The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About51- Planning & Building Services CITY OF SAN BERT iRDINO - REQUEST '. )R COUNCIL ACTION From: Al Boughey , Director Subject: Reconsideration of Council denial of General Plan Amendment No . * 92-06 Dept: Planning & Building Services and Tentative Tract No . 15407 Date: June 24 , 1993 MCC meeting of 07 /06/93 Synopsis of Previous Council action: 12 /21 /92 -- Motion to approve project failed . 01 /20/93 -- Motion to reconsider failed . 05/24/93 -- Motion to reschedule for a Public Hearing on July 6 , 1993 passed . Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed and the resolution be adopted which adopts the Negative Declaration and approves General Plan Amendment No . 92-06 and the Negative Declaration be adopted and the tentative tract be approved ; or That the hearing be closed and General Plan Amendment No . 92-06 and Tentative Tract No . 15407 be denied . L Signature Al Bou , ctor Contact person:_A 1 B o u g h e y Phone: 5057 Supporting data attached: Yes Ward: 5 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. Description) Finance: Council Notes: CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FuR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Subject: Reconsideration of Council Denial of General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 and Tentative Tract No. 15407 Mayor and Common Council Meeting July 6, 1993 REQUEST AND LOCATION The applicant requests an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Plan to change the designation from RL, Residential Low, to RS, Residential Suburban, on approximately 30.59 acres of land located at the southeast corner of on the south side of Irvington Avenue, between Olive Avenue and Walnut Avenue, directly north of the Cable Creek Flood Control Channel (see Attachment A.3 of the Staff Report to the Planning Commission). Staff proposes to increase the amendment area by approximately 2.65 acres to include 16 parcels of record bordering the western periphery of the subject property (see Attachment A.4 of the Staff Report to the Planning Commission). Concurrently, and contingent upon adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 92-06, the applicant requests approval of Tentative Tract No. 15407, to establish a residential subdivision consisting of 110 single-family lots and 3.2 acres of open space . KEY POINTS • The existing RL designation permits single-family detached residential development at a maximum density of 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre. • The proposed RS designation permits single-family detached residential development at a maximum density of 4.5 dwelling units per gross acre. • The subject property is contiguous to RS-designated properties to the east and north, which have been subdivided and developed in general accordance with current RS standards. Sixteen parcels adjacent to the western boundary of the subject property are also subdivided in accordance with RS standards. Thus, if the subject property is redesignated RS, the subsequent potential development would be consistent with the scale and rhythm of existing subdivisions. • Due to topographic constraints and Flood Control setback requirements, the actual density proposed under Tentative Tract No. 15407 is 3.6 dwelling units per gross acre. • Tentative Tract No. 15407 complies with all of the development standards of the Development Code and will be consistent with the General Plan if the land use designation is changed to RS. General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Mayor and Common Council Meeting July 6, 1993 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On June 18, 1992, the Environmental Review Committee reviewed two Initial Studies, separately evaluating the proposed RS designation and the proposed subdivision and recommended Negative Declarations for both requests. MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OPTIONS 1. The Mayor and Common Council may adopt the Resolution (Exhibit 2); adopt the Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract No. 15407; and approve Tentative Tract No. 15407, based on the Findings of Fact, and Subject to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in the Staff Report to the Planning Commission (Exhibit 1). 2. The Mayor and Common Council may deny General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 and Tentative Tract No. 15407. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The amendment request was considered by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing on November 4, 1992. No one was present to speak in opposition to the proposal. The Planning Commission placed a motion on the consent calendar to approve General Plan Amendment and Tentative Tract No. 15407. The Commission then voted to recommend adoption of the Negative Declarations and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 and Tentative Tract No. 15407 (Commissioner Stone abstained from the vote due to conflict of interest concerns). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council: 1. Adopt the resolution, copy attached, which adopts the Negative Declaration and approves General Plan Amendment No. 91-06 as presented. 2. Adopt the Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract No. 15407; and 3. Approve Tentative Tract No. 15407. General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Mayor and Common Council Meeting July 6, 1993 Page 3 Prepared by: Gregory S. Gubman, Associate Planner for Al Boughey, AICP, Director Department of Planning and Building Services Exhibit 1: Location Map Exhibit 2: Staff Report to the Planning Commission November 4, 1992 Attachment A - General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 A.1) Findings of Fact A.2) Initial Study A.3) Amendment Area Proposed by Applicant A.4) Amendment Area Proposed by Staff Attachment B - Tentative Tract No. 15407 B.1) Development Code and General Plan Consistency B.2) Findings of Fact B.3) Conditions of Approval B.4) Standard Requirements B.5) Initial Study B.6) Tentative Tract Map Exhibit 3: Resolution Attachment A - Location Map Attachment B - Legal Description 30 Jun 93 Planning and Building Services Dept San Bernardino City Hall 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Subject: General plan amendment No. 92-06, Tentative Tract 15407 As a property owner on Irvington Ave, I received notice of the proposed amendment and will be unable to attend the Mayor and Common Council meeting on 6 July 93, but would like to express my views on this proposed change. I support the change from RL to RS, as long as the developed homes maintain a high construction and architectural quality standard that enhances and compliments the surrounding areas. The density increase is of less concern to me than any compromise in the quality of the resulting developed property. Sincerely, John U. Foster h 1025 Hickory Ave Fairfield, CA 94533 O F ANFaeG k San Bernardino parcel #0261-241-43 JUL o 2 1993 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & BUILDING SERVICES r ' - A _ EXHIBIT "1" e (Planning Commission St, Report) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ITEM CASE r_PAg2-nti /Tmi _ LOCATION HEARING DATE --11 -4-q2 r v r v 1, � 1 J `7 v • 1 �' /• ' � �v •fir 1• '/ -t`�� •• �� r 111/i .• /v / ' ��.JMFe.11 �.+Ge^�F(jr a.ao1 Fsrh i h i t 1 AM EXHIBIT "2" r` CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 6 SUMMARY HEARING DATE 11-4-92 WARD 5 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. APPLICANT: Sierra Engineering W 92-06 AND TENTATIVE TRACT 25864 Business Ctr Dr, �F N Redlands , .CA 92374 Q NO. 15407 OWNER: California Properties Fun V 2330 Beverly Blvd. Los Angeles , CA 90017-092 To change the land use designation from RL, Residential Low to RS , Residential Suburban and to create a 110-lot single- family subdivision. WThe property is located on 33 . 24 at the south east corner M of Irvington Avenue and Olive Avenue. W Q EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION Subject Vacant RL Residential Low North Single-Family Residential RL/Rs Residential Low/ Residential Suburba South Flood Control Channel PFC Public Flood Control East Single-Family Residence RS Residential Suburba West Single & Multi Family RL Residential Low Residence GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC ==NO FLOOD HAZARD 5WESXtZ ZONE A SEWERS: YES HAZARD ZONE: ZONE: El NO ❑ ZONE B ❑ NO HIGH FIRE ❑ YES AIRPORT NOISE/ ❑ YES =PROJECT OPMENT ❑ YES HAZARD ZONE: NO CRASH ZONE: }}� AREA: } 'L1 NO LT NO J ❑ NOT ❑ POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z APPROVAL Q APPLICABLE EFFECTS WITH 0 F- MITIGATING MEASURES LZ U) NO E.I.R. Q CONDITIONS LL 0 2 Z ❑ EXEMPT ❑ E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO W Z ❑ Z C SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS Q W DENIAL 0 Z WITH MITIGATING F- M Ir M MEASURES N O 1:1 CONTINUANCE TO ZNO SIGNIFICANT ❑ SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS V W EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.R.C. W MINUTES C, OF aw �Wow F"PAOseR"us PLAN-9.02 PAGE I OF 1 (4-90) AM 0 General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item No: 6 Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Pacte 1 REQUEST AND LOCATION The applicant requests an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Plan to change the designation from RL, Residential Low, to RS, Residential Suburban, on approximately 30.59 acres of land (the subject property) located on the south side of Irvington Avenue, between Olive Avenue and Walnut Avenue, directly north of the Cable Creek Flood Control Channel (see Proposed Amendment Area, Attachment A. 3) . Staff proposes to increase the amendment area by approximately 2. 65 acres to include 16 parcels of record bordering the western periphery of the subject property (see Recommended Amendment Area, Attachment A.4) . Concurrently, and contingent upon adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 92-06, the applicant requests approval of Tentative Tract No. 15407, to establish a 110-lot, single-family residential subdivision. SITE AND AREA CHARACTERISTICS The subject property is comprised of four contiguous, irregularly- shaped parcels, and is currently undeveloped. The topography of the subject property slopes in a southeasterly direction from an elevation of approximately 1,710 feet m.s.l. to an elevation of approximately 1, 660 feet near its southerly boundary. A knoll, forming the southeasterly boundary of the subject property, rises to an elevation of approximately 1,695 feet and adjoins the Cable Creek Flood Control Channel (see proposed Tentative Tract Map, Attachment B. 6) . Approximately 39 mature trees are located within the boundaries of the subject property, including a wind row of 29 trees along Irvington Avenue. The flora is otherwise characterized by chaparral, sage scrub and ruderal species in a highly disturbed and degraded state due to human encroachment. The balance of the recommended amendment area consists of 14 developed single-family residential lots and two vacant lots, located on the east side of Olive Avenue, as recorded under Tract Nos. 10183 and 10184. Pad elevations descend southerly, from 1,711.6 feet m.s.l. at the southeasterly corner of Irvington and Olive Avenues (Lot 1, Tract 10184) , to 1,677 feet on lot 9 of Tract 10183 . Tract 10181, a 50-lot subdivision, adjoins the subject property to the east, which was developed under the R-1-7,200 standards in place prior to the adoption of the 1989 General Plan. Facing the r General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item No: 6 Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Page 2 amendment area to the north side of Irvington Avenue is Tract 10162 , also developed under R-1-7, 200 standards, as do four contiguous large custom lots beginning at the northeast corner of Irvington and Olive Avenues. BACKGROUND Prior to the 1989 adoption of the General Plan, the amendment area was zoned R-1-7200 (4 . 5 du/ac) . City records indicate that a tentative tract map (TT 10185) was previously approved at this density, though never recorded, on parcels comprising the subject property. On June 6, 1989, Tentative Tract No. 14404 was approved to allow recordation of a 77-lot subdivision under the newly adopted RL designation, which requires a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet and allows a maximum density of 3. 1 units per acre. The most recent one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract No. 14404 was approved by the Planning Commission on August 4, 1992 . On March 27, 1992 , the applications for General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 and General Plan Amendment No. 15407 were submitted to the Planning Division. The applications were deemed complete on April 24 , 1992 . On July 16, 1992, the DRC/DRC formally cleared the projects to the Planning Commission. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) STATUS Two Initial studies were prepared: one that generally addresses the potential environmental impacts resulting from development of the subject property at the maximum density permitted under the RS designation; the other evaluates specific impacts that may result from developing the property as proposed under Tentative Tract No. 15407. The Initial Studies were presented to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) On June 18, 1992. The ERC determined that neither the proposed amendment nor the proposed subdivision would have an adverse impact on the environment, and Negative Declarations were recommended. The proposed Negative Declarations were available for public review and comment from June 25, 1992 to July 15, 1992. No comments were received during the public review period. While the expanded amendment area, as recommended by staff, was not specifically mentioned in the GPA 92-06 Initial Study, the inclusion of the additional 2 . 65 acres along Olive Avenue as part of the map change will not result in additional or amplified impacts. All but two of those parcels in question are fully Am 9!31k General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item No: 6_ Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Page 3 developed, and the size and shape of each parcel is already consistent with the standards under the proposed RS designation. The redesignation of those parcels from RL to RS, thus, will not facilitate the development of more intensive uses of the properties, nor will it encumber future improvements to those properties; the result will only be to facilitate a more logical mapping of land use boundaries should the applicant's request be approved. COMMENTS RECEIVED Council Offices (Ward 5) In comments submitted to staff, Councilman Minor stated that he does not support any general plan amendment that will result in an increase in density. Verdemont Area Property Owners The Planning Division has received six letters of support for the proposed General Plan Amendment and Tentative Tract from owners of several large, undeveloped parcels in the Verdemont area. All of the properties identified under their ownership are located west of Olive Avenue and are currently designated RE, Residential Estates, or RL, Residential Low. ANALYSIS I. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Existing Land Use Designation The General Plan states that an objective of the City shall be to "promote the development of low-density, large lot, high quality single-family detached residential units" within the RL, Residential Low, land use designation (Objective 1. 10) . The RL designation permits single-family detached residential development at a maximum density of 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre. Assuming no other constraints, the undeveloped 30.59 acres of the amendment area could yield up to 95 lots (given the actual land configuration, topographic limitations and Flood Control District setbacks, however, Tentative Tract No. 14404 was approved for only 77 lots) . General Plan Policies included in the Design and Development Standards for RL require the use of extensive site landscaping and, AM s 0 General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item No: 6 Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Paste 4 where applicable, linkages to master planned equestrian and/or pedestrian trail systems. Proposed Land Use Designation General Plan Objective 1. 11 describes the intent of the RS, Residential Suburban, land use designation as follows: Promote the development of single-family detached units in a high quality suburban setting. The RS designation permits single-family detached residential development at a maximum density of 4 .5 dwelling units per gross acre. The maximum yield for the undeveloped portion of the amendment area would then be 138 lots. Due to characteristics specific to the subject property, the maximum actual yield would increase from approximately 77 lots to approximately 110 lots, as demonstrated by tentative tract maps drawn according to the standards of each designation (TT 14404 and TT 15407, respectively) . Similar to the design and development policies for the RL designation, General Plan Policy 1. 11. 31 encourages developers to incorporate greenbelts, pedestrian paths and community amenities within RS subdivisions. Land Use Compatibility/General Plan Consistency General Plan Policy 1.8. 31 states: Establish zoning which encourages developers to design residential projects which maintain the scale and rhythm of the existing lot divisions of 7,200 square feet and larger, or use other creative design and planning solutions which establish and maintain a distinctive character and environment The subject property is contiguous to RS designated properties to the east and north, which have been subdivided and developed in general accordance with current RS standards. As previously mentioned, the 16 parcels adjacent to the western boundary of the subject property are also subdivided according to RS standards, although they are currently designated RL. Therefore, if the subject property is redesignated RS, the subsequent potential development would be compatible with existing development and "maintain the scale and rhythm of existing lot divisions. " General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item No: 6 Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Page 5 The proposed RS designation may also be more appropriate for the site, given the proximity of the medium-to-high density apartment complex to the west. Although the subject property is largely buffered from the apartment complex by the existing lots along Olive Avenue, the transition in density created by an RL development may be so abrupt as to compromise the desirability of a larger lot subdivision. If the amendment area is redesignated RS, approximately 26 acres of undeveloped RL-designated land east of the subject property will remain, isolated from other RL-designated properties (Attachment C) . Although a 65 to 80-lot RL subdivision could potentially be created from these parcels, the likelihood of such a development may be reduced without a proximal relationship to other properties under the same designation. While staff may favorably consider a redesignation of these parcels if an application is submitted, it has not been the Planning Division's policy to initiate a recommendation in such cases, except as a necessary condition to supporting an applicant's request; staff has found no necessity to do so in this case, as it has with the 16 parcels along the westerly boundary of the subject property. II. TENTATIVE TRACT Subdivision May Act Tentative Tract No. 15407 was submitted in compliance with Section 66426 of the Subdivision Map Act. The subdivider has agreed to comply with the provisions imposed by the City under the authority of Chapter 4 of the Map Act. Density and Lot Design The proposed 30.59 acre subdivision into 110 single-family residential lots is a permitted use within the proposed RS, Residential Suburban, General Plan land use designation, which allows a maximum density of 4. 5 dwelling units per gross acre and a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. The proposed density is 3 . 6 dwelling units per gross acre. All lots meet or exceed the required minimum 7,200 square-foot area as well as the minimum 60-foot lot widths (66 feet for corner parcels) and minimum 100 foot lot depths. Lot sizes are increased to a minimum of 10, 055 square feet for the lots fronting Irvington Avenue, to ensure greater compatibility with the larger lots facing them on the north side of Irvington. a F� General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item No• 6 Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Page 6 Open Space The southern boundary of the subject property is located within the Hillside Management Overlay and adjoins the Cable Creek Flood Control Channel. The San Bernardino County Flood Control District requires a 100-foot, non-buildable setback from the Cable Creek right-of-way. To provide this setback, as well as comply with Hillside Management Overlay District standards, a remainder area of approximately 3 .2 acres along the southern portion of the subject property shall be maintained as open space, and designated Lot "A" . The lower portion will be landscaped as an open park area, while the knoll will be retained in a natural, undisturbed state. The formation of an assessment district among the property owners within the tract shall be required for the continued maintenance of the open space area. Access and Circulation Pursuant to Development Code Section 19 . 30. 200 (6) , all new subdivisions shall have, or provide, at least two standard routes of access, which are defined as public roads with a minimum paved width of 24 feet. The proposed subdivision can be accessed from either Palm Avenue, via Irvington Avenue, or Pine Avenue, via Irvington or Washington Avenue. Both Palm and Pine exceed the criteria for standard access routes. The internal street, sewer and water systems of the proposed project connect to those established by adjacent Tract 10181 to the east. Stephanie Avenue and Melissa Street, which currently terminate at the easterly boundary of the subject property, will be continued through the proposed tract. Due to the design of Tract 10181, key lots are unavoidably created at lots 14 and 110 of Tentative Tract 15407. Gregory Street, a cul-de-sac constructed by Tract 10181 with lots fronting on its east side and bulb, will be completed and improved as a result of new parcels created on its west side. The map proposes to vacate the southernmost portion of Olive Street. Presently, Olive Street ends at the Cable Creek Channel. The map proposes a knuckle at Brenda Drive, with ownership of the vacated portion of Olive Street to be divided amongst the adjoining parcels. Traffic Impacts The City Traffic Engineer has determined that additional trips from d General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item No: r, Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Page 7 the proposed project are not sufficient to cause a significant impact on the adjacent street system. Total traffic volume will be less than the street design capacity. However, a traffic systems fee, estimated in the amount of $14, 564, shall be collected prior to the final recordation of the map. Drainage Most of the runoff from the subject property presently drains into the Stephanie Avenue storm drain. Based on the recommendations of drainage studies prepared in 1989 and 1991, the runoff created by the proposed development will primarily be directed to catch basins in the southern portion of the tract, and outlet into Cable Creek via drainage easements traversing Lot "A". Final construction plans for the proposed drainage system will be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and the County Flood Control District. Biological Resources (excluding trees) The site is located within the Biological Resources Management Overlay (BRMO) , as identified in Section 10, Figure 41, of the City's General Plan. A biological assessment was prepared by Joe Gorman PhD Associates in April of 1992 . The consultants concluded that no sensitive plant or wildlife species, as determined by the criteria and listings of rare, threatened or endangered species, were found, nor was evidence of such habitats found on the project site. Plants identified on the site are representative of species typically present within Southern California chaparral and related inland sage scrub communities. Fauna was limited to common insect groups, small invertebrates, reptiles and rodents typically found within these areas. Generally, the site is in a degraded natural state, due to repeated discing, off-road vehicle use and other human-related factors. Trees on Site Currently, there are approximately 39 trees on the subject property, primarily consisting of a wind row of 29 mature olive and Blue Gum eucalyptus along Irvington Avenue. The trees are located within the Irvington and Olive ultimate rights-of-way, and thus must be either relocated or removed. An arborist report was prepared on March 6, 1989 by Samuel L. Knapp, ASCA during the review of Tentative Tract No. 14404. The trees were identified and catalogued in the report and plotted on a map, which is on file with the Planning Division. General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Aaenda Item No• 6 Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Page 8 The report concluded that only seven of the 39 trees, all olive species, were sufficiently viable to be transplanted. The report identified the remaining trees as diseased or severely damaged due to "extensive pruning injuries. " It is the recommendation of staff that the majority of the viable trees be relocated to Lot "A" as part of the overall landscape/open space plan. Prior to the removal or relocation of the trees, however, a Tree Removal Permit application must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division and Parks and Recreation Department. Cultural Resources The subject property is located within an area of concern for archaeological resources, as identified in the Historical Element of the City's General Plan (Section 3.0, Figure 8) . Based on field surveys and literature reviews conducted in 1988 by Victor C. de Munck, SOPA and Eileen Garo, it was determined that the potential for the presence of cultural resources within the project area is low. Lester Ross, coordinator of the San Bernardino County Museum Archaeological Information Center, concurred with the findings of the cultural resources report, and did not recommend any further review. CONCLUSIONS The proposed amendment is in conformance with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan. The proposed amendment is compatible with all contiguous and surrounding land uses. A change in land use designation to RS, Residential Suburban, will not create a significant negative impact on the environment. Tentative Tract No. 15407 complies with all of the development standards of the Development Code and will be consistent with the General Plan if the land use designation is changed to RS. Tentative Tract No. 15407 is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act. It is the conclusion of staff that, based upon the project design and proposed conditions of approval, the project will not pose a detriment to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of San Bernardino. dM F� General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item No: 6 Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Page 9 RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council that: 1. A Negative Declaration be adopted for General Plan Amendment No. 92-06; 2 . The General Plan Land Use Plan be redesignated from RL to RS on approximately 33 . 24 acres, consisting of the 30. 59 acre amendment area proposed by the applicant, plus the adjoining 2 . 65 acres to the west (as shown in Attachment A.4) , based on the attached Findings of Fact; 3 . A Negative Declaration be adopted for Tentative Tract No. 15407 ; and 4 . Tentative Tract No. 15228 be approved, based upon the attached Findings of Fact (Attachment B. 2) , and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Attachment B. 3) and Standard Requirements (Attachment B. 4) . Respectfully ubmitted, Bou AICP c or o P anning and Building Services 4 A Greg ry S. WGubman Assistant Planner sun F� 0 General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item No: H Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Page 10 ATTACHMENTS: A. General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 A. 1 - Findings of Fact A.2 - Initial Study A.3 - Amendment Area Proposed by Applicant A.4 - Amendment Area Proposed by Staff B. Tentative Tract No. 15407 B. 1 - Development Code and General Plan Consistency B.2 - Findings of Fact B. 3 - Conditions of Approval B.4 - Standard Requirements B. 5 - Initial Study B. 6 - Tentative Tract Map C. Location Map ATTACHMENT "A .1"A 0 General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item• 6 Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Pagel General Plan Amendment Findings 1. The proposed RS, Residential Suburban land use designation is internally consistent with the General Plan in that such a designation is not in conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan, and will facilitate the continued and orderly development of the area. 2. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. Factors related to the potentially higher density of residential development, such as increases in traffic or surface runoff, will not significantly impact existing or future public services. 3. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City in that the proposed amendment will not change the single-family residential designation of the subject property, and is compatible with the suburban residential character of development within the immediate vicinity. 4. The amendment area is physically suitable for the requested land use designation and anticipated development in that the size, configuration, topography and access to improved public roads and other public services are adequate to facilitate the development of the uses permitted within the RS, Residential Suburban, General Plan land use designation. ATTACHMENT "A.2" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY Initial Study for Environmental Impacts For GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-06 Project Number Project Description/Location To change the General Plan land use designation from RL, Residential Low to Residential Suburban on a 30. 59 acre site for proposed residential development of single family homes in con- !unction with a Tentative Tract No. 15407 proposal for subdivision into 110 lots. The subiect site is located on the south side of Irvington Avenue between Olive and Walnut Avenues in the Verdemont Area. Date June &, 1992 Prepared for: Applicants Sierra Engineering for California Properties Fund Address 25864 Business Center Drive, Ste. "F" Redlands, CA 92374 Prepared by: Name Paul G. Scroac;s Title Assistant Planner City of San Bernardino Planning and Building Services Department 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 GPA 92-06 CRY OF SN1 BEfiNMmMD Crr LvmHnwcSENNCES PLAN•8.0 PAGE!OF:1 14.901 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING,AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND Application Number: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-06 Project Description: To change the General Plan land use designation from RL, Residential Low to RS, Residential Suburban on four existing parcels totaling 30.59 acres for single family residential develop- ment in conjunction with Tentative Tract No. 15407 application for a proposed 110 lot subdivision. Location: The 30.59 acre site is located on the south side of Irvingtion between Olive and Walnut Avenues in the Verdemont Area. Environmental Constraints Area: The subject site is located in a zone of potential High Winds, portions within Flood Control Zones 11811 and abuts PFC Channel "All and in an Archaeological Cultural Resource Area. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explain answers,where appropriate,on a separate attached sheet 1. Earth Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a_ Earth movement(cut and/or fill)of 10,000 cubic yams or more? _ x b- Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15%natural grade? x c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone as defined in Section 12.0-Geologic &Seismic, Figure 47,of the City's General Plan? X d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? x e. Development within areas defined for high potential for water or wind erosion as identified in Section 12.0- Geologic&Seismic, Figure 53,of the City's General Plan? X f. Modification of a channel,creek or river? X °Einu CF &- OF060JUNNO rw.mm PU1W-9.06 PAGE 1 OF (_L (11-90) e� g. Development within an area subject to landslides, Yes No Maybe mudslides, liquefaction or other similar hazards as identified in Section 12.0-Geologic& Seismic, Figures 48, 52 and 53 of the City's General Plan? _ h. Other? }C. 2. Air Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or an effect upon ambient air quality as defined by AOMD? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Development within a high wind hazard area as identified in Section 15.0-Wind& Fire, Figure 59,of the City's General Plan? X 3. Water Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns,or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? x b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? X c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? �C d. Change in the quantity of quality of ground water? 7C e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards as identified in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map,Community Panel Number 060281 o=5 -_&,and Section 16.0- Flooding, Figure 62,of the City's General Plan? X I. Other? X 4. Biological Resources: Could the proposal result in: a. Development within the Biological Resources Management Overlay,as identified in Section 10.0 -Natural Resources, Figure 41,of the City's X General Plan? b. Change in the number of any unique,rare or endangered species of plants or their habitat including stands of trees? �C c. Change in the number of any unique,rare or endangered species of animals or their habitat? X d. Removal of viable, mature trees?(6'or greater) X e. Other? S. Noise: Could the proposal result in: a. Development of housing, health care facilities,schools, libraries, religious facilities or other'Wise'sensitive uses in areas where existing or future noise levels exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A)exterior and an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior as identified in Section 14.0-Noise,Figures 14-6 and 14-13 of the City's General Plan? b. Development of new or expansion of existing industrial, Yes No Maybe commercial or other uses which generate noise levels on areas containing housing, schools, health care facilities or other sensitive uses above an Ldn of 65 dB(A)exterior or an Ldn of 45 dB(A)interior? )C c. Other? X 6. Land Use: Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the land use as designated on the General Plan? �C b. Development within an Airport District as identified in the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone(AICUZ)Report and the Land Use Zoning District Map? X c. Development within Foothill Fire Zones A& B,or C as identified on the Land Use Zoning District Map? �C d. Other? k 7. Man-Made Hazards: Will the project: a. Use, store,transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials(including but not limited to oil, pesticides,chemicals or radiation)? )C b. Involve the release of hazardous substances? X c. Expose people to the potential heaRh/safety hazards? X d. Other? _X 8. Housing: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? X b. Other? k 9. Transportation/Circulation: Could the proposal, in comparison with the Circulation Plan as identified in Section 6.0-Circulation of the City's General Plan, result in: a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? X b. Use of existing,or demand for new,parking facilities/structures? c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? X d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? _ e. Impact to rail or air traffic? X f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles,bicyclists or pedestrians? x g. A disjointed pattern of roadway improvements? X h. Significant increase in traffic volumes on the roadways or intersections? i. Other? X a..v .MI GePNMP0 10. Public Services: Will the proposal impact the following Yes No Maybe beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X c. Schools (i.e.,attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? K d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Medical aid? X f. Solid Waste? X g. Other? X 11. Utilities: Will the proposal: a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? iK 2. Electricity? X 3. Water? X 4. Sewer? X S. Other? X_ b. Result in a disjointed pattern of utility extensions? �G c. Require the construction of new facilities? X 12. Aesthetics: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic view? b. Will the visual impact of the project be detrimental to the surrounding area? c. Other? X 13. Cultural Resources: Could the proposal result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site by development within an archaeological sensitive area as identified in Section 3.0-Historical,Figure S.of the City's General Plan? X b. Alteration or destruction of a historical site,structure or object as listed in the City's Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey? c. Other? x 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Yes No Maybe a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term,to the disadvantage of long-term,environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief,definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?(A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small,but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ?C C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) SEE ATTACHED SHEETS Amendment Site and Surrounding Area Characteristics: The site is comprised of 4 adjoining, irregularly-shaped parcels, which are all vacant and surrounded to the north, west and east by previously approved and developed resident- ial tracts and/or individual owner/builder residences. A portion of the site to the west also abuts an existing apartment complex. The adjoining properties to the south are a Public Flood Control Channel and a vacant, small knoll area. Under the present RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use designation the property was previously reviewed and approved for an 82 lot residential subdivision under Tentative Tract No. 14044. The General Plan Amendment applicant's request to change the land use designation to RS, Residential Suburban is in conjunction with a proposed Tentative Tract No.15407 application for an 110 lot subdivision for single-family residential development. i ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES DISSCUSSION 1. EARTH RESOURCES - la. Earth Movement/Grading If the proposed General Plan Amendment is approved, future on-site grading will likely occur in conjunction with subsequent residential development of the 30.59 acre site. The applicants are processing concurrently a proposed 110 lot subdivision with estimates involving approximately 115,510 cubic yards of cut and 65,306 cubic yards of fill, respectively. Any such future grading activities and/or noise related impacts shall require a a pre-approved soil erosion and dust control plan that would include: sand bagging, continued use of water trucks, pre- approved transport routes for any on or off-site soil transfer as well regulating noise levels and hours of construction. By following such procedures and techniques any potential impacts to adjoining residential property owners resulting from these grading and/or soil transport activities will be reduced to acceptable levels of non-significance. 2. AIR RESOURCES - 2c. High Winds Area The subject site is located in a City designated High Winds Hazard Area. All proposed residences, including auxiliary buildings shall meet and/or exceed Code requirments for additional structural, roofing or other veneer exterior wall treatments to withstand the hazards related to the presence of these high winds. Following such construction techniques and use of pre-approved materials will reduce any potential impacts to within acceptable levels. The approval or denial of the General Plan Amendment will not affect or alter these High Wind Area constrution requirements. 3. WATER RESOURCES - 3a. , 3b. & 3e. Absorption Rates, Runoff & Discharge and Potential Exposure to Flood Hazards If the General Amendment proposal is approved, the site will have the potential for future residential development that will increase hardscapes areas and reduce permeable surface areas, resulting in greater amounts of runoff during occasional periods of heavy precipitation. All such runoff shall be directed towards and into approved City storm drain facilities. For the Verdemont subject site area additional on and off-site infrastructure improvements and/or developer contributions towards same for future development shall be required as Conditions of Approval of subsequent tract proposals. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES DISCUSSION (CONT) . 4 . BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - 4a. , 4d. Biological Resource Management Overlay District and Possible Mature Tree Removal/Replacment The subject site is located within a City designated Biological Management Overlay Disrict for which the applicant was required to complete a Biological Resources Assessment Study. This study was undertaken and a report submitted to the City for review, which concluded that no sensitive plant nor wildlife species, as determined by the criteria and listings of rare, threatened or endangered species, were found or evidence existing for their presence over the subject site. Typical Chaparral and Inland Sage Scrub plant communities present on the site have been degraded from repeated evidence of disking, motorcycle use and related presence and use of surrounding residential owners of the subject property. Additionally, the presence of approximately 39 mature trees, principally planted Blue Gum eucalyptus and Olive tree species required the applicant's completion and submittal of an arborist report. This study was conducted and each tree was identified on the site, it's condition noted and recommendation for the potential for transplanting and/or removal that will be part of the Conditions of Approval of the proposed tract submitted in conjunction with the General Plan Amendment. By addressing these biological issues and concerns, potential impacts will be addressed and mitigated to levels of non- significance. 6. LAND USE - 6a. Proposed Land Use Designation Change - General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 proposes to change the land use designation of the four existing, legal parcels comprising a total 30.59 acres from RL, Residential Low, to RS, Residential Suburban. If approved the minimium sized lot area would be reduced from 10,800 to 7,200 square feet and would allow a dwelling unit density maximum of up to 4.5 units per gross acre, subject to Planning Commission approval. The applicant has concurrently submitted a proposed 110 lot residential tract subdivision, with lots ranging in size from 7,202 to 14,353 square feet and a proposed density of 3.6 dwelling units per acre, which is within the permitted maximum density referenced above for RS, Residential Suburban, General Plan land use designations. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES DISCUSSION (CONT. ) 9. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION - 9c. Alterations of Circulation Patterns and related Traffic Volume Increases The proposed General Plan Amendment, if approved, will not alter the requirements for providing adequate ingress/egress or internal circulation patterns for any subsequent residential tract submittal. The only notable change would be the permitted smaller lot size and resulting allowable greater density for RS, Residential Suburban, General Plan land use designations. The applicants have submitted concurrently a proposed 110 lot residential tract subdivision that shall be reviewed for all potential traffic and circulation issues to ensure adequate site design, ingress/egress and good internal circulation patterns. The General Plan Amendments approval would not pose any significant impacts to surrounding major arterials nor the creation of any traffic related congestion problems beyond those thresholds typically present in other similarily designated Residential Suburban areas of the City. The subject site was previously approved for an 82 lot single family subdivison under Tentative Tract No. 14044 and the RL, Residential Low land use designation. 10. UTILITIES - 10a. , 10b. , & 10c. Fire, Police and School Area Infrastructure Developments The proposed General Plan Amendment site is located in the Verdemont Area which, if approved or denied, shall require future residential tract developers to contribute towards the construction or future development of needed public services in this portion of the City. The need for additional fire and police stations to lessen response time as well as additional school construction at all levels for better serving this portion of the City is a recognized need and priority that City agency reviews have stressed for all project proposals within this area, including General Plan Amendment requests. Additional Assessment Districts as well other infrastructure fees and/or actual on and off-site improvement construction requirements shall be determined at the specific project level by all appropriate City agencies or other applicable governing jurisdiction, such as the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Compliance with these Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements will reduce development and occupational risks to within acceptable levels for the proposed subject area. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES DISCUSSION (CONT. ) 13. CULTURAL RESOURCES - 13a. Archaeological Cultural Resources The proposed General Plan Amnendment is located in a City designated area of potential Archaeological and/or Historical Cultural Resources. This required the applicant to complete an archaeological site field study as well as an ethnohistorical and records search on the subject property, as per requirements of Dr. Ross of the San Bernardino County Archaeological Infor- mation Center. The study and report were completed and the subject property was determined to have a low potential for the presence of cultural resources due to the site's low-lying topography and periodic flooding, resulting in an area unlikely for prehistoric aboriginal or more recent occupation. A Condition of Approval shall be added that if, in the process of grading and/or other construction activities, any artifiacts or other potential cultural resources are uncovered, all work shall cease immediately until a qualified archaeologist is contacted for further site evaluation. 14. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS - 14c. Potential for Future Cumulative Significance The proposed General Plan Amendment, if approved, would allow the potential for a greater density of home development then previously permitted under the RL, Residential Low land use designation. The applicant has proposed, concurrently, a residential tract of 110 lots if the RS, Residential Suburban land use change is approved that would be 28 more than previously approved for the subject site under the RL, Residential Low designation. As previously described under the Utilities Section, there is a recognized need for additional public services and infra- structure upgrades in the Verdemont Area. While this specific General Plan Amendment proposal's approval or denial will not, of itself, represent a significant impact, continued future development of the Verdemont area will require provisions to ensure this and all portions of the City adequate public services and levels of protection. pgs GPA92-06 ins ._� y m MW M-Mi D. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial study, The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,although there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA Larry E. Reed, Assistant Director Name and Title Sig 44tu re Date: 7rUN /S QTY 01 MM p GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT' APEA MAP Q h Q IRV INGTON AVE. X0 —MELISSA 8 j ✓O-AN APN+ DR. 261-191-23 WASHING TON _24 AVE. -9 -25 -26 �61- 30.59 AC T=ABLE CREEK M `rTE,oy CHANNEL 'biz qLF-QNiE I 2iS F'PEEWgY LAND USE EX/STING - RL PR'ROSED - RS ' A-PN MkKUeP S HAVE IE&► CA""L"To '000. \SC,ALE 1�46.� tt OF (Z CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ITEM CASE LOCATION HEARING DATE SiTf v � / 4 .r o f i f TO • 1/ . • 'e i :AMR f 1. �k. r ac:� d'r••, z+�......n.naiw.ce. �IAN.b.it ?11GeQpF�L s"70, AM, ATTACHMENT "A. 3" mah. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO . 92-06 TITLE AMENDMENT AREA PROPOSED BY APPLICANT RLI ti �y�yo ♦ � v R RL' R v �j •ti • R!- T �. M ,o SAN BERNARDINO ATTACHMENT A.3 ATTACHMENT "A. 4" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO . 92-06 TITLE AMENDMENT AREA RECOMMENDED BY STAFF 4 � �. yv 3 ` IL RS0 All �� ;X+`e•. 1, RL G, •ti V :iii• .- RL TO R f � 'y• a M1 R S CR ' F :?�• '' d Fib .] y SAN BERNARDINO ATTACHMENT AA - 1� v ATTACHMENT "E. 1" 0 General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item• 6 Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Page 27 DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY* Development Category Proposal Code General Plan Use Single- family homes Permitted Permitted Min. Lot 7 , 200 sq. 7,200 sq. 7, 200 sq. Size ft. ft. ft. No. of Lots 110 138 max. 138 max. Min. Lot 60 ft. 60 ft. N/A Width Min. Corner 66 ft. 66 ft. N/A Lot Width Min. Lot 106 ft. 100 ft. N/A Depth Frontage All Lots All Lots N/A on Dedicated Streets Standard Two: Palm Two min. N/A Means of and Pine Access * The information in this table is based upon the assumption that the land use designation is RS, Residential Suburban. ,l, ATTACHMENT "B. 2" 0 General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item• 6 Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Page 2 8 Tentative Tract Findings 1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan, in that the purpose of the map is to provide for the development of single-family homes at a density of 4 . 5 dwelling units per acre, as permitted within the RS, Residential Suburban, General Plan land use district. 2. The design of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan in that the minimum proposed lot size is 7,200 square feet, as required in the RS land use district. 3 . The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, in that the tentative map conforms to the subdivision design standards of the Development Code, the proposed streets comply with the minimum standards of the Public Works Department, the two routes of access meet City standards and water and sewer service can be accomplished through connections to existing infrastructure. 4 . The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development in that the subdivision design complies with all lot area and dimensional standards, as well as required public improvements standards. 5. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. A biological assessment report was prepared and found not evidence for the presence of any rare, threatened or endangered plant or animal species. Storm runoff from the proposed project falls below the capacity of the Cable Creek Flood Control Channel. Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and conditions of approval to establish an open space area to preserve the area of the subject property located within the Hillside Management Overlay District and to relocate existing, viable trees that will ultimately be displaced by development. i General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 & Tentative Tract No. 15407 Agenda Item: 6 Hearing Date: 11-4-92 Page 29 6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems in that environmental health concerns are addressed and mitigated through the design and construction standards of all public services and public and private structures. Additionally, a 100-foot non-buildable setback from the Cable Creek Flood Control Channel has been incorporated into the design of the subdivision to protect future residents from potential storm runoff overflows. 7. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access or use of, property within the proposed subdivision, in that no development shall occur within the required San Bernardino Flood Control setback. I ATTACHMENT "B.3" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE GPA 92-06/TT15407 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 6 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 11-4-92 PAGE 30 1. No tree shall be removed, replaced or relocated prior to the issuance of a Tree Removal Permit. 2 . The final map shall show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. Specific locations for such units shall be to the satisfaction of the U.S.P.S. , the Public Works Department and the Planning Division. 3. Building permits and utility clearances shall be issued in full compliance with Resolution No. 89-116, Resolution No. 90- 02 and Ordinance No. MC-690. 4. No home shall be constructed, or building permit issued, without formal design review and approval of a Development Permit by the review bodies empowered by the City to approve or deny Development Permits for 110-unit single-family residential developments. 5. Walls and Fences a. Wherever block walls, or pilasters in conjunction with wrought iron fences, are utilized which are visible to the public, they shall be constructed of either slump stone, split-faced block, river rock or stuccoed/plastered block with decorative caps. The walls shall have articulated planes, by providing at a minimum of 100 feet of continuous wall, an 18-inch deep by 8-foot long landscaped recession. Pilasters shall be provided at every change in direction, every five-foot difference in elevation and at a minimum of 25 feet of continuous wall. b. All wood fences that are directly visible from public view shall be treated with heavy body stains or paints. C. A wrought iron fence or other Flood Control District approved decorative barrier shall be constructed along the Flood Control District's right-of-way adjacent to the subject property. The use of chain link fencing shall be prohibited. 6. Prior to the construction of drainage outlets or any other activity within Flood Control District right-of-way, proper permits shall be obtained through the District's Field Engineering Division. At that time, the proposal (s) will be reviewed with respect to specific requirements. Cm OF SA RNAFWWO CENTRAL PLANTING SENNCES PLAN-8.09 PAGE 1 OF 1 ra.cnl AM all, I'1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE GPA 92-06/TT15407 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 6 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 11,-4-92 PAGE 31 7 • Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plan( s ) approved by the Director . Development Review Committee , Planning Commission or Mayor and Common Council . Minor modification to the plan( s ) shall be subject to approval by the Director through a minor modification permit process . Any modification which exceeds 10% of the following allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the ref iIing of the original application and a subsequent hearing b,, the appropriate hearing review authority if applicable . 1 . On-site circulation and parking , loading and landscaping : 2 . Placement and/or height of walls , fences and structures ; 3 . Reconfiguration of architectural features , including colors , and/or modification of finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approved theme : and . 4 . A reduction in density or intensity a development project . - ---------- Within one vear of development approval . commencement of construction shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void . In addition , if after commencement of construction . work is discontinued for a period of one year , then the permit/approval shall become null and void . Projects may be built in phases if preapproved by the review authority . If a project is built in preapproved phases , each subsequent phase shall have one year from the previous phase ' s date of construction commencement to the next phase ' s date of construction commencement to have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void . Project : ------------------------------------------- Expiration Date : o"6 W1!#M100 D1 Au-n ro ouac,nr, urn, l CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE GPA 92-06/TT15407 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 6 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 11-32 PAGE 32 _ The review authority may- , upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and for good cause , grant one time extension not to exceed 12 months . The review authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code provisions . 8 . In the event that this approval is legally challenged , the Cite will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter . Once notified , the applicant agrees to defend , indemnify , and hold harmless the City , its officers , agents and employees from any claim , action or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino . The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys ' fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action . but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition . --------- No vacant , relocated , altered , repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied or no change of use of land or structure ( s ) shall be inaugurated , or no new business commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Department . A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use , provided that a deposit is filed with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy . The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all terms , conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit . Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy , the landowner shall file a maintenance agreement or covenant and easement to enter and maintain , subject to the approval of the City Attorney . The agreement or covenant and easement to enter and maintain shall ensure that if the landowner , or subsequent owner( s ) . fails to maintain the required/installed site improvements , the City Will be able to file an appropriate lien( s ) against the property in order to accomplish the required maintenance . e..CF 280001*0 Milk CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE GPA 92-06/TT15407 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 6 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 11-4-92 PAGE 33 - --- — ii 9 '_ The developer is to submit a complete master landscape and irrigation plan ( 5 copies ) for the entire development to the Public Works Department with the required fee for review . The landscape plans will be forwarded to the ParkE , Recreation . and Community Services and the Planning Division for review . ( Note : The issuance of a building development Permit by the Department of Planning and Building Services does not waive this requirement . ) No grading permit ( s ) will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans . The landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with the "Procedure and Policy for Landscape and Irrigation" ( available from the Parks Department ) , and comply with all applicable provisions of Chapter 19 . 28 ( Landscaping Standards ) of the Development Code effective on the date of approval of this permit . Trees are to be inspected by a representative of the Parks Department prior to planting . ( The following provision is applicable to single family homes . ) Trees , shrubs and ground cover of a type and quality generally consistent or compatible with that characterizing single family homes shall be provided in the front yard and that portion of the side yards which are visible from the street . All landscaped areas must be provided with an automatic irrigation system adequate to insure their viability . The landscape and irrigation plans shall be reviewed as outlined above . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE GPA92-06/TT15407 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM ti CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 1 1-4-92 PAGE -14 10 . This permit or approval is Subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the following cit •- Departments or Divisions : X___ _ Fire Department X______ Parks , Recreation & Community Services Department Building Services Division of the Planning and Building Services Department Police Department Public Services ( Refuse ) Department Public Works ( Engineering ) Department Water Department U"OF wnw� DI ud_n m o•nc..,r. .._� :!'��'='tea ,: ..-"�-�-�' ;•...,� ��'�'tc.�.,,�....._.._ ., ;:,.��>� -,�*_,._ -v, � _ '�,� � Aft CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE GPA 92-06/TT15407 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 6 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 11-4-92 PAGE 35 I This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of approval . This includes Chapter 19 . 20 - Property Development Standards , and includes : dust and dirt control during construction and grading activities ; emission control of fumes , vapors , gases and other forms of air pollution ; glare control ; exterior lighting design and control ; noise control ; odor control ; screening ; signs , off-street parking and off-street loading ; and , vibration control . Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied with . Any exterior structural equipment , or utility transformers , boxes , ducts or meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened by wall or structural element , blending with the building design and include landscaping when on the ground . A sign program for all new commercial , office and industrial centers of three or more tenant spaces shall be approved by the Department prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy . This requirement also includes any applicable Land Use District Development Standards for residential , commercial and industrial developments regarding minimum lot area , minimum lot depth and width , minimum setbacks , maximum height , maximum lot coverage , etc . This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of standard off-street. narking spaces as shown on the approved plan( s ) on file . MY 6 31/a,lUpp Ilk, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE GPA92-06/TT15407 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 6 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 11-4-92 PAGE 36 12 . A Composite Development Plan ( CDP ) shall be filed with the Public works and Planning and Building Services Departments prior to Final or Parcel Map processing by the City . The CDP shall provide additional survey and map information including , but not limited to , building criteria ( i . e . setbacks ) , flood control criteria , seismic and geological criteria . environmental criteria and easements of record . The CDP shall be labeled with the title "Composite Development Plan" . and contain a section entitled "CDP Notes" The applicant shall have listed under the CDP notes section the following conditions or mitigating measures required for the development of the subject property : ----13_-- within two years of this approval , the filing of the final map or parcel map with the Council shall have occurred or the approval shall become null and void . Expiration of a tentative map shall terminate all proceedings and no final map or parcel map shall be filed without first processing a new tentative map . The City Engineer must accept the final map or parcel map documents as adequate for approval by Council prior to forwarding them to the City Clerk. The date the map shall be deemed filed with the Council is the date on which the City Clerk receives the map . The review authority may , upon application filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and for good cause , grant an extension to the expiration date pursuant to Section 19 . 66 . 170 of the Development Code and the State Map Act . Project : --TT 15407 --------------------------------------- Expiration Date : November 4 , 1994 ---------------------------------- an CF s CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE GPA92-06/TT15407 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 6 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 11-4-92 PAGE 37 - 14 ____- No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation , home owner ' s association , assessment district or other approved appropriate entity has been legally formed with the right to assess all those properties which are jointly owned or benefitted to operate and maintain all of the mutually available features of the development including , but not limited to , open space , amenities , landscaping or slope maintenance landscaping (which may be on private lots adjacent to street rights-of-way ) . No lot or dwelling unit shall be sold unless all approved and required open space , amenities , landscaping , or other improvements , or approved phase thereof , have been completed or completion is assured by a financing guarantee method approved by the City Engineer . ---------- Conditions , Covenants , and Restrictions (CC&R ' s ) shall be developed and recorded for the development subject to the review and approval by the Department and the City Attorney . This review and approval shall occur prior to the final map approval by Council . The recorded CC&R ' s shall permit the enforcement by the City . CRY PLAN BAD PAGE 1 OF 1 1 ATTACHMENT "B. 4" id Y F AN 13ERNARDINO PUBLIC ORKa/ENW. CST O S _ CASE TT 15407 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE 11-4-92 PAGE 38 NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required , the applicant is responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly NOTE the Engineering Division . They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans . Drainage and Flood Control 1 . X All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer , which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The developer ' s Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control . 2 . X A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage improvements , structures or storm drains needed to miti - gate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer ' s expense , and right- of-way dedicated as necessary . The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps ; therefore , a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued by the City Engineer shall be required . 3 . X The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps ; therefore , all building pads shall be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer . Comprehensive storm drain Project No . is master planned in the vicinity of your development. is rain shall be designed and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can conclu- sively show that the drain is not needed to protect your develop- ment or mitigate downstream impacts . X All drainage from the development shall be directed to - an approved public drainage facility . If not feasible , proper drain age facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfac- tion of the City Engineer . • X Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge suffi - ciently to maintain compliance with the City ' s NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit requirements . A "Notice of Intent" ( NOI ) shall be filed with the State Water Quality Control Board for construction disturbing 5 acres or more of land . • X An Erosion Control Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to grading plan approval . The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind , including blowing dust , during all phases of construction , including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon . AM CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/EPM. CASE TT 15407 STANDARD REOUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE PAGE Grading 7 . X If more than 1 ' of fill or 2 ' of cut is proposed , the site/plot/ grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required . The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City ' s "Grading Policies and Procedures " and the City ' s " Standard Drawings " , unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance . 8 • X If more than 5 ,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed , a grading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with Section 7012 ( c ) of the Uniform Building Code . A liquefaction report is required for the site . This report must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit . Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction report shall be incorporated in the grading plan . 9 • X An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project . Where feasible , this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15 . 04-167 of the Municipal Code ( See "Grading Policies and Procedures " ) . The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer . A reciprocal easement shall be recorded prior to grading plan approval if reciprocal drainage , access , sewer , and/or parking is proposed to cross lot lines , or a lot merger shall be recorded to remove the interior lot lines . 10 X The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4 copies to the Engineering Division for checking . An on-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer . This plan can be incorporated with the grading plan , or on-site improvement plan , if practical . 11 . x A Landscape Maintenance District shall be implemented to maintain landscaping within the following areas : Lot "A" 12 . �_ Separate sets of Landscape Plans shall be provided for the Landscape Maintenance District. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBU%o WORKS/EM K CASE TT 15407 STANDARD REC"REMENTS AGENDA ITEM - 6 HEARING DATE 11-4-92 PAGE 40 J Utilities 13 . X Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City code , City Standard and requirements of the serving utility , including gas , electric , telephone , water , sewer and cable TV . 14 . Y _ Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer faci - lities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area . 15 . X Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be con- structed at the Develo.per ' s expense . Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City ' s " Sewer Policy and Procedures " and City Standard Drawings . 16 . _ X Utility services shall be placed underground and easements pro- vided as required . 17 . X All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accor dance with Section 19 . 20 . 030 ( non-subdivisions ) or 19 . 30 . 110 ( subdivisions ) of the Development Code . 18 . _X Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer ' s expense as directed by the City Engineer . Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer ' s Engin- eer and approved by the City Engineer will be required . This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan , where practical . 19 . X A "communication Conduit" shall be installed in all streets with- in and adjacent to this project . The conduit shall be dedicated to the City and its primary use shall be for Cable TV installed by the Cable TV Company under permit from the City of San Bernar- dino . CITY OF UkiERNARDINO PUK3 WORK / _ a �oR. CASE TT 15407 = STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM h HEARING DATE 11-4-92 PAGE Mapping 20 . X A Final /Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required . 21 . X All street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer prior to Map approval . 22 • X Additional survey and map information including , but not limited to , building setbacks , flooding and zones , seismic lines and set- backs , geologic mapping and archeological sites shall be filed with the City Engineer in accordance with Ordinance No . MC-592 . Improvement Completions 23 . X Street , sewer , and drainage improvement plans for the entire pro- ject shall be completed , subject to the approval of the City Engineer , prior to the recordation of the Final /Parcel Map . 24 . X If the required improvements are not completed prior to record- ation of the Final /Parcel Map , an improvement security accom- panied by agreement executed by the developer and the City will be required . If the required improvements are not proposed to be completed prior to recordation of the Parcel Map , a deferred improvement agreement in accordance with Section 19 . 30 . 160 of the Development Code will be required . If the agreement is approved , an improvement certificate shall be placed on the Parcel Map stating that the required improvements will be completed upon develop- ment . Applicable to Parcel Maps consisting of 4 or less parcels only . 25 . X Street energy fee light 9 9Y to pay cost of street light energy for a period of 4 years . Exact amount to be determined prior to map recording . All rights of vehicular ingress/egress shall be dedicated from the following streets : CITY OF SAN"FRNARDINO PUBLIC"WORKS/Elio!!, C,-. E TT 15407 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE 11-4-92 PAGE Street Improvement and Dedications : 26 • X All public streets within and adjacent to the development shall be improved to include combination curb and gutter , paving , handicap ramps , street lights , sidewalks and appurtenances , including , but not limited to , traffic signals , traffic signal modification , relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction , striping , signing , pavement marking and markers , ` and street name signing . All design and construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino " Street Improvement Policy " and City " Standard Drawings " , unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer . Street lighting , when required , shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City ' s " Street Lighting Policies and Procedures " . Street lighting shall be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise i approved by the City Engineer . 27 X For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way ( R . W . ) to provide the distance from street centerline M to property line and placement of the curb line ( C . L . ) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows : Street Name Right-of-Way ( Ft . ) Curb Line ( Ft . ) Irvington Ave . 32 20 Olive Avenue 32 ' 20 ' Lori Lane 25 ' 18 ' All Others 30 ' 18 ' 28 X Construct sidewalk along all streets per City Std . No . 202 , Case "All 29 X Install street lights along all streets per City. Std . No . SL-1 and S L-2 . t i CITY OF SAN JERNARDINO PUSLK, WORKSANCK CASE IT 15407 STANDARD REC"REMENTS AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE 11-4-92 PAGE a Required Engineering Permits : 30 . X Grading permit ( if applicable . ) . 31 . X On-site improvements construction permit ( except buildings - see Planning and Building Services ) , includes landscaping . 32 . X Off-site improvements construction permit . Applicable Engineering Fees ( Fees subject to change without notice) 33 . X Plan check fee for Final /Parcel Map - $1 ,000 . 00 plus $30 . 00 per lot or parcel . 34 . X Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 3% and 2 . 5% , respectively , of the estimated construction cost* of off-site improvements . 35. X Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements ( except buildings - See Planning and Building Services ) - 1% and 1% , respectively , of the estimated construction cost* of on-site improvements , including landscaping . 36 . X Plan check and inspection fees for grading ( if permit required ) - Fee Schedule available from the Engineering Division . 37• X Drainage fee in the amount of $0 . 113/S . F . 38 • X Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of $132 . 40/Lot Exact amount shall be determined by the City Traffic ngineer at time of application for Building Permit . 39 . X Sewer connection fee in the amount.. of $235 . 47 per Bedroom Street or easement dedication processing fee in the amount of $200 . 00 per document . 40 . X Sewer Inspection Fee $ 15 . 84 per connection *Estimated construction cost is based on schedule of unit prices on file with the City Engineer . CaTY OF SAN' ERNARDINO PUBU%.* WORKS/EPM. CASE TT 15407 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE 11-4-92 PAGE 44 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS - GENERAL 41 . X A landscape maintenance easement shall be dedicated over the setback areas of each lot adjacent to public streets and a landscape maintenance district formed over these areas to maintain the landscaping in case of owner neglect. 42 • X Pay $47 ,970 . 00 as this tract ' s fair share of the cost of construction of a storm drain outlet from the Southerly terminus of Olive Avenue into Cable Creek , prior to recording of the final map or issuance of construction permits . 43 . X The above storm drain shall be extended in Olive Avenue to Irvington Avenue as approved by the City Engineer . 44 . X Lot "A" shall be landscaped by the subdivider and maintained in perpetuity by a Landscape Maintenance District . Lot "A" shall remain open space . 45 . X Subdivider shall pay $185 . 00 per lot toward the realignment of Pine Avenue between Irvington Avenue and Kendall Drive , prior to map recording . 46 . **DELETED** CITY OF SAN BERNARD_ INO PUBLIC WORKS/ENW. CASE TT 15407 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE 11-4-92 PAGE 45 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS - VERDEMONT AREA PROJECTS 47 . X This development will be required to pay Infrastructure Development Fees prior to issuance of building permits in the amount of $7 ,699 . 00 per single family residence-.-Mello Roos bonds may be applied toward fulfillment of this requirement . This single family residential project lies within the Chestnut Storm Drain Fee boundary . Therefore , a storm drain Surcharge Fee of $0 . 133 per square foot shall be paid ( not to exceed $2 ,050 . 00 per lot ) to the City prior to approval of building permits . This commercial , industrial , or multiple residential project lies within the Chestnut Storm Drain Fee boundary . Therefore , a storm drain Surcharge Fee of $0 . 138 per square foot for the first 3 ,000 square feet of building area , paving or other impervious area , and $0 . 133 per square foot in excess of 3 ,000 square feet , shall be paid to the City prior to approval of building permits . 48 . X This project lies within the proposed boundary of the Palm Avenue Box Culvert and Traffic Signal Fee area ; therefore , a fee of $0 . 02 per square foot of net project area shall be paid to the City prior to approval of building permits . 49 . X If net drainage from this 9 project is increased at the Stephanie/Walnut intersection , the outlet shall be upgraded to accept flows generated by a 100-year storm. 50 . X Drainage from Brenda Drive opposite Lot 55 shall be carried in an underground storm drain to Cable Creek with an overflow swals capable of accepting 100-year flow . 51 . X The existing 8" sewer line shown on the tentative map crossing lot lines shall be relocated into the streets . n Bernardino City Water Departm., STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Review of Plans: # GPA No. 92-06 W/Tent. Tr. No. 15407 Date: Location: S/side of Irvington Av btwn Olive & Walnut Aves. Approved: Type of Construction: To change RL to Rs — 1 In , Denied: Owner/Developer: California Properties Fund Continued: ENGINEERING: Name: �/�a�� _� Date: 52 . P"'P.S. L 96 166 f2S) �� — 53 • Size of Main Adjacent to the Project �- (/�1 Ve..4-iU� � �� LrUlh�i� uz�--� 54 . L Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter. 55 . Off-site Water Facilities Required to Meet Peak Flow Demand. 56 .c�Comments 57 . VSubject to the Rules&Regulations of the Water Department in effect at the time of Application for Water Service. This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All Fees/Conditions will be Determined by their Engineering Department. WATER QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT: Name: Avia, Date:f? ' —9 R.P.P. ❑ R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. ❑ Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. 7 Air Gap Required at Service Connection. 58 . k""No Backflow Device Required. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICER: Name: Date: (� Z- ❑ Industrial Waste Permit Required by Environmental Control Officer. ❑ Grease Trap Required by Environmental Control Officer. ❑ Pre-treatment Required by Environmental Control Officer. ❑ No Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed Without Prior Approval. ❑ Approved by Environmental Control Officer. SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: Name: 61 ` I 0))1 Scrx Date: — ' — 9 Z ��Sewer o Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. 59 . Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the City Water Department for the Amount of Gallons Per Day. Equivalent Dwelling Units: 60 . I/Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit. Proof of Payment Must be Submitted to the Building&Safety Department Priorto Issuance of the Building Permit. Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: 8216 (3-90) WATR-3.04 CITY pF SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL PRINTING SERVICES kor 01_)6- aiO CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CASE STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DATE REQUIREMENTS REVIEWED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: ( ) Provide one extra set of construction plans to Building anti ` �--tv for Fire Department use at time of plan check. [ J Contact Fire Department for specific or detailed requirements-IMPORTANT. 61 . The developer shall provide for adequate Fire Flow as computed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Fire Flow shall be based on square footage, construction f res and exposure information as supplied by the developer and may be taken from two hydrants. ACCESS: �/ V ( ] Provide two different routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shall be paved, all-weather. [ l Provide an access roadwav to each building for fire apparat,,:. Access roadway .shall have an all-weather driving surface of not less than 20-feet of unobstructed width. ( ] Extend roadway to within 150-feet of all portions of the exterior valls of all single-story buildings. [ ] Extend roadway to within 50-feet of the exterior walls of all mul_iple-story buildings. ( ] Provide "No PARKING" signs whenever parking of vehicles would possibly reduce the clearance of access roadways to less than the required width. Signs are to read "FIRE LANE-NO PARKING"(All caps). "M.C. Sec. 15.16". 62. Dead-end streets shall not exceed 500-feet in length and shall have a minimum 35-foot radius turnaround. 63 . The names of any new streets(public or private)shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. SITE: 64 . All access roads and streets are to be constructed and usable prior to combustible construction. [ ) Private fire hydrants shall be installed to protect each building located more than 150-feet from the curb line. No fire hydrant should be within 40-feet of any exterior wall. The hydrants shall be Wet Barrel type, with one 21-inch and one 4-inch outlet, and approved by the Fire Department. Fire hydrants are to be protected from damage by providing suitable traffic barriers. The area around the fire hydrant shall be designated as a"NO PARKING"zone by painting an 8-inch wide, red stripe for 15-feet in each direction in front of the hydrant in such a manner that it will not be blocked by parked vehicles. Suitable "NO PARKING"signs are required. 65 . Public fire hvdrants shall be provided along streets at 300-feet intervals for commercial and multi-residential areas and at 500-feet intervals for residential areas. Installation shall conform to City specifications and be installed prior to combustible construction or storage. BUILDING: [ ] The address of the structure, in six inch numerals, shall be installed on the building or in other approved location in such a manner as to be visible from the frontage street. The color of the numbers shall contrast with color of the background. [ ] Identify each gas and electric meter with the number of the unit which it services. [ l Fire extinguishers must be installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is 2A 10 B/C. Minimum distribution of fire extinguishers must be such that no interior part of the building is over 75-feet travel distance from a fire extinguisher. [ ] All buildings, other than residential over 5,000 square feet, shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system, designed to NFPA standards. ( ] Submit plans for the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction on the system. [ l Tenant improvements in all sprinklered buildings are to be approved by the Fire Department prior to construction. [ J Provide an automatic fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must be approved by the Fire Department,prior to installation. [ ) Fire Department connection to(sprinkler system/standpipe system)shall be required at curb line. NOTE: The applicant must request, in writing,any change in these or other requirements. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: �?C CFSS/!/E. rN�� Ct.9.0 !� �1�7.9G 9►-e'� ��+ f'R c� R'�� / I' iyn /3A0:7r ' C L Post.,C ��iJcrtlTY �4v/p�E%�T hti� �l,9�'aat)�R� FPB 170 7/89 Standard Requirement #66 . CITY OF SAN BD-O�M DFpARTMFN'I'S OF PARKS, REMFATICN AND MMIN M SM ICES pIANN DC DEPA PFOCEOM AND POLICY FOR IjWDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION - AS.SE&94EM DISTRICTS JANUARY, 1982. If ASSESSMEN ISTRICTS - IMUGATICN i IAH : CCN IRRIGATICN 1. Separate water meter for the irrigation shall be required. 2. Scpzrate electric meter for the irrigation controllers shall be required. 3. ValconVI M.P.C. controllers, with water miser feature, shall be used. Said controllers shall be enclosed in a "La Max" enclosure from the Valoon O Y- 4. 'IRain Gaard" units from the Hydro Visor Canpany shall be installed at each controller. 5. Valoon Hi-Flow series, remote control valves, in angle pattern shall be used. 6. All irrigation sprinklers in planter areas and small turf areas shall be Rain Bird 1800 series with M.P.R. , B-12 nozzles (¢H-F) . 7. All irrigation sprinklers in radium areas shall be Zbro, Super 700 C. 8. All irrigation sprinklers in large turf areas shall be Ibcnpson heads with rubber covers. 9. All sprinklers used shall be "pop up" type. 10. All irrigation sprinklers shall be on triple swing joints. 11. All pipe 2" and larger shall be class 315 P.V.C., all pipe 1V and smaller shall be P.V.C. sch. 40. 12. Rain Bird 3/4" quick ale' valves shall be installed every 100' in round plastic valve boxes. � ' j3 , p�L.=RR:64"b"krue,-Cor<<ere or Asph LANDSCAPE 1. Specific information on street trees and plant material will depend on project location. Contact City Parks Division for further information. 2. Minimrm plant sizes shall be as follows: Trees: A. Open recreation areas - 24" box B. Street trees - All 24" box shrubs: A. Even combination of 15 gallon and 5 gallon sizes ,Awfcgrass: A. Setback areas shall be sod B. Open recreation areas shall be hydroseede+d ND7re n 9p pA y Esfab//�5 A s,7 e T PQ/�� /QP4Lt i�'Pf�4N A/f /'�YDrpse"01 9 ori0or TG% S7-fir7-o-1 .,,. , ^- • i Groun savers A. Intent shall be total coverage at maturity o r 8 �;v�—rtoote �►,�aTe,c.•.s� 7- be ks a d. NO'T'E: •Intent and purpose of said plant sizes are to cxmplete a dense and mAure amcaring landscape. 3. A omplete soil test with reoa P)c')dations shall be required. Sanple msults and recanm_ndations shall be on the landscape plans and shall be adhered to. 71iree (3) copies of said sample reports shall be provided with the final landscape plans. 4. setback areas shall be berniled not to exceed 3:1 slope. Said beming shall be continuous in shape and form. S. planter areas shall be a mir min of four feet (4') wide. 6. Concrete curbing shall enclose all planter areas. 7. 6" concrete mowstrips shall separate all turf areas from shrub areas. 8. 6" concrete mowstrips shall separate assessment district from private landscaping. OTTER 1. 7he following information shall be listed in the sheet index and shall be referenced in the plans on a separate sheet. A. City of san Bernardino irrigation section for Assessment Districts. B. City of San Bernardino Assessrnnt Districts Mbintenanoe period. - R S 5E�Ir1EA(7' DiSTR%��rS _ 1 TURN, R ITEMS Q A CONTROLLER CHARTS: I. RECORD DRAWINGS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY'$ REPRESEN-TAIIVE P[FORF CHARTS ARE PREPARED. 2. PROVIDE ONE(1)CONTROLLER CHART(OF THE MAXIMJMi SIZE C0 N7R0LlER JOrr WILL ALLOW)FOR EACF?AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER. CHART SHAL AREA COVCRE�-61-CONIROLLFR. L SNOW 7,,r Z. THE:HARI-If 70 BE A REDUCED COPY OF 7 HE ACTUAL 'KEC;,AII C/QAWr�G M THE FI'EhT 7HrCONTRCLLER SEOJENCf 15 NOT LEGlbLt Yti'�' 1 !:JI/CEC (? SHAD or [N;ARGCC TC A READABLE 5,X c N 1h�DRAWINL IS CyARTS-All BE A PLACKUNE PRIM,W17H A D-FECCN? COL�7R USELT TOEHQ1y Tht AREA Ul COVERAGE FOR EACH E.7ATION •" Yy KEN"-')VPLETE;ANCAPPROVEC. THE C14ART SHALL CEtiERWVICALL'r SEA.EG EEIWC[h TN'0(2) PIECES OF PLASTIC, EACH P:ECI PIING A y,v;A7�plq 20 M1.5 iN THICKNE5$. 6 CONTROLLER CHARTS SHALL EE COMPLETED PRIOR 70 FINAL IN5FFC7104 E OPERATION ANJ MAINTENANCE MANUALS: I. TWO(21 INDIVIDUAL LY60UND COPIES OFOPERA TION AND MAIN7ENANCE MANUALS SHAL: BF DELIVERED TO THE CITY TEN'(10)CA,ENJAk DA"5 PR;C[ FINAL INSF-ECTION. THE MANUALS SHALL DESCRIBE T"r K4A'E4:A'f 2 EACH COMPLETE,60UNO MANUAL SHALL INCLUDE THE FO:,OWINC• I N$:0061ATION s %NJEA SHEET STATING CONTRACTOR'S A:.C;FS5 A.tiv iELEFHJNI NyMgER DURATION OF GUARANTEE PERIOD.L15T OF EGUIPMENT INC, NAMC5 A^ ADI)kES5ES0LULALMANUrAL'LlItCAktrlt�t�in;;rt� e COMPLETE OPERATING AN'D MAINTENANCE :N5TRUCTI NEGlIPMENT. ✓ S Far A/C, c SPARE PARTS 05T5 AND RELATED MANUFACTURER INFORMAT,O.%,FOR Aj.L EQUIPMENT. 5JFPLYA5 FAKT OF THIS CONTRACT THE FOLLOWIN(,,ITE41S • AJVC (3)30 INCH SPRINKLER KEYS FOR MANLIA. OPERATTpWgF CAy�. . yAt,.t� e TM/Of;) KEYS FOR EACH AUTOMATICCONTROLLES; r TMR[E(3)COUPLERS AND MATCHING HOSE SWIVELS. ONE(1)VALVE"A COVER KfY OR WRENCr+ TLR)J OVER • tHE LAN05CAPF CONTRACTOR 5HALL PRO 1 2900E 'QUICK DRAW SOIL MOISTURE PROVE AS A TURN - OVER ITEM I THE CITY UPON COMPLETION OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD. • 501L M015TURE PROVE AVAILABLE THROUGH: WATER CON5ERVATION SYSTEMS INC. 14130UTH SPRING STREET CLAREMONT. CALIFORNIA 91711 (714) 621.5605: 624.51!47 AAdmb ;SrUn W"mZIiIJCY m-- 2IOD MAI2nJ!W4C E All Areas landscaped by the contractor under this f� the Shall ate of written by him for a period of not less than one (1) year acceptance for start of maint , (365 days) . A. Start of Maint,enanoe Period 1. Maintenance period shall not start until all elements of the project are oanpleted in accordance with the contract documents. Projects will not be segmented into phases. 2. per to remote controllers shall be established prior to the beginning of the maintenance Period. 3, 'nee maintenance Period for the job shall not begin until after the first nVAng of the turf area. New turf shall not be mowed until attaining a minimum height of 1� inches. Mow at 1� inch height using a rotary mawer egLuPi� with a properly sharpened Notify the Parks Division representative 24 hours prior to this mowing, who will make an inspection. 4. Written acceptance of the landscape architect and the City must be obtained prior to the be-ginning of the maintenance period. Said letters shall be given to the Parks Division and shall be on file. 5. If the project maintenance fails to continuously meet standards required for start of maintenance, the mainterenoe period will be suspended and will not continue until contractor has corrected all deficiencies. 6. Contractor shall post a bond or cash in the alrount agreed upon with the Engineering Division/Subdivisions. Said monies are to guarantee the repair or replacement of any deficiencies in the irrigation, landscape and hard surfaces at the end of the one (1) year (365 days) maintenance period. 7. Contractor shall submit caupleted as-built drawings which shall be in the fonn of one (1) mylar reproducible and two (2) blue line copies. Actual submittal shal�bee elcity's andscaperepresentative. Said drawings shall enOmPa irrigation, surfaces. g. Parks Division representative shall be the sole deciding party, regarding all acceptance it.ens, for start of maintenance period. B. Durug Maintenance Period 1. Contractor and/or designee shall contact City's representative on the first Monday of each rronth during the one (1) year (365 days) maintenance period. Contact shall be by telephone or other means if pre-arranged. impose of contact is to review the status of the i _ ' enanoe district portions only' It Shall also be project, to leave a the zesponsi2,.rity of the contractor and/or gs representative. business address and telephone number with the City period reside all watering, weeding, fertiliz- 2. During the rnainte�1OC Per P to keep the plants and turf 9, cultivating and spraying necessary in a healthy gr owi-ng condition and to keep the planted areas neat, edged and attractive. All trees and shrubs shall be pinched and pruned as necessary to encourage new growth and to eliminate rank sucker growth• old wilted flowers and dead foliage shall be N,Tediately punched or cut off. Do no major tree pruning without proper approval of the City. planting and during the mainter0n0e period, in the event 3. After P 1 FE 138 Geigy that trees exhibit iron chlorosis s�, 'rates. or equivalent at manufacturer's reoccr-nd 4. During the maintenance period, should the appearance of any plant indicate weakness, that plant shall be replaced imTediat.ely with a new healthy p lant. At the end of the maintenance period, all plant materials shall be in a healthy, growing condition and spaced as indicated on the plans. 5. Lawns shall be rotary mowed at a A inch cut, minim may• Trimning and edging shall be done in 'Straw° days. 6. Damage to planting areas shall be repaired imnediately and throughout the maintenance period. planting areas that do not show a Pr�Pt establishment of plant 7. Any P intervals until accepted by material shall be replanted at 10-day the City's representative. g. Miscellaneous Maintenance Item: A. Depressions caused by vehicles, bicycles or foot traffic shall be filled and leveled. Replant damaged areas. B. Dcteuainate gophers, squirrels and males, and repair damage as above. C. The postplant fertilizing will consist primarily of a nitrogen only fertilizer program. Beginning approximately 30 days after planting, ammonium sulfate shall be applied at the rate of 5 pounds per 1,000 square feet on a monthly basis. D. Irrigation shall considere soil, exposure, day and night ten ra- tures and sprinkler output. Conservation of water is a mot- 9. Debris and trash shall be removed from the site weekly at a minims- 10. throughout the maintenance period, all plants shall be maintained in a disease and pest free ooexlition. A licensed pest control operator shall be reatined by the contractor to apply all pesticides. Pesticide reoommndations shall be made by a licensed pest control advisor. Elk C. " Of rS YK". � 0 1. on completion of the one (1) year (365 days) m3int.enance period the City's representative will inspect the project. Notify the City's representative 24 hours prior to said inspection. Vie contractor and/or designee shall be present during inspection. 2. Confinnation that the City has received all mdrd ttals and turn- over item shall be made. 3. Deficiencies noted during the inspection shall extend the maintenance period until all are corrected. 4. City's representative shall be the sole deciding party regarding all end of maintenance items. 5. End of maintenance period shall occur only on written acceptance by the City. Said letter shall be on file in the Parks, Recreation , and C uinity Services Department. 6. The Parks Division shall notify the Engineering Department/Subd-ivision in writing of said acceptance of project for bond/cash release. i City of San Bernardino Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department Residential Requirements Front Yard Package 66 . A. Irrigation System: (Per Front Yard) - Automatic Irrigation Controller (unit must be able to have enough stations for future hook up of possible back yard irrigation) . - Electric Valves with anti-siphon devices ( 12 ° inches above - Pop-Up Type Irrigation Heads (Turf and Shrub9areas)ead ) B. Landscape : (Per Front Yard) 1-15 gallon tree (double-staked - 4 cinch ties or 4 wonder ties) . C. Turf (no more than 75% of area) - drought tolerant type species. Sod or hydro-seeded. D. Shrub and Planter Area (not less than 25% of area) 70% - 1 gallon shrubs 30% - 5 gallon shrubs Groundcover in planter area under shrubs - 100% coverage when mature or 8" o.c. * NOTE: Shrubs not to exceed more than 5 feet apart. E. Polyethylene Bed Divider or Concrete Mow Strip to separate all turf and planter areas. Type of materials allowed: 6" concrete mowstrips, concrete curbmaker, Black Diamond (or equal)/polyethylene bed divider. F. All irrigation lines under concrete or asphalt to be sleeved . G . Slope landscape and irrigation--- (See Erosin .Control Requirements ) . ATTACHMENT "B.5" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY Initial Study for Environmental Impacts For TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15407 Project Number Project Description/Location To subdivide a 30. 59 acre site into 110 single family homes for pr000sded residential development in conjunction with an application for a General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 to change the General Plan land use designation from RL, Residential Low to RS , Residential Suburban. The subject site is located on the south side of Irvington Avenue between Olive and Walnut Avenues in the Verdemont Area. Date June 8 , 1992 Prepared for: Applicants Sierra Engineering for California Properties Fund Address 25864 Business Center Drive, Ste. "F" Redlands, CA 92374 Prepared by: Name Paul G. Scroggs Title Assistant Planner City of San Bernardino Planning and Building Services Department 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 TT 15407 CCMTU� Ma .0gaNCEs 01 AN_G n7 DM=,P1C. ,...... (77TY7SAN ERN ARDINO PLANNING.AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND Application Number: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15407 Project Description: To create an 110 lot subdivision of a 30.59 acre site for proposed single family residential development in conjunction with a General Plan Amend- ment No. 92-06 application to change the land use designation from RL, Residential Low to RS, Residential Suburban. Location: The 30.59 acre site is located on the south side of Irvingtion between Olive and Walnut Avenues in the Verdemont Area. Environmental Constraints Area: The subject site is located in a zone of potential High Winds, portions within Flood Control Zones "Bn and abuts PFC Channel ' All and in an Archaeological Cultural Resource Area. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explain answers,where appropriate,on a separate attached sheet. 1. Earth Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth movement(cut and/or fill)of 10.000 cubic yards or more? x b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15%natural grade? X C. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone as defined in Section 12.0-Geologic &Seismic,Figure 47,of the City's General Plan? X d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical X feature? e. Development within areas defined for high potential for water or wind erosion as identified in Section 12.0- Geologic&Seismic, Figure 53,of the City's General x Plan? f. Modification of a channel,creek or river? k a Rlow r g. Development within an area subject to landslides, Yes No Maybe mudslides, liquefaction or other similar hazards as identified in Section 12.0-Geologic& Seismic, x Figures 48,52 and 53 of the City's General Plan? h. Other? X 2. Air Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or an effect upon ambient air quality as defined by AOMD? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? k c. Development within a high wind hazard area as identified in Section 15.0-Wind& Fire, Figure 59,of the City's General Plan? X 3. Water Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns,or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? x b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? �{ c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? x d. Change in the quantity of quality of ground water? X e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards as identified in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map,Community Panel Number 060281***5 - A . and Section 16.0- X Flooding, Figure 62,of the City's General Plan? f. Other? X 4. Biological Resources: Could the proposal result in: a. Development within the Biological Resources Management Overlay,as identified in Section 10.0 -Natural Resources,Figure 41,of the City's General Plan? x b. Change in the number of any unique,rare or endangered species of plants or their habitat including stands of trees? X c. Change in the number of any unique.rare or endangered species of animals or their habitat? x d. Removal of viable,mature trees?(6'or greater) e. Other? X 5. Noise: Could the proposal result in: a. Development of housing,health care facilities,schools, libraries, religious facilities or other'noise*sensitive uses in areas where existing or future noise levels exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A)exterior and an Ldn of 45 dB(A)interior as identified in Sedan 14.0-Noise,Figures 14-6 and X 14-13 of the City's General Plan? arV CF 6P..WARONO ttwTwK POINT00 " n,..,n„e e.'•c .nc 1 2.,.. b. Development of new or expansion of existing industrial, Yes No Maybe commercial or other uses which generate noise levels on areas containing housing,schools, health care facilities or other sensitive uses above an Ldn of 65 dB(A)exterior or an Ldn of 45 dB(A)interior? X c. Other? x 6. Land Use: Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the land use as designated on the General Plan? X b. Development within an Airport District as identified in the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone(AICUZ)Report and the Land Use Zoning District Map? k c. Development within Foothill Fire Zones A& B,or C as x identified on the Land Use Zoning District Map? d. Other? X 7. Man-Made Hazards: Will the project: a. Use,store,transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials(including but not limited to oil, pesticides,chemicals or radiation)? X b. Involve the release of hazardous substances? X c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? }C d. Other? }( S. Housing: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? X b. Other? X 9. Transportation/Circulation: Could the proposal, in comparison with the Circulation Plan as identified in Section 6.0-Circulation of the City's General Plan, result in: a. An increase in traff ic that is greater than the land k use designated on the General Plan? b. Use of existing,or demand for new,parking facilities/structures? X c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? ?C e. Impact to rail or air traff ic? X f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles,bicyclists or pedestrians? X g. A disjointed pattern of roadway improvements? X h. Significant increase in traff ic volumes on the roadways or intersections? X i. Other? x 10. Public Services: Will the proposal impact the following Yes No Maybe beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Fire protection? �( b. Police protection? X c. Schools(i.e., attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? x d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Medical aid? f. Solid Waste? X g. Other? 11. Utilities: Will the proposal: a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? X 2. Electricity? 3. Water? _ 4. Sewer? S. Other? x b. Result in a disjointed pattern of utility extensions? X c. Require the construction of new facilities? x 12. Aesthetics: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any x scenic view? b. Will the visual impact of the project be detrimental X to the surrounding area? a Other? X 13. Cultural Resources: Could the proposal result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site by development within an archaeological sensitive area as identified in Section 3.0-Historical,Figure 8,of the City's General Plan? ?� b. Alteration or destruction of a historical site,structure or object as listed in the City's Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey? �( c. Other? X .µ �.. 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Yes No Maybe a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term,to the disadvantage of long-term,environmental goals?(A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief,definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) x c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small,but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) SEE ATTACHED SHEETS Amendment Site and Surrounding Area Characteristics: The site is comprised of 4 adjoining, irregularly-shaped parcels, which are all vacant and surrounded to the north, west and east by previously approved and developed resident- ial tracts and/or individual owner/builder residences. A portion of the site to the west also abuts an existing apartment complex. The adjoining properties to the south are a Public Flood Control Channel and a vacant, small knoll area. Under the present RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use designation the property was previously reviewed and approved for an 82 lot residential subdivision under Tentative Tract No. 14044. The General Plan Amendment applicants request to change the land use designation to RS, Residential Suburban is in conjunction with a proposed Tentative Tract No. 15407 application for an 110 lot subdivision for single-family residential development. C, CF cfwvv�4=1� 0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES DISSCUSSION 1. EARTH RESOURCES - la. Earth Movement/Grading The proposed Tract, if approved, will result in on-site pad grading which the applicant estimates will involve approximately 115,510 cubic yards of cut and 65,306 cubic yards of fill, respectively. To reduce potential soil erosion, dust control and related grading and noise impacts, a pre-approved soil erosion and dust control plan shall be followed to include: sand bagging, continued use of water trucks, pre-approved transport routes for any on or off-site soil transfer as well regulating noise levels and hours of construction. By following such procedures and techniques any potential impacts to adjoining residential property owners resulting from these grading and/or soil transport activities will be reduced to acceptable levels of non-significance. 2 . AIR RESOURCES - 2c. High Winds Area The subject site is located in a City designated High Winds Hazard Area. All proposed residences, including auxiliary buildings shall meet and/or exceed Code requirments for additional structural, roofing or other veneer exterior wall treatments to withstand the hazards related to the presence of these high winds. Following such construction techniques and use of pre-approved materials will reduce any potential impacts to within acceptable levels. 3. WATER RESOURCES - 3a. , 3b. & 3e. Absorption Rates, Runoff & Discharge and Potential Exposure to Flood Hazards If the Tentative Tract for the 110 lots is approved and the site is improved with the proposed residental development, there will be an increase in hardscapes areas and reduction in permeable surfaces that will result in greater amounts of runoff during occasional periods of heavy precipitation. All such runoff shall be directed to and into approved City storm drain facilities which will be developed on-site, including the construction of several catch basins along the tracts lower southern boundaries adjacent to Brenda Drive as well as any required additional off-site infrastructure improvements and/or developer contributions towards same for future developments. Sewer and water line extensions to service the tract shall be constructed per City Department requirements as well as required upgrades of the Cable Creek Flood Control Channel along those portions that abut the tract area per San Bernardino County Flood Control District and Federal Insurance Adminstration Standards. Additionally all habitable structures to be built outside of the minimum 100 foot setback line. Compliance of these regulations and provisions for the required infrastructure improvements will lessen the risks from flooding or related water runoff damage to within acceptable levels for the proposed tract's future residents. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES DISCUSSION (CONT) . 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - 4a. , 4d. Biological Resource Management Overlay District and Possible Mature Tree Removal/Replacment The subject site is located within a City designated Biological Management Overlay Disrict for which the applicant was required to complete a Biological Resources Assessment Study. This study was undertaken and a report submitted to the City for review, which concluded that no sensitive plant nor wildlife species, as determined by the criteria and listings of rare, threatened or endangered species, were found or evidence existing for their presence over the subject site. Those plants that were ident- ified on the subject site represented the speices typically present within Southern California Chaparral Plant communities and related Inland Sage Scrub Associations. Wildlife presence was also limited to common insect groups, small vertebrates and mammals typically found within these areas, despite the sites degradation from repeated evidence of disking, motorcycle use and related presence and use from residential owners whose properties surround the site. Additionally, the presence of approximately 39 mature trees, principally planted Blue Gum eucalyptus and Olive tree species required the applicant s completion and submittal of an arborist report. This study was conducted and each tree was identified on the site, it's condition noted and recommendation for the potential for transplanting and/or removal that will be part of the Conditions of Approval of the proposed tract. One probable area for transplanting will be the lower areas of Lot "All, the undeveloped parcel remainder or adjacent flood control set back area located along the tract's southern property lines. By addressing these biological issues and concerns, potential impacts will be addressed and mitigated to levels of non- significance. 6. LAND USE - 6a. Proposed Land Use Designation Change General Plan Amendment No. 92-06, submitted in conjunction with Tentative Tract NO. 15407, proposes to change the land use designation of the four existing, legal parcels comprising a total 30.59 acres from RL, Residential Low, to RS, Residential Suburban. If approved the minimium sized lot area would be reduced from 10,800 to 7,200 square feet and would permit, subject to Planning Commission approval, the applicants proposed 110 lot subdivision, with lots ranging in size from 7,202 to 14,353 square feet. The applicants also are proposing a density of 3. 6 dwelling units per acre, which is within the permitted maximum density of 4 . 5 dwelling units per acre, as allowed in the RS, Residential Suburban, General Plan land use designation. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES DISCUSSION (CONT. ) 9 . TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION - 9c. Alterations of Circulation Patterns and related Traffic Volume Increases The proposed 110 lot residential tract will have two means of primary access off Irvington Avenue either from the east via Pine Avenue or from the west via Palm Avenue. Internal circulation will be provided from extensions of Olive and Walnut Avenues and the creation of several additional local collector streets that will run both north and southerly as well as east and westerly across the 30 .59 acre subject site. This proposed arterial network will provide both ingress/ egress access and a good layout of internal circulation for the proposed tract. Traffic increases with a full development of the proposed 110 lot residential tract will not pose any significant impacts to surrounding major arterials nor the creation of any traffic related congestion problems beyond those thresholds typically experienced and present in other similarily designated Resid- ential Suburban areas of the City. General Plan Amendment No. 92-06, if approved, would not change access nor internal circulation patterns to the proposed tract but would allow the potential for development of a greater density of homes. If approved as proposed the applicants would add an additional 28 single family homes over the site then the 82 lots previously approved under old Tentative Tract No. 14044. 10. UTILITIES - 10a. , 10b. , & 10c. Fire, Police and School Area Infrastructure Developments The proposed tract site is located in the Verdemont Area which shall require the developer to contribute towards the construction or future development of needed public services in this portion of the City. The need for additional fire and police stations to lessen response time as well as additional school construction at all levels to better serve this portion of the City is a recognized need and priority that City agency reviews of this and other proposed tracts have repeatedly stressed. Additional Assessment Districts as well other infra- structure fees and/or actual on and off-site improvement construction shall be determined by appropriate City agency review or other applicable jurisdiction, as the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Compliance with these Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements will reduce levels of risk to within acceptble levels for the proposed tract development. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES DISCUSSION (CONT. ) 13. CULTURAL RESOURCES - 13a. Archaeological Cultural Resources The proposed tract site is located in a City designated area of potential Archaeological and/or Historical Cultural Resources. This required the applicant to complete an archaeological site field study as well as an ethnohistorical and records search on the subject property, as per requirements of Dr. Ross of the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center. This study and report were completed and the subject property was determined to have a low potential for the presence of cultural resources due to the sites low-lying topography and periodic flooding, resulting in an area unlikely for prehistoric aboriginal or more recent occupation. A Condition of Approval shall be added, if, in the process of grading and/or other construction activities any artifiacts or other potential cultural resources are uncovered, all work shall be ceased until a qualified archaeologist is contacted for further site evaluation. 14. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS - 14c. Potential for Future Cumulative Significance The proposed tract, if approved, would allow development of an additional 110 single family homes in a growing portion of the City previously described under the utilities Section as in need of additional infrastructure improvements and future upgrades to provide Verdemont community property owners with equivalent public services and utilities as presently exist in other City areas. While this specific tract proposals approval or denial will not, by itself, represent a significant impact, continued future residential development of the Verdemont area will require provisions for upgrading of utility infrastructure and public services to ensure all areas of the City adequate public protection and levels of service. Pgs TT15407 ins t.fis D. DETERMINATION -On the basis of this initial study, The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION will be prepared. ® The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,although there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. F7 The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA Larry E. Reed, Assistant Director Name and Title Signature Date: sz'"Iv 114F , l Q`f/� Cr"CF m hr CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ITEM # CASE LOCATION HEARING DATE o* O i, 0 "it i se- A. F .� �� ` •� /i SITS Tj olpQ dl. ozy ce.nw...rr..n*L..cty PLAN-u t PAGEQPF IL hN tea' ^. 7 ��:i 1 �• I Z it _ �� °_-' gl'L}j\ + �- E i:ii �'��a i.i� 19..na.a.:l:a-.lath►•! e 1 ;,� — ra� =_}] !: i + i33_ q � j _la !•�t!!.:��i:cee:e,:nre:,=,fi V 2� APP """ I — _ ..._.__._—...-• F� i ...•e.ar.:e•i:=ana I .'r PI i: :a:Fae;ai• 1 1r '4�ii /I ;t _ LT9U Is/1) r I Opt. '�` ..I � >�a" •i.%\\ �':1.•�-1,--,I>_'I,•-.Ir - Yt�a a •�a�ro�n �1� --�f'4Y- f'I F,: : ice•z;•1 f F'o Cl it zo ~ -�, I t:F` \Ckd• °� tom_ w� �i 1kt$ �h S k:gA. 111�l� / l:i � Y�. AY • a �� `1 ��—�1, ( �t + 1 � I_•\i to ki R t: i\ :3 R=.3�'a �l L`. -� �9— '�`J�I kd'ri •'k-IC � t .r- �y car !N_ .,__ + P17MI7 ' i1 � � " ��Fd � � � >t A a 9. �• u? it 3 � i 1',i I _ r- 1.;. li-.•1,: I--•I I\a 1" }' t 1 ii!' i] 'e 4 a %IE►i;I:S::I•a';ii°-i l ;�•r; a r" li!✓f:l 1- .1i871a_ .111..,..:7 +R--IT.lir r�:kn a ,•� d I i �' I •7Lw07 +• !� w � 1 a i yy r bi =E '>a ATTACHMENT "B. 6" d t � dfr Cris, ARAB/YCN7 .... I i r ` • t QAk-A f?tll 111L...IrtB r 1 ll.c, (f� 1^ i- P,I K l :8.1 0�l _ :ry,l.! I'.2' � a 2 •T�_ . 1 n �._, n � LLL� I•', ��i1yA 1`ta �` ;i �t .. � 3: :•t :'t '4 � i�•Q.� _ � �-' g fit: o_ ' � G r >c k atte; --- 1 10 I �, a. a wy �r I R NORYA `ANC _ AVE ZF a sr ALM — '.1I i.Jl;-<Ir-lll.ai... \�li,> ♦ r� � a [X/37. ,j•` TRACT - . -�- - ---- •— 1 n/ei _T wA N 1 !r:!ejnur;e:eaf i q Itll Naaa[[:i raniai:t:a,ii•taxt:to � rn� p Ittet:IttA22;a2a:i,i3t:t:t[tt i� ! tf i rte:i�p [,. , ttltilf!1liuvaia, _t-t tiI It zta,� �l ,•jj i _ !� 'F I i it j• li ii-1 la � " Ij _ -;� �� r6 Itttta,t tettl1Filit t[:ti�ait .I t� 7 j j . . .. •: is I�1 3 - t I i nno ,� � t t,d `` •�'� iii F"- � t1 � FItt* t tt w�p i� 0 , hyi Tt� I i.. II i't A_ it F 'jI il:ii se i u .4�Za, is •I i _ it !it I; a Fa tj{? tJ✓ lj ai[t ; •[: t;'= i R�^ � fir, it ! •i• , is I EXHIBIT "3" RESOLUTION NO. 1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN 2 AMENDMENT NO. 92-06 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 4 SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 5 SECTION 1. Recitals 6 (a) The General Plan for the City of San Bernardino was 7 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by Resolution No. 89-159 on 8 June 2 , 1989. 9 (b) General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 to the General Plan of 10 the City of San Bernardino was considered by the Planning 11 Commission on November 4 , 1992 , after a noticed public hearing, and 12 the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval has been 13 considered by the Mayor and Common Council. 14 (c) An Initial Study was prepared on June 8, 1992 and 15 reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee and the Planning 16 Commission who both determined that General Plan Amendment No. 92- 17 06 would not have a significant effect on the environment and 18 therefore, recommended that a Negative Declaration be adopted. 19 (d) The proposed Negative Declaration received a 21 day 20 public review period from June 25, 1992 through July 15, 1992 and 21 all comments relative thereto have been reviewed by the Planning 22 Commission and the Mayor and Common Council in compliance with the 23 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and local regulations. 24 e) The Mayor and Common Council held a noticed public 25 hearing and fully reviewed and considered proposed General Plan 26 Amendment No. 92-06 and the Planning Division Staff Report on 27 December 21, 1992. 28 1 I (f) The adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 is 2 deemed in the interest of the orderly development of the City and 3 is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the 4 existing General Plan. 5 SECTION 2 . Negative Declaration 6 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the Mayor 7 and Common Council that the proposed amendment to the General Plan 8 of the City of San Bernardino will have no significant effect on 9 the environment, and the Negative Declaration heretofore prepared 10 by the Environmental Review Committee as to the effect of this 11 proposed amendment is hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted. 12 SECTION 3 . Findings 13 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of the 14 City of San Bernardino that: 15 A. The proposed RS, Residential Suburban land use designation is 16 internally consistent with the General Plan in that such a 17 designation is not in conflict with the goals, objectives and 18 policies of the General Plan, and will facilitate the 19 continued and orderly development of the area. 20 B. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public 21 interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. 22 Factors related to the potentially higher density of 23 residential development, such as increases in traffic or 24 surface runoff, will not significantly impact existing or 25 future public services. 26 C. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance 27 of land uses within the City in that the proposed amendment 28 2 ., -' a.�Y"?-= az_ 1 will not change the single-family residential designation of 2 the subject property, and is compatible with the suburban 3 residential character of development within the immediate 4 vicinity. 5 D. The amendment area is physically suitable for the requested 6 land use designation and anticipated development in that the 7 size, configuration, topography and access to improved public 8 roads and other public services are adequate to facilitate the 9 development of the uses permitted within the RS, Residential 10 Suburban, General Plan land use designation. 11 SECTION 4 . Amendment 12 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that: 13 A. The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of San 14 Bernardino is amended by changing approximately 33 acres from 15 RL, Residential Low to RS, Residential Suburban. This 16 amendment is designated as General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 17 and its location is outlined on the map entitled Attachment A, 18 and is more specifically described in the legal description 19 entitled Attachment B, copies of which are attached and 20 incorporated herein be reference. 21 B. General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 shall become effective 22 immediately upon adoption of this resolution. 23 SECTION 5. Map Notation 24 This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be 25 noted on such appropriate General Plan maps as have been previously 26 adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common Council and which are 27 on file in the office of the City Clerk. 28 //// 3 EL 0 I 1 SECTION 6. Notice of Determination 2 The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of 3 Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino 4 certifying the City's compliance with California Environmental 5 Quality Act in preparing the Negative Declaration. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1 RESOLUTION . . .ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-06 TO THE GENERAL 2 PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly 4 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San 5 Bernardino at a meeting therefore held on the 6 day of 1993 , by the following vote to 7 wit: 8 Council Members AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT 9 NEGRETE 10 CURLIN 11 HERNANDEZ 12 OBERHELMAN 13 OFFICE VACANT 14 POPE-LUDLAM 15 MILLER 16 17 City Clerk 18 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of , 1993 . 19 20 Tom Minor, Mayor 21 City of San Bernardino 22 Approved as to form and legal content: 23 JAMES F. PENMAN 24 City Attorney 25 By. 26 27 28 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-06 TITLE AMENDMENT MAP ti i rsi+•� /� tiA �`e RL �2TS �° �0 N� RS RL N O RS , / RL T '0 V V A R S 0 � 4 si SAN BERNARDINO ATTACHMENT "All CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO . 92-06 T I T L E LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL "A-1" • PARCEL 11 AS PER PLAT ATTACHED TO LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 83-22, RECORDED JULY 6, 1984 , INSTRUMENT NO. 84-159923, OFFICIAL RECORDS, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL THAT PORTION OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6755, IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 66 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 43 AND 44, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6755; THENCE NORTH 27 DEG. 21 ' 43" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF OLIVE AVENUE, BEING 30 FEET EAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAME, A DISTANCE OF 161.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62 DEG. 38 ' 17" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 22 . 00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1010 .00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE NORTH AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 DEG. 19 ' 52" ; THENCE SOUTH- EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 252 . 63 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 27 DEG. 21 ' 43 " EAST, A DISTANCE OF 193 .26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 260 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE WEST AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 DEG. 05 ' 34 " ; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 63 . 95 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE AND THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 240 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE EAST AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 DEG. 05 ' 34 " ; THENCE NORTHERLY. ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 59 . 03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 27 DEG. 2.1 ' 43" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 299 . 99 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89 DEG. 54 ' 52 " ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 54 . 93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25 " EAST, A DISTANCE OF 116 . 64 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 260 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE NORTH AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 DEG. 23 ' 27" ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 47 . 15 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE AND THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 240.00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 DEG. 23 ' 27 " ; ATTACHMENT „B„ RL CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-06 C [TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 43 . 53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 250 . 18 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE WEST AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 00 ' 00" ; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 54 . 98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 16 ' 35,, WEST, A DISTANCE OF 260 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 2511 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 21 . 55 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 335 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE NORTH AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19 DEG. 39 ' 29 " ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 114 . 94 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE AND BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 315 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19 DEG. 38 ' 12 " ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 107 . 96 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY AND A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO. 10181, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 154, PAGES 53, 54 AND 55, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, FOLLOWING THE SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY THE NEXT SEVERAL COURSES: THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 15 ' 18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20 . 00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 20 - 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE WEST AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 00 , 00-- ; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 31 . 42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 15 , 18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 227 . 46 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 20. 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE NORTH AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 98 DEG. 07 ' 52 " ; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 34 .25 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 35 DEG. 23 ' 10" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 60 - 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEG. 36 ' 50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 11 -57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 32 DEG. 48 ' 29 " WEST, A DISTANCE OF 311 .47 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6755; THEN LEAVING THE SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO. 10181, NORTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 32" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 1, A DISTANCE OF 187 . 29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL RIGHT OF WAY AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6755 AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 965 - 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21 DEG. 08 ' 50" , A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT OF CURVATURE BEARS NORTH 48 DEG. 25 ' 18" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 356 . 17 FEET ALONG THE SAID NORTHWESTERLY FLOOD CONTROL RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID FLOOD CONTROL RIGHT OF WAY AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6755, NORTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 460 . 07 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (2) FATTACHMENT "Bli [TITLCITY OF SAN BERNARDINO E ENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-06 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A-211 • I PARCEL 2, AS PER PLAT ATTACHED TO LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT N0. 83-22 , RECORDED JULY 6 , 1984, INSTRUMENT NO. 84-159923, OFFICIAL RECORDS, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL THAT PORTION OF PARCELS 1, 2 , 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6755, IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 66 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 43 AND 44, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6755; THENCE NORTH 27 DEG. 21 ' 43" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF OLIVE AVENUE, BEING 30 FEET EAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAME, A DISTANCE OF 161.28 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 62 DEG. 38 ' 17 " EAST, A DISTANCE OF 22 . 00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1010 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE NORTH AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 DEG. 19 ' 52 " ; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 252 . 63 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 27 DEG. 21 ' 43" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 193.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 260 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE WEST AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 DEG. 05 ' 34 " ; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 63 . 95 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE AND THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 240. 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE EAST AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 DEG. 05 ' 34 " ; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 59 .03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 27 DEG. 21 ' 43" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 299 . 99 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35 .00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89 DEG. 54 ' 52" ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 54 .93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25 " EAST, A DISTANCE OF 116 .64 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 260.00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE NORTH AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 DEG. 23 ' 27 " ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 47 . 15 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE AND THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 240 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 DEG. 23 ' 27 " ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 43 .53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25 " EAST, A DISTANCE OF 250 . 18 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT (3) ATTACHMENT "B,l CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO . 92-06 [ TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE WEST AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 00 ' 00" ; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 54 . 98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 16 ' 35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 260 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 21 .55 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 335 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE NORTH AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19 DEG. 39 ' 29 " ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 114 . 94 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE AND BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 315 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19 DEG. 38 ' 12 " ; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 107 . 96 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY AND THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO. 10181, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 154, PAGES 53, 54 AND 55, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE FOLLOWING SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY THE NEXT SEVERAL COURSES: NORTH 27 DEG. 15 ' 18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 40 . 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG. 44 ' 42 " WEST, A DISTANCE OF 90 . 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 27 DEG. 15 ' 18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 230 . 00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY AND CONTINUING NORTH 27 DEG. 15 ' 18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 35 .97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 06 DEG. 38 ' 15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 111. 11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 486 . 18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 16 ' 35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 126 . 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100 .58 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 20 . 00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE EAST AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 63 DEG. 39 ' 27 " ; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 22 .22 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG. 38 ' 17" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 175. 97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 21 ' 43" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 39 .23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG. 38 ' 17 " WEST, A DISTANCE OF 114 .00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID OLIVE AVENUE, BEING 30 FEET EAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAME; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 21 ' 43" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF OLIVE AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 688 . 32 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN TRACT NO. 10183, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 118 OF MAPS, PAGES 63 AND 64, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN TRACT NO. 10184, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 178 OF MAPS, PAGE 65 AND 66, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. (4) FATTAACHMENT „B" �A► r ECITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO . 92-06 E LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A-3" • PARCEL 3, AS PER PLAT ATTACHED TO LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 83-22, RECORDED JULY 6, 1984, INSTRUMENT NO. 84-159923, OFFICIAL RECORDS, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL THAT PORTION OF PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6755, IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 66 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 43 AND 44 , RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6755; THENCE NORTH 27 DEG. 21 ' 43" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF OLIVE AVENUE, BEING 30 FEET EAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAME, A DISTANCE OF 849 . 60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 27 DEG. 21 ' 43" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF OLIVE AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 453 . 72 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF IRVINGTON AVENUE, BEING 30 FEET SOUTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAME; THENCE SOUTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF IRVINGTON AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 458 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 16 ' 35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 180 . 05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 43 . 96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 16 ' 35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 120 . 00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 2 HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE FOLLOWING SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 2 THE REMAINING COURSES: NORTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 6 . 18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 16 ' 35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 126 . 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100 .58 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, BEING CONCAVE TO THE EAST AND SUBTENDING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 63 DEG. 39 ' 27" ; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 22 .22 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG. 38 ' 17 " WEST, A DISTANCE OF 175.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 21 ' 43" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 39 .23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG. 38 ' 17" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 114 . 00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN TRACT NO. 10183, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 118 OF MAPS, PAGES 63 AND 64, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN TRACT NO. 10184 , AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 178 OF MAPS, PAGE 65 AND 66, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. (5) 0--mmmmmmm� ATTACHMENT "1311 lift [TITLCITY OF SAN BERNARDINO E ENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO . 92-06 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A-4 " • PARCEL 4, AS PER PLAT ATTACHED TO LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 83-22, RECORDED JULY 61 1984, INSTRUMENT NO. 84-159923, OFFICIAL RECORDS, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL THAT PORTION OF PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6755, IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 66 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 43 AND 44, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6755; THENCE NORTH 27 DEG. 21 ' 43" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF OLIVE AVENUE, BEING 30 FEET EAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAME, A DISTANCE OF 1303.32 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF IRVINGTON AVENUE, BEING 30 FEET SOUTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAME; THENCE SOUTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF IRVINGTON AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 458.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 16 ' 35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 180. 05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 43.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 16 ' 35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 120. 00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 2 HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE FOLLOWING SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 2 THE NEXT THREE COURSES: SOUTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 480.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 06 DEG. 38 ' 15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 111. 11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEG. 15 ' 18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 35.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO. 10181, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 154, PAGES 53, 54 AND 55, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID TRACT BOUNDARY SOUTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 280. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 27 DEG. 15 ' 18" EAST ALONG SAID TRACT BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 440 . 00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF IRVINGTON AVENUE, BEING 30 FEET SOUTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAME; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG. 43 ' 25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF IRVINGTON AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 755.04 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL "B" : ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS APPURTENANT AND PERTAINING TO PARCEL "A" DESCRIBED ABOVE, AS RESERVED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED FROM JACK FARKAS AND DONALD S. DAY, AS GRANTORS, TO THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, AS GRANTEE, WHICH GRANT DEED WAS RECORDED JANUARY 6 , 1972, IN BOOK 7329, PAGE 916, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. (6) ATTACHMENT "Bli CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO . 92-06 [TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "C" • PARCELS 1 THROUGH 9 OF TRACT 10183 , IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 178 OF MAPS, PAGES 63 AND 64 , RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL "D" • PARCELS 1 THROUGH 7 OF TRACT 10184 , IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 178 OF MAPS, PAGES 65 AND 66, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. \7/ ATTACHMENT ENGINEERING 0 �o CONSTRUCTION and ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, Inc. S E RV 14',E S inc. May 5, 1993 Ms. Valerie Pope-Ludlum, Councilwoman City of San Bernardino 300 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 RE: General Plan Amendment No. 92-06 and tentative Tract No. 15407, California Properties Fund Dear Valerie: Thank you for taking the time to meet with me and discuss the project noted above, hereafter referred as "the Project" . As you know, the project was approved 5-0 with Mr. Bob Stone abstaining. The approval was a result of 18 months of studies, surveys and public meetings held with the residents of the Verdemont Community. Enclosed herewith is a sample (letters of endorsement) of the support for this project which are of public record. We feel the significance of this item has never been addressed sufficiently during a public hearing or staff presentation. There are several facts which need to be expressed to the Mayor and Council, such as: (1) There is local neighborhood support for this project. (2) There is a genuine interest from local area property owners to see this project successful. This project will help revitalize the value of real estate and add an optimistic view for future developments. (3) This project is a participant in Mello/Roos District I/Verdemont Area. (4) This project has agreed to pay $47, 970. 00 towards an off-site drainage improvement. This condition is in compliance with a prior Council action taken late last year. 25864 Business Center Drive 0 Suite F 0 Redlands,CA 92374 0 Phone(714)799-8060 • Fax(714)799-8070 Ms. Pope May 5, 1993 Page Two (5) The development of this project has set aside a significant greenbelt area which will help preserve the natural hillside features located adjacent to Cable Creek. (6) The development of this project will complete the street and utilities system between Olive Avenue and the subdivision east of the project area. We truly believe that if the facts and circumstances outlined herein are presented to the Mayor and Council, their viewpoint for a decision may be made clearer. We appreciate your cooperation and consideration of this item. Very truly yours, E.C.E.S. , IN DAVID E. MLYN SKI PRESIDENT 4 DEM:gln jn:92-06:ludlum