Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.D- Public Works DOC ID: 2654 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO—REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Report/Information From: Tony Frossard M/CC Meeting Date: 09/03/2013 Prepared by: Tony Frossard, (909) 384-5140 Dept: Public Works Ward(s): 3,4,5,7 Subject: Request Direction from the Mayor and Common Council, Pursuant to a Request to Construct Pavement Rehabilitation on Mt. Vernon Avenue Between Grant Avenue and Walnut Street as a Separate, Stand-Alone Project (#2654) Current Business Registration Certificate: Not Applicable Financial Impact: These projects are included in the 2013-14 budget. Motion: Motion 1: The City Manager is directed to have the Public Works Department continue as planned to construct all of the projects combined into one larger project by soliciting competitive bids in the winter for start of construction as soon as weather conditions allow in the spring of 2014; bringing a proposed budget amendment forward at the time of the award of contract for construction to cover the actual lowest responsive bid amount plus contingencies and construction management costs. OR Motion 2: The City Manager is directed to have the Public Works Department revise the plans and specifications to construct the Mt. Vernon Avenue project as a single, stand-alone project as soon as possible for potential completion before the end of the calendar year, bringing a proposed budget amendment forward at the time of the award of contract for construction to cover the actual lowest responsive bid amount plus contingencies and construction management costs. Synopsis of Previous Council Action: None. Background: Refer to attachment. Supporting Documents: Memo to CM 08-22-13 (DOC) Priority List (PDF) Updated: 8/26/2013 by Jolena E.Grider Packet Pg.283 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO Tony Frossard-DIRECTOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 300 North D"Street San Bernardino, CA 92418-0001 909.384.5140 S_ �BCrnar 1110 Date: August 22, 2013 To: Allen Parker, City Manager From: Tony Frossard, Director of Public Works Subject: MEASURE I PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT Copies: v d 0 L Pursuant to your request, the following table is a summary of the seven pavement rehabilitation projects °- that are included in the FY 2013-14 adopted budget using Measure I funds (Fund 129). Plans and S specifications have been prepared for all of these projects to be bid as one combined project, but the a construction documents can be modified to bid each project as a separate, stand-alone project. The a estimates below are based upon constructing them as one combined project using unit prices that reflect v the larger quantities. tn N CIP No. Description Ward Budget Engineer's Difference Estimate SSO4-150 Mountain View Ave between 46t St and 501 St 4 $122,040 $161,870 $-39,830 N SS12-001 46t St between Mt.View Ave and Sierra Way 4 $49,224 $68,150 $-18,926 0 SS12-002 48t St between Electric Ave and Mt.View Ave 4 $39,489 $36,700 $2,789 2 U SS12-012 Belmont Ave between Olive Ave and Walnut Ave 5 $90,313 $117,480 $-27,167 0 SS12-014 Highland Ave between Lawrence Ave and Golden Ave 2,7 $54,006 $31,500 $22,506 0 SS12-007 Del Rosa Ave between Pumalo St and Date St 4,7 $162,068 $244,620 1 $-85,552 m SS14-005 Mt.Vernon Ave between Grant Ave and Walnut St 3 $300,000 $356,570 $-56,570 c Subtotal $1,017,250 E Design, Inspection,&Contingency(20%) $203,450 L) Total $817,140 $1,220,700 $-403,560 w Q The first six projects were previously identified in the adopted FY 2011-12 budget and Capital Improvement Program. The Mt. Vernon Avenue project was added during the approval and adoption of the current budget for FY 2013-14. It has been requested that the Mt. Vernon project be constructed as a separate, stand-alone project before the end of the calendar year. 0 - 6,d.a August 22,2013 Page 2 of 3 Below is a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of a few ways to approach these paving projects: Option Advantages Disadvantages • Lower unit prices due to the larger 1. Construct the projects as quantities involved. • Longer overall construction one combined package. duration and longer time periods between construction stages(i.e.,demolition work, concrete work, grinding streets,paving, etc.). d 0 L • The work would be delayed rn until early spring of 2014. • Less overall construction duration • Higher unit prices due to nom. 2. Construct each project and shorter time periods between smaller quantities. Possibly a individually. construction stages. less than a full day of work v for contractor paving crews, ,dr, • A single project could potentially further increasing costs. ctD•, be constructed before the end of M the calendar year. • The remaining projects N would be delayed until early C' spring of 2014. o • Some economy of scale could • Longer duration and longer v 3. Construct the projects as result in reduced unit prices below delays between stages than o two or more combined that of Option 2,but probably not Option 2,but less than E packages. as much as Option 1. Option 1. • Some projects would be delayed until early spring of E 2014. ca r BUDGET a The adopted budget amounts f - p g or FY 2013 14 were established prior to completion of plans and specifications. The Engineer's Estimate amounts are based upon detailed cost estimates using the completed plans and recent bid pricing. The higher costs are due to a combination of greater detail, recent bid pricing, and additional improvements that have been identified. Each of the locations were evaluated during the design phase to identify additional improvements that are required, including new ADA compliant curb ramps, replacement of concrete cross gutters, as well as localized curb, gutter and sidewalk repairs. In order to proceed with construction, a budget amendment will be necessary to increase the project budgets using unallocated Measure I funds and/or the scope of the work will need to be reduced (i.e., reduction of project limits). P 6.D.a August 22,2013 Page 3 of 3 Since the cash-flow projections prepared by Finance indicate that the available cash is expected to be extremely low through the month of November, a quarterly breakdown of the projected capital expenses was provided to the Finance Director based upon. anticipated project schedules and existing commitments with an intentional effort to defer as much of the capital expenses as possible until after November. Since paving should not be done in cold weather, it was anticipated that these paving projects would be scheduled to occur in early spring of 4014. It is probably not possible to complete all of the projects before the cold winter weather expected in November/December. Public Works/Engineering is requesting direction on w ether to revise the plans and specifications to advertise the Mt. Vernon Avenue project as a single, sta d-alone project for potential completion before m the end of the calendar year. •o L a rn a a_ U LO A A004% N N N 00 C1 M U O O E d I C E V t6 r Q Packet Pg. 286 c m � at —_ m m ca c m > > > a> > ~ O O O O O m Cc CL 0 0 a w u co c c c c c c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w z z z z z z z c rn 3 3 c o o d J J c c c V t t O O 0 O � O w _rn rn z z z ar z V W 0) C L L a) m c c c c x O O O O O z z z z o Im a V J J N �+ Z +r d Q E— d' rn rn _ m O a) rn rn .2) t/1 > o Q J :_ or. aa)i m F- o J V m m cm 0 a rn rn a�i v Q ro L L 3 o r r L 3 U _a °� rn m °_' o " x � LO W a Im co w 'i W CCU Z N N co O N N co N W E ! J W Z W d W` Co?` 0 00 00 00 0 o ao 0 0 / •m ro M O I� o coo v U) d Q ��` > H 0) r M M of a V Q WW csi ' M v v 0 v L /W V y w Q Q U) � Q zQ m w U) z U) F- 0 5 O ¢UJ Q w Q vi w N a ¢ > > Q U F- w U z O w Q aC z LL s z x > V g W a C7 v O w w E > > ¢ > w ro Q Q z Q q v z u¢i z ~ c g z w U j o 0 a! x _j > x z x N M It LO co (. Packet Pg. 287