Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout31- Planning & Building Services CITY OF SAN BERN ,DINO - REQUEST F( Z COUNCIL ACTION Frorr• Al Boughey, Director Subject: Development Code Amendment No. 93-15 - To permit a one time, automatic extension Dept: Planning & Building Services of time for previously approved CUPS , Development Permits and Variances . Date: December 21, 1993 MCC meeting of January 10, 1994 Synopsis of Previous Council action: 12/20/93 -- The Mayor and Common Council directed Planning staff to prepare an amendment to the Development Code. Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed, the first reading be waived and the ordinance be laid over for final adoption. Al Boughe Signature Contact person: Al Boughey Phone: 5357 Supporting data attached: Staff Report & Ordinance Ward: Citywide FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. Description) Finance: ;ouncil Notes: 15.0262 Agenda Item No. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Subject: Development Code Amendment (DCA No. 93-15) to permit a one time, automatic two year extension of time for previously approved Conditional Use Permits, Development Permits and Variances. Mayor and Common Council Meeting of January 10, 1994 BACKGROUND The Governor signed Senate Bill 428 on September 13 , 1993 , which extended the expiration date of tentative tract and parcel maps that had not expired on the effective date of the legislation. The legislation granted a one time, automatic two year extension of time. On December 20, 1993 the Mayor and Common Council directed staff to prepare a Development Code Amendment to allow a similar extension for Conditional Use Permits, Development Permits and Variances. KEY POINTS The State legislation was approved on an urgency basis because of adverse economic conditions in the construction industry. Those same adverse conditions affect all development projects. All applications that would be eligible for this extension have previously been reviewed pursuant to CEQA. All aspects of the applicable projects are in compliance with the provisions of the Development Code with the exception of those approved with a variance. (Some projects may have been deemed complete prior to Development Code adoption that are still valid. ) CEQA STATUS The Development Code Amendment is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Section 15061, the general rule which states " . . .that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be shown that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. " Extending the expiration date of previously approved development projects will not affect the environment. DCA No. 93-15 MCC Mtg. of 1/10/94 Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At their meeting of December 14 , 1993 the Planning Commission voted (5-0) to recommend adoption of Development Code Amendment No. 93- 15. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council approve Development Code Amendment No. 93-15 based on the Findings of Fact, to allow a one time, automatic two year extension of time for previously approved development projects. Attachment 111" Planning Commission Staff Report "A" Findings of Fact 112" Ordinance ATTACHMENT "1" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM #4 SUMMARY HEARING DATE December 14. 1993 WARD City-wide [APPLICANT: City of San Bernardino W N Development Code Amendment No. 93-15 NER: N/A V To permit a one time, automatic two year extension of time on previously N Uj approved Conditional Use Permits, Development Permits and Variances that were still valid as of September 13, 1993, Uj This amendment would be applicable city-wide, W cc Q EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION N/A GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC ❑=No L D HAZARD ❑ YES ❑ ZONE A SEWERS: OYES HAZARD ZONE: ❑ : ❑ NO ❑ ZONE B ❑ NO HIGH FIRE ❑ YES AIRPORT NOISE/ ❑ YES REDEVELOPMENT ❑ YES HAZARD ZONE: ❑ NO CRASH ZONE: PROJECT AREA: ❑ NO ❑ NO J ® "JOT ❑ POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z ® APPROVAL Q APPLICABLE EFFECTS WITH O H MITIGATING MEASURES L W Z V) NO E.I.R. < ❑ CONDITIONS Z ❑ EXEMPT ❑ E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO W Z Z G SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS Q W ❑ DENIAL OZ WITH MITIGATING H M IZ U: MEASURES N M ❑ CONTINUANCE TO Z ❑ NO SIGNIFICANT ❑ SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS O EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.R.C. V W W MINUTES CM of w.sap"Umm `rWPp ^"'rftG3E"CF_S PLM-9.02 PAGE 1 OF 1 (1.90) DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 93-15 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 HEARING DATE: December 14, 1993 Page 1 REQUEST Development Code Amendment (DCA) No. 93-15 would allow a one time, automatic two year extension of time on Conditional Use Permits, Development Permits and Variances which were previously approved and valid as of September 13 , 1993 . Sections 19. 36. 070, 19.44 . 070 and 19.72 . 080 of the Development Code pertaining to the expiration dates for conditional use permits (CUP) , development permits (DP) and variances would be amended to add language to this effect. BACKGROUND On September 13 , 1993 , the Governor approved Senate Bill 428 which extended the expiration date of tentative tract maps and parcel maps that had not expired on the effective date of the legislation. This automatic, 24 month extension was in addition to any other extensions permitted pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act. SB 428 was adopted on an urgency basis because of adverse economic conditions in the construction industry. The state legislation only extended tentative tracts and parcel maps and did not address related development projects. We have a number of conditional use permits and development permits that were approved concurrent with, or shortly after, tentative tracts and parcel maps. For projects in the Hillside Management Overlay District, we require a concurrent conditional use permit. Through DCA No. 93-07, the first phase of the Development Code revisions, the initial term for conditional use permits and development permits is being changed to two years from one year. There is no change to the one time, one year extension of time provision. This will apply to projects approved after the effective date of the ordinance, early 1994 , and will not affect previously approved projects. ANALYSIS Applicants spend a considerable amount of time and money preparing plans and miscellaneous environmental studies so that their application can be processed, and approved. Current economic conditions and unforseen circumstances have precluded many applications from going forward, after project approval. With the automatic extension by the state for tentative tract maps and parcel maps, staff feels that related CUPS or DPs should also be extended, for the same reason. In addition, staff recommends DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 93-15 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 HEARING DATE: December 14, 1993 Page 2 that all valid development projects receive the extension, even if they are not tied to a tentative tract map or parcel map. These projects are affected by the same economic conditions. Variances have been included because they are directly tied to a development through a conditional use permit or development permit. All tentative tracts, parcel maps, conditional use permits, development permits and variances are subject to CEQA. Some are determined to be exempt from CEQA for various reasons, while others require the preparation of an Initial Study to determine if there will be impacts, and, if so, identify appropriate mitigation. The Initial Study addresses impacts from the project itself, and impacts in conjunction with other projects (cumulative impacts) . The environmental review is completed prior to action by the Development Review Committee or Planning Commission. All projects that would be subject to this automatic extension have gone through the environmental review process. In all instances, the review authority has either certified an Environmental Impact Report, adopted a Negative Declaration, approved Mitigation Monitoring, recognized an Exemption, or a combination of these actions. In addition to environmental review, all projects are reviewed for consistency with the General Plan and Development Code. Throughout the General Plan are goals, objectives and policies pertaining to growth and development in the City. In particular, the Land Use Element addresses the types and distribution of land uses; the Housing Element addresses the provision of housing; and the Economic Element addresses the development of commercial, office and industrial uses to serve the community and to provide jobs. With the exception of projects approved with a variance, all aspects of the projects are in compliance with the provisions of the Development Code. Staff does not anticipate any upcoming revisions to the Code which would make these projects inconsistent. Please note that there may be some projects that were deemed complete prior to Development Code adoption that are still valid, but may not be completely consistent with current Code standards. CEOA STATUS Extending the expiration of previously approved projects by two years will not affect the environmental review completed for the project nor the environment. The Development Code Amendment is therefore not subject to CEQA pursuant to Section 15061, the general rule which states ". . .that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be shown that there is no possibility DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 93-15 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 HEARING DATE: December 14, 1993 Page 3 that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. " PROPOSED LANGUAGE Sections 19. 36. 070, Conditional Use Permit Expiration; 19.44 . 070, Development Permit Expiration; and 19.72 . 080, Variance Expiration will be amended to include the following language: Any Conditional Use Permit, Development Permit, Variance that was still valid as of September 13, 1993 is automatically extended for a two year period of time until September 13 , 1995. CONCLUSION Staff feels that a one time, two year extension of time for previously approved projects is consistent with the intent of the General Plan. It also demonstrates that the City recognizes the current economic conditions and seeks to provide a certain amount of relief. Since all affected projects have previously received environmental review, adopting an ordinance to extend the expiration date of the projects could not possibly affect the environments, and this DCA is not subject to CEQA. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the Mayor and Common Council approve Development Code Amendment No. 93- 15, to allow a one time, automatic two year extension of time for all previously approved conditional use permits, development permits and variances that were valid as of September 13, 1993. The amendment should also apply to all projects that were valid on that date, but would have expired between September 13, 1993 and the effective date of the ordinance. RRe]�spectfu Submitted, lJ� A Bou , I Direc or V�eucJ G,��- Valerie C. Ross Principal Planner Attachment "A" Findings of Fact DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 93-15 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 HEARING DATE: December 14, 1993 Page 4 ATTACHMENT "A" FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the intent of the General Plan in that the General Plan addresses land uses and the provision of housing and jobs. This amendment will help the City to realize those goals. 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that the amendment itself does not result in any physical changes to the environment. In addition, it is beneficial to the public interest in that it helps to promote housing and jobs as addressed in the previous finding. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS 19. 36. 070, 19 . 44 . 070 AND 19 . 72 . 080 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 3 CODE (DEVELOPMENT CODE) TO GRANT A ONE TIME, AUTOMATIC TWO YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. 4 THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO 5 ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 6 SECTION 1. Chapter 19 . 36 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS [see 7 Attachment A, Page IV-9, of the Development Code, attached hereto 8 and incorporated herein by reference] : 9 A. Amend Section 19 . 36. 070 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT EXPIRATION 10 to add the following paragraph: 11 "Any previously approved Conditional Use Permit that had not 12 expired as of September 13 , 1993 shall be extended for two years. 13 This automatic extension of time is a one time extension from 14 September 13 , 1993 and is in addition to the time granted under the 15 initial approval of the Conditional Use Permit or any subsequent 16 approval of an extension of time. " 17 SECTION 2 . Chapter 19 . 44 DEVELOPMENT PERMITS [see Attachment 18 B, Page IV-21, of the Development Code, attached hereto and 19 incorporated herein by reference] : A. Amend Section 19.44 . 070 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT EXPIRATION to 20 21 add the following paragraph: 22 "Any previously approved Development Permit that had not 23 expired as of September 13 , 1993 shall be extended for two years. This automatic extension of time is a one time extension from 24 25 September 13 , 1993 and is in addition to the time granted under the 26 initial approval of the Development Permit or any subsequent 27 approval of an extension of time. " 28 1 1 SECTION 3 . Chapter 19 . 72 VARIANCES [see Attachment C, 2 Page IV-82 , of the Development Code, attached hereto and 3 incorporated herein by reference] : 4 A. Amend Section 19 . 72 . 080 VARIANCE EXPIRATION to add the 5 following paragraph: 6 "Any previously approved Variance that had not expired as of 7 September 13 , 1993 shall be extended for two years. This automatic 8 extension of time is a one time extension from September 13 , 1993 9 and is in addition to the time granted under the initial approval 10 of the Variance or any subsequent approval of an extension of 11 time. " 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 ORDINANCE. . .TO AMEND SECTIONS 19 . 36. 070, 19 . 44 . 070 AND 19 . 72 . 080 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (DEVELOPMENT CODE) TO GRANT A ONE 2 TIME, AUTOMATIC TWO YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. 3 4 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly 5 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San 6 Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the 7 day of , 1994 , by the following vote, to wit: 8 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT 9 NEGRETE 10 CURLIN 11 HERNANDEZ 12 OBERHELMAN 13 DEVLIN 14 POPE-LUDLAM 15 MILLER 16 17 18 City Clerk 19 The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this day 20 of , 1994 . 21 22 Tom Minor, Mayor 23 City of San Bernardino Approved as to 24 form and legal content: JAMES F. PENMAN, 25 City Attorney 26 By: 27 28 3 r in.,iu inn CONDI- NAL USE PERMITS-1936 19.36.070 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT EXPIRATION A Conditional Use Permit shall be exercised by the commencement of construction within 1 year from the date of approval or the Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void. In addition, if after commencement of construction, work is discon- tinued for a period of one year, then the Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void. Projects may be built in phases if preapproved by the review authority. If a project is built in preapproved phases, each subsequent phase shall have 1 year from the previous phase's date of construction commencement to the next phase's date of construction commencement to have occurred, or the Conditional Use Permit shall be- come null and void. Any previously approved Conditional Use Permit that had not expired as of September 13 , 1993 shall be extended for two years. This automatic extension of time is a one time extension from September 13 , 1993 and is in addition to the time granted under the initial approval of the Conditional Use Permit or any subsequent approval of an extension of time. 19.36.080 MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT An approved Conditional Use may be modified, in a manner pursuant to Chapter 19.32 (Applications and Fees). Minor modifications to an approved Conditionl Use may be approved by the Director,pursuant to Section 19.60 (Minor Modifications). 19.36.90 TIME EXTENSION The Commission may, upon an application being filed 30 days prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension not to exceed 12 months. Upon granting of an ex- tension, the Commission shall ensure that the Conditional Use Permit complies with all current Development Code provisions. 19.36.100 REVOCATION The Commission may hold a hearing to revoke or modify a Conditional Use Permit granted pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter. Ten days prior to the hearing, notice shall be delivered in writing to the applicant and/or owner of the property for which such Conditional Use Permit was granted. Notice shall be deemed delivered 2 days after being mailed, first class postage paid, to the owner as shown on the current tax rolls of the County of San Bernardino, and/or the project applicant. A Conditional Use Permit may be revoked or modified by the Commission if any 1 of the following findings can be made: 1. That circumstances have changed so that 1 or more of the findings contained in Section 19.46.050 can no longer be made; rv-9 1/92 ATTACHMENT "B" DE '.OPMENr PERMITS-19.44 6. There are no significant harmful effects upon the environmental quality and natural resources; 7. The negative impacts of the proposed use shall be mitigated; 8. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan; and 9. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the requested use are not detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, con- venience, or welfare of the City. 19.44.070 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT EXPIRATION Within 1 year of Development Permit approval, commencement of construction shall have occurred or the permit shall become null and void. In addition, if after commence- ment of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the Develop- ment Permit shall become null and void. Projects may be built in phases if preap- proved by the review authority. If a project is built in preapproved phases, each subsequent phase shall have 1 year from the previous phase's date of construction com- mencement to the next phase's date of construction commencement to have occurred, or the Development Permit shall become null and void. Any previously approved Development Permit that had not expired as of September 13 , 1993 shall be extended for two years. This automatic extension of time is a one time extension from September 13 , 1993 and is in addition to the time granted under the initial approval of the Development Permit or any subsequent approval of an extension of time. 19.44.080 USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE FINAL DECISION No permit shall be issued for any use involved in an application for approval of a Development Permit until, and unless, the same shall have become final,pursuant to Section 19.52.080 (Effective Date). 19.44.090 MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT PERMIT An approved development may be modified, in a manner pursuant to Chapter 19.32 (Applications and Fees). Minor mr =ifications to an approved development may be ap- proved by the Director, pursuant to erection 19.60 (Minor Modifications). 19.44.100 TIME EXTENSION The review authority may, upon an application being filed 30 days prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension not to exceed 12 months. Upon granting the extension, the review authority shall ensure that the Development Permit complies with all current Development Code provisions. rv-n 5191 VARIANCES-19.72 19.72.060 PRECEDENTS The granting of a prior Variance is not admissible evidence for the granting of a new Variance. 19.72.070 BURDEN OF PROOF The burden of proof to establish the evidence in support of the findings, as required by Section 19.72.050, is the responsibility of the applicant. 19.72.080 VARIANCE EXPIRATION A Variance shall be exercised within 1 year from the date of approval, or the Variance shall become null and void. Any previously approved Variance that had not expired as of September 13 , 1993 shall be extended for two years. This automatic extension of time is a one time extension from September 13 , 1993 and is in addition to the time granted under the initial approval of the Variance or any subsequent approval of an extension of time. 19.72.090 TIME EXTENSION The Commission may, upon an application being filed 30 days prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension not to exceed 12 months. Upon granting of an ex- tension, the Commission shall ensure that the Variance complies with all current Development Code provisions. 19.72.100 USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE FINAL DECISION No permit shall be issued for any use involved in an application for approval of a Variance until, and unless, the same shall have become final,pursuant to Section 19.52.080 (Effective Date). 19.72.110 REVOCATION The Commission may hold a public hearing to revoke or modify a Variance granted pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter. Ten days prior to the public hearing,notice shall be delivered in writing to the applicant and/or owner of the property for which such Variance was granted. Notice shall be deemed delivered 2 days after being mailed,first class postage paid, to the owner as shown on the current tax rolls of the County of San Bernardino, and/or the project applicant. IV-82 5/91