Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout16- Public Works CPjT1P OF SAN BERNt 7DINO - REQUEST Fr'! COUNCIL ACTION — ' File Na": 6.46-1 Exception to 48-inch Standard From: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE Subject: Width - Sidewalk for Handicap Public Works Access - "E" Street, (West Side) , Dept: North of Second Street Date: 4-17-95 Synopsis of Previous Council action: ')Mir' 1 Cht7i None. AFT cJ r L Recommended motion: That the recommendation by the Handicap Accessibility Appeals Board, that the provision of the standard 48-inch width for the public sidewalk along "E" Street (west side) , north of Second Street, would constitute an unreasonable hardship, be accepted; and an exception granted for the actual width of 40 inches. cc: Shauna Clark Frank Rhemrev ignature contact person: Roger G. Hard rave Phone: 5025 supporting data attached: Staff Report & Report Ward: 1 =UNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. Description) Finance: ;ouncil Notes: 5-0262 Agenda Item No. CITY OF SAN BERN ,,ADINO - REQUEST FwA COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT A complaint was received from Mr. Robert Neves, 3771 Aspen Drive, San Bernardino, to the effect that the sidewalk on the west side of "E" Street, north of Second Street, had a 36- inch clear width, in lieu of the 48-inch clear width required for handicap access. An investigation was conducted in response to this complaint. The report of this investigation, dated 4-5-95 , was presented to the Handicap Accessibility Appeals Board for review and a recommendation, since the Mayor and Council have juris- diction over public rights-of-way. At their meeting of 4-12-95 , the Board unanimously approved the form motion to recommend that the Mayor and Council make a finding that provision of the standard 48-inch width would constitute an unreasonable hardship, and that an exception be granted for the actual width of 40 inches. We recommend that the recommendation by the Handicap Accessibility Appeals Board be accepted. 4-17-95 5-0264 C I T Y O F S A N B E R N A R D I N O INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY APPEALS BOARD FROM: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE, Director of Public Works/ City Engineer SUBJECT: Complaint on Sidewalk Width -- "E" Street (West Side) , North of Second Street DATE: April 5 , 1995 COPIES: Ernie Wilson; Frank Rhemrev; File No. 6 . 46-1 ; Reading File --------------------------------------------------------------- BASIS OF COMPLAINT: The recently installed street lights, as a part of the Main Street improvements, reduced the clear sidewalk width from 48 inches to 36 inches. DISCUSSION: "E" Street was improved as a part of the Central City Redevelopment Project in the late 1960 ' s. Street lights were installed by this project. The original street lights were recently replaced with new street lights in accordance with the Main Street theme. The minimum clear distance is about 40 inches. There are four (4) street lights within this section of "E" Street. Three (3) are set back from the curb, and the fourth is located at the normal distance from the curb face. Section 3324 of the Uniform Building Code states that walks and sidewalks shall be a minimum of 48 inches in width. However, an exception is allowed, as set forth in the CalACS Accessi- bility Standards Interpretive Manual, dated October, 1993 , to reduce the clear sidewalk width to 36 inches. This exception is allowed when, because of right-of-way restrictions, natural barriers, or other existing conditions, the enforcing agency determines that compliance with the 48-inch clear width would create an unreasonable hardship. Attached, for reference, is a copy of Figure No. 33-3 , from CalACS Accessibility Standards Interpretive Manual, depicting sidewalk obstructions. This figure shows a minimum sidewalk width of 48-inches, with a minimum clear distance to an ob- struction (such as a street light pole) of 36 inches. HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY APPEALS BOARD April 5 , 1995 Page - 2 - FINDINGS: Additional right-of-way would need to be acquired from the Carousel Mall parking lot in order to comply with the 48-inch standard width. The existing concrete block retaining wall would have to be removed and reconstructed, at the location of the four (4) street lights. The preliminary estimate of cost for removing and reconstruct- ing the concrete block retaining wall, and modifying the irri- gation and landscaping at four locations, is $25 , 000 . In addition, three of the existing Main Street street lighting standards would have to be relocated, at an estimated cost of $6 , 000 . Access is presently provided by this public sidewalk, since it is in excess of the 36-inch minimum width. Widening the side- walk at these four (4) street lights would only provide the standard width sidewalk. No funds are available for this widening, and would have to be transferred from another budgeted project. Provision of a 48- inch minimum clear width sidewalk would, therefore, create an unreasonable hardship. RECOMMENDATIONS: Appeals on accessibility for public facilities are heard by the Mayor and Council. This item is being presented to the Handicap Accessibility Appeals Board for review and a recommendation to the Mayor and Council. The following motion is offered for your consideration: MOTION: That the Handicap Accessibility Appeals Board recommend to the Mayor and Council that an exception, to the minimum width of 48-inches for a public sidewalk, at the four (4) street lights on the west side of "E" Street, north of Second Street, be granted to reduce the minimum width and obstructions to 36 inches, since widening the public side- walk to provide a minimum clear width of 48 inches would constitute an unreasonable hardship. OGER G. HARDGRAVE Director of Public Works/City Engineer Attach. _ 48' MIN. 1 48" MIN. SIDEWALK FACE OF SIDEWALK iti MIN. CURB 36" MIN. r CLEAR -CLEAR FACE OF POLE CURB STREET STREET ( o ) SIDEWALK OBSTRUCTIONS 12" MIN. 12" MIN. GUIDE RAIL CENTERED AT t 3" -t1" HIGH 00 o M ( b ) GUIDE RAIL GUIDE RAIL DETAIL HANDRAIL T HANDRAIL TO SUIT dt CURB DESIGN ic .� %0 3•± 1" HIGH O 1" HIGH n r WHEEL GUIDE ( C ) WHEEL GUIDE WHEEL GUIDE DETAIL RAMPS AND SIDEWALKS FIGURE NO. 33-3 THIS REGULATIONS AND IS MENDED REQUIREMENTS OF AN AID FOR BUILDING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION