HomeMy WebLinkAbout18- Development Services DEVEI - PMENT DEPARTMENT
OF T. -. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION/COUNCIL ACTION
F SUBJECT: UNIVERSTTY VILLAGE
ROM: KENNETH J. HENDERSON
ASSISTANCE REQUEST
Executive Director
DATE: August 30, 1993
---------------------------------------------------------------
Svnonsis of Previous Commission/Council/Committee Actions
On August 19, 1993,the Redevelopment Committee recommended that the staff create alternative scenarios for
Community Development Commission review and consideration.
--------------------------------------------
Recommended Motions .
(Community Development Comte—n
MOTION: That the Community Development Commission consider possible Agency assistance to
Camden Development,Ltd., in support of its proposed retail development located in the State
College Project Area,together with a review of funding allocations and resources.
�
��I r
Admini ator KENNETH J. HENPERSON
Executive Director
-------------------------- --
------------ - -
-------------------------------- - - 5081
----------------- Phone:
Contact Person(s): Kenneth J_Henderson/John Hoeuer
Ward(s): Five
Project Area(s): State Colle e
Supporting Data Attached: Staff Re ort
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: U 350.000 Source: Bond Proceeds and Tax Inc.
Budget Authority: Re uested
Commission/Council Notes:
--------------------------------------------------------------------- --
-------
------ COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
KJH:JBH:lag:uniwlg.cdc MEETING DATE: 09/07/1993
Agenda Item Number: --J-
DEVELC MENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT -----------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Universe Vilta a Assistance Rawest
Since February of year,, Camden Development, Ltd. has met with various Commission
Y assistance with its proposal to
Members and with Agency Staff in an effort to obtain Agency center project in the
develop University Village Shopping Center, a convenience shopping P l
State College Redevelopment Project Area. The project, as presented, requires assistance
are foot of building),
because it is unusually costly for this type of project ($122 per squ
because first phase construction requiring costly site work cannot
a site carried
h is the
to
the first phase by itself, and because the developer has p
develop due to extensive hillside management iss issues and d frontage area onulUn versitytParkway
existing residential areas. Additionally, a relatively g
must be improved to handle the additional traffic that
its l imp ct he location the adopted pnorities
Center's patronage. The Agency has constraints reatest possible return
and limited available funds require that as sisted projects provide the g P
for the investment.
The project is located in an area that is relatively successful l and resumably, be possible again as
that is able to proceed on private resources alone. Th ' p riorities are focused more in
the economy recovers from its current downturn• The adopted p project areas.
the downtown Central Business District and the Mount composed of a gasoline station, two fast food
The project, as currently described, is primarily Ty, plus strip retail space. A bank branch
operations, a family restaurant, and a childcare facile p e expansion can be attracted to the
could be a possible tenant if a banking firm that can justify ositions with high turnover. All
LE area. The jobs, however, are primarily part-time, low wage p
of these factors have made it difficult to support the developer's request for a grant of
assistance to facilitate the development.
Without taking steps to encumber additional Agency and would reeal ecati use existing
most
priorities and programs, the requested assistance for this project
of the remainder of the Agency's forecasted tax increment and out bond funds, a mined, o the
next three years. This could leave the Agency essentially we
likely needs.
THE DEVELOPER'S REQUEST
In its most recent form, the developer has requested $1,350,000 in assistance made up of an
Agency contribution to the project plus a loan:
A. A contribution of $1.1 million based upon its costs
cost f k
it has
that results from the character of the land p urchased and the
constructing a quality development; and,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
KJH:JBHJag:univvlg.cdc MEETING DATE: 09/07/1993
Agenda Item Number: --&L
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT cTAFF REPORT ,
University Village Assistance Req,-st
August 27, 1993
PageNumber=2---------------------------------_------------------------------ ---__- —"-
ect (the
B. A loan of $250,000 to reduce the developer's plus balloon
developer envisioned terms of 3 years, i nterest only payments p
payment at the end).
On August 19, 1993, the Redevelopment Committee heard the developer's most recent
assistance request and asked that staff develop several alternative assistance scenarios for
consideration by the Commission.
ALTERNATIVE SCE S:
1. A contribution of 65$ 0,0 0•
A.
A contribution of $650,000 in the form of reimbursements for pe ifi pluse
improvements based upon estimated tax increment receipts o Y ears,
an allowance for production of 200 new full-time jobs in San Bernardino.
u. A contribution of M 00 plus a loan au�antee of 70�0 000.
A. A contribution of $650,000 in the form of reimbursements
for fpveiyears,pluse
improvements based upon estimated tax increment re
an allowance for production of 200 new full-time jobs in San Bernardino.
B. An Agency guarantee of $700,000 to facilitate acquisition of additional private
financing for the project.
contribution of 650 0_00>J l�an a enc loan of 70$ 0,00 •
A. A contribution of $650,000 in the form of reimbursements for specified five years, plow
improvements based upon estimated tax increment
an allowance for production of 200 new full-time jobs in San Bernardino.
B. An Agency loan of $700,000 for additional project financing. Term of seven
years, interest rate of prime plus two points (8 0/6), quarterly payments of
interest only for two years changing to amortized payments for the remaining
five years.
------------- --
_ _ ----------------------------------------------------- --C ObVIISSION MEETING AGENDA
KJH JBH:1ag:univv1g.cdc
MEETING DATE: 09/07/1993
Agenda Item Number: —,d-
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TAFF REPORT
University Village Assistance Request
August 27, 1993
Page Number_3---------------------------------- --
-------------------- ------------------ °- ------_._
IV. A contribution of $650,000 plus an A enc loan of 70$_4 O00 �'�'h___1c_h can be Daid
��by_perf�e•
A. A contribution of $650,000 in the form of reimbursements ment receipts for specified
ve five years,me
improvements based upon estimated tax
an allowance for production of 200 new full-time jobs in San Bernardino.
B. An Agency loan of $700,000 to complete the project financing. Term of seven
years, interest rate of prime plus two points (8%), quarterly payments of
interest only for two years changing to amortized payments for the remaining
five years.
C. The Agency loan could be partially paid through credits for:
1 Tax Increment generation that exceeds $400,000 during the first
five years after completion of Phase I.
2. A credit of $1,000 per job for each new and additional full-time
equivalent (FTE) permanent job created in San Bernardino in
excess of 200 within the first five years after completion of Phase
r
I.
3 A return by the City of San Bernardino of 50% of the net increase
in sales tax due to the project during its first five years after
completion of Phase I.
V. A contribution of 650 0_0� A enc purchase of the hillside area for 75�__0 0_00.
A. A contribution of $650,000 in the form of reimbursements for specified off-site
improvements based upon estimated tax increment
'obs in San B rnardino.plus
an allowance for production of 200 new J
B. The Agency to purchase the improved hillside area for $750,000.
C. The developer to provide a satisfactory guarantee of maintenance of the hillside
landscaping.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------° COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
KJH:JBH:lag:uniwlg.cdc MEETING DATE: 09/07/1993
Agenda Item Number: -
University Village Assistance RequP--t
August 27, 1993
Fage Number_4------------------------------------------------------------_--------------------------------
SOURCE OF FUNDS
On August 9, 1993, the Commission met to consider its established priorities and current the
work in progress. At that meeting, an action was taken to allocate additional ss not complete,oand no
wo p
construction of the new Central Police Station. Although process which has
bids have been received, an estimated amount That number will soon be revised as we near
continued to be the goal for the project cost.
the completion of working drawings which will allow more precise quantities and
specifications.
Based upon the Commission's actions a total of $9,8d00,u00 n)of thelStationf for
was
construction (not including furnishings, fixtures, an equipment) from 80% monies to
obtained by shifting $1 million in a mobile home park funding priority
e revenues from street tree
20% set aside monies, by redirecting $300,000 in golf course leas
min and by reducing the adopted priority (at least temporarily) for the Vernon and the
tnm g,
Demolition Loan Program in the amount of $250,000e ac . totals u followsrecaste tax
increment and bond funds, combined, for the next three Y
Fore_ casted Tag Increment and Bond Proceeds
ALL PROJECT AREAS
(Three Years, Ending June 30, 1996)
FORECASTED UNALLOCATED:
$8,037,792
LESS ADOPTED PRIORITIES. $1,250,000
Community Hospital $1,750,000
Mt. Vernon $1,000,000
Performing Arts Center
LESS INITIATED PROJECTS: $ 700,000
Sm Bus Loans (2 add'l yrs) $ 175,000
Court & E Prkg Impvts $ 200,000
Court St. Diag Perm Impvts $ 75,000
"E" St Diag Experiment $ 750,000
"E" St Diag Perm Impvts $ 58,000
"E" St Terrace Impvts $ 225,000
201 Bldg Tenant Impvts
FORECASTED BALANCE (FY1996)
$1,874,792
------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
KJHJBH:lag:univvlg.cdc MEETING DATE: 09/07/1993
t
Agenda Item Number: —44L
University Village Assistance Req,- -t E
August 27, 1993
Page Number------------------------------------------------------
5 ---------- --------------
--------------------------------- ------
L
While this indicates that there are surplus funds available,
there is actually no provision for a
number of important probable costs and contingencies during the next three years. Some of
these are:
State Bu Requirements. The forecast does for not poses a for
additional money (beyond the current year) pure
balancing the State's budget• ibutions level
ould t million
total as much l
uch as $2 4
two years alone, future contr
million for three years.
Site AssAss=lv. Additional site assembly on the east one-half of
the Government Center block has been discussed, but an
additional $3 million or more may be needed for this assembly.
Business Attraction/Develonment. Any programs other than the
• existing ones do not have designated funding.
Potential Tax Allocation Bond Issue. A $16 million issue has
been discussed but would require $4.5 million for three year's
debt service.
provision_For Bad Debts. The forecast assumes that more than
$4 million owed by developers will be paid to the Agency in a
timely manner n delayed eand sometimes forgiven ent t m
ely. This
debts have bee
is not provided for.
Central Police Sta=Furni—gs• The forecast does not
provide funds for the furniture, fixtures, and equipment needed
in the facility. Detailed analysis of furniture, security system,other requirements document imaging, s are not included ed in the forecast underway. Th ese cost and may
exceed $1,800,000.
Real Estate Dever Assiae• The forecast does not have
any additional provisions for assistance to new development
projects, such as University Village, or for rehabilitation/reuse
projects or for additional assistance needed by existing projects.
------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
KJH:JBH:lag:univvlg.cdc MEETING DATE: 09/07/1993
f
Agenda Item Number: Jf-
r f
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
University Village Assistance Request
August 27, 1993
Page Number -6- _____________-__-
-------------------------------------------------------
A enc Loan Gua=es• The Agency serves as guarantor for
more than $4.5 million in loans that banks have made to
developers. No provision is made in the forecast for pay ments
that would be required if any of these guarantees are called
upon.
Based upon these potential requirements, staff has been already below those needed for the
contribution as it would further reduce reserves which are
next three years. The Redevelopment Committee recommended wishtto reexamine the current
alternative scenarios for consideration and the Commission y
allocations of Agency resources and potential requirements for e ter project sgdeemed t three
years if a decision to assist the University Village Shopping
appropriate.
Staff recommends adoption of the form motion.
n
KENNETH J. HEN ERSON, Executive Director
Development Department
________________ ------------------
------------
COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
KJH JBH:1ag:univvlg.cdc MEETING DATE: 09/07/1993
Agenda Item Number: —ZY-