LO I .a)'o 271a r r O U) LL a EliI TCl) LL M i r0 N M m� 0 I LL IL 1 ' C O m LO v j Cl) v O m v 1 cLO o 1 v O U Q d� Cl) I i 0 m co d� co LO m M O Y p w �� oOS r-� ooii 0.1°- o U----r---- I ----r---- '� O 1 0 M I� 0 =o 1 oM jCO M No Q i1 L d N I _M N L 2 N I N N r O O W N N N L L Q. N i N C V W d O OO i - ---r' - ' - co � N s I a -- --r ---- 1 _ -O Vi > O V 1 p � > O _ cD I c0 co 0) co :ate a 1w �g ^ �� n wo Oo W U- n i vi n LL a L' c 1 ria m �+ ---r- - - - - 1 ----r- - - - co •� O rn IO O o 1 p i O O _ C/) 0 T I O r O 0 I r r N O cn O o O 10. O O O 1 1 Ir O � 1r u2 •�( p rn IN O N r () p D ca v jv v I 1't m U o O c 1 v I r- 1J = x 10 co o2 ' rn x (D 11 O C O rn IN rn O rn � r -x o U O LO jv LO z o0 �� N Z O 7 ---r- --- - OI r 0 �+ ++ r I N N �+ - - - - - - - - N (n fn. 0)I n rn N 0'I+ D ID 1 1,05 N 1 c0 to Q O tJ O o o x -01 °m o E > N f*01 o N x 2 ? ;N S IL S I N ;N 17- 0 O O TM W O N N r c>s rl- N O In (v 0) cd 0- C6 (.6 O N 0 O 73 W L_L (15 U C O .0 O 2 LU LlJ m U >C C 7 O U U) ca O U O U) O _C 0 (a C N m cri C U) i L C U U) U .) 0) O O C 0 (iY C N m C co U) cc c O d Q 0 W r�1 m N ;1 O ;� N ' O O) T o ' V r ' : O M n M M M R (..) O N O ' M M ' nj ' M ( 1 I I O io 1�I 1 Z ----r-__ (D o to I I cNo I I r----r---- I 1 co I I I co 1 cl) 1 � c; v r�i U p p i ci i i t 10 a c6 N t o I t o N O — ----ice---ice---ice--- co 1r 1(D U NI O Imo I M INN t o I11 n OD�n m O Im Lo IM op IV M M H _---�---•�-_•-r---- N O U mI"; N lo? 1'o IM Iv to a r� g O I o o I N N 1.6 M M O I i p co M Z --- Io ----- co ----- � 1 ------ O 0 m O F ) o Lq 0 0 I r IV I O II` 1 � IV T N N coOO IL , I , I I I coN V I I� N_ j _N N Xa op I7 In Iv N w lo I Id I lo I �� I 1 I to I I > N z3 I 1 1 c I p I 1 � LL I I o I I I 1 I I1 0 Lo p. — M g o (LF 00o I� to01 la I o IM I c5 I I I I I I OIr 1 IN Op 1 I� IM N t6 7 xa coo co W Io Io IO T ca a----r----r----r---- �_ I I I 1 I I t 10 I Y _o I I o) 1 m m I Iv 1 v (ia I I Ir I 1 1 N p I IN I I IN I I Io I M pnj 0 O p o M I p l a O I N 1 o O co 1 0 C I n M o I 1 I v I I 1 I I 1 Ian IM � Oto rn Iq jM -IT I I 1 X d o v I In I r I Im I m I IN I p O Z o o N o I co I I p I co I I M o 7 M I M I t I I I I O IN IN IN O IM IM o) U, n Lo Lo co v Ip M 1 7 I p co IZ o m luT i O I i� I p iO 1 a N Q 2 N , 9 O N , O w � O W 2 0 F G d O O TM W T N N T co 0 >C r - N O N co 0- i O ++ cu d Q O m a) 7 i N N • I � � N N N O N Q m (c)N. M (OD N U p 'N �c1l N It p cd o .v (n+) O 10 I 1 0 Ir I 1 z Ic) 1 1 r 0 _---r----r ----r---- O Ico, 1m, ICN) V p 7 I 1 1 M p O T cacq 9 N I 1 I 1 I I O N U N la? 1I0 IMN IC'jN ICD �N m O oLq O IN oco Ici I`l F- ----r----r----r---- Cn'7 N O cD ILpo� IT Ivv c\jIt (n I� IN Inr oo O O iN i(..�N �W C)N O (O M Cn) z N O U 0 m ~~ ro I I I o N I I p I CA I- O't 1 I� I N I N Of I7 I� IV N N (pop _ j 0 j 7 lo N N 3 N o( D wa (oo 10 Io I0 I 1 I I I I ° NI I N 1 W (�j 1 I I 1 1 I N LL 1 1 I v ----r- -- -r--- -r---- p� oo In I� I� N o a F- 0o cD Id. t 1(D I N 1- 1 0 N (ti r o o o I I I � I� I T" I 1 � 'ZItoo I I I 10 •' Lo jo LE a o oo � Iv In Iv I p N W >. I p i p co ----r I --- I 1 -' ----' I I ---- I > p T 3d 1 Iv I IT LL 1 1 I 1 I I P- T N I I I OI m I N I a) O I N I N I o M n (Lo O 1 0 I N cocl) I o D p o N () O O 1 1 O I I I I Ico O `r p Io IN II - I^ rn U o o I- to Irj v 1 ----r----r I m I (n I ----r I I m I ---- I I N Lo (D p oo I� IN o In () o Z p 0 N I I I I c) I I v M v I� ----r--- I on Io Ip -r--- I NLo IN IN -r---- I IN C7 n Lo O i� i� iscq v Io i� I is I N o Q0 Q .w 2 ,o F- cu U cn i U O M A 2 IL 0 0 T 00 T N N p T T U c c6 .0 CL m c o in C O T ca jT I �N �N I N I ICO I .-- O I 1 1 U E I 1 I I vs Z __ r -r ---r ---I L LO LO U in U >. ) i i i I a) E� (n O Z __ i i i I r --- r --- r---� C 1 1 I I 1 1 I I N ca i co Q iO co Ir 10 it i^ Ir Ir 10 I^ Ir IO •� 0 N m a C W O I N I T 10 I N I N I^ I I N 1 Q I N 1 T 1 I r � c o I� I - if --I ---' ---' -- I c75 C a a7 1 '(D 1 0 I^ 1 TO I O 1 I U N I N I N j N N CO I N cn I� co I 1 U o l0 10 Ir I r I O 1 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 1 I O cri% Q 1 1 I 1 1 I c 1 1 .2 1 I I0, I C L O m 1 c 1 I U 1 3 1 ' I O IU m ca id i s U) I (T 1 t� 1 I U T v, 1 c a 'a'� 1 C 1 O) '> N 12 c9 a) 1 m I 1— 1 1 1 (LS I 0 N 0 O w ca cu U z U (D c i ; m C O ca c d 2 �c 'V5 ;U ; O � O O O �c ;a ;) 'a .Q W ... .. ... ... W cis a) (0-0 U a' Z O d ca CL T r_ . O N :. cn c�C co CL a L- CL m a Ln d T C3' O � C � c cu m > C7 0 a O O O N to N Q Q Q O O 3 O c d rn 'y C O Z O _M O N to L: O O m C d CO) d C O Z N O O _00 O N N T ca 0 N N O OD N L) cu CL C'7 O N 70 O 2 W W cz U C 0 (1) a O 2 W _W CSS U >C C O U Cn ca O U O U) 0 C C N m C cu CO N C O U In U .5 O J O C 0 C Ma� W C rr(^a Cl) C O E Q l� m E m z m m CL 00 O 100 in (S- 0 co V O .IM' -,00 ,�. ;� .M 'n . M '0 . N 'O N ^M q 7 NM00 o U o 'U O o U ' O O ;O 1 1 1 1 1 o 1 O : O ; O U 1 I 1 n M 1 N to Y O I 1 I 1 1 j > co 1 i 85 x ' X ' ' j X V cX _x 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 LLL 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 m 1 1 CD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 J 1 n I O 1 1 1 1 1 0 E 1 1 1 1 1 _ =3 z I I I I ' 1 1 1 1 � 1 n . In . 10 . to . sn . In . 'n . . . 1 1 . . . . l i N '0 IM iM IN i007 .0 iM 1000 00 Irn :cD ''ct io 'M iN iM io i00 CC,, I 1 m 1 1 1 O I ❑ I m 1 1 1 1 = it 1 a) 1 1 0 IT i m i 1 iN = l a l a 1 I 1 I 1 (D l a 1 1 ' J 1 1 i 1 I p 1 1 � i Q 1 1 1 1 1 •� 1W 1 1 i i ' i i ' ' . i . i i 1 N i it I w 1 1 1 O) IZ -0 ' O ' m' a I Q 1 O- 1 1 0 I— I Q) O a) 1 l i 1 0 7 o ' I U 1 1 1 0 1 0 ' :Q) ca I J co i -i----i--� 1 I L i j y ° 1 ' ° ' i i o to IQ IQO Io IOO;o _ �o _ ;o _ ;o ;o -i--�-- ;o06 p CO C O E Q l� m E m z m m CL 00 O 100 in (S- 0 co C O . C O 2 �cC G' I N0T NTN'T--f -- v >� .0 o m; n m , C- o U o 'U o ' U o U ' D_ m 1 ; a ,a m m 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Q O I O 1 0 I O I O a) 1 I 1 n M 1 N to Y O I 1 I 1 1 j > co 1 i 85 x ' X ' ' j X V cX _x 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 CD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 n I O 1 1 1 1 1 0 E 1 1 1 1 1 _ =3 z I I I I ' 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 I L I I 1 '� I 1 1 1 i I Ca 1 1 l i 1 1 0 m 1 I I ' U' I 1 1 1 1 1 N I m 1 I I N 1 CC,, I m 1 1 1 O I ❑ I m 1 1 1 1 I p 1❑ 1 1 a) 1 1 0 i m I N a I m 1 1 l a l a 1 I 1 I 1 (D l a 1 1 ' J I i 1 ' 1 I p 1 1 1 ' Q 1 1 1 1 1 •� 1W 1 1 a) c I N 0 I I In 0 1 1 N I 1 I I 1 e I w 1 1 1 O) IZ -0 ' O ' m' a I Q 1 O- 1 1 0 I— I Q) O a) 1 l i 1 0 7 X'LLI ' I U 1 1 1 0 1 0 ' :Q) ca I J co C O . C O 2 �cC G' v >� .0 o m; n m , C- o U o 'U o ' U o U ' D_ m . D_ ' m ; a ,a m m 0 . a — 1_I 2 U' '(D-1 � '� 'o :� :m 'm 'm 'm ' C '_0 C U m 0 �cC G' v >� .0 o C)) ' ' ' U ' C 0) iT :o C C C N �: mm m' 2 i co n n n — 1_I y y o c) U ;o ;o;o to O M .O lo ca O E I a � I m oU a _X I CD U ' _ .L - > (D Q IQ�r- > Q O I O 1 0 I O I O a) I 1 1 1 1 I 1 n M 1 N to Y O I 1 I 1 1 j > co 1 i 85 x ' X ' ' j X V cX _x 1 -1 --1--L--+ to i0 i❑ ID i — J IJ �J IJ O1 0 ' O ' IJ j• a O o to to Io toO 2- I 1 I I O =3r 0 =3J 1 1 1 I ca 1 1 1 i i i 1 1 1 �-ro-r�-ro-I 1 - C.�(P �0 I00j N CO IM IM coI (D o C 1 1 1 I CD > 1 I I I -- On Ct C CL In IN In in O 1 I I o - N U CD a) o ca Y O I I 1 1 I p J t I I I I I I I ,a .a ; Q O 1 10:1 -� o _I O o t I o 1 o 10 I o O O O O O E 1 1 1 1 1 _ =3 z I I I I 1 1 1 I o a ;o ;o;o to O M .O lo O E I a � I �z > I ' _ .L - Q O I O 1 0 I O I O F• I6 j0 4 T IM M I m E n M 1 Y O I 1 I 1 1 j O 1 1 I I 1 I 1 V 1 -1 --1--L--+ N i V 1CA i(0 i — it E 2- I 1 I I O =3r 0 U w 1 1 1 0 aU i i i CIS I I 1 I N p I I I 1 cu ..L... C o m C E c EU O m z o - N U rr a) o ca a w ca ' U ++ o m aUi ,a .a ; opj 7 O O T 00 O N N (v M 0 T O O N 0 O w w m U C O N O 5 w w_ c6 U m �20 O O O p o p � iC) t0 N Nm O N 0 O c) O M O O O O LO Ci 0 N N ON 0 I I I I Z Z I I I I I I I I '---r---- Io ti v I Iv v = ILO Ci I co co TO U..... N �0 0 .. _.r --- r-... O I O I co __ 1 U N 0 l0 t0 o eo O 0 O. Oo M F i LO N....r O U o Ir �o N co O O I N I N o jo r N o jiO un) Z ._..ro.._ Ic) -••-� ---------- -------- O 0 U 0 co 0 N N z IZ N (tl O H 1 I U 0 0 LO N 0 O O N ED O O O 10 10 O ..-.qty-... I I `4O I0o I0 0 C13L N i Cl) I I v I a O 1 0 O O v LU U o t o I co _o to N N 1 cq 2 10 ICC) C6 1 o v CL 1 ycn Cl) C- LL I o ICl) G 7 N O I Xd ru ca0 O I O f�D O M w lJ l O O C I I I 1 n� > I No I c O 1 0 1 0 0 ... N Of x d I 0t o I N N rn 2 > a - � M 1 M LL a- M ai I I Ln O 10 10 0 I laLO 0 LLn �o �0 I 1 I I O I co OOi m a) O 10 IOC) 0 O I O l 0 0 00 0 0 U) 0 1 0 I o 1 I Lo O N 1 I I I I 0 10 10 =O �� O 1 Cl)cn 1rn M a xCL O o 0 rn 0 a @ I ----r----r ---- I I O 1 0 I N N 0 > o O 1O 1r) N N ?a O 0 No i No I 1 m LL 0 I O 1 0 1 � ----r---- O l0 100 cr 1 to 0 N IT 1 O O CO O O rn a s U I to m O � co coo fn; n r i �_ --r---- to o p 1 c0 m C N O_ z i 77 r` v O y 1 to N N (p O I � cli C O iT � 0. .- �a = 2> r� ° N E ;0 LL r; m �20 O O O ID O N O p ; N N O O O O LO Ln 1 I ON I I Z I I I I I I Io ti v O C)0 V O L O 00 LO TO O I O I N N •p 9 .. _.r --- r-... O I O I O N U N 0 l0 t0 o eo 0 F ° io In ---- r---- LO N....r O U O I O I N 0 to to N co O 10 1: o jo m o jiO un) Z -••-� ---------- -------- O 0 U 0 m (tl I 1 H 1 I 0 0 LO N O O N O O O 10 10 O a I I `4O I0o I0 0 C13L N I I v I a O 1 0 O O O O LU o t o I co Cl) I I I I 10 ICC) v :. N O OI O I O)2 O O C- LL O 0 O G 1 I I I ru O 10 Ico o 1 O 1 o M w _o ° a1 O I O I O 0 �0 �0 O 0 I I I 1 n� 0 j0 jov0." ca O 1 0 1 0 0 00 x d 0t o I N N LU > a - � I Iv II ---r----r---- - I I v >0 O 10 1LO I I Ln O 10 10 0 o 0 LLn �o �0 I 1 I I m a) O 10 IOC) 0 O I O l 0 0 00 0 0 U) 0 1 0 I o 1 I Lo O N 1 I I I 0 10 10 O 0 10 Iv a 0 10 10 0 Ci C) 0 �0 0 ----r----r ---- I I O 1 0 I N N 0 O 1O 1r) r) z O to to 0 i0 ;0 O 0 I 1 0 Io 10 0 0 O 1 0 1 � U O l0 100 cr 0 �0 �0 0 a rn a s U O 00 O N N T O ( O N Z v U N 0 - to Lo toLo N x CL w° m Lf, N IL o CL wo m xa w coa Q °' o w La O In O U O O I I cO T cn, I N0 X O 1 i O O � *- U 7 L O � to CD U a a> a� o Io v1 ca U N y_ O L h NCM m o 0 �O Q 'c0 l0 to C G O N M N M O U o N N IUO N O �N r U O O O LO N N N ----r---- I 1 r---- O O 00 O N N T O ( O N Z v U N 0 - to Lo toLo N x CL w° m Lf, N IL o CL wo m xa w coa Q °' o w La O In '---h---- I 1LO Lf) M M 10 0 o Cl) v 0 Imo �o 0 1� I O 1 ^ N I 10 co M 1� a I r —0 1 N N I o O ; O O .o 0 1 I o Iv a M 1 o r I ai I o v I I O IM M I 7 -tr O 1000 coo 0 10 0 1 _0 1 0 I M I M MLo M I N Irn I o Irn rn o 0 1rn m I C) Im Cl) o O O I 1 I No I 0 O I O I I co co 1� I O O � O 0 I Ico 00 1 co to IMO 1to, 1 c Ir ri I� I I I� M 1 N N I] N ;O H LL LL , O U O O I I cO T cn, I N0 X O 1 C O O � *- U 7 L O � to CD U a a> a� o Io v1 ca U N y_ I M C '---h---- I 1LO Lf) M M 10 0 o Cl) v 0 Imo �o 0 1� I O 1 ^ N I 10 co M 1� a I r —0 1 N N I o O ; O O .o 0 1 I o Iv a M 1 o r I ai I o v I I O IM M I 7 -tr O 1000 coo 0 10 0 1 _0 1 0 I M I M MLo M I N Irn I o Irn rn o 0 1rn m I C) Im Cl) o O O I 1 I No I 0 O I O I I co co 1� I O O � O 0 I Ico 00 1 co to IMO 1to, 1 c Ir ri I� I I I� M 1 N N I] N ;O H LL LL , O I I N Z 1 I 0 10 Io 0 �+ I I M M 00 U 0 Io IUO L100 Q I IN N N ----r---- I 1 r---- O 0 10 U 0 Io IN_m co C O o 10 Co i^ r - F 1 1 Lo of N - _--r- - - - r - - - - O O 10 1N N U p 10 l ao O m o 10 Z L^ Ln Q 0 m I I I 10 u� Oo Io N N O 10 10 O g o Io Io 0 a I I yo 0 10 j d c) N 0 100 I O a 0 cO o 0 00 XG o to 0 IC a? I I ri ri _---r---- r---- W,n o 10 1ao 0 f, (V o 110 0 I V tT 0):2O l 1 0 O lia o 10 10 0 1 1 I I Om o 10 Io 0 6 00 1 0 o Ln O Ln O d o 10 10 0 _---r---- r - - -- 0 10 0 1-0 Iv a ash 0 0 o0 00 O O L a O I o I N N L 1 1 V V a � ---r---- - I r---- I > O o t o I 1 LO 1 0) o Io 0 0 10 0 t�a 10 10 ----' 1 I ----' N O I O ---- I'D N OO 1 1 0 O 0 I O 0 I M co W I LO Ln ----r----0 r---- 1 c I LO O 0 10 1Iq v U o 10 O 10 co O M 0 10 10 0 1 I X O I 1 0 I I N N O o 0 10 0 Z 1 O 10 10 0 - - - - r - - - - r---- ---- 0 0 l0 10 0 0 0 10 1V a O O 0 10 : 10IL : :. 0 � m o c; o m m a c s 0 > 0 H U = 5 IL O O T OD O N N N (d r - N O T (U 0) (a d C? CO O N 0 O 75 w w (Z U C O .0 N O w w cz U N 0 ' I� r O Cl) O NO 0 0 co O O W O O ' U U'� p (n In Cl) Cl) O _ 1 1 1 Z 1 1 I Z 1 1 I I I ---- 1 I = l0 10 OD co o 1 1 N V O p 0 0 O U 10 0 �o ui :o 10 tui '--'r----r---- -a ---r---- - N cn LO p I un OU O Ui m 0 Iq v H0 N 10 1� ----r----r---- 0 1 co cn O 1v (c u> a O1. 0 (�O 1 Cl) cn 00 1 00 1 c7 10 Iv ----r---- LO N N LO N 0 Z 1 1T N Icn°`O nln O o Iv It co Z 1 Cl) Cl) N m O � U I I 0 u] O 10 1co 'm N O t o I O O 0 10 10 0 IL LO R I I 1 1 0 1 co to to N O O 10I d 0 C>0 1 (On N N 1 ,-2 1.- 0 0o V rl N O a Cl) I -10 1OR '-'r----r---- 1 1 I O I (n co 1LO m (n N In to t10 I0) to >� O LO n 0)N W a 0 I T I 0 LLa 1 0 > :. N N1 I N 0 1 o 1 co v 1 a CL N C6 Cl) o Ip Ir r - ---r- - - - I OD 1 N N I m 0 0 O N 0 5a m I0) 0) p �.- O I o 1 Q) O 10 Ioc d 0 Z '---r---- 1 o j0) �C:� cli .co� x d L� 10 I cn 0 00 0 l0 rn v `si x CL 0 p 1 0 > m --"r - - - - > > O1 0 1 r CD Io Ir o� CL 0 10 10 O 13 N 1 N I � n- 1 d a U Cl) - ---r- - -- r 0 10 10p0 0O I I M 1 I m o N cn O I co Cl) O 10 O m ----r---- Iwa 1 I o CD 0 0 1 0 1 coo 0 10 10 O O U I� Ci Cl 0 1 0 1 LO l0 I N 0 N O I o I N N O O toZ O 1 co `" = O IcoM I I- cli r- O z I I 1 1 ON I N N ++ O 0 N I V R U. co 0 1 0 00 0 10 10 0 I 1 I (Di 10 O ++ p N O 0 I `coo m N 0 ¢ 15 o ca _ ;0 o 1 co Cl) ;� ;� c�C r a 7m 0 CM ;o M= LL Cl) ' ' Cl) N O O O W O O ' O U'� e 0 0 _ 1 1 O Z 1 1 I I 1 I l0 10 0 v o 1 1 N V O p 0 0 O O 10 1 0 �o ui :o 10 tui '--'r----r---- O O lO ILO LO U M o 10 1m m I I� v H0 10 1� ----r----r---- N O1. O 1 0 ILO (�O ((O 0 00 1 00 1 c7 10 Iv cl v ED 0 Z 1 1T N O U 0 m � I I I 1 u] O 10 1co M N O t o I O O 0 10 10 0 IL I I to to O 10I d 0 C>0 1 N C0 N N 1 ,-2 0 0 0 O 10 1c0 0 0o wa O r; -10 1OR '-'r----r---- 1 1 t10 I0) to >� O o I I 0)N 'mom o l0 10 0 LLa o 10 10 0 ----r----r ---- 0 1 o 1 co co O O 1 0 I NC) N �0 o Ip Ir r dF- 0 10 10 0 ----r----r---- p �.- O I o 1 Q) O 10 Ioc d 0 Z 0 10p 100 0 00 .co� x d 10 I cn (n W v `si 1m ---r----r ---- - I 1 0 0 O l 0 1 ODco > > O1 0 1 r CD Io Ir o� CL 0 10 10 0 13 ---r----r ----- 0 1 0 1 d Cl) O 0 10 10p0 0O 1 I m o O 0 1 0 1 r ---- r____ I I 0 1 0 1 00 m 1 I o 0 1 0 1 coo 0 10 10 m 0 I I ----r----r---- 0 1 0 1 LO n X O I o I N N O O 10 10 toZ O 0C) 1 0 O 1 1 ----r----r---- I I 1 1 ON (j O 0 N U O 1 0 1 co co 0 0 00 0 10 10 0 I 1 Ol 0 ;o ;� CCD ) 15 o ca _ ;0 o ;� ;� m N ' n ^ N 0 ' 00 , m M c G 00 O NO O C O O O ° C U O v ° M o- C o 0 r -, - O I O 1 I Z I Z I I O 1 I I N -' - -I 1 iro ro I io 00 ' Cc) c-, O r im I cc jr Io vi .O N a •---I�--- 0 LO LO N -'--i __-�r --_- O O N O OCO I O I O N O j n N to LO n N o 1 0 1 M M i O ~ O d O O I I r 7 0 O 1 M t7 E- 1 I r N O ----r�--- 1 - �n N --'-�----�---- >C Lq Ioo LO LO ( to cn co of O 00 I I o 10 1v +�. .2 Z Iv a v O 0 --'- I M--- M Z i U '0 0 U o O O U In o . 0 0 cdco d c o p m Um ..' ...� ..�* .� ..* ..� . ��--' N 1 (�O Hto O 0 0 co LO cn 1 1 O O N 7 I^ N O 1 0 1 0 O ■C0 d Cl) TLO IQ C\j O j 0 1 0 C * p a 1 1 -a =C\i� I(D m inn 6 N X C) LO 02 ooowo l a rm o10 cqW p ON o^ W IO II1 �I � ----� ----I O U)1 M v 1 I -i rn� o t o I N N O O O �j r 7 - - - -1 - - - - - - - -i - - - _' - - - - O@ 1 O l6 O 0 N !, U dO _N 0 m i N Lq ° 0 1 0 1 g n 1 a~ r o o 0 j 0 U ' - --r--- - I ---- r----�---- m� 0 10 0 m— 0 jo to 0 1 v v J x o �rn rn Xa o �o X00 T IT w a o ,�o l O m ca I0 Iro co 9 r---- - ---r----r - --- 0 N I N O O 0 I O 1 00 co 10 1 ' cuO O 1 O -rn� 0 .r - 10 Ir C )a n I n O o LLIL jo 1) ----r ---- ----r----r---- ' � N O Cl)M MO N I 1 O 1 0 I N d 00 100 100 c h 00 M rCf) 1 O O p O CO I o j 0 t O ----i ---- ----r----r---- 11 T 1 0 0 IM M O 0 1 O 1 ao co 1 1 N U O 0 0 1 1 1 0 I N o N o 0 0 coo O O�. � O i 0 O - -__-r---- �= ---- r ---- r - ` w X co C\l Ico In Cl) M cli n N `� X O I 1 o I O 1 cO MW 010 IcNo M IN 0 Z w o I O 10 O U O iv N v 0 �o �o 0 ----r - --- O - ---r- r O O -- - - - -- .� _ 3 O 1m C) O 1 I O N y ,-• ¢ 1 LO ctoo cn O 0 10 1oNo m I t N 1 ri Cl)+I N ¢ o o O o �o �0 0 ui ca w p) O ' O R O . O . p) SLR ¢ O O s N Cl m .'_ O LLM plo M � , � O m N N N p L7N LT I� O N O I,M I-Cl)c O O .o U 0)C) m co U o v ro N N ----h-_--F---- O T ON Z I 1 00 z 1 1 O---'r----�---_ N O 1 I CV Lo U) 0) m Lf) Cl) T V c(D m to = o I Ci1 to Io 0 *- o o T co ro a 11 --'-r----r---- a _""- N a I In 1 o n D tD N T O;(D O O OO O 0 mlc m l ald- m L F �_-_ N I� lop n N y Cl) O po loo lm n O U co O t0 U O 1�[)N INn 00O 1 0 0 co p O � O O OC) z V 00 zN N _ N Q Cj a U Go O m ca yy rirw.._.i....r.. 5 I r I N ~ O -C �--� f- LO LO LD Ln O 1 cN0 1 O p 1 V 1 N N a0 W N 21 Ip it r 1 a° ----F----F---- O -- ;5 Lo o 11 ILO o to LO co I p N N Lco LOco p I I� � Xa O �O i0 O N C W T lua I 1 r---- r'--' O Q) --- 1 1 CY): T 'm>—N LO mN p 1`O I O M po O �a LLa io i� a � ----�----r- --- 0- >_ --- 1 1 O �CD co O) -It_ O O CO rl 20 O O N 01 20 rn 0_ 0 T v Lri U 0_ F- r 1 1 O ---- r ---- r---- U _ N p O 1 M l a oC) 0 N co O a o O I N 1 Cl) Cl) co X O) D/ Q. p i O O O O J D_ w W T p a ---- v n --- ---r----r- - I 1 Q �o_ po l� lm o Q) > o o (D co L m� o m o rn LL o �o 1,v v C Ila 0) ---- ---- ----r ---- 1 [� o I— Irn O LT O N p 1 0 I r O C: N [O O NO O Cl) V co O O as O Np co O ' O i Cl O (nO O 10 10 r____r____ C? 0 1- I- `D p co O r O. O (D ID O oo �Lq 1CD (V Q U CO co r N O �� j C\1 N p N �' I ----i ----r ---- 73 i ---- Ln Ln o I 1 cp w O = O 1 0 I N N w _ O O O O Z p o I rn I N N O, z co 00 r N (fs =� N N +' I I U U __ U ---'r-'--r---- co V m NL N_ N C7 O rt•L ui (j O N O N In O O N T p I a0 Q 1_I ¢ V V r o p 1 0 1 N Cl) I I V o +-z �_ cC' m - o cm c 0 s m �J O O) p �_ y — cm m 3 C p O W 3 _ m F m = ) ~ CO U U E Co '_ plo R C G N O U 1- M rn co N I1 M o to N O W V M o ,� ;1 o O ''7 N' f` n N O I I O rc p Z Z I I I I r N r T Q C: > = U O U 0 F- O U O m T coa E to co o 0 ---- cMo O O c00 N O O co N Lnoo to o o � o o w N o o co N U N O F- 'O Z as •n �o �cNo N O I M I °� N o Io to o 1 I ----r----r ---- I n I O r O c0 rn r I o N I t` t�0 0 O Ip I� - C 7 ,o o eco �rn n ION I h o o IO I V V CO M O U O U = O NO U co o N d o o o o Lo m T o 0 0 d Ln~ W .- N O o °a 0 o N a. ..* ....*�� . . I I o o icNo io m O 17 I to O I O I r r I 1 r N 0 cu C Lo co . xd w N `T N cO 16 too X 2 wa Iv 1oD ro o i i 0 N o 16 Io 0 ON ---- - ---r----r---- d. r O� ZT (if m C U)ti mLo > c d a) N oa LL o IIS I o 0 04 o 1 ccoo I� V, oo io �o q I 1 T CO) O o CL m r rn rn r rn o— ns 2o d� 0 1M Irn N 1 I O I r I O N o I^ ui I 1 ---- ---r----r---- - 0)N� O J C9 i c>S F- yo X d w Go a `aa rn -_-_ rn no L� x d iLu ro >o ma- LL @ 9 o �n foo ccoo O i N i Cl) Cl) o 'o io 0 __--r----r---- O Io Ir co o 10 Im m O to IO rn o � o � v v I 1 O- -- - ----r----r---- m ca U) O rn I'll, am N O o I-- Irn o O 1 Cl) 1 7 co o 19 O o O o ... (i (p'T TCD O N -6 O----r----r---- LLJ U r O N i O i vi C O 0. O ("� x z ---- (D N in r OD N ---- v a w co in r 06O N cn w'- .f- O O x !7 Z ---r r ---- O 1 Ln o Ico Io n o I� it O cn N N 1 I 1 I o j j M v O 1 m I N N O I rn I N N - -I 1 - i ---- r - - -- > o +' 01 O N ch N o a Mcn U 7 i O O O I� Ia rn o I 10 rn 01 0 I D' O-- I I N .' LUoU U m O U o O «m �= O m C Y Y O ; 2 EL O O T 00 O N N T _O M 0 Q L: O U N c>5 O U O U) O !✓ 0 co N c O CV T W a) U) cz d i _Q (V U U N O 1 O C cz C CU m C as r Cl? Cfl O N 0 O w LU (a U C O (V c0 G w w ca ;�2 ,q co m 0 m • V M 0 O W ;ON nal U o .o 0 C v . v 00 I ON I I I Z I I _'--r-'-'r-_'- co 100 co <r o I N = 0 1� U o 10 Io 0 o---- r----r---- N I CC) 10 O O U p M 1CDr o Ior1 ma o I p t o O - OD N I Co l 0 0) O o 1� Io 0 0 I O M I� O I O 1 0 O Z O i V 1 co N O U 0 m N 1 1 OO 1 1T H I M 10 001 0 O 1 r 1 O N 0 1 0 I r 1 a 1 o is it w c N o I V I N I I Ir xa_ o Io Io 0 ----r---- r'--- d LO o 1 r` 1 0 0 cli O 0) I 1 �a o N 0 Io 1 C7 1 I I 1 0 Ln O — o N 00 O 5 O O O O V ui ----r---- r ---- �•O O i(O co M tjj IT Io x o o 10 Io c T I I r---- a)p o II� Irw a m 0 I I m t o co a o 10 Iv a U- ----r----r---- 1 oI� 1 ICA a)1 0 C0 co 0 1' o U 0 o iq iO 0 10 10 ----r----r---_ O 1(D 1N W o 0 1c 1C co p I I rn N 1� IT '---r----r--'- Qo I I C. o 0 0r I 0 o CO 1m I N rt+ (� - --r----r---- 7 I I L O 10 Iv N o fro ILO 0 Q 0 O p Ic0 Ic0 M O O 10 1N M -. . 0 cn ; ) ; r+ N 7 C Ocz O CL O O T _00 O N N O c>s I- N O _(D O 0) cz 0- C6 _C.6 O N 0 CO G W _W m U c 0 i (V 0 G LU _w m U O >_C C 7 0 U U) as O U O 0 c co C N m C co U) O C U U) U O J O _C 0 co F- a) O m c M U) T O N 1 c O V cn c O U m TT M ;m 'O co o �� o 'coo 'co oirn U o ;o ;O o o �v ev co O N Z I I I I IN O co I I O U o0 to 1� a 0 ca I I ----J --• --- N O — 1 0 co 0 1^ C', O m o i0M jcor IDv 5 0 to lC C �v iv co Nr----r---- O0---�^ co IM0 p O O IOM (Or n C m O 10 10 O Z � ----��- Iv - -- O 0 m 76 ..�-.t_...-.-. f�.._.� t t H O M O 1_M ICO t 1 O W clj O t7 Ir In 2 O 10 I• a t t of LO O I CO I r co coN O I m I sCL o Ir Ip wa CL o io �0 0 - ---r----r---- 'o >'n In l0 co :.. N O IM 10 N m� O I N I O C�7 Iia -1 I ---r----r---- O 76 O L N LO o o 11 a~ o �C? �v ui ---- I wo o I O I Oa) I ca 01 O I7 Ip � x wa o �o �0 0 cu a----r--''r---- I I � 1 1 >o 0o I� Imo v m� 0 I I Irn 10 m CL o �o rn v L=3 �v - ---r- - - - r - --- N 0 co O o Im to CO o Io Io 0 o �o 10 0 - ---r----r -- - - O ImIco rn O oo N 1Un O coI iO im o v I I N 1 I o j� jm rn O o I M 1 Z O Im 10 O N ----r---- r - - - - o I I Ico Iv rn 0 0 ;co O M O O N -. .: - Cl) T O _ O N G CL O O T OD O N N T N cSS r - N O I- N 0) cU IZ co O N 0 O W W U C O U) (1) 0 5 w _w ca U _O >_C C 7 O U cz O U 7 O CO i O C C N m C cis U) N C N U U) U O J O C 2 cu C O m C co U) ri m O O ,n , co n cO N N o o N Ci U 0 o cn0 cno I I U N I I I 1 Z I I 1 I I o to I l0 co 0 1 l O o 00 U O 0 0 Io In n ca I I I m I (6-a ---r ----r ---- ON o U o t o I0 I umi I co 76o o t2 o0 �o �^ ,2 I I o cc .-� N ---- r ---- r ---- op ,o ,� fo 6 o I0 10 I 0 �n m o ,o Ico m Z -------------- I 1 O U 0 'm I I o io o Ln N9 1 O O 2 O 1 0 , O O IL 1 1 mn o j0 w o I0 IoM o M (6N o No tun o ,o to ,moo I� 1 I n O I l 0 I 1 LO LO rnC� o Io Io 0 o U- io �0 0 ----r'---r---- 0 m oIo I 1 I Imo I m 2F o ,00 ,m 7 to 17 CL 0 10 0 0 I 1 7 o1 o O O OM M001� p O OL a N p NOW I I ca 9 I 1 I 1 r OO O 10 In n o ,o ,O O to Io 0 tin' o 1 I I 1 I N O I o 1. I d p 0 O Cl) Cf) 1 10 0 ,0 Imp cMOp '---r----r II I ---- o 1 LO 0 I I n U o o 1 op I C, 10 �0 0 ^- I -r---- I I r---- x o I o I I LO LO O o Io I0 0 Z o �o �o 0 I 1 cs o1o( I I I � Cl) aj 0 o, o O O o ;o i0 0 o _� ;o ;Q) o O O O T 00 O N N N r-' U) C 0 C LO ' ;n n m o o co O ' O N m N N U O ' O co co U o .o 0 0 I 1 O I I N Z 1 I 1 1 I I Io 0 v o o S U jio o o I I n 0 h 0 a o o 1 I c6 (o 9 I 1 N O U O 10 1TO O10 12 ap r o to l� m to Ico m I I 10-0 N OU O Io I I u°Di 0 0 loo Ir b m O O Z 1 I -------------- N O U 0 m � I 1 F io iLO o U) o Io Io 0 NO j j � 0 0 O a 1 I y Loo t o 1 m N 1 1 O'D 0 ctl L O 0 O 1 0 I N OO O N O w° o iC5 I 1 I I >`� o to 'v N 1 I a rn� O (0 IO O LLa 1 I I I O 1 0 I rn co CD 00 Q o o IL o io io 0 I I I 1 7 . O O O M 6 O M ca L0 1 0 1 O o I I N O o N X i- W T o 1 1 I 1 > 0 o i o i^ I- 00 00 'D 00 t0 o 0 ILIL �o �o I I I I a m N o 1 0 I o M o M OU 0 �o coo coo CD t o I r 1 I I I oIo I^ n I I O U o o rn o i 0 1 rl� rn n o 10 10 0 1 1 1 1 0 10 1LO N 0 o Io 1m m Io l0 z o o �o i0 0 0 -I 1 ---r----r---- I 1 O 1 0 1 Cl)m M 0 o :o i0 0 O O O O a L ----� `o o 0 c Q -O Y N C O O ~ U = > G 75 CL C) 0 T co C) N N r _O tts 0 O >C O U CO cis O U O U) 0 c 0 i Ncu C O Qs a) m T C ✓� U) CL C O U U U .O 0) 0 J O C i W C N m C / c�z T U) N 0 O 5 W W CTjU E 0 O 2E w w cis U N O U 0 z S U cli O U 0 F- N 0 U o_ Co z O U 0 m co a O O pOj O O ccoo N � co N N I I I I I 1 jrn rn O O �0 0 I C) I ro ao o la e o ' w co N N N N 1 o I M M O ' '� r 1 I I 00 ' co M O I� o io 0 - ---r---- I I I I I 1 ----r- - - - I o I cco o a) o �r r o 10 0 - ---r- - - - I 0 1 co m 0 'n O 1� r O O p - ---r- - - - I I 1 I 1 ----r---- I 1 0 m j�o 0oo O O m O 1 N N - - - - f - - - - 1 Ico co I T I co co N N 1 0, co 1 N M i co rn I N I O N ;a o f6 U o m 'w o Q ;0 ~ N Z CL N CL X wa (D L9 N rn2 La o� CL F CL �o L IL w d T m a °a' _o rnCL La O U) O N O O +� Oi z O v U L L 0 ¢ 7 OI V, U N -0 t ro a � � Q � U � M O O pOj O O ccoo N � co N N I I I I I 1 jrn rn O O �0 0 I C) I ro ao o la e o ' w co N N N N 1 o I M M O ' '� r 1 I I 00 ' co M O I� o io 0 - ---r---- I I I I I 1 ----r- - - - I o I cco o a) o �r r o 10 0 - ---r- - - - I 0 1 co m 0 'n O 1� r O O p - ---r- - - - I I 1 I 1 ----r---- I 1 0 m j�o 0oo O O m O 1 N N - - - - f - - - - 1 Ico co I T I co co N N 1 0, co 1 N M i co rn I N I O N ;a o f6 U o m 'w o Q ;0 ~ go No 00 so so go 2 CL 0 0 MT W T a T 1� ca 0 N O O N N O cu CL T T O N a O 5 w w ca U c 0 Q) O 5 w w ns U O U cu O U s O CO 0 c a L cz c L M� W c cu U) N C N U U) U .�5 0) O J O C L cu c L N m c cu cn G W H a7 7 C C Q N > 10 7 C C Q _ 00 ^' 'W M M 1 m V I� ,� Lo LO ` Ln CO ;0 0 I` ' m M CO 1 LQ �m � N .O, LO CD O) r LO:OCD I- �CCD � a ca m Z) CD a a a) C M [t CV G N N LO N N t` ' n CL co 'D OJM 1 (DC7 O M O ----hCo- T Ip O N I 1 1 *- O Z 1 1 N 1 r v = Cl) i ai U Co 1 C`r a 1 Q cri Q---}�--. O O Cl) N I CO N N 1 N ~ M M M 1 co 0 CD O U O Iq co N I O N M N IC)N m Z M 1 CO.) OL---- U p U) U � o O m ~ � 7 O ~ 1 1 m O ? I(o 1m 1 N 1� 1 I� V 1 V N iri co 1 N 1 cm H i xa h 1n O 0 W '6 MCD N CY �? I m 0) U) 2O O L -a 1 7 14 C O 6 N I N V I V U a� LO ;U') CD U 1 N 1� O CU 1 v I� J x CL r I r O w > 0 to C a }00 a Rf , o - 00 1 1` 0 1 i 7n. I V V ( ) IL I 1 U) CUri N 1 N N I N ('70 I O I � T ----} ---- N 0 0) a C) U n 1� 1 0 LIJ N x rn 1 rn RS Od z 1 0 o 10 U O co 106 1 C O N O ----} I o > V 1 a O cc Lli LLI = a N � m H a7 7 C C Q N > 10 7 C C Q _ 00 ^' 'W M M 1 m V I� ,� Lo LO ` Ln CO ;0 0 I` ' m M CO 1 LQ �m � N .O, LO CD O) r LO:OCD I- �CCD � a ca m Z) CD a a a) C M [t ' CD M ' O ' M o 0 ' T M 10 M U) co O I p co r NW :)O 0 C8 m o 10 IO 0 .0 0 I Tlco 1 —TO—T 1 Q% CD O I CD O 10 10 ca o io �o co +o 4 >` I i CO W Io it D m O I O I O 5 O l 0 1 0 O I O ' O 0 1 I I I !n M � i O M m O 10 l0 10 0 U � 0 10 O �o 16 �o-�� O U M 1 o I Cl) LO O = 1 N 1 O O O O U) 1 0 ol0 10 O N r\ _o o o N cu� c- Io �- O m m -o �c0 N CD o io a) 0) w U) 10 o io 16 ca i -- 1 6 4-- 'o ' T c N I� N n0 N =O 10 10 J U O � O 116 (-4-4 _U 0 O 1D 1 1 > (D O I (0 LO Q l 0 i M O T 10 Ir i(3 W co C N W o 1- 1 n 0 r to it m 0 1 0 1 0 N I—CD L '� (j CO �C 1 O 10 10 O O O r N rn ..L...L 'o 'rn Lf) 'o '(n 0 O c w CO . rn . M J (C) . If) . Lq o 'o 'o w co U ..f. .f.. o O _ u i N > O x C N y 6 =) l .r c v Q ._ n w —J O Cc,Q O 'a c o : 'Z _W CJ LL ? to � � : O �t Ir ' rrs Ira Ln m O U O z O U ro 0 N O U O m z O U m CM 2 a to Ln N w [1 > N mCL �a O_N 20 a- c, O �2 w [l > (a 0 - LL 0 CO O U O z 0 O IY 0 U O ' O r cli T t CM 11 C\l N � O 1 r o to 1 CD C\j I *2 a o Ip ,a 1 a Ln ---f�-- 1 rn Irn vrorn �v(n L[) 1 co (L) 1 Cp LO LO - - 1 rn Irn OD Ln I L (f) 1 CD _• - L---- 1 r n 1n � Iv 1 o Io v 1 [f O 1 p i 1 I n In 1 � V 1 7 o to _ 1 _ n In I r 7 I V 0 1 (j 1 i (n 1(n 1 N 0 1 CO OLO LO 1 p 1 00 ' O CD I (D I't LO I n 00 1 m V I � n 1LO 1 Cl) I (D O 1 O (D 1 D O 10 a m � : m Q) m m`D :mm cam m c 1z; :ZD I 2 CL O O Ip O N N T N 0 t\ N 0 C) N O cz CL C7 O N 0 O w w Lo U C O U U cO G w _w to U O >C C n O U Ca O U t 7 O U) O C 70 (i1 C m C cls U) C U U U _U) 0) O J O C CLS m C U) Cl) cu _0 m L- Z m Z rn D C cu J A� � W W N = I.:i � O U m F O U 0 co z O U 0 m m F�- In N CL CL TA Lo ca c N L2 IL W > a N .O� LLa _Om �0 a D� co w d > ca s > _O rn� ti a N O U) O U O z 0 O tL J N 0 O � O m O p N O m (A •o • O •co IC> rn bo to P crn 0100 10 1 I N � p fM i 0 Io I r 1p I 1 I O 0 I Op I , CM I N p O o I r 'o ri O N r I 00 1 0 I R '° ,o N ILo N 1 en N c r O 1 ,n lc6m ca r2 tLo o CC) rn bo to P crn ao p I In N 1 ;m n LO � Nr ...t.......... 1 0 1 0 N N U CD p p 0 p0 O p m O N r , m 1O ,rn o M l 0 , '� O I O 00 1 0 I V R 1 0 U G m 00 • 0 • m m 0MI 10 1 ' 1" n 000 N O I O O 1 1 CD > O 1 I 1 I I I 00 NO 10 17 O ' O 1 t � , ----i-''-�---- a> 0 Cl) 0 r n N O I Z C O I , O cr ' r r I U a1 10 o co Io to , ,rn , n n 00 N 0 Iv L p O I 10 I C 1 I , I , I , I I 1 1 I , , , N 1 C. co M 1 O m al 0O O c+i I O 1 0 I O m O Oi 10 ' O O 1I ----r---- I ---- F �r 0 toIv I r____�.____ 1 'c°o 1 LO O I O o 110 1 OO Iv I v -I ---r----�---- I d' m ov , to Iu) m o to o la co o I L6 Ln I U 1 r__--�----- 1 cDO M 'O IT1 10 10 r O irn cn m co p 1 0 . I cC) c00 F 1 yl cu I a I 1 a ¢ >m Q • > o • O ' m s I jo 'o rn cli O — to �O n m 10 'corn vrn U m l0 o m m �o ILo N 1 en N c r O 1 ,n lc6m ca r2 tLo o CC) rn bo to '((Dorn crn ao p I In N 1 ' c0 c0 LO o� ...t.......... 1 0 1 0 I ulIO C) CD g M 0 i 0 • , m 1O ,rn o M l 0 , '� O I O 00 1 0 I V R 1 0 1 0 I G 1 1 , 0MI 10 1 ' 1" n 000 N O I O O 1 1 1 > O 1 I 1 I I I 00 NO 10 17 O ' O 1 t � , ----i-''-�---- a> 0 Cl) 0 1 � o n N O I 1 7 C _ Io Io 0 I U a1 10 o co Io to , ,rn , n n 00 N 0 Iv 7 �O 10 I C 1 I , I , I , I I 1 1 I , , , N 1 C. co M 1 O m al 0O O 1 00 Cl) ' M M co 0 00 10 m O Oi 10 ' O O 1I ----r---- I ---- F �r 0 toIv � to 'c°o 1 LO O I O o 110 1 OO Iv I v -I ---r----�---- I m 100 ;rn m n to m 1 0 , ,n N n o to o la co o I L6 Ln I U') O 1 0 1 m 1 r__--�----- 1 a uD loo 100 irn cn m co p 1 0 . I cC) c00 F 1 yl I a I 1 a ¢ >m Q • > o • O ' m O I Ito I I Ln m U O z C CL z N ID U `0 0Q co H 0 U 00 z O U 0 E3 m 12 cli2 0- 'wrn nU) ao to IO p 1 en N c r O 1 ,n lc6m ca r2 OD 1, 01-0 'o rn w d crn 1 1 m d0 N .52 I a> I p 'rn LLa LO o� a 1 0 1 0 CL 1 1 FO - a • , m 1O ,rn o M l 0 , '� O I O N O O N O I O 1 V '0 R m 0 I -'--r----F---- X (L 1 , W 1 , coa 1 , 1 > O 1 , CD 0 j 0 � LOO 0 to h 00 NO 10 17 O ' O CL LLIL I 1 cliO , 1O CD oMCl) I0 ,O 10 r 00 N 0 I O 1 V 'O 7 Cn O I ----r----i"---- O 1 , U I , 1 , -' --I O Q) 0 10 ' N LO z 0 O ci 0 N 1 C. co M 1 O m O C) o C=? 1In 1 m I ro 1 lO ,n n ICD m n �r 0 toIv 7 o o ui ui I m 1 w m 100 ;rn m z Y Io 'o 0 1 m • 1 U') O 1 0 1 m a p I 1 O --'_L----L ---- m O J F U • N • OIC IL 'wrn wrn ao to IO p 1 en 1I Cp -'- ----F---- c r O 1 ,n lc6m to OD 1, 01-0 'o rn to 'co p 1 Irl crn 1 1 m N /c y' I a> I p 'rn LO opo jo iv N 0 a 1 0 1 0 O 1 1 ----F----r ---- I • , m 1O ,rn o M l 0 , '� O I O n O N O I O 1 V '0 R Io 1 0 I -'--r----F---- 1 , I , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 1 , CD 0 j 0 � LOO 0 to h 00 NO 10 17 O ' O C C I 1 I I , 1O CD oMCl) I0 ,O 10 r 00 N 0 I O 1 V 'O 7 10 ' O I ----r----i"---- 1 , I , 1 , I , I , 1 , -' --I 1 Q) 0 10 ' N LO N 0 O ci 1' ----r----i----- I N 1 C. co M 1 O m Ln rn C) o C=? 1In 1 m I 1 lO ,n n ICD m n �r 0 toIv 7 o o ui ui I 1 m 100 ;rn m 00 Io �m coo Io 'o 0 1 m • 1 U') O 1 0 1 m I 1 ,(j p I 1 O --'_L----L ---- m O ILzN F U • N • OIC IL - • L N L � O Or a ¢ >m Q • > O O T 00 O N N T 0 rl- N 0 It N a) cZ CL O N 0 O 75 w LU U c O N O LU LU U N O O O U 0 �o i O z 1 0 �0 = o01p0 U c000 IIo 1 ca N ,1 N N D O N ' OD N U rn 1 0 O 1 O 0 O 10 H O O I" Ucli , 0 0 'o FO O 1 0 Z----L---- N O U a m � 1 I O d 1 O N C 0 1 0 0 N O :00 0 '0 N 00 0 1 00 o X �o ;moo 1 LLy 1 N 1 U- a 1 0 '0 O 0 V 1 O V 0 0 0 1 0 0 a t- co , co 1 r 0 '0 :3 oo ioo _c_- oo 'oo x a 1 wcts , r a----h-- j , j O LL I o 10 N O 1 O COO 1 O O 1 O 1 V ' V OV 1 d U o0 C5 'o 1 0, OV O N 0 N OO I d , V 00 0 1 1 OI � 7 1 Cl) ai 1 m 1 p co M 0 2 C C O U U) CIS O U L O U) O C 0 czN C O O Lr) m N C cz 0) U) W O C O U U O 1 O C «5 F- a) N m U)'C^[S T C6 O O N O 5 W w co U C 0 i U O W W_ CLS U N 0 CD O ' 0) W N O O . O O O U o 0 0 0 - --- ----r----r I I o to 1 0 {o CD I00 OT O I O I 00 ON I 0 I 10 Ir ----r----r---- I I 1 I r Z I 1 v _- --r---- r ---- I I I l0vo ul v U I l00 Io cz a----r----r---- I IN N po 1 lop I O 1 ao 00 0 o Io Io 0 10 Io 0 0 a 't 1 I� 1 r o" o r 00 co 0(0p0 It I I N It rn O m I Iv I I I I 0 co U C\j 1 l0 C11 0 ED a - 1 10 0 O U U a o a ' O F- Q N O 1 o Co ao U Io Io 0 m 0 Io 0 6 10 ED t6 o O 1 1 1 o I N d ~ 0 10 iso Oo o O t o I(D O 0 O rG O I O 1 I -� - --� -- CL N I o 1 16 1a0 � r� o l0 0 to l0 00 00 W a ----�----r 1 0 1 r ---- a� � N '52 U- ,:3 a z g o a� � O X a w clss :a LL O Cn O U O Z 0 O it ----h----h---- O O N N Ol0 1(b d o Io 100 00 0 I I l 0 I to r - --- ----r----r I I o to 1 0 {o CD I00 OT O I O I 00 00 I 0 I 10 Ir ----r----r---- I I 1 I r ----r----r---- 0 i0 1 I O O - - - 1 10 - f - - - - r - - - - 0 I 1 I l0 I 10 _ 0 0 ----r----r - --- 1 1� I 10 V 0 1 lop 0 o p I I N N ----r----r---- I I v a 't 1 I� 1 r o" o r 00 co 0(0p0 It I I N It rn 1 1ov CT m I Iv I I U t6 O) N C C ' E a - N as N o O U U a o a ' O F- Q U J 1 o Co ao cc L co O O N N O O . O . O O U 0 .0 0 0 I 1 ON Z 1 I 1 1 O d v 1 1ov CT U 1 100 C)0 1 1 N N a - ---r----r---- I ON 0 1 o Co ao O Io Io 0 m 0 Io 0 6 r 10 O I 1100 OD U I Icm rn I l0 o 0 m 1 10 0 z -- -� - --� -- N O U 0 m ----------- .--.f-.-.-.ryO Z O Ip Id d F- o to low o� 0 Io 100 00 NO 10 1 C', cO m O 1 O 1 1� CL I (5 Lo0 10l0 0 O O .r O D IIp O 0 p O0 X CL O l 0 1 `° `° 1 1 LU ----r----r---- 1 1 > Lq 1 I N LL ----r----r---- o 01 0 1 a) o to lov m o•a o0 100 1`0°.0 ar `o°o 1 1 T ---'r----r ---- °cam 0 C3 -zr 0 0 10 1C)0 0 as tun' to Ir- r r -o a---- ---- - ---r 1 1 m O — I I Sa 1 I LL ----r----r---- 1 I 0 O N 1 l 1 10 0 ___-r----r ---- { 1 O I {� I U 1 O O 1 10 0 t I 1 1 a) d x 1 1 (0" o v O 1 100 O 00 O z 1 I C N 1 I v v ----r----r ---- O p Cl) ID C5, v CC I m I N I Iv I I O o N cm p • N c E U m m m UE0 mm •,tea N cQ a o F- iU op c in Q .0 m • J cc L co � � � � � CD CD / 7 Ftg & � k & / %LL'a co \ 0 -j \ OD & % cz 2IL U 2 0 \ U) 6 k m ¥ \ % 0 d ® { \ U) \ 0 C ! � ƒ / ? U) a l9e I ƒ � / T \ k � § U) % \ \ \ z _0° 0 3 W 5E2 � \ ƒ m m 2 § 3 ® / 7 = % 2 / \ § L/ E / = / k ± 7 $ ƒ / $ 7 m § k { _ $ q f / $ J 2 Q & ' 0 S / $ \ // % 7$ R 3 �_ / 3 4 / § 2 4$ / § 3 / /Io ƒ 3 2 $ 2 2 m : 06 § k r § a O 0 m k f / / _ / 10 Lc) \ § � ---- \ \ g g & J \ ---- ƒ & /IT Bas--- / §to to $ } m ƒ % Z ---- _ 0 \ LL 2 ) It % . to 00 OD 2 / z k w to -- \ / / m \ } 12 t U) cli CL c; \ % \ / @ E a) / / )2 w -° UCL ---- CIS\ \ / & 3 \_ CL ____ LO Lnk % Q 20 3 5 y / g )° §)LO ---- LO / 9 ) 3 / \ f e d --- § /� / ---- c* f § \ f § { E J \ e k / a_ � � \ 2 2 km / gCD E u u co § » / > 2 / 2 2 CO\ / § � ui ����co 00 -n _ - W L § K 2 m \ / \ ` © / ® / ® ( w 2 o k _ k / / \ D J 0 / / Q k & / / LL / / . ai r� San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA Start date and time 01/11/18 16:03:27 AERSCREEN 14147 San Bernardino Logistics Center San Bernardino Logistics Center ----------------- DATA ENTRY VALIDATION ----------------- METRIC ENGLISH ** AREADATA **--------------- ---------------- Emission Rate: 0.597E-02 g/s 0.474E-01 lb/hr Area Height. 3.00 meters 9.84 feet Area Source Length: 409.00 meters 1341.86 feet Area Source Width: 201.00 meters 659.45 feet Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet �1 Model Mode: URBAN Population: 216239 Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet of ** BUILDING DATA ** �4 No Building Downwash Parameters ** TERRAIN DATA ** No Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet No flagpole receptors No discrete receptors used ** METEOROLOGY DATA ** Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K -9.7 / 98.3 Deg F Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Page 1 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA Dominant Surface Profile: Urban Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture AERSCREEN output file: San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA.out *** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run ************************************************** SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET Obtaining surface characteristics... Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000 Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000 Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000 Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000 Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR started 01/11/18 16:04:52 ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Winter Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0 Page 2 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 Page 3 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Spring Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 Page 4 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Summer Page 5 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA Processing surface roughness sector 1 v Processing wind flow sector 1 FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 Page 6 on San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Autumn Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** Page 7 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30 Page 8 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** FLOWSECTOR ended 01/11/18 16:05:25 REFINE started 01/11/18 16:05:25 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** REFINE ended 01/11/18 16:05:28 ********************************************** AERSCREEN Finished Successfully With no errors or warnings Check log file for details *********************************************** Ending date and time 01/11/18 16:05:29 I� Page 9 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA_ max _conc_distance Concentration Distance Elevation Season/Month Zo sector Date H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-0 LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT 0.25678E+01 1.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26874E+01 25.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28008E+01 50.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29037E+01 75.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29979E+01 100.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30845E+01 125.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31643E+01 150.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32399E+01 175.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33107E+01 200.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.33264E+01 206.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32456E+01 225.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23877E+01 250.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20135E+01 275.01 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17582E+01 300.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15873E+01 325.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 1 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA_ max _conc_distance 0.14574E+01 350.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13449E+01 375.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12466E+01 400.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11598E+01 425.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10832E+01 450.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10146E+01 475.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95273E+00 500.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89761E+00 525.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.84732E+00 550.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80202E+00 575.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76009E+00 600.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72234E+00 625.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68735E+00 650.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65538E+00 675.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62605E+00 700.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59842E+00 725.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 2 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA_max_conc_distance 0.57291E+00 750.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54943E+00 775.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001' -1.39 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52772E+00 800.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50710E+00 825.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48796E+00 850.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47002E+00 875.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45323E+00 900.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43754E+00 925.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42251E+00 950.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40843E+00 975.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39520E+00 1000.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38276E+00 1025.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37105E+00 1050.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35999E+00 1075.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34950E+00 1100.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 ego 2.0 0.33931E+00 1125.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 3 ..... .........--...... . ............... r San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA _max_conc_distance 0.32968E+00 1150.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32055E+00 1175.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31189E+00 1200.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 I 0.30368E+00 1225.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29587E+00 1250.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28845E+00 1275.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28139E+00 1300.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27466E+00 1325.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26818E+00 1350.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26195E+00 1375.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25602E+00 1400.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25035E+00 1425.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24494E+00 1450.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23973E+00 1475.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23474E+00 1500.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22996E+00 1525.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 4 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA_max_conc_distance 0.22538E+00 1550.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22101E+00 1575.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21681E+00 1600.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21279E+00 1625.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20894E+00 1650.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20525E+00 1675.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20169E+00 1700.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19824E+00 1725.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19492E+00 1750.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19173E+00 1775.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18867E+00 1800.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18572E+00 1825.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18289E+00 1850.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18016E+00 1875.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17754E+00 1900.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17501E+00 1925.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 5 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA_max_conc_distance 0.17258E+00 1950.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17023E+00 1975.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16797E+00 2000.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16579E+00 2025.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16369E+00 2050.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16164E+00 2075.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15965E+00 2100.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15773E+00 2125.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15588E+00 2150.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15409E+00 2175.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15236E+00 2200.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15068E+00 2225.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14905E+00 2250.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14748E+00 2275.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14595E+00 2300.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14444E+00 2325.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 6 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA_max_conc_distance 0.14299E+00 2350.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14157E+00 2375.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14020E+00 2400.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13887E+00 2425.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13758E+00 2450.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13632E+00 2475.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13510E+00 2500.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13391E+00 2525.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13276E+00 2550.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13164E+00 2575.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13055E+00 2600.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12949E+00 2625.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12845E+00 2650.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12743E+00 2675.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12644E+00 2700.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12547E+00 2725.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 7 r r San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA 0.12452E+00 2750.00 _max_conc_distance 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12360E+00 2775.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12270E+00 2800.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12183E+00 2825.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12097E+00 2850.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12013E+00 2875.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 i 2.0 0.11931E+00 2900.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 VI -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11851E+00 2925.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11772E+00 2950.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11695E+00 2975.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11620E+00 3000.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11546E+00 3025.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11474E+00 3050.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11403E+00 3075.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11333E+00 3100.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11265E+00 3125.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 8 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA_max_conc_distance 0.11198E+00 3150.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 310.0 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.11132E+00 3175.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11067E+00 3200.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11002E+00 3225.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10939E+00 3250.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10877E+00 3275.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10817E+00 3300.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10757E+00 3325.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10698E+00 3350.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10640E+00 3375.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10583E+00 3400.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10526E+00 3425.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 - 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310. 0 310. 2.0 0.10470E+00 3450.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 - 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 310. 2.0 0.10415E+00 3475.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 - 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310. 0 310. 2.0 0.10361E+00 3500.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 - 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310. 0 310. 2.0 0.10307E+00 3525.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 - 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310. 0 310. 2.0 Page 9 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA_max_conc_distance 0.10255E+00 3550.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10203E+00 3575.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10152E+00 3600.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10101E+00 3625.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10052E+00 3650.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10003E+00 3675.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99542E-01 3700.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99065E-01 3725.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99838E-01 3750.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99360E-01 3775.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.98888E-01 3800.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.98422E-01 3825.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97962E-01 3850.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97507E-01 3875.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97059E-01 3900.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.96615E-01 3925.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 10 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA_max_conc_distance 0.96177E-01 3950.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95744E-01 3975.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95316E-01 4000.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.94894E-01 4025.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.94476E-01 4050.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.94063E-01 4075.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.93654E-01 4100.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.93250E-01 4125.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.92851E-01 4150.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.92456E-01 4175.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.92065E-01 4200.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.91679E-01 4225.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.91296E-01 4250.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90918E-01 4275.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90544E-01 4300.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90173E-01 4325.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 11 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA _max_conc_distance 0.89807E-01 4350.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89444E-01 4375.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89085E-01 4400.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.88729E-01 4425.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.88377E-01 4450.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.88029E-01 4475.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87684E-01 4500.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87342E-01 4525.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87004E-01 4550.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.86669E-01 4575.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.86337E-01 4600.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.86008E-01 4625.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.85683E-01 4650.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.85360E-01 4675.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.85041E-01 4700.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.84724E-01 4725.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 12 San Bernardino Logistics Construction HRA_max_conc_distance 0.84410E-01 4750.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.84100E-01 4775.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83792E-01 4800.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83486E-01 4825.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83184E-01 4850.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.82884E-01 4875.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.82587E-01 4900.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.82293E-01 4925.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.82001E-01 4950.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81711E-01 4975.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81424E-01 5000.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 13 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA Start date and time 01/11/18 16:10:16 AERSCREEN 14147 SAN BERNARDINO LOGISTICS CENTER ----------------- DATA ENTRY VALIDATION -------------_-__ METRIC ENGLISH ** AREADATA **--------------- ---------------- Emission Rate: 0.773E-02 g/s 0.613E-01 lb/hr Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet Area Source Length: 409.00 meters 1341.86 feet Area Source Width: 201.00 meters 659.45 feet Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet Model Mode: URBAN Population: 216239 Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet ** BUILDING DATA ** No Building Downwash Parameters ** TERRAIN DATA ** No Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet No flagpole receptors No discrete receptors used ** METEOROLOGY DATA ** Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K -9.7 / 98.3 Deg F Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Dominant Surface Profile: Urban Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture Page 1 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA AERSCREEN output file: San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA.out *** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run ************************************************** SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET Obtaining surface characteristics... Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with.Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000 Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000 Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000 Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000 Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR started 01/11/18 16:11:06 ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Winter Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** Page 2 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 Page 3 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Spring Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** 5 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** Page 4 r ¢ r r San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA r*** NONE *** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20 1A ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** Processing wind flow sector 7 �1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** Running AERMOD Processing Summer Processing surface roughness sector 1 Page 5 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** Page 6 goo moo ph No No no no 110 No do we me 00 0 goo vilik 00 00 so San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Autumn Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 . AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** Page 7 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** Page 8lowj r I� San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA *** NONE *** FLOWSECTOR ended 01/11/18 16:11:39 REFINE started 01/11/18 16:11:39 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** REFINE ended 01/11/18 16:11:42 AERSCREEN Finished Successfully With no errors or warnings Check log file for details *********************************************** of Ending date and time 01/11/18 16:11:42 D 1 r r r r Page 9 M 1 i San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA_ max_conc_distance Concentration Distance Elevation Season/Month Zo sector Date H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-0 LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT 0.33266E+01 1.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34817E+01 25.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36285E+01 50.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37618E+01 75.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38838E+01 100.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39961E+01 125.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40994E+01 150.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41974E+01 175.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42891E+01 200.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.43095E+01 206.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42048E+01 225.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30933E+01 250.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26085E+01 275.01 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22778E+01 300.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20564E+01 325.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 1 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA_max_conc_distance 0.18881E+01 350.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.17424E+01 375.00 0.00 Winter. 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.16150E+01 400.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.15026E+01 425.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.14033E+01 450.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.13145E+01 475.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.12343E+01 500.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.11629E+01 525.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.10977E+01 550.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.10390E+01 575.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.98473E+00 600.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.93582E+00 625.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.89049E+00 650.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.84906E+00 675.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.81107E+00 700.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.77527E+00 725.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 Page 2 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA_max_conc_distance 0.74223E+00 750.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.71180E+00 775.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68369E+00 800.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65697E+00 825.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63218E+00 850.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60893E+00 875.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58718E+00 900.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56685E+00 925.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54738E+00 950.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52913E+00 975.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51200E+00 1000.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49588E+00 1025.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48070E+00 1050.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46639E+00 1075.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45279E+00 1100.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43960E+00 1125.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 3 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA _max_conc_distance 0.42711E+00 1150.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41528E+00 1175.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40407E+00 1200.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39342E+00 1225.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38331E+00 1250.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37370E+00 1275.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36455E+00 1300.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35583E+00 1325.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34743E+00 1350.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33937E+00 1375.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33168E+00 1400.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32434E+00 1425.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31732E+00 1450.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31058E+00 1475.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30411E+00 1500.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29792E+00 1525.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 4 10, 1 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA _max_conc_distance 0.29199E+00 1550.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28632E+00 1575.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28089E+00 1600.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27568E+00 1625.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27069E+00 1650.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26590E+00 1675.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26130E+00 1700.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25682E+00 1725.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25252E+00 1750.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24839E+00 1775.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24442E+00 1800.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24061E+00 1825.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23694E+00 1850.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23341E+00 1875.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23001E+00 1900.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22674E+00 1925.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 5 A 06 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA _max_conc_distance 0.22358E+00 1950.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22055E+00 1975.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21762E+00 2000.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21479E+00 2025.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21207E+00 2050.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20941E+00 2075.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 j 2.0 0.20684E+00 2100.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20435E+00 2125.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20195E+00 2150.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19963E+00 2175.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19738E+00 2200.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19521E+00 2225.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19310E+00 2250.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19107E+00 2275.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18908E+00 2300.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18713E+00 2325.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 6 Bernardino Logistics operational HRA_ max_conc_distance 0-360 10011001 _1,30 San 0.00 Winter 0.18525E+00 2350.00 0.50 10.0 3,10.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21• 6.0 10011001 -1.30 2.0 Winter 2375.00 0.00 1.50 0-360 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 0.18342E+00 6.0 1.000 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21• 10011001 -1.30 2.0 0.00 Winter 2400.00 1.50 0-360 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 0.18164E+00 6.0 1.000 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21• 2.0 Winter 2425.00 0.00 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 0.17991E+00 6.0 1.000 1.50 21• 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 0-360 10011001 -1.30 2.0 0.00 Winter 0.17824E+00 2450.00 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21• 6.0 1.000 10011001 -1.30 2.0 Winter 2475.00 0.00 1.50 0-360 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 0.17661E+00 6.0 1.000 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 2.0 Winter 2500.00 0.00 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 0.17503E+00 .000 1.50 6.0 1 21• 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 0-360 10011001 -1.30 2.0 0.00 Winter 2525.00 0.17349E+00 000 1.50 1. 0.35 0.50 10. 310.0 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999• 21• 6.0 10011001 -1.30 2.0 0.00 Winter 2550.00 1.50 0-360 0.35 0.50 10. 310.0 0.17199E+00 6. 1.000 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 0 2.0 Winter 0.00 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.50 10.0 310.0 0.17055E+00 2575.00 21' 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.043 -9.000 0. 020 -999• 10011001 -1.30 2.0 0.00 Winter 2600.00 1.50 0-360 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 0.16914E+00 6.0 1.000 0.043 -9.000 0. 020 -999• 21• 2.0 . 2625.00 000 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 0.16775E+00 000 1.50 21• 6.0 1. 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 10011001 -1.30 2.0 0.00 Winter 2650.00 1.50 0-360 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 0.16641E+00 6.0 1.000 0.043 -9.000 0. 020 -999• 21• 2.0 . Winter 2675.00 000 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0 0.50 10.0 310.0 0.16509E+00 6.0 1.000 1.50 .35 21. 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999• 0-360 10011001 -1.30 2.0 0.00 Winter 0.16380E+00 2700.00 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 0.043 -9.000 0. 020 -999• 21• 6.0 10011001 - 1.30 2.0 0.00 Winter 2725.00 1.50 0-360 0.35 0.50 10. 310.0 0.16255E+00 6.0 1.000 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999• 21. 2.0 Page 7 OA 04 Ob Ob 0 1 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA_max_conc_distance 0.16132E+00 2750.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16013E+00 2775.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15897E+00 2800.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 2.0 0.0 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2. 0.15783E+00 2825.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 2.0 0.0 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2. 0.15672E+00 2850.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15563E+00 2875.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15457E+00 2900.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15353E+00 2925.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15251E+00 2950.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15152E+00 2975.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15054E+00 3000.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14959E+00 3025.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14865E+00 3050.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14773E+00 3075.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14683E+00 3100.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14594E+00 3125.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 8 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA_max_conc_distance 0.14508E+00 3150.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.14422E+00 3175.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.14337E+00 3200.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.14254E+00. 3225.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.14172E+00 3250.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.14092E+00 3275.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.14013E+00 3300.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.13936E+00 3325.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.13860E+00 3350.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.13785E+00 3375.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.13710E+00 3400.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.13637E+00 3425.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.13564E+00 3450.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.13493E+00 3475.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.13423E+00 3500.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 0.13353E+00 3525.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 2.0 Page 9 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 -1.30 310.0 Page 10 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA 0.13285E+00 3550.00 0.00 _max_conc_distance Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13218E+00 3575.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13152E+00 3600.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13087E+00 3625.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13022E+00 3650.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12959E+00 3675.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 - 2.0 0.12896E+00 3700.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12834E+00 3725.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12934E+00 3750.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 y 0.12872E+00 3775.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12811E+00 3800.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12751E+00 3825.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12691E+00 3850.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12632E+00 3875.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12574E+00 3900.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12517E+00 3925.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 10 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA_max_conc_distance 0.12460E+00 3950.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12404E+00 3975.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12349E+00 4000.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12294E+00 4025.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12240E+00 4050.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12186E+00 4075.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12133E+00 4100.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12081E+00 4125.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12029E+00 4150.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11978E+00 4175.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11927E+00 4200.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11877E+00 4225.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11828E+00 4250.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11779E+00 4275.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11730E+00 4300.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11682E+00 4325.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 11 w w San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA _max_conc_distance 0.11635E+00 4350.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 A 2.0 A 0.11588E+00 4375.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.11541E+00 4400.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 * 2.0 0.11495E+00 4425.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1..50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11450E+00 4450.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11404E+00 4475.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11360E+00 4500.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11315E+00 0.043 4525.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11272E+00 4550.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11228E+00 4575.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 1 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11185E+00 4600.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11143E+00 4625.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 1 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 I 0.11101E+00 4650.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11059E+00 4675.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11017E+00 4700.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10976E+00 4725.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 12 San Bernardino Logistics Operational HRA_max_conc_distance 0.10936E+00 4750.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10895E+00 4775.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10855E+00 4800.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10816E+00 4825.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10777E+00 4850.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10738E+00 4875.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10700E+00 4900.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10661E+00 4925.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10623E+00 4950.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10586E+00 4975.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10549E+00 5000.00 0.00 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 13 S W A P E Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP 2503 Eastbluff Dr., Suite 206 Newport Beach, California 92660 Tel: (949) 887-9013 Fax: (949) 717-0069 Email: mhagemann@swgl2e.com e.com Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization Industrial Stormwater Compliance Investigation and Remediation Strategies Litigation Support and Testifying Expert CEQA Review Education: M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984. B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982. Professional Certification: California Professional Geologist California Certified Hydrogeologist Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner Professional Experience: Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques. Positions Matt has held include: • Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 - present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010. - present; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc (2000 -- 2003); • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 — 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989- 1998); • Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 — 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 — 1998); • Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 —1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 —1998); and • Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 —1986). Senior Regglatojy and Litigation Su ort Analyst: With SWAPE, Matt's responsibilities have included: • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of numerous environmental impact reports under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions and geologic hazards. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a comunity adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells. • Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California. • Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant. With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt's duties included the following: • Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York. • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production -related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi -volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. 2 • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators. Executive Director: As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the dischrge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council. Hydrogeology: As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows: • Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater. • Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases. • Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum. At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui. As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following: • Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water. • Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation. 3 Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer. Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows: • Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements. • Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S. EPA legal counsel. • Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites. With the National Park Service, Matt directed service -wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks: • Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed -scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park. • Identified high -levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup. • Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup. • Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation- wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi -Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan. Policy: Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following: • Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies. • Shaped EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs. • Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region's 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy-making process. • Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 4 Geology With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslo e stability timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows of areas proposed for • Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability. • Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection. • Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon. As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following: • Supervised year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests. • Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal. Teachii e: From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the communit colle levels: Y ge and university At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination. • Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin. Matt currently teaches Physical Geology (lecture and lab) to students at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California. Invited Tt-gimnnv,Re orts Pa ers and Presentations: Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon. Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S. EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California. Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles. Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter -Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant. Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina. Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada. Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City. Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996. Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP -61. Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater. Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL- contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 7 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35. Other E erience: Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009- 2011. 1 � SWAPE HADLEY KATHRYN NOLAN Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment EDUCATION SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE 2656 29th Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, California 90405 Mobile: (678) 551-0836 Office: (310) 452-5555 Fax: (310) 452-5550 Email: hadley(@swape.com `UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES B.S. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS AND SOCIETY JUNE2016 PROJECT EXPERIENCE WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE AIR QUALITY SPECIALIST SENIOR PROJECT ANALYST: CEQA ANALYSIS & MODELING SANTA MONICA, CA b• Modeled construction and operational activities for proposed land use projects using CalEEMod to quantify criteria air pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. �• Organized presentations containing figures and tables that compare results of criteria air pollutant analyses to thresholds. �• Quantified ambient air concentrations at sensitive receptor locations using AERSCREEN, a U.S. EPA recommended screening level dispersion model. ;• Conducted construction and operational health risk assessments for residential, worker, and school children sensitive receptors. ■• Prepared reports that discuss adequacy of air quality and health risk analyses conducted for proposed land use developments ■ subject to CEQA review by verifying compliance with local, state, and regional regulations. k-ENIOR PROJECT ANALYST: GREENHOUSE GAS MODELING AND DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE �• Evaluated environmental impact reports for proposed projects to identify discrepancies with the methods used to quantify and assess GHG impacts. �• Quantified GHG emissions for proposed projects using CalEEMod to produce reports, tables, and figures that compare emissions to applicable CEQA thresholds and reduction targets. �• Determined compliance of proposed land use developments with AB 32 GHG reduction targets, with GHG significance thresholds recommended by Air Quality Management Districts in California, and with guidelines set forth by CEQA. PROJECT ANALYST: ASSESSMENT OF AIR QUALITY IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED DIRECT TRANSFER FACILITY �• Assessed air quality impacts resulting from implementation of a proposed Collection Service Agreement for Exclusive Residential ■� and Commercial Garbage, Recyclable Materials, and Organic Waste Collection Services for a community. '• Organized tables and maps to demonstrate potential air quality impacts resulting from proposed hauling trip routes. • Conducted air quality analyses that compared quantified criteria air pollutant emissions released during construction of direct transfer facility to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's (BAAQMD) significance thresholds. + Prepared final analytical report to demonstrate local and regional air quality impacts, as well as GHG impacts. %PROJECT ANALYST: EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT OF LEAD PRODUCTS FOR PROPOSITION 65 COMPLIANCE DETERMINATION i• Calculated human exposure and lifetime health risk for over 300 lead products undergoing Proposition 65 compliance review. �• Compiled and analyzed laboratory testing data and produced tables, charts, and graphs to exhibit emission levels. • Compared finalized testing data to Proposition 65 Maximum Allowable Dose Levels (MADLs) to determine level of compliance. • Prepared final analytical lead exposure Certificate of Merit (COM) reports and organized supporting data for use in environmental enforcement statute Proposition 65 cases. ACCOMPLISHMENTS Academic Honoree, Dean's List, University of California, Los Angeles MAR 2013, MAR 2014, JAN 2015, JAN 2016 ATTACHMENT C SMITH ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT January 15, 2018 Mr. Richard Drury Lozeau Drury 410 12th Street, Suite 250 Oakland, CA 94607 Subject: San Bernardino Logistics Center Project IS/MND Dear Mr. Drury: At your request, I have reviewed the Initial Study/proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (the "IS/MND") for the San Bernardino Logistics Center Project (the "Project") in the City of San Bernardino (the "City"). The Project involves a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Change to replace the current designation of Multiple Family Residential Medium High (RMH-20) in the City's General Plan and Residential Medium High (RMH) in the City's Zoning Code to Industrial Light (IL) and construction of up to a 450,000 square foot logistics warehouse, 20,000 square feet of which would be office space. My review is specific to the traffic and transportation section of the IS/MND and its supporting documentation. My qualifications to perform this review include registration as a Civil and Traffic Engineer in California and over 49 years professional consulting engineering practice in the traffic and transportation industry. I have both prepared and performed adequacy reviews of numerous transportation and circulation sections of environmental impact reports prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) including warehouse developments. My professional resume is attached. Findings of my review are summarized below. Compatibility With Existing Adjacent Land Uses Is Questionable �sP0R r \ i 100 • \1A NAG, _nii:N 1 5311 Lown Road. Union Cit;. (.A 9-}58- tcl: -510. 4'i has: 5!0.-489.9-}7l Mr. Richard Drury January 15, 2018 Page 2 Abutting lands to the east, north and northern half of the west side of the site are all developed as residential uses. The wisdom of developing a warehouse use that attracts heavy truck traffic immediately adjacent to residential uses is questionable. We note that the Figure 3 site plan in the IS/MND is different from the corresponding Figure 2 site plan in the Appendix E Traffic Impact Study in that the heavy truck loading bays are shown at the north end of the site in the Traffic Impact Study where they would be more impactful to surrounding residential development and at the south end of the site in the IS/MND where they would be somewhat less detrimental to adjacent residential uses. Please confirm that the site plan shown as Figure 3 in the IS/MND is the intended site plan for the Project and not that shown in Appendix E, Figure 2. We note that the circular logic of the IS/MND's Table K, Land Use Policy Consistency Analysis, wherein, with regard to Policy 2.2.1 Ensure compatibility between land uses and quality design through adherence to the standards and regulations in the Development Code and policies and guidelines in the Community Design Element. (LU -1) the IS/MND concludes that because the Project involves changing the General Plan and Zoning designation from medium high residential to Industrial Light that there is no conflict with land use policy. This is merely evasive nonsense that is inconsistent with the good faith effort to disclose impact required by CEQA. The conflict with good land use policy inherent in introducing a warehousing use into what heretofore has been a contiguous residential area is not avoided or mitigated by just changing the General Plan and Zoning designation for the Project site. We also note that spot zoning is improper under California law. Site Plan Dimensions Are Inadequate For Heavy Truck Maneuvering The IS/MND Figure 3 site plan shows 60 -foot truck loading bays and a 40 foot maneuvering apron between the bays and the trailer storage spaces. However, Callifornia Legal tractor -trailer rigs can be up to 65 feet in length and STAA' trucks can be 69 feet in length. Hence, if such trucks use the proposed facility, they will extend beyond the loading bays and into the maneuvering apron. Most of these trucks can turn on a 50 foot radius- some require a 60 foot radius. Hence, trucks of these dimensions maneuvering into and out of the loading bays will overrun the maneuvering apron and into the trailer storage area by as much as 15 to 20 feet or more. Even the less than 60 -foot rigs shown on the site plan will overrun the apron into the trailer storage area. The site plan should be ' The STAA designation refers to the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (STAA), that allows large trucks to operate on the Interstate and certain Federal Aid Primary System routes collectively called the National Network. rr.:\1 i !( • i is ".Xsr1)R T ri1)N • NIAN:�ct_�irN r 3311 Lcnvn' Rd. L!niun City. C;� ) }51 tcl: 510.-189.9-}' lac: 510.489.941-8 Mr. Richard Drury January 15, 2018 Page 3 redone to provide adequate maneuvering areas for the trucks that will call at the site.2 Use of the Fontana Truck Rates for the Proposed Project Is Inappropriate The IS/MND and its supporting traffic study calculates the portion of the Project's trip generation that would be comprised of heavy trucks and the composition of that truck fleet based on the 2003 City of Fontana Truck Trip Generation Study. While that study was a path -blazing study in its time, it was based on a small and localized data sample. The data was collected in 2002 and is now 16 years old. Based on much more extensive and recent study, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has issued its own guidance for analysis of truck traffic at warehouse facilities. The table below contrasts the guidance of the Fontana study versus that of SCAQMD3. FONTANA SCAQMD % Trips By Auto 79.6 60 % Tri s B Heav Truck 20.4 40 % Trucks 4+ Axle 60.34 60.35 % Trucks 3 Axle 22.71 22.71 % Trucks 2 Axle 16.95 16.94 As can be seen from the table, use of the modern SCAQMD rates results in about twice as many heavy trucks and twice as many of the heaviest trucks than use of the Fontana rates that were relied on in the IS/MND traffic analysis. This affects the total trip generation in passenger car equivalents (PCEs) which in turn affect the LOS calculations at intersections, the number of long vehicles (which affects queue storage requirements — particularly where entries are exclusively or predominantly by truck, and the air quality and greenhouse gas emissions analysis. If the passenger car equivalent trip distribution had been compiled relying on the distribution of vehicle type percentages in accordance with the SCAQMD statistics, the trip generation analysis would have found that the daily trip generation of the warehouse would be 1275 passenger car equivalents instead of the 1021 indicated on Table D of the supporting Appendix E traffic impact study. This is a 24.9 percent increase over the PCE trip generation in the traffic '- Dimensions and maneuvering requirements for heavy trucks can be found in Caltrans Highway Design Manual, Figure 404.2 and Figure 404.7 A through D. 3 See htt www.a md. ov docs default -source ce a handbook hi h -cube -warehouse -tri -rate-stud - for -air ualit -anal sis hi h-cube-resource-caleemod-a endix-e. df?sfvrsn=2, p. 15. 5311 Lown Road. Union Cit:. CA 94587 tcl: 510.459.9477 I;ic: Si0.489.9478 Mr. Richard Drury January 15, 2018 Page 4 study. Similarly, the PCE trip generation of the Project would be 85 in the AM peak and 96 in the PM peak instead of the respective values of 68 and 76 in Appendix D. This scale of difference could alter the conclusions of the traffic study as well as the air quality/greenhouse gas studies. Hence, the entire analysis should be redone using the proper modern data on truck share and truck fleet composition data. This truck data should also be used in the Air Quality analysis for the Project. Parking Provisions Appear Out -Of -Scale With Use The IS/MND and the Traffic Study do not discuss on-site parking provisions. However, the IS/MND site plan shows a total of 305 parking spaces for light duty passenger vehicles. If drivers of just 50 percent of the vehicles those spaces are intended to serve commute in the peak hours, that would be a peak hour passenger vehicle trip generation of 153 passenger vehicle trips; if only 40 percent, the peak hour trips would be 122. Both these numbers are vastly more than the 40 and 43 AM and PM peak hour passenger vehicle trips than the Appendix E traffic study estimates. This suggests that the site plan is either egregiously over -parked or that the applicant intends to convert the space to a use much more traffic -intense than a typical high -cube warehouse use. The IS/MND and the traffic study must clarify the relationship of parking provisions to the proposed use. We also note that the traffic analysis does not specifically account for the 20,000 square feet of office space that is proposed. Trip Generation, 9th Edition indicates that use in the General Office category (Category 710) generates11.03 trips per thousand square feet per day, 1.56 trips per thousand square feet in the AM peak and 1.49 trips per thousand square feet in the PM peak. The corresponding rates for logistics warehouse are 1.68 trips per thousand square feet daily, 0.11 in the AM peak and 0.12 in the PM peak. In other words, office use generates 6.6 times more traffic than an equivalent square footage of logistics warehouse on a daily basis and 12 to 13 times more traffic in the AM and PM peak hours. Traffic Impacts And Mitigation The IS/MND and the Appendix E traffic impact study disclose the Project as having significant traffic impacts at three analysis intersections at some or all of the analysis scenarios considered. As the analysis was performed, it was found that all of the impacts could be mitigated by converting the affected intersections from two-way stop control to 4 -way stop control. However, it is unknown if these mitigations would be sufficient had the Project's trip generation been properly calculated as detailed in the sections above. A recalculation of the trip generation and corresponding revision of the level of service analyses is required. IRA1I1(: • IRA\'>P0kT\ I 10N • N1A\AC;is\1LN'1 3311 LoNvrty Rtmd. Union Cir:, CA 94,387 [cl: 510.489.9477 fIm 310.489.1)476 Mr. Richard Drury January 15, 2018 Page 5 Moreover, although the calculation data shows this, neither the IS/MND nor Appendix E disclose that the primary beneficiaries of the mitigations are the Project's traffic and the minor amount of other traffic moving east -west in the Sixth Street Corridor. The mitigations are to the detriment of the heavier volumes of traffic on the crossing north -south streets. Conclusion This concludes my current comments on the San Bernardino Logistics Center Project IS/MND. For the reasons stated above, the traffic analysis is inadequate and revised traffic, air quality and greenhouse gas analyses should be performed. Sincerely, Smith Engineering & Management A California Corporation Daniel T. Smith Jr., P.E. President IV Nc :0 No. 0938 M i b Cr.r, y�S. Ex p. � ,—�--- 8: 5311 Lomv Road. Union Cit:'. CA 94587 tcl: 510_-}89.94'7 lax: .510.489-9476 Mr. Richard Drury January 15, 2018 Page 6 Attachment 1 Resume of Daniel T. Smith Jr., P.E. I !; "I i !( • i is \N>,P0 i TA I ION • n!ANAcenII N r 5311 Lown- Rorni. Union City. CA 94587 til: 510A89.9477 I:lc: 510.4,N.9478 Mr. Richard Drury January 15, 2018 Page 7 N -k C. E !vf f.. K T 1 : N 6 1 N NIA DA' ffiLT - SNHTM Jr. Presidest EDUCATION 1967 1961, PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Cabbraia NO. 21913 (civil) Nevada No_ 7M(Civil) WasbngamNo. 29337QCivi1) Cabibm"No. 918(Tiff1c) Arizona No. 22131 (Ciuil) pRGMS1OXALF_�E1E1iF.'+10E S,ifa Eagneerjug & ManapmmiL 1993 W presem. We0dent- Engine DM Associates 179 w 1993. FamderNice president PEhd* Tr-q-taxion 'r' De Lars, Cather & COmPaW. 1969 W 1979. Senior ThWPottadnu PlMroff- p.mnAT.cWdesmdprWcte.j - — —hld-- Mpt," Cm1tjmZ_ prmdes Emsdtton, in_tpij-5 and expert witam tE,�, is bigbwy demgn. transitdesign md1,ff1 111�1� EAUM �mduftg condetnuatmas mvoNW tc-q—mlim mxess issued traffic acudm% mvokmg blit dest;g, or mffi, upeering fw=,;-. land we md &wdqm-t —Ms 1OLvolving access and transporWicu imparts: parking and o&er taffic and m4mtatibn 1032EM Urban CIIM" StsdieslAttermfim Analyspr �al-iu-cbarge f- Sale. R (M 102 Feas;IW St(*- a . in Prograln. 35-M-3efreeway mti=me=study north OfSammi b- Cm1vd1=GmI-280Interstate TansfEr Cot San Framcism. an AAIEIS for completion, of 1-280, demolition of Embiatcadera free ray. -bsdme h& rag and conaraw rail projects Primcir 1-i.� SR 219 cerridw fteeway�eqtre—ay desiEV'W&=mmW study. Sarruento, Nw&mt Area multi -modal rMVM=- C—d- stody Hayward (ClIff.) PFCJect -mR-W- pardand, Oream project Tral L�W Smdy� md Harbor DnVe 7735C StUdY- -91mtanon pawner En I -SON West Tem Nfiddgm DiTemd staff on 1-90 , deign Of surface segment of Aloodward Corridor LRT. DeTcOit- manager fo'effloE Cawdor Su* (Sarrarueoto_San F_risro� US lo,_Scwm fremay,opmriom study, SR 92 National St studim Sartamem RTD light raj sr fre—Y OP -1— '1#' I_SSO fleewq Operations study. SR 152 Ago ARr elgension plmEIR, SRs 71199 syvterms mAy. Tamm Corridor LRT AA"Ev- Fremont`-%— SP'�uP B fi at eosin m -es =#, mad Rx1roOndmimay (SK 93) design studY sporfttio], p1M. p mm Cat} Bud PlAn Area Tram r�jn dWEE for ryanspOMODU de of C, of TAs Angeles Ge F"oneu'Ork' shaping ciaoians largest city two decades �nm 21%t cmmuy- PF*d manager?" the MnWtratiou element of 300-arre NbSsion Bay development m dawntown San Francisco. Mission Bay im-olms 7 m2hm Pf Officecocurogrcki Vw-e. 8,500 dwelline unin, and community &Wilies- Tram-TOrt3ho" fealur- indud"O'cation LRT - of r -I . a ��modg tmmng for LRT, commurer rail and local om,,w, nil s-urim ellanijon of ML)N -Metro mad 'way removal of a quer m& elevated freemm)- TEFINSmEnt by um' ramps and a bm'Lnwd; an imenual way ne,v& ,,cm= coostmrs imposed by an internal tidal basro; fre , strucrares and ra2 facJititiEC and concept pleas for 20,000 structured parking spaces. Frillyfig CnrWanon phn W acCOMIMOd" 9 Bell,,, (Wah). pmapal-m-rhareg for 64 acre, 2 nallion million esf of OfficeXOMD-1 910-h m d—w—nAirPO Pf =�j-use complex for F-mC adjacent 10 &m Jose hmmari"'al port - Project manager for Ir" r" 'ill of &1crAMMM Capitol Area. PLm for the stale goy cal comp s, anis far Downtown SmaanmMi) Redev'PLO nren plan.PID' Un Fel for Nava . (Calif.) GarL-1 Plan CiIC1313ficm Element and Dowelom Riverffml R mem 0, an jalk—. Program f- d ntnanIt Creek, an downtown trams -ftti- plan for San Mateo and red maem Plan for dou m1OWu M=tM LTiew (calif.), for Uaffv- cucrdabom and sifiety plans for CabDrnia ones of Davis, Aeasam 11111 and HaNward, and for Salem, orepm 1'::.i. 1. J.. 7 _1041-: G i I L N i J\ k F S311 1-()%vl\' R -Ii- U111" (-.1" (-.A 9)45 671 LC -1: 510.469.9477; �1 ` A ijl l Lown Road. Union Citc. CAA 4 8' Lcl: 510.489.947; las_ 5!0.4899478 P4 k Mr. Richard Drury January 15, 2018 Page 8 Transportation Centers. Project manager for Daly City Intermodal Study which developed a $7 million surface bus terminal, traffic access, parking and pedestrian circulation improvements at the Daly City BART station plus development of functional plans for a new BART station at Colma. Project manager for design of multi -modal terminal (commuter rail, light rail, bus) at Mission Bay, San Francisco. In Santa Clarita Long Range Transit Development Program, responsible for plan to relocate system's existing timed -transfer hub and development of three satellite transfer hubs. Performed airport ground transportation system evaluations for San Francisco International, Oakland International, Sea -Tac International, Oakland International, Los Angeles International, and San Diego Lindberg. Campus Transportation. Campus transportation planning assignments for UC Davis, UC Berkeley, UC Santa Cruz and UC San Francisco Medical Center campuses; San Francisco State University; University of San Francisco; and the University of Alaska and others. Also developed master plans for institutional campuses including medical centers, headquarters complexes and research & development facilities. Special Event Facilities. Evaluations and design studies for football/baseball stadiums, indoor sports arenas, horse and motor racing facilities, theme parks, fairgrounds and convention centers, ski complexes and destination resorts throughout western United States. Parking. Parking programs and facilities for large area plans and individual sites including downtowns, special event facilities, university and institutional campuses and other large site developments; numerous parking feasibility and operations studies for parking structures and surface facilities; also, resident preferential parking. Transportation System Management & Traffic Restraint. Project manager on FHWA program to develop techniques and guidelines for neighborhood street traffic limitation. Project manager for Berkeley, (Calif.), Neighborhood Traffic Study, pioneered application of traffic restraint techniques in the U.S. Developed residential traffic plans for Menlo Park, Santa Monica, Santa Cruz, Mill Valley, Oakland, Palo Alto, Piedmont, San Mateo County, Pasadena, Santa Ana and others. Participated in development of photo/radar speed enforcement device and experimented with speed humps. Co-author of Institute of Transportation Engineers reference publication on neighborhood traffic control. ' Bicycle Facilities. Project manager to develop an FHWA manual for bicycle facility design and planning, on bikeway plans for Del Mar, (Calif.), the UC Davis and the City of Davis. Consultant to bikeway plans for Eugene, Oregon, Washington, D.C., Buffalo, New York, and Skokie, Illinois. Consultant to U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for development of hydraulically efficient, bicycle safe drainage inlets. Consultant on FHWA research on effective retrofits of undercrossing and overcrossing structures for bicyclists, pedestrians, and handicapped. MEMBERSHIPS Institute of Transportation Engineers Transportation Research Board PUBLICATIONS AND AWARDS Residential Street Design and Traffic Control, with W. Homburger et al. Prentice Hall, 1989. Co -recipient, Progressive Architecture Citation, Mission Bay Master Plan, with I.M. Pei WRT Associated, 1984. Residential Traffic Management, State of the Art Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1979. Improving The Residential Street Environment, with Donald Appleyard et al., U.S. Department of Transportation, 1979. Strategic Concepts in Residential Neighborhood Traffic Control, International Symposium on Traffic Control Systems, Berkeley, California, 1979. Planning and Design of Bicycle Facilities: Pitfalls and New Directions, Transportation Research Board, Research Record 570, 1976. Co -recipient, Progressive Architecture Award, Livable Urban Streets, San Francisco Bay Area and London, with Donald Appleyard, 1979. A A �1 ` A ijl l Lown Road. Union Citc. CAA 4 8' Lcl: 510.489.947; las_ 5!0.4899478 P4 k ATTACHMENT D Shawn Smallwood, PhD 3108 Finch Street Davis, CA 95616 Oliver Mujica, Planning Division Manager City of San Bernardino Soo North "D" Street, San Bernardino, CA 92418 9 January 2018 RE: San Bernardino Logistics Center Initial Study Dear Mr. Mujica, I write to comment on the Initial Study (IS) prepared for the proposed San Bernardino Logistics Center, which I understand is to be an increase in distribution warehousing of 450,000 square feet on 20.3 acres in the City of San Bernardino. My qualifications for preparing expert comments are the following. I earned a Ph.D. degree in Ecology from the University of California at Davis in 1990, where I subsequently worked for four years as a post -graduate researcher in the Department of Agronomy and Range Sciences. My research has been on animal density and distribution, habitat selection, habitat restoration, interactions between wildlife and human infrastructure and activities, conservation of rare and endangered species, and on the ecology of invading species. I have authored numerous papers on special -status species issues, including "Using the best scientific data for endangered species conservation," published in Environmental Management (Smallwood et al. 1999), and "Suggested standards for science applied to conservation issues" published in the Transactions of the Western Section of The Wildlife Society (Smallwood et al. 2001). I served as Chair of the Conservation Affairs Committee for The Wildlife Society — Western Section. I am a member of The Wildlife Society and the Raptor Research Foundation, and I've been a part-time lecturer at California State University, Sacramento. I was also Associate Editor of wildlife biology's premier scientific journal, The Journal of Wildlife Management, as well as of Biological Conservation, and I was on the Editorial Board of Environmental Management. I have performed wildlife surveys in California for thirty-three years. Over these years, I studied the impacts of human activities and human infrastructure on wildlife, including on golden eagle, Swainson's hawk, burrowing owl, San Joaquin kangaroo rat, mountain lion and other species. I have also performed wildlife surveys at many proposed project sites. I also collaborate with colleagues worldwide on the underlying science and policy issues related to anthropogenic impacts on wildlife. I have performed research on wildlife mortality caused by wind turbines, electric distribution lines, agricultural practices, and road traffic. My CV is attached. BIOLOGICAL IMPACTS ASSESSMENT According to LSA Associates (2017:24), "The nearest critical habitat to the project site is for endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat approximately 0.5 mile southeast of the site. Therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact to candidate, sensitive, or special status species." Critical habitat is relevant to impacts assessments of Threatened and Endangered species, but not to other sensitive and special -status species that are supposed to be addressed in CEQA reviews. The Initial Study conflates its assessment of critical habitat occurrence to all sensitive and special -status species, effectively applying a false standard of environmental assessment. Furthermore, 0.5 miles is not very far from critical habitat of San Bernardino kangaroo rat. Members of this species can easily traverse 0.5 miles, and could do under an hour. Using a thermal imaging camera at night, I have witnessed kangaroo rats traveling over long distances very quickly. Half a mile is not far away for dispersing kangaroo rats. LSA Associates (2017:25) wrote, "Of the special interest species known to occur in the general area, only the burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) could potentially be found on site." This conclusion is false. Many special -status species can occur on the proposed project site (Table 1). As far as I could determine from the Initial Study, no surveys were performed for reptiles or amphibians, for sign or otherwise of fossorial small mammals, for up to a dozen special -status species of bat, for resident or migrating birds (Table 1). Based on habitat affinities and geographic range overlap, I tallied 56 special -status species as possibly or probably using the site for foraging, refuge, roosting, breeding, or for all purposes (Table 1). I doubt that all 56 of these species use this site currently, but without looking for these species it would be scientifically indefensible to claim that they are all absent from the site. After falsely claiming that burrowing owl is the only special -status species with potential to occur on the site, LSA Associates characterized burrowing owl ecology in ways that implied lower likelihood of occurrence on the site. For example, LSA Associates (2017:25) wrote, "They require large open expanses of sparsely vegetated areas on gently sloping or level terrain with an abundance of active small mammal burrows." Whereas habitat capacity increases with larger expanses of open space (Smallwood 2002, 2015), 20.3 acres could support a dozen nesting pairs of burrows owls and many more given the project site's adjacency to even larger expanses of open space. And whereas habitat capacity increases with an abundance of small mammal burrows, in my >20 years of surveying for burrowing owls I have often found them using spaces under concrete pads or in rock crevices or in whatever spaces they can find. The claim that burrowing owls require an abundance of small mammal burrows is incorrect. According to LSA Associates (2017:25), "This species requires the use of rodent or other burrows for roosting or nesting." As pointed out above, no, they do not require rodent burrows. In a six-year study of nesting burrowing owls numbering 24 to 42 pairs per year, each year I found about a third of the nesting pairs using concrete half -rounds, the eroded spaces under concrete ditch -liners, and in hollowed spaces under asphalt pads (Smallwood and Morrison, manuscript in review). I have also found them nesting or roosting in culverts, hollowed utility poles, rock caves, pipes, and erosional features. Burrowing owls will make use of whatever is available, so it would be inappropriate to conclude absence from a site based on availability of small mammal burrows. Even if a site is not used for nesting, it would be inappropriate to conclude absence because burrowing owls nesting or roosting nearby are likely foraging on the proposed project site. Eliminating foraging habitat has adverse consequences for a species like burrowing owl, and these consequences are no less severe than eliminating nesting habitat; that is, nesting habitat is of no use without foraging habitat. LSA Associates (2017:25) inappropriately injects uncertainty into the likelihood of the site's suitability as burrowing owl habitat, "The project site features sparse vegetation and bare ground that may be suitable burrowing owl habitat." It would have been more accurate to write that the site "is suitable" instead of "may be suitable." Any biologist with even minimal experience with burrowing owls should conclude that this site is suitable burrowing owl foraging habitat. In my investigations, both day and night, the conditions on the proposed project site are ideal as burrowing owl foraging habitat (Smallwood et al. 2009, 2013, Smallwood 2016). Even if burrowing owls nest on nearby properties, which they do according to eBird postings, then based on my experience I would expect these owls to fly to the proposed project site as part of their foraging range. Using my thermal camera at night I have often observed burrowing owls fly up to 400 in from their nest burrows for foraging. The standards expected from CDFW (2012) for assessing impacts to burrowing owl appear in Table 2. Because detection surveys were not performed, all but one of CDFW's (2012) 39 standards were not met in the Initial Study (Table 2). As far as I can determine from the Initial Study, not even a habitat survey was performed at the proposed project site. Following a review of occurrence and habitat suitability data bases, a habitat survey would be the first step in what are referred to as detection surveys. The first step of detection surveys was not taken, nor were any other steps recommended by CDFW (2012). I will add that the CDFW recommendations were prepared by a scientist who earned her PhD on research she performed on burrowing owls, and I'll further add that the recommendations built on decades of guidelines developed and widely circulated by professional biologists working on burrowing owls. There are scientifically sound reasons for the detection survey standards recommended in CDFW (2012). The City of San Bernardino should follow the guidelines. The Initial Study did not present any evidence that wildlife professionals performed surveys for special -status species on the proposed project site — not for burrowing owls and not for any species. Not looking for wildlife is the surest way to not find them. Data bases were cited in support of the extraordinary claim that the site is possibly only suitable for burrowing owl, but such data bases cannot provide defensible evidence of absence unless the data bases are designed appropriately, i.e., based on data from protocol -level detection surveys. Only evidence of presence can be ascertained from such data bases, and the problem here is that not all sites are surveyed, and not all survey results are reported to the data bases. One cannot rely on species absences in these data bases for determining absence on a given site. One data base that was available, but apparently not consulted was eBird (https://eBird.org). A quick review of eBird turned up 15 postings of burrowing owl sightings within 500 m of the proposed project site. One posting at a site only 400 m south of the project site included the note, "The best place to see this bird anywhere away from the Salton Sea." The eBird site also included postings of photos of burrowing owls nesting and roosting within 500 m of the proposed project site. Additionally, it included multiple postings of other special -status species of bird in the project area (Table 1). A quick review of eBird alone makes the case for preparation of an EIR in preparation for this project. My quick review of eBird also turned up nearby sightings of multiple other special - status species of bird, including 17 species of raptor and 11 other bird species. Some of these sightings included substantial evidence such as video or photos. A ferruginous hawk was photographed near the site. The available evidence suggests that the area remains rich in special -status species. The proposed project site should be surveyed thoroughly, given this evidence. Wildlife Movement It was not until the mitigation section that the Initial Study addressed the project's potential impacts on wildlife movement. The Initial Study applied a false CEQA standard to conclude the project will have no significant impact on wildlife movement in the region. The Initial Study focused on wildlife corridors, and said the project site does not overlap with a wildlife corridor. But the standard is whether a project will "Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors..." The primary phrase of the standard goes to wildlife movement regardless of whether the movement is channeled by a corridor. It would be absurd to conclude that wildlife do not forage on the site or that they do not stop over on the site during migration. Birds cannot fly through buildings, and neither can kangaroo rats safely negotiate their ways through them. It would be absurd to conclude that the project would have no impact on wildlife movement in the region. Of course it would. To assess whether the project would interfere with wildlife movement in the region, it would be important to determine whether migrating species stop over on the proposed project site. Surveys could be performed for this purpose, or one could review the available literature to assess the likelihood of particular special -status species use of stop -over habitat during migration. Another method for assessing impacts on movement would be to search the site for trails or watch it at night using a thermal imaging camera. Radar is another tool that could be used to detect nocturnal travel by terrestrial animals, migrating birds, or bats. Without making a serious effort to ascertain whether and how wildlife move across the proposed project site, there is no defensible basis for concluding that the project will have no significant impact on wildlife movement in the region. Lr LO LrLo Lr L: 3 0 0 0 0 0 Lr m 0 0 0 0 0 0 v, as=" CO co "'M p, Lr Lr cr �UUUVUUUUQQ cq �TIT a, � U)U)��U)wrUnUUUU Q QQu) UUUuU QvQQ .N ti Z) . Z cs In tn� O 4- ~ r ' z$ .� tn CL cnv 'ts •� o 0 0 0 o cs o 0 0 0 �' 0 •N N � o N PL CL0 ��� a 2 QO — QL)—. z.' ��0.,�U�UN�ggU�4 W WWU W��WW wWh� a� x 0 _ � 0 'Li CZ O O x x 4- x x NCL �•• O C6 } 3 1x 0cz 3 z~ a> o bczo Q 3 x7� a) :b4 CD tg :~ 3 Qi Sir N ^O �" O t, cz 0 S� CCS U �"UC"' ci0UCoocnUuU)E- UD i Z'"�"•'O c� s.. S-, ��U� aaaac7 Ln o a �co CIS a� � CO ;-4 (40 o° Lr 4� 00 00 > 4�� 0 0 �4�r ���� ���� 0 0 W 0 0 0 ^ 0 0 0 w rd +; ' o C rd rd -d rd Ts rs 4 ; rs 0 wo o�0 a� O aU Q, a� a) - � • a.n;s���.o IPL4 va a) .cn w U) v2 W UO ° �•- 3 WD tICw ...,as v o 0 cd z 0 � cd cd ++ ccs cd c� m cC cd �o o 0 o o 0 0 0 0�o000000 000)000caws-aaaaaG�r, Aft www r=,rS,www ,PL, Lr LO LrLo Lr L: 3 0 0 0 0 0 Lr m 0 0 0 0 0 0 v, as=" CO co "'M p, Lr Lr cr �UUUVUUUUQQ cq �TIT a, � U)U)��U)wrUnUUUU Q QQu) UUUuU QvQQ .N ti Z) . Z cs In tn� O 4- ~ r ' z$ .� tn CL cnv 'ts •� o 0 0 0 o cs o 0 0 0 �' 0 •N N � o N PL CL0 ��� a 2 QO — QL)—. z.' ��0.,�U�UN�ggU�4 W WWU W��WW wWh� a� x 0 _ � 0 'Li CZ O O x x 4- x x NCL �•• O C6 } 3 1x 0cz 3 z~ a> o bczo Q 3 x7� a) :b4 CD tg :~ 3 Qi Sir N ^O �" O t, cz 0 S� CCS U �"UC"' ci0UCoocnUuU)E- UD i Z'"�"•'O c� s.. S-, ��U� aaaac7 Ln 0 a� b4- 5 0 c Wim( 4-1 wco rd L a o 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 o rd rd , a rd rd rd ° r O 4 a� pa O P4 C� Gq +� W W i� '•d O a� rd a� a� a� vj a� a� a� pa O TC/) s-. s: �: 'v� is s- s O a� x0 0 00 NO00000000 0 v,C/)U) V,�v)U,v)aarrSrrrU N U L) �'riW �W C/)�4 cf) C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 vaw Qw rW�,v cnv a �u C\l c -C4 CA �Vo�Ci cdo aixaaa�a� ��w ��cn������� C� O ;z, w ~ cu O O U 0 m U N 1.0 3� � 03� :n 3 3 � °° ° ° O � =1 cn 4-1 o UcA ° ° o' o�cz a a a " " o °' o o'er o �a�x Uv�Oaa ��c�Oc7�, �HUa.H�t„ar�,a� ]U� Lo �A ] § 9 \ § Lo � § CO 0 � % �4— C) d U) m - 1-4 \� C - _.3 CZ \ � % ) 4- J % ° P4 00 / C) & D / § / A 44� 4- c rz� \ a) / cz 4. �./ \ CO = = o o C) � /q DO = m d t o Cd �o =mm \ \ � & m k § ;-4 d v 0 0 � c \ ';-4 4 \ o � o / (cz cz 2G .2 e--, ® C) F, a��«���� a o 'cz & m o UO ;-4 m.[ C) rc� � o = c bJD �'{ \ .- = m u C', 2'§ w cn 0 \ § � W / Z ; § C CA � / f o U bJD \ \ m = U § ul- ƒ � m % 4�_ / © ND o 7Z� m c CZ a 2 � _ .cn » Piko v z z z z za zea a z z cz o C o cd •� cu a) cd o y-C, v) :b O ,o b rd sE rd +a, as: +r O U .� ++ tS 4-4 � +r V p +' O O O O O cn O to p .� U y 4. C}'C tU-4 'v 4 110 O O Cn O '" o U cn Q d Lr ° tn c� o p o o o 0 0 Ici o 0} poo v? �Z' �Z Z oZ Z Z z 'ccZa� O z UEo 0 aro z 0 0 v � 3 `v °. ... O 12 12 is w a; cu o ° cz cz m cz o o ;-4° 0 o wo U O a `� � Cd o UO cn +-+ 3 cz o z ; I PL CIO SU -f i..'cn0 1 Cv O NO bhp O cd N $ncd N> p a) U 4 ' b ,O —• U O Z3 O U +, O ) cn� cd Co s. U � CCS ¢, _ f=, .--• +, U ^ + U cnCZ sr cz S•". . O O p �, + , dA s • c� co 4-1 cz cz o> C�j U cz o153 't7 U o cu w Www �W U La �,U�-+�^^•�� o cn cz -0 U C3 a) 00 i 00 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 z z zzzzzz z z z z z z z 0 a o o -db ti b -d b b b -6 -d 4-4 cd O o P. 0 0 0 0 o O o O o 0 0 0 O w w P4 a a a P4 QI a u, U c c ( cn a �a b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z zh zzzzzz z z z z z z z b 0 � U U 'b � U v� •� va cd 'r �U ;�4 O b (U O ;-4 cz U U a CZ x U)x :� � � � bO 110rL 3 v] CV Q''d r. N U cd O 'al `n b rd U O U 3 O O a ,, 3 p cd N cn U °O O`er 4-1 � N 0 Ocn n O �� ami G�Lrcd +� O U 't3 cid �-' cd 0 rd N° N �" sccn cS `d Ir.CZ� ~ w cd A 00��0� 0tc 000 o ���o �3 o U+ w `+ U U 3 C/) � �' cd `� U C) Cis cd UblQ U U w + +�cd O n .Q O tip }' U O U N 0 7' zzzzz zzzz 0 a Uj cd cz CU CZ O N O U rcj a -j O Q) O O bA ct . U O o w a a °' w A rn DOcna CZ s N co 1 z zz zz z zzz 0 Uj cd cz CU CZ O N O U rcj a -j O Q) O O bA ct . U O o 3 rn CZ s N 1 U O0 � Q v� U ' O �. • cz bO cz 3 ° �° CL Ncz cn to 5 o `+ O•�~ `a 3,�� . cz O . Q cocn O'Z� � O OQ am. z y `~' � � cn ' � 12)CLQ 7R z O O O c En U) > U O c+. Q, O w d U O CZ UCL cz O U O �- cn N'41 O U n U Q N Lo cz C)-, 0 Traffic Impacts on Wildlife The Initial Study made no attempt to estimate impacts on wildlife that will be caused by increased traffic on roadways servicing the project. Vehicle collisions have accounted for the deaths of many thousands of reptile, amphibian, mammal, bird, and arthropod fauna, and the impacts have often been found to be significant at the population level (Forman et al. 2003). It is likely project -related traffic impacts will far exceed the impacts of land conversion to a warehouse. But not one word of traffic -related impacts appears in the Initial Study — a gross shortfall of the CEQA review. As an example of road mortality impacts, a recent study of mortality along a 2.5 mile stretch of Vasco Road in Contra Costa County, California, revealed 1,275 carcasses of 49 species of mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles over 15 months of searches (Mendelsohn 2009). This fatality number needs to be adjusted for the proportion of fatalities that were not found due to scavenger removal and searcher error. This adjustment is typically made by placing carcasses for searchers to find (or not find) during their routine periodic fatality searches. This step was not taken at Vasco Road (Mendelsohn et al. 20o9), but it was taken as part of another study right next to Vasco Road (Brown et al. 2016). Applying searcher detection rates estimated from carcass detection trials performed at a wind energy project immediately adjacent to this same stretch of road (Brown et al. 2016), the adjusted total number of fatalities was estimated at 12,187 animals killed by traffic on the road. This fatality number translates to a rate Of 3,900 wild animals per mile per year killed along 2.5 miles of road in 1.25 years. Whereas this disturbing fatality rate might be biased high or low by incorrect extrapolations of detection rates from the wind project to the roadway (including the road verge), and whereas it likely does not apply equally to all roadways, it reveals a huge toll on wildlife caused by auto traffic. The indirect and cumulative impacts caused by San Bernardino Logistics Center's added traffic should be assessed and mitigated. According to the Initial Study, the project would generate a mean daily trip rate of 1,021 passenger car -equivalents (PCE), including 419 truck trips. But compared to other estimates of traffic associated with other distribution warehouse projects in the area, I find the Initial Study's prediction to be unusually low. For example, at a smaller warehouse project nearby (I-210 Logistics Center IV project composed of 431,265 square feet of warehouse on 18.3 acres), Kimley-Horn and Associates (2016) predicted 2,573 daily passenger car equivalent trips, more than twice the trip volume predicted for the 450,000 square foot San Bernardino Logistics Center. Using the square footage of warehousing to scale up the predicted PCE at I-210 Logistics Center IV to the larger San Bernardino Logistics Center yields 2,685 daily PCE. The impact caused by the project's added traffic should be assessed and mitigated, and the assessment should include a spatial scale that reasonably incorporates the travel paths of cars and trucks servicing the project. Cumulative Impacts The Initial Study adopts a false standard for determining whether a project's impacts will be cumulatively considerable (LSA Associates 2017:72). Specifically referring to the 11 burrowing owl, the Initial Study implies that a given project impact is cumulatively considerable only when it has not been fully mitigated. In essence, the Initial Study implies that cumulative impacts are really residual impacts left over from inadequate project mitigation of direct or indirect impacts. However, individually mitigated impacts at the project level do not negate the significance of cumulative impacts. If they did, then CEQA would not require a cumulative effects analysis. An EIR should be prepared, and it should include an adequate cumulative effects analysis. According to LSA Associates (2017:72), "No endangered or threatened species were identified on site during the biological resource surveys." But what surveys were performed? I saw no citations of reports of surveys in the Initial Study, nor did I find any reports of surveys on the City of San Bernardino's web site. If surveys were performed, then their methods and results should have been reported publicly. Also according to LSA Associates (2017:72), "The proposed project would not affect any threatened or endangered species or habitat." This assertion is not only most probably incorrect, but also it is misleading because cumulative effects analysis should not be limited to threatened and endangered species. The assertion is most probably false because the project's impacts will range far beyond the 20.3 acres of the land parcel proposed for the warehouse. The purpose of the project is to service the distribution of goods via trucking, and will therefore increase the traffic of both trucks and cars on the roads leading to and from the warehouse. These cars and trucks will collide with and crush wildlife encountered along the many miles of roadway that will be traversed by the project's added travel. This project's contribution of added automobile traffic on the roadways of the region will be cumulative to the traffic already added or that will be added by additional distribution warehouses in the area. There is an urgent need for a cumulative effects analysis of automobile traffic on wildlife in the region. The Initial Study does not address the project's cumulative contribution to road morality caused by increased traffic volume on the region's roadways. At a minimum the cumulative impacts analysis should have considered other like -kind projects in the region. Table 3 lists some distribution warehouse projects in the region, including the predicted traffic increases associated with each project, so far totaling 87,234 additional daily PCE and 26,023 additional daily truck trips. Additional like -kind projects are likely built, planned or under way in the region, and not included in Table 3. Cumulative impacts loom large due to crushing and collision fatalities of wildlife along many miles of roadway in the region. These impacts need to be addressed in an EIR. 12 Table 3. A list, likely incomplete, of some distribution warehousing projects in the region of proposed project. a FistCarbon Solutions 2o16 b RK Engineering Group 2015 city of San Bernardino 2016 d MIG I Hogle-Ireland, Inc. 2015 e City of Beaumont 2o16. f City of San Bernardino 2016 g FirstCarbon Solutions 2015 h ICF International (ICF) 2014 City of Moreno Valley 2015 i LSA 2o16 k Kimley-Horn and Associates 2o16 1 LSA Associates 2017 m Assumed 33% of mean daily trips will be truck trips, based on other studies in table. 13 MITIGATION The Initial Study proposes preconstruction take -avoidance surveys instead of detection surveys for burrowing owl. There is a large difference in objectives, methods, and interpretation of results between preconstruction take -avoidance surveys and detection A surveys. Given the possibility of burrowing owl presence that was acknowledged in the r Initial Study, a detection survey effort would be needed to comply with minimum standards of CEQA. Take -avoidance surveys follow detection surveys and immediately precede project grading, but take -avoidance surveys cannot replace detection surveys for informing likely levels of take and how best to avoid, minimize or mitigate for take. The formulation of take -avoidance surveys and other mitigation measures in the Initial Study grossly fall short of the standards recommended in CDFW (2012). I summarized the measures appearing in the Initial Study and compared them to the CDFW standards (Table 4). The Initial Study achieved only three of 33 CDFW (2012) mitigation standards related to burrowing owl. The appropriate mitigation would be to first perform detection surveys that meet the standards of CDFW (2012). Once it can be determined whether burrowing owls occupy the site, and if so, how many pairs occur there and how distributed, then the impacts can be appropriately mitigated by following the CDFW (2012) guidelines. An EIR should be prepared, and it should include specific compensatory mitigation measures for impacts to burrowing owl, including funds committed and property to be protected. Mitigation measures are also needed for traffic impacts on wildlife, including compensatory measures and measures to minimize impacts. Minimization measures can include wildlife under -crossings or overcrossings at critical reaches of roadway, or drift fencing to prevent wildlife crossing at particular reaches of roadway. Many mitigation measures have been developed to lessen the toll of traffic on wildlife; they should be put to use. Thank you for your attention, Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D. 14 Table 4. Summary of standards in CD -FW (2012) mitigation guidelines. Standard from CDFW (2012) Proposed mitigation Is standard met? Seasonal/Spatial Avoidance Avoid disturbing occupied burrows 1 February Preconstruction surveys would be Yes through 31 August done 1 Se tember to 31 January Avoid disturbing occupied burrows during Plan is to buffer, screen or evict No nonbreeding season by migratory or resident owls Do not destroy burrows through chaining, No mention. No disking, cultivatingor gradin Implement a worker awareness program to No mention. No educate workers about burrowing owls Place visible markers near burrows to prevent No mention. No burrow destruction Do not poison nuisance animals near burrows No mention. No known or suspected to have burrowin owls Dispense treated grain to poison mammals only No_ mention. No in Janua and February Take avoidance surveys (Preconstruction surveys) Complete initial take avoidance survey no less Surveys within 3 days prior to No than 14 days prior to ground -disturbing grading activities Use methods described for Detection Surveys to Detection Surveys not performed No inform take miti ! t Site surveillance Continue monitoring for attempted colonization No mention No or re -colonization of areas disturbed by j2roject Should owls return, implement take avoidance No mention No measures to assure no take Minimizin If protect -in-place is feasible, use buffer zones, Would use buffers or visual screen Yes visual screens or other measures during project activities Perform site-specific monitoring to inform of No mention No buffer effectiveness Consult with CDFW on buffer zones If occupied burrow deemed too No close to construction Buffers Rely on CDFW (2012) to establish buffer zones If occupied burrow deemed too No b time of year and level of disturbance close to construction Other minimization measures (such as livestock or vegetation management) 15 Standard from CDFW (2012) A Eliminate actions that reduce forage or species that excavate burrows used by owls Eliminate actions that introduce or facilitate predators of burrowing owls + Burrow exclusion (evictions is potentially • Only to be performed by qualified biologist(s) * Ensure that natural or artificial burrows are available on adjacent mitigation sites, which are within 210 In No exclusions until a Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan is approved by local CDFW office Mitigate for permanent loss of occupied burrows and habitat according to `Mitigating Impacts' in CDFW (2012) % Site monitoring before, during and after 4 exclusion; conduct daily monitoring for one week following exclusion implemented just after ► breeding season Document burrow occupancy should the evicted owls take up residence on adjacent mitigation site Translocation to sites >100 in distant is not authorized by CDFW Uompensatory mitigation A site should be considered occupied if burrows M documented as occupied over recent years 1 Temporarily disturbed habitat should be k restored to pre -project conditions, and `permanent habitat protection may be warranted For permanent impacts, replace lost habitat acreage, number of burrows and burrowing owls based on information provided from surveys in ' A .A Ensure mitigation site supports similar 1 vegetation conditions and fossorial animal abundance; mitigation lands may require ' enhancements Permanently protect mitigation land through conservation easement deeded to non-profit Y organization or public agency Develop and implement mitigation land management plan for long-term maintenance and sustainability 16 Is Proposed mitigation standard met? No mention No No mention No ificant impact under CEQA) Specifies qualified biologist Yes No mention No Plan will be developed for review by Yes CDFW Defers formulation of compensatory No mitigation to unspecified date and outside of public review No mention No No mention No No mention No No mention No No mention No No mention No No mention No No mention No No mention No Standard from CDFW (2012) Fund the maintenance and management plan over the long term Do not destroy or disturb burrowing owl habitat or burrows until mitigation land has been legally secured and management plan and long-term funding are in place Mitigation lands should be on, adjacent or proximate to impact site; otherwise land should be where burrowing owls occur and where conserved lands can be expanded REFERENCES CITED Is Proposed mitigation standard met? No mention No No mention � No No mention I Unclear Brown, K., K. S. Smallwood, J. Szewczak, and B. Karas. 2016. Final 2012-2015 Report Avian and Bat Monitoring Project Vasco Winds, LLC. Prepared for NextEra Energy Resources, Livermore, California. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. Sacramento, California. City of Beaumont. 2016. Hidden Canyon Industrial Park Plot Plan 16 -PP -02. City of Beaumont, California. City of San Bernardino. 2016. Initial Study for Hallmark at Shenandoah Warehouse Project. City of San Bernardino, California. City of Moreno Valley. 2015. World Logistic Center Specific Plan. World Logistic Center Specific Plan, Riverside County, California. City of San Bernardino. 2016. Mitigated Negative Declaration, Orange Show Logistics Center. City of San Bernardino, California. FirstCarbon Solutions. 2016. DRAFT Environmental Impact Report No. 534, San Gorgonio Crossing Riverside County, California, State Clearinghouse Number: 2014011009. Prepared for County of Riverside, Riverside, California. FirstCarbon Solutions. 2015. Draft Environmental Impact Report, Sierra Lakes Commerce Center Project, City of Fontana, San Bernardino County, California, State Clearinghouse Number: 2015031026. City of Fontana. Forman, T. T., D. Sperling, J. A. Bisonette, A. P. Clevenger, C. D. Cutshall, V. H. Dale, L. Fahrig, R. France, C. R. Goldman, K. Heanue, J. A. Jones, F. J. Swanson, T. 17 a Turrentine, and T. C. Winter. 2003. Road Ecology. Island Press, Covello, Ob California. 16 Ob Kimley-Horn and Associates. 2016. Traffic Impact Study for the proposed I-210 Logistics Center IV Project in the City of Rialto. Appendix I to Draft I-210 Logistics Center IV Addendum to the Renaissance Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report Sch No. 2006071021. City of Rialto, California. LSA Associates. 2017. City of San Bernardino Initial Study San Bernardino Logistics Center. City of San Bernardino Planning Division, California. LSA. 2016. Draft Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 2015101071 Caprock Distribution Center III, City Of Rialto, San Bernardino County, California Mendelsohn, M., W. Dexter, E. Olson, and S. Weber. 2009. Vasco Road wildlife movement study report. Report to Contra Costa County Public Works Department, Martinez, California. MIG I Hogle-Ireland, Inc. 2015. Columbia Business Center Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration, REVISED AUGUST 2015. Prepared for City of Riverside Community Development Department. RK Engineering Group. 2015. Agua Mansa High -Cube Warehouse traffic impact study (revised 7/31/15), County of San Bernardino, California. Report to Lansing Companies, San Diego, California. Shuford, W. D., and T. Gardali, [eds.]. 2008. California bird species of special concern: a ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California. A Smallwood, K.S. 2002. Habitat models based on numerical comparisons. Pages 83-95 A in Predicting species occurrences: Issues of scale and accuracy, J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, M. Morrison, M. Raphael, J. Haufler, and B. Wall, editors. Island Press, Covello, California. Smallwood, K. S. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and corridors. Pages 84-101 in M. L. Morrison and H. A. Mathewson, Eds., Wildlife habitat conservation: concepts, challenges, and solutions. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Smallwood, K. S. 2016. Report of Altamont Pass research as Vasco Winds mitigation. Report to NextEra Energy Resources, Inc., Office of the California Attorney General, Audubon Society, East Bay Regional Park District. Smallwood, K.S., J. Beyea and M. Morrison. 1999• Using the best scientific data for endangered species conservation. Environmental Management 24:421-435• ON Smallwood, K. S., L. Neher, and D. A. Bell. 2009. Map -based repowering and reorganization of a wind resource area to minimize burrowing owl and other bird fatalities. Energies 2009(2):915-943• http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/2/4/915 Smallwood, K. S., L. Neher, J. Mount, and R. C. E. Culver. 2013. Nesting Burrowing Owl Abundance in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. Wildlife Society Bulletin: 37:787-795• Smallwood, K.S., A. Gonzales, T. Smith, E. West, C. Hawkins, E. Stitt, C. Keckler, C. Bailey, and K. Brown. 2001. Suggested standards for science applied to conservation issues. Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 36:40-49. 19 Ib Kenneth Shawn Smallwood Curriculum Vitae 3108 Finch Street Davis, CA 95616 Phone (530) 756-4598 Cell (530) 601-6857 puma(agdcn.org Ecologist Expertise Born May 3, 1963 in Sacramento, California. Married, father of two. • Finding solutions to controversial problems related to wildlife interactions with human industry, infrastructure, and activities; • Wildlife monitoring and field study using GPS, thermal imaging, behavior surveys; • Using systems analysis and experimental design principles to identify meaningful ecological patterns that inform management decisions. Education Ph.D. Ecology, University of California, Davis. September 1990. M.S. Ecology, University of California, Davis. June 1987. B.S. Anthropology, University of California, Davis. June 1985. Corcoran High School, Corcoran, California. June 1981. Experience • 476 professional publications, including: • 81 peer reviewed publications • 24 in non -reviewed proceedings • 369 reports, declarations, posters and book reviews • 8 in mass media outlets • 87 public presentations of research results at meetings • Reviewed many professional papers and reports • Testified in 4 court cases. Editing for scientific journals: Guest Editor, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2012-2013, of invited papers representing international views on the impacts of wind energy on wildlife and how to mitigate the impacts. Associate Editor, Journal of Wildlife Management, March 2004 to 30 June 2007. Editorial Board Member, Environmental Management, 10/1999 to 8/2004. Associate Editor, Biological Conservation, 9/1994 to 9/1995. Member, Alameda County Scientific Review Committee (SRC), August 2006 to April 2011. The 1 Smallwood CV 2 five -member committee investigated causes of bird and bat collisions in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, and recommended mitigation and monitoring measures. The SRC reviewed the science underlying the Alameda County Avian Protection Program, and advised the County on how to reduce wildlife fatalities. Consulting Ecologist, 2004-2007, California Energy Commission (CEC). Provided consulting services as needed to the CEC on renewable energy impacts, monitoring and research, and produced several reports. Also collaborated with Lawrence -Livermore National Lab on research to understand and reduce wind turbine impacts on wildlife. Consulting Ecologist, 1999-2013, U.S. Navy. Performed endangered species surveys, hazardous waste site monitoring, and habitat restoration for the endangered San Joaquin kangaroo rat, California tiger salamander, California red -legged frog, California clapper rail, western burrowing owl, salt marsh harvest mouse, and other species at Naval Air Station Lemoore; Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, Detachment Concord; Naval Security Group Activity, Skaggs Island; National Radio Transmitter Facility, Dixon; and, Naval Outlying Landing Field Imperial Beach. Part-time Lecturer, 1998-2005, California State University, Sacramento. Instructed Mammalogy, Behavioral Ecology, and Ornithology Lab, Contemporary Environmental Issues, Natural Resources Conservation. Senior Ecologist, 1999-2005, BioResource Consultants. Designed and implemented research and monitoring studies related to avian fatalities at wind turbines, avian electrocutions on electric distribution poles across California, and avian fatalities at transmission lines. Chairman, Conservation Affairs Committee, The Wildlife Society --Western Section, 1999-2001. Prepared position statements and led efforts directed toward conservation issues, including travel to Washington, D.C. to lobby Congress for more wildlife conservation funding. Systems Ecologist, 1995-2000, Institute for Sustainable Development. Headed ISD's program on integrated resources management. Developed indicators of ecological integrity for large areas, using remotely sensed data, local community involvement and GIS. Associate, 1997-1998, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis. Worked with Shu Geng and Mingua Zhang on several studies related to wildlife interactions with agriculture and patterns of fertilizer and pesticide residues in groundwater across a large landscape. Lead Scientist, 1996-1999, National Endangered Species Network. Informed academic scientists and environmental activists about emerging issues regarding the Endangered Species Act and other environmental laws. Testified at public hearings on endangered species issues. Ecologist, 1997-1998, Western Foundation of Vertebrate Zoology. Conducted field research to determine the impact of past mercury mining on the status of California red -legged frogs in Santa Clara County, California. Smallwood CV 3 Senior Systems Ecologist, 1994-1995, EIP Associates, Sacramento, California. Provided consulting services in environmental planning, and quantitative assessment of land units for their conservation and restoration opportunities basedon ecological resource requirements of 29 special -status species. Developed ecological indicators for prioritizing areas within Yolo County to receive mitigation funds for habitat easements and restoration. Post -Graduate Researcher, 1990-1994, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, U. C. Davis. Under Dr. Shu Geng's mentorship, studied landscape and management effects on temporal and spatial patterns of abundance among pocket gophers and species of Falconiformes and Carnivora in the Sacramento Valley. Managed and analyzed a data base of energy use in California agriculture. Assisted with landscape (GIS) study of groundwater contamination across Tulare County, California. Work experience in graduate school: Co -taught Conservation Biology with Dr. Christine Schonewald, 1991 & 1993, UC Davis Graduate Group in Ecology; Reader for Dr. Richard Coss's course on Psychobiology in 1990, UC Davis Department of Psychology; Research Assistant to Dr. Walter E. Howard, 1988-1990, UC Davis Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Biology, testing durable baits for pocket gopher management in forest clearcuts; Research Assistant to Dr. Terrell P. Salmon, 1987-1988, UC Wildlife Extension, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Biology, developing empirical models of mammal and bird invasions in North America, and a rating system for priority research and control of exotic species based on economic, environmental and human health hazards in California. Student Assistant to Dr. E. Lee Fitzhugh, 1985-1987, UC Cooperative Extension, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Biology, developing and implementing statewide mountain lion track count for long-term monitoring. Fulbright Research Fellow, Indonesia, 1988. Tested use of new sampling methods for numerical monitoring of Sumatran tiger and six other species of endemic felids, and evaluated methods used by other researchers. Projects Repowering wind energy_projects through careful siting of new wind turbines using map -based collision hazard models to minimize impacts to volant wildlife. Funded by wind companies (principally NextEra Renewable Energy, Inc.), California Energy Commission and East Bay Regional Park District, I have collaborated with a GIS analyst and managed a crew of five field biologists performing golden eagle behavior surveys and nocturnal surveys on bats and owls. The goal is to quantify flight patterns for development of predictive models to more carefully site new wind turbines in repowering projects. Focused behavior surveys began May 2012 and continue. Collision hazard models have been prepared for seven wind projects, three of which were built. Planning for additional repowering projects is underway. Test avian safety of new mixer -elector wind turbine MEWT Designed and implemented a before - after, control -impact experimental design to test the avian safety of a new, shrouded wind turbine developed by Ogin Inc. (formerly known as F1oDesign Wind Turbine Corporation). Supported by a $718,000 grant from the California Energy Commission's Public Interest Energy Research program and a 20% match share contribution from Ogin, I managed a crew of seven field biologists who Smallwood CV 4 performed periodic fatality searches and behavior surveys, carcass detection trials, nocturnal behavior surveys using a thermal camera, and spatial analyses with the collaboration of a GIS analyst. Field work began 1 April 2012 and ended 30 March 2015 without Ogin installing its MEWTs, but we still achieved multiple important scientific advances. Reduce avian mortali1y due to wind turbines at Altamont Pass. Studied wildlife impacts caused by 5,400 wind turbines at the world's most notorious wind resource area. Studied how impacts are perceived by monitoring and how they are affected by terrain, wind patterns, food resources, range management practices, wind turbine operations, seasonal patterns, population cycles, infrastructure management such as electric distribution, animal behavior and social interactions. Reduce avian mortality on electric distribution poles. Directed research toward reducing bird electrocutions on electric distribution poles, 2000-2007. Oversaw 5 founds of fatality searches at 10,000 poles from Orange County to Glenn County, California, and produced two large reports. Cook el al. v. Rockwell International et al. No. 90-K-181 D. Colorado). Provided expert testimony on the role of burrowing animals in affecting the fate of buried and surface -deposited radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes at the Rocky Flats Plant, Colorado. Provided expert reports based on four site visits and an extensive document review of burrowing animals. Conducted transect surveys for evidence of burrowing animals and other wildlife on and around waste facilities. Discovered substantial intrusion of waste structures by burrowing animals. I testified in federal court in November 2005, and my clients were subsequently awarded a $553,000,000 judgment by a jury. After appeals the award was increased to two billion dollars. Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation. Provided expert testimony on the role of burrowing animals in affecting the fate of buried radioactive wastes at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Washington. Provided three expert reports based on three site visits and extensive document review. Predicted and verified a certain population density of pocket gophers on buried waste structures, as well as incidence of radionuclide contamination in body tissue. Conducted transect surveys for evidence of burrowing animals and other wildlife on and around waste facilities. Discovered substantial intrusion of waste structures by burrowing animals. Expert testimony and declarations on proposed residential and commercial developments, gas-fired power plants, wind, solar and geothermal projects, water transfers and water transfer delivery systems, endangered species recovery plans, Habitat Conservation Plans and Natural Communities Conservation Programs. Testified before multiple government agencies, Tribunals, Boards of Supervisors and City Councils, and participated with press conferences and depositions. Prepared expert witness reports and court declarations, which are summarized under Reports (below). Protocol -level surveys for special -status species. Used California Department of Fish and Wildlife and US Fish and Wildlife Service protocols to search for California red -legged frog, California tiger salamander, arroyo southwestern toad, blunt -nosed leopard lizard, western pond turtle, giant kangaroo rat, San Joaquin kangaroo rat, San Joaquin kit fox, western burrowing owl, Swainson's hawk, Valley elderberry longhorn beetle and other special -status species. Conservation of San Joaguin kangaroo rat. Performed research to identify factors responsible for the decline of this endangered species at Lemoore Naval Air Station, 2000-2013, and implemented Smallwood CV habitat enhancements designed to reverse the trend and expand the population. Impact of West Nile Virus on yellow -billed magpies. Funded by Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District, 2005-2008, compared survey results pre- and post -West Nile Virus epidemic for multiple bird species in the Sacramento Valley, particularly on yellow -billed magpie and American crow due to susceptibility to WNV. Workshops on HCPs. Assisted Dr. Michael Morrison with organizing and conducting a 2 -day workshop on Habitat Conservation Plans, sponsored by Southern California Edison, and another 1 - day workshop sponsored by PG&E. These Workshops were attended by academics, attorneys, and consultants with HCP experience. We guest -edited a Proceedings published in Environmental Management. Mapping of biological resources alon = Hi hwa s 101 46 and 41. Used GPS and GIS to delineate vegetation complexes and locations of special -status species along 26 miles of highway in San Luis Obispo County, 14 miles of highway and roadway in Monterey County, and in a large area north of Fresno, including within reclaimed gravel mining pits. GPS mapping and monitoring at restoration sites and at Caltrans mitigation sites. Monitored the success of elderberry shrubs at one location, the success of willows at another location, and the response of wildlife to the succession of vegetation at both sites. Also used GPS to monitor the response of fossorial animals to yellow star -thistle eradication and natural grassland restoration efforts at Bear Valley in Colusa County and at the decommissioned Mather Air Force Base in Sacramento County. Merculy effects on Red -le ed Frog. Assisted Dr. Michael Morrison and US Fish and Wildlife Service in assessing the possible impacts of historical mercury mining on the federally listed California red -legged frog in Santa Clara County. Also measured habitat variables in streams. Opposition to proposed No SuWrises rule. Wrote a white paper and summary letter explaining scientific grounds for opposing the incidental take permit (ITP) rules providing TTP applicants and holders with general assurances they will be free of compliance with the Endangered Species Act once they adhere to the terms of a "properly functioning HCP." Submitted 188 signatures of scientists and environmental professionals concerned about No Surprises rule US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, all US Senators. Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan alternative. Designed narrow channel marsh to increase the likelihood of survival and recovery in the wild of giant garter snake, Swainson's hawk and Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle. The design included replication and interspersion of treatments for experimental testing of critical habitat elements. I provided a report to Northern Territories, Inc. Assessments of a.,Tricultural production s stem and environmental technology. transfer to China. Twice visited China and interviewed scientists, industrialists, agriculturalists, and the Directors of the Chinese Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Agriculture to assess the need and possible pathways for environmental clean-up technologies and trade opportunities between the US and China. I - - - - _ - � J - - -. --a _ _ _ ____1 - spatially prioritize allocation of mitigation efforts to improve ecosystem functionality within the County from the perspective of 29 special -status species of wildlife and plants. Used a hierarchically structured indicators approach to apply principles of landscape and ecosystem ecology, conservation biology, and local values in rating land units. Derived GIS maps to help guide the conservation area design, and then developed implementation strategies. Mountain lion track count. Developed and conducted a carnivore monitoring program throughout California since 1985. Species counted include mountain lion, bobcat, black bear, coyote, red and gray fox, raccoon, striped skunk, badger, and black -tailed deer. Vegetation and land use are also monitored. Track survey transect was established on dusty, dirt roads within randomly selected quadrats. Sumatran tiger and other felids. Upon award of Fulbright Research Fellowship, I designed and initiated track counts for seven species of wild cats in Sumatra, including Sumatran tiger, fishing cat, and golden cat. Spent four months on Sumatra and Java in 1988, and learned Bahasa Indonesia, the official Indonesian language. Wildlife in agriculture. Beginning as post -graduate research, I studied pocket gophers and other wildlife in 40 alfalfa fields throughout the Sacramento Valley, and I surveyed for wildlife along a 200 mile road transect since 1989 with a hiatus of 1996-2004. The data are analyzed using GIS and methods from landscape ecology, and the results published and presented orally to farming groups in California and elsewhere. I also conducted the first study of wildlife in cover crops used on vineyards and orchards. Agricultural energy use and Tulare County groundwater study. Developed and analyzed a data base of energy use in California agriculture, and collaborated on a landscape (GIS) study of groundwater contamination across Tulare County, California. Pocket gopher damage in forest clear -cuts. Developed gopher sampling methods and tested various poison baits and baiting regimes in the largest -ever field study of pocket gopher management in forest plantations, involving 68 research plots in 55 clear -cuts among 6 National Forests in northern California. Risk assessment of exotic species in North America. Developed empirical models of mammal and bird species invasions in North America, as well as a rating system for assigning priority research and control to exotic species in California, based on economic, environmental, and human health hazards. i Smallwood CV Peer Reviewed Publications Smallwood, K. S. 2017. Long search intervals under -estimate bird and bat fatalities caused by wind turbines. Wildlife Society Bulletin 41:224-230. Smallwood, K. S. 2017. The challenges of addressing wildlife impacts when repowering wind energy projects. Pages 175-187 in Koppel, J., Editor, Wind Energy and Wildlife Impacts: Proceedings from the CWW2015 Conference. Springer. Cham, Switzerland. May, R., Gill, A. B., Klippel, J. Langston, R. H.W., Reichenbach, M., Scheidat, M., Smallwood, S., Voigt, C. C., Huppop, O., and Portman, M. 2017. Future research directions to reconcile wind turbine—wildlife interactions. Pages 255-276 in Koppel, J., Editor, Wind Energy and Wildlife Impacts: Proceedings from the CWW2015 Conference. Springer. Cham, Switzerland. Smallwood, K. S. 2017. Monitoring birds. M. Perrow, Ed., Wildlife and Wind Farms - Conflicts and Solutions, Volume 2. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter, United Kingdom. www.bit.lv/2v3cRgQ Smallwood, K. S., L. Neher, and D. A. Bell. 2017. Siting to Minimize Raptor Collisions: an example from the Repowering Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. M. Per -row, Ed., Wildlife and Wind Farms - Conflicts and Solutions, Volume 2. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter, United Kingdom. www.bit.ly/2v3cR9a Johnson, D. H., S. R. Loss, K. S. Smallwood, W. P. Erickson. 2016. Avian fatalities at wind energy facilities in North America: A comparison of recent approaches. Human—Wildlife Interactions 10(1):7-18. Sadar, M. J., D. S. -M. Guzman, A. Mete, J. Foley, N. Stephenson, K. H. Rogers, C. Grosset, K. S. Smallwood, J. Shipman, A. Wells, S. D. White, D. A. Bell, and M. G. Hawkins. 2015. Mange Caused by a novel Micnemidocoptes mite in a Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos). Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery 29(3):231-237. Smallwood, K. S. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and corridors. Pages 84-101 in M. L. Morrison and H. A. Mathewson, Eds., Wildlife habitat conservation: concepts, challenges, and solutions. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Mete, A., N. Stephenson, K. Rogers, M. G. Hawkins, M. Sadar, D. Guzman, D. A. Bell, J. Shipman, A. Wells, K. S. Smallwood, and J. Foley. 2014. Emergence of Knemidocoptic mange in wild Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in California. Emerging Infectious Diseases 20(10):1716- 1718. Smallwood, K. S. 2013. Introduction: Wind -energy development and wildlife conservation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 37: 3-4. Smallwood, K. S. 2013. Comparing bird and bat fatality -rate estimates among North American wind -energy projects. Wildlife Society Bulletin 37:19-33. + Online Supplemental Material. Smallwood, K. S., L. Neher, J. Mount, and R. C. E. Culver. 2013. Nesting Burrowing Owl Smallwood CV Abundance in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. Wildlife Society Bulletin: 37:787-795. Smallwood, K. S., D. A. Bell, B. Karas, and S. A. Snyder. 2013. Response to Huso and Erickson Comments on Novel Scavenger Removal Trials. Journal of Wildlife Management 77: 216-225. Bell, D. A., and K. S. Smallwood. 2010. Birds of prey remain at risk. Science 330:913. Smallwood, K. S., D. A. Bell, S. A. Snyder, and J. E. DiDonato. 2010. Novel scavenger removal trials increase estimates of wind turbine -caused avian fatality rates. Journal of Wildlife Management 74: 1089-1097 + Online Supplemental Material. Smallwood, K. S., L. Neher, and D. A. Bell. 2009. Map -based repowering and reorganization of a wind resource area to minimize burrowing owl and other bird fatalities. Energies 2009(2):915- 943. htt ://www.md i.com/1996-1073/2/4/915 Smallwood, K. S. and B. Nakamoto. 2009. Impacts of West Nile Virus Epizootic on Yellow -Billed Magpie, American Crow, and other Birds in the Sacramento Valley, California. The Condor 111:247-254. Smallwood, K. S., L. Rugge, and M. L. Morrison. 2009. Influence of Behavior on Bird Mortality in Wind Energy Developments: The Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. Journal of Wildlife Management 73:1082-1098. Smallwood, K. S. and B. Karas. 2009. Avian and Bat Fatality Rates at Old -Generation and Repowered Wind Turbines in California. Journal of Wildlife Management 73:1062-1071. Smallwood, K. S. 2008. Wind power company compliance with mitigation plans in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Environmental & Energy Law Policy Journal 2(2):229-285. Smallwood, K. S., C. G. Thelander. 2008. Bird Mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. Journal of Wildlife Management 72:215-223. Smallwood, K. S. 2007. Estimating wind turbine -caused bird mortality. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:2781-2791. Smallwood, K. S., C. G. Thelander, M. L. Morrison, and L. M. Rugge. 2007. Burrowing owl mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:1513- 1524. Cain, J. W. III, K. S. Smallwood, M. L. Morrison, and H. L. Loffland. 2005. Influence of mammal activity on nesting success of Passerines. J. Wildlife Management 70:522-531. Smallwood, K.S. 2002. Habitat models based on numerical comparisons. Pages 83-95 in Predicting species occurrences: Issues of scale and accuracy, J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, M. Morrison, M. Raphael, J. Haufler, and B. Wall, editors. Island Press, Covello, California. E Smallwood CV 9 Morrison, M. L., K. S. Smallwood, and L. S. Hall. 2002. Creating habitat through plant relocation: Lessons from Valley elderberry longhorn beetle mitigation. Ecological Restoration 21: 95-100. Zhang, M., K. S. Smallwood, and E. Anderson. 2002. Relating indicators of ecological health and integrity to assess risks to sustainable agriculture and native biota. Pages 757-768 in D.J. Rapport, W.L. Lasley, D.E. Rolston, N.O. Nielsen, C.O. Qualset, and A.B. Damania (eds.), Managing for Healthy Ecosystems, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida USA. Wilcox, B. A., K. S. Smallwood, and J. A. Kahn. 2002. Toward a forest Capital Index. Pages 285- 298 in D.J. Rapport, W.L. Lasley, D.E. Rolston, N.O. Nielsen, C.O. Qualset, and A.B. Damania (eds.), Managing for Healthy Ecosystems, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida USA. Smallwood, K.S. 2001. The allometry of density within the space used by populations of Mammalian Carnivores. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79:1634-1640. Smallwood, K.S., and T.R. Smith. 2001. Study design and interpretation of Sorex density estimates. Annales Zoologi Fennici 38:141-161. Smallwood, K.S., A. Gonzales, T. Smith, E. West, C. Hawkins, E. Stitt, C. Keckler, C. Bailey, and K. Brown. 2001. Suggested standards for science applied to conservation issues. Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 36:40-49. Geng, S., Yixing Zhou, Minghua Zhang, and K. Shawn Smallwood. 2001. A Sustainable Agro - ecological Solution to Water Shortage in North China Plain (Huabei Plain). Environmental Planning and Management 44:345-355. Smallwood, K. Shawn, Lourdes Rugge, Stacia Hoover, Michael L. Morrison, Carl Thelander. 2001. Intra- and inter -turbine string comparison of fatalities to animal burrow densities at Altamont Pass. Pages 23-37 in S. S. Schwartz, ed., Proceedings of the National Avian -Wind Power Planning Meeting IV. RESOLVE, Inc., Washington, D.C. Smallwood, K.S., S. Geng, and M. Zhang. 2001. Comparing pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) density in alfalfa stands to assess management and conservation goals in northern California. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 87: 93-109. Smallwood, K. S. 2001. Linking habitat restoration to meaningful units of animal demography. Restoration Ecology 9:253-261. Smallwood, K. S. 2000. A crosswalk from the Endangered Species Act to the HCP Handbook and real HCPs. Environmental Management 26, Supplement 1:23-35. Smallwood, K. S., J. Beyea and M. Morrison. 1999. Using the best scientific data for endangered species conservation. Environmental Management 24:421-435. Smallwood, K. S. 1999. Scale domains of abundance among species of Mammalian Carnivora. Environmental Conservation 26:102-111. Smallwood CV 10 Smallwood, K.S. 1999. Suggested study attributes for making useful population density estimates. V Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 35: 76-82. rA Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 1999. Estimating burrow volume and excavation rate of r,A pocket gophers (Geomyidae). Southwestern Naturalist 44:173-183. F� Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 1999. Spatial scaling of pocket gopher (Geomyidae) density. Southwestern Naturalist 44:73-82. Smallwood, K. S. 1999. Abating pocket gophers (Thomomys spp.) to regenerate forests in clearcuts. Environmental Conservation 26:59-65. 44 Smallwood, K. S. 1998. Patterns of black bear abundance. Transactions of the Western Section of 14 the Wildlife Society 34:32-38. 44 Smallwood, K. S. 1998. On the evidence needed for listing northern goshawks (Accipter gentilis) under the Endangered Species Act: a reply to Kennedy. J. Raptor Research 32:323-329. Smallwood, K. S., B. Wilcox, R. Leidy, and K. Yarris. 1998. Indicators assessment for Habitat Conservation Plan of Yolo County, California, USA. Environmental Management 22: 947-958. Smallwood, K. S., M. L. Morrison, and J. Beyea. 1998. Animal burrowing attributes affecting 4P hazardous waste management. Environmental Management 22: 831-847. 0 Smallwood, K. S, and C. M. Schonewald. 1998. Study design and interpretation for mammalian carnivore density estimates. Oecologia 113:474-491. Zhang, M., S. Geng, and K. S. Smallwood. 1998. Nitrate contamination in groundwater of Tulare County, California. Ambio 27(3):170-174. 40 Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 1997. Animal burrowing in the waste management zone of Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Proceedings of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society Meeting 33:88-97. Morrison, M. L., K. S. Smallwood, and J. Beyea. 1997. Monitoring the dispersal of contaminants by wildlife at nuclear weapons production and waste storage facilities. The Environmentalist 17:289-295. Smallwood, K. S. 1997. Interpreting puma (Puma concolor) density estimates for theory and management. Environmental Conservation 24(3):283-289. Smallwood, K. S. 1997. Managing vertebrates in cover crops: a first study. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 11:155-160. Smallwood, K. S. and S. Geng. 1997. Multi -scale influences of gophers on alfalfa yield and quality. Field Crops Research 49:159-168. Smallwood CV 11 Smallwood, K. S. and C. Schonewald. 1996. Scaling population density and spatial pattern for terrestrial, mammalian carnivores. Oecologia 105:329-335. Smallwood, K. S., G. Jones, and C. Schonewald. 1996. Spatial scaling of allometry for terrestrial, mammalian carnivores. Oecologia 107:588-594. Van Vuren, D. and K. S. Smallwood. 1996. Ecological management of vertebrate pests in agricultural systems. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 13:41-64. Smallwood, K. S., B. J. Nakamoto, and S. Geng. 1996. Association analysis of raptors on an agricultural landscape. Pages 177-190 in D.M. Bird, D.E. Varland, and J.J. Negro, eds., Raptors in human landscapes. Academic Press, London. Erichsen, A. L., K. S. Smallwood, A. M. Commandatore, D. M. Fry, and B. Wilson. 1996. White- tailed Kite movement and nesting patterns in an agricultural landscape. Pages 166-176 in D. M. Bird, D. E. Varland, and J. J. Negro, eds., Raptors in human landscapes. Academic Press, London. Smallwood, K. S. 1995. Scaling Swainson's hawk population density for assessing habitat -use across an agricultural landscape. J. Raptor Research 29:172-178. Smallwood, K. S. and W. A. Erickson. 1995. Estimating gopher populations and their abatement in forest plantations. Forest Science 41:284-296. Smallwood, K. S. and E. L. Fitzhugh. 1995. A track count for estimating mountain lion Felis concolor californica population trend. Biological Conservation 71:251-259 Smallwood, K. S. 1994. Site invasibility by exotic birds and mammals. Biological Conservation 69:251-259. Smallwood, K. S. 1994. Trends in California mountain lion populations. Southwestern Naturalist 39:67-72. Smallwood, K. S. 1993. Understanding ecological pattern and process by association and order. Acta Oecologica 14(3):443-462. Smallwood, K. S. and E. L. Fitzhugh. 1993. A rigorous technique for identifying individual mountain lions Felis concolor by their tracks. Biological Conservation 65:51-59. Smallwood, K. S. 1993. Mountain lion vocalizations and hunting behavior. The Southwestern Naturalist 38:65-67. Smallwood, K. S. and T. P. Salmon. 1992. A rating system for potential exotic vertebrate pests. Biological Conservation 62:149-159. Smallwood, K. S. 1990. Turbulence and the ecology of invading species. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Davis. Smallwood CV Peer-reviewed Reports 12 Smallwood, K. S., and L. Neher. 2017. Comparing bird and bat use data for siting new wind power generation. Report CEC-500-2017-019, California Energy Commission Public Interest Energy Research program, Sacramento, California. http://www.enerL,,v.ca.tiov/20]7niihli ations/CEC- 500-2017-019/CEC-500-2017-019pdf and ht :Hwww. energy.ca. ov/2017 ublications/CEC- 500-2017-019/CEC-500-2017-019-APA-F: df Smallwood, K. S. 2016. Bird and bat impacts and behaviors at old wind turbines at Forebay, Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Report CEC-500-2016-066, California Energy Commission Public Interest Energy Research program, Sacramento, California. htt ://www.enerp-.ca.L,ov/2016 ublications/CEC-500-2016-066/CEC-500-2016-066. )df Sinclair, K. and E. DeGeorge. 2016. Framework for Testing the Effectiveness of Bat and Eagle Impact -Reduction Strategies at Wind Energy Projects. S. Smallwood, M. Schirmacher, and M. Morrison, eds., Technical Report NREL/TP-5000-65624, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. Brown, K., K. S. Smallwood, J. Szewczak, and B. Karas. 2016. Final 2012-2015 Report Avian and Bat Monitoring Project Vasco Winds, LLC. Prepared for NextEra Energy Resources, Livermore, California. Brown, K., K. S. Smallwood, J. Szewczak, and B. Karas. 2014. Final 2013-2014 Annual Report Avian and Bat Monitoring Project Vasco Winds, LLC. Prepared for NextEra Energy Resources, Livermore, California. Brown, K., K. S. Smallwood, and B. Karas. 2013. Final 2012-2013 Annual Report Avian and Bat Monitoring Project Vasco Winds, LLC. Prepared for NextEra Energy Resources, Livermore, California. .htt ://www.altamontsrc.or /alt doc/ 274 ventus Vasco winds 2012 13 avian bat monitori Ig report year 1. df Smallwood, K. S., L. Neher, D. Bell, J. DiDonato, B. Karas, S. Snyder, and S. Lopez. 2009. Range Management Practices to Reduce Wind Turbine Impacts on Burrowing Owls and Other Raptors in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. Final Report to the California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Research — Environmental Area, Contract No. CEC-500-2008-080. Sacramento, California. 183 pp. littp://www.enem.ca.goN!/ 2008 ublications/CEC-500-2008-080/CEC-500-2008-080.PDF Smallwood, K. S., and L. Neher. 2009. Map -Based Repowering of the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area Based on Burrowing Owl Burrows, Raptor Flights, and Collisions with Wind Turbines. Final Report to the California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Research — Environmental Area, Contract No. CEC-500-2009-065. Sacramento, California. 63 pp. htt):%/www.enerLyv.ca.(),ov'2009 ublications/CEC-500-2009-065'CEC-500-2009-065.PDF Smallwood, K. S., K. Hunting, L. Neher, L. Spiegel and M. Yee. 2007. Indicating Threats to Birds Posed by New Wind Power Projects in California. Final Report to the California Energy Smallwood CV 13 Commission, Public Interest Energy Research – Environmental Area, Contract No. Pending. Sacramento, California. Smallwood, K. S. and C. Thelander. 2005. Bird mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, March 1998 – September 2001 Final Report. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/SR-500-36973. Golden, Colorado. 410 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and C. Thelander. 2004. Developing methods to reduce bird mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Final Report to the California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Research – Environmental Area, Contract No. 500-01-019. Sacramento, California. 531 pp. http://www.enefgy.ca.gov/reports/500-04-052/2004-08-09 500-04-052.PDF Thelander, C.G. S. Smallwood, and L. Rugge. 2003. Bird risk behaviors and fatalities at the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Period of Performance: March 1998—December 2000. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/SR-500-33829. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia. 86 pp. Thelander, C.G., S. Smallwood, and L. Rugge. 2001. Bird risk behaviors and fatalities at the Altamont Wind Resource Area – a progress report. Proceedings of the American Wind Energy Association, Washington D.C. 16 pp. Non -Peer Reviewed Publications Smallwood, K. S. 2009. Methods manual for assessing wind farm impacts to birds. Bird Conservation Series 26, Wild Bird Society of Japan, Tokyo. T. Ura, ed., in English with Japanese translation by T. Kurosawa. 90 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2009. Mitigation in U.S. Wind Farms. Pages 68-76 in H. H6tker (Ed.), Birds of Prey and Wind Farms: Analysis of problems and possible solutions. Documentation of an International Workshop in Berlin, 21 st and 22nd October 2008. Michael-Otto-Instiut im NABU, Goosstroot 1, 24861 Bergenhusen, Germany. htt}2://bergenhusen.nabu.de/forschung/ 7rg eifvoegel/ Smallwood, K. S. 2007. Notes and recommendations on wildlife impacts caused by Japan's wind power development. Pages 242-245 in Yukihiro Kominami, Tatsuya Ura, Koshitawa, and Tsuchiya, Editors, Wildlife and Wind Turbine Report 5. Wild Bird Society of Japan, Tokyo. Thelander, C.G. and S. Smallwood. 2007. The Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area's Effects on Birds: A Case History. Pages 25-46 in Manuela de Lucas, Guyonne F.E. Janss, Miguel Ferrer Editors, Birds and Wind Farms: risk assessment and mitigation. Madrid: Quercus. Neher, L. and S. Smallwood. 2005. Forecasting and minimizing avian mortality in siting wind turbines. Energy Currents. Fall Issue. ESRI, Inc., Redlands, California. Jennifer Davidson and Shawn Smallwood. 2004. Laying plans for a hydrogen highway. Comstock's Business, August 2004:18-20, 22, 24-26. Jennifer Davidson and Shawn Smallwood. 2004. Refined conundrum: California consumers Smallwood CV demand more oil while opposing refinery development. Comstock's Business, November 2004:26-27, 29-30. Smallwood, K.S. 2002. Review of "The Atlas of Endangered Species." By Richard Mackay. Environmental Conservation 30:210-211. Smallwood, K.S. 2002. Review of "The Endangered Species Act. History, Conservation, and Public Policy." By Brian Czech and Paul B. Krausman. Environmental Conservation 29: 269- 270. 14 Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Spatial scaling of pocket gopher (Geomyidae) burrow volume. Abstract in Proceedings of 44th Annual Meeting, Southwestern Association of Naturalists. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Estimating prairie dog and pocket gopher burrow volume. Abstract in Proceedings of 44th Annual Meeting, Southwestern Association of Naturalists. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Animal burrowing parameters influencing toxic waste management. Abstract in Proceedings of Meeting, Western Section of the Wildlife Society. Smallwood, K.S, and Bruce Wilcox. 1996. Study and interpretive design effects on mountain lionis density estimates. Abstract, page 93 in D.W. Padley, ed., Proceedings 5th Mountain Lion Workshop, Southern California Chapter, The Wildlife Society. 135 pp. Smallwood, K.S, and Bruce Wilcox. 1996. Ten years of mountain lion track survey. Page 94 in D.W. Padley,d. Abstract e,page 94 in D.W. Padley, ed., Proceedings 5th Mountain Lion � Workshop, Southern California Chapter, The Wildlife Society. 135 pp. _ Smallwood, K.S, and M. Grigione. 1997. Photographic recording of mountain lion tracks. Pages ■ 75-75 in D.W. Padley, ed., Proceedings 5th Mountain Lion Workshop, Southern California Chapter, The Wildlife Society. 135 pp. Smallwood, K.S., B. Wilcox, and J. Karr. 1995. An approach to scaling fragmentation effects. Brief 8, Ecosystem Indicators Working Group, 17 March, 1995. Institute for Sustainable Development, Thoreau Center for Sustainability — The Presidio, PO Box 29075, San Francisco, CA 94129-0075. Wilcox, B., and K.S. Smallwood. 1995. Ecosystem indicators model overview. Brief 2, Ecosystem Indicators Working Group, 17 March, 1995. Institute for Sustainable Development, Thoreau Center for Sustainability — The Presidio, PO Box 29075, San Francisco, CA 94129- 0075. EIP Associates. 1996. Yolo County Habitat Conservation Plan. Yolo County Planning and Development Department, Woodland, California. Geng, S., K.S. Smallwood, and M. Zhang. 1995. Sustainable agriculture and agricultural . Smallwood CV 15 sustainability. Proc. 7th International Congress SABRAO, 2nd Industrial Symp. WSAA. Taipei, Taiwan. Smallwood, K.S. and S. Geng. 1994. Landscape strategies for biological control and IPM. Pages 454-464 in W. Dehai, ed., Proc. International Conference on Integrated Resource Management for Sustainable Agriculture. Beijing Agricultural University, Beijing, China. Smallwood, K.S. and S. Geng. 1993. Alfalfa as wildlife habitat. California Alfalfa Symposium 23:105-8. Smallwood, K.S. and S. Geng. 1993. Management of pocket gophers in Sacramento Valley alfalfa. California Alfalfa Symposium 23:86-89. Smallwood, K.S. and E.L. Fitzhugh. 1992. The use of track counts for mountain lion population census. Pages 59-67 in C. Braun, ed. Mountain lion -Human Interaction Symposium and Workshop. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins. Smallwood, K.S. and E.L. Fitzhugh. 1989. Differentiating mountain lion and dog tracks. Pages 58-63 in Smith, R.H., ed. Proc. Third Mountain Lion Workshop. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix. Fitzhugh, E.L. and K.S. Smallwood. 1989. Techniques for monitoring mountain lion population levels. Pages 69-71 in Smith, R.H., ed. Proc. Third Mountain Lion Workshop. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix. Reports to or by Alameda County Scientific Review Committee (Note: all documents linked to SRC website have since been removed by Alameda County) Smallwood, K. S. 2014. Data Needed in Support of Repowering in the Altamont Pass WRA. ttt)://www.altaniontsrc.o r/alt doc/ 284 smallwood data needed in su ort of re owerin in the altamontass wra. df Smallwood, K. S. 2013. Long -Term Trends in Fatality Rates of Birds and Bats in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. littp://www.altamontsi,c..or!p-/alt doc/r68 smallwood altamont fatality rates longterm. �df Smallwood, K. S. 2013. Inter -annual Fatality rates of Target Raptor Species from 1999 through 2012 in the Altamont Pass Wind Resources Area. htt ://www.altamontsrc.orQ/alt doc/ 268 smallwood inter annual comparison of fatality rates 1999 2012.df Smallwood, K. S. 2012. General Protocol for Performing Detection Trials in the FloDesign Study of the Safety of a Closed -bladed Wind Turbine. htt ://www.altamontsrc.orQ/alt doc/ 246 smallwood flodesian detection trial protocol df Smallwood, K. S., 1. Neher, and J. Mount. 2012. Burrowing owl distribution and abundance study through two breeding seasons and intervening non -breeding period in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. htt //www.altaniontsrc.ort� alt doc/; 245 smallwood et al Smallwood CV 16 burrowing owl density 2012.12df Smallwood, K. S 2012. Draft study design for testing collision risk of Flodesign wind turbine in former AES Seawest wind projects in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area (APWRA). http://www.altamontsrc.oEg/alt doe/ 238 smallwood floeesiQn draft study -design aril 2012 Smallwood, L. Neher, and J. Mount. 2012. Winter 2012 update on burrowing owl distribution and abundance study in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. http://www. altamontsrc org/alt doc/p232 smallwood et al winter owl_survey update.pdf Smallwood, S. 2012. Status of avian utilization data collected in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, 2005-2011. http://www.altamontsrc.orp alt doe/ 231 smallwood a wra use data 2005 2011.pdf Smallwood, K. S., L. Neher, and J. Mount. 2011. Monitoring Burrow Use of Wintering Burrowing Owls. http://www.altamontsrc.orWalt doc/)229 smallwood et al Progress monitorin burrowing owl burrow use. df Smallwood, K. S., L. Neher, and J. Mount. 2011. Nesting Burrowing Owl Distribution and Abundance in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. httis//www.altamontsrc.or�lalt doc/ 228 smallwood et al for nextera burrowing owl distrib ution and -abundance study.pd Smallwood, K. S. 2011. Draft Study Design for Testing Collision Risk of Flodesign Wind Turbine in Patterson Pass Wind Farm in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area (APWRA). http://www.altamontsrc.or0alt doc/ 1.00 src document list with reference numbers. df Smallwood, K. S. 2011. Sampling Burrowing Owls Across the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. http://www.altamontsrc.org/alt doc/ 205 smallwood neher progress on sam lin -burrowing owls across a wra. )df Smallwood, K. S. 2011. Proposal to Sample Burrowing Owls Across the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. _http://www.altamontsrc.org/alt doc/p198 smallwood n.roposal to sample burrowing owls across a pwra. df Smallwood, K. S. 2010. Comments on APWRA Monitoring Program Update. http://www.altamontsrc.oEg/alt_doc/L)191 smallwood comments on a wra_monitorin 7 progra in update.pdf Smallwood, K. S. 2010. Inter -turbine Comparisons of Fatality Rates in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. http://www.altamontsrc.org/alt doc/ 189 smallwood report of a wra fatality rate patterns. -idf Smallwood, K. S. 2010. Review of the December 2010 Draft of M-21: Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area Bird Collision Study. htti)://www.a]tamontsrc.or(-,/alt doc/p 190 smallwood review of december 2010 monitoring report.0df Smallwood CV 17 Alameda County SRC (Shawn Smallwood, Jim Estep, Sue Orloff, Joanna Burger, and Julie Yee). Comments on the Notice of Preparation for a Programmatic Environmental Impact Report on Revised CUPS for Wind Turbines in the Alameda County portion of the Altamont Pass. bttp://www.altamontsrc. /P 183 src inte��rated comments on no df Smallwood, K. S. 2010. Review of Monitoring Implementation Plan. httL/www.altamontsrc.or ,/alt doe/)180 src comments on di df Burger, J., J. Estep, S. Orloff, S. Smallwood, and J. Yee. 2010. SRC Comments on Ca1WEA Research Plan. htt ://www.altainontsrc.M?/alt doc/ 174 smallwood review of calwea removal stud lan. df Alameda County SRC (Smallwood, K. S., S. Orloff, J. Estep, J. Burger, and J. Yee). SRC Comments on Monitoring Team's Draft Study Plan for Future Monitoring. http: /www.alt,9mnntQr,-nr> alt doc/ 168 src comments on m53 mt draft stud lan for fut ure monitorin . df Smallwood, K. S. 2010. Second Review of American Kestrel -Burrowing owl (KB) Scavenger Removal Adjustments Reported in Alameda County Avian Monitoring Team's M21 for the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. http://www.altamontsrc.orEt/alt doc/ 171 smallwood kb removal rates follow u df Smallwood, K. S. 2010. Assessment of Three Proposed Adaptive Management Plans for Reducing Raptor Fatalities in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. http://www.altamontsrc ori alt doc/ 161 smallwood assessment of am s. )df Smallwood, K. S. and J. Estep. 2010. Report of additional wind turbine hazard ratings in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area by Two Members of the Alameda County Scientific Review Committee. htt ://www.altamontsrc.or /alt doc/7153 smallwood estep additional hazard ratings Smallwood, K. S. 2010. Alternatives to Improve the Efficiency of the Monitoring Program. htt ://w�vw.altamontsrc.ora/alt doc/ 158 smallwood res onse to memo on monitoring c -df Smallwood, S. 2010. Summary of Alameda County SRC Recommendations and Concerns and Subsequent Actions. htt r.//www.altamontsrc.or >.ralt doc% i 147 smallwoodSummar of src recommendations and concerns 1 11 10. df Smallwood, S. 2010. Progress of Avian Wildlife Protection Program & Schedule. htt ://www.altamontsrc.or�/alt docl 148 smalhvood roaress of avian wildli ro gram 1 l l 10.. df Smallwood, S. 2010. Old -generation wind turbines rated for raptor collision hazard by Alameda County Scientific Review Committee in 2010, an Update on those Rated in 2007, and an Update on Tier Rankings. htt ://www.altamontsrc.org/alt doc/x155 smallwood src Smallwood CV turbine ratin s and status.. df Smallwood, K. S. 2010. Review of American Kestrel -Burrowing owl (KB) Scavenger Removal Adjustments Reported in Alameda County Avian Monitoring Team's M21 for the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. http://www.altamontsrc.orLZalt. doc/ 154 Smallwood kb removal rates 041610. df Smallwood, K. S. 2010. Fatality Rates in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area 1998-2009. Alameda County SRC document P-145. Smallwood, K. S. 2010. Comments on Revised M-21: Report on Fatality Monitoring in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. P144 SRC Comments on 2009 Draft Monitoring Report M21. Smallwood, K. S. 2009. http://www.altamontsrc.org/alt doc/p129 Smallwood search interval summaries_ supplemental to m39 pdf Smallwood, K. S. 2009. Smallwood's review of M32. Alameda County SRC document P-111. 6 pp. htip://www.altamontsrc.om/alt—doc/olll smallwoods review of m32.pdf Smallwood, K. S. 2009. Yd Year Review of 16 Conditional Use Permits for Windworks, Inc. and Altamont Infrastructure Company, LLC. Comment letter to East County Board of Zoning Adjustments. 10 pp + 2 attachments. Smallwood, K. S. 2008. Weighing Remaining Workload of Alameda County SRC against Proposed Budget Cap. Alameda County SRC document not assigned. 3 pp. Alameda County SRC (Smallwood, K. S., S. Orloff, J. Estep, J. Burger, and J. Yee). 2008. SRC Comments on August 2008 Fatality Monitoring Report, M21. Alameda County SRC document P-107. 21 pp. http://www.altamontsrc.org/alt doc/ 107 Smallwood review of july 2008 monitoring -report m21. df Smallwood, K. S. 2008. Burrowing Owl Carcass Distribution around Wind Turbines. Alameda County SRC document 106. 8 pp. http://www.altamoi-itsrc.org/alt doe/1)106 smallwood burrowing owl carcass distribution around wind turbines. df Smallwood, K. S. 2008. Assessment of Relocation/Removal of Altamont Pass Wind Turbines Rated as Hazardous by the Alameda County SRC. Alameda County SRC document P-103. 10 pp. httR://www.altamontsre.Qrg/alt doc/ 103 assessment of src recommendations to relocate rated turbines. df Smallwood, K. S. and L. Neher. 2008. Summary of wind turbine -free ridgelines within and around the APWRA. Alameda County SRC document P-102. 4 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and B. Karas. 2008. Comparison of MORTALITY ESTIMATES in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area when Restricted to Recent Fatalities. Alameda County SRC document P-101. 18 Smallwood CV 19 Smallwood, K. S. 2008. On the Misapplication of Mortality Adjustment Terms to Fatalities Missed During one Search and Found Later. Alameda County SRC document P-97. 3 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2008. Relative abundance of raptors outside the APWRA. Alameda County SRC document P-88. 6 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2008. Comparison of mortality estimates in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Alameda County SRC document P-76. 19 pp Alameda County SRC (Smallwood, K. S., S. Orloff, J. Estep, J. Burger, and J. Yee). 2010. Guidelines for siting wind turbines recommended for relocation to minimize potential collision - related mortality of four focal raptor species in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Alameda County SRC document P-70. Alameda County SRC (Smallwood, K. S., S. Orloff, J. Estep, J. Burger, and J. Yee). December 11, 2007. SRC selection of dangerous wind turbines. Alameda County SRC document P-67. 8 pp. Smallwood, S. October 6, 2007. Smallwood's answers to Audubon's queries about the SRC's recommended four month winter shutdown of wind turbines in the Altamont Pass. Alameda County SRC document P-23. Smallwood, K. S. October 1, 2007. Dissenting opinion on recommendation to approve of the AWI Blade Painting Study. Alameda County SRC document P-60. Smallwood, K. S. July 26, 2007. Effects of monitoring duration and inter -annual variability on precision of wind -turbine caused mortality estimates in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. SRC Document P44. Smallwood, K. S. July 26, 2007. Memo: Opinion of some SRC members that the period over which post -management mortality will be estimated remains undefined. SRC Document P43. Smallwood, K. S. July 19, 2007. Smallwood's response to P24G. SRC Document P41, 4 pp. Smallwood, K. S. April 23, 2007. New Information Regarding Alameda County SRC Decision of 11 April 2007 to Grant FPLE Credits for Removing and Relocating Wind Turbines in 2004. SRC Document P26. Alameda County SRC (Smallwood, K. S., S. Orloff, J. Estep, and J. Burger [J. Yee abstained]). April 17, 2007. SRC Statement in Support of the Monitoring Program Scope and Budget. Smallwood, K. S. April 15, 2007. Verification of Tier 1 & 2 Wind Turbine Shutdowns and Relocations. SRC Document P22. Smallwood, S. April 15, 2007. Progress of Avian Wildlife Protection Program & Schedule. Alameda County SRC (Smallwood, K. S., S. Orloff, J. Estep, J. Burger, and J. Yee). April 3, 2007. 20 Smallwood CV Alameda County Scientific Review Committee replies to the parties' responses to its queries and to comments from the California Office of the Attorney General. SRC Document S20. Smallwood, S. March 19, 2007. Estimated Effects of Full Winter Shutdown and Removal of Tier I & H Turbines. SRC Document S19. Smallwood, S. March 8, 2007. Smallwood's Replies to the Parties' Responses to Queries from the SRC and Comments from the California Office of the Attorney General. SRC Document S 16. Smallwood, S. March 8, 2007. Estimated Effects of Proposed Measures to be Applied to 2,500 Wind Turbines in the APWRA Fatality Monitoring Plan. SRC Document S15. Alameda County SRC (Smallwood, K. S., S. Orloff, 1% 2007 Settlement Agreement � 7, 2007. Analysis of Monitoring Program in Context of 1 Smallwood, S. January 8, 2007. Smallwood's Concerns over the Agreement to Settle the CEQA Challenges. SRC Document S5. Alameda County SRC (Smallwood, K. S., S. Orloff, J. Estep, J. Burger, and J. Yee). December 19, 2006. Altamont Scientific Review Committee (SRC) Recommendations to the County on the Avian Monitoring Team Consultants' Budget and Organization. Reports to Clients Smallwood, K. S. 2017. Summary of a burrowing owl conservation workshop. Report to Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency, Morgan Hill, California. Smallwood, K. S., and L. Neher. 2017. Comparison of wind turbine collision hazard model performance prepared for repowering projects in the Altamont Pass Wind Resources Area. Report to NextEra Energy Resources, Inc., Office of the California Attorney General, Audubon Society, East Bay Regional Park District. Smallwood, K. S., and L. Neher. 2016. Siting wind turbines to minimize raptor collisions at Summit Winds Repowering Project, Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Report to Salka, Inc., Washington, D.C. golden eagle ts from Smallwood, K. S., L. Neher, and D. R Bell. Area and Mitigating Los VaqueroscReservoir. repowering Altamont Pass Wind Resource Report to East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan Conservancy and Contra Costa Water District. Smallwood, K. S. 2016. Report of Altamont Pass research as Vasco Winds mitigation. Report to NextEra Energy Resources, Inc., Office of the California Attorney General, Audubon Society, East Bay Regional Park District. Smallwood, K. S., and L. Neher. 2016. Siting Wind Turbines to Minimize Raptor collisions at Sand Hill Repowering Project, Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Report to Ogin, Inc., i Smallwood CV Waltham, Massachusetts. Smallwood, K. S., and L. Neher. 2015a. Siting wind turbines to minimize raptor collisions at Golden Hills Repowering Project, Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Report to NextEra Energy Resources, Livermore, California. Smallwood, K. S., and L. Neher. 2015b. Siting wind turbines to minimize raptor collisions at Golden Hills North Repowering Project, Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Report to NextEra Energy Resources, Livermore, California. Smallwood, K. S., and L. Neher. 2015c. Siting wind turbines to minimize raptor collisions at the Patterson Pass Repowering Project, Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Report to EDF Renewable Energy, Oakland, California. 21 Smallwood, K. S., and L. Neher. 2014. Early assessment of wind turbine layout in Summit Wind Project. Report to Altamont Winds LLC, Tracy, California. Smallwood, K. S. 2015. Review of avian use survey report for the Longboat Solar Project. Report to EDF Renewable Energy, Oakland, California. Smallwood, K. S. 2014. Information needed for solar project impacts assessment and mitigation planning. Report to Panorama Environmental, Inc., San Francisco, California. Smallwood, K. S. 2014. Monitoring fossorial mammals in Vasco Caves Regional Preserve, California: Report of Progress for the period 2006-2014. Report to East Bay Regional Park District, Oakland, California. Smallwood, K. S. 2013. First-year estimates of bird and bat fatality rates at old wind turbines, Forebay areas of Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Report to FloDesign in support of EIR. Smallwood, K. S. and W. Pearson. 2013. Neotropical bird monitoring of burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia), Naval Air Station Lemoore, California. Tierra Data, Inc. report to Naval Air Station Lemoore. Smallwood, K. S. 2013. Winter surveys for San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides) and burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia) within Air Operations at Naval Air Station, Lemoore. Report to Tierra Data, Inc. and Naval Air Station Lemoore. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2013. San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys n. nitratoides) conservation research in Resource Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station: 2012 Progress Report (Inclusive of work during 2000-2012). Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, Desert Integrated Products Team, San Diego, California. Smallwood, K. S. 2012. Fatality rate estimates at the Vantage Wind Energy Project, year one. Report to Ventus Environmental, Portland, Oregon. Smallwood, K. S. and L. Neher. 2012. Siting wind turbines to minimize raptor collisions at North Smallwood CV 22 Sky River. Report to NextEra Energy Resources, LLC. Smallwood, K. S. 2011. Monitoring Fossorial Mammals in Vasco Caves Regional Preserve, California: Report of Progress for the Period 2006-2011. Report to East Bay Regional Park District. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2011. San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys n. nitratoides) Conservation Research in Resource Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station: 2011 Progress Report (Inclusive of work during 2000-2011). Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, Desert Integrated Products Team, San Diego, California. Smallwood, K. S. 2011. Draft study design for testing collision risk of F1oDesign Wind Turbine in Patterson Pass, Santa Clara, and Former AES Seawest Wind Projects in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area (APWRA). Report to F1oDesign, Inc. Smallwood, K. S. 2011. Comments on Marbled Murrelet collision model for the Radar Ridge Wind Resource Area. Report to EcoStat, Inc., and ultimately to US Fish and Wildlife Service. Smallwood, K. S. 2011. Avian fatality rates at Buena Vista Wind Energy Project, 2008-2011. Report to Pattern Energy. Smallwood, K. S. and L. Neher. 2011. Siting repowered wind turbines to minimize raptor collisions at Tres Vaqueros, Contra Costa County, California. Report to Pattern Energy. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2011. San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys n. nitratoides) Conservation Research in Resource Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station: 2010 Progress Report (Inclusive of work during 2000-2010). Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, Desert Integrated Products Team, San Diego, California. Smallwood, K. S. 2010. Wind Energy Development and avian issues in the Altamont Pass, California. Report to Black & Veatch. Smallwood, K. S. and L. Neher. 2010. Siting repowered wind turbines to minimize raptor collisions at the Tres Vaqueros Wind Project, Contra Costa County, California. Report to the East Bay Regional Park District, Oakland, California. Smallwood, K. S. and L. Neher. 2010. Siting repowered wind turbines to minimize raptor collisions at Vasco Winds. Report to NextEra Energy Resources, LLC, Livermore, California. Smallwood, K. S. 2010. Baseline avian and bat fatality rates at the Tres Vaqueros Wind Project, Contra Costa County, California. Report to the East Bay Regional Park District, Oakland, California. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2010. San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys n. nitratoides) Conservation Research in Resource Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station: 2009 Progress Report (Inclusive of work during 2000-2009). Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, Desert Integrated Products Team, San Diego, California. 86 pp. Smallwood CV 23 Smallwood, K. S. 2009. Mammal surveys at naval outlying landing field Imperial Beach, California, August 2009. Report to Tierra Data, Inc. 5 pp Smallwood, K. S. 2009. Mammals and other Wildlife Observed at Proposed Site of Amargosa Solar Power Project, Spring 2009. Report to Tierra Data, Inc. 13 pp Smallwood, K. S. 2009. Avian Fatality Rates at Buena Vista Wind Energy Project, 2008-2009. Report to members of the Contra Costa County Technical Advisory Committee on the Buena Vista Wind Energy Project. 8 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2009. Repowering the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area more than Doubles Energy Generation While Substantially Reducing Bird Fatalities. Report prepared on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy. 2 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2009. Surveys to Detect Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse and California Black Rail at Installation Restoration Site 30, Military Ocean Terminal Concord, California: March -April 2009. Report to Insight Environmental, Engineering, and Construction, Inc., Sacramento, California. 6 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2008. Avian and Bat Mortality at the Big Horn Wind Energy Project, Klickitat County, Washington. Unpublished report to Friends of Skamania County. 7 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2009. Monitoring Fossorial Mammals in Vasco Caves Regional Preserve, California: report of progress for the period 2006-2008. Unpublished report to East Bay Regional Park District. 5 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2008. San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys n. nitratoides) Conservation Research in Resource Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station: 2008 Progress Report (Inclusive of work during 2000-2008). Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, Desert Integrated Products Team, San Diego, California. 84 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2008. Habitat Assessment for California Red -Legged Frog at Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, Detachment Concord, California. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, Desert Integrated Products Team, San Diego, California. 48 PP. Smallwood, K. S. and B. Nakamoto 2008. Impact of 2005 and 2006 West Nile Virus on Yellow - billed Magpie and American Crow in the Sacramento Valley, California. 22 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2008. Former Naval Security Group Activity (NSGA), Skaggs Island, Waste and Contaminated Soil Removal Project (IR Site #2), San Pablo Bay, Sonoma County, California: Re -Vegetation Monitoring. Report to U.S. Navy, Letter Agreement — N68711-04LT-A0045. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, Desert Integrated Products Team, San Diego, California. 10 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2008. Burrowing owls at Dixon Naval Radio Transmitter 24 Smallwood CV Facility. Report to U.S. Navy. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, Desert Integrated Products Team, San Diego, California. 28 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2008. San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys n. nitratoides) Conservation Research in Resource Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station: 2007 Progress Report (Inclusive of work during 2001-2007). Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, Desert Integrated Products Team, San Diego, California. 69 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2007•rMarsh HarEffort to vest Detect est Presence Federally Listed Species California Clapper ail andSalt Habitat Assessment at the Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, Detachment Concord, California. Installation Restoration (IR) Site 30, Final Report to U.S. Navy, Letter Agreement — N68711-05LT-A0001. U.S. Navy Integrated Product Team (IPT), West, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. 8 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2007. San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys n. nitratoides) Conservation Research in Resource Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station: 2006 Progress Report (Inclusive of work during 2001-2006). U.S. Navy Integrated Product Team (IPT), West, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, Daly City, California. 165 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and C. Thelander. 2006. Response to third review of Smallwood and Thelander (2004). Report to California Institute for Energy and Environment, University of California, Oakland, CA. 139 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2006. Biological effects of repowering a portion of the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California: The Diablo Winds Energy Project. Report to Altamont Working Group. Available from Shawn Smallwood, Rjjma Gr.� olo.com . 34 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2006. Impact of 2005 West Nile Virus on Yellow -billed Magpie and American Crow in the Sacramento Valley, California. Report to Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District, Elk Grove, CA. 38 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2006• San Joaquin kangaroo (Dipodomys Station nitratoides) 2005 Conservation Research in Resource Management Area 5, Lemoore rat A Progress Report (Inclusive of work during 2001-2005). U.S. Navy Integrated Product Team (IPT), West, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, South West, Daly City, California. 160 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2006. A monitoring effort to detect the presence of the federally listed species California tiger salamander and California red -legged frog at the Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, Detachment Concord, California. Letter agreements N68711- 04LT-A0042 and N68711-04LT-A0044, U.S. Navy Integrated Product Team (IPT), West, Naval Facilities EngineeringCommand, South West, Daly City, California. 60 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2006. A monitoring effort to detect the presence of the federally listed species California Clapper Rail and Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse, and wetland habitat assessment at the Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, Detachment Concord, California. Sampling for rails, Spring 2006, Installation Restoration (IR) Site 1. Letter Agreement — Smallwood CV 25 N68711 -051t -A0001, U.S. Navy Integrated Product Team (IPT), West, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, South West, Daly City, California. 9 pp. Morrison, M. L. and K. S. Smallwood. 2006. Final Report: Station -wide Wildlife Survey, Naval Air Station, Lemoore. Department of the Navy Integrated Product Team (IPT) West, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, 2001 Junipero Serra Blvd., Suite 600, Daly City, CA 94014-1976. 20 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2006. Former Naval Security Group Activity (NSGA), Skaggs Island, Waste and Contaminated Soil Removal Project, San Pablo Bay, Sonoma County, California: Re -vegetation Monitoring. Department of the Navy Integrated Product Team (IPT) West, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, 2001 Junipero Serra Blvd., Suite 600, Daly City, CA 94014-1976. 8 pp. Dorm, Melinda, Linda Spiegel and K. Shawn Smallwood. 2005. Response to public comments on the staff report entitled Assessment of Avian Mortality from Collisions and Electrocutions (CEC-700-2005-015) (Avian White Paper) written in support of the 2005 Environmental Performance Report and the 2005 Integrated Energy Policy Report. California Energy Commission, Sacramento. 205 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2005. Estimating combined effects of selective turbine removal and winter -time shutdown of half the wind turbines. Unpublished CEC staff report, June 23. 1 p. Erickson, W. and S. Smallwood. 2005. Avian and Bat Monitoring Plan for the Buena Vista Wind Energy Project Contra Costa County, California. Unpubl. report to Contra Costa County, Antioch, California. 22 pp. Lamphier-Gregory, West Inc., Shawn Smallwood, Jones & Stokes Associates, Illingworth & Rodkin Inc. and Environmental Vision. 2005. Environmental Impact Report for the Buena Vista Wind Energy Project, LP# 022005. County of Contra Costa Community Development Department, Martinez, California. Morrison, M. L. and K. S. Smallwood. 2005. A monitoring effort to detect the presence of the federally listed species California clapper rail and salt marsh harvest mouse, and wetland habitat assessment at the Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, Detachment Concord, California. Targeted Sampling for Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse, Fall 2005 Installation Restoration (IR) Site 30. Letter Agreement — N68711 -051t -A0001, U.S. Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Daly City, California. 6 pp. Morrison, M. L. and K. S. Smallwood. 2005. A monitoring effort to detect the presence of the federally listed species California clapper rail and salt marsh harvest mouse, and wetland habitat assessment at the Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, Detachment Concord, California. Letter Agreement — N68711 -051t -A0001, U.S. Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Daly City, California. 5 pp. Morrison, M. L. and K. S. Smallwood. 2005. Skaggs Island waste and contaminated soil removal projects, San Pablo Bay, Sonoma County, California. Report to the U.S. Department of the Smallwood CV 26 Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Daly City, California. 6 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2004. 2004 Progress Report: San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides) Conservation Research in Resources Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station. Progress report to U.S. Department of the Navy, Lemoore, California. 134 pp - Smallwood, K. S. and L. Spiegel. 2005a. Assessment To Support An Adaptive Management Plan For The APWRA. Unpublished CEC staff report, January 19. 19 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and L. Spiegel. 2005b. Partial Re -assessment of An Adaptive Management Plan For The APWRA. Unpublished CEC staff report, March 25. 48 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and L. Spiegel. 2005c. Combining biology -based and policy -based tiers of priority for determining wind turbine relocation/shutdown to reduce bird fatalities in the APWRA. Unpublished CEC staff report, June 1. 9 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2004. Alternative plan to implement mitigation measures in APWRA. Unpublished CEC staff report, January 19. 8 pp. Smallwood, K. S., and L. Neher. 2005. Repowering the APWRA: Forecasting and minimizing avian mortality without significant loss of power generation. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy -Related Environmental Research. CEC-500-2005-005. 21 pp. [Reprinted (in Japanese) in Yukihiro Kominami, Tatsuya Ura, Koshitawa, and Tsuchiya, Editors, Wildlife and Wind Turbine Report 5. Wild Bird Society of Japan, Tokyo.] Morrison, M. L., and K. S. Smallwood. 2004. Kangaroo rat survey at RMA4, NAS Lemoore. Report to U.S. Navy. 4 pp. Morrison, M. L., and K. S. Smallwood. 2004. A monitoring effort to detect the presence of the federally listed species California clapper rails and wetland habitat assessment at Pier 4 of the Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, Detachment Concord, California. Letter Agreement N68711-04LT-A0002. 8 pp. + 2 pp. of photo plates. Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 2003. 2003 Progress Report: San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides) Conservation Research at Resources Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station. Progress report to U.S. Department of the Navy, Lemoore, California. 56 pp. + 58 figures. Smallwood, K. S. 2003. Comparison of Biological Impacts of the No Project and Partial Underground Alternatives presented in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Jefferson - Martin 230 kV Transmission Line. Report to California Public Utilities Commission. 20 pp. Morrison, M. L., and K. S. Smallwood. 2003. Kangaroo rat survey at RMA4, NAS Lemoore. Report to U.S. Navy. 6 pp. + 7 photos + 1 map. Smallwood, K. S. 2003. Assessment of the Environmental Review Documents Prepared for the Smallwood CV 27 Tesla Power Project. Report to the California Energy Commission on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy. 32 pp. Smallwood, K. S., and M. L. Morrison. 2003. 2002 Progress Report: San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides) Conservation Research at Resources Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station. Progress report to U.S. Department of the Navy, Lemoore, California. 45 pp. + 36 figures. Smallwood, K. S., Michael L. Morrison and Carl G. Thelander 2002. Study plan to test the effectiveness of aerial markers at reducing avian mortality due to collisions with transmission lines: A report to Pacific Gas & Electric Company. 10 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2002. Assessment of the Environmental Review Documents Prepared for the East Altamont Energy Center. Report to the California Energy Commission on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy. 26 pp. Thelander, Carl G., K. Shawn Smallwood, and Christopher Costello. 2002 Rating Distribution Poles for Threat of Raptor Electrocution and Priority Retrofit: Developing a Predictive Model. Report to Southern California Edison Company. 30 pp. Smallwood, K. S., M. Robison, and C. Thelander. 2002. Draft Natural Environment Study, Prunedale Highway 101 Project. California Department of Transportation, San Luis Obispo, California. 120 pp. Smallwood, K.S. 2001. Assessment of ecological integrity and restoration potential of Beeman/Pelican Farm. Draft Report to Howard Beeman, Woodland, California. 14 pp. Smallwood, K. S., and M. L. Morrison. 2002. Fresno kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides) Conservation Research at Resources Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station. Progress report to U.S. Department of the Navy, Lemoore, California. 29 pp. + 19 figures. Smallwood, K.S. 2001. Rocky Flats visit, April 4th through 6th, 2001. Report to Berger & Montaque, P.C. 16 pp. with 61 color plates. Smallwood, K.S. 2001. Affidavit of K. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D. in the matter of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's rejection of Seatuck Environmental Association's proposal to operate an education center on Seatuck National Wildlife Refuge. Submitted to Seatuck Environmental Association in two parts, totaling 7 pp. Magney, D., and K.S. Smallwood. 2001. Maranatha High School CEQA critique. Comment letter submitted to Tamara & Efren Compean, 16 pp. Smallwood, K.S. 2001. Preliminary Comments on the Proposed BIythe Energy Project. Submitted to California Energy Commission on March 15 on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy (CaRE). 14 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and D. Mangey. 2001. Comments on the Newhall Ranch November 2000 Smallwood CV 28 Administrative Draft EIR. Prepared for Ventura County Counsel regarding the Newhall Ranch Specific Plan EIR. 68 pp. Magney, D. and K. S. Smallwood. 2000. Newhall Ranch Notice of Preparation Submittal. Prepared for Ventura County Counsel regarding our recommended scope of work for the Newhall Ranch Specific Plan EIR. 17 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2000. Comments on the Preliminary Staff Assessment of the Contra Costa Power Plant Unit 8 Project. Submitted to California Energy Commission on November 30 on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy (CaRE). 4 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2000. Comments on the California Energy Commission's Final Staff Assessment of the MEC. Submitted to California Energy Commission on October 29 on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy (CaRE). 8 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2000. Comments on the Biological Resources Mitigation Implementation and Monitoring Plan (BRMIMP). Submitted to California Energy Commission on October 29 on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy (CaRE). 9 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2000. Comments on the Preliminary Staff Assessment of the Metcalf Energy Center. Submitted to California Energy Commission on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy (CaRE). 11 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2000. Preliminary report of reconnaissance surveys near the TRW plant south of Phoenix, Arizona, March 27-29. Report prepared for Hagens, Berman & Mitchell, Attorneys at Law, Phoenix, AZ. 6 pp. Morrison, M.L., K.S. Smallwood, and M. Robison. 2001. Draft Natural Environment Study for Highway 46 compliance with CEQA/NEPA. Report to the California Department of Transportation. 75 pp. Morrison, M.L., and K.S. Smallwood. 1999. NTI plan evaluation and comments. Exhibit C in W.D. Carrier, M.L. Morrison, K.S. Smallwood, and Vail Engineering. Recommendations for NBHCP land acquisition and enhancement strategies. Northern Territories, Inc., Sacramento. Smallwood, K. S. 1999. Estimation of impacts due to dredging of a shipping channel through Humboldt Bay, California. Court Declaration prepared on behalf of EPIC. Smallwood, K. S. 1998. 1998 California Mountain Lion Track Count. Report to the Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, D.C. 5 pages. Smallwood, K.S. 1998. Draft report of a visit to a paint sludge dump site near Ridgewood, New Jersey, February 26th, 1998. Unpublished report to Consulting in the Public Interest. Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Science missing in the "no surprises" policy. Commissioned by National Endangered Species Network and Spirit of the Sage Council, Pasadena, California. Smallwood CV 29 Smallwood, K.S. and M.L. Morrison. 1997. Alternate mitigation strategy for incidental take of giant garter snake and Swainson's hawk as part of the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan. Pages 6-9 and iii illustrations in W.D. Carrier, K.S. Smallwood and M.L. Morrison, Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan: Narrow channel marsh alternative wetland mitigation. Northern Territories, Inc., Sacramento. Smallwood, K.S. 1996. Assessment of the BIOPORT model's parameter values for pocket gopher burrowing characteristics. Report to Berger & Montague, P.C. and Roy S. Haber, P.C., Philadelphia. (peer reviewed). Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Assessment of plutonium releases from Hanford buried waste sites. Report Number 9, Consulting in the Public Interest, 53 Clinton Street, Lambertville, New Jersey, 08530. Smallwood, K.S. 1996. Soil Bioturbation and Wind Affect Fate of Hazardous Materials that were Released at the Rocky Flats Plant, Colorado. Report to Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia. Smallwood, K.S. 1996. Second assessment of the BIOPORT model's parameter values for pocket gopher burrowing characteristics and other relevant wildlife observations. Report to Berger & Montague, P.C. and Roy S. Haber, P.C., Philadelphia. Smallwood, K.S., and R. Leidy. 1996. Wildlife and Their Management Under the Martell SYP. Report to Georgia Pacific, Corporation, Martel, CA. 30 pp. EIP Associates. 1995. Yolo County Habitat Conservation Plan Biological Resources Report. Yolo County Planning and Development Department, Woodland, California. Smallwood, K.S. and S. Geng. 1995. Analysis of the 1987 California Farm Cost Survey and recommendations for future survey. Program on Workable Energy Regulation, University -wide Energy Research Group, University of California. Smallwood, K.S., S. Geng, and W. Idzerda. 1992. Final report to PG&E: Analysis of the 1987 California Farm Cost Survey and recommendations for future survey. Pacific Gas & Electric Company, San Ramon, California. 24 pp. Fitzhugh, E.L. and K.S. Smallwood. 1987. Methods Manual — A statewide mountain lion population index technique. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. Salmon, T.P. and K.S. Smallwood. 1989. Final Report — Evaluating exotic vertebrates as pests to California agriculture. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento. Smallwood, K.S. and W. A. Erickson (written under supervision of W.E. Howard, R.E. Marsh, and R.J. Laacke). 1990. Environmental exposure and fate of multi -kill strychnine gopher baits. Final Report to USDA Forest Service—NAPIAP, Cooperative Agreement PSW-89-0010CA. Fitzhugh, E.L., K.S. Smallwood, and R. Gross. 1985. Mountain lion track count, Marin County, 1985. Report on file at Wildlife Extension, University of California, Davis. Smallwood CV Comments on Environmental Documents I was retained or commissioned to comment on environmental planning and review documents, including: The Villages of Lakeview EIR (2017; 28 pp); ' Notes on Proposed Study Options for Trail Impacts on Northern Spotted Owl (2017; 4 pp); • San Gorgonio Crossings EIR (2017; 22 pp); ' Replies to responses on Jupiter Project IS and MND (2017; 12 pp); ' MacArthur Transit Village Project Modified 2016 CEQA Analysis (2017; 12 pp); • Central SoMa Plan DEIR (2017; 14 pp); • Colony Commerce Center Specific Plan DEIR (2016; 16 pp); ' Fairway Trails Improvements MND (2016; 13 pp); • Review of Avian -Solar Science Plan (2016; 28 pp); • Replies to responses on Initial Study for Pyramid Asphalt (2016; 5 pp); • Initial Study for Pyramid Asphalt (2016; 4 pp); • Agua Mansa Distribution Warehouse Project Initial Study (2016; 14 pp); • Santa Anita Warehouse IS and MND (2016; 12 pp); • CapRock Distribution Center III DEIR (2016: 12 pp); ' Orange Show Logistics Center Initial Study and MND (2016; 9 pp)) - 0 p);• City of Palmdale Oasis Medical Village Project IS and MND (2016; 7 pp); • Comments on proposed rule for incidental eagle take (2016, 49 pp); • Grapevine Specific and Community Plan FEIR (2016; 25 pp); • Grapevine Specific and Community Plan DEIR (2016; 15 pp); • Clinton County Zoning Ordinance for Wind Turbine siting (2016); • Hallmark at Shenandoah Warehouse Project Initial Study (2016; 6 pp); • Tri -City Industrial Complex Initial Study (2016; 5 pp); • Hidden Canyon Industrial Park Plot Plan 16 -PP -02 (2016; 12 pp); • Kimball Business Park DEIR (2016; 10 pp); • Jupiter Project IS and MND (2016; 9 pp); • Revised Draft Giant Garter Snake Recovery Plan of 2015 (2016, 18 pp); • Palo Verde Mesa Solar Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (2016; 27 pp); • Reply Witness Statement on Fairview Wind Project, Ontario, Canada (2016; 14 pp); 30 • Fairview Wind Project, Ontario, Canada (2016; 41 pp); • Supplementary Reply Witness Statement Amherst Island Wind Farm, Ontario (2015, 38 pp); • Witness Statement on Amherst Island Wind Farm, Ontario (2015, 31 pp); • Second Reply Witness Statement on White Pines Wind Farm, Ontario (2015, 6 pp); • Reply Witness Statement on White Pines Wind Farm, Ontario (2015, 10 pp); ' Witness Statement on White Pines Wind Farm, Ontario (2015, 9 pp); • Proposed Section 24 Specific Plan Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians DEIS (2015, 9 Pp) • Replies to comments 24 Specific Plan Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians FEIS (2015, 6 pp); Smallwood CV 31 • Willow Springs Solar Photovoltaic Project DEIR (2015; 28 pp); • Sierra Lakes Commerce Center Project DEIR (2015, 9 pp); • Columbia Business Center MND (2015; 8 pp); • West Valley Logistics Center Specific Plan DEIR (2015, 10 pp); • World Logistic Center Specific Plan FEIR (2015, 12 pp); • Bay Delta Conservation Plan EIR/EIS (2014, 21 pp); • Addison Wind Energy Project DEIR (2014, 32 pp); • Response to Comments on the Addison Wind Energy Project DEIR (2014, 15 pp); • Addison and Rising Tree Wind Energy Project FEIR (2014, 12 pp); • Alta East Wind Energy Project FEIS (2013, 23 pp); • Blythe Solar Power Project Staff Assessment, California Ener Commission (2013, 16 • Clearwater and Yakima Solar Projects DEIR (2013, 9 pp); Energy pp)' • Cuyama Solar Project DEIR (2014, 19 pp); • Draft Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) EIR/EIS (2015, 49 pp); ' Kingbird Solar Photovoltaic Project EIR (2013, 19 pp); • Lucerne Valley Solar Project Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration (2013, 12 • pp); Palen Solar Electric Generating System Final Staff Assessment of California Energy Commission, (2014, 20 pp); • Rebuttal testimony on Palen Solar Energy Generating System ( S 2014, 9 • Rising Tree Wind Energy Project DEIR 2014 32 pp)' ' Response to Comments on the Rising Tree Wind Energy Project DEIR2014 15 • Soitec Solar Development Project Draft PEIR (2014, 18 pp); DEIR( pp)' ' Comment on the Biological Opinion (08ESMF-00-2012-F-0387) of Oakland Zoo expansion on Alameda whipsnake and California red -legged frog (2014; 3 pp); ' West Antelope Solar Energy Project Initial Study and Negative Declaration (2013, 18 ' Willow Springs Solar Photovoltaic Project DEIR (2015, 28j ( 2015, 10 pp);Pp), p Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Project DEIR • � Declaration on Tule Wind project FEWFEIS (2013; 24 pp); • Sunlight Partners LANDPRO Solar Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (2013; 11 Declaration in opposition to BLM fracking (2013; 5 pp); g pp)' Rosamond Solar Project Addendum EIR (2013; 13 pp); • Pioneer Green Solar Project EIR (2013; 13 pp); Reply to Staff Responses to Comments on Soccer Center Solar Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (2013; 6 pp); Soccer Center Solar Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (2013; 10 pp), Plainview Solar Works Mitigated Negative Declaration (2013; 10 pp); ' Reply to the County Staff's Responses on comments to Imperial Valley Solar Company 2 Project (2013; 10 pp); • Imperial Valley Solar Company 2 Project (2013; 13 pp); • FRV Orion Solar Project DEIR (PP 12232) (2013; 9 pp); Casa Diablo IV Geothermal Development Project (3013; 6 pp); Reply to Staff Responses to Comments on Casa Diablo IV Geothermal Development Project (2013; 8 pp); • FEIS prepared for Alta East Wind Project (2013; 23 pp); Smallwood CV 32 • Metropolitan Air Park DEIR, City of San Diego (2013; ); • Davidon Homes Tentative Subdivision Map and Rezoning Project DEIR (2013; 9 pp); Analysis of Biological Assessment of Oakland Zoo Expansion Impacts on Alameda Whipsnake (2013; 10 pp); • Declaration on Campo Verde Solar project FEIR (2013; 1 1pp); • Neg Dec comments on Davis Sewer Trunk Rehabilitation (2013; 8 pp); • Declaration on North Steens Transmission Line FEIS (2012; 62 pp); ' City of Lancaster Revised Initial Study for Conditional Use Permits, 12-08 and 12-09, Summer Solar and Springtime Solar Projects (2012; 8 pp); • J&J Ranch, 24 Adobe Lane Environmental Review (2012; 14 pp); • Reply to the County Staff's Responses on comments to Hudson Ranch Power II Geothermal Project and the Simbol Calipatria Plant II (2012; 8 pp); • Hudson Ranch Power II Geothermal Project and the Simbol Calipatria Plant II (2012; 9 pp); Desert Harvest Solar Project EIS (2012; 15 pp); • Solar Gen 2 Array Project DEIR (2012; 16 pp); • Ocotillo Sol Project EIS (2012; 4 pp); • Beacon Photovoltaic Project DEIR (2012; 5 pp); • Declaration on Initial Study and Proposed Negative Declaration for the Butte Water District 2012 Water Transfer Program (2012; 11 pp); • Mount Signal and Calexico Solar Farm Projects DEIR (2011; 16 pp); • City of Elk Grove Sphere of Influence EIR (2011; 28 pp); • Comment on Sutter Landing Park Solar Photovoltaic Project MND (2011; 9 pp); • Statement of Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D. Regarding Proposed Rabik/Gudath Project, 22611 Coleman Valley Road, Bodega Bay (CPN 10-0002) (2011; 4 pp); • Declaration of K. Shawn Smallwood on Biological Impacts of the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) (2011; 9 pp); • Comments on Draft Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance (2011; 13 pp); • Comments on Draft EIR/EA for Niles Canyon Safety Improvement Project (2011; 16 pp); • Declaration of K. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D., on Biological Impacts of the Route 84 Safety Improvement Project (2011; 7 pp); • Rebuttal Testimony of Witness #22, K. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D, on Behalf of Intervenors Friends of The Columbia Gorge & Save Our Scenic Area (2010; 6 pp); • Prefiled Direct Testimony of Witness #22, K. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D, on Behalf of Intervenors Friends of the Columbia Gorge & Save Our Scenic Area. Comments on Whistling Ridge Wind Energy Power Project DEIS, Skamania County, Washington (2010; 41 pp); • Evaluation of Klickitat County's Decisions on the Windy Flats West Wind Energy Project (2010; 17 pp); • St. John's Church Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (2010; 14 pp.); • Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Results Radio Zone File #2009-001 (2010; 20 pp); • Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project Final Environmental Impact Report (2010;12 pp); • Answers to Questions on 33% RPS Implementation Analysis Preliminary Results Report (2009: 9 pp); • SEPA Determination of Non -significance regarding zoning adjustments for Skamania Smallwood CV 33 County, Washington. Second Declaration to Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. and Save Our Scenic Area (Dec 2008; 17 pp); • Comments on Draft 1 Summary Report to CAISO (2008; 10 pp); • County of Placer's Categorical Exemption of Hilton Manor Project (2009; 9 pp); • Protest of CARE to Amendment to the Power Purchase and Sale Agreement for Procurement of Eligible Renewable Energy Resources Between Hatchet Ridge Wind LLC and PG&E (2009; 3 pp); • Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project EIR/EIS (2009; 142 pp); • Delta Shores Project EIR, south Sacramento (2009; 11 pp + addendum 2 pp); • Declaration of Shawn Smallwood in Support of Care's Petition to Modify D.07-09-040 (2008; 3 pp); • The Public Utility Commission's Implementation Analysis December 16 Workshop for the Governor's Executive Order 5-14-08 to implement a 33% Renewable Portfolio Standard by 2020 (2008; 9 pp); • The Public Utility Commission's Implementation Analysis Draft Work Plan for the Governor's Executive Order 5-14-08 to implement a 33% Renewable Portfolio Standard by 2020 (2008; 11 pp); • Draft I Summary Report to California Independent System Operator for Planning Reserve Margins (PRM) Study (2008; 7 pp.); • SEPA Determination of Non -significance regarding zoning adjustments for Skamania County, Washington. Declaration to Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. and Save Our Scenic Area (Sep 2008; 16 pp); • California Energy Commission's Preliminary Staff Assessment of the Colusa Generating Station (2007; 24 pp); • Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (2008: 66 pp); • Replies to Response to Comments Re: Regional University Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (2008; 20 pp); • Regional University Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (2008: 33 pp.); • Clark Precast, LLC's "Sugarland" project, Negative Declaration (2008: 15 pp.); • Cape Wind Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement (2008; 157 pp.); • Yuba Highlands Specific Plan (or Area Plan) Environmental Impact Report (2006; 37 pp.); • Replies to responses to comments on Mitigated Negative Declaration of the proposed Mining Permit (MIN 04-01) and Modification of Use Permit 96-02 at North Table Mountain (2006; 5 pp); • Mitigated Negative Declaration of the proposed Mining Permit (MIN 04-01) and Modification of Use Permit 96-02 at North Table Mountain (2006; 15 pp); • Windy Point Wind Farm Environmental Review and EIS (2006; 14 pp and 36 Powerpoint slides in reply to responses to comments); Shiloh I Wind Power Project EIR (2005; 18 pp); • Buena Vista Wind Energy Project Notice of Preparation of EIR (2004; 15 pp); • Negative Declaration of the proposed Callahan Estates Subdivision (2004; 11 pp); • Negative Declaration of the proposed Winters Highlands Subdivision (2004; 9 pp); • Negative Declaration of the proposed Winters Highlands Subdivision (2004; 13 pp); • Negative Declaration of the proposed Creekside Highlands Project, Tract 7270 (2004; 21 Smallwood CV 34 pp); • On the petition California Fish and Game Commission to list the Burrowing Owl as threatened or endangered (2003; 10 pp); • Conditional Use Permit renewals from Alameda County for wind turbine operations in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area (2003; 41 pp); • UC Davis Long Range Development Plan of 2003, particularly with regard to the Neighborhood Master Plan (2003; 23 pp); • Anderson Marketplace Draft Environmental Impact Report (2003: 18 pp + 3 plates of photos); • Negative Declaration of the proposed expansion of Temple B,'nai Tikyah (2003: 6 pp); • Antonio Mountain Ranch Specific Plan Public Draft EIR (2002: 23 pp); • Response to testimony of experts at the East Altamont Energy Center evidentiary hearing on biological resources (2002: 9 pp); • Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report, The Promenade (2002: 7 pp); • Recirculated Initial Study for Calpine's proposed Pajaro Valley Energy Center (2002: 3 pp); • UC Merced -- Declaration of Dr. Shawn Smallwood in support of petitioner's application for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (2002: 5 pp); • Replies to response to comments in Final Environmental Impact Report, Atwood Ranch Unit III Subdivision (2003: 22 pp); • Draft Environmental Impact Report, Atwood Ranch Unit III Subdivision (2002: 19 pp + 8 photos on 4 plates); • California Energy Commission Staff Report on GWF Tracy Peaker Project (2002: 17 pp + 3 photos; follow-up report of 3 pp); • Initial Study and Negative Declaration, Silver Bend Apartments, Placer County (2002: 13 pp); • UC Merced Long-range Development Plan DEIR and UC Merced Community Plan DEIR (2001: 26 pp); • Initial Study, Colusa County Power Plant (2001: 6 pp); • Comments on Proposed Dog Park at Catlin Park, Folsom, California (2001: 5 pp + 4 photos); • Pacific Lumber Co. (Headwaters) Habitat Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Report (1998: 28 pp); • Final Environmental Impact Report/Statement for Issuance of Take authorization for listed species within the MSCP planning area in San Diego County, California (Fed. Reg. 62 (60): 14938, San Diego Multi -Species Conservation Program) (1997: 10 pp); • Permit (PRT -823773) Amendment for the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan, Sacramento, CA (Fed. Reg. 63 (101): 29020-29021) (1998); • Draft Recovery Plan for the Giant Garter Snake (Thamnophis gigas). (Fed. Reg. 64(176): 49497-49498) (1999: 8 pp); • Review of the Draft Recovery Plan for the Arroyo Southwestern Toad (Bufo microscaphus californicus) (1998); • Ballona West Bluffs Project Environmental Impact Report (1999: oral presentation); • California Board of Forestry's proposed amended Forest Practices Rules (1999); • Negative Declaration for the Sunset Skyranch Airport Use Permit (1999); 0 Calpine and Bechtel Corporations' Biological Resources Implementation and Monitoring . Smallwood CV 35 Program (BRMIMP) for the Metcalf Energy Center (2000: 10 pp); • California Energy Commission's Final Staff Assessment of the proposed Metcalf Energy Center (2000); • US Fish and Wildlife Service Section 7 consultation with the California Energy Commission regarding Calpine and Bechtel Corporations' Metcalf Energy Center (2000: 4 pp); • California Energy Commission's Preliminary Staff Assessment of the proposed Metcalf Energy Center (2000: 11 pp); • Site-specific management plans for the Natomas Basin Conservancy's mitigation lands, prepared by Wildlands, Inc. (2000: 7 pp); • Affidavit of K. Shawn Smallwood in Spirit of the Sage Council, et al. (Plaintiffs) vs. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, et al. (Defendants), Injuries caused by the No Surprises policy and final rule which codifies that policy (1999: 9 pp). Comments on other Environmental Review Documents: • Proposed Regulation for California Fish and Game Code Section 3503.5 (2015: 12 pp); • Statement of Overriding Considerations related to extending Altamont Winds, Inc.'s Conditional Use Permit PLN2014-00028 (2015; 8 pp); • Draft Program Level EIR for Covell Village (2005; 19 pp); • Bureau of Land Management Wind Energy Programmatic EIS Scoping document (2003: 7 pp.); • NEPA Environmental Analysis for Biosafety Level 4 National Biocontainment Laboratory (NBL) at UC Davis (2003: 7 pp); • Notice of Preparation of UC Merced Community and Area Plan EIR, on behalf of The Wildlife Society—Western Section (2001: 8 pp.); • Preliminary Draft Yolo County Habitat Conservation Plan (2001; 2 letters totaling 35 pp.); • Merced County General Plan Revision, notice of Negative Declaration (2001: 2 pp.); • Notice of Preparation of Campus Parkway EIR/EIS (2001: 7 pp.); • Draft Recovery Plan for the bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Range (Ovis candensis) (2000); • Draft Recovery Plan for the California Red -legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii), on behalf of The Wildlife Society—Western Section (2000: 10 pp.); • Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Draft Environmental Impact Statement, on behalf of The Wildlife Society—Western Section (2000: 7 pp.); • State Water Project Supplemental Water Purchase Program, Draft Program EIR (1997); • Davis General Plan Update EIR (2000); • Turn of the Century EIR (1999: 10 pp); • Proposed termination of Critical Habitat Designation under the Endangered Species Act (Fed. Reg. 64(113): 31871-31874) (1999); • NOA Draft Addendum to the Final Handbook for Habitat Conservation Planning and Incidental Take Permitting Process, termed the HCP 5 -Point Policy Plan (Fed. Reg. 64(45): 11485 - 11490) (1999; 2 pp + attachments); • Covell Center Project EIR and EIR Supplement (1997). Position Statements I prepared the following position statements for the Western Section of The Wildlife Society, and one for nearly 200 scientists: Smallwood CV 36 • Recommended that the California Department of Fish and Game prioritize the extermination of the introduced southern water snake in northern California. The Wildlife Society -- Western Section (2001); • Recommended that The Wildlife Society—Western Section appoint or recommend members of the independent scientific review panel for the UC Merced environmental review process (2001); Opposed the siting of the University of California's 10th campus on a sensitive vernal pool/grassland complex east of Merced. The Wildlife Society --Western Section (2000); • Opposed the legalization of ferret ownership in California. The Wildlife Society --Western Section (2000); • Opposed the Proposed "No Surprises," "Safe Harbor," and "Candidate Conservation Agreement" rules, including permit -shield protection provisions (Fed. Reg. Vol. 62, No. 103, pp. 29091-29098 and No. 113, pp. 32189-32194). This statement was signed by 188 scientists and went to the responsible federal agencies, as well as to the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. Posters at Professional Meetings Leyvas, E. and K. S. Smallwood. 2015. Rehabilitating injured animals to offset and rectify wind project impacts. Conference on Wind Energy and Wildlife Impacts, Berlin, Germany, 9-12 March 2015. Smallwood, K. S., J. Mount, S. Standish, E. Leyvas, D. Bell, E. Walther, B. Karas. 2015. Integrated detection trials to improve the accuracy of fatality rate estimates at wind projects. Conference on Wind Energy and Wildlife Impacts, Berlin, Germany, 9-12 March 2015. Smallwood, K. S. and C. G. Thelander. 2005. Lessons learned from five years of avian mortality research in the Altamont Pass WRA. AWEA conference, Denver, May 2005. Neher, L., L. Wilder, J. Woo, L. Spiegel, D. Yen-Nakafugi, and K.S. Smallwood. 2005. Bird's eye view on California wind. AWEA conference, Denver, May 2005. Smallwood, K. S., C. G. Thelander and L. Spiegel. 2003. Toward a predictive model of avian fatalities in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Windpower 2003 Conference and Convention, Austin, Texas. Smallwood, K.S. and Eva Butler. 2002. Pocket Gopher Response to Yellow Star -thistle Eradication as part of Grassland Restoration at Decommissioned Mather Air Force Base, Sacramento County, California. White Mountain Research Station Open House, Barcroft Station. Smallwood, K.S. and Michael L. Morrison. 2002. Fresno kangaroo rat (Dipodornys nitratoides) Conservation Research at Resources Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station. White Mountain Research Station Open House, Barcroft Station. Smallwood, K.S. and E.L. Fitzhugh. 1989. Differentiating mountain lion and dog tracks. Third Mountain Lion Workshop, Prescott, AZ. 10 Smallwood CV 37 Smith, T. R. and K. S. Smallwood. 2000. Effects of study area size, location, season, and allometry on reported Sorex shrew densities. Annual Meeting of the Western Section of The Wildlife Society. Presentations at Professional Meetings and Seminars Repowering the Altamont Pass. Altamont Symposium, The Wildlife Society — Western Section, 5 February 2017. Developing methods to reduce bird mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, 1999- 2007. Altamont Symposium, The Wildlife Society — Western Section, 5 February 2017. Conservation and recovery of burrowing owls in Santa Clara Valley. Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency, Newark, California, 3 February 2017. Mitigation of Raptor Fatalities in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Raptor Research Foundation Meeting, Sacramento, California, 6 November 2015. From burrows to behavior: Research and management for burrowing owls in a diverse landscape. California Burrowing Owl Consortium meeting, 24 October 2015, San Jose, California. The Challenges of repowering. Keynote presentation at Conference on Wind Energy and Wildlife Impacts, Berlin, Germany, 10 March 2015. Research Highlights Altamont Pass 2011-2015. Scientific Review Committee, Oakland, Califo 8 July 2015. rnia Siting wind turbines to minimize raptor collisions: Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. US Fish and Wildlife Service Golden Eagle Working Group, Sacramento, California, 8 January 2015. Evaluation of nest boxes as a burrowing owl conservation strategy. Sacramento Chapter of the Western Section, The Wildlife Society. Sacramento, California, 26 August 2013. Predicting collision hazard zones to guide repowering of the Altamont Pass. Conference on wind power and environmental impacts. Stockholm, Sweden, 5-7 February 2013. Impacts of Wind Turbines on Wildlife. California Council for Wildlife Rehabilitators, Yosemite, California, 12 November 2012. Impacts of Wind Turbines on Birds and Bats. Madrone Audubon Society, Santa Rosa, Californi February 2012. a, 20 Comparing Wind Turbine Impacts across North America. California Energy Commission Staff Workshop: Reducing the Impacts of Energy Infrastructure on Wildlife, 20 July 2011. Siting Repowered Wind Turbines to Minimize Raptor Collisions. California Energy Commission Staff Workshop: Reducing the Impacts of Energy Infrastructure on Wildlife, 20 July 2011, Smallwood CV 38 Siting Repowered Wind Turbines to Minimize Raptor Collisions. Alameda County Scientific Review Committee meeting, 17 February 2011 Comparing Wind Turbine Impacts across North America. Conference on Wind energy and Wildlife impacts, Trondheim, Norway, 3 May 2011. Update on Wildlife Impacts in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Raptor Symposium, The Wildlife Society—Western Section, Riverside, California, February 2011. Siting Repowered Wind Turbines to Minimize Raptor Collisions. Raptor Symposium, The Wildlife Society - Western Section, Riverside, California, February 2011. Wildlife mortality caused by wind turbine collisions. Ecological Society of America, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 6 August 2010. Map -based repowering and reorganization of a wind farm to minimize burrowing owl fatalities. California burrowing Owl Consortium Meeting, Livermore, California, 6 February 2010. Environmental barriers to wind power. Getting Real About Renewables: Economic and Environmental Barriers to Biofuels and Wind Energy. A symposium sponsored by the Environmental & Energy Law & Policy Journal, University of Houston Law Center, Houston, 23 February 2007. Lessons learned about bird collisions with wind turbines in the Altamont Pass and other US wind farms. Meeting with Japan Ministry of the Environment and Japan Ministry of the Economy, Wild Bird Society of Japan, and other NGOs Tokyo, Japan, 9 November 2006. Lessons learned about bird collisions with wind turbines in the Altamont Pass and other US wind farms. Symposium on bird collisions with wind turbines. Wild Bird Society of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 4 November 2006. Responses of Fresno kangaroo rats to habitat improvements in an adaptive management framework. California Society for Ecological Restoration (SERCAL) 13`h Annual Conference, UC Santa Barbara, 27 October 2006. Fatality associations as the basis for predictive models of fatalities in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. EEFAPLIC/PIER Workshop, 2006 Biologist Task Force and Avian Interaction with Electric Facilities Meeting, Pleasanton, California, 28 April 2006. Burrowing owl burrows and wind turbine collisions in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. The Wildlife Society - Western Section Annual Meeting, Sacramento, California, February 8, 2006. Mitigation at wind farms. Workshop: Understanding and resolving bird and bat impacts. American Wind Energy Association and Audubon Society. Los Angeles, CA. January 10 and 11, 2006. Incorporating data from the California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR) system into an Smallwood CV WE impact assessment tool for birds near wind farms. Shawn Smallwood, Kevin Hunting, Marcus Yee, Linda Spiegel, Monica Parisi. Workshop: Understanding and resolving bird and bat impacts. American Wind Energy Association and Audubon Society. Los Angeles, CA. January 10 and 11, 2006. Toward indicating threats to birds by California's new wind farms. California Energy Commission, Sacramento, May 26, 2005. Avian collisions in the Altamont Pass. California Energy Commission, Sacramento, May 26, 2005. Ecological solutions for avian collisions with wind turbines in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. EPRI Environmental Sector Council, Monterey, California, February 17, 2005. Ecological solutions for avian collisions with wind turbines in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. The Wildlife Society—Western Section Annual Meeting, Sacramento, California, January 19, 2005. Associations between avian fatalities and attributes of electric distribution poles in California. The Wildlife Society - Western Section Annual Meeting, Sacramento, California, January 19, 2005. Minimizing avian mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resources Area. UC Davis Wind Energy Collaborative Forum, Palm Springs, California, December 14, 2004. Selecting electric distribution poles for priority retrofitting to reduce raptor mortality. Raptor Research Foundation Meeting, Bakersfield, California, November 10, 2004. Responses of Fresno kangaroo rats to habitat improvements in an adaptive management framework. Annual Meeting of the Society for Ecological Restoration, South Lake Tahoe, California, October 16, 2004. Lessons learned from five years of avian mortality research at the Altamont Pass Wind Resources Area in California. The Wildlife Society Annual Meeting, Calgary, Canada, September 2004. The ecology and impacts of power generation at Altamont Pass. Sacramento Petroleum Association, Sacramento, California, August 18, 2004. Burrowing owl mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. California Burrowing Owl Consortium meeting, Hayward, California, February 7, 2004. Burrowing owl mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. California Burrowing Owl SytnposiL1117. Sacramento, November 2, 2003. Raptor Mortality at the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. National Wind Coordinating Committee, Washington, D.C., November 17, 2003. Raptor Behavior at the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Annual Meeting of the Raptor Research Foundation, Anchorage, Alaska, September, 2003. Smallwood CV 40 Raptor Mortality at the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Annual Meeting of the Raptor Research Foundation, Anchorage, Alaska, September, 2003. California mountain lions. Ecological & Environmental Issues Seminar, Department of Biology, California State University, Sacramento, November, 2000. Intra- and inter -turbine string comparison of fatalities to animal burrow densities at Altamont Pass. National Wind Coordinating Committee, Carmel, California, May, 2000. Using a Geographic Positioning System (GPS) to map wildlife and habitat. Annual Meeting of the Western Section of The Wildlife Society, Riverside, CA, January, 2000. Suggested standards for science- applied to conservation issues. Annual Meeting of the Western Section of The Wildlife Society, Riverside, CA, January, 2000. The indicators framework applied to ecological restoration in Yolo County, California. Society for Ecological Restoration, September 25, 1999. Ecological restoration in the context of animal social units and their habitat areas. Society for Ecological Restoration, September 24, 1999. Relating Indicators of Ecological Health and Integrity to Assess Risks to Sustainable Agriculture and Native Biota. International Conference on Ecosystem Health, August 16, 1999. A crosswalk from the Endangered Species Act to the HCP Handbook and real HCPs. Southern California Edison, Co. and California Energy Commission, March 4-5, 1999. Mountain lion track counts in California: Implications for Management. Ecological & Environmental Issues Seminar, Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Sacramento, November 4, 1998. "No Surprises" -- Lack of science in the HCP process. California Native Plant Society Annual Conservation Conference, The Presidio, San Francisco, September 7, 1997. In Your Interest. A half hour weekly show aired on Channel 10 Television, Sacramento. In this episode, I served on a panel of experts discussing problems with the implementation of the Endangered Species Act. Aired August 31, 1997. Spatial scaling of pocket gopher (Geonividae) density. Southwestern Association of Naturalists 44th Meeting, Fayetteville, Arkansas, April 10, 1997. Estimating prairie dog and pocket gopher burrow volume. Southwestern Association of Naturalists 44th Meeting, Fayetteville, Arkansas, April 10, 1997. Ten years of mountain lion track survey. Fifth Mountain Lion Workshop, San Diego, February 27, 1996. Smallwood CV 41 Study and interpretive design effects on mountain lion density estimates. Fifth Mountain Lion Workshop, San Diego, February 27, 1996. Small animal control. Session moderator and speaker at the California Farm Conference, Sacramento, California, Feb. 28, 1995. Small animal control. Ecological Farming Conference, Asylomar, California, Jan. 28, 1995. Habitat associations of the Swainson's Hawk in the Sacramento Valley's agricultural landscape. 1994 Raptor Research Foundation Meeting, Flagstaff, Arizona. Alfalfa as wildlife habitat. Seed Industry Conference, Woodland, California, May 4, 1994. Habitats and vertebrate pests: impacts and management. Managing Farmland to Bring Back Game Birds and Wildlife to the Central Valley. Yolo County Resource Conservation District, U.C. Davis, February 19, 1994. Management of gophers and alfalfa as wildlife habitat. Orland Alfalfa Production Meeting and Sacramento Valley Alfalfa Production Meeting, February 1 and 2, 1994. Patterns of wildlife movement in a farming landscape. Wildlife and Fisheries Biology Seminar Series: Recent Advances in Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, U.C. Davis, Dec. 6, 1993. Alfalfa as wildlife habitat. California Alfalfa Symposium, Fresno, California, Dec. 9, 1993. Management of pocket gophers in Sacramento Valley alfalfa. California Alfalfa Symposium, Fresno, California, Dec. 8, 1993. Association analysis of raptors in a farming landscape. Plenary speaker at Raptor Research Foundation Meeting, Charlotte, North Carolina, Nov. 6, 1993. Landscape strategies for biological control and IPM. Plenary speaker, International Conference on Integrated Resource Management and Sustainable Agriculture, Beijing, China, Sept. 11, 1993. Landscape Ecology Study of Pocket Gophers in Alfalfa. Alfalfa Field Day, U.C. Davis, July 1993. Patterns of wildlife movement in a farming landscape. Spatial Data Analysis Colloquium, U.C. Davis, August 6, 1993. Sound stewardship of wildlife. Veterinary Medicine Seminar: Ethics of Animal Use, U.C. Davis. May 1993. Landscape ecology study of pocket gophers in alfalfa. Five County Grower's Meeting, Tracy, California. February 1993. Turbulence and the community organizers: The role of invading species in ordering a turbulent Smallwood CV 42 system, and the factors for invasion success. Ecology Graduate Student Association Colloquium, U.C. Davis. May 1990. Evaluation of exotic vertebrate pests. Fourteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference, Sacramento, California. March 1990. Analytical methods for predicting success of mammal introductions to North America. The Western Section of the Wildlife Society, Hilo, Hawaii. February 1988. A state-wide mountain lion track survey. Sacramento County Dept Parks and Recreation. April 1986. The mountain lion in California. Davis Chapter of the Audubon Society. October 1985. Ecology Graduate Student Seminars, U.C. Davis, 1985-1990: Social behavior of the mountain lion; Mountain lion control; Political status of the mountain lion in California. Other forms of Participation at Professional Meetings • Scientific Committee, Conference on Wind energy and Wildlife impacts, Berlin, Germany, March 2015. • Scientific Committee, Conference on Wind energy and Wildlife impacts, Stockholm, Sweden, February 2013. • Workshop co -presenter at Birds & Wind Energy Specialist Group (BAWESG) Information sharing week, Bird specialist studies for proposed wind energy facilities in South Africa, Endangered Wildlife Trust, Darling, South Africa, 3-7 October 2011. • Scientific Committee, Conference on Wind energy and Wildlife impacts, Trondheim, Norway, 2-5 May 2011. • Chair of Animal Damage Management Session, The Wildlife Society, Annual Meeting, Reno, Nevada, September 26, 2001. • Chair of Technical Session: Human communities and ecosystem health: Comparing perspectives and making connection. Managing for Ecosystem Health, International Congress on Ecosystem Health, Sacramento, CA August 15-20, 1999. • Student Awards Committee, Annual Meeting of the Western Section of The Wildlife Society, Riverside, CA, January, 2000. • Student Mentor, Annual Meeting of the Western Section of The Wildlife Society, Riverside, CA, January, 2000_ Smallwood CV 43 Printed Mass Media Smallwood, K.S., D. Mooney, and M. McGuinness. 2003. We must stop the UCD biolab now. Op - Ed to the Davis Enterprise. Smallwood, K.S. 2002. Spring Lake threatens Davis. Op -Ed to the Davis Enterprise. Smallwood, K.S. Summer, 2001. Mitigation of habitation. The Flatlander, Davis, California. Entrikan, R.K. and K.S. Smallwood. 2000. Measure O: Flawed law would lock in new taxes. Op -Ed to the Davis Enterprise. Smallwood, K.S. 2000. Davis delegation lobbies Congress for Wildlife conservation. Op -Ed to the Davis Enterprise. Smallwood, K.S. 1998. Davis Visions. The Flatlander, Davis, California. Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Last grab for Yolo's land and water. The Flatlander, Davis, California. Smallwood, K.S. 1997. The Yolo County HCP. Op -Ed to the Davis Enterprise. Radio/Television PBS News Hour, FOX News, Energy in America: Dead Birds Unintended Consequence of Wind Power Development, August 2011. KXJZ Capital Public Radio -- Insight (Host Jeffrey Callison). Mountain lion attacks (with guest Professor Richard Coss). 23 April 2009; KXJZ Capital Public Radio -- Insight (Host Jeffrey Callison). Wind farm Rio Vista Renewable Power. 4 September 2008; KQED QUEST Episode #111. Bird collisions with wind turbines. 2007; KDVS Speaking in Tongues (host Ron Glick), Yolo County HCP: 1 hour. December 27, 2001; KDVS Speaking in Tongues (host Ron Glick), Yolo County HCP: 1 hour. May 3, 2001; KDVS Speaking in Tongues (host Ron Glick), Yolo County HCP: 1 hour. February 8, 2001; KDVS Speaking in Tongues (host Ron Glick & Shawn Smallwood), California Energy Crisis: 1 hour. Jan. 25, 2001; KDVS Speaking in Tongues (host Ron Glick), Headwaters Forest HCP: 1 hour. 1998; Smallwood CV Davis Cable Channel (host Gerald Heffernon), Burrowing owls in Davis: half hour. June, 2000; Davis Cable Channel (hosted by Davis League of Women Voters), Measure O debate: 1 hour. October, 2000; KXTV 10, In Your Interest, The Endangered Species Act: half hour. 1997. Reviews of Journal Papers (Scientific Journals for whom I've provided neer review) Committees Scientific Review Committee, Alameda County, Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area • Ph.D. Thesis Committee, Steve Anderson, University of California, Davis • MS Thesis Committee, Marcus Yee, California State University, Sacramento Other Professional Activities or Products Testified in Federal Court in Denver during 2005 over the fate of radio -nuclides in the soil at Rocky Flats Plant after exposure to burrowing animals. My clients won a judgment of $553,000,000. I have also testified in many other cases of litigation under CEQA, NEPA, the Warren-Alquist Act, and other environmental laws. My clients won most of the cases for which I testified. Testified before Environmental Review Tribunals in Ontario, Canada regarding proposed White Pines and Amherst Island Wind Energy projects. Testified in Skamania County Hearing in 2009 on the potential impacts of zoning the County for development of wind farms and hazardous waste facilities. Journal Journal American Naturalist Journal of Animal Ecology Journal of Wildlife Management Western North American Naturalist Auk Journal of Raptor Research Biological Conservation National Renewable Energy Lab reports Canadian Journal of Zoology Oikos Ecosystem Health The Prairie Naturalist Environmental Conservation Restoration Ecology Environmental Management Southwestern Naturalist The Wildlife Society—Western Section Trans. Functional Ecology Journal of Zoolo (London) Proc. Int. Con ress on Managing for Ecosystem Health Journal of Applied Ecology Transactions in GIS Ecology Tropical Ecology Biological Control The Condor Committees Scientific Review Committee, Alameda County, Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area • Ph.D. Thesis Committee, Steve Anderson, University of California, Davis • MS Thesis Committee, Marcus Yee, California State University, Sacramento Other Professional Activities or Products Testified in Federal Court in Denver during 2005 over the fate of radio -nuclides in the soil at Rocky Flats Plant after exposure to burrowing animals. My clients won a judgment of $553,000,000. I have also testified in many other cases of litigation under CEQA, NEPA, the Warren-Alquist Act, and other environmental laws. My clients won most of the cases for which I testified. Testified before Environmental Review Tribunals in Ontario, Canada regarding proposed White Pines and Amherst Island Wind Energy projects. Testified in Skamania County Hearing in 2009 on the potential impacts of zoning the County for development of wind farms and hazardous waste facilities. Smallwood CV W, Testified in deposition in 2007 in the case of O'Dell et al. vs. FPL Energy in Houston, Texas. Testified in Klickitat County Hearing in 2006 on the potential impacts of the Windy Point Wind Farm. Memberships in Professional Societies The Wildlife Society Raptor Research Foundation Honors and Awards Fulbright Research Fellowship to Indonesia, 1987 J.G. Boswell Full Academic Scholarship, 1981 college of choice Certificate of Appreciation, The Wildlife Society—Western Section, 2000, 2001 Northern California Athletic Association Most Valuable Cross Country Runner, 1984 American Legion Award, Corcoran High School, 1981, and John Muir Junior High, 1977 CIF Section Champion, Cross Country in 1978 CIF Section Champion, Track & Field 2 mile run in 1981 National Junior Record, 20 kilometer run, 1982 National Age Group Record, 1500 meter run, 1978 Community Activities District 64 Little League Umpire, 2003-2007 Dixon Little League Umpire, 2006-07 Davis Little League Chief Umpire and Board member, 2004-2005 Davis Little League Safety Officer, 2004-2005 Davis Little League Certified Umpire, 2002-2004 Davis Little League Scorekeeper, 2002 Davis Visioning Group member Petitioner for Writ of Mandate under the California Environmental Quality Act against City of Woodland decision to approve the Spring Lake Specific Plan, 2002 Served on campaign committees for City Council candidates Smallwood CV 46 Representative Clients/Funders Law Offices of Stephan C. Volker EDF Renewables Blum Collins, LLP National Renewable Energy Lab Eric K. Gillespie Professional Corporation Altamont Winds LLC Law Offices of Berger & Montague Salka Energy Lozeau I Drury LLP Comstocks Business (magazine) Law Offices of Roy Haber BioResource Consultants Law Offices of Edward MacDonald Tierra Data Law Office of John Gabrielli Law Office of Bill Kopper Law Office of Donald B. Mooney Law Office of Veneruso & Moncharsh Law Office of Steven Thompson Law Office of Brian Gaffney California Wildlife Federation Defenders of Wildlife Sierra Club National Endangered Species Network Spirit of the Sage Council The Humane Society Hagens Berman LLP Environmental Protection Information Center Goldberg, Kamin & Garvin, Attorneys at Law Californians for Renewable Energy (CARE) Seatuck Environmental Association Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. Save Our Scenic Area Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound Friends of the Swainson's Hawk Alameda Creek Alliance Center for Biological Diversity California Native Plant Society Endangered Wildlife Trust and BirdLife South Africa AquAlliance Oregon Natural Desert Association Save Our Sound G3 Energy and Pattern Energy Emerald Farms Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Southern California Edison Co. Georgia-Pacific Timber Co. Northern Territories Inc. David Magney Environmental Consulting Wildlife History Foundation NextEra Energy Resources, LLC O in, Inc. Black and Veatch Terry Preston, Wildlife Ecology Research Center EcoStat, Inc. US Navy US Department of Agriculture US Forest Service US Fish & Wildlife Service US Department of Justice California Energy Commission California Office of the Attorney General California Department of Fish & Wildlife California Department of Transportation California Department of Forestry California Department of Food & Agriculture Ventura County Counsel County of Yolo Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education Program Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District East Bay Regional Park District County of Alameda Don & LaNelle Silverstien Seventh Day Adventist Church Escuela de la Raza Unida Susan Pelican and Howard Beeman Residents Against Inconsistent Development, Inc. Bob Sarvey Mike Boyd Hillcroft Neighborhood Fund Joint Labor Management Committee, Retail Food Industry Lisa Rocca Kevin Jackson Dawn Stover and Jay Letto Nancy Havassy Catherine Portman (for Brenda Cedarblade) Ventus Environmental Solutions, Inc. Panorama Environmental, Inc. Adams Broadwell Professional Corporation C, ats kCalifomia clapper rail G1V1G_�olden eagle ainson's hawk (Northern harrier ff li te-tailed kite Loggerhead shrike �iast Bell's vireo llow flycatcher �Burrowing owl PValley elderberry longhorn `beetle Rallus longirostris Aquila chrysaetos Buteo swainsoni Circus cyaeneus Elanus leucurus Lanius ludovicianus Vireo bellii pusillus Empidonax traillii extimus Athene cunicularia hypugia Desmocerus californicus dimorphus 'Arroyo Arroyo southwestern toad Bufo microscaphus californicus hiant garter snake Thamnophis gigas rorthem goshawk Accipiter gentilis Northern spotted owl Strix occidentalis Alameda whipsnake Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus Thermal imaging surveys Surveys and detections Numerical & behavioral surveys Numerical & behavioral surveys Numerical & behavioral surveys Numerical & behavioral surveys Large area surveys Detected in Monterey County Research at Sierra Nevada breeding sites Numerical & behavioral surveys Monitored success of relocation and habitat restoration Research and report. Research and publication Research and publication Research and reports Expert testimony Smallwood CV 47 i Representative special -status species experience ommon name Species name Description yield experience California red -legged frog ��oothill frog Rana aurora draytonii Rana boylii Protocol searches; Many detections Presence Many detections yellow -legged surveys; Owestem spadefoot Spea hammondii Presence surveys; Few detections Kalifornia tiger salamander Ambystoma californiense Protocol searches; Many detections Coast range newt Taricha torosa torosa Searches and multiple detections Blunt -nosed leopard lizard Gambelia lila Detected in San Luis Obispo County California horned lizard Phrynosoma coronatum frontale Searches; Many detections Western pond turtle Clemmys marmorata Searches; Many detections Pan Joaquin kit fox Vulpes macrotis mutica Protocol searches; detections Sumatran tiger Panthera tigris Track surveys in Sumatra Mountain lion Qnt Puma concolor californicus Research and publications Arena mountain beaver Aplodontia rufa nigra Remote camera operation k`iiant kangaroo rat Dipodomys ingens Detected in Cholame Valley ISan Joaquin kangaroo rat Dipodomys nitratoides Monitoring & habitat restoration Monterey dusky -footed woodrat Neotoma fuscipes luciana Non -target captures and mapping of dens 'Salt marsh harvest mouse 'Salinas Reithrodontomys raviventris Habitat assessment, monitoring harvest mouse Reithrodontomys megalotus Captures; habitat assessment i distichlus C, ats kCalifomia clapper rail G1V1G_�olden eagle ainson's hawk (Northern harrier ff li te-tailed kite Loggerhead shrike �iast Bell's vireo llow flycatcher �Burrowing owl PValley elderberry longhorn `beetle Rallus longirostris Aquila chrysaetos Buteo swainsoni Circus cyaeneus Elanus leucurus Lanius ludovicianus Vireo bellii pusillus Empidonax traillii extimus Athene cunicularia hypugia Desmocerus californicus dimorphus 'Arroyo Arroyo southwestern toad Bufo microscaphus californicus hiant garter snake Thamnophis gigas rorthem goshawk Accipiter gentilis Northern spotted owl Strix occidentalis Alameda whipsnake Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus Thermal imaging surveys Surveys and detections Numerical & behavioral surveys Numerical & behavioral surveys Numerical & behavioral surveys Numerical & behavioral surveys Large area surveys Detected in Monterey County Research at Sierra Nevada breeding sites Numerical & behavioral surveys Monitored success of relocation and habitat restoration Research and report. Research and publication Research and publication Research and reports Expert testimony Allen Maticins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Allen Matkins Attorneys at Law 865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 28001 Los Angeles, CA 90017-2543 Telephone: 213.622.5555 1 Facsimile: 213.620.8816 www. al lenmath ins.com Fernando Villa E-mail: fvillaQnallenmatkins.com Direct Dial: 213.955.5647 File Number: 377157-00001/LA1095791.01 Via Hand -Deliver. and Electronic Mail January 16, 2018 Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members City of San Bernardino 201 North "E" Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 Re: Appeal from: Planning Commission's Denial of CUP 17-14 and ME 17-06 Applicant/Appellant: US Vets Property Address: 488 West 17th Street, San Bernardino, California 92405 Dear Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and San Bernardino City Council Members: Pursuant to City of San Bernardino ("City") Development Code ("Development Code") Section 19.52.100, Applicant and Appellant United States Veterans Initiative ("US Vets") submits this letter to you in support of its appeal of the October 10, 2017 decision of the San Bernardino Planning Commission (the "Planning Commission") denying US Vets' application to develop a social service housing facility on the currently -vacant 0.69 acre lot commonly known as 488 West 17th Street, San Bernardino, California 92405, Assessor's Parcel Number ("APN") 145-091-24 (the "Property"). Specifically, US Vets appeals to you to reverse the Planning Commission's October 10, 2017 denial of US Vets' application for Conditional Use Pen -nit ("CUP") 17-14, to allow the development, establishment and operation of a social service housing facility containing approximately 24,645 square feet comprised of twenty-nine (29) residential units for low-income United States military veterans, and Minor Exception ("ME") 17-06, to allow a reduction in parking stall depth from nineteen (19) feet to eighteen (18) feet, along with the construction of required on-site and off-site improvements, on the Property (the "17"' Street Project" or the "Project".) US Vets' appeal is based upon the Application for Appeal, this letter and all exhibits thereto, the entire record that was before the Planning Commission at the hearings on the Project, the testimony of US Vets' representatives at the hearings on the Project, the documents that the US Vets submitted with a copy of the initial draft of this letter, the Planning Division and City Manager's staff reports and recommendations to approve the Project, and the correspondence between US Vets and the Planning Division regarding the Project, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. This letter is not an exhaustive description of the arguments that will be raised by US Vets at the hearing on the appeal, and US Vets expressly reserves the right to make additional arguments and present additional evidence Los Angeles I Orange County I San Diego I Century City I San Francisco Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attorneys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 2 at or before the hearing. Additionally, US Vets submits this letter in order to present legal arguments it will not have an opportunity to raise at the City Council meeting due to the ten minute time -limit on US Vets' presentation at the hearing on the appeal. I. INTRODUCTION In 2017, US Vets applied to the City for permits approving the construction and operation of two separate but substantially similar social service housing facilities for United States veterans. One of the projects is the 17th Street Project, and the other project is located at 1351 N. E Street (the "E Street Project") (together, the "Projects"). The application for the 17th Street Project is the request for approval of CUP 17-14 and ME 17-06. The 17th Street Project proposes development of the currently -undeveloped Property into a social services housing facility with twenty-eight one-, two- and three- bedroom units for low-income veterans and their families, and one four-bedroom unit for a property manager. The facility will also contain amenities, like a community room and on-site services for residents, such as job training, financial management assistance, and case management of veterans' physical and mental care. The proposed architecture of the 17th Street Project is contemporary, with three -stories containing horizontal and vertical articulations, fluctuating color schemes and window sizes, and an interconnecting deck to create connectedness among the residential units. The neighborhood around the currently -vacant site is zoned residential, public facilities, and commercial, and contains all of these uses, in the form of, among other things, residences, a high school, a vehicle repair shop, offices, and other commercial uses. Accordingly, the proposed architecture provides cohesion to the neighborhood. The Property itself contains a covenant running with the land, requiring that the Property be used solely to promote housing for veterans of the United States Armed Forces. (See Exhibit 1.) As such, development of the 17th Street Project at the Property falls squarely within the Property's only permitted use. In advance of a September 12, 2017 hearing before the Planning Commission on whether to approve the 17th Street and E Street Projects, Planning Department staff issued substantially similar staff reports to the Planning Commission, recommending approval of both Projects. The staff reports are attached hereto as Exhibit 2 (the "17`h Street Staff Report") and Exhibit 3 (the "E Street Staff Report"), respectively, and incorporated herein by this reference. They also are attached to the City Manager's January 17, 2018 Request for Council Action on the Project. At the hearing, the Planning Commission approved the E Street Project, but refused to approve the 171h Street Project. The decision was arbitrary, as demonstrated by the fact that no evidence was offered in opposition to either project at the hearing. In fact, the only opposition to the Projects advanced at the hearing was unsubstantiated opinion testimony from a woman who expressed concern Allen Matkins Leek Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attomeys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 3 that neighborhood conditions would trigger the post-traumatic stress disorder ("PTSD") of veterans who suffer from that condition. She offered no evidence to support her concern. Because no evidence in opposition to the Projects was presented at the hearing, the findings of the Planning Commission, issued on October 10, 2017 denying approval of the 17`h Street Project (the "Denial Findings"), were not supported by evidence either. The Planning Commission made six findings, supposedly supported by six separate "findings of fact", but each of the findings of fact contains the same rationale for denial, which is not supported by any evidence. Specifically, each finding of fact states the following reason for denial (the "Rationale"): "1) Proximity to the adjacent residential neighborhoods; 2) Intensity of the existing, transient activity within the surrounding area; 3) Architectural design of the proposed building is not compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood; and 4) Expose[sic] of Veterans to existing socio-economic conditions and environmental setting of the surrounding neighborhood." (Denial Findings, p. 3 [Finding of Fact 11, p. 4 [Findings of Fact 2, 3], p. 5 [Findings of Fact 4, 5].) The Rationale is ambiguous, and was not supported by any citation to evidence, because none was offered in opposition to the Project. It is axiomatic that. the land use decisions of local jurisdictions, such as the Planning Commission's decision on CUP 17-14 and ME 17-06, must be supported by substantial evidence. Substantial evidence is not made up of unsubstantiated opinion testimony, argument or speculation, but rather facts, reasonable assumptions predicated on facts, and expert opinion supported by facts. (San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of S F. (2002) 102 Ca1.App.4th 656, 675 (San Franciscans).) Further, to support denial, agencies "must set forth findings to bridge the analytic gap between the raw evidence and ultimate decision or order." (See Topanga Assn. for the Scenic Community v. County of L.A. (1974) 11 Ca1.3d 506, 515 (Topanga).) Here, where the Denial Findings are not based upon a shred of evidence (because none was offered), contain no citation to evidence, and do nothing to bridge the gap between the evidence offered in support of the 17th Street Project and the Denial Findings, the Planning Commission's Denial Findings should be reversed. US Vets respectfully requests that the City Council order that CUP 17-14 and ME 17-06 are approved. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attomeys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 4 II. SUMMARY OF FACTUAL BACKGROUND A. US Vets Successfully Has Been Providing Housing And Supportive Services To Veterans And Their Families In California For Almost 25 Years, US Vets is a non-profit corporation whose mission is "the successful transition of military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support." (Www.usvetsinc.org.) One of its charitable purposes is to promote housing for veterans of the United States Armed Forces ("Charitable Purpose"). (See Exhibit 1, p. 2.) US Vets currently has twenty residential sites and nine service centers in thirteen cities, including Los Angeles, Long Beach, Inglewood, and the Inland Empire. (Www.usvetsinc.ore.) Its experienced staff of more than 500 employees contains many of the nation's premier executives in the provision of veteran services, including clinical treatment, housing, and business management. (See id.) B. US Vets Acquired The Property, An Undeveloped Vacant Lot That Only Can Be Used To Promote Housing For Veterans And Proposes The Project A Social Service Housing Facili With 29 Residential Units For Vets And Their Families. US Vets acquired the Property, which is a vacant lot on the corner of 17th Street and E Street, on or about June 22, 2017. A quitclaim deed was recorded in the official records of San Bernardino County, California, on June 30, 2017 ("Recording Date") as Document Number 2017-0269312 (the "Quitclaim Deed"). A copy of the Quitclaim Deed is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by this reference. The Quitclaim Deed contains a 10 -year covenant running with the land, which requires that for a ten year period after the Recording Date, the Property be used solely for the Charitable Purpose. In other words, until June 20, 2027, the Property may only be used to promote housing for veterans of the United States Armed Forces. (See id.) Any other use is prohibited. (Id.) As such, in 2017, US Vets applied to the City of San Bernardino, Community Development Department, Planning Division ("Planning Division") for a permit authorizing development of the 17'11 Street Project. Simultaneously, US Vets applied for a permit authorizing development of the substantially similar E Street Project, which is approximately five blocks away. The 17`h Street Project. According to the 17th Street Staff Report, the application for the 17" Street Project requested approval of "Conditional Use Permit 17-14 to allow the development, establishment and operation of a social service housing facility containing approximately 24,645 square feet comprised of twenty- nine (29) residential units for low income military veterans, and Minor Exception 17-06 to allow a Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attorneys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 5 ten (10) percent reduction in parking stall depth from nineteen (19) feet to eighteen (18) feet, along with the construction of the required on-site and off-site improvements", on a parcel containing approximately 0.69 acres. (See Exhibit 2, pp. 1-2.) The E Street Project. The E Street Project application proposed a substantially similar project. According to the E Street Staff Report, it requested authorization for "the development, establishment and operation of a social service housing facility containing approximately 22,750 square feet comprised of thirty (30) residential units for low income military veterans, and allowing for a ten (10) percent reduction in parking stall depth from nineteen (19) feet to eighteen (18) feet, along with the construction of the required on-site and off-site improvements, on a parcel containing approximately 0.76 acres." (See Exhibit 3, pp. 1-2.) Other than the minor size differences between the E Street Project and the 17th Street Project (0.76 acres versus, 22,750 square feet, thirty (30) residential units, versus 0.69 acres, 24,654 square feet, twenty nine (29) residential units, respectively), there are not any meaningful differences between the proposed social service centers. With that being said, the site and surrounding land uses of the E Street Project are solely zoned commercial, with surrounding uses including vacant lots, offices and some single-family residential Exhibit 3, p. 3], while the site and surrounding land uses of the 17th Street Project are residential, a high school, a vehicle repair shop, offices, and other commercial uses rExhibit 2, p. 3]. C. City Staff Recommends Approval Of Both Proiects But The Planning Commission Approves Onlv The E Street Proiect Arbitrarily Denving Approval Of The 17th Street Pro_lect Based Upon No Evidence. The 17th Street Staff Report Recommended Approval Of The Project. In the 17th Street Staff Report, the Planning Division recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution Number 2017-055 (1) adopting the categorical exemption pursuant to § 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) for CUP 17-14 and ME 17-06 in accordance with § 15061 (Review for Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"); and (2) approving CUP 17-14 and ME 17-06 based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. Exhibit 2, pp. 1, 8.) Among other things, the 17th Staff Report found that: With respect to project development, the site is located within the Commercial General (CG -1) Zone and Transit Overlay District (TOD), which permits establishment of Social Service Uses/Centers subject to approval of a CUP. (Id., p. 3.) Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attorneys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 6 • With respect to TOD considerations, the 17th Street Project adheres to standards that ensure a well-defined community and building design that is pedestrian - friendly and supports transit use. It also adheres to required on-site parking standards of one space per unit (e.g., twenty-nine parking stalls for twenty-nine units). (Id., p. 4.) • With respect to land use/site design/architecture, the three-story contemporary design with horizontal and vertical articulations, fluctuating color schemes and window sizes with an interconnecting deck to create connectedness among the residential units, will take the place of an undeveloped, underutilized vacant lot. Additionally, "[US] Vets' staff is uniquely sensitive to the special needs of veterans" and because the 17th Street Project is intended to serve as a component of the many support programs offered by US Vets (e.g., case management, crisis intervention, career development, job training, emergency food, clothing, life skills, benefits acquisition, legal assistance, child support resolution, financial management assistance, peer mentoring, medical and mental health care coordination including substance abuse treatment, counseling, overall comprehensive support, etc.), the proposal meets the intent of the definition for Social Service Uses/Centers under Development Code Section 19.02.050. (Id., pp. 4-5.) • With respect to operations, US Vets will provide on-site services to residents and only permanent housing (not overnight or temporary housing), no food distribution will be provided onsite, and prospective tenants will be screened. (Id., p. 5.) • With respect to access/parking, on-site vehicular circulation, emergency services and trash/refuse services are all adequate, thirty (30) off-street and two (2) disabled accessible parking spaces will be provided, and in any event, US Vets has indicated that residents of this type of facility often use local transit systems (and alternate transportation systems may also be provided). (Id., p. 6.) • With respect to parking stall depth, US Vets is requesting the minor exception to reduce parking stall depth from nineteen (19) to eighteen (18) feet, which still maintains access, parking and stall width. (Id., p. 6.) • With respect to development considerations, to ensure the completion and operation of the 17th Street Project to the City's satisfaction, a condition of approval has been included which would allow the Planning Division to conduct inspections of the business operations and property within six (6) months from the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for a period of two (2) years. (Id., p. 6.) Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attomeys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 7 With respect to the General Plan Goals and Policies, "the applicant will be renovating the subject building and property in a manner that will enhance the physical and visual qualities of the subject property thereby enhancing the aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood. Through this proposal, the existing property will be transformed from an underutilized site into a development that meets the City's special housing needs, while satisfying the Development Code requirements and will be adequately regulated through the Conditions of Approval in order to minimize potential impacts." (Id., p. 7.) • With respect to CEQA, CUP 17-14 and ME 17-06 "is found to be exempt under § 15061(b)(2) (Review for Exemption) of CEQA" and "Categorically Exempt from CEQA pursuant to § 15332 of the CEQA." (Id., p. 7.) Proposed Resolution No. 2017 -055 -PC, attached as Attachment A to the 170' Street Staff Report, provided yet more support for the 17th Street Project, noting, among other things, that: • "the development of the subject property will enhance the appearance of the blighted and undeveloped/underutilized site" [(Exhibit 2, Attachment A, p. 3)]; • "The proposed project will provide an attractive housing opportunity that will bring a contemporary design into an existing community by modernizing an underdeveloped/underutilize[sic] vacant site" [(id, p. 4)]; • "The existing vacant site is immerse within an existing neighborhood that has a combination of various residential types and commercial uses and thus will preserve and improve the neighborhood by mitigating the negatives of the contrasting land uses" [(id.)]; • "the proposed project will reduce the need for vehicle trips as the development is located along the Highland Avenue/E Street Boundary within the [TOD]" [(id.)]; • "by adding thirty (30) units of affordable housing to an existing vacant site, the City policies are realized through the support of an innovative not-for-profit development that encourages and facilities the new construction and maintenance of a housing type will minimizing impacts on the neighborhood" [(id.)]; and • "The project site is an in -fill lot and the surrounding area is urbanized. Therefore, no significant negative impacts on the environment are anticipated to result" [(id., p. 5.)]. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attomeys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 8 2. The E Street Staff Report Recommended Approval Of The Project. The E Street Staff Report is substantially similar to the 171,� Street Staff Report, and made the same recommendations with respect to the Categorical Exemption for the CUP and ME particular to the E Street Project. (See Exhibit 3.) 3. At The September 12. 2017 Hearing Before The Planning Commission, No Evidence Was Offered In Opposition To Either Project. But The Planni Commission Denied The 17th Street Project_ Anyway. At a hearing before the Planning Commission on September 12, 2017, number six on the agenda was approval of the E Street Project (CUP 17-13 and ME 17-05), and number seven on the agenda was approval of the 17th Street Project (CUP 17-14 and ME 17-06). Elizabeth Mora - Rodriguez, Assistant Planner, gave presentations in support of both projects. As set forth in the Staff Reports, Ms. Mora-Rodriguez's recommendation was to approve the projects. Kent Trimble, a representative of US Vets, also gave presentations in support of both projects. (The video of the hearing is incorporated herein by this reference.) There was no written opposition to either project. And there was only one oral opposition to each of the projects at the hearing, from someone named Sandra Ibarra, who provided her unsubstantiated opinion that neighborhood conditions could trigger the PTSD of military veterans. She offered no evidence in support of her opinion — no evidence that any neighborhood could trigger PTSD in veterans, let alone that this neighborhood would trigger PTSD in veterans, she offered only an anecdote about her brother-in-law, who she says suffers from PTSD, and has been violent with his wife (her sister) twice. The Planning Commission voted 4-3 to approve the E Street Project, but 5-2 to deny the 17th Street Project. There are no meaningful differences between the two projects with respect to land use, other than marginal differences in size (0.76 acres versus, 22,750 square feet, thirty (30) residential units, versus .69 acres, 24,654 square feet, twenty nine (29) residential units, respectively). 4. On October 10. 2017, The Planning Commission Issued Its Denial ,Findings, Deng CUP 17-14 and Minor Exception 17-06 Based Upon No Evidence On October 20, 2017, the Planning Commission issued its Denial Findings, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 4 and incorporated herein by this reference. The Denial Findings consist of the following six findings: "Finding No. 1: The proposed use is conditionally permitted within, and would impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district and does not Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attorneys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 9 comply with all of the provisions of the Development Code." (Denial Findings, p. 3.) • "Finding No. 2: The proposed use is not consistent with the General Plan." (Id., p. 4.) "Finding No. 3: There will be potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated or monitored." (Id.) "Finding No. 4: The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are not compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the proposed use is to be located and will create significant noise, traffic or other conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City." (Id.) • "Finding No. 5: The subject site is not physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed." (Id., p. 5.) • "Finding No. 6: There are not adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety." (Id.) Following each finding is a "Finding of Fact" purportedly explaining each finding, but the Findings of Fact do not actually offer any explanation. To the contrary, they admit that the proposed development would comply with all applicable Development Code standards. (Id., p. 3 ["The project site is located within the Commercial General (CG -1) Zone and Transit Overlay District (TOD) and the proposed development would comply with all applicable Development Code Standards."].) Each of the Findings of Fact also cites the Rationale as the reason for the denial, but neither fleshes out the Rationale nor supports it with evidence. Allen Matkins Leek Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attorneys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 10 III. THE CITY COUNCIL SHOULD REVERSE THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION AND APPROVE CUP 17-14 AND MINOR EXCEPTION 17-06. A. The Planning Commission's Decision Is Not Supported By Substantial Evidence. Under Section 19.36.050 of the Development Code, following a hearing, the Planning Commission must record its decision in writing and "recite therein the findings upon which such decision is based." (Development Code § 19.36.050.) The findings and the decision both must be supported by substantial evidence or the decision should be reversed. (See Topanga, supra, 11 CaDd at p. 514; McMillan v. Am. Gen. Fin. Corp. (1976) 60 Cal.App.3d 175, 177; Code Civ. Proc. § 1094.5.) Substantial evidence "include[s] facts, reasonable assumptions predicated upon facts, and expert opinion supported by facts, but not argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion, or clearly erroneous evidence." (San Franciscans, supra, 102 Cal.AppAth at p. 675.) Further, to support denial, an agency "must set forth findings to bridge the analytic gap between the raw evidence and ultimate decision or order." (Topanga, supra, 11 Cal.3d at p. 515.) If, based on the evidence before the agency, a reasonable person could not reach the conclusion the agency reached, the decision should be reversed. Here, the October 10, 2017 findings adopted by the Planning Commission with respect to the 17`h Street Project are supported by no evidence, let alone substantial evidence. The purported Rationale for each of the six Denial Findings ((I) that the Project would impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district, (2) that the Project is inconsistent with the General Plan, (3) that the Project will pose potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated or monitored, (4) that the location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed use are incompatible with the existing and future land uses in the area and will create significant noise, traffic or other conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City, (5) that the Property is not physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the use being proposed, and (6) that there are not adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation and public utilities and services to ensure the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety) is groundless. Not only was there no evidence to support the Denial Findings, but the only evidence in the record actually supports the opposite — approval of the Project. It is difficult to decipher what the first element of the Rationale, "proximity to the adjacent residential neighborhoods", means. To the extent the Planning Commission is suggesting that the 17`h Street Project, a residential social service facility, is too close to residential neighborhoods, that is not a lawful reason to deny the Project. The Project is zoned General (CG -1) Zone and Transit Overlay District (TOD), which permits establishment of Social Service Uses/Centers, subject to Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attomeys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 1 1 approval of a CUP. Additionally, the area surrounding the 17th Street Project is zoned public facility, commercial and residential, and is surrounded by uses such as a high school, a vehicle repair shop, offices and residential. As such, the 17th Street Project, which consists primarily of a residential use (i.e., providing permanent housing for low-income veterans along with ancillary supportive services), is more compatible with the surrounding residential uses than the other existing uses in the neighborhood, such as the high school, vehicle repair shop and offices. The Planning Commission's decision to deny approval for the Project just because it is close to residential neighborhoods was therefore clearly arbitrary. Furthermore, which the area around the 17th Street Project is zoned commercial, residential and public facilities, the area around the E Street Project is solely zoned commercial, and currently consists of vacant land, office use to the north, and single-family residential to the south. Nevertheless, the Planning Commission approved the E Street Project but denied the 17th Street Project. Thus, the Planning Commission's purported reasoning for denying the 17th Street Project, based upon "proximity to the adjacent residential neighborhoods", is disingenuous. Furthermore, the evidence before the Planning Commission, provided by the City planner, the 17th Street Staff Report and the testimony of Mr. Trimble, shows that the 17th Street Project's proximity to residential neighborhoods is actually an asset of the Project. The plan for the Project adheres to standards that ensure a well-defined community, the design of the facility provides an attractive housing opportunity that would modernize the undeveloped site, the neighborhood has a combination of residential types and commercial uses that would benefit from updating, and the facility would enhance the aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood overall. (See Exhibit 2.) With respect to the second element of the Rationale, "[i]ntensity of the existing transient activity within the surrounding area", there is again no color given to this phrase to indicate what it means, let alone any evidence to support it. At the hearing, there was a discussion of whether the homeless population in the vicinity of the Project would raise safety concerns. But the Staff Report and the City Planner's and Mr. Trimble's statements to the Planning Commissioners made it clear that both of the Projects would have security fencing, security cameras, and a security guard on-site for 24 -hours a day and 7 -days a week. Additionally, a proposed condition of approval was review of US Vets' Operational, Management and Security Plans by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. (See Exhibit 2, Attachment A, p. 10.) Finally, there was a short discussion about whether residents at the facility would be there temporarily, but it was made clear that housing at the Project would be permanent, and residents would be pre-screened to ensure they will be successful members of the community. The Staff Report even included a proposed condition of approval to "not pen -nit drop-in 'shelter style' or 'itinerant style' overnight stay." (See Exhibit 2, Attachment A, p. 10.) With respect to the third element of the Rationale, "[a]rchitectural design of the proposed building is not compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood", there is again no evidence in the record to support this finding, let alone substantial evidence. As set forth in the 17' Street Staff Report, "the applicant will be renovating the subject building and property in a manner that ivill enhance the physical and visual qualities of the subject property thereby enhancing the Allen Matkins Leek Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attorneys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 12 aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood." Exhibit 2, p. 7 [emphasis added].) And as set forth in the proposed resolution, "the development of the subject property will enhance the appearance of the blighted and undeveloped/underutilized vacant site," "[t]he proposed project will provide an attractive housing opportunity that will bring a contemporary design into an existing community by modernizing an underdeveloped/underutilize[sic] vacant site", and "[t]he existing vacant site is immerse within an existing neighborhood that has a combination of various residential types and commercial uses and thus will preserve and improve the neighborhood by mitigating the negatives of the contrasting land uses". Exhibit 2, Attachment A.) One Planning Commissioner raised a concern about the compatibility of the Project's contemporary style of architecture with the "historic" style of architecture in neighboring residential areas. But as the Commissioner acknowledged, the residences have not been designated as historic, and as she said, the City has not determined what the architecture in the corridor should look like. As such, the Commissioner's concern that the architecture of the Project would be incompatible with the neighborhood style were not based upon any evidence or any existing design standards for the area. Moreover, in order to assuage any concern, Mr. Trimble offered to work with City staff to revise the design of the Project to address any concerns regarding architectural style. Furthermore, it is worth noting, the Planning Commission approved the E Street Project, which has the same architectural style, and is only five blocks away from the 17th Street Proj ect. With respect to the fourth element of the Rationale, "Expose[sic] of Veterans to existing socio- economic conditions and environmental setting of the surrounding neighborhood", again there is no explanation offered as to what this means, let alone evidence to support the statement. The only proffered opposition to approval of the Project, that from Ms. Ibarra, was her opinion testimony that victims of PTSD might be triggered by the surrounding area of the Project. But, as set forth above, "argument, speculation, [and] unsubstantiated opinion" do not constitute evidence for purposes of the substantial evidence test. (San Franciscans, supra, 102 Cal.AppAth at p. 675.) The Planning Commission could not rely upon Ms. Ibarra's testimony unless she presented facts or expert opinion, neither of which she did. (Id.) In sum, based upon the evidence before the Planning Commission, no reasonable person could reach the conclusion the Planning Commission reached. The only evidence before the Planning Commission supported the exact opposite of the findings that the Planning Commission made, specifically, that like the E Street Project, the 17th Street Project should be approved. Nor do the Planning Commission's Denial Findings "bridge the analytic gap between the raw evidence and ultimate decision or order." (Topanga, supra, 11 Cal.3d at p. 515.) The findings of fact are wholly unsupported, fail to flesh out any legitimate reason to refuse to approve the Project, and show themselves to be only the arbitrary and capricious decision of the Planning Commission. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attomeys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 13 B. Under The Housing Accountability Act, The Commission Was Required To Approve The Proiect Unless It Made Specified Findings, Which It Failed To Do. Because the Project qualifies as a housing development project under California's Housing Accountability Act ("HAA"), in order to deny the Project, the City would have had to make certain findings, which it failed to do. Additionally, the City had the burden to prove that its decision conformed to all of the conditions specified in the HAA, which it also failed to do. (Cal. Govt. Code § 65589.5.) The HAA provides as follows: When a proposed housing development project complies with applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards and criteria, including design review standards, in effect at the time that the housing development project's application is determined to be complete, but the local agency proposes to disapprove the project or to approve it upon the condition that the project be developed at a lower density, the local agency shall base its decision regarding the proposed housing development project upon written findings supported by a preponderance of the evidence on the record that both of the following conditions exist: (1) The housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety unless the project is disapproved or approved upon the condition that the project be developed at a lower density. As used in this paragraph, a "specific, adverse impact" means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, ,identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete. (2) There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact identified pursuant to paragraph (1), other than the disapproval of the housing development project or the approval of the project upon the condition that it be developed at a lower density. (Govt. Code § 65589.50) (emphasis added).) The HAA's definition of a "housing development project" includes residential units only projects, certain mixed-use developments, and transitional and supportive housing. (Govt. Code § 65589.5(h)(2)). As such, the Project, which would provide 29 units of permanent supportive housing for low-income military veterans along with ancillary social and health services, qualifies as Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attomeys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 14 a housing development project for the purposes of the HAA. Additionally, contrary to the Planning Commission's findings, the Project is consistent with the applicable general plan and zoning standards and criteria. The most recent amendments to the HAA under Senate Bill 167 provide that a housing development project is "deemed consistent, compliant, and in conformity with an applicable plan, program, policy, ordinance, standard, requirement, or other similar provision if there is substantial evidence that would allow a reasonable person to conclude that the housing development project [] is consistent, compliant, or in conformity." (Govt. Code § 65589.5(f)(4).) Here, all of the evidence in the record establishes that the Project is consistent with the Development Code and General Plan. In fact, the Staff Report expressly found that: With respect to the Project, the applicant will be renovating the subject building and property in a manner that will enhance the physical and visual qualities of the subject property thereby enhancing the aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood. Through this proposal, the existing property will be transformed from an underutilized site into a development that meets the City's special housing needs, while satisfying the Development Code requirements and will be adequately regulated through the Conditions of Approval in order to minimize potential impacts. (Planning Commission Staff Report CUP -17-14 and ME 17-06, dated September 12, 2017, p. 7.) Additionally, at the Planning Commission hearing on September 12, 2017, the Commission considered and approved the E Street Project, a substantially similar low-income veterans supportive - housing project with the same amenities, located only five blocks south of the 171 Street Project site, at a site also zoned Commercial General (CG -1) Zone and Transit Overlay District (TOD), based upon a staff report that made the same findings and recommendations as the 171h Street Project Staff Report, clearly undermining any allegation that the 17th Street Project does not comply with the Development Code or General Plan. The fact that the Project requires a conditional use permit to allow social service center use in the Commercial General (CG -1) Zone does not mean the Project does not meet its zoning standards, or is inconsistent with the General Plan. In Honchariw v, County of Stanislaus, the Court of Appeal concluded that the County had failed to demonstrate a developer's proposed project, which required approval of a vesting subdivision map and an exception to a county code requirement that all lots be connected to a public water system, did not comply with applicable general plan and zoning standards and criteria. (Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus, 200 Cal.AppAth 1066, 1078-1082). The Court's analysis focused on whether the proposed project met the County's criteria for the entitlements sought Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attorneys at Law Honorable Mayor- R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 15 and for the development of the resulting lots. The fact that a discretionary subdivision map approval was required for the project was not considered by the court as evidence that it did not comply with general plan and zoning standards. To conclude otherwise would render meaningless the HAA's protections, which would only come into play when a project requires a discretionary approval that the city or county could then deny. If requiring a CUP is enough to remove a project from the HAA's protections, then the scope of the Act would be greatly reduced. This would be contrary to the state policy stated in the Act "that a local goverrunent not reject or make infeasible housing developments ... that contribute to the meeting the need [for housing] without a thorough analysis of the economic, social and environmental effects of the action." (Govt. Code § 65589.5(b)). As discussed above, there is more than substantial evidence that would allow a reasonable person to conclude that the Project is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code, even though a conditional use permit is required for the Project. Thus, the Planning Commission's rejection of the Project, which is a proposed housing development project that complies with applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards and criteria, including design review standards, without making the required findings under the HAA, violated the HAA. • Even If The PlanningCommission Had Made The Required Written Findings. Such Findings Would Not Satisfy The Preponderance Of The Evidence Standard. The preponderance of the evidence standard requires the trier of fact to believe the existence of a fact is more probable than its nonexistence. (Lillian F. v. Superior Court (1984) 160 Ca1.App.3d 314, 320 [internal quotation marks omitted].) To satisfy the preponderance of the evidence standard, there must be "evidence that has more convincing force than that opposed to it". (Glage v. Hawes Firearms Co. (1990) 226 Cal.App.3d 314, 324-325.) Under the HAA, in order to have denied the Project, the City was required to make specific, supported findings that the project would have an adverse impact upon the public health or safety, and there is no feasible way to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact. Here, the Planning Commission did not raise any specific, adverse public health or safety concerns with respect to the Project. Any discussions of concerns raised at the hearing were based upon conjecture and opinion. And as discussed above, the Denial Findings, which are unrelated to public health and safety, cited no evidence to support them. In fact, the only evidence presented about the Project supported approval of the Project, not denial. As such, there was no evidence in the record, let alone evidence to support the preponderance of the evidence standard, that the City could have relied on to support its Denial Findings. IV. CONCLUSION For the reasons discussed above, and those which will be presented at the hearing before the City Council, US Vets respectfully requests that the City Council vacate the Planning Commission's Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attorneys at Law Honorable Mayor R. Carey Davis and City Council Members January 16, 2018 Page 16 Denial Findings, reverse the Planning Commission's decision denying approval of CUP 17-14 and ME 17-06, and order that CUP 17-14 and ME 17-06 are approved. +'Fernando Villa Exhibits EXHIBIT 1 D.rurrenls provkled by NMT— LLC - ifs proprietary imaging and dewery aymem Copyrignt 2003, All rights remrvpd RECORDING REQUESTED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO. NATIONAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES RECORDING REQUESTED BY WHEN RECORDED MAIL DOCUMENT AND TAX STATEMENT TO: Stephen Peck United States Veterans Initiative 800 West 6'h Street, Suite 1505 Los Angeles, CA 90017 TITLE AND ESCROW ORDER NO. NCS-714837-SAI(RH) Electronically Recorded in Official Records, County of San Bernardino 6/3012017 01:13 PM BOB DUTTON NP ' ! ASSESSOR - RECORDER - CLERK 41L First American Title Ins Co 4 _ Doc #: 2017-0269312 Titles: 1 Pages: 6 Fees 40.00 Taxes .00 Other .00 PAID 40.00 TRIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY QUITCLAIM DEED APNs: 0145-091-24-0-000 The undersigned grantor(s) declare(s): DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ NONE X Gift Exempt—No Transfer Tax Ehomputed on full value of property conveyed, Ebomputed on full value less liens and encumbrances remaining at time of sale. QJnincorporated Area X City of San Bernardino For valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LE ISRAEL) INC., A NEW YORK NOT -FOR PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED JOHN AND DORA BORUCHIN LIVING TRUST, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1992 ("Grantor") does hereby remise, release and forever quitclaim, but without warranty or covenant of any kind, express or implied, to U.S. VETS —17TH STREET LLC, a California limited liability company ("Grantee"), the real property Iocated in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described as follows (the "Property"): Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. This conveyance is made "As Is/Where Is with all Faults," subject to all covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, rights and rights of way of record, without any warranties of any nature whatsoever, including without limitation: 1. General and special taxes for the current fiscal year, including personal property taxes, if any; of any former owner, and also including any bonds or special district assessments, the payment of which is included therein and collected therewith; Page 2 Dorwrenrs p—ded by DataTrea LLC -i irs praprletary imaging and A JNery.rystem Cnpyrignt 2gM, All rights reserved 2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California; 3. Bonds, taxes and assessments, if any; 4. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, rights, titles, interests, reservations, rights of way, and easements, and any other matters of record, if any; and 5. All encroachments and other matters which would be revealed by an inspection and accurate survey of the Property. FURTHER SUBJECT T0: the following covenant running with the land and right of termination in favor of Grantor and Grantor's successors and assigns. Grantee is a non-profit corporation with a purpose of promoting housing for veterans of the United States Armed Forces (the "Charitable Purpose"), and Grantor has donated the Property solely for this Charitable Purpose. Grantee, for itself and its successors and assigns covenants and agrees that it shall not, for a period of ten (10) years after the date this deed is recorded: 1) transfer any interest in the Property to any third party; or 2) permit use of the Property for any purpose other than the Charitable Purpose (each, a "Prohibited Use"). In the event of a violation of either of these restrictions, Grantor, and/or Grantor's successor and assigns, at their sole discretion, shall have the following remedies: 1) a power of termination in favor of Grantor as defined in California Civil Code §885.010, et seq.; 2) the right to receive fifty percent (50%) of all consideration, whether monetary or otherwise, of all sales, leasing and other proceeds or consideration received by or on behalf of Grantee pursuant to or arising directly or indirectly out of each such Prohibited Use, and/or 3) all available rights and remedies, including but not limited an action for injunction or damages, for the violation of a covenant running with the land. In addition to the right of termination mentioned above, the rights and duties created in this deed constitute covenants running with the land and shall bind and benefit Grantor, Grantee, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained herein shall not: (i) prohibit a transfer to a non- profit, charitable organization formed by Grantee in which Grantee owns a majority interest; (ii) prohibit a transfer to an entity formed by Grantee in connection with Grantee seeking tax credit financing for construction of affordable housing on the Property so long as the use of the Property still conforms with the Charitable Purpose; or (iii) defeat or render invalid the rights of the beneficiary under any recorded deed of trust against the Property made in good faith and for value where the proceeds from the loan evidenced thereby were actually used to construct, develop, improve or maintain the Property for the Charitable Purpose, and provided that after the foreclosure of any such mortgage or deed of trust, the Property shall remain subject to the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained herein. If Grantor, Grantee, or their successors or assigns, shall bring any action or proceeding to enforce or declare any rights herein created, or to bring about or declare the cancellation or rescission of this instrument, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to receive from the other party all reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection therewith. [Signatures on Next Page] Page 2 Documents prowled by DaMTree LLC M ifa pmprietary imaging ane 00...q ", — Copyright 2003, All r Uhts r r -d DATED: IBJ oZ�,2 0 JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LE ISRAEL) INC., A NEW YORK NOT -FOR PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED JOHN AND DORA BORUCHIN LIVING TRUST, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1992 BY: &Mathew nstei , Its Chief Planned Giving Officer Grantee, for itself and its successors and assigns, including U.S. VETS —17'h Street LLC, hereby accepts the conveyance of the Property subject to the reservations, covenants, conditions and restrictions stated herein. UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE, a California Not -For Profit Corporation, for itself, and as a single member of U.S. VETS —17'h Street LLC By: 9 y `— - Stephen Peck, resident and CEO United States Veterans Initiative Page 3 D—[mens prov:ted by DataTree LLC m its proprietary imaging and oelwry system Cnpyrignt 2nm, All rkjhts res ..d STATE OF NEW YORK ) ss.: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) On this `/-day of - ✓Awe , 2017, before me personally came to me known, who, being by me duly swom, did depose and say that he resides at 'YO/ y Vde,-1 lRri ✓e, /lrii�l(� �jPol37ilt 30338 ;that he is the!'�i�P//2�'�E.b✓��9 of Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth LeIsrael), Inc., the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; and that he signed his name by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation. JUDY H. FEIG NOTARY PUBLICState of New York No. 01 FE`4710574 QuaNfled In Wnps County Cl Flied In Naw Y c County Ca M*bn Expires /D% %492W Dor --M provided by DataTee LLC vm irs proprietary imaging and de0rery Rind— GnMrkjnt 2003, All njhrs reserved CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) S.S. On jkR2 71 11 before me, Liza G. Trice, Notary Public personally appeared S� p QE GSL who proved tome on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personN whose name(s) ois/ae`-,%ubscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me thaosNARb t executed the same inIs/ e�theXauthorized capacity(ii*, and that by is ,the` N signature(s),on the instrument the personl(-4 or the entity upon behalf of which the perso w acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under th hie Somali e foregoing paragraph is true and correct. LIZA G. TRICE " Notary Public - California i ; -: a WITNESS my hand and official seal.1:os Angelss Lourlty . z C Cotlimissift.r 2011170 M comm. E ks Jun 12.2 18+ Signature of Notary Public (Notary Seal) OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document Further Description of Any Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Q�I-cj aA WV P'— COC, Document Date: �oL'j� Number of Pages: Other Information: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: DOc—enle provided by DataTme LLC v its proprietary imaging and ON" system CopSnght 2003, All rights —r -n GRANT DEED EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description - LOTS 13, 14 AND 15, BLOCK 'Ert, THE PALMS, IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 14 PAGE(S) 41 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, APN: 0145-041-24-0-000 EXHIBIT 2 AGENDA ITEM # 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CITY OF SAN BERNARI)WO PLANNE-46- ]DIVISION CASE.: Conditional Use Permit 17-14: and Minor E7,cept.1011 1.7106 HEARING DATE; -September 12,201? WARD4 2 QW-NER/APPLICANT! U.S. VETS E Street LLC 80.0 West. Sixth Street, Suite 1.505 Log Angeles, CA 96011 REQUEST & LOCATION: A request to :allow the development,, establishment and operation of a social service housing facility containing AWWdmatelY 24,645' squarq 'feet comprised of twenty-nine (29) res VWis for IoWincoftte military veterans, and allowing fors ten (l 0) percent reduction .in .parld.ng -stall depth from nineteen (19) -feet to. eighteen (18) feet, along with the construction of the required onsite and .off site improvements, on A pair-pl containing approximately 1Y.60 acres, The :p ipc t site a 48-8-W.17"Street. .1 located dat APN.. 0145-09144 WNEt Commercial.:General (CG- 1) Zone and Transit overlayDistript (T'0j)) STAFF PSCOMMENDATIOM- The Plaw0og Division of the Community Development Depwt"ent recommends that jh-e- ecommerld Planning Cornmjss�jori adopt Resoluflon Ano o.,jo 17-05,5. (please seeAttachraent A)-. Adopt the Categofieal Exergption pMs4W to § 15332 (InFillDgyeloprnent- ft0*ecW for Candrtioo4l Use.Permit. i 7A4 $nd Minot. F4.oepttan 17606 iii accordance with -4159$1 (Review for Bx"tjop) of the California EnvironmAntal Quality Act; and 2. A00roving Conditional Use - Pqnnif .174 4 and Minor Excepfion 17-06 baodd en- - the, Findingsw6f Fact.and, subject to the: recor amended Conditions of.Approval. CUP.JY-14and UE17-66 ^jnning Commission Date: 9 1-2.2017 Page 2 BACKGROUND July- 10, 2017: Conditional Use Permit 17-14 and .Minor Exception 17-06 applications were submitted. August 9,2017: Development and Environmental Review Committee reviewed the applications and moved the Environmental Determination to the Planning .Comm issin kwConsidera i'on. August 30, 201.7: A legal was: sent to the S OOM-Wdino Sun Newspgper for publication on SoptcrobbT 2, 2017. August 31, 2.017-, Notices were to filed to the property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior bound 7 -the subject property; providing the mature- of ian es of the requeit, location of the property, the date, : time, and place; of the Planning Commission meeting ;of Septeiuber 1.2, .2017 for the Envirom,,nental Determination, Condi0onal Use Permit 17-14 and Minor Exception 1:7-06.. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Pursuant to the -requi'r;emintg of Chapter 19.3b (Condit.iOnal Ilse PqrW,'t§),k Chapter ISM (Minor Exce0ons), §19.06,020(2)(Y) (6rarderdal Zones Specific Standards, — Social Servive UscslCentfts), and -§19.10A*,(T git. ove,a r) -y District): of the City of $aft Bernardino al - Development Code the, -apPlicatit is requesting; &e: approval. of Condition 11-44 to Use allow the. development, establishtnent. andoperation: of a tdoilil service housing facility containing approximAtply 214,64 feet minprlsed :ef twerdY-ni4o (29). units for'low income. 5.8qqarp. t. - Tnilitary veterans' and Mirror l'7 -Q6 . allow a too (I %'percentreduction in par l&g stall depth from nineteen (19).feet. to eightedft (18) feet, along with the, construction of the required on-site and' off ,site: improvements (please see Attaoi=ent A,.E6GU8IT '4A".)l SETTING & SITE CHARACTERISTICS jU project site is location at. 488 W. I Street,, with 6fWw 19-71' SOW- and east- of R P, street, withinthe commercial, General (CO -1) ZOO and Transit 'OvOlay District:" .: WThe project site is -comprised of a parcel containing it total of approximately 0.'69' 9" and is - currently undeveloped:(please: see , AttadbifteWtO H aAd C) TAble I below provides -a summary -cf-,the surrounding land use charactookisficsof the subject, site and surrotindilig properties. -CVP_J744an4 - ME1706 Planning CPMMIS-SW'K Date: 9.12.2017 Page 3 TAM.P. i, RrMAND SURROUNDING LAND USES 'LOCATION LAND' USE ZONE GENERALYLAN CODE DESIGNATION site Vacant Commercial General (CG -1) and Commercial Ilse: Land 'U Fgcil:ity Transit Ovgd4y. District (TOD) w - I the . Approval of AJIM Q North Residential Dwellings CQmmqrcW General (CG-l)j. Commercial and Lot. Size and Vehicle Repair Shop Transit Overlay ;District (TM,- Residential Setbacks and Residential 'Suburban (RS) :Souih Residential Dwelfings" C(?Mmoelal. Qeu em-(C'G-. 1). Commercial and Side' and Office District (T017), Resldenfial Rear, Suburban East Single -FAmilyResiddritidl, CormnercialGeneral .MG4). Commercial and. Height 3 Story fftt) Transit Overlay District; (TOD), Residential. Parking and ResidentialSuburbanS): West Sarr. D brnardino High. :(o rcial Genera] ,'(CG -l), Commercial, and ADA Stalls School and Office Tfazisit'Oveyla,y* District (T , PobliclQuasi Public Per .0 9.19A (Transit Overlay District),. Public Facilities 0P� Pr-gkot Development !lid. pitposW demplopinput as a social service housing fadility.:dont ifig, approdmately 24,645 feet for corn military veterans has been designed W comply with the development .square. e b low ih e standardsof the City' of S an Bexnardinp Deve . lopment. Code: The project site'i:§ located witlAn.-the Commercial General (CQ -1) Zpne arid 'Transit ovotio V§Wd ('TCDD); wbieb lidmits the establishment ofSocialService Uses/Centers, subject. to :the approval, of a CoAditionQ rise Permit. Table 2 below provides; a site design enaly& that illustrates the consistency of Ite � project witli the; Devel� Code and General Plat TABLE 2-1 DEVELOPMENT -,CM AND GENERAL MAN 10 Pitt FOSAI IDEW.L011AMX -GENERALP'SM20. CODE Social Service Housing PermitteaSubjorate N�iftod'Sto rj Ilse: Land 'U Fgcil:ity the Approval -ofCUP the . Approval of AJIM Q Lot. Size 009 Acres (29,965:1 square: feet) 1.0.000 NIA Setbacks Front0 1.25 Feet W/ 815: Dedication -1-5 Feet* NSA Side' .5 to I Oi Feet NIA Rear, 49 Feet. NIA :Lot Covenige 2,1.65% (8,785 square, feet) 561/1o; max -mum VA Height 3 Story fftt) 3.Story (42' feet)* I" Parking 30 Stalls 29 -Stalls* . N/A. ADA Stalls 2 Stalls w/ Van Accessible i Stalls; Per .0 9.19A (Transit Overlay District),. CUP1744 andM)31..7-06 Planning Commission Date= 9.12.2017 Page -4 Transit Overlay District_TOD Constderadons The proposed project -is located, within the Transit Overlay District (TOD) and adheres to specific, standards in order to ensure a well-defined :community .and building design that: is pedestrian - friendly and supports transit. use, The proposed project has been designed to meet such standards as .it relates: to Building Height; Build �To-Lane Setback, :and .Required On -Site Parking. The Building Height within the TOD. E Street Neighborhood Station Area would -allow for the proposed development to Have a maximum height of forty-two (42) feet with a zaximum .of twee (3) stories and a Bund Tb- ne Setback ofa, maximum of fifteen (15) feet. Additionally, thegrill. be. developed .as an atypical multi family proposed social service housing fissility residential development that wound adhere to the Required On -Site Parking standard of ome (1) space per unit. within the TOI); Thus, thetwenty sine (29) residential units for low inc rue. military veterans being proposed would comply with the standard of twenty Edn. a (29) parking stalls: Land Usef Site Desi Arehitectur The proposed prtijeet t onsists of the -development of three-story social service housing facility° comprised of 'twenty-nine :(29) residential units on an: undeveioped/undertztYYized rectangular shape vacant site. The sociaX service housing faoilitx will have a contemporary design with horizontal and vertical atticulaogns in: -order to: create relief amongst the building design. The building. design will also utilize fllictuatilg color schemes and window sizes with an Interconnecting deck to create connectedness amongst tho residential waits. Furthermore, an architectural y treated. eight (8) foot .high decorative masonry black wall shall be, matrj3a aeil along th`e :east property line.: The: three-stoxy, social service housing facahty comprised of twenty nine (29) xesideatial units, will. provide ten.,09).:one bedroom urnts ,doritaining approximately 5:15 silt ate feet; fifteen (15) two bedrooiai units contauatng appxtrximutely 74,1 square feet, three )three bedr rn. um`ts containing.appxaxi mtely 1,13.1 .square feet, and one (1), four bedroom containing approxttriately 1;547 square feet- -A-e four (4) bedroom• unit will serve as the manager's Butte The managers shite will have; a master bodroom; with its own bathroom located on the second floor of the _softs; wh'le'the first floor of the -shite will contain the `living room,, kitchen facility; laundry room, and additionaLbathroom The: one (1) and two. (2) 'bedroom units will contain a bntlirootnx l ariitg room, kitchen facility; and laundry roam while the three bedroom units, will contain too bathrooms,. living room,. kitchdh facility, and laundry room. Additionally, a common. space amenity 'containing appro I'matel r 1;121 square: feet'will be provided on the first .floor, fa the fonn of a community Mum, United States Veterans Initiative° (U S. METS); a-blot=For-Profit Corporation has been committed' to serving wilitary veterans and: their families., over the past: twenty-four (24) years: tliroiigh file establishment of various:.pro}ects :arid support progxatris that situ at reducing the many biers veteran households face in. achieving or iiiaititailaing, self-sufh_cieney (please see Attachment L7): U,S,. VETS, staff is uniquely. sensitive to the special needs of veterans and taderstands the culture shared by veterans. Staff .receivesmonthly veteran -related trailing to include the fallowing :topics: Housing. First, Motivatidtial Interviewmg, Trauma: Ynforrried 'ase, 98I/93DI Outreach, .A mess, ;recovery (S(3A4 i'ost-Traumatic Stress Disordrsr, T...tic=:Brayn j Combat Trauma, SeXual.: Trauma, Suicide Prevention Boundaries :and l thtcs; avid nny otftex related training, that is gain through workshops, collaborative meetings, Stand Down events, and: resource fairs, CUP1.74 4 and WI 7-06 ,Planning Commission Date: 912.2(017 Page 5 The pro-posedsocial service housing facility will be a where permanpntlhousing� facility VMUM veteranhouseholds with incomes below sixty-one (61.) percent- of the average medium income for the County of -San Bernardino can Vive permanently. As ,part of the program, veteran households will, have -access to the following services: case managemerit, crisis interventions, career development, job training, emergency food,. clothing, life skills -related to work -ops, -ops, mainstream benefits a . cquisition, legal .assistance,, child.'support :resoJ.Vtion,..financiiI -MMAgomer-A assistance, peer mentoring, medical. and mental health care coordinati6n, ffichxft. substance abuse treatment, counseling, and overall comprehensive support. or. As part :of the pmogr4,m, every ery veteran household will. be assigneda Case Manager who w, work with the: veterans #o complete an Indi'vidiW Housing Stability Plan fttwill identify:resident's - gpatsand pnarltized needed ' services, The. Case Manager will Mot with the. vveteranhosth6l..d- togq" to address barriers "to maintaining housing and develop an individual plan with goals focused on housingl-Stability. Ple such as crisis riter.ftntioni counseling, Case Manager; will :eM.'PIOY clinical interventions M'. -1 " utter. - _- wi assessment treatment, referrals to support: groups, peer &61italidn, 000rdinate care: ith the Uma Linda VA Medical OWC, and 6inp_f. assistance I will assist ,,I'Gy other methods o ft wil as§ in addressing Any behavioral imps... $gcti 19,-02.050, (t)6finitions).pf the tity of San B Devel'opment Co4,defines- SoCIPI $eM'ceUsesX6nt as f6l.1-ow.s' Rd catimia ':eidjural,"� o e,!' onr .4 building or buildiaggOsedf0trecre j . aflona4, � V .I . rr.; actiWday operated by nonprofit groups or, agencies that are- open to tAe public. Pelated ziso may includefood .ffeevieg, childcarefiadlitiesJob Rini#ngPNV4rns, after school programs, me&patlfnics, and anther s jogs or arflyffles. Residential. facilities OW 60 establ&hed as print of the use: Dr. g- and, dkohal recovery facitities (outpatient or residentiao mo be a, component of the social service use. Because. the proposed: social services housing, f4pi1ity is lr#egded to .serve asa, component of th-e- supp6it programs offered by United StatesTeterans Ini . tiativ&, (U.S. VBTS,)� a,Nat -Por-Profit tft" Went * :Corporation, staff has, ihterpreted that this Propos': mm o. of ththe,damicon far so" service uses/centers. Therqfbrp this Conditional. Use Permit application for "the proposed_ project is beng procesged M. a social service welbentor; inatofypkal multi 'Y residential developnienck OP—er-B—tions-I I . . I The salient aperational points of the proposed social services hMing, facility am,, as fon ows. Us- VET'S will. provide- the onsite sami r oes to the residents �of thd- pOpOsod social, services housing facility. Over-Aightor temporary housing will not, be: provided. Rathm the: PIMecOve tenants will be. screened so that the prospective residents are, iW to, sustau themselves -through m., aintain their ci responsibilities: employment and ability to V' Food. distribution will not beprovided ori -site=., CUP] 7-14 and A&I-7-06 Plan,nhig Commission Date., 932-2017 Page 6 Acce 3/Parki The proposed development Will be accessed from W. l7Street with an ingress/egress alleyway aec,,S4 on N. E. Str.ee.t On-si site vehicular circulation has been adequately accommodated to access #Lp she through both W. 17.0, Strep 'y access on N. E Street Erdergericv. Services �t.4ftd the alleyWa M-11 be, able to adequately access, the site via N. E Street' and W. 11n Street, Whfli Trash/Refuse .Services will beable: to adequatelyaccess the site via W. 17"' Street. It should be noted that ucr I fence shall be installed on- thenorth, south or West Propery lineiIn order -to maintain for Emergency Services. The: tVg Traffic Engineering. Division has determined that A Traffic Ana ly*6 is not required for the'Pro. 9 circulation. p sed project site. Additionally, on-site vehicular ation, a ed will have: access to the poWng pre -as, and designated "paths of travel" have 91sa been providto jaisam-pe,destrian safety: , the proposed developititrit Will PT.OvIdthirty rty- (.3% off street parking spaces. m., In P"th"PoTe eOt :Order tocomply WM the 201,6 California Building Coder, two .(2,)- Di!�ahled Accessible paricing, spaces will be p s . of housing. provided.. USNETS has: indicated that residents of -these tYpeg. facilities 00411y utijiz& local -tMo* systems slid .alternate transportation services; may be also be provided. Parkins Stall Degtl(. to address In order. � -site.circulation and EmergencY:SeMde access Per San Bernadino COUJ.i.4 - On, * COr on Pim O& Standard, approval of a Minor Exception f parking stall .1 depth is,;econimdrided by tho Planning Division sfaff. Punuant to; (Design stall parldrig re Idi, I * *I . Stafidardsl lbimensior(W. Rle�irernenf* ninety (90) degree quires par. ng- -mm-tIm. dimensions, to b twenty4bur -04 1W 46va- , 0� (9. - ension feet by nineteen (1 9):,feet With alftl a sle, width, However, San Rdftoditio7C. jstrjtt' (P Code stand that ounty Fire D 's standard new' :development provide, -a�tWontrmslx, (16) foot drive aisle for On-site circulativri -and Thus,: the .applicant, is Emergency H requesting the. granting of 'a Minor. Excvfift .,y, service: :access: .. u,� - - - pursuant to f6t the Te4uc6:0,n- in parWng stall depth fromnineteen;,(19) feet eighteen (18) feet, 'UM. Chapter !,(Milor E'tiond), in. Which,% maximumoften percent may i m- ganteci 00 the treasurable pWkingst01idepth. Rihemore- parking stall :depth. be reduced toeighteen I feet.; while "still ,41aintaining awossparldng pnO Mail width. D , ele twit Q)Lonsiderations, The de"lopment of a social services housing facility is for,the community. Th - a .9 mefomin os jeo ard to ensure ib An offWtohelpierisurerthe success of the proposed- -tzilduasafegu A '#�e City. the followiaApproval eotgpletion, and, operOon, to the: satisfictio 'gConditionof-b" beeniacludcd! yWithin six ears, ;months koi.o,the issuanedof a Certificate by a period 10f rtificate & OccOPOOM f e two (2,) e I art, the Planning Dhnision shall; conduct an inspection IOf the business operations and property to, ensure corripliance with the Conditiocts of Approval:16 11W. saris I the: Comm inity DevelopmentDirector:In the went that 46 UMOONV4 issue cont to., exist, the enforcement of the Contlitiiins of Approval .shall cGRVIY 1with Chaptum 1146 of the Development Code related 4pplicationIm to Enforcement of I Provisions, -a- .apprica,ble applied., Stch remedy may require the applicant a-mk an icant, to s d appropriate a on fee, for reconsideration, by the I Planning COrMission (please 9ft Condition of Approval No. 11). CUPI 7-14 and MM 7-06 planning Commission Date: 932.2017 Page -7 General Plan Goals and Policies. TheCity of San Bernardino oner al Plan includes goals and policies to guide future : G - development withiii, the City, including the following; v, E-iffimpe-the aesthetic quality of land uses. and structures in San Bernardino. in San Bernardino , y: strategic economic vitality dift b Enhance the, qualify of life and eco -no revitalization of existing developments - V Control development and the use of land: to minimilze adverse impacts. With respect to the proposal, the. applicant. Will belvenovating the subject building and property.in a m , anner that will ;enhance the physical and visual qualities of the subject property 1hM*_V di - .enhbAcing the, aegthefics of 01a.sarrouning peighb. orhood. Through this PrOPQ9aI,- the existing site into a that meets the, City's underutilized devdlooment property will be transformed, frOM 411 erutilizdd' special housing needs, while .satisfying- the Develop -de requirements and -will be . adequatelyregulated.through the Conditions. of Approval in order t4 inminamp potenlig impacts. ICALYFORNI1A-1 ENVIRON1ViENTAL pIIALITYACT JCE4_.4) In accordance with 05000 (Preliminary Review) �o Quality .0 ,f the: CaliBbrnia.'Envitotim I - A fCEQA,evi uation in connection, W -M. the planning p. gion conducted An enviroPm, tal proposed Condi0onal use, POW. 17-14 and Minor: Exception 1.7-06 and :concluded that - Conditional. Use Permit 1744 and Nfia0r- -EXCOptiOn. 17 05 is. found to: be exempt under Exemption) of CEQA, Pursuant to §15$52 (Irir-Fill Development §1506.1(b)(2) (Review b I - - 'hatac ip� Proj�dcts),of,r,EQA, a CIM 32 -CAtC9QriW D(CMPtion cOnsists, of p.r6j,eqI$. c *0 fill development meeting, the.: conditions contained within. tl 5352, of CEQA. The.Planniqg Divisicii ,, staff has 4palyzed proposed Conditional Use'Peraiit 17-14 andMmortxcdp6=,17-00;and ba , determined that it is Categorically Exempt from cEQA, pursuant to §15332 of ;the CA .uidel' eg due 10 the fact _1W- J) tho� pmj ' iggo sistent the vippri 16 general plan designation Guidelines e :consistent applicable zoning designation and and All applicable general plan with app. policies as well as cated.within ft City 1-imits, on .less than five s) regulations,: 2)"the.,pioposed development is IP acres�, 3) Conditions of Approv,,jl will'be imposed to alleviate : potential. impacts; and, 4)there no additiong potential significant environmentalimpacts that may MW from the Oropood .development egtablent and operation oishm ti f thCproposed use. .on .August 9, theRevelment anti Envirorimeittal. Review CQ reviewed ilia application andF of the_Planning Division, on, wid moved the Class 32 Categorical.Exemption for. Conditional Use Permit. .17-44. and Mindt Ex eptton 17,46 to the Platining tbmi3fission for consi&iation, Accordingly), pursuant to 0 $062 (Notice of &eMpfi"), Exemption -for Coo Use TeriMI-7 4. of CEQ& a Noticp of Intent to Adopt a- Ca and minorExoeptian: M06 was published oil September 2, 2017 'for the CEQA-mandated, ten. (1,0) day public review and comment period-, MA there were %10 public written OMDMM* -of. --thir -00 - received or verbal conwimts presented :as . the of PrJeParA(iOAQf -StafIR QM CUP11-14 and MEI 3 -Of Planning Comn't-is'WO)I.Dole:9, 'RECOM' I_MATION Staff recornmPlanning that the Plannil , Corn es Ii 0 g inimion adopt R D1 ti n No- 2017-05.5 'Rdppti'fi�g the ,Cate, I golica). Exempt on for Conditional Use Punkt 17.14 and 'Minor EXcop6on 1-7-06 and -approvitig Conditional Use Permit 1'7-14 and Minor ception 17-06, based on the, Fin&iggs° of Fact. taid subject -to the; recon mended CbnditiobS of A.-pproval. Respectfully subraitted, .. /,Iizab Ith !Mora -Rodriguez .Assistatit.Pl"ner- Reviewed Ohmer V1- planning Approved f6f Dist Altacbmerds, ResolutiOn go. 210:17-055 Aerial MAP, C. L6t4am Map D, Scryqep. plan, Letter CUP17-1.4 and M.E'17-06 Planning Commission Date: 9.12:2017 page 9 ATTACI3MENT A Resoluiion No 2017-055 RESOLUTION NO. 2017 -055 -PC WHEREAS, on july io, 2017, pursuant to the requitMents of Chapter 19:36 .(Conditional Use PerWits), Chapter 19.58: (minor Plx'zeptions) §'19..06.020(i)(Y.),:(Commercial Zones. Specific Stondards.— Svciitl Svtvice U sWCenters)-j and9-A -(Transit Overlay District) of the City of San BernardinQ Development Cqdgi i cationfor: Conditional Use Permit 17� T 4PPH 14 and Minor txception'17606: was duly submitted by. Property Qwxlrr, U.S. VETS — F-'9b=t LLC 800 W6st-Sixth Weet Suitt 005 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Project Applicant- Tj,.s. v-ETS—.. E Street. LLC 800 West $ba Street :Sw'� 1 -50,5 - Los Angeles, CA 90017 Parcel Address-' 13-51 N. E Street APN: Q145 211,55 Lot Area: 0.76 acres WHEREAS, Conditional'ani Minor Ex-ce0oo 17-00 is a Use Permit 1744t request to allow_ .1 'al service .housing .facility th,, d-evelopwieftt, esta�ljshment and of- a soci containing appraxiiiriately.24,045square &,ei-ogmpyisea.,of twenty-nine (29 residentialentialuts.1b r 'on low lncogicln.,U,taryv4orans,and .alto vft.for,a:ten:(10).pMohttO:001- in pariar g, stali tepth 0 onsite e frDranine nineteen (19) feet to eIgbt0n:(18..): ipet'. along, w thecores Aructi n of tht� tequired�:o 't and= offsite iTqprqvemerjtgon a parcel contaiift app=ftatelY 0.69 kftg and WHEREAS, ft planning Division of the Community Dei e -Departfnent has or -exception -06 for-, consistency with tate Tev, conditional flon-nit 17-14. d :-, x tio 17.1 ,jewW o Min City of San Bernardjno: Creneral Flan and compliance with the: City of Sari Bernardim Develpprneint Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to requirements of §15060(p) of the California Environmental Quality Act,, the Planning Division of the Community Development Department evaluated Conditional Use Permit 17-14 and Minor Exception 17-061P and WHEREAS;. on Septem ber 2, 2017; pursuant to the requiremeritsa §19.52.020 of the City of San Bernardino Development code, the City gave public- notice by advertising in thd Sm Bernardino S a, newspaper of general circulation within the, City of San Bernardino, and by mailing n6tipes to the property owners within 500 feet of the subject property of the holding: of'.a public` hearing at which the, Environmental Determination. (Categoried Exvmption);Oonditional Use? nit 14 and Vmb 06 would considered;. Permit 17'- i ;. and WHEREAS,. on August 91 � 2017 pursuant to the requirements f §19.36.040 ofthe 'Q-ft y of San,130MArdiho Development Code, the Development: A ,pment, and, Environmental- Illeview C_ Opulftee. reviewed the application :and moved the Categorical Exemption, Conditional. Use Pdlt 17-14 and.Minor'Ex-ception -17-06 to-the Planning Commission for consideration; Arid WHEREAS, on'Septeniber 12, 2017, pursuant to the re.qvitamenu of §19.51.040, of the City of San Bex.nardIno Dovelopmetit Code,: the. Planning Cofnrnissionhild the dt4y, tioOped pubrIc'hearing at which interested persons had an OPPoftuaitY to ldstifY' IQ: $APPO;-_t 09 Or ,opposition to the thvitoftmontal beterininatiort (Categorical 'Ex.ftPt'iOn)j. ConAtOonal tr P, and Minor EX-cePti011 17-06 and. at which meeting the pianniaOornlfiisl_� SIOn 9 considered '(fered the- Categorieal Pmetriptiont Conditional Use Permit 1744 and: Minor Exception 17 06; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 1936of the City of $On BetnatdinoDevelopqnent Code; Planning. Co has the totake-66o' on *P Categorical Exemption, Conditional Use Permit 17-14 and Nor Exception 17-06. NOW 'THEREFORE,. the Planning Commission Of the City Of SAA Bernardino does hereby resolve; determine.. find, and order as Wows: SECTION .1,. :9NVjRON'TVMTA.L 'DETERMMATrONt Intecord,ance with. g15060 (Preliminary Pavjew) of the California Environmental. QuOty Art Division CE the the Planning D' -Conducted. an environmerital -evaluation ih 0W*tiORV*h proposed Conditiopal Ti9e: Permit 1771:4 and Minor Exmotioa IMO od -eqn0ludel ftf Conditional use Permit 1714 and 'Minor Exc6ptioi 17-06- is found t6 U 00ftPt -UAdq Pursuant to §15n! �b�TJR:Devilqqmnt x.150&1( b ,)(2) (Review for.E xMption) of CEQA Pr.ojeoWvfCEQA,aClosis32C,ategon*cal.E-Xemp.ti.Olicosts -of ts'- prqjzC -0 as infIl 64 within §;153 I deyelopment meeting the conditions contain2 of CE-0-A, The �P�gw s has analyzed proposed Conditional Use Permit 1.7 .-14 and Minor EXoVOOn 17-06 and: ba staff determined that it is -Categoricdly Exempt from ;CEQA pursuant to §131. of the CE_QA ;duidelines dur, to the fact .that - 1). the project t -is; consistent. the appli e-gipaqralplan, de si and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zonIwg,dcsigrf&iOn. Md tegulations; 2) the proposed development isslocat-Od within the: city Emit& on W$4 than A-Ve auresr, 3).Conditions of Approvalwill bo impose{ to. alleviatepotential impao* aad,, 4);t here aft no additi( - inal potential signifisafft euvizocimental impacts. that may' Imu, ftorn the ptopw0d- development, establishment and' operation: of the proposed use.: Accordingly, pursuant fo § 15062 (Notice of Exemption) of CEQA, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Categorical Exemption for. Conditional. Use Permit 17-14 :and Minor. Exception 17-06 was published on September 2,,. 2017 for the CEQA=mandated ten (IQ) day public review and comment periods In accordance with :§15061 of'OEQA, on September 12,20-17 during a duly advertised public hearing,-the,PWming CQYnMi S' adopted the Class.3'2 Categorical Exemption for the approval of Conditional Use Permit 17-14 aiid Minor Exception 174.6:: Subsequently, pursuant to 4=:15062 sof CpQA, the PI"antii tg Division of the City of San. Bernardino was- directed - to file a Notice of Exemption with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. SECTION 2. FINDINGS FOR CONDITIUNAZ uSE PERMIT 17-14: Section 19:36:00 of the City ,of Bernardino Development Code regtiires that Conditional Use Permit a the followingfinduigs PPgs � a .or to file approual by the Plaijxiing Gonimissiori: Pp Accordingly, . ed in support of the approval of Conditional Use: Permit I7=14: Finding No 1: The proposed lise-is conditionally permitted within, and would not irripa r the integrity and obaracter of the subject land. use distract and complies with Al of the applieabie provisions ofthe Developmen! Code-. Finding, of Fact. The proposed social..services housing facility is a conditionally pei`initted use, pursuant to Development Code ,§1.9.©6,020(2)(1) and §191 A.. The project site: is located within the Commercial General (CG -1) Zone and Transit Overlay L?stnct (RT()D) and. is sabstaritially surrotmded by e�siing residezitial :arid w=erc al uses The: proposed development, will be developed in emnp lance with all applicable provisions of the City of San Berziardno Development Cedei itialuding developnietit standards Arid applicable design guidelines. l urther,. the development of the: sub}ect. praperiy Will enhance the- appearance. of the blighted and undeveioperllundtiliz vacant site. Therefore, the project would nog ir#'pair tjte integrity and Character of the subject land use distract; or be detrimental, to. su routidingvropeffies. 3 Finding NO, 2: The proposed use is consistent with the Gen" Plan. Finding. of Fact: General Plan Housing Policy 3.2.1 states : "Protect the quality lof the existing housing stock through the rehabilitation and -improvement of market rate neighborhoods. and, affordable housing projects. ,s G A innovative ova tiv eneral pigh Housing Policy 3.3.1. states: `54ippa . ,e publi% private, and: not -&r -profit efforts for the devd1opmont :and financing of affordable housing" General Naft.Housing. Policy licy $,..S.4 states:. "Encourage and facilitate the construction; maintenance, and preservation of a variety of housing; types adequate to`- eet.a range of household heeds." General plan Housing policy 3.6.1 states: "Trot ote. infillbilita eta Ift tin :and new constriction projects through increasing housing potefitial in .already developed of the community;" The proposed project will provide an attractive hmift oppprtunity that roject . 1 A - will bring a contemporary design into an: ekisfing conX-MuTiRY.- by rnodopiz4ig an Underdevelpped/underutilize vacant, site. The, propegcd - development, establishment and operation zf -a social that hougihg facility will provide, additional housing OPPOMWties that will meet the g,ne s within 6 ds-wlj�, below bo in e"tin' d ' the City for veteran h0us h h I , - n sixty-one (6DP.Meat Of the: average med-RU M income for the: County of San Bernardbao, *Tbe- existing vacant site! is immerse within an sting_ neighborhood, that.has: a conibination of various residential types and, comrhercial uses and thus Will, ptesOrYe and improve the hoighborhood by mitigating: the negfives. of the contrasting land ilges. Rvtormore. the groposecl project will.redticethe need for vehiclettiP&3s the dovelopm. w islocated aloog. the Rtghland.Awnue)V; Street Somoaq within the Transit Q 'lav District (T-013). J the taii access to the site vialhesUX ver giving rap . id transit' bus line. The strategical impiementationof ft pro"Sod dev will preserve ilia asset and add unit count by Wcmg- g&ghtagp u a ng itty units. of 4-f - tight' fuhdjhgwjndow, Thus, by dAd M 0) -of affordable housing to an, iexisting, vacant site., 'thee C*y policies we 1realized through the support of aninnovative, note 4w�profii develbpMont that enwjjra&g;Wd f4cilitates, the now vopsOpcfloo arid. maintenance Whije minimWrig. impacts ph the housing type e zeighboflxood. , AdditionaUy, the proposed .project is permitted within the Commercial General {CG -1} :Zone ndTransit 0yelAyDIstdd.t.(TOD), s abjvot t© -the tipproyal of a Conditional Use Permit with the :approp Tale :Conditions of Approval and cEQA determination., Therefore, the proposed PrWOM would bb:compatible with surrounding land uses and consistent with ft General Plam 4 Finding No. 3 Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use is, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental. Quality Act (CEQA) and ::§'19.20.030(6) of the. Development; Code'. Finding of Fant: in accordance with § 15000 (Preliminary Review) Of the California Eirvironmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Division erjndircted an environmental evaluation in connection with 'proposed Conditronal Use Permit 1I-Mand Minor Exception 17-06 and concluded that Conditional. Use Permit 17-14 and Minor Exception 17-06 is found' to be exempt under -§ 15061(b)(2) (Review for Exemption) of CEQA. Pursuant oto §1 M (b_ Fill. Development Projects): of CEQA, .a Class 32 Categorical Exemption oonsists of projects characterized as :in-fill developrne tt tneeting the conditions contained within §15332 of CEQA. The. Planiuitg; Divisiari staff` has :analyzed proposed Conditional Use Permit M14 anis WWI E-xceptzoa l7-06 and has: determ t►ed that .it is :Categorically E tempt- ftin CEQA,pursuant to § l 53`32: of the CEQA Gwdelii es due: to the fact. that 1) the, project is eonSisteut'With the: applicable general .plan des goation and 'all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation :and regulatiow. 2); the proposed. development is located withiii it e City limits on less than five (5) acres;- 3j Conditici s of Approval will be imposed: to alleviate potential :impacts, and; 4) there are no additional potential s gni-cant: environmental impacts .that may, result iron►, the proposeddevelopment, establishment: and operation of #he- proposed tale. Therefore, the prbposed _project. is in ccimpliaacc -ft requirerments of the California Envuvnmental Quality Act (CEW and §13;20,030(6) of tho'Development Co _e. Finding No;:4 There will be no potentially signi'ficaxit rxegat ve itxtpacts. upQzt 'be environmental quality and. natural ,resources that could not ,prppetly mitigated and. monitored, Finding .of FsCt< The project :site is :an in-fill.lot and the surrounding area io txbai. Therefore, iw significant= negative impacts on the environment are anticipated'to result:from the. proposed social.-services housiizg facility 5 Finding No. 5s The location, size, design, and operating characteristics; of the proposed use are compatible: with the existing and -fu ture land uses within the general area in. Which the proposed use -is to be located and will not create sigiificant noise, traffic- or' other, conditions or situations that may be objectionable ordetrumntal to other permitted uses in. the. vicinity or adverse to the public int&-W4.bealth, safety, convenience; or'Welfare of the City. Eluding of F-20* The. proposed design is in compliance: with `.the Development Code requirements that ate applicable;16. location, height and setbacks for the proposed social service housing; facility, A11 access to the subject property will be thirougl.points of aceess_ from 11V 17a' Street with irtgesS/ogress_ access through the OgWay, on 1N. it Street: T.hpr-fore, the design. of the protect: will ensure that the<project wil..l, not create any Significant noisq, traffic, or other conditions: that would, be detrimental, or objectionable to other uses in the vtcift of adverse to the public health, safety, .convenience, or woffhre of the City; densi li Finding:No. 6.: Tlc subject site 'is physically suitable for the type and ty .ntensity;of use being proposed. Finding of Fact.. The site is physically suitabto for the type and density/intensity of the project beir►t proposed: as evidenced by project compliance wiIh :all applicable I3evetop hent Cade standards The size of the POO site iso adequate to: accommodate the proposed `iinprovements,mi compliance with the requi emeIIts. c�fthe D.. eveloprrrenfi Code:. Finding No. 7 There are .adequate provisions for poblic access, water? sanitation, and: public utilities and services to ensuro that the proposed use would not be detrimental to pubic`health and .safety.. Finding of Fact: The site has direct aecess off of�V. 17c-' Street. All agencies responsible - for :reviewing, .access and prodding watery sanitation and other public so tires to the site: bgyq %had thei nppio tanity to review the proposal, and none. indicated imba'lity ':to serve the project site. EatablishMeot of the proposed `social service housing l`aglrty; :subject to Conditions of Approval, will not be detrimental -to public services Or public hearth. and. UW. fi SECTION 2. IF] DINGS FOR MINOR EXCEPTION 17-0.6 Section 19;58.-50 of the, City of" Safi Bernardino Development Code requires that `Minor Exception applications meet certain findings: prior to the approval "by the Community Development; Ditector. Accordingly, the -following findings are ;provided 'in support of the approval by the .Community Development. Director for Minor Exception: 17-46.: Finding Alo.1 That there are° special circumstances applicable to the property; including size, shape, topography; location,. or surroundings, the stri"gt application of Ns, Development Code deprives 'such, property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the-vicinitY and under identical zone classification.. M-ding..of tact Pursuant to: y�.19.24,060(3`) (Ds$t Standards Dimensional Requirements), + ninety (90) degree parking, .requires parking stalLdimensi. oAs to: be nine (9) feet by .nineteen (19) feet with a mu iinvm twenty foutr (24) foot drive aisle wndth. However,, San Berriartiino CAvnty Fixe District's (9131+I3) Co ., e. standard requires that new development provide a twenty-six (26); foot: drive aisle for Qn-site circulation and Emergency service access, Proposed. on-site parking:.design eonsisfing of a: reduction: -of the parking. stall depth of i�iiaeteen (19) feet "is. subject to the approval of a .Minor Exceptions -With appropriate Conditions of'Approval and. CEQA determination. Pursuant to §'19.24 060(3) (Design $taiidards Dimensional. Requirements), nett' x(90.) degree parking requires parking stall dimensions to benine :(9) feet by nineteen (19) feet: However, parking stall depth may be r+�1 90 to erg7iteen {l8) feet r hale still Main Acct access, parking and stall' width. Thus; the proposed :.one (l.) foot"reduction from the parking stall depthwill maintain BFD's .Code standard and. the Development Code standards without adversely affecting project. fievelopinent in an existing. lot, and alLoiving the property to. enjoy the improvements enjoyed by :other property in the vicinity and under `identical zone classification.• 2ainding.Plo..;Z That granting the. Knot Excepti*%,1 is, necessary for the preservation an=ti enjoyment; of a substantial proQerty right possessed by other "property in the same vicinity acid zone a id denied, to thc•pxoperty for w : icb the Minor Exception is sought. Tiding of Fact. The proposed project site Vill "maintain the ndvelopinent Code standards WV, adversely affeetittg the project dovelopmppt and adhere to SBFD . Code standard. Crwft the" Minor Exception: would allow° tile- applicant to desgri a comprehensive acid cost effective ;development iri which ;ori site eirculstion wrll lie :maintain for aoces5. T11e current development ,standard would dead ser the parking stall ,depth at nineteen 0 9) feet, which would impede 'the: development:. of a compr=ehensive and cost effective new development on an existing vacant lot. Therefore, the proposed reduction in the paridZig stall depth: iivjSl allow the applicant to an improvement to th6 site that wouldnot be possiVle otherwiM Finding No. 3 That granting the Minor Exception will not be materially .detrimental to the public health,. safety, or welfare, or injuries to the property or- rimprovements improvementsin such vicinity and zone in which the property is. located. Finding of Fact The proposed reduction in parking stall, depth willnot deprive the site from having, adequate access to: and from tie site_ Therefore, the project will not have any significant negative impacts upon environmental quality or:natural resources and will not be detrimental to the publichealth, safety, or wel fare, or injurious to the pro)ect site -ar imprOveme lls in such. vicinity and zone in whiob the project site is located. FiriMug.No. 4 'That granting the Minor Exception does not constitute a special pti'vilege incoiiiistent: with the liin tatJons upon othez proper es in the- vide ty and zone: ift, which such property Located. Fin;ftg-of )fact w Th"e.location:and operating. eharactenstics of the proposed project mri l be coosistent. with all provisions ,of'tho Development Code. The proposed use will be compatible with existing and f iture :surrounding uses within the neighborhood The proposal will not create conditions that may 'be: objectionable nor .detrimental to other permitted uses. ml the vicinity due to the, proposal being consistent with the Commercial General (CG"" -1), Zone and Transit overlay 'District(TOO.),. Furthermore, the proposed development will strategically develop an. existing 'lot uito an economically sustainable operation thm will benefit -tht surroU d ng neighborhood. Therefore, no .land. use conflict or adverse effects on pubfie• health, safety: or xvelfare are anticipated to. result from the developr�t establishment and operation of a: social service housing facility.. Pri ding N&5 That.grantutg the; Minor'Exceptian does riot exceed 1`U°ro of the standard(s) being modified, or allow a use or activity which: is not otherwise expressly authorized by the regulations governing the subject parcel:.. Findiug of Fact: "The Minor.Exception is: requested for & reduction in the perh ilted parlang; stall depth only. -Tl e proposed.. reduction of ane (I,j "foot to the permitted. nineteen (19) foot parking stall 8epth does not exceed ten (i Q} percent of the standard- being modified. Additionally,. theproposed use: is wJ, the authorized Land use designation governing :the propbsed pr*ct site . 8 Finding No. 6 That granting the minor Exception will not be inconsistent with the General Plant Finding of Fact General plan Land Use Element Policy '24.1 state.- "Actively enforce development. standards, design gui&rinet,-4ud. policies to preserve and enhance the character of San Bernardiao'g neighborhoods.. ,Gen, , "EnsuTe the availability,rgl plan Safety Element G04110-12 stateg .o adisaster" , and effective response of emergency Services.inthe event d- Thepro-pos,d project wo uld,al w for the developrxient, establishment. and , operation of a social service housing, facility on an underutilized vacant site standards, design, guidelinegand lte� while adhering to. the development st, a,' Exception, Em. Through tho lQwanm.. - of the Minor E policies. ergenGy Services would adhere anti access and safely provide- th - he proposed gootal- service housing facility 'Therefore,'Therefore,1 0 services to t`the:i proposed pf'4ject would not -beincontiftof vnithGeneral Plan .and wll be compatible vniih,th0urroundingland ues. SECTION 4. CONDITIONS "OF APPP-OVAL'.' The, approval of,conditional Ilse Permit .11- 14 aid, Minor Exeeption, 13-06 shall be- -suWedt -to 1he follow. Wa.Conditiotit:.of Approva approval is -to all the-dVY d1i.t.'Phd Operation. of A social- ScTvice et. co.-ift of WcWYLi� housing facility contaimog,:Approx 'Y Wing for a ten bm t U0 U 29 residential units, 'for, low Ine, rm taly veterans, -arid a peteoot reduction iparkingstall 40101.from :nineteen. 1-9) to eighteen(18)feet, aeon f t site and Off sate ddt* on pm=l of q WWI' A with the congtrUctim 0 required . b do Approximatelyb69'acres. T, hdPWJe0$!te'is ocatod Id 17 Steet. ft rpWatam, stamped September. J4 20_17(P. 2; The prqk*t-:We shall, be developed 104 M c.ew..1 ith _ I - BIT =approved by the 'Planning :commission, which th- Planning IM ttons, filo 1� lanni -D .6s includeS' �4 site plan; floor an xtenor ova ' 9 fi . - 0 the0ty's-M %I -CO& M9414 theAp , 0 Conditions OfApproval d0fttoibod herein, 3. W thin -two (2} ydits of OW C ondtttor al Use .Permit an inor; ejto p..ih qn appf6va wired the pmY commencement ofconstructionshall lkavp ote ..e�permi Lop— -41 hal null and void., in addition, if after commencement Off. . �c0n§tuc work IS di"_ 4.6--oule-d- year then, t become In d period.for a of .One (1) h# penm app.. boom i do- flo� approval of :the Conditional Use. Permit and MiTlOr :Exception not. -alitilonzd-commencemea of construction. All: necessary paMits must be OWWd Pridr to coratneocempnt of sp9eified ootistruretion acti-Wirle$. -included mi the Conditions -of- Approval. EXPIRATION' DATE: S . P.PtMber- IX 2019 91 4. The review authority may grant a time extension, for good cause, not to exceed twelve (12) months: The applicant must file an application, the processing. fees, and all required submittal items, thirty (3 0) da the. expiration dam The review authority shall compli� prior to visions. ensure, that the proicot with all Development Code Pro in effect at the time of the requested extension. 5.. In the,:eveht this approval is legally challenged,, the City will PrOrJftPtl'Y notify the applicant : of any Claim action or proceedirig andwill cooperate fully in the defense of Aft matter.matter.matter.Oupe. notified, the a.-p-plicant agrees to Mend, indemnify and hol, d harmless fhe. 'or .y of San Bernardino. (City), any departments, agencieA,. divisions, boards coZinission of the City :as 'well as predecessors, successors, assigns, agents,, directors., elected O.M0161% 6ffiCCr$;:O!%PjOYCCs, representatives and attorneys of the City fromAny r,j a . im, tc(i on orproceeding against any of the f6r6going, persons of ent ifiPs. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City for any costs, and attorneys' fees; which the City may 0" participation shall not be required by a, court to pay: as f a- result, such- action, but such P a 0 relieve appI . Want of his Attorney obligation under this condition. The costs, salaries, and expenses of :the City AUMO and employees of his office shall be considered as "Attorney's feesfor the purpose of. this. condition. As part of the consideration nsideration fbr issuing thus Developmentt"' I eni Permit, this . condition shall remain in effect if the DevabPMOOt Pdrniit is rescinded or revoked, whother or not at the request of applicant.. Planning Division 6. The applicant, facility operator, and/or property Y owner shall submit' _-0PCM Onal' Management and Security :Plans' for the social services housing )f4cilitYtO ft 1I M-M—g! Division for, eview and approval'0 in, . ermit. prior to, the issuance ofiany grading or bOd g.p ice restricted to between the hours 7. Hours of operation for .the on site 910v Office' shall be .0 8 This approval :" not penit drop-il 'shelter styl t style" oveiniiglit stay:. 9. Public dishibution offood, ClOffag or any otherUtra shall not be peftitW, 10. Tho social services housing facilitY shall provide for 14 -hour security personnol to hall equppedw � ith. a secun yZatnera monitor, ,the -:04 shall .pToper.ty; seven (7) days a. weekmonitoring. system. i,i. Withio. six (6) Inonth-9 from the. issuance of.a. Certificate of 0 We cys f6r-,a pal of two (2) years, the Planning Diosion shall. con0jet an IffisPCOtiot, of -the. bl"Aue's , A� . � - A I V-A the operations and property, to ensure Compliance. Wa the Conditim of prbw to the p satisfaction of - the, Community Development Director.: In the event that. An unresolved. Conditions of.App shall: coin ply with.. --ontirimes to. at the OaftcemddtOf ft CO 46 of- the Devp Enforcement of 99 lopM__ht Code related to Chapter 19. . " may require. thtapplic4nt.�.to:gubtlit.fMapplitatio)i�,"o applicable applied. soa Temedy. .. l appropriate I.. -rcconsiderati . Planning Commission.. application, fee, for recons Oil �6y.t he, Plan 1 I %e property is sold by U, s� Veterans ffi State i--- A.VBTS - tile. city Shan - 1 tiaovo ( review . and, approve the new owner and Operator' TO 13- A n eight ght (8) foot high decorative masonry block wall shall bemaintained along the east property line. 14If the colors Of 4116 buildIngs exterior finish materials: are to be modified beyond . .or.other other m the current proposal and. improvement requirements, the revised color scheme Oodlor finish materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to .commencement of work. 1.:5. Minor modification 16 the P1211silIgIl be subject to approv..A by the Director through the Minor Modification permit process. Any modification which exceeds 10% of the allowable measurable design/Site. considerations shall require the refilling of the original application. 16. The facility operator -and property. owner shall be responsible for regular maintenance of the project site, The, site shall be maintained :in.a clean condition and free of litter :and any other undesirable Vandalism, graffiti, tragh, and other debris shall be removed and cleaned up. wi0fin 24 hours of being, reported. 17. The applicant: and/or :owner shall maintain :all f4ture. landscaping in thp.parking lot and, setbacksion at all times :and any dead or missift . in A woed, and :disease free, condition vegetation must be promptly replaced, 1.8.. Signs are not.. Approved as. a part of this permit: Prior to establighifig, sips, the applicant and/or -owner mustsubmit-. atapplication for approval. by the Planning DiviSJM�,JBWer% ,prova.... . .. - flapI' axe pro pennant, -and similar signshibiied unless a Temporary Sign Permit is obtained. 19. Constrwtion-r6lgted activities may not occur between, the hours of -8:00 pm and 7.00- arn, 'No construction veWcIes,;, eqLjipment, or,gmplpyew may be: delivered to', or anive, at the constr-ucfioil site before, �10.0, am.:or- leave the site, after :8 wo�o p :Cbnstructionwti'�rt►es may .only occur Monday ifirough Friday. 20.Submittalrequirements forpermit applications with Build.iand Safety Division shall :include all Conditions of Approval 1,ssuedwith 1hisapptovalj painted on the plan, Alieets. 21 i All now construction shall require.permits Prior to commencement. 22, All Conditions of Approval .shall he completed prior to finalinspettioti and sign -off. 23.NoFiia ill be� issodunt0 all Conditions of Approval haver been, completed. 24. The project shall comply with all applicable requirements of the City of San Bernardino: Community evelopnent Departwt,. Deyelopment and Building and Safety Divisions, .FireDepartment,, Polite Department; 'Municipal Water Departmen% PUblic Works De and the ;City =Qe*.15 O.flice/Businoss. Registration Division. 11 Land Development Division Conditions 25. Drama a and Flood C ntrol a. A. local drainage study will be: required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures oY storm drains needed. to mitigate downstream itripaets or protect the development shall be designed .and constructed at the :developer's expense, and right -6f -way dedicated as necessary. b. The detention basin shall be designed, in accordance V—n$' "Detention Isasin ardino County." Retention basins are not acoeptable. DesignCriteria for San Bern e The development is located within zone:Xof the .Federal Insurance RateMOPS ou booklet #060710545H with;year 08129V2008. d. All drainage from the development shall 'be directed to an approved public drainage facility.. If not feaable,. proper drainage facilities and easements shall: be provided to .the satisfaction of the City Engineer: e, If site drainage: is to be outlet.mto the public street, t , drainage: shah be conveyed through: a parkway' .culvert constructed m acoordatnce with Czty Standard No: 40,0. _Conveyanoe of site. ;drainage over the Driveway app .r.oadies will not be permitted. f. A Rretitmnary WQMP was submitted and 'the 'proposed underground chamber system was :conceptually approved. The oya " shall :include but not limited to pretreatment mechanism:overflow outlet in the final design. and emerge... g: AFull-Categorical dater Quality.Management plan {WQMp is tequlred f this project;. -he agplicam is .directed to the County of San 96inardino's Flood Control Wpage for the template acrd Technical Guidance Document.. The Land nor to issuance sof anypermit; shall approveWQNCP'•. Development Division, p A CD Copy of the approved WQM-P' is reared' prior to Z Mding:perM t tssumve. h. The Land Development Division, prior =to grad lgplanappioval, shall approve an Erosion Control Plan.plan shall be designed to oointrfll, erosion :due to water: and wind, including blowing dust, dut ug all' phases of construction, ixneludirig graded areas which ares not proposed to. he immediately bit -It uptm, 2-0. Gradin acid Landscaping a,; The grading and:.on-site niprovemen plan shall be sig-nel by a Registered CIl gueoeer and agrading perrriit will be required T O grading plan shall be ance with the City`a Il rad g P61 c +es and: Procedures„ pre� .pered in strict accar and the City's "StMndard Drawings" , unless Aerwise apprcived. by the Building Official. 1% If the gradin. g plan indicates export or unports the source of t13e import material• or the site for the deposition. of the eXpott, sl►all be notedon the ;grading. plan. Fen -nit numbers.shall be noted if the soorix or destination. is 'iii City of Safi geinardino. 12 c. If more than 5o cubic yard& of earth is,to be hauled on City Streets -then a. special hauling p . ermit: shall be obtained from the City Engineer. Additional conditions, such as. truck route approval, uaffic controls, bonding, covering of Wds., street cleaning, etc, maybe required by the City -En ifideL 91 d6 Wheel stops- are not permitted by the DeveloPMentCO.de, except at designated accessib contiftuous 6.11 high curb shall be: used .le parking; -spaces.,.. Therefore, around planter areas and areas- where head in paddng is adjacent to walkways. 1-6.57 d6e N the landscaping or The spaces my ,p and MAY overhang e an . parking sp walkwaZ;5'., overhang into (lie setback area or into an ADA path .of travel .y I�y. (xninimLtrn.4' wide). is.notpetmiuod. e6 Continuous oncretecurbing at least. 6 inches high and 6 inches wide, shall be provided at 1 east I feet from any wall, fence, property line, walkway, or structure where: parking and/or' drive aisles are located adjacent. thefdtO, C*v6j.pg may be Th are between the curb : lot out at Structuxe:4cce4s points, The space 20d wall, fence, property line, Walkway or. straoto Wo shall be, landscaped,. except asallowed liY the- nev,616P.In C d. refuse enclosure(a) shall. be.constructed ift. accordance with Qy% Standard. Drawing Nb. 5MV11th modification top d act.ess. Th rom;dq ADA c minimum size ofthe r6fuse enclosureshall be �8, -feet x 15 feet for: bint storage area. Whema refuse. . enclo$M' is. proposed 'to Vo constructed structed adjaomt. to spaces for parking Passenger vehicles,a. y Wide by 6.94 high concrete planter s611 berprovided 10 separate: the; enclosure from the adjacent parking. Theplacemoit -of the onplosur e and design, of the -plantershall preclude 'the enclosure doors from 0110hing into drive' aisles Or Wpactii against adjacent 0" 'g, g walls, blopkwalls and ell on-site feft!ing shall be designed AM detailed ani the on-site jijo4movement Plat.. Tift work shall be pwof, the: on-site improveniM poxnr t; issued by the Building Official. All masairy walls Shall be constructed of decorative block with architectural &MftV8 AdOePtWe to the City Planner.. h. No construction on a. site :shall begun before zi tomporarylseounity, fence is in.. place: mid approved is: ,proved 1�-y the bfficial or h designee. Ternpurary/sopurity fencing. may not. be removed until approved 'by .the *Building Official Or 'his de remove the ,Aignee. The owner or owner's: agent shall imin lenipmt�Csee #tY fencing- upon the approval of the Building Official or his 4"igneq. Sifts that icontain multiple buildings shall maintain the togporary/s6a*ft fencing: around 'the portion of the site. and buildings under construction, as jetennined by' the. Building Official. :Of his designee.: All temporayNecurfty fencing fbr construction sites •shall jrclude, :screening, eaiergoncy- identification and safety identification and ishall be kept in neat an d undamaged' condition. L. The lin improvement; 74 --an shall. include details. of `onsite lighting, including light: location,, type of poles and fixtures, foodation design WM stro0wal caioulations,. conduit location, - material and 92z, and Photometric plot shall be ation, provided which show that, the proposed on-site lighting :design will. provide: • 1 foot candle of illumination uniformly distributed over the siirf tee of the parking lot during hours 2of operation,, and 0.25..foot-candles security lighting -during all other hours. j. The design of on: site improvementsshall also Comply with all requirements of The California Building Code,, title 24, relating:, to accessible parking and accessibility, inc retrofitting aceez juding retro tfing of existing building access points for accessibility, if, applicable., k,. An :accessible path of travel. shall. be provided ftoin'the public way to the building entrance. All pathways shall be: paved and shall. provide a, minimum clear width of 4 feet, Where parking,overhangs the Pathway, the minimum ptived width shall be 6,5 feeli 1. A Lot Merger is required for this project: . rojeat Ilie applicant is directed to the City's web 'page at aww-shq orp----;Departments - Public Works - Submittal Requirements- forlubmittal.requirements.. m. The project Landscape Plan. :shah, be reviewed and by the Land Development Divisiot Prior, to . issuance e. of j:grad , jog permit Submit. 3 copies to the Land Development Division for Checking., jo Prior to. occupancy Of any building, the dgvelopershall post a bond to guarantee the maintenance! and survival o"'f,projJect landscaping for a period of one year., o. The -public right-of-way, bets oon the property line and top of curb (also known as 'shall be. landscaped 'by along. adjoining st -reefs the developer -and maintained in papdtft; by the PrOPOtV : O".0r. Details of the parkway landscaping shall be includedjji the project's on, -site landscape plan: 27 LUtffiges A., Design. and consitra all public utilities to ser%!e the site :�ul.a=-oridanpipwith :.City Code, City Standards: and reqUirernents -of the serving utility, includfag -as, electric,, telephone, water,; Ower, and cable TV'(Caine TV -optio4al for commoraC industrial, or instituti4nal; users; b. The :project site 64 'be..ProvidO with separate water and sewer facilities so ft- it- providing vzicesi the area can serve r -- 'City -or the, agency Pro I, , 9 such 0. Backflow;preventers sh.. ' f shall be installed. ft any building with ift firus e h a- loor , :elevation below the rim., elevation. of the, neArestupstream mantlolt- d. Sewer Maio extensions required to serve- :the site " be :constructed at IhO Developer's expense, 0; Th O prviect is lo.caied in the sewer service are th- f - a, rriajhWned �y e City 0 San Bemardinol therefore, arty necessary sewer Main extension shall be designed 4nd Cit constructed irj� accordance with. the City's `SewqrFbICY ' and ProceduresY :and _Y, I ,gtanAard'Drawings. Direct eonnectionto -the :6,9":Storni Drain Line on, 17th Street shall not be dllowed. .Drainage. from the project site ��,Ilbe difteted through parkway culvert or OOM approiied method;by -Public. 'Works. & Wity- (niderground and, as require& services be placed. easements provided 14 h. Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction: shall hb, relocated at the Developer's, expense as directed by the City Engineer, except overhead fines,. if , provisions cif the pevelopment C J od. required by prov ode to be Underground 28, Street ImprovementDedications a. For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right -of -way ;(R.W_), to provide the: distance from street centerline to-pfPPMt.Y line and placement -of curb lino-(CIIW in relation to the street centerline shall beas follows: KI& of W -a - ,Curb. Lin Street.Narne I YR 1. "F' Street. 50(8.75'Dedication: R -P j: 4) 1 quire 3Y b. 09" Str ent shalt be widerIllp 33" fiom.-cOnt e. Oei Curb & GUttef Ali P. m c. Construct 81, Curb and Gutter Gri, 17°' .Strper -CAY Stgnda _r4:No00 .adj .I ' -acent to the. site.. Widen pavement a4jacent to the 'site to ruatch viewcurb. and; gutter. Construct -approach and departure transitions for traffic safety acid drainage as approved by the City Engiueer- d. If the pxistings,idewalk grid/or -curb & gutter -adjacent to the Oe are irl POOT ,condition, the sidewalk -.and/or curb & gutter :shall be temolmd acid. reconstru AtO to City Standards. Curb & Gutter shall conform to Standard NO.2%Type 1W and :sidewalk AM conform t© Standa9.102i Case: "A(6' wide adjacent :to curb),. V41e$s otherwise approved by City Engineer. .e. Construct Dij;vewayApproadhes per City Standard.No.; 204 -11,, including, an, accessible by-pass: around the topof the dri'vo .-approach. Remae existing driveway 'approaches that a" not part o- p ' f theapproved plan and t*ace vitU full height curb & gutter and siaewa k_ f An encroachment permit .from Pubjjci Works' DePIM-tMent !**hai be :required for mont utility cuts into existing streets. or any work Witbili,CitY' fight -Of Pl-ive X0 -'I restoration or trench repair shall be in conformance WM City Standard No. 0i Public facilities shall' :be: restored or constructed. hack td Publip'Works, Depament sati sfaedoft� g. 171h Street shall have g o, to foot VW and. asphalt: -1conorde4W_V%air to � g5- centedinebf the Vrojel# slitefto' nft h.. The: alley -way dpiveway 4P..PrO4db and paverhem adjoin the prated Site, to the North shall be reconstfUOW in accordance to, Public works r*ircmeats to the ce werline. .i, Vsteetgwtlamp 1,bee4, , i th MLED1 j, :no applicant. Must post 4 performance bo: pnor to iSWOM Of the' off-site perm j the,gnoultofthebondis-to be deterin tied -by Publie-Works Department ,29, ftuiredEndll' Plans A complete submittal for plan checking shall Oonsist 4 15 street- improvement plans (may inplade street lights or street Jighting may be, separate. plan), ■ sewer plans ffriVate sewers may be shown on on-site improvement plan-, public-sewersmust be oAfa separate plan with profile), • storm draih plans (Private storin drains may be shown on on-site improvement plans; public storm -drains Mast be. on a Separate plan with ptofile),. • signing and striping plan . (nJay be on sheets included in street improvement lighting. (dhwsitd lighting maybe included M- on site. iroprovem ont plan or may beton aseparate stand-alone plan),, gradip& (may beincorpotated with on�site improvement plan), ite landscaping and irrigation; pa -site improVern. fit Plans 000 onr,.,s water plans (sbaU Iw submitted to Sart Bernardino Municipal Water Departmdni)j All : required supporting; calculations; studies and reports, must be included, iii the initial submittal (nidjuding but not limited to drainage studies, soils reports, structural calculations) b, All off-site improvement plans submitted for plan cheek shall be prepared on the pity's st-andard.24"X. 367' sheets, A signature block sg r ,,y to;the City - Eng in-ecror1is designee shall be, rovided. 0; After completions of. plao, checlong, final mylat drawings, stamped --and sigaed by ,the Register CM Engineer: iii AWgd,shalj be'sObInitted to_ the City -]8ngww and/or Building Official forapptML d: Copies .cif` the City's design polities and p n x9cedures and standard are 044ble at the Public Works Co-onter for the cost ofeprodvct on, They are also available attneg dwW at, tlie'Flublic Works Web Site at h#g-./I-w_ww,sbcitV 30-R-Muired hft9i9O&9 Pernlits a ceding pem, 'A site improvements construction permit (except 'buildings - see Development Sq.Mqes-Building-Oi%&A):, ineWdiag landscaping c. Cuff site improvement construction permit. .31- Applidable Rqg[,nqpdR& Fees. a, All Ppeninct. — _.ccflon, . insp and impact tees are outlined on the Public Works: x1ca FmSchedule. A deposit-, in the amount of 1,1060/6 of the estimated cbedklug fee; for each. ,set ,:O.fplops W be. required fir e, quired' at. time- of applica r plan ch Theamount of the fee issubject toadjustment: If- the construction Mst estimate varies more= pari 10% from the.estimate submitted with the: application for plan ch. b. 7bo current fee schedule is av ,ailable at, the Public WorksCounter and at httPe//wWW.SbcItYft 1.6 public Works — integrated. Waste Management Division 32. puring demolitiontconstruction developer.and contractor to use services through the City of San Bernardino�s ekcl%ive franchised hauler Burrtec Waste Industries. 33. The proposed location for the. refuse enclosure is acceptable: 34. Protect the parking stalladjacent to the refuse enclosure from the. gate opening. 35. Construct a modified :Standard Plein 508 :refuse enclosure with &'X15"interior. dimensions for bin storage. M. Work with the Building Division to Modify the re s6' enolosure to meet, ADA access requirements ADA `access requirements are in. addition. to the `8'X15 - interior dimension for bin storage. 37. if gated provided access by mean of a gate key, code, or`remote: 3:8`. Assembly Bi11341 Mandatory .Commercial Reoycling may apply 39. Assembly Bill, l SZfi lVlaridatory Comrriercial Organics Recycling may apply. 40, Upon completion ;semi is .provided through the City. of Sart Bernardino's exclusive franchised hauler:B.urrtee Waste h dustries. Da lding'and Safety Division Con,iiiious. 41. Plans subpmiftd. shall conform ;to the ,201"9 California Ming Codes. Please note this will. 1nclude.:the CATiforriia.Greaft Building Code. 42. Project shall' confonn to Chapter 3 of'the 'Catiforiia Building. Code 20`16. 4.1 Project.:shalt also conform to the requirements 'of Chapter 4 Of the Califbrnia Building Code,-pecial. Dotails .RequiTemonts Based on -use. of occupancy, 44. Proved *Wer requirements for: the occupant lead, according. to Cal&tnia Bi lding Code 2B16. 45. Provide. all.. disabled access :requirements per Cltapfer 1:1 A aid complete deta�-Is plans POT, to plain. review :submittal. 4b, Tlnere:shall lie a formal plan submittal prior to all issuance afper�riits. 47. Refer to Chapter t, of the California Building Code for Fire%SMOke PrDteC(ion Requ eiitents: 48... Please indi Cate 411 hydrants location on plans, 4R. Flease- take note that, the Fire submittal is separate from .the Building: submittal. Sall Bernardino County Cansol dated Fire district 50.,Shall comply with all current Building; Fire Codes ;and Fire D.epartiiieOt Standards requirements; basedon occupancy classification. 51: Any changes: to this: proposal, shall require crew Firef'Deartrabeftt condition letter, 52 Any, changes to the approved life_ safety system shalt require plans to, be, submitted to the FD ,prior to construction including the following: Fire Spnriklers, Fire Alarms, Underground' water supply for fireprotection, Cooking: appliances and. Hood protections. 17 53. monitored fire sprinkler systems are. required for the Proposed Wilding(s), Plans shall be submitted to Fl) prior to coristructio. PER CFC 903.2. Ll 54. Knox 130X/Key Box is required, and shall be provided aria installed in accordance with CFC and Fire Department Standard.. 55. Required fire flow for this shall meet the minimum requirements established in .re project the -California Fire Code: 56. An approved on-site fire protection water system, in accordance with Fire Depgftent Standard is required. The system is required to be- in place and serviceable prior to building. construction, 57,.. An approved Water. supply system, complete with streettire hydrants corap.1 :Fire g with.P._ e Department Standard, Shall be in place prior to any combustible construction.. 59. Provid -a. compjete on-sitefireprotection plan to the FD which indicatesthe location of Ii all required fire protection appliances (FDC,`9, Mls, DDC's, Proposed. and existing fire hydrants, etc.)., 59, Fencing,ha'' walls or carports s 11 not -obstruct Fire Department access to fire; hydrants and property- 6 0.. Paved access from 2 points shall be required foT. compl etion i and occupancy. 61. Intorior/exterior Fire Department access roadways/fire laftos, dial] be per fire Department Standard. If gates installed; must comply with Fire, Department Standu4s. 62s `Provide the followin S.FD notes on the site utility a. Aseparate permit is required by the, Fire De.pArtmerit f4r installation d on-site water systems. No work may begin until the, permit .has been obtained. A permit application ,may be obtained from Fitt Prevention. b; All; hydrants. shall WO a, blue reflective: -dot placed -in the drive loft adjacent to: the; hydrants per Fire Uppar(mot Standard. c„ Pant curbs red, 15" to either side of fire, hydrant arfd'.FD d. Fird.Depktnent Connection required witfifii $0 feet ,of a hydrant . e.. Bollards, (crash posts) may be, required at time of finalIASP q6tion (taprotect the -fire hydrants and FDC .from vehiculaftrafH4 f Public fire hydrants are required along streets at intervals not tovxowid, 30D -feet for commercial and SOG for residential areas. g.: Required fire: flow for this project is�_at ion ft 2: hours duration: 63. .Paved :access froro 2 points, is required to be 30 feet invidth 3 or more:stories ..iii hdj& or over 300,000 square .feet: 64. Premise And Building ideaifipatibn a-pd. addressing shall bea, mit imu;n of 12, inch jA height - 65. All fire access road$ shpl be paved and all. WcAther-Aad shall: meet the: min. turning ing radius, Hammerheads-- shall meet the Sat Bervardino County flm Department -Standards: All required access roads: shall, meet county standards of 2V in width and -turning Yedws. Pleas. shall be: submitted ,and approved prior to! construction :commeiicemen.t 18 rto!eonstruction:commeii)temen.t18 SECTION 5ePLANNING' COMMISSION ACTION: The planning commission hereby takes the following 8060n: i- Adoption. ofPIgnnin&Commission Resblutioiibio. 2017-055; a. Adopjkgrthe Categorical Exemption (§15332 - in -Fill. Development Projects) for - Cogditional Use Permit. 17-14 and Minor. Exception 17-06 I , 1 in accordance- with §1506100 o irocti-ag the f the California Environinerital Quality Act, and d Community Development Di *e to prepare and filewith. the Clerk of the County of San Bomatdirio a. -NoO* of Exemption asprovided. under P-Oblic Resources 'Code and ; and Section 21152(b) aAd,CSQA Guidelines Section, 15062- 'b, Approving conditional Use Permit 17-14 and Minor ExcWiol! 17-06, sub ject to the 4brembntioned Conditions of Approval.. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 126 day of September 2017. ATTEST.- ------------- 0 lanniAg. Mark fpwib;.sp. domotisdon Secretary city of San !33eMardino,;CdM0A4 19' Andrew M.Rchen,'Chaiman Sw Bernardino Planning Commission CERTIFICATION: I, Melina, Perez -Ramirez, Recording Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of San ul Bernardino, California, ilo: hereby certify that the foregfling;Resoltikon, No.. 2017-055, was ...Y adopted by the Planning Contin ssion of -the City of San Bernardino; Californnia, at a regular m. eeting thereofbeld on the 12`� day of Septetriber 20:17; by the following vote, to wit: .AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTATMI 20 Melina Perez Ramirez, Recording Secretary City of San. Bernardino, California APPROVED PLANS 21 K U. ER, � -, 11; r - u DL IE Q- lp .q- 9.4 M }� L-3 11 cr Ri colT Lu iv 07 to N UJ c.::. 34, ri, -1 L\ -j f y all '61 L-3 11 cr Ri colT Lu iv 07 to N UJ c.::. 34, ri, -1 L\ -j \�� 0 pe gs Zs! 0 6"S'gle $ ri OKH 0 pe LU off JzUj z 00. 10 It 0 mil r--t 4. Ida -D z tit-, z A- tu .co LU LLI Q-Yrfi �: -�-5 a 11 gqzva."' 2" 'cy 4 « -4 4Z @ 4A') tD a Ea S I hL iN 3 ; *Wowmiz A V2 ily lum 244 �� 4 3 ; *Wowmiz A V2 CUP17-14 and 1 L17--06 Pla?ining Commission Date. 9.12.M7 Page 10 XT'S,WNT A A,eral M#p, • .�.. a�.�_' � V`....' � •... ...gip:• x3`'N•. -, .. ,watt+G4' ,. S - jj � �y. �_}!'% _! ,.+v': ' — `,+y "t R � V � Y. � I' n"✓'"•" _':'M'[ � _ • s�• i' '-f�c+'{i`r� ,�•;; '_ ilii ''� • .:c,.=- . oAt ; .. iZA PROJECT SITEa wum �: �innf�aSi :-..' :� ��.K� ~'�f^ .:Y+.c^F4��.-s�...-:., • � � � - - •4F �i�rf<�_,�� 'iC I•st f, •Aj.s: "d��'F �:' i rc. �.i;'%,••A-� �. ' . _ •!s.;is.' _yea �_� .• ., .!'_ �. _ 3 .Sd. ' � _ - h+ ... �W,,:. {i. .dtu .. ... ��-!" z ..r .. .. �.%`',::.�`fTy._di�Fdl•4�:�?ai-: iyw'i.�c - .s v�''`.,j�1:.'�. :� a.-..i:.c. CUP] 744 andMEM06 Planning Cammission Rate :9;12,2017 Page 11 A,TTXC]DWNT,C. Locat, ion Map ATTACHMENT C - LOCATION MAP CITY OF SAN BERNARDI'NO PLANNING DfVtSION PROJECT: CUP41-14 AND MEI.7-06 LOCATION MAP NORTW HEARING DATE: September 12, 2017 W .1 81H :S T W '17T14 14 -S T Resider" Ab I.PQ 300HW i v v 1 � To 1� AT_— w k'�Vs PR 1& 15V ! T.�h NO �2hd V%Vd V� tM25, 22, WIT41, W '17T14 14 -S T Resider" Ab I.PQ 300HW i v v CUP17-14 and A&]7- PTanyiing Conirnission Date:9.12:2017 Page I2 A 1 1 AClr 1 D' Service :plan Letter VETS -UIW7EQ STATES VETE-PANS JNMATfVEO AmO-PmV.4 San Borniirdino Land Street Service Plain FED Through the proposed 4evv devOlopmewprqjec(s,.U.S , . I NETS will, add 59 hew affordhLblehousing units to the -communkv &r veteran households -who will .have access to the plethorapf Oervige$ offered 4 y the agency. The affordable housing Project lbeated at 488 West i T}' street win 01 0 'A of, 30 units. f6.1. liaw- .. income veterans and their familles in a three-story 'bull'TUI& The: unit II mmists, of 21 at be.dr oip, units,5 tw,.o6ibedr lootn units, 3 three -.i edroon) units, I four -b& room -apaftem, and I community room.. -The '22,720 q4 A::apt.t"ijoat col-api-ex will sit ort .92 a spate to provide a.,ippoilivi-, services. saes, 4nd tic C The:otb , tdcat' a is a un f6 low-income Yeteraps F . . fr .10 , t 1151 North. -P—Street and will wj ' isitt of its and. th6tr.farnilieg in a three. -story building- The unit mit consists of fQoiw-�bedtcora wilts, 15: two.-bedjrb6m- emits, 3 three-bedroom units, 1 foor beckdOin Apartment, and I c.Dmm" torn, The 24A�N. ft., APIM&LOW COMPlex: will sit .on ..79 acres and will -in..c.ludo spare toprovide suppoytive service -s. Service Plaw Q.SNETV 004tt services alm to reduce makv bartiers seveteran l ha�, maintaining- ff-sucle ffincy.. - On . S`,;rviobt inaude, :case management, ot de ve.t opment, job imihil ig,. t iiterg iicy- food, clabing, ji .0 skills related benieflis aoquai ion,- legal assistance, child stt' pport resolution, finanr, peer trientor-ffig. 'incd.idal and nionw ' I=Ith care p4prdjAa4 m inc I treat ment, coun se- -andoyera; aompre 1�#sly att ring 11 h _ e- - -Pport, EverY re$ iden't W 40 ase ped a Case- Manager who will work With . w- t! q9PIPIP.te an. hidividiml M Housing .Stability Plan ft VA-U.idetllfv� re nooded services. CCaseWv111meet -0th eftran ho Too to hiab.)1.4iniAg.: housing -and &-velppzn: individ , -11-A I -plan with: ;goals .fbcus gre:.iitilize-dt!Dhalpiesidents work WV" E+ot f.d.,sidents who, have experienced trauma : ofdify type. Trauma. hifort applied and: staff Oro rained to ro wgnize. the -effects: of Traur-no wi -d mvironment while-- helping ffie rt;sidchi totdbujlda sense of empowemiel issmsj. Case mati" will employ clinical interventiopssuch as ed Ts, -i f assessnittit for treatrrmni. :referrals to support gaups, peer farijitation, C addressing a and will also coordinate' ing� , aly issues crare, with the VA.. N services xvill be provided by the Lonza Urdu VA 7vl.0dical Center.. _S �g.t also avaijible! at the VA. face in achieving or into _fl. . .. rVIEW-10A, -Oreor kshops, mainstreatil 49MOA assistance, g substance ;abuse veteran household. to. :'s goals and p JotWt t, arty to, acfdsess barriers d owh tAb'-f- TOUSIT194 i adlifeving, their Is, ed Care PHh*[a are how to foster. a. sgk l+,ar anybehaVioral Mention; coUjj$P1jn--. .wa to assist veterans th �djcoi aftd psyahjutric ncc abuse -treatmmof is _71 SVETS NERt Tr THoSE UNITED St7tT51'7iiAlNS.INfFt4Ti►iE •d`non u tSaf(c)i3IQo;"+t hai, 11.S:ETS' offers a Workhsree.Devtltrptent programthtch _phot=di?s eIent assistance And job trdining and these.services will be available to residents of this project Skill building, will also be available fii all residents and include a broad fife sk]ls support eovrittg effect"ive<comri��ancatnn, anger. management, pe}sarrn.ttr:the Eorli seit�n,,]e*vAng basic Coots for personal and Cigaincial success; dressing and behaving far suceess� andcareer piaiz�trig an i job search; ll,S:VBTS will assist elietits in indreasmg inca5rr a and, resoilmes: through employment and/or mainstream benefits. and #'acilitate' money ptarragerr3eni classes to ensure flo dial stability and adlterenea to any Mgoared:rent p"etrts. Residents will: be assested with developing a monthly btitlgeT are encoura„ ed to begin .a sayings plan: for. qXpeises wtd unforeseeta situation& U S.VETS' staff- are uniquely susitive to the special needs of our veterans and und:erstantl the culture shared by veteransIts programs atld services mirror the poputation se. ircted by talerng. into account as many varialalet as posstbls, int:ludrng, Jangiasg�e, cultural>Whrlic i"idfication, gender; age, educ�ationaI level and: soc.ioeconon c status. TJ NII T- S_ staff' receive trionllify =Veteran related frai'ning to includc the fvllrnvin topics: I oust g First M"gtiVarionai 1nCcf+rte riir , TragMa unformed Care, SSIISSDI.Outreach, AccOsr and -Recovery :(SOAR). Post-`t'raumadc Stress Disorder, Trawnatic 0raifi: liltttry, Combat Traunts, S-Cmttl fimutna, Suicide �? ve inion, Boundaries B€ Ethics, etc _Adclitionallp, fi gain kno .led of the resouzces eadi[y ai=etl ble to address: veterans' needs ley, participatz'ttg' to Wbfksbups,. collaborative tr "Ongt , Stared Down Events -.,,and. Resaurce Fairs U &V1.ETS also prarnOtes a therapeutic _conirnun€ty thsl allows, 6c carnamderie .b tE7i ve tar ...J re to flourish.. Peer-to-peer sUpptart Is encn:omged through a m&&ruing pro , 5u" groups,, resident ccau'neil,. and corum>inr#y acttYaties: With U SNEM' cgperience in: and commPOneatt to seruing our nation's 1.military veterans and their families over the past 4 yeamr..the proposed profi is to Sat `�ernardino will be strecessft l in. frreettng the need cif These ve emus and as"wisll - a-&-the'thland! Binpire tQMniunity. 2 EXHIBIT 3 AGENDA ITEM # 6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION CASE: Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 BEARING DATE: September 12, 2017 WARD: 2 OWNER/APPLICANT: U.S. VETS — E Street LLC 800 West Sixth Street Suite 1505 Los Angeles, CA 90017 REQUEST & LOCATION: A request to allow the development, establishment and operation of a social service housing facility containing approximately 22,750 square feet comprised of thirty (30) residential units for low income military veterans, and allowing for a ten (10) percent reduction in parking stall depth from nineteen (19) feet to eighteen (18) feet, along with the construction of the required on-site and off-site improvements, on a parcel containing approximately 0.76 acres. The project site is located at 1351 N. E Street. APN: 0145-211-55 ZONE: Commercial General (CG -1) Zone and Transit Overlay District (TOD) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division of the Community Development Department recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2017-054 (please see Attachment A): I. Adopting the Categorical Exemption pursuant to §15332 (in -Fill Development Projects) for Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 in accordance with § 15061 (Review for Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act; and 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. IP17-13 and ME] 7-05 Planning Commission Date: 9.12.2017 j Page 2 BACKGROUND July 10, 2017: Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 applications were submitted. August 9, 2017: Development and Environmental Review Committee reviewed the applications and moved the Environmental Determination to the Planning Commission for Consideration. August 30,2017: A legal advertisement was sent to the San Bernardino lun Newspaper for publication on September 2, 2017. August 31, 2017: Notices were mailed to the property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property, providing the nature of the request, location of the property, the date, time, and place of the Planning Commission meeting of September 12, 2017 for the Environmental Determination, Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.36 (Conditional Use Permits), Chapter 19.58 (Minor Exceptions), §19.06.020(2)(x) (Commercial Zones Specific Standards Social Service Uses/Centers), and §19.19A (Transit Overlay District) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the applicant is requesting the approval of Conditional Use Permit 17-13 to allow the development, establishment and operation of a social service housing facility containing approximately 22,750 square feet comprised of thirty (30) units for low income military veterans, and Minor Exception 17-05 to allow a ten (10) percent reduction in parking stall depth from nineteen (19) feet to eighteen (18) feet, along with the construction of the required on-site and off-site improvements (please see Attachment A, EXHIBIT 66X-)). SETTING & SITE CHARACTERISTICS The project site is location at 1351 N. E Street, north of W. 13'' Street and Isouth of W. 10 Street, within the Commercial General (CG -1) Zone and Transit Overlay District (TOD). The project site is comprised of a parcel containing a total of approximately 0.76 acres and is currently undeveloped (please see Attachments B and Q. Table 1 below provides a summary of the surrounding land use characteristics of the subject site and surrounding properties. CUP] 7-13 and ME] 7-05 Planning Commission Date: 9.12.2017 Page 3 TABLE 1: SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USES LOCATION LAND USE ZONE iGENERAL PLAN CODE DESIGNATION Site Vacant Commercial General (CG -1) and ; Commercial Land Use Facility Transit Overlay District (TOD) to the Approval of North Office Commercial General (CG -1) and Commercial Lot Size 0.76 Acres Transit Overlay District TOD N/A South Vacant lot and Single- Commercial General (CG -1) and Commercial Setbacks Family Residential Transit Overlay District (TOD) East Vacant lot Commercial General (CG -1) and Commercial - Side 5 Feet Transit Overlay District TOD N/A West Vacant Lot Commercial General (CG -1) and Commercial Lot Coverage 24.67% (8,140 square feet) Transit Overlay District OD N/A ANALYSIS Project Development The proposed development as a social service housing facility containing approximately 22,750 square feet for low income military veterans has been designed to comply withe development standards of the City of San Bernardino Development Code. The project site i located within the Commercial General (CG -1) Zone and Transit Overlay District (TOD), which permits the establishment of Social Service Uses/Centers, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Table 2 below provides a site design analysis that illustrates the consistency of the project with the Development Code and General Plan. TABLE 2: DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENC'V * Per § 19.19A (Transit Overlay District). PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT GENERAL CODE I PLAN. Social Service Housing Permitted Subject to liermitted Subject Land Use Facility the Approval of to the Approval of CUP CUP Lot Size 0.76 Acres 10,000 N/A (33,000 square feet Setbacks - Front 1.25 Feet w/ 8.75 Dedication 0-15 Feet* - Side 5 Feet N/A N/A - Rear 32 Feet N/A Lot Coverage 24.67% (8,140 square feet) 50% maximum N/A Height 3 Story (33 feet) 3 Story (42 feet)* N/A Parking 30 Stalls 30 Stalls* - ADA Stalls 2 Stalls w/ Van Accessible 2 Stalls N/A * Per § 19.19A (Transit Overlay District). CUP17-13 and ME17-05 Planning Commission Date: 9.12.2017 Page 4 Transit Overlay District-(TOD) Considerations The proposed project is located within the Transit Overlay District (TOD) and adheres to specific standards in order to ensure a well-defined community and building design that is pedestrian - friendly and supports transit use. The proposed project has been designed to meet such standards as it relates to Building Height, Build -To -Line Setback, and Required On=Site Parking. The Building Height within the TOD _E Street Neighborhood Station Area woIuld allow for the proposed development to have a maximum height of forty-two (42) feet with a maximum of three (3) stories and a Build -To -Line Setback of a maximum of fifteen (15) feet. Additionally, the proposed social service housing facility will be developed as an aryl7ical multi -family residential development that would adhere to the Required On -Site Parking standard of one (1) space per unit within the TOD. Thus, the thirty (30) residential units for low income military veterans being proposed would comply with the standard of thirty (30) parking stalls. Land Use/ Site DesigUArchitecture The proposed project consists of the development of three-story social service housing facility comprised of thirty (30) residential units on an undeveloped/underutilized rectangular shape vacant site. The social service housing facility will have a contemporary design with horizontal and vertical articulations in order to create relief amongst the building degign. The building design will also utilize fluctuating color schemes and window sizes with an interconnecting deck to create connectedness amongst the residential units. Furthermore, an architecturally treated six (6) foot high decorative masonry block wall with a twenty-four (24) fpot gate shall be maintained along the north property line with a six (6) foot high decorative masonry block wall along the east and south property lines. The three-story social service housing facility comprised of thirty (30) residential units will provide twenty-one (21) one bedroom units containing approximately 513 square feet, five (5) two bedroom units containing approximately 741 square feet, three (3) three bedroom units containing approximately 1,131 square feet, and one (1) four bedroom containing approximately 1,547 square feet. The four (4) bedroom unit will serve as the manager's suite. The manager's suite will have a master bedroom with its own bathroom located on the second floor of the suite, while the first floor of the suite will contain the living room, kitchen facility, �aundry room, and additional bathroom. The one (1) and two (2) bedroom units will contain a bathroom, living room, kitchen facility, and laundry room while the three bedroom units will contain two bathrooms, living room, kitchen facility, and laundry room. Additionally,. a common space amenity containing approximately 1,200 square feet will be provided on the first floor, in the form of a community room, and a common deck area containing approximately 315 square feet on the second floor. United States Veterans Initiative (U.S. VETS), a Not -For -Profit Corporation has been committed to serving military veterans and their families over the past twenty-four (24), years through the establishment of various projects and support programs that aim at reducing' the many barriers veteran households face in achieving or maintaining self-sufficiency (please see Attachment D). U.S. VETS' staff is uniquely sensitive to the special needs of veterans ar d understands the culture shared by veterans. Staff receives monthly veteran -related trainil ig to include the following topics: Housing First, Motivational Interviewing, Trauma-Inform(d Case, SSUSSDI Outreach, Access, Recovery (SOAR), Post -Traumatic Stress Disorder, Traumatic Brain Injury, Combat Trauma, Sexual Trauma, Suicide Prevention Boundaries and Ethics, and any other CUP17-13 and ME17-OS Planning Commission Date: 9.12.2017 Page 5 related training that is gain through workshops, collaborative meetings, Stand Down events, and resource fairs. I The proposed social service housing facility will be a permanent housing facility program where veteran households with incomes below sixty-one (61) percent of the average medium income for the County of San Bernardino can live permanently. As part of the program, veteran households will have access to the following services: case management, crisis interventions, career development, job training, emergency food, clothing, life skills relAted to workshops, mainstream benefits acquisition, legal assistance, child support resolution, financial management assistance, peer mentoring, medical and mental health care coordination including substance abuse treatment, counseling, and overall comprehensive support. As part of the program, every veteran household will be assigned a Case Manager who will work with the veterans to complete an Individual Housing Stability Plan that will identify resident's goals and prioritized needed services. The Case Manager will meet with the veteran household regularly to; address barriers to maintaining housing and develop an individual plan with goals focused on housing stability. The Case Manager, will employ clinical interventions such as crisis intervention, counseling, assessment for treatment, referrals to support groups, peer facilitation, coordinate care with the Loma Linda VA Medical Clinic, and employ other methods of assistance that will assist in addressing any behavioral issues. Section 19.02.050 (Definitions) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, defines Social Service Uses/Centers, as follows: "A building or buildings used for recreational, educational, cultural, nr religions activities operated by nonprofit groups or agencies that are open to: the public. Related uses may include food service, childcare facilities, job training programs, after school programs, medical clinics, and other similar uses or activities. Residential facilities may be established as part of the use. Drug and alcohol recovery facilities {outpatient or residential) may be a component of the social service use. " Because the proposed social services housing facility is intended to serve as I component of the support programs offered by United States Veterans Initiative (U.S. VETS, a Not -For -Profit Corporation, staff has interpreted that this proposal meets the intent of the definition for social service uses/centers. Therefore, this Conditional Use Permit application for the proposed project is being processed as a social service use/center instead of a typical multi -family residential development. Operations: The salient operational points of the proposed social services housing facility I e, as follows: ✓ U.S. VETS will provide the on-site services to the residents ofle proposed social services housing facility. ✓ Over -night or temporary housing will not be provided. Rather, the rospective tenants will be screened so that the prospective residents are able to sustain themselves through employment and ability to maintain their financial responsibilities. ✓ Food distribution will not be provided on-site. C1.P17-13 and ME] 7-05 Planning CommiAsion Date: 9.12.2017 Page 6 Access/Parkins; The proposed development will be accessed from N. E Street with an ingress/egress roadway onto N. Stoddard Avenue. On-site vehicular circulation has been adequately, accommodated to access the site through both N. E Street and N. Stoddard Avenue. Emergenc l and Trash/Refuse Services will be able to adequately access and circulate through the site via E Street, while safely exiting through N. Stoddard Avenue (please see Attachment E). Additionally, the project site has an existing easement for roadway ingress and egress across and upon he eastern portion of the site. This easement allows access through the project site, for the no ern commercial property at 1359/1361 N. E Street (please see attachment F). Due to the existing condition and constrain the easement poses on the proposed project site an agreement between the property at 1359/1361 N. E Street and the project site has been reach to provide access through the project site by locating a 24' gate for a 40' delivery truck once to twice a week (please see attachment G). The City's Traffic Engineering Division has determined that a Traffic Analysis is not required for the proposed project site. They have determined that the easement being anI existing condition may not be altered. However, in order to potentially address neighborhood traffic concerns that may arise from the proposed new development, the 40' delivery truck may be routed through the project site and exist on N. E Street. Additionally, on-site vehicular circulation will have access to the parking areas, and designated "paths of travel" have also been provided to ensure pedestrian safety. Furthermore, the proposed development will provide thirty (30) off-street parking spaces. In order to comply with the 2016 California Building Code, two (2) Disabled Accessible parking spaces will be provided. U.S.VETS has indicated that residents of these types of housing facilities typically utilize local transit systems and alternate transportation services may also be provided. I CUP] 7-13 and ME] 7-05 Planning Commission Date: 9.12.2017 Page 7 Parking Stall Depth In order to address On-site circulation and Emergency Service access per San Bernardino County Fire District's (SBFD) Code standard, approval of a Minor Exception for ori -site parking stall depth is recommended by the Planning Division staff. Pursuant to §19.24.060(3) (Design Standards Dimensional Requirements), ninety (90) degree parking requ}'res parking stall dimensions to be nine (9) feet by nineteen (19) feet with a minimum twenty -fur (24) foot drive aisle width. However, San Bernardino County Fire District's (SBFD) Code standard requires that new development provide a twenty-six (26) foot drive aisle for On-site circulation and Emergency service access. Thus, the applicant is requesting the granting ofL.ay Minor Exception for the reduction in parking stall depth from nineteen (19) feet to eighteen (1feet, pursuant to Chapter 19.58 (Minor Exceptions), in which a maximum of ten (10) percent be granted on the measurable parking stall depth. Furthermore, parking stall depth may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet while still maintaining access, parking and stall width. Develonment Considerations The development of a social services housing facility is unique for the community. Therefore, in an effort to help ensure the success of the proposed project and as a safeguard to ensure its completion and operation to the satisfaction of the City, the following Conditin of Approval has been included: ✓ Within six (6) months from the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for a period of two (2) years, the Planning Division shall conduct an inspection of the business operations and property to ensure compliance with the Conditionsc�f Approval to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. In the event {ghat an unresolved issue continues to exist, the enforcement of the Conditions of Approval shall comply with Chapter 19.46 of the Development Code related to Enforcement of Provisions, as applicable applied. Such remedy may require the applicant to submit application, and appropriate application fee, for reconsideration by the Planning Commission (please see Condition of Approval No. 11). General Plan Goals and Policies The City of San Bernardino General Plan includes goals and policies to guide future development within the City, including the following: ✓ Enhance the aesthetic quality of land uses and structures in San Bem I dino. ✓ Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in San Bernardino by strategic revitalization of existing developments. ✓ Control development and the use of land to minimize adverse impacts: With respect to the proposal, the applicant will be renovating the subject building and property in a manner that will enhance the physical and visual qualities of the subje�cllt property thereby enhancing the aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood. Through this proposal, the existing property will be transformed from an underutilized site into a development that meets the City's special housing needs, while satisfying the Development Code requirements and will be adequately regulated through the Conditions of Approval in order to minimize potential impacts. Wi P17-13 and ME]7-05 Planning Comm ssion Date: 9.12.2017 Page 8 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL_ QUALITY ACT (CEOA) In accordance with §15060 (Preliminary Review) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Division conducted an environmental evaluation iii connection with proposed Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 qd concluded that Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 is found to The exempt under §15061(b)(2) (Review for Exemption) of CEQA. Pursuant to §15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) of CEQA, a Class 32 Categorical Exemption consists of projects characterized as in -fill development meeting the conditions contained within § 15332 of CEQA. They' Planning Division staff has analyzed proposed Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 and has determined that it is Categorically Exempt from CEQA pursuant to §15332 of the CEQA Guidelines due to the fact that: 1) the project is consistent the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; 2) the proposed development is located within the City limits on less than five (5) acres; 3) Conditions of Approval will be imposed to alleviate potential impacts; and, 4) there are no additional potential significant environmental impacts that may result om the proposed development, establishment and operation of the proposed use. On August 9, 2017, the Development and Environmental Review Committee reviewed the application and Environmental Determination of the Planning Division, and moved the Class 32 Categorical Exemption for Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 to the Planning Commission for consideration. Accordingly, pursuant to § 15062 (Notice of Exemption) of CEQA, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Categorical Exemption for Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 was published on September 2, 2017 for the CEQA-mandated ten (10) day public review and comment period, and there were no public written comments received or verbal comments presented as of the date of the preparation of this Staff Report. CUP] 7-13 and ME] 7-05 Planning Commission Date: 9.12.2017 Page 9 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2017-054 adopting the Categorical Exemption for Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 and approving Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05, based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. Respectfally Submitted, r V I I abeth Mora-Rodri z Assistant Planner r Mark PaDeve Commuent Director Attachments: A. Resolution No. 2017-:054 B. Aerial Map C. Location Map D. Service Plan Letter. E. Trash/Refuse and Fire Trucks Turning Template F. Easement Truck Turning Exhibit G. Letter of Agreement CUP]7-13and ME17-05 Planning Commission Date. 9.12.2017 Page 10 ATTACHMENT A Resolution No. 2017-054 RESOLUTION NO. 2017 -054 -PC A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 17-13 AND MINOR EXCEPTION 17-05 TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT, ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF A SOCIAL SERVICE HOUSING FACILITY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 22,750 SQUARE FEET COMPRISED OF THIRTY (30) RESIDENTIAL UNITS FOR LOW INCOME MILITARY VETERANS, AND ALLOWING FOR A TEN (10) PERCENT REDUCTION IN PARKING STALL DEPTH FROM NINETEEN (19) TO EIGHTEEN (18) FEET, ALONG WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE REQUIRED ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, ON A PARCEL CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.76 ACRES LOCATED AT 1351 N. E STREET (APN: 0145-211-55) WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG -1) ZONE AND TRANSIT OVERLAY DISTRICT (TOD). WHEREAS, on July 10, 2017, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.36 (Conditional Use Permits), Chapter 19.58 (Minor Exceptions), §19.06.020(2)(x) (Commercial Zones Specific Standards — Social Service Uses/Centers), and § 19.19A (Transit Overlay District) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, an application for Conditional Use Permit 17- 13 and Minor Exceptionl7-05 was duly submitted by: Property Owner: U.S. VETS — E Street LLC 800 West Sixth Street Suite 1505 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Project Applicant: U.S. VETS — E Street LLC 800 West Sixth Street Suite 1505 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Parcel Address: 1351 N. E Street APN: 0145-211-55 Lot Area: 0.76 acres WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 is a request to allow the development, establishment and operation of a social service housing facility containing approximately 22,750 square feet comprised of thirty (30) residential units for low income military veterans, and allowing for a ten (10) percent reduction in parking stall depth from nineteen (19) feet to eighteen (18) feet, along with the construction of the required on-site and off-site improvements, on a parcel containing approximately 0.76 acres; and WHEREAS, the Planning Division of the Community Development Department has reviewed Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 for consistency with the City of San Bernardino General Plan and compliance with the City of San Bernardino Development Code; and 1 WHEREAS, pursuant to requirements of §15060(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning Division of the Community Development Department evaluated Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05; and WHEREAS, on September 2, 2017, pursuant to the requirements §19.52.020 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the City gave public notice by advertising in the San Bernardino Sun, a newspaper of general circulation within the City of San Bernardino, and by mailing notices to the property owners within 500 feet of the subject property of the holding of a public hearing at which the Environmental Determination (Categorical Exemption), Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 would be considered; and WHEREAS, on August 9, 2017, pursuant to the requirements of § 19.36.040 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Development and Environmental Review Committee reviewed the application and moved the Categorical Exemption, Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 to the Planning Commission for consideration; and WHEREAS, on September 12, 2017, pursuant to the requirements of §19.52.040 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Planning Commission held the duly noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to the Environmental Determination (Categorical Exemption), Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 and at which meeting the Planning Commission considered the Categorical Exemption, Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17- 05; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.36 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Planning Commission has the authority to take action on the Categorical Exemption, Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino does hereby resolve, determine, find, and order as follows: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: In accordance with §15060 (Preliminary Review) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Division conducted an environmental evaluation in connection with proposed Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 and concluded that Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 is found to be exempt under §15061(b)(2) (Review for Exemption) of CEQA. Pursuant to §15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) of CEQA, a Class 32 Categorical Exemption consists of projects characterized as in -fill development meeting the conditions contained within §15332 of CEQA. The Planning Division staff has analyzed proposed Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 and has determined that it is Categorically Exempt from CEQA pursuant to §15332 of the CEQA Guidelines due to the fact that: 1) the project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; 2) the proposed development is located within the City limits on less than five (5) acres; 3) Conditions of Approval will be imposed to alleviate potential impacts; and, 4) there are no additional potential significant environmental impacts that may result from the proposed development, establishment and operation of the proposed use. 2 Accordingly, pursuant to § 15062 (Notice of Exemption) of CEQA, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Categorical Exemption for Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 was published on September 2, 2017 for the CEQA-mandated ten (10) day public review and comment period. In accordance with §15061 of CEQA, on September 12, 2017, during a duly advertised public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted the Class 32 Categorical Exemption for the approval of Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05. Subsequently, pursuant to §15062 of CEQA, the Planning Division of the City of San Bernardino was directed to file a Notice of Exemption with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. SECTION 2. FINDINGS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 17-13: Section 19.36.050 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code requires that Conditional Use Permit applications meet certain findings prior to the approval by the Planning Commission. Accordingly, the following findings are provided in support of the approval of Conditional Use Permit 17-13: Finding No. 1: The proposed use is conditionally permitted within, and would not impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. Finding of Fact: The proposed social services housing facility is a conditionally permitted use, pursuant to Development Code §19.06.020(2)(Y) and §19.19A. The project site is located within the Commercial General (CG -1) Zone and Transit Overlay District (TOD) and is substantially surrounded by existing residential and commercial uses. The proposed development will be developed in compliance with all applicable provisions of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, including development standards and applicable design guidelines. Further, the development of the subject property will enhance the appearance of the blighted and undeveloped/underutilized vacant site. Therefore, the project would not impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district or be detrimental to surrounding properties. 3 Finding No. 2: The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. Finding of Fact: General Plan Housing Policy 3.2.1 states: "Protect the quality of the existing housing stock through the rehabilitation and improvement of market rate neighborhoods and affordable housing projects." General Plan Housing Policy 3.3.3 states: "Support innovative public, private, and not-for-profit efforts for the development and financing of affordable housing." General Plan Housing Policy 3.5.4 states: "Encourage and facilitate the construction, maintenance, and preservation of a variety of housing types adequate to meet a range of household needs." General Plan Housing Policy 3.6.1 states: "Promote infill rehabilitation and new construction projects through increasing housing potential in already developed areas of the community." The proposed project will provide an attractive housing opportunity that will bring a contemporary design into an existing community by modernizing an underdeveloped/underutilize vacant site. The proposed development, establishment and operation of a social service housing facility will provide additional housing opportunities that will meet the housing needs within the City for veteran households with incomes below sixty-one (61) percent of the average medium income for the County of San Bernardino. The existing vacant site is immerse within an existing neighborhood that has a combination of various residential types and commercial uses and thus will preserve and improve the neighborhood by mitigating the negatives of the contrasting land uses. Furthermore, the proposed project will reduce the need for vehicle trips as the development is located along the Baseline Avenue/E Street Boundary within the Transit Overlay District (TOD), giving the residents access to the site via the sbX rapid transit bus line. The strategical implementation of the proposed development will preserve the asset and add unit count by taking advantage of a tight funding window. Thus, by adding thirty (30) units of affordable housing to an existing vacant site, the City policies are realized through the support of an innovative not-for-profit development that encourages and facilitates the new construction and maintenance of a housing type while minimizing impacts on the neighborhood. Additionally, the proposed project is permitted within the Commercial General (CG -1) Zone and Transit Overlay District (TOD), subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit with the appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA determination. Therefore, the proposed project would be compatible with surrounding land uses and consistent with the General Plan. 4 Finding No. 3 Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and § 19.20.030(6) of the Development Code. Finding of Fact: In accordance with §15060 (Preliminary Review) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Division conducted an environmental evaluation in connection with proposed Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 and concluded that Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 is found to be exempt under §15061(b)(2) (Review for Exemption) of CEQA.. Pursuant to §15332 (In - Fill Development Projects) of CEQA, a Class 32 Categorical Exemption consists of projects characterized as in -fill development meeting the conditions contained within §15332 of CEQA. The Planning Division staff has analyzed proposed Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 and has determined that it is Categorically Exempt from CEQA pursuant to § 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines due to the fact that: 1) the project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; 2) the proposed development is located within the City limits on less than five (5) acres; 3) Conditions of Approval will be imposed to alleviate potential impacts; and, 4) there are no additional potential significant environmental impacts that may result from the proposed development, establishment and operation of the proposed use. Therefore, the proposed project is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and §19.20.030(6) of the Development Code. Finding No. 4 There will be no potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored. Finding of Fact: The project site is an in -fill lot and the surrounding area is urbanized. Therefore, no significant negative impacts on the environment are anticipated to result from the proposed social services housing facility. 5 Finding No. 5: The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the proposed use is to be located and will not create significant noise, traffic or other conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. Finding of Fact: The proposed design is in compliance with the Development Code requirements that are applicable to location, height and setbacks for the proposed social service housing facility. All access to the subject property will be through points of access from N. E Street with minor ingress/egress access through N. Stoddard Avenue. Therefore, the design of the project will ensure that the project will not create any significant noise, traffic, or other conditions that would be detrimental or objectionable to other uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. Finding No. 6: The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed. Finding of Fact: The site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the project being proposed as evidenced by project compliance with all applicable Development Code Standards. The size of the project site is adequate to accommodate the proposed improvements, in compliance with the requirements of the Development Code. Finding No. 7 There are adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety. Finding of Fact: The site has direct access off of N. E Street. All agencies responsible for reviewing access and providing water, sanitation and other public services to the site have had the opportunity to review the proposal, and none indicated inability to serve the project site. Establishment of the proposed social service housing facility, subject to Conditions of Approval, will not be detrimental to public services or public health and safety. 2 SECTION 2. FINDINGS FOR MINOR EXCEPTION 17-05: Section 19.58.50 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code requires that Minor Exception applications meet certain findings prior to the approval by the Planning Commission. Accordingly, the following findings are provided in support of the approval by the Planning Commission for Minor Exception 17-05: Finding No.1 That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, Iocation, or surroundings, the strict application of this Development Code deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. Finding of Fact Pursuant to § 19.24.060(3) (Design Standards Dimensional Requirements), ninety (90) degree parking requires parking stall dimensions to be nine (9) feet by nineteen (19) feet with a minimum twenty-four (24) foot drive aisle width. However, San Bernardino County Fire District's (SBFD) Code standard requires that new development provide a twenty-six (26) foot drive aisle for On-site circulation and Emergency service access. Proposed on-site parking design consisting of a reduction of the parking stall depth of nineteen (19) feet is subject to the approval of a Minor Exception with appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA determination. Pursuant to § 19.24.060(3) (Design Standards Dimensional Requirements), ninety (90) degree parking requires parking stall dimensions to be nine (9) feet by nineteen (19) feet. However, parking stall depth may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet while still maintaining access, parking and stall' width. Thus, the proposed one (1) foot reduction from the parking stall depth will maintain SBFD's Code standard and the Development Code standards without adversely affecting project development in an existing lot, and allowing the property to enjoy the improvements enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. Finding No. 2 That granting the Minor Exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied to the property for which the Minor Exception is sought. Finding of Fact The proposed project site will maintain the Development Code standards without adversely affecting the project development and adhere to SBFD's Code standard. Granting the Minor Exception would allow the applicant to design a comprehensive and cost-effective development in which on-site circulation will be maintain for access. The current development standard would dead set the parking stall depth at nineteen (19) feet, which would impede the development of a comprehensive and cost-effective new development on an existing vacant lot. Therefore, the proposed reduction in the parking stall depth will allow the applicant to an improvement to the site that would not be possible otherwise. 7 Finding No. 3 That granting the Minor Exception will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injuries to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Finding of Fact The proposed reduction in parking stall depth will not deprive the site from having adequate access to and from the site. Therefore, the project will not have any significant negative impacts upon environmental quality or natural resources and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the project site or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the project site is located. Finding No. 4 That granting the Minor Exception does not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located. Finding of Fact The location and operating characteristics of the proposed project will be consistent with all provisions of the Development Code. The proposed use will be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses within the neighborhood. The proposal will not create conditions that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity due to the proposal being consistent with the Commercial General (CG-I)Zone and Transit Overlay District (TOD). Furthermore, the proposed development will strategically develop an existing lot into an economically sustainable operation that will benefit the surrounding neighborhood. Therefore, no land use conflict or adverse effects on public health, safety or welfare are anticipated to result from the development, establishment and operation of a social service housing facility. Finding No. 5 That granting the Minor Exception does not exceed 10% of the standard(s) being modified, or allow a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the regulations governing the subject parcel. Finding of Fact The Minor Exception is requested for a reduction in the permitted parking stall depth only. The proposed reduction of one (1) foot to the permitted nineteen (19) foot parking stall depth does not exceed ten (10) percent of the standard being modified. Additionally, the proposed use is within the authorized land use designation governing the proposed project site. 8 Finding No. 6 That granting the Minor Exception will not be inconsistent with the General Plan. Finding of Fact General Plan Land Use Element Policy 2.1.1 state: "Actively enforce development standards, design guidelines, and policies to preserve and enhance the character of San Bernardino's neighborhoods. General Plan Safety Element Goal 10.12 states: "Ensure the availability and effective response of emergency services in the event of a disaster." The proposed project would allow for the development, establishment and operation of a social service housing facility on an underutilized vacant site while adhering to the development standards, design guidelines and policies. Through the allowance of the Minor Exception, Emergency Services would adhere and maintain adequate access and safely provide services to the proposed social service housing facility. Therefore, the proposed project would not be inconsistent with the General Plan and will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. SECTION 4. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The approval of Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05 shall be subject to the following Conditions of Approval: This approval is to all the development, establishment and operation of a social service housing facility containing approximately 22,750 square feet comprised of thirty (30) residential units for low income military veterans, and allowing for a ten (10) percent reduction in parking stall depth from nineteen (19) to eighteen (18) feet, along with the construction of the required on-site and off-site improvements, on a parcel containing approximately 0.76 acres. The project site is Iocated at 1351 N. E Street. 2. The project site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the plans stamped September 12, 2017 (EXHIBIT "A"), approved by the Planning Commission, which includes a site plan, floor plans and exterior elevations, on file in the Planning Division; the Conditions of Approval contained herein; and, the City's Municipal Code regulations. 3. Within two (2) years of the Conditional Use Permit and Minor Exception approval, commencement of construction shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if after commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one (1) year, then the permit/approval shall become null and void. However, approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Minor Exception does not authorize commencement of construction. All necessary permits must be obtained prior to commencement of specified construction activities included in the Conditions of Approval. EXPIRATION DATE: September 12, 2019 6 4. The review authority may grant a time extension, for good cause, not to exceed twelve (12) months. The applicant must file an application, the processing fees, and all required submittal items, thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. The review authority shall ensure that the project complies with all Development Code provisions in effect at the time of the requested extension. 5. In the event this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and will cooperate fully in the defense of this matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of San Bernardino (City), any departments, agencies, divisions, boards or commission of the City as well as predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, directors, elected officials, officers, employees, representatives and attorneys of the City from any claim, action or proceeding against any of the foregoing persons or entities. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City for any costs and attorneys' fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition. The costs, salaries, and expenses of the City Attorney and employees of his office shall be considered as "Attorney's fees" for the purpose of this condition. As part of the consideration for issuing this Development Permit, this condition shall remain in effect if the Development Permit is rescinded or revoked, whether or not at the request of applicant. Planning Division 6. The applicant, facility operator, and/or property owner shall submit Operational, Management and Security Plans for the social services housing facility to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. 7. Hours of operation for the on-site service office shall be restricted to between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m, seven (7) days a week. 8. This approval shall not permit drop-in "shelter style" or "itinerant style" overnight stay. 9. Public distribution of food, clothing or any other items shall not be permitted. 10. The social services housing facility shall provide for 24-hour security personnel to monitor the property, seven (7) days a week and shall be equipped with a security camera monitoring system. 11. Within six (6) months from the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for a period of two (2) years, the Planning Division shall conduct an inspection of the business operations and property to ensure compliance with the Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. In the event that an unresolved issue continues to exist, the enforcement of the Conditions of Approval shall comply with Chapter 19.46 of the Development Code related to Enforcement of Provisions, as applicable applied. Such remedy may require the applicant to submit an application, and appropriate application fee, for reconsideration by the Planning Commission. 12. If the property is sold by United States Veterans Initiative (U.S. VETS), the City shall review and approve the new owner and operator. 10 13. A six (6) foot high decorative masonry block wall with a twenty-four (24) foot gate shall be maintained along the north property line with a six (6) foot high decorative masonry block wall along the east and south property lines. 14. If the colors of the buildings or other exterior finish materials are to be modified beyond the current proposal and improvement requirements, the revised color scheme and/or finish materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to commencement of work. 15. Minor modification to the plans shall be subject to approval by the Director through the Minor Modification Permit process. Any modification which exceeds 10% of the allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the refilling of the original application. 16. The facility operator and property owner shall be responsible for regular maintenance of the project site. The site shall be maintained in a clean condition and free of litter and any other undesirable material(s). Vandalism, graffiti, trash and other debris shall be removed and cleaned up within 24 hours of being reported. 17. The applicant and/or owner shall maintain all future landscaping in the parking lot and setbacks in a weed and disease free condition at all times and any dead or missing vegetation must be promptly replaced. 18. Signs are not approved as a part of this permit. Prior to establishing signs, the applicant and/or owner must submit an application for approval by the Planning Division. Banners, flags, pennant, and similar signs are prohibited unless a Temporary Sign Permit is obtained. 19. Construction -related activities may not occur between the hours of 8:00 pm and 7:00 am. No construction vehicles, equipment, or employees may be delivered to, or arrive at the construction site before 7:00 am or leave the site after 8:00 pm. Construction activities may only occur Monday through Friday. 20. Submittal requirements for permit applications with the Building and Safety Division shall include all Conditions of Approval issued with this approval, printed on the plan sheets. 21. All new construction shall require permits prior to commencement. 22. All Conditions of Approval shall be completed prior to final inspection and sign -off. 23. No Final Certificate of Occupancy will be issued until all Conditions of Approval have been completed. 24. The project shall comply with all applicable requirements of the City of San Bernardino Community Development Department, Land Development and Building and Safety Divisions, Fire Department, Police Department, Municipal Water Department, Public Works Department, and the City Clerk's Office/Business Registration Division. 11 Land Development Division Conditions 25. Drainage and Flood Control a. A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right-of-way dedicated as necessary. b. The detention basin shall be designed in accordance with "Detention Basin Design Criteria for San Bernardino County." Retention basins are not acceptable. c. The development is located within Zone X of the Federal Insurance Rate Maps on booklet #06071C8681J with year 09/02/2016. d. All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. If site drainage is to be outlet into the public street, the drainage shall be conveyed through a parkway culvert constructed in accordance with City Standard No. 400. Conveyance of site drainage over the Driveway approaches will not be permitted. f. A Preliminary WQMP was submitted and the proposed underground chamber system was conceptually approved. The system shall include but not limited to pretreatment mechanism and emergency overflow outlet.in the final design. g. A Full -Categorical Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is required for this project. The applicant is directed to the County of San Bernardino's Flood Control web page for the template and Technical Guidance Document. The Land Development Division, prior to issuance of any permit, shall approve the WQMP. A CD copy of the approved WQMP is required prior to grading permit issuance. h. The Land Development Division, prior to grading plan approval, shall approve an Erosion Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon. 26. Grading and Landscaping a. The grading and on-site improvement plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the Building Official. b. If the grading plan indicates export or import, the source of the import material or the site for the deposition of the export shall be noted on the grading plan. Permit numbers shall be noted if the source or destination is in the City of San Bernardino. 12 c. If more than 50 cubic yards of earth is to be hauled on City Streets then a special hauling permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer. Additional conditions, such as truck route approval, traffic controls, bonding, covering of loads, street cleaning, etc. may be required by the City Engineer. d. Wheel stops are not permitted by the Development Code, except at designated accessible parking spaces. Therefore, continuous 6" high curb shall be used around planter areas and areas where head in parking is adjacent to walkways. The parking spaces may be 16.5' deep and may overhang the landscaping or walkway by 2.5'. Overhang into the setback area or into an ADA path of travel (minimum 4' wide) is not permitted. e. Continuous concrete curbing at least 6 inches high and 6 inches wide shall be provided at least 3 feet from any wall, fence, property line, walkway, or structure where parking and/or drive aisles are located adjacent thereto. Curbing may be left out at structure access points. The space between the curb and wall, fence, property line, walkway or structure shall be landscaped, except as allowed by the Development Review Committee. f. The refuse enclosure(s) shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing No. 508 with modification to provide ADA access. The minimum size of the refuse enclosure shall be 8 feet x 15 feet for bins storage area. Where a refuse enclosure is proposed to be constructed adjacent to spaces for parking passenger vehicles, a 3' wide by 6 " high concrete planter shall be provided to separate the enclosure from the adjacent parking. The placement of the enclosure and design of the planter shall preclude the enclosure doors from opening into drive aisles or impacting against adjacent parked cars. g. Retaining walls, block walls and all on-site fencing shall be designed and detailed on the on-site improvement Plan. This work shall be part of the on-site improvement permit issued by the Building Official. All masonry walls shall be constructed of decorative block with architectural features acceptable to the City Planner. h. No construction on a site shall begin before a temporary/security fence is in place and approved by the Building Official or his designee. Temporary/security fencing may not be removed until approved by the Building Official or his designee. The owner or owner's agent shall immediately remove the temporary/security fencing upon the approval of the Building Official or his designee. Sites that contain multiple buildings shall maintain the temporary/security fencing around the portion of the site and buildings under construction as determined by the Building Official or his designee. All temporary/security fencing for construction sites shall include screening, emergency identification and safety identification and shall be kept in neat and undamaged condition. i. The on-site improvement plan shall include details of on-site lighting, including light location, type of poles and fixtures, foundation design with structural calculations, conduit location, material and size, and Photometric plot shall be provided which show that the proposed on-site lighting design will provide: • 1 foot-candle of illumination uniformly distributed over the surface of the parking lot during hours of operation, and 13 • 0.25 foot-candles security lighting during all other hours. j. The design of on-site improvements shall also comply with all requirements of The California Building Code, Title 24, relating to accessible parking and accessibility, including retrofitting of existing building access points for accessibility, if applicable. k. An accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way to the building entrance. All pathways shall be paved and shall provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet. Where parking overhangs the pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6.5 feet. 1. The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Land Development Division prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 3 copies to the Land Development Division for Checking. m. Prior to occupancy of any building, the developer shall post a bond to guarantee the maintenance and survival of project landscaping for a period of one year. n. The public right-of-way, between the property line and top of curb (also known as "parkway") along adjoining streets shall be landscaped by the developer and maintained in perpetuity by the property owner. Details of the parkway landscaping shall be included in the project's on-site landscape plan. o. All electrical transformers located outdoors on the site, shall be screened from view with a solid wall or landscaping and shall not be located in any setback/right-of-way area. If the transformer cannot be screened, it shall be located in an underground vault unless approved by the City Engineer pursuant to Section 19.30.110. 27. Utilities a. Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV (Cable TV optional for commercial, industrial, or institutional uses). b. The project site shall be provided with separate water and sewer facilities so the City or the agency providing such services in the area can serve it. c. Backflow preventers shall be installed for any building with the finished floor elevation below the rim elevation of the nearest upstream manhole. d. This project is located in the sewer service area maintained by the City of San Bernardino therefore, any necessary sewer main extension shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. e. Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as required. f. All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be placed underground in accordance with Section 19.20.030 of the Development Code. 14 g. Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer, except overhead lines, if required by provisions of the Development Code to be undergrounded. 28. Street Improvement and Dedications a. For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: Street Name Right of Way(ft.Z "E" Street 150 (8.75' Dedication Required) Curb Line(ft� 33 (Existing) b. If the existing sidewalk and/or curb & gutter adjacent to the site are in poor condition, the sidewalk and/or curb & gutter shall be removed and reconstructed to City Standards. Curb & Gutter shall conform to Standard No. 200, Type `B" and sidewalk shall conform to Standard No. 202, Case "A" (6' wide adjacent to curb), unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. c. Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 204, Type Il, including an accessible by-pass around the top of the drive approach. Remove existing driveway approaches that are not part of the approved plan and replace with full height curb & gutter and sidewalk. d. "E" Street was recently rehabilitated and is now under moratorium list, Utility or trench cut into "E" Street shall be approved by Public Works Department prior to permit issuance. e. An encroachment permit from Public Works Department shall be required for utility cuts into existing streets or any work within City's right-of-way. Pavement restoration or trench repair shall be subjected to Public Works Department requirement. Public facilities shall be restored or constructed back to Public Works Department satisfaction. f. The applicant must post a performance bond prior to issuance of the off-site permit. The amount of the bond is to be determined by Public Works Department. g. Access to Stoddard Avenue shall be limited to site exit only. A "Do Not Enter" or "Wrong Way" sign shall be posted by the driveway at the end of Stoddard Avenue. 29. Required Engineering Plans a. A complete submittal for plan checking shall consist of: ■ street improvement plans (may include street lights or street lighting may be separate plan), ■ sewer plans (Private sewers may be shown on on-site improvement plan; public sewers must be on a separate plan with profile), ■ storm drain plans (Private storm drains may be shown on on-site improvement plans; public storm drains must be on a separate plan with profile), 15 ■ signing and striping plan (may be on sheets included in street improvement plan), ■ lighting (on-site lighting may be included in on-site improvement plan or may be on a separate stand-alone plan), ■ grading (may be incorporated with on-site improvement plan), ■ on-site improvement plans and on-site landscaping and irrigation, ■ water plans (shall be submitted to San Bernardino Municipal Water Department), ■ All required supporting calculations, studies and reports must be included in the initial submittal (including but not limited to drainage studies, soils reports, structural calculations) b. All off-site improvement plans submitted for plan check shall be prepared on the City's standard 24" x 36" sheets. A signature block satisfactory to the City Engineer or his designee shall be provided. c. After completion of plan checking, final mylar drawings, stamped and signed by the Registered Civil Engineer in charge, shall be submitted to the City Engineer and/or Building Official for approval. d. Copies of the City's design policies and procedures and standard drawings are available at the Public Works Counter for the cost of reproduction. They are also available at no charge at the Public Works Web Site at http://www.sbcily.org 30. Required EnL�neerinv Permits a. Grading permit. b. On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see Development Services -Building Division), including landscaping. c. Off-site improvement construction permit. 31. Applicable Engineering Fees a. All plan check, permit, inspection, and impact fees are outlined on the Public Works Fee Schedule. A deposit in the amount of 100% of the estimated checking fee for each set of plans will be required at time of application for plan check. The amount of the fee is subject to adjustment if the construction cost estimate varies more than 10% from the estimate submitted with the application for plan checking. b. The current fee schedule is available at the Public Works Counter and at hM://www.sbciV.org Public Works — Integrated Waste Management Division 32. During demolition/construction developer and contractor to use services through the City of San Bernardino's exclusive franchised hauler Burrtec Waste Industries. 33. The proposed location for the refuse enclosure is acceptable with adequate turning radius for the service vehicle. Inadequate turning radius may require additional services. Additional services may be subject to additional monthly charges by the City's franchised hauler. 16 34. Construct a modified Standard Plan 508 refuse enclosure with 8'X15' interior dimensions for bin storage. 35. Work with the Building Division to modify the refuse enclosure to meet ADA access requirements. ADA access requirements are in addition to the 8'X15' interior dimension for bin storage. 36. If gated provided access by mean of a gate key, code, or remote. 37. Assembly Bill 341 Mandatory Commercial Recycling may apply. 38. Assembly Bill 1826 Mandatory Commercial Organics Recycling may apply. 39. Upon completion service is provided through the City of San Bernardino's exclusive franchised hauler Burrtec Waste Industries. Building and Safety Division Conditions 40. Plans submitted shall conform to the 2019 California Building Codes. Please note this will include the California Green Building Code. 41. Project shall conform to Chapter 3 of the California Building Code 2016. 42. Project shall also conform to the requirements of Chapter 4 of the California Building Code, Special Details Requirements Based on use of Occupancy. 43. Proved sprinkler requirements for the occupant load according to California Building Code 2016. 44. Provide all disabled access requirements per Chapter 11 A and complete details plans prior to plan review submittal. 45. There shall be a formal plan submittal prior to all issuance of permits. 46. Refer to Chapter 7 of the California Building Code for Fire/Smoke Protection Requirements. 47. Please indicate all hydrants location on plans. 48. Please take note that the Fire submittal is separate from the Building submittal. San Bernardino County Consolidated Fire District 49. Shall comply with all current Building, Fire Codes and Fire Department Standards requirements based on occupancy classification. 50. Any changes to this proposal shall require new Fire Department condition letter. 51. Any changes to the approved life safety system shall require plans to be submitted to the FD prior to construction including the following: Fire Sprinklers, Fire Alarms, Underground water supply for fire protection, Cooking appliances and Hood protections. 52. Monitored fire sprinkler systems are required for the proposed building(s). Plans shall be submitted to FD prior to construction. PER CFC 903.2.1.1 53. Knox Box/Key Box is required, and shall be provided an installed in accordance with CFC and Fire Department Standard. 54. Required fire flow for this project shall meet the minimum requirements established in the California Fire Code. 17 55. An approved on-site fire protection water system, in accordance with Fire Department Standard is required. The system is required to be in place and serviceable prior to building construction. 56. An approved water supply system, complete with street fire hydrants complying with Fire Department Standard, shall be in place prior to any combustible construction. 57. Provide a complete on-site fire protection plan to the FD which indicates the location of all required fire protection appliances (FDC's, PIV's, DDC's, proposed and existing fire hydrants, etc.). 58. Fencing, walls or carports shall not obstruct Fire Department access to fire hydrants and property. 59. Paved access from 2 points shall be required for completion and occupancy. 60. Interior/exterior Fire Department access roadways/fire lanes shall be per Fire Department Standard. If gates installed, must comply with Fire Department Standards. 61. Provide the following FD notes on the site utility plan: a. A separate permit is required by the Fire Department for installation of on-site water systems. No work may begin until the permit has been obtained. A permit application may be obtained from Fire Prevention. b. All hydrants shall have a blue reflective dot placed in the drive lane adjacent to the hydrants per Fire Department Standard. c. Paint curbs red, 15' to either side of fire hydrant and FDC. d. Fire Department Connection required within 50 feet of a hydrant. e. Bollards (crash posts) may be required at time of final inspection (to protect the fire hydrants and FDC from vehicular traffic). f. Public fire hydrants are required along streets at intervals not to exceed 300 feet for commercial and 500 for residential areas. g. Required fire flow for this project is at�)si for 2 hours duration 62. Paved access from 2 points is required to be 30 feet in width 3 or more stories in height or over 300,000 square feet. 63. Premise and Building identification and addressing shall be a minimum of 12 inch in height. 64. All fire access roads shall be paved and all weather and shall meet the min. turning radius. Hammerheads shall meet the San Bernardino County Fire Department Standards. 65. All required access roads shall meet county standards of 26' in width and turning radius. Pleas shall be submitted and approved prior to construction commencement. 18 SECTION 5. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission hereby takes the following action: 1. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017-054: a. Adopting the Categorical Exemption (§15332 - In -Fill Development Projects) for Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05, in accordance with §15061(b)(2) of the California Environmental Quality Act, and directing the Community Development Director to prepare and file with the Clerk of the County of San Bernardino a Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152(b) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15062; and; and b. Approving Conditional Use Permit 17-13 and Minor Exception 17-05, subject to the aforementioned Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12'h day of September 2017. ATTEST: Mark Persico, Planning Commission Secretary City of San Bernardino, California 19 Andrew Machen, Chairman San Bernardino Planning Commission CERTIFICATION: I, Melina Perez -Ramirez, Recording Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, No. 2017-054, was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12a' day of September 2017, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 20 Melina Perez -Ramirez, Recording Secretary City of San Bernardino, California EXHIBIT "A" APPROVED PLANS 21 . _ IWMMM � li ■i ti ------------ -----------0 0 Z i oe < 0 o. oe 3nN3AV CRIVC1001S *N — -- - — - — - — I — - PA LO m (,Awmk Ell �3AV OaVOWLS 'N 5 13 I— U J 01 m Q Z Z LU Q Z CY LU 00 Z Q h LU W F -- N LU M LO m z Q _J n 0 Z Q 0 t— LU Up -7 O <. a L-- :4 J -i uj CL J LAJ 0 Z;' 911, N U 0% U z ON z t3 z Q� uj cio z LLI uj ui VA LO cr) z LU z 0 LU W < X -j C3 co uj uj zu- Ir CML NJof.- m , U, U IL Q EL ix a- Fz ccLAJ :4 J -i uj CL J LAJ 0 Z;' 911, N U 0% U z ON z t3 z Q� uj cio z LLI uj ui VA LO cr) z LU z 0 LU N U 0% U z ON z t3 z Q� uj cio z LLI uj ui VA LO cr) z LU z 0 LU ? t o 2 o s- ? 2 c A. F/-" LJ CttL n �� »Z7 $ Nut N;- O p00 $ X 000�pw<Q oor< oommo< = mmw� z zo=000 9 LL N N V' J d W > N T h U. N ' '0 W 0 ,W M Q a rA U) m 0 r.v z-{ C C H. 0 W no ,L z O Q im ul to W Z M U ,X) LU uj H N IF M4 LO c2 a a LU r858 i LU maF O Z — O xnmmUn �- OY ^-r n.r aF di;m e, C C H. 0 W no ,L z O Q im ul to W Z M U ,X) LU uj H N IF M4 LO c2 a Z d O arc r OO k uaj U-a� O 0 tej 0 w�YO�mgvt;, A tC) J C) m Q � z Ow o� Q z w W CO z Q V) w LU V) V) LO \� '! z 0 T w 0 z i z 0 ui 0 z 0 (D ON Bo Co LO (Y) a) ■ OAI LO (Y) V& ra m el Z < LLI 2 7TT OAI LO (Y) V& ra m CUP17-13 and ME17-05 Planning Commission Date: 9.12.2017 Page 11 ATTACHMENT B Aerial Map ATTACHMENT B - AERIAL MAP CITY OF SAN BERNARD I NO PLANNING DIVISION PROJECT: CUP17-13 AND ME17-05 AERIAL MAP NORTH HEARING DATE: September 12, 2017 4 V, # tW - ...:_ 13 ` 7 72 1359r PROJECT SITE 1351, Aw fw 41111� X- 121 '" CUP]7-13and ME] 7-05 Planning Commission Date: 9.12.2017 Page 12 ATTACHMENT C Location Map ATTACHMENT C - LOCATION MAP CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION PROJECT: CUP17-13 AND ME17-05 LOCATION MAP NORTH HEARING DATE: September 12, 2017 W 13TH S T 14TH ST ,. :o 1344 1336 1 1322 0 1312 1306 Gtr fi CS z 1362 �irc� 1358 1345 1344 1336 1 1322 0 1312 1306 CUP]7-13and ME]7-05 Planning Commission Date: 9.12.2017 Page 13 ATTACHMENT D Service Plan Letter VETS uNITED STATES VETERANS lNmATAtE® A non-profit 501(cX3) corporation "'Vl-, 1 i 14NG THOSE O}J.[..e 14 11i.+' SERI<'jE D 13 San Bernardino Land 171h Street & E Street Service Plan Through the proposed new development projects, U.S.VETS will add 59 new affordable housing units to the community for veteran households who will have access to the plethora of services offered by the agency. The affordable housing project located at 488 West l7'h Street will consist of 30 units for low- income veterans and their families in a three-story building. The unit mix consists of 21 one - bedroom units, 5 two-bedroom units, 3 three-bedroom units, 1 four-bedroom apartment, and 1 community room. The 22,720 sq. ff. apartment complex will sit on .83 acres and will include space to provide supportive services. The other location is at 1351 North E. Street and will consist:of 29 units for low-income veterans and their families in a three-story building. The unit mix consistsof 10 one -bedroom units, 15 two-bedroom units, 3 three-bedroom units, l four-bedroom apartment, and I community room. The 241550 sq. ft. apartment complex will sit on .79 acres and will include space to provide supportive services. Service Plan: U.S.VETS' onsite services aim to reduce many barriers veteran households face in achieving or maintaining self-sufficiency. Services include case management, crisis intervention, career development, job training, emergency food; clothing, life skills related workshops, mainstream benefits acquisition, legal assistance, child ,support resolution, financial management assistance, peer mentoring; medical and mental health care coordination including substance abuse treatment, counseling, and overall comprehensive support. Every resident will be assigned a Case Manager who will work. with the veteran household to complete an Individual Housing Stability Plan that will identify' resident's goals and prioritize. needed services. Case Managers, will meet with veteran households regularly to address barriers to maintaining housing and develop an individual plan. with goals focused on housing stability. Motivational Interviewing skills are utilized to help residents work towards achieving their goals. For residents who have experienced trauma of any type,. Trauma Informed Care principles are applied: and staff are trained to recognize the effects of trauma and. how to foster a safe environment while helping the resident to rebuild :a sense of empowerment. For any behavioral issues; Case Managers will employ clinical interventions such. as crisis intervention, counseling, assessment for treatment, referrals to support groups; peer facilitation, etc. to assist veterans in. addressing any issues and will also coordinate care with the VA. Medical and psychiatric services will be provided by the Loma Linda VA Medical Center. Substance abuse treatment is also available at the VA. 1 r ■ VETS i ER UNITED STATES VETERANS minArivE® A non-profit 601(cH2) corporation U.SNETS' offers a Workforce Development program which provides employment assistance and job training and these services will be available to residents of this project. Skill building will also .be available to all residents and include a broad -scope life skills support covering effective communication, anger management, preparing for the work setting; learning basic tools for personal and financial success, dressing and behaving for success, and career planning and job search. U.SNETS will assist clients in increasing income and resources through employment and/or mainstream benefits and facilitate money management classes to ensure financial stability and adherence to any required rent payments. Residents will be assisted with developing a monthly budget are encouraged to begin a savings plan for expenses and unforeseen situations. U.SNETS' staff are uniquely sensitive to the special needs of our veterans and understand the culture shared by veterans. its programs and services mirror the population served by taking into account as many variables as possible, including, language, cultural/ethnic identification, gender, age, educational level and socioeconomic status. U.SNETS staff receive monthly veteran - related training to include the following topics: Housing, First, Motivational Interviewing, Trauma -Informed Care, SSI/SSDI Outreach, Access, and .Recovery (SOAR), Post -Traumatic Stress Disorder, Traumatic Brain Injury, Combat Trauma, Sexual Trauma, Suicide: Prevention, Boundaries &.Ethics, etc. Additionally, staff gain knowledge of the resources readily available to address veterans' needs by participating in workshops, collaborative meetings, Stand Down Events, and Resource Fairs. U.SNETS also promotes a therapeutic community that allows the camaraderie of the veteran culture to flourish. Peer-to-peer support is encouraged through a mentoring program, support. groups, resident council, and community activities. With U.SNETS' experience in and. commitment to serving our nation's military veterans and their families over the past 24 years, the proposed projects in San Bernardino will be successful in meeting the need of these veterans and as well as the Inland Empire community. CUP17-13 and ME17-05 Planning Commission Date 9.12.2017 Page 14 ATTACHMENT E Trash/Refuse and Fire Trucks Turning Exhibit q43, s civ ro M U (r) J 4- mol Q Z:) z U� zw Q Z w LU m Z Q INr LO n a Y L ~ U Q on a ap ai v ti --ti ®} C7 E O oc ry .1 J6 � p o q43, s civ ro M U (r) J 4- mol Q Z:) z U� zw Q Z w LU m Z Q INr LO n a U L() J t F- CN m QV) UZ ON Zw � D Q Z w w m Z Q I-= LU LU E -- w ►I LO M H vii v�iC„ ri 0 O x V � h C � � C L t•� Q �r Jbr: U L() J t F- CN m QV) UZ ON Zw � D Q Z w w m Z Q I-= LU LU E -- w ►I LO M H CUP]7-13and ME17-0S Planning Commission Date: 9.12.2017 Page 15 ATTACHMENT F Easement Truck Turning Exhibit QD La Ln U Lr) -i < o v- �z C'4 ::E C13 z o z z im ui m z cn a CUP17--13 and ME]7-05 Planning Commission Date. 4.12.2017 Page 16 ATTACHIIIENT G Letter of Agreement Letter of Agreement August 28, 2017 Ronald L Hawk 1359/1361 North E Street San Bernardino, CA 92445-4506 Elizabeth Mora -Rodriguez Assistant Planner, City of San Bernardino 290 North D St. San Bernardino, CA 92401 Dear Ms. Mora -Rodriguez, This letter shall serve as my agreement to the attached proposed site circulation and site plan as drawn and submitted by Rick Engineering Company, which drawing is incorporated herein by reference. Sincerely e'_� Q Ronald L Hawk O 'w ACKNOWLEDGEMENT "' A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the Identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of San Bernardino On August 28, before me, Lorelei L Volk, Notary Public, personally appeared Ronald L Hawk, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. LORELEI L. VOLK Commisslon # 2048655 Notary Public - California 2 Z San Bernardino County Comm. Ea fires l4oy 10, 2017 Stnatu "off Ic Ping NadrySaal Ab.. EXHIBIT 4 NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino does hereby resolve, determine, find, and order as follows: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: In accordance with §15061(b)(4) (Review for Exemption) of the (7alifomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission has determined that consideration of Conditional Use Permit 17-14 and Minor Exception 17-06 is exempt from CEQA due to the fact that the Planning Commission has denied requested Conditional Use Permit 17114 and Minor Exception 17-06. SECTION 2. FINDINGS FOR CONDITIONAL USE FEW", IT 17-14 AND MINOR EXCEPTION 17-06: Section 19.36.050 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code requires that Conditional Use Permit applications meet certain findings prior to the approval by the Planning Commission. However, the following findings are provided in support of the I denial by the Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit 17-14 and Minor Exception 1 T-06: FindingNo. 1: The proposed use is conditional) permitted wNIiin, and would impair the P P YP � P integrity and character of the subject land use diltrict and does not comply with all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. Finding of Fact: The proposed project as a social services housing facility containing approximately 24,645 square feet comprised of twenty-nine (29) residential units for low income military ve'erans is a conditionally permitted use, pursuant to Development Code 11 19.06.020(2)(Y), subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Peridt with the appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA determim; tion. The project site is located within the Commercial General (CG-1)one and Transit Overlay District (TOD) and the proposed developmen would comply with all applicable Development Code standards. However, the proposed social service housing facility for low income military veterans is not an appropriate land use due to the following: 1) Proximity to the adjacent residential neighborhoods; 2) Intensity of the existing transient activi y within the surrounding area; 3) Architectural design of the proposed b ilding is not compatible with the character of the surrounding nei borhood; and 4) Expose of Veterans to existing socioconomic conditions and environmental setting of the surroundin neighborhood. Therefore, the proposed project would impair Ilie integrity and character of the subject land use district or be darimental to surrounding neighborhood properties. Finding No. 2: The proposed use is not consistent with the Finding of Fact: General Plan Land Use Goal 2.2 states: "1 integrates with and minimizes impacts on General Plan Housing Policy 3.6.1 states: "P and new construction projects through incree already developed areas of the community." Al' establishment and operation of the social servi income military veterans is a conditionally pen with the Commercial General (CG -1), Transit commercial land use designation set forth ' proposed social service housing facility for for be consistent with General Plan Land Goal 2.2 Policy 3.6.1 due to the fact that is not an a subject location because of the proximity t neighborhoods, intensity of the existing tra surrounding area, architectural design of the compatible with the character of the surround expose of Veterans to existing socio -e environmental setting of the surrounding neigh) Plan. omote development that urrounding land uses." mote infill rehabilitation ing housing potential in ough the development, housing facility for low tted use and is consistent ,erlay District (TOD) and r the General Plan, the income veterans will not nd General Plan Housing iropriate land use at the the adjacent residential ient activity within the ►roposed building is not g neighborhood, and the nomic conditions and Finding No. 3 There will be potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored. Finding of Fact: The proposed project as a social service h approximately 24,645 square feet compri: residential units for low income military v permitted use, subject to the approval of a Cone appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQ the proposed social service housing facility is i at the subject due to the proximity to neighborhoods, intensity of the existing tra surrounding area, architectural design of the compatible with the character of the surround expose of Veterans to existing socio-ei environmental setting of the surrounding significant negative impacts on the environmer anticipated to result from the proposed social se Finding No. 4: The location, size, design, and operating chat use are not compatible with the existing and general area in which the proposed use is to significant noise, traffic or other conditions objectionable or detrimental to other permitt adverse to the public interest, health, safety, coi City. 4 using facility containing :d of twenty-nine (29) terans is a conditionally tional Use Permit with the determination. However, of an appropriate land use the adjacent residential sient activity within the proposed building is not ng neighborhood, and the anomic conditions and ieighborhood. Therefore, and natural resources are vice housing facility. ,teristics of the proposed ture land uses within the located and will create situations that may be uses in the vicinity or enience, or welfare of the Finding of Fact: The proposed project as a social service Inc approximately 24,645 square feet comprise residential units for low income military ve permitted use, subject to the approval of a Condi appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA the proposed social service housing facility is n at the subject site due to the proximity to neighborhoods, intensity of the existing trap surrounding area, architectural design of the compatible with the character of the surroundi. expose of Veterans to existing socio-ec environmental setting of the surrounding i significant noise, traffic, or other conditions i objectionable or detrimental to other permitte adverse to the public interest, health, safety, con City are anticipated to result from the propos facility. Finding No. 5: The subject site is not physically suitable for of use being proposed. Finding of Fact: The site is not physically suitable for the prol facility for low income veterans due to its residential neighborhoods, intensity of the exis the surrounding area, architectural design of t compatible with the character of the surroun expose of Veterans to existing socio -4 environmental setting of the surrounding neigh Finding No. 6 There are not adequate provisions for public a public utilities and services to ensure that the detrimental to public health and safety. Finding of Fact: Due to due the proximity to the adjacent intensity of the existing transient activity wi architectural design of the proposed building character of the surrounding neighborhood, an existing socio-economic conditions and en% surrounding neighborhood, establishment of t housing facility for low income veterans wil services or public health and safety. 5 ising facility containing d of twenty-nine (29) erans is a conditionally ional Use Permit with the determination. However, )t an appropriate land use the adjacent residential ;fent activity within the )roposed building is not g neighborhood, and the gnomic conditions and eighborhood. Therefore, r situations that may be 1 uses in the vicinity or ,enience, or welfare of the A social service housing type and density/intensity A social service housing oximity to the adjacent Y. transient activity within proposed building is not neighborhood, and the comic conditions and water, sanitation, and sed use would not be ;sidential neighborhoods, in the surrounding area, not compatible with the the expose of Veterans to onmental setting of the proposed social service be detrimental to public SECTION 5. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission hereby takes the following action: 1. Affirmation of the Planning Commission actions on September 12, 2017 and adoption of Resolution No. 2017-055: a. Den32M Conditional Use Permit 17-14 and Minor Exception 17-06, based on Findings of Fact. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10`' day of October 2017. ATTEST: Mark Persico, Planning Commission Secretary City of San Bernardino, California 6 Andrew Machen, Chairman San Bernardino Planning Commission