HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-0391
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-39
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, STATING ITS INTENTION TO RECEIVE FUNDS
FROM THE CALIFORNIA BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY
CORRECTIONS & AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO RECEIVE AND
ADMINISTER GRANT FUNDS
WHEREAS, the California Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC),
Ca1VIP Executive Steering Committee developed the Ca1VIP Request for Proposal (RFP),
formally known as the Ca1GRIP Grant Program; and,
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino desires to participate in the California
Violence Prevention and Intervention (Ca1VIP) Grant administered by the Board of State and
Community Corrections (hereafter referred to as BSCC); and,
WHEREAS, cities and community based organizations located in the State of
California are eligible to apply for Ca1VIP grant program funds. Cities and community based
organizations will compete separately; and,
WHEREAS, the State did not impose restrictions on the number of cities within a
county that may apply, or on the number of CBOs within a city or county that may apply for
CaIVIP funding; and,
WHEREAS, the BSCC CaIVIP grant is a 100% matching grant; and,
WHEREAS, the City's Community Intervention Program Manager, requested the
maximum amount of $500k for the 2 year grant cycle.; and,
WHEREAS, BSCC grant funds will be used to support data -driven, evidence -based
violence reduction strategies. The statutory language authorizing the CaIVIP Grant does not
specify the types of activities to be funded; and,
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11'
12
13
14
15
16
17
18.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino will implement proven violence reduction
approaches such as technology-based solutions, Ceasefire, street outreach intervention,
mentoring, recreation, and community/police relations strategies; and,
WHEREAS, if awarded, the City of San Bernardino will use CaIVIP funds to support
these approaches, and specifically build out the outreach case management component of
Ceasefire, group violence reduction model.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby
authorizes the City Manager to accept Board of State & Community Correction, California
Violence Intervention & Prevention Grant funds for purposes of implementing the San
Bernardino Violence Intervention Program.
SECTION 2. The Director of Finance, or designee, will prepare invoices on a
quarterly basis and submit them to the California Board of State & Community Corrections
for reimbursement.
SECTION 3. Grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant
expenditures controlled by the Mayor and City Council.
SECTION 4. The City of San Bernardino agrees to abide by the terms and conditions
of the Grant Agreement as set forth by the BSCC.
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, STATING ITS INTENTION TO RECEIVE FUNDS
FROM THE CALIFORNIA BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY
CORRECTIONS & AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO RECEIVE AND
ADMINISTER GRANT FUNDS
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor
and City Council of the City of San Bernardino at a Joint Regular Meeting thereof, held on the
21" day of February 2018, by the following vote, to wit:
Council Members:
AYES
MARQUEZ_
X C5
BARRIOS
x_
VALDIVIA�
SHORETT
NICKEL
X C5
RICHARD
k
MULVIHILL x
NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
It,
C
Georgeann arena, CMC, y Clerk
The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved this 21 sc day of February 2018.
4
R. Carey Davis,ayor
City of San Ber ardino
Approved as to form:
Gary D. Saenz, City Attorney
3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STANDARD AGREEMENT
STD 213(Rev 06/03) AGREEMENT NUMBER
BSCC 857-17
REGISTRATION NUMBER
1. This Agreement is entered into between the State Agency and the Contractor named below:
STATE AGENCY'S NAME
BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
CONTRACTOR'S NAME
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
2. The term of this Agreement is: May 1, 2018 through August 15,2020
3. The maximum amount of this $ 500,000.00
Agreement is: FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS
4. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following exhibits and attachments which
are by this reference made a part of the Agreement.
Exhibit A: Scope of Work 3 pages
Exhibit B: Budget Detail and Payment Provisions 3 pages
Exhibit C: General Terms and Conditions(04/2017) 4 pages
Exhibit D: Special Terms and Conditions 5 pages
Attachment 1: CaIVIP Request for Proposals*
Attachment 2: Grant ProposaVApplication for Funding 23 pages
Appendix A: CaIVIP Executive Steering Committee 1 page
Appendix B: Criteria for Non-Governmental Organizations Receiving CaIVIP Funds 2 pages
*This item is incorporated by reference and can be accessed at:hftJ/www.bscc.ca_Sp/s bscccalvip.Dhp
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.
CONTRACTOR cal(fo mia Department of
Genera/Services use Only
CONTRACTOR'S NAME(if other than an individual,state whether a corporation,partnership,etc.)
CITY OF3AN BERNARDINO
BY(Aurrc,ir u gnat rn) 177r
j t, )
,e
PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF ERSO S NIN
ANDREA M. MILLER, City Manager
ADDRESS
290 N. D Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
AGENCY NAME
BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY.CORRECTIONS
BY(Autha i Signature;) DATE SIGNED(Do not type)
.AS Gf�
PRINTED NAME AND TIT OF FrERSON SIGNING ®Exempt per. SCM 1,4.06
MARY JOLLS eputy Director
ADDRESS
2590 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 200, Sacramento CA 95833
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT A
Scope of Work
1. Grant Agreement—California Violence Intervention & Prevention (CaIVIP) Grant
! This Grant Agreement is between the State of California, Board of State and
Community Corrections(hereafter referred to as the BSCC)and City of San Bernardino
(hereafter referred to as Grantee or Contractor).
2. Project Summary and Administration
A. San Bernardino's Violence Intervention Program (VIP), an updated version of the
Boston "Ceasefire" strategy, is designed to respond to community violence as an
effort to reduce gun violence citywide, to improve outcomes for young people at
highest risk of violence, and to strengthen trust-based working partnerships
between the community and police.The city aims to achieve its goals and objectives
through real-time analysis and coordination of trauma-informed, culturally relevant
intervention and prevention strategies, individual and family case management
services, crime suppression rooted in principles of procedural justice and long-term
transitional service plans for individuals.
B. Grantee agrees to administer the project in accordance with Attachment 1: CaIVIP
Request for Proposals (incorporated by reference) and Attachment 2: Grant
Proposal/Application for Funding, which are attached and hereto and made part of
this agreement.
3. Project Officials
A. The BSCC's Executive Director or designee shall be the BSCC's representative for
administration of the Grant Agreement and shall have authority to make
determinations relating to any controversies that may arise under or regarding the
interpretation, performance, or payment for work performed under this Grant
Agreement.
B. The Grantee's project officials shall be those identified as follows:
Authorized Officer with legal authority to sign:
Name: Andrea M. Miller
Title: City Manager
Address: 290 N. D Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401
Phone: 909-384-5122
Email: Miller an@sbcity.org
Designated Financial Officer authorized to receive warrants:
Name: Brent Mason
Title: Director of Finance
Address: 290 N. D Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401
Phone: 909-384-5242
Email: Mason br(a)-sbcity.org
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 2 of 3
EXHIBIT A
Scope of Work
Project Director authorized to administer the project:
Name: David Miranda
Title: Program Manager
Address: 290 N. D Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401
Phone: 909-384-5122
Email: Miranda da sbci .or
C. Either party may change its project representatives upon written notice to the other
party.
D. By signing this Grant Agreement, the Authorized Officer listed above warrants that
he or she has full legal authority to bind the entity for which he or she signs.
4. Data Collection
Grantees will be required to comply with all data collection and reporting requirements
as described in Attachment 1: CaIVIP Request for Proposals and Attachment 2: Grant
Proposal/Application for Funding.
5. Reporting Requirements
Grantee will submit quarterly progress reports in a format prescribed by the BSCC.
These reports, which will describe progress made on program objectives and include
required data, shall be submitted according to the following schedule:
A. Progress Report Periods Due no later than:
1) May 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018 November 15, 2018
2) October 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 February 15, 2019
3) January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2019 May 15, 2019
4) April 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019 August 15, 2019
5) July 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019 November 15, 2019
6) October 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 February 15, 2020
7) January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020 May 15, 2020
8) April 1, 2020 to April 30, 2020 June 15, 2020
B. Evaluation Documents Due no later than:
1) Local Evaluation Plan August 15, 2018
2) Final Local Evaluation Report August 15, 2020
C. Other
Grantees shall submit all other reports and data as required by the BSCC.
I
6. Project Records
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT A
Scope of Work
A. The Grantee shall establish an official file for the project. The file shall contain
adequate documentation of all actions taken with respect to the project, including
copies of this Grant Agreement, approved program/budget modifications, financial
records and required reports.
B. The Grantee shall establish separate accounting records and maintain documents
and other evidence sufficient to properly reflect the amount, receipt, and disposition
of all project funds, including grant funds and any matching funds by the Grantee
and the total cost of the project. Source documentation includes copies of all
awards, applications, approved modifications, financial records and narrative
reports.
i
C. Personnel and payroll records shall include the time and attendance reports for all
individuals reimbursed under the grant, whether they are employed full-time or part-
time. Time and effort reports are also required for all subcontractors and
consultants.
D. The grantee shall maintain documentation of donated goods and/or services,
including the basis for valuation.
E. Grantee agrees to protect records adequately from fire or other damage. When
records are stored away from the Grantee's principal office, a written index of the
location of records stored must be on hand and ready access must be assured.
F. All Grantee records relevant to the project must be preserved a. minimum of three
(3) years after closeout of the grant project and shall be subject at all reasonable
times to inspection, examination, monitoring, copying, excerpting, transcribing, and
auditing by the BSCC or designees. If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit, or
other action involving the records has been started before the expiration of the three-
year period, the records must be retained until the completion of the action and
resolution of all issues which arise from it or until the end of the regular three-year
period, whichever is later.
7. Conflict of Interest
A. Existing law prohibits any grantee,subgrantee, partner or like party who participated
on the CaIVIP Executive Steering Committee(see Appendix A)from receiving funds
from the CaIVIP grants awarded under this RFP.Applicants who are awarded grants
under this RFP are responsible for reviewing the CaIVIP ESC membership roster
(see Appendix A)and ensuring that no grant dollars are passed through to any entity
represented by the members of the CaIVIP ESC.
B. in cases of an actual conflict of interest with an ESC member,the Board may revoke
the grant award and legal consequences could exist for the parties involved,
including, but not limited to, repayment of the grant award.
i
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT B
Budget Detail and Payment Provisions
1. Invoicing and Payments
A. Grantee shall be paid quarterly in arrears by submitting an invoice(Form 201)to the
BSCC that outlines actual expenditures claimed for the invoicing period
Quarterly Invoice Periods: Due No Later Than:
1) May 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018 August 15, 2018
2) July 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018 November 15, 2018
3) October 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 February 15, 2019
4) January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2019 May 15, 2019
5) April 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019 August 15, 2019
6) July 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019 November 15, 2019
7) October 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 February 15, 2020
8) January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020 May 15, 2020
9) April 1, 2020 to April 30, 2020 May 15, 2020
B. An invoice is due to the BSCC even if grant funds are not expended or requested
during the reporting period.
C. Supporting documentation must be submitted for expenditures upon BSCC's
request. All supporting documentation must be maintained by the grantee on site
and be readily available for review during BSCC site visits.
2. Grant Amount and Limitation
A. In no event shall the BSCC be obligated to pay any amount in excess of the grant
award. Grantee waives any and all claims against the BSCC, and the State of
California on account of project costs that may exceed the sum of the grant award.
B. Under no circumstance will a budget item change be authorized that would cause
the project to exceed the _amount of the grant award identified in this Grant
Agreement.
3. Budget Contingency Clause
A. This grant agreement is valid through CaIVIP funding generated from the General
Fund.The Grantee agrees that the BSCC's obligation to pay any sum to the grantee
under any provision of this agreement is contingent upon the availability of sufficient
funding granted through the passage of Assembly Bill 97 (Statutes of 2017, Chapter
14), also known as the California Budget Act of 2017. If CaIVIP funding is reduced
or falls below estimates contained within the CalVIP Request for Proposals, the
BSCC shall have the option to either cancel this Grant Agreement with no liability
occurring to the BSCC or offer an amendment to this agreement to the Grantee to
reflect a reduced amount.
B. If BSCC cancels the agreement pursuant to Paragraph 3(B) or Grantee does not
agree to an amendment in accordance with the option provided by Paragraph 3(B),
it is mutually agreed that the Grant Agreement shall have no further force and
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 2 of 3
EXHIBIT B
Budget Detail and Payment Provisions
effect. In this event, the BSCC shall have no liability to pay any funds whatsoever
to Grantee or to furnish any other considerations under this Agreement and Grantee
shall not be obligated to perform any provisions of this Grant Agreement except that
Grantee shall be required to maintain all project records required by Paragraph 6 of
Exhibit A for a period of three (3)years following the termination of this agreement.
4. Project Costs
A. Grantee is responsible for ensuring that actual expenditures are for eligible project
costs. "Eligible" and "ineligible" project costs are set forth in the July 2016 BSCC
Grant Administration Guide, which can be found under Quick Links here:
httv://www.bscc.ca.gov/s correctionsplanningandprograms.php
The provisions of the BSCC Grant Administration Guide are incorporated by
reference into this agreement and Grantee shall be responsible for adhering to the
requirements set forth therein. To the extent any of the provisions of the BSCC
Grant Administration Guide and this agreement conflict, the language in this
agreement shall prevail.
C. Grantee is responsible for ensuring that invoices submitted to the BSCC claim actual
expenditures for eligible project costs. i
D. Grantee shall, upon demand, remit to the BSCC any grant funds not expended for F:
eligible project costs or an amount equal to any grant funds expended by the
Grantee in violation of the terms, provisions,conditions or commitments of this Grant
Agreement.
E. Grant funds must be used to support new program activities or to augment existing
funds that expand current program activities. Grant funds shall not replace
(supplant) any federal, state and/or local funds that have been appropriated for the
same purpose. Violations can result in recoupment of monies provided under this
grantor suspension of future program funding through BSCC grants.
5. Prompt Payment Clause
Payment will be made in accordance with, and within the time specified in, Government
Code Chapter 4.5, commencing with Section 927.
6. Withholding of Grant Disbursements
A. The BSCC may withhold all or any portion of the grant funds provided by this Grant
Agreement in the event the Grantee has materially and substantially breached the
terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement.
F. At such time as the balance of state funds allocated to the Grantee reaches five
percent(5%), the BSCC may withhold that amount as security,to be released to the
Grantee upon compliance with all grant provisions, including:
1) submittal and approval of the final invoice;
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT B
Budget Detail and Payment Provisions
2) submittal and approval of the final progress report; and
3) submittal and approval of any additional required reports.
G. The BSCC will not reimburse Grantee for costs identified as ineligible for grant
funding. If grant funds have been provided for costs subsequently deemed ineligible,
the BSCC may either withhold an equal amount from future payments to the Grantee
or require repayment of an equal amount to the State by the Grantee.
H. In the event that grant funds are withheld from the Grantee, the BSCC's Executive
Director or designee shall notify the Grantee of the reasons for withholding and
advise the Grantee of the time within which the Grantee may remedy the failure or
violation leading to the withholding.
7. Project Budget
1
BSCC Bud et Line Item A. Grant B. Cash C. In-Kind D. Total
g Funds Match Match. (A+B+C)
1. Salaries and Benefits $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000
2. Services and Supplies $0 $0 $0 $0
3. Professional Services and $0 $0 $0 $0
Public Agency Subcontracts
4. Community-Based (CBO) k
Subcontracts $475,000 $0 $0 $475,000 F
.i
5. Indirect Costs $0 $0 $0 $0
6. Equipment/Fixed Assets $0 $0 $0 $0
7. Project Evaluation $0 $0 $0 $0
8. Other(Travel, Training, etc.) $25,000 $0 $0 $25,000
TOTALS $5,00,000 $506000: $0 $1,000,000
t
�I
f
I:
E
I:
I
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT C
General Terms and Conditions (0412017)
1. Approval: This Agreement is of-no force or effect until signed by both parties and
approved by the Department of General Services, if required. Contractor may not
commence performance until such approval has been obtained.
2. Amendment: No amendment or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid
unless made in writing, signed by the parties and approved as required. No oral ti
understanding or Agreement not incorporated in the Agreement is binding on any of the
parties.
3. Assignment: This Agreement is not assignable by the Contractor, either in whole or in
part, without the consent of the State in the form of a formal written amendment.
4. Audit: Contractor agrees that the awarding department, the Department of General
Services, the Bureau of State Audits, or their designated representative shall have the
right to review and to copy any records and supporting documentation pertaining to the
performance of this Agreement. Contractor agrees to maintain such records for possible
audit for a minimum of three (3) years after final payment, unless a longer period of
records retention is stipulated. Contractor agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to such
records during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who
might reasonably have information related to such records. Further, Contractor agrees
to include a similar right of the State to audit records and interview staff in any subcontract
related to performance of this Agreement. (Gov. Code §8546.7, Pub. Contract Code
§10115 et seq., CCR Title 2, Section 1896). G
5. Indemnification: Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the State,
its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or
resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, laborers, and any other
person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work services, materials, or supplies
in connection with the performance of this Agreement, and from any and all claims and
losses accruing or resulting to any person, firm or corporation who may be injured or
damaged by Contractor in the performance of this Agreement.
6. Disputes: Contractor shall continue with the responsibilities under this Agreement during p
any dispute. II
7. Termination for Cause: The State may terminate this Agreement and be relieved of any
payments should the Contractor fail to perform the requirements of this Agreement at the
time and in the manner herein provided. In the event of such termination the State may
proceed with the work in any manner deemed proper by the State. All costs to the State
shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Agreement and the
balance, if any, shall be paid to the Contractor upon demand.
8. Independent Contractor: Contractor, and the agents and employees of Contractor, in
the performance of this Agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as
officers or employees or agents of the State.
l
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 2 of 4
EXHIBIT C
General Terms and Conditions (04/2017)
9. Recycling Certification: The Contractor shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury,
the minimum, if not exact, percentage of post-consumer material as defined in the Public
Contract Code Section 12200, in products, materials, goods, or supplies offered or sold
to the State regardless of whether the product meets the requirements of Public Contract
Code Section 12209. With respect to printer or duplication cartridges that comply with
the requirements of Section 12156(e), the certification required by this subdivision shall
specify that the cartridges so comply (Pub. Contract Code §12205).
10.Non-Discrimination Clause: During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor and
its subcontractors shall not deny the contract's benefits to any person on the basis of
race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability,
medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity,
gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status, nor shall they
discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for employment because of
race, religious creed,color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability,
medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity,
gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status. Contractor
shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of employees and applicants for
employment are free of such discrimination. Contractor and subcontractors shall comply
with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act(Gov. Code§12900 et seq.),
the regulations promulgated thereunder (Cal: Code Regs., tit. 2, §11000 et seq.), the
provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, Title 2 of the Government Code
(Gov. Code §§11135-11139.5), and the regulations or standards adopted by the
awarding state agency to implement such article. Contractor shall permit access by
representatives of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and the awarding
state agency upon reasonable notice at any time during the normal business hours, but
in no case less than 24 hours' notice, to such of its books, records, accounts, and all
other sources of information and its facilities as said Department or Agency shall require
to ascertain compliance with this clause. Contractor and its subcontractors shall give
written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they
have a collective bargaining or other agreement. (See Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §11105.)
Contractor shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause
in all subcontracts to perform work under the Agreement.
11.Certification Clauses: The CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION CLAUSES contained in
the document CCC 04/2017 are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of
this Agreement by this reference as if attached hereto.
Available at: (htt ://www.d s.ca. ov/oWResources/StandardContractLan ua e.as x)
12.Timeliness: Time is of the essence in this Agreement.
13.Compensation: The consideration to be paid Contractor, as provided herein, shall be in
compensation for all of Contractor's expenses incurred in the performance hereof,
including travel, per diem, and taxes, unless otherwise expressly so provided.
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 3 of 4
I
EXHIBIT C
General Terms and Conditions (04/2017)
14.Governing Law: This contract is governed by and shall be interpreted in accordance
with the laws of the State of California.
15.Antitrust Claims: The Contractor by signing this agreement hereby certifies that if these
services or goods are obtained by means of a competitive bid, the Contractor shall
comply with the requirements of the Government Codes Sections set out below.
A. The Government Code Chapter on Antitrust claims contains the following definitions:
1) "Public purchase" means a purchase by means of competitive bids of goods,
services, or materials by the State or any of its political subdivisions or public
agencies on whose behalf the Attorney General may bring an action pursuant to
subdivision (c) of Section 16750 of the Business and Professions Code.
2) "Public purchasing body" means the State or the subdivision or agency making a
public purchase. Government Code Section 4550.
B. In submitting a bid to a public purchasing body, the bidder offers and agrees that if
the bid is accepted, it will assign to the purchasing body all rights, title, and interest
in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15
U.S.C. Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 (commencing with Section
16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from
purchases of goods, materials, or services by the bidder for sale to the purchasing
body pursuant to the bid. Such assignment shall be made and become effective at
the time the purchasing body tenders final payment to the bidder. Government Code
Section 4552.
C. If an awarding body or public purchasing body receives, either through judgment or
settlement, a monetary recovery for a cause of action assigned under this chapter,
the assignor shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for actual legal costs incurred
and may, upon demand, recover from the public body any portion of the recovery,
including treble damages, attributable to overcharges that were paid by the assignor
but were not paid by the public body as part of the bid price, less the expenses
incurred in obtaining that portion of the recovery. Government Code Section 4553.
D. Upon demand in writing by the assignor, the assignee shall, within one year from
such demand, reassign the cause of action assigned under this part if the assignor
has been or may have been injured by the violation of law for which the cause of
action arose and (a) the assignee has not been injured thereby, or (b) the assignee
declines to file a court action for the cause of action. See Government Code Section
4554.
16.Child Support Compliance Act: For any Agreement in excess of $100,000, the
contractor acknowledges in accordance with Public Contract Code 7110, that:
A. The contractor recognizes the importance of child and family support obligations and
shall fully comply with all applicable state and federal laws relating to child and family
support enforcement, including, but not limited to, disclosure of information and
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT C
General Terms and Conditions (04/2017)
compliance with earnings assignment orders, as provided in Chapter 8 (commencing
with section 5200) of Part 5 of Division 9 of the Family Code; and
B. The contractor, to the best of its knowledge is fully complying with the earnings
assignment orders of all employees and is providing the names of all new employees
to the New Hire Registry maintained by the California Employment Development
Department.
17.Unenforceable Provision: In the event that any provision of this Agreement is
unenforceable or held to be unenforceable, then the parties agree that all other
provisions of this Agreement have force and effect and shall not be affected thereby.
18.Priority Hiring Considerations: If this Contract includes services in excess of
$200,000, the Contractor shall give priority consideration in filling vacancies in positions
funded by the Contract to qualified recipients of aid under Welfare and Institutions Code
Section 11200 in accordance with Pub. Contract Code §10353.
19.Small Business Participation and DVBE Participation Reporting Requirements:
A. If for this Contract Contractor made a commitment to achieve small business
participation, then Contractor must within 60 days of receiving final payment under
this Contract (or within such other time period as may be specified elsewhere in this
Contract) report to the awarding department the actual percentage of small business
participation that was achieved. (Govt. Code § 14841.)
B. If for this Contract Contractor made a commitment to achieve disabled veteran
business enterprise (DVBE) participation, then Contractor must within 60 days of
receiving final payment under this Contract(or within such other time period as may
be specified elsewhere in this Contract)certify in a report to the awarding department:
(1) the total amount the prime Contractor received under the Contract; (2) the name
and address of the DVBE(s) that participated in the performance of the Contract; (3)
the amount each DVBE received from the prime Contractor; (4) that all payments
under the Contract have been made to the DVBE; and (5) the actual percentage of
DVBE participation that was achieved. A person or entity that knowingly provides
false information shall be subject to a civil penalty for each violation. (Mil. & Vets.
Code § 999.5(d); Govt. Code § 14841.)
20.Loss Leader: If this contract involves the furnishing of equipment, materials, or supplies
then the following statement is incorporated: it is unlawful for any person engaged in
i business within this state to sell or use any article or product as a"loss leader° as defined
in Section 17030 of the Business and Professions Code. (PCC 10344(e).)
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 1 of 5
EXHIBIT D
Special Terms and Conditions
1. Grantee's General Responsibility
B. Grantee agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement.
Review and approval by the BSCC is solely for the purpose of proper administration
of grant funds, and shall not be deemed to relieve or restrict the Grantee's
responsibility.
C. Grantee is responsible for the performance of all project activities identified in
Attachment 1: CaIVIP Request for Proposals and Attachment 2: Grant
Proposal/Application for Funding.
D. Grantee shall immediately advise the BSCC of any significant problems or changes
that arise during the course of the project.
2. Grantee Assurances and Commitments
A. Compliance with Laws and Regulations
This Grant Agreement is governed by and shall be interpreted in accordance with
the laws of the State of California. Grantee shall at all times comply with all
applicable State laws, rules and regulations, and all applicable local ordinances.
B. Fulfillment of Assurances and Declarations
Grantee shall fulfill all assurances, declarations, representations, and statements
made by the Grantee in Attachment 1: CaIVIP Request for Proposal and Attachment
2: Grant Proposal/Application for Funding, documents, amendments, approved
modifications, and communications filed in support of its request for grant funds.
C. Permits and Licenses
Grantee agrees to procure all permits and licenses necessary to complete the
project, pay all charges and fees, and give all notices necessary or incidental to the
due and lawful proceeding of the project work_
3. Potential Subcontractors
A. In accordance with the provisions of this Grant Agreement, the Grantee may
subcontract for services needed to implement and/or support program activities.
Grantee agrees that in the event of any inconsistency between this Grant
Agreement and Grantee's agreement with a subcontractor, the language of this
Grant Agreement will prevail.
B. Nothing contained in this Grant Agreement or otherwise, shall create any contractual
relation between the BSCC and any subcontractors,and no subcontract shall relieve
the Grantee of his responsibilities and obligations hereunder. The Grantee agrees
to be as fully responsible to the BSCC for the acts and omissions of its
subcontractors and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by any of them
as it is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by the Grantee. The
Grantee's obligation to pay its subcontractors is an independent obligation from the
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 2 of 5
EXHIBIT D
Special Terms and Conditions
BSCC's obligation to make payments to the Grantee. As a result, the BSCC shall
have no obligation to pay or to enforce the payment of any moneys to any
subcontractor.
C. Grantee shall ensure that all subcontractors comply with the eligibility requirements
stated in the CaIVIP RFP and described in Appendix B.
D. Grantee assures that for any subcontract awarded by the Grantee, such insurance
and fidelity bonds, as is customary and appropriate, will be obtained.
E. Grantee agrees to place appropriate language in all subcontracts for work on the
project requiring the Grantee's subcontractors to:
1) Books and Records
Maintain adequate fiscal and project books, records, documents, and other
evidence pertinent to the subcontractor's work on the project in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. Adequate supporting documentation
shall be maintained in such detail so as to permit tracing transactions from the
invoices, to the accounting records, to the supporting documentation. These
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three (3) years after the
acceptance of the final grant project audit under the Grant Agreement, and shall
be subject to examination and/or audit by the BSCC or designees, state
government auditors or designees, or by federal government auditors or
designees.
2) Access to Books and Records
Make such books, records, supporting documentations, and other evidence
available to the BSCC or designee, the State Controller's Office,the Department
of General Services, the Department of Finance, California State Auditor, and
their designated representatives during the course of the project and for a
minimum of three (3) years after acceptance of the final grant project audit. The
Subcontractor shall provide suitable facilities for access, monitoring, inspection,
and copying of books and records related to the grant-funded project.
4. Project Access
Grantee shall ensure that the BSCC, or any authorized representative, will have
suitable access to project activities, sites, staff and documents at all reasonable times
during the grant period including those maintained by subcontractors. Access to
program records will be made available by both the grantee and the subcontractors for
a period of three (3) years following the end of the grant period.
5. Accounting and Audit Requirements
A. Grantee agrees that accounting procedures for grant funds received pursuant to this
Grant Agreement shall be in accordance with generally accepted government
accounting principles and practices, and adequate supporting documentation shall
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 3 of 5
EXHIBIT D
Special Terms and Conditions
be maintained in such detail as to provide an audit trail. Supporting documentation
shall permit the tracing of transactions from such documents to relevant accounting
records, financial reports and invoices.
B. The BSCC reserves the right to call for a program or financial audit at any time
between the execution of this Grant Agreement and three years following the end
of the grant period. At any time, the BSCC may disallow all or part of the cost of the
activity or action determined to not be in compliance with the terms and conditions
of this Grant Agreement, or take other remedies legally available.
6. Debarment, Fraud, Theft or Embezzlement
It is the policy of the BSCC to protect grant funds from unreasonable risks of fraudulent,
criminal, or other improper use. As such, the Board will not enter into contracts or
provide reimbursement to grantees that have been:
1) debarred by any federal, state, or local government entities during the period of
debarment; or
2) convicted of fraud, theft, or embezzlement of federal, state, or local government
grant funds for a period of three years following conviction.
Furthermore, the BSCC requires grant recipients to provide an assurance that there
has been no applicable debarment, disqualification, suspension, or removal from a
federal, state or local grant program on the part of the grantee at the time of application
and that the grantee will immediately notify the BSCC should such debarment or
conviction occur during the term of the Grant contract.
BSCC also requires that all grant recipients include, as a condition of award to a
subgrantee or subcontractor, a requirement that the subgrantee or subcontractor will
provide the same assurances to the grant recipient. If a grant recipient wishes to
consider a subgrantee or subcontractor that has been debarred or convicted, the grant
recipient must submit a written request for exception to the BSCC along with supporting
documentation.
All Grantees must have on file with the BSCC a completed and signed Certification of
Compliance with BSCC Policies on Debarment; Fraud, Theft and Embezzlement
(Required as Attachment G of the original Proposal Package).
7. Modifications
No change or modification in the project will be permitted without prior written approval
from the BSCC. Changes may include modification to project scope, changes to
performance measures, compliance with collection of data elements, and other
significant changes in the budget or program components contained in the Application
for Funding. Changes shall not be implemented by the project until authorized by the
BSCC.
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 4 of 5
EXHIBIT D
Special Terms and Conditions
8. Termination
A. This Grant Agreement may be terminated by the BSCC at any time after grant award
and prior to completion of project upon action or inaction by the Grantee that
constitutes a material and substantial breech of this Grant Agreement. Such action
or inaction includes but is not limited to:
1) substantial alteration of the scope of the grant project without prior written
approval of the BSCC;
2) refusal or inability to complete the grant project in a manner consistent with
Attachment 1:CaIVIP Request for Proposal/Application for Funding, or approved
modifications;
3) failure to provide the required local match share of the total project costs; and
4) failure to meet prescribed assurances, commitments, recording, accounting,
auditing, and reporting requirements of the Grant Agreement.
B. Prior to terminating the Grant Agreement under this provision, the BSCC shall
provide the Grantee at least 30 calendar days written notice stating the reasons for
termination and effective date thereof. The Grantee may appeal the termination
decision in accordance with the instructions listed in Exhibit D: Special Terms and
Conditions, Number 9. Settlement of Disputes.
9. Settlement of Disputes
A. The parties shall deal in good faith and attempt to resolve potential disputes
informally. If the dispute persists, the Grantee shall submit to the BSCC Corrections
Planning and Grant Programs Division Deputy Director a written demand for a final
decision regarding the disposition of any dispute between the parties arising under,
related to, or involving this Grant Agreement. Grantee's written demand shall be
fully supported by factual information. The BSCC Corrections Planning and Grant
Programs Division Deputy Director shall have 30 days after receipt of Grantee's
written demand invoking this Section "Disputes" to render a written decision. If a
written decision is not rendered within 30 days after receipt of the Grantee's
demand, it shall be deemed a decision adverse to the Grantee's contention. If the
Grantee is not satisfied with the decision of the BSCC-Corrections Planning and
Grant Programs Division Deputy Director, the Grantee may appeal the decision, in
writing, within 15 days of its issuance (or the expiration of the 30-day period in the
event no decision is rendered), to the BSCC Executive Director, who shall have 45
days to render a final decision. If the Grantee does not appeal the decision of the
BSCC Corrections Planning and Grant Programs Division Deputy Director, the
decision shall be conclusive and binding regarding the dispute and the Contractor
shall be barred from commencing an action in court, or with the Victims
Compensation Government Claims Board, for failure to exhaust Grantee's
administrative remedies.
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT D
Special Terms and Conditions
B. Pending the final resolution of any dispute arising under, related to or involving this
Grant Agreement, Grantee agrees to diligently proceed with the performance of this
Grant Agreement, including the providing of services in accordance with the Grant
Agreement. Grantee's failure to diligently proceed in accordance with the State's
instructions regarding this Grant Agreement shall be considered a material breach
of this Grant Agreement.
C. Any final decision of the State shall be expressly identified as such, shall be in
writing, and shall be signed by the Executive Director, if an appeal was made. If the
Executive Director fails to render a final decision within 45 days after receipt of the
Grantee's appeal for a final decision, it shall be deemed a final decision adverse to
the Grantee's contentions. The State's final decision shall be conclusive and binding
regarding the dispute unless the Grantee commences an action in a court of
competent jurisdiction to contest such decision within 90 days following the date of
the final decision or one (1) year following the accrual of the cause of action,
whichever is later.
D. The dates of decision and appeal in this section may be modified by mutual consent,
as applicable, excepting the time to commence an action in a court of competent
jurisdiction.
10.Union Activities
For all agreements, except fixed price contracts of $50,000 or less, the Grantee
acknowledges that applicability of Government Code §§16654 through 16649 to this
Grant Agreement and agrees to the following:
A. No State funds received under the Grant Agreement will be used to assist, promote
or deter union organizing.
B. Grantee will not, for any business conducted under the Grant Agreement, use any
State property to hold meetings with employees or supervisors, if the purpose of
such meetings is to assist, promote or deter union organizing, unless the State
property is equally available to the general public for holding meetings.
C. If Grantee incurs costs or makes expenditures to assist, promote or deter union
organizing, Grantee will maintain records sufficient to show that no reimbursement
from State funds has been sought for these costs, and that Grantee shall provide
those records to the Attorney General upon request.
i
11. Waiver
dl The parties hereto may waive any of their rights under this Grant Agreement unless
such waiver is contrary to law, provided that any such waiver shall be in writing and
signed by the party making such waiver.
i
i
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 1 of 1
APPENDIX A
CaIVIP Executive Steering Committee Roster
CaIVIP Executive Steering Committee
Grant Cycle: May 1, 2018 through April 30, 2020
Name Title Organization
1 Michelle Scray Brown, Chair Chief Probation Officer San Bernardino County
Probation Department& BSCC
Board Member
2 Ben Beltramo Deputy District Attorney Alameda County District
Attorney's Office
3 Rev. Charles Dorsey, Ph.D. Executive Dkeetor t✓OR-Grttratra army Development.
4. Steven Kim Co-Founder and Executive Project Kinship
Director
5 Sam Lewis Dir ei arof Inside Setvfcea WMio Coalition i.
6 Ray Lozada Supervising Probation Sacramento County Probation
Officer Department
7 Ju#io Marcial Dhvatpr-Youth Justice Liberty Hil[Foundation
8 Mike McLively Senior Staff Attorney and Giffords Law Center to Prevent
Urban Gun Violence Gun Violence
Initiative Director
9 Steve Moore Sheriff - San:Joaquin County.
10 John Pineda Leadership & Learning Motivating Individual Leadership
Coordinator for Public Advancement(MILPA)
11 Fritz Reber Gaptoin Support Operations Chula Vista Police Department
l�.vision
12 Alfonso Valdez, Ph.D. Professor U.C. Irvine -School of Social
Services
Membersof - orliginal 2016 CaIGRIP ESC thatwere unable to participate ontheCaIVIP
Leonard Barra Sergeant Imperial City Police Department
Jason Berige Sergeant Humboldt County Sheriffs-Office
Lynn Sharpe-Underwood Community Advocate & Alliant University,San Diego
f ' Principal Lecturer
City of San Bernardino
BSCC 857-17
Page 1 of 2
APPENDIX B
Criteria for Non-Governmental Organizations Receiving CaIVIP Funds
The 2017-18 CaIVIP Request for Proposals (RFP) includes requirements that apply to
non-governmental, community-based ' organizations. Grantees are responsible for
ensuring that all contracted third parties continually meet these requirements as a
condition of receiving any CaIVIP funds. The RFP describes these requirements as
follows:
Any non-governmental, community organization that receives CaIVIP grant funds must:
• Have been duly organized, in existence, and in good standing as of May 13, 2017;
• Be registered with the California Secretary of State's Office, if applicable;
• Have a valid business license, Employer Identification Number(EIN), and/or
Taxpayer ID (if sole proprietorship);
• Have any other state or local licenses or certifications necessary to provide the
services requested (e.g.,facility licensing by the Department of Health Care
Services), if applicable.
• Have a physical address.
In the table below, provide the name of the Grantee and list all contracted parties.
Grantee: City of San Bernardino
Meets All
Name of Contracted Party Address Email/Phone Requirements
To be determined Yes E3 No ❑
To be determined Yes❑ No ❑
ITo be determined Yes❑ No ❑
ITO be determined Yes D No ❑
Grantees are required to update this list and submit it to BSCC any time a new third-
party contract is executed after the initial assurance date. Grantees shall retain(on-site)
applicable source documentation for each contracted party that verifies compliance with
the requirements listed in the CaIVIP RFP. These records will be subject to the records
and retention language found in Appendices A and C of the Standard Agreement. -
The BSCC will not reimburse for costs incurred by any third party that does not meet the
requirements listed above and for which the BSCC does not have a signed grantee
assurance on file.
See next page for signature block.
Page 2 of 2
APPENDIX B
Criteria for Non-Governmental Organizations Receiving CaIVIP Funds
(Page 2 of 2)
A signature below is an assurance that all requirements listed above have been met.
- .,i- -+i �!�{�\� ����//�j �y,a2" •-���3�-¢.'? } yip.,...*�.i. c�xW��'�.�'�-e -�`3�Tr c�L.`}9'"s, b* s -+ S� _�'"^".
""_K4 rte#' .. s}Sr=- �x�aw`��.Yw2'� "� '�,{' � _ ^$- ,.r-��� �. 'i'' _• �<` ,� '�'�x _ ; fir' ,.
x
r
-- � _-.- r- .: a �,«�=>--� r rpt .itw: a ,�-�••"'s-.*"-� ��x, 3�.. � -3} r... _: �3�.�«'`-":��a:fit
- ��Y -. Y�'e TyA �'an �lN t�•S�� L t. �'_L �� s".�.� 'n_'at .`�H6''2 eX^J'
-
--��-.s..-�..'�. .•. .- ,-- ...��_:, � __.,.t...-.dam.-�._-�-..: _ ._�.�.<,...�._3�rr z'e.,--�- '. ` a:
NAME OF AUTHORIZEDOFFICER TITLE TELEPHONE'NUMBER EMAIL ADDRESS
Andrea M_ Miller City Manager (909) 384-3122 Nt
STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE
.290 N. D Street San Bernardino CA 92401
APPLICANT'S NATURE(B3u. Ink Only) DATE
X j �: I f�
California Violence Intervention and Prevention
(CaIVIP) Grant
Submitted by:
Gita bfi n-" ihl-
Cate submitted:
ionury_
CaIVIP Proposal
A complete CaIVIP Proposal package must contain the following (to be submitted in the order
listed):
Required Items:
1 Cover Sheet
• insert Applicant Name and Date of Submission X
2 CaIVIP Proposal Checklist
• Signed in blue ink by the authorized signatory(original signature) X
3 Applicant Information Form
• Signed in blue ink by the authorized signatory(original signature) X
Proposal Narrative
4 • 10 pages or less X
• Optional—1-page biblio rah not counted toward 10 pages)
5 Budget Table
o 1 page—use template provided X
6 Budget Narrative
• 3 pages or less X
Required Attachment for All Agplicants:
Certification of Compliance with BSCC Policies on Debarment, Fraud, Theft
7 and Embezzlement(Attachment G) X
Signed in blue ink by the authorized si Hato oti inal signature)
8 I CaIVIP Project Work Plan(Attachment 1) X
Required Attachments for CIty Acra�licants ONLY:
9 Commitment to Coordinated Vwlence Reduction Efforts(Attachment B) X
• Signed in blue ink by the authorized signatory(original signature)
10 CaIVIP Coordinating and Advisory Council Membership(Attachment C) X
Optional:
Governing Board Resolution (Attachment F)
11 (Vote_ The Governing Board Resolution is due prior to Grant Award Agreement, not at
time of proposal submission.
I have reviewed,this checklist and verified that all required items are included in
this proposal cket.
X L) _I� l
Applicant Authorized Signahxe(see Apprrosnt lnfonnation Form,Part t,next page)
ApplicantForm
A..- �i (6riFi - -. - .. - •8: I'A/fi� f.3�iF i d .
NAME OF APPLICANT TAX IDENTIFICATION A
City of San Bernardino
STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE j
290 North D Street San Bernardino CA 92401 li
MAILING ADDRESS(if diffemr t) crry STATE ZIP CODE
-c.80 1IC :DAILY .ust a city(ar.o_1ael in whfch your'��irii�ir{or:�iiP�wvid�Ga1lII.�'.�retttfiirs�ed Ana cel;
PE JECT''>.TLE: Community Violence Intervention Program
E. PROJECT SUMMARY A�)�..,
San Bemardino's Violence Intervention Program Is designed to respond to community violence asy
an effort to reduce gun violence citywide, to improve outcomes for young people at highest risk of
Violence, and to strengthen trust-based working partnerships between the community and police.
We aim to achieve our goals and objectives through real-time analysis and coordination of trauma
informed culturally relevant intervention and prevention strategies, individual and family case
management services, crime suppression rooted in principles of procedural justice, and long term
transitionai service lans for individuals.
F. GRANT FI.0 S.F€Et VB, T`En' ds:..C�_ LIIC .�:£�NL�!• :�_:.:.
List the amount of fits SM WIN be t tough to
$ I;oo aoo.00 ,,, , („W,,,,,,,,50 r of F: s 406,000.00
€l: PROJECT DIRECTCP:
NAME TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER
David Miranda Program Manager 90984-3122
STREET ADDRESS FAX NUMBER
290 N_ D Street 909-3844397
CITY STATE ZIP CODE EMAIL ADDRESS
San'Bernardino CA -92401 Miranda t9a@shgtLom
I. FINANCIAL OFFICER:
NAME TALE 'TELEPHONE NUMBER
Brent Mason Director of Finance (909)384-5242
STREET ADDRESS FAX NUMBER
290 N. D Street (9W)3$,5043
CITY STATE ZIP CODE EMAIL ADDRESS
San Bernardino CA 92401 Mason br a sbg org
PAYMENT MAILING ADDRESS(I(d(6emni} CrrY STATE ZIP CODE
J. DA_iY,TO-DRY PRt_3GRAM CONTACT:;
NAME TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER
David Miranda Program Manager (909)384-5122
STREET ADDRESS FAX NUMBER
290 N_D Street (909)384-3397
CITY STATE ZIP CODE EMAIL ADDRESS
San Bernardino CA 92401 Miranda da&bdty.orS
K "da4y-T4-DR3�FlSCi €. #3�itTAGT; -
-NAME TITLE - TELEPHONE NUMBER
Brent Mason Director of Finance (909).384-5242
STREET ADDRESS FAX NUMBER
290 N.D Street (909)384-5043
CITY STATE ZIP CODE EMAIL ADDRESS
San Bernardino CA 92401 Mason brV-s `' .org
L. AV11HORaED SIGNATURE
Sy.sgr�irsg tiiLs applicatfpri,_8 hettag ccyt I ani vended lid 41i Axsplica�tk rrld ;2h� ietil4 ��ar.trfdsa �araau xc!Svo@i�t' SC ��rt�
€�a�.tt�e grates rid any au#SCc mractCw5'*kJ-ahide.bythe la S,poilelds and-pracedue s gov lln this f�ae�tif�rg.
NAME OF AUTHORIZED OFFICER TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBS EMAIL ADDRESS
Andrea M.Miller City Manager (909)384-5122 Miller an@sbeity.org
STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE
290 N.D Street San Bernardino CA 92401
APPLICANTS GNATt1RE(Blue Ink Only) DATE
X 0(11411
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
All documents submitted as a part of the CaIVIP proposal are public documents and
may be subject to a request pursuant to the California Public Records Act. The BSCC
cannot ensure the confidentiality of any information submitted in or with this proposal_
(Gov. Code, § § 6250 et seq.)
1
PROJECT NEED
San Bernardino (SB) has longstanding problems with poverty and serious violence. For
over four decades, the city's homicide rate has averaged almost 45 homicides per year,
2-4 times that of state and national rates. Moreover, SB is among the poorest cities in
the country_ Of the 100 biggest cities in the US, SB was ranked the second poorest in
the nation in the 2000 census, just behind Detroit, and, in 2012, SB filed bankruptcy.
Since then (2012), SB has had the lowest median income of any city in the state of over
50,000. Central to the issue of community need and service gaps is the fact that despite
the seriousness of the problem of violence in SB, there is no well-established county,
city or CBO-administered "outreach and support" organization in SB. This acts as a
significant barrier in serving people at risk of involvement in violence and making the
city a safe place to live and work.
Poverty is pronounced and affects people of color disproportionately.
• In the ten years leading up to 2013, the median family income, adjusted for inflation,
dropped from $50,000 to $37,440, the lowest in the state for a city of its size. In
some parts of the city, family income averages- less than $15,000 a year (U.S.
Census Bureau, 2013).
• The percentage of black families living in poverty is almost triple that of white
families_ The percentage of Latino families living in poverty is almost double that of
white families(U.S. Census Bureau, 2013).
• Income gaps are widening. Key indicators —e.g., the numbers of children eligible for
free lunches—show the gap for children of color has steadily increased over the last
decade (CA Dept. of Education, 2015).
• The percentage of homeless children is double that of California, which leads all
states in homeless children (the National Center on Family Homelessness).
Key public systems — such as education and.criminal justice — present struggles
for people of all races but especially so for people of color.
2
Blacks and Latinos in SB County are significantly less likely to have access to good
schools when compared with county's Asian and Caucasian residents (Race
Counts, December 2017).
In 2014-5, the SB County Black suspension rate (14 suspensions per 100
students)was nearly twice the next closest rate (Native American 7.9) and more
than 11 x higher than the lowest rate (Asian 1.2) in 2014.15 (CA Dept.-of Education,
2016).
SB County Black residents (-74.6 per 1k) are nearly 5x's more likely to be
incarcerated than White residents (3.1 per 1 k)(Race Counts, December 2017).
0 Less than half of SB County residents of each race feel safe all of the time in their
neighbor-hoods.
Violence has the greatest impact on young people of color, particularly young
black and Latino males.
Our primary data source for the following is a systematic and in-depth analysis designed
to support the implementation of partnership- and evidence-based violence reduction
strategies and referred to as a problem analysis. This analysis, just completed by the
-California Partnership for Safe Communities (CPSC) identifies the individuals within a
community who are at greatest risk of violence. The methodology, informed by
research, consisted of the systematic review of 111 of the homicides that took place in
the SB from January 2015 — June 2017. These incidents directly involved 189
individuals, including victims and known suspects. The review closely examined each
incident, including motives and circumstances; the demographics of the individuals
directly involved in these incidents and their criminal justice system involvement; the
role of networks and relationships in increasing the risk of involvement in violence; and
a variety of methods for understanding the geographic and soclal distribution of risk_ (As
we further describe, effective January 2018, the working partners in this initiative will
conduct a "real-time"version of this analysis, carefully reviewing all injury shootings and
serious assaults on a weekly basis.)
3
Violence in SB disproportionately impacts young people of color
■ Almost 73% of victims and known suspects are between the ages of 18 and 34. The
average age is almost 31. And, less than 7% are juveniles.
• Blacks make up over 50% of victims and suspects, even though they make up only
15% of all residents. Latinos make up 38% of victims and suspects but make up
60% of all residents (in this age group).
• Victims and suspects tend to be very similar in terms of demographics.
These victims and suspects tend have extensive involvement in the CJ system
• Victims and suspects are strikingly similar in terms of CJ system involvement_
• 80% of all the victims and suspects have been involved in the CJ system.
• Among individuals with prior involvement in the CJ system, the average number of
prior arrests was 8.36.
• These arrests are for a variety of violent, disorder, drug and property offenses.
• 50% of victims and suspects have been convicted of a felony, 79% have been on
probation or parole, 38% were on active supervision at the time of the incident, and
65% have been incarcerated_
Networks and relationships appear to play a significant role In serious violence
• The majority of homicides in SB involve individuals' active in networks such as
gangs and less formal group such as sets and crews as-victims, suspects, or both
(66-81%).
• About 55% these incidents are associated with ongoing personal and group
conflicts, about 20% are attributed to unknown motives, about 10% to domestic
violence and about 10% to robberies and drug-related crimes.
• These violent groups in SB have an estimated active membership of 615-875
members. However, fewer of these individuals — estimated at less than Y2 of 1% of
SB's population—are actively violent at any one time.
• These groups tend to be primarily African American or primarily Latino, though some
are racially mixed.
4
• The total number of groups is approximately 21. Of that, 7 groups were associated
with the greatest amount of homicides(40)from January 2015 —June 2017.
• While the social distribution is concentrated, the geographic distribution of actively
violent groups is fairly widely distributed across the city.
Summary findings
• The findings from this problem analysis represent a first effort. The ongoing "real
time" data collection and analysis the City has committed to will enable the partners
to better understand violence in SS and act on it.
• Poverty levels in SB are extremely high and pervasive. Resource issues also have a
significant effect on public funding streams and the general capacity of public
.agencies to address the problem of violence.
• The risk of violence to young people of color, particularly young males, Is high. The
risk to the small subset of young males involved in actively violent networks is
enormously high.
• Based on the data, the extensive CJ system involvement of homicide victims and
suspects did not prevent their further involvement in violence.
• The above findings recommend investing the city's limited resources in evidence-
based criminal justice and social service interventions tailored to the above small
subset of very highest risk individuals.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The program(s) to be implemented: SB is making a long-term investment in an
evidence- and partnership-based violence reduction strategy (the Violence Intervention
Program or VIP) that consists of an updated version of the Boston "Ceasefire" strategy.
This update actively incorporates time-tested and evidence-based elements of outreach
and support work now in place in Los Angeles (see evaluation section and
bibliography). This proposal focuses on two major parts of that initiative and makes a
major, though balanced, investment in building both community and civic capacity to
reduce violence in the near-term_
5
• The first is a carefully developed outreach and support effort targeted to young
people at highest risk of violence that combines elements of street outreach (e.g.,
violence interruption, mediation and conflict resolution), intensive case management
and joint crisis response.
• The second includes: (a) an initial intensive training effort; and (b) an ongoing
capacity building partnership including the City, the California Partnership for Safe
Communities (CPSC), and the Urban Peace Institute (UPI)_ These partners will work
together to ensure that SB's outreach and support program embraces national best
practice, is culturally competent and incorporates principles of trauma-infomned care.
How the program works: four operational components
The first of these is to continuously monitor and analyze local violence to identify and
intervene with young people at imminent risk of being involved in shootings. This
consists of a problem analysis (described above) and a tight cycle of real-time analysis
and coordination. This fast-moving process employs real-time analysis and collaborative
planning to strategically mobilize a wide range of partners that includes outreach
workers, case managers, community leaders, CBOs and criminal justice partners
around a double bottom line focused on reducing violence on community wide level
while also reducing recidivism and victimization — and doing so in a way that
strengthens trust between police and the community. This cycle begins with a team of
managers and front-line staff undertaking a shooting review (SR)_ The shooting review
meeting begins with a review of every shooting that resulted in injury in the previous
week. The team'moves through a series of analytical questions about the shootings with
the goal of identifying the individuals currently most at risk of being involved in violence;
and, continues with the partners drawing on this analysis to develop a collaborative plan
of action, Plans are designed to 'interrupt" violence quickly while also reducing the city's
reliance on police strategies and tactics, such as stop-and frisks and buy-and-busts,
that tend to focus on those at low risk of violence, sweeping them into the criminal
justice system with minimal public safety benefit. Instead, these plans link analysis to
frontline staff's deep experience to focus on the small number of individuals involved in
Violence. The goal is to put the output of the shooting review— an accurate assessment
6
of risk and the emerging response — into action as soon as is practically possible
consistent with the partnership's values. A key aspect of this process will be the local
development of LAMPI's evidence-based joint crisis response.
The second step consists of an alliance of community leaders engaging young
people at highest risk of violence through direct, respectful, "procedurally-just"
communication. In VIP, this communication will take place via two types of meetings.
In the first, often referred to as a call-in, community, young people that have
experienced violence directly, clergy, street outreach and criminal justice leaders gather
with 8-12 high-risk young people, typically in a church or community center(a safe and
familiar place). The partners share their commitment to making neighborhoods safe and
keeping the young men alive and free, while providing them with clear information about
the risks of violence and incarceration and, emphatically, their commitment to stand with
them as they step away from violence and move toward pathways to opportunity_ These
meetings are followed by a series of welcoming focus groups designed to engage and
give voice to the young men attending the call-in, often over meals or recreational
activities. The partners may also use what's known as a custom notification. In these
instances, the call-in message is compressed into a direct conversation between one or
two partners and the young person at risk and takes place wherever most-convenient
(e.g., at home or a street comer). Partners plan communications carefully to ensure
participants feel respected, caned for, and are able to share their perspective. Numerous
studies show these face-to-face communications — informed by procedural justice —can
reduce the chances of further involvement in violence and the justice system. This
communication also introduces these clients to relationship-based' case managers.
The partners constantly monitor their ability to engage the very highest risk of young
people in a meaningful and effective supportive relationship.
The third part consists of working quickly to address safety issues while building
a long-term, trusting relationship. Engaging young people at highest risk of violence
requires active outreach, constant in-person contact and "quick wins" (e.g., obtaining a
government ID or addressing an outstanding warrant). Incentives, such as gift cards,
7
stipends and food, help keep them engaged. Skilled outreach workers or case
managers focus on building a trust relationship and addressing a client's immediate
safety risks while developing a long-term plan for stability and increased life
opportunities.
The fourth moving part transitions from this urgent focus on safety to a
continuing relationship that includes formal services and a supportive
community focused on the long-term work of personal change. After addressing
immediate safety issues, case managers help clients access services such' as
education, housing and employment. Arranging for priority access to services helps
clients maintain a sense of momentum and optimism_ Stepping away from violence can
mean leaving behind close friends and family, so informal support is critical. Short-term
risk reduction stabilizes clients in crisis, followed by long-term counseling, mentoring
and support groups. This community of support provides a new peer group and models
healthy lifestyles and decision-making. Clients will remain connected to their outreach
worker or case manager for at least 1-2 years. They support clients to accomplish "life
plans" —centered on employment, education, parenthood and housing —while ensuring
safety and stability.
The design of this effort is rooted in evidence of effectiveness.
(1) The evidence in support of the VIP approach is well established. Leading
criminologists recently conducted a systematic review — considered the "gold standard"
of research—of the many evaluations (over 10 methodologically rigorous studies) of this
approach and found the strategy was effective across a number of different cities (10 of
11 cities achieved double-digit reductions in violence), leading the authors to conclude it
was among the most effective modern violence-reduction approaches. One of the
evaluations cited by the authors is of similar wont in Stockton, a city that has faced
economic and crime challenges resembling those of SB. (2) A growing body of evidence
suggests that what makes the VIP approach effective is its utilization of the principles of
procedural justice/police legitimacy. In particular, these authors focus on the
communication component of the approach (when that component incorporates
8
legitimacy) and note its effectiveness relative to, for example, street enforcement and
sentence length. The evidence specific to Los Angeles' Gang Reduction and Youth
Development (GYRD) initiative's joint crisis response (the "GRYD Intervention Incident
Response and Gang Crime 2017 Evaluation Report"). This recent evaluation of the
GRYD Crisis Response model showed a 43.2% reduction in retaliatory shootings, that
it prevented an estimated 185 gang retaliations citywide, and resulted in direct and
indirect savings of$110.2 million over 2 years.
The foundation for these operational components is a training/capacity building
partnership including the City, CPSC-and UPI. The City will employ an approach that
has been developed steadily and with significant success in Los Angeles. In that
framework (again, known as GRYD), the City will employ a combination of both RFQ's
and RFP's that invite and provide intensive support to community-based programs that
seek to operate the above programs (Note: this element of the work is .already
underway). Recognizing that- such ' organizations have been historically under-
resourced, SB will make a substantial and ongoing investment in building the capacity
of these CBO's for quality implementation. Among other things, this capacity building
effort will draw on UPI for training in professional standards and conduct, while CPSC
will provide training and capacity building for overall initiative management.
These partners will work together— through three complementary mechanisms —
to ensure the initiative, generally, and the operational-components, specifically,
are culturally competent and incorporate trauma-informed practice. The City, UPI
and CPSC will work closely together to'integrate this support and capacity building. (1)
By designing the linked RFQ and RFP process to clearly establish the importance of
these principles. (2) Through training and linked capacity building to be undertaken by
UPI. We note here that UPI will not only be a one-time, in-depth training but will also
include ongoing technical assistance and advice to a wide range of community partners
(not just city-contracted partners). (3) Through the steady and careful development of
an advisory group that will be made up of individuals at highest risk of violence, their
families and loved ones, and residents of communities experiencing disproportionately
g
high levels of violence. The primary vehicles for engaging, supporting, and collaborating
with- these stakeholders will be: (1) focus groups, listening sessions and related
activities designed for young people at very highest risk of violence (primarily through
the VIP outreach and support activities outlined above)_ (2) Mutual support groups and
related engaging activities/convening For families of individuals at very highest risk of
violence-through the city, CBO's and the faith community. Both UPI and CPSC have
developed such advisory bodies as part their work in other cities.
PROJECT EVALUATION
Program evaluation, oversight and monitoring will begin in June 2018_ The VIP partners
will come together to hold themselves accountable for quality implementation and
fidelity to the evidence and values guiding their work. This process will be jointly staffed
by the project director, CPSC, and SBPD crime analyst. Initially, .these meetings
(planning and performance reviews)will take place once every 2 months and have a 3-
part agenda. First, partners will assess progress toward their citywide- and individual-
level violence-reduction goals. Second, they will evaluate the quality of implementation
based on indicators drawn from the main operational components of VIP including
communication, outreach and support,- analysis, enforcement and coordination. For
each component,-indicators will be linked to focus (are we sustaining our focus on the
small proportion of individuals actually driving violence?), scale are we working at a
scale that promises citywide results?),-and "fidelity to the model" (are we carrying out
this activity in a way that is consistent with evaluation findings on effectiveness?). The
data on outcome and activity Indicators will be assembled into a user-friendly
worksheet, quickly conveying the information to department heads, city officials, project
leads, community leaders and participating CBO reps. The third element will be a
running conversation about the measures needed to strengthen implementation (e-g-,
modifying program policies and procedures, resetting priorities and reallocating
resources). Meetings will end with a summary of these commitments (deliverables) to
be revisited at subsequent convening. Component measures of this evaluation and
performance management framework include:
10
Goals & objectives (outcome indicators): Citywide: Reduce shootings as measured by--
(1)
y:(1) homicides; and (2) non-fatal injury shootings by a minimum of 5% each year.
Individual: Reduce gunshot victimizations and recidivism for violent crimes by 20% from
baselines for program participants over the course of the grant period.
Activity Indicators (process measures)_ These activity indicators may be modified
based on practice and experience but will remain focused on core operational
components, on key aspects of quality Implementation (e.g., focus and scale) and
accepted best practice research. (1) Communication: Cary out communications with
at least 50 very highest risk individuals yearly (roughly July to June): 30-40 individuals
through call-ins/60-70 through custom notifications. (2) Outreach & Support:
Examples: (a) Engage at least 50%of individuals in outreach and support relationships;
(b) Cary out at least 4 meaningful face-to-face with these individuals every week; (c)
Consistent use of "safety planning" in overall case mgt.(3) Analysis-Management-
Coordination: conduct shooting reviews & coordination mtgs, at least 3-4 weeks each
month with consistent attendance by project leads. (4) Quality Implementation:
Maintain consistent convening of and attendance by senior partners in semi-monthly
"planning and performance reviews."
Complementing this performance management and program oversightimonitoring
framework, is the partnership mentioned above between the City, CPSC and UPI to
build the capacity of community-led organizations to provide outreach and support. In
the first year of the grant, this capacity building will focus primarily on training in
outreach and support (with a focus on professional conducts and standards, practice as
It relates to violence interruption and case management). In the second year, the focus
will broaden to organizational development and leadership development. UPI is
considered a national leader in providing such training. This will be complemented by
trainings in procedural justice for SBPD and provided through CPSC, which is a
statewide (and national) leader in the application of the principles to violence reduction
efforts. In this way, C80's, the City, CPSC and UPI will work intensively over this 2-year
period to build the foundation for a sustainable, long-term partnership.
Annotated Bibliography
1. Braga, A. &Weisburd, D. (2012). The effects of"pulling levers" focused
deterrence strategies on crime_ Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6. This is a meta-
analysis of the leading (that is, methodologically rigorous) evaluations of the overall
approach to be implemented. It found that the approach was effective in over 90%of
the city efforts evaluated. Findings below.
Boston Operation Ceasefire --83% ,youth homicide
Indianapolis IVRP 34% total homicide
Stockton -42% gun homicide
Lowell PSN -44% gun assaults
Cincinnati CIRV 42% GMI homicide -22°o shootings
Newark Ceasefire No sic. reduction in gunshot wounds
LA Oi>eration Ceasefire Sig. short-term reduction in gun vio.
Chicago-PSN -37% homicide. -30% recidivism rate
Boston Re-entry -30° vio, recidivism rate
Nashville DMI -55% reduction in drug offenses
Rockford DMI -22% non-violent offenses
2. The following two stud les/evaluations tracked the influence of procedurally just
communication on recidivism and found positive results as per Chicago above.
a.Papachristos, A.V., Meares, T., and Fagan, J. (2009). The influence of
legitimacy & social networks on active gun offenders. Yale Law &
Economics Research Paper No. 373.
b.Meares, T_ (12015). Rightful Policing. New Perspectives in Policing Bulletin.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. DOJ, National Institute of Justice_ (3).
3. The evidence specific to GRYD. The "GRYD Intervention Incident Response and
Gang Crime 2017 Evaluation Report." Brangtingham, Sundback, Yan and Chan.
Evaluation that documented the following: a 43.2% reduction in retaliatory
shootings, that it prevented an estimated 185 gang retaliations citywide, and resulted
in direct and indirect savings of$110.2 million over two years city-wide.
11
PROJECT BUDGET
CaIVIP Budget Table for City of San Bernardino
BSCC Budget Line Item A. Grant B. Cash C. In-1(iind D. Total
Funds Klatch Match (A+B+C)
1. Salaries and"Benefits $0 1 $500,000.00 $0 $500,00.00
2. Services and Supplies $0 $0 $0 $0
3. Professional Services $0 $0 $0 $0
4. Community-Based
Organization (CBO) $475,000.00 $0 $0 $475,000.00 ,
Subcontracts i
5. Indirect Costs $0 $0 $0 $0
6. Equipment/Fixed Assets $0 $0 $0 $0
7. Project Evaluation $0 $0 $0 $0
8. Other (Travel, Training, etc.) $25,000.00 $0 $0 $25,000.00
TOTALS $500,000.00 $500,000:00 $0 $9,000,000.00
12
Budget Narrative
1. Salaries and Benefits
The following City of San Bernardino staff will be committed to the Ca1VIP match
for the two year grant cycle.
Community Intervention Program Manager(88%) $132,129
North Area Police Captain (751/) $163,692
South Area Police Captain (75%) $165,922
Crime Analyst(50%) $38,257
Total $500,000
a. Grant Funds Requested: $0
Narrative Detail: Grant funds will not be used to pay for city staff salaries.
b. Klatch: $500,00.00
C.
Narrative Detail: The City's Community Intervention Program Manager will serve
as the point of contact for the BSCC. CBOs, law enforcement partners in the City
of San Bernardino and adjacent jurisdictions providing program & fiscal
oversight. Program manager will develop scope of work for the-City's RFQ.&
RFP process, which is currently underway, host a bidder's conference, and
provide applicants technical assistance during_the process. Program manager
will convene community based organizations awarded direct service contracts-on
a weekly basis to ensure staff are identified, hired, and trained for this effort. In
addition, Program Manager will oversee the day to day operations of program
implementation and connect program staff to local schools and other service
providers.
North Area Captain will facilitate weekly shooting and homicide reviews that
occur in assigned area. Captain will provide input & direction on safety strategy
coordination, design custom notifications & call-in meetings in partnership with
front line staff and program manager. Captain will also deploy necessary law
enforcement resources to address public safety concerns.
South Area Captain will facilitate weekly shooting and homicide reviews that
occur in assigned area. Captain will provide input & direction on safety strategy
coordination, design custom notifications & call-in meetings in partnership with
front line staff and program manager. Captain will also deploy necessary law
enforcement resources to address public safety concerns.
Crime Analyst will gather all necessary crime data for weekly shooting and
homicide reviews. Using social network analysis software, analyst will produce
critical information what will influence safety plans designed to interrupt violence.
Analyst will also track public safety strategies, crime trends, and offender
relationships.
13
I Services and Supplies
Although not included in the budget, the City of San Bernardino will use city supplies
necessary to implement project.
a. Grant Funds Requested: $0
Narrative Detail: N/A
b. Latch: $0
Narrative Detail: N/A
3. Professional Services
Although not included in this budget, California Partnership for Safe Communities is
the City of San Bernardino lead consultant for this effort and is on a three year
contract cycle.
a. Grant Funds Requested: $0
Narrative Detail:
b. Match: $0
Narrative Detail:
4. Community-Based Organization (CBO) Subcontracts
The City of San Bernardino will initiate a RFQ/RFP process to identify and secure
culturally competent agencies to provide direct services.
a. Grant Funds Requested: $475,000.00
Narrative Detail: The City of San Bernardino aims to award two contracts for this
effort_ Services to be delivered include but not limited to hiring four hybrid
outreach/case managers, engage individuals and families impacted by gang
violence; complete incident response reports and log follow up service activities;
provide custom notifications, and, participate in meetings as requested by the
City's VIP Office. Document active gangs affecting the City of San Bernardino,
Identify, develop and implement strategies to engage active gangs; document
weekly Safe Passage routes at key elementary, middle and high schools within
the City. Develop short and long term safety plans and establish personal and
professional goals with program participants. Connect program participants &
their families to-other service providers in the city, Implement two proactive
peace keeping events a year. SB's plan is straightforward but ambitious. It will
pass through almost the entirety of the grant to CBO's and use that process to
ensure quality implementation and sustainability through providing thorough and
high quality training in outreach and support (as noted, with a focus on
interruption, and professional standards and conduct).
b. Match: $0
Narrative Detail: NIA
B
14
5. Indirect Costs
Although not included in this budget, the City of San Bernardino will absorb all
indirect cost.
a. Grant Funds Requested., $0
Narrative Detail: N/A
b. Match: $0
Narrative Detail: N/A
6. Equipment/Fixed Assets
Although not included in the budget, the City will used pre-purchased desktop,
software, cell phones and other equipment necessary to implement project.
a. Grant Funds Requested: $0
Narrative Detail: N/A
b. Match: $0
Narrative Detail: N/A
7. Project Evaluation
Evaluation will be absorbed by a different funding stream and will begin by June
2018. We gather qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate program goals and
objectives. In addition,-we will use a developmental evaluation approach for the
city's overall violenoe intervention program.
a. Grant Funds Requested: $0
Narrative Detail: N/A
b. Match: $0
Narrative Detail: NIA
B. Other(Travel, Training, etc.)
This line item will cover two trips to Sacramento up to five people and training needs.
a. Grant Funds Requested: $25,000.00
Narrative Detail: Advanced Training (ex. leadership development):
$21,000.00, training agency to be determined, based on need of project.
Air Fare: $1,600.00, flights are roughly $140 per round trip for two trips.
Lodging: $1,400.00, hotel rate of$130 per night for five, two nights total. Per
Diem: $500.00, daily allowance of $50.00 per person for five people, two
days._ Ground Trans: $500.00 set aside for car rental or taxi to get to and
from hotel and airport.
b. Match: $0
Narrative Detail: N/A
Attachment G
Certification of Compl lance with BSCC Policies;Regarding Debarment, Fraud, The
s Embezzlement
It is the policy of the BSCC to protect grant funds from unreasonable risks of fraudulent,
criminal, or other improper use. As such, the Board will not enter into contracts or provide
reimbursement to applicants that have been:
1. debarred by any federal, state, or local government entities during the period of
debarment; or
2. convicted of fraud, theft, or embezzlement of federal, state, or local government grant
funds for a period of three years following conviction.
Furthermore, the BSCC requires grant recipients to provide-an assurance that there has been
no applicable debarment, disqualification, suspension, or removal from a federal, state or local
grant program on the part of the grantee at the time of application and that the grantee will
immediately notify the BSCC should such debarment or conviction occur during the term of the
Grant contract.
BSCC also requires that all grant recipients include, as a condition of award to a subgrantee or
subcontractor, a requirement that the subgrantee or subcontractor will provide the same
assurances to the grant recipient. If a grant recipient wishes to consider a subgrantee or
subcontractor that has been debarred or convicted, the grant recipient must submit a written
request for exception to the BSCC along with supporting documentation_
By checking the following boxes and signing below, applicant affirms that:
1V/3 I/We are not currently debarred by any federal, state, or local entity from applying for
or receiving federal, state, or local grant funds.
V1 Me have not been convicted of any crime involving theft,fraud, or embezzlement of
federal, state, or local grant funds within the last three years. We will notify the BSCC
s Id such debarment or conviction occur during the term of the Grant contract.
,7] VWe will hold subgrantees and subcontractors to these same requirements.
A grantee may make a request in writing to the Executive Director of the BSCC for an exception
to the debarment policy. Any determination made by the Executive Director shall be made in
writing.
A.t.ITRURIM-.S dl! ATURt' _
(This xtacumQrrt r st bs.;s! ned by tt a person w_tro is atittia_rlx a.to al fa tha Grahf; r$e ifenL
NAME OF AUTHORIZED OFFICER TITLE TELEPHONE EMAIL ADDRESS
rrr,Ck / ! /derfee rjE in r7. 3-
STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE
2%V l 9a
APPLICANT SIGNATURE Blue Ink only) DATE r
X i
Attachment I
CaIVIP Project Work Plan
Applicants for CaIVIP grant funds shall complete a 1-page Project Work Plan.This Project Work Plan identifies
measurable goals and objectives, activities and services, the responsible parties and a timeline. To build the
CaIVIP Project Work Plan, applicants should copy and paste the following tables into a separate document.Ust
only the top three goals of the project.
�'� r4 1 #�tiiC �SIfDOlI18 Ci�yMl/do
Objectives a) Communicate via call-ins and custom notifications with at least 50 very
highest risk individuals in year 1 and 75 in the second year.
b) Engage 50% of these individuals in" ongoing outreach and support
relationships.
Project activities that support the identified Responsible staff/ Timeline
goal and objectives partners Start Date End Date
1. Develop and convene weekly shooting
reviews to ID very highest risk groups and Oversight by program May through April 30,
individuals. mgr. &CPSC in October of 2018 2020
2. Convene weekly coordination meetings partnership with SBPD
with partner CBO's and clergy leaders to project leads and CBO's I
plan and implement measures for (rolling implementation) I
addressing active conflicts and building
individual level interventions.
3. Convene 2 call-ins in year 1, convene 4
call-ins in-yr. 2. Carry out 1-2 custom
notifications per week.
4. Conduct semimonthly performance mgt.
reviews to ensure quality implementation.
(�) Goal: Reduce vietirniwdon and r6ddlivism fOr program,9114101001fttoy40ML
20%over couirse of. rant.
Objectives a) Build strong CBO capacity for providing high-quality.outreach and service
and support.
b) Engage 50% of individuals identified in shooting reviews and coordination
meetings . as very highest risk in ongoing outreach and support
relationships.
Project activities that support the identified Responsible staff/ Timeline
goal and objectives partners Start Date End Date
1. Training and capacity building plans are
developed and implemented by VIP core 1. Program mgr., UPI 1. 6.1.18 1. Capacity
partners. and, as appropriate, -through building
2. Carry out 4 in-person high quality CPSC. 10.18 continues
contacts with VIP'cliente on a weekly (rolling through
basis. 2.-4. CBO's in start date duration of
3. As part of life plans, develop safety partnership wlprogram for training) grant.
measures(safety plans)for 75%of all mgr. and UPI.
high risk clients. 24Approx 24 Through
4. Participating CBO's will convene weekly Oct. 2018 duration of
case management meetings in grant.
partnership with technical assistance
providers.
Attacbment B (City Applicants Only)
Commitment to Coordinated Violence ReductionEfforts
,Assembly Bill 97 (Statutes of 2017, Chapter 14) mandates that: "Each city that receives
a CaIVIP grant shall collaborate and coordinate with area jurisdictions and agencies,
including the existing county juvenile justice coordination council, with the goal of
reducing violence in the city and adjacent areas."
In the space below, please explain how your city will fulfill this obligation if selected for
CaIVIP funding:
If the City of San Bernardino is awarded BSCC, CaIVIP funds, the city will continue
to work with the Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council of San Bernardino County&
Re-entry collaborative hosted by the SB County Department of Public Health to
strengthen and expand our current partnership In violence reduction efforts.
The City's Community Intervention Program Manager and subcontracted outreach
workers will attend regional meetings hosted by the JJCC at the Juvenile Justice
Center to gather and exchange referral information with Probation Officers and
contracted service providers in the area.
We will collaborate with San Bernardino School District and the probation officers
assigned to schools in the City to identify-youth and families in need of services.We
will also collaborate with the department of behavior health to establish a referral
process for youth and families.
In addition, as part of our Ceasefire, social network analysis approach to violence
reduction, the San Bernardino Police Department and the city manager's
community intervention program manager will collaborate when appropriate with the
adjacent city police departments and service providers in the Cities of Rialto,
Highland, and Colton.
A signature below is an assurance that the city will fulfill this obligation if selected for
CaIIVIP funding:
KU-THORl�ED -
.h'ia.dacurr€en#riiusf 6e sl�n�d�y.i�perspn vv_'i�o is authof�tf to,sigrs tt#��rar4t��reanleF��: -_ - -
NAME OF AUTHORIZED OFFICER TITLE - TELEPHONE NUMBER EMAIL ADDRESS
Andrea M. Miller City Manager Miller a00sbcity.oru
STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE Z1P CODE
280 North D Street San Bernardino CA 92401
APPLICANTS S ATURE(Blue Ink nly) DATE
o-Vd
— m > > c
�C .mn-U v m
c n
co 0
mi O U-
o a� nm
o L.J.
m —
o
Cc"
c o
m c c
� m c � �
C m CL
m U
O
O0 -6 ,rmif N
Pa
O Q `
CL:, C
:3
� -0 a.
Jb
0- n P
m@ o > m rn E' p
o
CDM to C � _ N
.o D m c
ami o c o ,; o� of o �n ve
cc > vm m E m� 0
o nmi -0 c c eo x
U Q a m to ter'
to
m O E
� O �
;� •v 'Mo 0
v v
w C �
m �'a o � � E •n �.
c0O W a qL
-O � m m d EL
• ID
to C 16 j O D
" E c co o o
c
vm cv' mE
to c c o
a d d
�'
�
C-�Ym c cmc � 0 —OL0 r
(3 -0 v Q m Q an d v '
� Eu, ooa
m e E oraotm E �
r .r r})
NCH m = LM O O rm O 0 C =
46 wE PO C-)P a) zcri0 !�
mem oa, Q
astr � °
� �
- o-v m c
~ mm Eco a sn
c -r- o
O m O uj
O ¢ S
mg m
z > d
tu C LM
E m £a CO m m
CO
m -00o Qc E o
¢ c _o � c nw
o
Irl- N V3 Ul) m n CD df