HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.C- City Manager 5.0
RESOLUTION (ID#3435) DOC ID: 3435 F
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO—REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Agreement/Contract
From: Allen Parker M/CC Meeting Date: 09/02/2014
Prepared by: Lisa Sherrick, (909) 384-5057
Dept: City Manager Ward(s): All
Subject:
Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino Authorizing the
Execution of Consultant Services Agreements with Willdan and CSG Consultants, Inc. for Plan
Review, Inspection, Stormwater Management, Fire and Life Safety Plan Review, Building
Official, and Counter Services. (#3435)
Current Business Registration Certificate: Yes
Financial Impact:
Account Budgeted Amount: $121,900 for the Fire Department Account No. 001-200-
0047-5505 (Fire) 772-2306-192 and 772-2306-193 (Community Development)
Account Description: Professional/Contractual Services (Fire) and Trust Account(Community
Development)
Balance as of. 08/14/2014
Balance after approval of this item: $1,900 (Fire)
Please note this balance does not indicate available funding. It does not include non-encumbered
reoccurring expenses or expenses incurred,but not yet processed.
Motion: Adopt the Resolution.
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
September 4, 2007 Council adopted Resolution 2007-374 approving agreements with Willdan
Associates, Interwest Consulting Group, and Esgil Corp.for professional
plan review services.
September 20, 2010 Council adopted Resolution 2010-309 approving agreements with Bureau
Veritas, CSG Consultants, JAS Pacific, and Willdan Engineering for
professional plan review services.
November 19,2012 Council adopted Resolution 2012-275 approving an agreement with
Transtech Engineers, Inc. for Interim Building Official services.
March 4, 2013 Council adopted Resolution 2013-48 approving an agreement with
Transtech Engineers, Inc. and Hayer Consultants Inc,. for Building
Official, on-call Building Inspection,NPDES and Plan Review services.
May 19, 2014 Council adopted Resolution 2014-131 Authorizing release of a Request
for Proposals for plan check,building inspection, counter technician and
stormwater services.
%r/
Updated: 8/27/2014 by Jolena E.Grider F Packet Pg. 27
3435
Background:
In Fiscal Year 2010-11 85% of plan checks were conducted in house. At that time there were
four (4) full time inspectors, two (2) part-time inspectors and a full time Building Official and
full time plan checker. With the reduction to staff and the departure of the Building Official, it
has become necessary to supplement the remaining full time staff with contract staff.
Currently the Community Development Department has four (4) service agreements to assist the
department with various building services. In order to improve efficiencies, staff is
recommending that the plan check, building inspection, counter and stormwater inspection
services be consolidated into a single firm and a secondary firm when the need arises.
After issuing a Request for Proposals, the City received proposals from six (6) firms. After the
initial evaluation of the written proposals the top three (3) firms were interviewed by a panel of
in-house staff. The firms were evaluated on the following criteria: experience and qualifications,
capabilities of firm, reasonableness of cost/price, the completeness of the response, and local
vendor preference.
Based upon Staff s evaluation of the written proposals and the interviews, Staff is recommending
new contracts with two companies: Willdan and CSG to provide plan review, inspection,
stormwater management, fire and life safety plan review, and counter services. In addition,
Willdan will provide Building Official services. The firms are paid based upon a percentage of
the fees collected from applicants, with hourly charges for contract staff. The range varies from
45%-65% of the revenue collected based on the service requested. The hourly rates for staff also
vary based upon the position requested. Willdan will serve as the primary plan check firm with
CSG as the secondary firm.
In addition to Willdan and CSG the department will maintain its contract with Hayer Consultants
Inc. for building inspection services. Willdan will also serve as the primary firm for building
inspection services with Hayer as the secondary firm.
City Attorney Review:
Supporting Documents:
Resolution (DOC)
agrmt 3435 -Willdan (PDF)
Attachment "A" Vender Services Agreement for Willdan (DOCX)
WILLDAN PROPOSAL (PDF)
Attachment"B"Vendor Services Agreement with CSG Consultants, Inc. (DOCX)
CSG Proposal (PDF)
Agrmt 3435 -CSG (PDF)
Attachment B, CSG Consultants, Inc. Agmt (DOCX)
Request for Proposals F-14-41 (PDF)
0
Updated: 8/27/2014 by Jolena E.Grider F Packet Pg. 28
5.C.a
1 RESOLUTION NO. °'
c
2 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN m
BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF CONSULTANT SERVICES
3 AGREEMENTS WITH WILLDAN AND CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR PLAN
4 REVIEW, INSPECTION, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, FIRE AND LIFE
SAFETY PLAN REVIEW,BUILDING OFFICIAL,AND COUNTER SERVICES.
5 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
6 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: cn
a�
7 -0
SECTION 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute
8
L
Consultant Services Agreements with Willdan for plan review, inspection, stormwater r
9 =
m
to management, fire and life safety plan review, building official, and counter services; and with E
11 CSG Consultants, Inc. for plan review, inspection, stormwater management, fire and life safety
L
d
12 plan review, and counter services; copies of which are attached hereto as Attachments "A" and 3
E
13 `B"respectively, and incorporated herein. in
14 SECTION 2. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized to issue a purchase order for o
as
15 services related to Community Development to Willdan and CSG Consultants, Inc., per CL
16 Specification No. F-14-41 for a total of$355,600 in aggregate, with provisions for three single d
17
year renewal options. _
18 n.
SECTION 3. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized to issue a purchase order for
19
Fire and Life Safety Plan Review Services to Willdan and CSG Consultants, Inc., per
20 M
Specification No. F-14-41 for a total of$120,000 in aggregate, with provisions for three single Q
21 N
22 year renewal options.
0
23 SECTION 4. The authorization to execute the above-referenced agreements is
0
0
24 rescinded if the agreements are not executed and returned to the Office of the City Clerk within
25 sixty(60) days following the effective date of this Resolution. 0
E
0
r
r
a
FPacket Pg. 29
1 �
_
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
2 BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF CONSULTANT SERVICES
m
AGREEMENTS WITH WILLDAN AND CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR PLAN
3 REVIEW, INSPECTION, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, FIRE AND LIFE
4 SAFETY PLAN REVIEW,BUILDING OFFICIAL,AND COUNTER SERVICES.
5 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
6 Cn
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held
J
7 M
on the day of , 2014,by the following vote, to wit: cc
8 d
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT r
9 =
d
10 MARQUEZ
_
11 BARRIOS
L
12 VALDIVIA 3
E
13 SHORETT
in
C
14 NICKEL 2
U
d
15 JOHNSON
N
_
16 MULVIHILL v
17
c
18 Georgeann Hanna, City Clerk a
19
Cl)
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of , 2013.
20 M
_
o_
21 A
R. Carey Davis, Mayor
d
22 City of San Bernardino
Approved as to form: 2
23 Gary D. Saenz, City Attorney o
24 By: ix
_
25
U
fQ
w
Q
Packet Pg. 30
5.C.b
CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
QW11 tt:
n
0
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2014
("Effective Date"), by and between the CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a charter city ("CITY"),
and Willdan("CONSULTANT"). m
WITNESSETH :
3
m
A. WHEREAS, CITY proposes to have CONSULTANT perform the services
described herein below; and
a�
B. WHEREAS, CONSULTANT represents that it has that degree of specialized cn
expertise contemplated within California Government Code, Section 37103, and holds all
necessary licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated; and
_
C. WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT desire to contract for plan review,
inspection, stormwater management, fire and life safety plan review, building official, and
counter services; and Q
d
D. WHEREAS, no official or employee of CITY has a financial interest, within the
provisions of California Government Code, Sections 1090-1092, in the subject matter of this
Agreement.
a�
L.-I NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
3
contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: o
Y
co
1.0. SERVICES PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT o
U
1.1. Scope of Services. For the remuneration stipulated, CONSULTANT shall N
provide plan review, inspection, stormwater management, fire and life safety plan review,
building official, and counter services described in RFP F-14-41 and the Scope of Services
attached hereto as Exhibit "1" and incorporated herein by this reference. If a conflict arises
between the Scope of Services and this Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter
"Agreement"),the terms of the Agreement shall govern.
a
1.2. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by M
CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by skilled personnel and in a M
manner consistent with the standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by
professional consultants in similar fields and circumstances in accordance with sound
professional practices. CONSULTANT also warrants that it is familiar with all laws that may
affect its performance of this Agreement and shall advise CITY of any changes in any laws that
may affect CONSULTANT's performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT further represents M
that no CITY employee will provide any services under this Agreement. E
L
a+
_
CD
V
w
1 Q
Packet Pg. 31
5.C.b
Qw �
1.3. Warranty. CONSULTANT warrants that it shall perform the services required by
this Agreement in compliance with all applicable Federal and California employment laws o
including, but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational
health and safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers' compensation insurance
and safety in employment; and all other Federal, State and local laws and ordinances applicable m
to the services required under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold
harmless CITY from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and 3
judgments of every nature and description including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, d
presented, brought, or recovered against CITY for,or on account of any liability under any of the
above-mentioned laws, arising from or related to CONSULTANT's performance under this
Agreement.
Cn
1.4. Non-discrimination. In performing this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall not 2
engage in, nor permit its officers, employees or agents to engage in, discrimination in
employment of persons because of their race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age,
mental or physical disability, medical condition, marital status, sexual gender or sexual °-'
orientation, except as permitted pursuant to Section 12940 of the Government Code. Violation of LL
this provision may result in the imposition of penalties referred to in Labor Code, Section 1735.
a�
1.5 Non-Exclusive Agreement. CONSULTANT acknowledges that CITY may enter
into agreements with other consultants for services similar to the services that are subject to this
Agreement or may have its own employees perform services similar to those services
contemplated by this Agreement.
3
1.6. Delegation and Assignment. This is a personal service contract, and the duties set o
forth herein shall not be delegated or assigned to any person or entity without the prior written N
consent of CITY. CONSULTANT may engage a subcontractor(s) as permitted by law and may o
employ other personnel to perform services contemplated by this Agreement at
CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense.
1.7 Conflicts of Interest. During the term of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall at
all times maintain a duty of loyalty and a fiduciary duty as to the CITY and shall not accept
payment from or employment with any person or entity which will constitute a conflict of
c
interest with the CITY. .
a
1.8 CITY Business Certificate. CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain during the
LO
term of this Agreement, a valid CITY Business Registration Certificate pursuant to Title 5 of the
City of San Bernardino Municipal Code and any and all other licenses, permits, qualifications,
insurance and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required of CONSULTANT to
practice its profession, skill or business.
LO
2.0. COMPENSATION AND BILLING M
w
2.1. Compensation. Over the term of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall be paid E
for such services in accordance with the specifications contained in RFP F-14-41 and the
CONSULTANT's Cost/Price Form contained in Exhibit"I".
U
2 <
Packet Pg. 32
2.2. Additional Services. CONSULTANT shall not receive compensation for any
V
services provided outside the Scope of Services unless the CITY, prior to CONSULTANT o
performing the additional services, approves such additional services in writing. It is specifically c
understood that oral requests and/or approvals of such additional services or additional
compensation shall be barred and are unenforceable. m'
c
2.3. Method of Billing. CONSULTANT may submit invoices to CITY for approval.
Said invoice shall be based on the total of all CONSULTANT's services which have been
completed to CITY's sole satisfaction. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT's invoice within forty-
five (45) days from the date CITY receives said invoice. The invoice shall describe in detail, the
services performed and the associated time for completion. Any additional services approved and
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as "Additional Services" and shall in
identify the number of the authorized change order,where applicable, on all invoices. J
2.4. Records and Audits. Records of CONSULTANT's services relating to this m
Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles
and shall be made available to CITY for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient times for `
a period of three (3)years from the Effective Date.
3.0. TERM AND NOTIFICATION.
3.1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue
through September 30, 2017, unless the Agreement is previously terminated as provided for
herein. There may be two (2) one-year extensions upon mutual agreement of the parties not to 3
E
exceed maximum compensation stated in Section 2.1. o
3.2 Termination. CITY or CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement for any o
reason upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. In the event of termination,
CONSULTANT shall be paid the reasonable value of services rendered to the date of N
termination. _
3
33 Documents. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all documents d
prepared by CONSULTANT in its performance of this Agreement shall be delivered to the
CITY within ten (10) days of delivery of termination notice to CONSULTANT, at no cost to
CITY. Any use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization from °
CONSULTANT shall be at CITY's sole risk and without liability or legal expense to M
CONSULTANT.
4.0. INSURANCE
4.1. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. CONSULTANT shall obtain and
M
M
E
L
Y
V
3 a
Packet Pg. 33
maintain during the team of this Agreement all of the following insurance coverages:
0
(a) Commercial general liability, including premises-operations, products/completed =
operations, broad form property damage, blanket contractual liability,
independent contractors, personal injury with a policy limit of not less than One m
Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence and =
aggregate. c°
3
d
(b) Automobile liability for owned vehicles, hired, and non-owned vehicles, with a
policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined
per occurrence and aggregate.
'
single limits,p M
Cn
(c) Workers' compensation insurance as required by the State of California.
J
4.2, Endorsements. The commercial general liability insurance policy shall contain or
be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
LL
(a) Additional insureds: "The City of San Bernardino and its elected and appointed
boards, officers, agents, and employees are additional insureds with respect to E
CONSULTANT'S performance under this contract."
c
(b) Notice: "Said policy shall not terminate, nor shall it be materially changed or
cancelled, nor the coverage reduced, until thirty (30) days after written notice is
(44�1 E
given to CITY."
(c) Other insurance: "Any other insurance maintained by the City of San Bernardino �°
shall be excess and not contributing with the insurance provided by this policy." o
.2
4.3. Certificates of Insurance. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY certificates of a
insurance showing the insurance coverages and required endorsements described above, in a =
form and content approved by CITY,prior to performing any services under this Agreement. 3
)
4.4. Non-limiting. Nothing in this Section shall be construed as limiting in any way,
the indemnification provision contained in this Agreement, or the extent to which R
CONSULTANT may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property. a
Lo
5.0. GENERAL PROVISIONS
M
5.1. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the
parties with respect to any matter referenced herein and supersedes any and all other prior
writings and oral negotiations. This Agreement may be modified only in writing, and signed by
the parties in interest at the time of such modification. The terms of this Agreement shall prevail M
over any inconsistent provision in any other contract document appurtenant hereto, including M
exhibits to this Agreement. E
L
Y
Q
1
U
l4
a.+
4
Packet Pg. 34
S.C.b
5.2. Notices. Any notices, documents, correspondence or other communications
2
concerning this Agreement or the work hereunder may be provided by personal delivery, o
facsimile or mail and shall be addressed as set forth below. Such communication shall be deemed
served or delivered: a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal delivery;
b) at the time of transmission if such communication is sent by facsimile; and c) 48 hours after m
deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such communication is sent =
through regular United States mail.
3
v
IF TO CONSULTANT: IF TO CITY: (D
a
Willdan City Manager 4!
650 Hospitality Lane Suite 250 300 North"D" Street in
San Bernardino, CA 92408 San Bernardino, CA 92418
Telephone: (909) 386-0204 Telephone: (909) 384-5122 $
Facsimile: (909) 888-5107 Facsimile: (909) 384-5138
d
L
U-
5.3. Attorneys' Fees. In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection
with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all w
costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the
exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms,
conditions, or provisions hereof. The costs, salary and expenses of the City Attorney and L
members of his office in enforcing this contract on behalf of the CITY shall be considered as 3
attorneys fees" for the purposes of this Agreement. E
L
O
5.4. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the N
laws of the State of California without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of o
laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the parties hereto
agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in San N
Bernardino County, California.
3
5.5. Assignment. CONSULTANT shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign,
transfer, sublet or encumber all or any part of CONSULTANT's interest in this Agreement
without CITY's prior written consent. Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting or
encumbrance shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and cause for a
LO
termination of this Agreement. Regardless of CITY's consent, no subletting or assignment shall
release CONSULTANT of CONSULTANT's obligation to perform all other obligations to be y
performed by CONSULTANT hereunder for the term of this Agreement.
5.6. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. CONSULTANT shall protect, defend, y
indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its elected and appointed officials, boards, commissions,
officers, attorneys, agents and employees from any and all claims, losses, demands, suits, M
administrative actions, penalties, liabilities and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees,
damage to property or injuries to or death of any person or persons or damages of any nature a�
including, but not limited to, all civil claims or workers' compensation claims arising from or in
any way related to CONSULTANT's performance under this Agreement, except when caused
solely by the CITY's negligence. E
U
tC
r+
5 `Z
Packet Pg. 35
S.C.b
(awl,
5.7. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT, at all times while performing under
U
this Agreement, is and shall be acting at all times as an independent contractor and not as an o
agent or employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure, at its expense, and be responsible for
any and all payment of wages, benefits and taxes including, but not limited to, Income Tax,
Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, and m
other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT and its officers, agents, and employees, and all
business licenses, if any are required, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder. `0
Neither CONSULTANT nor its officers, agents and employees shall be entitled to receive any d
benefits which employees of CITY are entitled to receive and shall not be entitled to workers'
compensation insurance, unemployment compensation, medical insurance, life insurance, paid Y
vacations, paid holidays,pension, profit sharing or social security on account of CONSULTANT
and its officers', agents' and employees' work for the CITY. This Agreement does not create the N
relationship of agent, servant, employee partnership or joint venture between the CITY and
CONSULTANT. _
5.8 Conflict of Interest Disclosure. CONSULTANT or its employees may be subject
to the provisions of the California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act"), which (1) requires Y
such persons to disclose financial interests that may be materially affected by the work v
performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibits such persons from making or participating in
making decisions that will have a foreseeable financial effect on such interest. _
M
CONSULTANT shall conform to all requirements of the Act. Failure to do so
constitutes a material breach and is grounds for termination of the Agreement by CITY. 3
E
5.9. Responsibility for Errors. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for its work and o
results under this Agreement. CONSULTANT, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or N
explanation as may be required by the CITY's representative, regarding any services rendered o
under this Agreement at no additional cost to CITY. In the event that an error or omission d
attributable to CONSULTANT occurs, then CONSULTANT shall, at no cost to CITY, provide N
all other CONSULTANT professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the `
sole satisfaction of CITY and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction.
5.10. Prohibited Employment. CONSULTANT shall not employ any current employee
of CITY to perform the work under this Agreement while this Agreement is in effect.
a
5.11. Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and
negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as M
expressly provided herein.
5.12. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is entered into for the sole
benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental
beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right in, under or to this M
Agreement. »�
E
L
5.13. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement
are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or
U
f6
Y
Y
6
Packet Pg. 36
5.C.b
accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or .-
interpretation of this Agreement. o
c
5.14. Amendments. Only a writing executed by all of the parties hereto or their
respective successors and assigns may amend this Agreement. m
5.15. Waiver. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or
compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a
waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of
this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative
of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy
with respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy with in
d
respect to any other occurrence or event,nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. �-
J
5.16. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such determination shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the U-
offending provision in any other circumstance, and the remaining provisions of this Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.
a�
5.17. Countemarts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall L
constitute one agreement.
3
5.18. Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the c
L
parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said N
parties and that by doing so, the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this o
Agreement.
a
3
a
to
M
M
_
0
M
M
E
L
i+
_
Qa
U
f4
a..
w
7 Q
Packet Pg. 37
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and .2
through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first above written. r-
0
as
c
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WILLDAN, m
A Municipal Corporation CONSULTANT a
�o
3
m
m
Allen Parker, City Manager Signature
M
d
J
Naive and Title
a�
W
_
ATTEST:
�a
_
Georgeann Hanna, City Clerk
3
E
0
co
APPROVED AS TO FORM: o
Gary D. Saenz,
City Attorney ,CL
3
x m
By:
_
a
LO
M
M
_
tQ
Ln
M
M
E
L
_
V
w
8 Q
Packet;Pg.38
see • • • -
r
r � a r ■ r ■ � .w r � 1 � � • a
w s' ei i.i '.�� n. 1•r K
e
� SI a ' � _.. rl1 1 � 1 •
1..
' � rwv�t;al L tY7u 9}^'1>t*ar.•sr:?: .+•M't:..,. ..� — CIIS�RU �
�Sl`' �Wh '` "T �r a ,R ` 1 S�J.® �-1 X1!•!71■
wY
dl tint
WILLDAN
Packet . . 39
V'T" WILLDAN '
Celebrating 50 years of service
m
July 21,2014
3
m
Ms. Vanessa Sanchez
City of San Bernardino
Purchasing Department
300 North "D"Street,4th Floor
Cn
San Bernardino,CA 92418
J
Subject: Proposal to Provide Plan Review,Inspection,Stormwater Management,Fire and Life
� �v
Safety Plan Review and Building Official Services d
RFP F-14-41 U_
c
Dear Ms. Sanchez: m
m
ca
Wiiidan Engineering is excited to present this proposal to the City of San Bernardino to provide
services to the City and broaden our current professional relationship with the City. Willdan has been
providing building and safety plan review, inspection,counter technician services and engineering plan
review to the City since 1986. Further,Willdan's proposed on-call Building Official,Mr. Ron Espalin,
Ar PE, has been serving the City of San Bernardino in the capacity of Responsible Engineer since 1986. In
0
addition,Willdan has been a consistent industry leader for 50 years providing all aspects of municipal in
and infrastructure engineering, including building and safety,public works, public financing, planning, o
and construction management services. 2
Q
While our exceptional services are presented in the proposal,listed below are reasons why Willdan is
uniquely qualified to provide these services to the City. —
3
m
Knowledge of Local Environment - Our team members have provided building and safety services,
land surveying and civil plan review services to numerous California municipalities. Willdan has been C
providing services to the City of San Bernardino for approximately 28 years and our staff has extensive t°
a
experience working with the City's procedures and expectations for quality service to the community.
LO
Willdan's team will be managed and coordinated through our local full service San Bernardino office,
just a 10-minute drive to the City's office—making Willdan conveniently located and responsive to the
City's requests. Willdan has been an integral part of the San Bernardino community since 1977.
a
O
Electronic Plan Check - Willdan Engineering offers electronic plan checking which significantly n-
expedites review and reduces shipping and printing costs for the applicant,and promotes a paperless w
environment. a-
z
a
Our Team of Subject Matter Experts—We are the One-Stop-Shopl -Willdan Engineering prides itself
on providing subject matter experts in all areas of services to our clients. From engineering,
community development,planning and homeland security to financial consulting and geotechnical
services,Willdan possesses expertise in all facets of public sector needs. The services required for this 0
contract are directly related to our core competencies. No other firm matches Willdan's combined
breadth of directly relevant technical and operational expertise and depth of experience. We are truly w
the City's"one-stop-shop"to meet virtually any municipal service need. Q
Engineering and Planning I Energy Efficiency and Sustalnability I Financial and Economic Consulting I National Preparedness and Interoperability
909.386.0200 1 800.789.7597 1 fax:909.888.5107 1 650 E.Hospitality Lane,Suite 250,San Bernardino,CA 92408-3317 1 www.
Packet>Pg.40
Ms.Vanessa Sanchez
City of San Bernardino
July 21,2014
Page 2 =
=a
m
Experience with Comparable Engagements-Willdan Engineering specializes in providing professional
building and safety,engineering,and planning services to municipalities. The firm has been providing
building and safety services to cities and counties on a contract basis since 1979 and civil engineering
plan reviews since our inception in 1964.
tr
Demonstrated Competence and Expertise-Willdan Engineering presently provides building and
safety,civil engineering and other services to more than 60%of the cities and counties in California.
In this capacity,we provide a full range of services including building and safety plan review, permit
issuance, inspection, civil improvement plan review, land surveying and permit support. We service -'
client needs from occasional overload plan review to staffing an entire division.
a�
L
Availability of Key Personnel-Our convenient location to the City of San Bernardino,enables the LL
development community,that is,engineers,architects,contractors and homeowners,to resolve plan
check issues at Willdan's local office,thereby reducing foot traffic and telephone traffic at City hall. E
Willdan Engineering key staff and support personnel will be prepared to provide services to the City
within 24 hours notice or sooner if necessary for additional services.
L
No Conflict of Interest-Willdan Engineering provides no private sector engineering services;
therefore there is no conflict of interest. 3
E
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to the opportunity to further y
our professional relationship with the City of San Bernardino. If you have any questions concerning o
this proposal or would like to schedule an interview with our outstanding team,please do not hesitate
to contact me. This proposal shall remain valid for a period not less than 120 days from the date of a
submittal. w
Respectfully submitted, 3
d
WIllN ENGINEERIN
OA G
Ronald L. Espalin,PE
Director of Building and Safety
909.386.0204—phone Q
909.888.5107—fax N
O
respalin @willdan.com a.
O
tr
a
Z
a
0
J
J_
C
d
E
t
a
Packet Pg.41
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
TABLE OF CONTENTS
m
FirmDescription......................................................................................................... ...............1 3
m
Scopeof Services ..........................................................................................................................5
m
14..
...
Experience ............................................................................................... . ............................
II! Cn
d
Qualifications of Key Personnel ..................................................................................................17
References .. . ..... ....... ....... .........
.... . ........... .............. .................................................. ........ . .21 m
L
U.
FeeSchedule ..............................................................................................................................22 '-`
Cost/Price Form
E
m
as
Appendix
Resumes 1°
Instructions to Bidders—Checklist m
Technical Specifications Form f4
3
Non-Collusion Affidavit E
L
Listing of Proposed Subcontractor in
c
0
Y
U
d
Q
N
G
d
W
C
tC
D.
L0
M
d'
M
J
Q
W
O
a.
O
o!
a
z
a
0
J
J_
C
d
E
S
U
Q
J j Wl LLDAN City of San Bernardino
Engineering R P, Packet°P .42
g
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO -
FIRM DESCRIPTION
m
Willdan Group, Inc. (WGI)is a provider of professional technical and u .
WfL4bgIPT 40f.
consulting services to public agencies that ensures the quality,value,and ry
security of our nation's infrastructure,systems,facilities,and environment.
fi N
The firm has pursued two primary service objectives since its inception in ubl�call fir; dedr 1 4;;D Q,
( - >.
1964—ensuring the success of its clients and enhancing its surrounding fickeP V1li D►V)
communities.In doing so,WGI has gained a notable reputation for
technical excellence,cost-effectiveness,and client responsiveness in tat Ih�orK`,", Cl)
p�t�afi�� � <e�� �
providing superior consulting services.The company's service offerings W-61 GI De(av,V�re( Q� f !'
span a broad set of complementary disciplines that include building and �v1Eld�nngr2'eerlah , 5 i,}�
safety, engineering and planning, energy efficiency and sustainability, Callfotnia(14}
financial and economic consulting,and national preparedness.WGI has
crafted this set of integrated services so that, in the face of an evolving Year�hunded
environment—whether economic, natural or built—WGI can continue to
extend the reach and resources of its public agency clients. Locat(an olfi#f�es;;Ahht'Pt�,k
, Asa,Elk rave,l Wc9w, fs�y
(n�iistry,o�kl�nd,I?Isa�a��n„�Y �
WGI has hundreds of employees operating out of offices located �tedd(�g,Roseville san
� .o pf4f
throughout California,as well as in New York, New Jersey,Arizona, �-
�ei`rardfP�o,'Sa�1
Nevada,Florida, Illinois,Texas,Washington and the District of Columbia. 7err�cu(a,�le34u fa,CAZ'g {jljs
Through our wholly-owned subsidiaries—Willdan Engineering, Willdan WQ EnleVi�od,`1�J {
Energy Solutions,Willdan Financial Services,Willdan Homeland Solutions, Hei%derstiri,'NV;Nousor►,'( ;;f;k a
Now and Willdan Infrastructure—WGI offers comprehensive consulting services
to public agencies. Phber�ix,1alNasl�rri�to€� C,j , o
Chl VegM N�s
WGI has been delivering skilled, integrated,cost-effective engineering and
planning services to its clients for SO years.WGI combines multidisciplinary ' '4i?� ► �5• 1i
lyu�l f
experience and expertise,technical excellence,and management IVationafly S,b3 fp Y Yrt;�;
p g Qj 3
proficiency to deliver flexible, practical solutions at the lowest possible }5x `r k t
cost.
�9jra of srptaots s
ot
.irk;;` (C
a
5ahBernarino,CA 924`08 •,,` M
90,��36,d2Qb , M
f 4hgt}t af'riin�e Perfprt�lfi►g"'1," a
_trt111arfSeri�e$, 5b Years`' N
a
O
z
Q
0
J
J
C
E
t
U
Y � �
r..
Q
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN I RFP
ri Engineering Packet Pg.43
1
CITY OF
N BER D
SA NAR INO
Willdan's corporate-wide capabilities include: 2
m
:t ly
Building Safety Demand Side Management Financial Consulting
City Engineering Energy Efficiency Y Cast Allocation Plans
Code Enforcement IT Applications m
Cost of Service/User Fees �-
Contract Staff Support Renewables —'
Building and Safety Fee Studies
Development Review Smart Grid Technology
Utility Rates
Disaster Recovery Microgrids
Environmental g Gybor Security
Engineering Fiscal Impact Analysis
g
Geotechnical Services SCommunication.,; Impact Fee Studies
trategic m
Geotechnical Projects Sustainability Strategy Fire Assessment and CFDs
Geographical Information Water Conservation Annexations and Incorporations
Systems Facility Financing Plans
Landscape Architecture Vertical markets
Solid Waste Audits, Q+M
Materials Testing and Inspection m
Materials Testing Protects Data Centers Federal Compliance; E
Direct Install RI=P for Federal Compliance o
Materials Testing Project Sites Educational Institutions Services
Planning and Community
Development Hospitals and Healthcare District Administration o
Community Development Laboratories Apportionments
Environmental Planning Lodging and Hospitality Continuing Disclosure
Program/Construction Multi-Family blousing Custom District Administration
Management Utilities 3
Delinquency Management 2
Structural Engineering
Survey and Mapping Staff Augmentation D:
IT Assessments
Traffic Engineering �:, fo. a
Transportation Engineering zjcf Property Assessed Clean LO
Airports Energy M
Highways and Roads
J
Railroads Communications and a
"Total Water Resources Technology O
Flood Control and Drainage National Preparedness
o!
Wastewater Management Planning and Hazard Mitigation
Z
Water Supply Preparedness Training
Preparedness Exercises J
Prevention and Fusion Centers
Water Security
E
2
U
gy Wf LLDAN City of son Bernardino
Engineering I RFP Packet Pg. 44
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
WILLDAN ENGINEERING(Wilidan)has dedicated itself to providing public agencies with reliable m
engineering and consulting services for 50 years. Combining depth of staffing,state-of-the-art
technical resources,and local offices rooted in their communities,Willdan has earned its reputation as M
a problem solver across a wide range of client interests. We understand the concerns of government
agencies—especially those of local government. Our company offers a broad scope of expertise that
uniquely qualifies us to serve the needs of cities,counties,and special districts, as well as state and
federal agencies. '
M
U)
Since 1964,Wilidan has helped revolutionize the way
INILLDAN ENGINEERING consulting services are provided by local offices. Our regional ''
and satellite offices are strategically located to offer local,
Building and Safety
focused service to the varied demographics of our public m
agency customers. Wilidan Engineering's lean organization '`
enables staff to efficiently communicate individual project Management (D
challenges and goals company-wide,thereby utilizing all of
Construction
E
a�
Willdan's resources to deliver the highest quality and most Managernent/inspection
cost-effective product. M
Review
Wilidan understands the unique nature of public agency needs
and issues. In addition to many of our staff having served in 3
Landscape Architecture
E
management and technical positions at public agencies prior to o
joining Wilidan, we have executed numerous assignments with )Structural Engineering
over 60%of the cities and counties in California for building Survey/Mapping =
0
officials,city engineers,planning directors,traffic engineers, Traffic U
and other public agency staff members. Transportation- Q
C
Building and Safety Services
m
Willdan's experience and strength in building and safety encompasses the complete range of technical
Of
disciplines,including permit issuance,building inspection,grading inspection,accessibility inspection, r_
CASp services,OSWPD III plan check and inspection,flood zone experience, building plan review,fire- a.
life safety,building official services,and emergency safety assessment expertise. The inspection and
LO
plan review staff maintain current certifications and attends training on a regular basis,to stay current n
with industry technologies and standards. Specific certifications and education are delineated in staff
resumes herein.
a
Civil Engineering Services O
O
Willdan's public works plan check engineers possess improvement plan check expertise in street, M
CL
traffic,street lighting, striping,sewer,storm water management,water(potable and recycled)and Z
erosion control(plans and SWPPP). We also check other types of plans,such as landscaping and joint o
trench for consistency with the civil plans. Map checking includes parcel maps,subdivision maps,lot
mergers, lot line adjustments,easements and right-of-way. Our plan check staff regularly attends
seminars,affiliated organization events, and workshops to remain current with updated standards and
regulations such as the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA), National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES),Low Impact Development(LID)and storm water management and compliance criteria
under CWA.
Q
WI LLDAN City of San Bernardino
Engineering ftFP F Packet P .45
1
CITY OF
SAN BERNA DINO
Public Works Inspection Services :a
Willdan has maintained a pool of 25-40 inspectors over the past 30 years,with numerous contracts on m
an as-needed basis. Our standard procedures have been refined and enhanced for local agencies from
the comprehensive basis of the Caltrans Construction Manual. Though we work under the Caltrans 3
Specifications for the great majority of our contracts,frequently we provide the same services under
the "Greenbook"APWA standards.
a
r
a�
w
c�
co
m
J
I C
t0
d
L
U.
d
E
L
d
i+
E
L
0
U)
E
0
V
Q.
N
3
a�
m
o:
c
c�
a
LO
M
M
J
Q
N
O
a-
0
a
z
Q
0
J
>J_
C
d
E
t
V
Ri
r.+
a
Will WI LLDAN City of San Bernardino
Engineering I Ri P
Packet Pg.46
I
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
S
SCOPE OF SERVICES m
It is our understanding that the City is in need of services for plan review, on-call inspection, storm 3
water management, Fire and Life Safety plan review and on-call building official services.
m
o:
BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES
m
All building plans will be examined for compliance with the adopted version of the California Building
Code California Residential Code Green Building Standards Code California Mechanical
Code
d
California Plumbing ode California Electrical Code and d the Accessibility,Noise and Energy J
Conservation requirements as mandated by State Title 24 and all applicable City Ordinances. Plan =
review for Disabled Access Compliance will include a review of precise grading plans.
m
L
All plan check will include compliance with code requirements as well as an overview of the
application package for other applicable requirements such as approvals from other local agencies and °'
E
� districts and coordination with oth er City departments. All Ian review will comply
with the City's
a�
a�
directives, codes and policies. M
c�
Plan check will include a review of any or all of the following design elements as determined by the a;
City:
3
E
L
■ Architectural Residential o
,,,mr ■ Fire/Life-safety ■ Electrical
■ Plumbing Energy Conservation Regulations(Title 24) o
■ Mechanical Disabled Access Regulations(CBC) 0
Structural Green Build ing Standards Q.
y
c
After completion of each plan review,Willdan will notify the applicant with two complete typewritten 3
m
plan check letters which outline the documents reviewed, instructions to the applicant regarding the >
processing of documents,and a listing of plan check comments. The w'Ian check comments
P ill refer
to appropriate sheets,details or calculation pages and the code section of concern. Comments shall
specify the apparent code violation. At the City's di a
pp y discretion, plan check comments, plans and
documents will be returned directly to the designers until such time as plans are approved. Plan
M
review activity
ty an status will be entered into the City's logging Y to in system. �
r,
Assigned Willdan staff will pick up plans from the City and return plans to the City at no additional N
cost.
O
IL
Our plan checkers will schedule meetings during work hours to discuss and clarify plan check issues a.
a
with designers,owners and contractors. Resolutions of code issues may also be accomplished by z
a
telephone,or meetings prior to resubmitting corrected plans and documents. o
J
J_
_
d
E
V
.ate+
a
� q W!LLDAN City of San Bernardino
Engineering RFP
Packet`lPg.47
-
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
Turn-Around Schedule
This schedule is applicable for all types of construction and can be adjusted to serve the in the most m
efficient manner. Expedited plan check will be provided at the request of the City.
}
}k ' LL.
All residential and non-residential Eight-ten working days Five working days
Cn
d
ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW
Willdan has the ability to provide plan review services electronically,at no additional cost to the City a
or applicants. No additional computer software or hardware is required,only an Internet connection ii
is necessary.Services are provided at the request of the applicant or the agency we serve. Submittals c
are accepted in PDF format. Willdan will review plans and can transmit the electronic redlined plans E
back to the applicant or designer as directed,electronically along with the plan review comment c,
sheet. Plan review information is available to all parties 24/7 on-line.
This service allows for expeditious review and collaboration between the City,designer and plans
examiner to facilitate a complete understanding and documentation of plan review comments and 3
can reduce shipping, printing and time for plan review processing for the applicant. Below is an E
example of a redlined plan as reviewed in electronic format. °
in
AR.x-Ol.pdf - •`W.
a i?aS °
i
se add your comments and cSck PublihCommmlt to%it oDte renewer ran lutorpatically ceethern. +"Check for New Comments Pub{sb COn,rDeMs
a
KIP i _ — .
s C i 1%
r 1 PAT T E.
i w I 7us - -1 attar E:J✓�
7.11 S A57.11 i Iu
SPS 50 - 1G p� 6L' hEt;vFE55
1 �rl ar I l01 11a 0 and ® C4' 4' e �
r+a• ti f,)Dana R...- Is5 Nl- M
V I Paull 8119 a111R1:11 Pfd
I
r—
s3 Noel IIAWIA111:17.1 Phi
' I uewln I - a
° N7Wf • Z
CIO
ItEm I o
1 AY2E I ril'�S�"t6S�r,1. 0
Z
tra Ala.1./ 1-1o• 5-1• 0 7
'.;74fy3QA73 in. c
D a - - - --+.s— �sr'- „rri.--s 1 ti ' s a ;t�Inl�inee�Po(ecfesl Mock Elf g,f1� 1aa96 • E
V
l�
a
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN
RfiP r.
1 . Engineering Packet Pg.48
GANBERNARDINO
_
BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES
Inspection staff will be available on a same-day or next-day basis,and will also be available to meet m
with City staff,builders,developers,and citizens to provide assistance and resolve any inspection
issues that may arise. Inspectors will attend and participate in required meetings with other City
inspection and plan review staff, property owners,contractors and/or design professionals,
Inspectors will review the permit package to verify that the on-site condition is consistent with the
appropriate records for square footage,setbacks, heights,and other requirements that may be ,
applicable. Inspectors will comply with the City's procedures for reporting inspection results, use City un
inspection correction forms, make appropriate entries onto the permit documents,and follow City T
procedures prior to finalizing a building permit. J
i c
Willdan will verify that all inspection records, including daily records of what was inspected which will P
be recorded on the job card, and permit copy entered into the City's Building and Safety computer
system. We will employ such techniques as necessary to minimize delays to builders and provide 4)
helpful advice and counsel to builders, owners,engineers and architects as to enhance the orderly E
flow of the construction process,yet maintaining an effective level of enforcement. Inspectors will
ensure that any construction changes are documented and approved by appropriate City staff. o
Willdan inspectors will record inspection site address and the nature of the inspection into the City's
permitting system.The entries will include the inspection results and the inspector comments,if any.
r
3
E
L
0
FIRE LIFE SAFETY PLAN REVIEW SERVICES_ vi
Fire plans including suppression systems,alarm systems,sprinkler systems and fire-life safety,will be o
reviewed in accordance with the 2013 California Fire Code,provisions of Title 19 and NFPA standards U
and any City ordinances. a
N
C
Turn-Around Schedule 3
m
a.
All residential and non-residential Eight-ten working days Five working days
M
J
Q
Cn
0
a
O
a:
a
Z
Q
0
J
yJ_
_
d
E
V
r
a
City of San Bernardino
-_t WI LLDAN RFp
Engineering Packet Pg. 49
I S.C.c
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
BUILDING OFFICIAL SERVICES
Services provided will include, but will not be limited to: '
m
c
• Oversee City Building and Safety staff.
3
m
• Manage and oversee the Building Division.
• Prepare Conditions of Approval.
U)
• Develop policies. �?
■ Interact with customers,City staff and elected officials.
• Participate in meetings and discussions of the City's Development Review Committee where
professional design opinion, counsel, perspective and recommendations are provided to
applicants. E
• Review proposed legislation affecting Building Code enforcement.
• Arbitrate disputes on code interpretations and resolve the more difficult and complex engineering
and code problems. 3
E
L
0
• Attend City meetings on an as needed basis to answer questions and provide testimony on issues in
pertaining to Building Code laws and regulations. c
0
w
U
• Assist with all necessary administrative duties associated with a Building Division.
c
• Prepare codes,ordinances,and staff reports,as well as attend any meetings that may be required. 3
d
CD
1X
c
a
� M
M
J
Q
N
O
a-
0
a
Z
a
0
J
J_
C
d
U
fII
w
a
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN RFP
ill .,,.t Engineering racket Pg.50
5.C.c
CITY OF
SAN RERNARDINO
CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW :2
Willdan plan check staff will check all improvement plans under the jurisdiction of the City for m
compliance with general plan requirements,the conditions of approval of the proposed project, City
standards,standard City checklists, and sound engineering practice. The plans to be checked include: t°
3
• Street and road improvements 0 Sewer/water/underground utility >
• Construction detour/construction phasing ■ Signing/striping
■ Structural ■ Street lighting ,a>
Traffic signal ■ State SWPPP and WQMP in
Mass Grading, Fine Grading and Erosion
Control Plans
c
M
As required,Willdan plan check staff will review and prepare comments on documents,such as d
drainage/hydrology studies,traffic studies related to an application for consistency with City U.
Standards,policies, and guidelines. Grading and drainage plans will include review of calculations and d
reports for: E
M
■ Hydraulics and hydrology calculations
■ City of San Bernardino Storm Water Management Program
■ Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)report
■ Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) 3
Quantity estimates E
o
Additional optional reports that Willdan plan check staff can check include:
0
U
• Geotechnical reports ■ Structural calculations �-
N
• Water network pressure calculations ■ Road structural section calculations 5
• State of California AB 1881 Water ■ Sewer capacity calculations/studies
Conservation Ordinance Calculations ■ Traffic reports/studies ">
d
o:
Grading Plan Check
a
Willdan will perform grading and site accessibility plan review for projects constructed in the City for LO
conformance with City codes and ordinances, including the City grading code and manual,Greenbook
Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction,City Standards and Design Manual,California v
Building Codes related to site accessibility,consistency with the City's Master Plan of Drainage,or a
Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications. N
O
o.
Willdan's staff assigned to City projects has a thorough knowledge of civil engineering principles and a
practices and site improvement design requirements. All plan reviews are completed using City z
established policies and procedures and within City timeframes. a
0
Our grading plan check review will be consistent with Willdan plan review quality guidelines, Willdan —J
will utilize the City's grading plan checklist and will mark up plans. Willdan will ensure plans meet all
applicable codes and ordinances upon completion of plan checks,evaluation of the engineers cost ;=
estimate,and final recommendation on bond amount and permit fees.
E
s
I L m
r
Q
City of San Bernardino
Wl LLDAN
rzrA
Engineering Packet Pg. 51
F°" 1
-
CITY OF
SAKI BERNARDINO
MAP CHECKING AND INSPECTON
Willdan will review parcel maps,tract maps,lot mergers and lot line adjustments to ensure m
compliance with applicable provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Land Surveyors'Act,Title 19 of the c
San Bernardino Municipal Code,approved Tentative Map,approved Conditions of Approval, and
current title report. There will be detailed checks made,including, but not limited to, review of survey
documentation and title reports,lot and boundary closures,dedication and easement provisions, legal
descriptions,completeness,and accuracy of data notation,and necessary certifications of City and
County staff. We encourage open communication between the map preparer and the checker so as to T
limit the amount of map checks. Rather than trying to overcrowd a map check with too many u)
comments,we invite the preparer to come to our office to sit down and discuss the various issues.
We feel that this method benefits both parties.
� c
Turn-Around Schedule
L
xti � �y5v��e L. •r
A .a' s )' z ${� �[����;� ��,{�€"'asy�Sig���'/�}t���.f � ��Y"` r d �S � ���� "� F �• �i1 Cl
E
f�� �+ f""h4'��y�y�'t5�7.?yy, 1 k N G'��.�r�2''t�YR�,f t��n�i-• r �`�,S j
., a!£ �Pv.�§� ��ki��� `+srb.�A�S i i u�'� �`�t � s ✓"��"f `� a'' �ti G�
ftS
C
All engineering reviews Ten-fifteen working days Five-seven working days
L
d
3
Inspection E
Willdan staff will inspect and verify that all monuments shown as"SET"on the subdivision map have N
been set at the locations denoted on the map and are of the character as described on the map and E
advise surveyor of record if any of the monuments do not agree with what is shown on the map 2
concerning the location and character. a
N
C
PUBLIC WORKS AND STORMWATER(NPDES)INSPECTION
Public Works Inspection as
Willdan's construction inspectors may be assigned to individual projects or serve as staff on projects
requiring multiple construction inspectors. During the normal course of their work our inspectors will
perform the following tasks:
LO
M
• Become thoroughly familiarized with review of plans,specifications, and all other contract and M
construction related documents.
Q
• Conduct a field investigation of the project area to become familiar with the existing facilities and N
the project environment. a-
O
• Become familiar with traffic control plans, construction schedule,construction sequence,and ee
a-
permit requirements from other agencies. z
a
• Meet with City staff to review the scope of work and establish project schedules.
J
J
• Prepare special concerns to be presented at preconstruction conference.
• Attend preconstruction meeting.
E
�a
a
I City of San Bernardino
WI LLDAN I I? P
W1 01 Engineering Packet P� 52'
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
• Perform construction inspection,oversight,and enforcement of compliance with the contract 32
documents for construction of various Department road,sewer,water,traffic signal,and flood m
control projects being constructed by contractors under contract with the Department and
document non-conforming items as they are discovered.
3
• Prepare and process change orders,daily logs,and working day statements;collect work records; }
maintain accurate records of work done for payment purposes;conduct employee interviews;
prepare as-built plans,and perform other associated contract administration tasks.
r
d
• Respond to complaints and inquiries from the public,elected officials,other agencies, v
Construction Division staff,and other affected Department Divisions. )
■ Perform the roles and responsibilities described above for work being performed under permits
issued by the Department.
Monitor compliance with Cal OSHA requirements and compliance with all local,state,and federal L
ii
regulations,including but not limited to,Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act(NPDES).
• Meet with the contractor at the beginning of each day and review proposed work plans, including
specific details that may affect progress. m
w
• Review actual contractor performance throughout the day and discuss discrepancies with the
contractor as they occur.
• Coordinate activities of engineering support,surveying,and testing. 2 2
• Coordinate contractor's fieldwork with utility companies and other agencies. E
0
' Attend weekly jobsite meetings and other meetings with City staff,merchants,engineer,public N
relations personnel,contractor,and construction manager,as needed.
0
• Observe construction safety,and public safety and convenience,and report discovered
discrepancies to construction manager and City. a
N
• Evaluate contractor's operation and production with respect to quality and progress,and report to =
construction manager and City.
• Photograph in color continuous property frontages along street alignment once prior to
construction and once immediately following construction. _
• Arrange for material testing and construction staking to be performed by Department staff, a.
• Establish and maintain effective working relationships with Department staff. M
• Closely monitor testing results and require contractor to provide corrective measures to achieve y
compliance.
a
• Maintain copies of all permits needed to construct the project and enforce special requirements O
of each. a
0
• Prepare clear and concise letters and memorandums,as needed. a
• Maintain field file bound workbooks during construction, including a cumulative record of o
quantities constructed,daily and weekly reports,working day reports,change order J
documentation,photographs, and other documentation.
• Review the construction schedule and enforce requirements for updating schedules and
maintaining appropriate progress of the work.
E
• Coordinate engineering support at response to construction clarification requests.
Q
t Wt LLDAN I City of San Bernardino
Engineering RFP
Packet Pg. 53
i
f f�5rvc
CITY OF
RAN BERNARDINO
• Analyze delays and review claims on a timely basis and make recommendations to the City. :2
• Review,evaluate,and discuss with the City, all requests for changes of work,including costs m
involved; prepare change orders,including provision of cover memorandum of explanation. c
• Maintain all data for change orders,and record information with regards to the time of dispute, 3
time of notification by the contractor, and action taken by the inspector.
d
• Provide complete measurements and calculations documented to administer progress payments.
• Prepare documentation for final payment to the contractor. w?
• Maintain and submit a clean set of plans marked in red for as-built corrections on record drawings N
to be filed with the City. (Agency will be responsible to transfer contractor's record drawings to
original Mylar drawings.) _
• Prepare punch list at substantial completion and follow up. d
L
• Recommend and schedule,with the City and applicable agencies,the final inspection. Prepare, U_
distribute,and inspect corrections of the final punch list for completion and acceptance.
CD
• Prepare documentation for final payment to the contractor.
ar
• Upon project completion,provide the finished set of project workbooks to the City. c
L
NPDES Inspection
.r
3
• Willdan will perform two site inspections of the Water Quality Mitigation Plan(WQMP)Treatment E
BMP facilities for High Priority properties to meet the annual inspection required by the Region 8 °
MS4 permit.
s=
• Willdan will perform one site inspections of the Water Quality Mitigation Plan (WQMP)Treatment °
BMP facilities for Medium Priority properties to meet the inspection required by the Region 8 MS4
CL
permit.
• Willdan will perform one site inspections of the Water Quality Mitigation Plan(WQMP)Treatment 3
BMP facilities for Low Priority properties to meet the annual inspection required by the Region 8
and Region 9 MS4 permits
• Willdan will use the City-provided checklist to document that the Treatment BMPs have been
maintained as required by the MS4 Permits and that the BMPs are capable of proper treatment of a
storm water. M
• Willdan will perform on site inspections of the Water Quality Mitigation Plan(WQMP)Treatment
BMP facilities for HOA properties to meet the annual inspection required by the Region 8 and a
Region 9 MS4 permits. N
O
• Willdan will provide the City with documents for inclusion in the City database so that the City A
may document the results of the inspections for the Annual report for the MS4 permit. a
• Willdan will perform follow-up inspections for sites that have been issued violation notices during a
the initial inspection. o
J
• Willdan will issue correction notices to the property owner as well as the facility operator. In the
case of a condominium project where there multiple owners the correction,notices will be given
to the management company of the HOA and the contractor or subcontractor that is responsible
for the maintenance and operation of the treatment BMPs. E
i•+
Id
Q
wmA' City of San Bernardino
Q"' WI L LDA g I RFP
Packet 'g7574
i
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINQ
CD
r-
• Willdan will notify the City's Water Quality Coordinator if the violations have not been adequately
addressed during the follow-up inspection of the property. m
• Willdan will distribute educational material,developed by the City,during site inspections. c
• Willdan will photo document the inspections to provide evidence if the enforcement case must be 3
moved to the City Prosecutor if the property does not correct violation notices.
d
a
r
N
J
C
cc
G7
L
LL
w
C
d
E
c6
C
L
d
3
E
L
0
d.+
N
c
0
i-+
V
d
N
C
d
W
C
R
a
i LO
Cl)
d'
M
J
a
O
A
O
M
a
z
a
0
J
>J_
C
d
E
V
r
a
Z WI LLDAN City of San Bernardino
RFP
Engineering Packet Pg. 55
1 S.C:c
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
EXPERIENCE _
IM
Founded in 1964,Wilidan Engineering(Willdan) is a full-service civil engineering and planning firm
serving more than 800 public agencies and clients, including over 60%of all cities and counties in 3
California alone! Willdan provides building and safety plan check and inspection,code enforcement,
civil land development review,civil design engineering, environmental documentation and compliance, W
project management,and construction management and inspection services that ensure the quality,
value,and security of public infrastructure projects.
co
Willdan differs significantly from other firms in that our focus is meeting the needs of governmental 2
entities and providing no services to private land developers,thus eliminating conflicts of interest. _J
Willdan has concentrated our efforts in the area of public works planning,engineering,and inspection =
for small to midsized counties and cities. Since its establishment,Willdan has expanded in size, d
location,and service capabilities. We have evolved into a professional consulting firm offering a broad b-
array of services that provide a comprehensive and integrated approach to our clients' needs. The firm c
has been a consistent industry leader in providing all aspects of municipal and infrastructure E
engineering,civil and building plan review,public works contracting,construction management, a�
planning,public financing, homeland security,environmental investigation and remediation,and
energy efficiency and management.
L
When it comes to serving the residents of a community,Willdan sees our role as that of facilitator and
guide—helping the City's customers in getting through the review, permitting,and inspection 3
process—rather than leaving the applicant in a lurch in obtaining or signing off permits.We E
understand that the process of complying with the various codes,standards, regulations and laws can v>
be a formidable and daunting undertaking—for even the most seasoned design or construction o
professional. Furthermore,an understanding of the complexity associated with processing private
development applications and the sometimes competing interests is essential to exceptional customer a
service. Competing interests include, but are not limited to,creating a sense of place,achieving c
economic development objectives,ease of maintenance,and assuring the City will be as satisfied with
the infrastructure on day one as 20 years from"day one." Common sense decision making and
technical analysis in interpreting the intent of regulatory guidelines will be a premium feature the City
Ix
will use to evaluate all proposals. _
n.
Building Plan Check and Inspection �n
Willdan Engineering presently provides Building and Safety services to a number of municipalities and M
jurisdictions throughout Southern and Northern California. In this capacity,we provide a full range of
services including plan review, permit issuance,inspection,code enforcement,counter technician and a
Building Official services. We service client needs from an occasional overload plan review to staffing a
an entire Building Division. Willdan has gained a great deal of municipal insight and expertise in 0
o:
serving our extensive clientele over the years. We have performed plan review and inspection on a
projects ranging from single family residential additions to complex high rise towers(including hotels Z
and casinos),parking structures, medical facilities and industrial centers.Willdan's plans examiners are
ICC certified plans examiners, CASp certified, licensed architects,and/or registered engineers. J
d
E
c�
w
a
+ WI LLDAN City of San Bernardino
Engineering Packet Pg.66
i
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
Willdan's experience and strength in building and safety encompasses the complete range of technical
disciplines,that is,structural engineering plan check,fire-life safety,electrical, plumbing and m
mechanical codes,the Title 24 codes,as well as local amendments to the adopted codes. Willdan staff -a
attends classes and seminars on a regular basis to maintain an up-to-date comprehension of all code
requirements at no expense to our clients. 3
m
Our inspectors are ICC certified and fully experienced to perform residential,commercial and
industrial inspections for compliance to the approved plans and related documents. The inspections d
will be performed in accordance with the City's adopted version of the California Building Code, N
California Residential Code,Green Building Standards Code,California Mechanical Code,California
Plumbing Code,California Electrical Code,and the State and Federal regulations for Accessibility,
Noise and Energy Conservation,California Fire Code and provisions of Title 19 and NFPA. c
ca
Civil Plan Review LL
Willdan's plan check engineers possess improvement plan check expertise in street,traffic, street
fighting,striping, sewer, storm drainage, and water and erosion control(plans and SWPPP). We also E
check other types of plans,such as landscaping and joint trench for consistency with the civil plans. a,
Submittals are initially checked for completeness,compliance with tentative map conditions of
approval and compared to environmental mitigation and monitoring plan (environmental approval
document).Hydrology and hydraulic calculations are checked for accuracy to verify that the drainage a;
plans are adequate to provide for design runoff. Structural calculations,when submitted,are checked 3
by our in-house structural engineers. Grading plans are checked against geotechnical E
recommendations and City grading requirements. Sewer,water, and other utility(joint trench plans) 4°
improvement plans prepared for other agencies are reviewed for conflict/consistency with the City's n
established design guidelines. Our plan check staff regularly attends seminars,affiliated organization g
events,and workshops to remain current with updated standards and regulations such as the
Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA), National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES), and N
Low Impact Development(LID).
3
Map checking includes parcel maps, subdivision maps, lot mergers and lot-line adjustments, Maps are
reviewed for compliance with the Subdivision Map Act, Land Surveyors'Act,Title 19 of the San
Bernardino Municipal Code and other required documents. _
Willdan coordinates with the various regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the assigned projects °
to obtain approvals and permits for each specific project, including Caltrans,the US Army Corps of M
Engineers,the California Regional Water Quality Control Board,the California Department of Fish and M
Wildlife,and other agencies and approvals as may be required.Willdan presents signature-ready
permits for final execution. All mitigation measures from the permits are documented and tracked to a
ensure they have been incorporated into the final plans and specifications. 0
a-
Public Works and NPDES inspection W
a
Inspectors for Willdan closely monitor public works projects to ensure compliance with all contract Z
requirements. Most of our inspectors have American Construction Inspectors Association(ACIA) Q
0
certification as construction inspectors,and attend regular seminars, college courses,and in-house
presentations to keep abreast of current construction technologies. In addition to ACIA,many of our
staff are certified QSP's and QSD's and are provided with the latest information concerning the
implementation of the State Water Board permit.Willdan's inspectors have knowledge of basic soil E
s
w
a
City of San Bernardino
WI LLDAN RFP�-
Engineering
Packet Pg. 57
5. .c
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
dynamics and are highly cognizant of the crucial role of soils compaction in construction. They are zs
also familiar with the needs for general material testing for asphalt and concrete. m
Our inspectors know the importance of maintaining good relations with residents and businesses c
affected by the project. They are always encouraged to be courteous and helpful,and to 3
communicate as necessary,to satisfy local concerns.Our inspectors are coached by their supervisors
to routinely look for potential site safety problems,uncover potential construction claims,and provide
claims avoidance procedures. This includes checking ahead for utility interferences, unsuitable
materials,and other unforeseen site conditions. We also encourage our inspectors to closely monitor
traffic control to conform to the latest editions of the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook(WATCH) N
Manual and California State Manual of Traffic Controls. Willdan's inspectors receive special in-house J
training from our traffic professionals on traffic control safety. They are expected to ensure that -a
safety concerns are expeditiously addressed,in the same manner in which they are expected to
monitor overall site safety. d
U.
To make this organizational approach function smoothly and efficiently,a set of standard procedures c
has been developed to thoroughly control and document the projects at all points. These are based E
on Caltrans Construction Manual. Well-structured documentation provides for smooth contract
enforcement and our claim avoidance procedures and forms minimize exposure to extra costs. Our
quality control approach is highly refined and efficient. A field supervisor monitors the projects,as
appropriate based on the level of oversight provided by construction engineering staff,to check ;
project files and provide secondary oversight of construction methods,scheduling, and potential claim 3
circumstances. Our supervising construction engineer reviews feedback from the field supervisor and E
oversees special problems and especially scheduling issues and potential claims. �°
Our public works inspection personnel are linked by cellular telephone and E-mail which allows for o
fast and dependable communications. U
d
CL
c
3
a�
Q
c
a
M
d'
M
J
Q
N
0
a-
0
a
Z
Q
0
J
J_
Y
s
R
w
a
Y
``µla WI LLDAN ( City of San Bernardino
' Engineering RF�'�" "
Packet Pg. 58
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
PERSONNEL
m
Mr. Ronald Espalin,PE, will serve as Responsible Engineer,on-call Building Official and the point of
contact for building and safety assignments. Mr. Ray Wellington, PE will be the point of contact for
engineering plan review assignments. Mr.Dave Knell,PLS will be the point of contact for map
checking and inspection assignments. Mr. Chris Baca, RCI will be the point of contact for Public
Works and NPDES inspection assignments. They will have primary responsibility for assuring staff is
available to meet the needs of the City. The table below represents key staff that will be providing T
on-call services to the City. We also have the resources of staff company-wide to assist as to
necessary.
J
Resumes for key staff are located in the appendix, herein. c
to
(D
L
U_
Organization Chart
d
E
a�
c
CITY'OV SA Nj O� tNAR41NQ
Cp"rhmunity i�eveltitaMeht::
24
60partment
O
p 'r^
57M
O
RONALD ESPALIN,PE
Responsible Engineer
3
d
d
c
Ronald Espalin,PE Ray Wellington,PE !r Dave Knell,PLS 3 Chris Baca,RCI
Building&Safety Engineering Plan Check Map Checking p{ Public Works/NPDES 11
' Assignments Assignments Assignments a Inspection Assignments Lr)
�xf> ;& ... rl
M
Plan Review and =Checking Public Works Plan Review Staff
Inspection Staff Inspection staff 0
a
O
w
a
Z
a
0
J
>J_
C
d
E
V
Q
WRE Cit y of San Bernardino
WILLDAN RFP Engineering g Packet Pg.59
S.C.0
CITY of
RAN BERNARDINO
Team. Member Registration/Certif icat ions Role /Responsibilities m
�J tit.w;".l�_�s_Lrt c;' ll..'��,:G.t�bi7 � .r ! iY��dt' �'lF-?�. 1P.rT•I.i 3,r! {1 li�c���'��till {�! -.;y,�tk�E J�!yt5,t r. A,y
Ron Espalin,PE � �
Professional Engineer,CA#26187 Responsible Engineer
CABO Building Official No.560 Building Official
37 years experience
Patrick Johnson,PE Professional Engineer,CA#67960 i }
Professional Engineer,Arizona#50435 j ?
Professional Engineer,Colorado#43704 I -�
Structural Plan Review
ICC Plans Examiner f
io
ICC Building Inspector
120 years experience ICC Building Official U.
Ricardo Guzman,PE, i C
E
SE Structural Engineer,CA#1833 ! E
Civil Engineer,CA#21238 Structural Plan Review
34 years experience
--- ---... -- - - - - - - -- --
Saeed Amirazlzi,PE, California Licensed Structural Engineer,53499
SE,CBO California Licensed Civil Engineer,C43751
ICC Building Official 3
ICC Plans Examiner Plan Review E
C:� I (n
ICC Accessibility Inspector C i
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
30 years experience ICC Residential Building Inspector I j o
Arne Lovnaseth,
CL
Architect Licensed Architect
ICC Plans Examiner Plan Review
26 years experience I 3
_...._......._........ _.._.. .._.._.__ .._i ] w
-- -- - ] >
Anne Schneider,PE 0)
Professional Engineer,CA#46183 iI i
ICC Plans Examiner ! Plan Review
26 years experience ;
ICC Building Inspector n-
40
Dana Reed,CASp CASP Certified#287 M
ICC Plans Examiner j
ICC Building Inspector Plan Review/CASp i Q
ICC Combination Inspector Inspection/OSHPD III va
ICC Electrical Inspector a
30 years experience ICC Plumbing Inspector j 0
ICC Mechanical Inspector C-
--- - --
Z
Rich Shields,COO ICC Certified Building Official o
ICC Certified Building Inspector 1 J
ICC Certified Plumbing Inspector h Building Inspection
! ICC Certified Mechanical Inspector Supervisor
' � c
ICC Certified Electrical Inspector d
25 years experience IAPMO#032681 ! E
- - -- -- - - --.... — - - --- -... --------- v
a
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN RFP F
Engineering "Pj Packet Pg. 60
CITY OF
SAN ERNARDINO
Rick Kastner ICC Certified Building Inspector
ICC Certified Plumbing Inspector Building Inspection 5
13 years experience ICC Certified Mechanical Inspector °0
David Cook - --- -__. . --_--.•-_ C
ICC Certified Building Inspector Building Inspection
13 years experience. --
-
OSHPD Class A-20182 vl a)
i Leonard Patzer ICC Commercial Electrical Inspector I
ICC Certified Building Inspector a4-+i
ICBO Certified Special Inspector(Structural i
Steel and Welding and Reinforced Concrete) Building Inspection
American Welding Society -i
Certified Welding Inspector
American Concrete Institute j ca
26 years experience Concrete Field Testing Technician
g--- ' LL
ICC Certified Building Inspector
Kenny Hambrick I c
ICC Certified Plumbing Inspector d
ICC Certified Mechanical Inspector ; Building Inspection s E
20 years experience
ICC Certified Electrical Inspector j
ICC Certified Plans Examiner j
DuWayne Olson ICC Certified Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Certified Residential Building Inspector
Building Inspection
ICC Certified Electrical Inspector j
28 years experience ACI-Field Testing Technician Grade 1 E
srcq
t.',:� s�� ?� K tyVT {fTi`,l Y pA� ",�.
UQ w's ,
tfy � i \ � � �K
Vain.4 1✓15� a�a
Will ya 3 . W �r
�
I Ray Wellington,PE
j o
I
Professional Engineer,CA#25131 Engineering Plan Check �
Project Manager CL
41 years experience
Dave Knell,PLS
Professional Land Surveyor, CA#5301 Map Checking
Project Manager
41 years experience - - -
Susy Barrientos
BS,Civil Engineering,California State i F"
Polytechnic University Map Checking
13
ears experience M
_...y._._. . _ i
Ray Manger,PLS Professional Land Surveyor,CA#5154
Supervising Transportation Surveyor,Caltrans Land Surveyor
33 years experience #3032 0
-- - --- ----
Johnny Ghazal,PE, - - -- -- O
QSD Professional Engineer,CA#76395 i Engineering Plan Check j a.
Z
13 -ears experience-
. Q
Y
Ken Krieger
Engineering Plan Check
28 years experience j c
E
.s
Q
- , City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN
k
Engineering I Packet Pg. 61
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
Chris Kelley,EIT BS,Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic `a
State University,Pomona i m
Engineering Plan Check k
8 years experience Engineer-in-Training,California No.138557
Vanessa Munoz
Traffic Engineer,CA#2341 i >
Professional Engineer,CA#67583 i
Traffic Plan Review
15 years experience
r Bob Burch 4-
Traffic Plan Review
22 years experience ! J
---- - - __
I Reggie Greene C
BS,Civil Engineering,California Polytechnic ; Traffic Plan Review
15 years experience ; State University,Pomona LL
Jeff Lau,EIT BS,Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic j
State University,Pomona E
Traffic Plan Review
10 years experience Engineer-in-Training,California No.121060
HAI'
; Chris Bata,RCI, � S°
Registered Construction Inspector,Division IV, 3
CESSWI E Public Works,California No.4161 o
Registered Construction Inspector, Division 1, Public Works Inspection N
`"'✓ Engineering,California No.5161 Project Manager
Certified Erosion,Sediment and Storm Water i o
Inspector, 2957 i
28 years experience Q
- - --
Jason Brown,RCI
Construction Inspector,California No.5510 Public Works Inspection I °�
a�
21 years experience
Larry Brown,RCI Construction Inspector,California No.5181 0.
AQMD PM-10
Concrete Paving,Slurry Seal and Traffic Signals l E M
Public Works Certification California State I Public Works Inspection M
University,Los Angeles
Macco Trench Shoring
28 years_experience Toxler Nuclear Soils Testing Equipment I _} a
Scott Gibson,CESSWI Sediment and Erosion Control Certified _ i O
Inspector,No.01063 ( ! a
ACI Concrete Technician Public Works Inspection Q
Journeyman Electrician I
Trenching and Excavation Competent Person —�
J
21 years experience Confined Space Competent Person
Danny Ayala Contractor,California No.C10
Certificate of Completion in Fiber Optic Theory, i m
AQMD 1 Public Works Inspection ' E
35 years experience Professional Development,Asphalt Institute
a
City of San Bernardino
WI LLDAN I RFP -_
'f , Engineering Packet Pg.62
CITY of
SAN BERNARDIN
REFERENCES
m
Mr. Marcus Fuller Mr.John Dutrey m
Public Works Director,City Engineer Project Manager,Development Services
335 W. Rialto Avenue 150 S. Palm Avenue
Rialto, CA 92376 Rialto, CA 92376 w
909.421.7279 909.820.8014 in
a�
J
i C
lC
Mr.Joseph Hughes
City Manager
27215 Baseline
Highland, CA 92346 E
909.864.2136
ca
c
d
Mr. Konrad Bolowich 3
E
Community Development Director o
25541 Barton Road Cn
Loma Linda,CA 92354 c
0
909.799.2810
m
a
N
Mr. Gil Estrada Mr. Ricardo Sandoval 3
Building Official City Engineer >
8353 Sierra Avenue 8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana,CA 92335 Fontana, CA 92335 c
909.864.7640 909.864.7613 °-
LO
Cl)11 10
Sol
M
J
Ms. Sandra Molina N
Community Development Director 0
22795 Barton Road 0
Grand Terrace,CA 92313 a
909.430.2218 Z
a
0
J_
w
C
Ci
E
t
U
r
Q
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN f RFP
,� tE Engineering Packet Pg. 63
lv S.C.c
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDIN4
FEE SCHEDULE
m
Percent of fee based services and hourly,time and material services are delineated in the Price Form
attached herein.
3
m
o!
!
M
(n
0
4-
J
1 �
cc
L
ii
c
v
E
a)
�s
e
a�
Ca
3
E
L
0
cis
0
U
0
N
G
d
d
C
R
a.
LO
M
d'
M
J
a
0
a
0
w
a
z
a
0
J
>J
C
d
E
V
.i�
a
r =z City of San Bernardino
.i ' WILLDAN I RFP
v,'� Engineering
Packet Pg. 64
i,
5 C.c
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
PRICE FORM
m
REQUEST FOR QUOTES: RI=P F-14-41
DESCRIPTION OF RFP: Plan Review Services
PRINT
NAME OF AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE Ronald L. Espalin, PE
d
Provide pricing that is a Firm Fixed Fee LL
E
The undersigned Contractor hereby offers to provide Plan Review Services in strict
compliance with the specifications, terms and conditions set forth in this Request for
Proposal.
General Information w
3
A. Company Name: Willd E an Engineering o
rn
B. Company Address: 650 Hospitality Lane,Suite 250,San Bernardino, CA 92408 C
C. Number of Employees: 291 C.
N
C
D. Average annual business volume over last three calendar years
$ 34,364,333 >
m
E. Number of years providing Plan Review Services at this location? 28
a
F. Please provide a minimum of three references: Company name, address, M
contact person and telephone number for which your company has current
contracts or provided Plan Review Services within the last three years. a
City of Highland City of Grand Terrace City of Riplto 0
Mr.Joseph Hughes Ms. Sandra Molina Mr. Marcus Fuller O a.
W
City Manager Community Dev. Director PW Director/City Engineer a
27215 Baseline 2795 Barton Road 335 W. Rialto Ave. a
Highland,CA 92346 Grand Terrace,CA 92313 Rialto, CA 92376
909.864.2136 909.430.2218 909.421.7279
City of Loma Linda City of Fontana
Mr. Konrad Bolowich Mr. Ricardo Sandoval
Community Dev. Director City Engineer
25541 Barton Road 8353 Sierra Avenue Q
Loma Linda, CA 92354 Fontana, CA 92335
909.799.2810 909.350.7613
Packet Pg.65
5.C.c
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
PRICE FORM (continued)
m
G. Primary contact person for the City of San Bernardino:
Name: Ronald Esaalin, PE Telephone No. 909.386.0204 3
H. Business Organization Type. Indicate whether your firm is an individual
proprietorship, partnership, corporation, etc.
1. If incorporated, provide the following information:
Date of incorporation: 1964 State of incorporation: CA
d
Names and titles of all officers and directors:
Thomas Brisbin, Chairman of the Board
d
Daniel Chow, President rn
Stacey McLaughlin, CFO f°
L
Q�
2. If an individual, partnership, provide the following information: 3
E
Formation date of company: 0,
Names and addresses of all partners. Indicate whether they are general or o
limited partner: a
N
C
3
AD
m
c
CL
I. Indicate whether your firm has ever failed to complete any contract awarded to it. M
N/A �*
M
If so, note when, where and why (enter here or attach narrative.)
a
m
0
a
J. Indicate whether your firm has been or is the subject of a bankruptcy or 0
insolvency proceeding or is subject to assignment for the benefit of creditors. z
N/A a
0
J
J
C
d
E
s
a
26
`Packet;Pg.66
I
Plan Review Sory o'e3
PRICE FORM(continued)
ANNUAL PURCHASE_ORDER m
C
Effective on or about September 1, 2014, one three (3) year purchase order will .be lssued, 'at-
the City's discretion for City's requirements, on an as-needed basis, with no guarant06d .;
rriinlmurn usage for Plan Review Services.
TWO one year options to renew are possible. Option years shall become effective only upon,
isouance by the City of a duly authorized Purchase Order: n
J
Please provide detailed cost information in the spaces provided below, and. any other
incidental or additional costs required to complete the requirements of the proposal
LL
L
Description —..�.
1. Percentage of:Building Plan Review.Fee: 6504 of fee
2 P±Or,centage of Land Development Plan Review Fee:. $ Hou'rl r
(Grading, Soils, Traffic) o . r
2a Map Checking/improvement Plans $ 8n/o of fee
3. Percentage of Plan Review Fee_Structural Only: $ OU of fee E
4, Fla.urly Hate--Land.Davelvpment Plan Review (no schedules please); $ 118:(10
(Grading., Soils, Trafflt*nd Map checking/Improvement Plans Q
U
d
$, Hourly Rate—Building Plan Review4i disciplines(no schedules): $ _1.x8.00 C
& Hourly Rate—Certified Accessibility Specialist program Services: $ 1,x.8-.00
d
S.. ether Optional Services please specify: Bylldift.Inspection. $ 75 p0
C
7. HbUrly Charge f+or NpoES;Program A ministration and inspection: $__L7,0,0
a
M
8. Hourly casts for Building.Official WOOS: $ ;oo M
J
9. Other-please spi o'o"..: Publ1g Work ki0rl $ 97100 uQi
0
a
1.0; Percentage surcharge for expedited plan review: X25 0
(Building and-Land oevelopment) a
Z
14, Hourly Rate--Fire Department Plan RevidW: $A1$0.0
0
12..Hourly Rate :an' a D
E
a
2
Packet Pg. 67
RFP F-
14-41
Plan Review Services
Are there any other additional or incidental costs that will be required by your firm in order to
meet the requirements of the Technical Specifications? Yes / No circle one). If u
� N ( ) Y� �
answered "Yes", please provide details of said additional costs:
m
c
3
Please indicate any elements of the Technical Specifications that cannot be met by your firm:
r
M
a�
Have you included in your bid all informational items and forms as requested? es 1 No
(circle one). If you answered "no" please explain:
d
L
U_
W
E
This offer shall remain firm for 120 days from RFP close date. The terms and conditions as
set forth in the RFP shall apply to this bid.
L
In signing this bid, Bidder warrants that all certifications and documents requested
herein are attached and properly completed and signed.
O
From time to time the City may issue one or more addenda to this RFP. Below, please �
indicate all addenda to this RFP received by your firm, and the date said addenda o
was/were received.
d
a
Addenda No.: 1 Received on: July 15, 2014 =
Addenda No.: Received on:
Addenda No.: Received on:
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:
a
PRINT SIGNER'S NAME AND TITLE: Ronald L. Espalin, PE M
M
Director of Building and Safety a
DATE SIGNED: July 21, 2014 0
COMPANY NAME AND ADDRESS: Willdan Engineering a
z
a
650 Hospitality Lane,Suite 250 0
San Bernardino, CA 92408
d
E
PHONE: 909.386.0200 FAX: 909.888.5107
c
a
28
Packet Pg.68
GIB(of
SAN BERNARDINO
S
APPENDIX
This section includes the following: 00
zs
_
Resumes 3
Z Instructions to Bidders—Checklist
�D Technical Specifications Form
Z Non-Collusion Affidavit
a�
:D Listing of Proposed Subcontractor
m
J
a�
c
E
m
rn
_
CU
a�
3
E
L
0
in
c
0
U
N
Q
N
c
3
v
m
a:
c
a
Cl)
M
J
a
O
A
O
Q_
z
a
O
J
J
c
d
E
U
a
City of San Bernardino
r WILLDAN RFP 1
Engineering Packet Pg. 69
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
RONALD ESPALIN, PE, CBO -
Director of Building and Safety m
yy�5
Mr.Espalin is Director of Building and Safety for Willdan Engineering. He has
`K` IJ _ ' aERf� ? �� extensive experience in managing engineering and technical staff and has served as
5rry4 r ` i y� � s l li g li >
the responsible engineer and building official for plan check and inspection services �
for numerous cities,counties and other municipal organizations. Mr. Espalin has
el i�` rl w
f �t� v� r��=df�� 7n�}Y��, served as Interim Building Official for local cities in San Bernardino and Riverside
r sif' i � t &� i¢ i Counties.
Prior to joining Willdan, Mr.Espalin was the Assistant Director of Building and Safety J
for the City of Riverside. He was responsible for the day
-to-day operations of the =
t,z;lnF�a, .��A. <i Y p - Y p �
�ae � o department and was responsible for 130 employees. d
£ 410 rFrf4tdl,,, In the private sector, Mr. Espalin was a structural design engineer. Mr. Espalin
maintains a lifetime teaching credential in Engineering with the California Community m
College system.
u r� i w t tf~ ctJ e c ri'y�E, Relevant Project Experience =
r ° afx`ti �� '' ■ City of San Bernardino—Responsible Engineer. From 1986 to the present Mr.
1 ,}F [ L
t;`�h,, � Espalin has served the City in the capacity of Responsible Engineer for plan review
4 'lJiJiP �rl�40j t` ca
services for Building and Safety,Engineering and Development Review. Mr. 3
f .�f, Espalin is responsible for overseeing Willdan staff assigned to serve the City. in o
,' �Bk�rfrr UftlfYhe r;
,, i addition,Mr. Espalin performed structural inspections of City Hall and the City u�
mwi s: fi fa -e r rfd f�g it
'm,Ifuc Parking Structure following the Big Bear/Landers earthquakes. o
f ,� '' cY'+' f 7 ' ■ Sacramento County v
Ga f atnlaft g; fLJJ6r]B. ty—Consulting Services. Assisted the Community Development
t �} Department with in-depth recruitment and evaluation of Building Official and N
+sfi'lS��licer. n�� e ?J
ti
�a fA;xJ� ins r� ar<r; Principal Building Inspection candidates. Reviewed and evaluated some of the BPI
procedures and the responsibilities of supervisory staff,as well as provided
i J�fi5 t VL recommendations for improved customer service and cost savings. >
Morongo Band of Mission Indians—Responsible Engineer. Responsible for the =
1
0.
rt # ,7, plan check and inspection of Tribal projects including,but not limited to,a 27
story high-rise hotel,parking structure and casino,street improvements,
t ;t 0'' infrastructure and other Tribal improvements. v
r
t °1z [ t; ■ City of Banning—Interim Building Official. Oversees Building and Safety Q
operations including plan review, inspection,counter service, permit issuance, cn
resolving minor and complex engineering and code problems. a.
O
■ California Energy Commission-Delegate Chief Building Official. Provided a
oversight for the plan review and inspection prior to and during construction of Q
various Peaker Plant Energy Facilities. o
J
City of Highland—Served the newly incorporated City of Highland as their Interim J
Building Official. Established the City's Building and Safety operation,coordinated
the transition with the City of San Bernardino,developed Building and Safety a
ordinances for the City and oversaw the day to day Building and Safety s
operations.
w
a
City of San Bernardino
? WIN-5 WI LLDAN 1 RFp
Engineering Packet Pg. 70
C.II Y OF
SAN BERNARDINO
PATRICK JOHNSON, PE, CRO
Plan Check Engineer m
`m r� yt �tq� fa'r�t! fG
`� h ` Mr.Patrick Johnson,a registered Civil Engineer in California,Arizona, Nevada, and
-US
Colorado is a Plan Check Engineer for the Building and Safety Division. Patrick has
�_Y l more than 18 years of experience in the construction and engineering field. He has
1%
P 1
more than six years plan check experience with Willdan,and is responsible for r
d
structural plan review. W
s'J Mr.Johnson's primary focus has been on structural engineering of lightweight
commercial,industrial,and residential structures. Since employed with Willdan,he °a
has attended a number of code enforcement and seismic application seminars and
has received his Master of Engineering degree, specializing in Structures,from �-
Ftf , �u�tn�� perJ� California State Polytechnic University. His extensive experience includes plan w
checking numerous projects that vary in size and complexity.
�7 rlr
Wt s ,aia
� s sj Mr.Johnson's previous engineering experience includes the position of a Design
GrlJot��tfla>'�' �r3,1� !<
� d Engineer with KLP Consulting Engineers of Centennial, Colorado. In this capacity, he
specialized in the design of lightweight commercial,multi and single-family housing. L
+ `lV'rYA Ct �l 2� er' °j
, �j t� At times he would be called out to the field as a forensic engineer to justify the ra
probable cause of structural damages caused by expansive soils. Mr.Johnson also has E
TY, ur'kb
engineering experience in the design of variety of transportation projects including o
1 f�t�tty, ` 74;
single and multi-span bridges, pedestrian tunnels, retaining walls,and concrete box N
culverts. o
Uther than residential and commercial timber framed structures, Mr.Johnson has
CL
�
ufjs1 °f �x`i Ian checked several tilt u warehouse buildings that range in size u to 2.3 million
p p g p
square feet. He has also plan checked numerous structures consisting of braced and
c?�lur � 3�a "rrn r� 5
r` T �x ,� ��` moment frames for lateral resistance,prestressed concrete structures,and multi-
r ,3o,r, N52Mff p
story buildings up to 6 stories in height.
d
Relevant Project Experience
M
T�ikFjfi�bitCtr�f: ^` PLAN CHECK Cl)
�±'7d fc�ilT�rg3�fl�ltrl3 { Morongo Band of Mission Indians-Administration Building J
t : i� Sf Il> P dAI Ii, ■
i i `j Uji v ■ March Joint Powers Authority- Fresh and Easy Food Processing Facility cn
�X t RC 61 x California State University,San Bernardino-Education Building a.
s
;Yt �^ ;�r s�'� ■ City of Moreno Valley-Skechers Warehouse
Bar
}{ `��«' , '�t����`�+�;; ::? ■ City of Fontana-Kaiser Administration Building Z
'� t� 4 =t' a` Y,t Y ■ City of Riverside-Amazon Warehouse q
J_
C
d
E
s
Q
City of San Bernardino
WMW I LLDAN I HFP F-14-41
AEngineering Packet Pg. 71
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINQ
RICARDO GUZMAN, SE
Structural Plan Review m
0.
{rdiii1(1e Mr. Ricardo Guzman brings diverse industry strengths and experience in international
V" business development and California state government oversight of public school and
d
hospital designs to his employment with Willdan.As a skilled structural engineer, �
y r Ricardo has performed structural design of various commercial and agricultural light-
Rim,�, gauge steel structures and their foundations in California;and offshore platforms, �
Cn
sobAggAt major port facilities,ore processing plants,and one major hotel in Mexico. His
expertise includes management and supervision;plan review;forensic structural J
ssr k z y r h � ,„ engineering;and performing earthquake engineering studies and seismic risk studies. a
p p g
4,
chemical gyf j Ricardo's structural expertise encompasses a wide range of industrial services:
chemical plants,mining industry plants,spillways,several water supply projects, U_
nuclear power plants,and oil industry facilities.
Relevant Project Experience m
3 t ! i
a+, ', j' `� Plan checked many major California State University(CSU)buildings, including:
t a t r.
Up r o s y z ■ The new Library for the CSU at Monterey Say—a five-story concrete building
T ,Ff �rts{is fi with a modernistic complex structure. 3
The three-story buckling restrained steel frame building for the Hornet E
lli L
,l, Bookstore and CSU Foundation at CSU Sacramento. o
r€ sA%�StlrfFt3cr+ �rs} ; ■ The new Parking Garage for the CSU at Sacramento—a six-story post- N
'itssoraisa�aC, dn�r�4;^; c
tensioned concrete building that involved 3-D linear and 2-D push-over _o
}x�y �st7ne dynamic analyses.
hig � - ■ Tke Canyon Village at CalPoly San Luis Obispo--a$230,000.00 project with y
t-Irt t
nine housing buildings and two post-tensioned parking structures.
C
i ;$ u(nttcp R{r�tereYRCa, 3
37Itf,+ltN ' C�+ff�-P'
#tray rE` y4�sz RY f
Plan checked many major commercial buildings in Northern California,including: >
The new Wheatland Wal-Mart store. �
�rr, x �jdh >' Roseville Galleria Mall additions,alterations and two post-tensioned parking �+
<„ + •.'t,� K,' `k�v+a„.fr; structures. o.
The new two-story Tracy City Hall. M
The new two-story Auburn Justice Center.
Plan checked five major hospital buildings and many school buildings,including: o
UCSD Hospital—A 12-story(170'high)elevator tower with an eight-story corridor o.
bridging structure and an approximately 25,000 sq.ft.three-story addition.The W
addition required dynamic analysis considerations due to the way it is attached to the a
existing building. o
J
J_
r..
C
d
E
V
w
Q
City of San Bernardino
WI LLDAN RFF'F-14-4
Engineering Packet Pg. 72
5. .c
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
SAEED AMIRAZIZI, SE, PE, CBO -
Supervising Plan Check Engineer m
Mr.Saeed R Amirazizi is a California licensed structural engineer with over 30 years
-tji% `-, of structural engineering experience in structural design,seismic analysis, retrofit and
5�a �, �� ;' <F plan checking of hospitals and schools,commercial, industrial and public facilities. He W
s
is also experienced in the design of various multi-story structures shopping centers,a
parking structures,and residential units. He has organized,scheduled, and supervised
W
staff of engineers, draftsmen, and technicians. Mr.Amirazizi has performed finite �
f', 1fffSrcr$fP�f; element analysis on many structures of all types and is completely familiar with
fi i,tz,a� F a,+ g :'trjz s� ETABS, SAP 2000, RISA2D,and RISA 3D computer programs. a
l
Fq� + � ,r ;: Mr.Amirazizi has been grading California Structure License Exams in the past and has
3 ?Sis�s ��"� ��> i been a art-time instructor teaching a course in masonry design at Continuing
}aifZ Tsar Professional Engineering d
Education (CPEE)in Irvine. m
* ; Sb V y
� ,� � trx Mr.Amirazizi has investigated damage to building and equipment after several major cC
7 SY r $!;, s� rrA 4 G
r k 'rrrr � � earthquakes,including Loma Prieta, Landers, Northridge,and Kobe.
Ma v
t - S 3
Mr.Amirazizi is available to provide complete plan review services for our California E
r�sW9 Y' i �?�y! clients. a
;>
Cn
r r� o ,�,rz4r�fte��
>zs�fig;4�fCstty,�rtc1)�it� Relevant Project experience o
e�bIFI�L',�L�l�,( �ifSL } V
Plan Check Experience: H
Mr.Amirazizi performed structural plan review of schools and community colleges for
� I the Division of the State Architect(DSA).
xt
Mr. Amirazizi has previously performed structural plan review services for the Power
s`at�,`Zs'1 and Utility(P&U)division of Bureau Veritas in the Costa Mesa office.
MIA Cn
f ' d �'t�t4ia4e � �y Mr.Amirazizi has also performed in-house structural plan review of commercial, M
industrial and residential buildings for the City of Palm Desert. J
Q
O
! i 3 u F i r�Yj'�r,fir Fl�Ea�y'ryy�NyySt,,t'iii 0.
}• , ! x 2 Z
Q
O
J
SJ_
C
d
E
t
V
.i+
a
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN RFC' _
WOW Engineering Packet Pg. 73
1 5.
CITY OF
BAN BERNARDINO
DANA REED, CASp
Senior Plans Examiner/Deputy Building Official m
ii4+Y� hth <x i Mr.Dana Reed is a Senior Plans Examiner/Deputy Building Official for Engineering. He 3
�#�rui.�f rt tlonis
has more than 30 years of plan review,'inspection and construction experience. His
%
>
d1
l extensive experience includes plan review of numerous projects in compliance with
the California Building, Plumbing,Mechanical,Electrical,and Fire Codes. Also review Y
uvii
of projects under ADA Title 11,OSHPD,and Titles 19&25.
(n
`iti./ ♦ S�f.{>.pZ.�ari b, t{' t ,Ay� 3'� i'ydyy5.E5
Relevant Project Experience "=
ADA TITLE II COMPLIANCE -a
City of Grand Terrace c
�f,<!r 'r�iatx '�N�r�lds7'ot"; ■
City
of La Canada Flintrid a
Sa P{ rriLyrg� d tNii� �i1F C l
, �$` " Quality Inn Hotels
Stater Bros.Markets a
l f f x tS1 r trek C :i PLAN CHECK
3
' rrTcc � � lfs�f° Barona Casino
, 'Xr 5 it! lr7
> F Hampton Inn cc�
,Y �t�?? yi� tE ■ Wal-Mart
rt ' r' e`�°` % P#�/fie 3 ■ Moron g o High Rise Hotel and Casino a
g
California State University Student Housing
1 itv�t�ltL(�rjC t 'Kb �E✓t
' ' ' ■ Wai reens Distribution Center `o
ic� 't1� rf� iRS! g .-
w>r';<< PLAN CHECK-OSPD III
Kaiser Support Building,49,650 SF o
t°�3 r#7`arttr �s t ■ Surgical Center,6500 SF
Medical Clinic, 12,000 SF �-
as !}r �, rf�� '�ffd'P1 r PLAN CHECK(Fire Review)
rf#�'�j 2 z,4 -?Zs �r'o., rdo ■ Morongo Casino( alarm system ) 3
rXrix�c= ljrG#f�lc�fftt3b , >
un, � s Buena Vista Casino
°etc}csrrtr�(°lirt �ign;st ` " Lowes
p�...... ■ Hampton Inn
�.f.f�S��iS tot rant �t ky ZJt d
Wal-Mart
Ln
V .► a,�, °>k�1�ft ,l"ll� � ■ San Manuel Village
Ll
7?y,'jS1 m {fY! F3,0)Ysecis�.= INSPECTION
New 100,000 square foot Mercedes-Benz dealership Q
■ New 115,000 square foot K-Mart store p
■ New 5,000 square foot California Pizza Kitchen p
a
Prior to joining Willdan, Mr. Reed's extensive experience includes plan checking and Z
inspecting industrial and commercial buildings and reviewing plans for compliance J
with the applicable codes,state and local requirements. Mr. Reed served the City of J
Riverside as a plans examiner for the Building Department and as a building inspector
for the Cities of Mission Viejo and Laguna Niguel. In this capacity, he reviewed plans
for compliance with City and City ordinances,State requirements and codes;he E
assisted with permit issuance at the public counter,
r
a
W I LLDAN City of San Bernardino
Engineering RFF� - -
Packet Pg. 74
S.C.c
CI'T'Y 0r
SAN BERNARDINO
ARNE LOVNASETH, ARCHITECT
Plan Check Architect m
Mr.Arne Lovnaseth,a registered Architect in California, is a Plan Check Architect for
Willdan's Building and Safety Division. He has 26 years experience in the construction 2
field specializing in design work and plans examining. As a 1983 and 2001 graduate of (D
lzi , ' � yuc Cal Poly Pomona his primary focus has been on architectural design of lightweight
commercial and residential structures. He has attended a number of code
enforcement seminars and currently is compiling a NCARB record for certification N
JT
nationwide. He has extensive experience in ADA compliance.
q :i During his tenure with Willdan, Mr. Lovnaseth has provided Counter Plan Review a
services to the City of Redlands, City of Colton,and the March Joint Powers °1
Authority, a redevelopment agency located at March Air Force Base. "-
,Lic, Sj
Relevant Project Experience E
m
' '{�9 f'Cl,,r,+✓ C,&r f+�jPrSti4*'fl :1
CD
� rd ■ March JPA-Sysco,500,000 sq.ft.food processing facility.
;,'i `,s rtriti, '; ,' " ■ March JPA-Fresh &Easy Processing facilities 800,000 sq.ft.complex.
ar ty City of Banning- Multi-building Office and Industrial Complex
S E 1
J' t " , '- City of Loma Linda -Assisted Care Facility,20,000 sq.ft E
i09 ..
L
t` v i t }: City of Loma Linda-Church addition,30,000 sq.ft. N
26"rYe�r ''
t; ' ,� s �i�a ■ City Moreno Valley-Chili's Restaurant, 10,000 sq.ft. o
City of Moreno Valley-New LA Fitness 42 000 sq.ft.
v. .a,,� ■ +.
I tJ�1.}lYn j.41.G�'1�. rilj.tft3T ■ ir-
i.;�. City of Colton-Warehouse,500,000 sq.ft. N
c
■ Morongo Band of Mission Indians-Administrative Complex,50,000+sq.ft.
3
d
Other projects include single and multi-family homes, industrial buildings,commercial
warehouses, restaurants, fitness centers,motels,medical facilities and numerous
tenant improvements, f°
CL
Mr. Lovnaseth's previous architectural and plan checking experience includes the M
v
position of Senior Plans Examiner for a large Inland Empire City for more than five v
years. In this capacity, he specialized in the plan checking of lightweight commercial, Q
multi and single-family housing. He supervised a staff of 5 plans examiners and permit
technicians, issuing over 3,000 building permits a year. a.
o!
a.
Prior experience includes project manager at John McInnes Architect in Laguna Beach Z
for five years and job captain at Sumich Design in San Juan Capistrano for eight years. Q
0
J
J_>
C
E
V
r
Q
,a City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN
R
Engineering FP F-14-41
Packet'Pg.75
CITY OF .
SAN BERNARDINQ
ANNE SCHNEIDER, PE °
Plan Check Engineer 'a
----------_..._. __--------._-.___.._----------------._.._.._... ._.____...__.-
C
#q l k 4tC C ` f r ,I
r ,_<4r s�, , rt� io�n`� Ms.Anne Schneider, a registered Civil Engineer in California, is a Supervising Plan 3
N" kyFtt ; Check Engineer for Willdan s Building and Safety Division. She has over 26 years
professional experience in building and safety enforcement of model codes, State and
IM �fS local building regulations. Her plan review experience includes commercial and
� , ,< industrial facilities,and single-and multi-family residential developments,with an
ti✓ {�• YSr' (/�
I aYW� F .�1f1�{x I
g�sFatio�s5, expertise in structural and life safety review of plans. Ms.Schneider has worked on
y o �V` 8
k assi g nment for Willdan in the off ices of San Die g o City, City of Indio,City
of Perris,and
.t
Riverside City Building Departments providing interim Building Official and plan check
r r} ��%�`cl�tiuftdt services. She provided plan check service to Riverside City for the Whitewater Wind �
t � 'h� °'" Energy Field in the San Gorgonio Pass region of the City. `-
£�">• kt��s�ec'fbr, gY g g 11
„ k Ms.Schneider has also served as City Engineer for the City of Big Bear Lake, City
Engineer for the City of Calimesa. As Building Official for the City of Moreno Valley,
3,
c ; Anne oversaw the Building Department as well as Code Enforcement services.
rt�at FIltn tr;�cr
Prior to joining Willdan, Ms.Schneider held the position of Tribal Engineer for the d
Cabazon Band of Mission Indians in Indio,California. In this capacity she supervised 1°
t,,, S f�{'17�1!ICr71T l��f�l jlC�yv107�('S '•
yt �'ys `J� �ociQh construction and design work for the Reservation and was primarily responsible for a
$3 million Federal Highway Administration road construction project. °
Her past experience includes the responsibility of Plan Check Engineer for several
o
1,,1 t V
drs � jurisdictions in California where she evaluated commercial and residential plans for d
a
code compliance and coordinated City response to applications for construction N
permits.
3
m
d
c
n.
M
M
J
d
Cn
O
a-
0
a
z
d
0
J
J_
C
U
E
U
fC
d
W I LLDAN City of San Bernardino
RFA
Engineering `
Packet fig. 76
5.G.c
1
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
CD
RICHARD SHIELDS, 0130 m
Principal Project Manager/Supervisor- Building Inspection
Mr.Shields serves as Principal Project Manager for W#Ildan Engineering serving the •�
i u �i 'n=f51s xr3 i
1 1r1 G1
r .�, r� Ftt � , �j Southern California area. In this capacity,Mr. Shields serves as Building Official for
�'01. � J j numerous cities and municipalities including March JPA,City of Canyon Lake, City of
' s2 Grand Terrace,City of Loma Linda,City of Calimesa,and City of Banning. His duties
3 a Y g
r��xr° rtista
" ''trc ' rtiFit3;ri also include the placement of experienced inspectors to fill inspection needs in cities
R I
` tad ! and agencies, providing complex inspections on residential commercial and industrial "=
�} lGrtlfl projects,coordination of conditions of approvals for city projects,and managing
project contracts.
W, Y 4r��=r7l�t�`r.S �1
AMSM ' Mr.Shields has extensive experience in managing technical staff including building
..
�GC� ®�'tjterll e li—.4 i P g g g g =
Stf{ , inspector,code enforcement officers and permit counter technicians. He has more
11#ta3g'trtz ��"ICrI than 25 years of Building and Safety experience including Building Official services,
building inspection,code compliance and overseeing permit counter services. _
r il?f=,x , innn , t
Prior to joining Willdan, Richard served as Director of Community Development and
Building Official for the City of Grand Terrace. During his tenure with the City, he was
a; u r � �tr �fobs l 3
�,rEriJiictldjc? arr� responsible for reviewing plan submittal packages,ordinance adoption, budget and o
�� ' rdi, trcls i ti nph« ,' policy preparation. He also oversaw and scheduled building inspections and set
r i 4( si a6Cr11 C/irr rr to
t = project conditions of approval,ensuring compliance with California Code regulations
W-.1'64 ttxrf�rh42�e,cg�ivi '! and Municipal Code regulations. His responsibilities included conduction inspections o
ctruprPY��Stct as r? an commercial and residential projects,assisting citizens and the development
community with technical and general questions brought to the Building and Safety v
counter.
rgPeJience 3
ar d d
(31 Z�S/, ,`Ilzy�25fYears�y- Mr.Shields also served as Building Official for the City of Highland. In this capacity,he >
managed the Building and Safety Division and Code Compliance Division.
Responsibilities included supervision of Division staff,building inspections,budget
preparation,ordinance adoption and policy preparation. Further duties included the
•
creation of a high fire zone ordinance in the foothills of the City and providing Cn
information to the California Fire and Forestry Department on fire code compliance
issues. J
a
Cn
O
a
O
W
a
Z
a
0
J
>J_
3
w
C
d
E
V
Q
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN RFP .
Engineering Packet Pg. 77
a
1, 5CC An
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
LEONARD PATZER
Senior Building Inspector
Mr.Leonard Patzer,OSHPD and Building Inspector in our San Bernardino Office has 3
over twenty years of Building and Safety inspection experience. Extensive building
N"'i" inspections include public buildings,commercial and retail construction, medical and
I . educational facilities,single-family dwellings,and multi-family developments. He
>�. fi r
coordinates with plan check staff,other municipal departments and agencies at the co
permit issuance stage and when finalizing permits. Most recently he served as an
,f r4N� �4r�`h`dUr` 1.0.11 for the Casino Morongo Co-Gen Plant,multi level parking structure, high rise J
hotel tower and casino and the San Manuel Casino,central plant, and multi level
sl p" parking structure. f°
����j� � 41
41. 'fw
LL
r 7 3 j t $ £ ,�, Prior to joining Willdan, Mr.Patzer served as Lead Inspector for an engineering firm
(r Ua E rr 7iiWj Ft 000"1, c
,r/;{ Fr f}�f, �� r�� located in Spring Valley,California. In this capacity, he supervised three inspectors
fa and performed welding and high strength bolt inspection in the field and in the shop. a,
Special projects included the Rancho Los Amigos Hospital in Downey,Riverside County c
�
' �?cactrtrl �jaf
� Medical Center,Regional Re
• � .�� ,� � � g White Memorial Medical Center Market Creek Plaza and �
cYr� �iCr&t�atrlsh�`
Courtyard by Marriot Hotel located in San Diego. `m
c r �
Relevant Project Experience E
a tYr§li �Cfft;( O
W
Morongo Band of Mission Indians-Mr. Patzer as Sr. Building Inspector served as an
t r41akl�IfG 't3tf�lel €tCttYF~� C
CfnEt�/ ? stn°f..` I.O.R. on this project. It consisted of a 29 story hotel tower, 5 level parking structure, .°
ti riiflx'+tinn 500,000 square foot casino and a 16 delta mega watt co-gen plant. a
f.. k,r,; w'� ''{:`"..;`� 'M.
�t,�!f' San Manuel Band of Mission Indians-Mr. Patzer as a Sr. Building Inspector served as _
7�i "d; �i
an I.O.R.on this project. It consisted of a Casino,a 7 level parking structure and a y
central plant. d
i y
City of Indian Wells-As a Sr. Inspector Mr. Patzer provided all of the California
Building Codes inspections for this project. The project was a 6 story addition to the a
LO
i Hilton Grand Champions Resort and Conference Center. He was responsible for M
v
ensuring all construction including but not limited to structural,electrical,mechanical y
and plumbing met the California Codes and approved plans. J
a
0
City of Fontana-As a Sr. Inspector Mr. Patzer provided supervision of 3 contract o.
inspectors in the City of Fontana. Inspections were performed under the provisions of a
the California Building Codes. Specifically, Mr. Patzer performed all of the inspections Z
for 3, one million square foot warehouses. Each with a electric service of 1200 AMPS. a
0
J
J
Various Special Inspector Assignments-Mr. Patzer performed the Welding and High
Strength Bolt Inspections for the following projects: Rancho Los Amigos Hospital in
Downey, Riverside County Regional Medical Center,White Memorial Medical Center. d
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN I Engineering RFP x-14-4
W:.,,F Packet Pg.78
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
SLICK KASTIVER
Building Inspector 0°
,tf J 9.J _....-._.-
�ii t Mr.Rick Kastner,Building Inspector in our Building and Safety Division,has more than
a' �
! t C• r r ,pr , ls;
I twelve years of Building and Safety inspection experience.
7A Te e �t
rf ,w'±y lyilwt+t.71�`2.r r �:Jam, 3•„R 1,�/
t i}f�S0± 1r �y�� q� -# Relevant Project Experience >.
v
3. R11 j 3 iZ�r rr p giv n d
i �'� V t��Y, 7 Willdan-Building Inspector Various Cities/Counties-
5 �}�fir= M. f�,, y; Mr.Kastner currently works for Willdan and is assigned as the on-call Building
r' 1ti -Q,R�fiI�ns
i'°pctd+''; Inspector for Sierra County and other jurisdictions as-needed. He conducts J
kf ;i� }z l, c� ircgtto�li<, inspections of all phases of construction including residential and non-residential and =
commercial construction projects, He also performs over-the-counter plan checks and
rrie° dtF +c�! Rlnf ,r assists the public at the permit counter.
Re
�i r t Yu LL
i
1
h Sj 5 (� y=a4E.S7 ! 5V
flf 5 h /
� �tkUi 'ttb`/r' n(�ctta ,a City of Roseville—Building Inspector
tr d�t,ri,r CttM Mr. Kastner retired as a certified building inspector,construction inspector and code
t
e�f� r` 5 enforcement officer with the City of Roseville. He inspected new residential
-MAIM construction remodel work and commercial construction. He also worked in code �
vp",}w l'� I'lr enforcement and enforcement of environmental pollution and storm water
M air � } r .+
ent BMP's through the SWPPP program.em m
2' ?
E
rYs��st �i�l,�fTF�'O�•�`f'FiL��'6r.�
1W/S Lu4°�rti r�i r t ii.y. t i L
'hx , �' r„N ';i 5elf-Employed General Contractor o
y
Y'= s
�r� = Mr. Kastner has worked in the construction industry as a licensed contractor. His
�SS'r� duties included working as the sub-contractor on residential remodels,tenant o
'' �' } w'.!''''w' improvements,T-bar ceiling installations,carpentry, lumbin and electrical work. c
V.
r r F rya�.'r�• �ssi'I
�,.w•.f:i:%rot; '��Fr tv'`3'x,��`,;�ywlSt�+,f;i;s•t^• .:
',r`-i-:°L`"i5,•J� f{�2rTuyKjt�Yy`3c,�.'�F�J�i?(g�'�,..; •>
l >lise {�,,"''x} i'S"',�+ry$xrl-
{(Y'J.:r'r..5.'YMrftt:
'y.''•vw..k'r"�tt,'''til.,:d,7.! i .•'*Y•
LO
M
d'
M
J
a
U)
O
a
O
W
a
z
a
0
J
7J_
3
C
d
E
s
a
�r W1 LLDAN City of San Bernardino
RFW F-I4-4I
Engineering �
�Y:•}
Packet Pg. 79
CIV OF
SAN BERNARDINO
_
DAVID COOK
Building Inspector �
Mr. cv
s . David Cook,an ICC certified Building Inspector,serves as a Building and Housing 3
r,{) �y Inspector for the San Bernardino Office. David currently serves as Building Inspector
t , � '»$``,�la`yr for the Cities of Loma Linda,Grand Terrace and Colton. Mr.Cook has experience in
= ;4 building and safety inspection' housing inspections and code enforcement. His
.SS� j tiI 4E,t SSa l{�}�fS. Yi
, experience includes inspection of multi-story office buildings,commercial �
Cn
`}S #;" � , $`t construction,retail outlets,single-family and multi-family residential developments.
33ace
. atr1 �rout� + Mr.Cook also performs housing inspections and prepares reports for redevelopment
agencies and housing improvement programs.
�er� 1�af�; 9rser` As a Certified Building Inspector, David has been responsible for front counter
�rV4 Ir��x�r+tk �trrtt operations,over the counter plan check,field inspection,and permit coordination y
` `F ��t r with other municipal departments and agencies. His inspection expertise includes E
complete fire-life safety building code enforcement,model codes in plumbing, °
�
mechanical and electrical as well as the California Building Standards,Title 24 Energy
Z W,?V fi�a`} 4# F Standards,Accessibility,and ADA requirements.
i z Y -x 4f
f X,t f,�rz{3ti{�'t ltt7$+�{i1t y� C1
Mr.Cook's housing experience includes housing inspections,receiving and processing 3
t ,+t Y s3y1,eaf complaints, investigating unpermitted construction and sub-standard housing as well E
as preparing reports and performing follow up inspections. °
tq
Prior to joining Willdan,Mr. Cook worked in construction performing multiple phases r
of residential and commercial construction.
N
_
3
m
°
D:
c
ca
o.
LO
M
M
J
Q
N
0
0.
0
W
CL
z
Q
0
J
J
r
_
d
E
AV
U
w
Q
City of San Bernardino
3 W I LLDAN RFP F-14-41
Engineering Packet Pg. 80
5:C.c
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINQ
KENNY HAMBRICK
Building Inspector m
tC }.L✓s tKYfat..ilk�t�tUr��,� i i� �
Mr.Kenneth Hambrick,an ICC certified Building Inspector,serves as a Building
to 3
R � x� itcY '"{l��( ` Inspector for the San Bernardino Office. Kenny currently serves as Building Inspector
t�(3�, k d`ytSr�tYrfr t
for a number of local cities including Calimesa' Highland and Grand Terrace. Mr.
Hambrick has experience in building d safety inspection,code enforcement and T
` r1jH 5f,A"!p.l_i R Spc ljr' S sr ,.c ii an l Y
}F� L �4 , ios r,l plan reviewing responsibilities. His experience includes inspection of multi-story
office buildings,tilt-up commercial construction, retail outlets,single-family and multi-
vr A;' r� family residential developments J
ft '
tsd i/tir Ytitt zr4, s4 +�
As a Certified Building Inspector, Kenny has been responsible for front counter
jt r�� f�cVIP operations,over the counter plan check,field inspection,and permit coordination L
with other municipal departments and agencies. His inspection expertise includes
< t,z r3• s,ts -i d
ct }r , ° a�C�urj�r complete fire-life safety building code enforcement,model codes in plumbing,
R f � S, f mechanical and electrical as well as the California Building Standards,Title 24 Energy E
Standards,Accessibility,and ADA requirements. rn
f0
�it�ttr fd���tr� c'�t Mr.Hambrick's code enforcement experience includes building abatements receiving
� E and processing complaints, investigating unpermitted construction and sub-standard L
{�`x r ,{rrt , Qctr p g p O
,t e
r� = �' �( y housing. He received his 832 training from the California Correctional Academy. a
�1� f �ds Prior to joining Willdan, Mr. Hambrick served as Superintendent for a large home
v <�1�glrfPfer O
Southern California home builder. Cl)
r s i
fit;;''✓��ci�t� v,sr�Y'P�lF{jrx�"�G ,��3 G1
Q
e•-i�sFl�i'i Y3*;s;s�r Y'F`"r�1�4j, .a, ?,}..+ `•'1.7.�'n
?:,3, 1 t?�fPli:�yjthlki•' �'1,r,#teY`+1".�5 �V
0.
i(:'.••„�SFt??i.Yil�V..'N as/j aWrx F:. 'y: Jr�txar..ya ..
f}'.tit
!i.`fi�f LA
;.F.���:iir+.•::n�i:rsx'�1��:'L¢Si. 'r��:.�ir'iS Y�%iS M
M
J
Q
N
0
0-
0
a
z
Q
0
J
J_
C
d
E
t
V
Q
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN RFPF-14-41
Engineering
Packet Pg.81
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
tM
®uWAYNE OLSON
.3
Building inspector m
T SS.iL4filY` - L1 K'�ffTCC} 3t t ?i
Mr.DuWayne Olson,an ICC certified Building Inspector,serves as a Building Inspector
3
r,{,, {drE 'cf� riy�rii '<<< for the San Bernardino Office. Mr.Olson holds certifications from the International
Code Council for Commercial Building Inspection, Residential Building Inspection and
s{, F,i�. �cr16rr� n `1y� Electrical Inspection. DuWayne currently serves as Building Inspector for the Cities of
Loma Linda and Grand Terrace and the County of San Bernardino.
i.S jy r (n
It i li.tr rill 1 "'".iR Qa ,c
! 13f oxft �►13 J 4,r4{�
im NI
rc )t {F1U , � Mr.Olson has more than 28 years of experience in the construction field,including
„tYK ;`f; iutti�r�`grE�ktK '. reading building plans,job layout,supervision of piece workers,and coordination with
:'6? bullding inspectors and general contractors.
C•t aSI'r +SOr f .
p ,2 '•
{#t�iffiOiGjOt1CFC�. C
it1t �rtT��a3FlfS �tl �`dl;�i E
Prior to joining Wilidan,DuWayne owned and operated his own construction
company for more than thirteen years. His familiarity with construction standards is
rah {� invaluable for his field inspection tasks.
rryC z in1GC. Er' V
c+{ z
k� 3�5; 0
y tr c1`, QYr. i U)
ii:ir..•i,:• .�It,f`N�15�4•....i:�s$!,`,�>=v;3{{��;''g'ru N
a N
.df y�;;'r))`r'..S
�!'1*..,''I;.,.;;.•i1•nfi'•:;.'L jSi,�1:%i1"'+.F¢i�7°.tt y i<C*f.i'c+•&;Si''N ]1 hr r.!
_�..
;i..: M„T'NYY :
b.
M
J
Q
N
O
a
O
o:
a
z
Q
0
J
J
0
Q1
E
V
a
City of San Bernardino
W!LLDAN
� liFp F-14-41
Engineering
Packet Pg. 82
CITY OF
AN BERNARDINO
RAY WELLINGTON, PE
Deputy Director Engineering Services/Plan Review m
Er , n xy s{ 4 t rt. WF •c -, --____�._M�_�- _. _ ___..,,�_..___.__.___ _.__ ____--_ _...��.._.__....__ (tS
:Sz rtid3 t
tr ' ?�f'� c�% 4.. Mr.Ray Wellington joined Willdan in 2006 and brought an extensive and diverse 3
,
�;' ��s background to the team. He has served both public and private entities in such roles
�s ,s d
I as designer,inspector,traffic engineer, project manager,construction manager,
f x a� 4 $� W. �
i vet
consulting engineer,city engineer, public works director,general manger,and owner. �
These various roles have involved coordination with boards,councils,commissions, ca
FU
Cn
clients, committees,staffs and stakeholder interest groups,and a variety of
.�r� Q�;x infrastructure planning,funding,design and improvement construction. Within these
Ctc�ere t�:� tlbf(8 'a
roles he has addressed development siting, project economics and funding, _
`iF1e �rarAtli
«� erlsi(s subdivision mapping,facility integration,and construction. Specific projects involving d
3. s{g �pxo4i, infrastructure in business districts have included:rehabilitation or replacement of U_
sewer and water and storm drain pipelines the rehabilitation and widening of streets
s yf,{ _
�crtyr;�Q{¢a�ge�y installation of a soundwall,the design and placement of traffic signals and street
ftrs�,(1'(�1r
<< lighting,under rounding or relocation of overhead utilities,and the installation of
g
irrigation and landscaping. He has guided the planning and engineering of the c
0, �� d�1Qf1S! a to
physical assets upgrades and replacements,while accomplishing a reduction in
� txy� lftj maintenance expenses. He has served as agency liaison to various regional :3
JJ
committees,and developed improved communications with customers,agencies and
� �i,', contractors,and facilitated shareholder involvement in water supply and conservation
-
7r.` issues. N
`At�'Ij Mr.Wellington's specific experience, in conducting improvement plan reviews and °
U
l�4 rtr ' overseeing teams of plan reviewers, ranges from personal hands-on reviews of various d
Y p ublic infrastructure improvements to the sco in g,contracting and managing review
a "CGtrfY � N
teams. He has also been involved in fee studies and permitting processes including 3
a 5 �r�rJ48Y'friwh ,� rtur J certificates of occupancy and bonding releases for land development projects. He has d
also conducted evaluations of site conditions relative to property negotiations for the a�
�?lstfit �ie ��+f ! land owners to prospective developers.
s bLi r ryf
fC
Relevant Project Experience a
o
4 Ft r Plan Review Oversight,County of Orange Public Works,CA. Project Manager. �
Responsible for client coordination and reporting on assigned development review M
projects,and coordination of our internal team members including sub-consultants
';f4,;ltez(c5r�� ¢te� vYt involved in differing projects. Our review assignments on planned communities'
air:totrf���i�
F F'<<✓ , ,� =�1?r� tjt projects involve: initial site planning,tract maps, conformance with adopted general o
'Y and specific plans,conditions of approval, grading plans,geotechnical reports, O
1 hydrology&hydraulic reports,storm drain plans,street plans,reviewing Water a
Quality Management Plans(WQMP)for conformance with the NPDES and MS4 permit Q
conditions,and with Orange County's Drainage Area Management Plan(DAMP).
c�5�ttt Plan Reviews,Cities of Brea,Cerritos,Compton,San Bernardino,and Scotts Valley,
3' CA. Reviewer and/or Consultant to team members. Responsible for component
reviews,consultation on various elements being reviewed by team members,and for
coordination with applicant's engineer when needed.This has involved reviewing of
a
City of San Bernardino
001(w ILLDAN RFP _Engineering Packet Pg. 83
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
water,sewer,storm drains, utility impacts and clearances,street plans,and
grading/drainage routing.
m
Development Conditioning and Inspection Oversight,City of Lake Forest,CA.— c
Manager. Responsible for conducting oversight on development application
conditioning and routine and permit inspection services administration.This was a
part-time service.
New Development facilities Impact Report(Woodglen),City of Modesto,CA.-
a�
Project Manager. Responsible for reviewing and completing the preliminary on and
off site infrastructure impact reports on the vacant 79-acre property that had been
suspended two and a half years earlier. Quantities and costs were revised as were
some of the perimeter requirements and responsibilities during the finalization c
process with the city.
Contract City Engineer,City of Canyon Lake,CA.-Responsible for addressing land u'
use/development proposals and periodic maps; performing development design
reviews and permit approvals;funding procurement for a major CIP project by E
obtaining Certificates of Participation for major roadway improvements,traffic signal,
irrigation and landscaping and adjacent sound walls; managing contracts for design
and construction of public facilities, coordinating consultants;conducting inspections; �.
preparing various contract documents,cost estimates, presentations at public
meetings,final project reports and presentations to homeowners associations and 3
E
local cable television interviews. o
Interim Director of Engineering and Building,City of San Juan Capistrano,CA.- c
Responsible for providing staff augmentation service while the City reorganized some °
operations; participated in various land development reviews;and processing reviews
and reports to the city manager and city council.
Interim City Engineer,City of Fontana,CA.-Responsible for supervising the 3
engineering department activities and personnel,and for performing the >
administrative and technical duties of city engineer. There were substantial land
development improvement projects and CIP projects underway involving document
and plan reviews and permitting approvals,assisted in restructuring the department a.
budget for improved accountability of funds,and reporting to the public works M
director and city council as requested. M
Director of Public Works/City Engineer,City of Chino,CA.-Served the community —�
a
during a period of intense/active land development growth,various standards and Cn
practices were revised, intradepartmental cooperation was improved,the department Q.
was restructured for efficiencies and overall moral improved,development impact o:
fees and water service rates were re-evaluated and increased,department staffing Z
level increased by 50 percent,relations with involved agencies became more o
cooperative,budgets stabilized,and capital improvements/maintenance programs
were better organized and scheduled.
r
c
as
E
s
4
City of San Bernardino
L WI LLDAN RFP F-14-41
1� Engineering
Packet Pg.84
I
CITY or
SAN BERNARDINO
DAVE KNELL, PLS
Principal Project Manager/Map Checking 0°
__...__._.._.__..................
Mr. David Knell has more than 41 years of experience in the surveying and mapping �
field including the preparation and checking of Subdivision Maps, Lot Line >
t Adjustments,Mergers,and Easements. He currently serves as City Surveyor for Big
Bear Lake Calabasas Cudahy Grand Terrace Hawaiian Gardens La Puente Loma r
gq rev({� � r � i � . Q1
{,'ta�xyZ�Sa J" y Linda Los Alamitos Maywood,Paramount Rosemead and Yorba Linda. In this f°
�j#(L W2,yC.l I� �.�i S ! I y 7 1 7 Cn
capacity, he performs or supervises the technical check of Tract Maps,Parcel Maps,
F Lot Line Adjustments, Mergers,and Easements. He specializes in difficult title
problems,and assists in the preparation of corrective legal descriptions and the re-
` C- ,
ggg, r �� �A recording of documents which contains errors. He has prepared or reviewed over L
'} y
0 b,� rat% a 1000 maps in his 40 year career, iT_
Mr. Knell has a wide range of experience preparing and checking subdivision maps. As
4i y •<
a contract checker for the Cities of Agoura Hills,Dana Point, Lake Forest, Bell Gardens c,
is ,f�r�tt:urt>l�� ✓zF�Gb`�t - � �
Paramount,
and Cerritos,and a surveyor in private practice,Mr.Knell has been �
# j, ahq'ij� +ts involved in the preparation and checking of numerous Parcel Maps and Tract Maps, f°
;ttj i2h4�Sit aE
A.L.T.A Surveys,Records of Survey, Lot Line Adjustments,Parcel Map Waivers,
,+: 4 5;;z`'r', Certificates of Compliance,and boundary determination. He also was responsible for o
preparing legal descriptions and sketches for a wide range of easements involving
� e t�5 ix'{'l�� fcPrTin�@(
t f , r ar ,1, s 3 utilities,air space reservations,and construction projects. He has also worked with o
;r 4aY�f1�6 7 in
major utilities and title companies in determining easements and correcting defective
legal descriptions. o
!,
�:5th-5e13� r. .Y'•� ;�..c >�:�.. � :: J:: �=+
Mr. Knell is currently the City Surveyor for the Cities of Agoura Hills, Big Bear Lake, a
Calabasas,Cerritos, Hawaiian Gardens, Indian Wells, La Canada Flintridge, Lake Forest,
Malibu, Paramount, Rosemead,and Yorba Linda.
He also has been the lead in dealing with LAFCO for various annexations in Los m
Angeles, Orange, and San Bernardino Counties.
c
He lectures frequently on the Laws of Easements and how to best write effective legal a
descriptions.
Ln
' M
Mr. Knell also performs land surveying services for Stewart Title of California. M
Relevant Project Experience
Safe Routes to School(SR2S),Cycle 10 Project,City of La Puente,California, 0
(102056). Survey Lead. Willdan provided professional engineering design,utility a
coordination, public outreach,contract administration and funding administration
services for the SR2S—Cycle 10 project.The City was awarded$387,000 FY 2012/2013 a
Z
for the improvement of the intersection of Prichard Street and Hacienda Boulevard to a
0
include bulb-outs,school crosswalk signs,high visibility crosswalks,median island
fencing,driveway reconfiguration,ADA compliant access ramps and parking lot y
reconfiguration. Furthermore,the grant includes the installation of 38 high visibility
crosswalks,2 speed awareness signs and 68 countdown pedestrian heads for the
school areas surrounding La Puente High,Sierra Vista Middle School and Workman
M Elementary School.
r
a
M City of San Bernardino
>
"I W I LLDAN Rrp _14-d I
W.A, Engineering Packet Pg.85
5.C.c
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
PCH Bike Route Improvements,City of Malibu,California.Survey. Provided
environmental and traffic design services for the study and design of conversion of 7 m
miles of Class III Bike Route to Class II Bike Lanes along Pacific Coast Highway from =
Zuma Beach to the westerly City Limits,funded through an HSIP grant. This work
involved assisting the City with the environmental documentation and costal
development permit for the project,preparation of a preliminary design report, >
m
including a traffic study and evaluation of various design alternatives,conducting
community outreach through community workshops,and preparation of final design
plans,specifications,and estimates,and providing construction assistance. In
Cn
addition to assistance during construction,we also assisted the City with obtaining the
E-76 for construction and their application for the Caltrans encroachment permit. -'
a
c
Vermont at 119th Improvements,City of Los Angeles,California.Survey. Provide
professional engineering design services for the installation of a new traffic signal at
U.
the intersection of Vermont Avenue and 119th Street. The project will include the
installation of the new traffic signal, modification to the existing medians to provide
for new left turn pockets, minor signing&striping and the reconstruction of existing
access ramps. The project will also include the repainting of existing school crosswalks
and upgrading school warning signs around West Athens Elementary School. 1°
Coordination with City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation (DOT),Bureau of
Street Lighting(BSL)and Bureau of Engineering(BOE)will be required. 3
Willow Place Widening,City of South Gate,California. Responsible for design survey c
l for this project which involves the widening of Willow Place,within the existing right- N
of-way four feet on the east and west sides,from Long Beach Boulevard to Santa Fe c
Avenue, reducing the parkway width from 10 feet wide to six feet,with full-width 2
sidewalks and a curb to curb width of at least 36 feet,plus upgraded street lights on Q
Willow Place and also on numerous nearby streets. The project encompasses the
following work: pavement rehab,curb and gutters, new sidewalks/curb and gutter, 3
drive approaches removal of street trees, relocation of fire hydrants, relocation of v
water meters and other utilities,ADA access,relocation of street lights,conversion of
street lights from series to multiple system, planting of street trees,striping,etc. The
project involved the design, bidding and final record drawing work plus biweekly and a
special meetings as warranted. Community outreach is continuous through design LO
i including direct communications with residents as special needs arise.
M_
221st Parking lot Design,City of Hawaiian Gardens,California. Land Surveyor. J
Responsible for providing professional engineering design service to the City of
Hawaiian Gardens for the design of the 221st parking lot. Willdan prepared plans, a
specifications and estimates(PS&E)for street, landscape, lighting,signing and striping 0
a:
plans. Other services provided by Willdan included topographic,boundary and 0-
construction survey as well as contract observation, labor compliance and utility Q
coordination.
J
J_
C
d
E
V
to
Q
City of San Bernardino
W I LLDAN I?FP F-14-41
Engineering
Packet Pg. 86
CITY OF
SAN RERNARDINO
VANESSA MUNOZ.. PE, TE, PTOE
[deputy Director— Engineering/Traffic Plan Review m
f ' > { !� � Ms.Vanessa MuEioz is a Deputy Director of Engineering at Willdan with 14 years of 3
i f experience in transportation planning and traffic engineering. Ms.Munoz is an
accomplished engineer for multi-discipline and multi-agency traffic and transportation
�3ipStT► ra and has supervised the completion of more than 1000 projects,for a varlet
v c's• t 3 ems'{ a
i1� projects p p p j Y ar
<s id t�,tJli�Id z ' �r- i, of large to smaller scaled projects and understands the importance of meeting o
#0 tbt Cl)
schedules and developing the most cost-efficient project in order to meet the City's
uf ` budgetary constraints,
{x' Se� 7 �t�t�' : r/J'41lrr�tl ; She is responsible for analysis,coordination,and design of various projects, including
preparation of plans,specifications and estimate for traffic and street improvement a?
s'T;�> �t� n i J � Kjrta projects. Ms.Munoz has secured funding through the Safe Routes to School (SR25) LL
�IGe
x 5, ,rflriJ83Y and Highway Safety Improvement Program(HSIP)grants. Ms.Munoz is bilingual,
7 taps )> itsz�erat�rs 1 fluent in the Spanish language.
♦ tJ !j S t / J
Relevant Project Experience
, FlftCli�tib"
Engineering and Traffic Survey 34 Segments), City of Red Bluff CA. Traffic Engineer.
f 7. r nit Ur t g g Y( g �, ,
Responsible for the preparation of an Engineering and Traffic(E&T)Survey to re-
r, 1rru ,r'tY biro fls i certify 34 segments in the City of Red Bluff. The E&T report included a radar survey
y'1i,rt DAIS R Aa
F4 na
I study,24 hour counts, accident data analysis, review of existing and none readily E
r� �(►9�1r�'u�c�.�i�`y7src�i�i��o+��Cl��+ �
p � Ys r apparent conditions and report documenting 85th,50th percentile speeds and o
average speeds as well as 10th mile per hour pace. The E&T complied with the
` current CA Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices(CA MUTCD)Section 26.13 0
(1
�J 3 guidelines and as required by the CA Vehicle Code Section 627 and 40802. L)
�
j 7aYe °r's
�1Z' � }+��?fJr `F'�t`; ;t��-;{� Engineering and Traffic Survey(29 Segments),City of Pinole,CA. Project Manager.
Responsible for the preparation of an Engineering and Traffic(E&T)Survey to re-
if 2 h
re-
certify 9-segments in the City o Pinole. The E&T report included
is tj,•r;`bFi4�,N'7q; y! y :r`yV. :I 1J'`r y f p radar survey study,
24 hour counts,accident data analysis, review of existing and none readily apparent
conditions and report documenting 85th, 50th percentile speeds and average speeds c
as well as 10th mile per hour pace. The E&T complied with the current CA Manual of a
Uniform Traffic Control Devices(CA MUTCD)Section 2b.13 guidelines and as required LO
by the CA Vehicle Code Section 627 and 40802. Cl)
M_
Slauson Avenue Business District Improvements,City of Maywood,CA. Responsible
for providing engineering support for this project which involved construction a
Cn
management services for the City's Business District Improvement on Slauson Avenue, 0
o-
from Downey Avenue to Pine Avenue. The project general items of work included 0
Asphalt Rubber Hot-Mix(ARHM)street resurfacing, cold milling, new landscape a
median islands,concrete repairs,curb ramps in compliance with ADA requirements, Z
a
PCC pavement, roadway striping,and traffic loop replacement. Wilidan services
included contract administration,construction observation,Caltrans invoicing,federal
labor compliance,and material testing. The project was federally funded by ESPL
funds.
d
E
r
a
YT.
City of San Bernardino
W1 L L DAN R,I+P F-14--4,
Engineering
Packet Pg. 87
5.C.c
1
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
FY 2009-2010 Various Streets,City of Hawaiian Gardens,CA. Project Manager. :2
Responsible for providing professional engineering services for the preparation of m
plans,specifications and estimate for rubberized asphalt concrete overlay on various
City streets for the 2009-2010 fiscal year.Once the design was completed,Willdan
advertised and bid the project, provided bid analysis and recommended bidder to City
staff. During construction,Willdan provided construction observation,materials
testing, labor compliance and monument restoration for the CDBG funded project.
J
CD
E
a�
c
v
CU
3
E
0
n
0
U
d
CL
N
G
3
m
c
ii
01
M
J
Q
0
d
0
a.
Z
Q
J
J_
C
d
E
a
City of San Bernardino
WiLLDAN
� RFP F-1441
'.. _ Engineering
Packet Pg. 88
_mss•
i
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
SUSANA BARRIENTQS
Senior Survey Analyst/Map Checking �
As a Senior Survey Analyst in the Surveying and Mapping Division at Willdan 3
s '=r Y Y Y g pp g , Ms.
fduc�iI fin.', ,
Susana C.Barrientos duties include CAD drafting for various projects,including right- >
4jcats �,�flc �, F t,� of-way drawings,subdivision maps,and other survey related drawings. Parcel maps,
` ,s{ �n,v��rr?yEttmo „., tract maps,and surveys are some of the other items she has worked on.
Ms. Barrientos assists in the technical checking of maps legal descriptions. She U
g p g p
�dilwv..1 checks the closure calculations and the references on the map or in the document. J
` She is proficient in reading and understanding Title Reports and Conditions of
,i Approval.
va0 ;1'. Ms. Barrientos previously worked in the Civil Design Division where her duties L
included assisting in the preparation of plans,specifications,and estimates for public
works projects, as well as the preparation of geometric plans, project reports, and E
project study reports. She is proficient with software such as MicroStation and o,
AutoCAD computer-aided drafting programs. Ms. Barrientos is bilingual,fluent in the
Spanish language.
L
Relevant Project Experience
Surveying and Mapping E
o
rrrrr 223rd Street Improvements,City of Carson,California. Survey Analyst. Responsible cn
for providing survey services for this project which involved the preparation of plans, o
specifications,and cost estimate for the 223rd Street Improvements, Lucerne Street U
to Alameda Street Project No. 1003. Services included developing a landscape master Q
plan to create an identity for Auto Row,and preparation of plans and specifications, c
street widening and rehabilitation, landscape medians,signing and striping and traffic
control.
d
Sepulveda Boulevard Widening,City of Culver City,California. Survey Analyst.
c
Responsible for survey services for this project which involved project management,
CL
conceptual design;preparation of construction drawings and technical specifications
1 for a major street widening on Sepulveda Boulevard from Playa Street/Jefferson M
Boulevard to Green Valley Circle. Sepulveda Boulevard is a major corridor with an
average traffic count of 50,000 vehicles and parallels the 405 Freeway through Culver Q
City. Sepulveda Boulevard is an alternative route taken by many commuters to access v)
Los Angeles International Airport. This project was done to alleviate an existing a-
bottle-neck and provided for a third southbound lane within the existing right-of-way. W
A portion of the project was within the City of Los Angeles and Caltrans. Willdan's Z
services included civil and traffic engineering design,landscape architectural design, o
survey, pavement engineering,and utility coordination.
J_
C
d
E
U
Q
d WI LLDAN City of San Bernardino
RFP
Engineering -
Packet-Pg.89
CITY OF
RAN BERNARDIN®
Atlantic Avenue Street Improvements,City of South Gate,California. Survey Analyst. 22
Responsible for assisting Mr. Knell with providing survey services for this project. The
m
project included civil and traffic engineering design, pavement engineering, design
survey, landscape architectural design,and utility coordination services for Atlantic
Avenue improvements between Firestone Boulevard limit and south city limit.
Fred Waring Drive Widening,City of La Quinta,California. Survey Analyst.
Responsible for assisting Mr. Knell with providing survey services for this project.
Project consisted in widening Fred Waring Drive to accommodate a third lane of traffic
in each direction. Project included street widening,concrete median design,traffic N
signal installation at Palm Royale and modification at Washington Street,signing and J
striping and interconnect design. Other services included utility coordination, -a
1 topographic survey and legal deed preparation.
d
Paramount Boulevard Rehabilitation,City of Pico Rivera,California. Survey Analyst. U.
Responsible for assisting Mr. Knell with providing survey services for this project. This
project involved the provision of professional engineering services including E
preliminary engineering,survey,and design preparation of plans and specifications for a�
the Paramount Boulevard Rehabilitation Project. The roadway width of Paramount
Boulevard within the project limits of Washington Boulevard to Gallatin Road varies
from 58 feet to 72 feet wide. The services for this project include civil design,traffic
engineering,survey,utility coordination,and preparation of technical specifications 3
for the project. E
L
O
bd
Linda Vista Hospital,Boss Law Firm. Survey Analyst. Responsible for providing m
survey services for this project which involved preparing easement to remedy o
encroachment issues.
CL
Claim 287707 San Rafael, Fidelity National Title Group. Survey Analyst. Responsible
c
for providing survey services for this project which involved performing a field survey 3
of the southeasterly corner of the subject property to locate alleged encroachments. d
Puente Street Property,City of Covina,California. Survey Analyst. Responsible for
providing survey services for this project which involved preparing legal descriptions
and exhibits for a property exchange between the City of Covina Redevelopment a
Agency and the Covina School District,which owns an adjacent property. LO
M
J
a
N
O
a-
0
W
a
z
a
0
J
J
C
d
E
s
v
R
w
a
0 City of San Bernardino
Engineering WI LLDAN I
f?FP a`",2441
Packet Pg.90
S.C:c
1
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
RAY MANGER, PLS
Supervising Surveyor/Mapping
Mr.Ray Manger is experienced and proficient in the fundamentals of land surveying, 3
z 7 tic Ala r r ti try
5 ;•/ rVey�,�Pbtsacfeij '3 mathematics, and basic science as applied to surveying; methods of precise survey
measuring; use and adjustment of precision surveying instruments; procedures,
� 4 j h alb i 5 7�It F
! equipment,and materials used in surveying,including conventional and the most
w-
,, recent technology;mapping and drafting techniques; mathematics and procedures �
l �iiveDrr yfJl►ornu 'i
used in plane and geodetic surveying;computer applications and usage;the California
s VicS z s Coordinate System; Code of Safe Surveying Practices;photogrammetric mapping
y a tt procedures; principles and practices of boundary determination,land title research, c
and surveying;Segal descriptions of real property;methods and terminology used in ;v
searching for land titles and factors involved in determining ownership of property; LL
real property acquisition and mapping laws pertaining to public and private ownership
of real property;monumentation of facilities;the Land Surveyors'Act;the Subdivision E
Map Act;factors which influence the impact of projects on property and basic net;
right-of-way engineering projects; and planning,design, construction,and right-of-
way procedures and policies as they relate to surveys.
Relevant Project Experience 3
Staff Augmentation,City of Elk Grove, CA. Consultant Land Surveyor for Public Works
Department. Responsibilities for: o
co
■ Checking all final maps for technical accuracy and compliance with conditions of c
approval °
■ Preparing all necessary documents for execution of final maps including
agreements, bonds,staff reports and resolutions for City Council approval
• Signing final maps for technical accuracy; record all final maps and accompanying d
documents at the County Recorder
■ Reviewing and signing all certificates of corrections
Developing the submittal requirements for final survey monumentation of all final a
maps, and maintains the survey database and field inspects survey monuments M
for final acceptance of subdivision in the City
■ Searching County and City GIS records for maps,deeds and miscellaneous N
documents for ownerships,easements,etc.for all City departments p
CL
■ Processing and preparing staff reports,resolutions and postings for all City O
o:
summary and regular abandonments for public streets, public service easements, a
etc. Q
0
■ Reviewing and approving all documents submitted for dedications such as Streets,
Highways,Parks,etc.to the City of Elk Grove
• Working with the City of Elk Grove Capital Group to provide technical input on d
survey related matters regarding including review of maps and documents and E
offering professional expertise
a
w"llllifO�' W1 LLD AN RFP F-Z4-41
City of San Bernardino
Engineering
Packet Pg.91
---- - -----
1
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
• Reviewing all tentative maps,design reviews and conditional use permits to
provide survey related project conditions for approval '
m
• Answering questions, providing information on City procedures,processing any
public works and survey matters at the Public Works counter 3
a�
• Mentoring staff on surveying, mapping, ownership and a variety of subjects.
o:
• Preparing legal descriptions and plats for City departments including Public Works, ,
Capitol and Real Estate
996-Acre Mix-Use Master-Planned Community,West Creek,Valencia,CA.Survey Cn
Project Manager for this master-planned,mixed use community.The 996-acre site J
included 2,545 single-and multi-family detached and attached units, an
elementary school,park areas,and 180,000 square feet of retail/commercial
L
space. Responsible for all survey services for this project including survey ii
mapping, pre-zoning and encumbrance maps,topography,tentative mapping, and
preparation of the final maps. E
m
Subdivision Plan Checking,City of Palmdale,CA.As a Contract Consultant,
responsible for plan checking approximately 375 subdivisions.Set all criteria for
checking standards.Worked with the Planning and Engineering Departments on L
lot line adjustments,certificate of Compliance,and Conditions of Approval.
3
E
o
0
m
CL
y
G
d
.y
m
a:
c
ca
a
LO
M
J
a
Cn
O
A
O
a
Z
Q
0
J
J_
C
d
V
:a
Q
City of San Bernardino
vh WI LLDAN RFP F-14-41
? Engineering
Packet Pg. 92
S.C.c
CITY OF
SAN RERNARDINO
.3
JOHNNY GHAZAL, PE, QSD m
Associate Engineer/Plan Review �
0
igg Mr.Johnny Ghazal is an Associate Engineer at Willdan with over 12 years of
diversified civil engineering experience throughout California covering public works
z rYz �? �w j� + ' ' r � >' and private sector projects,preceded by 6 years of residential and commercial
t<Y� lr 'Ft'fgt� `zf�erE construction experience. co
�s�;f�1�tt�e'r57 � �nc����+ �
J
His private sector experience includes the design of master planned communities -�
}F�;'eS? involving the preparation of tentative tract maps,g radin g p lans,improvement plans
for streets,water&sewer,and storm drain facilities. Mr.Ghazal's v�
public sector L
t5 ilhT LT �r31Y! STS l q,Y2 _r -:} LL
4yip f z>+Y experience includes the design of capital improvement projects for various County
4rG3aC9!}s s=
and City jurisdictions involving street,water&sewer, and storm drain improvements.
1 ar[ t r �fc#RIP gm yo-i, E
r (Q .
e Rj4is�' x� ' ' As a certified QSD, Mr.Ghazal has facilitated water quality related permitting having M
r ��.; � �> ! �, � 4 p g g w
`r y r xrr�aa� prepared and reviewed many Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans(SWPPP)and
. Water Quality Management Plans(WQMP)for various public agencies. Mr. Ghazal L
currently assists multiple agencies with data entry on the State's SMARTS system.
3
£` ':^ 's}` Relevant Project Experience q
.r
F� L£.n��S �o Development Review �
plan Check Engineer Services. Mr.Ghazal provides plan check services for multiple o
city jurisdictions within the Counties of San Bernardino,Riverside, Los Angeles,Santa c,
XI,,, ;�� } Rik 3 y`,;. F Barbara,and Santa Cruz. He is responsible for reviewing both private developer and U)
... capital improvement projects. Review services cover Final Parcel/Tract Maps, Lot Line _
Adjustments, Grading&Erosion Control Plans,Storm Drain Plans,Water&Sewer
Improvement Plans,Street Improvements Plans,Signing&Striping Plans,Storm Water >
Pollution Prevention Plans(SWPPP),and Water Quality Management Plans(WQMP). w
C
Staffing Support a-
City Engineering Services,City of Grand Terrace. Mr. Ghazal is currently serving as M
Consulting City Engineer having responsibilities for planning level reviews for M
conditions of approval,development plan reviews of private projects,and review of
capital project improvement plans. Mr.Ghazal works closely with the City's Public a
cn
Works Director on various CIP project responsibilities including bidding assistance and 0
CL
management. Mr. Ghazal also assists the City with their NPDES compliance efforts, 0
which includes the review of SWPPP's,WQMP's,and Erosion Control Plans(ECP's). a
Z
a
0
J
J_>
C
E
OWN
s
Q
City of San Bernardino
. WIEL�DAN RFPF-14-41
Packet Pg.93
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
KENNETH KRIEGER
Senior Designer II/Plan Review
..........._
Mr.Kenneth R.Krieger has 28 years of experience at Willdan in the design of various
improvement projects for several public agencies and municipalities.He is specialized >
in the development and execution hydraulic modeling software for flood control,
f;''`6 h - storm drain and sewer related projects. He is trained and experienced with HEC-2, v
�'�.-....`41 HECRAS as utilizing River CADD,Storm Plus, WSPG,AES and Hydra software packages cn
including H2OMap Sewer training and other sewer hydraulic modeling software. He ,a?
has performed hydrology and hydraulic calculations on numerous flood control
channels,storm drains and performed capacity analysis on over 10 complete sewer
systems within the past 6 years.As a member of the Design Engineering Group in
Anaheim, he has worked on most of Willdan's more complex drainage and sewer U_
designs. He is also fully versed on Micro Station,AutoCAD and ARCGIS software, c
a�
Relevant Project Fxperlence E
SCE Bridge at LCWP,City of Orange PF&RD. Hydraulic Analysis. Design a single-span
bridge using railroad flatcar at the Laguna Coast Wilderness Park. The bridge spans °
over 100-yr expected flood water surface. Pursue and obtain all applicable
v
environmental clearances and government permits/approval. Provide construction
support, including independently check bridge shop drawings E
Del Obispo Bridge Widening,City of San Juan Capistrano,California. Project °
in
Engineer-Channel Design. The City of San Juan Capistrano retained Willdan to C
provide planning,engineering and architectural consulting services for the °
preparation of plans and specifications for Del Obispo Street circulation improvements Q.
from Alipaz Street to Los Rios Street. The proposed improvements include widening
the Del Obispo Street bridge over Trabuco Creek and optimization of lane 3
configurations of the intersections at Alipaz Street, Paseo Adelanto and Los Rios 2
Street. Willdan will be responsible for roadway design,water quality,utility
coordination,structural design, hydraulics/channel design,traffic engineering, c
g eotechnical engineering,survey/right-of-way,and landscape architecture.
n-
5th Street Bridge,City of Highland,California. Senior Designer. Willdan and T.Y. Lin M
teamed to plan and design this Federally funded bridge replacement project over City ItT
Creek in Highland.The existing bridge,built in 1960,was structurally and seismic _J
inadequate. Willdan was responsible for the hydraulics analysis of the proposed a
replacement bridge along with channel plans and on-site storm drain improvements. O
a
The proposed bridge was modeled under four different conditions; 100 year Q existing 0
O
condition; 100 year Q"AS-BUILT"condition;Standard Project Flood existing condition; a
Standard Project Flood "AS-BUILT" condition.The Willdan/T.Y.Lin team designed a Q
new structure that will safely pass a 50-and 100-year storm on the City Creek,
c
d
E
a
W LLDAN City of San Bernardino
A, Engineering
I RFP -
Packet Pg.94
if
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
CHRISTOPHER KELLEY(, EIT
Senior Designer Engineer/Plan Review
fl
iy+ �f lr€s
Mr.Chris Kelley is a Senior Design Engineer for Willdan with eight years of design 3
use �,kFf� ,Ylv �► (Flisrs� experience. He is primarily responsible for the design of public works improvement >
projects,including streets,highways,storm drains,sewers,and waterlines as well as �
engineering plan review.
-'�s xc x3 -,'i;F
r ,r , � it�k ,s Relevant Project Experience to
Nt,e7r u sffltejkQ?sfr ��°
On Call Plan Checking Services,City of Brea,California. Engineering Plan Review.
>r.'`,`Ca�orcaivi `f8`s7, Responsible for providing p rofessional engineering plan check services. Willdan staff
c
is performing complete and thorough plan check services to ensure that the proposed
developments and the associated improvements are designed in accordance with
;} "'h ' a City-accepted standards,Orange County Highway Design Manual,Orange County Y
"f Y �_ t/
iYt Local Drainage Manual, Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan(DMAP), City
Master Plan of Drainage,as well as other applicable design standards and the
Conditions of Development adopted by the City of Brea City Council of Planning c
Commission for each development.
Plan Review for Various cities. Engineering Plan Review. Responsible for providing
engineering plan for including:Grading and Erosion Control,Drainage,Street 3
E
Improvements,Water Quality/National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System o
(NPDES),and Hydrology/Hydraulics for the following cities: un
CF
a
• County of Orange
■ Cerritos a
M
• Compton =
• Azusa 3
• San Bernardino d
• Fontana
• Brea
• Irvine Campus Housing Authority o-
■ Goleta LO
• Camarillo
M
J
a
N
O
a
O
W
a.
Z
a
0
J
J_
C
E
V
a
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN
RFp F-14-41
,�, ' Engineering Packet Pg. 95
i
CITY OF
SAN OERNARDINO
ROBERT BURCH
Senior Designer Manager/Plan Review °0
t,ssxFs� Mr.Robert W.Burch provides traffic design services for client cities,outside agencies,
r, �iY `gig �:�P ; and California Department of Transportation(Caltrans)projects. Mr. Burch offers 22 >
UY �rt?K years of design and drafting experience. He has experience with both AutoCAD and
m ffivv�'!" �ttr r� trt yr MicroStation. Specifically,his experience relates to preparing plans,specifications,
YIN
and estimates for traffic signals,signing and striping, street lighting,traffic control a
}.'
co
M � s� f t f and stage construction projects and utilizing Caltrans standards.
,,f J
nt> { yy�t �i%d ' 4ul�Tt Relevant Project Experience a
I t�f , ; ; af1zff�ttrr�r ,s Plan Checking Services,City of San Bernardino,California. Senior Design Manager. f°
l y SCR ff'i` .04
Provided traffic engineering services for plan checking related to the installation of
naPapi signing, l'
g g,striping,flashing beacon, lighted crosswalk and traffic signal modification.
;fir Plan Checking Services for Atlantic Avenue,Sanitation District Project,City of E
Lynwood,California. Provide professional a plan check of traffic control plans for the w as
Atlantic Avenue,
i a�o��{�,{i'�x►,������st'€��sj�i� � Sanitation District project. Services included 1st,2nd and 3rd plan
,CtfStr �i $ check,coordination with sanitation district and development of conditions for the
R. ^ installation of traffic control plans.
Plan Checking Services,City of Temecula,California.Senior Design Manager. E
;f Providing professional traffic engineering services forthe plan checking of o
t` : construction traffic control plans related to the installation of communication
)4'f� -, ^ ff ` ` i�ejxierac antennas throughout the City. The developer,Crown Castle, is installing o
21 communication antennas on street light poles,with the majority of the antenna
r' i; '''`{` locations will be located on City arterials. This requires the preparation of traffic C-
f,l f,.
control plans by a registered engineer per City standards.The plan checking services
entails approximately 125 traffic control plans to required for the antenna installation 3
d
project.
Q:
Plan Checking Services,City of Highland,California. Senior Design Manager. Provided c
traffic engineering services for the plan checking of traffic control plans related to the a.
installation of signing,striping and traffic signal modifications.
Plan Checking Services,City of Maywood,California.Senior Design Manager, M_
Provided traffic engineering services for the plan checking of traffic control plans J
related to the installation of electrical conduit by the Edison Company. N
0
Plan Checking Services,City of Ridgecrest,California.Senior Design Manager. o.
O
Provided traffic engineering services for plan checking of roadway widening,signing, o:
a
striping and traffic signal installation plans related to the new Walmart Development z
Project. a
0
J
Plan Checking Services,City of Pomona,California.Senior Design Manager, Provided J
traffic engineering services for the plan checking of traffic control plans related to
signing and striping.
a�
E
C,
Q
vil" City of San Bernardino
W I LLDAN RFP F-14-41
Engineering
Packet Pg.96
CITY OF
SAN RERNARDINO
Plan Checking Services,City of Cudahy,California.Senior Design Manager. Provided a
traffic engineering services for the plan checking related to the modification of a
m
traffic signal. -a
c
Plan Checking Services,City of California City,California.Senior Design Manager.
Provided traffic engineering services for the plan checking of traffic control, detour,
signing,striping and traffic signal modification plans related to the widening of an
arterial roadway.
a�
0
U)
d
4-
1 �
(D
L
U-
++
C
d
E
d
R
C
tC
i
d
3
E
0
U)
c
0
v
m
a
N
C
3
A)
.y
d
o:
c
a
LO
M
d'
M
J
a
Cn
O
a
O
e:
a
z
a
0
J
J_
r
C
N
E
s
0
r
Q
City of San Bernardino
W I L L D A N RFP F-14-41
Engineering
Packet Pg.97
i
S.C;c
1
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINo
REGINALD GREENE
Senior Designer Engineer II/Plan Review m'
it kj�Ftc sr't`�ll
._.....
g5adt rSrJrri3r 3�jrxti<ti. _ .....-___
( t irjl } fb v
ie,, r ckvr' cat€ n�=kl Mr.Reginald Greene provides assistance in traffic design services for a variety of
p g Y 3
traffic engineering projects for client cities, outside agencies,and California
Department of Transportation(Caltrans)projects, Mr.Greene offers 15 years of
traffic-related experience and has experience using AutoCAD,MicroStation, r
Y { M j SPEEDPLOT,and Crossroads Collision software. Additionally, he has experience using a
K4nr4a�r €fir, N
r �
„ tBgrstl =, Caltrans,Standard Plans and Specifications,California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices(California MUTCD),AASHTO and Highway Design Manual
yn}L.Sr�'tL4' wlDn -a
Relevant Project Experience
Plan Check Services,County of Riverside,California. Responsible for providing plan LL
check services for signing and striping plans,traffic sign plans,and traffic signal plans
nffln � ��' ipyr ;f for numerous development projects.
City traffic Engineering Su pport,City of Fontana,California. Senior Design Engineer, 0
)
responsible for working at the City of Fontana's City Hall(East Annex Building)in the s Traffic Section. Mr.Greene's duties included the investigation of various traffic issues,
including intersection sight distance,signing and striping,and street fighting. Mr.
Greene's duties also included plan checking traffic signal,signing and striping and
st z , x r
, traffic control plans for development project. Mr.Greene prepared work orders,
0
signing and striping plans,traffic signal installation and modification plans,concept N
plans,and signal interconnect plans.
p o
Plan Checking Services for Street Lighting Conversion Project Circuits 31,41,44 and
69,City of South Gate,California.Senior Design Engineer, responsible for providing CL
professional traffic engineering plan checking services of 45 street lighting sheets for
the Street Lighting Conversion Project Circuits 31,41,44,and 69. We understand the 3
Y.F \
plan check involves the conversion of street Eights from an existing series system to a
multiple system including, but not limited to,the installation of conduits, pull boxes,
ye ►g c
�i gffl electrical cabinets,installation of LED lights,etc. Plan check involves checking the �a
Q,; plans specifications and estimates. a
LO
Plan Check Services,City of Brea,California. Responsible for providing plan check
services for signing and striping plans,traffic sign plans,and traffic signal plans for
numerous development projects.
Q
City Traffic Engineering Support,City of Newport Beach,California. Associate A
a-
Engineer, responsible for working at the City of New Port Beach's City Hall in the 0
Traffic Section. Mr.Greene's duties included the investigation of various traffic issues, a
including intersection sight distance,signing and striping,and street lighting. Mr. Z
a
Greene's duties also included plan checking traffic signal,signing and striping and
traffic control plans for development project. Mr.Greene prepared work orders,
signing and striping plans,traffic signal installation and modification plans,concept
plans,and signal interconnect plans.
E
a
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN
RFY F-14-41
Engineering
Packet Pg.98
Cl`fY IMF
SAN BERNARDIN®
Orange Line Extension,Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Los Angeles,California. Traffic Designer. Provided quality assurance and quality
control(OA)/QC)by providing independent plan check reviewing of traffic design
g
plans,signing and striping. 3
m
Traffic Signals for Three Locations(HSIP),City of la Puente,California. Senior Design
Engineer. Responsible for providing traffic engineering design, ement roject management
f; r
and funding administration services for the 2007-2008 Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP)funded project. The City was awarded$312,818 for the traffic signal
modification of three locations: Temple Avenue/Sunset Avenue;Valley T
J
Boulevard/Ferrero lane and Temple Avenue/Orange Avenue. The project involved -a
the full design of Valley Boulevard/Ferrero Lane and modification of the other two m
intersections for federal compliance as well as completeness. The design included the L
modification of the traffic signal to protective/permissive left turn phasing. u-
.r
;_
w
_
d
c�
3
E
L
f (n
_
0
V
V
CL
_
d
NN�
6i.
_
a
Ln
M
J
Q
N
O
n
O
a.
z
a
0
J
>J_
3
_
d
E
t
V
iL
a
W I LLDAN City of San Bernardino
Engineering Rr±P F-14-41
Packet Pg.99
1
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
JEFF LAU, EIT
Senior Designer Engineer it/Plan Review 00
INR
bra=is�t �c�,ryry N�-R( Mr.Jeffrey Lau is an Associate Engineer II. Prior to joining Willdan,Mr.Lau interned 3
yryi, �1 y !Sf f i� i r�
� x.k '�NZ r with the Cities of Chino Hills and Glendale where he was introduced to the various >
t 9z �, N� `; a�
tC facets of traffic engineering, including field investigations,traffic data collection and
r
WO P1, G u ft
analysis,traffic design,and project management.Since joining Willdan, Mr. Lau has Y
�
been involved in fieldwork,design, and drafting on a variety of traffic engineering
signals, te
projects including traffic signin and street lighting,and construction a,
' �, ' � b traffic control. Mr. Lau has also assisted in the preparation of traffic impact studies _J
f Fi �t uti K 1 t{-F
f t 3 �' a+Gr1'i yrr rt S
' irk Oilp f � '� {,�' '" and analysis,plan checking,and engineering and traffic survey updates. Mr. Lau is c
s {,4 , 1r26Q,i m
highly proficient innumerous traffic software programs such as AutoCAD, ai
MicroStation Synchro HCS+ PGWarrants and Crossroads Collision Database,
J I ,
Relevant Project Experience
L j k fir�Jh ro�ta,yA t�.�r�t 0 �.Ft{ E
. �1 ;��� �x� z,�'�`k Plan Checking
Atrr��t�if � �y�a�elu�c a as
V.
Plan Check Services,City of Fontana,California.Senior Design Engineer.Mr. Lau is
responsible for providing plan check services for signing and striping plans and street
lighting plans for new development projects in the City of Fontana. '
z
Plan Check Services,City of Moreno Valley,California.Senior Design Engineer.Mr. E
Lau is responsible for providing plan check services for traffic signal plans for new o
'= x
y tt y- ti u..)
aT14 -1 development projects in the City of Moreno Valley. fn
uG
et? Plan Check Services,City of Brea,California.Senior Design Engineer. Mr. Lau is U
responsible for providing plan check services for signing and striping plans and traffic d
CL
signal plans for public works and new development projects in the City of Brea.
Plan Check Services,City of Cerritos,California.Associate Engineer. Mr. Lau is
responsible for providing plan check services for signing and striping and circulation
plans for new development projects in the City of Cerritos.
Plan Check Services,County of Riverside,California. Design Engineer. Mr. Lau is
a
responsible for providing plan check services for signing and striping plans and traffic L;
signal plans for new development projects in the County of Riverside. M
M
On-Call Traffic(Engineering Services,City of Downey,California.Senior Design �
Engineer. Responsible for providing professional traffic engineering services to the Q
City of Downey on a routine basis. Mr. Lau's duties included the investigation of 0
o.
various traffic issues, including review and analysis of citizen inquiries such as parking 0
restrictions and stop sign analyses,intersection sight distance,signing and striping, d
and street lighting. Mr. Lau's duties also included plan checking traffic signal and Q
signing and striping plans. Mr.Lau prepared work orders,signing and striping plans,
street improvement plans,traffic signal installation and modification plans,concept
plans,street lighting plans,and signal interconnect plans
c
d
E
AF I
a
City of San Bernardino
WI LLDAN
Engineering RFP F-14-41
Packet Pg. 100
1
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
m
CHRISTOPHER BACA, RCI, CESSWI 2
Deputy Director, Construction Management/Inspection m
r-s.- tFtl 17��,}i+f'�51�s;3����y�y� --- --_.,..� .--- -- -,..._..._ ___ _ _ —...__. _..._.._ _�._..°.--__._.•--__ ._--- -------._. ___._— tCC
Mr.Baca is responsible for directing and monitoring public works inspection services,
;IN and overseeing construction observation personnel. His experience includes y
•<Y "' *`3� construction management of large-scale projects in areas of waters stems, street
1 ' ,4 im rovements ark improvements,storm drains sanitary sewers asphalt resurfacing
(including asphalt-rubber products),concrete paving, landscaped medians, and traffic
Cn
fi til, signals. In addition to his experience with Community Development Block Grant
;.� XrL£ iGrlirs,
(CDBG)funded projects, Mr. Baca is also familiar with the inspection and contract �
', t g> "/�d � rn `�',; administration of other federally funded projects in accordance with Caltrans Local
rSs"prelfF,y}tf jA`girl lt�fr:j �
Program Manual. During his 25 years of experience with Willdan, Mr. Baca has served C,
as a senior public works observer, as well as a permit inspector in the Cities of Bell
U.
Gardens, Paramount,and Rosemead. Currently,Mr.Baca manages work in Los w
+a�i; ' rrx�tvtu€c its £°fit; Angeles and Orange Counties. He interfaces with California Department of
F r
Transportation on a regular basis.
c
Zr r I ��C3 Grtlfo �ttlb
c
£ fF�rcv�uliA,7ria' r�� Prior to joining the Willdan team, Mr.Baca worked for a soils engineering firm
s< ? �;frfF3�Jy� � t k6 j conducting field inspections and performing laboratory testing. m
>;YS;: } �Jk� %yf/jp(}r (3��j '�F67ys'A-,}'Ar1
'�, of Relevant Project Experience
ia? r' �i Public Works On-Call Services,County of Riverside,CA. Project Manager responsible r°
4k T k �,{ I.,A L
`€ fitiit for providing on-call public works observation for subdivisions and capital
fry` $�,,/���°n't. improvement projects throughout the County of Riverside. Willdan is responsible to 0
t �_► ,n ,� Et � g�`y check grade;installation of curb,gutter and sidewalk,asphalt overlays and other Q
appurtenant work. N
f
On-Call Public Works Observation,City of Long Beach,CA. Project Manager
t4 hi✓fix r 1- { '�`yf; Ft.+ t'i T
responsible for providing public works observation services for several tracts •>
throughout the City of Long Beach. Willdan is responsible to check grade; installation
7�0:• .',S 7.!{ ,>y ty(�r'�Qr'I Pik rS `.i
of curb,gutter and sidewalk,asphalt overlays and other appurtenant work. c
.
5
Transit Priorit y.City of Santa Monica CA. Project Manager responsible for providing
FL
51, r construction management services for the City's Transit Priority Project. The project M
involved the installation of new fiber optic,some minor traffic signal modification and
other appurtenant work. In addition to construction management services,Willdan
provided public outreach services to the local businesses and residents. Q
Business District Improvement on Atlantic Boulevard,City of Maywood,CA. Project d
Manager responsible for construction management services for the City's Business o
District Improvement on Atlantic Boulevard,from Randolph Street to 59th Place. The a
project general items of work included Asphalt Rubber Hot-Mix(ARHM)street Q
resurfacing,cold milling, new landscape median islands,concrete repairs,curb ramps
in compliance with ADA requirements,PCC pavement,roadway striping,and traffic
loop replacement. In addition to construction management services,Willdan
provided Caltrans invoicing,federal labor compliance,and material testing services. v
E
a
City of San Bernardino
WI LLDAN I RFP F-sa-¢Z
'10 Engineering
Packet Pg. 101
1
CITY OF
SAN BERNA,RDINO
Roger's Lane Street Improvements,City of Highland,CA. Project Manager m
responsible for construction management of this project. The Roger's Lane Project
included infill asphalt paving,curb and gutter, new sidewalks, driveway relocations, 3
adjustment of existing mailboxes, utility relocation and adjustment,crack filling, slurry
seat,and other appurtenant work.
Dillon Road Widening,City of Coachella,CA. Project Manager responsible for
providing construction management and inspection services for the project. The
project involved the complete removal and replacement of the existing roadway n
between the Dillon Road Cutoff and the 10 Freeway;construction of fully landscaped
medians;installation of new safety lighting, and other appurtenant work. Willdan
additionally construction staking and material testing services.
L
LL
a.T
C
U
>_
d
fQ
C
M
L
d
M
E
L
0
Cn/W�
C
. y
U
Q.
N
C
d
U
C
fC
a
LO
M
d'
M
J
a
Cn
O
a-
0
Q!
a
z
Q
0
J
3J_
3
C
d
E
s
ca
Q
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN
RFP F-14-41 Engineering �
Packet Pg.102
5.C.c
(1
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
JASON BROWN, RCI
Supervising Public Works Observer 0°
Mr.Jason Brown serves as both a Construction Manager and Supervising Public 3
,b m
r,la tp;� yfiupa«,,4.; Works Observer for Willdan;his duties include the inspection and management of
large-scale public works improvement projects. His experience includes the w
U
fSu s:;,t 'Fc '!t; 3`l construction administration and inspection of subdivisions,traffic signals,storm
."%1 drains, sanitary sewers,ARHM overlay, conventional asphalt overlays,and street a
N
beautification projects. In addition, Mr. Brown has experience with specially funded
z FrrlcCftlfp �tr?i` projects,such as ISTEA and CDBG. During Mr.Browns 21 years of experience with
5rf Willdan,he has served as a Permit Inspector for the Cities of Paramount, Bell Gardens, c
3 �f �� {t s
and Rosemead.
N. X_'jl z 3 Mr. Brown's previous experience includes concrete cutting and core drilling,
landscape construction and maintenance, concrete finishing,and masonry
construction. E�
i i f!',v�r i e-r sr 1 1ST t4i Z ``yPiQY�','S t6
� Relevant Project Experience �
Third Street Improvements,City of Calimesa,California. Supervising Public Works
}} 4 ✓t
Observer. This project involved providing professional construction engineering and
funding administration for the Third Street Improvements Project. Willdan provided 3
labor compliance,construction management,and construction inspection services for E
the ARRA funded project. The project involved the removal and replacement of °
damaged street sections, asphalt overlay, miscellaneous concrete repairs to sidewalk U)
C
and curbs, planting of street trees,and other appurtenant work. °
U
Bradford/Madison Street Improvement,City of Placentia,California. Supervising Q.
Public Works Observer. This project involved providing professional construction c
engineering and funding administration for the Bradford/Madison Street 3
Improvement Project. Wilidan provided labor compliance,construction management,
and construction inspection services for the ARRA funded project. The project
involved the removal and replacement of damaged street sections,asphalt overlay,
miscellaneous concrete repairs to sidewalks and curbs, planting of street trees,and �-
other appurtenant work. M
Towne Avenue Phase 2,(Lexington Avenue to Riverside Drive),City of Pomona,
California. Construction Manager. This project involved providing construction Q
management and observation for the City's street improvement project. This project O
included minor concrete repairs, removal and replacement of existing asphalt,cold o.
milling,ARHM overlay,and other appurtenant items of work. Willdan also provided
labor compliance and material testing. This was an ARRA funded project. a
z
County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. Mr. Brown will work closely with J
the various LACDPW Supervisors and will monitor the activities of the Wilidan Public
Works Observers. Willdan will provide public works observation services for various
publicly funded projects throughout the County of Los Angeles. The projects include
the installation of new storm drains, bridge construction, asphalt paving,sidewalk E
replacement,sewer line construction,traff ic signals,and other appurtenant work.
City of San Bernardino
' WI LLDAN RFP F-14-41
? Engineering
Packet Pg. 103 `
i w
5.C.c
CITY OF
SHIN BERNARDINQ
LARRY BROWN, RCS
Supervising Public Works Observer m
�s s d�SZ'raLglxr�,-���� �q��`,�h dL•�,4 to
Mr.Brown is responsible for construction administration and observation of a wide 3
range of public works improvement projects. Mr. Browns field experience includes ">
r�IYA,, e{x;25 drainage facilities, railroad grade crossings, highway and landscape improvements, o:
traffic signals and signing projects,and underground utility construction,as well as
commercial and residential development projects. Mr. Brown served as Public Works
P ik it
Observer for the Cities of Hesperia,Moreno Valley,and Temecula,and was
7 responsible for review of plans and specifications prior to construction,to ensure
A O 1�` -}
' compliance with city standards. He also conducted field observations of the
p Y C
improvements. Mr. Brown's construction administration experience includes:
tis coordinating activities with contractors, utility companies,and other agencies; U.
processing change orders, progress payments,and other construction documents;
i�t,ja �fpvr s investigating citizen complaints,and resolving field problems;and reviewing plans,
r specifications and estimates packages for compliance with city standards. °E'
' rrye" t7
, �
E 1 •�+ `ij..'`r4f'�;L+; a J'A�; '• Relevant Project Experience =
{ Niif'j'` �atr# � City of Ridgecrest,College Heights Boulevard Re-habilitation Improvements,
Ridgecrest,CA.Construction Inspector responsible for inspection of roadway
e i >ia
fir`= 'f�r3',, r► e Q improvements from Franklin Avenue to Javis Avenue.The project includes full-width
3af i �tz ,rt i
{ 4 � 1'�Pr�nh ( �ttg r cold milling,5,127 tons of 3-inch asphalt overlay,ADA-compliant access ramps,AC o
t ,a r+> dikes,adjustment of various utilities,signing and striping,and other appurtenant in
1 t01lPr�tYc 'fh,�+ rrf3?
C + fY �r� �a
work. o
rr �, F r `�• - 9th Street Improvements,City of Highland,CA. Supervising Public Works Observer
U
�,f responsible for providing construction management and construction observation of o-
'�- the City of Highland's 9th Street Project. The project involved the removal and
replacement of damaged asphalt,repair of existing concrete improvements, asphalt 3
overlay and slurry seal installation. Willdan tracked quantities,provided claims
mitigation, responded to RFIs,tracked submittals,and maintained the construction
file.
R
Roger's Lane Street Improvement,City of Highland,CA. Supervising Public Works a
Observer responsible for construction management for the Roger's Lane v
improvements included infill asphalt paving,curb and gutter,new sidewalks,driveway
relocations,adjustment of existing mailboxes,utility relocation and adjustment,crack Q
filling, slurry seal,and other appurtenant work. Willdan provided construction O
management,material testing,survey and public works observation for the project. a
Public Works Observation,City of Murrieta,CA. Supervising Public Works Observer a
responsible for providing public works observation for various projects throughout the Z
City of Murrieta. The projects may involve asphalt pavement overlay,street a
0
reconstruction,sidewalk construction,curb and gutter installations,sanitary sewers,
RCP storm drains,slurry seals,traffic signal modification and new installations,and
other appurtenant work.
c
d
E
s
Q
VW I LLDAN City of San Bernardino
-0-111 Engineering I RFP F-14-41
Packet Pg. 104
µ
5.QC _
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
Seminole Trunk Sewer Improvements, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Banning, a
CA. Supervising Public Works Observer responsible for providing public works m
observation services for the Seminole Truck Sewer Line. The project involved the
installation of a new 12-inch VCP sewer line in Seminole Drive and serviced the Tribe's c
new Administration Building.
Dillion Road Grade Separation,City of Coachella,CA. Supervising Public Works
d
Observer responsible for inspection services for the Dillon Road Grade Separation
Project. The project involved the construction of a new bridge at Dillon Road and the
existing UPRR tracks. The new structure carries Dillon Road traffic over Indio in
Boulevard and the UPRR's two existing tracks by means of a reinforced concrete
bridge. —�
Q
L
U-
E
d
c
C
L
w
E
L
0
dr
Cn
0
O
i•+
U
d
Q
N
C
d
d
C
t0
CL
M
J
Q
N
0
0-
0
W
a
z
a
0
d
E
a
City of San Bernardino
WI LLDAN RFP F-14.41
Engineering
Packet Pg. 105
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
SCOTT GIBSON, CESSWI
Senior Public Works Observer m
Mr.Scott Gibson brings to Willdan over 21 ears of experience in the construction
r�r:� ? (�� 1c,f� 0 a g Y p 3
3 f ze 7 d
rzcttf{�i industry where he has experience in the following areas: concrete structures,steel
`st9rrpo-o � /[1ntrJJfd ,� structures, Underground Storage Tanks(UST),pipeline,electrical,excavation,grading,
� NY sL1' ", } � paving,and landscape. Currently,Mr. Gibson provides construction observation and w
y;T'a£ + y7'tr 't{k ' Y ? management services. His duties involve the inspection of various types of public
works projects such as bridge construction, bridge retrofits, pipeline, roadway Cn
' � t� improvements and traffic signals/lighting.
iny # d �V1,3� <r",`,j c
„rr+. ����3 Relevant Project Experience �
i�,t
,Y , ; sY Public Works Inspections,City of Fontana,California. As a City-employed Public i
' � �,,t„ Jx Works Inspector, Mr.Gibson was responsible for inspection all work related to
construction of housing tracts and commercial construction in the City's right-of-way.
,k ✓ s = ry s _ , +u m
0e j' n'e #oc atiorr' '. Work included dry utilities, sewer,water,roadway and landscape improvements. E
Cactus Avenue Bridg e Widening,March Joint Powers Authority,
Riverside Count
IM
y.
e
Mr.Gibson provides public works observation and project administration services to
the March Joint Powers Authority for the construction of the Cactus Avenue Bridge
Widening Project. The work involves the inspection and Quality Assurance of all �+
construction related activities for the new bridge over the BNSF Railway. The new E
bridge is a box girder/post tensioned concrete structure. Willdan has adopted the
Caltrans Construction Manual and the Caltrans Bridge Construction Records and
Procedures Manual,and is providing all observation and record keeping services per o
these standards.
Exprie0+co
Fr`. r•�i;{{'p.:;Li•tii��d`x�r211Years:_;. Process Waste Water Force Main,Morongo Band of Mission Indians,Banning, c
Ilz yc iY rj^{f `�r.,.`,. ..`... �' California. Mr. Gibson provided construction observation and project management
'i`CSh-r:Y.^}`;)iLrv;s`Jti i'� ..`;=".LF;:'iJ•'.�t 2
services to the Morongo Band of Mission Indians for the installation of a 5,300'8-inch
HDPE force main from the Nestle Waters bottling facility to the Tribes wastewater
t+J rS Ski.^fAl,S ?I{,'�;' a): '•,r
treatment plant. The work involved inspecting the pipeline,trenching, HDPE butt
fusion joints, lift station installation,and discharge structure. Key to completion of the n.
project involved installing 400 feet of double-wall HDPE pipe through a jack and bore L,
I 30-inch casing under the 1-10 Freeway near Cabazon. Cl)
Verizon FTTP,City of Banning Electric. Mr.Gibson provided public works observation J
services to the City of Banning's electric utility during Verizon's FTTP installation Cn
project. The work involved the inspection of fiber optic installation throughout the A
City both above and below ground. Verizon brought fiber optic service to O
w
approximately 70 percent of the City's residents. Mr.Gibson ensured construction a
and restoration per the City's standard and interfaced with residents of the City to Q
maintain access and safety. °
J_
C
d
E
V
Q
City of San Bernardino
WILLDAN I RFPF--.i4-41
100 Engineering
Packet Pg. 106
a
5.C.c
1 --
CITY Or
SAN B RNARDINO
DANNY AYALA
Senior Public Works Observer m
Mr.ri,g�.�Jf�ry�f�Xfy,ic'�i• -? - —�-._... �
�a4� {,M stn tbn
i f{zit 3it. W N� y yala is responsible for the inspection of large-scale public works projects His
t �,� experience includes over 35 years of public works construction experience including:
assignments in administration and inspection of subdivisions traffic signals storm
2 n .
e zs���ze�a i 4 ,jg¢ � drains,sanitary sewers,ARHM overlays,conventional asphalt overlays,and street
l ' � zrr ft
beautification projects with raised landscape medians and decorative parkway �
U >- renovations. In addition, Mr.Ayala brings experience in all areas of traffic signal Cn�
JT
prftidra �a{�r�, r installation and inspection.
MV
Relevant Project Experience =
On-Call Public Works Inspection,County of Riverside,CA. Mr.Ayala has been a
providing on-call inspection services to the County of Riverside from July 2003 through
the present.The work involved the inspection of over 40 subdivisions,SWPPP review, e
geotechnical coordination, subgrade inspection, RCP,sewers,ARHM,conventional E
overlays,water mains,and other appurtenant work. In addition to Mr.Ayala's
subdivision inspection,he also performed inspection for several large CIP projects and R
sn �;
was responsible for the administration and inspection of the projects.
L
On-Call Public Works Inspection,City of Lang Beach,CA. Mr.Ayala provided on-call
inspection services to the County of Riverside from June 2008 through October 2011. 3
E
""'"► Mr.Ayala was responsible for the inspection and management of the City's$8 Million c
Annual Local Street Projects,which included over 14 miles of street overlay and pcc N
repairs. Mr. Ayala's duties included the tracking of quantities,management of project o
file,and communication with design engineers,coordination with outside agencies,
SWPPP review,public outreach,geotechnical coordination, and electrical inspections. N
Atlantic Boulevard Street Overlay and Landscape Improvements,City of Maywood,
CA. Public Works Inspector. Responsible for the construction management and 3
a�
inspection of the project.The project involved ARHM overlay, landscaped medians, >
m
PCC repair,traffic signal modifications and other appurtenant work.The project was
an ARRA funded project and had a construction budget of$2.5 million. a
n.
Slauson Street Reconstruction,City of Maywood,CA. Public Works Observer and
Administrator.Willdan provided construction management,labor compliance,
material testing,and public works observation services.The project involved median
plant material installation,banner pole installation,existing asphalt cold milling,curb —�
a
and sidewalk reconstruction,and ARHM overlay installation.Willdan monitored the N
contractor's payroll for conformance with applicable state and federal laws. In
addition,the contractor's construction activities were monitored for compliance with o:
the City's design. a
z
Q
0
J
J_
C
d
E
U
Q
City of San Bernardino
WI LLDAN RFP F-14-41
Engineering
9� 9
Packet Pg. 107
5.C.0 A
CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
DANNY AYALA
Senior Public Works Observer m
�1l eg rr Mr.Ayala is responsible for the inspection of large-scale public works projects. His
experience includes over 35 years of public works construction experience including: >
assignments in administration and inspection of subdivisions,traffic signals, storm
t, � 4
$t ? �• drains,sanitary sewers,ARHM overlays,conventional asphalt overlays,and street .�
rn" beautification projects with raised landscape medians and decorative parkway
�
Cn
?��� renovations. In addition,Mr.Ayala brings experience in all areas of traffic signal
vrsa o ON installation and inspection.
Relevant Project Experience �
' CA. Mr.Ayala has been to
„��� On-Gail Public Works Inspection,County of Riverside, y L
r a+`L ti ; providing on
inspection services to the County of Riverside from July 2003 through
Y z>2£,K Sz^, # the present.The work involved the inspection of over 40 subdivisions,SWPPP review,
geotechnical coordination,subgrade inspection, RCP,sewers,ARHM,conventional E
i4 it Mj13 r14n
IF �o ti. v overlays,water mains,and other appurtenant work. In addition to Mr.Ayala's
subdivision inspection, he also performed inspection for several large CIP projects and �
was
responsible for the administration and inspection of the projects.
...s,.. .s....-1 Yid::•} p p p 1
L
On-Call Public Works Inspection,City of Long Beach,CA. Mr.Ayala provided on-call
.r
inspection services to the County of Riverside from June 2008 through October 2011. 3
E
Mr. Ayala was responsible for the inspection and management of the City's$8 Million o
Annual Local Street Projects,which included over 14 miles of street overlay and pcc
repairs. Mr.Ayala's duties included the tracking of quantities, management of project o
file, and communication with design engineers,coordination with outside agencies,
SWPPP review, public outreach,geotechnical coordination,and electrical inspections.
N
Atlantic Boulevard Street Overlay and Landscape Improvements,City of Maywood, _
CA. Public Works Inspector. Responsible for the construction management and
inspection of the project.The project involved ARHM overlay,landscaped medians,
PCC repair,traffic signal modifications and other appurtenant work.The project was
an ARRA funded project and had a construction budget of$2.5 million.
Slauson Street Reconstruction,Cit y of Maywood, a
,CA. Public Works Observer and
Administrator.Wilidan provided construction management,labor compliance,
material testing,and public works observation services.The project involved median
plant material installation,banner pole installation,existing asphalt cold milling,curb —J
a
and sidewalk reconstruction,and ARHM overlay installation.Wilidan monitored the Cn
contractor's payroll for conformance with applicable state and federal laws.In CL
addition,the contractor's construction activities were monitored for compliance with o!
the City's design. a
z
a
0
J
J
C
d
E
V
Q
W010
WI LLDAN City of San Bernardino
RFP F-14-41
Engineering
Packet Pg. 108
S.C.c
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
m
Bid Documents to Be Returned by Bidder
RFP )
Plan Review Services
® Bidder Experience, Competency, Qualification and Profile (Vendor Document) III
Proposal/Bid Content Forms to
d
Instructions to Offeror(s)1 Bidders J
® Non-Collusion Affidavit (City Form)
® Listing of Proposed Subcontractor (City Form) III Proposal 1 Bid content and Forms 0
w
Instructions to Bidders,III Bid Content and Forms =
® Cost/Price Form {City Form) E
® Authorized Signatures
Instructions to Bidders c�a
® Bidder Identification III Bid Content and Forms ..
d
3
Addendum Received (City Form) III Bid Content and Forms o
Cn
® 120 Day Bid Validity Statement III Bid Content and Forms o
w
III Bid Content and Forms
® Authorized Signatures (City Form)
N
C
® References III Bid Content and Forms
®
Proper dentification and Submittal of Proposal/Bid Package, and Price Form �
c
a Bidders
M_
Bidders are required to submit this checklist completed with all bid documents. J
This list may not be reflective of all documents necessary for submittal. ran
O
a-
0
a
Z
a
0
J
J_
_
d
E
s
a
s
Packet Pg.. 109
5 C.c
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Plan Review, Inspection, Stormwater Management, and Building Official Services 3
m
NOTICE : "SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO THE BIDDER"
3
Services:
Bidder shall complete right-hand column indicating brief reasoning for
exceptions to requirements when not acceptable. State "Acceptable" if
requirements are agreeable as set forth in left-hand column.
Cn
Equipment:
Bidder shall complete right-hand column indicating specific size and or =
make and model of all components when not exactly as specified. State
"As Specified" if item is exactly as set forth in the left-hand column.
_
FAILURE TO COMPLETE RIGHT HAND COLUMN WILL INVALIDATE BID E
CATEGORY I ACCEPTABLE!AS SPECIFIED
Provide plan reviews of development projects
necessary to determine compliance with all
applicable building and fire codes, provisions of Title AS SPECIFIED Y
19, all NFPA standards, codes and laws.
0
1. SCOPE n
A. Plan Review Services: The project, in o
general will consist of the examination, a
analysis, and review of plans for various N
construction projects within the City in order to =
determine compliance with all applicable
building and fire regulations, including but not
limited to local building regulations and
amendments, as well as the California Building
Standards Code (CAC Title 24), comprised of AS SPECIFIED a
Ln
the latest adopted editions of the model codes
with State amendments, and the State M
Housing Law (CAC Title 25) as adopted by the a
State of California and the City of San cn
Bernardino and California Fire Code, Title 19 0.
and all NFPA standards. Dependent upon °�
each specific project assigned, such plan a.
reviews may consist of an examination of the o
grading, site drainage, onsite improvement,
geotechnical, structural, fire and life safety,
electrical, mechanical, plumbing, disabled
accessibility, energy conservation, stormwater
management and green building features of
a
14
Packet Pg. 110
S.C.c
RFP F-1441
Plan Review Services
the proposed project. The City shall provide
the consultant with copies of code
2
is an code amendments and interpretations
p
d b the Building m
issue y g Official and/or Fire
Official. Related consultant services such as
the availability of a Certified Access Specialist
3
(CAS
p) to SB 1 608 will be required.
� p} p '>
o!
B. Building,and Site Inspection Services: r
Consultants shall provide building inspection w
M
staff to supplement the City's existing staff on co
an on-call as-needed basis. The consultant's J
building inspection staff shall be certified by
F the international Code Council or other 1°
appropriate entities in accordance with AB717 AS SPECIFIED L
iz
and possess a minimum of one-year of
building code enforcement experience with a
municipality or a private municipal consultant.
The Director shall have the right of refusal of
any staff member assigned by the consultant. 2
d
3
C. Building Official Services: o
Consultant shall provide a Certified Building N
Official on an on-call as-needed basis. The
individual shall have a bachelor's degree in
public administration, engineering, architecture Q
or a related field and a minimum of 3 years
experience as a building official with another AS SPECIFIED 3
municipality. The individual will provide
supervision and direction to the Building &
Safety Division staff, code administration and
interpretations, develop policies and a
ordinances, interface with customers, city staff M
and elected officials, and perform related
administrative functions as assigned. The
Director shall have the right of refusal of any
staff member assigned by the consultant.
0
CL
z
a
0
J
>J_
C
4i
E
V
Y
a
15
Packet Pg. 111
S.C.c
t RF'P F-14-41
Plan Review Services
D. Engineering Map Checking and Inspection:
Consultants shall provide on-call map
checking, approval and inspection services to
the City for the review of Subdivision Tract and m
Parcel Maps, Lot Mergers, Lot Line C
Adjustments and Certificate of Compliance
which shall be reviewed by a Licensed Land
Surveyor in the State of California for the
procedure of survey, mathematical closure,
and compliance with the Subdivision Map Act, AS SPECIFIED cn
the Land Surveyors' Act, Title 19 of the San
Bernardino Municipal Code, the approved
Tentative Map, the approved Conditions of
Approval, and the current title report. This d
review shall include but is not limited to the U_
review of survey documentation, lot and
boundary closure calculations, dedications and E
easement provisions, legal descriptions and
completeness and accuracy of data notation.
E. Engineering Grading, On-Site and Off-Site
Plan Checking: 3
Consultants shall provide on-call plan o
checking, approval services to the City for the N
review of grading plans, on-site and off-site o
Improvement plans and inspection. The plans AS SPECIFIED
shall be reviewed by a Licensed Professional
Civil Engineer in the State of California for
compliance with The Green Book, Title 19 of 3
the San Bernardino Municipal Code, the
approved Conditions of Approval, and the
current title report. M
a
F. Stormwater (NPDES) Program Inspections: M
The Consultant shall provide inspection y
services to ensure compliance with the
Stormwater Management Program in N
accordance with the MS4 Permit. The AS SPECIFIED a
Consultant's NPDES inspection staff shall be 0
experienced and trained to inspect the City's
commercial businesses, construction sites, a
and industrial projects and post construction
onsite Stormwater Best Management
Practice's (BMPs).
E
a
16
Packet Pg. 112
5.C.c
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
2. REQUIREMENTS
_
A. Consultant shall utilize employees to perform the
plan reviews and inspections who are certified as m
Plans Examiners and Building Inspectors through
the. International Code Council (ICC) and retain
CASp certified inspectors and Plans Examiners AS SPECIFIED
as required. Plans Examiners and Inspectors
shall be provided with a reasonable degree of r
annual training in accordance with the
requirements of AB 717 (Health and Safety Code N
18965 et seq.).
B. A California Registered Civil, Structural Engineer,
Licensed Land Surveyor, or a Licensed Architect AS SPECIFIED LL
shall review the portion of plans that involve
engineering design.
C. The standard turn-around time for assigned
building plan review shall be 10 (ten) working
days for the Initial review and 5 (five) working AS SPECIFIED w
days for re-checks. Consultants shall pick up and
deliver plans daily to the Department unless the E
Department approves alternate arrangements. 0,
D. The standard turn-around time for assigned 2
engineering plan review shall be 15 (fifteen) Q
working days for initial review and 7 (seven) AS SPECIFIED
working days for re-checks. Consultants shall 3
pick up and deliver plans daily to the Department
unless the Department or Fire Official approves
alternate arrangements.
C.
D. Projects shall be assigned at the sole discretion of LO
the Building Official, or Fire Official and the City.
The City may use its own employees and/or other J
independent contractors to perform plan reviews
in addition to any such work assigned to a
Consultant. The volume of plan reviews is AS SPECIFIED �°
dependent upon economic conditions that are a
outside the control of the City. Consequently, a
there is no guarantee provided as to the minimum °
or maximum volume of work that may be
assigned to a Consultant within any given time
r
period.
a
17
Packet Pg.113
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
E. In the course of the plan review and inspection
process, the Consultant shall avoid situations
involving an actual or potential conflict of interest,
and shall act as an agent and a deputy of the m
Building Official or Fire Official and shall act in AS SPECIFIED
the interest of the City and the citizens of San
Bernardino. Consultants shall provide no
services for any private client within the corporate
boundaries of the City during the contract period.
3. COMPENSATION Un
A. Proposals shall include the consultant's
expected compensation expressed as a
percentage of the City's plan review fee.
LL
The proposals should also include the
consultant's expected compensation for
structural only plan reviews as a percentage of
the City's plan review fee. AS SPECIFIED
The consultant's plan review fee shall be 3
considered the full compensation for all plan E
review performed through the second recheck.
Thereafter, the consultant may charge any
additional plan review time at their agreed
upon hourly rate if the base plan review fee is Q
not adequate to cover the consultant's cost for
the review.
3
a
B. Hourly rates for grading, on-site and off-site
plan review, mapping review and building plan
review and fire plan review shall be specified a
separately. Projects not assigned a valuation M
by the Department are to be billed by the M
consultant to the City based on the hourly rate AS SPECIFIED J
and the actual plan check time in one-half hour N
increments. The consultant's current o
a.
accumulated plan review hours, to be billable, o
must be specified on each transmittal sheet a
accompanying the plans. The final transmittal
sheet accompanying the approved plans must
indicate the total accumulated hours. Hours
not indicated on the transmittal sheets shall
not be billable.
E
v
a
18
Packet Pg. 114
1
RFP F-14-41 5•C.c
Plan Review Services
C. The Department(s) may assign any plan
review at an hourly rate rather than based on _
valuation at City's sole discretion.
m
D. The hourly rate for CASp services, if available,
shall be specified.
3
a�
E. The costs of services for the Stormwater AS SPECIFIED
Program Inspections should be specified on
an hourly basis.
U)
F. The costs of Building Official Services should
be specified on an hourly basis.
1
G. The Consultant shall invoice the City for
Services rendered on a monthly basis. U.
Q
E
d
4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
Prospective consultants shall be qualified based
upon experience, education, training, and 3
professional registration and certification. Proposals
shall indicate the following in a detailed manner: °
U)
6
A. Past experience on similar projects. 2
B. Education, training, experience, professional Q
registration and certification of the principal and of
staff members who will be involved in the project. 3
C. A brief narrative of the processes that will be AS SPECIFIED d
employed to accomplish the project including a
discussion of quality control measures.
D. Expected compensation based on Item No. 3 a
above. LO
E. Any additional capabilities of the firm or optional M
services that may be offered (e.g. CASp services), J
which are outside the scope of the project a
description. o
F. Six (6) copies of the proposal shall be submitted o
to the Purchasing Department, Vanessa Sanchez, a
Accounting Assistant, 300 North "D" Street, San Z
a
Bernardino, CA, 92418 no later than 3:OOPM on
July 21, 2014. Proposals shall be clearly J
marked on the outside of the envelope: "Plan
Review Services."
d
E
Y
a
19
Packet"Pg. 115
RFP F-14-41
' Plan Review Services
5. SELECTION PROCESS
Staff will analyze all submittals and verify the M
information contained therein. Interviews of selected m
firms will be conducted at the time and date specified -�
_
on the cover. The firms will be rated on a point AS SPECIFIED
system with a maximum score of 100. An additional
five points will be given to City of San Bernardino
based consultants. Such companies shall have an
office with a minimum of two employees doing 1 41
business inside the city limits and shall possess a city CO
Business Registration.
J
_
lC
d
L
V
_
Q
E
_
C�
G
L
d
Y
3
E
O
_
O
V
d
Q
N
_
3
m
m
o!
a
a.
f M
d'
M
J
a
Cn
0
a
O
W
a
Z
a
J
J_
_
d
E
t
V
a
20
Packet Pg. 116
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review services
NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
TO: THE COMMON COUNCIL, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
m
In accordance with Title 23, United States Code, Section 112, the undersigned
hereby states, under penalty of perjury: 3
d
That he/she has not,
either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement,
participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken action in restraint of free c
competitive bidding in connection with RFP.
Cn
d
J
Business Name Willdan Engineering
d
Business Address 650 Hospitality Lane,Suite 3,50,San Bernardino,C 92408
Signature of bidder X — E
a>
SA 0r
Place of Re ' nce w
3
E
0
w
Cn
Subscribed and sworn fe� this l`� day of LA , 201 o
r
Notary Public in and for the County of n 6cm A +�0 , State of N
California.
See PrRaG\ecX Nbl-onad Ce9'h`�i Cc�
My commission expires
120
LO
a
_
a
M
J
a
Cn
0
o-
0
W
a
z
a
0
J
J_
_
ai
E
t
V
cC
Q
31
Packet Pg. 117;
State of California
County of")JrY)F_)ffharA ►r-O �
Subscrib d and sworn to (o affirmed) before me on this �_
m
day of u 201` , by n
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the •;
person(,who appeared before me.
Mp►VIQU�Etp�H
COmntisloit 2040293 CO
Notary�uDl�c,=0911toWe
Bun
CO J
Seal _ . �
( ) Sgratur ��.Q��. Q
iz
C
0
E
a�
_
3
E
0
Cn
CF
0
0
d
CL
LO
N
_
3
d
d
o:
c
c�
a
M
M
J
a
Cn
O
a
O
W
CL
z
a
0
J
J_
_
d
E
V
fG
r+
r
a
Packet Pg. 118
5.G.c
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
SUBCONTRACTOR'S LIST
As required by California State Law, the General Contractor bidding will
hereinafter state the subcontractor who will be the subcontractor on the job for m
each particular trade or subdivision of the work in an amount in excess of one-
half of one percent of the General Contractor's total bid and will state the firm 3
name and principal location of the mill, shop, or office of each. If a General
Contractor fails to specify a subcontractor, or if he specifies more than one
subcontractor for the same portion of work to be performed under the contract in
excess of one-half of one percent, he agrees that he is fully qualified to perform
that portion himself and that he shall perform that portion himself.
4-
1 DIVISION OF NAME OF FIRM OR LOCATION
WORK OR CONTRACTOR CITY
TRADE
E
a�
L
V
E
L
0
Y
V
Q.
Ronald L. Espalin, PE
Print Name Signature o B der
d
Company Name: Willdan Engineering a
i Address: 650 Hospitality Lane,Suite 250,San Bernardino, CA 92408
M
J
REJECTION OF BIDS can
0
A
The undersigned agrees that the City of San Bernardino reserves the right to reject any a
or all bids, and reserves the right to waive informalities in a bid or bids not affected by z
law, if to do seems to best serve the public interest. o
J
J_
C
W
E
V
t4
.v
a
30
1
Packet Pg. 119
5Cc
m
c
3
m
d
o!
r
m
ca
U)
J
' C
d
L
LL
c
(cc
C
c
cc�
G
L
d
0
C
V
Q
0
c
3
m
d
c
a
M
M
b.
M
J
a
O
a
O
Ix
IL
z
a
0
J
J
c
d
E
t
m
Q
Packet Pg. 120
5.C.d
PROPOSAL TO THE .2
t
O
City of Sa n Bernardino .�
m
FOR
3
Plan Review Inspection, NPDES, Building Official
Services and Fire and Safety Plan Review
co
JT
J
C
t0
i
LL
E
a7
to
C
t6
L
M
3
E
L
0
vJ
e
O
V
C1
Q
N
C
3
aD
W
PREPARED BY
a
CSG Consultants, Inc. M
M
July 21, 2014
0
CL
0
a
O
U
c
m
801 Park Center Drive Suite 230 Santa Ana,CA 92705 E
Phone(714)568-1010 Fax(714)568-1028 1 www.csgengr.com
WL
San Mateo•Sacramento•Santa Ana•Salinas•Newman•Pleasanton +'
..,
Q
Packet Pg. 121
Table of Contents
U
I
O
C
� m
Letter of Introduction
3
m
Firm Summary
' J
Capabilities
L
Staffing
E
Related Project Experience
L
3
E
0
References Cn
6
O
U
CL
City-Requested Bid Forms =
3
w
Appendix: Resumes
a
Ln
M
It
M
N
O
Q
O
L
a
c�
U
r
c
as
E
U
Q
Packet Pg. 122
5.C.d
Letter of Introduction
2
July 21, 2014 p
a�
City of San Bernardino —°
Purchasing Department m
Attn:Vanessa Sanchez,Accounting Assistant =
300 N. "D"Street,4th Floor
San Bernardino,CA 92418 y
Re: RFP for Plan Review,Inspection,NPDES, Building Official Services,and Fire and Safety Plan Review m
CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) is pleased to present this proposal for Plan Review, Inspection, NPDES, Building
Official,and Fire and Safety Plan Review services to the City of San Bernardino(City).Our firm brings
Cn
specialized expertise,proximity,and knowledgeable and highly competent staff. 12
We understand the City is seeking on-call services for plan review,inspection,NPDES, building official M
services,and fire and safety plan review when demand is in excess of the City's staff capacity.CSG can readily
provide these requested services and no sub-consultants will be used for these services.All proposed CSG L_
staff are registered, [CC certified,with additional qualifications including LEED, DSA,and CASp experience and LL
certification. Many of our proposed staff members are cross-trained in multiple service levels, providing our
clients with increased efficiency as well as the ability to provide on-call staffing depending upon the City's E
fluctuating needs. t
We currently furnish building and safety, public works, planning,fire prevention,code enforcement as well as
additional services to over 100 clients, including many nearby communities.Our local office is in Santa Ana L
and we can easily be available for meetings at City Hall when requested. I will serve as the primary contact
r
for this contract,and my contact information is as follows: 3
E
Khoa Duong, P.E.I Vice President Building&Fire Life Safety 0
801 Park Center Drive Suite 230 1 Santa Ana,CA 92705 U)
(714)568-1010 Phone (714)872-6123 Cell c
khoa @csgengr.com
d
Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you may have regarding our proposal. If I am N
unavailable, please contact Paul Armstrong,PE. He can be reached at(714)679-9769. We look forward to an
opportunity to provide building department services to the City.
Sincerely,
c
R
a
U0
M
Khoa Duong, PE
Vice President Building& Fire Life Safety, CSG Consultants, Inc.
0
CL
0
v
r
r
801 Park Center Drive I Suite 230 1 Santa Ana,CA 92705 Q
Phone(714)568-1010 1 Fax(714)568-1028 1 www.csgengr.com
Packet Pg. 123
5.C.d
Firm Summary
2
CSG Consultants, Inc.(CSG) is a California company with our local office located in Santa Ana.Additional p
support is available from our corporate office in San Mateo and other offices in Salinas, Pleasanton,
Newman and Sacramento. Founded in 1991, CSG performs work solely for public agencies,eliminating `a
the potential for conflicts of interest. In this way,we can focus exclusively on the specific needs of our '
m
municipal clients. _
CSG provides a wide range of services to community development and public works departments,often 3
serving as a seamless extension of City staff.The majority of the 150+ individuals within our firm have 2
provided public agency services throughout their entire careers. Our talented personnel bring a wealth
of ideas and experiences having held similar positions with communities facing the same development r
issues as the City of San Bernardino. Depending upon the needs of our clients,we can serve in either a
project-specific or on-call staff augmentation capacity. m
m
w
J
Firm Details
NAME OF FIRM: CSG Consultants,Inc. iy
PROJECT CONTACT: Khoa Duong,PE,Vice President, Building&Fire Life Safety
m
LOCAL OFFICE: 801 Park Center Drive,Suite 230,Santa Ana,CA 92705 E
(714) 568-1010 phone,(714)568-1028 fax
khoa @csgengr.com
R
CORPORATE OFFICE: 1700 South Amphlett Boulevard,3rd Floor,San Mateo,CA 94402
(650) 522-2500 phone, (650)522-2599 fax as
www.csgengr.com
3
info @csgengr.com E
SATELLITE OFFICES: 6200 Stoneridge Mall Road,Suite 300, Pleasanton,CA 94588 0
21 West Alisal Street,Suite 108,Salinas,CA 93901
c
1022 G Street,Sacramento,CA 95814 0
1247 Main Street, Newman,CA 95360
YEARS IN BUSINESS: 23 • Founded in 1991 N
c
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: 150+
3
TYPE OF BUSINESS: California Corporation • Incorporated June 15,2000 • Federal ID:91-2053749 D
d
Staff Composition
a
Our professional municipal services staff consists of: M
v
Structural Engineers I Grading Improvement Plan Reviewers&Inspectors
P Plan Review Engineers P Fire Department Plan Reviewers&Inspectors Ta
U)
Plan Reviewers P Information Technology Professionals 0 CL
Building Officials P Program & Project Managers a0`.
Inspectors 0 Civil Engineers 0
0 CASp Professionals P Construction Managers V
0 Planning Professionals P Sustainability Professionals
m
E
z
c�
Q
Packet Pg. 124
S.C.d
Municipal Services
Our services and project experience include the following areas of expertise: T
.2
BUILDING & FIRE LIFE PLANNING & INFORMATION 0
SAFETY SUS T A I N A B I L I T Y TECHNOLOGY s�
Building Department Administration CEQA Environmental Review Green Vue Software c
Building Plan Review and Inspection Public Outreach Programs Digital Plan Review
Fire Plan Review and Inspection Energy Efficiency, Water Conservation, Electronic Archiving m
Structural Plan Review Solid Waste Program Development Web-Based Construction Management
OSHPD3 Review AB 32 Compliance/Climate Action Plan Asset Management M
CASp Assessment and Inspection Development and Implementation Project Management 3
Public Facilities Assessment Sustainable Task Force Facilitation GIS and IT Support d
LEED/Green Building Services Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies
Code Compliance/Enforcement Grant Writing and Grant Management �
Staff Augmentation w
R
PUBLIC WORKS CIP PROJECT & CONSTRUCTION fA
ENGINEERING & PROGRAM MANAGEMENT & w
DES I G N MANAGEMENT INSPECTION J
Capital Improvement Project Design: Capital Improvement Program Contract Administration,including:
Transportation/Roadway, Water and Development and Implementation Resident Engineer Oversight L
Sewer Utilities,Traffic Engineering Federal and State Grant Administration Inspection and Construction LL
Development Review,Plan Check, Rule 20A Undergrounding Management C
Surveying and Mapping,Storm Water Staff Augmentation Including:Design Constructability/Bidability Reviews a)
Program Compliance(NPDES, Consultant Coordination,Project Cost and Schedule Control E
QSP/QSD) Scoping,RFP Preparation Claims Avoidance
c
to
L
d
R
3
E
L
O
a+
U)
O
V
d
Q.
d
NNd
LPL
a
Ln
M
M
f�
N
O
rL
O
i
a.
(7
U
c
d
E
t
v
ca
Q
Packet Pg. 125
S.C.d
Capabilities E C T 1 0
2
r_
Approach to Work
CSG understands the City seeks on-call services for plan review, inspection, NP DES, building official =o
services,and fire and safety plan review in times when work load exceeds the capacity of City staff. CSG
m
employs a team of professionally licensed structural engineers, plan review engineers,certified building '0
officials, plan reviewers,CASp professionals, inspectors and permit technicians to manage building
department operations,support front counter procedures, review plans,and inspect structures for code
conformance. >
m
Our extensive experience in furnishing comprehensive building and fire life safety services to m
jurisdictions provides a consistent,strong technical foundation to all projects. From cutting edge digital
plan review to providing faster-than-scheduled turnaround times and assisting with last minute m
inspection requests,CSG will deliver the highest quality services to the City of San Bernardino. Key .2
J
benefits that we offer include:
c
f Concentrated focus on cost-saving approaches and methods. Because we serve many m
municipalities and agencies,we are constantly improving and adapting to provide our clients LL
with the most cost-effective services.We share a wealth of recommendations from our varied
experience with other communities to help keep our clients' budgets healthy and on-track.
(1)
Customized, responsive services.We are skilled at assessing time commitments, developing an ,0)
accurate work plan and applying dedicated, professional personnel. We can quickly fine-tune
staffing levels to match or adjust to changes in plan review, inspection and front counter L
activity—always maintaining the highest level of customer service. We hand pick staff uniquely
qualified and experienced to deliver the exact services requested. 3
E
L
Fully committed and qualified personnel. Each member of our staff is fully licensed and 0
certified at the highest level of industry standards.To keep our personnel on the industry's
c
cutting edge, many serve as popular educational instructors and lecturers as well as sit on 0
r
leading boards and committees for organizations developing and implementing important code 0
regulations. We also keep up with latest in procedures and use of products,e.g.,green building, U)
accessibility,CASp certification requirements, NPDES, MRP, and more.
3
i Swift turnarounds and expedited services. With extensive experience in the digital plan review
process,our staff excels at providing the speediest turnarounds in the industry. We easily match
and more often beat any required timing,and make available our scanned plan review
documents free to our clients. a
P Leading-edge technology with cost-saving solutions.CSG delivers a suite of digital options for M
jurisdictions—speedy digital plan reviews including electronic versions of plan comments as well
as a final set of scanned plans;an optional,easy-to-use online web application/portal for
submittal,tracking and approval of digital plans;and full scanning and archival services. 0 CL
0
0 Environmentally friendly practices.Our corporate policy on sustainability supports a healthy a
environment, reduces our carbon footprint and promotes environmental stewardship through N
environmentally preferable purchasing and other sustainability actions. Our digital plan review t)
system encourages the bypass of paper products,and all possible documents at CSG are printed
double-sided on recycled, post consumer content paper. E
r
ea
Q
Packet Pg.126
S.C.d
Commitment to Excellence
We encourage staff to participate in and contribute to the many associations important to our industry. 2
Knowing technical excellence and proficiency is vital to successful public service,attending update t
seminars,specialized training classes and continuing certification conferences is an integral part of 0
0
delivering"best-in-the-business"service to our clients. Many of our staff hold or have held key positions E
within the groups listed below as well as serve as in-demand instructors and trainers. 2
0
m
League of California Cities '0
California Building Officials ;I
International Code Council 4)
P ICC Chapters of Los Angeles Basin, Coachella, Orange
Empire, Foothill,Sacramento Valley, East Bay, MEMBER
Peninsula, Napa-Solano, Yosemite, Monterey,Shasta
f
Cascade, � cn
County Building Officials Association of California w
INTUNkrIONAL CALBD J
California Fire Chiefs Association CODE ax*CU .,_ a
Northern Fire Prevention Officers n
Southern Fire Prevention Officers ii
National Fire Protection Association �
California Automatic Fire Alarm Association y E
4
P American Fire Sprinkler Association I!' 4`cam c
National Fire Sprinkler Association
American Public Works Association L
5C TnEfN CUECf a Y
P Institute of Transportation Engineers 3
P Structural Engineers Association of Northern California E
0
P Structural Engineers Association of Southern California y
P Certified Access Specialist Institute(CAST) 1
0
m
Methodology N
Our proposed team has been selected to best support the project and will deliver the highest level of
service through its application of technical expertise, knowledge of municipal processes and procedures,
efficient and effective customer care,and application of code compliance combined with innovative and
helpful alternatives.
a
Building Plan Review CO)
Compliance Standards N
0
Our team of professionals is ready to assist in all aspects of plan review and to focus on the special Q-
0
L.
needs and requirements of each of our clients. We promise prompt turnaround times and offer 0-
comprehensive online status reports. Our plan checkers carefully review all documents for compliance
with building codes,fire codes, energy conservation standards,State accessibility regulations,and all U
local ordinances. We understand and will comply with the City's own requirements for plan review c
services. Our engineers and plan reviewers review plans for compliance with all policy and model codes E
adopted by the State of California, including but not limited to: U
Q
Packet Pg.
5.C.d
2013 California Building Code, Volumes 1 and 2
2013 California Residential Code
�a
P 2013 California Electrical Code .5
2013 California Plumbing Code p
2013 California Mechanical Code =
2013 California Fire Code as jointly published by the Western Fire :2
Chiefs Association and the National Fire Protection Association m
(NFPA)as amended and adopted by the State of California(Title-24, "0
c
Part 9 California Fire Code)
P National Fire Codes as published by the National Fire Protection Association(NFPA);as adopted 2
and referenced by the State of California(California Code of Regulations, Title-19,Section 1.09)
P 2013 State Historical Building Code
m
P 2013 California Energy Code a
P 2013 California Green Building Code w
NPDES/WQMP/SWPPP Compliance _J
a
City adopted ordinances and amendments relative to building and municipal codes, including
project Conditions of Approval from other City departments, divisions, regulating agencies, and L
jurisdictions LL
r
c
CASp Services E
4)
We understand California Building Departments are required to have a CASp cc
certified person in place and available for technical questions and
interpretations. Our CASp certified staff are knowledgeable of state and federal L
accessibility laws and regulations and possesses the expertise necessary to
promote access to facilities for persons with disabilities. In accordance with 3
E
newly formed rules and regulations,CSG can supply a CASp certified c
professional to review all plans for accessibility and to facilitate compliance N
with regulations to provide a sufficient number of building department staff o
who are CASp certified.
a�
a
OSHPD 3 Reviews
Our staff of professional engineers and certified plans examiners is experienced with the differences
between CBC and OSHPD 3 facilities and have successfully completed many OSHPD 3 plan reviews for
multiple client agencies. CSG can also provide certified OSHPD Inspectors of Record for a variety of
different projects.
a
Green Building and LEED Certification M
Our Building Division staff is experienced in plan review and inspection for compliance with CALGreen
and local green building ordinances. In addition, CSG Consultants has all of the qualifications necessary �a
to assist the City in both the development of policy and the implementation of green and sustainable a
building practices. CSG's Sustainability Programs division can assist,for example,with construction and o
demolition debris recycling programs as well as public outreach to the building industry. We have a
Certified Green Building Professionals(CGBP)and LEED accredited personnel on staff. v
Digital Plan Review
CSG began the transition to digital plan review over 7 years ago, leading the consultant field with this
ground-breaking service.All paper plans submitted to CSG are immediately scanned into digital files and
stored on CSG's servers for speedy access by both our clients and our plan reviewers. Our plan reviewers Q
Packet Pg.128
S.C.d
furnish electronic versions of their plan comments conforming to each client's established correction list
templates.Any additional forms utilized by the City for alternative methods of construction and/or
deviations from requirements,such as disabled access,will be incorporated into the correction
.2
comments and returned with the appropriate recommendations. Plan check comments can be delivered r
electronically by email or other City approved means,enabling City staff to immediately modify CSG's 0
checklist for incorporation with other department comments. Upon final approval,clients are provided c
with a set of digitally scanned plans at no cost and including convenient,"green"(paperless)storage •2
of all construction-related documents. 00
In addition,for jurisdictions requesting a pure digital plan review workflow,CSG has developed an online R
web application for an applicant to submit digital files directly to us,which includes an online portal for
the applicant/jurisdiction to retrieve comments and submitted digital files with redlines.This online
portal tracks all submittals, including re-submittals until the plans have been approved. Key features of
our digital plan review service include: m
w
ca
P Efficiency. Plans are pushed to plan review staff the some day they are submitted. There is no U)
"bin time." w
J
Simplicity. CSG developed our own web-based portal to manage the electronic file submittal
process. By using a web interface, the applicant is no longer faced with size restrictions on email `0
m
attachments or required to learn complex FTP settings.
i Experience. We have provided a digital plan review option to our clients for over seven years. c
m
Non-Proprietary. CSG's electronic review process is 100%PDF based with no additional software E
a�
required to view redlines. cc
c
P Growth.Should the City decide to implement electronic review as a standard, CSG offers an 10
integration path for our electronic review software(GreenVue Fusion). y
R
Online Plan Check Status
Welcome to CSG Online Plan Check Website E
L
CSG offers a convenient service allowing clients to check plan review �°
status and comments online. By logging in to our Plan Check Status CSG Plan Check Login c
website,staff as well as authorized applicants can view each project Ple—ter Yap+CSGLognMandieowwmd.
:r
document and communicate with the plan checker via e-mail or post- m
CSG Login M:
a-note. Staff or authorized applicants can download comments from
C
the web upon completion of the plan review.There is no additional Pa—and:
cost for this service.
m
Quality Control / Quality Assurance
R
CSG's in-house quality assurance/quality control program utilizes a peer review process with multi-level n,
internal plan checking and project management.A senior staff member will review plan check ul
comments in order to ensure relevance and accuracy.
M
Plans Pickup and Delivery N
CSG will arrange for pickup and delivery of plans from/to City offices. The a K.,-� ,.r s, Q.
pickup and delivery of plans and other materials via CSG staff or an J. U
6.
approved alternative service will be provided at no additional cost.
.i
Fire Plan Review Services =_
E
CSG furnishes fire and life safety,special hazards,and fire sprinkler and fire a
alarm plan review for any and all structures with an emphasis on the unique
needs and requirements of each of our clients. We are also experienced in
Packet Pg.129
S.C.d
special hazards and risks associated with industrial and commercial buildings,and single-family and
multi-family complexes. CSG will become an active partner with the City,working as an extension of the
City,and working closely with the development community and general public.All fire plan review and
.2
inspection personnel are thoroughly trained and familiar with jurisdictional processes,working within r_
multiple departments,and serving the public. 0
a�
=a
Engineering Grading Plan Review, On-Site a Offsite Plan Checking and m
Inspection
CSG utilizes an individualized review process tailored to meet a jurisdiction's particular needs and design
requirements or guidelines. Upon initiation of the project,CSG will prepare a customized plan check
review checklist encompassing industry standards and state or federal rules and regulations.The
checklist is commonly prepared from the City's Municipal Codes/Ordinances,City standard plans and
w
specifications,design guidelines available online to the general public,and any other public or M
U)
confidential information made available to CSG by City staff. Our experienced staff regularly reviews the ,a)
following in conjunction with grading and drainage plan Submittals:
P Rough and Precise Grading Plans M
P Hydrology/Hydraulic Studies
Utility Plans&Profiles(Storm Drain,Sanitary Sewer, Water, Electric, Gas) r
Off-site Improvements and Encroachment Permits m
Sediment and Erosion Control Plans
m
P Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans(SWPPPs)
Construction Details
- P Demolition Plans
0 Construction Cost Estimates(Engineer's Estimates/Probable Costs) i
3
We review the plans and supporting documents for compliance with the following: E
0
r
P Geotechnical recommendations U)
Hydrology Report c
Municipal Code, City Design Guidelines and Standards, or other City procedures and policies
Community Plans(Specific Plan, General Plan) N
Caltrans Standards 5
P CEQA&other environmental documents 3
m
P Final/Parcel Map&Subdivision Map Act ">
P National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permits
P Other regional agency requirements as they relate to infrastructure needs
P ADA compliance a
Traffic studies,parking issues M
P Industry Standards M
Our staff is trained and experienced in the following: N
0
P NPDES Compliance,Specialized in Provision C.3 Compliance(MRP) 0.
0
Hydro-Management(HM), Certified Third Party Reviewer a`
P Construction Site Compliance for Water Quality Protection
P Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD) v
P State General Construction Permit(QSD's/QSP's on staff) c
a)
P Caltrans Standard Specifications and Standard Plans E
P Subdivision Maps Act& Land Surveyor's Act
Industry Standards Q
Packet Pg. 130
i
S.C.d
Engineering Map Checking and Inspection
Typical Scope of Work
.2
Review of Final and Parcel Maps includes the following: p
P Review for compliance with the approved Tentative Map and Conditions of Approval c
P Review for compliance with the California Subdivision Map Act
P Review for compliance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act 3
m
P Review of closure calculations
P Review of title information for the property, including existing easements and any other relevant R
encumbrances, based on information contained in a preliminary title reports and other m
documents to be furnished by applicant
P Review of record documents(deeds and maps)of the subject and adjacent properties m
P Preparation of Staff Report for City Council Approval, if required.
w
Review Process
T
w
New map submittals will be coordinated with the proposed project manager.At the time of new
submittals,the applicant may decide to meet with the City and CSG's project manager to briefly present
the project and discuss any challenges facing the project.At that time,CSG will perform a cursory review L
and let the applicant know if additional documents are needed for the review. U_
r
Unless otherwise dictated by unusual requirements, map reviews for the City will be conducted in CSG's
facilities in San Mateo,although project meetings can be scheduled at City Hall upon the City's request. (D
tM
CSG's offices are adequately staffed with trained map checkers to deal with any fluctuating workload
that the City might experience in reviewing maps,and we consistently provide timely turnaround for `0
various applications,according to the City's specified time line. If staff is requested to be on-site, map
review services can be performed on-site.
Once the map check has been completed,the applicant may decide to meet with the reviewing party to E
discuss the comments. Meetings with applicants and City staff may be conducted at CSG's offices or at
U)
on-site at City's offices. CSG will be readily available to meet with applicants to discuss any concerns c
they may have at any stage during the review process. 2
m
Methodology
CSG utilizes an individualized review process tailored to meet the government agency's particular needs 3
and requirements or guidelines. Upon initiation of the project, CSG will prepare a customized map >
review checklist to be used by every map checker to complement his or her knowledge of state or
federal rules and regulations and industry standards.The customized checklist is commonly prepared
ca
from Cities' Municipal Codes/Ordinances and any other public or confidential information made a
available to CSG by City staff.
M
M
Building and Site Inspection Services N
O
Standards and Responsibilities o
IL
CSG provides fully integrated, multi-disciplined building and fire inspection services for residential,
commercial,and industrial projects,and are experienced in all construction types. We provide v
experienced, ICC certified (and/or with other appropriate entities in accordance with A6717) inspectors.
m
E
L
V
Q
Packet Pg. 131
i
S.C.d
Our inspectors ensure compliance with applicable codes and requirements by identifying code
violations,offering solutions to developers, property owners and tenants
on potential risks and safety hazards, and by working as a team to correct
.2
violations. Specific responsibilities include but are not limited to the o
following:
0
E
1 Providing inspection services for project compliance with relevant V
codes including accessibility,fire,grading,building, electrical,
m
mechanical and plumbing :., c
1 Addressing resident inquiries and resolving complaints
Assisting with the construction and demolition permitting process
Providing code administration, inspection and enforcement >
as
P Maintaining records and files concerning construction permits and building code administration,
documents for storage and/or imaging
R
In addition,we can utilize combination inspection personnel whenever possible to perform over-the- m
counter plan reviews or assist as customer service back-up at the front counter in addition to regular 2
J
inspection duties to save jurisdictions valuable time and expenses. Our inspection staff easily integrates -a
into client organizations,consistently implementing policies and procedures and remaining transparent
to applicants and customers.CSG provides all vehicles,fuel, maintenance and other equipment L
necessary for inspectors to carry out duties with no additional cost to the City.
c
m
Continuing Certification and Training E
We take pride in working with inspectors who have variety of inspection project experiences and who =
are motivated to achieve the highest level of certification. We work hard to match your jurisdiction's
r level of safety and code compliance and understand that personality and customer service are crucial to
on-the-job success. All CSG inspectors are ICC certified and/or possess additional required certifications. 3
In addition,they routinely update their knowledge and skills through specialized training classes and £
seminar attendance in approved and modern methods, materials,tools and safety used in building
inspection, as well as the most current building standards. U)
CF
0
CASp Inspection Services
CL
To facilitate the City's compliance with current rules and regulations,CSG can provide a CASp certified
professional for technical questions and interpretations,and to perform accessibility compliance —
inspections and CASp inspection report development.
m
Building Official Services
a
CSG's building officials can perform management of a Building Division,as well as provide oversight and Ln
direction and be available part-time as needed as requested. Our building officials are certified with v
many years of building industry experience,and can provide staff management, plan review,and
inspection roles as needed. CSG's Building Officials provide a well-rounded approach to building y
administration and the operations of a building department. Our building officials are well-known for Q,
consummate customer service skills and are successful at public interaction to determine solutions with 0 L-
0-
innovative problem-solving.They are thoroughly familiar with the following services listed below as well 0
as adapting to other needed requests: v
Quality Control
Building Code updates and adoption t
Resolution of resident inquires and complaints
Building Official Administration,processing of complex Building Code issues and dispute resolution Q
Packet Pg. 132
5.C.d
Participate in the City's Architectural Review Board
Building and Safety procedure manual
T'a
Monthly reporting of Building and Safety activities and annual reporting '3
Participate in pre-development review and provide comments p
Processing of Planning Commission and City Council staff reports(as needed) c
P Attendance at Planning Commission and City Council meetings(as needed) :2
m
Stormwater [NPDESI Program Inspections
3
The MS4 Permit regulates discharges of urban storm water runoff from all MS4 facilities within the LD
Santa Ana River watershed in San Bernardino County.The permittees covered by this permit include the
San Bernardino County Flood Control District,San Bernardino County,and 16 municipalities, including
the City of San Bernardino. The Flood Control District is the Principal Permittee,and the remaining
jurisdictions are the Co-Permittees. Although all permittees work cooperatively to implement the area- N
m
wide MS4 program, each permittee is responsible for compliance with the permit within its respective
jurisdiction. Below is a sample of the tasks that CSG will perform in conjunction with administrating the
City's Storm Water Program. CSG is committed to providing all specific responsibilities identified for co- ca
m
permittees by the permit's Section III(B), including all reporting requirements. U_
New Development:
I Determine applicability of WQMP requirements for proposed projects E
Review and approve project-specific WQMP's
0 Review and approve improvements plans for compliance with the QWMP's. R
Review and approve Erosion Control Plans
L
Lead meetings with project applicants, if required
Develop storm water specific conditions of approval 3
Revise the WQMP Guidance and Template to implement permit updates when necessary c
Conduct construction and post-construction BMP inspections N
c
Municipal Facilities: g
r
Develop and maintain inventory of municipal facilities required for inspections
Manage inspection programs for drainage facilities U)
P Conduct inspections and follow-ups
Develop and implement enforcement actions m
Agency Construction Project:
1 Ensure compliance with the MS4 permit
Ensure compliance with the State Construction General Permit, if required a.
P Regulate practices on street and road projects M
v
Industrial/Commercial Sites:
Develop and maintain inventory of industrial and commercial facilities required for inspections R
P Conduct inspections and follow-ups a
P Develop and implement enforcement actions a
P Maintain inspection program database
Public Education and Outreach: v
Participate in Public Education Subcommittee
d
Conduct outreach to the General Public E
0 Implement school education program
Miscellaneous other Program Management Tasks: Q
Packet Pg. 133
Attend Management Committee/Subcommittee meetings
P Coordinate permit compliance with other agencies
P Develop Implementation Agreement and annual cost sharing 1°
.2
Assist with ordinance and code revisions
Develop training programs and perform training as required 0
a�
.3
m
Availability and Customer Service
M
CSG's main function is to serve as an extension of the City. We clearly understand the importance of our 3
role in the success of the City and commit to providing its citizens and business partners—residents, •D
architects,engineers,developers,contractors—as well as City staff,the highest level of service. We
believe effective communication and excellent customer service are essential to a successful working
relationship between the City,CSG and the development community. a
Office Hours and Meeting Availability «'
CSG staff plan checkers and inspectors are available for applicant inquiries or conferences anytime
during regular business hours without charge via telephone,8:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through
Friday. We can easily alter our hours to meet the City's needs. Evenings and weekends for special events L-
and meetings can be accommodated with 48 hours notice. For the City's convenience,we can also meet
r
with City staff,architects and applicants. Customers have the option of meeting our staff at the City or
at our Santa Ana office.We recognize the value of pre-design consultation with prospective applicants E
m
and are available to provide this service as well. Our Project Manager/Lead will be available in person for
consultation and meetings with a reasonable lead time c=a
Response to City Questions or Requests a
CSG staff can typically respond to the City for all questions or requests generated during field f°
3
inspections or any plan review during the same day, but no later than the following day a request is E
received. °
Emergency Response c
CSG is well qualified to respond to a local or regional emergency. Many of our personnel, have assisted
in emergencies such as the recent San Bruno gas explosion,the Northridge, Loma Prieta and Napa N
earthquakes as well as regional floods,fires and other emergencies. Our personnel's certifications 5
include those obtained through FEMA, Office of Emergency Services (OES),and IACET First Responder. m
2
d
c
°
a
LO
M
M
R
ql
O
O.
O
a
c�
U)
U
r
_
d
E
t
v
M
a
Packet Pg. 134
S.C.d
Staffing S E T 10�
2
Team members o
CSG proposes the following staff and organizational structure for this project.All services will be directed out
of our Santa Ana office with additional resources available,if necessary,from any of our regional offices.Khoa m
Duong, Project Manager,will oversee the proposed staff members who are available immediately. He
will allocate appropriate staff and hours to complete all projects on time. e=a
3
a�
ARp �9
0
JT
U)
J
JT
p J
�G`t'DED IN�gti _
to
d
Khoa Duong,PE LL
Project Manager
aD
E
0
elk eo
c
R
PLAN REVIEW FIRE PLAN REVIEW &
Khoa Duong,PE INSPECTION R
Paul Armstrong,PE,CBO Page Dougherty
Chi Tran,SE,PE,CBO o
r
Ritchie Kato,SE,PE,CASp 0)
Ed Chock,SE,PE ENGINEERING c
GRADING, ON-SITE &
Mariam Madjlessi,PE OFFSITE PLAN y
Andrew Hoang CHECKING AND N
Andrew Bond INSPECTION
Dung Vu,PE
m
INSPECTION _
John Hartle ENGINEERING MAP a
Hartley CHECKING &
Melvin Fleener INSPECTION 'O
M
Forest Johnson Dung Vu,PE
Vance Cook
R
Richard Millan c
CL
STORMWATER o
BUILDING OFFICIAL (NPDES) PROGRAM 0
INSPECTION N
Paul Armstrong,PE,CBO V
Sophie Truong,PE,PLS,
Chi Tran,SE,PE,CBO QSP/QSD =
a�
E
R
r
Q
Packet Pg. 135
5.C.d
Staff Qualifications
2
Key personnel qualifications and certifications are provided in the following chart,including license and 0
certification numbers.Copies of all licenses and certifications are available upon request.Resumes for all 0
proposed staff can be found in Section 8.
NAME QUALIFICATIONS
CERTIFICATION
m
a
c
Khoa Duong,PE Professional Engineer,State of California 43901 M
Project Lead/Plan Review Professional Engineer,State of Nevada 013620 a
Engineer Certified Plans Examiner,ICC Certified 0840436 >
Paul Armstrong,PE Professional Engineer,State of California 45464 W
Senior Plan Review Engineer/ Building Official,ICC Certified 0002014-CB .
Building Official
co
rn
Chi Train,SE,PE,CBO Structural Engineer,State of California 2728
Structural Plan Review Engineer/ Professional Engineer,State of California 33643 j
Building Official Building Official,ICC Certffied 1061872-CB a
Plans Examiner,ICC Certified 1061872-63
Ritchie Kato,SE,PE,CASp Structural Engineer,State of California SE2650 ( d LL
Structural Plan Review Engineer Civil Engineer,State of Califomia C31833
CASp Specialist 272 =
Ed Chock,SE,PE Structural Engineer,California SE3759 E
Structural Plan Review Engineer Structural Engineer,Nevada 018605
Structural Engineer,Arizona 51735 c
Structural Engineer,Utah 7850765
Civil Engineer,California 2203
Civil Engineer,Nevada 24158 ar`i
Civil Engineer,Texas 018605 3
Certified Building,ICC Certified 1067543118
Plans Examiner,ICC Certified 88554 `E
Building Plans Examiner CBC Certified 0123030 N
Building Plans Examiner Certified 0123030
Certified Building Official 0123030 p
Registered Civil Engineer 24158
Mariam Madjlessi,PE Professional Engineer,State of California 79714 0.
Plan Review Engineer Plans Examiner,ICC Certified 8183364
Residential Fire Sprinkler Plans Examiner/Inspector,ICC Certified 8183364 3
Andrew Hoang Engineer in Training,State of California XE104446 m
Certified Plans Examiner/Permit Plans Examiner 5044839-133 >
Technician
Andrew Bond Residential Plans Examiner,ICC Certified 8246642
Certified Plans Examiner/Permit a
Technician
John Hartley Certified Building Inspector ICC 530130
Building Inspector/Code Certified Plans Examiner ICC 530130
Enforcement Officer Certified Code Enforcement Officer
Certified CACEO
Post-Disaster Safety Officer a
Melvin Fleener Building Inspector ICC 847237
0
Building Inspector a
C7
Forest Johnson Residential Building Inspector ICC B-15308629 N
Building Inspector Residential Mechanical Inspector ICC M-15308629 U
c
m
E
V
Q
Packet Pg. 136
S.C.d
NAME QUALIFICATIONS LICENSE/
CERTIFICATION i
Vance Cook Building Inspector ICC 5003436-10
Building Inspector Building Inspector ICC 5003436-65
Combination Inspector ICC 5003436-56 F—
Residential Combination Inspector ICC 5003436-R5
CA Commercial Plumbing Inspector ICC 5003436-13
CALK Disaster Worker Certified SAP50958
Richard Milian Residential Building Inspector ICC 8259814 3
Building Inspector m
Page Dougherty Fire Plans Examiner,ICC 5258353
Fire Service Specialist Fire Inspection II,ICC 106477667 3
Sophie i roung,PE,PLS, Professional Civil Engineer State of California 68110
QSPIQSD Professional Land Surveyor State of California 8998
Dung Vu Professional Civil Engineer State of California C38902 ,
Grading Plan Review Engineer m
rn
a)
w
c
ns
a�
_L
U.
r
E
4)
R
C�
G
d
it
R
E
L
O
4+
rn
d
O
i+
V
Q
3
a�
a�
c
R
a
LO
M
M
f6
O
Q
O
L
CL
V
Cn
U
c
E
s
U
Q
Packet Pg. 137
S.C.d
L Related Project Experience
The following are examples of projects for which CSG has performed related services,as indicated. p
co
c_
The Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center(ARTIC) I Anaheim, CA
CSG performed fire and life safety and electrical reviews for the 00
v
Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodai Center(ARTIC) project;
a world-class development project in the City of Anaheim at 2626 3
Katella Road within the agreed timeframe and budget of the city.
ARTIC combines a transportation gateway and mixed-use activity
center on a 16-acre site owned by the Orange County Transportation {> w
Authority(OCTA)and the City of Anaheim. Construction details
include a 120 foot high clam shell-like, 2-story structure and interior 4,
mezzanine.The structure is connected to train platforms by a bridge. -
ARTIC will serve as a hub for Orange County and the region,where freeways, major arterials,bus
routes and Orange County's backbone rail system converge. ARTIC services will include:OCTA bus, L
Anaheim Resort Transit,airport flyaway shuttles,taxi, and tour and charter buses as well as LL
accommodate future plans for the Anaheim Rapid Connection (ARC)and high-speed trains. _
m
E
City of Fullerton Police Department Facility I Fullerton, CA
c
CSG staff coordinated and provided building and structural plan
review as well as on-call building inspections services within the (D
agreed timeframe and budget of the city. The present Fullerton 3
Police facility was originally dedicated as the City Hall in July, 1942. E
The building's balanced design,enclosing the sunken patio on two
sides, is complemented by fine detail work that is particularly U)
r apparent in the central corner tower.The Police Department has o
occupied the building since construction of the New City Hall in
d
1963. N
c
3
ai
Costco Huntington Beach, CA >
CSG provided plan review on this 154,113 sq.ft within the agreed timeframe° I �,
and budget of the city. Costco building included exterior trash enclosure for0
compactor, exterior loading dock concrete/masonry walls, interior refrigeration ,n
units and extended 4' high cart corrals.Valuation of this new construction: v
$12.5 million.
R
N
O
C.
O
Best Buy Tustin, CA a
CSG provided on-going building plan review and building inspection services vii
within the agreed timeframe and budget of the city. Work included reviewing v
plans for on-and off-site improvements,collaborating with the City toward the
timely delivery of the project,and participating in hearings and presentations to E
s
City Council and various neighborhood organizations.
Packet Pg.I M
5.C.d
Fairfield Inn and Suites I Tustin, CA
CSG provided architectural,structural, plumbing, mechanical and electrical
plan review services for this$8.2 million, new construction project .2
consisting of 82,289 square feet within the agreed timeframe and budget p
of the city.The 4-story structure is of Type V-A/SP with occupancy groups
_
R-1,A-2,and A-3. =a
'3
Hoag Hospital Expansion Huntington Beach, CA m
.a
CSG performed complete plan review within the agreed a
timeframe and budget of the city for this project;approximately 3
52,775 sq.ft.three-story addition to an existing 52,177 sq.ft.
medical office building.The structure is of Type II-B,fully Ce
sprinklered,with a designation of occupancy group B. In
addition,CSG reviewed new construction of a four-story, T
y
192,079 sq.ft., and 486 stall parking structure.The structure is of d
Type I-B,with an occupancy group designation of S-2 open
parking garage. The structure is supported on mat-foundation. _
Parking decks are constructed of a post-tensioned slab. Dual `0
WOMMORMW
m
systems,concrete shear walls and concrete moment frames are E
used to resist lateral loads.The expanded services will include urgent care, pharmacy, rehab/therapy,
and imaging,a wellness center for public education, medical oncology/infusion,and physician clinical aD
E
space.All deadlines and expectations were met or exceeded. a
R
The Village at Bella Terra I Huntington Beach, CA `°
too
CSG provided plan review and inspection services for all phases of this fi
project within the agreed timeframe and budget of the city. f L 3
E
Phase I: New construction of 68,539 sq.ft.,Type-VA construction, multi- t o
residential apartment building.Valuation:$7.6 million. iR` in
Phase II: New construction of 82,622 sq.ft.,Type-VA construction, multi- g
residential apartment building. Valuation:$9.2 million.
CL
Bella Terra II Parking Structure: New construction of five-and-one-half-story, _
700+stall parking structure. The structure is supported on a pile foundation 3
system. Parking decks are constructed of a post-tensioned slab. Dual systems, concrete shear walls and !
concrete moment frames are used to resist lateral loads.Valuation:$6.5 million.
_
Marconi Automotive Museum and Foundation for Kids I Tustin, CA `°
CL
This project re-classified an existing museum from Group B u,
Occupancy to a Group A using the 2010 CBC. CSG provided a review M
of the proposed structural upgrades due to a Tier 1 Seismic
Evaluation that was conducted within the agreed timeframe and c
budget of the city.The building is a precast/tilt-up concrete shear c
wall structure with flexible diaphragms designed under the 1970 a`
UBC.The walls are 21 feet tall with the roof diaphragm connected y
using wood ledgers.The area of the building is 25,720 square v
feet.This project was originally designed as collector's museum of
American classic cars and includes a floor full of buses and more
E
than 30 motorcycles, motorbikes including the 100 cars on display.
The museum has over 20,000 sq.ft. in additional storage for vehicle Q
rotation on a regular basis.
Packet Pg.139
S.C.d
Richard Nixon Library ( Yorba Linda, CA
CSG coordinated and provided building and structural plan review
throughout the project, in addition to reviewing plans for on-site ! ^�
improvements,within the agreed timeframe and budget of the p
city. CSG provided assistance to the City in working with architects,
structural engineers,and delivering overall plan check comments. =a
CSG worked with staff and the development team from the m
beginning to ensure all questions pertaining to the structure were "0
addressed,enabling construction to start on time. CSG also
participated in numerous hearings and presentations to City Council
and various neighborhood organizations. >
a)
a
Beachwalk Apartments I Huntington Beach, CA �
Within the agreed timeframe and budget of the city,CSG v)
provided structural, plumbing, mechanical and electrical review
J
of the 173 unit project.The$16 million dollar project included V
four-stories and over 185,000 square feet.The project also
includes a 5-level parking structure, public and private open
space areas,a leasing office,fitness room, resident clubhouse u_
and rooftop deck. CSG coordinated building and structural
review throughout the project and worked with architects, E
d
structural engineers and the City to ensure code compliance
while keeping the project on track.The developer held a grand
opening in May, 2012.
�a
CVS Pharmacy I La Habra, CA E
0
CSG reviewed plans,within the agreed timeframe and budget of the city,for the c"n
redevelopment of a new CVS Pharmacy distribution center.Valuation of the CVS c
project was$16.9 million. pharmacy
m
CL
Statewide Residential Projects 3
CSG has coordinated and provided building LD
and structural plan check and inspection 0
ih services for new residences, remodels and
alterations, ranging from 2,000 to 10,000 sq. a
feet. We have provided on-call building
inspection services,evaluated individual M
projects and provided recommendations
based on specific needs,and ensured N
compliance with local building codes,fire 0
codes,energy conservation standards,ADA a
_._._ regulations and local ordinances. c9
kn
U
c
m
E
t
r
Q
Packet Pg. 140
5.C.d
References •
Our track record of success with our clients is outstanding and we encourage you to contact our p
references with any questions or clarification you might require. In addition to the references listed on c
the City's Price Form,we have provided the following, more comprehensive list of references for which =a
we have recently provided similar services as those requested in the Request for Proposal. '
m
v
City of Anaheim City of Tustin c=a
Bob Heinrich Dana Ogdon
Chief Building Official AICP Assistant Director
200 S.Anaheim Boulevard 300 Centennial Way
Anaheim,CA 92805 Tustin,CA 92780
(724)765-51533 (714)573-3109
Cn
bdheinrich @anaheim.net dogdon @tustinca.org
Building Plan Review and Inspection Services Building Plan Review and Inspection Services
City of Fullerton City of Huntington Beach
Kirk Warren Scott Hess -
303 W.Commonwealth Ave. AICP Director L`
Fullerton,CA 92832 2000 Main St. a=i
(714)738-6541 Huntington Beach,CA 92648
kirkew @ci.fullerton.ca.us (714)536-5241
Building Plan Review and Inspection Services chess @surfcity-hb.org
Staff Augmentation,Building Plan Review and
Inspection Services,Permit Technician Services 3
City of La Habra City of Costa Mesa E
Dennis McCreary Khanh Nguyen
Building Official Building Official c
201 E. La Habra Blvd. 77 Fair Drive,2nd Floor
La Habra,CA 90631 Costa Mesa,CA 92626 m
CL
(562)383-4119 (714)754-5273
dmccreary@lahabraca.gov knguyen @ci.costa-mesa.ca.us 3
Building Plan Review and Inspection Services,Permit Building, Fire,&Grading Plan Review Services, 2
Technician Services, Building Official Services Inspection Services,Document Archiving Services
City of Signal Hill City of Orange
a.
Scott Charney Reggie Miegs
Community Development Director Building Official
2175 Cherry Avenue 300 E.Chapman Avenue
Signal Hill,CA 90755 Orange,CA 92866
(562)989-7343 (714)744-7201 0
CL
scharney @cityofsignalhill.org Building Plan Review and Inspection Services °
Building Plan Review and Inspection Services, Permit
a
Technician Services,Building Official Services v
c
d
E
r
ca
a
Packet Pg. 141
S.C.d
City of Yorba Linda County of San Bernardino
Steven Harris,AICP Gia Kim
Director of Community Development Assistant Director 2
4845 Casa Loma Avenue 385 North Arrowhead Avenue,1t Floor 0
Yorba Linda,CA 92885-8714 San Bernardino,CA 92415 =
(714)961-7130 (909)798-7593
sharris @yorba-linda.org gia.kim @lus.sbcounty.gov m
Building Plan Review and Inspection Services Building Plan Review and Inspection Services c
ca
City of Hemet City of Hemet Fire Department 3
Jeff Thomas Primo Reynoso
Building Official Fire Chief m
445 E.Florida Avenue 510 E. Florida Avenue
Hemet,CA 92543 Hemet,CA 92543
ea
(951)765-2477 (951)765-2450
m
Building Plan Review Services Fire Plan Review and Inspection Services
City of Palm Springs
Ron Beverly m
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal U-
300 N. El Cielo Road c
Palm Springs,CA 92262 E
(760)323-8187
Ron.Beverly @palmsprings-ca.gov
Fire Plan.Review Services
r
3
E
O
c
0
a�
CL
U)
c
3
d
(D
c
ca
a
Ln
M
V
M
N
O
a
O
L
a
a
U)
U
r
c
m
E
r
R
Q
Packet Pg. 142
li
S.C.d
City-Requested Bid Forms
The City-required bid forms listed below are provided on the following pages. p
0)
P Instructions to Bidders =_
v
P Technical Specifications m
Price Form
c
ca
Subcontractors List ;
m
i Non-Collusion Affidavit
(D
w
Cn
m
w
J
C
O
(D
L_
U_
E
a)
CR
C
L
d
r
3
E
0
y
U)
c
0
r
m
a
c
3
m
CD
c
ca
a
LO
M
M
R
N
O
CL
O
L_
a.
c�
U
c
m
E
t
v
to
Q
Packet Pg. 143
i
5.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS `°
.0
r_
0
Bid Documents to Be Returned by Bidder
'S
m
RFP
Plan Review Services `°
3
❑
x Bidder Experience, Competency, Qualification and Profile (Vendor Document) III
a�
Proposal/Bid Content Forms
d
❑
X Non-Collusion Affidavit (City Form) I"Stn,°t'°ns to Offeror(s)/Bidders N
III Proposal/Bid Content and Forms J
x0 Listing of Proposed Subcontractor (City Form)
c
❑ Cost / Price Form (City Form) Instructions to Bidders, III Bid Content and Forms
ii
X❑ Authorized Signatures Instructions to Bidders
E
m
III Bid Content and Forms
Bidder Identification
M
III Bid Content and Forms
❑ Addendum Received (City Form)
r
M
❑
X 120 Day Bid Validity Statement III Bid Content and Forms E
0
r
RI Authorized Signatures (City Form) III Bid Content and Forms y
c
0
❑ References III Bid Content and Forms v
d
CL
0
FX Proper Identification and Submittal of Proposal/Bid Package, and Price Form r_
Instructions to Bidders 3
d
c
M
a
Bidders are required to submit this checklist completed with all bid documents LO
This list may not be reflective of all documents necessary for submittal. M
0
a
0
a
0
U)
U
c
m
E
v
M
Q
8
Packet Pg. 144
S.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
.2
r_
Plan Review, Inspection, Stormwater Management, and Building Official Services o
c
NOTICE : "SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO THE BIDDER"
.3
m
Services:
Bidder shall complete right-hand column indicating brief reasoning for 3
exceptions to requirements when not acceptable. State "Acceptable" if
requirements are agreeable as set forth in left-hand column.
Equipment:
Bidder shall complete right-hand column indicating specific size and or
make and model of all components when not exactly as specified. State
"As Specified" if item is exactly as set forth in the left-hand column. _
d
FAILURE TO COMPLETE RIGHT HAND COLUMN WILL INVALIDATE BID E
CATEGORY I ACCEPTABLE/AS SPECIFIED
Provide plan reviews of development projects Acceptable as specified E
necessary to determine compliance with all
applicable building and fire codes, provisions of Title
19, all NFPA standards, codes and laws.
d
1. SCOPE 3
A. Plan Review Services: The project, in Acceptable as specified E
general will consist of the examination, N
analysis, and review of plans for various c
construction projects within the City in order to
determine compliance with all applicable �.
building and fire regulations, including but not
limited to local building regulations and 3
amendments, as well as the California Building
Standards Code (CAC Title 24), comprised of
the latest adopted editions of the model codes
with State amendments, and the State a
Housing Law (CAC Title 25) as adopted by the
State of California and the City of San
Bernardino and California Fire Code, Title 19
and all NFPA standards. Dependent upon c
each specific project assigned, such plan o
reviews may consist of an examination of the a
grading, site drainage, onsite improvement, vii
geotechnical, structural, fire and life safety,
electrical, mechanical, plumbing, disabled
accessibility, energy conservation, stormwater E
management and green building features of o
a
14
Packet Pg. 145
5.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
the proposed project. The City shall provide
the consultant with copies of code
amendments and official code interpretations o
issued by the Building Official and/or Fire
Official. Related consultant services such as
the availability of a Certified Access Specialist m'
(CASp) pursuant to SB 1608 will be required.
R
B. Building, and Site Inspection Services: Acceptable as specified
Consultants shall provide building inspection
staff to supplement the City's existing staff on
an on-call as-needed basis. The consultant's
building inspection staff shall be certified by Un
the International Code Council or other
appropriate entities in accordance with AB717 M
and possess a minimum of one-year of o
building code enforcement experience with a
municipality or a private municipal consultant.
The Director shall have the right of refusal of
any staff member assigned by the consultant. a�
c
C. Buildinq Official Services: Acceptable as specified I 2
Consultant shall provide a Certified Building 3
Official on an on-call as-needed basis. The E
individual shall have a bachelor's degree in
public administration, engineering, architecture
or a related field and a minimum of 3 years °—
r
experience as a building official with another a
municipality. The individual will provide c
supervision and direction to the Building &
Safety Division staff, code administration and 2
interpretations, develop policies and
ordinances, interface with customers, city staff
and elected officials, and perform related a
administrative functions as assigned. The Ln
Director shall have the right of refusal of any M
staff member assigned by the consultant.
0
CL
0
a`
0
co
U
r
m
E
t
v
ca
a
15
Packet Pg. 146
S.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
D. Engineering Map Checking and Inspection: Acceptable as specified
Consultants shall provide on-call map
checking, approval and inspection services to 0
the City for the review of Subdivision Tract and 0
Parcel Maps, Lot Mergers, Lot Line
Adjustments and Certificate of Compliance m'
which shall be reviewed by a Licensed Land =
Surveyor in the State of California for the 3
procedure of survey, mathematical closure, d
and compliance with the Subdivision Map Act,
the Land Surveyors' Act, Title 19 of the San ,
Bernardino Municipal Code, the approved
Tentative Map, the approved Conditions of cn
Approval, and the current title report. This J
review shall include but is not limited to the
review of survey documentation, lot and
boundary closure calculations, dedications and
easement provisions, legal descriptions and
completeness and accuracy of data notation.
d
E. Engineering Grading, On-Site and Off-Site Acceptable as specified
Plan Checking:
Consultants shall provide on-call plan
checking, approval services to the City for the 3
review of grading plans, on-site and off-site E
Improvement plans and inspection. The plans N
shall be reviewed by a Licensed Professional )
Civil Engineer in the State of California for c
compliance with The Green Book, Title 19 of
the San Bernardino Municipal Code, the
approved Conditions of Approval, and the 3
current title report.
F. Stormwater (NPDES) Program Inspections: Acceptable as specified
The Consultant shall provide inspection a
services to ensure compliance with the LO
Stormwater Management Program in M
accordance with the MS4 Permit. The
Consultant's NPDES inspection staff shall be N
experienced and trained to inspect the City's c
commercial businesses, construction sites, a
and industrial projects and post construction y
onsite Stormwater Best Management
Practice's (BMPs).
a�
E
C
v
R
a
16
Packet Pg. 147
S.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
2. REQUIREMENTS
2
.2
A. Consultant shall utilize employees to perform the Acceptable as specified o
plan reviews and inspections who are certified as
Plans Examiners and Building Inspectors through
the International Code Council (ICC) and retain m'
CASp certified inspectors and Plans Examiners
as required. Plans Examiners and Inspectors M
shall be provided with a reasonable degree of
annual training in accordance with the
requirements of AB 717 (Health and Safety Code
18965 et seq.). J'
M
co
B. A California Registered Civil, Structural Engineer, Acceptable as specified w
Licensed Land Surveyor, or a Licensed Architect
shall review the portion of plans that involve o
engineering design.
LL
r
C. The standard turn-around time for assigned Acceptable as specified d
building plan review shall be 10 (ten) working a)
days for the Initial review and 5 (five) working
days for re-checks. Consultants shall pick up and
deliver plans daily to the Department unless the
Department approves alternate arrangements. 3
E
D. The standard turn-around time for assigned Acceptable as specified c
engineering plan review shall be 15 (fifteen)
working days for initial review and 7 (seven) 2
working days for re-checks. Consultants shall a)
pick up and deliver plans daily to the Department U)
unless the Department or Fire Official approves 3
alternate arrangements. a)
D. Projects shall be assigned at the sole discretion of Acceptable as specified
the Building Official, or Fire Official and the City. a
The City may use its own employees and/or other Ln
independent contractors to perform plan reviews
in addition to any such work assigned to
Consultant. The volume of plan reviews is N
dependent upon economic conditions that are a
0
outside the control of the City. Consequently, a`
there is no guarantee provided as to the minimum
or maximum volume of work that may be
assigned to a Consultant within any given time
period. °7
E
�a
a
17
Paacet Pg. 148
5.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
E. In the course of the plan review and inspection Acceptable as specified �o
process, the Consultant shall avoid situations
involving an actual or potential conflict of interest, o
and shall act as an agent and a deputy of the =
Building Official or Fire Official and shall act in
the interest of the City and the citizens of San m'
Bernardino. Consultants shall provide no c
services for any private client within the corporate M
boundaries of the City during the contract period. d
d
3. COMPENSATION
w
A. Proposals shall include the consultant's Acceptable as specified
expected compensation expressed as a J
percentage of the City's plan review fee.
c
�o
The proposals should also include the LL
consultant's expected compensation for
structural only plan reviews as a percentage of
the City's plan review fee.
The consultant's plan review fee shall be M�
considered the full compensation for all plan
review performed through the second recheck. 3
Thereafter, the consultant may charge any E
additional plan review time at their agreed °
upon hourly rate if the base plan review fee is )
not adequate to cover the consultant's cost for C
the review.
a�
c.
N
B. Hourly rates for grading, on-site and off-site Acceptable as specified
3
plan review, mapping review and building plan
review and fire plan review shall be specified
separately. Projects not assigned a valuation
by the Department are to be billed by the a.
consultant to the City based on the hourly rate
and the actual plan check time in one-half hour M
increments. The consultant's current
accumulated plan review hours, to be billable, N
must be specified on each transmittal sheet c
accompanying the plans. The final transmittal a`
sheet accompanying the approved plans must
indicate the total accumulated hours. Hours
not indicated on the transmittal sheets shall c
not be billable. E
�o
a
18
Packet Pg. 149
S.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
C. The Department(s) may assign any plan Acceptable as specified
review at an hourly rate rather than based on
valuation at City's sole discretion. O
D. The hourly rate for CASp services, if available, Acceptable as specified M
shall be specified. m
E. The costs of services for the Stormwater Acceptable as specified
Program Inspections should be specified on
an hourly basis.
F. The costs of Building Official Services should Acceptable as specified I 4
be specified on an hourly basis. in
G. The Consultant shall invoice the City for Acceptable as specified M
Services rendered on a monthly basis.
d
LL
r
4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Acceptable as specified
E
d
Prospective consultants shall be qualified based
upon experience, education, training, and
professional registration and certification. Proposals Q
shall indicate the following in a detailed manner: 3
E
A. Past experience on similar projects. co
B. Education, training, experience, professional c
registration and certification of the principal and of
staff members who will be involved in the project. a
C. A brief narrative of the processes that will be
employed to accomplish the project including a
discussion of quality control measures. d
D. Expected compensation based on Item No. 3
above.
E. Any additional capabilities of the firm or optional a
services that may be offered (e.g. CASp services), U)
which are outside the scope of the project M
description.
F. Six (6) copies of the proposal shall be submitted N
0
to the Purchasing Department, Vanessa Sanchez, c
Accounting Assistant, 300 North "D" Street, San a.
Bernardino, CA, 92418 no later than 3:OOPM on
July 21, 2014. Proposals shall be clearly U
marked on the outside of the envelope: "Plan
Review Services." E
t
o
a
19
Packet Pg. 150
5.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
5. SELECTION PROCESS Acceptable as specified
.2
Staff will analyze all submittals and verify the p
information contained therein. Interviews of selected
firms will be conducted at the time and date specified
on the cover. The firms will be rated on a point m'
system with a maximum score of 100. An additional
five points will be given to City of San Bernardino f0
based consultants. Such companies shall have an
office with a minimum of two employees doing
business inside the city limits and shall possess a city
Business Registration. a'
d
J
C
l4
d
L
U-
C
d
E
d
O
C
O
L
d
M
M
3
E
L
O
a+
O
V
d
Q
3
d
as
c
a
M
M
N
N
O
Q.
O
L-
E
s
v
R
Q
20
Packet Pg. 151
5.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
m
.v
PRICE FORM r-
0
0
32
REQUEST FOR QUOTES: RFP F-14-41 m
DESCRIPTION OF RFP: Plan Review Services o
3
m
PRINT
NAME OF AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE Khoa Duong, PE, Vice President, Building and Fire Life Safety 2
d
w
Provide pricing that is a Firm Fixed Fee
c
d
L
The undersigned Contractor hereby offers to provide Plan Review Services in strict r
compliance with the specifications, terms and conditions set forth in this Request for
Proposal. d
General Information
c
M
A. Company Name: CSG Consultants, Inc.
r
M
B. Company Address: 801 Park Center Drive#230, Santa Ana, CA 92705 E
L
O
r
C. Number of Employees: Santa Ana Office: 32 / CSG Total: 186 y
EF
0
r
D. Average annual business volume over last three calendar years a
$ Santa Ana Office: $1,513,480 / CSG Total: $10,574,345 c
E. Number of years providing Plan Review Services at this location? 5 years 2
F. Please provide a minimum of three references: Company name, address, r-
contact person and telephone number for which your company has current a
contracts or provided Plan Review Services within the last three years. W)
M
M
City of Huntington Beach:Scott Hess,AICP Director,2000 Main Street Huntington Beach CA 92648 (714)536-5241 0
Q.
O
City of Redlands: Henry Roe,Chief Building Official,35 Cajon Street,Suite 20, Redlands,CA 92373,(909)798-7593 a
City of Azusa, Robert Keyes, Building Official,213 E. Foothill Blvd.,Azusa,CA 91702-1395,(626)812-5293 U
c
m
Please see proposal for additional references. E
r
R
Q
25
Packet Pg. 152
S.G.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
R
.2
PRICE FORM (continued) o
M
_
G. Primary contact person for the City of San Bernardino:
m
Name: Khoa Duong Telephone No. 714-568-1010
a
H. Business Organization Type. Indicate whether your firm is an individual
proprietorship, partnership, corporation, etc.
1. If incorporated, provide the following information: T
Date of incorporation: June 15, 2000 State of incorporation: California in
w
Names and titles of all officers and directors:
Cyrus Kianpour, President; Nourdin Khayata, Secretary; M
m
L
Charles Rider, Assistant Secretary; Bradley Donohue,Assistant Secretary; U-
as
Khoa Duong,Treasurer E
ca
2. If an individual, partnership, provide the following information: M
L
Formation date of company: 3
E
Names and addresses of all partners. Indicate whether they are general or N
limited partner:
c
0
d
CL
3
d
d
I. Indicate whether your firm has ever failed to complete any contract awarded to it.
No. M
a
If so, note when, where and why (enter here or attach narrative.) LO
M
IV
M
J. Indicate whether your firm has been or is the subject of a bankruptcy or c
insolvency proceeding or is subject to assignment for the benefit of creditors. o
No.
a
C9
U
_
d
E
t
v
M
Q
26
Packet Pg. 153
5.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
PRICE FORM (continued)
.2
ANNUAL PURCHASE ORDER 0
0
Effective on or about September 1, 2014, one three (3) year purchase order will be issued, at 'a
the City's discretion for City's requirements, on an as-needed basis, with no guaranteed m
minimum usage for Plan Review Services.
�a
Two one year options to renew are possible. Option years shall become effective only upon a,
issuance by the City of a duly authorized Purchase Order.
W
Please provide detailed cost information in the spaces provided below, and any other 2
incidental or additional costs required to complete the requirements of the proposal. in
a�
w
Description Cost
M
1. Percentage of Building Plan Review Fee: $ Plan Review Fees i
iL
80%of City's r
2. Percentage of Land Development Plan Review Fee: $ Plan Review Fees
(Grading, Soils, Traffic) (up to 3 reviews) E
rn
45%of City's c
3. Percentage of Plan Review Fee — Structural Only: $ Plan Review Fees
L
4. Hourly Rate — Land Development Plan Review (no schedules please): $ $135/hr 3
(Grading, Soils, Traffic) E
L
0
5. Hourly Rate — Building Plan Review-all disciplines (no schedules): $ $85/hr
_
0
5. Hourly Rate — Certified Accessibility Specialist program Services: $ $95/hr
CL
U)
6. Other Optional Services - please specify: Permit Technician $ $55/hr c
3
m
7. Hourly charge for NPDES Program Administration and inspection: $ $135/hr
c
8. Hourly costs for Building Official services: $ $95/hr a
W
9. Other— please specify: Building Inspection Services $ $70/hr(w/CSG VehiclA2
10. Percentage surcharge for expedited plan review: 90% y
(Building and Land Development) °
a
0
a
11. Hourly Rate — Fire Department Plan Review: $ $85/hr a
U
r
d
E
r
a
27
Packet Pg. 154
S.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
Are there any other additional or incidental costs that will be required by your firm in order to
meet the requirements of the Technical Specifications? Yes / No . (circle one). If you
answered "Yes", please provide details of said additional costs: o
_
Please indicate any elements of the Technical Specifications that cannot be met by your firm:
3
m
W
Have you included in your bid all informational items and forms as requested? Yes / No
(circle one). If you answered "no" please explain: y
w
J
_
N
4)
L
This offer shall remain firm for 120 days from RFP close date. The terms and conditions as "
set forth in the RFP shall apply to this bid. d
E
W
In signing this bid, Bidder warrants that all certifications and documents requested
herein are attached and properly completed and signed.
L
From time to time the City may issue one or more addenda to this RFP. Below, please 3
indicate all addenda to this RFP received by your firm, and the date said addenda E
was/were received. `o
r
U)
Addenda No.: Received on: o
Addenda No.: Received on:
Addenda No.: Received on: CL
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE-
2
PRINT SIGNER'S NAME AND TITLE: Khoa Duong
_
a.
Vice President, Building and Fire Life Safety
LO
M
DATE SIGNED: July 18, 2014
R
COMPANY NAME AND ADDRESS: CSG Consultants, Inc. Q.
0
L
a
801 Park Center Drive#230
U
Santa Ana, CA 92705
m
E
PHONE: 714-568-1010 FAX: 714-568-1028
R
a
28
Packet Pg. 155
S.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
IF SUBMITTING A "NO BID", PLEASE STATE THE REASON(S) BELOW: 2
t
0
3
m
C
3
a�
m
m
m
Co
2
J
C
R
N
L_
u-
r
C
d
E
C
C�
C
L
d
a+
3
E
0
0
r
m
CL
N
C
3
m
C
m
a
LO
M
M
R
VJ
O
Q
O
L
a
c�
U)
U
C
m
E
t
L)
Q
�q
Packet Pg. 156
S.C.d
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
SUBCONTRACTOR'S LIST
M
.2
As required by California State Law, the General Contractor bidding will o
hereinafter state the subcontractor who will be the subcontractor on the job for c
each particular trade or subdivision of the work in an amount in excess of one-
half of one percent of the General Contractor's total bid and will state the firm m
name and principal location of the mill, shop, or office of each. If a General =
Contractor fails to specify a subcontractor, or if he specifies more than one
subcontractor for the same portion of work to be performed under the contract in
excess of one-half of one percent, he agrees that he is fully qualified to perform
that portion himself and that he shall perform that portion himself.
w
U)
DIVISION OF NAME OF FIRM OR LOCATION w
WORK OR CONTRACTOR CITY
TRADE
Not Applicable ;v
M
c
a�
E
d
as
a
�a
a)
r
R
3
E
L
0
C
Khoa Duonk, PE 2
Print Name Signature of Bidder Q
c
3
Company Name: CSG Consultants, Inc. •D
d
Address: 801 Park Center Drive#230. Santa Ana CA 92705 =
a.
LO
REJECTION OF BIDS M
The undersigned agrees that the City of San Bernardino reserves the right to reject any c
or all bids, and reserves the right to waive informalities in a bid or bids not affected by o
law, if to do seems to best serve the public interest. a.
t�
U
c
4)
E
t
v
to
Q
30
Packet Pg. 157
A;ajes GJ!-1 PUB and `;uawa6euew aa;ennuaaolS `uol;oodsul `nnalAaa veld : 9£ti£) lesodWd JSD :;uauayoe7Ay
a �
v RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services a
NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT law
TO: THE COMMON COUNCIL, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
In accordance with Title 23, United States Code, Section 112, the undersigned
hereby states, under penalty of perjury:
That he/she has not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement,
participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken action in restraint of free
competitive bidding in connection with RFP.
Business Name CSG Consultants
Business Address 801 Park Center Drive,#230, Santa Ana, CA 92705
Signature of bidder X
1443 Deer Hollow Drive, Corona, CA 92882
Place of Residence
Subscribed and sworn before me this day of , 20_.
Notary Public in and for the County of , State of
California.
My commission expires , 20
Sfcrie of California,Coun yof p E
Suuscriberi nd sworn to(oraffir a beforem— e f
(�a r 'ZO by
proved Of e n th basis of so isfactory evidence
to be he person(�j wh appeared evidence'rae,
�rature of a
II•n.V! NAVEExD v. JATTA LA
�UNOTARY PBLIC
R -CALIFORNIA
M Y C COUNT MAR-1'5, Vtton!
2017'`
31
5.C.d
Appendix: Resumes
Resumes for CSG's key personnel are provided on the following pages. p
a�
m
c
co
3
a�
m
r
as
ca
ca
m
J
_
R
d
L_
U-
r
_
d
E
d
_
C�
C
d
r.+
R
3
E
L
0
r
c
0
r
m
CL
0
C
3
m
d
o:
c
IL
LO
M
M
N
O
R
O
L
a
0
CO
v
u
_
m
E
a
Packet Pg. 159
S.C.d
Khoa Duong PE
Vice President, Southern California
Building & Fire Life Safety
O
LICENSES and Mr. Duong serves as CSG's Building&Life Safety Manager and performs the key role of c
CERTIFICATES plan review quality control. With more than twenty five years of experience in building 'a
Professional Engineer, plan review, including onsite plan check engineer services, Mr. Duong ensures that CSG's
State of California clients receive the highest quality plan review services. Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Duong
43901 worked in both the public and private sectors. His experience includes the following: R
Professional Engineer,
State of Nevada ' Vice President in charge of plan review for Berryman& Henigar,where he worked m
013620 for ten years.
tY
Certified Plans Examiner 0 Supervising plan review engineer for Willdan,where he was responsible for the
ICC 0840436.63 day-to-day operations of the plan review section in the San Bernardino office and 0-
Certified CEC Non-Residential served as plan review engineer for numerous cities and counties throughout to
ICC NR05-94-5665 California and Nevada.
J
Certified CEC Residential • Plan review engineer with the City of San Diego Building Department. _
M
!CC R05-05-5055
Mr. Duong's expertise includes review of complex commercial, industrial and residential m
structures for compliance with applicable building codes and ordinances,engineering ii
EDUCATION standards and specifications,supplemental energy requirements,and ADA regulations.
Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering y
California Pol�rtechnic State University RELEVANT EXPERIENCE m
Pomona,CA lim
R
c
Plan Check Engineer I Various California Jurisdictions `0
Mr. Duong has served as Plan Check Engineer for the Cities of Turlock, Burlingame,
Rancho Cordova, Chino, Murrieta,and Costa Mesa. Mr. Duong performed structural plan 3
check and non-structural MEP, energy,as well as ADA reviews for commercial, industrial, E
and residential structures. `o
r
co
In-House Plan Check Engineers Various California jurisdictions c
Mr. Duong has served as an In-House Plan Check Engineer for the Cities of Orange, O
Fullerton,Yorba Linda,Tustin, Westminster,and La Habra, performing structural plan a
check and non-structural MEP, energy,and ADA reviews. He interfaced with developers,
architects, and engineers. —
3
d
a�
c
R
a
M
M
R
O
Q
O
L
a
O
to
U
;.o
c
m
E
t
Q
Packet Pg. 160
5.C.d
Paul Armstrong PE, CBO ,
Senior Plan Review Engineer IVA u t:
Building Official Cog O
a>
c
LICENSES and Mr.Armstron g offers a stron g back g round in plan review and code development from his •3
CERTIFICATES longtime position with ICBO/ICC starting as an engineer and ending as the Vice President. m
Professional Engineer, He was the Building Official for El Monte and "knows code"from many angles with 24 c
State of California �
45464 years experience in the building codes and standards community, including his work with 3
all the Uniform and International Codes,ASCE 7,ANSI A117.1, FHAct,ADA,CA Title 24 !
Building Official Accessibility regulations.At CSG Mr.Armstrong combines his wealth of knowledge, hard K
ICC 0002014-CB work,and excellent customer services;tap into Mr.Armstrong for all code related issues
EDUCATION including effective plan review and inspection solutions. d
Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering �
California State University RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Long Beach,CA _J
Building&Safety Services Manager
PROFESSIONAL Mr.Armstrong managed the building and safety service line for varied consultant firms in Iv
AFFILIATIONS Southern California. Responsible for oversight,coordination and quality control of plan U.
Secretariat:International Residential Code
I and 2 Family Dwellings review and inspection services for client jurisdictions. Provide client care and assistance c
1991-2000 on code related issues. He currently performs structural plan review for multiple E
Co-Seuetarlat:IC( jurisdictions.
Performance Based Building Code c
Secretariat: International Zoning Code Regional Manager
R
1996.2000 Responsible for the development of new business and the maintenance of existing r
Secretariat:General Design,Administrative, contracts for full-service building departments, inspection services and plan review 3
Lateral Design,Fire and Lrfe Safety and services for various jurisdictions in Southern California. E
Fire Risk Code Committees of ICBO 0
1992-1996 Vice President I Architectural and Engineering Services Department N
Technical Editor. 1991 Uniform Codes and Mr.Armstrong managed ICBO Technical Services department responsible for the o
UB(Handbook maintenance of the code development process, plan review service and code opinion 0
NIBS HHS Code Comparison Committee service for both external and internal customers. He represented ICC to many national, 0-
1994 N
state and local organizations and is responsible for the technical image of the conference. _
FEMA Building Performance Review Team member
1993 He provided technical assistance on code related issues to both jurisdictional and 3
� �
NIBS Flood Standards Comparison Committee professional members and non-members and provided research on many code-related •>
1992 issues.
Coordinator,Pacific Rim Conference on
Performance Based Codes a
Various ASCE Standards committees LO
SEAOC Code Committee liaison
M
ASME A11.1 Code Coordinating Committee
ANSI Construction Standards Board B
U)
0
AWARDS a
0
CALBO Instructor of the Year ti
0
rn
U
c
m
E
t
v
ra
Q
Packet Pg. 161
5.C.d
-- Chi Tra n PE, SE, CBO
Structural Plan Review Engineer
Building Official '0
E
O
LICENSES and Mr.Tran provides professional structural engineering and building official services for CSG
CERTIFICATIONS Consultants.With over 30 years experience in the building industry, Mr.Tran has a
Structural Engineer,State of California 2128 demonstrated knowledge of both the California and International Building Codes as
Civil Engineer, State of California 33643 reflected in his numerous years serving as a project engineer, plan check supervisor, m
Certified Building Official building permits manager and building official. Mr.Tran has experience in all forms of
1061812-CB structural construction, including:steel,concrete, masonry,timber, and light-gauge steel 3
materials.
Certified Building Plans Examiner >
1061812-63 Prior to joining CSG, Mr.Tran worked for the County of Orange in various capacities;
including plan check supervisor, project engineer and building official. Mr.Tran has a
MEMBERSHIPS thorough working knowledge of how Building Departments function and his various roles
California Building Officials Association (CALBO) reflect his wide range of knowledge and experience.
m
International Code Council Mr.Tran's expertise includes review of complex commercial, industrial and residential --J
structures for compliance with applicable building codes and ordinances,engineering c
EDUCATION standards and specifications,supplemental energy requirements,and ADA regulations.
Masters of Science, Civil Engineering Some notable projects include: `—
California Polytechnic University u_
r
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering RELEVANT EXPERIENCE aci
California Polytechnic University 0 Hotel and Resort Projects rn
Masters in Business Administration . Ritz Carlton Resort and Hotel,Laguna Niguel
California Polytechnic University . Pelican Hill Resort and Hotel, Newport Coast
• Multi-Story Office Buildings y
• 7-Story Coldwell Bank Office Building, Lake Forest 3
• Airport Terminals E
L
• John Wayne Airport Terminal Building and Parking Structures,Santa Ana 0
• Detention Facilities
c
• 7-Story Orange County Juvenile Court Building, Orange o
r
m
Theo Lacy Jail and Juvenile Hall I City of Orange y
c
Musick Jail Facility I City of Irvine
Joplin Juvenile Facility I City of Rancho Santa Margarita W
c
R
Soka University City of Aliso Viejo a
Ln
Cl)
It
M
!C
N
O
Q
O
L
IL
C)
U
c
d
E
z
v
R
Q
Packet Pg. 162
S.C.d
Ritchie Kato SE, PE, CASp
` Structural Plan Review Engineer
Certified Access Specialist ca
2
LICENSES and CERTIFICATES Mr. Kato is a Structural Engineer for CSG Consultants, Inc. His extensive experience in O
Structural Engineer, State of California
g performing plan review on public,commercial, industrial,and residential structures �
SE2650 provides CSG's clients with premiere quality plan review services. His expertise includes v
Civil Engineer,State of California structural design and plan review for compliance with all applicable codes,accessibility, M
C31833 and energy requirements. '0
ca
Certified Access Specialist Prior to his employment with CSG, Mr. Kato was the Principal for Kato Engineering,where 3
CASp-272 he performed structural engineering consulting services for public and private clients. He °'
was responsible for structural design and structural plan reviewing for a full spectrum of
EDUCATION
building types and occupancies. His employment with the City of Westminster provided
Master of Science,Structural Engineering
him with extensive plan review experience. Mr. Kato reviewed plans for compliance with
Stanford University
Palo Alto, CA all relevant state and local codes. N
� �
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering Subsequent to his work with the City of Westminster as a plan review engineer, Mr. Kato
California Polytechnic State University was commissioned by the City to update the municipal code to correspond to current c
Pomona, CA California code requirements. R
Mr. Kato has performed plan review for the Westminster City Hall and Police Station, UL
Laguna Hills High School,Chapman University,Whittier Christian High School, and the City
of Orange, Main Public Library. His extensive knowledge of public buildings and his
commitment to timeliness and quality contribute greatly to each jurisdiction he serves. a�
Mr. Kato was commissioned as full-time Building Official for the City of La Habra. c
Recommended by the City of Orange, Mr. Kato assisted the City of La Habra's Building 2
Department during their period of transition,supervising and managing plan review, +;
inspection and counter staff,coordinating the various building departments, and 3
managing personnel issues.Additionally, Mr. Kato coordinated City and private projects E
with the building, planning, engineering,and public works departments,worked to w
update the City's municipal code, and provide feedback to facilitate development of y
efficient departmental practices and procedures. c
Mr. Kato has the expertise and broad experience necessary to effectively coordinate, a
foster, and help develop all aspects of a municipal building department. c
3
d
d
c
M
a
LO
M
M
R
U)
O
kZ
O
L
CL
c�
U
c
m
E
t
U
O
a
Packet Pg. 163
5.C.d
Ed Chock SE, PE, CBO
Structural Engineer
Building Official '2
r
LICENSES and CERTIFICATES As a Structural Engineer for CSG Consultants,Mr.Chock provides plan review of complex O
at
Structural Engineer,State of Nevada structural and non-structural buildings for numerous government agencies and municipal S
018605 32
� jurisdictions.He has a thorough knowledge of local,state and international building codes. •3
Structural Engineer,State of California pp
h
3159 Mr.Chock has both public and private sector experience.Prior to joining CSG, e worked as a .a
Structural Engineer, State of Arizona consultant Plan Review Manager,with oversight in the day to day operations of the building
1 51135 plan review division. 3
Structural Engineer, State of Utah g y providing g >
g Mr.Chock also served as Building Official for the City of Dana Point; rovidin building '>
1850165-2203 department management for the City;responsible for plan check,building inspection and the W
Professional Engineer, State of Nevada public counter staff. r
1 018605 w
Additional private experience includes serving as Plan Review Division Manager for a consultant
Professional Engineer,State of California N
24158 company with duties including plan check of buildings and structures for compliance with the !L-
Professional
Engineer,State of Texas California Building Code,Title 24 Disabled Accessibility and Energy requirements,coordination
1 106154 of plan check service with contract jurisdictions and staff supervision.
Certified Building Official As an Engineer with the County of Orange,his duties included plan checking,public counter
1 ICC 3118 service and issuing building permits for building projects in the County's unincorporated areas. t+•
Certified Plans Examiner
1 ICC 88554 Mr.Chock also served as a Senior Facilities Design Specialist/Lead Structural Engineer for
Rockwell International's Rocketdyne Division in Canoga Park.In this role,his responsibilities E
EDUCATION included design and construction management of construction project for company facilities eM
Master of Science, Civil Engineering such as rocket test stands,manufacturing and industrial buildings,office renovations,bridge e=o
California State University crane systems and pipe support systems.Duties included structural design and drafting,project
1 Long Beach, CA management,construction coordination,review of vendor's design and management of the
Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering structural design unit.In addition,he supervised the engineering of the civil/structural design E
California State University group. E
1 Long Beach, CA co
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE c
0
Consultant Plan Review Manager
Duties included plan checking,management of the plan review function,hiring and training n,
plan check staff and providing building official services to contract cities. c
Building Official I City of Dana Point, CA
Mr.Chock was responsible for the day to day operation of the City's Building Department; >
including plan review,permitting and inspection.
c
Civil Engineer 1 County of Orange, CA `°
a
Mr.Chock performed plan check,counter service and permit issuance for the County.
to
M
d'
M
!i
N
O
C.
O
L
IL
0
C*
U
c
m
E
r
v
co
Q
Packet Pg. 164
5.C.d
Mariam Madjlessi PE
Plan Review Engineer <►$i,'
.2
LICENSES and Mariam Madjlessi is a plan review engineer for CSG with a wealth of 0
CERTIFICATIONS experience serving southern California jurisdictions. c
Professional Engineer
California 1 19114 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
M
Senior Plan Check Engineer I City of Newport Beach, CA
IC(Building Plan Examiner 8183364 c
Ms. Madjlessi served as a contract plan check engineer for the City of Newport Beach,
ICC P,esidential Fire Sprinlder Plans Performing in house and counter plan checking. She reviewed plans and advised home
Examiner/Inspector 1 8183364 owners, business owners and design engineers of California Building Standards code and
local amendments including fire and life safety,structural and foundation design W
EDUCATION requirements per city policies for flood, landslides and liquefaction zones. She also :
M.S.in Civil/Structural Engineering reviewed grading and drainage plans. M
University of Southern California
Los Angeles,CA Senior Plan Check Engineer,VCA Code Group 10 r a n g e, C A J
Ms. Madjlessi performed complex and advanced structural engineering and building code .a
review of structural engineering calculations and plans submitted to determine
B.S.in CiviUStrudural Engineering conformance with California Building Code. Plans were reviewed for compliance with (D
University of Southern California
Los Angeles,CA electrical, mechanical, plumbing,energy and green building codes. Projects included LL
single family homes in wood, multi-family condominiums on podiums with subterranean m
parking structures,a library involving several structures with complex steel moment E
frames and reinforced concrete and masonry shear wall design,commercial buildings and a)
restaurants. Ms. Madjlessi also reviewed grading and drainage plans.She served as a plan r-
check consultant for the cities of Arcadia,San Moreno and Bradbury while at VCA.
L
Plan Check Engineer I City of Riverside, CA
Ms. Madjlessi performed professional structural engineering work,checking structural
plans for conformance to building and zoning code regulations. She plan checked for E
complex structures such as multi-story tilt-up buildings;residential and commercial rn
buildings,and seismic retrofit of historic masonry structures. c
Project Engineer,Rubicon Engineering I I ry i n e, C A
Ms. Madjlessi performed seismic design and calculations to restrain water treatment N
tanks and designed their supporting foundations.She provided on site quality control and E
structural observation during the construction.
Project Engineer,Palos Verdes Engineering I R o I I i n g H i I I s E s t a t e s, C A
Ms. Madjlessi designed and remodeled over 200 residential,commercial and industrial
projects located in Los Angeles and Orange County.She integrated with insurance
a
companies to develop plans and calculations for fire restoration of residential and
commercial buildings per current building codes.She collaborated with project owners, v
architects, contractors,and geotechnical,mechanical and electrical engineers involved in
projects. Ms. Madjlessi stabilized endangered hillside structures by using retaining walls R
and shear pin walls,deepened footings, caissons and grade beams in compliance with c
current Building Codes.She prepared hydrology and drainage plans for all projects o
involved. Ms. Madjlessi also provided structural observation during the course of the a
construction. O
U
Plan Check Engineer, Delta Engineers Corporation I D a n a P o i n t, C A
Ms. Madjlessi performed engineering design and calculation of residential, commercial
and industrial buildings.She also prepared plans and construction details using AutoCAD. t
R
Q
Packet Pg. 165
5.C.d
Staff Engineer,Stan Schroffer&Associates I D a n a P o i n t, C A _
Ms. Madjlessi provided engineering and design of residential custom homes.She reviewed architectural plans for
compatibility with structural plans. rz
O
Engineer,Consulting Engineer I S o u t h B a y, C A c
Ms. Madjlessi provided engineering and design of new and remodeled residential custom homes. S
Staff Engineer,Parsons I Pasadena, CA o'p
Ms. Madjlessi provided engineering and design of new and remodeled residential custom homes.
ca
3
LD
d
m
�o
a�
w
J
C
f0
d
L_
LL
r
C
d
E
d
C1
N
C
tC
L
3
E
L
O
O
r
V
d
3
a�
d
o:
c
�a
IL
LO
M
M
R
N
O
G.
O
L
IL
0
CO
U
r
c
m
E
t
v
�a
a
Packet Pg. 166
5.C.d
Andrew Hoang EIT
Plans Examiner T
Permit Technician .2
O
LICENSES and CERTIFICATES Mr.Hoang is a plans examiner and permit technician for CSG Consultants.In this capacity,he a)
Engineer in Training, performs review of residential,commercial and industrial projects;ensuring code compliance 5
State of California
and building and life safety.Mr.Hoang is experienced in the enforcement of plumbing, •3
XE104446 mechanical,electrical and building codes as well as local and state regulations. m
Certified Plans Examiner
5044839.63 In addition,Mr.Hoang serves as a permit technician,coordinating construction projects from cOa
plan review submittal,routing of plans for multi-department review,all the way to permit ;
issuance.Mr.Hoang has an excellent command of the entire development review process and •2
Bachelor of ScEDU n lE g1�0' works well with applicants and the development community. �
California State Uniyersity Mr.Hoang has worked for several jurisdictions throughout his career,including:the Cities of
San Diego,CA Santa Clarita,Santa Monica,Tustin,Oxnard and Salinas. His duties included plan check,over
the counter plan check and permit technician services.His 11 years of experience in the w
building industry,combined with his code knowledge and excellent customer service skills
provide CSG and our clients with a thorough knowledge of the development process.
ca
m
L_
rL
r
E
d
C�
C
L
d
i+
{Q
3
E
L
O
i+
O
V
d
CL
U)
C
3
d
CD
C
O
a
LO
M
M
U)
O
CL
O
L
a.
C)
U)
U
r
c
m
E
t
v
to
Q
Packet Pg.167
5.C.d
Andrew Bond
Residential Plans Examiner
Permit Technician 25
LICENSES and CERTIFICATES r-
Residential Plans Examiner Mr. Bond serves as a Building Plans Examiner and Permit Technician for CSG. In this role,
ICC 8246642 he reviews residential projects,ensuring code compliance and building and life safety. His =_
knowledge of the code and experience with applicants helps him bring quality service and 25
EDUCATION communication. m
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering =
California State University Mr. Bond has also worked for numerous Southern California jurisdictions and provided
Long Beach, CA counter service to architects,contractors and the general public. He has had the
Business Administration opportunity to gain experience and knowledge of the Building Department process from
California State University behind the front counter. He works with applicants and the development community
Long Beach, CA throughout the development review process;from plan check submittal through permit
issuance. Mr. Bond coordinates project review through multiple departments and M
agencies to ensure code compliance. In addition, Mr. Bond has experience in reviewing 2
plans for conformance to CBC building requirements thereby honing his knowledge of 'D
building codes and industry laws.
m
L_
UL
r
d
d
C�
C
L
it
c�
G
L
O
U)
C
O
V
d
Q.
0)
r-
3
d
d
c
ca
a
Ln
M
M
N
N
O
a
O
L
(L
0
U)
U
c
W
E
s
v
ca
a
Packet Pg. 168
5.C.d
John Hartley
Plans Examiner Ta
Building Inspector Code Enforcement Officer G .2
LICENSES and CERTIFICATES O
Certified Plans Examiner Mr. Hartley provides building inspection and code enforcement services. Mr. Hartley's
ICC 530130 experience includes work as a NAT team Coordinator and an Inspector Supervisor.As a _c
Certified Building Inspector NAT Team Coordinator he was a Code Enforcement Inspector,directed teams of various
ICC 530130 departments,and inspected structures for building code violations.As an Inspector op
Certified Code Enforcement Officer Supervisor he oversaw the professional discipline of employees,examined plans for code =
compliance,served as a code enforcer,and inspected structures for code compliance.
Certified CACEO 3
Mr. Hartley combines extensive expertise with outstanding customer service to provide
Post Disaster Safety Officer the highest quality building inspection services on behalf of CSG Consultants. tY
EDUCATION RELEVANT EXPERIENCE T
Associate of Arts,Cerritos College iM
Norwalk CA Building Inspector)City of Signal H i I I, CA )
As building inspector, Mr. Hartley has performed inspections and completed plan reviews J
for residential,commercial, and industrial projects in two jurisdictions. He has evaluated -r3
and resolved code enforcement complaints that have been referred to the Building m
Department.
u_
NAT Team Coordinatorl County of Los Angeles
As NAT Team Coordinator, Mr. Hartley directed a team of various departments. In
addition he inspected structures for building code violations, issued citations, and a)
obtained compliances.
Inspector Supervisorllnterwest - Southern California Office
In this role, Mr. Hartley oversaw building inspectors and attended conferences for the
R
purpose of continuing education. He also reviewed plans and code cases for code 3
compliance. E
0
r
c
0
a)
CL
N
C
3
m
a>
c
a
LO
M
M
ti
U)
O
Q
O
a
O
rn
U
c
m
E
v
to
Q
Packet Pg. 169
S.C.d
Melvin Fleener
Building Inspector
LICENSES and CERTIFICATES Mr.Fleener works as a building inspector.He has been an inspector for 0
O
Building Inspector the cities of Fullerton and Newport Beach,working with them for over 22 years.While working c
ICC 847237 with the cities,Mr.Fleener performed inspections on heavy industry,commercial,tilt ups and :a
residential structures including an 1100 bedroom dorm with a seven story parking structure. He m
also has about 20 years of experience in the private sector a
c
Mr.Fleener's uses his 43 plus years of experience in construction to provide,for CSG ca
Consultants,quality building inspection services.
.R
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
r
Specialist, Consultant, Inspector I City of Fullerton
Mr.Fleener performed combination inspections for an 1100 bedroom dorm including
m
mechanical,electrical,plumbing,fire sprinklers and structural inspections.The site also
included a seven story parking structure with retail space on the ground floor.
Senior Building Inspector I City of Newport Beach L
In August of 2010,Mr.Fleener retired from the city after 22 years as a building inspector. LL
r
General Contractorl Orange County Carpentry
Prior to working as a municipal inspector,Mr.Fleener held a general contractors license for E
approximately 20 years.He specialized in remodels,installations of door,windows and
skylights.
m
r
ca
3
E
L
O
r
O
i+
V
d
Q.
rn
_
3
m
d
rY
c
co
a
Ln
M
M
V)
O
a
O
L
V
co
U
c
m
E
t
v
ra
Q
Packet Pg. 170
5.C.d
Forest Johnson
Building Inspector
.2
LICENSES AND Mr.Johnson provides building inspection services.30 years of 0
CERTIFICATES construction experience has taught Mr.Johnson skills for interacting with construction c
Residential Building Inspector professionals with speed while also keeping the highest quality of work.His experience includes
IC( B-1 5308629
,assistant Construction Supervisor and Combination Building Inspector.As Assistant �
Residential Mechanical Inspector m
� ICC M-I 5308629 Construction Supervisor,Mr.Johnson oversaw sub-contractors and provided code compliance �
and quality control.He also issued permits,provided plan review and delivered notice of
EDUCATION violations as an inspector for the City of Montebello. 3
R
Associate of Science Mr.Johnson uses experience in different areas of construction to serve the city with the highest
Fullerton College quality building inspections on behalf of CSG Consultants.
Fullerton,CA
T
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE W
Assistant Construction Supervisor I Light and Life Christian Fellowship
2010 to Present
Mr.Johnson oversaw sub-contractors,provided with code compliance and quality control
services,and coordinated volunteer work assignments. `
LL
Combination Building Inspector I City of Montebello 2007 to 2010
r
Some of Johnson's tasks were issuing permits,providing plan review,delivering notice of a=i
violation,fire and structural investigation,and the inspection of all types of residential, E
commercial and industrial projects.In this position,Mr.Johnson worked well with other city
departments.
Building Internship Program I City of Fullerton 2007
.r
Building Trade Experience 1 1 980 to 2007 3
E
Mr.Johnson found construction experience by working as a journeyman-carpenter,a 0
construction maintenance worker,a brick m aso n/wate rp roofer apprentice,an indentured
waterproofer,a resident manager,general contractor,and a mechanical technician. _
0
r
d
CL
W
3
!
d
ca
a
M
M
R
N
O
a
O
a
t9
U
_
m
E
t
v
ca
Q
Packet Pg. 171
S.C.d
Vance Cook
Building Inspector ►
LICENSES and CERTIFICATES
Building Inspector Mr.Cook is a Building Inspector with over ten years of professional experience,focusing on a�
ICC 5003436-10, 5003436-B5 building inspection and plan review.
Combination Inspector Among his many projects are commercial and residential building inspections,chief swimming 3
ICC 5003436-56 pool inspector for commercial and large estates for the City of Anaheim,contract municipal m
Residential Combination Inspector building inspector for the cities of La Habra,Costa Mesa,and Tustin,permit technician services
ICC 5003436-115 for the County of Los Angeles,and structural surveys for the City of Los Angeles. 3
m
CA Commercial Plumbing Inspector Major projects include complete inspections of renovated commercial structures,rated and
ICC 5003436-13 non-rated single and community family residential new construction,and assisting the cities of W
CALBO Disaster Worker Certified Costa Mesa and Tustin in implementing the 20105 energy code.
SAP50958 Prior to joining CSG,Mr.Cook performed building and safety inspection services for three years
for a number of developers,contractors,and the public. ,T
EDUCATION He has a wide range of experience including:field inspection;U.B.C.application;electrical,
Fullerton Community College, 'D
4.0 Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical,Title 24 mechanical and plumbing code application;code enforcement;permit technician;commercial
Fullerton, CA and residential inspection,commercial inspection,fire safety and administration. L
LL
Fullerton Community College, RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Energy/Disabled Access d
Fullerton, CA Contract Building Inspector I City of La Habra, CA E
Duties included inspection of commercial and residential structures.
Addison Career Institute,
Uniform Building Code p I R
Contract Building Inspector City of Costa Mesa, CA 2
Ontario, CA Mr.Cook served as an inspector for the City;inspecting a variety of building projects—from °:
Associate of Ara Degree, simple residential additions to complex construction. 3
Cerro Coso Community College,
Ridgecrest, CA Contract Building Inspector I City of Tustin, CA o
Human Relations i Speaking, Dale Carnegie, Mr.Cook was a contract inspector for the City on an as needed basis. N
Anaheim, CA p
Permit Technician I County of Los Angeles, CA
Duties included front counter service,overthe counter plan review and permit issuance. a
c
Structural Surveyor I County of Los Angeles, CA
Mr.Cook provided structural surveys on behalf of the County. m
d
c
m
a
M
M
O
N
O
C.
O
L
a
t7
U
c
m
E
z
v
R
Q
Packet Pg. 172
5.C.d
Richard Milian
Building Inspector 2
2
EDUCATION Mr.Millan brings over 18 years of public sector experience—from building inspection to water 0
Coastline Community College quality field inspection—in his role as a Building Inspector for CSG. _
Building Code and Inspection Coursework :a
Fountain Valley,CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Orange County Sherriffs Training Academy m
Penal Code Coursework Building Inspector I City of Tustin, CA
� Orange,CA Mr.Millan performed building inspection,private improvement,and grading inspection,as well
Golden West Junior College as water quality field inspection for the City.He also assisted in the implementation of the City's m
Huntington Beach,CA water quality program,performing regular site inspection and reporting the activity to d
engineers for annual reports.Mr.Millan was also responsible for communicating job
specifications to architects,and engineers. d
CIO
m
J
C
R
d
L_
LL
•F+
d
E
d
R
C!Q
C
L
d
{Q
3
E
0
y
C
r
V
d
N
C
3
a�
a�
c
R
a
M
M
f6
N
O
O_
O
a
t9
U
r
c
m
E
t
v
ra
Q
Packet Pg. 173
,. AN
5.C.d
Page Dougherty _
Fire Service Specialist R
O
LICENSES and With over 40 years of experience in the fire industry, Mr. Dougherty serves as a Fire
CERTIFICATES Analyst, Fire Inspector and contract Fire Marshal for CSG Consultants. His ability to apply
Fire Plans Examiner his knowledge, experience,skills, and professionalism to ensure the highest level of
1(( 5258353 service in the area of fire and life safety is an asset to CSG and our clients.
c
Fire Inspector II As a Fire Analyst, Mr. Dougherty performs analysis of fire and life safety issues; performs
ICC 1064116-61 plan review of new construction,tenant improvement projects and fire protection
Certified Fire Marshal systems;and provides consulting services for jurisdictions needing assistance on the
California State Fire Training 00006 intent and application of codes relating to fire and life safety issues.As an inspector, Mr. W
Certified Fire Officer Dougherty performs site inspections for new construction,tenant improvements,fire d
California State Fire Training 011689 protection systems,and annual inspection programs. He has a wealth of experience in N
Certified Fire Prevention Officer I, II, III assisting developers, architects and engineers with interpretations and applications of U)
California State Fire Training— adopted fire and building codes. He reviews pre-development plans for compliance with n
111134, 810026, 870019 fire protection requirements,and fire and life safety issues.As part of his duties, Mr.
Dougherty develops proposals for alternate materials and methods to be submitted to
fire Instructor Level I fire departments for approval. He has also reviewed and developed wildland interface
California State Fire Training— projects for fire and life safety requirements.
P.C. 832, Level 111 80 hours c
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Vocational Education in Fire Service E
California Community College Limited Service Mr. Dougherty has private and public sector experience,previously serving as Principal of tm
Credential Dougherty Code Consulting,as well as working on behalf of the International Code
Council (ICC)as a Senior Technical Staff Member, Regional Director for Fire Service
MEMBERSHIPS Activities and Staff Engineer/Fire Safety Specialist for the International Fire Code Institute. 3
Senior Fire Specialist I County of Orange, CA
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Mr. Dougherty directed the activities of a Fire Prevention Division and assisted the Deputy c
International Fire Marshal's Association (IFMA) Fire Marshal. y
National Codes and Standards Association NCSA 0
( ) Fire Marshal � City of San Luis Obispo, CA c
International Code Council (ICC) Mr. Dougherty managed the Fire Prevention Bureau. In this role, he planned,directed and
California Fire Chiefs Association—Southern supervised a comprehensive fire prevention program for the City. w
California Fire Prevention Officers Association Fire Captain I City of Santa Barbara, CA
Mr. Dougherty's role as Fire Captain was a culmination of years serving as a firefighter and
fire engineer for the City. His fire suppression experience adds to his overall insight into
EDUCATION fire and life safety issues.
Fire Protection Certificate Program, _R
University of California, Irvine d
B.A. 7. Management, M
University of Redlands M
A.A. Fire Science �a
Los Angeles Harbor Community College p
CL
National Fire Academy Courses o
a
c7
U)
U
r
m
1=
.c
v
ca
Q
Packet Pg. 174
Sophie Truong PE, PLS
Senior Engineer To
.2
LICENSES and Ms.Truong has extensive experience in both the design and review of various types of p
CERTIFICATIONS projects at all levels of development,from entitlement to final grading and improvement =
Professional Civil Engineer plans. Past projects have included the preparation or review of tentative maps,final or
State of California parcel maps,and comprehensive improvements plans for large, hillside and coastal m
68110 residential subdivisions in both Southern and Northern California,commercial and
Professional Land Surveyor industrial proiects in San Francisco Bay and the Los Angeles regions,and various local
State of Uifomia public improvement projects such as bicycle and pedestrian paths, new roadway 3
� 8998 construction, roadway rehabilitation, and utility projects. •m�
Qualified SWPPP Developer/Practitioner(QSD/QSP) �
RELEVANT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW EXPERIENCE
Z4
w
EDUCATION 0 Pacific Ridge 63-lot Subdivision in Half Moon Bay �
Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering y
• Redwood Gate 45-lot Subdivision in Palo Alto
University of California Berkeley JT
Berkeley,CA • The Oyster Point Redevelopment Project in South San Francisco _J
• The Branciforte Creek 32-lot Subdivision in Santa Cruz r_
TRAINING 0 Menlo College/Menlo School Redevelopment in Atherton
California Subdivision Map Act Seminar As part of her development review functions, Ms.Truong manages incoming submittals, LL
Bay Area Hydrology Model(BAHM) reviews plans and prepares comments and redlines,and regularly meets with project
Municipal Regional NPDES Permit Provision C6 applicants and City personnel to review difficult projects and discuss design issues. Since E
((onstruction. BMPs) 2008, Ms.Truong has been effectively managing CSG's Development Review team, not
only providing quality assurance/quality control for in-house reviews, but also providing M
training, mentoring and engineering support to the review team.She also prepares
L
contracts and proposals on behalf of the firm.
Ms.Truong is particularly adept at reviewing projects for compliance with the State's E
Subdivision Map Act and Land Surveyor's Act, Local Ordinances, Project Conditions of o
Approval, NPDES permit requirements,CEQA mitigation measures, Coastal Development N
Permit conditions of approval,and any other permits or regulations enforced at the c
municipal,state,or federal level.
m
Ms.Truong also provides design and surveying efforts as a project manager for projects.
Some of Sophie's recent design experience includes the Seymour Street Extension to —
Highway 1 and the Highway 1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail in Half Moon Bay,the federally y
funded Serramonte Blvd Roadway Rehabilitation project in Colma,and the Spencer Dam
Spillway Repair and Tartan Trail Sanitary Sewer Relocation Projects in the Town of
Hillsborough.
a
Prior to joining CSG, Ms.Truong pursued a career in geotechnical engineering where she Ln
acquired valuable knowledge in the construction industry preparing engineering M
recommendations for various types of foundations and pavement systems,and
supervising field and laboratory work.She followed her geotechnical experience with two N
years as a consultant for the City of Los Angeles,establishing methods of repair and a
managing construction of the City-wide sewer system damaged in the 1994 Northridge
earthquake. a
O
Cn
U
r
c
as
E
r
v
R
a
Padket Pg. 175
S.C.d
Dung VU PE
Senior Engineer
5
LICENSES and Mr.Vu is a p rofessional engineer with over 31 years of experience in all aspects of
O
CERTIFICATES municipal engineering including capital projects, land development,transportation as
c
Professional Civil Engineer planning, and construction.
State of California
C38902 WORK EXPERIENCE
c
EDUCATION Project Engineer I City of Orange, CA M
BS., Civil Engineering Mr.Vu's work with the City of Orange included: m
Montreal University * Plan checking and approval of tract maps, parcel maps and lot line adjustments
Montreal, Canada for the City's Subdivision Section;
w
+ Writing council items for map approvals; �
+ Preparing street,storm drain and sewer easements in public right of way;
w
• Checking and approving hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storm drain and -J
sewer systems; c
M
+ Reviewing and approving drainage and sewer studies to comply with the City
Storm Drain and Sewer Master Plans; U.
+ Writing conditions to upgrade existing storm drain and/or sewer pipes prior to
approval for land development; E
m
a)
• Plan checking and approving street improvement plans,storm drain plans,sewer R
plans and grading plans for land development; M
Developing a street names and address system for tract development;
r
Coordinating with Fire and Police Departments and Post office regarding 3
addressing; E
L
Maintenance of City records for sewer laterals and approving new requests for �°
connection;
c
+ Coordinating with Water Division,Traffic Division and Water Quality Section prior r
to approval of grading plans and/or construction permits; a
• Issuing construction permits and coordinating with the City inspectors from c
revisions and modifications of construction plans to completion of permits. 3
d
Project Engineer I City of Torrance, CA
Mr.Vu's work with the City of Torrance included:
Performing design of street improvement plans,storm drain plans and sewer `0
a
plans for the City's Design Section;
LO
Performing calculations of hydrology and hydraulics for storm drain and sewer M
systems;
+ Developing a new set of the City Standard Plan; N
• Plan checking of tract maps, parcel maps and lot line adjustments for the City's c.
Subdivision Section; a
• Writing conditions of the planning cases for Tract Map and Parcel Map; t7
Reviewing grading plans from the building department to comply with existing V
street and drainage improvements.
d
E
r
R
�= a
Packet Pg.176
S.C.cl
Project Engineer ( City of Culver City, CA
aq
Mr.Vu's work with the City of Culver City included: Q►: _
• Performing construction surveying and serving as survey party chief; —
�
• Setting construction staking for street storm drain and sewer projects and parking lots;
O
• Setting and maintaining street center line monuments and ties. CO
=a
m
R
3
m
m
as
w
U)
d
w
J
C
M
d
L_
U.
d
E
d
M
CC�
i C
L
d
r
M
3
E
LO
U)
c
O
r
m
CL
c
3
a�
a�
IL
Ln
M
M
R
U)
O
a
O
L
a
(9
U)
U
m
E
t
0
M
Q
Packet Pg. 177
S.C.e
CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT 2
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2014
("Effective Date"), by and between the CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a charter city ("CITY"),
and CSG Consultants, Inc. ("CONSULTANT"), m
WITNESSETH : a
3
A. WHEREAS, CITY proposes to have CONSULTANT perform the services
described herein below; and
r
B. WHEREAS, CONSULTANT represents that it has that degree of specialized
expertise contemplated within California Government Code, Section 37103, and holds all 44.1
necessary licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated; and
C. WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT desire to contract for plan review, L
inspection, stormwater management, fire and life safety plan review, and counter services; and M
r
_
D. WHEREAS, no official or employee of CITY has a financial interest, within the E
provisions of California Government Code, Sections 1090-1092, in the subject matter of this
Agreement. _
ca
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions 0
contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: 3
E
L
1.0. SERVICES PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT cn
c
LL Scope of Services. For the remuneration stipulated, CONSULTANT shall
provide plan review, inspection, stormwater management, fire and life safety plan review, a
building official, and counter services described in RFP F-14-41 and the Scope of Services c
attached hereto as Exhibit "1" and incorporated herein by this reference. If a conflict arises ;
between the Scope of Services and this Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter •D
"Agreement"), the terms of the Agreement shall govern.
_
1.2. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by c
CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by skilled personnel and in a M
manner consistent with the standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by M
professional consultants in similar fields and circumstances in accordance with sound
professional practices. CONSULTANT also warrants that it is familiar with all laws that may
affect its perfonnance of this Agreement and shall advise CITY of any changes in any laws that
may affect CONSULTANT's performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT further represents M
that no CITY employee will provide any services under this Agreement. r
E
L
Q
it
_
E
V
Q
1
Packet Pg.I-M
S.C.e
1.3. WqgAn1y. CONSULTANT warrants that it shall perform the services required by 2
this Agreement in compliance with all applicable Federal and California employment laws o
including, but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational
health and safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers' compensation insurance
and safety in employment; and all other Federal, State and local laws and ordinances applicable m
to the services required under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold
harmless CITY from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and
judgments of every nature and description including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs,
presented, brought, or recovered against CITY for, or on account of any liability under any of the
above-mentioned laws, arising from or related to CONSULTANT's performance under this
Agreement.
w
1.4. Non-discrimination. In performing this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall not JT
engage in, nor permit its officers, employees or agents to engage in, discrimination in J
employment of persons because of their race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age,
mental or physical disability, medical condition, marital status, sexual gender or sexual W
orientation, except as permitted pursuant to Section 12940 of the Government Code. Violation of U_
this provision may result in the imposition of penalties referred to in Labor Code, Section 1735.
E
1.5 Non-Exclusive Agreement. CONSULTANT acknowledges that CITY may enter
into agreements with other consultants for services similar to the services that are subject to this
Agreement or may have its own employees perform services similar to those services
contemplated by this Agreement.
1.6. Delegation and Assignment. This is a personal service contract, and the duties set E
`o
forth herein shall not be delegated or assigned to any person or entity without the prior written Cn
consent of CITY. CONSULTANT may engage a subcontractor(s) as permitted by law and may o
employ other personnel to perform services contemplated by this Agreement at
CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense. a
c
1.7 Conflicts of Interest. During the tern of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall at 3
all times maintain a duty of loyalty and a fiduciary duty as to the CITY and shall not accept
payment from or employment with any person or entity which will constitute a conflict of
interest with the CITY.
a
1.8 CITY Business Certificate. CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain during the M
term of this Agreement, a valid CITY Business Registration Certificate pursuant to Title 5 of the M
City of San Bernardino Municipal Code and any and all other licenses, permits, qualifications,
insurance and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required of CONSULTANT to
practice its profession, skill or business.
M
2.0. COMPENSATION AND BILLING M
E
2.1. Compensation. Over the term of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall be paid Q
for such services in accordance with the specifications contained in RFP F-14-41 and the
,.r
CONSULTANT's Cost/Price Form contained in Exhibit"I".
s
r
a
2
Packet Pg. 179
S.C.e
2.2. Additional Services. CONSULTANT shall not receive compensation for any
services provided outside the Scope of Services unless the CITY, prior to CONSULTANT tr_
performing the additional services, approves such additional services in writing. It is specifically a�
understood that oral requests and/or approvals of such additional services or additional �a
compensation shall be barred and are unenforceable. m
2.3. Method of Billiniz. CONSULTANT may submit invoices to CITY for approval.
Said invoice shall be based or, the total of all CONSULTANT's services which have been 3
completed to CITY's sole satisfaction. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT's invoice within forty- 2P
five (45) days from the date CITY receives said invoice. The invoice shall describe in detail,the
services performed and the associated time for completion. Any additional services approved and
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as "Additional Services" and shall N
identify the number of the authorized change order, where applicable,on all invoices.
J
2.4. Records and Audits. Records of CONSULTANT's services relating to this C
Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles L
and shall be made available to CITY for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient times for U.
a period of three (3) years from the Effective Date. c
d
E
3.0. TERM AND NOTIFICATION.
�o
c
3.1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue 2
through September 30, 2017, unless the Agreement is previously terminated as provided for r
herein. There may be two (2) one-year extensions upon mutual agreement of the parties not to 3
exceed maximum compensation stated in Section 2.1. E
L
O
co
32 Termination, CITY or CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement for any c
reason upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. In the event of termination, 2
CONSULTANT shall be paid the reasonable value of services rendered to the date of a
termination. N
c
3
33 Documents. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all documents JV
prepared by CONSULTANT in its performance of this Agreement shall be delivered to the
CITY within ten (10) days of delivery of termination notice to CONSULTANT, at no cost to c
CITY. Any use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization from a
CONSULTANT shall be at CITY's sole risk and without liability or legal expense to
CONSULTANT.
M
4.0. INSURANCE
U
4.1. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. CONSULTANT shall obtain and M
M
r
E
Q
r
C
d
E
t
V
t9
Q
3
Packet Pg. IN
5.C.e
maintain during the term of this Agreement all of the following insurance coverages:
E
(a) Commercial general liability, including premises-operations, products/completed a�
operations, broad form property damage, blanket contractual liability,
independent contractors, personal injury with a policy limit of not less than One
Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence and 00
aggregate.
3
(b) Automobile liability for owned vehicles, hired, and non-owned vehicles, with a
policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined
single limits, per occurrence and aggregate.
w
�a
(c) Workers' compensation insurance as required by the State of California.
w
J
4.2. Endorsements. The commercial general liability insurance policy shall contain or
be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
a�
(a) Additional insureds: "The City of San Bernardino and its elected and appointed U.
boards, officers, agents, and employees are additional insureds with respect to
CONSULTANT'S performance under this contract."
�a
(b) Notice: "Said policy shall not terminate, nor shall it be materially changed or
cancelled, nor the coverage reduced, until thirty (30) days after written notice is
given to CITY." 3
E
(c) Other insurance: "Any other insurance maintained by the City of San Bernardino 0
shall be excess and not contributing with the insurance provided by this policy." U)
CF
0
4.3. Certificates of Insurance. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY certificates of
insurance showing the insurance coverages and required endorsements described above, in a �-
form and content approved by CI`fY, prior to performing any services under this Agreement.
3
4.4. Non-limiting. Nothing in this Section shall be construed as limiting in any way, >
the indemnification provision contained in this Agreement, or the extent to which
CONSULTANT may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property.
a
5.0. GENERAL PROVISIONS M
M
5.1. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the
parties with respect to any matter referenced herein and supersedes any and all other prior Cn
U
writings and oral negotiations. This Agreement may be modified only in writing, and signed by
the parties in interest at the time of such modification. The terms of this Agreement shall prevail Cn
over any inconsistent provision in any other contract document appurtenant hereto, including Y
exhibits to this Agreement. E
a
d
E
4 a
Packet Pg. 181
5.C.e
` 5.2. Notices. Any notices, documents, correspondence or other communications 20
concerning this Agreement or the work hereunder may be provided by personal delivery, 0
facsimile or mail and shall be addressed as set forth below. Such communication shall be deemed °1
served or delivered: a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal delivery;
b) at the time of transmission if such communication is sent by facsimile; and c) 48 hours after m
deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such communication is sent
through regular United States mail.
3
IF TO CONSULTANT: IF TO CITY:
d
CSG Consultants,Inc. City Manager
801 Park Center Drive, Suite 230 300 North"D"Street
Santa Ana, CA 92705 San Bernardino, CA 92418 o
Telephone: (714) 568-1010 Telephone: (909) 384-5122
Facsimile: (714) 568-1020 Facsimile: (909)384-5138
°
L_
U-
5.3. Attorneys' Fees. In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection
with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all
costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the CD
exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms,
conditions, or provisions hereof. The costs, salary and expenses of the City Attorney and
members of his office in enforcing this contract on behalf of the CITY shall be considered as
"attorneys' fees" for the purposes of this Agreement. 3
E
L
5.4. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the °
U)
laws of the State of California without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of 6
laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the parties hereto •°
agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in San a
Bernardino County, California.
5.5. Assig ent. CONSULTANT shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign, 3
a�
transfer, sublet or encumber all or any part of CONSULTANT's interest in this Agreement
without CITY's prior written consent. Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting or
encumbrance shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and cause for a
termination of this Agreement. Regardless of CITY's consent, no subletting or assignment shall LO
release CONSULTANT of CONSULTANT's obligation to perform all other obligations to be M
performed by CONSULTANT hereunder for the term of this Agreement.
c�
co
5.6. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. CONSULTANT shall protect, defend,
indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its elected and appointed officials, boards, commissions, M
officers, attorneys, agents and employees from any and all claims, losses, demands, suits, M
administrative actions, penalties, liabilities and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, E
damage to property or injuries to or death of any person or persons or damages of any nature °1
a
including, but not limited to, all civil claims or workers' compensation claims arising from or in
any way related to CONSULTANT's performance under this Agreement, except when caused E
solely by the CITY's negligence.
M
5 a
Packet Pg. 182
S.C.e
5.7. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT, at all times while performing under 2
this Agreement, is and shall be acting at all times as an independent contractor and not as an
agent or employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure, at its expense, and be responsible for 0
any and all payment of wages, benefits and taxes including, but not limited to, Income Tax, E
Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, and m
other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT and its officers, agents, and employees, and ail
business licenses, if any are required, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder. o
Neither CONSULTANT nor its officers, agents and employees shall be entitled to receive any
benefits which employees of CITY are entitled to receive and shall not be entitled to workers'
compensation insurance, unemployment compensation, medical insurance, life insurance, paid
vacations, paid holidays, pension, profit sharing or social security on account of CONSULTANT
and its officers', agents' and employees' work for the CITY. This Agreement does not create the cn
relationship of agent, servant, employee partnership or joint venture between the CITY and JT
CONSULTANT.
5.8 Conflict of Interest Disclosure. CONSULTANT or its employees may be subject a
to the provisions of the California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act"), which (1) requires ii=
such persons to disclose financial interests that may be materially affected by the work
performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibits such persons from making or participating in E
malting decisions that will have a foreseeable financial effect on such interest.
CONSULTANT shall conform to all requirements of the Act. Failure to do so
constitutes a material breach and is grounds for termination of the Agreement by CITY. r
�a
3
5.9. Responsibility for Errors. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for its work and E
results under this Agreement. CONSULTANT, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or can
explanation as may be required by the CITY's representative, regarding any services rendered c
under this Agreement at no additional cost to CITY. In the event that an error or omission
attributable to CONSULTANT occurs, then CONSULTANT shall, at no cost to CITY, provide Q
all other CONSULTANT professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the c
sole satisfaction of CITY and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. ;
as
5.10. Prohibited Employment. CONSULTANT shall not employ any current employee
of CITY to perform the work under this Agreement while this Agreement is in effect.
a
5.11. Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and
negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as M
expressly provided herein.
5.12. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is entered into for the sole v
benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental M
beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right in, under or to this M
Agreement. E
a�
5.13. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement a
are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or
�a
6 a
Packet Pg.I
S.C.e
accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or 2
interpretation of this Agreement.
ai
5.14. Amendments. Only a writing executed by all of the parties hereto or their v
respective successors and assigns may amend this Agreement. 3
m
5.15. Waiver. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or C
compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a 3
waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of
this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative
of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy
with respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy with
respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver.
w ai
J
5.16. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of c
competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such determination shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the U-
offending provision in any other circumstance, and the remaining provisions of this Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect. E
a�
5.17. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each c
of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall
constitute one agreement.
r
5.18. Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the E
parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said .I
Co
parties and that by doing so, the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this c
Agreement. C
r
a�
0 CL
as
C
a
Ln
M
M
C0
U
LO
M
M
E
L
Q
r
d
L
V
7 a
Packet Pg. 184
S.C.e
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and f°
.2
through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first above written. U
O
tM
c
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CSG Consultants, Inc. —°
A Municipal Corporation CONSULTANT m'
c
M
3
d
m
Allen Parker, City Manager Signature r
as
d
J
Name and Title =
d
U.
r
c
ATTEST: E
as
a�
�v
c
�a
Georgeann Hanna, City Clerk d
r
3
E
0
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Gary D. Saenz, 2
City Attorney d
a
N
C
By: ti r'_ 2
m
c
�a
a.
LO
M
It
M
U
M
M
r
E
Q
r
C
d
L
V
8 a
Packet Pg.185
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
3
m
C
3
RD
0
Q:
San Bernar Ino
SM ,A
W
J
Date: July 8, 2014
ea
a�
SUBJECT: NOTICE INVITING BIDS(RFP) LL
c
The City of San Bernardino(City) invites bids from qualified vendors for:
E
m
co
Plan Review Inspection,NPDES, Building Official Services,and Fire and Safety Plan Review
so
Parties interested in obtaining a copy of this RFP F-14-41 may do so by accessing the
City of San Bernardino Web Page at www.sbcity.org > City Hall > Administrative 3
Services > Finance > Request for Bids on July 8, 2014, or by faxing their request to E
(909) 384-5043, Attention Vanessa. Please include the following information in your r
request: name and address of firm; name, telephone and facsimile number of contact U)
person; specify RFP F-14-41. g
a�
Copies of the RFQ may also be obtained by calling Vanessa Sanchez at (909) 384- 0
5346, or in person at City Hall, 300 N. "D" St., 4th floor Finance Department, San
Bernardino, CA 92418. d
a�
From the issuance date of this Request for Proposal until a Vendor is selected and the c
selection is announced, Proposers are not permitted to communicate with any City staff a
or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews, demonstrations, M
and/or site visits, except at the direction of Vanessa Sanchez, Accounting Assistant, the
designated representative of the City of San Bernardino. Contact with anyone not
designated will result in elimination from the bid process.
LL
Closing Date: Bids must be submitted at or before 3:00 PM, PST, July 21, 2014, at A
the address listed above. o
0.
0
L
Issuance of this RFQ and/or receipt of Bids does not commit City to award a contract. &-
L
W.
Sincerely,
Vanessa Sanchez a
Accounting Assistant
r
E
V
Q
Packet Pg.186
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
a�
c
00
c
m
3
d
SECTION I.
INTRODUCTION
J
C
d
L_
u-
r
E
R
C�
G
L
�.1
m
3
E
L
0
Y
Cn
i+
V
Q
3
v
a�
a
M
M
r
d'
r
i�
tC
O
II.
O
L
a
L
O
y
tv
7
d
L
C3
Q
Packet Pg. 187
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
a�
c
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
PLAN REVIEW, INSPECTION, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT,
FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY PLAN REVIEW, AND BUILDING OFFICIAL
SERVICES
o!
r
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of San Bernardino (City)wishes to obtain the services of one or more
professional governmental consulting firms (Consultant)to provide the following c
services: 1)plan reviews services, 2)building code inspections services, 3)Building
Official Services 4)Engineering Map Checking and Inspections 5) Stormwater(NPDES) LL
Program inspection. The selected firm(s)will be issued an open purchase order and
projects will be assigned by the Community Development Director,the Fire Department E
Director or their designee.
c
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
d
r
Plan Review for Building,Engineering,and Fire Services
The project, in general,will consist of the examination, analysis, and review of plans for o
various construction projects within the City in order to determine compliance with all in
applicable building regulations, including but not limited to local building and fire o
regulations and amendments, as well as the California Building Standards Code (CAC
Title 24),comprised of the latest adopted editions of the model codes with State �-
amendments, and the State Housing Law(CAC Title 25) as adopted by the State of
California,the City of San Bernardino, California Fire Code, Title 19 and NFPA
Standards. Dependent upon the scope of each specific project assigned, such plan
reviews may consist of an examination of the grading, drainage, geotechnical, onsite
improvements, off-site improvements, structural, fire and life safety, electrical, a
mechanical,plumbing, energy conservation, green building measures, stormwater
management and disabled accessibility aspects of the proposed project. The City shall
provide the Consultant with copies of code amendments and official code interpretations.
The standard turnaround time for assigned building plan reviews shall be 10 working
days for the initial check and 5 working days for re-checks. The standard turnaround time LL
for assigned engineering plan reviews shall be 15 working days for the initial check and 7 y
working days for re-checks. Consultants shall pick up and deliver plans to the department a
on a daily basis unless an alternate arrangement has been approved by the Director. °
a`
L
°
d
NN�
N.
bd
E
L
V
L+
i+
Q
3
Packet Pg. 188
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
The Consultant shall utilize employees to perform the plan reviews who are certified as
Plans Examiners through the International Code Council, CASp Certified and who are m
provided with a reasonable degree of annual training in accordance with the requirements c
of AB 717 (Health and Safety Code 18965 et seq.). A California Registered Civil 3
Engineer or Licensed Architect employed by the Consultant shall review the portion of aD
plans that involve engineering design.
Projects shall be assigned at the sole discretion of the Director or his designee and the
City. The City may use its own employees and/or other independent contractors to
perform plan reviews in addition to any such work assigned to Consultant. The volume
of plan reviews is dependent upon economic conditions that are outside the control of the
City. Consequently,there is no guarantee provided as to the minimum or maximum
L
volume of work that may be assigned to a Consultant within any given time period.
r
c
In the course of the plan review process,the Consultant shall avoid situations involving E
an actual or potential conflict of interest, shall act as an agent and a deputy of the
Building Official and/or Fire Official, and shall act in the interests of the City and the
citizens of San Bernardino. Consultants shall provide no services for any private client
L
within the corporate boundaries of the City during the contract period.
3
E
Building Code Inspections o
Consultants shall provide building inspection staff to supplement the City's existing staff
on an on-call as-needed basis. The Consultant's building inspection staff shall be certified o
by the International Code Council or other appropriate entities in accordance with AB717
and possess a minimum of one-year of building code enforcement experience with a ,CL
municipality or a private municipal consultant. Consultants shall also provide CASp
Certified Inspectors as required by SB 1608. Staff provided by the consultant shall have a
reasonable degree of annual training in accordance with the requirements of AB 717
(Health and Safety Code 18965 et seq.) The Director shall have the right of refusal of any
staff member assigned by the consultant. a
Ln
Building Official Services
Consultant shall provide a Certified Building Official on an on-call as needed basis. The
individual shall have a bachelor's degree in public administration, engineering,
architecture or a related field and a minimum of 3 years' experience as a building official
with another municipality. The individual will provide supervision and direction to the L
Building& Safety Division staff, code administration and interpretations, develop y
policies and ordinances, interface with customers, city staff and elected officials, and c
perform related administrative functions as assigned. The Director shall interview and 0-
have the right of refusal of any staff member assigned by the consultant. w
Engineering May Checking and Inspection 3
a
a�
The Consultants shall provide experienced and trained staff on an on-call as needed basis.
r
The individual shall be a licensed land surveyor in California with a minimum of 2 years a
err in mapping and inspection services. E
U
Q
4
Packet Pg. 189
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
Stormwater (NPDES)Prosram Inspection —
m
The Consultant shall provide inspection services to ensure compliance with the =
Stormwater Management Program in accordance with the MS4 Permit. The Consultant's 1°
NPDES inspection staff shall be experienced and trained with a minimum of 3 years'
experience in inspection of commercial businesses, construction sites, and industrial
projects and post construction onsite Stormwater Best Management Practice's(BMPs).
r
a�
Engineering Grading, On-site and Off-site Plan Checking and Inspection `6
m
a�
w
The Consultants shall provide experienced and trained staff on an on-call as needed basis.
The individual shall be a California Licensed Registered Civil Engineer with a minimum c
of 2 years of experience in plan checking.
U_
III COMPENSATION OF CONSULTANTS
a�
E
Proposals should include the Consultant's expected compensation expressed as a
percentage of the City's plan review fees. Additionally, hourly rates for building plan c
review services, building inspections, and building official services, fire plan review
services, engineering map checking and inspection, stormwater (NPDES) program
inspection, engineering grading, onsite and off-site plan checking and inspection shall be
specified on the cost sheet. Projects not assigned a valuation by the building official or o
fire official will be compensated for based on the hourly rate and the actual plan check
time accrued in increments of one-half hours. The total accrued hours must be provided c
on the final transmittal sheet for each project. If the total hours are not provided with a
transmittal, the City will assume no charges will be assessed. The City will collect all fees
for plan review services from the applicant. The Consultant shall invoice the City for the
services rendered on a monthly basis. 3
a�
IV PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Prospective Consultants shall be qualified based on experience, education,training, and a
LO
professional registration and certification. Proposals shall indicate the following in a
detailed manner:
1. Past experience on similar projects.
2. Education,training, experience,professional registration and certification of the LL
principal and of staff members who will be involved in the project. N
3. A brief narrative of the processes that will be employed to accomplish the project Q
including a discussion of quality control measures. a
4. Expected compensation based on Section III above. o
5. Able to provide complete on-line plan review processing to customers.
6. Any additional capabilities of the firm or optional services that may be offered
which are outside the scope of the project description.
_
a�
E
s
r
Q
5
Packet Pg. 190
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
tM
_
B. Three (3) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy of the proposal shall be submitted to the
Purchasing Department, Vanessa Sanchez, 300 North "D" Street, 4th Floor, City Hall, San m'
Bernardino, CA 92418, by the due date specified on the cover. Proposals shall be clearly
marked on the outside of the envelope "Plan Review and Inspection Services". 3
m
a�
d
w
a�
w
J
.O
_
R
d
L_
U-
_
4)
E
_
CC�
L
L
d
M
3
E
L
O
U)
_
O
V
d
CL
N
_
3
aD
m
M
a
LO
M
It
M
r
r
LL
y
R
V1
O
a
O
L
a
L
O
W
d
d
_
d
E
V
yyR
i.�
Q
6
Packet Pg. 191
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
rn
c
3
m
C
3
a�
m
r
m
w
m
Cn
m
w
J
_
SECTION II.
L
LL
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
E
CD
_
L
d
r
R
3
E
L
0
rn
c
0
r
m
CL
U)
c
3
m
0
c
�a
a.
Lo
M
M
r
r
LL
N
R
N
0
Q
0
L
a
L
0
m
m
E
r
u
m
a
7
Packet Pg.192
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
M
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS m
_
Bid Documents to Be Returned by Bidder 3
as
d
RFP r
Plan Review Services
I M
❑ Bidder Exrience, Competency, Qualification and Profile (Vendor Document) ill J
Proposal/Bid Content Forms .O
_
fC
❑ Non-Collusion Affidavit (City Form) Instructions to Offerors)/Bidders
r
d F
Bid C
B
Proposal/ i Content and y U.
❑ Listing of Proposed Subcontractor (City Form) III E
d
Instructions to Bidders, III Bid Content and Forms R
❑ Cost/ Price Form (City Form)
F-1 Authorized Signatures Instructions to Bidders r
❑ Bidder Identification III Bid Content and Forms E
0
Y
III Bid Content and Forms N
❑ Addendum Received (City Form) o
r
F1 120 Day Bid Validity Statement III Bid content and Forms a
N
_
❑ Authorized Signatures (City Form) III Bid Content and Forms 3
a�
El III Bid Content and Forms
c
R
❑ Proper Identification and Submittal of Proposal/Bid Package, and Price Form a
Instructions to Bidders
LO
M
M
r
Bidders are required to submit this checklist completed with all bid documents. LL
This list may not be reflective of all documents necessary for submittal. y
M
bl
O
0-
O
a
o
w
Y
m
r
as
E
r
o
Q
8
Packet Pg. 193
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
tM
_
A. Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference m
N/A
3
A)
B. Examination of Bid Documents a
I �
1. By submitting a bid, the Bidder represents that it has thoroughly examined 12
and become familiar with the items required under this RFP and that it is
capable of quality performance to achieve the City's objectives. J
2. The City reserves the right to remove from its mailing list for future RFP's,
for an undetermined period of time, the name of any Bidder for failure to L
accept a contract, failure to respond to two (2) consecutive RFP's and/or r
unsatisfactory performance. Please note that a "No Bid" is considered a a)
response.
tM
°
c
C. Addenda
L
d
Any City changes to the requirements will be made by written addendum to this 3
RFP. Any written addenda issued pertaining to this RFP shall be incorporated E
into the terms and conditions of any resulting Purchase Order. The City will not °
be bound to any modifications to or deviations from the requirements set forth in C
this RFP as the result of oral instruction. °
CL
d
All Addendums will be posted to our website at www.sbcity.org > City Hall >
Administrative Services > Finance > Request for Bids. For automatic electronic 3
notifications, please visit our website and sign-up for SB Connect. LD
D. Clarifications a.
Ln
1. Examination of Documents M
T
Should a Bidder require clarifications of this RFP, the Bidder shall notify
the City in writing in accordance with Section D.2 below. Should it be
found that the point in question is not clearly and fully set forth, the City 2
will issue a written addendum clarifying the matter, which will be posted to n
our website, and may be sent to all persons who have requested the RFP. o
L
a
2. Submitting Requests c
r
a. All questions, clarifications or comments shall be put in writing and a
must be received by the City no later than 3:00 PM July 10, 2014 �
and be addressed as follows:
E
s
a
a
9
Packet Pg. 194
scf
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
City of San Bernardino —
300 North "D" Street m'
4th floor, Purchasing Division c
Attn: Vanessa Sanchez 3
San Bernardino, CA 92418 D
d
b. The exterior envelope of all requests for clarifications, questions
and comments must be clearly labeled, "Not an Offer." The City is
not responsible for failure to respond to a request that has not been N
labeled as such. J
The City will also accept questions sent by email to:
sanchez va65�sbcity.org or facsimile machine; however, all emailed
or faxed questions must be received by the City no later than 3:00 c
PM, PST, July 10, 2014. Send facsimile transmissions to (909) 0
384-5043, Attention Vanessa Sanchez.
C. Inquiries received after 3:00 PM July 10, 2014 will not be
accepted. r
3
3. City Responses E
- o
r
Responses from the City will be communicated in writing to all recipients =
of this RFP, and will be posted to our website, www.sbcitV.org, by the
close of business July 15, 2014. a
N
C
For automatic electronic notifications, please visit our Homepage and 3
register for SB Connect. If you are not registered for SB Connect, you 2
may view or download any Addenda at www.sbcity.org > City Hall >
Administrative Services > Finance > Request for Bids.
a
E. Submission of Bids LO
M
le
M
1. Date and Time
All bids are to be submitted to the City of San Bernardino, Attention: LL
Vanessa Sanchez, Accounting Assistant. Bids received after 3:00 PM N
PST, July 21, 2014, will be rejected by the City as non-responsive. c
CL
0
2. Address a
0
Bids shall be addressed as follows:
City of San Bernardino a
Finance Department
300 N. "D" Street, 4th Floor-Purchasing
San Bernardino, CA 92418. E
r
M
Q
10
Packet Pg.195
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
cm
:a
Bids may be delivered in person to the Purchasing Division, 4th floor of
the above address. m'
3. Identification of Bids 3
d
Bidder shall submit a SEALED bid package consisting of:
r
a) One (1) signed original of Proposal
b) Three (3) copies of the Proposal
I c) One (1) electronic copy of the Proposal J
M
c
The bid package shall be addressed as shown above, bearing the
Bidder's name and address and clearly marked on the outside of the U_
envelope as follows: c
0)
E
RFP F-14-41 0,
Plan Review Services
L
4. Acceptance of Bids
�o
3
a. The City reserves the right to accept or reject any and all bids, or E
L0
any item or part thereof, or to waive any informalities or in
irregularities in bids. o
1
b. The City reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time without c.
prior notice and the City makes no representations that any
contract will be awarded to any Bidder responding to this RFP.
C. The City reserves the right to postpone bid opening for its own W
convenience.
a
d. Faxed or emailed bids will not be accepted. M
I �
F. Pre-Contractual Expenses
The City shall not be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by Bidder LL
in the preparation of its bid. Bidder shall not include any such expenses as part U)
of its bid. Pre-contractual expenses are defined as: c
a-
0
L
1. preparing its bid in response to this RFP; a.
L
0
w
2. submitting that bid to City;
0
3. negotiating with City any matter related to this bid; or W
d
E
�a
a
11
Packet Pg. 196
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
4. any other expenses incurred by the Bidder prior to date of award, if any of
the Agreement. m'
C
G. Contract Award
3
m
Issuance of this RFP and receipt of bids does not commit the City to award a
Purchase Order. The City reserves the right to postpone bid opening for its own r
convenience, to accept or reject any or all bids received in response to this RFP,
and to negotiate with other than the selected Bidder(s) should negotiations with U)
the selected Bidder(s) be terminated. The City also reserves the right to 12
apportion the award among two or more Bidders. _
d
A signed Vendor (Contractor) / Consultant Service Agreement (VSA/CSA), along U_
with a pre-performance meeting, outlining additional terms and conditions relating
to performance, warranty, materials, goods, services, or other items as deemed
necessary by the City, may be required prior to the commencement of the job.
c
H. Acceptance of Order r
3
The successful Bidder will be required to accept a Purchase Order in accordance c
with and including as a part thereof the published Notice Inviting Bids, and the N
RFP documents including all requirements, conditions and specifications
contained therein, with no exceptions other than those specifically listed in the
written purchase order. a
N
C
I. Business License ;
The City's Business Ordinance requires that a Business doing business
with the City, obtain and maintain a valid City Business Registration Certificate
during the terms of the Agreement. Bidder agrees to obtain such Certificate prior a
to undertaking any work under this Agreement.
a
M
J. Local Vendor Preference r
The City of San Bernardino gives any formal or informal bid submitted by a local u.
bidder a one percent (1%) credit for goods and materials, where labor and/or y
installation is incidental; and a five percent (5%) credit on Contractual services, o
for comparison purposes with other bidders, as authorized in the San Bernardino 0
Municipal Code Section 3.04.125, and Executive Order 2003-1, respectively. a
0
For the purposes of this section, "local bidders" shall be bidders for which the point
of sale of the goods, materials or services shall be within the limits of the City of
San Bernardino.
c
E
r
a
12
Packet Pg. 197
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
�7
m
C
f0
3
a�
a�
r
SECTION III.
Co
w
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
U.
r
E
CD
L
3
E
L
O
U)
.2
U
Q.
N
C
3
a�
a�
c
a
an
M
M
r
r
LL
N
f6
N
O
CL
O
L
(L
L-
0
bd
U)
O
m
o"
NQ
1.6
E
U
f6
r+
r
Q
� i
Packet Pg. 198
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS °
m
Plan Review, Inspection, Stormwater Management, and Building Official Services
3
NOTICE : "SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO THE BIDDER"
d
Services:
Bidder shall complete right-hand column indicating brief reasoning for
exceptions to requirements when not acceptable. State "Acceptable" if w
requirements are agreeable as set forth in left-hand column.
c
Equipment:
Bidder shall complete right-hand column indicating specific size and or
make and model of all components when not exactly as specified. State c
"As Specified" if item is exactly as set forth in the left-hand column. E
�o
FAILURE TO COMPLETE RIGHT HAND COLUMN WILL INVALIDATE BID
CATEGORY I ACCEPTABLE/AS SPECIFIED
L
Provide plan reviews of development projects
necessary to determine compliance with all
applicable building and fire codes, provisions of Title c
19, all NFPA standards, codes and laws. n
0
1. SCOPE
A. Plan Review Services: The project, in
general will consist of the examination,
analysis, and review of plans for various
construction projects within the City in order to
determine compliance with all applicable m
building and fire regulations, including but not
limited to local building regulations and a
amendments, as well as the California Building
Standards Code (CAC Title 24), comprised of
the latest adopted editions of the model codes
with State amendments, and the State
Housing Law (CAC Title 25) as adopted by the LL
State of California and the City of San
Bernardino and California Fire Code, Title 19 0
and all NFPA standards. Dependent upon o
each specific project assigned, such plan a
reviews may consist of an examination of the w
grading, site drainage, onsite improvement,
geotechnical, structural, fire and life safety,
electrical, mechanical, plumbing, disabled
accessibility, energy conservation, stormwater
management and green building features of E
z
a
14
Packet Pg. 199
S.Cf
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
the proposed project. The City shall provide
the consultant with copies of code m
amendments and official code interpretations
issued by the Building Official and/or Fire 3
Official. Related consultant services such as _'
the availability of a Certified Access Specialist
(CASp) pursuant to SB 1608 will be required. r
w
B. Building, and Site Inspection Services: Cn
Consultants shall provide building inspection JT
staff to supplement the City's existing staff on
an on-call as-needed basis. The consultant's
building inspection staff shall be certified by LL
the International Code Council or other
appropriate entities in accordance with AB717
and possess a minimum of one-year of
building code enforcement experience with a
municipality or a private municipal consultant.
The Director shall have the right of refusal of
any staff member assigned by the consultant. 3
E
0
r
C. Building Official Services:
Consultant shall provide a Certified Building
Official on an on-call as-needed basis. The a
individual shall have a bachelor's degree in
public administration, engineering, architecture 3
or a related field and a minimum of 3 years R
experience as a building official with another
municipality. The individual will provide
supervision and direction to the Building & a
Safety Division staff, code administration and M
interpretations, develop policies and M
ordinances, interface with customers, city staff
and elected officials, and perform related
administrative functions as assigned. The LL
Director shall have the right of refusal of any N
staff member assigned by the consultant. o
a
0
a
0
N
d
7
d
r+
C
d
E
t
V
R
Q
15
Packet Pg.200
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
tM
c
D. Engineering Map Checking and Inspection:
Consultants shall provide on-call map m
checking, approval and inspection services to
the City for the review of Subdivision Tract and 3
Parcel Maps, Lot Mergers, Lot Line
Adjustments and Certificate of Compliance
which shall be reviewed by a Licensed Land r
Surveyor in the State of California for the
procedure of survey, mathematical closure, d
and compliance with the Subdivision Map Act,
the Land Surveyors' Act, Title 19 of the San
Bernardino Municipal Code, the approved
Tentative Map, the approved Conditions of LL
Approval, and the current title report. This
review shall include but is not limited to the E
review of survey documentation, lot and (D,
boundary closure calculations, dedications and
easement provisions, legal descriptions and
completeness and accuracy of data notation.
M
3
E. Engineering Grading, On-Site and Off-Site c
Plan Checking: m
Consultants shall provide on-call plan c
checking, approval services to the City for the
review of grading plans, on-site and off-site a
Improvement plans and inspection. The plans
shall be reviewed by a Licensed Professional 3
Civil Engineer in the State of California for
compliance with The Green Book, Title 19 of
the San Bernardino Municipal Code, the
approved Conditions of Approval, and the a
current title report. M
F. Stormwater (NPDES) Program Inspections:
The Consultant shall provide inspection
services to ensure compliance with the LL
Stormwater Management Program in N
accordance with the MS4 Permit. The c
Consultant's NPDES inspection staff shall be c
experienced and trained to inspect the City's a`
commercial businesses, construction sites,
and industrial projects and post construction U)
onsite Stormwater Best Management a
Practice's (BMPs).
a�
E
r
M
Q
16
Packet Pg.201
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
2. REQUIREMENTS °
m
A. Consultant shall utilize employees to perform the
plan reviews and inspections who are certified as 3
Plans Examiners and Building Inspectors through
the International Code Council (ICC) and retain
CASp certified inspectors and Plans Examiners r
as required. Plans Examiners and Inspectors
shall be provided with a reasonable degree of
annual training in accordance with the
requirements of AB 717 (Health and Safety Code =
18965 et seq.).
_L
LL
B. A California Registered Civil, Structural Engineer,
Licensed Land Surveyor, or a Licensed Architect
shall review the portion of plans that involve
engineering design. _
C. The standard turn-around time for assigned r
building plan review shall be 10 (ten) working 3
days for the Initial review and 5 (five) working E
days for re-checks. Consultants shall pick up and
Cn
r
deliver plans daily to the Department unless the c
Department approves alternate arrangements.
d
D. The standard turn-around time for assigned
engineering plan review shall be 15 (fifteen) 3
working days for initial review and 7 (seven)
working days for re-checks. Consultants shall
pick up and deliver plans daily to the Department
unless the Department or Fire Official approves a
alternate arrangements. M
D. Projects shall be assigned at the sole discretion of
the Building Official, or Fire Official and the City.
The City may use its own employees and/or other
independent contractors to perform plan reviews N
in addition to any such work assigned to c
Consultant. The volume of plan reviews is o
dependent upon economic conditions that are a`
outside the control of the City. Consequently, ,o
there is no guarantee provided as to the minimum
or maximum volume of work that may be Cr
assigned to a Consultant within any given time
period.
c
a�
E
s
a
17
Packet Pg.202
. S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
E. In the course of the plan review and inspection
process, the Consultant shall avoid situations m
involving an actual or potential conflict of interest, a
and shall act as an agent and a deputy of the 3
Building Official or Fire Official and shall act in
the interest of the City and the citizens of San
Bernardino. Consultants shall provide no r
services for any private client within the corporate
boundaries of the City during the contract period. o
w
J
3. COMPENSATION
A. Proposals shall include the consultant's LL
expected compensation expressed as a
percentage of the City's plan review fee. E
a�
The proposals should also include the
consultant's expected compensation for
structural only plan reviews as a percentage of
the City's plan review fee.
L
O
The consultant's plan review fee shall be in
considered the full compensation for all plan c
review performed through the second recheck.
Thereafter, the consultant may charge any Q
additional plan review time at their agreed
upon hourly rate if the base plan review fee is 3
not adequate to cover the consultant's cost for
the review. Of
c
�o
B. Hourly rates for grading, on-site and off-site a
plan review, mapping review and building plan M
review and fire plan review shall be specified
separately. Projects not assigned a valuation
by the Department are to be billed by the
consultant to the City based on the hourly rate
and the actual plan check time in one-half hour y
increments. The consultant's current c
accumulated plan review hours, to be billable, c
must be specified on each transmittal sheet a
accompanying the plans. The final transmittal w
sheet accompanying the approved plans must
indicate the total accumulated hours. Hours Cr
not indicated on the transmittal sheets shall
not be billable.
a�
E
r
Q
18
Packet Pg.203
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
E
C. The Department(s) may assign any plan
.3
review at an hourly rate rather than based on m
valuation at City's sole discretion.
3
D. The hourly rate for CASp services, if available,
shall be specified.
w
E. The costs of services for the Stormwater
Program Inspections should be specified on )
an hourly basis.
c
F. The costs of Building Official Services should
be specified on an hourly basis. LL
r
G. The Consultant shall invoice the City for
Services rendered on a monthly basis. 0
M
r-
M
2
4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
M
3
Prospective consultants shall be qualified based c
upon experience, education, training, and �
professional registration and certification. Proposals c
shall indicate the following in a detailed manner:
a
A. Past experience on similar projects. c
B. Education, training, experience, professional 3
registration and certification of the principal and of
staff members who will be involved in the project.
C. A brief narrative of the processes that will be
employed to accomplish the project including a a
discussion of quality control measures.
D. Expected compensation based on Item No. 3 M
above.
E. Any additional capabilities of the firm or optional
services that may be offered (e.g. CASp services), LL
which are outside the scope of the project N
description. o
F. Six (6) copies of the proposal shall be submitted c
to the Purchasing Department, Vanessa Sanchez, a`
Accounting Assistant, 300 North "D" Street, San
Bernardino, CA, 92418 no later than 3:OOPM on
July 21, 2014. Proposals shall be clearly
marked on the outside of the envelope: "Plan W
Review Services."
a�
E
r
M
a
19
Packet Pg.204
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
_
5. SELECTION PROCESS
m
Staff will analyze all submittals and verify the
information contained therein. Interviews of selected 3
firms will be conducted at the time and date specified .D
on the cover. The firms will be rated on a point �
system with a maximum score of 100. An additional
five points will be given to City of San Bernardino
based consultants. Such companies shall have an
office with a minimum of two employees doing
business inside the city limits and shall possess a city
Business Registration.
L_
r
_
E
d
_
C�
C
L
3
E
L
O
it
_
O
V
d
Q.
U)
_
3
ai
m
a
LO
M
le
M
r
r
LL
_N
N
O
Q
O
L-
a.
L
O
W
U)
d
Cr
Nd
I.L
i.
_
d
E
L
V
f+
Q
20
Packet Pg.20.5
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
a�
S
W
c
co
3
a�
m
m
w
R
SECTION IV.
BID CONTENT AND FORMS L
U-
_
E
_
m
L
r
E
L
0
Co
_
2
r
V
0
Q
_
3
a�
a�
C
m
a
Lo
M
M
r
r
LL
0
Q
0
L
a
L
O
a.+
0
0
_
d
V
R
Q
21
Packet Pg.206
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
M
A. BID FORMAT AND CONTENT 'm
1. Presentation 3
d
Bids should not include any unnecessarily elaborate or promotional
material. Information should be presented in the order in which it is r
requested. Lengthy narrative is discouraged, and presentations should be
brief and concise. Bids shall contain the following:
d
w
J
a. identification of Bidder, including name, address and telephone;
a�
b. proposed working relationship between Bidder and subcontractors, LL
if applicable;
E
C. acknowledgment of receipt of all RFP addenda, if any;
r �
c
d. name, title, address and telephone number of contact person
during period of bid evaluation; r
3
e. a statement to the effect that the bid shall remain valid for a period E
of not less than 120 days from the date of submittal; and
CO
I �
f. signature of a person authorized to bind Bidder to the terms of the 2
bid. a
U)
c
Bidder may also propose enhancement or procedural or technical 3
innovations to the Technical Specifications which do not materially
deviate from the objectives or required content of the project.
c
2. Exceptions/Deviations a
Ln
State any exceptions to or deviations from the requirements of this RFP, M
stating "technical" exceptions on the Technical Specifications form, and
"contractual" exceptions on a separate sheet of paper. Where Bidder
wishes to propose alternative approaches to meeting the City's technical
or contractual requirements, these should be thoroughly explained. N
y
O
3. Qualifications, Related Experience and References of Bidder o
L
a.
This section of the bid should establish the ability of Bidder to satisfactorily w
perform the required work by reasons of experience in performing work of
a similar nature; demonstrated competence in the services to be provided;
strength and stability of the firm; staffing capability; work load; record of
meeting schedules on similar projects; and supportive client reference.
a�
E
�o
V
a
22
Packet Pg.207
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
Bidder shall: —
m
a. provide a brief profile of the firm, including the types of services
offered; the year founded; form of the organization (corporation, 3
partnership, sole proprietorship); number, size and location of a�
offices; number of employees;
CD
r
b. describe the firm's experience in performing work of a similar
nature to that solicited in this RFP: m
a�
w
J
C. provide, as a minimum, three (3) references from current =
customers of a similar size as the City as related experience;
reference shall furnish the name, title, address and telephone
LL
number of the person(s) at the client organization who is most
knowledgeable about the work performed.
CD
4. Appendices =
Information considered by Bidder to be pertinent to this RFP and which r
has not been specifically solicited in any of the aforementioned sections 3
may be placed in a separate appendix section. Bidders are cautioned, E
however, that this does not constitute an invitation to submit large
amounts of extraneous materials: appendices should be relevant and c
brief. 2
r
a�
a
B. LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
3
By submitting a bid, bidder warrants that any and all licenses and/or certifications AR
required by law, statute, code or ordinance in performing under the scope and
specifications of this RFP are currently held by bidder, and are valid and in full
force and effect. Copies or legitimate proof of such licensure and/or certification a
shall be included in bidder's response. Bids lacking copies and/or proof of M
said licenses and/or certifications may be deemed non-responsive and may M
be rejected.
v
C. COST AND PRICE FORMS LL
ql
Bidder shall complete the Cost/Price Form in its entirety including: 1) all items c
listed and total price; 2) all additional costs associated with performance of o
specifications; and 3) Bidder's identification information including a binding a`
signature. w
r
aD
W
a�
E
r
Q
23
Packet Pg.208
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
a�
S
Bidder shall state cash discounts offered. Unless discount payment terms are
offered, payment terms shall be "Net 30 Days". Payment due dates, including m'
discount period, will be computed from date of City acceptance of the required
services or of a correct and complete invoice, whichever is later, to the date 3
City's check is mailed. Any discounts taken will be taken on full amount of d
invoice, unless other charges are itemized and discount thereon is disallowed.
Freight terms shall be F.O.B. Destination, Full Freight Allowed, unless otherwise JT
specified on price form. cn
w
J
C
U-
r
C
d
E
d
t0
C
R
L
d
3
o
c
0
m
CL
E
3
a�
m
a
LO
M
M
r
r
LL
_N
M
N
O
Q
O
a
L
d
3
N�
E
t
V
I24
Packet Pg.209
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
:a
00
PRICE FORM
3
m
REQUEST FOR QUOTES: RFP F-14-41 W
DESCRIPTION OF RFP: plan Review Services
U)
PRINT
J
NAME OF AUTHORIZED .c
REPRESENTATIVE
d
L
U_
r
Provide pricing that is a Firm Fixed Fee
a�
The undersigned Contractor hereby offers to provide Plan Review Services in strict
compliance with the specifications, terms and conditions set forth in this Request for r
Proposal. 3
General Information E
0
Cn
A. Company Name: c
0
B. Company Address:
c
C. Number of Employees: 3
A,
D. Average annual business volume over last three calendar years
$
a
E. Number of years providing Plan Review Services at this location? M
M
F. Please provide a minimum of three references: Company name, address,
contact person and telephone number for which your company has current
contracts or provided Plan Review Services within the last three years. LL
W
0
CL
0
L
L
0
V
d
Cr
N�
I.L
CD
E
0
0
Q
Packet Pg.210
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
tM
3
m
PRICE FORM (continued)
G. Primary contact person for the City of San Bernardino:
a�
Name: Telephone No.
d
H. Business Organization Type. Indicate whether your firm is an individual
proprietorship, partnership, corporation, etc.
c
1. If incorporated, provide the following information:
Date of incorporation: State of incorporation:
LL
r
Names and titles of all officers and directors:
d
c
I �
r
3
E
L
2. If an individual, partnership, provide the following information: °
c
Formation date of company:
a
Names and addresses of all partners. Indicate whether they are general or
limited partner: 3
a�
a
M
M
I. Indicate whether your firm has ever failed to complete any contract awarded to it.
If so, note when, where and why (enter here or attach narrative.)
LL
N
J. Indicate whether your firm has been or is the subject of a bankruptcy or c
insolvency proceeding or is subject to assignment for the benefit of creditors. a`
L
°
W
F+
N
d
3
a+
C
d
E
t
V
M
Q
26
Packet Pg.211
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
E
PRICE FORM (continued)
.3
m
ANNUAL PURCHASE ORDER
o
Effective on or about September 1, 2014, one three (3) year purchase order will be issued, at 2
the City's discretion for City's requirements, on an as-needed basis, with no guaranteed
minimum usage for Plan Review Services.
d
w
M
Two one year options to renew are possible. Option years shall become effective only upon )
issuance by the City of a duly authorized Purchase Order. 2
Please provide detailed cost information in the spaces provided below, and any other
incidental or additional costs required to complete the requirements of the proposal. U_
r
Description Cost
1. Percentage of Building Plan Review Fee- $
2. Percentage of Land Development Plan Review Fee: $ r
(Grading, Soils, Traffic) 3
E
L
3. Percentage of Plan Review Fee — Structural Only: $ °
y
c
4. Hourly Rate — Land Development Plan Review (no schedules please): $ °
(Grading, Soils, Traffic) a
c
5. Hourly Rate — Building Plan Review-all disciplines (no schedules): $ 3
d
5. Hourly Rate — Certified Accessibility Specialist program Services: $
c
6. Other Optional Services - please specify: $ a
7. Hourly charge for NPDES Program Administration and inspection: $ M
8. Hourly costs for Building Official services: $
9. Other— please specify: $ N
10. Percentage surcharge for expedited plan review: c
(Building and Land Development) a
L
°
11. Hourly Rate — Fire Department Plan Review- $ N
d
Cr
r
c
d
E
M
a
27
Packet Pg.212
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
Are there any other additional or incidental costs that will be required by your firm in order to
meet the requirements of the Technical Specifications? Yes / No . (circle one). If you m'
answered "Yes", please provide details of said additional costs: _
3
R
m
Please indicate any elements of the Technical Specifications that cannot be met by your firm: ,
W
°
d
J
Have you included in your bid all informational items and forms as requested? Yes / No
(circle one). If you answered "no" please explain: LL
r
_
E
_
This offer shall remain firm for 120 days from RFP close date. The terms and conditions as
set forth in the RFP shall apply to this bid. d
r
°
3
In signing this bid, Bidder warrants that all certifications and documents requested E
herein are attached and properly completed and signed. °
c
From time to time the City may issue one or more addenda to this RFP. Below, please 2
indicate all addenda to this RFP received by your firm, and the date said addenda a
was/were received. y
3
Addenda No.: Received on: d
Addenda No.: Received on:
Addenda No.: Received on:
a
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: LO
M
M
PRINT SIGNER'S NAME AND TITLE:
LL
VJ
DATE SIGNED: N
°
a
COMPANY NAME AND ADDRESS: a
L
°
W
Y
N
NNd
LIB
PHONE: FAX: d
E
r
a
2s
Packet Pg.213
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
=a
IF SUBMITTING A "NO BID", PLEASE STATE THE REASON(S) BELOW: m'
V
C
m
3
2
CD
d
Co
as
J
A -a
C
d
u-
1 �
d
E
C)
!C
C
L
a+
3
E
0
r
Co
c
0
a>
CL
N
C
3
d
C
m
a.
LO
� M
M
r
et
I r
t0
0
a
i 0
L
a
0
w
as
Cr
a�
c
a)
E
z
Q
m
Q
29
Racket Pg.214
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
SUBCONTRACTOR'S LIST
m
As required by California State Law, the General Contractor bidding will
hereinafter state the subcontractor who will be the subcontractor on the job for 3
each particular trade or subdivision of the work in an amount in excess of one- d
half of one percent of the General Contractor's total bid and will state the firm
name and principal location of the mill, shop, or office of each. If a General r
Contractor fails to specify a subcontractor, or if he specifies more than one T
subcontractor for the same portion of work to be performed under the contract in m
excess of one-half of one percent, he agrees that he is fully qualified to perform
that portion himself and that he shall perform that portion himself. _
L_
LL
DIVISION OF NAME OF FIRM OR LOCATION
WORK OR CONTRACTOR CITY
TRADE 0
c
a�
r
�a
3
E
0
r
U)
0
m
CL
0
C
3
m
Print Name Signature of Bidder
a
Company Name: M
M_
Address:
LL
REJECTION OF BIDS
tn
0
The undersigned agrees that the City of San Bernardino reserves the right to reject any o
or all bids, and reserves the right to waive informalities in a bid or bids not affected by a
law, if to do seems to best serve the public interest. 2
r
Cr
a)
a�
E
U
r
a
30
Packet Pg.2
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
a�
NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
m
TO: THE COMMON COUNCIL, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 3
d
I In accordance with Title 23, United States Code, Section 112, the undersigned
hereby states, under penalty of perjury:
�o
That he/she has not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement,
Iparticipated in any collusion, or otherwise taken action in restraint of free
competitive bidding in connection with RFP.
a�
L_
Business Name
a)
E
CD
Business Address
Signature of bidder X
L
d
M
R
3
E
Place of Residence n
c
0
r
as
CL
Subscribed and sworn before me this day of , 20_.
3
Notary Public in and for the County of State of
California.
c
IMy commission expires 20 a.
LO
M
M
r
I �
r
LL
N
f6
N
O
Q
a.
L
0
U)
a�
Cr
c
a�
E
s
U
a
Q
31
Packet Pg.216
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
=a
00
C
m
3
A)
a�
r
SECTION V.
d
GENERAL EVALUATION CRIETERIA
L_
LL
M
C
d
E
d
R
C�
C
1
d
r
R
3
E
O
r
O
m
CL
N
C
3
m
d
C
R
a.
to
M
M
r
r
LL
_N
N
O
C.
O
a
L
O
W
a.+
N
d
7
Cr
d
r
C
d
L
V
a
32
Packet Pg.217
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
A. EVALUATION CRITERIA _
3
m
1. Capabilities of Firm to Effectively Complete the Project =
Requirements - 35%
3
m
Depth of Offeror(s)'s understanding of, and ability to manage, City's CD
requirements; ability to meet task deadlines; utility of suggested enhancements r
or technical innovations.
2. Qualifications of Firm/Related Experience -45% J
Experience in providing services similar to those requested herein; experience
working with public agencies; strength and stability of the firm; strength, stability, LL
experience and technical competence of subcontractors; assessment by client r
references; qualifications of project staff; key personnel's level of involvement in
performing related work; logic of project organization; adequacy of labor
commitment.
M
3. Reasonableness of Cost and Price - 10% iv
r
M
3
Reasonableness of the individual firm-fixed prices and competitiveness of E
quoted prices with other proposals received; adequacy of the data in support of
figures quoted; basis on which prices are quoted.
0
r
4. Completeness of Response - 5% a
U)
_
Completeness of response in accordance with RFP instructions; exceptions to or 3
deviations from the RFP requirements which the Offeror(s) cannot or will not
accommodate; other relevant factors not considered elsewhere.
5. Local Vendor Preference - 5% a
Ln
As approved in Executive Order 2003-01--Offeror(s)'s which posses a fixed
office or distribution point with at least one owner or employee located within the
City of San Bernardino, and possessing all valid and current permits, and
licenses required to transact such business, including, but not limited to a City LL
Business Registration Certificate shall receive a five percent (5%) preference. !�
[Unless contrary to Federal, State or Local Law (such as contracts for the c
construction of public works projects), or unless contrary to the requirements c
mandated by the funding source for such contractual services (such as the a`
Federal Government or other source which requires award to the lowest ,o
responsible Offeror(s.) N
a
a�
r
c
a�
E
M
a
33
Packet Pg.218
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
rn
c
B. EVALUATION PROCEDURE
m
All proposals received as specified will be evaluated by City staff in accordance =
with the above criteria. Additional sub-criteria beyond those listed may be 1°
considered by the evaluators in applying the major criteria to the proposals. 2
During the evaluation period, the City may require an on-site visit and/or tour of
the Offeror(s)'s place of business. OFFEROR(S) should be aware; however, that
award may be made without vendor visits, interviews, or further discussions.
m
C. AWARD w
J
Depending on the dollar amounts of the offers received, City staff will either M
select the vendor best meeting the above-specified criteria or submit to City
Council, for consideration and selection, the offer(s) judged by staff to be the
most competitive.
The City reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time without prior notice
and, furthermore, makes no representations that any contract(s) will be awarded
to any OFFEROR(S) responding to this RFP. The City expressly reserves the
right to postpone proposal opening for its own convenience, to waive any 3
informality or irregularity in the proposals received, and to reject any and all E
proposals responding to this RFP without indicating any reasons for such °
rejection. �
0
r
The CitV also reserves the right to award its total requirement among two a
or more OFFEROR(S) as City staff may deem to be in its best Interests In c
addition, negotiations may or may not be conducted with OFFEROR(S); 3
therefore, the proposal submitted should contain the OFFEROR(S) most 2
favorable terms and conditions, since the selection and award may be made
without discussion with any Offeror(s).
a
D. TIE PROPOSALS LO
M
If the final evaluation scores (after applying the local preference allowance) result
in a tie score, then the recommendation for award will be given to the local
vendor. r
LL
U)
E. NOTIFICATION OF AWARD y
0
a
OFFEROR(S) who submit a proposal in response to this RFP shall be notified a`
regarding the firm(s) who was awarded the agreement. Such notification shall be
made within a reasonable time after the date the agreement is awarded.
3
O'
a.+
C
d
E
V
f0
Q
34
Packet Pg. 219
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
a�
00
c
m
3
d
m
r
SECTION VI.
Co
w
GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
_
m
L
LL
w
_
CD
E
a)
0
m
_
Cm
C
L
W
R
3
E
L
O
Cn
_
O
V
d
Q
_
3
2
i m
m
IL
M
M
r
LL
t6
O
CL
O
L
a
L
O
N
ty
O
_
V
R
i+
Q
35
Packet Pg.220
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
`o
GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS m
V
1. Each bid shall be in accordance with Request for Proposal (RFP) Number F-14-41.All m
specifications are minimum. Bidders are expected to meet or exceed these specifications as written.
Bidder shall attach to their bid a complete detailed itemization and explanation for each and every
deviation or variation from the RFP specifications and requirements. Conditional bids, or those that
4.
take exception to the RFP specifications and requirements, may be considered non-responsive and w
may be rejected. in
2. The City reserves the right to accept or reject any and all bids and to award a contract to the bidder w
® whom best meets the City's requirements. This may include waiver of minor irregularities or _J
discrepancies, or nonconformity to specifications in appropriate circumstances. Purchase shall be on
a best buy basis after due consideration of all relevant factors, including but not limited to,
workmanship, accessibility of parts and service, known evidence of manufacturer's responsibility and LL
record, durability and known operational record of product and suitability as well as conformity to City
needs and requirements. In all cases the best interest of the City shall prevail in all contract awards.
3. The City of San Bernardino reserves the right to purchase more or less than the quantities specified at E
unit prices bid.
4. Bids shall be firm offers, subject to acceptance or rejection within 120 days of the opening thereof. C
5. Regular dealer. No bidder shall be acceptable who is not a reputable manufacturer or dealer of such
items as submitted for bid consideration.
6. All materials, workmanship and finish entering into the construction of the equipment must be of the 3
best of these respective kinds and must conform to the character of the equipment and the service for E
which it is intended to be used and shall be produced by use of the current manufacturing processes. 0
"Seconds", factory rejects, and substandard goods are not acceptable. U)
7. Each bidder shall submit with their bid a copy of the proposed product specifications, complete c
detailed drawings, and other descriptive matter in sufficient detail to clearly describe the equipment, o
materials and parts offered.
m
8. Manufacturer and/or Contractor shall defend any and all suits and assume all liability for any and all y
claims made against the City of San Bernardino or any of its officials or agents for the use of any r_
patented process, device or article forming a part of equipment or any item furnished under the 3
contract. d
9. Each bidder must state in their bid the guaranteed delivery date of product and/or services in number m
of calendar days from the date of contract execution by the City of San Bernardino, time is of the =
essence relative to this contract. Contractor shall prosecute the work continuously and diligently and a
shall deliver the items at the earliest possible date following the award of the contract.
10. Each bidder shall list in their bid all factory, manufacturer's and/or dealer's warranty and/or guarantee 'O
M
coverage and shall submit such written documents evidencing the same attached to the bid.
11. Successful bidder(s) (Contractor) shall furnish and deliver to the City complete equipment as bid and
awarded, ready for installation and fully equipped as detailed in these specifications.
12. Price shall be quoted F.O.B. San Bernardino (all transportation charges shall be fully prepaid), and
shall include all discounts. Bid shall include California sales tax, where applicable, (effective January LL
1,2013)computed at the rate of 8.25°/x, (this will normally be shown as a separate line item on the
price form). y
13. City shall make payment within thirty(30) days after the complete delivery and acceptance of the c
specified items by the City of San Bernardino and receipt of the Contractor's priced invoice. a`
14. All"standard equipment" is included in any bid. Bidders furnishing bids under these specifications
o
shall supply all items advertised as"standard" equipment even if such items are not stipulated in the w
specifications, unless otherwise clearly accepted in the bid. d
15. The items which the bidder proposes to furnish the City must comply in all respects with the M
Cr
appropriate safety regulations of all regulatory commissions of the Federal Government and the State
of California, whether such safety features and/or items have been specifically outlined in these
specifications or not. c
m
E
s
U
M
Q
36
Packet Pg.221
S.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
rn
c
16. Contractor delivering equipment pursuant to these RFP specifications shall guarantee that equipment
meets specifications as set forth herein. If it is found that equipment delivered does not meet
m
requirements of these specifications the Contractor shall be required to correct the same at their own -�
expense.
17. By submitting a bid, each bidder agrees that in the event complete delivery is not made within the time 3
or times set forth pursuant to this specification, damage will be sustained by the City, and that it is,
and will be impractical and extremely difficult to, ascertain the actual damage which the City will
sustain in the event of and by reason of such delay.
18. In case the delivery of the items under this contract is delayed due to strikes, injunctions, government
r
controls, or by reason of any cause or circumstance beyond the control of the Contractor, the time for
delivery may be extended (in the City's sole discretion) by a number of days to be determined in each co
instance by mutual written agreement between the Contractor and the Purchasing Manager of the City 2
of San Bernardino. The City shall not unreasonably refuse such extension. a
19. Contract. Each bid shall be submitted and received with the understanding that acceptance by the City
of San Bernardino of bid in response to this solicitation shall constitute a contract between the
Contractor and the City. This shall bind the Contractor to furnish and deliver at the price bid and in ii
complete accordance with all provisions of RFP No. F-14-41. In most cases the basis of award will be
the City's standard purchase order that may or may not incorporate this solicitation by reference. m
20. Prohibited interest. No member, officer, or employee of the City or of any agency of the City during his aa)i
tenure or for one year thereafter shall have any interest, direct or indirect in this contract or the ca
proceeds thereof. Furthermore, the parties hereto covenant and agree that to their knowledge no c
board member, officer or employee of the City has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual,
financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City, ;
and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete 3
disclosure of all such information will be made in writing to the other party or parties, even if such E
interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4(commencing with Section 1090) r
or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1120) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the to
State of California. C
21. One Document. These specifications, the notice inviting bids, RFP F-14-41, the Contractor's bid, any
written agreement executed by the parties, the purchase order and all documents referred to in the a
complete specifications and purchase order, and all written modifications of said documents shall be c
construed together as one document.Anything called for in any one of said documents shall be —
deemed to be required equally as if called for in all. Anything necessary to complete the work properly
shall be performed by the contractor, whether specifically set out in the contract or not.All sections of >
the specifications shall be read as constituting a whole and not as an aggregation of individual parts,
and whatever is specified in one section shall be construed as applying to all sections. c
22. The City of San Bernardino reserves the right to accept or reject any and all bids. a
23. Prompt payment. Each bidder may stipulate in their bid a percentage prompt payment discount to be
taken by the City in the event the City makes payment to the Contractor within ten (10)working days v
of receipt of material and approval of invoice. For the purpose of this provision, payment is deemed to
be made on the date of mailing of the City check. NOTE: prompt payment discounts will only be
used during bid evaluation in the case of ties.
Ile
24. Inquiries. Direct all inquiries to Vanessa Sanchez at 909-384-5346. Technical questions may be sent
via fax to 909-384-5043. The answers to material questions will be provided to all potential bidders. LL
25. Bid/Price forms. No bid will be acceptable unless prices are submitted on the pricing forms furnished 2
herein, and all required forms are completed and included with bid. Deliver all bids, SIGNED and gn
0
SEALED, to the Purchasing Division, Finance Department at 300 North "D" Street, 4"' Floor, City Hall, °-
0
San Bernardino, California 92418. CLEARLY MARK THE RFP SPECIFICATION TITLE: PLAN a
REVIEW SERVICES and Number F-14-41 ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE ENVELOPE. o
26. Time. All bids must be received in the Purchasing Division no later than 3:00 PM, PST,July 21, y
2014,where at such time and said place bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared. Any a�
bid may be withdrawn by bidder prior to the above scheduled time for the opening of bids. Any bid c
received after that time and date specified shall NOT be considered. tr
27. The City of San Bernardino reserves the right at its own discretion to award separate contracts for
each category, or to award multiple contracts, or to award one contract for furnishing and delivering of E
all equipment and/or services in all categories. E
M
Q
37
Packet Pg.222
5.C.f
RFP F-14-41
Plan Review Services
c
28. Equipment. In the purchase of equipment, Contractor shall be required to furnish one (1)
OPERATORS MANUAL and one (1) PARTS MANUAL for all equipment bid. '
m
29. In submitting a bid to a public purchasing body, the bidder offers and agrees that if the bid is accepted, -a
it will assign to the purchasing body all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may
have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (U.S.C. Sec 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, 3
commencing with Section 16700 of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), 2
arising from purchases of goods, materials, or services by the bidder for sale to the purchasing body
pursuant to the bid. Such assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the purchasing
body tenders final payment to the bidder.
30. Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold City, its officers, employees and agents harmless from M
any claim, demand, liability, suit,judgment or expense (including, without limitation, reasonable costs
of defense) arising out of or related to Contractor's performance of this agreement, except that such
duty to indemnify, defend and hold harmless shall not apply where injury to person or property is a
caused by City's willful misconduct or sole negligence. The costs, salary and expenses of the City
Attorney and members of his office in enforcing this Agreement on behalf of the City shall be m
considered as"attorney's fees"for the purposes of this paragraph. ii
31. While not restricting or limiting the foregoing, during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall
maintain in effect policies of comprehensive public, general, and automobile liability insurance, in the
amount of$1,000,000 combined single limit, and statutory worker's compensation coverage, and shall
file copies of said policies with the City's Risk Manager prior to undertaking any work under this °1
c�
Agreement. The policies shall name the City as an additional insured and shall provide for ten (10)
day notification to the City if said policies are terminated or materially altered.
32. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE , ar
f0 Geirtified GheGk or faithful perflqFmallGe bond 1 bid bend made payable to GheGk, o � 3
-Rerpardine in an arnGHRt equal to B
perfermaRG8 Gf this GGntraGt. Said surety shall be subjeGt tG the appFeval ef the Gity nf R;;A L
0
g 6aid bORd shall have a rating in Be6t'6 Fnest FeGeRt iRsyraRGe guide of'A" or,better.
a.+
33. Written contract documents, duly authorized and signed by the appropriate authority, constitute the
complete and entire agreement(s) that may result from the RFP. m
CL
34. City may, at its discretion, exercise option year renewals for up to three (3) years, in one-year
increments. —
35. By submitting a bid, bidder warrants that any and all licenses and/or certifications required by law,
statute, code or ordinance in performing under the scope and specifications of this RFP are currently
held by bidder, and are valid and in full force and effect. Copies or legitimate proof of such licensure
and/or certification shall be included in bidder's response. Bids lacking copies and/or proof of said
licenses and/or certifications may be deemed non-responsive and may be rejected. a.
36. Once the award has been made and prior to the commencement of the job, the City's Municipal Code
LO
(M.C. 5.04.005) requires that a Business doing business with the City, obtain and maintain a valid City
Business Registration Certificate during the term of the Agreement.
37. Vendor(Contractor)/Consultant services agreement(s) (VSA/CSA). A signed vendor/Consultant
service agreement may be required between both parties prior to commencement of the job.
ILL
0
0-
0
L
a
L
0
W
N
d
7
Cr
C
0
E
t
V
fC
Q
JS
Packet Pg. 223