HomeMy WebLinkAbout09- Development Services CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: MICHAEL E. HAYS , Director Subject: Review of the City's Unreinforced Masonry Building
Mitigation Program and Consideration of proposed
De-' Development Services Ordinances amending SBMC Chapter 15.12 relating
to time limits for compliance.
Date: May 12, 1999 O p
File No:
Synopsis of Previous Council Action: MCC DATE: May 17, 1999
MC982 Adopted September 16, 1996 provided a 3 year extension of the time limits for compliance.
Recommended Motion:
That further reading of Ordinance"A"be waived and that said Ordinance be laid over for final adoption.
v
Michael E. s
Contact Person: Joseph Lease or Henry Empeno Phone: 5171/5235
Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: all
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: -0-
Source (Acct. No.)
(Acct. Description)
Finance:
Cou-r.il Notes: �, 2/�
Agenda Item No
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
bject:
,L.eview of the City's Unreinforced Masonry Building Mitigation Program and Consideration of alternate
proposed Ordinances amending SBMC Chapter 15.12 relating to time limits for compliance.
Background:
The California Government Code, Section 8875.1 requires all cities within seismic zone 4 to identify potentially
hazardous unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings and to establish mitigation programs. The City of San
Bernardino's URM Mitigation Program is contained in Chapter 15.12 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code.
Chapter 15.12 requires URM buildings to be seismically strengthened to resist the damaging effects of
earthquakes in order to mitigate the potential for loss of life or injury during future events. All of the known
URM buildings in the City have been issued compliance orders. Buildings falling within Hazard Classification
II were required to obtain a building permit by April 15, 1999 (other classifications have subsequent deadlines).
The building official is required to issue orders to close and vacate buildings which fail to meet this deadline
(SBMC 15.12.040,UCBC Al 11.(C)6). In preparation for this deadline a survey of the buildings and
businesses contained within the Class II designation was recently completed. The results are summarized
below:
CLASS II BUILDING SURVEY
No. of Buildings: 26
No. Vacant: 4
" Occupied: 22
_ .J. of Affected Businesses: 33
Prior to commencing abatement actions against the noncomplying buildings this matter is being brought before
the Mayor and Common Council to review the issues involved and to decide whether the existing ordinance
should be enforced, resulting in the closure of 21 occupied buildings currently having a noncompliance status,
or to consider options for amending the ordinance. This same deadline originally came due in April 1996, at
which time the council opted to amend the ordinance to allow an additional three years for compliance. This
was done to avoid the negative economic impacts which would have resulted from numerous business closures
and relocations as a consequence of the building closures. Also, there was an expectation that economic
conditions might improve to a point where retrofitting might be financially feasible for building owners. Many
building owners continue to express that due to low occupancy and lease rates, seismic strengthening is not
financially viable for them. Since economic conditions have not significantly changed the Council may wish to
consider several options at this time. Potential options include, but are not limited to the following:
Options:
A. Adopt the proposed Ordinance "A"amending SBMC Chapter 15.12 to allow an additional five years for
compliance.
B. Adopt the proposed Ordinance `B" amending SBMC Chapter 15.12 to make the time limits permissive, and
not mandatory.
a
Enforce the current ordinance and close the 21 noncomplying buildings. Consider using EDA resources to
the extent feasible to retain and relocate businesses in the city.
i
i
It should be noted that the Class II buildings comprise only about a quarter of the URM buildings in the City.
"iere are a total of 119 URM buildings in the City that have yet to comply with SBMC 15.12. The Class III
A IV buildings have later deadlines. The proposed ordinances (noted in Options A and B) would affect the
time limits for all of these buildings. Because the time limits for Class II buildings have expired,
Councilmembers have requested that these two ordinances be proposed for consideration.
Additional information is attached , which includes a list of affected businesses in Class II buildings
(Addendum A) and a summary of the City's Unreinforced Masonry Building Mitigation Program (Addendum
B).
Financial Impact:
Dependent upon the action taken. If business closures occur the City would experience a loss of an
undetermined amount of sales tax revenue.
Recommendation:
That the Mayor and Common Council adopt Ordinance "A" (identified as option A above) providing for a
five year extension of the time limits, and lay said Ordinance over for final adoption.
ADDENDUM A
BUSINESSES LOCATED IN CLASS II UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS
Address/Businesses Notes & Status
1 . 281-291. W. Baseline St . /1181-1191 N. Arrowhead Plans submitted
- (vacant) (281) 10/16/95-
- Quick Pawn (291) Plan Check
- Botanica (1181) Expired-
- Salon De Belleza (1185) noncompliance*
- La Tambora (1187)
- Las Polencias Botanica (1191)
2 . 456 W. Baseline St . No action -
- (vacant) noncompliance
3 . 535 W. Baseline St . No action -
- Value Plus Furniture noncompliance
4 . 1023 W. Baseline St . No action -
- (vacant) noncompliance
5 . 362-366 N. D St . Plans submitted
- Lara' s Boxing Gym (364) 1/11/95 -
- S .B. Jewelry and Loan (366) Plan Check
Expired -
noncompliance
6 . 361-369 N. E St . Plans submitted
- (New - unknown) (361) 10/31/95-
- Airwave Communications (365) Permit obtained
- Louie The Tailor (369) 1/27/97 - Expired-
noncompliance
7 . 961 N. E St . Permit for Partial
- Valley Thrift - p l a n s f or
remainder
8 . 1233-1235 N. E St . Plans submitted
- Las Palmas Restaurant 10/11/95 - ready to
issue 12/21/95 -
Plan Check Expired
- Noncompliance
9 . 410 S . E St . No action -
VACANT noncompliance
10 . 1156 N. F St . Plans submitted
- Victory Chapel 9/13/95 - Plan
Check Expired-
noncompliance
11 . 137 S . G St . No action -
- San Bernardino Arena noncompliance
12 . 338-340 W. Highland Ave. No action -
- Dance Magic (338) noncompliance
13 . 339-349 W. Highland Ave . No action -
- (vacant) (339) noncompliance
- Noyes Bakery (341)
- Chandler' s Wind Up (347)
- Hair International (349)
14 . 346 W. Highland Ave. Plans submitted
- Harris Kempo Karate 11/21/95 - Plan Check
Expired -
noncompliance
15 . 357 W. Highland Ave. Plans submitted -
- GoldBall Billiards Permit issued.
Partial construction
completed - Permit
Expired
16 . 472-474 W. Highland Ave. No action -
- Sin City Tattoo (474) noncompliance
- Glady' s Video Games
1 . 602 N. Mt . Vernon No action -
- Mitla' s Cafe noncompliance
18 . 610 N. Mt . Vernon No action -
VACANT noncompliance
19 . 644 N. Mt . Vernon No action -
- Fonseca' s Discount Store noncompliance
20 . 1168 N. Waterman/290 E. Orange No action -
- Tabernacle Church noncompliance
21 . 467-473 W. 4th St . Plans submitted
- Security Loan and Jewelry (467) 10/16/95 - Permit
- Inland School of Performing Arts (469) issued 12/6/95
- Fat Freddies (471) Permit Expired
22 . 1199 W. 5th St . No action -
- Los Faroles Restaurant noncompliance
23 . 1562-1564 W. 5th St . No action -
- Club Trinidad noncompliance
24 . 1788 W. 5th St . No action -
- Unity Missionary Baptist Church noncompliance
25 . 1242 W. 6th St . No action -
- Iglesia Apostolica De La Fe En Christo Jesus noncompliance
26 . 1524 W. 7th St . Demo.& Reconstruction
- Casa Ramona Inc . Pending Environmental
Review 4/8/99
Summary of Class II Buildings
Number of Buildings 26
Buildings with No Action 16
Buildings Not in Compliance 25
- Vacant: 4
- Occupied: 22
- No. of affected businesses 33
Plan Checks Pending or Completed 7
Active Permits *** 0
Expired Permits 3
'TOTES :
* The status "noncompliance" denotes whether the owner has met the most
recent. deadline of April 15, 1999 . Permits are required by this date for
Class II buildings .
** The term "no action" indicates that none of the required steps have been
taken to retrofit the building (i .e engineering evaluation, plans
submittal, permit issuance, commencement of construction, etc . )
*** Does not include buildings that are no longer on the list due to full
compliance.
ADDENDUM B
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDING
MITIGATION PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Unreinforced Masonry Buildings (URM's), as the name implies, are building
which lack adequate structural steel reinforcement, and therefore lack the ability
to resist the shaking effects of earthquakes. In addition to the lack of adequate
steel reinforcement within the masonry walls, these buildings have other inherent
weaknesses such as 1)unbraced masonry parapets which may fall onto sidewalks
or streets, 2)a lack of structural attachment of the floor and roof diaphragms to the
walls, which allows excessive movements in the walls and which may lead to
collapse. In San Bernardino these buildings were typically constructed prior to
July, 1938.
As are most areas in California, San Bernardino is situated'in a seismically active
region. Two major earthquake faults, the San Andreas and the San Jacinto,
traverse the city and the surrounding communities, and represent substantial risks
to seismically vulnerable structures. Numerous studies conducted in the aftermath
of earthquakes throughout the world have demonstrated that unreinforced masonry
(URM) buildings suffer a greater amount of damage and contribute to a greater
loss of life than any other type of structure. Because of the unique risks associated
with URM buildings, the State Legislature passed into law SB 547 (Alquist) in
1986. This law requires local jurisdictions to identify URM buildings and to
establish mitigation programs to alleviate the potential hazards. The law does not
specify that mandatory strengthening is a necessary element of a city's mitigation
program.
In response to this law, the City has identified and established a list of URM
buildings, and has adopted an ordinance which requires that these buildings be
rehabilitated in accordance with the adopted State design standards. These design
standards are less stringent than the building code requirements for new masonry
buildings, and are not intended to make the building "earthquake proof". Instead,
their purpose is to reduce the risks of loss of life or injuries caused by partial or
total collapse of the building in the event of a moderate to severe earthquake.
The City's ordinance. SBMC Chapter 15.12 has several key features:
I. It adopts the UCBC Appendix Chapter 1, which is the State of California
design standard for the strengthening of URM buildings.
2. It categorizes the buildings into "hazard classifications" based upon the
allowable occupant load and the relative hazard. These classifications are:
Classification Occupant Load
I (essential services buildings)
II (high risk) 100 or more
III (medium risk) 20 to 99
IV (low risk) less than 20
3. It establishes time limits for strengthening the buildings which vary based
on the hazard classification. These time limits vary from 3 to 11 years and
are measured from the date a Notice and Order is issued. An amendment
to the ordinance in 1996 added an additional 3 years to all of the deadlines.
4. It provides that those buildings which are not strengthened within the time
limits must be vacated.
In 1994 Notices were issued to the owners of URM building currently on the list.
I ORDINANCE NO.
2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
3 15. 12.100, 15.12. 110, AND 15.12.120 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE EXTENDING THE TIMELIMITS FOR RETROFITTING
4 UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS; AND AMENDING SECTION 15. 12.140
ESTABLISHING THE PENALTY FOR NONCOMPLIANCE.
5 NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
6 SAN BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1 . Section 15 . 12 . 100 of the San Bernardino
7 Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows :
8 "15.12.100 Class II Buildings, Compliance Extension and Sign
9 Posting.
Notwithstanding any other provision in this Chapter, any
10 building owner who has received actual or constructive notice that
the building is an unreinforced masonry building, whether vacant
11 or occupied, that has been designated Class II by the Building
12
Official shall comply with the following:
a. The building owner shall receive 1 ) an extension to
13 April 15, 2004 to submit a structural analysis and plans; and 2 )
an extension to April 15, 2005 to obtain a building permit from
14 the Building Official, provided that within 30 days of receiving
written notice of this section, said building owner shall post and
15 maintain in a conspicuous and unobstructed place at the entrance
of the building, a sign not less than 5" X 7" the following
16 statement, printed in not less than 30-point bold type:
17 "This is an unreinforced masonry building.
18 Unreinforced masonry buildings may be unsafe in the
event O.L. a major earthquake . "
19 b. If the sign provided for in subsection (a) is not
posted or maintained as required, the building owner shall vacate
20 the premises as required pursuant to Section 15 . 12 . 040 Subsection
21 6 .A. "
22 SECTION 2 . Section 15 . 12 . 110 of the San Bernardino
Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows :
23 "15. 12 . 110 Class III Buildings, Compliance Extension and Sign
24 Posting.
Notwithstanding any other provision in this Chapter, any
building owner who has received actual or constructive notice that
26 the building is an unreinforced masonry building, whether vacant
or occupied, that has been designated Class III by the Building
27 Official shall comply with the following:
28 a. The building owner shall receive 1) an extension to
April 15, 2005 to submit a structural analysis and lans; and 2)
1 .�9'
1 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
2 15.12.100, 15.12.110, 15.12.120,AND 15.12.140 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL
CODE.
3
an extension to April 15, 2006 to obtain a building permit from
4 the Building Official, provided that within 30 days of receiving
written notice of this section, said building owner posts and
5 maintains in a conspicuous and unobstructed place at the entrance
of the building, a sign not less than 5" X 7" the following
6 statement, printed in not less than 30-point bold type:
7 "This is an unreinforced masonry building.
Unreinforced masonry buildings may be unsafe in the
8 event of a major earthquake. "
9 b. If the sign provided for in subsection (a) is not
posted or maintained as required, the building owner shall vacate
10 the premises as required pursuant to Section 15 . 12 . 040 Subsection
6 .A. "
11
SECTION 3 . Section 15 . 12 . 120 of the San Bernardino
12 Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows :
13 "15 . 12.120 Class IV Buildings, Compliance Extension and Sign
Posting.
14
Notwithstanding any other provision in this Chapter, any
15 building owner who has received actual or constructive notice that
the building is an unreinforced masonry building, whether vacant
16 or occupied, that has been designated Class IV by the Building
17 Official shall comply with the following:
a. The building owner shall receive 1 ) an extension to
18 April 15, 2007 to submit a structural analysis and plans; and 2 )
an extension to April 15, 2008 to obtain a building permit from
19 the Building Official, provided that within 30 days of receiving
written notice of this section, said building owner posts and
20 maintains in a conspicuous and unobstructed place at the entrance
of the building, a sign not less than 5" X 7 " the following
21 statement, printed in not less than 30-point bold type:
22 "This is an unreinforced masonry building.
Unreinforced masonry buildings may be unsafe in the
23 event of a major earthquake. "
24 b• If the sign provided for in subsection (a) is not
posted or maintained as required, the building owner shall vacate
25 the premises as required pursuant to Section 15 . 12 . 040 Subsection
6 .A. °
26
SECTION 4 . Section 15 . 12 . 140 establishing the penalty
27 for noncompliance is hereby amended to read as follows :
28
2
1 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
2 15-12.100, 15.12.110, 15.12.120,AND 15.12.140 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL
CODE.
3
"15.12.140 Penalty.
4
Failure to comply with Sections 15. 12 . 100, 15 . 12 . 110 or
5 15. 12 . 120 is an infraction, and every day the building owner fails
to vacate the premises or display the sign mandated by this
6 Chapter, shall constitute a separate violation of this section.
The penalty provided for in this section does not exclude any
7 other remedy and shall not be construed to prevent the City from
also bringing an administrative proceeding or other civil action
8 to cause any building to be vacated and or demolished. "
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
2 15.12.100, 15.12.110, 15.12.120,AND 15.12.140 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL
CODE.
3
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor and Common
4 Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof held on the day of
5 _ 1999, by the following vote, to wit:
6 t-"ouncil Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
7 ESTRADA
8 LIEN
9
10 MCGINNIS
11 SCFMTZ
12 ANI DERSON
13 DEVLIN
14 MH-LER
15
16
17 Rachel Clark, City Clerk
18 The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this_ day
19 of , 1999.
20
21
Judith Valles, Mayor
22 City of San Bernardino
23 Approved as to
24 form and legal content:
25 JAMES F. PENMAN,
City Attorney
26
27 By:
28 /
t, 4
1 ORDINANCE NO.
2
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADDING SECTION
3 15.12 .005 TO THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE CHANGING THE
TIMELIMITS FOR RETROFITTING UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS FROM
4 MANDATORY TO PERMISSIVE; AND AMENDING SECTION 15. 12 .140
5 ESTABLISHING THE PENALTY FOR NONCOMPLIANCE.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
6 SAN BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
7
SECTION 1 . Section 15 . 12 . 005 is hereby added to the San
8 Bernardino Municipal Code to read as follows :
9 "15. 12 .005 Permissive Timelimits.
10 Notwithstanding any other provision in this Chapter, any
timelimit or date stated in this Chapter within which the owner of
11 a legally occupied building "shall" comply, etc . , is hereby
changed to "may" comply, etc. ; that is, from mandatory to
12 permissive, except that the requirements, as stated in Sections
15 . 12 . 100, 15 . 12 . 110, and 15 . 12 . 120, that the building owner shall
13 post and maintain warning signs, remain mandatory. "
14 SECTION 2 . Section 15 . 12 . 140 establishing the penalty
15 for noncompliance is hereby amended to read as follows :
16 15. 12 . 140 Penalty.
Failure to comply with Sections 15 . 12 . 100, 15 . 12 . 110 or
17 15 . 12 . 120 is an infraction, and every day the building owner fails
to vacate the premises or display the sign mandated by this
18 Chapter, shall constitute a separate violation of this section .
The penalty provided for in this section does not exclude any
19 other remedy and shall not be construed to prevent the City from
also bringing an administrative proceeding or other civil action
20 to cause any building to be vacated and or demolished. "
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
1 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADDING SECTION
2 15 . 12.005 . . . CHANGING THE TIMELIMITS FOR RETROFITTING
UNR.EINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS FROM MANDATORY TO PERMISSIVE; AND
3 AMENDING SECTION 15.12.140 ESTABLISHING THE PENALTY FOR
NONCOMPLIANCE.
4
5 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly
adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
6 San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the
day of 1999, by the following vote, to wit :
7
8 Council Members : AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
ESTRADA
9
:LIEN
10
14CGINNIS
11
SCHNETZ
12
13 ;? NDERSON
DEVLIN
14
15 MILLER
�
16
17 Rachel Clark, City Clerk
18 The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this day
19 of , 1999 .
20
21 Judith Valles, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
i
22 Approved as to
23 f=orm and legal content:
JAMES F. PENMAN,
24 City Attorney
25
26 By:
27
28
2