HomeMy WebLinkAbout08- Economic Development D ., VELOPMENT DEPARTME1,4T
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION/COUNCIL ACTION
FROM: KENNETH J. HENDERSON SUBJECT: NEW POLICE FACILITY
Executive Director
DATE: July 1, 1993
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Synopsis of Previous Commission/Council/Committee Action (s):
On December 7, 1992, the Community Development Commission approved the site plan for Scenario "C", and
authorized staff and consultants to proceed with the development of plans and determinations of costs and
methods of financing a new central police station.
(Synopsis Continued to Neat Page)
----------------------------------------------
Recommended Motion (s):
(Community Development Commission)
MOTION: That the Community Development Commission authorize the issuance of the general contractor
Request for Qualifications/Invitation to Bid and reaffirm its May 10, 1993 decision to utilize tax
allocation bond proceeds totalling $8 million to finance construction of the New Police Facility.
Administrator KENNETH J. HENDE SON
Executive Director
------------------------------------- - ---------------------
Contact Person(s): Kenneth J. Henderson Phone: 5081
Project Area(s): Central CWNorth (CCN) Ward(s): One (1)
Supporting Data Attached: Staff Report: Exhibits
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: N/A
Budget Authority: Approved May 10, 1993
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commission/Council Notes:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KJH:lag:npolice.cdc COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: 7/6/1993
Agenda Item Number:
REQUEST FOR COMMISSI%,A/COUNCIL ACTION
New Police Facility
July 1, 1993
Page Number-2-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Synopsis of Previous Commission/Councit/Committee Actions Continued:
On April 19, 1992 the Commission received and filed interim status report from staff on cost and design issues
for the proposed facility and re-affirmed it prior decision authorizing staff and consultants to proceed.
On May 10, 1993, the Common Council voted to vacate Seventh Street to enhance the new central police station
site and the Community Development Commission re-appropriated $8 million in existing tax allocation bond
proceeds to finance construction of the new police facility.
On June 21, 1993, the Commission continued this matter to July 6, 1993.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KJH:lag:npolice.cdc COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: 7/6/1993
Agenda Item Number: _
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Police Facility
On June 21, 1993, the Community Development Commission considered issuing a Request
for Qualification/Invitation to Bid related to the identification and selection of a general
contractor for the new police facility. After discussion, the Commission took action referring
the matter to its Redevelopment Committee along with an additional matter requesting the
Committee to consider alternative financings.
By way of background, it is important to note that the prior members of the Redevelopment
Committee, Councilmembers representing Wards 6 and 7 and the current Mayor have
reviewed in-depth various matters pertaining to the new police facility as follows:
- Conducted workshop on December 7, 1992, and selected the preferred
development alternative and location.
- Information from Caltrans regarding the proposed I-215 expansion.
- An alternative location with the facility fronting on "E" Street rather than "D"
Street.
- Information regarding preliminary concerns voiced by GTE.
- Traffic flow and circulation data regarding the proposed closure of 7th Street.
- A report from Consultant McDonald regarding downtown parking structures.
- A time-line for the completion of the facility.
- Various financing alternatives.
As a result of the above and related reports and oral presentations, the Committee and the
Commission voted on several occasions between December 7, 1992 and May 10, 1993 to
authorize staff and the architect of record to proceed and re-appropriate $8 million in tax
allocation bond proceeds to finance construction of the facility.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KJH:1ag:npo1ice.cdc COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: 7/6/1993
Agenda Item Number: _
DEVELOPMENT DEPA, _vIENT STAFF REPORT
New Police Facility
June 30, 1993
Page Number -2-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to expedite the development of the new police facility, incur significant savings and a
reduction in change orders and provide for the development of the consolidated state office
complex on the Superblock site, staff, at the direction of the Commission, developed the
attached Request for Qualification/Invitation to Bid (Exhibit "A"). The purpose of the
document is to select a general contractor prior to the completion of working drawings so the
general contractor's experience can be extensively and effectively utilized during the
completion of the construction drawings and bidding of the specialty trades (plumbing,
electrical, etc.). Then general contractor bidders submit fixed price data involving items
under the general contractor's control, such as profit, insurance and bonding. The lowest
responsible specialty trade bids are then added to the lowest responsible general contractor
bid, producing a guaranteed maximum final price for construction of the facility.
As indicated earlier, the time-line for development, financing and process for selecting a
general contractor have all received prior approval from the Commission. It is important this
process not be unduly delayed because of the negative impact it would have on our efforts to
secure the state consolidated office complex.
As to the financing of the facility, and as noted earlier, the Commission considered six (6)
alternative methods of financing the new police facility, ultimately determining that the "Use
of Existing Bond Proceeds" was the most effective, efficient and expeditious manner of
financing available to the Agency. This alternative also carries with it the not insignificant
benefit of having no detrimental impact on the City's General Fund. A summary of the
financing alternatives previously considered follows:
1. PRVATE FINANCING: This would entail the development and issuance of a Request
for Proposals (RFP) to competitively select a developer with established banking
relationships who could obtain private construction financing subject to the City entering
into a long-term lease with the developer for occupancy of the facility by the Police
Department. The benefits to this scenario is that the Agency would not have to debt
finance the construction of the building and the building would be on the tax rolls
generating property taxes for the City and the Agency. On the other hand, the City
would, in effect, be financing the mortgage on the building through its lease with the
private developer. The developer would also pass through to the City the cost of paying
property taxes and other building management costs. This alternative would probably
also upset the current construction schedule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KJH:1ag:npolice.cdc COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: 7/6/1993
Agenda Item Number: _
DEVELOPMENT DEPA� VIENT STAFF REPORT
New Police Facility
June 30, 1993
Page Number -3-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—--------------------------
2. ISUANCE OF "A" RATED CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION WITH $2
MILLION CASH CONTRIBUTION BY AGENCY (30 YEAR TERM : This
scenario would require $11,655,000 with the primary uses being deposits to the
Construction Fund ($9.7 million), the Debt Service Reserve Fund ($721,577) and
furniture, fixtures and equipment ($1 million). This last figure is just a guesstimate.
The benefits to this scenario are that the City and Agency share in the costs for this
project, with the Agency financing the acquisition ($3.5 million), architectural and
engineering ($550,000) and cash contribution ($2 million) and the City handling the
thirty (30) year debt service of approximately $720,000 a year. An obvious downside to
this scenario from the City's perspective is the need to budget for the debt service
($720,000) for the next thirty (30) years, especially with lean General Fund budgets
being the rule rather than the exception. An additional wrinkle to this scenario is that
the Agency, with existing bond proceeds, pay the first 2-3 years debt service, allowing
the City to better plan for this obligation and for an upturn in the economy. A twenty-
five (25) year term of the above scenario would require annual debt service of about
$767,000.
3. SUBORDINATE TAX ALLOCATION BOND ISSUE 25 YEAR TERM): This
alternative would require $11,755,000 with the primary uses of the bond proceeds being
the Construction Fund ($9.7 million), the Debt Service Reserve Fund ($810,070) and $1
million to finance furniture, fixtures and equipment. As noted earlier, this last number is
a very rough estimate. This alternative also assumes, and includes, a $2 million up-front
cash contribution by the Agency.
The primary difference between this scenario and alternative #2 is that the Agency
would bear 100% of the cost of the project, including an annual debt service averaging
$808,000 and the aforementioned acquisition, architectural and engineering costs of $3.5
million and $550,000, respectively. The benefits from the City's perspective is that it
gets a brand new purpose-built police facility at no cost to its General Fund.
From the Agency's perspective, however, we would be incurring additional bonded
indebtedness with significant amounts of unexpended bond proceeds on hand, further
limiting our ability to conduct business with private developers. Additionally, as noted
above, the Agency would be incurring the entire cost of the new police facility,
including acquisition, architecture and engineering, construction, furniture, fixtures and
equipment and a $2 million cash contribution, plus acquisition of the existing police
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KJH:1ag:npolice.cdc COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: 7/6/1993
Agenda Item Number: _
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
New Police Facility
June 30, 1993
Page Number -4-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
facility and the south side of Seventh Street ($500,000). Today, as outright cash
payments, these items amount to $17,675,000. Having to finance the construction cost
(includes furniture, fixtures and equipment) over twenty-five (25) or thirty (30) years
would add $21 to $24 million to the initial cash outlay of$6,975,000.
An anticipated benefit to the Agency would be the sale of the Pacific Federal Building
for at least $2-3 million when the new police facility is constructed and occupied. A
twenty (20) year subordinate tax allocation issue would be the same as above, except
that annual debt service would average approximately $856,000. Alternatively, twenty-
five (25) and thirty (30) year issues without the $22 million cash contribution from the
Agency would require annual debt service amounts approximating $993,000 and
$1,052,000, respectively.
4. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FINANCING: It is possible to form a City-wide
assessment district as was previously done for street sweeping. Assuming a $10 million
issue, for illustrative purposes, at a seven percent (7%) interest rate and a term of ten
(10) years, preliminary discussions with the Real Property Section of the Public Works
Department revealed an average annual assessment of approximately $17 for the 63,831
parcels currently on record in the City. The actual numbers would have to be refined if
the Council was seriously interested in this alternative.
The benefits to this alternative are that the burden is spread equally among all property
owners and beneficiaries with total costs to each property owner over the ten (10) year
period approximately $170.00-$200.00 per parcel. This amount could be less if a
provision could be included that would automatically apply to newly-annexed property
as well. Additionally, neither the City's General Fund or the Agency would be obligated
to finance the costs previously described. On the negative side, there will most likely be
serious opposition that the Council could override and the construction schedule that has
been set out would certainly be delayed, may be substantially so. Moreover, the Public
Works Department would most likely have to front the district formation costs which we
believe could be reimbursed by the bond proceeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KJH:1ag:npolice.cdc COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: 7/6/1993
Agenda Item Number: �_
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
New Police Facility
June 30, 1993
Page Number -5-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. USE OF EXISTING BOND PROCEEDS: Currently, there exists approximately $12.0
million in obligated but unexpended bond proceeds. These proceeds were obligated by
the Commission at its March 7, 1992 Budget Workshop.
The benefits of this scenario is that new indebtedness would not have to be incurred by
the Agency (or City for that matter) and the existing indebtedness has already been
properly structured and included in the current Agency budget. You would also
immediately eliminate such high cost items as the debt service reserve fund,
underwriter's discount and the cost of issuance as there would be no bond issue. This
alternative would also facilitate the existing construction schedule.
The downside to this particular alternative is that it would require a major re-ordering of
the thirteen (13) priorities adopted by the Commission on March 7, 1992. Further, it
would mean the Agency bearing 100% of the costs of the project as discussed earlier.
The difference here, however, is that there would be no long-term financing or
obligation of the Agency that would negatively impact future Agency budgets.
6. ANTI-RECESSIONARY LEGISLATION: In this alternative, staff would continue its
activities with respect to the preparation of plan and specifications, in order to be job
ready. Were the Presidents stimulus package to be resuscitated and passed by Congress,
the new police facility could be financed as part of this initiative. The benefits are that
the City or Agency would not have to incur any costs over and above those already
budgeted.
On the negative side, the project would be subject to the whims of Congress and
Washington politics with no certainty of positive action. Additionally, the project
schedule being closely adhered to by staff would have to be shelved with the result that
the Police Department would have to remain in its existing facility for the foreseeable
future. This would also prevent any significant development from occurring on the
Superblock, delaying and possibly foreclosing on the possibility of any serious
development desperately needed in the downtown Central Business District.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KJH:1ag:npohce.cdc COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: 7/6/1993
Agenda Item Number: _
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
New Police Facility
June 30, 1993
Page Number -6-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit "B" is a copy of a memorandum previously sent to Councilwoman Miller and
members of the Common Council relative to costs incurred to date on the new police facility.
With respect to architectural and engineering services a total of $323,938 has already been
paid with another $433,060 encumbered but not yet paid. These costs are allocated to the
"Architectural and Engineering" and "Any Other Cost" categories shown in the memorandum
to Councilwoman Miller.
Finally, a matrix has been prepared and inclusded as Exhibit "C" showing comparatively the
impact of the financing alternatives discussed earlier.
On July 1, 1993, the Redevelopment Committee considered this matter and voted to
recommend to the Community Development Commission the issuance of the Request for
Qualifications/Invitation to Bid and forwarded the matter of police facility financing to the
Commission for its consideration.
Based upon the alternatives listed above, the need to move the Police Department as soon as
possible, the impact the demolition of the existing Police facility will have on future
development, the need not to incur additional indebtedness on behalf of the City and Agency
and the ability to adhere to the existing construction schedule, staff recommends the adoption
of alternative #5.
Staff recommends adoption of the form motion.
�&�M
KENNETH J. H NDERSON, Executive Director
Development Department
i
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KJH:1ag:npohce.cdc COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: 7/6/1993
Agenda Item Number: _
a� BFq�
°-L City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency
. 2 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Kenneth J. Henderson
Executive Director
n�rF�T Df,
June 21, 1993
To All Interested Parties:
NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/INVITATION TO BID
CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION, PHASE I
CONSTRUCTION OF CENTRAL POLICE STATION
SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
The Development Department of the San Bernardino Economic
Development Agency, on behalf of the Community Development
Commission, is inviting submission of qualifications and bids
from general contractors to provide preconstruction services and
to construct the San Bernardino Central Police Station.
Responses must be submitted to the Economic Development Agency of
San Bernardino, Development Department, Development Division,
Attn: John Hoeger, 200 N. "E" Street, Third Floor, San
Bernardino, California 92401, not later than 11 .00 o'clock a.m. ,
July 9 1993 .
If there are any questions, or if additional clarifications are
required, please contact John Hoeger, Project Manager or David
Norman/ Development Specialist at (909) 384-5081.
Very truly yours,
KENNETH J. HENDERSON
Executive Director
201 North E Street, Third Floor • San Bernardino, California 92401.1507 • (909)384-5081 • FAX(909)888-9413
EXHIBIT A
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/INVITATION TO BID
PRECONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL CONTRACTING SERVICES
FOR A CONSTRUCTION OF A CENTRAL POLICE STATION
FOR THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
1.0 INTRODUCTION
At the direction of the Economic Development Agency (Agency)
design of the San Bernardino new Central Police Station has
reached a point where final schematics are complete and the
completion of working drawings is under way. The current design
pioneers a new lower cost approach to building prominent public
structures and, as the development of working drawings proceeds,
further reductions in the final construction costs can be
achieved by ob ain Ba value engineering and construction
ethodolo information from—E e general contractor who will
ultima e y construct the building. Timely suggestions and
information from the contractor will help the architects make
choices between all aspects of the design which affect the
economy and efficiency of the eventual construction. The Agency
is therefor issuing this Request For Qualifications/Invitation to
Bid for preconstruction and general contracting services. The
resulting contract will provide for pre-construction services _
from the same eneral contractor who will eventually construct
the building. rIt will also result in a publicly bid, least-cost,
fixed price contract, using all applicable public works bidding
procedures
1.1 BACKGROUND
Development Department staff has consulted with staff from the
Public Works Department and the City Attorney's Office to develop
an approach that is similar in many respects to techniques used
by private developers when building major buildings while, at the
same time, adhering to the standards of the public bidding
process and required public works bidding procedures. This
ap 11 allow a general contractor to be selecte for to
S� completion o wor in rawin( s u com ive biddin of
ose c ments directly provided by or rolled by the
g r r supervision and site costs, insurance and
bonding costs profit margins and overhead expense, etc. ) . The
M� A bids from qualified general contractors will be based upon
hVe extensive design and cost estimating information available�..c a ailable today.
Q This includes the final schematic designs together with itemized
design specifications, detailed cost estimates and preliminary
schedules which have been developed during the initial schematic
design phase. The contract will be awarded to the lowest
responsible bidder.
Subsequently, the specialty trades (electrical,plumbing, masonry,
landscaping, etc. ) will publicly bid their portions of the
construction work after working drawings have been completed and
final specifications have been approved. Each component of the
bidding process will then be awarded to the lowest responsible
I
bidder for that component. As the specialty contractor are
accepted, they will become subcontractor to the general
contractor and their subcontracts will be included as additional
components of the master construction contract between the Agency
and the general contractor.
At the end of this procedure, the Agency will have a single,
fixed-price Guaranteed Maximum Contract with a not-to-exceed
price that will have been determined through public bidding and
awarded to the lowest responsible bidders for each component.
----'i"he Agency will also be able to benefit from the experience,
advise and value engineering services of the general contractor
during the completion of the working drawings.
1 .2 BIDDING SEQUENCE
PHASE I
A. Complete schematic design and preliminary cost estimate
(completed) .
B. Prepare Request for Qualifications/Invitation to Bid
(RFQ) (completed) .
C. Prepare and place advertisement (in process) .
D. Distribute RFQ (in process) .
E. Receive contractor Pre-qualification Statements.
I. Perform reference check.
2. Perform overall review.
F. Select a short list of a minimum of three (3) general
contract i ers.
1. Per orm background check.
PHASE II
A. Notify the selected general contract bidders. Contractors
will have seven calendar days to prepare and submit the bid.
B. Receive and review the bid submittal.
C. Select the lowest responsive bidder.
D. Notify all participants of results.
E. Make recommendation to Community Development Commission.
F. Execute contract with the lowest responsive general
contract i er.
PHASE III
A. Complete final construction drawings and
specifications using preconstruction services from the
selected general contractor.
B. Complete final City plan check and obtain Community
Development Commission approval.
C. Issue Invitations to Bid for each specialty trade.
D. Add individual specialty trade sub-contractors to the above
generaI contract based upon t e owest res onsi e i ers
pro ucinq one single price Maximum Guarantee Contract
2.1 PHASE I CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT AND PROPOSAL
Contractors are required to complete Phase I - Contractor's
Prequalification Statement and submit it to the Agency for
evaluation. An outline to be used is attached as a part of this
RFQ. Selection to participate in Phase II will be determined by
the evaluation of Phase I of the RFQ. Selected firms will be
notified and will be requested to complete Phase II of the RFQ.
In addition to the Prequalification Statement, contractors are
required to submit a comprehensive proposal by responding to
items "a" through "p" listed below. Information submitted must
be arranged in the proposal in the same order in which it is
requested in this RFQ. Please provide at least one project
example when responding to each item. When indicating a
reference, please provide the name of a contact who was/is
involved in the daily operations of the project described. When
describing methods, techniques or procedures for performing a
particular operation, indicate the person (s) responsible for
ensuring completion and success of that operation. Provide at
least one project reference where procedures have been
successfully employed.
a. Address the basic concepts and objectives of the project
scope and describe a plan of action indicating the
management techniques that the contractor intends to employ
that will assure the completion of the project within the
time and budget parameters.
b. Indicate the contractors table of organization and the
onsite staffing. Provide a detailed description of the
duties and responsibilities of each staff member indicated
on the chart above the craft foreman level.
C. Describe the techniques that will be employed to manage the
schedule during the construction and the means that will be
employed to maintain the work progress and remedy any
slippage that may occur. List the projects where these
techniques have been successfully implemented.
d. Describe the method for determining ow er caused delays and
the procedure for determining compen tion for same.
e. List previously completed "fast-t ked" or "accelerated
construction schedule" projects. Include the scheduled
completion versus the actual completion dates.
f. Describe the methods and the procedures that will be used to
accommodate any extra work that may become necessary during
the course of construction. Discuss what techniques will be
employed to minimize the effect on the schedule and to
assure the Agency of a reasonable cost. Indicate the method
to be used for resolving questions and to facilitate action
by the Agency.
g. Address what methods will be employed to maintain labor
relations and to prevent work stoppages that may affect the
project schedule. Describe a plan of action to assure
adequate manpower on the site. Describe the method that
will be employed to assure compensation at prevailing labor
wage rates.
h. Value Engineering is required; describe what procedure
will be used to analyze the various components,
building systems and recommendations for alternative
construction methods that may benefit the Agency's
budget or the construction schedule. Address how an
equitable cost adjustment would be determined. Do NOT
include associated cost reductions at this time.
i. List the procedures and the techniques for managing the low
voltage work during construction.
j . Describe the proposed method for providing a contractor
initiated Quality Control/Quality Assurance Program.
Identify the staff member who will be responsible for
implementing the Quality Control/Quality Assurance Program
on this project. Outline the management plan for the
project closeout. What methods will be used to facilitate
the completion of the punchlist items?
k. Describe the safety program and how it will be implemented
on this project.
1. Outline the proposed change order approach, including the
cost determination, approach methods and schedule
impact approach and analysis.
M. Describe the methods which will be implemented to coordinate
owner furnished/contractor installed materials and
equipment. Describe the proposed material and equipment
procurement procedures which will be used to track, monitor
and expedite materials and equipment to the furnished by the
contractor, subcontractors and suppliers.
n. Describe the method for expediting submittal information to
insure that all required submittal data is provided in a
timely manner.
o. Describe what techniques will be employed to coordinate the
various subcontractors and the techniques to accommodate
discrepancies in the construction documents. Describe how
document coordination will be managed.
P. Describe the methods that will be used to facilitate the
turnover of the final as-build documents? Describe the
methods that will be used to process warranties and
guarantees.
2.2 PHASE II - BID SUBMITTAL
A minimum of three (3) firms will be selected to participate in
Phase II of the RFQ. At this time schematic designs, preliminary
budgets and scheduling documents will be provided to a minimum of
three selected firms. Bidding will be carried out on forms that
will be furnished.
Bids will not be publicly opened. The Agency may require a
contractor to verify or explain any apart of the submitted bid_
Bids will be received in a format that is generally as follows:
CENTRAL POLICE STATION
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
GENERAL CONTRACTOR BID
I. General Contractor' s Fee $
(Assume the costs to be indicated
on the attached budget)
II. Contractor' s liability insurance premium $
(Assume the limits as indicated on the
attached schedule)
III. Total premium of Completion and Payment - $
Bond (Assume costs on the attached budget)
IV. Total cost of Contractor's personnel $
required to complete the project.
(Assume 3 months of preconstruction and-
9 months of construction)
V. Total of all additional costs to be $
Incurred by general contractor including
costs for on-site management (job trailer,
phone, office supplies, water, safety,
clean-up labor, etc. )
TOTAL BID AMOUNT (NOT TO EXCEED) $
3 . 0 SCOPE OF WORK
3 . 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is a two-story tilt-up concret-P h»ilri;nc wi
steel ming tlt-i 1 i zi ng caacrata f 1 deeking for
both the second floor and the roof. The air handling system
will be comprised of four variable air volume package units
with air cooled compressors connected to direct digital
controls. Heating is provided by hot water reheat supplied
from a central gas fired boiler. Some special areas have
self-contained split system heat pumps as a supplement to
the base system. The building will have an automatic fire
protection system that does not utilize halon. An emergency
generator and fuel tank will be located in the secured
parking area and other feat tinent to a police
0 operation are inclu ed in the facile The total floor
area is approximate) 78, 000 sf bui on a 41, 800 sf
footprint. Site w k a ncludes
demolition, gra ing an a improvements necessary to
complete the facility and to provide secured surface parking
for both the new building and a nearby existing structure
which will become a part of the Central Police Station
campus. Street widening and other offsite improvements are
a part of the project.
The preliminary budget for the project including all site
work, base building and tenant improvements but not
including permits, fees, architecture, engineering, general
contracting, computers, furniture and fixtures is
$6, 750, 000.
The anticipated schedule for construction is three months to
complete all documents, bid all subcontracts and start
construction plus a construction period of nine months.
3.2 PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES
The general contractor will be required to provide (included
in the fee and overhead portion of the bid) the following
services primarily during preconstruction but also while
construction is underway:
a. Value Engineering Services. The contractor shall
provide design and specification alternatives for all
appropriate components of the project as the Architect
completes the working drawings and construction
documents. It shall produce matrices for the
evaluation of all alternatives which compare first
costs, operational costs, utility, and scheduling
differences as well as any other construction details
which could affect costs, schedules, or building
performance.
b. Construction Methodology. The contractor shall review
all contract documents to assure that all construction
methods will complete the project on time and within
budget.
C. Project Scheduling. The contractor shall develop the
project schedule and maintain it with changes as the
working drawings are finished and construction is
carried out. Any potential time saving alternatives
shall be offered during the preconstruction period
where possible and the project schedule shall be used
to prepare the bidding requests sent to specialty
subcontractors.
d. Cost Estimating Services. The contractor shall produce
and maintain a current project cost estimate. The
estimate will be used to evaluate the project's current
budget. The contractor shall contact subcontractors or
vendors where necessary to verify any details relating
to cost or schedule. The estimate shall be used as a
resource when producing bidding specifications for
specialty subcontract work.
e. Design Review. The contractor shall regularly review
the progress of drawings and specifications to judge
their consistency with the project budget and project
schedule. It shall make suggestions regarding
materials, methods and cost saving alternatives in
accordance with the value engineering services
described above.
f. Subcontract Bidding. The contractor shall prepare
detailed bidding specifications for all specialty
subcontract items, including quantities where
applicable, so as to ensure that the lowest responsible
bid will be complete, be responsive and result in the
elimination of or the least possible level of change
orders during construction. The general contractor
will be required to accept the lowest responsible
bidder for each specialty trade and incorporate the
resulting subcontract into its general contract, adding
the accepted subcontract amount to the total price of
the Guaranteed Maximum Contract.
3.3 GENERAL CONTRACTING SERVICES
The contractor will provide all services required to
undertake and complete the construction of the San
Bernardino Central Police Station including, but not limited
to, all parking, all site improvements, and all ancillary
facilities for both the Central Police Station and the
existing building to be included within the Central Police
Station campus.
The contractor will execute a Guaranteed Maximum Price
Contract which will ultimately include the lowest
responsible specialty subcontractors as selected through
public bidding in a manner prescribed by and supervised by
the Agency. The contractor will perform all general
contracting functions required for completion of the
project.
4 . 0 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
4 . 1 SUBMITTALS
Deadline for submission of Phase I - Contractor's
Prequalification Statement and Proposal is 11: 00 A.M. , July
9, 1993. Ten (10) copies of the completed Contractor' s
Prequalification Statement, clearly labeled as such, must be
submitted to the Economic Development Agency, Development
Department, 201 North "E" Street, Third Floor, San
Bernardino, CA 92401, Attention: John Hoeger.
Prequalification Statements which are hand delivered must be
brought to the receptionist at the location above. The
response to the RFQ must be made according to the
requirements set forth in this section, both for contents
and for sequence. Failure by the contractor to adhere to
these requirements, conditions or limitations may be cause
for rejection.
Deadlines for submission of Phase II - Bid Submittal shall
be identified at a later date.
4 .2 CONTENT AND SEQUENCE OF REQUIRED INFORMATION
4 .2 . 1 Phase I - Contractor's Prequalification Statement
All sections of the Contractor's Prequalification Statement
must be completed. Questions 7, 9 and 12 must be answered
on separate, attached sheets and other questions may be so
answered if necessary. Questions 10 through 15 are to be
completed by the primary contractor only. The contractor
may submit any additional information needed to clarify or
explain his answers. Joint ventures should provide the
information for all members.
In addition the contractor must submit a comprehensive
proposal that responds to items "a" through "p" of Section
2 . 1 of this RFQ in the manner described in that Section.
4 .2 .2 Phase II - Bid
Information presented in the bid must be submitted in the
same order as will be requested in the bidding documents.
4 . 3 ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS
The contractor will provide positive statements affirming
the contractor's acceptance of the following conditions :
a. Any and all parts of the submitted proposal may become part
of any subsequent contract between the selected contractor
and the County.
b. All information submitted thus far shall be considered firm
and binding for a period of ninety (90) days.
C. The Agency may require whatever evidence is deemed necessary
relative to the contractor's financial stability.
d. The Agency reserves the right to request further information
from the RMO of the contractor, either in writing or orally.
Such requests will be addressed to the RMO of the
contractor.
e. The Agency reserves the right solely to judge the
contractor' s representations, either written or oral.
f. Agency' s evaluation team will review and evaluate the Part I
- Contractor's Prequalification Statement and Proposal.
Upon completion of this review, the committee will recommend
a minimum of three (3) contractors to participate in Part II
of the RFP process .
g. The Agency reserves the right to reject all proposals or
cancel the project at any time up to the award of the
contract.
h. This RFP does not commit the Agency to award any contract
and the Agency is not liable for any costs incurred in the
submission of a proposal.
i. The selected lowest responsive bidder must agree that the
Agency may reassign his contract to a non-profit entity for
financing purposes.
4 . 4 TRUTH AND ACCURACY OF REPRESENTATIONS
False, incomplete or unresponsive statements in connection with
the Contractor' s Prequalification Statement or Proposal may be
sufficient cause for rejection. The evaluation and determination
of the fulfillment of the above requirements will be the Agency's
responsibility and its sole judgement shall be final.
C
4 .5 AGENCY CHANGES TO RFQ
The Agency reserves the right to interpret or change any
provision of the RFQ at any time prior to the submittal
dates . Such interpretations or changes shall be in the form
of addenda to the RFQ. Such addenda will become part of
this RFQ and may become part of any resultant contract.
Such addenda shall be made available to each person or
organization which has received an RFQ. Should such addenda
require additional information not previously requested, a
contractors failure to address the requirements of such
addenda may result in the proposal not being considered.
The Agency, in its sole discretion, may determine that a
time extension is required for submission of proposals, in
which case such addenda shall indicate the new submission
date.
4 . 6 PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
Responses to this RFQ become the exclusive property of the
I Economic Development Agency of the City of San Bernardino.
At such time as the Development Department recommends a
contractor to the Community Development Commission, and such
recommendation appears on the Commission Agenda, all
proposals submitted in response to this RFQ become a matter
of public record and shall be regarded as public records.
Exceptions will be those elements in each proposal which are
trade secrets as that term is defined in Government Code
Section 6254 .7 and which are so marked as "TRADE SECRET",
"CONFIDENTIAL", or "PROPRIETARY" . The Agency shall not in
any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any
such records including, without limitation, those so marked
if disclosure is deemed to be required by law or by an order
of the Court. Proposers which indiscriminately identify all
I or most of their proposal as exempt from disclosure without
justification may be deemed unresponsive.
I 4 .7 CONTACT WITH AGENCY EMPLOYEES AND AGENCY CONSULTANTS
I
As of the issue date of this RFQ and continuing until the
final date for submission of all information, all Agency
personnel and consultants, connected to the San Bernardino
Police Station Project, are specifically directed not to
hold meetings, conferences, or technical discussions with
prospective contractors.
4 .8 All work shall comply with the "Standard Specifications for
Public Works Construction, 1991 Edition" where not addressed
elsewhere in the contract documents.
0
0
5. 0 EVALUATION PROCESS
5. 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSAL
To be evaluated, a contractor must adhere strictly to the
format for proposals outlined in this RFQ. Each section of
the response must be specifically labeled as to the section
of the RFQ which is being addressed. Upon receipt of said
information as specified in the following section, the
Agency evaluating team will select the most qualified
contractors to participate in Phase II.
The selection process for Phase I shall be based on the
"Evaluation Criteria" set forth in Section 5.2 in this RFQ.
The selection process for Phase II shall be determined by
the lowest responsive bid.
Bids will not be publicly opened. The Agency may require a
contractor to verify or explain any part of the submitted
bid.
The Economic Development Agency of San Bernardino reserves
the sole right to judge the contractor's representations,
either written or oral, as stated in the qualifications and
proposals submitted. The Agency may reject any and all
Prequalification Statements and Proposals. This RFQ does
not commit the Agency to award any contract and the Agency
is not liable for any costs incurred in the submission of a
Prequalification Statement or proposal.
After the contractor has been selected by the Agency, the
Agency and contractor will negotiate a contract for final
review and approval. If a satisfactory contract cannot be
executed, the Agency may, at its sole discretion, begin
contract negotiations with the next lowest responsive bidder
as determined by the Agency.
5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA
The Agency will use certain criteria as guidelines to assess
the qualifications of the firms submitting proposals.
Evaluation criteria shall include, but not be limited to the
following:
a. Contractor's course of action, ability and commitment
to successfully complete the construction in accordance
with specified time and budget limitations.
b. Prior experience in managing and constructing projects
Of similar scope, size and complexity.
13
C. Knowledge of construction industry procedures,
construction techniques and management.
d. Prior experience in construction of projects for public
works and dealings with public entities.
e. Demonstrated competence in all areas presented in RFQ.
f. Listing of all relevant projects completed in the
preceding five years, including dates and their
relevance to this RFQ.
g. Size, experience and effectiveness of contractor's
organization to manage and construct the project.
h. Effectiveness and completeness of the presentation,
method and response to the RFQ.
i. Financial capability and stability of the contractor's
firm.
5.3 BACKGROUND CHECK
A background check of contractor bidders shall be carried
out at the discretion of the City of San Bernardino.
Bidders may be disqualified at the sole discretion of the
City based upon the information obtained in such background
check.
5.4 CUMULATIVE SCORE RATING
Proposals will be rated according to the stated criteria on
the basis of an assigned point system.
6. 0 CONTRACT CONDITIONS
In the event a contract is awarded, Contractor agrees to
comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents for
the project and that the same is sufficient in scope and
detail to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and
conditions for the performance of the work. The Contractor
must consent to the assignment of his contract to an
awarding entity for financing purposes.
O
CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
PHASE I
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
CENTRAL POLICE STATION
SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
Development Department
Economic Development Agency of San Bernardino
201 North "E" Street, Third Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92401
(909) 384-5081
San Bernardino Central Police Station
Request for Qualifications
PHASE I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS
• It is mandatory that the information requested be submitted
on the attached Contractor's Prequalification Statement Form.
• All questions must be answered and the data must be clear and
comprehensive.
• Line items that do not require your response shall be noted
with a "N/A" referencing items that are not applicable.
• Attachments A (Certification of Current Bonding Capacity) ,
Attachment B (Insurance Experience Rating Form) and
Attachment C (Financial Statement) are requested within the
submittal . These attachments are to be labeled at the top of
the page accordingly and attached to the Contractor's
Prequalification Statement submittal.
• The contractors are requested to make duplicate work sheets
within the Contractor's Prequalification Statement package if
additional references or space is required.
• When indicating a reference, please provide the name of a
contact who was/is involved in the daily operation of the
project described.
• Joint ventures shall provide information for all partners.
• Question 7 on pages 5 and 6 of the Contractor's
Prequalification Statement, list projects that your
organization is currently involved with that are similar in
magnitude and complexity to the Central Police Station.
• Question 8 on pages 7 and 8 of the Contractor's
Prequalification Statement, list projects that your
organization has completed in the past five years that are
similar in magnitude and complexity to the Central Police
Station.
• Questions regarding the completion of the attached forms
shall be directed to:
Development Department
Economic Development Agency
City of San Bernardino
201 North "E" Street, Third Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92401
(909) 384-5081
Attention: John Hoeger
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONVINVITATION TO BID
PART I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
Name of Firm
( ) Corporation ( ) Partnership ( ) Individual
( ) Joint Venture ( ) Other
Address:
City State Zip Code
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Contractor's License No.
1 . 0 How many years has your organization been in business as a
General Contractor? Years
1 . 1 What year was your organization established?
1 .2 Identify Total Number of Permanent Employees:
Construction Administration_ Engineering_
Type of engineering performed:
Highest manpower level in past five years:
Lowest manpower level in past five years:
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONVINVITATION TO BID
PHASE I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
2 .0 How many years has your organization been in business under
its present business name? Years
2 . 1 Under what other and former names has your organization
operated?
2 .2 Identify Parent Company if applicable.
2 . 3 List Affiliates, Divisions and Subsidiaries:
Name
Address
City State _Zip Code
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Name
Address
City State Zip Code _
Telephone No.
p Facsimile No.
Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
g
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION/INVITATION TO BID
PHASE I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
3.0 If a Corporation, complete the following:
3 . 1 3.2
Date of Incorporation Name of State
{s) in whic
incorporated
3. 3 3.4
President' s Name Vice Press ent s Name
3. 5 3. 6
Secretary s Name Treasurer's Name
4 . 0 If an Individual or Partnership, complete the following:
4 . 1 Is the Partnership: ( ) General
Date of Organization ( ) Limited
( ) Association
4 .2 List Names and Addresses of all Partners:
Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
U
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/INVITATION TO BID
PHASE I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
5. 0 If other than a corporation or partnership, describe
organization and name principals .
Owners and/or Partners
Percentage of
Name Ownership
$
$
$
6. 0 List States and categories in which your organization is
legally qualified to do business. Indicate registration or
license numbers, if applicable. List State (s) in which
partnership or trade name is filed.
State Category
Registration/License No.
State Category
Registration/License No.
State Category
Registration/License No.
State Category
Registration/License No.
State Category
Registration/License No.
State Category
Registration/License No.
I
I
I
h
z
w
N
E-4 a a 3
4z Z - _
w4
04 H
a b W
Of
W w
� �
A U w
W
El
w O
co U
I
CIS H
cn
C/I
H
U
W
h
O
a
a
0
H
LL
LL
w
zW Z z
Oa
� �
(nz o
UQ
J U w
O F
azi
L W
OX
O W
Z LL iR O
W Z ~
m0
U
LU
CL
U) W
CO
a.
M
N
N
W
Z
P
Z
0
U
FU)-
U
W
0
x
a wi
w q
U if $
z a a a
z
w
0
(no �y
UQ S
m U w
O u.
a �
0
w
Lua.
za
0 �
F3 � W W W
wz
m0
� w
a w` N
/ M
LLL.
FL
,^-
v/
g
w
0
U)
F-
U
w
O
X
a
a
2 p q
y
LL
W
w a U.
a a
zw
OQ
coo
UQ
:3U
Q-
� x
F- W
v
a-
0
W W
z z o
f ° o
wz z ,�
z03 U
� W
a >
U-
0
W
>
O
U
W
O
CL
0
W
2
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION/INVITATION FOR BID
10 . 0 TRADE REFERENCES
List reference information:
Company Name
Address
City State_ Zip Code
Contact Name
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Type of Trade
Referenced Project Name
Referenced Project Location
Company Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Contact Name
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Type of Trade
Referenced Project Name
Referenced Project Location
Company Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Contact Name
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Type of Trade
Referenced Project Name
Referenced Project Location
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION/INVITATION FOR BID
PART I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
11 .0 BANK REFERENCES
List Reference information:
Institution Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Contact Name/Title
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Institution Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Contact Name/Title
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Institution Name
Address
City State Zip Code _
Contact Name/Title
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Institution Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Contact Name/Title
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
' REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION/INVITATION FOR BID
PART I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
12 . 0 BUSINESS VOLUME
Average annual billable volume during the past five years:
Estimated billable volume this year:
Estimated volume carry over next year:
13 .0 List the name of all bonding companies utilized by your
organization in the last five years (5) years. State the
number of times the bonding company has had to complete any
part of your work during the last five (5) years.
Bonding Co. Name:
Address:
City: State: Zip Code:
Contact Name/Title:
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Project Name Amount Completed
Bonded by Bonding Co.
0
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION/INVITATION FOR BID
PART I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
Bonding Information
Bonding Co. Name
Address:
City State Zip Code
Contact Name/Title
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Project Name Amount Completed
Bonded by Bonding Co.
Bonding Co. Name
Address:
City State Zip Code
Contact Name/Title
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Project Name Amount % Completed
Bonded by Bonding Co.
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION/INVITATION FOR BID
PART I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
13 . 1 Attach a notarized statement from the bonding company your
organization proposes to use, indicating total bonding
capacity and certification of current bonding capacity.
This notarized document shall be known as Attachment A.
14 . 0 Provide the name, address, telephone number and contact
person for company which will provide insurance coverage.
Insurance Co. Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Contact Name/Title
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Insurance Co. Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Contact Name/Title
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Insurance Co. Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Contact Name/Title
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
14. 1 Please obtain a copy of your Experience Rating Form from
your insurance carrier and include with this completed
Prequalification Statement. This form shall be known as
Attachment B.
0
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION/INVITATION FOR BID
PART I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
15 . 0 Attach a financial statement, audited if available,
including the proposer's latest balance sheet and income
statement showing the following items. This financial
statement shall be known as Attachment C.
a. Current assets (e.g. , cash, joint venture accounts,
accounts receivable, notes receivable, accrued
income,deposits, materials inventory and prepaid
expenses) .
b. Net fixed assets.
C. Other assets.
d. Current assets (e.g. , accounts payable, notes
payable,accrued expenses, provision for income taxes,
advances accrued salaries and accrued payroll taxes, ) .
e. Other liabilities (e.g. , capital, capital stock,
authorized and outstanding share par values, earned
surplus and related earning) .
f. Name of firm preparing financial statement and date
thereof.
g. Is this financial statement for the identical
organization named on page one? If not, explain the
relationship and financial responsibility of the
organization whose financial statement is provided
(e.g. , parent-subsidiary) .
h. Will this organization act as guarantor of the
contractor for construction?
16 . 0 List any projects in which your organization has been
involved in litigation in the last five years. Identify
lawsuits by name, number, parties and your claim.
Project Name
Project Location
Lawsuit Name
Lawsuit Number
Parties Involve
Lawsuit Claim
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION/INVITATION FOR BID
PART I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
17 . 0 within the last five years, has any officer or partner of
your organization ever been an officer or partner of any
organization when it failed to complete a contract? If so,
list occurrences below:
Name
Organization Name
Project Name
Project Location
Client
Contact Name
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Explanation
Name
Organization Name
Project Name
Project Location
Client
Contact Name
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Explanation
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION/INVITATION FOR BID
PART I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
Contract Completion
Name
Organization Name
Project Name
Project Location
Client
Contact Name
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Explanation
Name
Organization Name
Project Name
Project Location
Client
Contact Name
Telephone No. Facsimile No.
Explanation
0
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION/INVITATION FOR BID
PART I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
18.0 Identify and provide information on prior and current
MDE/WBE participation as follows:
MBE/WBE Firm Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Telephone NO. Facsimile No.
Contact Name/Title
Project Name
Project Location
Date and Duration of MBE/WBE Services/Work Performed
Percentage of MBE/WBE Services/Work Participation
MBE/WBE Services/Work Performed
MBE/WBE Firm Name
Address
City State Zip Code
Telephone NO. Facsimile No.
Contact Name/Title
Project Name
Project Location
Date and Duration of MBE/WBE Services/Work Performed
Percentage of MBE/WBE Services/Work Participation
MBE/WBE Services/Work Performed
SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL POLICE STATION
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION/INVITATION FOR BID
PART I - CONTRACTOR'S PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
The undersigned hereby authorizes and requests any person, firm,
agency or corporation to furnish any information requested by the
Agency in verification of the recitals comprising this
Contractor's Questionnaire and also hereby authorizes the Agency
to contact such persons, firms, etc. in order to obtain
information regarding the undersigned.
I declare under penalty of perjury that all of the foregoing is
true and correct.
(Place where signe Name of Organization
Date: By:
Signature of Au orize
Representative
Title: -
J
0
D E V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
MEMORANDUM
---------------------------------------------
TO: COUNCILWOMAN NORINE MILLER
WARD 7
FROM: KENNETH J. HENDERSON, Executive Director
Development Department
RE: CENTRAL POLICE STATION COST ESTIMATES
DATE: June 21, 1993
FILE: Mayor Minor; Council Members Negrete, Curlin,
Hernandez, Oberhelman, Pope-Ludlam; Administrator-EDA;
Deputy Director; Project Manager Hoeger; File
---------------------------------------------------
The cost estimates you requested are presented below. The
estimates have been grouped as you requested, however, there is
one exception. Furnishings were combined with telephones and
computers because there is no breakdown in that estimate at this
time. Attached is detail on the construction cost estimates and
a copy of the Commission action which allocated $8,000,000 in
financing on May 24, 1993 .
CENTRAL POLICE STATION COSTS
Architecture & Engineering $ 826,000.00
Building 71474,975.00
Landscaping 292,925 .00
7th Street Closure 500,000.00
Fixtures/Furnishings/Equipment 11000,000:00
Any Other Costs 751 ,730.00
TOTAL COSTS $10,845,630.00
CENTRAL POLICE STATION FINANCING
Bond Financing $ 8,000 , 000 00
TOTAL FINANCING $ 81000,000.00
0621nwpd.nm
EXHIBIT B
COUNCILWOMAN MILLER
RE: CENTRAL POLICE STATION COST ESTIMATES
JUNE 21, 1993
Page 2
As stated in the minutes of the Commission action, the allocation
from bond financing was done, "with the understanding that the
new Council will have to address future financing. " The
estimated difference is $2,845,630. This amount may eventually
be realized from the sale of the existing building on the corner
of Seventh and E Streets.
Additional information is attached. There are computerized
summaries of the construction cost information which is the
primary source for the above information. Also attached is a
copy of the Commission minutes for May 24, 1993 pertaining to the
financing for the facility.
Please let me know if you have questions or need additional
information.
L—�� C - 6 CX7
RE ETH J. H DERSON, Executive Director A nistra or, EDA
De elopment Department
0621nwpd.nm
W
OC
f-
2
OL
7
W
M
on .01
\ 2P O �.rn,..� 00 00
bpQ1l.1IQy�A O O
O_\ p . . .• .... nMNM
NNNN N M , .D yW►N
xY N N
N I I / I I • • • / • / • I • • • • I I • 1 14.1 I • 1 I • • ' ' ; ; / I I ; • I� • •
W ••V 1 1 I • r • • • I • • r • • I 1 I • • • I N 1 1 I • • I • I • I /
N ; Kif I I / / I • • 1 W• • I • ; 1 I / • I I\I 1 • I • • I ' � ' � � I 1 1 I •^ 1 •
.N.N 1 H2�11 • • I • `I I /l!/ / r r • I NYN/ r • • I ; ; I • I / I I W I I
WOC3•-1 /N 1 t I Ni'1 / •r• • • / • I•- '{.f•-I I • 1 i 1 • / • /
�W�� U J<>1 I •I WJV-••I �•W(•-,�d=I/1 I� ;I LLOH ZI •I r I • ;=NW • • i • 'I N ; a.=
J ; : • 1 W xi7 I ; ; •r'/ • / • / / I (f\
• •
VU-:
I
& O[H<W I •«I OCr• r IM�►,- • ' • NOC I • I I U; Am • ;
di W. N I I of. . ;Wy I 2OJ/ ; • I r Z • • • • • W I
UO J�J<)r/ • • g
W i/)NUfp 1 •�I (qIy I(/f<��I • • ;µ� I • �1"�I r I I /
XU Vt7WO I '7 I C2gq�CC�1--N• • r • >p�d..(/l • • I • F3W�I I OCC7 =J I
&",,; Z I ._ / I ry�gCJU O I • I ;Wr UW I • • • h-2 \ r.yf
N�>O 17W�J I I O=Qcu< l r • I ;
N••-UW I r j
FO W<"•�+�uIW20 .Ki/I I 17-10«� 1 I • >J I W I U c O
pC1.�J<�r-CCCOO[UI��• 2< OCUU LLJ►- • • Ci�O[W I I •- dit
dUU �.0•-•-K I Ud�.I W I�7 C[J•- H= r= "'`�`W\ ►- �IH <qpC UW
JHN I ac<JNW�fIq I�NOCJ2 OOQQ oc•. ar ar Nll��.d W o<cJ N3 -CO
i./U W�=< OCN -•J1LWI�JUW�+ J�Qf-�a!Ir
W�4fN I W OC W-• O
.J-•
N d \7220000-�OCO�•-< 70U<WGC 03 Z OCOC�+NJ OC 2> 2r- 2m
N 200 QWU�N 2Z{O.FOdiJNOCW-NUNd miJNWNH ►-67 � O..I�O•yl<7•W C9U J< <W
< .2. Jp
• I I
J �h. d UOJ• I ' • ' • 1 � I
• ^uf H r o• • ' I 1 I ,
uj
J /V C OOS O y�>N�H I • • I r
AnWN Z ..JO< • I I
'H aba4c J WtJ2 I
I ' I • I / �
pp� p
OHO G 4000 S O M O OOOONO 00 p � g• �p� p,
C .1flp .Nf I. ,QON �8O 61%
.QN N N N M N N "' _O O N
i I. 0
N N M N N N N
10 w
_H � • �� • I � � � r I I • I I �
J I I� / I • ' � • / • • / 1 I I � I • I � I 1
W r
J]Z��(��t! • I • • • r i �L i W I U I d4
OW VN= {/f I • • W I 1 I I • I '~(�f� I • QC I�J ` N
dw U WO I • W W 2 67 • t_1►� OL N
O►- --•50 Vf< • ' \ •` d I I I Iy'jW d V
0
N OC2aW O = 0 2 W m. I N I < HC7 N •-
OO W x4f !- x l�
Z ZC9•-. 0 ' y/ ly I U• UW�U 1-I at < LLI
W �HNU� W �',� OL d I U l 2 W<O Z I yf ="' U
W 01 mu. W' 2 Kd
�G20CtALLJ.. _ d ( p, =J •T„ = W W<
L'J<WONx J WINOCJW \ �7
{7 N V' w NWO<Y �U2J J
< 2JOW W F m W W<ZWOC V,NO N.ZO.. H WS O <
IA I-a/10V1r fV•f O <N N WJ ►'< O
W OJ ►-
O S
""•�'.'� ....�x p xx- Y
0 x
—0 0 =x O
OZO
Nrrfrf fffffNrNfffNffNfffNffNrffNNffrf
ftt K 0 L L ffr
CON STRUCT 1 0 N •*+
N/Nf•ffffftfff•fffftfffffNff•Nfffrffff/fffr
PROJECT: SAN BERNARDINO POLICE FACILITY
DESCRIPTION: TWO LEVEL POLICE FACILITY
BUDGET 0: THREE
DATE: APRIL 7, 1993
PREPARED BY: BOB WILSON
79,961 ■ BUILDING SQ.FOOT
206,800 ! SITE SQ.FOOT
SITE SHELL T.I.
frf
206,800 79,961 79,961
•'* SUMMARY
�•••tfftmtfNtf:t•fftffffffffffff
LINE DESCRIPTION SITE S/SF SHELL S/SF T.I. S/SF TOTAL S/BLDG SF
1 OFFSITE WORK 561,274 0.30 50 0.00 50 0.00 561,274 0.77
2 SITEWORK -----819,330 3.96 0 0.00 0 0.00 819,330 10.25
.........................8888-....--.8888----•--
880,6-- •----__--
SUBTOTAL SITEWORK 880,604 4.26 0 0.00 0 0.00 880,604 11.01-
3 STRUCTURAL 0 0.00 1,087,477 13.60 0 0.00 1,087,477 13.60
4 SKIN 0 0.00 818,614 10.24 0 0.00 818,614 10.24
5 MOISTURE/THERMAL PROTECTION 0 0.00 108,178 1.35 4,206 0.05 112,384 1.41
6 FINISHES 0 0.00 152,847 1.91 1,687,044 21.10 1,839,891 23.01
7 EQUIPMENT 0 0.00 0 0.00 33,290 0.42 33,290 0.42
8 BUILDING TRANSPORTATION 0 0.00 105,000 1.31 0 0.00 105,000 1.31
PLUMBING 0 0.00 75,600 0.95 206,900 2.59 282,500 3.53
FIRE PROTECTION 0 0.00 44,048 0.55 33,552 0.42 77,600 0.97
HVAC 0 0.00 319,844 4.00 434,805 5.44 754,649 9.44
12 ELECTRICAL _...0. 0.00 126,100 1.58 629'846 7.88
755,94- 9.45
-8888-• ,
SUBTOTAL BUILDING •....'•"7-_5--•-_--•_•-
0 0.00 2,837,707 35.49 3,029,643 37.89 5,867,350 73.38
13 TENANT IMPROVEMENTS 0 0.00
--_-........0. 0.00 0 0.00
0 0.00
--------- -----
S U B T O T A L ----- ----
880,604 4.26 2,837,707 35.49 3,029,643 37.89 6,747,954 84.39-
14 GENERAL CONDITIONS 33,229 0.16 107,079 1.34 114,321 1.43 254,629 3.18
8888-..............U 8 T 0 T A L 913,833 4.42 2,944,785 36.83 3,143,964 39.32 7,002,583 87.57
15 LIABILITY INSURANCE 5,026 0.02 16,196 0.20 17,292 0.22 38,514 0.48
16 CONTRACTOR CONTINGENCY 27,415 0.13 88,344 1.10 94,319 1.18 210,077 2.63
17 CONTRACTOR FEE 37,650 0.18 121,325 1.52 129,531 1.62 288,506 3.61
18 PERFORMANCE i PAYMENT BOND 10,860 0.05 34,996 0.44 37,363 0.47 a3,219 l�4
liisiiiiiiliii! iii!liiiiii i!
D
G R A N T O T A L 5994,784 53,205,646 53,422,470 57,622,900 95.33
4.81 $/SSF 40.09 S/BSF 42.80 S/TSF 95.33 S/BSF
12.44 S/BSF
THE ATTACHED QUALIFICATIONS FORM A PART OF THIS BUDGET AND SHOULD BE REFERRED TO DURING THE REVIEW OF THIS BUDGET.
f:\sbpolice\poticee3.wk1
"• PAGE 1 ••• PRINT 07-Apr-93 "' APPRVID BY: BW _ RS _ •+•
N*ffNwfN K 0 1 L PROJECT: SAN BERMUDINO POLICE FACILITY
•
•
OWNER: CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
* C O N S T R U C T I O N • ARCHITECT: LEACH MOUNCE ARCHITECTS
• f
ffNNfffNNfNNffffNfffff
C S I S U M M A R Y BUILDING: TWO LEVEL POLICE FACILITY
* • BUDGET DATE:APRIL 7, 1993
9.0 MONTH SCHEDULE BUILDING SF: 79,961 SF
LINE CODE DESCRIPTION SITE ES-3 ES-2
SHELL T.I. 4/7/93 4/5/93 VARIANCE S/SF
1 01604 FINAL CLEAN-UP SO SO 519,990 519,990 519,990 0 0.25
2 01800 SURVEY i ENGINEERING 21,880 7,996 0 29,876 29,876 0 0.37
3 02200 EARTHWORK 122,262 0 0 122,262 122,262 0 1.53
4 02510 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING 163,974 0 0 163,974 163,974 0 2.05
5 02521 CONCRETE CURB i GUTTER 94,221 0 0 94,221 94,221 0 1.18
6 02580 PAVEMENT MARKING 4,439 0 0 4,439 4,439 0 0.06
7 02600 SITE UTILITIES 29,750 0 0 29,750 29,750 0 0.37
8 02820 FOUNTAINS 50,000 0 0 50,000 50,000 0 0.63
9 02830 FENCES t GATES 9,100 0 0 9,100 9,100 0 0.11
10 02841 BICYCLE RACKS 500 0 0 500 500 0 0.01
11 02876 TRASH & LITTER RECEPTORS 5,425 0 0 5,425 5,425 0 0.07
12 02900 LANDSCAPE i IRRIGATION 123,650 0 0 123,650 123,650 0 1.55
13 03200 CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT 2,465 40,834 0 43,299 43,299 0 0.54
14 03300 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE 47,698 288,022 9,000 344,720 335,720 (9,000) 4.31
15 03470 TILT-UP CONCRETE 0 237,057 0 237,057 237,057 0 2.96
03480 PRECAST CONCRETE 0 143,646 0 143,646 143,646 0 1.80
03520 INSULATING CONCRETE 0 119,037 0 119,037 119,037 0 1.49
04200 UNIT MASONRY 94,283 0 83,580 177,863 177,863 0 2,22
19 04400 STONE VENEER 0 55,950 0 55,950 33,936 (22,014) 0.70
20 05120 STRUCTURAL STEEL 0 458,776 0 458,776 458,776 0 5.74
21 05300 METAL DECKING 0 125,525 0 125,525 125,525 0 1.57
22 05500 METAL FABRICATIONS 3,550 102,796 10,188 116,534 120,471 3,937 1.46
23 05510 METAL STAIRS 0 16,500 0 16,500 16,500 0 0.21
24 06100 ROUGH CARPENTRY 0 3,270 1,990 5,260 5,050 (210) 0.07
25 06220 MILLWORK 0 2,200 101,445 103,645 85,295 (18,350) 1.30
26 07100 WATERPROOFING 828 3,763 4,206 8,797 8,797 0 0.11
27 07200 INSULATION 0 15,4466 12,1980 27,644 27,644 0 0.35
0
28 07250 SPRAYED FIREPROOFING 0 0 0 0.00
29 07510 MEMBRANE ROOFING 675 56,234 0 56,909 56,909 0 0.71
30 07600 FLASHING i SHEET METAL 0 86,508 0 86,508 75,422 (11,086) 1.08
31 07820 METAL FRAMED SKYLIGHTS 0 28,560 0 28,560 28,560
32 07900 JOINT SEALERS 0 3,925 0 3,925 3,925 0 0.36
33 08100 METAL ODORS Z FRAMES ,800 3305 0 0.05
1 , 21,880 26,985 25,325 (1,660) 0.34
34 08190 INSTALL DOORS 6 FRAMES 405 2,390 29,595 32,390 31,410
35 08200 WOOD DOORS 0 2,400 39,600 42,000 41,200 (980) 0.41(800) 0.53
36 08320 SECURITY DOORS 0 0 26,560 26,560 26,560
37 08330 COILING DOORS 0 0.33
0 9,520 16,415 25,935 24,415 (1,520) 0.32
38 08340 FIRE DOORS 0 20,000 0 20,000 20,000
39 08400 ENTRANCE Z STOREFRONTS 0 0.25
0 136,258 82,553 218,811 144,727 (74,084) 2.74
40 08710 DOOR HARDWARE 0 8,550 77,000 85,550 82,350 (3,200) 1.07
41 09200 LATH i PLASTER 0 64,216 0 64,216 64,216 0 0.80
42 09250 DRYWALL SYSTEMS 0 41,178 308,149 349,327 349,075 (252) 4.37
43 09300 CERAMIC TILE 0 60,335 98,637 158,972 158,972 0 1.99
44 09510 ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS 0 2,640 77,199 79,839 79,839 0 1.00
45 09520 ACOUSTICAL WALL TREATMENT 0 0 9,288 9,288 9,288 0 0.12
46 09650 RESILIENT FLOORING 0 392 74,769 75,161 75,161 0 0.94
47 09680 CARPETING 0 0 173,698 173,698 173,698 0 2.17
48 09900 PAINTING 500 7,885 55,330 63,715 56,954 (6,761) 0.80
49 09950 WALL COVERING 0 0 9,126 9,126 9,126 0 0.11
10100 VISUAL DISPLAY BOARDS 0 0 9,080 9,080 9,080 0 0.11
10160 METAL TOILET COMPARTMENTS 0 3,6000 10,000 13,600 13,600 0 0.17
0
10260 CORNER GUARDS 950 950 950 0 0.01
.� 10270 COMPUTER ACCESS FLOORING 0 0 38,088 38,088 38,088 0 0.48
54 10350 FLAG POLES 3,300 0 0 3,300 3,300 0 0.04
*** PAGE 1 **• *** PRINT 07-Apr-93 ***
_S 10430 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE 7,500 0 0 7,500 7,500
10440 INTERIOR SIGNAGE 0 0 3,500 3,500 3,500 0 0.09
10500 LOCKERS 0 0 92,624 92,624 92,624 0 0.04
.8 10520 FIRE PROTECTION SPECIALTIES 0 981 0 981 981 0 1.16
59 10550 POSTAL SPECIALTIES 0 0 2,500 2,500 2,500 0 0.01
60 10600 CUBICLE PARTITIONS 0 0 p 0 0.03
61 10650 OPERABLE PARTITIONS 0 0 13,680 13,680 113,680 150,960 0.00
62 10675 METAL STORAGE SHELVING 0 0 152,224 152,224 152,224 0 0.17
63 10750 TELEPHONE ENCLOSURES 0 0 600 600 600 0 1.90
64 10800 TOILET d BATH ACCESSORIES 0 0.01
0 7,4200 17,1400 (2
24,560 22 160
65 11130 A/V EQUIPMENT ,400) 0.31
66 11150 PARKING EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
67 11450 RESIDENTIAL EQUIPMENT 0 0 7,290 7,290 7,290 0 0.09
0 0 0
68 11470 DARKROOM DOORS 0 0 10,400 10,400 10,400 0 0.13
69 11480 ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0.00
70 11600 FUME HOODS 0 0 15,600 15,600 15,600 0 0.20
71 12500 WINDOW TREATMENT 0 0 5,668 5,668 5,668 0 0.07
72 12670 RUGS b MATS 0 0 2,800 2,800 2,800
73 14200 ELEVATORS 0 105,000 0 105,000 105,000 0 0.04
74 15300 FIRE PROTECTION 24,400 44,048 33,552 102,000 102,000 0 1.28 0 1.31
75 15400 PLUMBING 0 75,600 206,900 282,500 271,700 (10,800) 3.53
76 15500 HVAC 0 319,844 434,805 754,649 754,649 0 9.44
77 16000 ELECTRICAL 68,000 126,100 629,846 823,946 815,546 (8,400) 10.30
------------------•-
TOTAL -----------------> 1880,604 52,837,707 53,029,643 16,747,954 !6,731,334 (!16,619) 84.39
GENERAL CONDITIONS 33,229 107,079 114,321 254,629 254,629 0 3.18
--•-------.-.--•-----------------------------------
SUB TOTAL -------------•---> 5913,833 $2,944,785 $3,143,964 57,002,583 96,985,963 016,619) 87.57
LIABILITY INSURANCE 5,026 16,196 17,292 38,514 38,423 (92) 0.48
CONTRACTOR CONTINGENCY 27,415 88,344 94,319 210,077 209,579 (499) 2.63
CONTRACTOR FEE 37,650 121,325 129,531 288,506 287,822 (685) 3.61
PERFORMANCE i PAYMENT BOND 10,860 34,996 37,363 83,219 0 (83,219) 1.04
sass:az sz zz azzz zsaszszzaszasazzazazsazssaaasaz sass zsazsasazsaaasszzazsazzszzza
T O T A L E S T I M A T E :a::::sas> 5994,784 !3,205,646 $3,422,470 57,622,900 57,521,786 ($101,114) 95.33
•� PAGE 2 PRINT 07-Apr-93 •�►
The motions carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members Estrada; Reilly; Hernandez; Maudsley; Minor; Pope-Ludlam.
Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Council Member Miller.
(Community Development Commission)
Commission Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Commission
Member Reilly, that the following resolution be approved and adopted:
RESOLUTION NUMBER 5366
RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AUTHORIZING, ON BEHALF OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, THE
BORROWING OF FUNDS FROM THE SAN BERNARDINO JOINT POWERS
FINANCING AUTHORITY IN A TOTAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF
NOT TO EXCEED $7, 500, 000 TO REFUND CERTAIN OUTSTANDING TAX
ALLOCATION BONDS, AUTHORIZING THE FORM OF CERTAIN LEGAL
DOCUMENTS RELATED THERETO AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
PREPARATION, EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF THE FORMS THEREOF.
The motions carried by the following vote: Ayes: Commission
Members Estrada; Reilly; Hernandez; Maudsley; Minor; Pope-Ludlam.
Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Commission Member Miller.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
----------------------
Continued from May 13, 1993
7. FINANCING OF NEW POLICE FACILITY
(Community Development Commission)
ommission)
Mayor Holcomb stated this item will be discussed in conjunction
with item number 37 on the Mayor and Common Council agenda which reads
as follows:
"Public Hearin - RESOLUTION ORDERING THE VACATION FOR THE
PORTION ur ITH STREET LYING BETWEEN "D" STREET AND "E" STREET IN
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND RESERVING EASEMENTS OVER THE
ENTIRE AREA FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM DRAINS, STREET
LIGHTS, AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND APPURTENANT FACILITIES FOR THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AND ALSO RESERVING EASEMENTS FOR GENERAL
TELEPHONE, PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AND
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES THEREIN."
Kenneth Henderson, Executive Director, Development Department
passed out a memorandum (dated May 10, 1993) for the Council's
consideration and use at the Public Hearing relating to the impact of
the vacation on the site's parking capacity, traffic, circulation and
Property owners.
Mr. Henderson reported there is a construction estimate of $7.8
million from Koll Construction (excluding furniture, fixtures and
equipment) which can be financed separately. He summarized the six
JOINT REGULAR MEETING
XJH:dle:=in5jr2 _ 5 _ COMMISSION MINUTES
MAY 24, 1993
0
alternatives for the financing of the police facility as outlined in
the memorandum. Based upon the alternatives, the need to move the
Police Department as soon as possible, the impact the demolition of
the existing Police facility will have on future development, the need
not to incur additional indebtedness on behalf of the City and Agency
and the ability to adhere to the existing construction schedule, staff
recommends the adoption of alternative #5.
Mr. Henderson made reference to the thirteen priority projects
established at the March 1992 workshop which totaled $15, 700, 000. He
said staff is recommending that the Commission reappropriate
$9, 000, 000 of the original amount ($15,700, 000) approved. This motion
would take the money set aside for blight removal and beautification
Of $1 million; the original contribution to the Police Facility for $2
million; the Platt Building demolition $500, 000; the Rancon whole-
block development for $4.5 million and the $1 million set aside for
the Mobilehome Park to finance the new Police Facility.
Mr. Henderson advised the Commission that two other potentional
sources of funding for the Police Facility could be the HAB loan
and/or Carousel Mall loan, both which can be cashed out or borrowed
against.
As information, Mr. Henderson reported that the priorities
remaining untouched are as follows:
Main Street Streetscape - Phase II ($1, 000, 000)
Mt. Vernon Specific Plan Implementation ($2, 000, 000)
Performing Arts Center ($1, 000, 000)
Public Improvements, Wal-Mart at Highland and Boulder ($800, 000)
Community Hospital Medical Office Building ($1,250, 000)
Mr. Henderson stated $400, 000 has already been spent in getting
the project construction ready. Staff anticipates being able to grade
the site, contingent on Commission approval, within the next 45 days.
Commission Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Commission
Member Minor, that the Community Development Commission adopt
alternative #5 as set forth in the attached Staff Report relative to
the financing of the new police facility. Further, that the
Commission review its priorities adopted on March 7, 1992 and take all
necessary and appropriate actions resulting in the reappropriation of
tax allocation bond proceeds in an amount sufficient to finance the
construction and furnishing of the new police facility.
Commission Member Hernandez stated, for the record, he has never
supported the Super Block concept because the Council has never
received all of the facts. He felt staff did not justify to the
public what was the higher priority -- a new Police Department or the
development of the downtown Super Block to accommodate Caltrans and
the courts. Commission Member Hernandez suggested using existing
buildings and establishing Satellite Police Stations throughout the
City instead of building a new police station. He voiced concerns
about the non-implementation of consultant's recommendations,
vacillation of the demolition of the Platt Building and so forth.
JOINT REGULAR MEETING COMMISSION MINUTES
RJH:d1e:cminS jr2 - 6 _
MAY 24, 1993
Timothy Steinhaus, Administrator, Economic Development Agency
informed the Commission that a meeting with the State has been
scheduled for June 4, 1993. At that time the State will produce a
written proposal.
Chairman Holcomb indicated the State said it would give the City
20-25 year leases and felt these leases would be strong enough to
finance at least 90% of the project. He reminded the Commission that
the City can finance tax exempt bonds, 2% below the private sector.
The money saved could go toward additional amenities and arts. Mayor
Holcomb said Governor Wilson supports this project. The Mayor
reiterated that the State will not put anything in writing until there
is knowledge that the Commission will move forward with building the
new Police Facility.
COMMISSION MEMBER REILLY WAS EXCUSED AT 11:58 A.M.
COMMISSION MEMBER REILLY RETURNED AT 11:59 A.M.
Discussion ensued regarding the costs involved to purchase the
land, construct the building and parking lot; the support of property
owners; replacement parking sites and so forth. Mr. Henderson
referred to alternative #3 in the staff report which clarified
Commission members inquiries regarding a complete breakdown of costs.
He noted that the recommendation being made excluded the furniture,
fixtures and equipment costs and $500, 000 for the street vacation.
Mr. Henderson estimated the Seventh Street purchase at between
$300, 000 - $500, 000.
MAYOR HOLCOMB WAS EXCUSED AT 12:10 P.M.
MAYOR HOLCOMB RETURNED AT 12:11 P.M.
Commission Member Estrada asked if alternative #4, could be
altered by assessing the City's parcels less than the illustrated $17
fee. In this way, the $10 million issue may not be necessary and bond
Proceeds could be used for the difference.
Mayor Holcomb asked the Commission to focus on the objective of
building the police station now and emphasized that almost $500, 000
has been spent on plans, specifications and engineering costs. He
advised the Commission to choose the source of money to use as the
approval of this item was contingent on developing the State's office
complex in San Bernardino.
Mayor Holcomb reminded the Commission that there is already $2
million appropriated for a new police facility and $4, 500, 000 for
Super Block. He reminded the Commission they already committed
themselves to buy the block by paying for the engineering fees. The
next step is for the Commission to decide which option to take.
A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the proposed alternatives
and/or combinations of the alternatives being recommended.
JOINT REGULAR MEETING
KJH:d e:onia5jr2 _ 7 _ COMMISSION MINUTES
MAY 24, 1993
Mr. Henderson explained that the primary issue is not to incur
any new debt to finance the new police facility because staff felt
existing bond proceeds could finance the project. Secondarily, staff
did not want to issue new tax exempt bond proceeds because it limits
the ability to deal with private development. Mr. Henderson would
like to relegate the additional bonding capacity to financing new
development surrounding the Super Block rather than incurring new
indebtedness for the police facility when there is sufficient tax
exempt bond proceeds.
Mr. Henderson stated that the State offices would most likely be
private financed based upon the strength and length of the leases. It
was concluded that, in essence, $4.5 million would not need to be set
aside for the Super Block development as originally envisioned, but
could be used for the existing police facility instead because staff
believed in the strength of the leases to be entered into with the
State.
Commission Member Minor said he attended two meetings with
Caltrans and State Offices where the State indicated they would come
to the Super Block if movement was made on our end. This would employ
about 1, 100 people downtown. He felt the key is to move the existing
Police Department to the Seventh and "D" Streets location.
Commission Member Minor made a substitute motion, seconded by
Commission Member Reilly, to adopt alternative number 5 to include
only the new police headquarters $2 million, and the Rancon whole
block development $4.5 million, with the understanding that the new
Council will have to address future financing.
Commission Member Maudsley asked that the motion be amended to
include $1, 000, 000 from blight removal and $500,000 from the Platt
building demolition for a grant total of $8, 000, 000.
Commission Member Minor accepted and agreed to the amended
motion.
Commission Member Maudsley inquired whether there would be any
other bond financing issues coming up to include extra money.
Mr. Henderson noted there is an additional capacity of about $16-
$17 million. Originally allocated block grant money for the
demolition of the Platt Building was reappropriated and used in the
capital projects which were approved last year. Again he mentioned
that the key is not to incur unnecessary additional indebtedness to
finance the police facility when there are other sources of financing
available today. This would give staff maximum flexibility in the
future to deal with the State and private development surrounding the
State complex and the downtown central business district.
Commission Member Minor amended his original motion, based on
Commission Member Maudsley's comments.
JOINT REGULAR FETING CO
KJH:dl a:�i a5 j r2 IrWSSION MINUTES_ 8 _
MAY 24, 1993
Commission Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Commission
Member Reilly, that the Community Development Commission adopt
alternative #5 as set forth in the attached Staff Report relative to
the financing of the new police facility to include only the new
Police Headquarters at $2 million, the Rancon Whole-Block Development
at $4.5 million, the Blight Removal and Beautification at $1 million,
and the Platt Building demolition at $500, 000 for a total of $8
million, with the understanding that the new Council will have to
address future financing.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Commission
Members Estrada; Reilly; Maudsley; Minor; Pope-Ludlam. Noes:
Commission Member Hernandez. Abstain: None. Absent: Commission
Member Miller.
The Mayor closed the Public Hearing on item 37 of the Mayor and
Common Council agenda.
RS-1. PROPOSED PERFORMING ARTS CENTER MARKET FUND RAISING PLAN
Community Development Commission)
Commission Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Commission
Member Reilly, that the Community Development Commission receive and
file the subject report.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Commission
Members Estrada; Reilly; Hernandez; Maudsley; Minor; Pope-Ludlam.
Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Commission Member Miller.
Commission Member Estrada congratulated the consultant on the
comprehensive report. The Redevelopment Committee reviewed the report
and found it to be a good guide on how the task will be accomplished.
RECESSED MEETING
At 12:35 p.m., Chairman Holcomb recessed the meeting of the Mayor
and Common Council and the Community Development Commission until 2:00
p.m.
MEETING RECONVENED
At 3:25 p.m. , the meeting of the Mayor and Common Council and the
Community Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino was
called to order.
ROLL CALL,
Roll call was taken with the following members
W. R. Holcomb; Commission Members Esther Estrada; Jac k Reilly; Chairman alph
Hernandez; Michael Maudsley; Tom Minor and Valerie Pope-Ludlam.
Absent: Commission Member Norine Miller.
JOINT REGULAR MEETING COMMISSION MINUTES
XJB:d14:cmin5 jr2 - 9 -
MAY 24, 1993
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Tim Steinhaus, Administrator, Economic Development Agency
FROM: Council Office
SUBJECT: Police Facilities Cost _
DATE: June 16, 1993 `"'`i 161993
COPIES:
Please provide the following ASAP:
Police Facilities cost:
Architecture & Engineering
Building
Landscaping
7th Street Closure
Furnishings —T
Phones/Electrical/MIS
Any other Costs
TOTAL—
Bond Financing
City Reserves
Any Other Allocations
TOTAL
NORINE MILLER
Councilwoman, Seventh Ward
NM:sr
C�'
Na b b a a
a o
n � C + .-* � .y-► C N. y � fD � of
CD cr
CD
d CD O cD O 1 0 ° .+ � O � r..►
CD
c '" CD Nr -4 (1Q
(D
CD
CD
C b
Oq L7 �
A A
O ! C
00 O
kA
z z z z z z z a
a a a a a a a :0 o W N W �' � ° z
o o a vv, o d
° a °o v �0 0 0 <
w o0 0 o a, a. b
o o
A
`. CD
=i A
� o Y
°•ti � oNO C'1
sR a b o o y C~
a a a a a � "kot
° °° a a a a a a '
M. "� �' f'1 'r1
koq
z °o z z z z z z> P a a a a a a � a a
0 a a a a a a
n
C7 y
0
0 l l
Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a .�
LU I
0 0
EXHIBIT "C"
° 0
pa
O CD A �. Ate? C ' C o CD
� n n Fig (A '-� (M cD CD
w
A O D C' `C N co O� cD �.
CD
3 CCD
a CD
fo
y O
G.
n
O .�+ r
.�+ A
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z_ "'► Z_ Z_ Z Z_ Z_ Z
a a a a a a a A• a a a a a a a
Oil
a r
b �•
0 o
� r
o �
o �
a a
A
a a a a a a a ° a a y z z z z O N r
n a a a a R
Do
a
n �
n Y
Z Z Z z Z z Z ° F„ Z Z Z z Z o
a a a a a a a N � a a a a a a
O O A
69
N
O
CD
CD
011
a a a a a z z z z z z z a
C)
CD
° o b
o
Li
CD
eb
CD w
C-D} „fir CD n '.3 CDD
G CD O O
CD
n (D CD lD
lD SAD
ti O
A
O
A �
O u
O �•
z z z z z z z z z z z z z °
t as
a a a a a a a a 0 �cc
_ A (D O C
O a
0 y•
m =° I O
n
A n
a �
Y
ILI
0 o A
0
z z z z z z z z z z z z
a a a a a a a
n
� O
z z z z z z z
a a v a a a a a � � ° k
Oo to oU o Wa
9.
z o z z o 0
a o o
0
0
f°/1 O
a a a a a a a ° z z z z z z z
a a a a a a a -V
b
0 0
n
a s ; a as a s
w (D
CD C o n CD
Itz C7 ZtL
ON ;. w N
cr
CD
...r O G
.y ►� CD CD
C �t y' CD
qq
p, cD CD O
o b cD n
o. o CL w
'-h CAD d CD
CD f�
CD
�. CD C� r»
CD
CD (D
O
CD w
'L3 v
C3
qo �
o
CD
W W 0 CN
A' O 00
us ON 00
a C o
cro
CD
a N O� °o
•t N CD
O O 03 O � ai
D CD `C
O {�� 0
CD
C(D A Es9
a'
CD
CL
� C O