HomeMy WebLinkAbout25 PoliceCITY'OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Lee Dean, Chief of Police Subject: Amendment of Chapter 8.81 and Resolution
98 -193, Expenditure of Funds For
Dept: Police ORIGINAL Automation of Alarm Ordinance Fee
Collection.
Date: November 19, 1998
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
On July 8, 1998 the Mayor and Common Council adopted Resolution 98 -193 amending Chapter 8.81, Security Alarm
Systems
Recommended motion:
1. Adopt resolution.
2. Authorize the Director of Finance to amend the FY 1998 -99 revenue and expenditure budget to reflect the transfer
of $23,900 from the Police Evidence Impound account to purchase Records Management software for the Alarm
Ordinance program.
3. That said ordinance be laid over for final adoption.
Contact person: Capt. Michael Billdt
Supporting data attached: yes
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $23,912
Council Notes:
Source: (Acct. No.) 001 - 220 -5604
Si ature
Phone: 384 -5608
Ward: City Wide
(Acct. Description) Police Evidence Impound account
Finance:
/Z/,Itig
Agenda Item No. 25'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
Subject: Amendment of Chapter 8.81 and Resolution 98 -193, Expenditure of Funds For Automation of Alarm
Ordinance Fee Collection.
Background:
Amendment of Chapter 8.81, Security Alarm Systems:
On July 8, 1998, the Mayor and Common Council adopted Resolution No. 98 -193, establishing certain fees for
services furnished by the City of San Bernardino. Part IV; Section II of said resolution established permit fees for
alarms in the City of San Bernardino as follows:
Residential alarm system, $25
Commercial alarm System, $50
In addition, the resolution increased the number of permissible false alarms from three to four false alarms, prior to
the assessment of false alarm fines
The adoption of Resolution #98 -193 by the Mayor and Common Council necessitated the department's review of
Municipal Code, Chapter 8.81. Through our review of the security alarm system ordinance we identified the
following sections that require amendment, repeal or additional language.
• Sub - section (L) is added to Section 8.81.020 to address multiple alarms issued within a 72 -hour period.
• Section 8.81.070(B), as amended, clearly defines when a separate alarm permit is required and establishes each
permit is subject to a registration fee and annual fees.
• Section 8.81.090, is recommended for repeal as the police department, for some time now, has not monitored or
serviced any alarms in the City of San Bernardino.
• Section 8.81100, as it pertains to false alarm fees, is amended to state each permit has its own false alarm count
and all structures covered under one permit use the same false alarm count.
• Section 8.81.110(A), is amended to insure that every alarm user files, with the police department, a notice
containing the names and telephone numbers of persons responsible for response to the scene when necessary.
• Sub - sections (C) and (D) are hereby added to Section 8.81.110 allowing the department to assess reasonable fees
incurred securing premises when alarm users either refuse or fail to respond when noticed.
• Section 8.81.120 is amended to require each alarm company to include the City permit number when reporting
alarm activations.
• Section 3, of Resolution #98 -193 be amended identifying the 365 -day period as being the annual date of when a
permit was issued; all alarm accounts will begin with no false alarm on each record.
Alarm Ordinance automation upgrade:
A modification to the current Tiburon alarm software program is needed to automate the additional tasks and
workload associated with the revised fee schedule and proposed alarm ordinance revisions. The projected cost of
these modifications is $23,912.
The revised alarm fee schedule drastically changes the workload and oversight of the alarm ordinance performed by
the assigned clerk. The major changes are as follows:
V An annual alarm permit renewal fee has been reinstated. The fee will be billed via letter and due on the
anniversary date of the permit.
• The number of forgivable false alarms has been increased from three to four.
• Time frames for renewal fees and false alarm fees will be changed from calendar year to a 365 -day period
commencing on the date of the alarm permit.
• Courtesy warning letters will be generated commencing on the third and subsequent false alarm and all alarm
permit revocations.
• Billings for annual permit renewals will need to be prepared in addition to the current false alarm fees.
These changes will increase the workload of the alarm clerk by at least 25 %. The current alarm software tracks false
alarms by calendar year and does not have the capability of tracking alarm permit renewal dates. Courtesy false alarm
letters and all billings are generated manually.
The proposed modification of the Tiburon alarm software will automate these functions, resulting in the efficient
administration of the alarm ordinance. Time saved can be applied to additional oversight of the program and
increased interaction with persons possessing alarm permits. Problem locations will be readily identifiable and
referred to appropriate area commands for problem solving efforts. Revenue will be enhanced through the automated
billing process.
Financial impact:
Staff proposes funding the computer automation with a one -time expenditure of $23,912 from the Police Evidence
Impound account. $23,900 will be moved into the general fund as revenue and then budgeted as an expenditure in the
police budget for MIS internal service charges. The MIS budget will also be adjusted accordingly.
The Police Evidence Impound account has been collecting funds for many years. Currently, there is approximately
$350,000 in this account with additional funds being deposited sporadically. A recent audit reveals that this account
is overfunded and thus monies are available for general fund purposes. The department estimates that approximately
half or $175,000 of the money in this account is available for general fund use. This current Request for Council
Action proposes the expenditure of $23,912 from that account. A separate Request for Council Action, generated by
Management Information Services, and agreed to by the police department, will request the expenditure of $71,910
from that account for an additional Public Safety Programmer. If both of these requests are approved, approximately
$80,000 will remain for additional general fund purposes. The department is not recommending that these funds be
immediately encumbered. Rather, the department suggests that these funds may be used in the following ways to be
specified in a subsequent staff report.
• To supplement the police departments overtime account.
• To pay for third year funding for the additional Public Safety Programmer as requested by Management
Information Services.
• To provide funding for a possible computer software upgrade to automate the collection of fees associated with
the towing ordinance.
• To upgrade Evidence Storage Facility in the `B" building.
As required by Government Code Section 50050 and consistent with direction from the City Attorney's Office, the
police department will publish the transfer of monies to the general fund. In the event that any claims are filed with
the police department, sufficient funds are available to reimburse legitimate claims of three years or less.
Recommendations:
Staff recommends the Mayor and Common Council adopt resolution amending sections 8.81.070(B), 8.81.100,
8.81.110(A), and 8.81.120; adding subsection (C) and (D) to section 8.81.110; sub - section (L) is added to Section
8.81.020 ,to address multiple alarms issued within a 72 -hour period; and repealing section 8.81.090 relating to City
security to
Systems. Adoption will assist the police department in accurately tracking alarm users and identifying
those alarm users who are not complying with the ordinance. In addition, the City will be able to recover cost
associated with securing properties when the alarm user fails to respond in a reasonable time.
Staff recommends the Mayor and Common Council approves the expenditure of funds from the Police Evidence
Impound account to automate the collection of fees associated with the Alarm Ordinance. Failure to approve
expenditure will impact the police department's ability to generate projected revenue.
City of San Bernardino
MIS Department, Public Safety Systems
False Alarm Module
Proposed Design Document
Purpose:
The City of San Bernardino regulates the use of private and commercial
alarm systems. This project seeks to enhance the present billing
module to reduce the amount of time necessary to process false alarm
transactions.
Regulatory Issues:
The City Council, by resolution and conversation, has set the following
standards for false alarm events:
I. All alarm users must have a permit.
2. False Alarm Count
A. Users get a total of 4 free responses in each category of alarm
(burglary and robbery) during the 12 -month period, which starts
with the date that the permit was issued. The response counter,
for each category is reset to zero on the anniversary date that
the permit was issued.
B. A new data file that contains free days will need to be created.
A free day occurs when the city experiences a day of abnormal
weather or nature conditions. Events that occur on these dates
are globally "forgiven" and are not charges against any account.
(Ex. DAYFILE -> 07/14/1998 -WIND, 12/01/98 -RAIN)
3. Courtesy Notices, Warning Notices and Invoices
A. A courtesy letter is generated for the third false alarm event in
each category.
(The courtesy letter will be in the form of a postcard)
B. A warning letter is generated for the fourth false alarm event in
each category.
(The warning letter will be in the form of a postcard)
C. The fifth and sixth responses in each category are charged a
specific fine. These invoices will be sent on mailer- invoices.
Once the user begins receiving billable invoices, multiple
incidents can be sent on one invoice.
D. The seventh through ninth responses in each category are charged
the fee previously mentioned plus a penalty assessment.
E. A warning letter of revocation is issued on the tenth false alarm
event in each category. This notice also serves as an invoice.
The alarm license will be flagged for revocation on the eleventh
response. This notice also serves as an invoice.
F. There should be a field in this module that automatically gets
flagged at the 11th response. The Police Department can reset
this flag once a permit holder has resolved the problem with
their alarm. Once the field is cleared, the next false alarm
event would flag the field again and the alarm permit would again
be considered for revocation.
G. There should be a report and the Police Department can run that
will identify all accounts that are in the revocation mode. The
report should use this new field to identify these accounts.
H. Invoicing continues after the eleventh incident. If the new
"revocation field" is flagged, there is a new warning message
asking the user to immediately contact the Police Department.
Otherwise, a notice of revocation message is generated on the
invoice and the "revocation flag" is set again.
I. This cycle continues until the end of the annual period.
4. Renewals - All alarm users must pay an annual renewal fee. There
are separates fee for residential alarms and commercial alarms.
Private citizens can request a senior citizen discount. There must
be a means to flag such discount accounts. Government agencies are
exempt from the renewal fees. There must be a means to exclude them
from the renewal billing cycle.
A. Fees are invoiced for renewal annually on the anniversary of the
first day of the month before the date that the permit was
issued. As an example, if the user's permit expires on 07- 10 -98,
the user would get a renewal notice with the 06 -01 -98 batch of
renewal notices.
B. Renewal invoices use the same mailer format that false alarm
events also use.
5. Aged Invoices /Renewals
The same process should be used for aged invoices and aged renewal
notices. We would like a process similar to the following:
A. Renewals /Invoices that are not paid within 30 days from the date
of the original invoice have a penalty assessment added to them.
An invoice cycle should generate late notice invoices on mailer -
invoices.
B. Renewals /Invoices that are 60 days past due will generate a
second warning message. Like the 30 day late notices, an invoice
cycle should generate these late notices on mailer - invoices.
C. Renewals /Invoices that are past due after 90 days will generate a
final collection invoice. These invoices will also be sent on
mailer- invoices. In addition to the mailer, a summary report
needs to be created that can be sent to the City Finance
Department.
D. A new field should be created that reflects that fact that a 90-
day late notice was sent. This field will be used to produce
reports of aged collection accounts.
6. Automated Incident Processing
The volume of false alarm incidents drains our staff. To help reduce
the volume of work and to be more time effective, we wish to automate
much of the incident processing procedure. The following is a concept
that we would like to employ:
False Alarm events are queued in the BROW transaction. An operator
would active a process and the following procedures would happen:
A. Incident /Permit Matching
The process uses the MLI of the queue BROW record to search for a
valid permit. Since permits have an MLI attached to them, a
positive match can be made at this level.
B. Rain /Wind Day Check
Once a positive match is made, the process checks the date of the
event again the dates in the Rain /Wind Day File. If the date of
the event match a date in this file, the type of day (Rain or
Wind) is passed to the Disposition Field.
If the event date is not in this file, the FAL disposition is
automatically passed to the Disposition Field.
With the incident matched to a permit and a disposition code
(provided by the Rain /Wind check or the default of FAL, the AADD
record can be automatically added to the False Alarm System. No
further RMS user interaction is necessary.
C. "No Permit Found" Processing
If a permit can not be located using the incident /permit matching
process listed above, the event must be processed as an
"unlicensed" event. We would like to see a procedure similar to
the following:
The basic location information from the false alarm incident
should be transferred to a blank ALOC screen. The clerks
processing the record will add /edit some basic ALOC information
after double checking that the location data is valid.
Once the required information has been entered, the ALOC screen
will be transmitted to RMS. RMS will assign the next available
permit number. It will also automatically set the RESPONSE field
(discussed in Section 6 below) to "U" to flag the location as an
unlicensed permit. The new FEES DUE field (also discussed below)
will be set to "Y" to indicate that fees are due.
The TYPE field should be filled in with the correct alarm type
based on the following data:
NATCALL = ALARMB TYPE -B = Y
NATCALL = ALARMR TYPE -R = Y
Instead of a first response courtesy card, RMS will generate a
warning letter and an alarm permit application on blank white
paper. The basic location information and some of the ALOC
information (like alarm permit number and MLI) should
automatically be filled in on the application. The new PAPERWORK
field (discussed below) should be set to "Y" to indicate that an
alarm permit application needs to be completed for this permit
number.
This will start the false alarm counter for this permit. Alarm
events at this location will be recorded and processed like a
permitted alarm.
7. ALOC changes
A. Rename DATE field to Permit issued field.
B. Change TYPE field to be three separate type files (TYPE -B and
TYPE -R). These will be yes /no fields.
C. Use RESPONSE field as our revoked field. The field can contain
codes (A- active, C- cancel, R- revoked, U- unlicensed, V- vacation).
D. ALOC will need space for 3 responsible parties (RP). The data
will include name, address, work phone number, home phone number.
E. ALOC will need a SENIOR CITIZEN yes /no field.
F. ALOC will need a GOVERNMENT ENTITY yes /no field.
G. ALOC will need a FEES DUE yes /no field.
H. ALOC will need a PAPERWORK yes /no box.
8. AADD changes
A. Expand TYPE field to TYPE -B, TYPE -R and TYPE -F fields. These
° will be yes /no fields.
B. TYPE field should be automatically inputted from BROW based on
CALL -TYPE. (Ex. An ALARMB code in BROW will put a "Y" in the
TYPE -B field)
November 13, 1998
Mr. Michael Eckley
Project Manager
City of San Bernardino
MIS Division
710 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Dear Mr. Eckley:
P643- Q980029
In response to the City provided document, City of San Bernardino MIS Department, Public
Safety Systems, False Alarm Module, Proposed Design Document, Tiburon is pleased to
provide this quotation for modifications to the Tiburon Software required to the meet the
functionality described within the document.
This quotation is for Tiburon Services only, no hardware is proposed. Included in the Services
to be provided under this quotation are:
• Design and Specification Review
• Software Implementation Services.
• Project Management Services
The quotation being provided is based on the functionality requirements described in the City
provided document. Tiburon will provide the following modifications:
RMS Modifications:
Due to the detailed nature of the City's False Alarm standards described in the document,
Tiburon recommends a Design and Specification Review to ensure that all modifications that
need to be made are agreed to by Tiburon and the City.
Folllowing the Specification Review, Tiburon will implement the changes identified in the
Specification Review phase.
Tiburon will provide the functionality for a firm fixed price of $23,912. This price includes a
credit of ten (10) days of software services carried over from the Upgrade Project.
This quotation is based on the following assumptions and general comments:
City to be Invoiced as follows:
1. Upon Acceptance of Quotation - 50% $11,956.00
2. Upon Production Use of RMS Modifications - 50% $11,956.00
P643- 0980029
November 13, 1998
Page 2
Payment terms are net thirty (30) days upon receipt of invoice.
Terms and Condition of the existing Contract between the City and Tiburon apply.
This quotation is valid for ninety (90) days from date of submittal.
Please sign below indicating your acceptance of this Quotation and return this letter along with
a City Purchase Order to my attention. Upon receipt of your Purchase Order, Tiburon will
contact the City to schedule Design and Specification Review meetings.
As always, if you have any questions, please call me at 1- 714 -712 -2925.
Sincerely,
Don Miller
Manager - Southern California Office
Western Operations
Tiburon, Inc.
cc: File P643
By this signature, the City of San Bernardino acknowledges and accepts the terms of this
quotation.
Mr. Michael Eckley
Date
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10'
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2 3)
24
25
26
27
28
COPY
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS 8.81.070(B), 8.81.100,8.81.110(A) AND 8.81.120;
ADDING SUBSECTION (L) TO SECTION 8.81.020 AND SUBSECTIONS (C), (D) AND (E)
TO SECTION 8.81.110; AND REPEALING SECTION 8.81.090 RELATING TO CITY
SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMS.
THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Subsection L is hereby added to Section 8.81.020 of the San Bernardino
Municipal Code to read as follows:
"L. Common Cause. A common technical difficulty or malfunction which causes
an alarm system to generate a series of false alarms, all of which occur within
a 72 hour period. The series of false alarms shall be counted as one false
alarm only if the cause of the series of false alarms is repaired before it
generates additional false alarms beyond the 72 hour period, documentation
of the repair is provided to the Police Chief, and during the 30 -day period
following the repair, the alarm system generates no additional false alarms
from the documented cause."
SECTION 2. Section 8.81.070(B) is hereby amended to read as follows:
"B. Separate alarm permits shall be required as follows:
1. A single alarm system permit may be granted to any single - family residence. The
permit may authorize intrusion, panic and/or robbery coverage. The permit may
include the primary residence and any outbuildings (such as garages, sheds or hobby
shops) on the parcel that are not used for commercial purposes. A separate permit
must be issued for any buildings on the property that are used for commercial
purposes. If the residence and the outbuildings are on separate parcels. separate
permits are required for each parcel.
2. A single alarm system permit may be granted to any single unit of any multi - family
residential complex (such as an apartment, a condominium or a mobile home). The
permit may authorize intrusion, panic and/or robbery coverage. The permit may
RLSijs [ALAR LORDI
71
81
Gl
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
include the primary residential unit and any outbuildings (such as stand -alor
garages, sheds or hobby shops) used exclusively by the applicant that are not used f
commercial purposes. A separate permit must be issued for any outbuildings that a.
used for commercial purposes. If the residence and the outbuildings are on separa
parcels, separate permits are required for each parcel.
3. A single alarm system permit may be authorized to any commercial business. T
permit may authorize intrusion, panic and/or robbery coverage. The permit m:
authorize these types of coverage for any structures used by the applicant on d
parcel. If a commercial business operates on more than one land parcel, the busine.
must have a separate permit for each parcel of land.
4. If the commercial business is a mall, strip mall or other commercial buildir
complex, a single permit may be used to provide coverage for any vacant unit.
unless they are on separate parcels. If located on separate parcels. separate permi
are required for each parcel. Each commercial unit rented, leased or sold to anoth,
commercial business must be covered by a separate permit.
5. Each permit is subject to a registration fee and annual fees. Each permit has it's ow
false alarm count. All structures covered under one permit use the same false alar=
count.
SECTION 3. Section 8.81.090 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is hereby repealer
SECTION 4. Section 8.81.100 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is hereby amende
to read as follows:
"The Citv shall charge false alarm fees at a rate set by resolution of the Mavor
and Common Council. Each permit has its own false alarm count. All structures
covered under one permit use the same false alarm count."
SECTION 5. Section 8.81.110(A) of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is hereb
amended to read as follows:
"A. Every alarm user shall file with the police department a notice containing the
names and telephone numbers of the persons to be notified to render repairs
RLS /js [ALARNI.ORD]
I
L1
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
91
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
117
2,
74
25
26
27
28
.. -. ...- �. >r._.�wac..�ruc:r.a u.._. •.,.� _. ......:. tsd. �iPtizati` .��.,aawc.�.z?�kii"iYTl�.;:k.;. ,,, ..
or service and secure the premises during any time the alarm is actuated. In
addition, such notice may be posted. If posted, such notice shall be placed
near the front door of the premises or gate if fenced, and this notice shall be
posted in a position that is clearly visible. ".
SECTION 6. Subsections C, D and E are hereby added to Section 8.8 1.110 of the S
Bernardino Municipal Code to read as follows:
"C. Alarm users shall pay to the City reasonable costs, as determined and
assessed by the Police Chief or Fire Chief, or his/her designee, respectively,
for expenses incurred in securing premises where a burglar alarm or fire
alarm has been activated, whether or not the activation is a false alarm. The
assessment shall be satisfied by the alarm user within fifteen days after the
alarm user has been notified of the assessment and the grounds for the
assessment. This section shall apply only to instances where the alarm user
has failed to reasonably respond to notification that an alarm has been
activated on premises owned, occupied or controlled by the alarm user. If the
expenses set forth in the assessment are not paid within 15 days. the alarm
user may be placed on a no response status. The alarm user will be notified
by first class mail of the no response status at the address on the alarm permit.
An additional amount of 10% of the amount of the expenses per month, not
to exceed 100 %, shall be added to the expenses until paid. This assessment
in this subsection shall be instituted to cover escalating costs incurred to
pursue delinquent assessments requiring extended enforcement action."
"D. Where the Police Chief or Fire Chief; or his /her designee, respectively, is
required to cause the assessment of costs pursuant to the provisions of this
section, he or she shall keep an accounting of the costs thereof, including
administrative expenses for the abatement. The term "administrative
expenses" includes but is not limited to the actual expenses and costs of the
City in the preparation of notices, specifications and contracts, inspection of
RLS /js [ALARNLORD)
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
24
25
2611
27 II
71811
;;„ ai
the work, office overhead, filing fees, and the costs of printing and mailings
required under this Chapter. Upon conclusion of the assessment, he or she
shall submit his or her itemized statement of costs in a Report to the Hearing
Officer and set the same for a hearing before the Hearing Officer. Notice of
the time and place of the hearing and a copy of the Report shall be given by
the respective department to the alarm permit holder to which the
assessments relate, and to any other interested person requesting the same, by
first -class mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the person at his or her last -
known address at least five days in advance of the hearing. The hearing shall
be heard before the Hearing Officer in the Council Chambers at City Hall,
300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino. California, at such date and time as
provided by resolution."
"E. Hearing by the Hearing Officer. At the time set for hearing, the Hear'
nv
Officer shall hear and consider all objections or protest to the assessment and
may continue the hearing from time to time. Upon the conclusion of the
hearing, the Hearing Officer shall allow- or overrule any or all objections.
The decision of the Hearing officer is final."
SECTION 7. Section 8.81.120 of the San Bernardino tilunicipal Code is hereby amend,_
I to read as follows:
"Every alarm business which monitors an alarm system located within the
City shall maintain on file a current listing of all such alarm systems including the
alarm permit number and the name, address and telephone number of the individual
or individuals from whom entry to the premises may be obtained. Said information
shall be available to the police department upon request of any authorized
representative thereof. The alarm permit number assigned to an alarm system by the
police department shall be given to the police /fire dispatcher at the time an alarm is
reported to the police /fire communications center by an alarm company. a central
monitoring station, a telephone answering service or any other business that monitors
RLS js hLARNLORDI
91
1
2
4
5
6
7
8.
9'
10
11 III
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
and reports alarms."
I ///
RLS /js [ALARtit.ORD1
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14'
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
74
25
26
27
78
ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF S.-
BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS 8.81.070(B), 8.81.100,8.81.110(A) AND 8.81.1"
ADDING SUBSECTION (L) TO SECTION 8.81.020 AND SUBSECTIONS (c) , (D) AND;
TO SECTION 8.81.110; AND REPEALING SECTION 8.81.090 RELATING TO CI
SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMS.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held
the day of , 1998, by the following vote, to wit:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
ESTRADA
LIEN
VACANT
SCHNETZ
DEVLIN
ANDERSON
MILLER
CITY CLERK
The foregoing Ordinance is hereby approved this day of
Approved as to form
and legal content:
JALIES F. PENMAN
City Attorney
By:
r
RLS js [ALARM.ORD]
0
JUDITH VALLES, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
1998.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
J
24
25
26
27
78
COPY
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SA
BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 98 -193 RELATING Z
CERTAIN FEES FOR SERVICES FURNISHED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section Three of Resolution No. 98 -193 of the City of San Bernardino
hereby amended to read as follows:
113. The 365 day period is defined as being on the annual date of when a permit
was issued; all alarm accounts will begin with no false alarm on each record. This
shall not excuse or waive past due fines or permit fees that may be owed and is
strictly for record keeping purposes. "
RLS js (FEES.RESI
1
4
5
6
7
8
91i
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
74
26
27
28
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SA'
BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 98 -193 RELATING Ti
CERTAIN FEES FOR SERVICES FURNISHED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor ar
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meet:
thereof, held on the day of , 1998, by the following vote, to v
COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
ESTRADA
LIEN
VACANT
SCHNETZ
DEVLIN
ANDERSON
MILLER
The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved this
Approved as to form and
legal content:
JAMES F. PENMAN,
City Attorney
RLS js [FEES.RES]
CITY CLERK
day of
JUDITH VALLES, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
199