Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout21- Planning & Building Services CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: Michael E. Hays, Director Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 97-07, Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21; to change the land use designation from IH, Industrial Heavy, to OIP, Dept: Planning & Building Services Office Industrial Park, and establish a Children's Services Center at 1499 South Tippecanoe Avenue. Date: March 12, 1998 MCC Date: April 6, 1998 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: N/A MAR 12 1998 Recommended Motion: That the Mayor and Common Council close the public hearing and adopt the Negative Declaration, adopt the resolution which approves General Plan Amendment No. 97-07, waive the first reading and lay over the ordinance for final adoption, and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21, based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements. Michael E. lAys Contact person: Michael E. Hays Phone: 384-5357 Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Resolution, Ordinance Ward(s): 1 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct No ) N/A (Acct Description) Finance: Council Notes: 14/4 ' Agenda Item No. �_ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 97-07, Development Code Amendment No. 97-05, Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Mayor and Common Council Meeting of April 6, 1998 Owner: Arthur & Phora Gerdes Applicant: Children's Fund 4431 Palm Avenue Bonnie O'Conner Yorba Linda, CA 92886 Executive Director 714.779.9076 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92415 909.387.4059 REQUEST AND LOCATION: A request to amend the General Plan land use plan from IH, Industrial Heavy, to OIP, Office Industrial Park; to amend the Development Code to include a definition of "Children's Services Centers" as a conditionally permitted use within the OIP land use district; and to establish a Children's Services Center on a 1.59 acre site located at the southeast corner of Tippecanoe and Victoria Avenue, at 1499 S. Tippecanoe Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Children's Fund, a non-profit organization that serves San Bernardino County, proposes to establish a Children's Services Center in the City of San Bernardino. The center will assist children ages infant to 17 years who have been abused and/or molested. Children's Fund works in partnership with Loma Linda University Medical Center through use of its medical facilities and staff. The center has two main components: an Assessment Center and an Evaluation Center. The Assessment Center will be established first in the existing 5000 square foot office building for the administration of medical and forensic examinations for the children. This component is generally a weekday operation from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., although the facility will provide services, as needed, on a 24-hour basis. The Evaluation Center will provide sleeping facilities on a temporary basis until the children can be placed in a long-term facility. The Center will include a kitchen and dining area for the children, and a small outdoor play area. This component will be completed in Phase II through demolition of the existing warehouse and construction of a new 7000 square foot building. The children will be housed at other existing facilities until this Center is constructed. Refer to the Planning Commission staff report (Exhibit 3) for further discussion. KEY POINTS • The proposed site is separated from surrounding industrial uses by Tippecanoe Avenue and Victoria Avenue, and from adjacent residential uses by the railroad tracks. No impacts to the surrounding uses are anticipated as a result of the change to the land use designation or the establishment of this facility. GPA No. 97-07, DCA No. 97-05 & CUP No. 97-21 MCC 4/06/98 Page 2 • No impacts to the Children's Services Center by the surrounding industrial uses are anticipated because although the adjacent IH district allows outside uses and activities, the uses must be screened from view, and all potential impacts (noise, use of hazardous materials, etc.) mitigated. • The proposed use provides a service not found elsewhere in the City, consistent with General Plan Policy 1.1.7 which addresses "... the provision of governmental administrative, health, ... and other similar services ..." • The use will be established in an office park setting, consistent with the Development Code requirements for OIP. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: An Initial Study was prepared by LSA and Associates and independently reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on January 8, 1998. No comments were received during the public review period which extended from January 15, 1998 to February 4, 1998. The ERC cleared the Initial Study to Planning Commission on February 5, 1998, with a recommendation to adopt a Negative Declaration. FINANCIAL IMPACT/COSTS TO CITY: The applicant paid all application processing fees. There are no costs to the City. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: At their meeting of March 3, 1998, the Planning Commission considered the request and recommended approval to the Mayor and Common Council. Commissioners Hamilton, Lockett, Reilly, Schuiling, Suarez, and Thrasher voted in favor of the motion; Commissioner Gonzalez was opposed; Commissioners Enciso and Quiel were absent. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council: 1. Adopt the Negative Declaration; 2. Approve General Plan Amendment No. 97-07; 3. Approve Development Code No. 97-05; and, 4. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements. EXHIBITS: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. Planning Commission Staff Report 4. Resolution 5. Ordinance EXHIBIT 'T' CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING GPA-97-07 AGENDA AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT DCA-97-05 ITEM# CASE CUP-97-21 LOCATION HEARING DATE 03/03/98 T f RD IrMMLIL �- 1 1 RlVttylsr L LIH a � � t / ANR \J1 O f 6T. 10 • •� i 1 4 6 i ))s. f u L L J,+ i•+_' voCTo*gA 1 VICTORIA MAR OT �tT 19!116d Ll t I BRIER � I � �03(711 • so f tt AIeT♦ LA RR 1 C:--3 z Z HARRIMAN MO$nTAU LANE - - - - 0 N 1 FRWy, S AV COLINT ST n OPAL PWIa tt PAGE t 1 �� li 'wa °•��i. ern A� 1 °r w. s1D i Aga& � u 9 wtZ?4 j 9H1� p p v9k?'.MBt854t � , d • C ;;.,mamwma= .wa am a r'f A If e dp EXHIBIT "Y SUND4ARY CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION CASE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 97-05, & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-21 AGENDA ITEM: 1 HEARING DATE: March 3, 1998 WARD: 1 APPLICANT OWNER Children's Fund Arthur and Phora Gerdes c/o Lloyd Zola 4431 Palm Avenue 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, 2nd floor Yorba Linda, CA 92886 San Bernardino, CA 92415 REQUEST/LOCATION A request to amend the General Plan designation of an industrial parcel from IH, Industrial Heavy, to OIP, Office Industrial Park, amend the Development Code to include a definition of "Children's Services Centers" and allow them as permitted uses subject to a Conditional Use Permit within the OIP land use district, convert an existing office building into a Children's Assessment Center, and construct a new 5,000 square-foot building to serve as the Children's Evaluation Facility as Phase II of the proposal. The site is located at 1499 South Tippecanoe Avenue in the IH, Industrial Heavy, land use district. CONSTRAINTS/OVERLAYS Area of Potential Ground Subsidence and Moderately High to Moderate Liquefaction ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Exempt ■ No Significant Effects, Proposed Negative Declaration ❑ Potential Effects STAFF RECOMA ENDATION ■ APPROVAL ■ CONDITIONS ❑ DENIAL ❑ CONTINUANCE TO: General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 & Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98 Page 1 of 8 REQUEST AND LOCATION The applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan designation of an industrial parcel from IH, Industrial Heavy, to OIP, Office Industrial Park, amend the Development Code to include a definition of "Children's Services Centers" and allow them as permitted uses subject to a Conditional Use Permit within the OIP land use district, convert an existing office building into a Children's Assessment Center, and construct a new 5,000 square-foot building to serve as the Children's Evaluation Facility as Phase H of the proposal. The site is located at 1499 South Tippecanoe Avenue in the IH, Industrial Heavy, land use district (Refer to Attachment A, General Plan Land Use Designation and Location Map). PROTECT DESCRIPTION A non-profit organization, Children's Fund, proposes to occupy a vacant office building and build a new 5,000 square-foot, 30-bed facility to establish a Children's Services Center at the property referenced above. The facility is intended to aid children suspected of having been sexually abused/molested and/or physically abused (ages infant to 17 years). The existing office building will be remodeled to operate as the Assessment Center to provide professional medical and forensic examinations for the children. The new building will operate as the Evaluation Center with temporary sleeping facilities in order to be able to evaluate a child's needs and find an appropriate long-term facility. The Assessment Center is proposed as a weekday operation from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. while the Evaluation Center is proposed as a daily 24-hour operation. The Evaluation Center is being proposed as a second phase after the Assessment Center is in operation. The existing warehouse will be demolished and replaced with a new 5,000 square-foot building. A Development Permit Type H application will be submitted to the City for the new building as a separate project at a later date (Refer to Attachment B, Site Plan). SETTING/SITE CHARACTERISTICS The subject site is located at a T-intersection fronted by industrial development. The parcel on the northeast corner of this intersection is designated as OIP, Office Industrial Park while the remainder of the properties fronting this intersection are located within the IH, Industrial Heavy, land use district. The land north of the site and across Victoria Avenue is presently occupied by the Support Services Center of the Loma Linda University Medical Center. The property adjacent to the site on the east is used as a building contractor's storage yard. The properties directly west and across Tippecanoe Avenue are occupied by two wholesale roofing suppliers. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad tracks are located directly south of the site. Further south is a flood control channel, which runs parallel to the railroad tracks, and single-family and multi-family residential units within the RMH, Residential Medium High, land use district. Also General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 & Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98 Page 2 of 8 within the RMH district to the south is an auto repair shop which is considered a legal nonconforming use (Refer to Attachment C, General Plan Amendment Proposal). The site is a triangular-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 1.59 acres. It is presently developed with a 5,201 square-foot single-story office building, a 5,000 square-foot metal industrial warehouse, and a parking lot. The land is relatively flat and screened from the railroad tracks to the south by an eight-foot high hedge and chainlink fence. BACKGROUND The buildings on the site were constructed in 1978 as an office and warehouse. City records indicate that the warehouse was last occupied in 1996 and the office building was vacated within the last year. Children's Fund is a non-profit organization that provides aid to all children within San Bernardino County with various impairments (e.g. - abuse, neglect, poverty, etc.). Children's Fund has been serving San Bernardino County since 1986 and presently has administrative offices in the County of San Bernardino Administrative Building at 385 North Arrowhead Avenue. The organization has been searching for a permanent home to establish a Children's Services Center. Presently, a similar use is being operated in the City of Loma Linda within donated lease space. Children's Fund intends to purchase the property upon project approval. Development Review Committee The project was reviewed by the Development Review Committee on November 20, 1997, January 8, 1998, and February 5, 1998. The DRC cleared the project to Planning Commission on February 5, 1998 with Standard Requirements. No comments were received from other agencies. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT An Initial Study was prepared by LSA and Associates and independently reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on January 8, 1998. The study was noticed for public review from January 15, 1998 to February 4, 1998. No comments were received. The ERC cleared the Initial Study to Planning Commission on February 5, 1998 with a recommendation to adopt a Negative Declaration. General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 & Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98 Page 3 of 8 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ANALYSIS & FINDINGS OF FACT Existing Land Use Designation The IH, Industrial Heavy, land use district is intended for the continuation and development of heavy manufacturing industries in locations where they will be compatible with and not adversely impact adjacent land uses [Development Code §19.08.010(2)(B)]. Proposed Land Use Designation The OIP, Office Industrial Park, land use districris intended to establish the Waterman Avenue corridor and other appropriate areas as distinctive office industrial parks and corporate centers serving City and regional needs with supporting retail/commercial services [Development Code §19.06.010(2)01. Findings of Fact 1. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan. The proposal does not change the industrial characteristics of the site. By re-designating the site to OIP, the uses that can be permitted on this site are limited to certain light industrial uses within a fully enclosed structure. In-addition, it is the objective of the City to establish the Waterman Avenue corridor and other appropriate areas as distinctive office industrial parks and corporate centers serving the San Bernardino community and region pursuant to General Plan Objective 1.31. 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. The proposed amendment does not allow a use that changes the density or intensity of the surrounding land uses. Children's Services Centers are administrative type uses which benefit the community directly by providing aid to disadvantaged children. As such, the proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. 3. The proposed amendment would maintain an appropriate balance of land uses in the City The proposed amendment area will remain an "industrial" district. The OIP district is intended for office industrial parks and corporate centers. No change to residential, commercial, or any other type of designation is proposed. As such, the current balance of land uses would not be affected. General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 & Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98 Page 4 of 8 4. The subject site is physically suitable for the requested OIP land use designation. The property included in the proposed amendment meets the minimum requirements of the development code in regards to lot size, access, and circulation. The change from IH to OIP does not affect the physical characteristics of the site. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT ANALYSIS & FINDINGS OF FACT Presently, Children's Services Centers are not defined by the San Bernardino Development Code and, therefore, not permitted anywhere in the City. Because OIP exists north of the site and the operating characteristics of the proposed project are more compatible with the type of uses permitted in the OIP district rather than the IH district, Staff believes a Children's Services Center would better fit in the OIP district with Conditional Use Permit review and approval. Proposed Text Addition Addition to §19.02.050, DEFINITIONS (alphabetical order): "Children's Services Center. A facility operated by a non-profit organization to administer services to children suspected of having been neglected or abused. The facility may include professional medical and forensic services, food, shelter, legal assistance, personal guidance, and other similar services for children up to 17 years of age; the facility may also include temporary sleeping quarters with a licensed foster care professional to provide for children in transition from one foster home to another. " Addition to §19.08.020 TABLE 08.01, INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS LIST OF PERMITTED USES (alphabetical order): LAND USE ACTIVITY CH OIP IL IH IE "Children's Services Center; ___ C _-_ _-_ Findings of Fact 1. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan. Refer to General Plan Amendment Finding #1. 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. Refer to General Plan Amendment Finding #2. General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 & Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98 Page 5 of 8 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS & FINDINGS OF FACT The Conditional Use Permit is being required as part of the Development Code Amendment which is proposed to allow "Children's Services Centers" as "conditionally permitted" uses within the OIP land use district. In analyzing the Conditional Use Permit, the various components and requirements of development within the OIP land use district have been reviewed, including, but not limited to, parking, circulation, landscaping, and building design. Findings of Fact 1. The proposed use is conditionally permitted within and would not impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed use is conditionally permitted within the OIP land use district subject to approval of the General Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment. The Development Review Committee found the project to be in compliance with all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code (Refer to Attachment D, Development Code and General Plan Consistency Table). 2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. Refer to General Plan Amendment Finding #1. 3. The approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 19.20.030(6) of the Development Code. As previously stated in the CEQA discussion, an Initial Study was prepared by LSA and Associates and reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on January 8, 1998. The study was noticed for public review from January 15, 1998 to February 4, 1998. No comments were received. The ERC cleared the Initial Study to Planning Commission on February 5, 1998 with a recommendation to adopt a Negative Declaration. 4. There will be no potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored. An Initial Study was prepared by the applicant and reviewed by Staff and the Environmental Review Committee on January 8, 1998. The project was found to have no significant impacts upon the environment. Standard requirements were issued by the Development Review Committee (Refer to Attachment F, Standard Requirements). General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 & Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98 Page 6 of 8 S. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the proposed use is to be located and will not create significant noise, traffic or other conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. Building & Design Of the two existing buildings, the 5,201 square-foot office building will remain and be remodeled for use as the Assessment Center while the 5,000 square-foot warehouse will be demolished and replaced with a 7,072 square-foot building to be used as the Evaluation Center. The total building lot coverage will be approximately 17.4%, well below the 50% allowed in the OIP land use district. Both buildings will be required to be architecturally compatible with one another (Refer to Attachment E, Conditions of Approval). The project is proposed to be built in two phases. Construction of the new building will be developed under Phase II of this proposal and will be submitted as a Development Permit Type II application. Hours of Operation & Staj cing The Assessment Center is proposed as a weekday operation to be open from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. However, it is anticipated that the Center may open after hours to deal with emergency situations. The Evaluation Center, on the other hand, is proposed as a 24-hour operation. Fifty-five children per month are anticipated to be served by the proposed facility. To provide for these numbers, the Assessment Center will be staffed by six (6) employees at any one time with up to fifteen (15) professionals present during interviews/investigations. The Evaluation Center will be staffed by four (4) to six (6) child care specialists at any one time and will have sleeping facilities for up to 30 children. Due to the nature of the proposed facility and characteristics of the surrounding heavy industrial uses, no impacts on adjacent properties are anticipated. Landscaping A minimum landscaping of 15% of all surface parking/drive aisle areas is required to be landscaped pursuant to Section 19.24.060(6) of the Development Code. The project proposes well over 30% landscaping to provide a pleasant atmosphere for the children and employees. General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 & Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98 Page 7 of 8 Parking Pursuant to Section 19.24.040 of the Development Code, "Off-street Parking Standards", the proposed use is required to have a minimum of thirty-three (33) parking spaces, including two handicapped stalls. The parking was configured using "General Office" parking standards at one space for each 250 square feet of the Assessment Center (20 spaces) and "Nursing home" parking standards at one space for each 6 beds (5 spaces), plus one space for each employee at the Evaluation Center (6 spaces for a maximum of 6 employees at any one time), and one space for each staff doctor or supervisor (2 spaces for estimated 2 doctors/supervisors). Thirty-seven parking spaces are proposed in compliance with the Development Code requirements. Screening An eight-foot high hedge exists along the southern boundary to provide screening from the railroad tracks, flood control channel, and residential properties to the south. In addition, several large trees exist along Victoria Avenue to provide shade and a pleasant separation from other surrounding industrial uses. Because of the substantial screening and nature of the proposed use, it will not conflict with or preclude development of new industrial uses within the vicinity. Traffic & Circulation Due to the nature of the proposed use, the Traffic Engineering Division found no significant impacts. Sidewalk improvements and handicap path of travel access from the street to the buildings have been incorporated into the proposal. All approaches and drive aisles will be required to meet minimum Engineering requirements (Refer to Attachment F, Standard Requirements). In addition, the site fronts onto Tippecanoe Avenue which is considered a primary arterial street with substantial capacity and direct freeway access. 6. The subject site is physically suitable for the type/density/intensity of use being proposed. The site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the project being proposed as identified by the project's compliance with parking, landscaping, access, circulation, and refuse requirements issued by the Development Review Committee as shown on Attachment D, Development Code and General Plan Consistency Table, and as discussed in Finding No. 5. General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 & Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98 Page 8 of 8 7. There are adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety. All agencies responsible for reviewing access and providing water, sanitation, and other public services have had the opportunity to review the proposal. None have indicated an inability to serve the project. As such, the proposal will not be detrimental to the public health and safety. CONCLUSION General Plan Amendment No. 97-07, Development Code Amendment No. 97-05, and Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 are consistent with the City of San Bernardino General Plan and meet all of the required Findings of Fact for approval. An Initial Study was prepared and a Negative Declaration is recommended in compliance with CEQA guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the Mayor and Common Council: 1. Adoption of the Negative Declaration (Attachment G), and 2. Approval of General Plan Amendment No. 97-07, Development Code Amendment No. 97-05, and Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 based on the Findings of Fact incorporated into this report and subject to the Conditions of Approval (Attachment E) and Standard Requirements (Attachment F). Respectfu mitted, MICHAEL E. HA irector of Planning and Building Services ASTAVO-�J. ROMO, Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: A - General Plan Land Use Designation and Location Map B - Site Plan C - General Plan Amendment Proposal D - Development Code and General Plan Consistency Table E - Conditions of Approval F - Standard Requirements G - Initial Study ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING GPA-97-07 AGENDA AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT DCA-97-05 ITEM# CASE CUP-97-21 LOCATION HEARING DATE 03/03/98 T r � N A RD RrvRRVIRr O j Ac SAM 3 W aj 1/ / *Lay I J r �f R pa D 00A Ire p ,s t C J' M i•�� -.voCTORiA V ICTOR IA • rAROT =_aT IL ST BRIER I I Ll I f1t =110sum aRh, AMITY P IA . NIVII ST Z 14RRirAN MOSPITALI Y LANE N 10 F W AND F Aff COCINT 21T. r `S to �1 �� Pl AWLI t PAGE t OF 1 (4'9m 1 1 ,,rte �f � 1 son a ion �' 4 �.�I ter...+... !��� �' � .•'� •iA'► ftl"J ►+��I own SMAN 4p fit• �� /� O O +fiFi';�Bb4�.4?!�i' w� fy ,yam.• • �/► �° ah dw � � �• i�. �Ii. f �a E a��^ 91 /•, V V ZS lail3ald 1�1 in•r •� � RSy!R'Itf! .00 General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 ATTACHMENT "C" Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Proposed General Plan Amendment From IH to OIP Existing General Plan Land Use Designations IH, Industrial Heavy RMH, Residential Medium High ® OIP, Office Industrial Park RU-1, Residential Urban PFC, Public Flood Control ® CR-3, Commercial Regional (Tri-City/Club) • Net to Scsle N / . • K . , ,- - O�F1;/;�:—y !:?:'.C:C7f i Y:G*.7^t9,7S:tp:i(•+�•):":S':f�.N:L�.. 1.f2�:�. BERNARD1N0-AVE ti . ' •�• 10 .•:I::' '�i' U'`'': ''/•�'�{'+-/i:x,1.3:•�:1• ''' * :::... .., ::' ',�„L•':�; is%( '•(_l:r;:•':'•';j:•:•;, +�,::t+;i':(•Ji :17::- :%+� ::+:3r'' I ;;:j:G:•::<r;;•':% :' ,� %i4;:�:cr<i!e)c:ifjc•::l• :, :1z %'j <i; G..; :'. ; ' 'Y —eeeL-EY AY •in:j :(:+' i - j3+ti :(:+i'r.':;1;' '�"•'15F'=(ac3c::0� • f•`• t .” .O.ti (1 G:•-:(T �'':(:ri:�i'�:(le i •.., n�C)�t�5}..: 'i:,: tl:i:)?:(:i�;,..:;!y;..�fJ� 3: (:i:jcr:J3ncs y :�:,l•. i :!,..:(7c v J,,;': . . /. ,:%. •�..•:�. ,1. ......J,::O:•:}:l• :i:-(%+� '�:•'•• .'+:i��i:i'i=t;+:i:.:FJ::=:C�c :0:::��i�'C:+:i:::�7:;•:(�:'r.''�' ( •t:;:r:.:j:;:(J:):::0::=:ii:j::=<• --V ET-ORt>, �• !c.:'('!c,-.:(.+i'-:Oc:?O�:%+�>=::(:+� tie)- Jc:�:C�a�:•f•'.::r• :�k ::(:: "'f`=•::,�:.•:%j..:..:: +:)'= ic) :J. .J. .:G: ..l• ::+„ :�.,.:<:+,..3<:l'r'-:O I :}!{? :._::: R. =(%+�i'=(l:•r:'r'l:'r(:j:i:,-< :;:.:(:• :(:'i::��i::ti•: _ - (:+:i"'•:r%'':i:::�:' _ �:/. �:�• •• ,)�, :Q ): J:::(._{:::�../::�. - - ::(: :'(:• 'ice` I :JC.:..,J.•::J::..: O Y::(::3 : s (:•rr.'::•:3 :: ;.( ........:1?:i:7C7ei'iOc (: '.•:{. ',:(�: :iOcr{._/...(..3'���"j; :_,/..�..r iZ•: :'::• ••l..:J,.. R.,W. •:'�':'i .,�• nl! iCt••'•i4.•�::l• !i=::'�? ;'i•.al�'ici i7�:?ri;. �?�ici iii ilii ii5i �iE iti :::E?� E93 E3EE iio'i ?E q\ b\ b\ \� d c i.. M.: ui:itdE Ettii iif9 i&E IMFfi E `n 1, . ..... ........... ...........: ::: ::: ... ...E : ..... .... .... .... ............ ..::... .... .......... ....::::.... ... .....::: ... ::.. ....Eii E .......... ::: ....... .............:::: ::::: ....... .............. ..... EEi c ......... ........ ... ::::..... w.::............ . ... .... ... ::: ::: :::: iri a a o 0 M:..a,� \ 3s?p Ems=Etol =3z: IN:t'�'nE:roc Eea 'E E EN cEEi c:raliiiE' I +n V+\ 1511 �•. . :.. .:.::.:.".... :.:.::.:.:.•:•.E.E.....E.i i in :.::::....... Eii . :EE5iL•liEi E \\ a \ ... .............. .............. .............. ....:::...........:::. iiir�EE..........................: ...:: ...;; ...: ... ... .:: _ — - _ €� I 'i}it €f!iE tl3iE iEni :io: Etni :tu: - -�—GBULB-SF-• - - -::� - - - S. € F- \ it�ii':EioE: E E mi � ii3E iiiiiE E7�1:•E EYES U) N N N O r. Eli ++ee .. i5 fiE ii: Zw: ii3SiE .i lf' 1........ :.....:........:...... ......:... ....... ES#- i i i5�f1i \ ..................... ::::::::::......:::::::i ::::::.:::::::...................... :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::: :: ............. ::::::::::::::::::::::: ............... ..... .. .:«EE EEEo'e'p:::::::�o::::::FF;ri '•a::::�;i:: ci i7 ei�^v^ �v• � >fl\�� a eo Actual Land Use: 000-Vacant Land 107 _Warehouse 113 -Light Industrial 710 -Undefined 363 - service station/Auto Repair 510- SFR 522• 7Wo SFR'e 539-Duplex 540 - Triplex 541 - Ouadplex 546 . 5 to 14 Units ATTACHMENT D DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY TABLE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 97-05, & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-21 1499 SOUTH TIPPECANOE AVENUE Category Proposal Development Code General Plan Use Children's Conditionally Conditionally Services Permitted in OIP' Permitted in OIP Center Setbacks: From Tippecanoe Avenue 40 ft. 20 ft. minimum N/A From Victoria Avenue 33 ft. 10 ft. minimum N/A Side yard 27 ft. 10 ft. minimum N/A Rear yard 27 ft. 10 ft. minimum N/A Landscaping >32% 15% minimum N/A Lot Coverage 17.4% 50% maximum N/A Parking No. 37 (2 HC spaces) 33 (2 HC spaces min.) N/A 'Subject to approval of GPA-97-07 & DCA-97-05. General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 & Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98 Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT E CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 97-05 & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-21 1499 SOUTH TIPPECANOE AVENUE 1. Within two years of this development approval, commencement of construction shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if after commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the permit/approval shall become null and void. Project: GPA 97-07, DCA 97-05 & CUP 97-21 Expiration Date: Two years from effective date (M.C.C. approval) 2. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and for good cause, grant a one time extension of time not to exceed 12 calendar months. The review authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code provisions. 3. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in defense of the matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorney's fees which the City may be required by the Court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his or her obligation under this condition. 4. A Development Permit Type H shall be submitted for Phase II of the proposal, the Children's Evaluation Facility, within one year of issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy for the Assessment Center. Any change of more than 10% to the approved plans for Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 shall require submittal of a new Conditional Use Permit application. General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 & Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98 Page 2 of 3 5. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plan(s) approved by the Planning Commission or Mayor and Common Council. Minor modification to the plan(s) shall be subject to approval by the Director through a minor modification permit process. Any modification which exceeds 10% of the following allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing review authority if applicable. a. On-site circulation and parking, loading and landscaping; b. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and structures; C. Reconfiguration of architectural features, including colors, and/or modification of finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approve theme; and, d. A reduction in density or intensity of a development project. 6. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied or no change of use of land or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new business commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all terms, conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit. 7. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air pollution; glare control; exterior lightning design and control; noise control; odor control; screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and, vibration control. Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied with. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts or meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened by wall or structural element, blending with the building design and include landscaping when on the ground. General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 Development Code Amendment No. 97-05 & Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21 Planning Commission Hearing Date: 03/03/98 Page 3 of 3 8. Both buildings shall be architecturally compatible in design, colors, and materials. 9. A minimum of thirty-three (33) on-site standard parking spaces, including two required handicap stalls, shall be provided and maintained at all times. Thirty-seven (37) stalls have been approved for this project. If at any time the applicant wishes to delete any or all of the additional spaces provided, a minor modification application will be required to be submitted and approved by the Planning and Building Services Department. Wheel stops are prohibited. 10. Signs are not a part of this approval. Applicant must submit a sign permit application and obtain approval from the Planning Division prior to obtaining any building permits for signs. 11. The existing chainlink fence separating the two buildings and phases of development shall remain locked at all times. The proposed site for Phase II shall not be used for storage, parking, or any type of occupancy until the Development Permit Type II has been approved and-a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued for the new building. 12. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the following City departments or divisions and public agencies: a. Building Services Division b. Public Works/Engineering Department C. Fire Department d. Water Department e. Public Services Department f. Parks and Recreation Department ATTACHMENT "F" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Case No.: GPA No. 97-07, DCA No. 97-05 & CUP No. 97-21 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Hearing Date: 3/3/98 Page 1 1. Submit plans prepared by a Registered Building Architect or Civil or Structural Engineer. 2. Submit State of California Title 24 Energy Calculation Forms for non-residential buildings including a signed compliance statement. 3. Submit floor plan of existing structure. Label all uses and existing materials of construction. 4. Submit four (4) complete sets of construction plans including: (Five (5) complete sets for expeditious review). a. Copy of conditions. (3) C. Energy Calculations. (3) 5. Permit required for demolition of existing building(s) on site. 6. Submit a plan of the heating, ventilating or air conditioning system. (Clearly identify the location and rating of the equipment and the sizes and material of all ducts, registers and the location of all fire dampers.) Show means of providing mechanical ventilation, as required by the Uniform Building Code, for each office space. 7. Show compliance with Title 24 for disabled access. 8. Fire Sprinklers required if any alteration occurs. Plans for fire sprinklers shall be submitted to Fire Department and approved prior to installation. No building inspections shall be performed beyond "framing and ventilation" until fire sprinkler plans are approved. 9. City of San Bernardino named as certificate holder for Worker's Compensation Insurance. 10. Assessor's Parcel Number: 0281-102-11. 11. Contractor's City license. 12. Contractor's State license. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Case No.: GPA No. 97-07, DCA No. 97-05 & CUP No. 97-21 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Hearing Date: 3/3/98 Page 2 13. Other: Plan Check time is approximately 3 weeks for tenant improvements. Expeditious Plan Check time is approximately 10 working days. Contact Development Services at (909) 384-5071 for possible expeditious plan check. 14. Contact Development Services for Plan Check fee prior to Plan Check submittal. Additional 25% Plan Check fee required for expeditious review. 15. Separate submittal required for Children's Evaluation Facility. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION FACILITY APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: E/S OF T/PPECANOEAVE. SIS FUND VICTORIA AVE. ♦ NOTE TO APPUCANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the applicant is responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. 1. Drainage and Flood Control a) All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. b) Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit Requirements. c) The City Engineer, prior to grading plan approval, shall approve an Erosion Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon. 2. Grading and Landscaping a) If more than V of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Page 1 of 8 Pages 21911998 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER CASE NO: CU_ AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION FACILITY APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: EIS OF TIPPECANOE AVE. S/S FUND VICTORIA AVE. b) If more than 5 trees are to be removed from the site, a tree removal permit conforming to the requirements of Section 19.28.090 of the Development Code shall be obtained from the Department of Planning and Building Services prior to issuance of any grading or site development permits. c) If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with Section 7012(c) of the Uniform Building Code. d) A liquefaction evaluation is required for the site. This evaluation must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction evaluation shall be incorporated in the grading plan. e) An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). f) A refuse enclosure constructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing No. 508. The minimum size of the refuse enclosure shall be 8 feet x 15 feet, unless the Public Services Department, Refuse Division, approves a smaller size, in writing. g) Retaining walls, block walls and all on-site fencing shall be designed and detailed on the On-site Improvement Plan. This work shall be part of the On-site Improvement permit issued by the Department of Public Works/City Engineer. Page 2 of 8 Pages 2/9/1998 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION FACILITY APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: FJS OF TIPPECANOEAVE. S/S FUND VICTORIA AVE. h) The on-site improvement plan shall include details of on-site lighting, including light location, type of poles and fixtures, foundation design, conduit location and size, and the number and size of conductors. Photometry calculations shall be provided which show that the proposed on-site lighting design will provide 1 foot-candle of illumination uniformly distributed over the surface of the parking lot during hours of operation and 0.25 foot-candles security lighting during all other hours. i) The design of on-site improvements shall also comply with all requirements of The California Building Code, Title 24, relating to handicap parking and accessibility, including retrofitting of existing building access points for handicap accessibility, if applicable. j) A handicap accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way to the building entrance. All pathways shall be paved and shall provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet. Where parking overhangs the pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6 feet. k) The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5 copies to the Engineering Division for Checking. 1) An easement and covenant shall be executed on behalf of the City to allow the City to enter and maintain any required landscaping in case of owner neglect. The Real Property Section for execution by the property owner and shall ensure that, if the property owner or subsequent owner(s) fail to properly maintain the landscaping, the City will be able to file appropriate liens against the property in order to accomplish the required landscape maintenance. A document processing fee in the amount of 200.00 shall be paid to the Real Property Section to cover processing costs. This easement and covenant shall be executed by the property Page 3 of 8 Pages 2/9/1998 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION FACILITY APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: EIS OF T/PPECANOEAVE. S/S FUND VICTORIA AVE. owner prior to plan approval unless otherwise allowed by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 3. Utilities a) Design and construct all public,utilities to serve the site in accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV (Cable TV optional for commercial, industrial, or institutional uses). b) This project is located in the sewer service area maintained by the City of San Bernardino therefore, any necessary sewer main extension shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. c) Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as required. d) A street cut permit, from the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, will be required for utility cuts into existing streets where the street is not being repaved as part of the required improvements. e) All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Section 19.20.030 of the Development Code. f) Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer, except overhead lines, if required by provisions of the Development Code to be undergrounded. See Development Code Section 19.20.030. Page 4 of 8 Pages 21911998 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION FACILITY APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: E/S OF TIPPECANOE AVE. S/S FUND VICTORIA AVE. 4. Phasing a) If the project is to be developed in phases, each individual phase shall be designed to provide maximum public safety, convenience for public service vehicles, and proper traffic circulation. In order to meet this requirement, the following will be required prior to the finalization of any phase: b) Improvement plans for the total project or sufficient plans beyond the phase boundary to verify the feasibility of the design shall be complete to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; c) A Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Division, Fire, and Planning Departments indication what improvements will be constructed with the given phase, subject to the following: d) Dead-end streets shall be provided with a minimum 32 foot radius paved width; e) Drainage facilities, such as storm drains, channels, earth berms, and block walls, shall be constructed, as necessary, to protect the development from off-site flows; f) A properly designed water system shall be constructed which is capable of providing required fire flow, perhaps looping or extending beyond the phase boundaries; g) Easements for any of the above and the installation of necessary utilities shall be completed; and, Page 5 of 8 Pages 2)911998 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION FACILITY APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: EIS OF TIPPECA NOE A VE. S/S FUND VICTORIA AVE. 5. Street Improvement a) Construct sidewalk adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard No. 202, Case "A" (6' wide adjacent to curb). b) Construct Handicap Ramps in accordance with City Standard No. 205 at all curb returns within and adjacent to the project site. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way at the comer to accommodate the ramp. c) Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 204, Type 11, including Handicap by-pass. Remove existing driveway approaches that are not part of the approved plan and replace with full height curb & gutter and sidewalk. d) All Curb return radii shall be 25 feet minimum. e) Install Street Lights adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard Nos. SLA and SL-2. 6. Required Engineering Permits a) Grading permit (If applicable.). b) On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see Planning and Building Services), including landscaping. c) Off-site improvements construction permit. Page 6 of 8 Pages 2911998 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION FACILITY APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: E/S OF 77PPECANOEAVE. S/S FUND VICTORIA AVE. 7. Applicable Engineerin4 Fees' a) Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 4% and 4%, respectively, of the estimated construction cose of the off-site improvements. b) Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildings - See Planning and Building Services) - 2% and 3%, respectively, of the estimated construction costa of the on-site improvements, including landscaping. c) Plan check and inspection fees for grading (If permit required) - Fee Schedule available at the Engineering Division Counter. d) Drainage fee in the approximate amount as follows based on $0.405 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of impervious lot area (estimated as 85% of the net lot area), then $0.139 per square foot of remaining impervious lot area or fraction thereof: EST. IMPERVIOUS AREA SF TOTAL FEE i Not Applicable 0 ii) 26,554 $4,489 TOTAL $4,489 All Fees are subject to change without notice. 2Estimated Construction Cost for Off-Site Improvements is based on a list of standard unit prices on file with the Department of Public WorkslCity Engineer. 3 Estimated Construction Cost for On-Site Improvements is based on a list of standard unit prices on rile with the Department of Public Works/City Engineer. Page 7 of 8 Pages 219/1998 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSMITY ENGINEER DESCRIPTION: CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER CASE NO: CUP 97-21 AND CHILDREN'S EVALUATION FACILITY APPLICANT: CHILDREN'S LOCATION: EJS OF TIPPECANOEAVE. S/S FUND VICTORIA AVE. e) Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of $4,938 . Based on 306 trips per day c@ $16.137 per new trip generated by the project. The City Traffic Engineer shall determine exact amount at time of application for Building Permit for Phase II. f) Sewer Connection fee in the approximate amount as follows based on $229.15 per 3,000 square feet or fraction thereof: BLDG AREA SF TOTAL FEE i Not Applicable 0 ii) 7,072 $687 TOTAL $687 g) Sewer inspection fee in the estimated amount as follows based on $19.32 per connection: NO. OF CONNECTIONS TOTAL FEE i Not Applicable 0 ii) 1 $19.32 TOTAL $19.32 h) Street or easement dedication processing fees in the amount of 200.00 per document. Page 8 of 8 Pages 2)9 11998 a CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Case: C(,f P -( I ��r✓ Date: - ` 1P�LC �/ Reviewed By: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Provide one additional set of construction plans to Building and Safety for Fire Department use at time of plan check. Contact the City of San Bernardino Fire Department at (909) 384.5388 for specific detailed requirements. The developer shall provide for adequate fire flow as computed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Minimum fire flow requirements shall be based on square footage, construction features, and exposure information supplied by the developer and must be available 2dX to placing combustible materials on site. WATER PURVEYOR FOR FIRE PROTECTION: The fire protection water service for the area of this project is provided by: LS San Bernardino Municipal Water Department - Engineering (909) 384-539, ❑ East Valley Water District-Engineering 1909) 888-8986 ❑ Other Water Purveyor: Phone: PUBLIC FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES: Public fire hydrants are required along streets at intervals not to exceed 300 feet for commercial and mufti-residential areas and at intervals not to exceed 500 feet for residential areas. Fire hydrant minimum flow rates of 1,50OApm at a 20psi minimum residual pressure are required for commercial and mufti-residential areas. Minimum fire hydrant flow rates ofT7=gpm at psi minimum residual pressure are required for residential areas. Fire flow requirements may be met from the combined flow of two adjacent fire hydrants. Fire flow requirements may be adjusted, as deemed appropriate by the Fire Department, based on individual site specific conditions and available mitigations. Fire hydrant type and specific location shall be jointly determined by the City of San Bernardino Fire Department in conjunction with the water purveyor. Fire hydrant materials and installation shall conform to the standards and specifications of the water purveyor. ❑ Public fire hydrants, fire services, and public water facilities necessary to meet Fire Department requirements are the developer's financial responsibility and shall be installed by the water purveyor or by the developer at the water purveyor's discretion. Contact the water purveyor indicated above for additional information. ACCESS: ❑ Provide two separate, dedicated routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shall be paved, all weather. ❑ Provide an access road to each building for fire apparatus. Access roadway shall have an all-weather driving surface of not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width. ❑ Extend roadway to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of all single story buildings. ❑ Extend roadway to within 50 feet of the exterior wall of all multiple-story buildings. Z1& Provide"NO PARKING" signs whenever parking of vehicles would possibly red}�c-e.the clgara a of.a ass r adw ys to les than the required width. Signs are to read "FIRE LANE-NO PARKING -M.C.Sec 15.16". W 1 Vh �Q/�F4 jA r, /�� ❑ Dead-end streets shall not exceed 500 feet in length and shall have a minimum 40 foot radius tGrnaround. ❑ The names of any new streets (public or private) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. SITE: ❑ All access roads and streets are to be constructed and usable prior to combustible construction. ❑ Private fire hydrants shall be installed to protect each building located more than 150 feet from the curb line. No fire hydrants should be within 40 feet of any exterior wall. The hydrants shall be Wet Barrel type, with one 2//=inch and 4 inch outlet, and approved by the Fire Department. Fire hydrants shall be designated as a "NO PARKING" zone by painting an 8 inch wide, red stripe for 15 feet in each direction in front of the hydrant in such a manner that it will not be blocked by parked vehicles. BUILDINGS: Address numerals shall be installed on the building at the front or other approved location in such a manner as to be visible from the frontage street. Commercial and multi family address numerals shall be 6 inches tall,single family address numerals shall be 4 inches tall. The color of the numerals shall contrast with the color of the background. ❑ Identify each gas and electric meter with the number of the unit it serves. Fire Extinguishers must be installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is 2A 1013/C. Minimum distribution of fire extinguishers must be such that no interior part of the building is over 75 feet travel distance from a fire extinguisher. ❑ Apartment houses with 16 or more units, hotels(motels)with 20 or more units, or apartments or hotels(motels)three stories or more in height All be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers designed to NFPA standards. All buildings, other than residential, over 5,000 square feet,,shall be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system designed to NFPA standards. This includes existing buildings vacant over 365 days. —ig Submit plans for the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction of the system. ❑ Tenant improvements in all sprinklered buildings are to be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of construction. °t Provide fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of installation. Fire Department connection to (sprinkler system/standpipe system) shall be required at Fire Department approved location. Note: The applicant must request, in writing, any changes to Fire Department reguirements. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: y6e A k J� /C_Q l� G>• �,5 f / r Z4 Q�f FPO 170(1194) - r ZZ�( —102-1 i 113,-om A-5 X07 8� SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Review of Plans:G CA 9 7 `fl 1 DC pt C1 7-01�P W p -Z I Date Compiled: / I A S A7 Owner/Developer: A Rivur. k P1-IOgA !.,-'- & Compiled By: �J Type of Project: 56 1Z-',.tW>✓5 Number of Units: Location SE �oP.,,1C-K of �l plV6CAp1c�F e V/iCrnZ�A(� �( "► 1-� T� A.JC A\45 }3'ATER DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING• Contact: "? l LA— 1�. -f� Phone: 5e6 r7 k Fax: 4 SS A Note: All Water Services are Subject to the Rules&Regulations of the Water Department. ❑ Size of Main Adjacent the Project: 12" S-165L i.,J V&=-Lt k: 1A t W,'57E-4-L- ,.J Ti?rECAJ96 _ ❑ Approximate Water Pressure: pp 60f�51 Elevation of Water Storage:/�9 FT Hydrant Flow®20 psi: > FM ❑ Type, Size, Location, and Distance to Nearest Fire Hydrant: �STEv►,...E� CG+7JY) C)J Sc coalli iz- -Tj ??'Ech.1cE *.tC.!ROZiA ❑ Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter. ❑ Off-site Water Facilities Required. ❑ Area Not Served by San Bernardino Municipal Water Department. X Comments: Ft W'- WATER QUALITY CONTROL: Contact: �/J F��E V`t Phone: �b}-cJ i Fax: WI P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. W�bouble Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. ���/�i.�T/G��✓ ❑ Backflow Device to be Inspected Before Water Service can be Activated. ❑ No Backflow Device Required at This Time. ENVIRONMENTAL.CONTROL/INDUSTRIAL.WASTE: Contact: 1210 ,3 CAS EZO Phone: I��' �J�-7 Fax: 36-4 17�� Note: No Brine Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed, Unless Holding and Hauling is Provided for the Brine. All Interceptors ill be a 1200 Gallon Capacity with a Sample Box Included. ]"'trial Waste Permit Require(,- O ❑ Grease Interceptor Required. ❑ Sand/Oil Interceptor Required. ❑ No Issues at this Time. ❑ Pre-treatment Required. SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: r� Contact: �]�1 1, J3'IOt'•i1�+J Phone: 35 - 5 0973 Fax: �&4 rjZ l 5 Note: Proof of Payment Must be Subnutted to the Building&Safety Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit. • No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. �-7 q G • Sewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the Water Department for '70 Gallons Per Day, Equivalent Dwelling Units: • Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building.Permit. -7 !�� Breakdown of Estunated Gallons Per Day: 07 Z �'!Z !D7& > SPDRLQVU.FRM(2/97) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING & BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 300 NORTH "D" STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418 (909) 384-5057 AGENCY CONAIENT SHEET NOVEMBER 4, 1997 PROJECT: CWNERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. -97-67, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 97-05& CONDITIONAL USE PERMrr NO. 97:21 DESCRIPTION: _A request to change the General Plan designation of a parcel from IH, Industrial Heavy, to OIP, Office Industrial Park, construct a new 5,000 square-foot children's evaluation facility, establish a children's services center, and amend the Development Cade to allow children's services centers as permitted uses subject to conditional use permits. within the OIP land use district. LOCATION: 1499 South Tippecanoe Avenue (APN: 0281-102-11). FROM: ,Gustavo J. Romo THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN,FILED WITH THE CITY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTM-ENT. PLEASE REVIEW TIDE ENCLOSED INFORMATION AND RETURN THIS'SHEET WITH YOUR COMMENTS AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS WITHIN 21 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS FORM. IF WE RECEIVE NO COMMENT, WE WILL ASSUME NO CONCERNS. BEEP THE ATTACHMENT FOR YOUR FU IF YOU SO DESIRE. This project will be reviewed by the DRC on NOVEMBER 20, 1997. THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS APPLY TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM(S): it "SE I� /1srbQM�� if: "12&k WCt. C4 141 AVE ; IF Ytf ACed'RSLr. ; IF Ab Ac, J 6�JcLa1v?F /v/ OQ,t� A tSG� Crx!l trT l Sys b,k t a t[/1& Sr 6, �c./J*0 54p. �'cur�cr �vduc St/Zt�r�tr1- ` Q€lycu,JC AT 3p/-SSVy 7D 65rA4LaN &Aj7F v4iaJ � �GYCU� OQo�Q� t'.cl t TN t+cJ fit u t t z( �#01 hkx s0yiad 114017 (SIGNATURE) (AGENCY) (DATE) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PARRS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Case• Date• Reviewed By: I GENERAL REQUIREMMITS: (v] Cossaercial Industrial and Multi-Unit Assessment District [ ] Residential [v] Purpose, Guidelines and submittal procedure (C`,] Irrigation and Landscaping Plans. (»>(((] Contact the City of San Bernardino Parks,Recreation and Community Services Department at (909) 384-5117 or 384-5314 for specific detailed requirements. SPECIFIC REQUIRE34ENTS: [ ] Maintenance of landscape areas [x] Planter Areas JAN 1 3 1998 [x ] Interior Planter Areas [ ] Irrigation Systems [Xy ] Setback Areas CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO [^] Slope Areas DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & [ ] Ground Cover and Bedding Material BUILDING SERVICES [k] Erosion Control [ ] Need Control PLANT MATERIALS ( ] Plant list and climatic conditions [ ] Street Trees ( ] Plant Material Size Requirements and Ratios INSPECTION AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS [k ] Irrigation System [ ] Landscaping [)e] Sandscape Items ( ] Street tree Specifications [x j Arborist Report [ ] Removal or destruction of trees [ ] Screening Requirement (City, Dev.Code) Note: The applicant must request, in writing, any changes to the Parks, Recreation and Community Services requirements. Additional information _ S KS:ii ATTACHMENT ►►G►► INITIAL STUDY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 97-05 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-21 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A request to convert an existing industrial facility into a Children's Services Center on a property located at 1499 Tippecanoe Avenue (southeast comer of Tippecanoe Avenue and Victoria Avenue), including a General Plan Amendment to change the project site from Heavy Industrial (III) to Office Industrial Park (OIP), and a Development Code Amendment to add a definition of"Children's Services Center" to the Development Code and to permit a Children's Services Center in the OIP, subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The project will be implemented in two phases. The first phase will include conversion of an existing office building, improvements to the existing parking area,and enhancement of onsite landscaping. The second phase will consist of removing an existing warehouse building and construction of a new 5,000 square foot building. Date: January 13, 1998 Applicant: Children's Fund 385 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA Prepared by: Lloyd Zola LSA Associates, Inc. 3403 10th Street, Suite 520 Riverside, CA 92501 The Environmental Review Committee independently reviewed, analyzed and exercised judgement in making the determination on the above-referenced Initial Study on February 5. 1998 pursuant to §21082 of the California Environmental Quality Act. 1 City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 2 of 15 January 13, 1998 INITIAL STUDY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97-07 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 97-05 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-21 INTRODUCTION This Initial Study is provided by the City of San Bernardino for General Plan Amendment 97-07, Development Code Amendment 97-05, and Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21. It contains an evaluation of potential adverse impacts that can occur if the General Plan Amendment, Development Code Amendment, and conditional use permit were to be approved. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study when a proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency, and is not exempt from CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a proposal,not exempt from CEQA, qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)must be prepared. The following components constitute the Initial Study for General Plan Amendment 97-07, Development Code Amendment 97-05, and Conditional Use Permit No. 97-21: • Project Description • Site and Area Characteristics • Environmental Setting • Location Map • Conclusion/Environmental Determination • Environmental Impact Checklist • Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures. The combination of these components constitute the complete Initial Study. 2 City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 3 of 15 January 13, 1998 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Children's Fund, a non-profit organization dedicated to the welfare of San Bernardino County's youth proposes to develop a Children's Services Center within the City of San Bernardino at 1499 South Tippecanoe Avenue (southeast corner of Tippecanoe and Victoria avenues). The 1.59-acre site,which was previously developed as an industrial facility. Both onsite buildings are currently vacant. The site consists of an office building and a warehouse building, parking areas, and landscaping. Children's Fund proposes to convert the former industrial facility into a Children's Services Center by modifying the interior of one existing building on site, demolishing a second existing building,constructing a new building within the footprint of the existing one, and providing improvements to the site's parking and landscape areas. The Children's Services Center encompasses one lot, which is irregular in shape, having a diagonal easterly property line. The site has approximately 450 feet of frontage along Victoria Avenue, and 310 feet of frontage along Tippecanoe Avenue. The Children's Services Center will consist of two components: an Assessment Center and an Evaluation Center,which will be operated as separate units on the site. The children who will be served at the proposed Children's Services Center have been victimized, and are not children who have done anything wrong themselves. They will range in age from infant through 17, predominantly between the ages of 7 and 16. Assessment Center The need for an Assessment Center in San Bernardino County was identified several years ago by County Children's Services, a division of the Department of Public Social Services. The Assessment Center which will be operated at this site has served San Bernardino County's children from temporary quarters donated by Loma Linda University Children's Hospital since 1994, and is in need of a permanent home. The Assessment Center provides professional medical and forensic examination for children who are suspected of having been sexually abused or molested. In its proposed permanent home, the Assessment Center will also be able to accommodate exams for children who are suspected of having been physically abused. According to the applicant, because the Assessment Center is a multi-agency collaborative effort, victimized children are able to tell their story one time, with all of the professional entities that need to be involved included in a single procedure. The applicant has further stated that, in addition to providing an advantage for the traumatized child, the Assessment Center also puts the law enforcement community in a much better position to successfully prosecute those who committed the abuse or molestation. The Assessment Center is anticipated to serve 55 children per month. Staffing will be six (6) employees at any given time,with up to fifteen(15)professionals present on site during an interview/investigation. 3 City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 4 of 15 January 13, 1998 Evaluation Center The second component of the Children's Services Center is an Evaluation Center. The only comparable facility in San Bernardino County is the recently opened Cooper Home in Apple Valley. Because County Children's Services would like to see a 25- to 30-bed Evaluation Center contiguous or in close proximity to the Assessment Center, Children's Fund has proposed a 30-bed Evaluation Center facility for the project site. The Evaluation Center will provide assessment and temporary placement for abused children (other than sexual abuse) who have been removed from their homes, and need to be given the time it takes to conduct an extensive evaluation of the child's needs in order to find an appropriate"match"for longer term placement. The Evaluation Center will be staffed by professional child care specialists,who will provide 24-hour medical, social, and psychological assessments, as well as support in a home-like atmosphere. There will be four(4)to six(6) employees present at any give time within the Evaluation Center. The Assessment Center will typically operate during weekday business hours -- Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. However, during an emergency, children may be brought to the Assessment Center at any time. The Evaluation Center,because it provides temporary placement,will operate seven days per week, 24 hours per day. It is proposed that the interior of the westerly building will be modified to house the Assessment Center as soon as possible following approval of the proposed project. Demolition of the easterly, warehouse building and construction of a new building to house the Evaluation Facility will occur as soon as practical thereafter. SITE AND AREA CHARACTERISTICS The project is located on the site of an abandoned industrial facility, and is bordered by industrial parcels to the east and west. To the east, immediately adjacent to the project site, are two industrial warehouse buildings, for construction material storage and the general storage for the United Parcel Service. Area characteristics to the west of the project site include two industrial warehouse buildings housing Ford Wholesale Roofing Supplier and ABC Roofing Supply at the northwest corner of Tippecanoe Avenue and AT&SF Railroad. Just southwest of the project site, at the comer of Tippecanoe Avenue and the AT&SF Railroad, is a vacant parcel that is zoned CR-3. The AT &SF Railroad divides the project site from the land uses to the south. The area to the south is zoned RMH, Residential Medium-High. Uses in this area consist of an Auto Repair Service, which is a legal non- conforming use for this area, and single family residential. The area to the north is designated OIP, and consists of the Loma Linda University Medical Center Support Service Center at the northeast corner of Tippecanoe Avenue and Victoria Avenue. Uses in the 4 City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 5 of 15 January 13, 1998 center include the medical center patient business office, Loma Linda Mercantile Receiving, and AHS Laundry. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project site was previously developed for industrial use, and contains no significant or sensitive environmental features. The site is not located within an area susceptible to any environmental hazards as identified in the General Plan. CITY CONTACT Gustavo J. Romo, Assistant Planner City of San Bernardino Department of Planning and Building Services 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Phone: (909) 384-5057 5 Z = Ford Wholesale A Ig f jg ABC Roofing Supply w Roofing Supplier o - — - — - — - — - — - - Tippecanoe Avenue d — T — - rt - — - — - — - — - — - o 179.41' I� I - I so , o so, � ° s i 40' ( 40' A 00 7� I b Ao CT — I � � I I I n I I I i N CD i o 0 BCD ITI CD EL Cn CAD CD I � x I City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 7 of 15 January 13, 1993 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY for GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97-07 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 97-05 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-21 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ON THE BASIS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY, ■ The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be significant effect in this case because the mitiga- tion measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGA- TIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA Gustavo J. Romo, Assistant Planner Name and Title D2 dS yam' Signs Date 7 City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 8 of 15 January 13, 1998 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS "Yes" and"Maybe" answers are explained at the . end of this checklist under"Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures." "No" answers are explained on this checklist. See Attachment "A" Preliminary Environmental Description Form, where necessary. (SECTION 6) Yes No Maybe 1. Earth Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Earth movement(cut and/or fill)on slopes of 15%or more based on information contained in the Prelimi- nary Environmental Description Form No.D.(3)? X b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15%natural grade based on review of General Plan HMOD map,which designates areas of 15%or greater slope in the City? X c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Stud- ies Zone as defined in Section 12.0-Geologic &Seismic,Figure 47, of the City's General Plan? X d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature based on field review? X e. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Stud- ies Zone as defined in Section 12.0-Geologic &Seismic,Figure 53, of the City's General Plan? X f. Modification of a channel, creek or river based on review of USGS Topographic Map(Name) San Bdno.No. Qua ra gle? g. Development within an area subject to landslides, mudslides, subsidence or other similar hazards as identified in Section 12.0 -Geologic &Seismic, Figures 51, 52, and 53 of the City's General Plan? X h. Development within an area subject to liquefaction as shown in Section 12.0 -Geological& Seismic, Figure 48, of the City's General Plan? X i. Other? X 2. Air Resources: Will the proposal result in: 8 City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 9 of 15 January 13, 1998 Yes No Maybe a. Substantial air emissions or an effect upon ambient air quality as defined by South Coast Air Quality Management District,based on meeting the thresh- old for significance in the District's"CEQA Air Quality Handbook?" X b. The creation of objectionable odors based on infor- mation contained in Preliminary Description Form, No. G.(3)? X c. Development within a high wind hazard area as identified in Section 15.0-Wind&Fire,Figure 59,of the City's General Plan? X 3. Water Resources: Will the proposal rrsult in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to imperme- able surfaces that cannot be mitigated by Public Works Standard Requirements to contain and convey runoff to approved storm drain based on review of the proposed site plan? X b. Significant alteration in the course or flow of flood waters based on consultation with Public Works staff? X c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality based on requirements of Pub- lic Works to have runoff directed to approved storm drains? X d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground water? X e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards as identified in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map,Community Panel Number 060281 0010-13, and Section 16.0- Flooding,Figure 62,of the City's General Plan? X f. Other? X 9 City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 10 of 15 January 13, 1998 Yes No Maybe 4. Biological Resources: Could the proposal result in: a. Development within the Biological Resources Man- agement Overlay, as identified in Section 10.0- Natural Resources,Figure 41,of the City's General Plan? X 1. Change in the number of any unique,rare or endangered species of plants or their habitat including stands of trees based on information contained in the Preliminary Environmental De- scription Form No.B.(1) and verified by on-site survey/evaluation? X 2. Change in the number of any unique,rare or endangered species of animals or their habitat based on information contained in the Prelimi- nary Environmental Description Form No.E.(8) and verified by site survey/evaluation? X 3. Impacts to the wildlife disbursal or migration corridors? X b. Removal of viable,mature trees based on site sur- vey/evaluation and review of the proposed site plan? (6" or greater trunk diameter at 4'above the ground). X c. Other? X 5. Noise: Could the proposal result in: r l a. Development of housing, health care facilities, schools, libraries,religious facilities or other noise sensitive uses in areas where existing or future noise levels exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A)exterior and an Ldn of 45 dB(A)interior as identified in Section 14.0-Noise, Figures 57 and 58 of the City's General Plan? X b. Development of new or expansion of existing indus- trial, commercial or other uses which generate noise levels above an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior or an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior that may affect areas containing housing, schools, health care facilities or other sensi- tive uses based on information in the Preliminary Environmental De- scription Form No. G.(1) and evaluation of surrounding land uses No. C., and verified by site survey/evaluation? X 10 City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 11 of 15 January 13, 1998 Yes No Maybe c. Other? X 6. Land Use: Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the land use as designated based on the review of the General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning Districts Map? X b. Development within an Airport District as identified in the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ)Report and the Land Use Zoning District Map? X c. Development within Foothill Fire Zones A&B, or C as identified on the Development Code Overlay Districts Map? X d. Other? X 7. Man-Made Hazards: Based on information contained in Preliminary Environmental Description Form,No. G.(1)and G.(2)will the project: a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials(including but not limited to oil,pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? X b. Involve the release of hazardous substances? X C. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? X d. Other? X 8. Housing: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing as verified by a site sur- vey/evaluation? X b. Create a significant demand for additional housing based on the proposed use and evaluation of project size? X c. Other? X 9. Transportation/Circulation: Could the proposal,in comparison with the Circulation Plan as identified in Section 6.0-Circulation of the City's General Plan and based on the conclusions of the City Traffic Engineer and review of the Traffic Study if one was prepared, result in: 11 City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 12 of 15 January 13, 1998 Yes No Maybe a. A significant increase in traffic volumes on the road- ways or intersections or an increase that is signifi- cantly greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? X b. Use of existing,or demand for new,parking facili- ties/structures? X c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? X d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? X e. Impact to rail or air traffic? X f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles,bicyclists or pedestrians? X g. A disjointed pattern of roadway improvements? X h. Other? X 10. Public Services: Based on the responses of the re- sponsible agencies or departments,will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X c. Schools(i.e.,attendance,boundaries,overload, etc.)? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Medical aid? X f. Solid Waste? X g. Other? X 11. Utilities: Will the proposal: a. Based on the responses of the responsible Agen- cies, Departments, or Utility Company, impact the following beyond the capability to provide ade- quate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? X 12 City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 13 of 15 January 13, 1998 Yes No Maybe 2. Electricity? X 3. Water? X 4. Sewer? X 5. Other? X b. Result in a disjointed pattern of utility extensions based on review of existing patterns and proposed extensions. X 12. Aesthetics: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any significant or important scenic view based on evaluation of the view shed verified by site survey/ evaluation? X b. Will the visual impact of the project create aesthet- ically offensive changes in the existing visual set- ting based on a site survey and evalua- tion of the proposed elevations? X c. Other? X 13. Cultural Resources: Could the proposal result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or l historic archaeological site by development within an archaeological sensitive area as identified in Section 3.0-Historical, Figure 8,of the City's Gen- eral Plan? X b. Alteration or destruction of a historical site, struc- ture or object as listed in the City's Historic Re- sources Reconnaissance Survey? X c. Other? X 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe,the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Based on this Initial Study: 13 City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 14 of 15 January 13, 1998 Yes No Maybe a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal com- munity,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate im- portant examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental goals?(A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future.) X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small,but where the effect of the total of those im- pacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human be- ings,either directly or indirectly? X B. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (SECTION'n 1. Earth Resources h. The existing buildings within the project were constructed in recognition of onsite conditions,and provide adequate protection from liquefaction hazards. The new building that is proposed within the project site will be constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code and local ordinances, thereby providing adequate protection. 5. Noise a. The proposed Children's Services Center will be subject to noise from vehicles traveling along Tippecanoe and Victoria avenues, as well as from railroad operations on the track forming the site's southerly property line. Because the existing rail line is a local service spur, its use will be intermittent, and speeds will be slow, minimizing noise impacts. In addition,noise will be mitigated up to 15 dB by standard building construction. As a result, significant impacts are not anticipated. 14 City of San Bernardino Initial Study Page 15 of 15 January 13, 1998 6. Land Use a. The proposed Children's Services Center use is not currently described in the General Plan or the City's Zoning Ordinance. As part of the project application, a General Plan Amendment from IH to OIP is proposed. The project application also requests that "Children's Services Center"be added to the list of uses permitted within the OIP district subject to a Conditional Use Permit. 7. Man-Made Hazards a. Because medical exams are among the proposed activities for the Children's Services Center, the facility will generate small amounts of medical wastes,similar to,but in smaller volumes than would result from a typical doctor's office. The disposal of medical wastes is highly regulated by the State of California,and the Children's Services Center will be required to comply with all applicable regulations. 15 co 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN 3 BERNARDINO. 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 5 SECTION 1. Recitals 6 (a) WHEREAS, the General Plan for the City of San Bernardino 7 was adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by Resolution No. 89- 8 159 on June 2 , 1989 . 9 (b) WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared on January 8, 1998 10 and reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee who determined 11 that General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 would not have a significant 12 effect on the environment and therefore, recommended that a 13 Negative Declaration be adopted. 14 (c) WHEREAS, the proposed Negative Declaration received a 21 15 day public review from January 15, 1998 through February 4, 1998 in 16 compliance with the California Environmental Act (CEQA) and local 17 regulations and no comments from the public were received relative 18 thereto. 19 (d) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed 20 21 public hearing on March 3 , 1998 in order to receive public 22 testimony and written and oral comments on General Plan Amendment No. 97-07, a proposal to change the General Plan Land Use 23 Designation from IH, Industrial Heavy, to OIP, Office Industrial 24 25 Park, for a parcel of land located on the southeast corner of 26 Tippecanoe Avenue and Victoria Avenue, at 1499 N. Tippecanoe 27 Avenue, and fully reviewed and considered the Planning Division 28 1 1 staff report and the recommendation of the Environmental Review 2 Committee. 3 (e) WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council held a noticed 4 public hearing and fully reviewed and considered proposed General 5 Plan Amendment No. 97-07 and the Planning Commission and 6 Environmental Review Committee recommendations and Planning 7 Division Staff Report on April 6, 1998. 8 (f) WHEREAS, the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 9 is deemed in the interest of the orderly development of the City 10 and is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the 11 existing General Plan. 12 SECTION 2 . Environmental Determination 13 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the Mayor 14 and Common Council that the proposed amendment to the General Plan 15 of the City of San Bernardino will have no significant effect on 16 the environment and the Negative Declaration heretofore prepared by 17 the Environmental Review Committee as to the effect of this 18 proposed amendment is hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted. 19 SECTION 3 . Findings 20 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of the 21 City of San Bernardino that: 22 A. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the 23 General Plan in that it does not change the industrial 24 characteristics of the site or area and the amendment is 25 consistent with Objective 1. 31 relating to the establishment 26 of appropriate areas of the City as distinctive office 27 industrial parks. 28 B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public 2 1 interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City 2 in that the permitted uses would be conducted within enclosed 3 structures and the proposed designation does not change the 4 land uses which are presently on the site or allow new land 5 uses which are otherwise prohibited. 6 C. The proposed amendment would not affect the balance of land 7 uses within the City in that the proposed amendment area will 8 retain industrial uses as well as related office uses. 9 D. The amendment site is physically suitable for the requested 10 olp, office Industrial Park land use designation in that the 11 site meets the minimum requirements of the development code in 12 regards to lot size, access, and circulation. The change from 13 IH to OIP does not affect the physical characteristics of 14 these parcels. 15 SECTION 4. Amendment 16 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that: 17 A. The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of San 18 Bernardino is amended by changing one parcel of land (APN: 19 0281-102-11) from IH, Industrial Heavy, to OIP, Office 20 Industrial Park. This amendment is designated as General Plan 21 Amendment No. 97-07 and its location is outlined on the map 22 entitled Attachment A and further described in Attachment B, 23 copies of which are attached and incorporated herein by 24 reference. 25 B. General Plan Amendment No. 97-07 shall become effective 26 immediately upon adoption of this resolution. 27 SECTION 5. Map Notation 28 This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be 3 1 noted on such appropriate General Plan maps as have been previously 2 adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common Council and which are 3 on file in the office of the City Clerk. 4 SECTION 6. Notice of Determination 5 The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of 6 Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino 7 certifying the City's compliance with California Environmental 8 Quality Act. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1 RESOLUTION. . .ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly 3 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San 4 Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the 5 day of 1998 , by the following 6 vote, to wit: 7 Council Members AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT 8 ESTRADA 9 LIEN 10 ARIAS 11 SCHNETZ 12 DEVLIN 13 ANDERSON 14 MILLER 15 16 City Clerk 17 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day 18 of , 1998. 19 20 JUDITH VALLES, Mayor City of San Bernardino 21 Approved as to form 22 and legal content: 23 JAMES F. PENMAN, City ttorney 24 B 25 y: 26 27 28 5 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 97-07 ATTACHMENT "All - SAN BERNARDINO leb) s90 277. 75 a, SO ro 3> ^r� W Par. 2 h b W 4 Q m 1.89 AC. O a o n 2S/•20 N 3A X76 L49.6Z 0 PM. � 18 3 L ' N 3 H hN Par. I "' `V a n m to 19 AC. o M i � hl O m a a � a g, 539 90 Is m � vlcroRlA W ro�vt::NNI F'i i `:i ....... Par.3 a s a ..:E ;+ = 1.14 AC. 1 qv E`a :ram.. 2 zoo.w .az.zo 14 7045 .............. 9 MAP 804-36-105 104 0 1 f Parcel Map No. 5049, P.M.45/89-90 Parcel Map No. 4639, PM.43/89-90 Pnr Parcel Mao No.4138. P.M.38/76-77 ATTACHMENT B GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-07 - PROPOSED AMENDED PARCEL: Assessor Parcel Number: 0281-102-11 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING CHAPTERS 19.02 AND 19.08 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (DEVELOPMENT 3 CODE) REGARDING CHILDREN'S SERVICES CENTERS. 4 THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 5 SECTION 1. Section 19. 02 . 050, DEFINITIONS is amended to 6 add a definition of Children's Services Center (see Attachment 1-A, 7 8 Development Code page I-9, a copy of which is attached hereto and 9 incorporated herein by reference) . SECTION 2. Section 19. 08 . 020, Table 08 . 01 INDUSTRIAL 10 DISTRICTS LIST OF PERMITTED USES is amended to add a new item 11 (6) Children's Services Center, as a conditionally permitted use 12 in the OIP land use district, and renumber the remaining items 13 sequentially (see Attachment 1-B, Development Code page II-128, a 14 copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by 15 reference) . 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 ORDINANCE. . .AMENDING CHAPTERS 19.02 AND 19.08 OF THE SAN 2 BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (DEVELOPMENT CODE) REGARDING CHILDREN'S SERVICES CENTERS. 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted 4 by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a 5 meeting thereof, held on the day 6 of , 1998, by the following vote, to wit: 7 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT 8 ESTRADA 9 LIEN 10 ARIAS 11 SCHNETZ 12 DEVLIN 13 ANDERSON 14 MILLER 15 16 17 CITY CLERK 18 The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this day 19 of , 1998. 20 21 JUDITH VALLES, Mayor 22 City of San Bernardino 23 Approved as to form and legal content: 24 JAMES F. PENMAN, 25 City torn 26 By: 27 28 2 ATTACHMENT 1-A BASIC PROVISIONS - 19.02 Children's Services Center. A facility operated by a non-profit organization to administer services to children suspected of having been neglected or abused. The facility may include professional medical and forensic services, food, shelter, legal assistance, personal guidance, and other similar services for children up to 17 years of age; the facility may also include temporary sleeping quarters with a licensed foster care professional to provide for children in transition from one foster home to another. �. The City of San Bernardino. Clinic. A place for outpatient medical services to human patients. Club. An association of persons (whether or not incorporated) organized for some common purpose, but not including a group organized primarily to render a service customarily carried on as a business. Clustered Subdivision. A subdivision development in which building lots are sized to conform to the "footprint" of the structures and sited closer together than conventional development, usually in groups or clusters, provided that the total density does not exceed that permitted under conventional zoning and subdivision regulations. The additional land that remains undeveloped is preserved as open space and recreation land. Private development easements around the structures are permitted for inclusion of private landscaping, pools, spas, yards, etc. Combination Residence/Office Use. A structure used for a residence and an office where no major external structural alterations or additions are made and no advertising is permitted except for up to a 3 square foot attached sign identifying the name of the occupant or business. Commercial Vehicle. A vehicle customarily used as part of a business for the transportation of goods or people. Commission. The Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino. Community Apartment. A development in which an undivided interest in the land is coupled with the right of exclusive occupancy of an apartment located on the land. Community Care Facility. Consistent with Health and Safety Code (Section 1267.8) the intermediate care facility shall include provisions for developmentally disabled habilitative - nursing or congregate living. Conditional Use/Development Permit. A discretionary entitlement which may be granted under the provisions of this Development code and which when granted authorizes a specific use to be made of a specific property, subject to compliance with all terms and conditions imposed on the entitlement. Condominium. A development consisting of an undivided interest in common for a portion of a parcel coupled with a separate interest in space in a residential or commercial building on the parcel. Construction Commencement. The start of construction of substantial site and structural I-9 5/91 ATTACHMENT 1-B INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS - 19.08 C. EE (INDUSTRIAL EXTRACTIVE) DISTRICT This district is intended to promote the mining and processing of the City's mineral resources in the Cajon Creek, Lytle Creek, and Santa Ana River areas, while ensuring their compatibility with adjacent land uses. Additionally, this land use district provides for the development of interim uses including, but not limited to lumber yards, outdoor storage, plant nurseries, recreation (non- structural), etc., which do not impair the long term ability to extract and process mineral resources. 19.08.020 PERMITTED, DEVELOPMENT PERMITTED AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES The following list represents those primary uses in the manufacturing/industrial zoning districts which are Permitted (P), subject to a Development Permit (D) or a Conditional Use Permit (C): TABLE 08.01 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS LIST OF PERMITTED USES MC 888 1/6/94 LAND USE ACTIVITY CH OIP IL III EE 1. Accessory structures/uses typically appurtenant to a D D D D D principally permitted land use activity; 2. Agricultural Production-crops; — — — D D 3. Agricultural Services; D — D D — 4. Assembling, cleaning, manufacturing, processing, D D' D D — repairing or testing of products including automotive related (except dismantling) and welding and excluding explosives, conducted entirely within an enclosed structure except for screened outdoor storage areas; 5. Assembling, cleaning, manufacturing, processing, repair D — — D of products, research, storage, testing or wholesale land uses (except explosives) with a portion of the operation (other than storage) occurring outside of the enclosed structure: A. Outside land uses in the CH and IH districts C — — C — within 150 feet of a residential land use district; 6. Children's Services Center; — C — — — U-128 2/94 CHILDREN'S FUND PHOTO ESSAY February 26, 1998 Prepared for: Children's Fund �a2� CHILDREN'S FUND PHOTO ESSAY February 26, 1998 Prepared for: Children's Fund 385 North Arrowbead Avenue San Bernardino, California 92418 i �r r �r mg I Photograph 1: New of Future Children's Assessment Center with Future Children's Evaluation Center in background. tt � x b r 1 >��°s` r% � ��s° � r �i���i'�III ��sy�!:ys � �I�����' r.,d., �u'!✓9:,�p �a ' � ° we �. r; € Photograph 2: View of southwest corner of Future Children's Assessment Center, runoffgutter and parking lot to be repaired. 2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND) ISA Existing Building (to Remain) Conversion to Children's Assessment Center p 04, 1-7 y S °ry b Photograph 3: View of southeast corner of Future Children's Assessment Center with Victoria Avenue in background. Entrance and parking lot to be repaired. y uF M � � 113�r t�7 ��f�333�377�333��1�i��p Photograph 4: View of southeast corner of Future Children's Assessment Center with Tippecanoe Avenue and Ford Wholesale Company Roofing Suppliers building in background. 2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND) ISA Existing Building (to Remain) Conversion to Children's Assessment Center t z _ :'wqsW6 X A Photograph S: New of entrance between Future Children's Assessment Center(on left)and Future Children's Evaluation Center(on right). Roadway between buildings to be repaired. r ra r _ �W Y ,3 P r tw b r °:�k n�Sx d •x�3rDb { N Photograph 6: Rear view of Future Children's Centers and parking lot. 2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND) ISAFuture Children's Centers I 9 L _ x ry Y , f h' Photograph 7: View of northwest corner of Future Children's Evaluation Center(existing building to remain during Phase 1 development but eventually will be removed and replaced with a new one). WO N TI Il �Sy F a n WT 3 ii I I ,E. 7 777! na Photograph 8: Looking eastward, showing southwest corner of Future Children's Evaluation Center, existing fence and gated parking lot. 2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND) ISAFuture Children's Evaluation Center iaai � n i nt l 3 � I a. ;s.� . WAR Photograph 9: View facing southeast corner at entrance of site showing southwest corner of Future Children's Evaluation Center fence and parking lot. 2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND) MAFuture Children's Evaluation Center 7 9- Photograph 10: AT&SF Railroad and Tippecanoe Avenue intersection located south of the Future Children's Centers. I Mi, � Y ZF/ �yi yyY y ��WQ t� sc u s x y �A � Photograph 11: View of the AT&SF Railroad and drainage easement south of the Future Children's Centers. Fencing exists in vegetation in left side ofphotograph. 2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND) ISARailroad South of Future Children's Centers y ,s r �n ;may r=� x t 3 j J M ,+ � � 4s�z'&V3 ��sG A mill Photograph 12: Rear view of Future Children's Centers. KY r �i n Dn�. srw,1 .mr• f d �' irk'` .) a 1i Photograph 13: Rear view of the Future Children's Centers. Razor wire to be removed,fencing to be repaired and site to be cleaned. 2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND) Fencing Along South Side MA of Future Children's Centers ra A-1 iayf.N' i. Photograph 14: View of Tippecanoe Avenue and Ford's Wholesale Company Roofing Suppliers. Photograph taken from rear of Future Children's Assessment Center parking lot. •- y �3 suvRUn+ m wh Photograph 15: View of Tippecanoe Avenue and Victoria Avenue taken from the northwest corner of the Future Children's Assessment Center. 2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND) ISALand Uses Along Tippecanoe Avenue y1�7�F N �tF C .d k r,✓�c P r w xrq .✓ '*.ten" � ec���i�'� «�5 Photograph 16: View of Loma Linda Support Services Center taken from the intersection of Tippecanoe Avenue and Victoria Avenue. ! Photograph 17: View of Loma Linda Support Services Center taken from the intersection of Tippecanoe Avenue and Victoria Avenue. Future Children's Centers shown in right side ofphotograph. 2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND) l s MALand Uses Alon g Tippecanoe ecanoe Avenue I� Photograph 18: View of small parking lot of Loma Linda Support Services Center. Victoria Avenue and Future Children's Centers in background. O,`.;. { J k Photograph 19: Easterly view of Victoria Avenue.Loma Linda Support Services Center located in right of photograph. A sidewalk will be installed on the south side of Victoria Avenue;the distance from the curb to the closest tree is 4%feet. 2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND) MALand Uses Along Victoria Avenue � ryry nxrtr�� � r IpY r Photograph 20: View of Victoria Avenue and the AT&SF Railroad crossing. ' Loma Linda Support Services Center located in background. q p. � rid q , i a W-1 r �,° ✓� ,� ��r$� � � two � r� ��w Photograph 21: View of Victoria Avenue and the AT&SF Railroad crossing. Loma Linda Support Services Center buildings and parking lot located in background. 2/26/98(CHILDREN'S FUND) ISALand Uses Along Victoria Avenue R I F 2 Z Z i n , , I TIPPECA NOE AVER R d 0 i a Y c Y Y g p� R a 0 b I F ' , 1 i \ L I r m Z 4 � O a � D Y � } 0 � V m Q X I W Z 2 r� y V JZQ mOc� x02 � UV �n 1 D � r � \ 0 � I x z i x k x k I X IJ �C HIMES • PETERS • JEPSON ARCHITECTS„ INC. 1 5 0 5 • L 5 C A 0 1 L L A C A V C N U C C 0 9 TA M C 9 A , C A L I F O R N I A 0 2 d Z d (714) 549 - 0044 FAX (7141649 - 7' 141 A R C H I T C C T U R C d P L A N N I N G a ' 1 n 0 R � I ► I I z 0 � I a Qn � d t r , s 0 r i Oyy Cy rn R 00 C7 9 D N DDDDD N C. n � i v �i -4 v � 0 S �' j CHILDRENS FUND CHILDREII�S SFRVI CEs CEN TE