HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.A- Parks, Recreation & Community Services DOC ID: 1552
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO—REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Report/Information
From: Kevin L. Hawkins M/CC Meeting Date: 02/06/2012
Prepared by: Harriet Myers, (909) 384-5233
Dept: Parks, Recreation& Community Ward(s): 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6
Services
Subject:
Approval of Landscape Maintenance Reorganization Plan - Parks, Recreation and Community
Services. (Recommended for Approval at the Ways and Means Committee Meeting of January
11, 2012 - Committee Members Present: Kelley, Johnson, Shorett)
Financial Impact:
Presently, 24 full-time City Employees are maintaining the City's 58 LMDs and over 550 acres
of open space, which includes 39 parks and other city green-space. The Proposed FY 2011/12
Budget for LMD maintenance is $1,271,200 and Park Maintenance is budgeted at$2,119,600,
which includes the gas tax funded tree crews and consolidated internal services costs.
In 2010, the City's LMDs generated$1,285,297 in revenue for maintenance; however, total
expenses were $1,447,688, resulting in a current general fund subsidy for LMD and general park
maintenance of$192,844. According to the Real Property Division, figures for 2011 are typically
not available until 30 days of the following year or February 2012.
It is estimated the cost of servicing the LMDs under a contract is $578,600, resulting in a general
fund subsidy of an amount to be determined. The estimated cost of maintaining the City's parks
is still underfunded; however, the $2,119,600 would remain constant.
In FY 10/11, according to Finance and the Real Property Division, a return to LMD contracting
could reduce the financial impact to the Assessment District Reserve $1,100,077, which remains
the case in FY 11/12. As a result of the delay in moving this item forward, it is estimated that
the General Fund Subsidy to the LMDs for Calendar Year 2010 (to be assessed at the end of
Calendar Year 2011) will be approximately$192,844. Granted, this is not solely due to the
current LMD staffing structure; however, implementation of the outsourcing proposal can
mitigate the General Fund impact and improve maintenance/service delivery to both our LMDs
and park sites.
Funds for any subsequent contract remain available in the Assessment District Reserve (Account
No. 254-150-5506-1462-0106).
fL
Updated: 2/2/2012 by Mayra Ochiqui
Packet PgA 16'
1552
Please note this balance does not indicate available funding. It does not include non-encumbered
reoccurring expenses or expenses incurred,but not yet processed.
Motion: Approve the Ways and Means Committee's recommendation to direct staff to
initiate the Bid Process as part of the LMD Reorganization Plan,which via Option
A, would return the City's LMD maintenance to contract services and the pre-
2009 staffing levels.
SYNOPSIS OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
January 11, 2012 - The Ways and Means Committee reviewed the proposed reorganization and
recommended the matter be presented to the Mayor and Common Council with a
recommendation of approval.
BACKGROUND
During the May 2011Budget Workshops, the City Council expressed concern with the decline in
quality and consistency of the maintenance of City's landscape maintenance districts (LMDs).
The Council directed that this matter be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for review,
analysis and recommendations.
In February 2009, as a continuation of the Interim City Manager's efforts to reduce costs, the
Mayor and Common Council approved a plan to restructure the City's Parks, Recreation and
Community Services Department to reduce General Fund expenditures while protecting jobs.
Specifically, the plan involved consolidating the maintenance of the City's 58 Landscape
Maintenance Districts (LMDs), 39 parks and other open space.
Under the plan, which was initially considered a pilot program, the City eliminated 14 of the
existing 24 park maintenance positions, which were general fund funded. Twelve of the 14
positions were shifted to LMDs, which had previously been maintained using contractors,
resulting in 24 park maintenance positions remaining in the Department. The existing contracts
were allowed to expire or were terminated. The Department aggressively supplemented the 24
City maintenance positions, which were now responsible for the maintenance of the LMDs, the
City's parks, and various open space areas, with community volunteers, SBETA, Urban
Conservation Corps (UCC), California Conservation Corps (CCC) and Glen Helen Correctional
workers in an effort to maintain service delivery levels. Further, the Department has used service
agreements with local landscaping companies to supplement services as needed. The
restructuring resulted in a General Fund savings of approximately $1.1 million. At the time the
restructuring plan was implemented, it was intended to be a temporary measure, and the intent
was to return park workers to the parks activities and contract for LMD maintenance when
additional resources were realized.
The measures approved and related costs savings are as follows:
Measure Cost
Terminated 14 general park maintenance positions $ 749,086
General park maintenance and operations savings $ 100,000
Updated:2/2/2012 by Mayra Ochiqui
Packet Pg. 117
1552
Transferred 12 positions to LMDs (includes $150,000 in $ 886,480
M&O)
Eliminated Annual Maintenance Contracts -$ 650,000
Total GF Savings $ 1,085,566
During the Budget workshops in April 2010, August 2010, and May 2011, it was determined that
certain revenue measures, in which future parks and open space maintenance staffing was
heavily dependent upon, would not move forward. Since 2009, park maintenance staffing ratios
have ballooned from a 1 person per 20 acre of parkland to a 1 person per 60 acre parkland,
resulting in inconsistency in the maintenance of landscaping throughout the City. This is due to
the heavy reliance upon non-city personnel and volunteers. (Note: industry standards recommend
a ratio of 1 person per 10 acres of parkland maintenance).
ANALYSIS
Over the past two years, despite the extraordinary efforts of the City's parks workers, City staff
agree that the model currently being utilized to maintain the City's parks and open space and the
LMDs is unsustainable and does not provide consistent, quality service and maintenance.
Moreover, after significant improvements to LMD maintenance in FY07/08, the Department has
received numerous complaints from residents and some business owners regarding concerns over
ongoing maintenance as mentioned in the Grand Jury report.
On October 13, 2010, a formal bid process was initiated to solicit bids for the servicing of 58
Landscape Maintenance Districts in the City utilizing outside contractors. Notices of bids were
posted in local media, industry websites, and to approved vendor lists. The bid documents
requested pricing for maintenance of easements, open space, and medians in designated City
Assessment Districts. There was a mandatory pre-bid conference and job walk on October 20,
2010, which resulted in the attendance of sixteen vendors.
The bid closing date was November 10, 2010, and seven bids were received. The agreements
would have covered the maintenance of 58 Landscape Maintenance Districts in the City of San
Bernardino from April 1, 2011,to March 31, 2012,with the option for two additional years.
Vendor ANNUAL OPTION OPTION Total
BASE YEAR YEAR ONE YEAR TWO
COST COST COST
X $ $ 200,200 $ $ 600,800
194,200 206,400
Y $ $ 194,000 $ $ 597,900
194,000 209,900
Z $ $ 196,100 $ $ 583,900
190,400 197,400
Updated:2/2/2012 by Mayra Ochiqui Packet Pg. 118
1552
If a contract were awarded for LMD maintenance, approximately 12 City positions, which had
been shifted to the LMDS,would be eliminated at an estimated cost of$628,300. The original 12
�. employees who were transferred from City Park maintenance into the LMDs in 2009 as a
General Fund cost savings measure would be returned to the City Parks. According to the City's
Civil Service rules, without the identification of any additional funding, which is estimated at
$628,300 for salaries and benefits, this action would result in the termination through bumping.
Currently, 2 full-time positions are vacant and are being filled with part-time personnel.
Given the uncertainty of the City's financial outlook, recommendation of the award of the
contract by Council was delayed pending further discussion. The purpose of this discussion is to
identify a course of action that will restore the maintenance of the LMD and parks and open
spaces to a more consistent/quality service level.
The following is a summary of the options available for consideration:
• Option A: Contract with outside vendors for LMD maintenance and reorganize the Park
Maintenance Division by returning those employees back to City parks and eliminating
12 full-time positions through bumping and attrition
• Option B: Continue the in-house pilot program which includes maintaining the existing
staffing and maintenance levels in the City's LMDS and Parks
• Option C: Seek, through a vote of residents, approval for a reassessment of each district
resulting in higher annual assessment values in accordance with Proposition 218
If the Council were to approve contracting for the maintenance of the LMDs, staff would attempt
to utilize the volunteers, SBETA, UCC, CCC, and Glen Helen Correctional workers at the City
parks and open space areas in an attempt to improve the quality of the maintenance at these sites.
The bids for LMD maintenance, which were received in November 2010, have expired and new
bids would be required if the Council were to direct that LMD maintenance be provided utilizing
contract services. An expedited process may look as follows:
1. Issue RFQ February 14,2012
2. Advertise in Sun February 14, 2012
3. Mandatory Pre-Proposal Mtg & Job Walk February 21, 2012
4. Written Questions from Vendors due February 28, 2012
5. Responses Due from City March 6, 2012
6. Proposals Due March 13, 2012 it 3:00 PM
7. RFP Evaluation and Negotiations To Be Determined
8. Vendor Selection April 2012
Updated:2/2/2012 by Mayra Ochiqui
Packet Pg. 119
1552
9. Request for Council Action Due May 2012
10. Council Approval June 2012
11. Vendor Award June/July 2012
RECOMMENDATION
Direct staff to initiate the Bid Process as part of the LMD Reorganization Plan, which via Option A,
would return the maintenance of the City's LMDs to contract services and result in a reduction in
parks maintenance personnel of approximately 12 positions, which would be achieved through
bumping and attrition pursuant to the City's employment rules and regulations.
Supporting Documents:
E
i
Updated: 2/2/2012 by Mayra Ochiqui
Packet Pg. 120