Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17- Public Works ORIGINAL CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO —REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: Robert Eisenbeisz, City Engineer Subject: Two Project Grant Applications for FY 2010/11 Highway Safety Dept: Public Works Improvement Program Funding Cycle 4. Date: November 23, 2010 MCC Date: December 6, 2010 File: Synopsis of Previous Council Action: 11/09/10- Grants Ad Hoc Committee recommended approval of two Highway Safety Improvement Program grants for Funding Cycle 4. Recommended Motion: Adopt Resolution authorizing the submittal of two Project Grant Applications for FY 2010/11 Highway Safety Improvement Program Funding Cycle 4. Nadeem jaj Contact person: Robert Eisenbeisz, City Engineer Phone: 5203 Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Resolution&Applications Wards: 1,2 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Should both pWiiects be selected. CIP funds will be used for the 10 percent local match of$34,050. Acct. Description: Finance: ez-�o a0&)- 30V � /7 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO — REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Subject: Resolution authorizing the submittal of two Project Applications for FY 2010/11 Highway Safety Improvement Program Funding Cycle 4. Background: The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), codified as Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code was elevated to a core program as a result of the passage of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). SAFETEA- LU was originally effective through September 30, 2009 and now has been extended by continuing resolution through December 2010. The HSIP Program is a reimbursement program that provides funds for safety improvements on any publicly-owned roadway or bicycle/pedestrian pathway or trail that corrects or improves the safety for its users. The HSIP funds serve to eliminate or reduce the number and severity of traffic accidents at locations selected for improvement. The amount of federal safety funds expected to be available for the local HSIP program for FY 2010/2011 is approximately $50 million. The Public Works Department has nominated two projects for this cycle. Both projects are Statewide Benefit/Cost Ratio (B/C) Projects. Projects competing for funding will be prioritized in descending order, statewide, by the calculated B/C. The project locations have been considered for safety improvement upgrades as a result of their 3-year accident history analyses. The HSIP application deadline is December 9, 2010. The HSIP Projects, which require a 10 percent local match, are listed as follows: Local HSIP Total Match Funds Cost 1. 9s' Street at Arrowhead Ave: Traffic Signal Upgrade $17,170 $154,000 $171,170 2. 90' Street at Sierra Way : Traffic Signal Upgrade $16,880 $151,700 $168,580 Total HSIP Project Funding Breakdown= $34,050 $305,700 $339,750 Financial Impact: The maximum federal reimbursement ratio for the whole HSIP Program is 90 percent and the maximum federal reimbursement amount for any project will be $900,000. In accordance with that requirement, the City would be obligated to allocate 10 percent local matching funds of $34,050, if both projects are awarded. There will be no impact to the General Fund. If either project is awarded a grant, a separate council action will be requested at that time, amending the 5-year CIP to add either one or both projects with the funds needed for local match, using a non- General Fund source of funding. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. - 2 - CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT - Continued Attachments: 1. Application for HSIP Funds—Project Location: Intersection of 9t' Street&Arrowhead Ave. 2. Application for HSIP Funds—Project Location: Intersection of 90' Street& Sierra Way. - 3 - California Department of Transportation's APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS - Cycle 4 - Submitted By Agency: SAN BERNARDINO Application Ranked #: 2 Out of : 2 Project Location Intersection of Ninth Street and Sierra Way. Project Description Upgrade the existing traffic signal with protected permissive phasing in the north-south direction and protected phasing in the east-west direction. Install pedestrian signals and Handicapped ramps. Project Countermeasures Countermeasure Type Countermeasure Name CM # Signal Mod. Provide protected left turn phase (with existing LT lane) 1 Signal Mod. Provide protected left turn phase (with existing LT lane) 2 Project's Total Benefit / Cost Ratio 2.860 Caltrans District 08 08-SAN BERNARDINO-02 Page 1 Contents Cover Page 1 Contents 2 Project Information Basic Project Information 3 Narrative Questions 4 Project Cost Estimate 5 Implementation Schedule 6 Benefit / Cost Calculation Result 7 Applicant Data Verification and Signature 8 Attachments Vincinity Map Project map showing existing and proposed conditions Collision diagram Collision summary report/list Detailed Engineer's Estimate Additional Narration, Documentation, Letters of Support, etc. 08-SAN BERNARDINO-02 Page 2 APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS Basic Project Information Date 11/0812010 Caltrans District 08 MPO SCAG Agency SAN BERNARDINO Locode 5033 Total number of applications being submitted by your agency 2 Rank of this project(each project application must have a different rank) 2 Contact Person Information Position/Title of Contact Person Traffic Operations & System Analyst Name Manas Bista Email bista_ma @sbcity.org Telephone (909)384-5253 Address 300 North D Street County SAN BERNARDINO City SAN BERNARDINO Zip 92418-0001 Project Information Project Location Intersection of Ninth Street and Sierra Way. - Be Brief -See Instructions Project Description Upgrade the existing traffic signal with protected permissive phasing - Be Brief in the north-south direction and protected phasing in the east-west - See Instructions direction. Install pedestrian signals and Handicapped ramps. Functional Classification 14-Urban Other Principal Arterial Posted Speed 40 Current Average Daily Traffic Major Street 17,000 (Required) Minor Street 6,863 (For Intersection Projects) Year Collected 1996 Is the project focused primarily on 'Intersection" or"Roadway" Improvement Intersection Number of Intersections 1 Number of Roadway miles N/A Work on the State Highway System Does the project include improvements on the State Highway System? No If Yes, is this a joint-funded project with Caltrans? N/A If Yes, confirm a 'letter of support" is attached to the application. N/A If No, confirm in writing that Caltrans-District Traffic Office is in support or neutral to the proposed improvements within the State Right of Way. N/A adfasdfasdfasdfsd Page 3 APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS Narrative Questions These narrative questions are intended to provide additional project details for the reviewers and project files. These questions will be used in the scoring of projects that do not make the initial funding cut based fully on their Benefit/Cost Ratios. 1. Identification and Demonstration of Need Describe how was the problem identified. Provide information showing the agency identified the project based on a data-driven,comprehensive safety evaluation of their roadway infrastructure and crash data. Given that other problems may exist within the applicant's jurisdiction,explain why this problem was chosen to compete for federal safety funds. Provide some background information about the problem: How long has the problem existed? Have other countermeasures been deployed? Describe the primary cause(s)of the collisions that have occurred at the location. Are there patterns in the crash types? Attach and reference any collision data,traffic data, community surveys,reports, plans,pictures,etc.to illustrate the problem. The 9th Street and Sierra Way intersection problem was identified by reviewing the City's intersection collision data. The intersection problem has existed for few years now but due to the lack of funding this intersection did not make it to the City's priority list. The intersection is currently controlled by a two phase traffic signal on sub- standard poles. In order to improve the safety of the intersection standard traffic signal poles with standard mast arms are needed which will improve the visibility of the signal heads. The older two-phase intersection was reported to have 27 accidents during 4 year period from June 5, 2004 to October 5, 2008. Out of the 27 accidents, 6 collisons were reported to be visible injuries and only 1 was reported to be severe, which is the major concern. Based on the collision diagram, the collison pattern can be attributed to the lack of standard mast arms and dedicated pedestrian signal phase which may have caused some confusion between the vehicular and pedestrian traffic. This intersection also requires better pedestrian access especially for the disabled persons. Apart from not having any pedestrian signals, the current pedestrian ramps are also not up to the standards of Americans with Disability Act (ADA).This intersection was chosen for improvement in lieu of other locations due to these existing safety concerns. Ninth Street is a major arterial in the City of San Bernardino and upgrading the intersection to current standards are expected to enhance the safety of the vehicular as well as pedestrian traffic. 08-SAN BERNARDINO-02 Page 4-1 2. Potential for Proposed Improvement to Correct or Improve the Problem Describe how the proposed solution will improve the traffic safety at or near the project site. Clearly demonstrate the connection between the problem and the proposed solution. What other countermeasures were considered? Does the proposed solution provide safety benefits for all modes of travel? Does the countermeasure reduce speed? Increase visibility?Reduce collision severity? Reduce the occurrence of specific crash types?Enhance safety for persons with disabilities? Explain why the proposed solution is the preferred alternative. A modified traffic signal and new handicapped ramps complaint with Americans with Disability Act (ADA) is expected tol improve public safety by providing better signal visibility, better signal operation, and improved access to pedestrians at the intersection. Improving the visibility of the signal heads with standard mast arms will help avoid confusion and improve safety at the intersection. The signal at this location is very old and sits on old poles with non standard mast arms. As a result, the signals apperar to be outside the cone of vision to the vehicular traffic in the inner Iane.The current Caltrans standard calls for at least two signals head for this type of roadway as opposed to only one existing at this location. The proposed signal phasing is expected to reduce the collision problem currently existing at the intersection. This will also avoid the conflict between the pedestrians and left turning vehicles. This project will also install pedestrian countdown heads for pedestrians to safely cross the intersection since this intersection does not have any pedestrian signals at its current condition. The proposed solution is the only countermeasures for this type of situation. The proposed solution is expected to enhance the overall safety of both the vehicles and the pedestrians. Protected permissive left turn signals on Sierra Way are recommended to alleviate the number and severity of accidents at this intersection. The addition of protected permissive left turn signals in the north-south direction and protected left turns in the east-west direction is the most viable and cost effective option that can be applied to the intersection. Without the recommended improvements, the safety of the intersection is expected to get worse. 08-SAN BERNARDINO-02 Page 4-2 3. Potential for Timely Implementation of Project Describe the time frame to implement the project(This timeframe and follow-up discussion must match the "Implementation Schedule" section of the application). Identify any potential barriers to a timely implementation. Are there likely environmental issues that could delay the project? Are there seasonal considerations for the construction period? Are all construction improvements within existing public rights of way? Have other local,regional or state funds been targeted for the project that have not yet been secured? Is there community support for, or opposition to the project? The project is expected to be completed in less than two years from the award of the grant. There are no potential barriers or environmental issues that could delay the project. Since the project involves modification of the existing signals within the existing right of way, no right of away acquisition is necessary to complete the project. The project is relying on this grant to improve the overall safety of this intersection both to the traveling public and the pedestrians. Since this project is expected to improve the overall safety of the intersection, community support is anticipated for the project. 08-SAN BERNARDINO-02 Page 4-3 APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS Project Cost Estimate Project Costs Preliminary Engineering Costs (Preliminary Engineering costs should not exceed 25% of Construction Item costs) Environmental $ 500 PS&E $ 5,000 PE Subtotal $ 5,500 Right of Way Costs (Right of Way costs should not exceed 10% of Construction Item costs) Engineering $ 500 Appraisal and Acquisition $ - Utilities $ 500 ROW Subtotal $ 1,000 Construction Costs Construction Engineering $ 19,100 (Construction Engineering costs should not exceed 15% of Construction Item costs) Construction Items $ 127,660 (The cost for the"Construction Items" must match the Detail Engineer's Estimate) CON Subtotal $ 146,760 Project Cost Subtotal $ 153,260 Contingencies $ 15,320 (Maximum of 10% of Project Costs Subtotal) Total Project Cost $168,580 Federal Funds Requested $151 ,700 (Federal Funds must not exceed $900,000 or 90%of Total Project Cost, whichever is less) Local or other funds $16,880 08-SAN BERNARDINO-01 Page 5 APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS Implementation Schedule This schedule is based on the assumption that the 6/1/2011 proposed project is amended into the FTIP on: The Local Agency is expected to deliver the project per Caltrans Local Assistance HSIP Guidelines. Otherwise the project will be "flagged"in the program's delivery report. Request Authorization to Proceed with Preliminary Engineering (PE) If the PE phase for the project is already complete, check this box I-- Time for agency to internally staff project and request PE authorization 0.5 Months Time for Caltrans and FHWA to process and approve PE Auth 1.5 Months Proposed PE Authorization Date: 7131/2011 Estimated Durations for elements of the PE delivery phase Will external consultants be required to complete the PE phase of this project? (✓ Additional time allocated to the Delivery Process for hiring PE consultant(s) 1.0 Months Time to prepare environmental studies request 1.0 Months Time to complete CEQA NEPA studies/approvals * 0.0 Months Time to complete the Right of Way Acquisition (federal process) 0.0 Months Time to complete final PS&E documentation 2.0 Months Other: Months Expected Completion Date for the PE Phase: 11/30/2011 * See PES Form in the Local Assistance Procedures Manual for typical studies and permits Request Authorization to Proceed with Construction (CON) Time for agency to request CON authorization 0.5 Months Time for Caltrans and FHWA to process and approve CON Auth 1.5 Months Proposed CON Authorization Date: 1130/2012 Estimated Durations for elements of the CON delivery phase Time included for the Agency's workload-leveling or Construction-Window needs 1.0 Months Time to award contract with CON contractor(using the federal process) 1.0 Months Including: Board/Council approval, Advertise, Award, Execute, Mobilize Time to complete Construction 6.0 Months Time included for closing the CON contract 1.0 Months Other : Unforseen Conditions 1.0 Months Expected Completion Date for the CON Phase: 11/29/2012 Complete the Project Close-out Process Time to complete the Project Close-out Process 0.5 Months Time for Caltrans and FHWA to process and approve Project Clost-out 1.5 Months Expected Completion Date for the Project Close Out: 1/2912013 08-SAN BERNARDINO-02 Page 6 APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS Benefit / Cost Ratio Result 1. Summary of Project Countermeasures Project Type Countermeasure Crash Type CRF Life Signal Mod. Provide protected left turn phase (with existing LT lane) All 20 20 Signal Mod. Provide protected left turn phase (with existing LT lane) All 30 20 2. Crash Data Time Period From 1 06/05/2004 To 10/05/2008 1 Years 4.30 3. Details of Each Countermeasures A. Countermeasure #1 : Provide protected left turn phase (with existing LT lane) a) Crash Data Summary b) Result Crash Type Fatal SI Injury MI PDO Total Benefit(Annual)l $23,986 All 0 1 4 3 9 17 Benefit Life $325,978 Night Ped & Bike % of Total Cost 60 Animal Cost $102,701 Ernerg Vehicle B/C Ratio 3.174 B. Countermeasure #2: Provide protected left turn phase (with existing LT lane) a) Crash Data Summary b) Result Crash Type Fatal SI Injury MI PDO Total Benefit(Annual) $13,430 All 0 0 2 3 5 10 Benefit Life $182,521 Night Ped & Bike % of Total Cost 40 Animal Cost $68,468 Emerg Vehicle B/C Ratio 2.666 C. Countermeasure #3: a) Crash Data Summary b) Result Crash Type Fatal SI Injury MI PDO TotalBenefit(Annual) All Benefit Life Night Ped & Bike % of Total Cost Animal Cost Emerg Vehicle B/C Ratio 4. Total Benefit : $508,499 5. Total Project Cost : $171 ,169 6. Project's Total BIC Ratio : 2.971 08-SAN BERNARDINO-02 Page 7 APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS Applicant Data Verification and Signature All HSIP applications (hard-copies only) must be signed by a registered engineer or the Agency's Transportation Manager in responsible charge of their Traffic Enginerring section. By signing and submitting this application, the engineer/manager is attesting to 1. All data in the application is accurate. 2. All likely project costs are included in the Total Project Cost. 3. Each countermeasure included represents a minimum of 20% of the Total Project Cost 4. All crash data is accurately shown in the application and applied to countermeasures using generally accepted traffic engineering principles. 5. The agency understands the Project Delivery Requirements for the HSIP Program and is prepared to deliver the Project with these requirements. Agency Official Name Engr. License#or Title Signature Date Application Attachments Attachments to be included in Application Not Included Included Vicinity map s Project map showing existing and proposed conditions C: Collision diagram <•' Collision summary report/list r: Detailed Engineer's Estimate C t Warrant studies (required when applicable to proposed improvement) f` f: Letter of Support from Caltrans x: t Additional Narration, Documentation, Photographs, Letters of Support, etc. Page 8 08-SAN BERNARDINO-02 qTN w� - 13TH � � � € - { W 13TH ST - - W ASELINE ST a R O J-E - r,','. .. ST• .E.T.A afire O CAT I - N' } - W 9TH �l 9Ti ST o — ]TII ST Z Dill ST _ - E 6 E WW ST.a >Pkuu= 5TH ST STH� ST - _ H 5TH ��ST- — - - en lam ran 02005 Thomas Bms_Maps � � I � � � 1 VICINITY MAP No SCALE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT VICINITY MAP TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION AT 9TH STREET AND A SIERRA WAY INTERSECTION Created by: Manas Bista Date: 10/29/10 r_ ______________________________________________________� i City of San Bernardino, California Public Works Department/ Traffic Engineering Proposed Traffic Signal Improvements I N (at 9th Street& Sierra Way) � I I � I I I I I N. T.S S. I 1 45 I , I , I I 1 �1 1 I ' N O U X W > W N �m O�� 1 i F� o¢ 1 i X0 d I I of I+1 I J , I I , I , EXI TING TRAFFIC EXIST. C&GJ , SIGNAL CONTROLLER I I I 1 , I , I , I I � I I 1 I I EXISTING DOUBLE YELLOW DOUBLEGYELLOW—�, I , I t , I , I , I , I I I PROPOSED EXIST. C&G HANDICAP RAMP EXIST C&G (TYP. 4) I I .0 i o f{-_ j 9TH STREET V � I h Z U) !� 1 w cn=) i 1 li I I I I I Collision Diagram Street: 9TH ST From: 6/5/2004 TO: 101512008 Cross Street: SIERRA WAY Date Prepared: 111812010 Wrong 8 Wrong Side N 11 pa>.6----�� �P10 MP 12l O6 6/13107 1214/07 DUI Unef yy�a C P wll 10111107 Q�7 SigalSigns 7121106 8/15/04 Auto RAN Sigs/Signs 92/04 Unknown 2118/07 ImProP Tum 9/4410 9129107 Auto RAN ,1 ig Sis 6/5/04 �)�) Impro Sigsl$igns aii 6/15108 �R/W Improp Tum 9/7/04 SigNS 1216107 Auto R W 6/10/04 07 3/171068446 1 go,/ V Sigs/Signs 425106 Sigs/Signs DUI T Sigslsign 7119104 mp op TUm � Q� If_y^15/7 Auto RAN 920106 Pod Viol 9/16/W Number of Collisions Legend Right Turn Pedestrian - Moving Vehicle 14 Property Damage Only Lett Turn Fixed Object �� Stopped Vehicle 13 Injury Collisions .Q �� Backing Vehicle Q Sideswi Bicycle Ran Off Road 0 Fatal Collisions ® _ pe V DUI 27 Total Collisions Movement Day O Injury Unknown ® Night (0 Fatal Color Legend - Highest Degree of Injury Maroon=Fatal Purple=Severe Injury Green=Other Visible Injury Teal=Complaint of Pain Dark Bloc—Properly Damew Heb' Settings Used For Query Parameter Setting Street Name 9TH ST Cross Street SIERRA WAY Starting Date 6/5/2004 Ending Date 10/5/2008 Intersection Intersection Related Y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O � C O O N N O M N O O O � N N — N` p) IL c C c N N N N N C C N m m m c d c c Fes- F c c un vrn o LL m p �m �o- p °m o pu c = E a �°m`' aa Q > Q > H m � >H m m N L c c N O -p E U m O l (P m L m L m L m m L m O) a) L m N m L m E p m m cc p 6 p O cC E 0@'Q C d G Q H 0 0 W 0 N m O za U) V 2F-- 2 a ai Y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N — CM Fi m o f9 C u) N N N «O C C C C C O C m m fq ¢ m U�N M n n 0 U5 LL Ui o m 0 O a C m C 2 m IL 0 m = .2> F- m or C — C C c C C m C N C c C N O 615 a) m « 'O « .- J 'O « J 'O « 'O E U 0 m L a) L m L a) L m m L m L m L a) L N mm C m Q) 0) mm 0 ` N 0 U U O N O N U .- 4) @ 2 N m N N 2a am 2 IL am LLm IL 2F LLin 2F'- 0- 65 LLm din -6 N L L L � w w w O Z Z w Z Z ( Z H c a Ev a°it rn rn m � t rn dt CD t Qt d d y dm c a.o c c mmin c mm aim aim n� c i. ° O o O O O «O O O 'm 0 -m O n O r 2n. ai 2 i Fr 2 m a «n z 2 ai ai `am C75 0: p o i N Or CD C 2 m U m L L v •� m > y N N J N N m -C, m m J o � w 3 w 3 w 3 w w 3 w w N c _N �O O _« V U+T+ O O O O t R, o O O O C O O O W O O O O O O O O m O O O U 2 0 2 0 2 m 2 m 2 y 2 m 2 m Z M CD 2 m 2 m 20 F N N N N N N N F- N E L N L L N L L L L O > O > a O > O > O > O >f 5 O > O > O > O > O > C 0 0 a v v v N v v c El N N N N 3 41 N m m N N N N Q co T V O m m m d N N U m N N @ O F- O O O V O O O O O m N m m m to m m Z > a m m m 2 N O r 0 C C C C C C C w C C C C O 0 a � r m N m E r o do co io n 00 0 0 o ao y o c r r r r co ao O p d o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L) m m c� a — - v — w — u� t O N O t0 m m .N- r r co m aF m a C O c E z o o N co m m r m m c'� m N n N m v o M r O m e Z O M 7 O N Cl) O ID O � O O co m O N a m O f0 m I cM0 crD (O n O U J Q F w M m M M M M M M M M It Y 0 N y — m m m � a LL U a N C — N O EU o � a O N U d 10 ❑ F p E Q E U C t N N ti R o C � a 0 0 i 0) Mn 0 , m ❑ O > > C d O ❑ F- m d O r O U r LlJ V d � U v > w o0 F- H ~ 9 C 0 .0 0� O CL O C N ~ � 3 0 N Q O U F O N y m w N ° N jn � ❑ m p r r y N N vi E Li a •p ~ g O N y N O O r O a V m U N d w ❑ O 0 v w � O p1 cm . a a E c c E Z E r K Z Y Z L y CE C ate+ O O O O. (v 9L4 J) V Vl w O N p N p Detailed Engineer's Estimate For Construction Items Only Agency City of San Bernardino Date: 10/04/2010 Project Description 9th Street at Arrowhead Ave Traffic Signal Upgirade Project Location City of San Bernardino Prepared Diego Juatm Item No. Item Description Ouamitv Units Unit Cost Total I 2 Pavement Marlin THERMO 1 LS $3,000.00 $1000 3 4 Sandblasun SF $2.00 5 Si Install each $125.00 6 Si Renove. each $50.00 7 Sign&Post Remove each $50.00 8 Curb Markin One-Coat Paint LF $0.75 9 Install 244-100 Pole 4 each $9350.00 $37,400 10 Install 17-2-100 Pole each SS 800.00 It Push Button Sim 8 each $230.00 $1,840 12 Pedesvian Indication and plug holes 8 each $800.00 $6,400 13 Remove Poles 19 4 each $750.00 $3,000 14 Lumiaaie Install 4 each $750.00 $3,000 IS Install 12"Veh.HD(Special) 4 ILF $920.00 LEE 16 Install 12"Veh.HD MAS 4 $1,000.00 54000 17 Install 12"Veh.W.W/Framework 6 $770.00 54620 18 Instal Type 1-A posts 4 $1,980.00 $7,920 19 Street Name Si Reflec 4 $1,000.00 54,000 20 Install Photoelectric Control T 1 Sign,Most Arm Mounted 5380.00 21 Install 2".2 1/2"Conduit Steel Path 545.00 22 Install 3"-3112"Conduit Steel Push 555.00 23 Install 4"Conduit Steel $65.00 24 Install 95 Pull Box 8 1 LF $500.00 $4,000 25 Install#6E Pull Box 4 LF 5600.00 52,400 26 Install Lac 6'a 6 Crype E Circular 32 LF 5450.00. $14,400 27 Install Various Sizes Signal Wire 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000 28 Install Detector Lead-in-Cable 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000 29 Install Conaete Bases 8 each $500100 S4,000 30 Install Rehm Cages 8 each $500.00 $4,000 31 Install Unintem red powet on sepetate cabinet each . S5500.00 32 Install Time Base Coordination Unit UPS(City Fumshed each $150.00 33 Install Time Base Coordination Unit UPS each $750.00 34 Install Service Type III-BF each $5000.00 35 Install Phase Type 170 Controlla LS $10,000.00 36 Remove and Install ADA Access Ramp 4 each $3,000.00 $12,000 37 38 39 40 41 TOTAL: - 512 7,66O i tC 3.. t TM4 f XS�'ysTpi .. i a .x *i t 1k � e t 5; l^tAj { j } r ~ fl, AN �� f I ytl� w� b y �M 11 p 1j v `t- u 1 C `G E � F F 1 z 1 a 4 a al �1 ry �� a e r-� 1 t�^ • '.iz.if'ea v x 'Alti! cr Aw, ■� 1"Up . 41.7�ifRSs,W - 7 B� � fi 3° � t f % z7 s �®_ + J tg ti 4�+ �� }� t� f,f �u L°; �� y s; r i kl' F r III =r�'• %'; f --' Y ,.' f "a1%e � F �a �" � � ���' � __—; ;' � , i_b � i- w. 11.4 mmr � . . . . . a .y. . . . . . , . . . . > x. . . « � , . . .d»: . , w. . � < � « - �. � i California Department of Transportation's APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS - Cycle 4 - Submitted By Agency: SAN BERNARDINO Application Ranked #: 1 Out of : 2 Project Location Intersection of Ninth Street and Arrowhead Avenue Project Description Upgrade the existing traffic signal with protected phasing in the east- west direction and install new poles with standard mast arms in the north- south direction. Also install pedestrian signals. Project Countermeasures Countermeasure Type Countermeasure Name CM # Signal Mod. Provide protected left turn phase (with existing LT lane) 1 Signal Mod. Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates, mounting, size, and number 2 Project's Total Benefit / Cost Ratio 10.911 Caltrans District 08 08-SAN BERNARDINO-01 Page 1 Contents Cover Page 1 Contents 2 Project Information Basic Project Information 3 Narrative Questions 4 Project Cost Estimate 5 Implementation Schedule 6 Benefit / Cost Calculation Result 7 Applicant Data Verification and Signature 8 Attachments Vincinity Map Project map showing existing and proposed conditions Collision diagram Collision summary report/list Detailed Engineer's Estimate Additional Narration, Documentation, Letters of Support, etc. 08-SAN BERNARDINO-01 Page 2 APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS Basic Project Information Date 11/08/2010 Caltrans District 08 MPO SCAG Agency SAN BERNARDINO Locode 5033 Total number of applications being submitted by your agency 2 Rank of this project(each project application must have a different rank) 1 Contact Person Information Position/Title of Contact Person Traffic Operations & System Analyst Name Manas Bista Email bista_ma @sbcity.org Telephone (909)384-5253 Address 300 North D Street County SAN BERNARDINO City SAN BERNARDINO Zip 92418-0001 Project Information Project Location Intersection of Ninth Street and Arrowhead Avenue - Be Brief - See Instructions Project Description Upgrade the existing traffic signal with protected phasing in the east- - Be Brief west direction and install new poles with standard mast arms in the -See Instructions north-south direction. Also install pedestrian signals. Functional Classification 14-Urban Other Principal Arterial Posted Speed 40 Current Average Daily Traffic Major Street 17000 (Required) Minor Street 9500 (For Intersection Projects) Year Collected 1992 Is the project focused primarily on "Intersection" or"Roadway" Improvement Intersection Number of Intersections 1 Number of Roadway miles N/A Work on the State Highway System Does the project include improvements on the State Highway System? No If Yes, is this a joint-funded project with Caltrans? N/A If Yes, confirm a 'letter of support" is attached to the application. N/A If No, confirm in writing that Caltrans-District Traffic Office is in support or neutral to the proposed improvements within the State Right of Way. N/A adfasdfasdfasdfsd Page 3 APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS Narrative Questions These narrative questions are intended to provide additional project details for the reviewers and project files. These questions will be used in the scoring of projects that do not make the initial funding cut based fully on their Benefit/Cost Ratios. 1. Identification and Demonstration of Need Describe how was the problem identified. Provide information showing the agency identified the project based on a data-driven, comprehensive safety evaluation of their roadway infrastructure and crash data. Given that other problems may exist within the applicant's jurisdiction, explain why this problem was chosen to compete for federal safety funds. Provide some background information about the problem: How long has the problem existed? Have other countermeasures been deployed? Describe the primary cause(s)of the collisions that have occurred at the location. Are there patterns in the crash types? Attach and reference any collision data,traffic data, community surveys,reports, plans,pictures,etc.to illustrate the problem. The 9th Street and Arrowhead Avenue intersection problem was identified by reviewing the City's intersection collision data. The intersection problem has existed for few years now but due to the lack of funding this intersection did not make to the City's priority list. The intersection is currently controlled by a two phase traffic signal on substandard poles. Inorder to improve the safety of the intersection, standard traffic signal poles with standard mast are needed which will improve the visibility of the signal heads. Also protected left turn phase on 9th Street are proposed which will provide a dedicated phase to the traffic turning left from 9TH street to Arrowhead Avenue. The older two-phase sub standard intersection was reported to have 19 accidents during a period of 3years from January 11, 2006 to January 12, 2009. Out of 19 accidents, one was reported to be fatal which is a major concern. The collision diagram is attached to this application to further illustrate the situation at the intersection. It can be inferred from the collision diagram that the majority of the accidents could be due to the lack of standard mastarms and the dedicated pedestrian phase which may have caused some confusion between vehicular and pedestrian traffic. This intersection also requires better pedestrian access especially for the disabled persons. Apart from not having any pedestrian signals, the current pedestrian ramps are also not up to the standards of Americans with Disability Act (ADA).This intersection was chosen for improvements in lieu of other locations due to the existing safety concerns. Ninth Street is a major arterial in the City of San Bernardino and upgrading the intersection to current standards are expected to enhance the safety of the vehicular as well as pedestrian traffic. 08-SAN BERNARDINO-01 Page 4-1 2. Potential for Proposed Improvement to Correct or Improve the Problem Describe how the proposed solution will improve the traffic safety at or near the project site. Clearly demonstrate the connection between the problem and the proposed solution. What other countermeasures were considered? Does the proposed solution provide safety benefits for all modes of travel? Does the countermeasure reduce speed?Increase visibility?Reduce collision severity? Reduce the occurrence of specific crash types?Enhance safety for persons with disabilities? Explain why the proposed solution is the preferred alternative. A modified traffic signal and new handicapped ramps complaint with Americans with Disability Act(ADA) is expected to improve public safety by providing better signal visibility, better signal operation, and improved access to pedestrians at the intersection. The street signs are mounted on the post as opposed to being on the signal mast arm. Improving the visibility of the signal heads with the proposed phasing as well as the street name signs will help to avoid confusion and is expected to improve safety of the intersection. The signal at this location is very old and sits on old concrete posts with non standard mast arms. As a result, the signals appear to be outside the cone of vision to the vehicular traffic in the inner lanes. The current Caltrans standard calls for at least two signal heads for this type of roadway as opposed to only one existing at this location. The proposed signal phasing is also expected to reduce the collision problem currently existing at the intersection. The proposed phase will also avoid the conflict between the pedestrians and left turning vehicles. The project will also install pedestrian count down heads for pedestrians to safely cross the intersection since this intersection does not currently have any pedestrian signals. The proposed solution is the only countermeasures for this type of situation. The proposed situation is expected to enhance overall safety for both the vehicles and the pedestrians. Protected left turn signals on 9TH Street and pedestrian signal heads at all four quadrants are recommended to alleviate the number and severity of accidents at this intersection. The proposed recommendation is the most viable and cost effective option that can be applied to the intersection. Without the recommeded improvements, the safety of the intersection is expected to get worse. 08-SAN BERNARDINO-01 Page 4-2 3. Potential for Timely Implementation of Project Describe the time frame to implement the project(This timeframe and follow-up discussion must match the "Implementation Schedule" section of the application). Identify any potential barriers to a timely implementation. Are there likely environmental issues that could delay the project? Are there seasonal considerations for the construction period? Are all construction improvements within existing public rights of way? Have other local,regional or state funds been targeted for the project that have not yet been secured? Is there community support for, or opposition to the project? The project is expected to be completed in less than two years from the award of the grant. There are no potential barriers or environmental issues that could delay the project. Since the project involves modification of the existing signals within the existing right of way, no right of away acquisition is necessary to complete the project. j The project is relying on this grant to improve the overall safety of this intersection both to the traveling public and the pedestrians. Since this project is expected to j improve the overall safety of the intersection, community support is anticipated for the j project. 08-SAN BERNARDINO-01 Page 4-3 APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS Project Cost Estimate Project Costs Preliminary Engineering Costs (Preliminary Engineering costs should not exceed 25% of Construction Item costs) Environmental $ 500 PS&E $ 5,000 PE Subtotal $ 5,500 Right of Way Costs (Right of Way costs should not exceed 10%of Construction Item costs) Engineering $ 500 Appraisal and Acquisition $ - Utilities $ 500 ROW Subtotal $ 1,000 Construction Costs Construction Engineering $ 19,450 (Construction Engineering costs should not exceed 15% of Construction Item costs) Construction Items $ 129,660 (The cost for the "Construction Items" must match the Detail Engineer's Estimate) CON Subtotal $ 149,110 Project Cost Subtotal $ 155,610 Contingencies $ 15,560 (Maximum of 10% of Project Costs Subtotal) Total Project Cost $1719170 Federal Funds Requested $154,000 (Federal Funds must not exceed $900,000 or 90% of Total Project Cost, whichever is less) Local or other funds $17,170 08-SAN BERNARDINO-02 Page 5 APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS Implementation Schedule This schedule is based on the assumption that the 6/1/2011 proposed project is amended into the FTIP on: The Local Agency is expected to deliver the project per Caltrans Local Assistance HSIP Guidelines. Otherwise the project will be "flagged"in the program's delivery report. Request Authorization to Proceed with Preliminary Engineering (PE) If the PE phase for the project is already complete, check this box (- Time for agency to internally staff project and request PE authorization 0.5 Months Time for Caltrans and FHWA to process and approve PE Auth 1.5 Months Proposed PE Authorization Date: 7/31/2011 Estimated Durations for elements of the PE delivery phase Will external consultants be required to complete the PE phase of this project? Wo Additional time allocated to the Delivery Process for hiring PE consultant(s) 1.0 Months Time to prepare environmental studies request 1.0 Months Time to complete CEQA NEPA studies/approvals ` 0.0 Months Time to complete the Right of Way Acquisition (federal process) 0.0 Months Time to complete final PS&E documentation 2.0 Months Other : Months Expected Completion Date for the PE Phase: 11/30/2011 See PES Form in the Local Assistance Procedures Manual for typical studies and permits Request Authorization to Proceed with Construction (CON) Time for agency to request CON authorization 0.5 Months Time for Caltrans and FHWA to process and approve CON Auth 1.5 Months Proposed CON Authorization Date: 1/30/2012 Estimated Durations for elements of the CON delivery phase Time included for the Agency's workload-leveling or Construction-Window needs 1.0 Months Time to award contract with CON contractor(using the federal process) 1.0 Months Including: Board/Council approval, Advertise, Award, Execute, Mobilize Time to complete Construction 6.0 Months Time included for closing the CON contract 1.0 Months Other : Unforseen conditions 1.0 Months Expected Completion Date for the CON Phase: 11/29/2012 Complete the Project Close-out Process Time to complete the Project Close-out Process 0.5 Months Time for Caltrans and FHWA to process and approve Project Clost-out 1.5 Months Expected Completion Date for the Project Close Out: 1/29/2013 08-SAN BERNARDINO-01 Page 6 APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS Benefit / Cost Ratio Result 1. Summary of Project Countermeasures Project Type Countermeasure Crash Type CRF Life Signal Mod. Provide protected left turn phase (with existing LT lane) All 20 20 Signal Mod. Improve signal hardware:lenses,back-plates,mounting,size,and number All 15 10 2. Crash Data Time Period From 1 01/11/2006 To 01/12/2009 1 Years 3.00 3. Details of Each Countermeasures A. Countermeasure #1 : Provide protected left turn phase (with existing LT lane) a) Crash Data Summary b) Result Crash Type Fatal SI Injury MI PDO Total Benefit( nnual)l $10,760 All 0 0 1 2 2 5 Benefit (Life) $146,232 —Night Ped & Bike % of Total Cost 60 Animal Cost $103,296 Ernerg Vehicle B/C Ratio 1.416 B. Countermeasure #2: Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates, mounting, size, and number a) Crash Data Summary b) Result Crash Type Fatal Sl Injury MI PDO Total Benefit (Annual) $213,570 All 1 0 1 4 8 14 Benefit Life $1,732,244 —Night Ped & Bike % of Total Costi 40 Animal Cost $68,864 Emerg Vehicle B/C Ratio 25.155 C. Countermeasure #3: a) Crash Data Summary b) Result Crash Type Fatal SI Injury MI PDO Total Benefit(Annual) All Benefit Life Night Ped & Bike % of Total Cost Animal Cost Emerg Vehicle B/C Ratio 4. Total Benefit : $1 ,878,476 5. Total Project Cost : $172,160 6. Project's Total B/C Ratio : 10.911 08-SAN BERNARDINO-01 Page 7 APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) FUNDS Applicant Data Verification and Signature All HSIP applications (hard-copies only) must be signed by a registered engineer or the Agency's Transportation Manager in responsible charge of their Traffic Enginerring section. By signing and submitting this application, the engineer/manager is attesting to 1. All data in the application is accurate. 2. All likely project costs are included in the Total Project Cost. 3. Each countermeasure included represents a minimum of 20% of the Total Project Cost 4. All crash data is accurately shown in the application and applied to countermeasures using generally accepted traffic engineering principles. 5. The agency understands the Project Delivery Requirements for the HSIP Program and is prepared to deliver the Project with these requirements. Agency Official Name Engr. License# or Title Signature Date Application Attachments Attachments to be included in Application Not Included Included Vicinity map c: Project map showing existing and proposed conditions Collision diagram ?� Collision summary report/list Detailed Engineer's Estimate t G Warrant studies (required when applicable to proposed improvement) t G Letter of Support from Caltrans c: f Additional Narration, Documentation, Photographs, Letters of Support, etc. Page 8 08-SAN BERNARDINO-01 r- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------� I � I City of San Bernardino, California Public Works Department/ Traffic Engineering I Proposed Traffic Signal Improvements (at 9th Street&Arrowhead Ave) I I I N.T.S. i 1 1 1 U 30 H J Z I I x ZW 1 I x W X� (n L» 1 o¢ Wm° a� 1 7f I I I I l � I EXIST. C&G� EXIST. C&G� I I 1 � i I � I I I I 1 I I I I I EXISTING / EXISTING DOUBLE YELLOW DOUBLE YELLOW I 1 I I I I i 1 1 I 1 EXIST. C&G PROPOSED EXIST. C&G HANDICAP RAMP -:_ (TYP. 4) ......... 9TH STREET , EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER I N ZW I T I 1 W U) W 1 Wm ' ° 1 I , I , I , I , 1 , 1 , I , I I I Collision Diagram Street: 9TH ST From: 1/11/2006 To: 111212009 Cross Street:ARROWHEAD AVE Date Prepared: 11/612010 �7 IV f� 71/30/06 12/1/07 M27M �— Sn 4/1706 6607 Sigs/s DUI 7 Sigs/Sign 11nm6 SigslSigm 9gM sis 'i Aut�R/N/ signs seen% nRy 7124106 1�1 y11/OG 128/07 �j Pe 71/9107 9/10107 Sigs/Signs Sge/Sgne Auto R/W Auto R/VJ 3/27/06 Sigslsigns 9/1108 I � 0/2/06 Unst La eCh Number of Collisions L pend Right Turn Pedestrian d - Moving Vehicle [-0 Fixed Object 10 Property Damage Only Leff Turn ®� Stopped Vehicle 8 Injury Collisions ,lg � d Bicycle - Backing Vehicle �-- Sideswipe 1 Fatal Collisions ®_ ti Ran Off Road DUI 19 Total Collisions Movement Day 0 Injury Collisions Not Plotted: 1 Unknown ® Night 0 Fatal Color Legend Highest Degree of Injury Maroae-Fatal Purple=Severe Injury Green=Other Visible Injury Teal=Complaint of Pain Dark Blue=Property Damage Only Settings Used For Query Parameter SettinE Street Name 9TH ST Cross Street ARROWHEAD AVE Starting Date 1/11/2006 Ending Date 1/12/2009 Intersection Intersection Related 1 Y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C O O O O N O O O O O f0 N W — m m C a N 6 m N 0 N N N 5 C C C C O C C C C C C m m m m m m m e J O C C C O C C C O C O C U - D � � wm o °) � D � t, � � 1 = U � D � U v v $ m m m °c 7 m `� c c@ °c m e CL c C c C m C L @ O O O N F m H m H m H m a ¢ > >U H m Q > F m H m Q > ¢ > F m m N m �E U m '-1 m '- m '- m - U D « "m C O) V m U '«- m U) L'- 0)m U '«- 'm J'y m J m C m O « D N U m m m m m 'm m m m U m m m m m m m m C C 'C m m 0 CO m ff Uo] ` io U0 i Ei 'y CL a a ai ain am a a > am a L'«m- t0 d-c ain 2H Mr am CL CO -6 ry pp 0 m 0 m 0 a 0 0 0 m 0 0 m N G H in w too w z ton z w w w z in w 3 w y d C C C C C m m C C m C C C C C C O O cm -0 « aN « v « vN « v « v « vN m m d 'm 0 m N O) N m 0) c N m m N m 0 m «m vN «m ;� Q U U '@ �y c U '� U '� V 'f U'� 0 .2- U 2 C � O O m O O m O i 0 N N — a0 p� N C a p N W �p N O C C > CO c) U > LL 'a. _U U) c O tr: > ? U IL O 4 9 Q > N j U a U p ` O p O O p J � a cow aa> 0- U) Zr w O �y V O r (n cn W Y O 0 m p m m m Q E Q EU NL QlL 6 m O 0 O` = O` O` @ O CL d � a a %oananz c 0 ° 01 w 0 , m C p > L w N N C d C 0 °1 p l9 d O r U) z O 0 t c V W t 3 ° ° ° w 9 o m Y U 0 0 U U L > N N N y 0 75 N R O > w L L L F � 5 0 > 0 > O > a w- co N N U � O o a m Of O.= -O N U y C> r V o o w� N m m n > a N r CD C C W W d O Q N O O N O N_ R CD 3 C p r O � p r N N ao 0 d p O O CL o r y 0 . D N t O N rn d d rna o z ° z C a m coo a an d O v c0i a coo U � a Y 0 N � C W N m R a LL U a N C - N O EU j U O o. w oN U j d � 0 H C a " U m m R O C a � p o A `o — m c _ > C d p m (n C y >1 w v > d U ca y O m F W c > y `o o_ Q 0 v w A ai T 3 e e u C m O e e m N N ti co N o O Q C'4 _N a V N r y ¢U R U b L ° ° a o a �' Z q c Qoc a"i 0 E z E CI y a O 7 d N V Z C z R y O ♦+ R +�' i 5 O m a % ..+ P. rn U ti W .. d -i o �- w 0 V] e ITH - bl 13T T o i TH 3 EEi ! S W AS ST " -�� u O J ET T ,r.. Tl CATI N s F.°•,' t - - W 9T ST = 9 TT S` — z I� r - E4 5TH ST 5TH_ ST +_! 1,Tfi 5T _ i 3RD ST _ _- R[ r�ntnve aar on 1350 2700 '©2005 Thomas Bros maps ✓I VICINITY MAP No S�A�E CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 'µ"'„- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT VICINITY MAP TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION AT 9TH STREET AND ARROWHEAD AVE INTERSECTION Created by: Manas Bista Date: 10/29/10 Detailed Engineer's Estimate For Construction Items only Age.Ag,.cy City of San Bemmdino Date: 10/042010 Project Description 9th Sbeet at Siena Way TmtHC Signal Upgrade Project Location City of San Berasrdino Pi-cluired by Diego Juarez Item No. Item Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total 1 2 Pavement Marlin THERMO) 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000 3 4 Sandblasting SF $2.00 5 Si Install each 5125.00 6 Si Remove each $50.00 7 SiSn&Post Remove each $50.00 8 Curb Mmkin s One-Coat Paint LF $0.75 9 Install 244-100 Pole 4 each . .59,350.00 $37,400 10 Install 17-2-100 Pole each $8,800.00 11 Push Button Sign 8 each $230.00 $1,840 12 Pedesnian Indication and plug holes) 8 each $800.00 $6,400 13 Remove Poles 19 4 each $750.00 $3,000 14 Laminate Install 4 each $750.00 53000 15 Install 12"Veh.HD(Special) 4 each $920A0 $3,680 16 Install 12"Veh.HD(MAS) 4 each $1,000.00 $4,000 17 Install 12"Veh.Hd.W/Fremework 6 each $770.00 54620 18 Install Tyic 1-A posts 4 each $1980.00 $7920 19 Sncet Name Si Reflec 4 each $1,000.00 54,000 20 Install Photoelectric Control T 1 Sign,Most Arm Mounted each $380.00 21 Install 2"-2 12"Conduit Steel Push LF 545.00 22 Install 3"-312"Conduit Steel Push LF $55.00 23 Install 4"Conduit Steel LF $65.00 24 Install#5 Pull Be. 8 LF $500.00 54,000 25 Install#6E Pull Box 4 LF $600.00 $2,400 26 Install Locipt 6'x6' T E,Cinutar 32 LF 5450.00 $14400 27 Install Vanous Sizes Signal Wire I LS $5,000.00 $5,000 28 Install Detector Lead-in-Cable 1 LS S5,000.00 $5,0 29 Install Concrete Bases 8 each $500.00 S41000 30 Install Rebar Cages 8 each $500.00 S4,000 31 Install Unintenu ted er on sepeamse cabinet each $5 500.00 32 Install Time Base Coordination Unit GPS(City Famished each $150.00 33 Install Time Base Coordination Unit GPS each $750.00 34 Install Service Type III-BF each $5,000.00 35 Install Phase Type 170 Controller LS $10,000.00 36 Remove and Install ADA Access Racnp 4 each $3,000.00 S12.000 37 38 39 40 41 TOTAL: $129,660 . : . . . . . . . . . �yy > . � a\ «t ��� » < � m ��. . . . � ©y j : § � � �� � : « : � « : ? \bt «a J-P . _ . . . . \ . . � > r. . � , . . j& , zt � . < . § ; . . . t . . ---� . r . i = =- .� ,��_ � �-- -#-_ �-__ �---+- �_ = R a `,� a� ,aye J* t, .. �. _.~M- / o � �,,. � _ 3 � � � x�' ... .. I, ,� ` s ry �'�. - - �.�y � _�"�_•_ -. _ . <, ,. "�Iti.. 4 _ ��... �������_ „� '�`� Ki,�� ' - F_� f J, r , :�i, ��� 3 i E- r � �x �� �� �*z� +` ;, r _1�.� ?a „�uz, '; ka iI Y:'��,i�n�:� ..i �' ��_ b iti.:1 ., .... 1!F. . _ij}.YY,� � �.W 32� �i w;i� r.o,y� �`�`" y a - �' �fl .. t .. N r 5 � k � ' la 3 IL r r +a s.� r �i `4 w w i s Y. e dAW f:; i RESOLUTION NO. COPY ® 2 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 3 SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF TWO PROJECT APPLICATIONS FOR FY 2010/11 HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 4 (HSIP) FUNDING, CYCLE 4. 5 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 6 7 WHEREAS, the HSIP Program is a reimbursement program that provides funds for 8 safety improvements on any public road, public surface transportation facility, any publicly 9 owned bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail, or for any traffic calming measures, which 10 eliminate or reduce the number and severity of traffic accidents at locations selected for 11 improvement; 12 WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the total funds available for HSIP Projects for this 13 14 funding cycle is $50 million; and 15 WHEREAS, the City has identified two candidate projects for the FY 2010/11 HSIP 16 funding cycle; 17 NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF i8 SAN BERNARDINO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 19 SECTION 1 The Director of Public Works or his designated representative is 20 authorized to execute and to submit applications on behalf of the City for the following projects, 21 each of which require a 10 percent local match: 22 Local Match HSIP Funds Total Cost 23 A. 91h Street at Arrowhead Ave: 24 (Traffic Signal Upgrade) $17,170 $154,000 $171,170 25 B. 9`h Street at Sierra Way: 26 (Traffic Signal Upgrade) $16.880 $151,700 $168,$80 27 Total HSIP Project Funding Breakdown $34,050 $305,700 $339,750 I RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF TWO PROJECT 2 APPLICATIONS FOR FY 2010/11 HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 3 (HSIP) FUNDING, CYCLE 4. 4 SECTION 2 The Director of Public Works or his designated representative is 5 authorized to execute all documents, as may be required by Caltrans, and are necessary 6 7 to complete and submit these grant applications to Caltrans. 8 SECTION 3 This resolution shall take effect upon the date of adoption. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 V 27 1 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF TWO PROJECT 2 APPLICATIONS FOR FY 2010/11 HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 3 (HSIP) FUNDING, CYCLE 4. 4 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and 5 6 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the 7 day of 2010, by the following vote, to wit: g Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT 9 MARQUEZ 10 DESJARDINS 11 BRINKER 12 SHORETT 13 14 KELLEY 15 JOHNSON 16 MCCAMMACK 17 18 Rachel G. Clark, City Clerk 19 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of , 2010. 20 21 22 Patrick J. Morris,Mayor City of San Bernardino 23 Approved as to Form: 24 25 J#4ES F. PENMAN, 26 Pty Attorney 27