The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About35- Continued PLANNING DEPARTMENT SAN BERNARDINO CITY HALL 300 NORTH D. STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 19, 1988 REF: REZONING THE CHANGE IN ZONING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE PARCEL WEST OF THE PROPERTY AT 2151 RIALTO AVE. WE PROTEST THE CHANGE FROM R--1 TO PRD ZONING. THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL HOUSES OF SMALLER STRUCTURE, AT CHEAPER PRICES FOR MORE FAMILIES. THIS WOULD SURELY IMPACT THE AREA. LOW INCOME HOUSEING IS NOT THE NEED OF THE AREA. INDUSTRY IS A MAIN CONCERN-,THEN IAW INCOME HOUSING WOULD NOT BE NECESSARY. WE BELEIVE THE CURRENT ZONING IS ADAQUATE FOR THE DEVELOPER TO MAKE A PROFIT AND STILL ENHANCE THE AREA. -RESPECTFULLY: LES MGR. GLEN AIRE MOBILE ESTATES 222 SOUTH RANCHO AVENUE SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA y . , �ipl �PCIIHT111ItQ �II�Q�£ �C££it Village 2122 CHESTNUT STREET SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 92410 Green (71 4) 888-3001 SAN. 5, 1987 CITY of SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING COMMISSION 300 NORTH "D" STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92418 re: CHANGE OF ZONE # 87-9 GENTLEMEN; We would like to express our grave concern with the proposed zoning change as referenced above. Our feelings are that this would be extremely detrimental to the community due the fact that the density is so high. We do not object to the construction of new homes. . . . . . . only the density of the same. Your consideration in this matter is greatly appreciated. E. CHINSON PROP RTY MANAGER The Friendly Village Mobile Estates 2151 WEST RIALTO AVENUE SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92410 Planning Department Sean Bernardino City Hall North "D" Street San Bernardino, Ca 92418 Dear Sir: Regarding the change in zoning before the Planning Commission on the parr_elWest of my property at2151 Rialto Ave. , I firmly protest the change from R1 to PRI) zoning. It is my understanding that PRD allows 7 residents per acre but also could allow other than single family resident buildings_ It would seem then that there could be a move to go from planned residents of 7 per acre to apartments. Not only that,, but to go from 5 (or� b) to 7 per acre means that there will be additional houses of smaller structure, " of less price for more families. Certainly, this woUl d impact the area. I believE-? the Current :_oning is adaquate for the developer to malce a profit and still enhance the area. Sincerely, Alfred Montanari 2250 W. Chestnut Street San Bernardino , Ca 92410 January 5 , 1988 Planning Department San Bernardino City Hall 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino , CA 92418 Subject : Change of Zone No. 87-9 We are property owners directly South of the property where the applicant requests a zoning change from R-1-7200 to PRD-7. We very strongly object the zoning change. The reasons for the protest are listed as follows: 1. High Density of the area. ,There are several big complexes in the area at this time. 2. Crime Activity. There is a high crime area - drugs , burglary , petty theft. 3. Schools. The property is within Rialto School District, The Schools are already at a maximum peak load for their population limit. A zoning change from R-1-7200 to PRD-7 will add one more home per acre. It means 20 more homes for the development and it will be atleast 100 more people in these area. It would only add more problems to ones we already have. Please keep the zoning as is , R-1-7200. Thank You , Henry Stie Mice Stiel Xi IN. RI:.L' ) AVE.- ij ANUA RY -18's 19 8, PL-'_NNING DyTARTMEYT S1=r' i ?1 RDIY-- CITY T ,LL 5�) TTORTH "D" STREET' SAN BERN^_RDINC q CA-.X2418 DaR SIR: Regarding the change in wa- i:ng before the Planning, Comritssi.o-m oz- the y)arcel T3 at ai Ll;� i:^ ,. � �rF,y at - 7 Ri�a.7�ta- Ante. I fi-rm y p ro t e st tYne change from R7. to P RD zc ni:mg. t s UaL tandin that PRD allaws 7 resiAeats per acre 2HPT also wauld or could al:.>`aw athe than s Lae family resiLdent bua:l.di:ngs�. It wauSLd seem: then that there colt be a move to go, frarm planneJ residents o,f 7 per acre to. bui.ldimLg of apartments or con�dogs. Also' sta go from; 5 or 6 to 7 per acre meaner that there will be additional houses of smaller structures o,f less price fo)r mare families. Certainly., this waiald impact the area. I believe the current zoning is adaquate for the developer to- make a .)ro.fit and still enhance tie area. SINCERELY JIM ANDES & MARY WURLA Y/ ep. 9 !�/V(�- ,L�/y1-t1�x'/1.•¢��-�(.- ✓� � .�/.L_ LCD � /��-d-�1'�--•./,r-�� ..-(/h-G�--Q--�� .X�- •Ct�.C.�%�-��—J L��,y,,•�-�`�, _L��L�Ga-GLJL, 'l r 6�lt) 1617%-eAClef 3: i J i 'r � -1/��-C��C.-�•<L1 /"-d-C:, I.GtiI CL��,�•f�'L.L_�i�C 1�- 1 L�' � ��/ C%G•7 Z�(L-C�'E��-G7'ti- �� L' Z/�'C•� �iL�l_.L't L� i -C�; ��. �- r l./�' /�'2�-�'�i� (/L/`� i G�'Ct tiL C�... �'`r� t L •�.�/ ��fi77�1 �-G /� 7 � J�L �7 2l. �G�1'��.Q/1.-e�J 6L 2280 W. Rialto Ave. San Bernardino, CA 92410 December 31 , 1987 Planning Department San Bernardino City Hall 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, Ca 92418 Dear Sir: Regarding the change in zoning before the Planning Commission on the parcel south of my property at 2280 W. Rialto Ave. I firmly protest the change from R1 to PRD zoning. It is my understanding that PRD allows 7 residents per acre but also could allow ot_h_e_r_ t_ha_o single family r_esi dent bui 1 di n_gs_ It would seem then that there could be a move to go from planned residents of 7 per acre to apartments. Not only that, but to go from 5 (or 6) to 7 per acre means that there will be additional houses of smaller structure, of less price for more families. Certainly, this would impact the area. I believe the current zoning is adaquate for the developer to make a profit and still enhance the area. Sincerely, ( d � Robert H. Faul ks