The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016-137 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-137 2 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A NOTICE 3 OF INTENT (NOI) TO CREATE A QUIET ZONE ALONG THE RAILROAD LINE 4 BEING CONSTRUCTED BY THE DOWNTOWN SAN BERNARDINO PASSENGER RAIL PROJECT (DSBPRP) AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO 5 EXECUTE A NOTICE OF QUIET ZONE ESTABLISHMENT AT THE TIME AND IN A FORM SET BY 49 CFR§222. 6 7 WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) is in the process of constructing the Downtown San Bernardino Passenger Rail Project (DSBPRP) 8 railroad line (Corridor) which will extend passenger rail service from the existing Metrolink station at the Santa Fe Depot to the transit station on "E" Street (See Attachment "A" for 9 details); and 10 WHEREAS, SANBAG is in the process of upgrading the controls at the highway-rail 11 at-grade crossings along said corridor in conformance with 49 CFR §222 and §229 to qualify for a quiet zone designation; and 12 WHEREAS, establishment of a quiet zone along said corridor is a benefit to the City; 13 and 14 WHEREAS, all work necessary to establish the quiet zone is being done by 15 SANBAG at no cost to the City. 16 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON 17 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 18 SECTION 1. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to issue a Notice of 19 20 Intent(NOI)to create a quiet zone along said Corridor. 21 SECTION 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice 22 of Quiet Zone Establishment (Sample attached hereto as Attachment "C") at the time and in a 23 format established by 49 CFR §222. 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A NOTICE 2 OF INTENT (NOI) TO CREATE A QUIET ZONE ALONG THE RAILROAD LINE BEING CONSTRUCTED BY THE DOWNTOWN SAN BERNARDINO PASSENGER 3 RAIL PROJECT (DSBPRP) AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO 4 EXECUTE A NOTICE OF QUIET ZONE ESTABLISHMENT AT THE TIME AND IN A FORM SET BY 49 CFR §222. 5 6 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor 7 and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a joint regular meeting thereof, held on 8 the 5th day of July, 2016, by the following vote, to wit: 9 10 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT 11 MARQUEZ X 12 BARRIOS X 13 VALDIVIA X 14 SHORETT X 15 16 NICKEL X 17 RICHARD X 18 MULVIHILL X 19 20 Georgeann Hanna, CW, City Clerk 21 22 The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved this d day July, 20 23 �C� 24 R. Carey Davi , Mayor 25 City of San B rnardino 26 Approved as to form: Gary D. Saenz, City Attorney 27 28 By: 2 2016-137 ATTACHMENT °A" Railroad Quiet Zone Fact Sheet LGovernments Proposed San Bernardino, CA Quiet Zone SANSAG !! Santa Fe Depot to San Bernardino Transit Center i or g ,Together What is a Quiet Zone? The term "Quiet Zone" refers to a segment of a railroad line that has one or more consecutive public highway-rail crossings I# at which locomotive horns are not routinely sounded. However, N0 ` x when a locomotive engineer perceives a dangerous condition, 4 such as trespassers on the railroad or a car stopped on the tracks, he or she can use the locomotive horn at their discretion. Railroad construction activities within a quiet zone require the locomotive engineer to sound the train horn as an added safety measure. Under normal conditions within the quiet zone, train horns will not be used. Once implemented, a "No Train Horn" sign is posted on the roadway approaches to the railroad crossing Proposed San Bernardino Quiet Zone The Downtown San Bernardino Passenger Rail Project(DSBPRP) is presently under construction. Design features known as"Supplemental Safety Measures" will be provided at each of the four DSBPRP at-grade crossings thus allowing the City of San Bernardino to designate a quiet zone between the Santa Fe Depot and San Bernardino Transit Center (SBTC). Supplemental Safety Measures San Bernardino Quiet Zone . 3d Street will be �.n�ro.. •- - s I � � permanently _ �,r+ ,z . " • 2"d Street, Rialto Avenue SANTA FE DEPOT'. 3RD STREET _ and"G"Street will receive non-traversable roadway medians,minimum length of 2ND STREET 100-ft.from the crossing gate arm RIALTO AVENUE SBTC Legend i ® Quiet Zone Crossings MTrain Station -DSBPRP Rail Line �. BNSF Railway Co.Main Line I Passenger I 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 � Redlands Rail Project(Proposed) z Miles 2016-137 San Bernardino Quiet Zone Fact Sheet Page 2 The San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and City of San Bernardino prepared a joint environmental document for DSBPRP and SBTC. FTA approved a Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI) in October 2012 in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. SANBAG certified a Final Environmental Impact Statement in September 2012 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The environmental document included consideration of implementing Quiet Zones along the corridor as a means of reducing operational noise associated with the sounding of train horns in advance of passing the at-grade crossings. To support the adoption of a Quiet Zone, SANBAG also evaluated multiple roadway reconfigurations to support their implementation, including the permanent closure of 3rd Street. In 20-13, the City of San Bernardino amended the Circulation Map in its General Plan to facilitate the closure of 3rd Street. Why is a Quiet Zone Necessary? The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) issued a Rule in 2006, known as the "Train Horn Rule"that From The"Train Horn Rule" addresses the use of train horns at public at-grade crossings. The Rule states that all trains must sound "Train horns must be sounded their horns at all public crossings; however, the Rule also in a standardized pattern of 2 includes provisions for communities to establish "quiet long, 1 short and 1 long blast. zones"wherein locomotive horns are not sounded. More The pattern must be repeated information on the Train Horn Rule is available on the or prolonged until the lead FRA website http://www.fra.dot.gov. A quiet zone is not locomotive or lead cab car required; however, many communities throughout the occupies the grade crossing." U.S. have established a quiet zone to reduce the impact of train horns. How is a Quiet Zone Established? The City of San Bernardino, as government entity with jurisdiction over the roadways within the DSBPRP Corridor, must take the lead in following the process proscribed by the FRA. In cooperation with railroad entities (Metrolink and BNSF) and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), the City assumes responsibility for implementing improvements to the crossing that reduce the risk to crossing users in the absence of train horns. The process of establishing the San Bernardino Quiet Zone includes these remaining tasks: • Prepare and submit Notice of Intent(NOI). • Sixty-day NOI review period. • Final construction of crossing improvements, including quiet zone roadway signs. • Prepare and submit Notice of Establishment. 2016-137 ATTACHMENT "B" City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone May 26, 2016 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Distribution is indicated in Section 5 herein Date: May 26, 2016 Subject: City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone NOTICE OF INTENT TO CREATE NEW QUIET ZONE Notice is hereby provided that the City of San Bernardino, California, (City) intends to create a New 24-hour Quiet Zone in accordance with the regulatory provisions contained in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 222 and 229 Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings; Final Rule (Final Rule). The routine sounding of train horns at crossings would be restricted within the quiet zone unless an imminent danger is perceived by the train engineer. A party receiving this Notice of Intent (NOI) may submit information or comments regarding the proposed quiet zone to the City during the 60 days following the issuance of this letter. However, this comment period will terminate if all of the parties either submit comments or signed statements that they do not have any comments. SECTION 1 —AFFECTED HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSINGS There are four (4) existing public highway-rail at-grade crossings located within the proposed quiet zone as shown in Table 1 below. All affected streets are under the jurisdiction of the City of San Bernardino. There are no existing private highway-rail at- grade crossings or pedestrian-exclusive rail at-grade crossings located within the proposed quiet zone. Table l: Crossings within the Proposed Quiet Zone 027201U 002U-0.10 3` Street _...----_.__....._....__._..................._...._......._...._............__...._-...._._..................._............................................................................................................................ ..............................._.............................................................................................._................................ 027204P 101SG-56.98 2 Street ...__...._.........._....._..._.....__.-..._..._._...._..................-...-...---...._...__._..._.__.._....__.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 027206D IO1SG-57.13 Rialto Avenue ....................__...._.__....._...._............._............._...._....._...._......._......_....._............._._...._.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 027208S IO1SG-57.42 G Street 2016-137 City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone May 26, 2016 The following railroads operate, or will operate, over some or all of the crossings within the proposed quiet zone: • Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) • BNSF Railway (BNSF) SECTION 2—TIME RESTRICTION The routine sounding of horns will be restricted twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week unless an imminent danger is perceived by the train engineer. SECTION 3—PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The quiet zone is proposed to be established based upon the implementation of Supplemental Safety Measures (SSMs) under 49 CFR §222.39(a)(3) at these four (4) crossings. The SSM being implemented at the 3`d Street highway-rail at-grade crossing is a permanent crossing closure, effectively eliminating vehicular and pedestrian traffic through this crossing. The Rialto Avenue crossing will have approximately 101-foot median constructed on the eastbound approaches and approximately 157-foot median on the westbound approaches. The 2nd Street and G Street crossings will have approximately 100-foot medians constructed on both side of the approaches along with the installation of pedestrian channelizing gates. The improvements are described and shown in detail on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) General Order 88B Approval documents and CPUC Decision 13- 04-015 document (attached herein as Exhibit A) and the proposed crossing improvements (attached as Exhibit B). SECTION 4—POINT OF CONTACT The point of contact for the City of San Bernardino is: Christopher Alanis, PE Public Works Director City of San Bernardino 300 North D Street, 3`d Floor San Bernardino, CA 92418-0001 Bus: (909) 384-5140 2016-137 City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone May 26, 2016 SECTION 5—DISTRIBUTION This notice has been sent to the following individuals: Mr. Sergio Licon Mr.Michael Robertson Utilities Engineer Manager, Rail and Crossing Branch Rail Crossing Engineering Section Rail Crossing Engineering Section California Public Utilities Commission California Public Utilities Commission 320 West Fourth Street, Suite 500 320 West Fourth Street, Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Mr.Justin Fornelli Ms. LeeAnn Dickson Chief of Transit&Rail Programs Regional Manager, Grade Crossing Safety & San Bernardino Associated Governments Trespass 1170 W. 3`d Street,2nd Floor Federal Railroad Administration San Bernardino, CA 92410 801 "I" Street, Suite 466 Sacramento, CA 95814 Mr. Naresh Patel Assistant Director,Design & Standards Mr.Jason Sanchez SCRRA Manager, Public Projects 279 E. Arrow Hwy, Suite A BNSF Railway San Dimas, CA 91773 740 East Carnegie Drive San Bernardino, CA 92408-3571 Ms. Patricia Watkins Director,Engineering and Construction Mr.John Shurson SCRRA Assistant Director,Public Projects 279 E. Arrow Hwy, Suite A BNSF Railway San Dimas, CA 91773 740 Est Carnegie Drive San Bernardino, CA 92408-3571 Mr. Ronald Ries Staff Director, Crossing Safety&Trespass Prevention Federal Railroad Administration RRS-23 Mail Stop 25 1200 New Jersey Avenue Washington,DC 20590 2016-137 City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone May 26, 2016 List of Exhibits: Exhibit A — CPUC General Order 88B Approval for Second Street & Rialto Avenue, CPUC Decision on Application 13-04- 015 on "G" Street Exhibit B — Proposed Crossing Improvements Exhibit C — Quiet Zone Risk Index Existing Condition Without SSM Exhibit D — Preliminary Quiet Zone Risk Index Calculations Exhibit E — Updated FRA Inventory Form 2016-137 City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone May 26, 2016 Exhibit A — CPUC General Order 88-B Approvals on Second Street & Rialto Avenue, CPUC Decision 13-04-015 on "G" Street 2016-137 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G.BROWN JR., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 320 W"'STREET,SUITE 500 .� LOS ANGELES.CA 90053 May 3), 2013) tvt (`t', bile Number: XREQ 201040022 Inc Rialto Avenue Mitchell A. Alderman ,1gineerin9, pity of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County Director of Transit & Rail Programs San Bernardino Associated Governments 1170 W. 3r`' Street, 2°6 Floor San Bernardino, CA 92410 Re: General Order 88-B Request for Authority to Modify the Rialto Avenue Highway- I2ail Crossing, CPUC Crossing No. 00211-0.50 and DOT No. 027206D, in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County. Dear Mr. Alderman: This refers to your letter dated April 23, 2013, received by us on April 26, 2013, requesting authorization, pursuant to California Public Utilities Commission (Commission) General Order (GO) 88-13, to modify the Rialto Avenue at•grade crossing(crossing) on the Redlands Subdivision railroad tracks owned by San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and operated by BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) in the City of San Bernardino (City), San Bernardino County, identified as CPUC Crossing Number 002U-0.50 and DOT Number 027206D. The crossing is a divided roadway with four lanes, two lanes in each direction. The railroad tracks currently cross the signalized intersection of Rialto Avenue and I Street diagonally. The crossing is equipped with four curb mounted Commission Standard 9 (flashing light signal assembly with automatic gate arm), and one curb mounted Commission Standard 8 (flashing light signal assembly) warning devices with advance warning signage and pavement markings. The crossing improvement project is part of the proposed Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Metrolink commuter extension project from the current terminus at the City's Santa Fe Depot Station to the proposed Transit Center in Downtown, SANBAG proposes the following alterations to the crossing as part of the Metrolink extension project to meet the service operator, SCRRA, standards: • Install one additional mainline track and realign the existing mainline track at 16-feet track centers; • Close the "l" Street roadway portion of this crossing, leaving only Rialto Avenue crossing for the proposed double track crossing by reconstructing "I" Street, north of the crossing, to become a T-Intersection with Rialto Avenue allowing only right-turn movements; 2016-137 Mitchell A. Alderman XRIQ 2013040022 May 3,2013 Page 2 of 3 • Reconstruct "I" Street, south of the crossing to become a cul-de-sac with pedestrian pathway and fencing to channel users to the Rialto Avenue crossing; ■ Remove the traffic signals at the intersection of Rialto Avenue and "I" Street; ■ Remove the Commission Standard 9 warning devices; Install two new Commission Standard 9-A (flashing light signal assembly with automatic gate arm and additional flashing light signals over the roadway on a cantilevered arm) warning devices in the northeast and southwest quadrants of the crossing for each Rialto Avenue approach; ■ Construct a new raised median 8-inch in height, 4-feet 3-inches in width, and approximately 101-feet in length on the eastbound approach to the crossing; • Construct a new raised median 8-inch in height, 4-feet 3-inches in width, and approximately 1574cet in length on the westbound approach to the crossing; • Install Commission Standard 9 pedestrian gate warning devices in combination with swing gates at all four pedestrian sidewalk approaches to the crossing; ■ Install pedestrian channelization in the form of hand railing, and mesh fabric chain link fencing along right-of-way to prevent trespassing, as shown in plans; ■ Install Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant detectable warning tactile strips for all pedestrian sidewalk approaches to the crossing; ■ Construct ADA compliant sidewalks on north and south approaches of the crossing; • Construct curb ramps, curb, gutter and ADA compliant sidewalk landing on the "I" Street/Rialto Avenue intersection and "I" Street cul-de-sac south of the crossing, as shown Oil plans; ■ Install pedestrian pathway through crossing on both sides; Install illumination at the crossing; ■ Install concrete crossing panel surface for both tracks; and ■ Apply California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTC )) compliant signage and pavement markings, including W10-1 and W48 advance warning signs, and 1210-6 `STOP MERE ON RED', R6-1R `ONE WAY', and R-28A (CA) `NO PARKING ANYTIME' regulatory signage as shown in plans. The proposed new crossing identification number will be CPUC Crossing Number 101 SG-57.12 and DOT Number 027206D. The Commission's Rail Crossings Engineering Section (RCI�S) investigated the request by SANBAG and finds it adequately addresses compliance and safety. As SANBAG, City, SCRRA, and BNSF are in agreement as to the design and apportionments of the cost under the provisions of GO 88-13, the improvements as described in your request letter dated April 23, 2013 and summarized above are authorized. "temporary traffic controls shall be provided in compliance with the CA murCD, published by the California Department of Transportation. All parties shall comply with all applicable rules; including Commission General Orders and CA MUTCD. 2016-137 Mitchell A.Alderman XREQ 2013040022 May 3,2013 Page 3 of 3 This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. [California Public Resources Code 21084] This authorization shall expire if the above conditions are not complied with and the work is not completed within three years of the date of this letter. Upon written request to RCES, the time to complete the project may be extended. Any written request for a time extension must include concurrence letters by involved parties in support of the time extension. If an extension is requested, ROES may reevaluate the crossing prior to granting an extension. Within 30 days after completion of this project, SANBAG shall notify RCES that the authorized work is completed, by submitting a completed Commission Standard Form G title Report of Changes u1 Highway Grade Cr-oa'sinols and Separation. Form G requirements and forms can be obtained at the CPUC web site Dorm G page at lltti)://ivw\v.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/safety,/Ra.ii/Crossin.Lis/fornlg. This report may be submitted electronically to rces<c )uc ca.g)ov as outlined on the web page. At the conclusion of the project, BNSF should submit an updated I'RA inventory form to the Federal Railroad Administration, reflecting the changes. Commission requests a concurrent copy of the updated inventory form be submitted to rces!ri.cpuc.ca.gov. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Lay at 213-576-1399 or bllr .tc.ca.gov. Sincerely, Anton Gara etian, P.E. Program and Project Supervisor Rail Crossings Engineering Section Safety and Enforcement Division C: Melvin 'rhomas, Public Project Manager, BNSF Naresh Patel, Public Projects Engineer, SCRRA Robert G. Eisenbeisz, City Engineer, City of San Bernardino Gerard Reminiskey, Senior Project Engineer, HDR 2016-137 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G.BROWN JR., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION E 'I)! 320 W.4T STREET,SUITE 500 LOS ANGELES.CA 90013 December 18, 2012 Y File Number: G.12-12-001 Second Street City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County Mitchell A. Alderman Director of Transit and Rail Programs San Bernardino Associated Governments 1170 W. 3`d Street,2sld Floor San Bernardino, CA 92410-1715 Re: General Order 88-B Request for Authority to Modify the Second Street Highway- Rail Crossing, CPUC Crossing No. 002U-0.27 and DOT No. 027204P, in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County. Dear Mr. Alderman: This refers to your letter, dated November 29, 2012, received by us on December 3, 2012, requesting authorization, pursuant to California Public Utilities Commission (Commission) General Order (GO) 88-B, to modify the existing Second Street at-grade crossing (crossing) on the Redlands Branch Subdivision railroad tracks owned by San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and operated by BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) in the City of San Bernardino (City), San Bernardino County, identified as CPUC Crossing Number 002U-0.27 and DOT Number 027204P. The Second Street single track at-grade crossing is currently a divided roadway with four lanes,two lanes in each direction. The crossing is equipped with two curb and two median mounted Commission Standard 9 (flashing light signal assembly with automatic gate arm) warning devices. The crossing improvement project is part of the proposed Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Metrolink commuter extension project from the current terminus at the Santa Fe Depot Station in the City of San Bernardino to the proposed Transit Center in Downtown, City of San Bernardino. SANBAG proposes the following alterations to the crossing as part of the Metrolink extension C> project to meet the service operator, SCRRA, standards: • Install one additional mainline track and realign the existing mainline track at 16-feet track centers; • Relocate the existing four Commission Standard 9 warning devices; • Construct a new raised median 8-inch in height, 9-feet in width, and approximately 100-feet in length on the eastbound approach to the crossing; 2016-137 Mitchell Alderman G.12-12-001 December 18,2012 Page 2 of 3 • Construct a new.raised median 8-inch in height, 9-feet in width, and approximately 100-feet in length on the westbound approach to the crossing; • Install Commission Standard 9 pedestrian gate warning devices in combination with swing gates at all four pedestrian sidewalk approaches to the crossing; • Install pedestrian channelization in the form of hand railing, and mesh fabric chain link fencing along right-of-way to prevent trespassing, as shown in plans; • Install Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant detectable warning tactile strips for all pedestrian sidewalk approaches to the crossing; • Construct ADA compliant sidewalks on north and south approaches of the crossing; • Install pedestrian pathway through crossing on both sides; • Relocate the existing power pole with street lighting on the southeast quadrant of crossing; • Install concrete crossing panel surface for both tracks; and • Apply California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) compliant signage and pavement markings, including W 10-1 and W48 advance warning signs, and R3- 2 `NO LEFT TURN,' and R-28 `NO STOP ANY TIME' regulatory signage as shown in plans. The proposed new crossing identification number will be CPUC Crossing Number 101SG-56.98 and DOT Number 027204P. The Commission's Rail Crossings Engineering Section (RCES) investigated the request by SANBAG, and finds it adequately addresses compliance and safety. As SANBAG, City, SCRRA, and BNSF are in agreement as to the design and apportionments of the cost under the provisions of GO 88-B, the improvements as described in your request letter dated November 29, 2012 and summarized above are authorized. Temporary traffic controls shall be provided in compliance with the CA MUTCD, published by the California Department of Transportation. All parties shall comply with all applicable rules, including Commission General Orders and CA MUTCD. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. [California Public Resources Code 21084] This authorization shall expire if the above conditions are not complied with and the work is not completed within three years of the date of this letter. Upon written request to RCES, the time to complete the project may be extended. Any written request for a time extension must include concurrence letters by involved parties in support of the time extension. If an extension is requested, RCES may reevaluate the crossing prior to granting an extension. Within 30 days after completion of this project, SANBAG shall notify RCES that the authorized work is completed, by submitting a completed Commission Standard Form G title Report of Changes at Highway Grade Crossings and Separation. Form G requirements and forms can be obtained at the CPUC web site Form G page at 2016-137 Mitchell Alderman G.12-12-001 December 1 S,2012 Page 3 of 3 .c}ac� uca.��o�-/P_t'C/St /Rail/C:rossinas/form<�. This report may be submitted electronically to rccs(i%c uc.ca.<Yov as outlined on the web page. At the conclusion of the project, SANBAG (or BNSF, as appropriate) should also submit an updated Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) inventory form to the FRA, reflecting the changes. CPUC requests a concurrent copy of the updated inventory form be submitted to rces(i)cpuc.ca..gov. If you have any questions,please contact Bill Lay at 213-576-1399 or bl1 c,'cpuc.ca.<<ov. Sincerely, Anton 'ar' a t' G be ian, P.E. Program and Project Supervisor Rail Crossings Engineering Section Consumer Protection and Safety Division C: Melvin Thomas, Public Project Manager, BNSF Robert Eisenbeisz, City Engineer, City of San Bernardino Naresh Patel,Assistant Director of Standards and Design, SCRRA Gerard Reminiskey, Senior.Project Manager, HDR Engineering Inc. 2016-137 ATTACHMENT"B" City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone March 11,2016 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Distribution is indicated in Section 5 herein Date: March 11, 2016 Subject: City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone NOTICE OF INTENT TO CREATE NEW QUIET ZONE Notice is hereby provided that the City of San Bernardino, California, (City) intends to create a New 24-hour Quiet Zone in accordance with the regulatory provisions contained in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 222 and 229 Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings; Final Rule (Final Rule). The routine sounding of train horns at crossings would be restricted within the quiet zone unless an imminent danger is perceived by the train engineer. A party receiving this Notice of Intent (NOI) may submit information or comments regarding the proposed quiet zone to the City during the 60 days following the issuance of this letter. However, this comment period will terminate if all of the parties either submit comments or signed statements that they do not have any comments. SECTION 1-AFFECTED HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSINGS There are four (4) existing public highway-rail at-grade crossings located within the proposed quiet zone as shown in Table 1 below. All affected streets are under the jurisdiction of the City of San Bernardino. There are no existing private highway-rail at- grade crossings or pedestrian-exclusive rail at-grade crossings located within the proposed quiet zone. Table 1: Crossings within the Proposed Quiet Zone 027201U 002U-0.10 3r Street . -- — -- — — — _....__..._-._....._....__....._.._..--................._....-_. 027204P 10ISG-56.98 2°�Street — — _- — — — — — _...---........._....._...._._._........---.._.._........._......---..._........_._.._......__...._...._....._......._..........__.........._._--...._...._..........._..................__...._....... 027206D 101SG-57.13 Rialto Avenue — — — — --— —-- .._ ..............._..---................_....._...._.....-_._......_.._...... _..--_......_.._._..._..__......._.._............_...._.._......_........._...._.._....._........_.................._......... ..... 0272085 101 SG-57.42 G Street 2016-137 City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone March 11,2016 The following railroads operate, or will operate, over some or all of the crossings within the proposed quiet zone: • Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) • BNSF Railway (BNSF) SECTION 2-TIME RESTRICTION The routine sounding of horns will be restricted twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week unless an imminent danger is perceived by the train engineer. SECTION 3-PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The quiet zone is proposed to be established based upon the implementation of Supplemental Safety Measures (SSMs) under 49 CFR §222.39(a)(3) at these four (4) crossings. The SSM being implemented at the 3rd Street highway-rail at-grade crossing is a permanent crossing closure, effectively eliminating vehicular and pedestrian traffic through this crossing. The Rialto Avenue crossing will have approximately 101-foot median constructed on the eastbound approaches and approximately 157-foot median on the westbound approaches. The 2nd Street and G Street crossings will have approximately 100-foot medians constructed on both side of the approaches along with the installation of pedestrian channelizing gates. The improvements are described and shown in detail on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) General Order 88B Approval documents and CPUC Decision 13- 04-015 document(attached herein as Exhibit A) and the proposed crossing improvements (attached as Exhibit B). SECTION 4-POINT OF CONTACT The point of contact for the City of San Bernardino is: Emilio Murga, PE Interim Public Works Director City of San Bernardino 300 North D Street, 3rd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92418-0001 Bus: (909) 384-3423 2016-137 City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone March 11,2016 SECTION 5—DISTRIBUTION This notice has been sent to the following individuals: Mr. Sergio Licon Mr.Michael Robertson Utilities Engineer Manager,Rail and Crossing Branch Rail Crossing Engineering Section Rail Crossing Engineering Section California Public Utilities Commission California Public Utilities Commission 320 West Fourth Street, Suite 500 320 West Fourth Street,Suite 500 Los Angeles,CA 90013 Los Angeles,CA 90013 Mr.Charles Hagood Ms.LeeAnn Dickson Regional Manager, Grade Crossing Safety& Regional Assistant Manager,Grade Crossing Trespass Safety&Trespass Federal Railroad Administration Federal Railroad Administration P.O.Box 453 P.O.Box 1292 Oakhurst,CA 93944 Roseville,CA 95678 Mr.Naresh Patel Mr.Jason Sanchez Assistant Director,Design&Standards Manager,Public Projects SCRRA BNSF Railway 279 E.Arrow Hwy,Suite A 740 East Carnegie Drive San Dimas,CA 91773 San Bernardino,CA 92408-3571 Ms.Patricia Watkins Mr.John Shurson Director,Engineering and Construction Assistant Director,Public Projects SCRRA BNSF Railway 279 E. Arrow Hwy, Suite A 740 Est Carnegie Drive San Dimas,CA 91773 San Bernardino,CA 92408-3571 Mr. Ronald Ries Mr.Justin Fornelli Staff Director,Crossing Safety&Trespass Chief of Transit and Rail Programs Prevention San Bernardino Associated Governments Federal Railroad Administration 1170 W. 3'd Street,2"d Floor RRS-23 Mail Stop 25 San Bernardino,CA 92410 1200 New Jersey Avenue Washington,DC 20590 2016-137 City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone October 30,2015 Page 4 of 8 Exhibit A — CPUC General Order 88B Approval for Second Street & Rialto Avenue, CPUC Decision on Application 13-04- 015 on "G" Street Exhibit B — Proposed Crossing Improvements Exhibit C — Quiet Zone Risk Index Existing Condition Without SSM Exhibit D — Preliminary Quiet Zone Risk Index Calculations 2016-137 City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone October 30,2015 Page 5 of 8 Exhibit A — CPUC General Order 88-B Approvals on Second Street & Rialto Avenue, CPUC Decision 13-04-015 on "G" Street 2016-137 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G.BROWN JR., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION _ 320 W 4*'STREET,SUITE 500 LOS ANGELES.CA 90053 May 3,2013 ! ' file Number: XREQ 2013040022 Rialto Avenue nginsBrtriS lnl_"ity of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County Mitchell A. Alderman Director of Transit& Rail Programs San Bernardino Associated Governments 1170 W. P Street,2nd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92410 Re: General Order 88-B Request for Authority to Modify the Rialto Avenue Highway- Rail Crossing, CPUC Crossing No. 002U-0.50 and DOT No. 027206D, in the City of San Bernardino,San Bernardino County. Dear Mr. Alderman: This refers to your letter dated April 23, 2013, received by us on April 26, 2013, requesting authorization, pursuant to California Public Utilities Commission (Commission) General Carder (GO) 88-B, to modify the Rialto Avenue at-grade crossing(crossing) on the Redlands Subdivision railroad tracks owned by San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and operated by BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) in the City of San Bernardino (City), San Bernardino County, identified as CPUC Crossing Number 002U-0.50 and DOT Number 027206D. The crossing is a divided roadway with four lanes, two lanes in each direction. The railroad tracks currently cross the signalized intersection of Rialto Avenue and I Street diagonally. The crossing is equipped with. four curb mounted Commission Standard 9 (flashing light signal assembly with automatic gate arm), and one curb mounted Commission Standard 8 (flashing light signal assembly) warning devices with advance warning signage and pavement markings. The crossing improvement project is part of the proposed Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Metrolink commuter extension project from the current terminus at the City's Santa Fe Depot Station to the proposed Transit Center in Downtown. SANBAG proposes the following alterations to the crossing as part of the Metrolink extension project to meet the service operator, SCRRA, standards: • Install one additional mainline track and realign the existing mainline track at 16-feet track centers: • Close the "I" Street roadway portion of this crossing, leaving only Rialto Avenue crossing for the proposed double track crossing by reconstructing "I" Street; north of the crossing, to become a T-Intersection with Rialto .Avenue allowing only right-turn movements, 2016-137 Mitchell A.Alderman xRE.,Q 2013040022 May 3,2013 Page 2 of 3 ■ Reconstruct "I" Street, south of the crossing to become a cul-de-sac with pedestrian pathway and fencing to channel users to the Rialto Avenue crossing; ■ Remove the traffic signals at the intersection of Rialto Avenue and"I" Street; ■ Remove the Commission Standard 9 warning devices; ■ Install two new Commission Standard 9-A (flashing light signal assembly with automatic gate arm and additional flashing light signals over the roadway on a cantilevered arm) warning devices in the northeast and southwest quadrants of the crossing for each Rialto Avenue approach; ■ Construct a new raised median 8-inch in height, 4-feet 3-inches in width, and approximately 101-feet in length on the eastbound approach to the crossing; ■ Construct a new raised median 8-inch in height, 4-feet 3-inches in width, and approximately 157-feet in length on the westbound approach to the crossing, ■ Install Commission Standard 9 pedestrian gate warning devices in combination with swing gates at all four pedestrian sidewalk approaches to the crossing; ■ Install pedestrian channelization in the form of hand railing, and mesh fabric chain link f-encing along right-of-way to prevent trespassing, as shown in plans; ■ InstalI Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant detectable warning tactile strips for all pedestrian sidewalk approaches to the crossing; ■ Construct ADA compliant sidewalks on north and south approaches of the crossing; ■ Construct curb ramps, curb, gutter and ADA compliant sidewalk landing on the "I" Street/Rialto Avenue intersection and "I" Street cul-de-sac south of the crossing, as shown on plans; ■ Install pedestrian pathway through crossing on both sides; ■ Install illumination at the crossing; ■ Install concrete crossing panel surface for both tracks; and ■ Apply California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) compliant signage and pavement markings, including W10-1 and W48 advance warning signs, and R10-6 `STOP HERE ON RED'; R6-1R `ONE WAY', and R-28A (CA) `NO PARKING ANY TIME' regulatory signage as shown in plans. The proposed new crossing identification number- will be CPUC Crossing Number 101 SG-57.12 and DOT Number 027206D. The Commission's Rail Crossings Engineering Section (RCES) investigated the request by SANBAG and finds it adequately addresses compliance and safety. As SANBAG, City, SCRRA, and BNSF are in agreement as to the design and apportionments of the cost under the provisions of GO 88-8, the improvements as described in your request letter dated April 23, 2013 and summarized above are authorized. Temporary traffic controls shall be provided in compliance with the CA MUTCD, published by the California Department of Transportation. All parties shall comply with all applicable rules, including Commission General Orders and CA MUTCD. 2016-137 Mitchell A.Alderman XREQ 2013040022 May 3;2013 Page 3 of 3 This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. [California Public Resources Code 210 84] This authorization shall expire if the above conditions are not complied with and the work is not completed within three years of the date of this letter. Upon written request to RCES, the time to complete the project may be extended. Any written request for a time extension must include concurrence letters by involved parties in support of the time extension. If an extension is requested, RCES may reevaluate the crossing prior to granting an extension. Within 30 days after completion of this project, SANBAG shall notify RCES that the authorized work is completed, by submitting a completed Commission Standard Dorm G title Report of Changes at Highway Grade Crossings and Separation. Form G requirements and fors can be obtained at the CPUC web site Form G page at littr)://,A;-vv\v.cl?uc.ea.gov/PUC/sai'ety/Rail/Ci-ossinp s/formlY. This report may be submitted electronically to rces�O'�cpuc.ca.t7ov as outlined on the web page. At the conclusion of the project, BNSF should submit an updated FRA inventory form to the Federal Railroad Administration, reflecting the changes. Commission requests a concurrent copy of the updated inventory form be submitted to rces kl2tic.ca.gov. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Lay at 213-576.1399 or bllgcRuc.ca.gov. Sincerely, Anton Gara etian, P.F. Program and Project Supervisor Rail Crossings Engineering Section Safety and Enforcement Division C; Melvin'Thomas, Public Project Manager; BNSF Naresh Patel, Public Projects Engineer, SCRRA Robert G. Eisenbeisz, City Engineer, City of San Bernardino Gerard Reminiskey, Senior Project Engineer, HDR 2016-137 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G.BROWN JR., Govemor g PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 320 W.e STREET,SUITE WO LOS ANGELES.CA 90013 f! i-i 1-1 Cl December 18,2012 File Number: G.12-12-001 Second Street City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County Mitchell A. Alderman Director of Transit and Rail Programs San Bernardino Associated Governments 1170 W. 3rd Street,2 nd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92410-1715 Re: General Order 88-D Request for Authority to Modify the Second Street Highway- Rail Crossing, CPUC Crossing No. 002U-0.27 and DOT No. 027204P, in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County. Dear Mr. Alderman: This refers to your letter, dated November 29, 2012, received by us on December 3, 2012, requesting authorization,pursuant to California Public Utilities Commission(Commission) General Order (GO) 88-B, to modify the existing Second Street at-grade crossing(crossing)on the Redlands Branch Subdivision railroad tracks owned by San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and operated by BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) in the City of San Bernardino (City), San Bernardino County, identified as CPUC Crossing Number 002U-0.27 and DOT Number 027204P. The Second Street single track at-grade crossing is currently a divided roadway with four lanes,two lanes in each direction. The crossing is equipped with two curb and two median mounted Commission Standard 9 (flashing light signal assembly with automatic gate arm) warning devices. The crossing improvement project is part of the proposed Southem California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Metrolink commuter extension project from the current terminus at the Santa Fe Depot Station in the City of San Bernardino to the proposed Transit Center in Downtown, City of San Bernardino. SANBAG proposes the following alterations to the crossing as part of the Metrolink extension project to meet the service operator, SCRRA, standards: ■ Install one additional mainline track and realign the existing mainline track at 16-feet track centers; • Relocate the existing four Commission Standard 9 warning devices; ■ Construct a new raised median 8-inch in height, 9-feet in width,and approximately 100-feet in length on the eastbound approach to the crossing; 2016-137 Mitchell AIderman G.12-12-001 December 18,2012 Page 2 of 3 • Construct a new.raised median 8-inch in height, 9-feet in width, and approximately 100-feet in length on the westbound approach to the crossing; • Install Commission Standard 9 pedestrian gate warning devices in combination with swing gates at all four pedestrian sidewalk approaches to the crossing; • Install pedestrian channelization in the form of hand railing, and mesh fabric chain link fencing along right-of-way to prevent trespassing,as shown in plans; • Install Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant detectable warning tactile strips for all pedestrian sidewalk approaches to the crossing; • Construct ADA compliant sidewalks on north and south approaches of the crossing; • Install pedestrian pathway through crossing on both sides; • Relocate the existing power pole with street lighting on the southeast quadrant of crossing; • Install concrete crossing panel surface for both tracks; and • Apply California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) compliant signage and pavement markings, including W10-1 and W48 advance warning signs, and R3- 2 `NO LEFT TURN,' and R-28 `NO STOP ANY TIME' regulatory signage as shown in plans. The proposed new crossing identification number will be CPUC Crossing Number 101 SG-56.98 and DOT Number 027204P. The Commission's Rail Crossings Engineering Section (RCES) investigated the request by SANBAG, and finds it adequately addresses compliance and safety. As SANBAG, City, SCRRA, and BNSF are in agreement as to the design and apportionments of the cost under the provisions of GO 88-B, the improvements as described in your request letter dated November 29, 2012 and summarized above are authorized. Temporary traffic controls shall be provided in compliance with the CA MUTCD,published by the California Department of Transportation. All parties shall comply with all applicable rules, including Commission General Orders and CA MUTCD. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. [California Public Resources Code 21084] This authorization shall expire if the above conditions are not complied with and the work is not completed within three years of the date of this letter. Upon written request to RCES, the time to complete the project may be extended. Any written request for a time extension must include concurrence letters by involved parties in support of the time extension. If an extension is requested, RCES may reevaluate the crossing prior to granting an extension. Within 30 days after completion of this project, SANBAG shall notify RCES that the authorized work is completed, by submitting a completed Commission Standard Form G title Report of Changes at Highway Grade Crossings and Separation. Form G requirements and forms can be obtained at the CPUC web site Form G page at 2016-137 Mitchell Alderman G.12-12-001 December 18,2012 Page 3 of 3 littp://xvww.cl)uc.ca.�rov/PtjC/safety/Rail/Crossings/form r. This report may be submitted electronically to rces�/.iioepuc.ca.gov as outlined on the web page. At the conclusion of the project, SANBAG (or BNSF, as appropriate) should also submit an updated Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) inventory form to the FRA, reflecting the changes. CPUC requests a concurrent copy of the updated inventory form be submitted to rcesru;cpuc.ca.uov. If you have any questions,please contact Bill Lay at 213-576-1399 or b11'"icpuc.ca.gov. Sincerely, �--F-z-1 Anton Garabetian, P.E. Program and Project Supervisor Rail Crossings Engineering Section Consumer Protection and Safety Division C: Melvin Thomas,Public Project Manager, BNSF Robert Eisenbeisz, City Engineer,City of San Bernardino Naresh Patel,Assistant Director of Standards and Design, SCRRA Gerard Reminiskey, Senior-Project Manager, HDR Engineering Inc. 2016-137 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl Date of Issuance 9/6/2013 Decision 13-09-013 September 5, 2013 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of the San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the County Transportation Commission,for authority to construct pedestrian Application 13-04-015 crossings at two passenger rail stations and to (Filed April 22,2013) modify an existing at-grade railroad crossing at South"G" Street on the SCRRA San Gabriel Subdivision in the City of San Bernardino. DECISION GRANTING AUTHORIZATION TO THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS TO CONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN AT-GRADE CROSSINGS AT TWO PASSENGER RAIL STATIONS AND MODIFY THE EXISTING AT-GRADE RAILROAD CROSSING AT SOUTH "G" STREET IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Summary This decision grants the San Bernardino Associated Governments authorization to construct one new pedestrian grade-separated rail crossing and two new at-grade pedestrian emergency crossings at the Santa Fe Depot Station; one new at-grade pedestrian crossing at the proposed San Bernardino Transit Center in Downtown San Bernardino; and modify the existing South"G" Street at-grade crossing on the Southern California Regional Rail Authority San Gabriel Subdivision railroad tracks in the City of San Bernardino,San Bernardino County. This decision also grants its request for authority to revise the current South"G" Street CPUC Crossing number from"002U" to "101SG" prefix, to reflect the change from BNSF 76751578 - 1 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl Railway Company's Redlands Subdivision to Southern California Regional Rail Authority San Gabriel Subdivision tracks. The proposed and existing crossings are to be identified as: • New pedestrian grade-separated crossing at Santa Fe Depot Station - California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Crossing No. 101SG- 56.50-AD and United States Department of Transportation (DOT) No. 945412Y; • New at-grade pedestrian emergency crossing located west of Santa Fe Depot Station - CPUC Crossing No. 101St-56.43-D and DOT No. 945411S; • New at-grade pedestrian emergency crossing located east of Santa Fe Depot Station - CPUC Crossing No. 101SG-56.63-D and DOT No. 945412F; • New at-grade pedestrian crossing at San Bernardino Transit Center - CPUC Crossing No. 101SG-57.48-D and DOT No. 945414M; and • South "G" Street - CPUC Crossing No. 101St-57.41 and DOT No. 0272085. Discussion The San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission, as part of its Downtown San Bernardino Passenger Rail Project, is proposing to extend Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Metrolink commuter rail service from the current terminus at the Santa Fe Depot Station to the proposed San Bernardino Transit Center in downtown, both in the City of San Bernardino. Metrolink will implement the extension of commuter service along an existing rail corridor - 2 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl acquired by SANBAG specifically to initiate passenger service. The line currently hosts freight service by BNSF Railway Company (BNSF). As part of the rail extension, SANBAG requests authority to construct one new pedestrian grade-separated crossing and two new at-grade pedestrian emergency crossings at the Santa Fe Depot Station; one new at-grade pedestrian crossing at the proposed San Bernardino Transit Center; modify South"G" Street to include two additional tracks; and revise the current South"G" Street crossing CPUC Crossing number prefix from"002U" to "101SG" to reflect the change from BNSF's Redlands Subdivision to SCRRA's San Gabriel Subdivision tracks. The first mile of BNSF Redlands Branch will become an extension of SCRRA's San Gabriel Subdivision railroad tracks. The new rail extension will host passenger service, to be operated by SCRRA,the operators of the Metrolink commuter rail system in Southern California. SCRRA will operate approximately 38 passenger trains per day at a maximum speed of 79 MPH and BNSF will continue to operate 12 freight trains per day at approximately 55 MPH on this track. The CPUC Safety and Enforcement Division-Rail Crossings Engineering Section (RCES) staff participated in field diagnostic review meetings with SANBAG and Metrolink personnel. SANBAG proposes to extend the tracks of the SCRRA San Gabriel Subdivision by constructing two new main tracks and two new platforms at the Santa Fe Depot Station: Platform A and Platform B. The two new platforms will be linked by a new pedestrian overhead bridge. The new overhead bridge will provide pedestrians safe access to the Metrolink and Amtrak platforms. Access to the pedestrian overhead bridge will be provided by an elevator and stairwell. - 3 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl The pedestrian overhead bridge design and construction will conform to all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The vertical and horizontal clearances between the railroad track and the pedestrian bridge structure comply with the requirements specified in CPUC General Order 26-D, Regulations Governing Clearances on Railroads and Street Railroads, and the SANBAG Design Criteria Manual. The proposed Santa Fe Depot pedestrian overhead bridge will eliminate five existing at-grade pedestrian crossings within the Santa Fe Depot Station area,between mileposts 56.50 and 56.63. Under current passenger boarding conditions, Amtrak patrons gain access to the existing top-of-tie level asphalt platform, adjacent to BNSF Main Track 3, through the use of portable step stools and a portable wheel chair lift. The new Santa Fe Depot Station design will improve the Amtrak passenger access by providing elevated platforms. Amtrak passengers will gain access to Platform"A" by use of the new pedestrian overhead bridge. Metrolink passengers at the Santa Fe Depot will board trains from either Platform"A" or "B"; however, the primary boarding platform for Metrolink trains would be Platform"B," which will be directly adjacent to the Santa Fe Depot. The two Santa Fe Depot Station's pedestrian emergency-use at-grade crossings will include locked 4.5 feet high sliding gates provided in line with the inter-track fence. The emergency crossing will consist of: • Installing locked double swing gates at both ends of Platform"A" crossings entrances; • Installing ADA walkway approaches to crossing; - 4 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl • Installing ADA compliant detectable warning tactile strips at all pedestrian sidewalk approaches to the crossing; • Installing precast concrete panel crossing surface; • Installing cast-in-place concrete pedestrian pathway connecting the crossing panels to the Platforms A and B; • Installing a locked double swing gate with signage at the south end of for the west crossing leading away from the station; and • Installing a locked gate with signage at the south end of the east crossing near the station parking lot. The Santa Fe Depot Stations emergency crossings pedestrians' movement is governed by SCRRA's standard operating procedure, which includes General Code of Operating Rules (GCOR) Sections 6.32.2 and 6.32.9. GCOR requires operators to operate trains at restricted speed when notified that emergency crossings are in use. Train speed will be restricted to allow trains to stop within half the range of vision short of the emergency crossing location. The GCOR states that movement at restricted speed must not exceed 20 MPH,which will be the maximum authorized rail track speed within the Santa Fe Depot Station area. SANBAG will construct a second station at the San Bernardino Transit Center located west of South "E" Street and South of West Rialto Avenue. SANBAG proposes to construct a new at-grade pedestrian crossing at the west end of San Bernardino Transit Center Station that will cross four tracks. The station will serve as the terminus to the rail extension service. The crossing construction will consist of: • Installing precast concrete panel crossing surface; • Installing cast-in-place concrete pedestrian pathway connecting the crossing panels to the platforms; - 5 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl • Installing one CPUC Standard 9 warning device at each platform entrance to the crossing; • Installing one push-to-open swing gate adjoining the location of each Commission Standard 9 gate arm, to create a point of emergency egress when the gates are in the down position; • Installing pedestrian channelization in the form of edge fencing along the pedestrian crossing approaches as shown in plans; • Installing inter-track fence of welded-wire construction on either side of the crossing to preclude pedestrian circumvention of warning devices; • Installing ADA compliant detectable warning tactile strips at all pedestrian pathway approaches to the crossing; • Constructing ADA compliant sidewalks on both sides of the crossing; and • Applying California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) compliant signage including R15-8 "LOOK," "PULL GATE TO OPEN," "EXIT ONLY," and "PUSH GATE TO OPEN" signs as shown in plans. South"G" Street crosses over a single track and is equipped with two curb-mounted CPUC Standard 9-A (flashing light signal assembly with automatic gate arm and additional flashing light signals over the roadway on a cantilevered arm) warning devices, pavement markings and advanced warning signage. Proposed alterations to the crossing will consist of: • Installing one additional main line track; • Installing one additional yard lead track; • Realigning the existing main line track; - 6 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl • Installing one new Commission Standard 9-A warning device for each crossing approach; • Installing four Commission Standard 9 (flashing light signal assembly with automatic gate arm) pedestrian gate warning devices in combination with swing gates at all pedestrian sidewalk approaches to the crossing; • Installing pedestrian channelization in the form of hand railing along the pedestrian crossing approaches and fencing along the right-of-way to prevent trespassing, as shown in plans; • Installing ADA compliant detectable warning tactile strips at all pedestrian sidewalk approaches to the crossing; • Constructing ADA compliant sidewalks on both sides of the crossing; • Installing concrete crossing panel surface for all tracks; • Installing concrete raised medians for both approaches; and; • Applying CA MUTCD compliant signage including W10-1,W48, R15-8 `LOOK; R28 (CA) "NO PARKING ANYTIME,- and "RXR" pavement markings as shown in plans. Environmental Review and CEQA Compliance The California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), as amended, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) applies to discretionary projects to be carried out or approved by public agencies. A basic purpose of CEQA is to inform governmental decision-makers and the public about potential, significant environmental effects of the proposed activities. Since the project is subject to CEQA and the Commission must issue a discretionary decision in order for the project to proceed (i.e., the Commission has the exclusive authority to approve - 7 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl the project pursuant to Section 1202 of the Public Utilities Code), the Commission must consider the environmental consequences of the project by acting as either a lead or responsible agency under CEQA. The lead agency is either the public agency that carries out the project,' or the one with the greatest responsibility for supervising or approving the project as a whole.2 SANBAG is the lead agency for the Downtown San Bernardino Passenger Rail Project and proposes to construct one new pedestrian grade- separated rail crossing, two new at-grade pedestrian emergency crossings, one new at-grade pedestrian crossing, and modify the South"G" Street at-grade crossing. The Commission is a responsible agency under CEQA because it will be issuing a permit for a portion of the project. As a responsible agency under CEQA, the Commission must consider the lead agency's environmental documents and findings before acting on or approving this project.3 As a responsible agency,the Commission must make findings regarding each significant effect of the project components under its jurisdiction; such findings shall include relevant mitigation measures.4 Pursuant to CEQA, SANBAG prepared an environmental document titled Downtown San Bernardino Passenger Rail Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which identifies environmental impacts and associated mitigation measures related to the Downtown San Bernardino Passenger Rail Project. Per CEQA, a 1 CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations),Section 15051(a). 2 CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations),Section 15051(b). 3 CEQA Guidelines,Sections 15050(b) and 15096. 4 CEQA Guideline Section 15096(g). - 8 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl Revised Environmental Assessment, dated August 2012, was also completed to determine if an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was necessary. It was prepared in accordance with requirements of the Federal Transit Administration and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)5. In addition, under CEQA SANBAG filed a Notice of Determination (NOD) on April 22, 2013. The NOD states that 1) the project will have a significant effect on the environment; 2) an EIR was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA; 3) Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project;4) a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) was adopted for this project; 5) a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project; and 6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. In the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), findings indicate the parts of the proposed project that are under the Commissions jurisdiction there is the potential impacts of permanent increases in ambient noise levels in the project area. However, the effects would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with the implementation of the identified mitigation measures. Specifically SANBAG adopted a MMRP, as a condition for the project,which requires the establishment of a "quiet zone," via supplemental safety measures, for the at-grade crossings at 2nd Street, Rialto Avenue/I Street, and G Street. The CPUC reviewed and considered the FEIR, NOD and MMRP and finds the documents adequate for our decision-making purposes. 5 42 USC 4332 (2)(c) of 1969 as amended. Projects undertaken in California that utilize federal funds,require discretionary federal approval, or are undertaken by federal agencies are subject to both NEPA and CEQA. - 9 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl Filing Requirements and Staff Recommendation The application is in compliance with the CPUC's filing requirements, including Rule 3.7 of Rules of Practice and Procedure,which relates to the construction of a public highway across a railroad. The CPUC's Safety and Enforcement Division- Rail Crossings Engineering Section has inspected the site of the proposed crossings,reviewed and analyzed the plans submitted with the application, and recommends that the requested authority to construct and modify the subject crossings be granted for a period of three years. Categorization and Need for Hearings In Resolution ALJ 176-3314, dated May 9,2013, and published in the Commission Daily Calendar on May 10,2013, the Commission preliminarily categorized this application as ratesetting, and preliminarily determined that hearings were not necessary. No protests have been received. Given these developments, it is not necessary to disturb the preliminary determinations. Waiver of Comment Period This is an uncontested matter in which the decision grants the relief requested. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 311(g)(2) of the Public Utilities Code and Rule 14.6(c)(2) of the CPUC's Rules of Practice and Procedure, the otherwise applicable 30-day period for public review and comment is waived. Assignment of Proceeding Emory J. Hagan,III is the assigned Examiner in this proceeding. Findings of Fact 1. Notice of the application was published in the Commissions Daily Calendar on April 24, 2013. There are no unresolved matters or protests. A public hearing is not necessary. - 10 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl 2. SANBAG requests authority,under Public Utilities Code Sections 1201- 1205, to construct one pedestrian grade-separated crossing and two pedestrian at-grade emergency crossings at the Santa Fe Depot Station; one pedestrian at- grade crossing at the proposed San Bernardino Transit Center; modify the existing at-grade crossing of South"G" Street; and to revise the current CPUC number from"002U" to "101SG" prefix to reflect the change from BNSF's Redlands Subdivision to Metrolink's San Gabriel Subdivision tracks, in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County. 3. Metrolink will operate approximately 38 passenger trains per day at a maximum speed of 79 MPH and BNSF will operate 12 freight trains per day at approximately 55 MPH over the newly designated San Gabriel Subdivision railroad tracks. 4. SANBAG is the lead agency for this project under CEQA, as amended. 5. SANBAG prepared an EA/DEIR for this project and approved a NOD for the Project on September 5, 2012. 6. The CPUC is a responsible agency for this project and has reviewed and considered the lead agency's FEIR, including NOD and the MMRP. 7. Pursuant to the FEIR, the parts of the proposed project that are under the Commissions jurisdiction may create permanent increases in ambient noise levels in the project area. However, the effects would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with the establishment of a "quiet zone," via supplemental safety measures, for the at-grade crossings at 2nd Street, Rialto Avenue/I Street, and G Street. 8. With the required mitigation measures the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. - 11 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl Conclusions of Law 1. The NOD,MMRP and FEIR prepared by the SANBAG are adequate for our decision-making purposes. 2. The NOD and MMRP were completed in compliance with CEQA. 3. The application is uncontested and a public hearing is not necessary. 4. The application should be granted as set forth in the following order. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The San Bernardino Associated Governments is authorized to construct one new pedestrian grade-separated rail crossing and two new at- grade pedestrian emergency crossings at the Santa Fe Depot Station; one at- grade pedestrian crossing at the proposed San Bernardino Transit Center; and modify the at-grade crossing of South"G" Street and revise the current California Public Utilities Commission crossing number from"002U" to "101St" prefix to reflect the change from BNSF Railway Company's Redlands Subdivision to Southern California Regional Rail Authority's San tabriel Subdivision tracks uM the City of San Bernardi�.o, San Bernardino County. 2. The proposed crossings shall be identified as: • New pedestrian grade-separated rail crossing at Santa Fe Depot Station-California Public Utilities Commission Crossing No. 101SG-56.50-AD and United States Department of Transportation No. 945412Y; • New at-grade pedestrian emergency crossing located at the west end of the Santa Fe Depot Station - California Public Utilities - 12 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl Commission Crossing No. 101SG-56.43-D and United States Department of Transportation No. 9454115; • New at-grade pedestrian emergency crossing located at the east end of the Santa Fe Depot Station-California Public Utilities Comnussion Crossing No. 101SG-56.63-D and United States Department of Transportation No. 945412F; • New at-grade pedestrian crossing at San Bernardino Transit Center -California Public Utilities Commission Crossing No. 101SG-57.48- D and United States Department of Transportation No. 945414M. • South"G" Street-California Public Utilities Commission Crossing No. 101SG--57.41 and United States Department of Transportation No. 029208S. 3. The new pedestrian at-grade crossings and modifications to the existing at- grade rail-crossing shall have the crossing treatments and configuration described above and specified in the application and attachments. 4. San Bernardino Associated Governments shall comply with all applicable rules, including California Public Utilities Commission General Orders,the United States Department of Transportation's Americans with Disabilities Act Standards for Transportation Facilities and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 5. San Bernardino Associated Governments shall notify the California Public Utilities Cormission s Safety and Enforcement Division-Rail Crossing Engineering Section at least five business days prior to opening the crossings. Notification shall be made to roes .cpuc.ca.goy. - 13 - 2016-137 A.1�15 SEQ/ /PV C/DAR/A {SAL,/Vdl 6. WAbm• 30 days after completim of the work wwder this order,San Bernardirko 'ated Cmerra Cahimm. Pmblic U-Wifies Coamissices Safety and Divmm. . -Rail CrossaW F Cam' rte at •HVhmY Qmk OMUW' sqwatipwH of aw 1 fi of the audwrized,work Form G . a forrme can be obtained at Owe CahhwrAaPW, cU '' ' s ComamAssim web site G at http•//www cpuc ca.yoy/PUC/safety/Rail/Crossin Igs formg. report This easy be subinmed ekcbuMcaHy to rcesO-)cauc.ca.gov as oudined on the web page. 7. Widtin 30 days dt& of the work under this order,San Bmw&m Associated Govetuments ' Federal Railroad Adninhostim eel'the esi+ence of the crossing by submit'submitft a U.S. ` QRO . M VE K fom FRA F618D 11.A copy AA be provided cmxurmidy to the California Public Utilities CowwussfoWs Safety and Erdorcenumt Division- Crossing Enghwering Siectiim This copy of the Rad form nay be subtritted elemw6cally to rcesQ-ct)uc.ca.goy. a. Tlis amdwnzwbi m sha expire if not exercised widim dwee yews,unless tip is extended or if the abow conditionis are not satisfied. The CAliforma Public Utilities CAnwassim awy revoke or imodify this audionzabort 9. A request f4w eat of to mAhmizatim Period Sh011 be 'subinatted to the California Pubes Utilities,C • s Shy acrd Enforcement Di - . CrasskW fingirwaring Sectim at lemst 30 days - 14 - 2016-137 A.13-04-015 SED/EJH/PWK/DAR/AGG/SAL/vdl before its expiration. A copy of the extension request shall be sent to all interested parties. 10. The application is granted as set forth above. 11. Application 13-04-015 is closed. This order becomes effective 30 days from today. Dated September 5, 2013, at San Francisco, California. MICHAEL R. PEEVEY President CATHERINE J.K. SANDOVAL MARK J. FERRON CARLA J. PETERMAN Commissioners Commissioner Michel Peter Florio,being necessarily absent, did not participate. - 15 - 2016-137 City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone October 30,2015 Page 6 of 8 Exhibit B — Proposed Crossing Improvements 2Ol6—l37 JON EXIST 53.94 F5 U53AU TC 27.25'FIT BE GN 19 4w EUG 41 2 41,25 27.25' 33 CALDW LL ALLEY ALLEY 3V. -2 IL 9-63 7 Fs- 72 N ffiso- ID-12.81 lo:cl 8;g 1D-24.83 V51.27 TR 2C ID-34.61 GB cn(D 40 1051.20 TC mo Li oco [--1 47'�T� is 9 52,92 DWY Gojoa 105D.00 TC END MG JM EMT Co CP fm cr t SEi w n n $ Kw Cal 44 a r i i L 3W y / ------ • // Ti atss stmt 3W tx i` / > w s0W wi ss"m / wi ins% •T trsc z-u rn-a itsesr'�ecse / •• • � mul / Z t a W • iM'IOE,i�-�yha .r.r ■r wsw n�w�ro i y �Ez w i 7 j N db6 r ------ -- A A � 5 � w 1 1 u-w r � r y__ i i 4 n[a'tat i •i � 4 .r SA K*KM c w u 4 Y i l r 7 _ i o � ' ua t lie ,St'[ OS'SL•6 g I 26a t-�iYaCt�Mfs-i�Mi-Ni'YRMI'1>f+�6V41i-i�«Aw9-w�1+4!-ixnwJ�l!'@VMS-OI! �`M Ifl f�[$•t 11R/C/1 a O 2016 137 °a i W z Win ww'n j owo 4 sit F" io4 f ix3 L ( i W ji ` 1 i ! 1 Mt< ° x-<� µ � 1 � 1 AMNL Irs 1 t y i 1 # i a it soEi °a a .`- cssM° e� w d s M — a svp !�Hgll o< a .$: IM-1 P; id x s $ € � °W y u W~ 3 $ IN .2_ = ; BEE io x 54r, =Y P.w �my M .°o ice$ i =`°'- `: .�y'<w�.`- •% �. Wr< x� ac wz .� < _« w � K ii6 x 1=5 zes9t�` mR w21ty O fO 6 3a�0� .Yt w g `fry.. �° < n i � w .�a� Wo _ � s .. w �-■�..°<.ai ..saww'So /T+T Q I a L ! o 2 A311Y 113AGW3 E ! $ " Z x ! wY .W— P0 1 1 • ( � � � a °dig-au�" "°s ` ,['� 1 3 jrw g:; I- WWI v I ` a - ;;92 <W a `a« - sod$ •u� $� w'�i x_ LSIT3 MIOP I i � wwrt� a .rr1 v caws n�w�co 2016-137 m a n 01 1 •• ,-,� o.1 3' t � v, 4' c's a 3 ! ',' !i W cues o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ® 0 00 oaooa oao , :, I Z 1 1 ' °I I ;m CC slx3 Nlor of yl �I LSIX3 ra 013 O +mM3 ( I 0 L f Z f •11 N L 1 ��T A _ W m t4 i-i g id l z I j — GL' et I c 1 MUCA 51X3 'xM ` BOW •U I I Z.•It` 0 1l.SZ•6f 00'SZ•11 1 1 A wzsu l � OW -IA'1 3dA1 e I 3A3 q-U (A 6 IN��'3fGtl� H I I o t!3 s 'a sY'1 0 3 CL 30 911 00-it Q m^ OA3 'L6•01 v¢� I O l6 YZ I o cJi� .La11'l 3dit I 151X3 wor °.9 xMS aN3 mon^ .i selsa m« s d 1 ]30Ui70 SI lx.SZ'fif i� folm I i I L 00'SL•a SW ON 1- ' la.s9'et 0AB 'L9•a � I �i 'el1Sa 4� .., ,a Gwa-� 1 .3 XMS a3 �� a 0 lsa - I a ,vecx.e u'K•a I 3o„s •a7S01� a ® � a • " y ll_ZI ZY- c� '00'M > p= a � 'fe'0Sa C' _ I W r I a o� vio3u 'ZSa.., sllY" z (o1T'lal e a \ 3.91. 6aN a 3 a�z 6eN ° a� a Ag l � RAN; - _ 5 , I i •' ---_ J oz't v ems n J Ol j 0 to. N I I m m .ZL•LZ I m W j 1l.OZ'BS I 'u ( - -1 LL q 011m 9B"OSot - I 9s _ � t6lsa� o 01 OL'OSa �gyp a RL am 1,.tee-s st•oz _ I Isosotn I II N I .OL3l ir 03 eye j -SIX3 NOW ' xM-M ON3 I .L' •9 F ( 18'OSaN 6 j 01 6S'OSa 6' a ai-teosa _ a.Le'cf-lL ne oz y a3 e 1 _ LL I I -'S1ZL'OSa cS Se'OSa I ° I la.Y'Of-2z".oz 1 Z TT r 33x1 31 69'0 . Me 'eZ-Oslz•0Z M, - •- aes a 3 oo.oz i o -1S..I.. Se'90•L ,2t I 33X1 15013 NMN' I 6t ° ! ° J m ti a�:; 3,W^ I La.00zz-aaoo•oz !1 1 I° ! � QmlOmm3samc,l LL � � rr �InI o�y yo ' sly 411`: / N N so o °Rl000RRl _ ' � � � ti L � I f d,ptl s9L tall-OVONOS\ZZ£GSZ00\>tla\dllymutl�> I �9F9tlI1NI5\zz£sszoo\>os.e.�,lm..tl\:> lVVIOtB-0-6LL5£t\B95L020P\>.a\6uimv.tl\:> ', owomtlE Y.Y B0+£211 Cl\1L\f0 II "Wit molm in Ali +4 a w iii FE t i u IBB 1 � us - ------------ MOM MMMM ! sr �s s a of wt g� w Y 1 11• (' TT t I `.--------- --- F� OR IlLu SS3 JN03 ism ------------- - Af Mf i no t Am no tio1:M!11 UM 34W M A 2016-137 � m s" � � 1 i El l � $ 1 13 lie" (NIVV i g L r u,Gee '•'sams�ms ; o � m a'-',: a " ------------------------ 9 s a� �irra �id g 3 000 • wrw w�ssim n�xtta 3"aff ®1WW I w � ------------i------ ---- ld6 2 052. r � t V s - a � I `Fi astir I ' 1 I ' O i o ` I ' r t — _—_- can < ^� co r IN Z � � g me o g Y I 1 I a. Z I O ® ® ® oa00® 0E9 WAY M Zi\!SW QNt\CO 2016-1 Wu uj I x q v L so wx ISO .7F i i . IT time fit FALL ffi i b. R oil! j II I I � � n►a.-�u+u-atirnx8�i � «� w crscu R�mco st of g °' tI rl z €A M sA 9. 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 OOOOOO O iE1-IHHIHIE9!2 W21 all to� NI01 NOLLJ36 ^ z �+I li' °.� Imo/ =W �a�[ ¢qM: vd QI3 '� - `�I e 6S' CL v C31 ui ~ca t�S I �' I (M/aszlnI 0 (of zi I i I vl I(M/a,szln I�— 19x3 rvor i of 1 1a. - 'L•u I 1 9B'LSa. 1 I I� I � 1 11Att I 1 ,�•.... I Lsa3 ; 8 ^ ^I s A3l74 XMS as 9f9 xa OG �- l,.Tv 1 I _ 113MaTiO or A31 V»imial (�1 1 l3 SB'65a '09'6 7 9l' LYTZ•U SCfZ•lt° YL'iZ•LLI C' •U y�y11' •U o -73 Y£'ZZ•Ill I a311lYJ SSOiq ^Ol OS'09a 13 OB'b9a 13 ZS'6Sa 1 YL'tl•u SL'il•U C •U 91 9t'09a 13 99'6Sa al 09'6Sa 71 9f'6Sa I $ o W .., •u o .099 .OS'9Z t O9". BZ :09'9 ,66 $m $ I l O O I 8 $s § x3 Alq rcl� $3 AMO 151X3 I o 7 Y6' I Di 010901 1 t Q BS'lY•01 r I h I 0 _ a*-G 938 ' a.s 1•a w Y9 9Z a L ? - 1 99'09a � a1 ST09a al YB'65a / G S (!-LA)Z I t _ 1 99 0901 S (Z-ln IfY[•Z9. o (_ I�SZ'0901 at Y86Sa _ 0 7� g3� 3.YS,ZZ.00N 63 o i e 10 iMS'0 1 80'16• 153 SZ 09a 71 YB' 01 MiIIDD Y _ _ ONIl9 ON3 43.9 ,...:- 09'06.6 9L.6 1 F 0 699L•6^ 1 - �3 3 00'09• IR fM/tl.SZ'lY) (M/a.SZ"lYl 3 S 3 96a1a3 s 00'51.61 m o W MMS,OS.9 I �MMS_ Y"! 1 1 BS'09a .3 NIOP .O9'BZ .OS"92 im JA 00 SL• °f I tl S Bz19al o9 a• 1 J 7 I gn I °o ll�S'Y La:S"Y r U j 1 00"OM6 OB 00"56.8 73 00'56.9 1 [a.ct �� a S zcl9ml N II .fkM 1 3dA1 a73 00'9B•B I i •I f I a ^ mp r � r gnv7 W190L I nU A3TN 9 x3 worr I A311V L n al'—f- 1134NV8 s3 zzsa ^ AM0 `�"� 1a.ff I I ° I 7A8 o9•a �� a aua I 11 SS. J1 0. 8n 'z3 Nor ^ I 19X3 Ma' 1 99'4 b' I N W133S 1N3n3Atld M3N 1 MMS'M 938 31 61 Z I 71 'Z9a 1SIX3 wr 1 - 1 1 - 89/9A8 00 Z.B., 00 / Lu Na1735 1N3n3AYd M3N _- v I ro4'y' I o \ N LLJ °zlo� ^I iWlpe-.9L1 W-9vBM'S�ZZSYSZOP.�w.6rin.W.:� m'oraws�zzcBC:oa.m..aw.a..h:� Iw'1a9-0•cl(stt�a9slazoo�.ene:y,l.e..e�:. owonee Nd SS919 EIOZ/lZ/9 b 2016-1'17 _ Al O Z C a :E u s° w U�� o ova o� O ® $ Roma at gem] I -----__._------—..,------- ms i � 3 AS ,4b 3 r s z s y J i � m r a W - a- ssra as iv Jm e j 63 IMOMM AIM YO M a s IM a i � I i i i i � I i � i I i t r..m wau:rn raenzn I I Y C T ia.i i i L N L z LLJ AN 3 { y I 31 WIM ° T s Jf z w � g � a S a t xsrm ' .n r13 T .>r J 1 1 i ` s v a Of �� ■.a�a»w.iftra-.uan aaznzia 2016-137 13 IS 1 A _ s s am °p� cc W N N Y Z F _t RK Ld a am <o ,. » Y< F iWA A' i DVA WA Or �# � �« .K•s� .z{ .� .zt ss'st � � a Res I 0 BB a d » r 4 esss at it s g » NOR Ego W W I � < h » 51 _ Iv jE ELI ) t » b g 133 LS r A « <o < K til-'� � I I3 uj O O O O O O 3 £7, c0- it gi� o LLj RZ fit Z, gxm < °uu . W o HE 00 0 0 0 0 o ®�®®®E VIBBBEIS a©- ° • ° M I 1 � aiy Y 3 i �. to VXa) % 1 lei. ,�.e� m »r sza yec p—" Mas - �- -- ------ claw am.= , -I _ " # ---------� " 'rye'"' W arss ac< N w j AA iitl Y 3dLL t2 dttZ St'! u v=ta u u Coma \ 0 0 0 W efZlRi rt 9[ 8 N. -_ : .M" fT r t{(( f al was ILL a B 31 st aaa W" i t AMD MG wK r a c .ssa sWfz .t a AM I i a NAM { crss aao tic.,at-e tsoa ie WK-2 sta - . o tsrta - uwm �r IK � 1 = 2016-137 § g cc =a V d d 6 u F g WWI 51 � Y � --------- ------------ i ' Ara I , I s 1 C I r i 1 I :<i f � lam S u 1 , .w., 1 46 t ► t j - W pr F 1 � I i •- I x WE 1 n 11 Lj WI i o 'k a� ��MWltllp� \ •�L� e � 2016 137 y0 @0 ® 0 (z ® M �g 3� n- �. mWooirtz ^ g om �...p s 411. T $f —'m'° a �I L N N-sal I Gs ! ; IMF W �3 s - aI as awwa m was M S p 11.St5i NiS�t 'i., t lCNOI Yt'LM- Ii SY'M4 LNf 1tSi'K'N'S1K H N'60l 51tN6 i i i Zt � A i t i a•r/a IY K VF"ZO[f-}NffiV�Lf9ZCh�h 3 LIM 0 w - Q 1 _ ________________ i t f .WS a►: a .uo W2 KEY W F ©® , I I � ,n a «will at k r 3r �t ' Hill lua mw 'M T 3 na stna+ n¢cnan t 2016-137 City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone October 30,2015 Page 7 of S Exhibit C - Quiet Zone Risk Index Existing Condition Without SSM 2016-137 FRA - Quiet Zone Calculator Page 1 of 1 Print This Page Home I Help I Contact I 10gOfffreddy.cheung@hdrinc.com Cancel Change Scenario: I CITY OF SA 46259 v Continue Crossing Street Traffic Warning Device Pre-SSM S�Risk __. .9999 999 ,_. ..._.D _ . Risk Create New Zone (027201UF3RD STREET 4826 ;Gates 0 0 ;18,057.081 MODIFY .027204Pj2ND ST 19250 Gates ? 0 ,0 :80,989.95i MODIFY Manage Existing Zones _ ., 99,9,9 989.9 :027206DiRIALTO&"I"ST =114104ates 0 0 x43,430.023 MODIFY Log Off ...,_._. 0272085'"G"ST 5010 Gates 0 -0 16,951.74{ MODIFY *Only Public At Grade Crossings are listed. Summary Step by Step Instructions: Click for SUDDIementary Safety Measures ISSM1 Proposed Quiet Zone: CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DSBPRP Click for ASM spreadsheet: ASM *Note:The use of Type: New 24-hour QZ Step 1:To specify New Warning ASMs requires an application to and approval from the FRA. Scenario: CITY OF SA_46259 Device(For Pre-Rule Quiet Zone Only) Estimated Total Cost: $0.00 and/or SSM,click the MODIFY Button Nationwide Significant Risk 14347.00 Step 2:Select proposed warning Threshold: device or SSM.Then click the UPDATE Risk Index with Horns: 23895.2 button.To generate a spreadsheet of the values on this page,click on ASM Quiet Zone Risk Index: 39857.2 button—This spreadsheet can then be used for ASM calculations. Step 3:Repeat Step(2)until the SELECT button is shown at the bottom right side of this page.Note that the SELECT button is shown ONLY when the Quiet Zone Risk Index falls below the NSRT or the Risk Index with Horn. Step 4:To save the scenario and continue,click the SELECT button http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/Quiet/myzone_2.aspx?zoneid=36789 10/2/2015 2016-137 City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone October 30,2015 Page 8 of 8 Exhibit D - Preliminary Quiet Zone Risk Index Calculations 2016-137 FRA - Quiet Zone Calculator Page 1 of 1 Print This Page Home I Help I Contact I logoff freddy.cl,eung @hdrinc.com Cancel , Change Scenario: I CITY OF SA46259 Continue Crossing Street Traffic Warning Device Pre-SSM Risk ;0272011.11111113 STREET 0ICLOSED(SSM 2) 0 ,2 0 Closed Create New Zone { _._i_ _.,,. ., .,__ u _...._. 027204P4ND ST 13111;Gates 0 ;13 18,692.3Bi MODIFY Manage Existing Zones - I i ,.. g g 027206DJRIALTO&"I"ST 12375iGates j 0 X13 .8,798.12 , MODIFY Log Off 0272085"G"ST 5010 £Gates 0 13 ;3,390.35 ! MODIFY *Only Public At Grade Crossings are listed. Summary Step by Step Instructions: Proposed Quiet Zone: CITY OF SAN ALERT:Quiet Zone qualifies because SSM has been BERNARDINO DSBPRP applied in each crossing. Type: New 24-hour QZ Step 1:To specify New Warning Click for SuDDiernentary Safety Measures fSSMI Scenario: CITY OF SA_46259 Device(For Pre-Rule Quiet Zone Only) Estimated Total Cost: $50,000.00 and/or SSM,click the MODIFY Button Click for ASM spreadsheet: ASM *Note:The use of Nationwide Significant Risk ASMs requires an application to and approval from the FRA. Threshold: 14347.00 Step 2:Select proposed warning device or SSM.Then click the PU DATE Risk Index with Horns: 23895.2 button.To generate a spreadsheet of Quiet Zone Risk Index: 7720.21 the values on this page,click on ASM button—This spreadsheet can then be used for ASM calculations. Select Step 3:Repeat Step(2)until the SELECT button is shown at the bottom right side of this page.Note that the SELECT button is shown ONLY when the Quiet Zone Risk Index falls below the NSRT or the Risk Index with Horn. Step 4:To save the scenario and continue,click the SELECT button http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/Quiet/scen.aspx?wdeode=8&ssmcode=0&crossingid=027201... 10/2/2015 2016-137 City of San Bernardino, California San Bernardino Quiet Zone May 26,2016 Exhibit E - Updated FRA Inventory Forms 2016-137 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION OMB No.2130-0017 Instructions for the initial reporting of the following types of new or previously unreported crossings:For public highway-rail grade crossings,complete the entire inventory Form.For private highway-rail grade crossings, complete the Header,Parts i and II, and the Submission Information section. For public pathway grade crossings(including pedestrian station grade crossings),complete the Header,Parts I and II,and the Submission Information section.For Private pathway grade crossings,complete the Header, Parts I and il,and the Submission information section.For grade-separated highway-rail or pathway crossings(including pedestrian station crossings),complete the Header,Part I,and the Submission Information section. For changes to existing data, complete the Header, Part I Items 1-3,and the Submission Information section, in addition to the updated data fields.Note:For private crossings only,Part I Item 20 and Part III Item 2.K.are required unless otherwise noted. An asterisk'denotes an optional field. A.Revision Date B.Reporting Agency G Reason for Update(Select onl a 0.DOT Crossing (MM/DD/YYYY) W Railroad ❑Transit 19 Change in ❑New used ❑No Train ❑Quiet Inventory Number Data Crossing Traffic Zone Update �j / ❑State ❑Other ❑Re-Open L7 Date ❑Change in Primary ❑Admin. 027201U b Change Only Operating RR Correction � ;is . , .,4_�. ar l,lacation and„dassification3tnfom►.atln �? .:* ., <. ., w. 1.Primary Operating Railroad ( ) State 3.County BNSF Railway Company(BNS ALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO 4.City/Municipality S.Street/Rod Oft=e& 1 ck Number 6.Highway Type&No. ®in 3RD STREET 1 ❑Near SAN BERNARDINO (Street/Rood Name) I'(Block Number 7.Do Other Railroads Operate a Separate Track at Crossing? ❑Yes (J No B.Do Other Railroads Operate Over Your Track at Crossing? ❑Yes Csl No If Yes,Specify RR if Yes,Specify RR 9.Railroad Division or Region 10.Railroad Subdivision or District 11.Branch or Line Name 12.RR Milepost .1 v I COW" I ❑None CALIFORNIA ❑None REDLANDS ❑None MAIN (prefix) I (nnnn.nnn) I (suffix) 13.Line Segment 14.Nearest RR Timetable IS.Parent RR (if applicable) 16.Crossing Owner(if applicable) • Station ' 7603 SAN BERNARDIN ❑N/A .0 ❑N/A 5� -A 17.Crossing Type 18.Crossing Purpose 19.Crossing Position 20.Public Access 21.Type of Train 22.Airerage Passenger (iii Highway 19 At Grade (if Private Crossing) 0freight ❑Transit Train Count Per Day (3 Public ❑Pathway,Ped. ❑RR Under ❑Yes U Intercity Passenger ❑ hared Use Transit ❑Less Than One Per Day , C3 Private 11 Station,Ped. U RR Over ❑No El Commuter wrist/Other U Number Per Day's 23.Type of Land Use ❑Open Space ❑Farm U Residential Cl Commercial L9 Industrial ❑Institutional ❑Recreational ❑RR Yard 24.is there an Adjacent Crossing with a Separate Number? 25.Quiet Zone (FRA provided) ❑Yes ❑No If Yes,Provide Crossing Number (3 No ❑24 Hr ❑Partial ❑Chicago Excused Date Established 26. HSR Corridor ID 27.Latitude in decimal degrees 28.Longitude in decimal degrees 29.Lat/long Source ❑N/A (WGS84 std: nn.nnnnnnn) 34.0661010 (WGS84 std: -nnn.nnnnnnn)-117.3315960 [9 Actual ❑Estimated 30.A. Railroad Use ' 31.A. State Use 30.8. Railroad Use ' 31.8. State Use 30.C. Railroad Use • 31.C, State Use 30.D. Railroad Use • 31.D. State Use • 32.A. Narrative (Railroad Use) • 32.B. Narrative(State Use) 33.Emergency Notification Telephone No.(posted) 34.Railroad Contact (Telephone No.) 35. State Contact (Telephone No.) 800.832-5452 817-352-1549 415-703-3722 X, x, rpart,fi:Railroad,infornation .. M VA7 iil i .. .: , 1.Estimated Number of Daily Train Movements I.A. Total Day Thru Trains 1.8. Total Night Thru Trains I.C.Total Switching Trains I.D.Total Transit Trains I.E.Check if Less Than (6 AM t0A PM) (6 PM t9.4 AM) One Movement Per Day ❑ 4 How many trains per week? 2.Year of rain Count Data(YYYY) 3.Speed of Train at Crossing 3.A.Maximum Timetable Speed(mph) Z w�+t 3.8.Typical Speed Range Over Crossing(mph) From 1 to 10 4.Type and Count of Tracks Main 1 Siding Yard Transit Industry S,Train Detection(Main Track only) ❑ Constant Warning Time ❑ Motion Detection ❑AFO ❑ PTC U OC U Other Oil None 6. Is Track Signaled? 7.A. Event Recorder 7.8. Remote Health Monitoring 0 Yes 19 No I ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No FORM FRA F 6180.71(Rev.3/15) OMB approval expires 3/31/2018 Pagel OF 2 2016-137 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM 5Date 0 ) PAGE 2 OD2.R�Or?s1;ing inventory Number(7 char.) `' Part ill Highway:or Pathway Traffic Coiitroi Device InfomatUUicn 1.Are there 2.Types of Passive Traffic Control Devices associated with the Crossing Signs or Signals? 2.A.Crossbuck 2.8.STOP Si g ns(RI-1) 2.C.YIELD Signs(RS-2) 2.0.Advance Warnin g Si g ns(Check all that apply;include count) 11 None Ci Yes ❑No Assemblies(count) (count) (count) Ed W10.1 __- ❑W10-3 11 W10-11 2 0 O W10.2 ❑W10-4 ❑W10-12 2.E.Low Ground Clearance Sign 2.F.Pavement Markings 2.G.Channelization 2.H.EXEMPT Sign 2.1,ENS Sign(1.13) (w10-5) Devices/Medians (R15-3) Displayed 11 Yes (count ) Q Stop Lines ❑Dynamic Envelope ❑All Approaches ❑Median ❑Yes ❑Yes E1 No N RR Xing Symbols El None n One Approach El None El No 171 No 21 Other MUTCD Signs 0 Yes 1,9 No 2.K.Private Crossing 21.LED Enhanced Signs(List types) Signs(if private) Specify Type Count Specify Type Count El Yes ❑No Specify Type Count 3.Types of Train Activated Warning Devices at the Grade Crossing(specify count of each device for all that apply) 3.A.Gate Arms i 3.B.Gate Configuration 3.C.Cantilevered(or Bridged)Flashing Light 3.0.Mast Mounted Flashing Lights 3.E.Total Count of (count) Structures(count) (count of masts) 2 Flashing Light Pairs ❑2 Quad ❑Full(Barrier) Over Traffic Lane 0 ❑incandescent U Incandescent ❑LED Roadway 2 E]3 Quad Resistance ❑Back Lights Included ❑Side Lights 4 Pedestrian_ U 4 Quad U Median Gates Not Over Traffic Lane 0 U LED Included 3.F.Installation Date of Current 3.G.Wayside Horn 3.H.Highway Traffic Signals Controlling 3.1.Bells Active Warning Devices:(MM/YYYY) Crossing (count) ❑ Not Required 11 Yes installed on(MM/YYYY)_____j ❑Yes [J No 0 11 No 3.J.Non-Train Active Warning 3.K.Other Flashing Lights or Warning Devices ❑Flagging/Flagman ❑Manually Operated Signals ❑ Watchman ❑Floodlighting ❑None Count 0 Specify type 4.A.Does nearby Hwy 4.6.Hwy Traffic Signal 4.C.Hwy Traffic Signal Preemption 5,Highway Traffic Pre-Signals 6.Highway Monitoring Devices Intersection have in rconnection ❑ Yes El No (Check all that apply) Traffic Signals? KNot Interconnected C) Yes-Photo/Video Recording O For Traffic Signals ❑ Simultaneous Storage Distance• ❑ Yes—Vehicle Presence Detection ❑Yes o 0 for Warning Signs U Advance Stop Line Distance ❑ None �{ Bart iV•`Physical tharacteristia ` 1.Traffic Lanes Crossing Railroad El One-way Traffic 2. Is Roadway/Pathway 3, Does Track Run Down a Street? 4. Is Crossing Illuminated? (Street ❑ Two-way Traffic Paved? lights within op rox.50 feet from Number of Lanes 4 E1 Divided Traffic Eli Yes El No 13 Yes Eli No nearest roil) Yes ❑No 5. Crossing Surface(on Main Track,multiple types allowed) installation Date•(MM/YYYY)v_/ Width• Length ❑ 1 Timber M 2 Asphalt i1 3 Asphalt and Timber n4 Concrete El 5 Concrete and Rubber n 6 Rubber E1 7 Metal E1 8 Unconsolidated U 9 Composite U 10 Other(specify) 6. Intersecting Roadway within SOO feet? 7. Smallest Crossing Angle 8. Is Commercial Power Available? U Yes 19 No If Yes,Approximate Distance(feet) ❑ 0'—29' D 30'—59' ❑ 60' 90' es f -No Part V:Public Highway Information 1 Highway System 2 Functional Classification of Road at Crossing 3.is Crossing on State Highway 4 Highway Speed Limit ❑ (0) Rural 11 (1) Urban System? MPH ❑ (01)interstate Highway System E1 (1)Interstate Q (5)Major Collector ❑ Yes Gf No ❑Posted El Statutory W (02)Other Nat H wy System(NHS) ❑ (2)Other Freeways and Expressways S.Linear Referencing System(LRS Route ID) ' ❑ (03)Federal AID,Not NHS ❑ (3)Other Principal Arterial ❑ (6)Minor Collector El (08)Non-Federal Aid 11 (4)Minor Arterial rl (7)Local 6.LRS Milepost 7. Annual rage Daily Traffic (AADT) 8. Estimated Percent Trucks 9. Regularly Used by School Buses? 10. Emergency Services Route Year 4089 AAOT 04 % ❑Yes IR No Average Number per Day 0 ❑Yes ❑No Am 7 Submission Information-This informotion is used far administrative purposes and is not ovoilable on the public website. Submitted by Organization Phone Date Public reporting burden for this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response,including the time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a person is not required to,nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with,a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for information collection is 2130-0017. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection,including for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Officer,Federal Railroad Administration,1200 New Jersey Ave.SE,MS-25 Washington,OC 20590. FORM FRA F 6180.71(Rev.3/15) OMB approval expires 3/31/2018 Page 2 OF 2 2016-137 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION OMB No.2130-0017 Instructions for the initial reporting of the following types of new or previously unreported crossings:For public highway-rail grade crossings,complete the entire inventory Form.For private highway-rail grade crossings,complete the Header,Parts I and 11, and the Submission Information section.For public pathway grade crossings(including pedestrian station grade crossings),complete the Header,Parts 1 and 11,and the Submission Information section.For Private pathway grade crossings,complete the Header, Parts I and 11,and the Submission Information section.For grade-separated highway-rail or pathway crossings(including pedestrian station crossings),complete the Header,Part 1,and the Submission Information section.For changes to existing data,complete the Header,Part I Items 1.3, and the Submission Information section,in addition to the updated data fields.Note:Far private crossings only,Part I Item 20 and Part III Item 2.K.are required unless otherwise noted. An asterisk•denotes an optional field. A.Revision Date B.Reporting Agency C.Reason for Update(Select only one) D.DOT Crossing (MM/DD/YYYY) 19 Railroad ❑Transit Cli Change in ❑New ❑Closed U No Train 17 Quiet Inventory Number �f 2-115 Data Crossing Traffic Zone Update ID 95 t Z,p Z.O ❑State C]Other ❑Re-Open ❑Date U Change in Primary n Admin. 027204P 1 Change Only Operating RR Correction Part!: tlan and Classlfitafiort'!r►foftatilon 1.Primary Operating Railroad i 2.State 3.County ] 1%* CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO 4.City/Municipality S.Str /Road Name&Black Number 6.Highway Type&No. (R in 2ND ST U Near SAN BERNARDINO (Street/Road Name) I' Block Number) 7.Do Other Railroads Operate a Separate Track at Crossing? ❑Yes Ig No 8.Do Other Railroads Operate Over Your Track at Crossing? Yes ®No If Yes,Specify RR If Yes,Specify RR 9.Railroad Division or Region 10.Raiir2aa Sub vision or�District 11.Branch or Line Name 12.RR Milepost Sty`' Y U 1© S I- U None CALIFORNIA ❑None [71 None MAIN (prefix I (annn.nnn) I (suffix) 13,Line Segment 14.Nearest RR Timetable 15,Parent RR (if opplicable) _ 16.Crossing Owner(if applicable) • ,�.rrr/' Station • A I602'�0 S �-3te+, SAN BERNARDIN ❑N/A ❑N/A "�F" 17.Crossing Type 18.Crossing Purpose 19.Crossing Position 20.Public Access 21.Type of Train 22.Average Passenger (9 Highway 51 At Grade (if Private Crossing) Freight ❑Transit Train Count Per Day ®Public n Pathway,Ped. U RR Under ❑Yes C Intercity Passenger O Shared Use Transit j 11 Less Than One Per Day G Private ❑Station,Ped. U RR Over L`]No 0 Commuter Tourist/Other ' ❑Number Per Day's 23.Type of Land Use ❑Open Space U Farm ❑Residential 1W Commercial ❑Industrial U Institutional `,:7 Recreational ❑RR Yard 24.Is there an Adjacent Crossing with a Separate Number? 25.Quiet Zone (FRA provided) ❑Yes ❑No If Yes,Provide Crossin Number (t!No ❑24 Hr O Partial ❑Chicago Excused Date Established 26. HSR Corridor ID 27.Latitude in decimal degrees 28.Longitude in decimal degrees 29.Lat/Long Source I�N/A (W(;S84 std: nn.nnnnnnn) 34.1026990 (WGS84std: -nnn.nnnnnnn)-117.3033980 L9 Actual 9 Estimated 30.A. Railroad Use • 31.A. State Use 30.6. Railroad Use • 31.8. State Use 30.C. Railroad Use • 31.C. State Use 30.D. Railroad Use • 31,D. State Use ' 32.A. Narrative (Railroad Use) • 32.B. Narrative(State Use) 33.Emergency Notification Telephone No.(pasted) 34.Railroad Contact (Telephone No.) 3S. State Contact (Telephone No.) BOD-832-5452 817-352-1548 415.703-3722 ;Part`1! Railr6ad16f6MUtId ,. 1.Estimated Number of Daily Train Movements 1.A. Total Day Thru Trains I.B. Total Night Thru Trains I.C.Total Switching Trains I.D.Total Transit Trains I.E.Check if Less Than (6 A o PM) (6YM f 6 AM) One Movement Per Day 13 r( ,Z I I How many trains per week? 2.Year of train Count Data(YYYY) 3.Speed of Train at Crossing 3.A.Maximum Timetable Speed(mph) 38 `j T3.B.Typical Speed Range Over Crossing(mph) From 1 to 10 4,Type and Count of Tracks Main 1 Siding_,_ Yard Transit Industry S.Train Detection(Main Track only) Constant Warning Time ❑ Motion Detection ❑AFO ❑ PTC R DC ❑ Other ❑ None 6. is Track Signaled? 7.A. Event Recorder 7.B. Remote Health Monitoring Yes Na I U Yes U No EJ Yes ❑ No FORM FRA F 6180.71(Rev.3/15) OMB approval expires 3/31/2018 Pagel OF 2 2016-137 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM A.RgvisDate PAGE 2 O.Cr sing Inventory Number(7 char.) UTrYJ 0272 4P Part iilrHighwaybor Pathway Traffic Contrcirbevice lnfortratton 1.Are there 2.Types of Passive Traffic Control Devices associated with the Crossing Signs or Signals? 2.A.Crossbuck 2.8.STOP Signs(RI-1) 2.C.YIELD Signs(RI-2) 2,13,Advance Warning Signs(Check all that apply;inrlude count) ❑None Li!Yes ❑No Asse blies(count) (count) (count) IH W10-1 11 W10-3 [I W10-11 0 U W10.2 ❑W10-4 ❑W30.12 2-E.Low Ground Clearance Sign 2.F.Pavement Markings Z.G.Channelization _ 2,H.EXEMPT Sign 2.1.ENS Sign(1-13) (WI0-5) Devices/Medians (RI5-3) Displayed ❑ Yes (count— Q Stop Lines ❑Oynamic Envelope ❑All Approaches ❑Median U Yes 177 Yes U No )KRR Xing Symbols ❑None Cl One Approach ❑None ❑No U No 2-1.Other MUTCD Signs U Yes 10 No 21.Private Crossing 21.LED Enhanced Signs(List types) Signs(if privote) Specify Type Count Specify Type Count C7 Yes ❑No Specify Type Count 3.Types of Train Activated Warning Devices at the Grade Crossing(specify count of each device for alt that apply) 3.A.Gate Arms 3.13.Gate Configuration 3.C,Cantilevered for Bridged)Flashing Light 3.0.Mast Mounted Flashing Lights 3.E.Total Count of (count) Structures(count) (count of masts) 4 Flashing Light Pairs 4 Quad ❑Full(Barrier) Over Traffic Lane 0 ❑Incandescent ❑Incandescent ❑LED Roadway Q 3 Quad Resistance El Back Lights Included ❑Side Lights 0 Pedestrian ❑4 Quad -AM eclian Gates Not Over Traffic Lane 0 U LED included 3.F.Installation Date of Current 3.G.Wayside Horn 3.H.Highway Traffic Signals Controlling 3.1.Bells Active Warning Devices:(MM/YYYY) Crossing (count) ❑ Not Required Yes Installed on(MM/YYYY) J C1 Yes L9 No 2 13 No 31 Non-Train Active Warning 3.K.Other Flashing Lights or Warning Devices U Flagging/Flagman [ Manually Operated Signals 9 Watchman ❑Floodlighting ❑None Count 0 Specify type 4.A.Does nearby Hwy A.B.Hwy Traffic Signal 4.C.Hwy Traffic Signal Preemption 5.Highway Traffic Pre-Signals 6,Highway Monitoring Devices Intersection have I�n(terconnection 1] Yes U No (Check all that apply) Traffic Signals? r Not Interconnected J Yes-Photo/Video Recording U For Traffic Signals iJ Simultaneous Storage Distance• ❑ Yes–Vehicle Presence Detection ❑Yes Xio ❑ For Warning Signs J Advance Stop Line Distance• U None x` mart iV.PliysicaE Char`ateristics' 1.Traffic Lanes Crossing Railroad ❑ One-way Traffic 2. Is Roadway/Pathway 3, Does Track Run Down a Street? 4. Is Crossing Illuminated? (Street U Two-way Traffic Paved? lights within approx.50 feet from Number of Lanes 4 ❑ Divided Traffic I N Yes ❑No U Yes Cd No nearest rail)nYes i'l No S. Crossing Surface(on Main Track,multiple types allowed) Installation Date•(MM/YYYY) J— Width• Length• _,_ U i Timber ❑ 2 Asphalt U 3 Asphalt and Timber IN 4 Concrete ❑ 5 Concrete and Rubber 11 6 Rubber ❑ 7 Metal ❑ 8 Unconsolidated ❑ 9 Composite ❑ 10 Other(specify) _„_,_ 6. Intersecting Roadway within 500 feet? 7. Smallest Crossing Angie 8. Is Commercial Power Available?' ❑ Yes R No If Yes,Approximate Distance(feet) ❑ 0'–29 L3 30'–59' R 60'-90' R Yes ❑No Part V:Public Highway Information 1.Highway System 2.Functional Classification of Road at Crossing 3.Is Crossing on State Highway 4.Highway Speed Limit ❑ (0) Rural ® (1) Urban System? MPH Cl (01)interstate Highway System ❑ (1)interstate CA (S)Major Collector ❑ Yes Gi No 4J Posted ❑Statutory Q (02)Other Nat Hwy System(NHS) ❑ (2)Other Freeways and Expressways 5,Linear Referencing System(LRS Route ID) n (03)Federal AID,Not NHS L] (3)Other Principal Arterial ❑ (6)Minor Collector U (08)Non-Federal Aid ❑ (4)Minor Arterial ❑ (7)Local 6.LAS Milepost 7. Ann�u�a erage Oaily Traff (AAOT) 8. Estimated Percent Trucks 9. Regularly Used by School Buses? 10. Emergency Services Route Year K89 AADT 0 00 05 y, ❑Yes : No Average Number per Day 0 U Yes ❑No ubmission nformation-This information is used for administrative purposes and is not available on the public website. Submitted by Organization Phone Date Public reporting burden for this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response,including the time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a person is not required to,nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with,a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for information collection is 2130-0017, Send Comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection,including for reducing this burden to: information Collection Officer,Federal Railroad Administration,1200 New Jersey Ave.SE,MS-25 It Washington,OC 20590. FORM FRA F 6180.71(Rev.3/15) OMB approval expires 3/31/2018 Page 2 OF 2 2016-137 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION OMB No.2130-0017 Instructions for the initial reporting of the fallowing types of new or previously unreported crossings:For public highway-rail grade crossings,complete the entire inventory Form.For private highway-rail grade crossings, complete the Header, Parts I and It,and the Submission Information section. For public pathway grade crossings(including pedestrian station grade crossings),complete the Header,Parts I and II,and the Submission Information section.For Private pathway grade crossings,complete the Header, Parts I and Ii,and the Submission Information section.For grade-separated highway-rail or pathway crossings(including pedestrian station crossings),complete the Header,Part 1, and the Submission Information section.For changes to existing data, complete the Header,Part I Items 1.3, and the Submission Information section,in addition to the updated data fields.Note:For private Crossin s only,Part I Item 20 and Part III Item 2.K.are required unless otherwise noted. An asterisk'denotes an optional field. A.Revision Date B.Reporting Agency C.Reason for Update(Select only one) D.DOT Crossing (MM/DD/YYYY) 51 Railroad ❑Transit R Change in ❑New ❑Closed ❑No Train ❑Quiet Inventory Number 8t _20"- Data Crossing Traffic Zone Update 05/2 t J State ❑Other ❑Re-Open ❑Date [7 Change in Primary ❑Admin. 027206D Change Only Operating RR Correction Part 1:"tocatlon and.dasslfiriuiii lnformatib 1.Primary Operating Railroad ' .State 3.County F K CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO 4.City/Municipality S.Street/ oad Name&Block Number 6.Highway Type&No. iii in RIALTO&"I"ST j ❑Near SAN BERNARDINO Street/Road Name) I'(Block Number) 7.Do Other Railroads Operate a Separate Track at Crossing? U Yes rd No 8.Do Other Railroads Operate Over Your Track at Crossing? es o If Yes,Specify RR If Yes,Specify RR &J-3 9.Railroad Division or Region 10.Rai lr ad u ivi Igp o strict 11.Branch or Line Name�l 1 R MSepast 5 I ❑None CALIFORNIA U None MUu-1 � ❑None MAIN I (prefix) I (nnnn.nnn) '( (suffix) 13.Line Segment 14.Nearest RR Timetable S.Parent RR (if applicable) 16.Crossing Owner(if applicable) • (( Stati�Qtn Z6f& o ) YrG.f..r'/""Yf 6 ❑N/A S C J N/A BW'F- L 17.Crossing Type 18.Crossing Purpose 19.Crossing Position 20.Public Access 2 Type of train 22.Average Passenger W Highway N At Grade (if Private Crossing) X1 Treight U Transit Train Count Per Day Public ❑Pathway,Ped. Cl RR Under U Yes C]Intercity Passenger U hared Use Transit ❑Less Than One Per Day 0 Private U Station,Ped. (7 RR Over ❑No Cl Commuter urist/Other ❑Number Per Da��} 23.Type of Land Use ❑Open Space C]Farm ❑Residential 19 Commercial U Industrial ❑institutional 0 Recreational ❑RR Yard 24,is there an Adjacent Crossing with a Separate Number? 2S.Quiet Zone (MA provided) U Yes U No If Yes,Provide Crossing Number Is!No ❑24 Hr ❑Partial ❑Chicago Excused Date Established 26. HSR Corridor ID 27.Latitude in decimal degrees 28.Longitude in decimal degrees 29.tat/Long Source U N/A (WGS84 std: nn.nnnnnnn) 34.1010020 (WGS84 std: -nnn.nnnnnnn)-117.2956010 (13 Actual ❑Estimated 30.A. Railroad Use + 31.A. State Use ' 30.6. Railroad Use • 31.8. State Use 30.C. Railroad Use ' 31.C. State Use 30.D. Railroad Use ' 31,D. State Use ` 32.A. Narrative (Railroad Use) + 32.B. Narrative(State Use) ' 33.Emergency Notification Telephone No,(posted) 34.Railroad Contact (Telephone No.) 35. State Contact (Telephone No.) 800-832-5452 817-352.1549 415-703-3722 Palrt 11 I ad infolrniW in 1.Estimated Number of Daily Train Movements I.A. Total Day Thru Trains 1.B. Total Night Thru Trains 1.C,Total Switching Trains 1.D,Total Transit Trains 1.E.Check if Less Than (59M to M) (6 PM 6 AM) One Movement Per Day ❑ T ,3r I I How many trains per week? 2.Year of ain Count Data(VYYY) 3.Speed of Train at Crossing t 3.A.Maximum Timetable Speed(mph) , 4 S B.Typical Speed Range Over Crossing(mph) From 1 to 10 4.Type and Count of Tracks Main 1 Siding Yard Transit Industry S,Train Detection(Main Track only) Constant Warning Time ❑ Motion Detection ❑AFO O PTC U DC ❑ Other n None 6. Is Track Signaled? 7.A. Event Recorder 7-B. Remote Health Monitoring 12 Yes ❑ No I ❑ Yes 11 No ❑ Yes U No FORM FRA F 6180.71(Rev.3/15) OMB approval expires 3/31/2018 Pagel OF 2 2016-137 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM A.R is o Date(MM/ D/Y PAGE 2 D.Crossing Inventory Number(7chor.) 027206D Part II1:Highway'ar Pathway Traffic Controt Device tnformation .. ,., . w ,,. .d. . . 1.Are there 2.Types of Passive Traffic Control Devices associated with the Crossing Signs or Signals? �A.C'o'sbuc.l 2.B.STOP Signs(RI-1) 2.C.YIELD Signs(RI-2) 2.D.Advance Warning Signs(Check all that apply;include count) ❑None fit Yes C]No emblies(cunt) (count) (count) 511 W10-1 ❑W10.3 U W10.11 Z _ 0 1 U W10.2 ❑W10-4 ❑W10-12 2.E.Low Ground Clearance Sign 2.F.Pavement Markings 2.G.Channelization 2.H.EXEMPT Sign 2.1.ENS Sign(1-13) (W10-5) Devices/Medians (R75-3) Displayed ❑ Yes (count ) 13 Stop Lines C3Oynamic Envelope ❑All Approaches 13 Median U Yes ❑Yes ❑ No 13 RR Xing Symbols U None ❑One Approach ❑None ❑No U No 21 Other MUTCD Signs D Yes 19 No 2.K.Private Crossing 21.LED Enhanced Signs(List types) Signs(if private) Specify Type Count Specify Type Count 173 Yes 71 No Specify Type Count 3.Types of Train Activated Warning Devices at the Grade Crossing(specify count of each device for all that apply/ 3,A.Gate Arms 3.8.Gate Configuration 3.C.Cantilevered(or Bridged)Flashing Light 3.D.Mast Mounted F ashing Lights 3.E.Total Count of (count) Structures(count) (count of mostsLX_ Flashing Light Pairs A Quad U Full(Barrier) Over Traffic Lane 1.1 incandescent U Incandescent F1 LED Roadway D 3 Quad Resistance D Back Lights Included U Side Lights 0 Pedestrian ❑4 Quad ❑Median Gates Not Over Traffic Lane 0 i]LED included 3.F.installation Date of Current 3.G.Wayside Horn 3_H.Highway Traffic Signals Controlling 3.1.Bells Active Warning Devices:(MM/YYYY) -J Crossing (count) D 3 ( !� ❑ Not Required C Yes Installed on MM YYY) W Yes ❑No 4 3.1.Non-Train Active Warning 3.K.Other Flashing Lights or Warning Devices ❑Flagging/Flagman UManually Operated Signals ❑ Watchman ❑Floodlighting D None Count 0 Specify type _ 4.A.Does nearby Hwy 4.8.Hwy Traffic Signal 4.C.Hwy Traffic Signal Preemption 5.Highway Traffic Pre-Signals 6.Highway Monitoring Devices Intersection have In rconnection U Yes U No (Check all that apply) Traffic Signals? Not Interconnected U Yes-Photo/Video Recording for Traffic Signals �$imultaneous Storage Distance• _ . U Yes-Vehicle Presence Detection U Yes No ❑ For Warning Signs ❑ Advance Stop Line Distance U None Part'M'Physical Characteristics 1.Traffic Lanes Crossing Railroad ❑ One-way Traffic 2. Is Roadway/Pathway 3. Does Track Run Down a Street? 4. Is Crossing illuminated? (Street Two-way Traffic Paved? lights within approx.50 feet from Number of Lanes 4 ❑ Divided Traffic I R Yes D No U Yes ©No nearest rail) U Yes Cl No S. Crossing Surface(on Main Track,multiple types allowed) installation Date•(MWYYYY) J Width• __ Length' ❑ 1 Timber D 2 Asphalt ❑ 3 Asphalt and Timber N 4 Concrete C? 5 Concrete and Rubber D 6 Rubber ❑ 7 Metal ❑ 8 Unconsolidated ❑ 9 Composite D 10 Other(specify) 6. Intersecting Roadway within 500 feet? 7. Smallest Crossing Angle B. is Commercial Power Available? N Yes U No If Yes,Approximate Distance(feet) -75 U 0'-29' 1A 30'-59' ❑ 60'-90' Q Yes D No Part V:Public Highway information 1.Highway System 2.Functional Classification of Road at Crossing 3.is Crossing on State Highway 4.Highway Speed Limit D (0) Rural W (1) Urban System? MPH U (OS)interstate Highway System L3 (1)Interstate U (5)Major Collector D Yes W No D Posted ❑Statutory [3 (02)Other Nat Hwy System(NHS) ❑ (2)Other Freeways and Expressways 5.Linear Referencing System(LRS Route lo) ' D (03)Federal AID,Not NHS ❑ (3)Other Principal Arterial ❑ (6)Minor Collector 1Y (08)Non-Federal Aid R (4)Minor Arterial 0 (7)Local 6,LRS Milepost ' 7. Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) 8. Estimated Percent Trucks 9. Regularly Used by School Buses? 10. Emergency Services Route Year.1983 AADT 017000 06 % ❑Yes [a7 No Average Number per Day 0 ❑Yes ❑No Subrnlssio in armation-This information is used for administrative purposes and is not available on the public website. Submitted by Organization Phone _ Date Public reporting burden for this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response,including the time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a person is not required to,nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with,a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for information collection is 2130-0017. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection,including for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Officer,Federal Railroad Administration,1200 New Jersey Ave.SE,MS-25 is Washington,DC 20590. FORM FRA F 6180.71(Rev. 3/15) OMB approval expires 3/31/2018 Page 2 OF 2 2016-137 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION OMB No.2130-0017 Instructions for the initial reporting of the following types of new or previously unreported crossings:For public highway-rail grade crossings,complete the entire inventory Form. For private highway-rail grade crossings,complete the Header, Parts I and 11,and the Submission Information section. For public pathway grade crossings(including pedestrian station grade crossings),complete the Header,Parts I and 11,and the Submission Information section.For Private pathway grade crossings,complete the Header, Parts I and It,and the Submission Information section.For grade-separated highway-rail or pathway crossings(including pedestrian station crossings),complete the Header,Part 1,and the Submission Information section. For changes to existing data, complete the Header,Part I items 1-3,and the Submission Information section, in addition to the updated data fields.Note:For private crossings only,Part I Item 20 and Part III item 2.K.are required unless otherwise noted. An asterisk'denotes an optional field. A.Revision Date B.Reporting Agency C.Reason for Update(Select only one) D.DOT Crossing (MM/00/YYYY) W Railroad U Transit G#Change in ',-1 New ❑Closed ❑No Train ❑Quiet Inventory Number / Data Crossing Traffic Zone Update S �,p 41.t� ❑State C]Other ❑Re-Open ❑Date ❑Change in Primary ❑Admin. 027208S Change Only Operating RR Correction Partl:Location`and,dassiflcatioril Information , 1.Primary O erating Railroad ► _ 2,State 3.County 1iPi3FR�Itwa�Ciyfttp8n {k3iJSFi CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO 4.City/Municipality S.StreetyRoad Name&Block Number 6.Highway Type&No. W In -G„S 1 ❑Near SAN BERNARDINO (Street/Rood Nome) I' Stock Number) 7.Do Other Railroads Operate a Separate Track at Crossing? ❑Yes Cr7 Na 8.Do Other Railroads Operate Over Your Track at Crossing? No If Yes,Specify RR If Yes,Specify RR 9.Railroad Division or Region 10.RaIII d su divislon or District 11.Branch or Line Name 12.RR Mile;ost - g CarAiM. 1 {f,C i ( O None CALIFORNIA ❑None -fJL3"VS ❑None MAIN (pre ix I (nnnn.nnn) I (su ix) 13.line Segment 14.Nearest RR Timetable S.Parent RR (if applicable) 16.Crossing Owner(if applicable) • Station • 7408 01 - .-�'L I SAN BERNARDIN 0 N/A � � !"J N/A 17.Crossing Type 18.Crossing Purpose 19.Crossing Position 20.Public Access 21.Type of Train 2I.Average Passenger 13 Highway Cs7 At Grade (if Private Crossing) 0-ffeight FJ Transit Train Count Per Day W Public ❑Pathway,Ped. 1-1 RR Under CJ Yes ❑Intercity Passenger ❑Shared Use Transit 0 Less Than One Per ay 13 Private ❑Station,Ped. U RR Over U No F;Commuter urist/Other ❑Number Per DaYA'& 23.Type of Land Use U Open Space [J Farm C Residential Cd Commercial ❑Industrial ❑Institutional 0 Recreational ❑RR Yard 24.Is there an Adjacent Crossing with a separate Number? 2S.Quiet Zone (FRA provided) ❑Yes ❑No If Yes,Provide Crossing Number 1 09 No ❑24 Hr ❑Partial ❑Chicago Excused Date Established 26. HSR Corridor 10 727.Latitude in decimal degrees 28.Longitude in decimal degrees 29.Lat/Long Source ❑N/A (WG584 std: nn.nnnnnnn) 34.0999170 (WG584 std: -nnn.nnnnnnn)-117.2985980 [1 Actual 13 Estimated 30.A. Railroad Use • 31.A. State Use 30.8. Railroad Use • 31.8. State Use ' 30.C. Railroad Use • 31.C. State Use 30.D. Railroad Use • 31.D. State Use 32.A. Narrative (Railroad Use) • 32.8. Narrative(State Use) 33.Emergency Notification Telephone No.(posted) 34.Railroad Contact (Telephone No.) 3S. State Contact (Telephone No.) 800-832-5452 817-352-1549 415-703-3722 Part ill Railroad Information' 1.Estimated Number of Daily Train Movements S.A. Total Day Thru Trains 1.8. Total Night Thru Trains 1.C.Total Switching Trains I.D.Total Transit Trains 1.E.Check if Less Than (6 AM to.6 PM) (6 PM 6 AM) One Movement Per Day X How many trains per week? 2.Year of rain Count Data(YYYY) 1 3.Speed of Train at Crossing 3.A.Maximum Timetable Speed(mph) 10 W 1 3.8.Typical Speed Range Over Crossing(mph) From! to 10 4.Type and Count of Tracks Main 1 Sclins 14 Yard Transit industry 5.Iro Detection(Main Track only) onstant Waming Time ❑ Motion Detection LIAFO ❑ PTC Fa DC ❑ Other [0 None 6. Is Tack Signaled? 7.A. Event Recorder 7.B. Remote Health Monitoring es IR No ❑ Yes ❑ No El Yes C! No FORM FRA F 6180.71(Rev.3/15) OMB approval expires 3/31/2018 Pagel OF 2 2016-137 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM PAGE 2 427 rgfsgng inventory Number(7 chor.) Part I1I:`Highway orrPathwayTraffic Control.Device lnforriiattori 1.Are there 2.Types of Passive Traffic Control Devices associated with the Crossing Signs or Signals? 2.A.Crossbuck 2.8.STOP Signs(R1-I) 2.C.YIELD Signs(R1-21 2.0.Advance Warning Signs fCheck all that apply,include count) ❑None 14 Yes ❑No Assemblies(count) (count) (count) [9 W10-1 ❑W10.3 0 W10-11 2 0 ❑W10.2 ❑W10-4 ❑W10.12 2.E.Low Ground Clearance Sign 2.F.Pavement Markings 2.G.Channelization 2.H.EXEMPT Sign 2.t.ENS Sign(1-13) (W10-5) Devices/Medians (R15-3) Displayed ❑ Yes (count ) (A Stop Lines ❑Dynamic Envelope U All Approaches L]Median ❑Yes U Yes f No 19 RR Xing Symbols n None ❑One Approach U None G No ❑No 21 Other MUTCO Signs U Yes FA No 2.K.Private Crossing 21.LED Enhanced Signs(list types) Signs(if private) Specify Type Count _ Specify Type Count ❑Yes 0 No Specify Type Count 3.Types of Train Activated Warning Devices at the Grade Crossing(specify count of each device for aft that apply) 3-A.Gate Arms 3.8.Gate Configuration 3.C.Cantilevered(or Bridged)Flashing Light 3.D,Mast Mounted Flashing Lights 3.E.Total Count of (count) Structures(count) (count of most4,2-_Q� Flashing Light Pairs IL Quad L7 Full(Barrier) Over Traffic Lane ._ F1 Incandescent ❑incandescent U LED Roadway 2 11 Quad Resistance ❑Back Lights Included Side Lights 4 Pedestrian ❑4 Quad ❑Median Gates Not Over Traffic Lane U LED Included 3.F.Installation Date of Current 34.Wayside Horn 3.H.Highway Traffic Signals Controlling 3.1.Bells Active Warning Devices:(MM/YYYY) Crossing (count) No ❑ Not Required C] Yes Installed on(MM CJ Yes Cti/YYYY) � 0 n No 31 Non-Train Active Warning 3A.Other Flashing Lights or Warning Devices ❑Flagging/Flagman UManually Operated Signals 0 Watchman 0 Floodlighting F1 None Count 0 Specify type 4.A.Does nearby Hwy 4.B.Hwy Traffic Signal 4.C.Hwy Traffic Signal Preemption S.Highway Traffic Pre-Signals 6.Highway Monitoring Devices Intersection have Interconnection El Yes C: No (Check oil that apply) Traffic Signals? Xpot Interconnected C7 Yes-Photo/Video Recording L7 For Traffic Signals ❑ Simultaneous Storage Distance 171 Yes—Vehicle Presence Detection ❑Yes No ❑ For Warning Signs ❑ Advance Stop Line Distance• ❑ None Part IVv'Physicai Characteristics 1.Traffic Lanes Crossing Railroad 13 One-way Traffic 2. Is Roadway/Pathway 3, Does Track Run Down a Street? 4. Is Crossing Illuminated? (Street n Two-way Traffic Paved? lights within approx.50 feet from Number of Lanes 4 U Divided Traffic Cti Yes ❑No U Yes N No nearestrail) 0 Yes U No 5. Crossing Surface(on Main Track,multiple types allowed) Installation Date'(MM/YYYY) ------/ Width' Length' 0 1 Timber ❑ 2 Asphalt 0 3 Asphalt and Timber [1 4 Concrete 13 5 Concrete and Rubber 17 6 Rubber ❑ 7 Metal ❑ 8 Unconsolidated ❑ 9 Composite ❑ 10 Other(specify) 6. Intersecting Roadway within 500 feet? 7. Smallest Crossing Angle B. is Commercial Power Available?' U Yes La No if Yes,Approximate Distance(feet) 1-1 0'—29' ❑ 30'-59' Lid W.-90' Lii Yes ❑No Part V:Public Highway Information 1.Highway System 2.Functional Classification of Road at Crossing 3.is Crossing on State Highway 4.Highway Speed Limit ❑ (0) Rural W (1) Urban System? MPH 17 (01)Interstate Highway System 13 (1)Interstate ❑ (5)Major Collector ❑ Yes Cti No U Posted 3 Statutory 0 (02)Other Nat Hwy System(NHS) 0 (2)Other Freeways and Expressways S.Linear Referencing System(t RS Route ID) ❑ (03)Federal AID,Not NHS 173 (3)Other Principal Arterial J (6)Minor Collector LR (08)Non-Federal Aid U (4)Minor Arterial R (7)Local 6.LRS Milepost " 7. Annual A erage Daily Traffic (AADT) 8. Estimated Percent Trucks 9. Regularly Used by School Buses? 10. Emergency Services Route Year AADT 00We0' 03 96 ❑Yes CIi No Average Number per Day 0 In Yes Cl No ubmissian Information-This information is used for administrative purposes and is not available on the public website. Submitted by Organization Phone Date Public reporting burden for this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response,including the time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a person is not required to,nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with,a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The valid OM8 control number for information collection is 2130-0017. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection,including for reducing this burden to: information Collection Officer,Federal Railroad Administration,1200 New Jersey Ave.SE,MS-25 Washington,DC 20590. FORM FRA F 6180.71(Rev. 3/15) OMB approval expires 3/31/2018 Page 2 OF 2 2016-137 ATTACHMENT"C" CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Distribution is indicated in Section 9 herein Date: March 20, 2012 Subject: City of Anaheim, California Southern California Regional Rail Authority(Metrolink)— Orange Subdivision Quiet Zone NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT OF'NEW'OUIET ZONE Notice is hereby provided that the City of=Apaheim, California, (City) will establish a new 24-hour Quiet Zone in accordance witl .lhe regulatory oirovyi sons contained in Title 49 of the Federal Railroad Adr iinistration bode of Federal Regulations, Parts 222 and 229 Use of Locomative Horns at Highway Rail Grade Crossings; Final Rule (Final Rule), effective April 10, 2012. The routs e'sounding of train horns at crossings will be restf, within the-g0iet'zone. The following sections describe contents required to be included in the Notice of Quiet Zone Establishment under°49,CFR §22243(d). SECTION I —AFFECTED HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSINGS Two (2) existing .public highway-rail at grade crossings are located within the proposed,quiet zone as.,,indicated`in Table 1. All affected streets are under the jurisdiction'of the. City of;Anaheim. There are no existing private highway-rail at- grade crossings-And.-no pedestrian-exclusive rail at-grade crossings located within the proposed quiet"zone:' 200 S.Anaheim Blvd.,Suite 276 Anaheim,California 92805 TEL (714)765-5176 www.anaheim.net FAX (714)765-5225 2016-137 ATTACHMENT"C" City of Anaheim, California Southern California Regional Rail Authority(Metrolink) - Orange Subdivision Quiet Zone Notice of Establishment Page 2 Table 1 Crossings within the Proposed Quiet Zone 77� 09.1-Mm 026651M 101OR-169.7 Cerritos Avenue 026652U 101OR-170.3 State College Boulevard The following railroads currently operate over some or all of crossings within the proposed quiet zone: • Southern California Regional Rail Authority(SCRRA)", • National Railroad Passenger Corporatid (Amtrak) • BNSF Railway(BNSF) • Union Pacific Railway(UP) SECTION 2 —REGULATORY PROVISION FOR ESTABLISHMENT',".. The quiet zone is proposed to be established based upon the regulatory provision described under 49 CFR §222.39(b). The implementation of Alternative Safety Measures (ASMs) at selected crossings reduces the Quiet Zone Risk Index to, a level below the Risk Index with Horns. The Federal Railroad Administration I I (FICA) notification of approval letter is attached herein as Exhibit A. SECTION 3 —DIAGNOSTIC TEAM REVIEW AND COMMENTS A diagnostic team,,'review was held with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and all railroads affected "by"the proposed quiet zone, listed above in Section 1, were given Opportunity to participate commended improvements are addressed and shown in detail on the CPUC Getral he Approval documents (attached herein as Exhibit B). Subsequent to;thP,submission of the General Order 88B documents in Exhibit B, some changes or variations in the-design and construction of the grade crossing safety improvements may have been implemented. The implemented improvements are listed in the CPUC Form G (see Exhibit C) and shown ih,the As-Built Drawings (see Exhibit D). SECTION 4—TIME RESTRICTION Effective April 10, 2012 the routine sounding of horns will be restricted twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week. SECTION 5—GRADE CROSSING INVENTORY PRE SAFETY MEASURES The Grade Crossing Inventory Forms reflecting the existing conditions at each crossing listed in Section 1, above, prior to the implementation of ASMs, are shown attached herein as Exhibit 2016-137 ATTACHMENT"C" City of Anaheim, California Southern California Regional Rail Authority(Metrolink) - Orange Subdivision Quiet Zone Notice of Establishment Page 3 E. Updated inventory forms were submitted to the FRA on January 1, 2010, however the revised inventory sheets gathered from the FRA website do not reflect all the submitted corrections. As such, corrections to the pre safety measures grade crossing inventory sheets in Exhibit E are shown in red. SECTION 6—GRADE CROSSING INVENTORY POST SAFETY MEASURES The Grade Crossing Inventory Forms reflecting ASMs at the &ossings listed in Section 1, above, at the time of establishment of the quiet zone, are shown attached herein as Exhibit F. Updates reflecting improvements to the crossings are shown in green. SECTION 7—PROVISION OF NOTICE OF INTENT, Notice of Intent (NOI) to establish a quiet zori&�was provided in accordance with 49 CFR §222.43(a)(3) on July 20, 2011. SECTION 8—PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLIANCE The point of contact for the City of Anaheim is: Taher Jalai Principal Traffic Engiii eer- City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. #276 Anaheim,CA 92805 Bus: 714-765-5183 2016-137 ATTACHMENT"C" City of Anaheim, California Southern California Regional Rail Authority(Metrolink) - Orange Subdivision Quiet Zone Notice of Establishment Page 4 SECTION 9 —DISTRIBUTION This notice has been sent to the following individuals: Ms. Cristina Talley Mr.John Welter City Attorney Chief of Police City of Anaheim City of Anaheim Police Department 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. 425 S.Ha bor Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 Anaheim„CA 92805 Mr. Mark Vukojevic Ms.NatalieiVleeks City Engineer Director of Public>Works City of Anaheim 'City of Anaheim 200 S.Anaheim Blvd. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd." Anaheim, CA 92805 Anaheim, CA 92805 Ms. Mary Toutounchi Mr.Johri Fenton ' Project Manager -Chief Exectttive,O>fficer Orange County Transportation Authority SCRRA 550 South Main Street One Gateway Plaza, 12`h Floor PO Box 14184 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Orange, CA 92863 Mr. William Doran Mr.Naresh Patel Manager, Rail Corridor C&E Manager, Civil Engineering, SCRRA SCRRA 279 E Arrow Hwy, Suite A 279 E Arrow`H,y, Suite A San Dimas, CA 91773 San Dimas,CA 01773 Mr. W. Douglas Werner �Mr.Melvin Th6inas Associate General Counsel Manager Public LroJect� BNSF Railway Co. = 2016-137 ATTACHMENT"C" City of Anaheim, California Southern California Regional Rail Authority(Metrolink) - Orange Subdivision Quiet Zone Notice of Establishment Page 5 Mr. Daren Gilbert Ms. Cindy Quon Rail Crossings Engineering Section Director—District 12 California Public Utilities Commission California Department of Transportation 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 115 3347 Michelson Drive, Suite CN380 Sacramento, CA 95834-2939 Irvine, CA 92612 Ms. Rosa Munoz Mr. Joseph,Boardman Senior Utilities Engineer President;&`CEO Rail Crossings Engineering Section Amtrak California Public Utilities Commission 60 Massachusetts avenue,NE 320 West 4th Street, Suite 500 Washingt"64 D -24002 Los Angeles, CA 90013 '' Mr. Stefan Gilmor-e Mr. Dale Bonner ""Senior Safety Coordinator- ; Acting Director Amtrak Business,Transportation and Housings National,Railroad Passenger Cooperation 980 91h Street, Suite 2450 40 Massachusetts Ave.,N.E. Sacramento, CA 95814 Washington;DC 20002 Mr. Kenneth Tom Mr. Cheung Freddie Manager of Industry—Special Projects . ,Manager Public Projects Union Pacific Railroad Union Pacific Railroad 2015 S. Willow Avenue 201:5 S. Willow Avenue Bloomington, CA 9231:6 ;° Bloomington, CA 92316 2016-137 ATTACHMENT"C" City of Anaheim.California Southern California Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink) -Orange Subdivision Quiet Zone Notice of Establishment Page 6 SECTION 10-SIGNATURE OF CITY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I hereby certify that the information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. Bob Wingenroth, Acting City Manager DatE 2016-137 ATTACHMENT"C"