HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-162 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-162
2 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE REVISIONS TO CIVIL SERVICE RULE 511,
3 REDUCTION IN FORCE.
4
5 WHEREAS, the revision to Civil Service Rule 511 pertaining to reductions in force
6 was developed by the Chief Examiner, and was presented to all of the respective bargaining
7 unit representatives for review; and
8 WHEREAS, the Civil Service Board took action on June 10, 2014, to adopt the
9
revisions identified in Exhibit"A."
10
11 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
12 COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
13
14 SECTION 1. The change to Civil Service Rule 511, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is
15 hereby approved.
16
17 ///
18 11/
19 ///
20 ///
21
///
22
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28
2014-162
1 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
2 SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTIONG THE REVISIONS TO CIVIL SERVICE RULE
511, REDUCTION IN FORCE.
3
4
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
5
6 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a joint regular meeting
7 thereof, held on the 16 tYday of June , 2014, by the following vote,to wit:
8 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
9
MARQUEZ x
10
11 BARRIOS x
12 VALDIVIA x
13 SHORETT x
14 NICKEL
X
15
JOHNSON x
16
17 MULVIHILL x
18
Ale Li.
19 Georg/ Hanna, ' ity Clerk
20 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this 17 day of , 2014.
21
22 Ze:le
R. Carey Da is, Mayor
23 City of San ernardino
24 Approved as to form:
25 Gary D. Saenz, City Attorney
26
27 B : . �.• •_ A—. •
28
2014-162
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSED CIVIL SERVICE RULE REVISION
RULE 511 - REDUCTION IN FORCE
Rule 511 Reduction in Force. When it becomes necessary through lack of work or lack of
funds or for other reasons to reduce the number of employees within a given
class, the appointing power shall present evidence to the Chief Examiner that
every effort has been made to transfer, demote, temporarily appoint or undertake
other action to retain permanent employees in lieu of a lay-off.
The department head shall give at least two working days advance notice to the
Chief Examiner of the titles, classes and number of positions involved. The Chief
Examiner shall thereupon designate the order of lay-off in accordance with this
rule and the department head shall process the necessary personnel actions.
Emergency, temporary and provisional employees shall be laid off in that order
prior to the lay-off of permanent employees in the same class. The order of
layoffs shall thereafter be determined by seniority. Seniority of employees for
purposes of reduction in force or transfers and demotion brought about by said
reduction in force shall be based on seniority in class with the department so that
the employee with the shortest term of service within the department shall be the
first to be transferred, demoted or laid off. However, any employee who has or
shall be transferred involuntarily or who was or shall be transferred upon written
initiating notice to the Chief Examiner by, or at the behest or initiation of, an
appointing power or department head for the benefit of the City to a position in
another department shall retain the seniority earned and accrued in the class in the
department from which the employee was or shall be transferred. In the event
more than one employee is transferred, demoted or laid off, such transfers,
demotions or layoffs shall be in inverse order to the length of service in the class,
provided, however, no employee shall be transferred or demoted to a class, title or
position fef in which the employee has not previously held status. t s--
po sess the minimum requirements of know,ledge skill and experience.
In a department where there is more than one class having equal rates of
compensation, any probationary or regular employee subject to lay-off under this
rule shall, in lieu thereof, be allowed to transfer to a position in one of the other
classes of equal compensation, for in which the employee has previously held
status - . . - .
provided that the employee subject to lay-off has longer service in class than the
employee displaced has in the class. To be considered for said transfer in lieu of
lay-off, an employee must notify the appointing power in writing of such election
not later than the end of the next working day, that the Civil Service office is
open, after receiving written notice of said lay-off.
5/20/2014
2014-162
Any probationary or regular employee subject to lay-off under this rule shall in
lieu thereof be allowed a demotion to the next lower class within the department
in which the employee subject to lay-off has previously held status possesses the
• , and shall become the
senior employee in that class for the purpose of this rule; provided, however, that
in the first grade or lowest class within a department, total time in service shall be
the only criteria to be considered in determining which employee shall be laid-off
To be considered for said demotion in lieu of lay-off, an employee must notify the
appointing power in writing of such election not later than the next working day,
that the Civil Service office is open, after receiving written notice of said lay-off
If an employee subject to lay-off displaces another employee in an equal or lower
class in a position in which said employee subject to lay-off has served, but not
completed the required probationary period
Y, , such
appointment shall be on a probationary basis and Section 254 of the City Charter
shall apply. Not later than the end of the probationary period, said employee shall
either become regular in this position or be allowed to displace an employee in the
next lower class in which the employee has previously held status. subject to lay
Any employee displaced hereunder shall have the same right to displace
employees in equal or lower classes as does an employee subject to lay-off
Any employee laid off or demoted to a lower class or transferred to an equal class
under this rule shall have the right for two (2) years to be re-employed, transferred
or promoted to the former class or any lower class -upon the first vacancy
occurring in any such class in the department provided the person laid off or
demoted possesses the minimum requirements of knowledge, skill and experience
for such vacancy and such right shall take precedence over the regular
employment or promotional lists. In the event more than one employee was so
laid off, demoted or transferred from such class the rights to re-employment,
transfer or promotion to such class shall be in the order of seniority in said class
before lay-off, transfer or demotion.
If, at any point in the above described procedure, it becomes evident that two of
more employees within the same classification possess the exact and same
seniority rights under this rule, the following method shall be used to determine
the order of lay-off
1. The department head shall review all personnel records including
probationary and/or annual employee evaluation reports, letters of
commendation or reprimand and such other information as may assist
him in making a final determination. The department head's review
shall be objective in nature and free of any personal bias or
consideration. After such review and based upon work performance
5/20/2014
2014-162
and the good of the service, the department head shall establish the
final order of lay-off.
2. In the event two or more employees within the same classification are
determined to be equal, based upon the above criteria, the time and
date of filing application for appointment to the position shall be
used. The last employee to have filed application for appointment to
the position shall be the first employee subject to lay-off.
Any employee laid off, transferred or demoted under this rule shall have the right
of appeal to the Civil Service Board based upon misinterpretation or improper
application of said rule in writing, not later than the end of the next working day,
that the Civil Service office is open, after receiving written notice of said lay-off.
(Amended by CS-23, August 5, 1975; Council Ordinance No. 3526, September 8,
1975; Resolution No. 2012-213, August 6, 2012).
5/20/2014