The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutR16- Economic Development Agency ORIGINAL CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FROM: Emil A.Marzullo SUBJECT: Ratify the submittal of an application to the Interim Executive Director California Energy Commission for State Energy Program Funds DATE: January 12,2010 --- - -------------------------------------------------------- Svnoosis of Previous Commission/Council/Committee Action(s): ---- --------------- --------------- ------ Recommended Motion(s): Mayor and Common Council) Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino consenting and approving the prior submission of a grant application to the California Energy Commission for State Energy Program Funds. Contact Person(s): Brian Turnbull Phone: (909)663-1044 ProjectArea(s): Citywide Ward(s): All Supporting Data Attached: H Staff Report B Resolution(s)❑Agreement(s)/Contract(s) ❑Map(s)❑ Letter(s) FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: S -0- Source: N/A Budget Authority: N/A Signature: Fiscal Review: R^� Emil A. arzu o, ntenm Executive Director // Russ eJe s Inte ' Administrative Services �pyec r CommiaWn/Council Notes: Qsd aD/jJ- 9 - II P1Agendes\Comm D Comn nioo\cnc 2010\01-19-10 c.ufome�gy com mjm sxd« — COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Meeting Date: 01/19/2010 Raq lace"&+-t pales Avenda Item Number: RUO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT RATIFY THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION FOR STATE ENERGY PROGRAM FUNDS BACKGROUND: On July 21, 2008, Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law AB 811, which became effective immediately as an emergency measure. The bill authorizes municipalities to enter into contractual assessment agreements with property owners to finance the installation of energy efficiency improvements that are permanently fixed to real property. AB 811 programs allow cities to enter into a loan agreement with property owners for the purchase and installation of such improvements. Property owners then repay the loan through a contractual assessment on their property. The contractual assessments are collected on property owner's tax bills at the same time, and in the same manner, as property taxes. On February 17, 2009, Congress enacted the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("ARRA") to preserve and create jobs, promote economic recovery and to make investments that will have long term economic benefits. As part of the ARRA, the Federal Department of Energy ("DOE") is providing funding to individual states to develop State Energy Program ("SEP") strategies that are consistent with the national goals of increasing jobs, reducing U.S. oil dependency through increases in energy efficiency, development of renewable energy technologies, promoting economic growth by creating"green jobs,"and reducing green house gas emissions. The DOE has allocated to the California Energy Commission ("CEC") $226 million in ARRA funding for the development of SEP strategies. State law authorizes the CEC to use these SEP Funds for energy efficiency, energy conservation, renewable energy, and other energy related projects and activities authorized by the ARRA. The CEC is seeking projects in the following program areas: 1. Municipal Financing Program 2. California Comprehensive Residential Building Retrofit Program 3. Municipal and Commercial Building Targeted Measure Retrofit Program CURRENT ISSUE: SEP Funds provide an excellent opportunity for the City of San Bernardino to take a leadership role in the region by establishing a San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District which has the potential to create substantial economic development opportunities, new green jobs and significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. The East Valley could see as much as $75 million infused into the local economy through the creation of this program. r:wpna..\Con Dw Commi"ion��2010TI-19-ioc.ur. EwWC oinioosx.dm COMMISSION MEETING AGEND. Meeting Date: 01/19/201 Aoenda item Namher• 1210 Economic Development Agency Staff Report California Energy Commission Funding Page 2 The State Municipal Financing Program has $95 million in SEP Funds available to award grants ranging from $2 million to $20 million to local governments. A grant proposal application was submitted requesting the amount of $2,750,000 for the development of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District, a proposed multi jurisdictional AB 811 Program that would encompass all of San Bernardino County. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: i This item does not meet the definition of a "project' under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the Agency. An application requesting a grant in the amount of $2,750,000 was submitted to the California Energy Commission on December 21, 2009, and a copy of the application is on file with the City Clerk. RECOMMENDATION: That the Mayor and Common Council adopt the attached Resolution. Emil A. Marzullo, Interim Executive Director P.1Agendw\Con DevComminm\l 2010101-19-10GifomisEmrgyCommissmSR.doc COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA II!, Meeting Date: 01/19/2010 Agenda Item Number: 9j(D 1 RESOLUTION NO. D Oo 2 00 © 3 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONSENTING TO AND RATIFYING SUBMISSION 4 OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY 5 COMMISSION FOR STATE ENERGY PROGRAM FUNDS 6 WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino ("Council') 7 recognizes that it is in the interest of the regional, state, and national economy to stimulate the 8 economy; create and retain jobs; reduce fossil fuel emissions; and reduce total energy usage and 9 improve energy efficiency within our jurisdiction; and 10 WHEREAS, the State Energy Program ("SEP") Funds are available through the California 11 Energy Commission for grants to eligible local governments for cost-effective energy efficiency 12 projects; and 13 WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino is eligible for SEP funding through the California 14 Energy Commission. © 15 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED BY 16 THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AS 17 FOLLOWS: 18 Section 1. The Council hereby finds and determines that the facts and circumstances set 19 forth in the Recitals hereof are true and correct in all respects. 20 Section 2. The Council hereby consents to and ratifies submittal of a SEP Grant Funds 21 application to the State of California as the same is on file with the City Clerk and further approves 22 and authorizes the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino ("Agency") as the sub- 23 recipient for the use and administration of the SEP Grant Funds. 24 Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption and execution in the manner 25 as required by the City Charter. 26 27 ® 28 1 P:Ugendu\RewlutiorrsUt cwlutionsV0I0WI.19-IOGlifoniivE�y Commission MCC Reso.doc I RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONSENTING TO AND RATIFYING 2 SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA 3 ENERGY COMMISSION FOR STATE ENERGY PROGRAM FUNDS 4 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and 5 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting 6 thereof,held on the day of , 2010, by the following vote to wit: 7 8 Council Members: Aves Nays Abstain Absent 9 ESTRADA — 10 BAXTER — 11 BRINKER — 12 SHORETT — 13 KELLEY — 14 JOHNSON — 15 MC CAMMACK � — 16 17 Rachel G. Clark, City Clerk 18 The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved this day of . 2010. 19 20 Patrick J. Morris, Mayor 21 City of San Bernardino 22 Approved as to Form: 23 24 By: James F. Penman, City Attorney 25 26 27 28 2 P.NgeMes`,ResoWtionsVtesoWrions`2010101-19-10 Ctlifamia Energy Commisaian MCC Resod Tp v.:seu � M San Bernardino Valle `Clean Ener 7 g x . Program r. CAfornia Energy Commission State Energy Program PON#400-09-401 - r;u Voirkne 2 Technical Program 'p � z Information p fl tf W � v r a 1 ro +. Y Y �.r�t Y T.' � California Energy Commission State Energy Program Program Opportunity Notice#400-09-401 Program Title:San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy Program Volume 2:Technical Program Proposal& Cost Information Table of Contents Program Title Page 1 Program Executive Summary Page 2 Program Design Page 4 Workforce Development &Job Creation Page 35 Energy, Peak Demand and GHG Emissions Reduction Page 36 Economically Disadvantaged Areas Page 39 Time Criticality Page 40 Program Transparency & Reporting Page 42 Program Team Qualifications& Experience Page 44 Scope of Work& Deliverables Page 46&Appendix B Budget Forms(Exhibit A-1, B-1 & Exhibit F) Page 47 References Page 50& Appendix D Program Cost Effectiveness Analysis Appendix A Budget Forms (B-2, B 2.1-2.4, B-3, B-3.1-3.4, B-6 and B-7) Appendix C Support Letters Appendix E Team Resume's Appendix F SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY CLEAN ENERGY PROGRAM 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of San Bernardino, in partnership with the County of San Bernardino, City of Redlands, the Energy Coalition, Clean Energy Advocates and EnerPath, is pleased to submit this proposal to the California Energy Commission's State Energy Program — Municipal Financing Program to fund the creation of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District (SBVCED), a Joint Powers Authority specifically created for the purposes of financing energy efficient, water conservation and renewable energy improvements to residential, commercial and industrial properties under the authority of AB 811 throughout San Bernardino County. The creation of SBVCED will allow any city within San Bernardino County to participate in the District and save significant costs in program design, judicial validation, legal fees and administrative overhead. The program is estimated to create over 450 new jobs throughout the region and save nearly 9,000,000 kWh over the life of the grant. SBVCED will provide property-owners access to financing, marketing, education & outreach materials, coordination of utility rebate programs and program administration for the installation of energy efficiency retrofits, water conservation improvements and renewable energy projects throughout San Bernardino County. The District will also coordinate job training activities and workforce development with existing job training centers and trade specific programs. The goals of SBVCED are completely aligned with the goals of the Department of Energy. Increasing jobs, reducing US oil dependency through increases in energy efficiency and deployment of renewable energy technologies, promoting economic vitality through an increase in "green jobs," and reducing green house gas emissions are all envisioned through SBVCED. Once the District is setup, it will use a market based approach that is not contingent upon sustained funding from the Federal or State government. The Program will result in significant market transformation thereby creating a demand for more "green jobs" in San Bernardino County. This approach satisfies the State requirements of focusing program efforts on market transformation initiatives and actions that align with the goals of the Department of Energy's national goals. The goals of the proposal are to create a Joint Powers Authority with a judicially validated AB 811 program available to every city within San Bernardino County that wishes to participate. A turn key approach is being developed to allow any jurisdiction within the boundaries of San Bernardino County to join the program without the significant costs of program development and validation. The objective of the proposal is to create the opportunity for a regional approach to energy efficiency improvements and spur economic revitalization in one of the hardest hit regions in the State of California, with an unemployment rate exceeding 14%. Because of the complexity in development of such a Program, the City of San Bernardino is seeking funding to cover the cost of preparing the Program documentation, structuring the legal underpinnings, marketing and educational materials. Having this set-up securely established prior to offering loans to their constituents will be vital to the Program's success. The proposed use of SEP funds include: JPA establishment and documentation for future participants to join; contractual assessment area establishment; program documentation and design; program validation filing in San Bernardino County; professional staff retainers; initial operating budget for program administrators; marketing, outreach & education to residents, business owners and contractors and website development. The total estimated cost of the program is $42,140,920. The City of San Bernardino has committed $390,920 of its Energy Efficiency & Conservation Block Grant funds towards this proposal and the development of SBVCED. Additionally, it is anticipated that an initial bond sale of $39,000,000 will be offered to finance the actual installation of energy efficiency, water conservation and renewable energy projects. The Program will 2 offer residential loans ranging from $5,000 up to $60,000 and commercial loans ranging from $7,500 to $100,000 with the ability to loan higher amounts after analysis on a case by case basis. The Program anticipates funding 2,145 loans with the initial $39,000,000, but with a population of over 2,000,000 in San Bernardino County and over 340,000 owner occupied homes and close to 40,000 businesses it is anticipated that the initial $39,000,000 bond issuance will be the first of many to satisfy the demand. Based on the Council of Economic Advisor's Estimates of Job Creation from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the total number of jobs created using all SEP funding, EECBG funding and leveraged funds from the issuance of mini bonds is estimated at approximately 458 newly created direct jobs. As the program matures and grows, and as more mini bonds are issued, the total number of jobs will continue to grow even after all of the SEP funding has been expended. For every $20 million bond issuance, there are an estimated 217 jobs created. The San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy Program will save 8,709,000 kWh and 109,350 therms, generating 100,106,451,000 BTUs through March 2012. The total 8.7 million kWh energy savings represent an average 36% energy reduction in kWh for all loan applications. Solar projects are conservatively estimated to average 75% in energy savings and non-solar energy efficiency products (HVAC, windows, duct and insulation, etc.) are expected to produce 20% in energy savings. Based on a 30%/70% mix of solar and energy efficiency loans, total solar energy savings account for over half of the total energy savings. Additionally, the solar loans include the 10% minimum energy efficiency requirement. The energy efficiency energy savings were analyzed per product category based on available data sources such as Database for Energy Efficiency Resources (DEER), California Energy Commission Consumer Energy Center, Energy Star, and published consultant reports. Loans are expected to be distributed 2,000 to Residential and 145 commercial customers based on 1.0% and .4% market penetration respectively for each segment. Additional energy savings will be generated from home energy surveys and installation of Tier 1 measures, primarily CFLS, low flow faucet aerators and showerheads. The proposal includes energy savings from 5,000 Tier 1 homes totaling 910,000 kWh and 60,000 therms. Through a partnership with the San Bernardino Community College District Center for Excellence and their California Clean Energy Workforce Training Program, the proposed program will assist in the training and placement of hundreds of newly trained workers. This training will occur in four key areas: 1) Building Performance Retrofitting Specialists, 2) Energy Auditors or Home Energy Raters, 3) Resource Conservation or Energy Efficiency Managers, and 4) Solar PV/Thermal Installers. Center of Excellence research indicates these key occupations have a 3-year projected growth totaling over 1,470 additional jobs within the region. Additionally, by putting the structure in place for financing energy efficient, water conservation and renewable energy improvements, this region will create a market for the associated services and products related to the projects to be funded by SBVCED. SBVCED will essentially create a new economic market for San Bernardino County. 3 PROGRAM DESIGN Financing Plan Provide the financing plan for the proposed program. The financing plan must, at a minimum, answer the following questions. If this information is not yet available, answer the questions to the extent possible and include both a discussion of what will be done to complete the answers and an estimated schedule of when this information will be available. The San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District (the "Program" or "District") will utilize an established municipal financing structure to enable ongoing expansion and funding of the Program. This tool is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) and will be one of the initial formation steps taken in the establishment of the Program. The Cities of San Bernardino and Redlands and the County of San Bernardino have agreed to participate in the formation of this JPA. Additional cities, counties, and other authorized jurisdictions will have the ability to join the JPA for funding purposes in the future through passage of a resolution acknowledging the JPA and its funding provisions for their respective inclusion in the Program. The JPA is a separate legal entity, thus providing assurance to all participating municipalities that they will carry no liability or obligation for any debt repayment for participant loans made through the Program. Funding will be secured through Marks-Roos bonds, issued by the JPA, secured by the individual borrowers' contractual assessments, and sold to a lender/investor. The JPA will be the conduit for all financing established through the Program. The Program Financial Advisor will use the JPA to administer all debt issuance and direct lending needed by the Program. The anticipated lending facility will be a revolving loan fund that initially provides funding from a private source (pension fund, managed fund, or private equity). From time to time, this fund will be replenished through the infusion of new monies either from bond financing or additional direct lenders. Repayments to the fund will provide assurance to lenders and investors that the fund is sustainable and properly secured. Furthermore, the JPA will establish a common reserve fund to enhance the credit of all the underlying obligations. The financing team is currently in negotiations with several direct lenders to establish such a revolving fund. It is anticipated that this fund will be made available as a lending contract to the JPA for purchase of Marks-Roos bonds as they are originated by property owners and sold to the JPA as contractual assessments. This structure may be illustrated as follows. Contractual Assessment _ Marks-Roos Bonds Property JPA Revolving Owner -- K .- _._.. _...� Fund Project Funding$ Bond Proceeds$ The Financial Advisor will work closely with the direct lender(s) to establish the lending criteria and debt repayment requirements. In order to maintain competitive rates to participating property owners, the revolving loan fund will have the ability to receive new and reimbursement funds from bond proceeds as well as from direct lenders. Private Capital Revolving 4 Muni Bond Fund At------------------------------ Proceeds Loan Repayments 4 1. Will the bidder contract with a bank or other lender to issue financing for each property owner? The Program, through the JPA, will secure mini-bonds with contractual assessments from property owners. These mini-bonds will be purchased by the JPA from funds provided by the revolving loan fund. The revolving loan fund will provide funding for all loans purchased by the JPA subject to conformity with established Program loan processes and procedures. The revolving loan fund will be allowed to receive funds from multiple sources in order to provide ongoing funding for the purchase of mini-bonds from the JPA. Initial funding will be established from a private lender or lenders that agree to fund an initial loan fund of $39 million. Future infusions of cash may be received from publicly offered bond proceeds; replenishment of original direct lender(s) capacity based their sale of aggregated mini-bonds, new or additional contracts from direct lenders, and loan repayments from contractual assessment collections. 2. What is the status of the Bidder's financial commitments with lenders regarding the proposed program? The Program is in discussion with several potential direct lenders and expects to have a commitment of $39 million to initially fund the revolving loan. A formal commitment cannot be made until the JPA is created, individual contractual assessment authority is established, and all related program documents are in place. However, the commitment of the lenders/investors is to work with the team to secure funds on an initial and ongoing basis. The attached support letter from Regent Capital Group is evidence that private capital groups are interested in participating in the proposed Program. The Program will seek a rating from Standard & Poor's to the extent that bonds are issued. This will be done with the expectation of an "A" category rating after further discussion with the rating agency and, hopefully, establishment of rating criteria. This expectation is based on the strength of a voluntary tax lien security, reasonable underwriting criteria, and experienced Program management. The voluntary tax lien placement is standard for these AB 811 Programs and will require notarized signature(s) of property owner(s) on which the lien and improvements are being placed. Loan approval will be based upon reasonable underwriting criteria expected to be at a minimum: (i) Title verification of property owner (ii) Current on property taxes (iii) Current on mortgage payments (iv) Reasonable loan to value ratio based upon lender underwriting standards (vi) Improvements qualified for loan (vii) Improvements verified complete prior to funding (viii) Validation action of all funding documents prior to commencement of lending (ix) No outstanding property liens Assuming an initial revolving loan authorization from direct lenders of $39 million, the intention would be to issue bonds, or seek additi< nal direct lending capaci, when the revolving loan facility has committed $31.2 million, or 80%of its availat• amounts, in order to ha 3n additional funding amounts secured before the fund is entirely depleted. 5 3. For financing offered to property owners: The financing team will structure each contract with direct lender(s) (i.e. warehouse line of credit) or bond purchase agreement to provide the lowest cost and greatest flexibility to property owners based upon available market rates and conditions. Because of the currently limited access to credit enhancement, the Program intends to self-fund a reserve account for each individual mini-bond, in an amount equivalent to one year's payment of principal and interest. This amount will be held by a third party trustee, will earn interest, and will be used to offset any payment shortage from the pooled mini-bonds. This common reserve feature will provide security for the entire revolving loan fund and will grow over time with the origination of additional loans and interest earnings. Property owners will agree to a tax lien equivalent to their loan plus the reserve account in order to fund this account. Reserve fund earnings will be used to cover ongoing administrative costs of the JPA and to support expansion of the Program. Final property owner payments will be made from the reserve fund. The following illustration shows the operation of this reserve feature: Borrower: Property Owner 1 Project amount: $25,000 Interest rate: 8% Term: 20 years Reserve deposit: $2,546.31 Total lien: $25,000+$2,546.31 = $27,546.31 Similarly, depending upon the timing of the loan funding, an additional amount may be added to make debt service payments prior to the assessments being made on the tax rolls. a) What interest rate will be offered to property owners? The lending rate will be subject to market conditions available at the time direct lending contracts are agreed upon and/or bonds are sold. It is anticipated that the initial funding will need to meet the goal of an all inclusive interest rate to the property owner that does not exceed 8%. b) Is the interest rate fixed or variable? Interest rates will be fixed at the time of loan funding in order to define the debt service obligation to the property owner and establish the first year assessment for the County tax collector. The reserve fund will make the final payment of debt service amounts due. c) Will property owners be charged any fees to apply and/or participates in the program? Yes, in order to assure intention to proceed with projects and funding, the property owners will be charged a loan application fee of$150. Similarly, there will be fees based upon individual site analysis for the preliminary and completion energy assessments. If desired, the energy assessment amounts can be rolled into the loan amount. 6 d)What are the program's minimum and maximum financing amounts? Following are the estimated Program funding parameters: Residential Commercial Loan minimum $5,000 $7,500 Loan maximum $60,000 $100,000 Maximum exceptions Subject to approval Subject to approval Partial payments allowed Subject to project Subject to project verification verification A Program oversight committee will be assembled at the JPA level to review any exceptions as identified above. e) How long is(are)the financing repayment term(s)? It is anticipated that loans will be made for terms of 5, 10 or 20 years at the discretion of the property owner. Longer and shorter durations may be available depending upon underwriting criteria and legal confirmation of useful life compliance. S. Will financing coincide with other existing or potential energy efficiency and renewable energy financial incentives (i.e. California Solar Initiative, utility rebates, and tax incentives)? Loan funding will occur upon filing of the project completion certification form. The loan application will be approved for the total project amount, less the California Solar Initiative, which is assignable to the contractor as a reduction in cost. Property owners will be allowed to borrow up to the entire amount of the project (less CSI rebate)despite eligibility for other tax benefits and utility rebates. Because these benefits are not available until project completion and may not be applicable in all circumstances, property owners will have the ability to borrow the entire amount in order to complete the desired improvements. 6. Has the bidder ever filed for bankruptcy? No. 7. What funds and resources, if any, is the program proposing to leverage with the ARRA SEP funds? The City of San Bernardino has budgeted $390,920 of its Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) monies for Program implementation. Additionally, the City of San Bernardino will use $150,000 of funding from its Compass BluePrint award from Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to create a profile of all the properties in the region based upon location, size, and age. These property profiles will provide significant assistance in the targeting of properties for improvements based upon the likelihood of making transformational changes in their energy consumption. The funds for the Compass BluePrint grant are not included as leveraged funds since it is a separate project that will enhance the ability of the proposed program. The CEC SEP award amount requested will be used for Program establishment, NOT for funding to property owners. The intended usage of the ARRA SEP funds, as detailed in the Program budget will be: (i) Joint Powers Authority establishment and documentation for future participants'to join (ii) Contractual assessment area establishment for initial participating jurisdictions 7 (iii) Program documentation A. Eligible projects definition B. Application documentation C. Processes and procedures for approval D. Contractual assessment agreements E. Contractual assessment purchase agreement F. Marks-Roos bond documents (iv) Program validation filing in San Bernardino County (v) Professional staff retainers (vi) Development of Program-specific website and with funding application tie-in (vii) Initial operating budget for Program Managers and Administrators (viii) Marketing and outreach (ix) Education module preparation and workforce tie-in 8. How does the bidder's program propose to transition to self-sufficiency after the cessation of ARRA SEPfunding? ARRA SEP funding will be used only for Program establishment intentionally to create a self-sufficient Program from the start. After Program establishment all administrative and marketing costs will be covered through an incremental portion of the debt service payments made by property owners on the outstanding loans. In addition to the incremental administrative fee added to the interest rate, a portion of the interest earnings on the common reserve account will also be available for administrative and marketing expenses of the JPA. The JPA will promote the program to new jurisdictions. New jurisdictions will be able to utilize all program documents and financing after adopting resolutions to join the JPA and following all appropriate procedures to establish the contractual assessment area. Subject to legal opinion, jurisdictions outside of San Bernardino County that want to participate in the JPA established program may be required to file a separate validation action in their respective county. 8 Use for Energy Commission Funds The Energy Commission intends to use the ARRA SEP funds in a manner that will best help local governments establish or continue their municipal financing programs. Indicate which of potential uses below (multiple uses may be chosen) for Energy Commission funds are being proposed. Include a detailed description of how the ARRA funding is anticipated to improve aspects of the proposed program and increase the likelihood of its success, including but not limited to: the effect on application and other participant fees, interest rates, bond ratings, the program's general fund, leveraging of private and other funding, job creation and retention, and energy use: The funding being offered by the California Energy Commission's State Energy Program is integral for establishing the District and implementing the Program. The Program will establish and administer this innovative funding mechanism for property owners in the San Bernardino County. Such funding will enable reduced fees for resident participation, possibly promote higher bond ratings for the pertinent public agencies and can attract additional funding sources to leverage in execution of the program. This "seed money" will contribute to the success of the District at the ground level. As referenced in the previous section tt7, the Program intends to use ARRA SEP funds for the comprehensive Program establishment. ARRA SEP funded tasks will include: JPA establishment and documentation, contractual assessment area creation, program documentation, program financing validation action, initial operating budget for Program managers and administrators, professional staff retainers, development of Program-specific website, marketing materials and outreach, and all other related costs associated with Program establishment. 1. Cover program start-up costs, such as legal services and financial advisor costs; As previously indicated, ARRA SEP funds will be used to cover initial Program start up costs. Using ARRA SEP funds for the initial program start up will significantly improve the ability of the Program to attract additional jurisdictions to join SBVCED. By covering the one time costs of legal services for JPA formation, program validation and program documentation, a turn key approach will be created for jurisdictions that wish to join. 2. Cover some ongoing program costs (such as staffing, market surveys, marketing and tracking and reporting energy savings); The only ongoing program costs expected to be covered by ARRA SEP funding will be staffing of the Program's main administrative office for the first two years, and ARRA reporting costs. After the ARRA funding period, the ongoing administrative operations of the Program will be supported by an incremental administrative fee to participating property owners. Because the collection of debt service payments will be at the same time as property taxes, these amounts will not accumulate or be able to pass through for administrative functioning until the Program is well underway and collecting amounts on outstanding loans. Thus the ability to fund the first two years administrative costs from ARRA funds will provide a vital bridge to long term program viability. Years 1-2 Years 3 and after ARRA Program Administrator: Loan Funding an Bernardino Economic _ ._._ ___ g �� Development Agency JPA Repayment Admin. Fees 9 The City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency will serve as the Program administrator for the Program. Their role will include administration of all ARRA funds, reporting and monitoring to meet transparency requirements related to ARRA fund receipt and distribution, maintenance of business office for consumers, aggregation of energy related savings for reporting and credit as may be applicable, and other "hands-on" administrative tasks as may be defined from time to time by the Program team. 3. Home energy ratings, energy audits and the investigation phase of building commissioning projects: As an incentive to encourage initial participation in the Program, the first 2,000 Tier I energy surveys will be free to participating property owners. This contribution from ARRA funds will be equal to $150 per assessment for a total ARRA expenditure of$300,000. 4. Interim financing(warehouse line of credit); The Program does not intend to make any loans to property owners from the ARRA SEP funds. 5. Loan loss reserve fund; The ARRA funds will make an initial deposit of $390,000 to the pooled reserve fund; this amount represents approximately 1% of the total anticipated loan amount for the initial round of funding. By having an initial deposit to the JPA pooled reserve fund, lenders will be assured of adequate risk offset for any delinquent payments from property owners. Additional deposits to this reserve fund will be made at the time of loan funding for each property owner. The Program design anticipates an amount between 5-10% of each loan to be deposited to the reserve fund in order to continue the support strong credit ratings for the JPA pooled revolving loan fund. By creating a self-funded reserve available on an ongoing pool of diverse borrowers, the Program will have reserves that can offset the need for a Letter of Credit or Bond Insurance. Letters of credit and bond insurance are extremely difficult to receive under current market conditions, can cost as much as 4% of the initial borrowing amount with no recovery, and generally require defined participants prior to issuance. By self funding the reserve, all participants will benefit from the earnings on the reserve fund being able to offset future administrative, marketing and interest costs on the outstanding loans. 6. Interest rate buy-down; The Program does not intend to buy down the interest rate. 7. Homeowner rebates(for low income homeowner or energy efficiency retrofits). The Program does not anticipate making rebates available. 10 LEVERAGED FUNDs/RESOURCES Explain what resources and funding will be actively used by the proposed program to supplement the requested ARRA SEP funding to maximize the effective delivery of all components of the program to accomplish the benefits described in the Goals and Objectives section. These may include, but are not limited to bond sales, the general fund, direct financing from lenders,the California Solar Initiative,federal energy tax credits, and utility rebates. The San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District Program (the "Program") will leverage multiple sources of funding. ARRA SEP funds will be used to establish the Program. Individual property owner loans will be made through the sale of mini-bonds sold to a JPA that will purchase them with funds provided either from a direct lender or bond proceeds. Loans will be made to property owners based upon completed project cost, less any rebate amounts that are available from the California Solar Initiative, or utility programs that make payments directly to the contractor that result in reduced contract costs. Property owners will be allowed to borrow up to the entire project cost without having to adjust for potential tax benefits. To the extent that the property owner will receive utility rebates directly (instead of passing through to contractor), they will be allowed to borrow amounts sufficient to pay for the completed project. This ability to borrow adequate amounts for project completion will encourage full retrofits. However, amounts recoverable within the first year will be identified and property owners will be discouraged from borrowing these amounts because of the cost of borrowing long term for a short term expense coverage. Property owners, through the energy audit component of the Program, will be made aware of all eligible rebates and tax benefits related to the proposed improvements. This is a direct benefit of the program that will be available to all audit recipients regardless of the level of retrofits selected and installed. The City of San Bernardino has allocated a portion of its Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) funds to support the Program. This amount of $390,920 will be used to support Joint Powers Authority establishment and documentation, contractual assessment area establishment, Program documentation, program validation filing in San Bernardino County, marketing and outreach and professional staff retainers. Incoming cities will be encouraged to use EECBG or other city funds to support local Program marketing efforts. To the extent that incoming participants are in counties other than San Bernardino, and legal counsel determines there is a requirement for legal validation in participants' residing counties, such participants will be required to fund the validation filing in their respective county. To the extent that multiple cities or agencies from another county decide to join the JPA within the same 180 day period, the validation filing costs will be split pro-rata by population among the newly participating agencies. 1: Eligible Improvements List the improvements eligible for funding under the proposed program.At a minimum: Include energy improvements listed in both the Second and Third Tiers, of the California Comprehensive Residential Building Retrofit Program for residential customers as specified in Section 11, Table 1, of the California Comprehensive Residential Retrofit Program solicitation (note that municipal financing programs may determine that water efficiency improvements may or may not be eligible); Residential Tier I measures are as specified in Section II, Table I of the California Comprehensive Residential Retrofit Program. The Program design strategy includes providing customers with energy efficiency introductory kit, which includes 1 low-flow showerhead (1.75gpm or better), 2 faucet aerators (1.Sgpm or better) and 5 compact fluorescent lamps (EnergyStarg rated). Customers will be encouraged to install lamps in Dens/Offices, Hallways, Kitchens, Living Rooms and Exteriors, where usage is typically higher and thus the energy efficiency benefits are greater. Tier II measures will include: • Insulation in Attics and Un-Insulated Walls(Minimum R30 Value or Greater) EnergyStar® Listed) • Complete Building Envelope Sealing/Weather Stripping(EnergyStar®Guidelines) • Complete Duct Sealing (EnergyStar® Guidelines) • Replacement of near end of useful life air conditioners and/or furnaces with CEE qualifying model— (T-24 refrigerant charge, airflow and duct sealing verification) (EnergyStar®Guidelines) • Replacement of near end of useful life water heaters with CEE model (solar water heating) • Radiant Heat Barriers (Energy Star® Rated) • Windows Replacement (U value of.40 or less Energy Star(R) Rated) • Tankless Water Heaters - EF of.82 or higher (Energy Star® Rated) • Ultra-High Efficiency Toilets (1.28 GPF or less) • Smart Irrigation Controllers(Energy Star® Rated) Tier III measures will include: • Solar/Photovoltaic's • Geothermal Ground Source Heat Pumps In addition, the Program will offer replacement of exterior incandescent lighting with LED lighting fixtures (permanent fixture replacement). The Program will also seek out other practical measures and emerging technologies that are tested and proven as they enter the marketplace. Items, such as cool roofs, will not be included in the targeted measure installations. Tier 11 measures above, as well as Tier III measures, including Home Performance by Energy Star®, will be performed by specialty contractors and will be managed by EnerPath Services, Inc. EnerPath is a licensed Home Performance Contractor as recognized by the California Building Performance Contractors Association (CBPCA). 1. Provide a strategy for how the program will strongly transition towards Third Tier approaches within one year of award; and The Tier I and Tier II strategies are designed to support the goals of market transformation by making energy efficiency popular and influencing installation of Third Tier renewables for qualified homeowners. The program design combines marketing and outreach support, including in-home Tier 1 12 energy assessments. This strategy will strongly influence consumers creating the opportunity for building a "trusted advisor" relationship with the homeowner with heavy emphasis on customer education. The Program will also seek out and pre-qualify contractors that can perform the various work in an effort to help support customer decisions. Often the market barrier is that customers don't know where to start or how to get started. A pre-qualified list of local contractors serving the various markets also serves the objective of creating local jobs in the respective markets. This will in turn influence and drive deeper dive investments in Tier II and III energy efficiency and renewable energy measures. The Program team has developed a strategy to reach and perform 5,000 to 6,000 Tier I audits for homeowners within the first year and to build a backlog of interested consumers that will qualify for the financing element. The transitioning from Tier I assessments and measures to Tier II & III audits and implementation will ramp up quickly as a result of the program design. All Tier I participants will have access to a web-based SBVCED branded sustainability platform provided by EnerPath®. This web dashboard is designed achieve various objectives including management tracking of program activities. The dashboard will also assist in the program transparency and reporting requirements of collecting project performance data. • Tier I Audit Activities & Measure Kit Installations • Data Acquisition of Measure Opportunities • Tier II and Tier III Measure Installations • Historical Billing and Usage History • Display Energy Savings and Water Conservation Savings • Display Carbon Reduction • Other Miscellaneous Displays and Customer Report Information • Links to EE Related Websites, (EnergyStar(D, Flex Your Power, etc.) The Tier I homeowners will be encouraged to acquire usage and billing history, which can be input on- line, and/or through other means. This strategy engages the consumer in a kind of energy social networking environment. Data acquisition for both the 12 months prior billing and usage history as well as the forward 24 months of usage history is required as a condition of financing, so all Tier II and Tier III customers will consent to providing this data. The platform will be accessed via username and password crea_ed by the customer and will be a personal resource since data provided during the Tier I assessment will identify obvious opportunities for energy efficiency and water conservation. So in this regard, even customers that elect not to participate in the financing program will have access to important information that further supports the objectives of market transformation. In addition, data from both Tier II & III measure installations will be leveraged so there is a common and central database for tracking energy savings results in an active environment. The EnerPath® program reporting dashboard will aggregate all data so that various stakeholders can see the performance related activities, which can be sorted by view in whole or in part based on zip code and/or by sponsor city. Tier III homeowners will gain special status including recognition with goal achievement. Strong emphasis will be placed on prioritizing investments, first by making the home as efficient as possible, secordly by using clean renewable resources to become more energy independent and thirdly by doing a be- -r job of managing the home more efficiently. 13 2. Include the permanent improvements eligible for the Municipal and Commercial Building Targeted Measure Retrofit Program as specified in Section II of the Municipal and Commercial Building Targeted Measure Retrofit Program solicitation. The targeted measures as specified in the Municipal and Commercial Building Targeted Measure Retrofit Program, Section II, will be applied in our program to the extent that applicable measures are deployed. Our program will also target market sectors that have high usage hours such as convenience stores and restaurants since they offer the greatest potential for energy savings and sometime utilize the most capital intensive equipment. Retrofits which require permits will also be required to demonstrate the basis for efficiency improvements via calculation or deemed savings. Standard IOU Express Efficiency Measures will not be offered as part of the financing program, though customers may participate separate of the financing program. An effort will be made to integrate and promote IOU programs that serve as lead generation for the commercial financing program. Commercial The following measures shall be included as approved for this program • Occupancy Sensored Lighting Fixtures • Task Ambient Office Lighting • Refrigerated Case LED Lighting with Occupancy Sensors • Lighting Controls • Kitchen Exhaust VAV Controls • HVAC Controls with Fault Detection • HVAC Replacement Min. 14 SEER or 12EER Split System or 13 SEER or 11 EER for Packaged Systems • Windows Replacement (U value of.40 or less Energy Star® Rated) • Tankless Water Heaters - EF of.82 or higher(Energy Star® Rated) • Ultra-High Efficiency Toilets (1.28 GPF or less) • Smart Irrigation Controllers (Energy Star® Rated) • Solar/Photovoltaic's • Geothermal Ground Source Heat Pumps "* screw-in bulbs will not qualify as financeable in this Program 14 Loading Order Indicate that the proposed program requires and will offer financing for energy efficiency that will achieve at least a 10% reduction in total energy use as a condition of financing on-site solar electric or other on-site renewable generation. The 10% reduction shall be determined using the Home Energy Rating System (HERS) Phase II index for residential buildings once HERS II-approved HERS Providers and certified HERS Raters are available in the region. Explain the method or methods that will be employed as a temporary measure to determine the 10% reduction in the absence of HERS II-approved HERS Providers and certified HERS Raters in the region covered by the proposed program. The Energy Commission may approve other methods for determining the 10%reduction as it determines necessary. The program will offer financing for on-site solar electric or other on-site renewable generation based on the condition that the residence or commercial building(s) have made additional energy efficiency improvements designed to achieve a minimum 10% reduction in total energy use. Homes and commercial buildings must exceed 2008 Title 24 standards for HVAC and duct systems, attic insulation, and south and west facing windows to be eligible for program financing to install solar-electric or other on-site renewable generation. If the above equipment meets 2008 Title 24 standards and a blower test has been completed within past two years, the building will be approved as adequately energy efficient and financing may be provided without reaching a 10% energy reduction threshold. The Title 24 (2008) requirements corresponding to HVAC and duct systems, attic insulation, and windows facing south and west directions as described above, will ensure that the overall energy efficiency improvements exceed the 10% minimum level. The long useful life of these energy efficiency improvements will be worthwhile investments that support the longer payback periods for renewable projects. The program has established benchmarks to be used in estimating the 10% threshold during the absence of HERS II-approved HERS Providers and certified HERS Raters. The loading order as ranked by greatest energy savings is HVAC upgrades with corresponding duct improvements, attic insulation, and windows. The program has estimated standard energy savings for the following residential improvements which will be used in approving the 10%energy savings eligibility criteria: Individual Improvements that exceed 10% Energy Savings Energy Old Equipment New Equipment Savings' HVAC Upgrade' SEER 10 or lower SEER 14 or higher, EER 12+ over 10% HVAC Upgrade' SEER 11 SEER 16 or higher, EER 12.5+ over 10% HVAC Upgrade' SEER 12 SEER 17 or higher, EER 12.5+ over 10% 'Assumes Heating/Cooling accounts for at least 35% of total energy consumption 'Assumes blower test and required duct upgrades are included. Other categories of HVAC upgrades will need to be bundled with additional energy efficiency improvements in order to meet the residential 10% energy savings requirement. See Table below. 15 All Other Residential Energy Efficiency Upgrades: Energy Old Equipment New Equipment Savings* HVAC Upgrade SEER 11 SEER 14, EER 12+ 7.5% HVAC Upgrade SEER 11 SEER 15, EER 12+ 9.00/0 HVAC Upgrade SEER 12 SEER 14, EER 12+ 5.00/0 HVAC Upgrade SEER 12 SEER 15, EER 12+ 7.0% HVAC Upgrade SEER 12 SEER 16, EER 12.5+ 8.8% Dud Sealing' Leaks No Leaks 7% Attic Insulation' R-19 or Less R-30 or higher 7% LowE Windows' (South/West) Single Pane Dual Pane, LowE 5% Window Film' Solar Control EE Window (South/West) None Film 3% Whole House Fan' None New 2% ' Assumes Heating/Cooling accounts forat least 35%of total energy consumption 'Based on Flex your Power estimate factored by.J of minimum savings. Commercial renewable projects seeking financing that do not qualify based on HVAC and duct upgrades will be evaluated on a case by case basis. Lighting improvements will be evaluated based on equipment wattage improvements and regular business operating hour usage. Vacancy sensors and other lighting use optimization improvements will be evaluated based on SCE work paper assumptions. 16 Home Energy Ratings, Energy Audits,and Building Commissioning Explain how the proposed program will meet the home energy ratings and energy audit requirements of the California Comprehensive Residential Building Retrofit Program, including, for third tier measures under that program, providing California Home Energy Ratings or California Energy Audits, as specified by the California Home Energy Rating Program (HERS II). Describe how commercial energy audits or the investigation phase of building commissioning for commercial properties will be conducted and funded as part of the proposed program. The proposed program is geared primarily to the single-family residential market with lighter emphasis on small business. Multi-family is not targeted in the program. The program supports the objectives for Comprehensive Home Energy Audits including home energy ratings and energy audit requirements. In the residential portion of the program, the preferred approach is the Tiered approach as prescribed by the State Energy Office. The program is designed to engage customers through marketing and outreach, encourage customer investments in energy efficiency and energy audits, and provide incentives. Tier I Energy Surveys - The Tier I survey is not a HERS audit, it is primarily considered a visual inspection only, and does not require the use of a blower door, duct leakage test, an infrared camera or other test equipment. Tier I energy surveys capture essential customer information, identifies checklist type energy efficiency measures that can be easily installed, and further pre-qualifies the customers desire to participate in the financing of other energy efficiency measures. Customers are encouraged to make investments in energy efficiency regardless of their desire to participate in the financing program. The Tier I data capture will be performed using energy survey software provided by EnerPath®. Reports are generated for customers on-site in real-time, which aids with outreach effort, energy efficiency education for customers, and helps customers with decisions that support one of the key objectives of the program, "market transformation". Training of entry-level people can be accomplished in two weeks. This Home Energy Survey shall include on-site visual inspection of the energy features of the residence and documentation of its general condition, including envelope types and ages; equipment types, characteristics and ages of equipment; and appliance and fighting types and characteristics. EE opportunities such as evaporative coolers and room air conditioners are also identified in the Tier I survey. Aside from the initial program funded Tier 1 Outreach, the Tier I survey is paid for by the customer at the time of survey and includes a low-cost energy efficiency kit (1-low-flow shower head, 2 faucet aerators and 5 compact fluorescent lamps). Tier I surveys also identify measure opportunities that are supported by standard Express Efficiency Program offerings provided by SCE and The Gas Company.The customer investment in Tier I Surveys is important to the success of this program. It serves to help qualify customers early on during program enrollment period and minimizes the risk of non-qualifying customers while encouraging implementation of EE measures. It is estimated that approximately 5,000 to 6,000 Tier I surveys will be performed. Tier II & Tier III - HERSII audits are required in this phase of the program whenever financing is involved. Customers are informed that efficiency improvements that result in a minimum 10% energy reduction, or meet the requirements of eligible improvements as described in Section D, are required as a condition of[oars for any renewables such as solar. The program is designed to encourage customers to make investments HERSII audits, which can then be rebated and/or rolled into the qualified financing along with other EE measur s at the customers option. HERS Ratings and Title 24 compliance is required for all qualified projects that are nanced prior to installations for measures such as HVAC replacement, windows, insulation, etc. Non-permane, fixture items such as screw-in compact fluorescent lamps, refrigerators, washers, dryers and other appliance do not _7 qualify as part of the financing, though customers are encouraged to undertake replacement of older appliances with new Energy Starr appliances. The program seeks to perform approximately 3000+/- HERSII audits to balance the distribution of EE loans. Absent HERSII raters and providers in the area, one of the conditions of the loan qualification is that customers are required to provide their previous 12 months of electric and gas billing / utility usage history. An additional condition of the loan is that customers agree to provide at least 24 months of subsequent billing/usage history from the date of project commissioning. HERSII Raters will perform energy audits prior to Tier II or Tier III measure installations and will provide the Ratings. Specially trained Building Performance Contractors (BPI) will perform and/or supervise the installation of energy efficiency improvements working in conjunction with several specialty contractors to achieve the whole-house retrofit. Tier II and Tier III requires that customer's consent to duct testing, blower door testing, and carbon monoxide testing in addition to the whole-house audit. This testing will be performed by a BPI certified individual absent the availability of HERSII providers and raters so as to gain traction early on in the program. The California Energy Commission recognizes that the greatest opportunity for significant energy savings is through comprehensive retrofits. Careful analysis will be performed to ensure that comprehensive testing and analysis is achieved prior to investments that utilize ARRA funding. Small Commercial Since there are very effective small business direct installation programs offered by the IOU's in the State of California, this program seeks to leverage these activities with deeper dive analyses and finance measures. The segment of the program is designed to provide Energy Audits by building specialist in the areas of building envelope, space conditioning, refrigeration and food services for small commercial buildings with a list of measures that will qualify for financing including those described in the Municipal and Commercial Building Targeted Measure Retrofit Program, Section II. In addition, financing for HVAC replacement and permanent fixture replacement will be offered, but only to the extent that IOU incentives are not included. The program will be offered to owners of small businesses based on the qualification parameters described herein. The same criteria for loading order and minimum energy savings will apply as described in the residential section above, including the requirements for minimum savings achieved in order to finance renewables. All audits performed for small commercial will be conducted by a Building Performance Contractor. Commercial businesses will also be required to pay for the BPI audit, though the audit investment may be rolled into the financing for qualified customers. A pre-inspection / assessment will be performed prior to installation of any energy efficiency measures. In the event that small commercial incentives are offered by the utility, only amounts less the utility incentive may be financed for permanent fixture installations. Verification of measures is addressed in Section K below. 18 Property Qualifications Describe methods the proposed program will use to screen applicants for a basic level of creditworthiness. Explain how these methods will protect the proposed program from defaults and increase lender confidence. Applicants will be screened through a process intended to identify secure contractual assessments for the financing of energy efficient and renewable energy improvements. The process would include a title report that would be reviewed by the District's Program Administrators to check the public records and legal documents related to a property. This step in the process would safeguard the integrity of the program by determining: the names of the legal property owners and their employment status at the time they purchased the property; if the owner has or has not paid off the mortgage loan against the property; if there is any charge against the property and whether the property has any building lien on it in case an owner has not paid a contractor for work on such property. This process ensures that the Clean Energy District's loan pool will not be used to finance energy efficiency improvements on properties with numerous federal or state liens against the property. To do this, applications will be reviewed to make sure information reported within is complete and accurate. Program administrators will verify that the owner(s) own the property without federal or state income tax liens, judgment liens, or similar involuntary liens; that the property is developed and within the jurisdiction of the participating municipality and/or JPA district; that the property is not exempt from secured property taxes and that the property owner is current on property taxes. In addition the following will be verified: that the property owner is current on mortgage(s); that the property owner has declared that the property owner(s) and the property is/are not currently involved in a bankruptcy proceeding; and that the property owner has executed all declarations required in the application. In this way, the most eligible applicants will prove to be those current on all taxes and free of municipal charges. The assurance of high caliber loan recipients will increase lender confidence. As far as using the Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio as an estimator of creditworthiness, proposed improvements should not exceed 20% of the assessed value. Further, the property will be assessed on the basis of debt to market value. If more costly improvements are proposed, the program administrators may require additional information supporting both the reasonable relationship of the improvements to the property, and the information related to the ability of the property owner to repay the assessment. 19 Legal Considerations Describe current and planned progress in the legal status of, and any legal concerns regarding, the proposed program, including but not limited to resolutions or other official decisions made by Bidder's governing body regarding the proposed program and the status of future, pending, or already obtained unqualified legal opinions and validation actions. Explain how the proposed program will address mortgage provisions restricting the property owner's voluntary acceptance of the addition of a priority lien for both residential and commercial property owners. This may include requiring notification of and/or approval from the primary mortgage lender. Actions Taken The City of San Bernardino will adopt a resolution on January 4, 2010 to approve its submission of this application. Legal opinions/Validation At the earliest opportunity, the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District Program (the "Program") plans to validate the program documents, including lien priority and Constitutional issues relating to the superior lien of contractual assessments under the Program, in connection with a privately-placed limited obligation improvement bond financing pursuant to Government Code Section 53511. Such bond financing will be secured solely by contractual assessment revenues and will not close until a favorable validation judgment has been entered and the 30-day statutory appeal period has expired. The validation will afford protection for future bond financings which utilize a similar basic structure (limited obligation improvement bonds secured solely by contractual assessments), whether offered on a private-placement basis or through a public offering. Also, Bond Counsel has stated the completion of a successful validation proceeding will enable the firm to provide an unqualified legal opinion as to the validity of limited obligation improvement bonds issued to finance the Program. Mortgage Provisions In its application materials, the Program intends to provide clear and prominent disclosure as to (a) the existence of mortgage provisions that require a property owner to obtain lender consent in order to establish a lien on a senior basis to the mortgage, and (b) the resulting default under the mortgage that may occur if any required consent is not obtained. The Program will also require participating property owners to certify as to having obtained all required consents in order to participate in the Program. The provision by the property owner of an executed lender consent form may be required for property owners participating in the Program for the financing in larger amounts, to reduce the potential adverse impact of delinquencies on large assessments. However, since lenders still have the ability to declare a default and to accelerate under the mortgage documents (i.e., they still have the ability to exercise their contractual remedies), the Program does not intend to undertake the property owner's contractual obligations for them. Since contractual assessments run with the land and will survive foreclosure actions by junior lienholders, mortgage lenders can exercise their remedies without adversely affecting the lien of Program assessment contracts. Additionally, a successful validation proceeding will enable foreclosure proceedings undertaken by the Program to collect delinquent installments expeditiously, precluding lender arguments on matters protected by the validation. 20 Federal securities laws registration issues arising out of Rule 131 under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 3b-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 The Program intends to seek limited obligation improvement bond financing through private placements, as well as public offerings. As to public offerings, to ensure that registration of the assessment contracts will not be required pursuant to the "separate security" concepts of Rule 131 under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 3b- 5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Program intends to incorporate elements of governmental control over the ownership and operation of the financed improvements and to apply for and obtain no-action letter relief from the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission. Such no-action letter relief will also protect the Program and its team from SEC enforcement action for acting as unregistered underwriters or broker-dealers of unregistered securities. Prevailing Wage The Program intends to require the payment of prevailing wages to persons protected by the state law prevailing wage provisions (contractors, laborers, etc. performing actual contraction work). CEQA As set forth in Question 1 of the CEQA Compliance Attachment, the City of San Bernardino has determined pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) that adoption of the Program is not a "project' subject to the requirements of CEQA, because it is the creation of a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project. At the time that specific projects in the future may be approved for financing for the Program, additional CEQA evaluation, determinations, and actions, will be taken as necessary. 21 Sustainability Explain how the proposed program will accomplish DOE's SEP goal of strategic intervention that causes lasting changes in the market. Explain how the proposed program will jump start the effort to meet California's aggressive Energy Action Plan goals to achieve an average of 40% savings in existing California residences by 2020. The Program will include property audits that encourage the installation of Tier 2 and ultimately Tier 3 retrofits to accomplish long term transformational changes in the State's energy profile. High upfront costs, lack of funding options and inability to recover investment have been significant deterrents to the implementation of these changes in the past. As a result of the Program, property owners will be able to achieve significant savings in consumption at little upfront cost and be able to finance the improvements over time with the ability to transfer contractual assessment balances with the property upon sale. Describe the methods the proposed program will use to ensure its sustainability after ARRA funds are no longer available, including an explanation of how additional funds from the Energy Commission will aid the program to assure sustainability. Proposals that include a revolving financing fund must specify the following: The Program is being established to assure its continued operation and expansion by using ARRA funds exclusively for Program startup costs and NOT relying upon these funds for property owner funding. The Program, through its JPA structure, will be able to provide ongoing funding by accessing public and private capital markets. 1. Whether an increased interest rate will be used to sustain the revolving fund; The Program will offer rates consistent with the market at the time that financing is secured, either through public debt offering, or a warehouse line of credit. Initially, the Program anticipates securing funding equal to $39 million with additional funds provided upon 80% of funds being drawn for property owner contractual assessment. 2. How often additional capital will be infused into the revolving fund; and, The Program currently anticipates regular replenishment upon 80% of funds being drawn. Therefore, assuming an original warehouse line of $39 million, upon payment of $31.2 million of property owner loans, the fund would seek additional capital of$25 million. The timing of this replenishment will be dependent upon the speed with which the Program is able to complete audits and transition these into projects requiring funding. Based upon initial projections, the Program anticipates funding contractual assessments for the first $39 million in the first six months of the Program with additional $25 million increments being infused every 3 to 4 months. 3. What percentage of the total amount of the fund this additional capital will constitute. As a revolving fund, additional capital will continually infuse this fund. Contractual assessment repayments will ultimately pay down investor balances. Therefore, each time the additional capital is infused the percentage will increase. 22 Regional Approach The Energy Commission encourages collaboration among communities, on a county-by-county basis or through a joint powers authority,to create a larger and more effective municipal financing program. Detail the geographical scope of the proposed program, including potential population covered by the proposed program's region. Include any available information regarding expected market penetration, in terms of both percentage of the total population throughout the region and penetration within specific target populations or communities within the region. San Bernardino County is home to more than 2,000,000 residents and is the largest geographic county in the United States. According to the California Department of Finance, San Bernardino County has the fourth largest population in the State, behind only Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego. Throughout the County there are over 340,000 owner occupied homes and tens of thousands of commercial and industrial businesses that SBVCED will have the opportunity to serve. A regional approach through a joint powers authority will provide the opportunity for all cities within San Bernardino County to join the District without the upfront costs of program development and judicial validation. This approach will save hundreds of thousands of dollars and personnel hours and will create uniformity throughout the District; this uniformity is critical to ancillary benefits such as economic growth in the various industries that will serve the needs of the District, such as electrical and building contractors and product manufacturers and retailers. While the District will initially be started with the City and County of San Bernardino and the City of Redlands, every other city in San Bernardino County will be eligible and encouraged to join. The proposal anticipates penetrating 1% of the residential market and 0.4% of the commercial market with loan financed retrofits within the first two years of the Program. With the County of San Bernardino committed as a partner, the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District will serve as the single countywide program and will ensure that there are no other competing regional programs in the County. 23 Verification of Energy Savings Describe the data collection and computation methods required to calculate the energy savings and demand reductions from the targeted measure retrofits resulting from this program. Explain the activities that will be included in the program to verify the actual energy savings and demand reductions due to the retrofits. The Energy Commission will be separately evaluating the ARRA SEP Programs using contract resources. This separate program evaluation will include surveying a sample of retrofit program participants. The evaluations may be conducted via mail, phone and/or field surveys and may also require pre-retrofit and post-retrofit utility billing data. Describe the strategies included in the proposed program to encourage retrofit participants to cooperate with these ARRA SEP Program evaluations. Data Acquisition — The program will utilize rules-based software from EnerPath® to perform Tier 1 energy surveys and to acquire prospecting data related to specific measures targeted in the program. The software will gather data elements related to types and conditions of existing equipment and perform a first pass assessment of opportunities for energy efficiency investments. When a customer chooses to participate in financed Tier II and III measures, the analytical foundation for the financed home performance measure investments will be HERSII approved software which will be utilized to provide residential customers a rating for each home where HERSII audits and Tier 11 and III measures are performed. EnerPath will work to integrate data capture and reporting capabilities to report HERSII audits and analysis results. Customers with homes that are already energy efficient and simply want to participate in the renewable energy finance portion of the program will be given that opportunity, but will be required to submit kWh and peak kW savings estimates for their systems and comply with applicable renewable energy metering requirements. Computation/Calculation Methodologies— The program wilt apply three (3) methodologies for calculation and accounting for energy savings results as follows; 1) Deemed Savings from Database of Energy Efficiency Resources (DEER) 2) Deemed Savings from Utility Provided Work Papers 3) Pre and Post Billing/Usage Data The program will utilize the DEER 2008 tables and/or utility work papers to determine energy savings and demand savings for the Tier 1 product kits, tune-ups, and pool pump measures. For Whole House Tier II and III measures, HERSII audits and analysis will serve as the basis for savings calculations. In the event that targeted measures are not within the tables, we will seek approved work papers from the utility to support values related to energy and demand savings. Lastly, to validate the savings, our program will have a requirement for twelve (12) months of prior billing and usage history related to electric and gas utilities, and twenty-four (24) months post billings and usage history. This will be a mandatory requirement for financing any energy efficiency improvements. Progress reports will be made available for homeowners to encourage them to continue saving energy and power. To further encourage program participation, a program strategy has been developed, designed to support the participants in the form of a sustainability platform. Each resident will have individual access to a mini dashboard that displays energy savings as compared to the customers' historical data. Program partir pants are encouraged to access a dedicated portal, "MainStreet Efficiency", which will also be a source of edu ition and awareness of energy efficiency and conservation technologies. Participants will be contacted via p` one on a quarterly basis to gather billing/usage history and to update the database. Once the database i<_ updated, participants will be able to evaluate their performance as compared to prior months. The aggregate esults of the data will be displayed in the main area of the program reporting dashboard. 24 Participant Recruitment and Communication Explain how the proposed program will establish excellent marketing, outreach, education and information strategies that will lead to successful recruitment of participants and will communicate the program approaches so that participants will choose to make the energy improvements that are recommended for their residential, commercial or industrial buildings. Explain how the proposed program will communicate information regarding the program and will encourage participants to follow the State's loading order and move toward whole-house retrofits. Explain how the proposed program will provide marketing, outreach, education and information about the program by leveraging the combined information resources and taking maximum advantage of the access to potential participants of the following: local governments in the region covered by the proposed program; subcontractors such as turnkey services and marketing firms; utilities; and, any other organization that will be involved in marketing the proposed program. Explain what marketing, outreach, education and information methods will be used and how sub-sets of the population of potential participants will be targeted. The Program will create a communications strategy that is primarily focused on one basic question: What will motivate homeowners to invest in energy efficiency, water conservation and renewable energy retrofits to their properties? General information on the economic and environmental benefits associated with retrofits is by itself insufficient to precipitate large numbers of energy retrofits.The Program will be designed based on a more thorough understanding of property owner perceptions related to retrofit benefits and barriers. A communications plan will be developed and will include creation of a readily identifiable program "brand." The plan will detail innovative and robust public education, marketing, and outreach strategies to stimulate interest and promote wide participation. It will also be designed so that it can be readily adapted and scaled for use in multiple jurisdictions. The communications plan will include a strategy for multiple points of contact: telephone, web-based, community and neighborhood events, contractor workshops, presentations and updates to civic and business groups, use of surrogate marketing conduits such as contractors and realtors, as well as targeted in-person field contacts. All of these efforts will be coordinated with existing outreach resources, events and strategies of the participating jurisdictions and key program partners such as SCE and The Gas Company. The Program will centralize the marketing and service message with clarity to communicate to all those parties impacted by the program: participants, county assessor officials, internal city staff and contractors. Marketing, outreach and education activities would be conducted in both English and Spanish to cast a wider net for participation. The approach envisioned to facilitate widespread participation would also include a one-call oriented application process whereby all customer needs are addressed instead of an inordinately complex and lengthy pursuit. To communicate information about the program and encourage potential participants to follow the tiered approached of the State's loading order and move towards whole-house retrofits, the Clean Energy District would design eligible measures in "suite" format. A set of eligible measures would be defined based on needs of the home determined through HERS II energy surveys and based on project cost in relation to financial concerns. These defined measures would be packaged as a "suite of solutions" for the homeowner of tiers 1 through 3 in succession. The benefits of energy efficiency and conservation would be well established; a net 10% reduction of energy consumption and its impacts on an energy bill would serve as impetus to complete these initial requirements. A key strategy to ensure success both in the Program design and its implementation will be to engage a broad range of stakeholders starting early in the process and continuing throughout program implementation. The project team will develop and implement a comprehensive stakeholder engagement strategy to reach industry 25 partners, Southern California Edison, The Gas Company, other energy utilities, water and wastewater districts/agencies, individual contractors and contractor groups, building industry associations, property owner groups, green jobs training coalitions, economic development organizations, and others. Such engagement will ensure that all relevant information, insights, and perspectives are woven into the design and implementation of the Program. The participating stakeholders will also be regularly involved and informed of program goals, progress, and results.The team will engage the contractor community early in the design process to understand the incentives and barriers to contractor participation in the process. The Program will take advantage of the opportunity to engage property owners though their interface with contractors as a result of home improvement, repair, or remodeling decisions. 26 Program Cost Effectiveness Determine the cost effectiveness of the proposal program by converting the estimated energy savings of the program to source BTU S4 and dividing by the amount of requested ARRA SEP funds, showing and justifying the calculations. Compare to the DOE and ARRA goal of 30 million source BTUs saved per $1,000 of SEP money spent. Explain why the requested funds are appropriate, relative to the goals and objectives of the proposed program. Justify the amount requested funds based on the resultant value to the state such as the number and type of jobs created, energy savings, demand reductions and sustainable market change. 4 Electric energy saved shall be converted to source BTUs by multiplying kWh by 10,239 BTU/kWh. The requested $2,750,000 SEP grant for this program is highly appropriate in light of the tremendous potential for increased energy efficiency in San Bernardino County and the very significant positive economic impacts that can result from the program. The program's goals are ambitious, namely to retrofit approximately 1% of the residential properties within the participating communities. The program's projected 2,145 retrofits will involve nearly $39 million in private investment supported through the AB811 financing made available through this program. This high level of investment is projected to create approximately 458 jobs, primarily in local construction labor, but also in supporting occupations throughout the mostly California-based supply chain as well as through indirect jobs in local services created through the increased demand from those new primary wage earners. Electricity demand reduction is important to San Bernardino County and its serving investor owned utilities: Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company. The area is served primarily by far-remote generating plants subject to periodic service interruptions. In addition, the County's growing population exerts an increasing demand for power that strains the capacities of the serving transmission lines during peak demand periods. The proposed program would reduce that demand by approximately 4.1 MW, which will make a critically important positive impact on service reliability during peak demand days. This program will serve as a model for other California counties as well as for cities and counties outside of California. It will transform the local market for home energy upgrades by enhancing public awareness and understanding of the benefits as well as contractor capabilities to deliver high quality projects. The proposed program is anticipated to expand and continue beyond the three year grant period as more and more San Bernardino County cities decide to participate thereby deepening and sustaining the residential and commercial building energy reductions and positive economic impacts from a growing home performance industry into the future. The estimated project energy savings as follows. The program's goals of at least 20% energy savings will be met by retrofitting 2,000 residential and 145 commercial properties. The average retrofit investment per property is estimated to be $16,000 per residence and $48,000 per business. The annual program energy saved is shown in the following chart: Program Annual Energy Saved source electricity natural gas (million (million TOTAL energy BTUs) BTUs) (million BTUs) 89,171 10,935 100,106 27 With a total proposed Program SEP grant of $2.75 million, the proposed program projects a yield of 36 million BTU per $1000. This exceeds the CEC/ARRA requirement of 10 million BTU per $1000. In addition to the cost- effectiveness of the CEC-SEP funds employed, the Program's projected 2,145 retrofits will involve nearly $39 million in private investment, largely supported through AB811 financing. This high level of investment is projected to create approximately 424 jobs, reduce CO2e by 6,270 metric tons, with an associated average annual per unit decrease in KWh, KW and therms as shown below. rogram Program CO2e Jobs Average Average Program 3nnual annual avoided created annual annual annual kWh W therms (metric (from kWh/unit therms/unit saved aved saved tons) Loans) Residential 2,870 35 6,650,000 3,035 105,000 4,788 348 Commercial 14,200 30 ,059,000 046 4,350 1,482 76 Total ,060 5 709,000 ,081 109,350 6,270 424 The complete Program Cost Effectiveness analysis can be found attached to the proposal as Appendix A. 28 Quality Assurance/Conformance with California Law Explain how the proposed program will ensure that installation of energy improvements will be completed in conformance with California law: The program is designed to utilize independent resources for the purpose of quality assurance, verification and inspection of work being completed. Construction elements of the program, including all measure installations, will be performed in accordance with California laws in addition to meeting any requirements of local laws. All construction activities will be overseen by the programs' General Contractor who will be responsible for inspecting work and providing completion documents to the Buildings and Safety Department for each City where installation of energy improvements have taken place. 1. How the proposed program will ensure that building permits have been pulled for the work, and that Contractors are in good standing with the Contractors State License Board. All contractors and subcontractors, including specialty contractors, will be required to register through eVerify and will include all personnel performing work on the program in compliance with ARRA and State guidelines. Contractors must have valid licenses for work being performed and be in good standing through the Contractors State License Board. Each contractor, subcontractor and specialty contractor shall be required to maintain good standing as a condition of work being performed in the program. Verification of these criteria shall be performed on a quarterly basis by the program administrator. Contractors shall also be required to meet minimum requirements for insurances and bonding, where applicable. Subcontractors will be required to pull permits for certain energy efficiency improvements prior to any installation activity. Once permits have been pulled, contractors will be authorized to perform the work. When the work is completed, contractor shall provide a notice of completion to the general contractor with signed "completion document". The completion document needs to be signed by both the contractor who performed the work and the customer. The general contractor's inspector will inspect the work to ensure that the work was performed in compliance with State and local laws, and that the equipment is operating to manufacturers specifications. Once satisfied, the inspector shall sign-off and provide the completion document to the City for final inspection and sign-off. 2. How the proposed program will ensure that the California Building Energy Efficiency Standards requirements for alterations to existing buildings are met for each building project and will coordinate with HERS Providers and Raters, other Energy Auditors/Raters, and Commissioning Providers to ensure that required field verification and diagnostic testing is completed. All projects including alterations to existing buildings shall be performed in compiiance with the requirements of California Title 24. Program Guidelines will delineate the general requirements for conformance and shall be provided to all contractors, HERS Providers and Raters, Energy Auditors and Commissioning Providers performing work in the program. In addition, the program administrator shall coordinate and provide a program overview and orientation for various stakeholders to help ensure understanding of the program requirements as it relates to Title 24. Building & Safety Departments for each city shall be responsible for ensuring compliance. Diagnostics testing shall be required for all residential projects, which shall include blower door, duct blast testing and sealing. At a minimum HERS Raters, under the preview of HERS Providers and/or BPI certified inspectors will perform and provide the test results. A HERS level test-in should be performed in any instance that financing is required and in any instance that the customer requests this level of testing to be done (testing fees may be associated). Testing of a home should identify potential energy upgrades as well as safety hazards. 29 In any home where air or duct sealing, insulation installation, or HVAC retrofit have been performed a test-out will be required to assess the after-scenario and insure that no safety hazards exist as well as to assess the demonstrable energy savings accomplished by the retrofit activities. 3. How the proposed program will ensure and demonstrate the quality of installed energy improvements (both energy efficiency and onsite renewable generation). Program Guidelines shall specify quality metrics for installed energy improvements including the use of EnergyStar® rated products. All products must meet minimum safety and rating compliances such as UL®, ETL®, etc. Any and all hazardous materials removed must be disposed of or recycled in compliance with State and Federal laws. Recycling of packaging materials and other materials will also be encouraged. For renewable such as solar, utility customers participating in the California Solar Initiative (CSI) program are required to install performance meters to determine the gross energy generated by their equipment. 4. What quality assurance procedures will be undertaken to maintain the cost-effectiveness, energy savings and reputation of the program. All contractors and subcontractors, including specialty contractors, will be required to conform to Program guidelines to ensure that the highest levels of quality standards and customer satisfaction are being met. Cost effectiveness will be determined based on; 1) the team's knowledge and understanding of proven and practical technologies that meet certain criteria, 2) established special pricing arrangements (SPA'S) negotiated with J specialty manufacturers to establish economies of scale for certain measure installations, and 3) competitive pricing based on measure labor cost from local contractors in the market. The program will establish specification criteria for many of the measures including considerations for manufacturer warrantees and will validate various energy savings performance metrics represented by measures. S. How the proposed program will coordinate with HERS Providers and Raters to ensure that HERS Phase II procedures are followed for whole-house retrofits. All homes requiring financing will be provided with a HERS rating per HERSII standards. The rating will be done using HERS approved software and will show the current energy of the house and the proposed measures as well as the cost-effectiveness of the proposed measures. A report with a HERS score will be provided to the homeowner prior to implementation of measures and will be used in evaluation of financing mechanisms. All retrofits will be done in accordance with HERSII and Title 24 standards. 6. How the program will ensure that measures are installed by well qualified Contractors, including training and certification consistent with Home Performance with Energy Star Guidelines. Participating contractors will need to qualify to participate in the program and in some cases may not have as much experience in the energy efficiency space. Because a key objective of the program is market transformation, including workforce development, it be will necessary to perform more detailed inspections of the work early on in the program to ensure that quality performance standards are being satisfied, In addition, training will be required for participating contractors including certification consistent with BPI, HERS and HERSII. Ongoing training will be offered throughout the program to ensure a quality of work consistent with Home Performance with Energy Star Guidelines. 30 10 Provide details on the methods included in the program design to assure that commercial retrofit measures are installed properly and functioning efficiently. The Energy Commission encourages Bidders to define, implement and fine-tune acceptance test methods for the retrofit measures. Many of the same requirements for contractor compliance will be employed for commercial as is defined in the residential sections of our proposal. Contractors will need to pre-qualify and will have to accept "program guidelines" built around commissioning, quality controls and verification. Title 24 Code Compliance will also apply for installation of energy efficiency improvements along with standard requirements and local compliance for permits. For HVAC replacement, duct test and seal throughout the envelope will be required along with test- in and test out results. Commissioning reports will also be required detailing the test results. Customers will be encouraged to implement HVAC measures that utilize variable air volume systems, wireless controls and fault detection so that continuous monitoring of system performance is maintained. 31 Team Organizational Structure Describe the organizational structure of the program, and provide an organizational chart of the entire program team. Provide a short description of each subcontractor and partner, and explain their specific role in the program. Describe the relationship between the Bidder, subcontractors and partners. Summarize any history of working relationships between the team members, noting any significant success stories. Identify the location of the Bidder's, subcontractors' and partners' business locations and discuss methods of minimizing costs to the State. Identify a primary contact person for the program. Describe any technical capabilities that would facilitate communicating with the Energy Commission and managing the program (e.g.,web conferencing, web portal for document management and team collaboration). The San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District (SBVCED) is a true consortium of public, private and nongovernmental partners. The attached organizational chart outlines the roles and responsibilities of each partner. Representatives from the three founding governmental agencies, the City of San Bernardino, the County of San Bernardino and the City of Redlands will represent the Board of Directors for SBVCED; as additional cities join the District, they will be entitled to a position on the Board. The City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency will act as Program Administrator, The San Bernardino Economic Development Agency (SBEDA) is a full service Agency that currently administers the City's Housing, Community Development Block Grant, and Neighborhood Stabilization Program, as well as its Redevelopment Agency and Economic Development initiatives. The presence of the existing housing and low income programs will compliment the activities of the District. With a staff of over 30 the SBEDA has the in- house financial and accounting capabilities to monitor expenditures, revenues, prepare progress reports, etc. for both grant and program administration. The City of San Bernardino has partnered on several occasions with most of the partners in this proposal. Since 2004, the City of San Bernardino has participated in the Community Energy Partnership (CEP), a collaboration between ten Southern California cities, Southern California Edison, The Gas Company and The Energy Coalition. Its mission is to build positive relationships among cities, energy consumers, and their serving utilities to educate r communities about sustainable energy efficient practices. In 2007, the City of San Bernardino and the Community Energy Partnership partnered on the Little League Baseball & Softball Western Region Energy Efficient Makeover Demonstration Project. This project included facility audits, energy efficiency retrofits, education to the staff and community. The project resulted in a 20% reduction in electricity bills and a 40% reduction in natural gas bills since the installation was completed in December 2008. The Energy Coalition (TEC) is a southern California 501(c)3 non-profit corporation founded in the 1970s to mobilize, educate, inform and empower communities to change the way they use and think about energy and other resources. For more than thirty years, TEC has pioneered innovative concepts within the energy sector by forging partnerships between local governments, utilities, businesses, schools, community-based organizations, and other constituencies. TEC is a proven leader in implementing comprehensive and integrated approaches to address energy, resource management, greenhouse gas reduction, and sustainable development issues within our partner cities. Over the past five years, TEC's award-winning, cross-cutting marketing and outreach programs successfully reduced energy usage and provided more than 10,000 energy efficiency retrofits of homes and small businesses across southern California. TEC continues to offer cu-tomized solutions to meet unique regional needs and providing leadership to promote more sustainable >e of energy and natur resources by California communities. Clean Energy Advocates, Inc. (CEA) is a municipal financial advisory firm that focus on financing solutions f r energy efficiency, clean and renewable energy programs. As the Financial Advist -,, ZEA will work with Let 32 Counsel to establish the joint powers authority (1PA) to assure appropriate structuring for debt funding through either public or private capital markets. CEA will prepare standardized financing parameters for inclusion in each participating city/jurisdiction's adoption documents to assure their ability to access funding through the JPA. Additionally, CEA will provide oversight and documentation of all required property audits and certifications prior to the release of funding. CEA will also provide Program financial oversight that will include: analysis of funding options; identification of required contractual assessment terms and conditions; work with Legal Counsel to appropriately draft bond documents for validation of the Program; modeling, structuring and securitizing of contractual assessments to public and/or private investors; work with the County to assure correct assessments to participating property-owners; and provide ongoing assistance, reporting and analysis to original and new participating jurisdictions. EnerPath is a world-class company providing the most efficient and effective systems and services for driving successful energy efficient programs by combining wireless mobile applications with a web-based enterprise processing, analysis, work-flow management and reporting system. Program performance is enhanced via real- time status reporting that enables management to take quick corrective and/or optimizing action and insures the highest level of program performance. EnerPath services a wide range of clients that include small business, industrial, health care, education, hospitality sectors, and federal and local governments. Its primary focus is mass market energy efficiency and weatherization programs for utility companies and government agencies. When it comes to delivery of projects and programs, EnerPath also has a unique advantage. This is due to its program management software and industry standard wireless handheld devices for controlling audits and all field operations and transactions. EnerPath was recently awarded the City of Redlands Green Action Award for the company's work to help homeowners and businesses become more energy efficient. The NECA & IBEW Labor Management Cooperation Committee (LMCC) is a partnership of the Southern Sierras Chapter of the National Electrical Contractors Association and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Unions 440 and 477. It is a non-profit organization established through the collective bargaining agreement devoted to promoting the Union Electrical Construction Industry through advertising, promotion, publicity, continuing education, and a wide range of services to both Union and Management members. LMCC will be the program's workforce training advisor providing training courses in electrical pre-apprenticeship, energy audits and lighting retrofits. These training courses will provide the opportunity for new job creation opportunities as well as professional career development for journeymen. While the geographic location of the various partners in the proposal are spread throughout southern California, through the use of the internet and a web portal provided by EnerPath, the team has the ability to have web conferences with audio connectivity as well as document management capabilities. This streamlining of data management allows for efficient use of the team members time. Casey Dailey from the City of San Bernardino will be the Program Contact throughout the life of the Program. 33 PROGRAM ORGANIZATIONAL CHART San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District Board of Directors Legal Counsel: Program Administrator: Richards,Watson& San Bernardino Economic Gershon Development Agency Financial Advisor: Energy Efficiency Advisors: Marketing,Outreach& Workforce Advisor: Clean Energy Advocates EnerPath Education:The Energy San Bernardino Community Coalition College District Center for Excellence& NECA`IBEW: Labor Management Coop. Cmte. 34 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND JOB CREATION r Provide a formula-based estimate of jobs created by the proposed program. Describe each of the types of jobs expected to be created or retained by the proposed program. Provide an estimate of the number of direct jobs expected to be created based on the labor requirements for the proposed audits and retrofits as well as the direct jobs required to deliver the Scope of Work, including but not limited to program marketing and participant recruitment, training of all persons involved in delivering services,and other job-creating program components. Describe the proposed approach to training Contractor staff, auditors, retrofit technicians and other professionals, as appropriate and if applicable, to implement the proposed program. Explain the coordination planned with the Green lobs Training Program, utility training centers, HERS Providers and other existing and emerging workforce development efforts across the state to bring entry-level workers into the energy efficiency and distributed renewable retrofit workforce and provide new job skills to professional tradespeople. Based on the Council of Economic Advisors Estimates of Job Creation from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the total number of jobs created using all SEP funding, EECBG funding and leveraged funds from the issuance of mini bonds is estimated at approximately 458 newly created direct jobs. As the program matures and grows, and as more mini bonds are issued, the total number of jobs will continue to grow even after all of the SEP funding has been expended. For every $20 million bond issuance, there are an estimated 217 jobs created. Given the success of other municipal financing programs, it is anticipated that there will be a significant pent up demand for the services offered by SBVCED. As such, it is anticipated that the creation or retention of jobs directly related to the services offered by SBVCED will expedited as soon as the Program is operating. All of the workforce training opportunities that will accompany the SBVCED Program will catalyze the local workforce that has been significantly distressed as the national recession and housing crisis has hit this region especially hard. San Bernardino County has an extremely well positioned workforce in the various industries likely to be impacted by the Program. A recent study conducted by the San Bernardino Community College District's Centers of Excellence, titled "The Green Economy: Industries & Jobs in San Bernardino County' identified six major sectors within the economy that are either: 1) aimed at utilizing resources more efficiently, providing renewable sources of energy, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, or otherwise minimizing the environmental impact or 2) occupations that directly work with policies, information, materials and/or technologies that contribute to minimizing environmental impact and require specialized knowledge, skills, training or experience in those areas. The study found that there are over 134,000 employees in 15,687 businesses working within those classifications based on the NAICS code. Those classification codes include specialty trade contractors, commercial and industrial building construction, plumbing, heating and air-conditioning contractors, engineering services or electrical contractors. These are existing jobs and businesses located in San Bernardino County that will directly benefit by the SBVCED Program. As part of the California Clean Energy Workforce Training Program (CEWTP) the San Bernardino Community College District is implementing a project that will recruit, train, and place 200 residents into green building apprenticeships or employment, by providing 400 hours of customized training in environmental literacy, green building, energy fundamentals, retrofits and energy efficiency, water efficiency, solar installation and design, basic skills, and workplace readiness. This training program will prepare San Bernardino County residents for four career pathways/occupations: 1) Building Performance Retrofitting Specialists, 2) Energy Auditors or Home Energy Raters, 3) Resource Conservation or Energy Efficiency Managers, and 4) Solar PV/Thermal Installers. Center of Excellence research indicates these key occupations have a 3-year projected growth totaling over 1,470 additional jobs within the region. The San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District will coordinate its training activities with the San Bernardino Community College District to facilitate a cross collaboration approach and ensure the most effective use of resources possible. In addition to the training provided through CEWTP, the NECA-IBEW Labor Management Cooperative Committee offers training courses in electrical pre- apprenticeship, energy audits and lighting retrofits. These training courses will provide the opportunity for new job creation opportunities as well as professional career development for journeymen. 35 Energy. Peak Demand. and GHG Emissions Reductions Document, explain and justify the estimates of electricity savings, natural gas savings and peak demand reductions expected from the proposed program. The Energy Commission will use California specific emission factors to calculate the greenhouse gas emission reductions expected from the energy savings estimates provided by the Bidder. The Bidder does not need to provide estimates of the GHG emission reductions from the proposed program. Residential Measures: Conceptually, the two tier approach will generate energy savings through a combined approach, the Tier 1 savings will result from outreach surveys and home efficiency "kit" applications. These Tier 1 surveys serve to provide leads for financed program participation and provide valuable face time with the residential customers to answer questions about the financing program and increase awareness of energy efficiency in general. The energy and demand savings for this portion will be significant due to the amount of homes reached, but small on a per home basis due to the limited scope of measures involved. Savings estimates for the energy efficiency kit application are included on the following page. Tier 11 and III measures will provide the bulk of the program energy savings on a per home basis and it is estimated that initial financing amounts would service approximately 2000 homes. The energy and demand impacts of these efforts are forecast and tabulated in Section "M" - Program Cost Effectiveness and are summarized below. It is important to note that these savings estimate are somewhat conservative and do not include potential synergies that can arise from conducting a whole house building analysis that which may lead to the ability to actually down-size the air conditioning system. This "tunneling through the cost barrier" will be an element of the program which may lead to significant additional savings through right sizing AC unit replacements. It is expected that HERSII analysis will update estimated kWh, kW and Therm savings for this program and will be documented on a per project basis. Residential Tier 1 Outreach savings estimates from Energy Efficiency kits. Savings from Tier 1 Outreach Surveys and EE Kits Average Average Average kWh Peak kW Therm Activity Savings Savings Savings Residential Outreach and EE Kit' 182 0.018 12 Total Savings for 5000 Kits 910,000 90 60,000 'Savings Based on DEER Estimates and/or EE filings for Residential Kit Components. Savings estimates for Tier 1 measures are derived from the residents applying measures in an introductory energy efficiency kit which will be distributed by the Tier 1 outreach survey personnel at the time of the survey. The application of the kit which includes several compact fluorescent lamps as described in section M, 2 faucet aerators and an economical low flow showerhead are estimated to produce the savings above. Savings for the kit applications have been derived from DEER and/or EE program filings. 36 Residential Tier 2-3 Measure savings projections for AB811 financed upgrades: Residential Energy Savings Loan E uipment Distribution kWh KW Therms Average Average Average %HH HH Total HH Total HH Total %of Energy Energy Residential Energy Residential Energy Residential Loans #of HH Savings Savings Savings Savings' Savings Savings` Savings Solar only' S% 100 75% 6,000 600,000 3.7 366 0 Solar+HVAC' 15% 300 75% 6,000 1,800,000 3.7 1,098 0 Solar+Other EE 109/ 200 75% 6,000 1,200,000 3.7 732 45 9,000 HVAC only` 30% 600 19% 1,500 900,000 0.7 420 0 HVAC+Other EE 30% 600 23% 1,840 1,104,000 0.7 420 45 27,000 Other EEa SO% 200 8.5% 680 136,000 0.0 0- 4' 9,000 TOTAL 100% 2,000 36% 2,870 5,740,000 1.5 3,035 23 45,000 'Assumed 25%of residential loans would include solar. Estimated solar would reduce 75%of electric consumption of average 8,000 kWh. Solar only households already made prior EE upgrades above 10%threshold. For other households,HVAC or other EE upgrades were assumed to be needed to meet 10%reduction requirement which provided the same 75%level of savings as Solar only households. 2 kWh savings modeled using the Summit Blue 2007 calculations presented in"Savings uncertainties in Residential Air Conditioning Rebate Programs"by Rachel Freeman for upgrading SEER 10/EER 9 to SEER 14/EER12. s Other EE energy savings are considered to be partially offset by HVAC upgrade,so full estimated 8.5%savings wererestated to contribute 4%incrementally. 'Other EE energy efficiency upgrades include EE windows,window film,attic/wall insulation,and duct sealing. See Table 'Solar KW based on kWh savings converted to KW system assuming 1,640 hours(4.5 hours/day). HVAC KW based on calculation stated in note 2 above. Deatiled HVAC analysis is provided in Table. 6 Estimated 8.5%therm savings for Other EE upgrades of EE windows,window film,attic/wall insulation,and duct sealing of total 450 household therms. Detailed information presented in Table Commercial Measures: Commercial buildings savings are also summarized below. It is important to note that savings estimates have been derived for Tier II and III measures exclusively as SCE currently offers a direct install program for highly efficient lighting retrofits. This program will seek to leverage that program to insure that small businesses tap into those savings programs as well. In essence Tier 1 efficiency improvements can be considered leveraged benefits for this program and the team will work closely with the serving IOU to obtain reports of savings estimated for those efforts. Below, please find a delineation of the savings for the Commercial efficiency component of the program that will be financed by AB811 Funds: 37 Commercial Energy Savings Loan Equipme nt Distribution kWh KW Therms Average Average Average %Bus Bus Total Bus Total BUS Total %of Energy Energy Commercia Energy Commercial Energy Commercial Loans k of Bus Savings Savings I Savings Savings Savings Savings6 Savings Solar only' 5% 7 75% 30,000 217,500 18.3 132 - Solar+HVAC' 15% 22 75% 30,000 652,500 18.3 397 - Solar+OtherEE' 10% 15 75% 30,000 435,000 18.3 265 50 725 HVAConly' 20% 29 12% 4,800 139,200 1.4 41 - HVAC+OtherEE' 30% 44 26% 10,400 452,400 3.5 151 50 2,175 Other EE° 200A 29 14% 5,600 162,400 2.1 60 50 1,450 TOTAL 100% 145 36% 14,200 2.059.000 7.2 1,046 30 4,350 'Assumed 25%of commercial loans would include solar. Estimated solar would reduce 75%of electric consumption of average business energy consumption of 40,000 kWh. Solar Only business were assumed to have already made EE upgrades above 10% threshold. HVAC or other EE upgrades were assumed to be needed to meet 10%reduction requirement and reach the same 75%energy savings level as Solar Only business. 'Assumed two 3 Ton AC unit upgraded from SEER 10 to SEER 14,operating 3,000 hours. Used conservative kWh and KW savings based on Summit Blue 2007 calculations presented in"Savings Uncertainties in Residential Air Conditioning Rebate Programs"by Rachel Freeman. More information in Table . 'Since 80%of Other EE is fighting upgrades,energy savings were combined for HVAC and Other EE. Other EE energy efficiency upgrades include EE lighting and duct retrocommi ss i oni ng. See table s Solar KW based on kWh savings converted to KW system assuming 1,640 hours(4.5 hours/day). HVAC KW based on calculation stated in note 2 above and in HVAC table. 6 Estimated 10%therm savings for Duct Retrocommissioning,representing 20%of0ther EE upgrades. Other Duct work is included within HVAC energy savings. Details on Commercial Other EE is presented in Table 38 Economically Disadvantaged Areas Economically disadvantaged areas are those that have unemployment rates that are higher than the statewide average, based on data from the Employment Development Department Labor Market Information Division, for the month of June 2009. Applicants should compare the unemployment rates for the region covered by their proposed program compared to that of other areas of the state and the statewide average unemployment rate. Unemployment rates for areas within a region may be considered if the proposal explains how the proposed program will place emphasis on those areas. Other characteristics of economically disadvantaged areas, such as high foreclosure rates and low income levels, may also be considered if explained in the proposal. Explain the extent to which the proposed program is targeted to create jobs and enhance the economy in economically disadvantaged areas of the state that have been particularly impacted by California's housing and economic crisis. Explain how the proposed program will coordinate with and leverage affordable housing and neighborhood stabilization programs to bring not only the energy bill savings, but also the improved comfort, indoor air quality, and safer and quieter home environments resulting from deeper retrofits to under-served, economically disadvantaged populations. San Bernardino County has been hit extremely hard by the nationwide economic recession. As one of the fastest growing regions in the nation, the Inland Empire experienced some of the highest appreciation rates in residential real estate values and served as a significant driving force for new development. With the collapse of the housing market, not only did foreclosure rates soar with over 5,000 foreclosures in the City of San Bernardino alone in the past two years, unemployment did as well due to the large number of construction and contracting jobs associated with residential development. According to the California Employment Development Department Labor Market Information Division, as of June 2009, the unemployment rate for San Bernardino County was 13.6%, while the statewide average for unemployment was 11.69%. In Southern California, San Bernardino County has a disproportionately higher unemployment than some of the neighboring counties including: Orange County with 9.2%, San Diego County with 10.1% and Los Angeles County with 11.4%. It is these very employment sectors that will benefit the most from SBVCED; the program provides an opportunity to be re-trained in a similar skill set allowing displaced workers to compete and succeed in the new green economy. With NECA/IBEW as the Program's workforce development advisor and the workforce training they are already providing to electrical contractors, immediate training and job creation opportunities will exist through SBVCED. Coordination with Existing Housing Programs Through the City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency's Neighborhood Stabilization Program, affordable housing programs and other residential and commercial beautification programs, the SBVCED will coordinate energy efficiency improvements to leverage investments being made across various housing programs. For example, the costs of performing the energy audits and improvements will be subsidized using the 20% set aside funds required by California Redevelopment Law to low and moderate income individuals in the City of San Bernardino. Additionally, as homes are purchased through the NSP efforts, energy efficiency improvements will be made prior to the home being resold. These coordination efforts with existing housing programs will not only leverage those resources, but also bring down the energy bill, improve the comfort, indoor air quality and create a safer home environment for the under-served and economically disadvantaged populations, such as those found in the cities of San Bernardino County. The potential for expansion of the Program is possible through future incorporation of these cities. The SBVCED will present the attractive option of leveraging the HUD programs already in existence in these surrounding jurisdictions, such as the HOME Investment Partnership, Healthy Homes Initiative, the Community Development Block Grant program and Public Housing Capital Grant programs. Through leveraging Commission dollars with recurrent funding streams from HUD, the sustainability of the District can be established with more efficacy and lead to greater benefits as the economies of scale appear en masse. 39 TIME CRITICALITY Demonstrate that the requested ARRA SEP funding will be expended to complete all planned energy retrofits by March 31, 2012. Document the proposed plans to monitor implementation progress so that program resources can be adjusted as necessary to achieve the proposed retrofit savings by the March 2012 deadline. Provide a schedule from start of contract (assume start date of January 1, 2010) to March 31, 2012, that delineates progress reports, Critical Program Reviews and other program milestones. Include information and/or evidence that support this schedule. Provide details that establish certainty that progress reports will be provided and Critical Program Reviews will be conducted so that resources can be reallocated by July 1, 2010, if necessary. Since ARRA SEP funding will not be used by the Program to fund energy retrofits and will be used to create the program from which these retrofits will be made, it will be much easier to ensure the entire funding is used by March 31, 2012. This funding will provide the necessary resources to build a robust administrative, processing, reporting, and funding infrastructure that is expects to start funding loans by October 1, 2010. The Program has several mechanisms by which to monitor implementation progress. The first is through the use of monthly progress reports. Monthly progress will be monitored according to the schedule of deliverables and due dates. In addition to this, Critical Program Reviews will be conducted according to the schedule established by the CEC. The following matrix provides a summary of tasks and their expected timing for the first six months of the award period. 40 Jaek Apr- Ma>r10 Jun.. Aug.iG Sep-70 Oct- Kick-off Meeting CPR Meetings Final Meeting - - Monthly Progress Reports Identify&Obtain Leverage Funds Tool Development - Framework Integration Tools _ Property Owner Tools City/County Tools EE/RE Tools Funding Application Tools Tracking Tools _ Jurisdiction Establishment 1PA Creation Contractual Assessment Areas Created Financing Documents City/County financing documents 1PA financing documents Approval of financing documents Legal Validation Validation action filed Emerge from legal validation Program Design Program Framework/Participants Indentified _ Program Financing Plan Technical Standards&Guidelines Program Operations Manual Market Research&Analysis Program Implementation&Operations Program Marketing Plan Program Incentive Execution Plan County/City Partner Education Website Launch Marketing Outreach,Audits&Installs Data Collection Resources Established Workforce Training Modules and Coordination Software&Reporting Contracts Secured Conferences booth and scheduling Program Funds Established Revolving Loan Fund financing secured Reserve Fund established Incentive Fund established Reporting Related Program Related 41 Program Transparency and Reporting Explain how the Bidder will comply with the transparency and reporting requirements of the Federal Government, State of California, Energy Commission, ARRA, and DOE for SEP programs. Provide details on how the Bidder will enforce these transparency and reporting requirements for sub recipients and vendors. Describe the proposed methods to collect project performance data, compute key project metrics, transfer data to the Energy Commission, and publish project results. Explain how the Bidder's methods are designed to be flexible enough to meet probable changes to known tracking and reporting requirements for ARRA SEP programs. Describe the financial and accounting processes and procedures the Bidder will use to safeguard ARRA SEP funds from fraud, misuse and waste. Bidders that are awarded SEP funds must implement adequate financial and accounting processes and procedures to safeguard ARRA SEP from fraud, misuse and fraud. The Energy Commission is informed that it will likely be audited by both the State and DOE. As part of these audits an awarded bidder's contract may also be audited. Attachment 11 lists the elements of a program that could be considered as part of audit. This list is provided by way of example only and is NOT exhaustive of the elements or the type of information that could be considered as part of an audit. The program will comply with the accepted principals and reporting requirements under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Specifically, under Section 1512 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Public Law 111-5—Grants, Cooperative Agreements and Loans, program administrators shall ensure strict compliance with transparency and oversight requirements. A program database specific to the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District Program will enable the Office of Inspector General (OIG), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the California Energy Commission (CEC) and the US Department of Energy (DOE)to access all records, reports, audits, reviews, documents, papers, recommendations, or other materials related to program and operations. As required by the State Energy Program Guidelines adopted on September 30, 2009 the Program Administrator will provide, upon request, copies of all consultant contracts, description of theroles of all parties involved in the Program, all publicly available legal opinions and judicial validation decisions, results of market research/surveys, detailed accounting of program startup and ongoing staffing, marketing and other continuing program costs, aggregate details of financing, details of bonds sold, progress reports and program reports. In addition, the Program is flexible in data collection and storage so any additional changes or requirements can be easily incorporated. Data will be collected in the field and processed by a server where a report will be generated and furnished to the customer at the time of audit. The server will collect and maintain data that can be used to generate measurements for program metrics, including but not limited to: kilowatt demand reduction, kilowatt hour saving, therm savings, water savings, green jobs created and CO2 emissions reduced. Reports can be created using a variety of parameters and can be aggregated on many different levels, including by individual jurisdiction or by aggregating the entire district as well as by different timeframes: monthly, yearly, etc. This data is readily and easily transferrable to the CEC using a CSV file or exporting the information to an excel spreadsheet. The information will also be tracked using the Program Dashboard furnished by EnerPathg software. The information will be published at each level of program participation. At the customer level, homeowners will be given a report at the time of audit. At the sub-JPA level, each municipal g vernment will be given a Bess to the Program Dashboard that reports key program metrics to track progress. .t the 1PP. level, Progran ashboard will be published for review by the Board of Directors. This information w also be published to all icipating partner websites. 42 The software furnished by EnerPath® for program implementation is designed to adjust to different jurisdictions and programmatic needs. The software can function at many different levels of detail and shall prove fully responsive in the case of any changes to known tracking and reporting requirements for ARRA SEP programs. The City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency will ensure the strictest financial and accounting processes and procedures to safeguard ARRA SEP funds from fraud, misuse and waste. These processes include setting up a specific fund within the financial management software to track all expenditures and revenues associated with the Program. Documentation will be open for review and all major decisions will be shared with community partners. As Program Administrator, the City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency is experienced in fulfilling the extensive reporting requirements of various awarded federal, state and local funding streams. All income and expenditures will be tracked; all financial records will be maintained in accordance with accounting practices required under Section 1512 of ARRA 2009 and the requirements of the State of California. The program administrators will coordinate with the Contract Officer from the Energy Commission to report on the use of funds 10 days after the end of each quarter. Program administrators will be responsible for completing the project according to the approved plans and specifications and will manage all records of subcontractors or subgrantees. OProgram Team Qualifications and Experience Document the program team's qualifications for conducting a highly effective program that will meet the goals, objectives and strategies identified in this solicitation,and performing the tasks described in the Scope of Work. Describe the nature and scope of prior work that is related to the goals, objectives, and strategies of this solicitation and tasks in the Scope of Work. List all Bidder staff, Subcontractor staff and partners, including those who are not anticipated to receive ARRA funding, and describe their roles in completing each task. Provide job classifications, relevant experience, education, academic degrees, and professional licenses of these staff. Provide a current resume for all team members. Identify the percentage of time each team member will be available throughout the contract. Describe their familiarity with the administration, management,and their technical expertise in meeting the goals,objectives and strategies of the solicitation and performing pertinent tasks identified in the Scope of Work. The program team consists of the following members according to specialization*: Program Managers- Casey Dailey—Assistant to the Mayor, City of San Bernardino Danielle Garcia —Project Specialist, City of Redlands Program Financial Advisor- Laura Franke—Principal, Clean Energy Advocates Tony Haske—Vice President, Clean Energy Advocates Program Energy Partners - Stephen Guthrie—CEO, EnerPath Jonathan Baty—Vice President,Technology, EnerPath Steven Meyers—Vice President, Strategy, EnerPath Craig Perkins—Executive Director, The Energy Coalition Mark Fleming— Director of Special Projects, The Energy Coalition Program Legal Counsel - Richards, Watson, &Gershon Law Firm Complete Resume's of Key Team Members can be found as Appendix F. Casey Dailey and the City of San Bernardino serve as the lead and primary applicant respectively with regard to the creation and implementation of the SBVCED. Casey Dailey currently serves as Assistant to the Mayor in the City of San Bernardino. His responsibilities include transportation, land use development, environmental sustainability and legislative & intergovernmental affairs. Some of his current projects include the $190 million sbX Bus Rapid Transit Project, the $170 million San Bernardino Multi Modal Transit Center, development of a Citywide Transit Oriented Development Overlay District and the planning and implementation of the City of San Bernardino's $1,954,600 in Energy Efficiency & Conservation Block Grant funds. He is currently managing the City's EECBG Program and Climate Action Plan development. Program team members formulate recommendations, using their industry and technical expertise and operating under direction and contributions from the lead applicant,the structure of the SBVCED is created. Casey will serve as the Program Managerfor this proposal and will coordinate all activities associated with the administration of the grant and implementation of the Program. Laura Franke and Tony Haske are the executive leaders of Clean Energy Advocates, a company that focuses on financing solutions for energy efficiency, clean and renewable energy programs. Clean Energy Advocates will serve as Financial Advisor. They will work with Program Counsel to establish the joint powers authority (JPA) to assure appropriate structuring for debt funding through either public or private capital markets. In this capacity, they will prepare standardized financing parameters for inclusion in each participating city/jurisdiction's adoption documents to assure their ability to access funding through the JPA. Additionally, Program Management services will include oversight and documentation of all required property audits and certifications prior to the release of funding. As Financial Advisor we will provide Program financial oversight that will include: analysis of funding options; identification of required contractual assessment terms and conditions; work with Program Counsel to appropriately draft bond documents for validation of the Program; modeling, structuring and securitizing of contractual assessments to public and/or private investors; work with the County to assure 44 correct assessments to participating property-owners; and provide ongoing assistance, reporting and analysis to original and new participating jurisdictions. Stephen Guthrie, Jonathan Baty and Steven Meyers will bring their expertise in providing the most energy efficient and effective systems and services for driving successful EE programs by combining wireless mobile applications with a web-based enterprise processing, analysis, work-flow management and reporting system. Their company, EnerPath, is the only supplier to the Southern California Edison company that continues to win back-to-back-to-back emerging technology programs (Innovative Design for Energy Efficiency Applications — IDEEA's). EnerPath has been responsible for the emergence and entry of many technologies that are now main stream in the EE and demand response marketplace. EnerPath will be implementing Tier I Surveys / Assessments, coordinating with Workforce Training and Development, pre-qualifying contractors / subcontractors and developing Contractor Program Guidelines. EnerPath will also serve as construction management and reporting on projects, manage all EE Data Reporting / Data Repository, conduct tools / software training for data acquisition, manage the Survey Central (Web) and Hotline, manage the Customer Sustainability Platform and support other Training Programs (HERSII/BPI) Training Workshops. In addition to these functions, EnerPath will also perform Inspection of Work / Post Inspection, Quality Verification and Test Out Inspections for Commissioning and the implementation of HERSII Audits (Partial). Craig Perkins and Mark Fleming of The Energy Coalition will serve the primary role of implementing marketing, outreach and education for participants in the program, both residential, commercial and the contractors themselves. For more than thirty years, TEC has pioneered innovative concepts within the energy sector by forging partnerships between local governments, utilities, businesses, schools, community-based organizations, and other constituencies. TEC is a proven leader in implementing comprehensive and integrated approaches to address energy, resource management, greenhouse gas reduction, and sustainable development issues within our partner cities. TEC will take the lead on establishing a communications strategy that is primarily focused on motivating homeowners to invest in energy retrofits to their property. This will consist of communications plan that identifies a highly visible program brand as well as marketing, outreach and education strategies targeted at a broad range of stakeholders and potential participants. A strategy will also be developed for the use of contractors and realtors as surrogate marketing conduits that will serve to multiple our Program's marketing and outreach efforts. The Energy Coalition will further develop and implement a comprehensive stakeholder engagement strategy to reach industry partners like Southern California Edison and The Gas Company, with the intent of leveraging any potential for marketing and outreach efforts. Danielle Garcia will serve as the Program Manager for the City of Redlands. Danielle currently supports operations across various operating divisions within the City: municipal airport, landfill, solid waste operations, building maintenance, and the branch of operations dealing with the development and execution of environmental policy and programs. These programs included Title 27 Landfill Compliance, creation of an AB- 811 Municipal Financing District, the City's SCE Energy Partnership to retrofit municipal facilities with EE/EC technology, and management of the City of Redlands' Energy Efficiency & Conservation Block Grant funds. In addition to this Danielle is responsible for implementing various grant projects (i.e.; through procurement and the corresponding reporting process). Under the SBVCED program, Danielle will serve as the coordinator between Redlands, San Bernardino and the Program Team, providing whatever technical, logistic or programmatic assistance necessary in order to successfully implement the program proposed herein. As well, she will provide any necessary resources to complete reporting requirements of the grant program. The law firm of Richards, Watson & Gershon will act as Program Legal Counsel and will assist in all legal aspects of JPA formation, program documentation and bond issuance. RWG Law has a proven track record with AB 811 and related programs. Serving as Legal Counsel in Sonoma County and Palm Desert, RWG Law has overseen the development of the two most successful AB 811 programs in the State of California. 45 SCOPE OF WORK AND DELIVERABLES Due to the length of the Program's proposal, the complete scope of work and deliverables can be found as Appendix B. 46 Erhlbit A Attachment A-1 Schedule of Deliverables and Due Dates City of San Bernardino Promo PtannW Start Planned Task Task Name Defiverablew) Compblion ARRA Funds Lewnge Np glean Dde Dab Fulls Administra0on 04072010 06!152012 A.1 Attend K ck-o f Meeti M U ted Schedule of Deliverables 04/012010 04/152010 fi 335 0 An U tea Gann Cron(Optional) WA WA M Updated List of Leverage Funds 04/072010 04/152070 An U aced List of Permits WA N/A An U ffied Poanc Plan 04/012010 09/012010 Schedule for Re rti PAC Members to ,onal) 04/012010 06/152010 Commission Contract Manage Final report Instructions Deliwrab A.2 CPR Meet, s CPR R s 071012010 07 30=10 51 401 0 CPR delrverabbs idereifl d in the Scope d Work 04/012010 06/012012 Commission Contract Menage Agenda and a list of Expected Partoipalts Dellwrabba Schadub for Written Determination 04/15/2010 D4232010 Wnnen Determination 0423/2010 04232010 Written documentation of meet a reemens all a4 A.3 Final Meting g 0420/2012 061752012 12,7 0 inarn information Schedule for can closeout activinm 04/20/2012 06/152012 A.4 Monthl Progress Re MOMN Pm press Re 05/102010 04/102012 156 0 A 5 Test Plans,TecrtACZI Reports all N/A WA 0 0 Interim Deliverables A.6 Final Report 16,985 0 A.6.1 Final Ra Outline Draft Outline of the Final Report 04202012 05/012012 3 860 0 Fire)Outline of the Final Re 05/012012 05/70/2012 A.6. Final Re Drag Final R 05/152012 05252012 13,125 0 Fuel R 06/012012 06/15/2012 A.7 IdM and Obtain Lev A letter regarding Leverage Funds or stating that ro itY Leverage Funds Levera Funds are 07/012010 09/012070 0 0 Left a for Nev,Levers Funds 01/032011 01/032072 A m d each Levers Fund commitment letter 07/022020 051012012 Letter that Leverage Funds were Reduced(it WA N/A a loeble A.B Idernily and Oblae Reourotl Permits A leper,documenting the Permits er stating fiat m 04012010 05/012012 0 0 Perm4s are reaumd Updated list of Permits as they charge during ill Term of the Agreement Idurrig Updated schedule for scouktng Permits as it charges the Term of the Agreement A copy of each approved Forms A.9 Ebcbortc File Formal A Leiter requesting ezemption tram ire Electronic Fib N/A N/A Formal it s licable 0 0 AID IESWbhsh the PAC f0ptoorb Draft List of PAC Members 1 04/012010 1 071012010 1 --2-46—OT- 0 Feel List of PAC Members 1 07/01/2010 1 09/012010 Letters of acceptance,a other comparable 071012010 09101201D documentation of commitment for each PAC Member A.it Conduct PAC s(Optional) Draft PAC Meetim Schedule 071012010 091012010 4.716 0 Final PAC Mee! Schedule 08/012010 05/012012 PAC Meetbg Agenw(s)with eack-up Materials for 11ems a9rovzoto D1roz12o12 Wild., PAC meeting sutmmarvs,moluderg 10/072010 07/012012 recanmended resolution of maim PAC ssues Atlmin let rat We Tasks Sub-Tdal E 250.6 Technical Tasks 04/012010 01/312011 1.Framework Integration Tools,2.Comumer Marketing all Education,3.City/County Marketing& 1.0 Tool Development Education,4.EEJRE Processing 8 Evaluation,5. 041012010 07/15/2010 285,895 0 Contractual Assessment Funding Request Applcaho its,6.Energy/CMVGHG Savings Tracking toils,7.Team Responsibilities 8 Timeline 2.0 Jurisdiction Establishment JPA and Contractual Assessment documents 04/012010 06101/2010 103.992 60,000 3.0 Financing Documents Development Bond/Private Placement documents 04/01/2010 06/012010 196,560 70000 4.0 Lapal Valfdetlon Filing Vetkbton Ring documents 06/012010 10/01/2010 38,755 35.000 cmlval Prue,aw tat Critical Project Review Report 071012010 07(302010 1.Program Design Document,2.Financing Plan,3. 5.0 Program Design Technical Standards 8 Guidelines,4.Program 06/012010 09/012010 215.855 165,000 Hors Manuel 5.Marketing Analyes Crmut Prelee aw 2nd Critical Project Review Report 10/012010 10/292010 Exhibit A Attachment A•1 Schedule of Deliverables and Due Dates Protect o Planned Stan Planned Leverage Task Task Name Deliverabie(c) Date Completion ARRA Funds Fume Number Date 1.Program Marketing Plan,2.Pmgnam Ineart" Execution Plan($150 towards first 2000 audits),3. Program Implementation 8 Cwnry/City Partner L stkg,4.Webske laurch,5. 6.0 Operations Marketing.Olmesch,Audits 81nsists.6.Data 10/012010 orgoi g 1,182,509 60,920 Collection Resource List,7.Wondonce Training Modules,6.Software and Reponirg Contract Agreements.9.FxIbt booth Reserve d Incentive Fund 7.0 Established along with Revolving Trustee Documents 101012010 ongoing 475,755 39,000,000 Fund crefral PreMct R.r 3rd Crtical Pmject Review Report 01/052011 01/312011 0 Technical Testis Sub TOlel f 2 499 321 f 39 390,920 Total S 27""1 39 390 920 i ' Exhibit B Att B-1 Summary Summary Project Budget ARRA Reimbursable Task Leverage Total Task Costs City of San Bernardino Task Costs Funds 0.0 Administration 250,679 0 250.679 Project Technical Activities 1.0 Tool Development 285,895 0 285,895 2.0 Jurisdiction Establishment 103,992 60,000 163,992 3.0 Financing Documents Development 196,560 70,000 266,560 4.0 Legal Validation Filing 38,755 35,000 73,755 5.0 Program Design 215,855 165,000 380,855 6.0 Program Implementation&Operations 1,182,509 60,920 1,243,429 7.0 Reserve& Incentive Fund Established along with Revolving Fund 875,755 39,000,000 39,475,755 Technical Activities Subtotals 2,499,321 39,390,920 41,890,241 Total ARRA Cost Total Leverage Total Project Funds Cost Project Totals 1 2,750,0001 39,390,9201 42,140,920 Exhibit F List of Contacts Commission Contract Manager: Contractor Contract Manager: Casey Dailey California Energy Commission City of San Bernardino 1516 Ninth Street, M5 43 300 N. D Street Sacramento, CA 95614 San Bernardino, CA 92418 Phone: Phone: 909-384-5133 Fax: Fax: 909-384-5067 e-mail: e-mail: Dailey_Ca @sbcity.org Commission Contracts Officer: Contractor Contract Administrator: Brian Turnbull California Energy Commission San Bernardino Economic Development Agency 1516 Ninth Street, MS - 18 201 N. E Street, Suite 301 Sacramento, CA 95814 San Bernardino, CA 92418 Phone: Phone: 909-663-1044 Fax: (916)654-4423 Fax: 909-888-9413 e-mail: e-mail: Btumbull @sbrda.org Deliver confidential deliverables to this location only. Invoices, Progress Reports and Contractor Accounting Non-Confidential Deliverables to: Invoicing Contact: Donna Green Russ DeJesus Accounting Office Accounting Manager California Energy Commission San Bernardino Economic Development Agency 1516 Ninth Street, MS -2 201 N. E Street, Suite 301 Sacramento, CA 95814 San Bernardino, CA 92418 Phone: (916)6543904 Phone: 909-663-2288 Fax: (916)653-1435 Fax: 909-888-9413 e-mail: doreenaenergy.state.ca us e-mail: RDeJesus @sbrda.org Commission Legal Notices: Contractor Legal Notices: Cheryl Raedel Tim Sabo Manager, Contracts Office San Bernardino Economic Development Agency California Energy Commission 201 N. E Street, Suite 301 1516 Ninth Street, MS -18 San Bernardino, CA 92418 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916)6544392 Phone: 909-663-1044 Fax: (916)654-4423 Fax: 909-888-9413 e-mail: craedelaenergv.state.ca.us e-mail: Sabo @lbbslaw.com Page 1 of 1 References Due to the length of the proposal and amount of references provided by the City of San Bernardino and sub contractors, all references have been included in Appendix D. Fendix A - Program Cost Effectiveness ENDICES — LOAN FINANCING Table 1 Loan Fund Financing Opportunity Residential Commercial Market Potential 202,000 36,000 r % Market Penetration 1.0% 0.4% #-of HouseHolds Receivin Financin 2,000 145 Average Amount of Financing $ 16,000 $ 48,000 Estimated Proposal Loan Pool $ 32,000,000 $ 7,000,000 Assumptions presented in Tables 2 & 3 Table 2 Forecasted Residential Loan Allocation The total loan funds for 2,000 households is approximately $32 million and will be allocated roughly 50/50 between solar and energy efficiency upgrades. The average loan amount for solar is estimated to be $25,000 compared to energy efficiency upgrades averaging $9,000. Thirty percent or 600 of the homes would include solar totaling $15 million. An additional $3.25 million would be loaned to solar customers for energy efficiency improvements. The remaining 1,400 homeowners are expected to invest in new SEEP. 14 or higher A/C systems costing $8,000 and/or other energy efficiency improvements such as new EE windows, EE window film, attic/wall insulation, duct sealing, and natural gas furnace totaling $6,000 per household. Average size of residential loan is forecasted to be $16,000. Residential Financing %of Loans #of HH Avg Loan$ Total Loans Solar only 5% 100 $ 25,000 $ 2,500,000 Solar+HVAC 15% 300 $ 32,500 $ 9,750,000 Solar+Other EE 1 10% 200 $ 30,000 $ 6,000,000 HVAC only 30% 600 $ 8,000 $ 4,800,000 HVAC+Other EE 30% 600 $ 13,000 1 $ 7,800,000 Other EE 10% 200 $ 6,000 $ 1,200,000 Total 100% 2,000 $ 16,000 $ 32,050,000 Q APPENDICES — LOAN FINANCING Table 3 Forecasted Commercial Loan Allocation The total loan funds for 145 commercial businesses is approximately $7 million and will be allocated roughly 50/50 between solar and energy efficiency upgrades. The average loan amount for solar is estimated to be $75,000 compared to average energy efficiency upgrades averaging $27,000. 44 or 30% of the commercial businesses would include solar totaling $3.3 million. An additional $775,000 would be loaned to solar customers for energy efficiency improvements. The remaining 101 businesses are expected to invest in new SEER 14 or higher A/C systems costing $24,000 and/or other energy efficiency improvements such as lighting fixtures and/or duct recommissioning totaling $18,000 per business. Average size of business loan is forecasted to be $48,000. Commercial Financing %of Loans #of Bus Avg Loan $ Total Loans Solar only 5% 7 $ 75,000 $ 525,000 Solar+ HVAC 15% 22 $ 100,000 $ 2,200,000 Solar+Other EE 10% 15 $ 90,000 $ 1,350,000 HVAConly 20% 29 $ 24,000 $ 696,000 HVAC+Other EE 30% 43 $ 39,000 $ 1,677,000 Other EE 20% 29 $ 18,000 $ 522,000 Total 100% 145 $ 48,000 $ 6,970,000 Table 4 Forecasted Energy Efficiency Savings $39 million of loan financing is expected to generate approximately 7.8 million kWh or 80 billion Source BTUs plus 49,350 therms equivalent to 4.9 billion Source BTUs in energy savings. The electric savings are equivalent to 36% savings for both residential and commercial customers, primarily driven by solar savings estimated at 75%. Therm savings are conservatively estimated to be 5% for residential and 1% for commercial customers. Financing Energy Savings kWh Therms Residential Commercial Residential I Conrnercial #of Customers Receiving Financing 2,000 145 2,000 145 Average Ener gy consumption per Year 8,000 40,000 450 2,500 Average%Energy Savings 36% 36°! 5% 1% Average Energy Savings* 2,870 14,200 23 30 Total Energy Savings 5,740,000 2,059,000 45,000 4,350 Proposal Source BTUs 58,771,860,000 21,082,101,000 4,500,000,000 435,000,000 (1kWh=10,239 BTUs,1 Thernw100,000 BTUs) Assumptions presented in Tables 7 8 8 i APPENDICES — LOAN FINANCING Solar 10% Minimum Energy Efficiency Savings Requirement Table 5 Forecasted Energy Efficiency Savings for Residential Solar Customers Residential -Solar Energy Efficiency Savings Average %of % HH HH Total Solar Energy Energy Residential Loans #ofHH Savings Savings Savings Solar only 17% 100 0% 0 0 Solar+ HVAC 50% 300 19% 1,500 449,872 Solar+Other EE 33% 200 9% 680 136,000 TOTAL 100•% 600 12.2% 976 585,872 Table 6 Forecasted Energy Efficiency Savings for Residential Solar Customers Commercial-Solar Energy Efficiency Savings Average %of % Bus Bus Total Solar Energy Energy Business Loans #of Bus Savings Savings Savings Solar only 17% 7 0% - - Solar+HVAC 50% 22 12% 4,800 104,400 Solar+Other EE 33% 15 14% 5,600 81,200 TOTAL 100% 44 10.7•/ 4,267 185,600 APPENDICES— LOAN PROGRAM ENERGY SAVINGS Table 7 Forecasted Residential Energy Efficiency Savings Residential E ergySavings Loan Equi ment Distribution kWh KW LAverage erms Average Average%HH HH Total HH Tota l Total %of Energy Energy Residential Energy Residential Residential Loans ppf HH Savin s Savin Savin s Savingss Savings Savings Solaronly' 5% 100 75% 6,000 600,000 3.7 366 0 Solar+HVAC' 15% 300 75% 6,000 1,800,000 3.7 1,098 0 Solar+Other EE 10% 200 75% 6,000 1,200,000 3.7 732 45 9,000 HVAC onl Y2 30% 600 19% 1,500 900,000 0.7 420 0 HVAC+Other EE' 30% 600 23% 1,840 1,104,000 0.7 420 45 27,000 Other EE°, 10%. 200 8.5% 680 136,000 0.0 0 45 91000 TOTAL 100% 2,000 36% 2,870 11 5,740,000 1.5 3,035 23 45,000 'Assumed 25%of residential loans would include solar. Estimated solar would reduce 75%of electric consumption of average 8,000 kWh. Solar only households already made prior EE upgrades above 10%threshold. For other households,HVAC or other EE upgrades were assumed to be needed to meet 10%reduction requirement which provided the same 75%level of savings as Solar only households. 'kWh savings modeled using the Summit Blue 2007 calculations presented in"Savings Uncertainties in Residential Air Conditioning Rebate Programs"by Rachel Freeman for upgrading SEER 10/EER 9 to SEER 14/EER32. 'Other EE energy savings are considered to be partially offset by HVAC upgrade,so full estimated 8.5%savings were restated to contribute 4%i ncrementa I ly. 'Other EE energy efficiency upgrades include EE windows,window film,attic/wall insulation,and duct sealing. See Table S Solar KW based on kWh savings converted to KW system assuming 1,640 hours(4.5 hours/day). HVAC KW based on calculation stated in note 2 above. Deatiled HVAC analysis is provided in Table. 6 Estimated 8.5%therm savings for Other EE upgrades of EE windows,window film,attic/wall insulation,and duct sealing of total 450 household therms. Detailed information presented in Table APPENDICES - LOAN PROGRAM ENERGY SAVINGS Table 8 Forecasted Commercial Energy Efficiency Savings Commercial Energy Savings Loan Equipment Distribution kWh KW Therms Average Average Average %Bus Bus Total Bus Total Bus Total %of Energy Energy Commercia Energy Commercial Energy Commercial Loans #of Bus Savings Savings I Savings Savingss Savings Savings` Savings Solaronl ' 5% 7 75% 30,000 217,500 18.3 132 - Solar+HVAC' 15% 22 75% 30,000 652,500 18.3 397 - Solar+Other EE' 100% 15 75% 30,000 435,000 18.3 265 50 725 HVAC only' 20% 29 12% 4,800 139,200 1.4 41 - HVAC+Other EEs 30% 44 26% 10,400 452,400 3.5 151 50 2,175 Other EE4 20% 29 14% 5,600 162,400 2.1 60 5o 1,450 TOTAL 100% 145 36% 14,200 2,059,0011 7.2 1,006 30 4,350 'Assumed 25%of commercial loans would include solar. Estimated solar would reduce 75%of electric consumption ofaverage business energy consumption of40,000 kWh. Solar Only business were assumed to have already made EE upgrades above 10% threshold. HVAC or other EE upgrades were assumed to be needed to meet 10%reduction requirement and reach the same 75%energy savings level as Solar Only business. 'Assumed two 3 Ton AC unit upgraded from SEER 10 to SEER 14,operating 3,000 hours. Used conservative kWh and KW savings based on Summit Blue 2007 calculations presented in"Savings Uncertainties in Residential Air Conditioning Rebate Programs"by Rachel Freeman. More information in Table . 'Since 80%of Other EE is lighting upgrades,energy savings were combined for HVAC and Other EE. Other EE energy efficiency upgrades include EE lighting and duct retrocommissioni ng. See table 5 Solar KW based on kWh savings converted to KW system assuming 1,640 hours(4.5 hours/day). HVAC KW based on calculation stated in note 2 above and in HVAC table. 6 Estimated 10%therm savings for Duct Retrocommissioning,representing 20%of0ther EE upgrades. Other Ductwork is included within HVAC energy savings. Details on Commercial Other EE is presented in Table APPENDICES - RETROFIT ASSUMPTIONS Table 9 Estimated Residential Existing AC Inventory Most Likely HVAC Overall Overall %of Target System Avg SEER Average Average Total % Have HVAC SEER % Houses Rating of SEER EER Housing HVACs Homes Rating Upgraded Upgrades Rating Rating Year Built (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) Pre-1980 65% 65% 85,345 7.2 90% 9.5 9.3 8.2 1980-1990 17% 85% 29,189 8.7 759/. 11.5 10.8 9.8 1990-2000 8% 900/0 14,544 10.5 40% 13.5 11.7 10.2 2000-2006 7% 90% 12,726 11.5 10% 14.5 11.8 10.3 2006+ 3% 90% 5,454 13.5 0% 13.5 11.5 Total 100°/ 147,258 10.0 8.9 A) Housing distribution based on US Census Bureau data for major cities of program. B) Estimates from Proposal Team. Referenced U.S. Energy Information Administration study of 1997 and ARI 1996 study showing 80%of new single family homes being built with central AC C) Calculated based on (A) and (B) for 202,000 homes. D) Estimated average SEER ratings by year based on 3 sources: ARI research reported in "Latent Performance of Unitary Equipment" by Amrane, Hourahan, and Potts, 2002; Carrier Corp analysis; and HVACOPCOST.com. E) Estimated based on 20year useful life assumption. F) Assumed Pre-1980average 1990 SEER level; 1980-1990 averaged 2000., 1990-2000 averaged 2006 level. SEER levels based on ARI 2002 study G) Calculated based on mix of upgraded SEER levels and non-upgraded SEER levels [D*E+F*(1-E)]. H) EER correspond to average SEER level. Used several sources to establish relationship between SEER and EER levels: ARI 2002 previously referenced; "Savings Uncertainties in Residential Air Conditioning Rebate Programs" by Rachel Freeman, MS Summit Blue Consulting, LLC, 2007 Energy Program Evalution Conference, Chicago APPENDICES — RETROFIT ASSUMPTIONS Table 10 Estimated Residential AC Enemy Savinas HVAC Energy Savings based on Upgrades to SEER 14 (Assumed 1,800ope rating hours,3ton units) DaSTING Total EXISTING Target HVAC kWh Target HVAC Target Markets NEW Avg Average kWh Energy Markets NEW Avg KW HVAC %Target Avg SEER SEER kWh Energy Savings Avg EER EER Avg KW Energy Year Homes Markets Rating Rating Savings Savings % Rating Rating Energy Savings% Built (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) Swings(J) (K) Pre-1980 85,345 60% 9.3 14.0 1,889 369,. 24% 8.2 12.0 1.0 32% 1980-1W 29,189 21% 10.8 14.0 1,097 21% 14% 9.8 12.0 0.5 1 16% 1990-200C 14,544 10% 11.7 14.0 728 1 14% 9% 10.2 12.0 0.4 12% 20DO-200E 12,726 9% 11.8 14.0 690 13% W. 10.3 12.0 0.4 12% 2006+ 0% Total 141,804 100% 1 10.1 14.0 1,500 1 29% 19% 8.9 ILO 0.7 24% A) Represented in prior HVAC housing chart. B) Calculated allocation of(A) C) Data from HVAC housing inventory shown in Table. D) Conservative minimum level of Title 24 SEER 14. E) Calculated based on formula used in Summit Blue Consulting study by Rachel Freeman,MS,titled"Savings Uncertainties in Residential Air Conditioning Rebate Programs"presented at 2007 Energy Program Evaluation Conference,in Chicago.Formula of kWh savings=tons(3)•12• (1/SEERold-1/SEERnew(14))•toad hours(1800)•conservative load factor(90) F) HVAC savings in(D)as%of avg ofd HVAC SEER 10. Old SEER energy=5,200 kWh based on above formula. G) HVAC savings in(D)as%of total energy estimate of 8,000 kWh. For A/C users using 9,000 kWh,the average%savings is 16%. H) Data from HVAC housing inventory shown in Table. I) Conservative minimum EER level of 14. J) Calculated based on formula used in Summit Blue Consulting study by Rachel Freeman,MS,titled"Savings Uncertainties in Residential Air Conditioning Rebate Programs"presented at 2007 Energy Program Evaluation Conference,in Chicago.Formula of KW savings=tons(3)•12 (1/EERold-1/EERnew(12))•conservative Coincident factor(.90)•load factor(b0) K) HVAC savings in(G)as%of avg old HVAC SEER 10. Old EER energy=35 kW based on above formula. APPENDICES — RETROFIT ASSUMPTIONS Table 11 Estimated Commercial AC Energy Savings Commercial HVAC Energy Savings based on Upgrades to SEER 14 (Assumed 3,000 operating hours,two 3 ton units) OLD NEW NEW Total Total OLD NEW NEW Total Average Average Average HVAC kWh Average Average Average HVAC SEER SEER kWh kWh Energy EER EER KW KW Rating Rating Savings Savings Savings Rating Rating Savings Savings (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) Total 10.0 14.0 4,800 30% 12% 9.2 12.0 1.4 25% A) Estimated average SEER ratings based on three sources: ARI research reported in"Latent Performance of Unitary Equipment' by Amrane, Hourahan,and Potts, 2002; Carrier Corp analysis;and HVACOPCOST.com. B) Minimum Title 24 SEER level C) Calculation based on formula used in Summit Blue Consulting study by Rachel Freeman, MS,titled "Savings Uncertainties in Residential Air Conditioning Rebate Programs" presented at 2007 Energy Program Evaluation Conference, in Chicago. Formula of kWh savings=tons(3) ` 12`(1/SEERold-1/SEERnew(14))` D) HVAC savings in(C) as%of avg old HVAC SEER estimated 16,000 kWh based on above formula. E) HVAC savings in (D) as%of total energy estimate of 40,000 kWh. F) Estimated average EER ratings based on SEER level of 10. G) Estimimated minimum EER level H)Calculated based on formula used in Summit Blue Consulting study by Rachel Freeman, MS,titled "Savings Uncertainties in Residential Air Conditioning Rebate Programs"presented at 2007 Energy Program Evaluation Conference, in Chicago. Formula of KW savings=tons(3) ' 12`(1/EERold- 1/EERnew(12))' Coincident factor(.90) `load factor(.80) 1) HVAC savings in(G) as%of avg old HVAC SEER 10. Old EER energy=3.5 kW based on above formula. APPENDICES — RETROFIT ASSUMPTIONS Table 12 Residential Non-HVAC Energy Efficiency Financed Improvement Assumptions Residential Energy Efficiency Improvements (Non-HVAC) Energy Savings %of kWh Therms MiscEE % kWh %1 Therms EE Windows 15% 5% 400 5% 23 Solar Controlled Window Film 15% 5% 400 5% 23 Attic/Wall Insulation 30% 10% 800 10% 45 Duct Sealing 40% 10% 800 10% 45 Gas Furnace 10% 15% 15% 68 Average Other EE Improvements 8.5% 680 10% 45 'Source: California Energy Commission Consumer Energy Center 'kWh savings based on total Residential usage of 8,000 kWh 3 kWh savings based on total Residential natural gas usage of 450therms. Table 13 Commercial Non-HVAC Energy Efficiency Financed Improvement Assumptions Commercial Energy Efficiency Improvements (Non-HVAC) %01 Energy Savings Misc EE % kWh KW Therms Lighting Fixtures 80% 15% 6,000 2.2 Duct Retrocommissioning° 20% 10% 4,000 3.2 250 Average Other EE Improvements 14% 5,600 2.1 50 ' kWh savings based on total Commercial usage of 40,000 kWh Lighting KW savings based on 50/.011 KW/kWh ratio DEER ratings for TB's. Duct Retrocommissioning kWh/KW ratio = .0008 . 3 kWh savings based on total Commercial natural gas usage of 2,500 therms. °Other EE Duct Retrocommissioning was assumed to be incremental to HVACrequired upgrades. 20% of Other work. Appendix B—Scope of Work and Deliverables TASK I:CONTRACT MANAGEMENT A. KICKOFF MEETING Through this process the contractor shall establish the lines of communication and procedures for implementing this Agreement. The Contractor shall: • Attend a "kick-off' meeting with the Commission Contract Manager, the Contracts Officer, and a representative of the Accounting Office. The Contractor shall bring their Project Manager, Contracts Administrator, Accounting Officer, and others designated by the Commission Contract Manager to this meeting. The administrative and technical aspects of the Agreement will be discussed at the meeting. Prior to the kick-off meeting, the Commission Contract Manager will provide an agenda to all potential meeting participants. The administrative portion of the meeting shall include, but not be limited to, the following: • Terms and conditions of the Agreement • Critical Project Reviews—expectations and schedule • Leverage fund documentation • Permit documentation The technical portion of the meeting shall include, but not be limited to, the following: • The Commission Contract Manager's expectations for accomplishing tasks described in the Scope of Work; • An updated Schedule of Deliverables • Processes for submitting, reviewing and approving Progress Reports, Task Deliverables and Final Report The Commission Contract Manager shall designate the date and location of this meeting. B. INVOICES The Contractor shall prepare an invoice for all contract expenses performed at each stage identified in the schedule of the proposed program. The official invoice will be submitted to the Energy Commission's Accounting Office. C. SUBCONTRACTORS? The contractor will manage and coordinate subcontractor activities. The Contractor is responsible for the quality of all subcontractor work. If new subcontractors are added, the contractor shall notify the CCM who will follow the Energy Commission's process for adding or replacing subcontractors. D. MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORTS Through this process the contractor shall pe odically verify that satin tory and continued progress is made towards achieving the obie Ives of the project. Thi -slt will include the mandatory reporting activities for the ARRA S 7 ?rograms. The Contractor shall: • Prepare monthly progress reports which summarize all contract activities conducted by the Contractor for the reporting period, including an assessment of the ability to complete the contract within the current budget and any anticipated cost overruns. • Submit each progress report to the CCM within 3 working days after the end of the reporting period. • Submit electronic data to the relevant ARRA SEP tracking and reporting entities Deliverables: • Monthly Progress Reports • Monthly submittal of electronic data to ARRA SEP tracking and reporting entities E. CRITICAL PROGRAM REVIEWS Through this process the contractor shall determine if the Contractor's project should continue to receive SEP funding to complete this Agreement and whether there are any modifications that need to be made to the tasks, subtasks, deliverables, schedule, or budget. The first Critical Program Review (CPR) shall be held within the first six months of the contract start date to determine the level of funding that is appropriate for the tasks and to ensure work will be completed on schedule. Additional CPRs shall be scheduled throughout the term of the agreement. The Energy Commission Contract Manager may schedule additional CPRs as necessary, and any additional costs will be borne by the Contractor. CPR participants include the Energy Commission Contract Manager and the Contractor, and may include the Energy Commission Contracts Officer, one or more members of the ARRA Committee or their designee, other Energy Commission staff and management, and any other individuals selected by the Energy Commission Contract Manager to provide support to the Energy Commission. The Energy Commission Contract Manager shall: • Determine the location, date and time of each CPR meeting with the Contractor. These meetings generally take place at the Energy Commission, but they may take place at another location. • Send the Contractor the agenda and a list of expected participants in advance of each CPR. • Conduct and make a record of each CPR meeting. One of the outcomes of this meeting will be a schedule for providing the written determination described below. • Determine whether to continue the project, and if so, whether or not to modify the tasks, subtasks, schedule, deliverables, and budget for the remainder of the Agreement, including not proceeding with one or more subtasks. If the Energy Commission Contract Manager concludes that satisfactory progress is not being made, this conclusion will be referred to the Energy Commission's ARRA Committee for its concurrence. • Provide the Contractor with a written determination in accordance with the schedule. The Contractor shall: • Prepare a CPR report for each CPR that discusses the progress of the Agreement toward achieving its goals and objectives. This report shall include recommendations and conclusions regarding continued work of the projects. This report shall be submitted along with any other deliverables identified in the Scope of Work. These documents shall be submitted to the Commission Contract Manager and any other designated reviewers at least 5 working days in advance of each CPR meeting. • Present the required information at each CPR meeting and participate in a discussion about the Agreement. Deliverables: • CPR Report • CPR deliverables identified in the Scope of Work F. FINAL REPORT Through this process the contractor shall prepare a comprehensive written Final Report that describes the original purpose, approach, results and conclusions of the work done under this contract. The CCM will review and approve the Final Report, The Final Report will be completed on or before the termination date of the contract. The Final Report shall be a public document. The Contractor shall prepare a draft Final Report summarizing the tasks under this agreement, and shall encompass all tasks performed under this agreement. The draft final report shall be prepared in a language easily understood by the public or layperson with a limited technical background, and submitted to the Commission Contract Manager for review and comment. The draft Final Report shall follow the Energy Commission's report format as specified by the Contract Manager. The Contract Manager will review the draft Final Report, provide comments, and request changes as needed. The Contractor will then revise the draft and submit a Final Report as directed by the Contract Manager. After approval of the Final Report by the Contract Manager, the Contractor shall deliver one original, reproducible 8 112" by 11" camera-ready master in black ink of the Final Report. Illustrations and graphs shall be sized to fit an 8 1/1" by 11" page, readable if printed in black and white. In addition, the Contractor shall deliver an electronic copy (CD ROM or memory stick) of the full text in Microsoft Word file (doc.). Both the final meeting and the Final Report must occur 15 days prior to the ending term of this Agreement TASK 2: PROGRAM DELIVERY A. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Through this process the contractor shall develop a detailed plan to complete the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District program. The Contractor shall: • Prepare a Draft Implementation Plan that includes, but is not limited to, the following: • A list of the spec;fic activities that will be conducted to deliver the program, • Explanations for how the contractor, subcontractors, and any other organization that is key to the success of the program (such as financing institutions), will contribute to the completion of the program activities, • A detailed Financing Plan, A timeline for the program that delineates the schedule for each • program activity, including invoices, • Milestones that can be used to gauge progress towards the program objectives, • Contingency plans for the critical components of the program. • Present the draft Implementation Plan to the Commission Contract Manager via a phone conference or physical meeting, • Prepare the Final Implementation Plan that addresses the comments received on the draft plan, • Since the proposed program includes separable components (such as program startup or ongoing program administration), the Implementation Plan shall discretely delineate the activities, partners, timelines, milestones and contingency plans separately for each component, • Since the proposed program includes separable components, the Implementation Plan shall discreetly delineate the activities, partners, timelines, milestones and contingency plans separately for each component. Deliverables: • Draft Implementation Plan • Final Implementation Plan B. ADDITIONAL SUBTASKS • Workforce Development • Participant Recruitment • Energy Audits • Retrofit Installations • Quality Assurance • Verification of Energy Savings • Program Reporting Each subtask should include a description of the task goal, a list of contractor activities, and resulting deliverables. Deliverables and Due Dates Summarize the deliverables and due dates for the Scope of Work in a tabular format. The deliverables already listed are contract requirements that the Bidder must incorporate into the proposed deliverables list and also budget and schedule resources for in the proposal. Task Deliverable Due Date 1 Monthly Progress Reports: Monthly 1 Critical Program Review Reports: Within 30 days of CPR meetings 1 Final Report End date of contract 2 Draft Implementation Plan: Within 30 days of contract start date 2 Final Implementation Plan: Within 10 days of receipt of Contract Manager comments on Implementation Plan Exhibit B Att B-2 - Contractor ARRA Buooet for ARRA Reimbursement to Contractor Personal Services Protect Operating Expenses ARRA City of San Bernardino Reimbursable Direct Labor IF,,W Bene0ts Materials Equipment Trawl Misc. SuR Task Costs m rcra o 1.0 Project Administration Activities Al Attend Kick-off Mewing 2.472 1,334 2,529 6,3351 PR Meetings 43,815 7,586 51,401 inal Meeting 8.920 1,334 2,529 12,783 Monthly Progress Report 155,000 0 56,000 est Plans,Technical Reports and Interim p - r �d� w n eliverables r.n i�p:;Y u(w'i J.tt ( nx n.�U'ii�, n inal Report 16,985 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.995 inal Report Outline 3,860 0 3.860 inal Report 13,125 0 13.125 entify and Obtain Leverage Funds I` ,Ir °� +ri P ni entt and Oblem Required Penn85 lectronic File Formal stablish the PAC(Optional) 2,460 0 2,460 A.11 Conduct PAC Meetin gs(Optional) 4,716 0 4 716 Administration Activities Subtotals 235,368 D 0 0 2.668 0 12,643 250,679 Protect Technical Activities(Dell.or add rows as necessary) 1.0 Tool Development 37,215 0 D 0 0 0 248,680 285,895 1.1 Framework Integration Tools 1D,095 79,800 89.895 1.2 Consumer Marketing&Education 8,040 13,600 21,640 13 CM/Court Marketing&Education 8040 3,900 11,940 1.4 EE/RE Processing&Evalustion 133,130 133,130 1.5 Contractual Assessment Funding Request 3,650 3,650 16 Energy/Cost/GMG Savings Trading 12,700 12,700 1.7 Team Responsibilities&Timeline 11,040 1,900 12,940 2.0 Jurisdiction Establishment 1,640 0 0 0 0 0 102,352 103,992 2 1 Document Creation 89,252 89,252 2.2 Document Ri rtew 1,640 13,100 14,740 3.0 Financing Documents Dewlopnronl 2,060 0 0 0 0 0 194,500 196,560 3 1 Document Creation 180,000 180,DD0 3.2 Document Review 2,060 14,500 16,560 4.0 Legal Validation Filing 1,780 0 0 0 D 0 36,975 38,755 4.1 Document Creation 35.000 35,000 4.2 Occurrent Review 1,780 ' 1,975 3,755 8.0 Program Design 24,010 0 0 0 0 0 191,645 215,855 51 Program Design Document 8,954 26,250 35.204 - -- - - Page 1 of 2 Exhibit B "* Aft B-2 - Contractor ARRA 401 Budget for ARRA Reimbursement to Contractor Personal Services Project Operating Expenses ARRA City of San Bernardino Reimbursable Direct Labor Fri Sub- Task Costs Fringe Benefits Materials Equipment Travel Misc. cormadors 5.2 Program Financing Plan 52,325 52,325. 5.3 Technical Standards 8 Guidelines 73,795 73.795' 54 Program Operations Manual 9,056 31,650 40,706 55 Marketing Analysis 6,000 7,825 13,825 6.0 Program Implementation 8 Operations 156,730 0 0 0 23,970 1,002.40P` 1',31t2;5DB 61 Program Marketing Plan 27,770 3,350 31 120 6.2 Program Incentive Execution Plan 23,400 27,550 50,950 63 City/County Partner Listing 12,384 0 12,384 64 Website Launch 6,408 0 6,408 6 Marketing,Outreach,Audits&Installs 28,200 23,370 783,684 835,254 6.6 Data Collection 8 Reporting 48,800 147,400 186 200 6.7 Workforce Training Modules 6,360 40,425 46,785 68 Software and Reporting Contracts 3,000 0 6.9 Exhibit Booth 408 0 »vd 7.0 Reserve 8lncentive Fund Established 41,480 0 0 0 0 390,000 44,275 475,755 along with Revolving Fund 7.1 Establish Reserve Funds and Dowmems 390,000 44,275 d3d,275 7.2 Administer Funds 41.480 0 41 480 Technical Activities Subtotals 264.9151 0 0 0 0 d13,370 1 821.036 2,499,321 a Total ARRA Prime Contractor Direct Labor Fringe Benefits Materials Equipment Travel MiscReimburs-able factors Cost ARRA Reimbursable Totals 500,283 0 0 0 2.668 41 2,750,000 Percent of the Tout 18% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100.6 (1)Prime Contractor profit not allowed on Subcontractor invoices and profit cannot exceed 10%of the ARRA funds allocated to the Task. Exhibit B Aft B-2.1 - Sub ARRA - RWG Budget for ARRA Reimbursement Penaorel SarviceS Project Operitbrg Expenses to Major Subcontractor ill ARRA Reimburs ❑eves sw adeTask Costs Richards Watson Gershon Direct Labor Fringe Benefits Materals Equipment Travel Mmc Sub icv Sub#1 W,bell ons to Project Administration Activities A.1 Attend Kick-pH Mail 0 A2 CPR Meetings 0 A.3 Final Meeting 0 AA Kim*Ny Progress Reports 0 A.5 Test Pars.Teclpucal Reports 2W Interim Deliverables A.6 Final Report 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A.6.1 Fine Report Outlire 0 A.6.2 Final Report 0 A.7 Itletlity and Obldld Leverage Funds Y 1 A.8 Idemity and Obtain Required Permit A.9 Electronic File Format A.10 Establ'sh the PAC(OFtoreO G 0 AM Conduct PAC Meetings(Optional) 0 Administration Activities Subtotals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Technical Activities(Delete or add rows as necessary) 1.0 Tool Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Framework Imegralicn Tots 0 1.2 Consumer Marketing It Education 0 1.3 Cily/Courny Marketmi Eduratwn 0 1A EEIRE Processing 8 Evaluation 0 1.5 Comracbsit ASSessmem Fu ng Request 0 1.6 Energy/CostIGHG Savings Tracking 0 1 7 Team Reppo sidlihes It Timelme D 2.0 .)msdldion Establishment 86.5110 0 0 0 2.752 0 89.252 2.1 Docanerd Creation 86.500 2.752 69,252 2.2 Document Review 0 3.0 Financing Documema Development 180.000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000 31 Docvmem Creation 180,000 180.000 3.2 Document Review 0 4.0 Legal Validation Filing 35,000 0 0 0 D 0 35,000 41 Do nt Creation 35.000 35000 42 Decadent Review 0 5.0 Program Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.1 Program Design Documem 0 Page 1 of 2 Exhibit B Aft B-2.1 - Sub ARRA - RWG Budget for ARRA Reimbursement to Major Subcontractor#1 Personal Services Protect Operating Expenses ❑ova[sus ARRA Rmmburs adeTask Costs Richards Watson Gershon Direct Labor Fringe Benefits MatenaLS Equipment Travel Msc Sub for Sub#1 comractors 5.2 Program Fm mwg Plan 0 5.3 Techrecal Standards 8 Guidelines 0 6.4 Program Operations Manual 0 5.5 Marketing Analysis p 6.0 Program Implementedon 8 Operatlom 0 0 320 0 0 0 327 61 Program Marketing Plan 0 62 Program Incer¢ne Executor,Plan 0 6.3 Cby/Coumy Partner Listing 0 6.4 Website Launch 0 6 Marketing,Outreach.Audits d Installs 320 320 6.6 Data Collection 8 Reporting 0 6.7 Workforce Tniung Modules 0 6.8 Soft"m an Repontmg Contams 69 Exhibit Booth p Reserve I1 Incentive Fund Established 7.0 alo with Revolving Fund D 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.1 Establish Funs and Documents 0 7.2 Adminster Funs 0 Technical Activities Subtotals 301.500 0 320 01. 2.752 01 0 304.572 Major Sub#1 Major Subcontractor 01 Dew Labor Fringe Benefits Materels I Equipmem Travel Miss. ARRA Re mburs. ab a Cyst ARRA Reimbursable Totals 301,500 0 3217 0 2,752 0 0 304,572 Percent of the Total 99% 0% D% 0% 1% 0% 0%1 100'% Total Project expenses=1 3,072 (1)Subcontractor profit is not altowed on Sub-subcontractor invoices and profh cannot exceed 10%of the ARRA funds allocated to the Task. Exhibit B Att B-2.2 - Sub ARRA - CEA Budget for ARRA Reimbursement I to Major Subcontractor#2 Pemonel services Pmecl Oiberahng Ex es ARRA Reimbm abieTask Costs Clean Erwgy Advocates,Irw. Direct Labor Fnnge Benefits Materials Equipment Travel Mar. Sub- for Sub al contactors 1.0 Project Administration Activities AA Attend KwkoH Meeting 2,200 329 2.529 A2 CPR Meetings 6,600 966 7,586 A.3 Final Meeting 2.200 1 329 2.529 A.4 Monthly Progress Reports 0 A5 Test Plane,Techncal Reports and Interim Deliverables" A.6 Final Report 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A.6.1 Final Report OuOire 0 A.62 Final Report 0 A.7 Identify and Obtain Leverage Funds ry"W•�,1t 10. " a1f: up Maw A.8 Identity and Obtain Required Permits u''r iI�r A.9 Electronic File Format dp •"'ti T u itI " r dv ' r ". A.10 Establish the PAC(Optional) 0 A.11 Conduct PAC Meetings(Ophona0 0 Administration Activities Subtonls 11,000 D 0 0 1,643 0 0 12.663 Project Technical Activities(Delete or add rows as necessary) 1.0 Tool Development 26,650 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,850 1.1 Framework Integration Tools 3.650 3.650 1.2 Consumer Marketing&Edrsanon 3,900 3,900 1.3 City/Cwmy Marketing&Edixatron 3,900 3900 1.4 EErE Processing is 3,650 3,650 1.5 Contractual Assessment Frmdaig Request 3,650 3,650 16 Energy/CosVGHG Savings Tracking 6.000 6 000 1 7 Team Rwwraroilmes&Timeline 1,900 1,900 20 Jurisdiction Establishment 9.750 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,750 2.1 Document Creation 0 21 Documem Review 9,750 9.750 3.0 Financing Documents Development 14.500 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,500 31 Document Creation 0 3.2 Document Review 14,500 14.500 4.0 Legal Validation Filing 1,975 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,975 4.1 Document Creation D 4.2 Document Revew 1,975 1,975 5.0 Program Design 112.825 0 0 0 0 0 0 111,825 5.1 Program Design Document 16,760 16,750 Page 1 of 2 Exhibit B Att B-2.2 - Sub ARRA - CEA Budget for ARRA Reimbursement P to Major Subcontractor#2 Personal services Project opemt.g 6yenses ARRA Ranmbvs ❑ores sub ableTWk Cosh Clean Energy Advocates,Inc. Direct Labor Fringe Benefits Materials Equipment Travel Misc Sub for SW 41 convectors 5.2 Program Financing Plan 52,325 52,325 52 Tectcacal Standards&Guidelines 23,300 23,300 54 Program Operations Manual 20,450 20450 5.E Marketing Analysis 0 6.0 Program Implementation d Opendions 74,525 0 3,400 0 4,025 0 0 81,950 61 Program Marketing Plan 0 6.2 Program Incentive Execution Plan 12,850 12,850 6.3 Coy/CDuMy Partner Lstmg 0 64 Websde Launch 0 6_E Marketing,Outreach,Audits&Installs 15,250 3,400 4,025 22,675 6.6 Data Collection&Reporting Q000 6.000 6 7 Workforce Training Modules 40 425 40,425 6.6 Sctw re and Reporting Contracts 6.9 Exhibit Booth u 70 Reaerve&Incentive Fund Established 44.275 0 0 0 0 0 0 44.275 along with Rineolving Fund 7.1 Establish Funds and Documents 44,275 44.275 7.2 Administer Funds 0 Technical Activities Subtolajs 284,500 0 3.400 0 4,025 0 0 291,825 Malin Stb#1 Major Subcontractor a1 Direct Latior Fringe Benefits Materials Equpment Travel Misc. ARRA Bee C;os- ade Cost ARRA Reimbursable Totals 295,500 0 3,400 0 5,668 0 0 304,568 Percent of the Toni 97% 0% 1%1 0% 2*11 0% 0% 100% Taal project expenses= 9,068 Exhibit B Aft B-2.3 Sub ARRA - EnerPath Budget for ARRA Reimbursement to Major Subcontractor#1 (1) Personal Services F Project Charahng Erdenses ARRA Cca s (]proe sw adeTask sk Goss EnerPath Direct Labor Fringe Berens Materials Equipment Travel Mac. SW for Sub 91 contractors 1.0 Project Administration Activities A.1 Attend Kick-o0 M-I ng 0 A2 CPR Meetings 0 A3 Rnl Meeting 0 A.4 Monthly Progress Reports 0 A.5 Test Plans,Technical Reports and Interim i l?k lrnl µ�1 r akhw,' e+ pal, r +; r. . upr De4werables rY n w =t, i, �' Y M A.6 Final Report 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A.6.7 Final Report Outlkle 0 A.62 Final Report 0 A.7 Identify and Obtain Leverage Funds Y$y PpPY A.B Idemify and DMeln Required Permits 1ar�"" A.9 Elegrontc Fie Format and Pkd Y d ?WRL,1� ry t t 7 r 1-1 A.10 Establish the PAC(Optional) '+� 0 A.11 Conduct PAC Meetings(Optional) 0 Administration Activities Subtotals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Technical Activities(Delete or add rocs 85 necessary) 1.0 Tool Development 202,280 0 0 0 D 0 0 202.2110 1.1 Framework Integration Tools 72.800 72 B00 1.2 Consumer Marketing 8 Education 0 1.3 CBy/Coumy Markabrg6 Eduwiron 0 1A EErRE Processing 8 Evali atbn 129.480 129,480 1.5 Contract.:Assessment Funding Request 0 16 Erergy/CosVGHG Savings Tracking 0 1 7 Team Responsibilities 6 Timaime 0 2.0 Jurisdiction Establishment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Document Creation 0 2.2 Document Review 0 3.0 Financing Docammrts Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Dawment Creation 0 3.2 Document Review 0 4.0 Legal Validation Filing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.1 Document Creation 0 4.2 Docurr ent Renew 0 5.0 Program Design 42,120 D 0 D 0 0 0 42,120 5 cum 1 Program Design Doent 0 Page 1 of 2 Exhibit B Att B-2.3 - Sub ARRA - EnerPath Budget for ARRA Reimbursement Personal Services Project Dceratirg Expenses to Major Subcontractor#1 (1) ARRA Remount, ❑ores sw ableTask Costs E.Path Direct Labor Forge Benefits Materials Equipment Travel M¢c. Subtr for Sub#1 contrapors 52 Program Financing Plan 0 5.3 Technical Standards 8 Guidelines 42,120 42.120 54 Program Operations Manuel 0 5 5 Marketing Analys¢ 0 6.0 Program Implementation a Operations 166,560 0 0 0 0 0 0 166,560 6.1 Program Marketing Plan 0 6.2 Program lncemive Execution Plan 0 63 Clly/Couray Partner Listing 0 64 Websde Launch 0 6..5 Marketing,Outreach,Aueds 8l r¢talis 71,760 71,760 6.6 Data Collection B Reporting 124,800 124,600 67 Workforce Trsintlrg Moduies 0 6.6 Software ano Repodng Contracts 69 Extabd Booth u 7.0 Reserve 8 Incentive Fund Established 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 alo with Revolvi Fund 7.1 Establish Funds and Documents 0 7.2 Administer Funds I 0 Technical Activities Subtotals "40960 0 D 0 0 0 0 440,96D Major Sub 41 Major Subcontractor#1 Dkep Labor Fringe Benefits Materials Equipment Travel Misc. ARRA Remburs- able Cost ARRA Reimbursable Totals 440,960 0 0 0 0 0 0 "0,960 Percent of the Total 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1D0% Total project expenses= 0 Exhibit B Aft B-2.4 - Sub ARRA - TEC Budget for ARRA Reimbursement Personal Services Protect Dooming Expanses to Major Subcontractor#1 (1) ARRA Reunbas ❑oval se aMeTask Costs The Energy Coalition Direct Labor Fringe berms Materials Equipment Travel Msc. sl R for Sub 1111 contractors 1.0 Protect Administration Activities A.1 Attend Kick-off Meeting 0 A2 CPR Meetings 0 A.3 Final Meetb"g 0 A.4 Monthly Progress Reports 0 A.5 Test Plans,Technical Reports and Interim ^ ; i,. lsv Dellverades A.6 Final Repo" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A.6.1 Final Report Outline 0 A.62 Final Report 0 A.7 Identify and Obtain Leverage Funds , 1'• AX Well and Obtain Required Permits A.9 Electronic File Format 4v ia. " t P d inn ,ON A.10 Establish iM PAC(Optional) 0 A11 DOIdgLI PAC Meetings(Ogiora0 0 Administration Activities Subtotals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Technical Activities(Delete or add rows as necessary) 1.0 Tool Development 19,750 0 0 0 0 D 0 19,750 1 Framework Integration Tools 3.350 3.350 1.2 Consumer Marketing 8 Education 9.700 9.700 1.3 Cty/C.rdy Marketirg8 Education 0 14 EE/RE Processing 8 Evakation 0 1.5 Cwroaqual Assessment Funding Request 0 1 6 Energy/Cost/I Savings Tracking 6,700 6 700 1.7 Team Repoo sties It Timelme 0 2.0 Jurisdiction Establishment 3,350 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,350 2.1 Document Creation 0 2.2 Document Review 3,350 3.350 3.0 Financing Documents Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 3 1 Docuner¢Creation 0 3.2 D=mem Review 0 4.0 Legal Validation Filing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.1 DocimieM Creation 0 4.2 Document Review 0 5.0 Program Design 36.900 0 0 0 0 0 0 38,90D 5 1 Program Design Donumem 9,500 9,500 Pagel of 2 Exhibit B Att B-2.4 - Sub ARRA - TEC Budget for ARRA Reimbursement to Major Subcontractor#1 (1) persornl Services Project Operating Expenses ARRA Reim pwxsc ableTwk Cos¢burs TM Energy Coalition Direct Labor Fringe Benef2s Materols Equipment Travel MsC Sub for Sub#1 tortradors 5.2 Program Financing Plan 0 5.3 Technical StaMaras 8 Guidelines 8,375 8,375 54 Program Operations Manual 11,200 11.200 5:'. Marketing Analyses 7,825 7,825 6.6 Program Implementation&Operations 653.579 0 28000 0 0 50.0130 0 723.579 5A Program Marketing Plan 3,350 3.350 6.2 Program Incertme Execution Plan 14,700 14.700 6.3 CtylC unty Pannar Lmhrg 0 6.4 Webste Launch 0 6_5 Marketing,Outreach,Audits&Installs 618,929 20,000 50,000 688,929 6.6 Data Collection 8 Reporting 16,600 16AD0 6.7 Workforce Traimng Modules 0 6.8 SoBware aM Reporting Contracts 6.9 Exhibit Booth 0 7.0 Reserve&Incentive Fund Establishod 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D slot wflh=11lin fund 7.1 Establish Funds anb Documents 0 7.2 Admurster Funds 0 Technical Acfiv0ies Subtohls 713.579 0 20,000 0 D 50,000 0 783,579 Major Subcontractor 01 D sect labor Fringe Benefice Materials Equipment Travel Msc. ARRA ARRA Reimbursable Totals 713,579 0 20.000 0 0 50,000 0 783.579 Percent of the Totel 91%1 0% 3% 0% 0% 6% 0% 100% Total protect experees= 70.000 Exhibit B Att B-3-Contractor Rates Crty of San Bemardbio Pr acted Hotoly Rates El Dates From 7/1/09 From 7110 From 7/1/11 From From prgened Total To 6/30/10 To'. Wd0111 To 6/30/12 To--] To Hours Worked qNa.ejob lasstl¢atroMds, (S)Ceiling R.I. (E)CaNag Rai. (S1 Ceilag Rate ($)Ceiing Rate (E)Calrng Rate This#1 am Dvector 75 75 75 am Arel t 26 2B 26 am ASSStalll 1 17 17 17 'Your actual billable rates..."t exceed the ceiling rates specified in this exhibit. As a reminder,this sheet lists unloaded(that Is,before fringe benefits or any other overhead)rates. Exhibit B Att B-3.1 -Sub Rates . Richards Watson Gershon Pm ected Houd Rates($ Dates Fmm: V1I70 From 1/1/11 From: 111/12 From-. Fmm: Projected Total To 12r31 110 To: 12/31/11 Tot 12/37/12 To: I To Hours Worked Name Job ClassA¢abon/Tdle ($)Ceiling Rate ($)Ceiling Rate ($)Ceiling Rate (s)Ceiling Rate ($)Ceiling Rate Subpl Employee Name (or TBD' Subol Employee Title TBD Partner 500 500 500 TBD Shareholder 400 400 400 TBD Paralegal 225 225 225 Adjoin 90 90 90 Your actual billable rates cannot exceed the rates specified in this exhibit •As a reminder,this sheet lists unloaded(that is,before hinge benefits or any other overhead)rates. Exhibit B Aft B-3.2- Sub Rates Clean Energy Advocates,Inc. Pro ected Hou Rates($ Dates From 111/10 From. 1 111/11 Fmm' 1 1/1112 1 Fmm: I I From I Projected Total To: 12/31!10 70: 1ZlJ7/11 To' 12/31/12 To: To. Hours worked Name Job Classification/Title ($)Celeng Rate ($)Ceiling Rate ($)Ceiing Rate ($)CeAmg Rate ($)Cetlmg Rate $ubal Employee Name (or'MD') Subfll Employee Tft Laura Franke 1pfincipal 275 275 275 Fire Ca Yo Panner 275 275 275 Ton Haske Vice President 200 2D0 200 TBD Ana t 100 100 100 TBD lAdmin 50 50 50 Your actual billable rates cannot exceed the rates specified In this exhibit. As a reminder,this sheet lists unloaded(that is,before fringe benefits or any other overhead)rates. Exhibit B Aft B-3.3- Sub Rates EnerPath Protected Hourly Rates(E Dales From 1 111/10 From 111/11 From 1 111112 f From I I From I Protected Total To 12/31/10 To 12lJ1/11 To. 12/31H2 To' To' Hours Worked Name Job Class,ficabon/Tltle IS)Ceiling Rate (SI Ceiling Rate (EI Ceiling Rate (bl Ceiling Rate ($)Ceiling Rate Sub#1 Employee Name (or 7BD") Subpt Employee Title Ste hen Guthrie ICECIPtesment 175 175 175 Jonathan Baby VP Technology 135 135 135 Paul Gomez IVP Software 8 Dev 140 140 140 Ronald Green Director/ft Engineer 110 110 110 Jeff Benny Senior Developer 90 90 90 Joe Hm IVP Operations 115 115 115 Your actual billable rates cannot exceed the rates specified In this exhibit. As a reminder,this sheet lists unloaded(that is,before fringe benefUS or any other overhead)rates. Exhibit B Att B-3.4-Sub Rates The Energy Coalition protected Hourly Rates(8 Dates From 1 111110 From 1 111111 From 1 111112 From I From I Protected Total To 12/31/10 To 12/31/11 Tc. 12/31112 To To Hours Worked Name Job Classihcahonrinle (S)Ceiling Rate (SI Ceiling Rate (8)Ceiling Rate (S)Ceiling Rate (51 Geeing Rate Sub#1 Employee Name pr TBD" Sub#1 Employee Title TBD Director 225 225 225 TBD Program Manager 110 110 110 TBD Assistant 80 80 80 'Your actual billable rates cannot..coed the rates specified in this exhibit. As a reminder,this sheet lists unloaded(that is,before fringe patterns or any other overhead)rates. Exhibit B Aft B-6-Leverage Funding ome, other. Cdy Sera Gean E Leverage Leverage Total Task Contractor/Subcontractor Name: BemaNirno WBte0n nergy The Energy Revolving Advocates,Ind Caalttion Loan Funtl Fundirny FuMinp Lewrape (EECBG) Gershon Organicatdn Organksation Fulls Name Name Project Admitastratlon Activl0va A 1 AOend lilci Meeting c A.2 CPR s4seungs A.3 Final Mining C A4 Monthly Progress Reports 0 A.5 1.Te Plam.Temno=t Reports all Interim # , Dsliwmbles Ab Final Report 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p is As 1 Final Report Outline 0 A6. Final Report C A] Identify and Obtain Leverage Funds 0 A.e Identify all Obtain Required Permts rz G A.9 Electronic File Format rye n ti ti... t wYk A.1D Establish the PAC(Optional) 0 AM Conduct PAC Meetings(Optional) 0 Ad min a"tion Activities SUblMal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Prisi Technical Activities(Dekte rows as necessary) 7.0 Tool Dwabpmem 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D o 1.1 Framework Integration Tools 0 1.2 Consumer Marketing S Education 0 1.3 City/County Marketinga Education 0 1.4 EE/i Processing a Evaluation 0j 1.5 COM&Clual Assessment Funding Request o1 1.6 Emrgy/COSUGNG Savings Tracking 0 1.7 Team Responsibilities a Timeline 0 2.0 urisdkfbn EstabNStsnam 6000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e0,000 2 1 Document Creation 80.000 60.000 22 Document Revtaw 0 3.0 Financing Docur mras Dwebpmere 70,000 0 - 0 0 0 0 a 3.1 Document Creation 70,000 70.000 3.2 Document Review 0 4.0 Legal Validation Filing 35.000 0 0 0 0. 0 0 ._3-5 4.1 Document Creation 35,000 - .+36,000 4.2 Document Review 0 5.0 Program Design 165.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t6s 5.1 Propmm Design WCUIrent 50.000 S. 5.2 Program Financing Plan 25,000 23.000 5.3 Technical standards a Guidelines 45,000 45.OW 54 Program Operations Manual 45,000 45,000 Exhibit B Att B-6•Leverage Funding Othe: Otne, pty of San Pochant. Clean Energy The Energy Rerol7--6 uevering Leverage Le"r ask Contractor I Subcontractor Name: Be naramo Watson Advocates,Mc. FnerPaM Coaliaon Loan Funding ganwh LFunds (EECBG) Gershon OrgName ion Organisation Funds Name Name 5.5 Marketing Analysis 6.0 Program Implamentatinn&Operations 60,920 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,92, 6.1 Program Markefing Plan 15,000 moo, 6.2 Program Inoenkve Exawtion Plan 63 Gry/Couny Partner Uatinp 6.4 Weoalte Launch 6.5 Marketing,Outreach,Audis&Installs 45,920 45.92: C 66 Dos Cdlecum 6 Rationing 67 Workfome Training Modules 6.6 SoMvare and Reporting Conlrees 6.9 Evtlllul Booty 7.0 Reserve&Incentive Fund Established 0 0 0 - 0 0 39.00(1,000 0 _ *000:00C along seen Reimalvino Fund 7.1 Establish Funds and Documents 39,WD,000 39,000,001 C 71 Admiriiner Funds Tmhnk*Activities,Subtotak 39D,920 0 0 0 D 39,000,00 0 0 39.390,92C Leverage Foods Tatar 39(1,920 0 0 0 0 39,00(1,000 0 0 39.39892[ Portent of the Total 1% 0% 0% D% O% 99% OX o% 100% Exhibit B Aft B-7 - Additional Notes Exhibit I Attachment Name (e.g., Exhibit B,Attachment B-3 Sub#2 Rates) I Note Att B2.1 Sub ARRA Sub#1 =Richards,Watson& Gershon, Program Legal Counsel Att 62.2 Sub ARRA Sub#2=Clean Ener y Advocates, Financial Advisor Att 62.3 Sub ARRA Sub#3=EnerPath, Pro ram Energy Consultant Att B2.4 Sub ARRA Sub#4=The Energy Council, Pro ram Marketing Partner Aft B2.1 Sub Rates ISub#1 =Richards, Watson& Gershon, Program Legal Counsel Att B2.2 Sub Rates ISub#2=Clean Ener Advocates, Financial Advisor Att B2.3 Sub Rates Sub#3=EnerPath. Program Energy Consultant Att B2.4 Sub Rates Sub#4=The Ene[ey Council, Program Marketinp Partner Attachment 18 PON 400-09401 REFERENCES STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CONTRACTS OFFICE REFERENCES For the prime contractor and each subcontractor, provide a minimum of three (3) references who can independently assess that prime's or subcontractor's effectiveness in previously delivering similar programs or responsibilities. Firm Name: City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency Reference#1 Name of Organization US Department of Housing & Urban Development Los Angeles Field Office Address 611 W. 6th St. Room 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Contact Name Chin Woo Choi Contact Title Program Manager Contact Phone Number (213) 534-2571 Describe the similar programs previously Administer $5.8m CDBG, HOPWA, ESG, HOME delivered and/or similar responsibilities grant program previously met. Administer $8.42m Neighborhood Stabilization Program Administer& Manage $17 m HUD Section 108 Funding Reference #2 Name of Organization US Environmental Protection Agency Address 75 Hawthorne Street, WST-4 San Francisco, CA 94105 Contact Name Deirdre Nurre Contact Title EPA Project Officer Contact Phone Number (415)947-4290 Describe the similar programs Administer: 2 - $200,000 US EPA grants to inventory sites, previously delivered and/or perform Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments, conduct similar responsibilities previously Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessments, and prepare site met. remediation plans addressing Brownfield sites. Reference #3 Name of Organization California Department of Toxic Substances Control Address 5796 Corporate Avenue Cypress CA 90630 Contact Jame Maryam Tasnif-Abbasi Contact 1 we Brownfields/TSI Grant Coordinator Contact 'hone Number (714) 484-5489 Describ: he similar programs pre sly delivered Coordinate implementation of 2 - and/or: ilar responsibilities prev Jy met. $100,000 grants for site investigations of environmental hazards leading to siteclean up and reuse. Attachment 18 PON 400-09-401 REFERENCES STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CONTRACTS OFFICE REFERENCES ATTACHMENT 18 For the prime contractor and each subcontractor, provide a minimum of three (3) references who can independently assess that prime's or subcontractor's effectiveness in previously delivering similar programs or responsibilities. Firm Name: Clean Energy Advocates Reference #1 Name of Organization — California School Boards Association (CSBA) Address — 3100 Beacon Blvd., West Sacramento, CA 95691 Contact Name — Susan Rader Contact Title — Senior Director, District and Financial Services Contact Phone Number— 916-331-6669 Describe the similar programs previously delivered and/or similar responsibilities previously met. Clean Energy Advocates Principal, Laura Franke, has worked with CSBA for the past 19 years to develop, manage, and administer successful financing programs for school districts statewide. These include: California Schools Cash Reserve Program Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes (pooled financing), FlexFund (capital lease program), GASB 45 Solutions Program, and most recently Schools Targeted Energy Program (STEP). Reference #2 Name of Organization — Innovative Energy Services, Inc. Address — P.O. Box 910216, San Diego, CA 92191 Contact Name— Nancy Rorabaugh Contact Title — Energy Services Consultant Contact Phone Number— 800-500-6711 Describe the similar programs previously delivered and/or similar responsibilities previously met. Working with Innovative Energy Services, Clean Energy Advocates has provided debt analysis related to energy projects for customers utilizing power purchase agreements (PPA) and municipal debt issuance through general fund and taxpayer supported debt. Reference #3 Name of Organization — Bret Harte Union High School District Address — 323 South Main Street, Angels Camp, CA 95221 Contact Name — Michael Chimente Contact Title — Superintendent Contact Phone Number- 209-736-8340 Describe the similar programs previously delivered and/or similar responsibilities previously met. Clean Energy Advocates Principal, Laura Franke, has worked with the District in the past to successfully deliver several different debt financing solutions including: Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Refunding Certificates of Participation, and preparation for General Obligation Bond authorization. The District has indicated interest in participating in a new California School Boards Association Program being offered for targeted energy efficiency measures. Attachment 18 PON 400-09401 REFERENCES STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CONTRACTS OFFICE REFERENCES For the prime contractor and each subcontractor,provide a minimum of three (3) references who can independently assess that prime's or subcontractor's effectiveness in previously delivering similar programs or responsibilities. Firm Name: Richards, Watson & Gershon, A Professional Corporation Reference#1 Name of Organization City of Palm Desert Address 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert. California 92260 Contact Name Paul S. Gibsqn Contact Title Finance Director and City Treasurer Contact Phone Number (760) 346-0611 Describe the similar programs Formation of Palm Desert' s AB 811 program, previously delivered and/or similar Bond Counsel for all past& current bond responsibilities previously met financings to fund the program (limited obligation improvement bonds and lease revenue bonds), legal advice for ongoing program administration issues. Commencement of validation and SEC no- action request documentation. District formation and Bond Counsel for other land- secured special assessment districts and community facilities districts in Palm Desert. Legal advice for ongoing district levy and administration issues. Delinquency management and foreclosure legal services. Reference#2 Name of Organization County of Sonoma Address 575 Administration Drive, Room 105A Santa Rosa, California 95403 Contact Name Kathleen A. Laroc ue Contact Title Deputy C unty Counsel Contact Phone Number (707) 565-331 Describe the similar programs Formation of Sonoma County's AB 811 previously delivered and/or similar program, Bond Counsel for all past and current responsibilities previously met limited obligation improvement bond financings to fund the program, legal advice for ongoing program administration issues. . Handled successful validation proceeding of the AB 811 program, assessment contracts, and related limited obligation improvement bond financings. Reference#3 Name of Organization City of Upland Address 460 N. Euclid Avenue O. Box 460 Upland, California 91786 Upland, California 91785-0460 Contact Name Jeff Zwack Contact Title Redevelopment Director Contact Phone Number (909)931-4148 Describe the similar programs Assistance with district formation and special previously delivered and/or similar tax bond financing as City Attorney and responsibilities previously met Disclosure Counsel for land-secured community facilities districts in Upland. Legal advice for ongoing district levy, administration and dissolution issues. Attachment 18 PON 400-09401 REFERENCES STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CONTRACTS OFFICE REFERENCES For the prime contractor and each subcontractor, provide a minimum of three(3) references who can independently assess that prime's or subcontractor's effectiveness in previously delivering similar programs or responsibilities. Firm Name: EnerPath Reference#1 Name of Organization Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Address 111 N. Hope St. Room 1057 Los Angeles, CA 90012-5701 Contact Name Alex Brown Contact Title Program Manager Contact Phone Number (213) 367-4036 Describe the similar programs Direct Install Program: previously delivered and/or similar Energy audit of small commercial clients and responsibilities previously met. installation of lighting and other lighting related energy efficient measures. Reference#2 Name of Organization Riverside Public Utilities Address 3900 Main Street Riverside, CA 92522 Contact Name Michael McLellan Contact Title Program Manager Contact Phone Number (951) 826-5977 Describe the similar programs previously delivered Direct Install Program: and/or similar responsibilities previously met. Lighting surveys and direct installation for small business. Energy audit of residential homes and tune-ups of HVAC units and water measures. Reference #3 Name of Organization Southern Califomia Edison Address 6042 N. Irwindale, Suite A Irwindale, CA 91702 Contact Name Tony Coonce Contact Title Program Manager Contact Phone Number (626)633-3051 Describe the similar pro! is previously Southern California Edison—Palm Desert delivered and/or similar onsibilities Partnership: areviously met. C&I and residential direct install program with lighting, HVAC, refrigeration, gas and water measures. Attachment 18 RFP 400-09-401 CLIENT REFERENCES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CALIFORNIA CONTRACTS OFFICE CLIENT ATTACHMENT 18 REFERENCES For the prime contractor and each subcontractor, provide a minimum of 3 references who can independently assess that prime's or subcontractor's effectiveness in previously delivering similar programs or responsibilities. Firm Name: The Energy Coalition Reference 1 - COMMUNITY ENERGY PARTNERSHIP (CEP) PROGRAM Name of Organization A. City of Brea - CEP Program B. Southern California Edison - CEP Program Address A. 1 Civic Center Circle, Brea, CA 92821 B. 6042-A N. Irwindale Ave, Irwindale, CA 91702 Contact Name A. Tim O'Donnell B. Gene Rodrigues Contact Title A. City Manager B. Director of Energy Efficiency Contact Phone Number A. (714) 671-4421 B. (626) 633-3133 Describe the previously delivered The Community Energy Partnership is a collaboration between similar programs or responsibilities. Southern California Edison, The Gas Company, The Energy Coalition, and eight Southern California Partner Cities. The Energy Coalition has been the implementing and facilitating partner responsible for managing home and small business energy efficiency tune-ups and community outreach activities within the Partner cities to achieve hard energy savings goals. The project addresses the need to integrate statewide energy and greenhouse goals into effective local action. The project assists local governments in defining individualized energy reduction plans to support the California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan and AB 32 for their facilities and their communities. From 2006-2008, the project exceeded energy savings goals by 20% for a total of 8 million kWh through energy efficiency tune-ups of homes and small businesses, distribution of more than 88,000 energy efficient products at more than 200 community events, and conducting successful marketing campaigns to educate residents and business owners on available tools to reduce energy. The program also trained high school students in becoming energy efficiency auditors for small businesses. Reference 2 — PALM DESERT ENERGY PARTNERSHIP PROJECT Name of Organization A. City of Palm Desert — Palm Desert Energy Partnership Project B. The Gas Company— Palm Desert Energy Partnership Project Address A. 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 B. 555 West 5th St, Mail Code GT28A4, Los Angeles CA 90013 Contact Name A. John Wohlmuth B. Frank Spasaro Contact Title A. City Manager B. Manager of Energy Efficiency Partnerships Contact Phone Number A. (760) 346-0611 B. (213) 244-3655 Describe the previously delivered The Palm Desert Energy Partnership was formed in 2006 by the similar programs or responsibilities. City of Palm Desert, Southern California Edison, The Gas Company, and The Energy Coalition to achieve a 30% reduction in electric and gas usage and peak demand in Palm Desert by 2011. The Energy Coalition is facilitating partner and sits on all committees including the Executive Committee, Management Team, Working Group, and Marketing Team. Lead responsibilities include strategic planning, developing innovative program implementation approaches and community outreach. Key program accomplishments include the development of AB 811 financing, piloting of innovative implementation strategies and marketing campaigns, and generating savings of 70 million kWh and 1.8 million therms to date. Reference 3 — PEAK STUDENTS ENERGY ACTIONS PROGRAM Name of Organization Irvine Unified Schools — PEAK Student Energy Actions Address 5050 Barranca Parkway, Irvine, CA 92604 Contact Name Gwen Gross Contact Title Superintendent Contact Phone Number (949) 936-5250 Describe the previously delivered PEAK Student Energy Actions is a standards-based science similar programs or responsibilities. curriculum that The Energy Coalition developed and implements in California schools to empower elementary students to manage their energy use in their homes. The curriculum includes multi-media tools, such as an interactive website, hands-on lab activities and field trips. From 2006-2008, The Energy Coalition enrolled over 55,000 California students statewide into the PEAK program as well as 6,000 students in Illinois, and conducted more than 400 outreach events, including teacher orientation trainings, educational assemblies, site visits, and CFL fundraisers. I STATE CAPITOL COMMITTEES HOOM 5094 VICE CHAIR CRAMENTO.CA 95814 BUDGET&FISCAL REVIEW )65140 7 FAX 31 Cfalifozrtitt Mate Prtate )32 227 2 MEMBER DISTRICT OFFICES RULES 6577 HAVEN AVENUE SENATOR BUDGET&FISCAL REVIEW SUITE 210 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 BOB DUTTON SUBCOMMITTEE NO 19091 466-41 BD (909)466-4185 FAX THIRTY-FIRST SENATE DISTRICT 3560 UNIVERSITY AVENUE RIVERSIDE.CA 92501 1951)7152625 (951)7152627 FAX # - s r 4,:'•t December 16, 2009 The Honorable Karen Douglas Chairwoman California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS—33 Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District State Energy Program RFP#400-09-401 Dear Chairwoman Douglas: 1 am writing this letter to respectfully request that you give full consideration to the application under the i state Energy Program (SEP) Municipal Financing Program for the creation of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District(SBVCED). The formation of this AB 811 District has the potential to provide helpful economic benefits across our region in the current economic recession. These benefits would include the creation of new jobs and lower home and business energy costs. At the same time it will provide added value to the existing buildings and spur an economic revitalization in a region that has been hit extremely hard with an unemployment rate hovering above 14%. The SBVCED would strategically position San Bernardino County as a leader in energy efficiency improvements as well as renewable energy generation and will serve to attract new industries to locate in this region to supply the increase in energy efficient improvements and renewable energy systems on homes and businesses. My support for this application is in response to the assurances that the program will uphold the highest standards in regard to consumer protection and the professionalism and reliability of service providers. 1 am pleased to support the City of San Bernardino's application for the establishment of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District and urge you and the other Commissioners to approve the full grant amount. Sincerely, ; BOB DUTTON �yJ Senator,31'District cc: Angela Gould Rachel Grant REPR ESENTING BIG BEAR LAKE C OLeT.O.N,•-.0 RE STLINE GLEN AVON..GR ANO TERRACE HIGH.G,R OV E iaH.IIG.H LAND LAKE ARROWHEAD.L'O^MA LINDA _' Nuarb of Suprrui,soni GARYC.OVITT Lountg of Ahn jOrruarbins CHAIRMAN SUPERVISOR,FOURTH DISTRICT December 16, 2009 The Honorable Karen Douglas Chairwoman California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS—33 Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District State Energy Program RFP 11400-09-401 Dear Chairwoman Douglas: I am writing this letter in support of the City of San Bernardino's application under the State Energy Program (SEP) Municipal Financing Program. The formation of a region wide AB 811 District will provide much needed benefits in the current economic recession. These benefits include the creation of new green jobs; lowering home and business owners' energy bills, while at the same time providing added value to the existing buildings; -*. and spur an economic revitalization in a region that has been hit extremely hard with layoffs and an unemployment rate of more than 13%. This proposal has the potential to strategically position San Bernardino County as a leader in energy efficiency improvements as well as renewable energy generation and will serve to attract new clean and green industries to locate in this region. Additionally, by capitalizing on AB 811, the overall carbon footprint of this region will be dramatically reduced by the infusion of energy efficient improvements and renewable energy systems on homes and businesses. The proposed Program will be standardized to provide program administration and financing through a Joint Powers Authority (JPA). This structure will facilitate easy inclusion of additional jurisdictions on an ongoing basis to assure Program sustainability. The City of San Bernardino has partnered with San Bernardino County and the City of Redlands and assembled a team that will create Program documents, establish the financing program, and administer distribution of funds to provide an infrastructure that is replicable across jurisdictions. In conclusion, on behalf of the County of San Bernardino, I am pleased to support the City of San Bernardino's application for the establishment of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District and urge you and the other Commissioners to approve the full grant amount. Sincerely, 0/ Ge Cwitt,c man Forth District S. rvisor cc: Angel;, uld Rache" ant City of JERRY BEAN' Mavor Pro Tem RED LANDS JON HARRISON PAT GILBREATH Council Member Mayor IncorporatrA ISM 35 Cajon Street, Redlands, CA 92373 MICK GALLAHER 909-',98-7533 Council Member pgilbrrin:n�citvofrrdlands.ore PETE AGUILAR December 15, 2009 Council Member The Honorable Karen Douglas California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS—33 Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District, State Energy Program RFP#400-09-401 Dear Chairwoman Douglas: I am writing this letter in support of the City of San Bemardino's application for the creation of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District (SBVCED) under the State Energy Program (SEP) Municipal Financing Program. The formation of a region wide AB 811 District will provide much needed benefits in the current economic recession. These benefits include the creation of new green jobs; lowering home and business owners' energy bills, while at the same time providing added value to the existing buildings; and spur an economic revitalization in a region that has been hit extremely hard with layoffs and an unemployment rate hovering around 13%. SBVCED has the potential to strategically position San Bernardino County as a leader in energy efficiency improvements as well as renewable energy generation and will serve to attract new clean and green industries to locate in this region. Additionally, by capitalizing on AB 811, the overall carbon footprint of this region will be dramatically reduced by the infusion of energy efficient improvements and renewable energy systems on homes and businesses. The proposed Program will be standardized to provide program administration and financing through a Joint Powers Authority (JPA). This structure will facilitate easy inclusion of additional jurisdictions on an ongoing basis to assure Program sustainability. The City of San Bernardino has partnered with San Bernardino County and the City of Redlands and assembled a team that will create Program documents, establish the financing program, and administer distribution of funds to provide an infrastructure that is replicable across jurisdictions. On behalf of the City of Redlands I am pleased to support the City of San Bernardino's application for the establishment of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District and urge you and the other Commissioners to approve the full grant amount. Sincerel Pat Gilbreath Mayor, City of Redlands cc: Angela Gould Rachel Grant � e November 25, 2009 The Honorable Karen Douglas Chairwoman California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street,MS—33 Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: Support for San Bemardino Valley Clean Energy District. State Energy Program RFP #400-09-401 1 am writing this letter in support of the City of San Bernardino's application for the creation of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District (SBVCED) under the State Energy Program (SEP) Municipal Financing Program.This support is extended by the regional Center of Excellence, part of the Economic Development & Corporate Training division of the San Bernardino Community College District. Earlier this fall, San Bernardino Community College District was awarded $869,000 from the California Energy Commission to conduct training for Weatherization Specialists, Building Performance Professionals, and Home Energy Auditors. This vital training is part of a systematic, regional effort to provide the region a clean and green workforce and is delivered in collaboration with San Bernardino County, San Bernardino Community College District, Colton-Redlands-Yucaipa ROP, San Bernardino County ROP, Chaffey College, Uncommon Good,and the Inland Empire chapter of the United States Green Building Council. Over the next 18 months, we will be training over 175 San Bernardino county residents into these key energy efficient occupations by providing them the classroom and hands-on instruction they need to obtain industry certifications in the field. We look forward to partnering with the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District, and the other strategic cities/partners involved with this application, to supply our local cities with a local, trained workforce that will be a vital component to the proposed program. The Center of Excellence believes in working together with other local and regional entities, leveraging resources, planning strategically, and ensuring effective execution towards shared goals. On behalf of San Bernardino Community College District's Center of Excellence, I am pleased to support the City of San Bernardino's application for the establishment of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District and urge you and the other Commissioners to approve the full gram amount. Should you have questions or requires additional information about our specific partnership activities I can be reached at 909.382.4037 or kflemina@sbccd.edu. Best Regards, Kevin Fleming Director, Inland Empire Center of Excellence San Bernardino Community College District 114 S. Del Rosa Dr. San Bernardino, CA 92408 NE �q�,yy��ORK1NG f3 EW I - TOG ETHER "Working Together to Energize the Inland Empire' fJECA Rational L!tchical Cur racla!i Assc�iaiiur !REl4-INVOtiural Bratllerbaar c'Esrt,cal l..orxen December 16, 2009 The Honorable Karen Douglas, Chairwoman California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS-33 Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District State Energy Program RFP#400-09-401 Dear Chairwoman Douglas: I am writing this letter in support of the City of San Bernardino's application for the creation of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District (SBVCED) under the State Energy Program (SEP) Municipal Financing Program. The formation of a region wide AB 811 District will provide much needed benefits in the current economic recession. These benefits include the creation of new green jobs; lowering home and business owners' energy bills, while at the same time providing added value to the existing buildings; and spur an economic revitalization in a region that has been hit extremely hard with layoffs and an unemployment rate hovering around 13%. SBVCED has the potential to strategically position San Bernardino County as a leader in energy efficiency improvements as well as renewable energy generation and will serve to attract new clean and green industries to locate in this region. Additionally, by capitalizing on AB 811, the overall carbon footprint of this region will be dramatically reduced by the infusion of energy efficient improvements and renewable energy systems on homes and businesses. The proposed Program will be standardized to provide program administration and financing through a Joint Powers Authority(1PA). This structure will facilitate easy inclusion of additional jurisdictions on an ongoing basis to assure Program sustainability. The City of San Bernardino has partnered with San Bernardino County and the City of Redlands and assembled a team that will create Program documents, establish the financing program, and administer distribution of funds to provide an infrastructure that is replicable across jurisdictions. On behalf of the Inland Empire Labor Management Cooperation Committee, I am pleased to support the City of San Bernardino's application for the establishment of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District and urge you and the other Commissioners to approve the full grant amount. Sincerely.,, ' an Hudson, Director cc: Angela Gould Rachel Grant S C: Ysk A YT{'I �e yS. P athry 1758 Orange Tree Lw* .�E M tel 909.335r �Raa` Services,Inc. M 4 £, December 15, 2009 The Honorable Karen Douglas Chairwoman California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS-33 Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District State Energy Program RFP 11400-09-401 Dear Chairwoman Douglas: I am writing this letter in support of the City of San Bernardino's application for the creation of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District (SBVCED) under the State Energy Program (SEP) Municipal Financing Program. The formation of a region wide AB 811 District will provide much needed benefits in the current economic recession. These benefits include the creation of new green jobs; lowering home and business owners' energy bills, while at the same time providing added value to the existing buildings; and spur an economic revitalization in a region that has been hit extremely hard with layoffs and an unemployment rate hovering around 13%. SBVCED has the potential to strategically position San Bernardino County as a leader in energy efficiency improvements as well as renewable energy generation and will serve to attract new clean and green industries to locate in this region. Additionally, by capitalizing on AB 811,the overall carbon footprint of this region will be dramatically reduced by the infusion of energy efficient improvements and renewable energy systems on homes and businesses. The proposed Program will be standardized to provide program administration and financing through a Joint Powers Authority(JPA). This structure will facilitate easy inclusion of additional jurisdictions on an ongoing basis to assure Program sustainability. The City of San Bernardino has partnered with San Bernardino County and the City of Redlands and assembled a team that will create Program documents, establish the financing program, and administer distribution of funds to provide an infrastructure that Is replicable across jurisdictions. On-behaI-of-Enerpath-ServicesrAnc Aam-pleased-to-support-the-City-0f-San-Bernardino%application-for_the establishment of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District and urge you and the other Commissioners to approve the full grant amount. Sincerely, F41 Stephen T. Guthrie CEO cc: Angela Gould Rachel Grant I �;�►L RICHARDS WATSON I GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW-A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 355 South Grand Avenue,Goth Floor,Los Angeles,California 90071-3101 Telephone 213.626.8484 Facsimile 213.626 0078 RICHARD RIE"AROS December 18, 2009 GLENN R.WATSON (RETI"F°) HARRY L GERSHON (1922-2007) STEVEN L DORSEY The Honorable Karen Douglas WIUUAM L STRAUS2 MIICNELL E.KaEOTT Chairwoman GREGORY W.STEPANICICN QUENELLE BARRNE California Energy Commission QUINN ROCHE M.BARROW E""°L W.LYNCH 1516 Ninth Street, MS— 33 GREGORY M.KUMEAI ..I°E'MCi«� Sacramento, CA 95814 STEVEN N.KAUFMANN AEVIN G.ENN IS ROBIN O.NMRIS MICHAEL ESTRADA UURENCE S.WIENER STEVEN Re: San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District e.TILDEN KIM SASKIA T.ASAMURA MAKER D.SOME State Energy Program RFP#400-09-401 PETER M.iNORSo JAMES L MAR KMAN CRAIG A.STEEL: T.PETER PIERCE Dear Chairwoman Douglas: TERENCEA.BOGA USA BOND IAN ET E.Co RIIM G.GRAYSON°M2 I am writing this letter in support of the City of San Bernardino's application for the WIUUAM 1.CUMFY".E creation of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District (SBVCED) under the MICHAEL F.YDENIBA MICHAEL, "ANNE" State Energy Program (SEP) Municipal Financing Program. The formation of a PAULA GUTIERRE2 RAM BRA GALLOWAY DIANA [NOWAY region wide AB 811 District will provide much needed benefits in the current DI PATRICK K E°BKO NORMAN A.DUPONT economic recession. These benefits include the creation of new green jobs; lowering DAVID M. OW LOLLY A.ENRIOSNDa home and business owners' energy bills, while at the same time providing added KIRS7 EN R.BOWMAN BILLYD.°°NEMORE value to the existing buildings; and spur an economic revitalization in a region that AMY GREYSON °E°°° RAM^" Q CRAIG has been hit extremely hard with layoffs and an unemployment rate hovering around D. - A SUSAN L RUSNAK 130/0 G.INDER KNAUUk GINETTA L GIOVINCO TRISHA0RT2 GNDICE E.at DAVID G.ROSTRASON SBVCED has the potential to strategically position San Bernardino County as a MELISSA M.CROSTNWAOE MAMCGI A MARRO°UTT leader in energy efficiency improvements as well as renewable energy generation and GFNA M.PURUS i JETEVER L.I EIS STEVEN L. I.Dw will serve to attract new clean and green industries to locate in this region. CHRISTOPHER EBBIE I.CHO DEBBIE Y.WARD Additionally, by capitalizing on AB 811, the overall carbon footprint of this region GEOFFREY ERIN L TOUSSAINT SP/�IEIEY will be dramatically reduced by the infusion of energy efficient improvements and WHITNEY G.MCDCAR LD SERITA R.YOUNG renewable energy systems on homes and businesses. VERONICA S.GUNDERSON SHMI KUMA DIANA".VARAT KATRINA C GONZALES The proposed Program will be standardized to provide program administration and DRE°"IEEE MARK L 4MI(FN financing through a Joint Powers Authority (JPA). This structure will facilitate easy zAYIIE WFAYEv UM R.MRMAR inclusion of additional jurisdictions on an ongoing basis to assure Program 3WIPYI°u°°EE'° sustainability. The City of San Bernardino has partnered with San Bernardino TE SAHONE4+&4D CRIME DRAIGE COUNTY,DEVICE County and the City of Redlands and assembled a team that will create Program TELEPHONE 714-990 0901 documents, establish the financing program, and administer distribution of funds to Cprovide an infrastructure that is replicable across jurisdictions. RICHARDS I WATSON I GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW-A PROFE55IONAL CORPORATION The Honorable Karen Douglas December 18, 2009 Page 2 On behalf of Richards, Watson & Gershon, I am pleased to support the City of San Bernardino's application for the establishment of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District and urge you and the other Commissioners to approve the full grant amount. Very truly yours, Diana K. Chuang Shareholder cc: Angela Gould Rachel Grant 9990"253\1195459v1.doc - Gaalifiai� Dec 21,2009 Karcn Douglas,Chairman California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street Sacramento.CA 95814 Dear Chairman Douglas: The Energy Coalition is pleased to partner with the City of San Bernardino, City of Redlands and County of San Bernardino in the creation of the San Bemardino Valley Clean Energy District through a grant application to the California Energy Commission under the State Energy Program (SEP) PON #400-09-401 — Municipal Financing Program. The Cities of San Bernardino and Redlands and the County of San Bernardino have committed a significant portion of their Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant funds to develop and implement an AB 811 building retrofit financing program. The Project partners intend to make this program available to property owners in cities throughout San Bernardino County that elect to participate in the program as well as to property owners in unincorporated areas of the County. The Energy Coalition will play a significant cuntracted role on behalf of the Project for stakeholder engagement, marketing, outreach, communications and other important program design and implementation responsibilities. The Energy Coalition is a non-profit 50l(c)3 that manages a seven city Community Energy Partnership energy efficiency program in conjunction with SCE and So Cal Gas. The Energy Coalition is also a founding partner for the Palm Desert Energy Demonstration Project,as well as the creator and implementer of a statewide energy efficiency curriculum(PEAK)taught to over 50.000 4th to 6th graders. We have extensive experience and success in designing and implementing community-scale energy efficiency programs that are able to take full and creative advantage of all available financial and technical assistance for residential and commercial property owners. Our program approaches adeptly coordinate and communicate the co-funding leverage opportunities from utility programs, State and federal programs,and other sources in addition to delivering a proven model for effective marketing, outreach and community engagement that is able to create a groundswell of awareness and participation within the targeted communities. The proposed San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District Project will create a demand for thousands of new career-track jobs and achieve substantial energy, water. and carbon reductions in buildings throughout the County, In addition, the program will adhere to the State's loading order which emphasizes achieving cost-effective energy efficiency and energy use reductions prior to the installation of renewable energy systems. We urge you to fully fund this innovative multi-agency SEP application under the PON #400-09-401 — Municipal Financing Program. _ Thank you for supporting this critically important Municipal Financing Program for energy retrofits led by the Cities of San Bernardino and Redlands and the County of San Bernardino. Sincerely, Craig Perkins. Executive Director �_ � � ' 4.-, v�re, 9zfs i 8 7e!. �'4v�'f i 4o4c f o�: 949 70 i-4644 REGENT CAI" tT`ALCtifOU1t Member FINRA/SIPC December 17,2009 The Honorable Karen Douglas Chairwoman California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS—33 Sacramento,CA 95814 Re: San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy olsfrict State Energy Program RFP#400-09-401 Dear Chairwoman Douglas Regent Capital Group is pleased to submit this letter of support for the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District(SBV)to create a regional AB "11 Program under the State. Fnergy Program (SEP) Municipal Financing Program. The Cities of San Bernardino and Redtands are in the process of establishing a Program that will be standardized to provide program management and financing through a .loint Powers Authority (JPA). This structure will facilitate easy inclusion of additional jurisdictions on an ongoing basis to assure Program sustainability. As a potential recipient of SEP funds, the City of San Bernardino has assembled a team that will create Program documents, establish the financing program, and administer distribution of funds to provide an infrastructure that is reputable across jurisdictions. Funds will not he used for individual property-owner expenditures, rather to create the model that will provide ongoing funds to property-owners. San Bernardino and Redlands both have lire commitment of their respective City Councils and staff to implement this program and establish a template for the region. These cities have already prepared their surrounding cities with information related to their efforts, and have identified key partners for legal, financial, marketing, energy services, workforce development, education and community outreach. These cities and Participating partners have histories of effective Program implementation from document and jurisdictional establishment, to energy services program delivery, and pooled financing. Furthermore,the Inland Empire region targeted by this Program is an economically disadvantaged area that will benefit significantly from job creation/workforce development through the Program. In conclusion, on behalf of Regent Capital Group we are pleased to support the SBV application for the establishment of the San Bernardino Valley Clean Energy District. As a firm that supports the securitization of these types of liens, we are pleased to support this program. Sincerely, rL'bule Ucc+fern ..� President Casey Dai! ey 4420N. `ilarsity,4ve. #1134 Phone #: 909-473-7715 San Bernardino, Ca 92407 E-mail- Cadaifey37 @yahoo.com Objective Obtain a challenging, responsible and rewarding management level position to utilize my skills and knowledge of City Management, Finance, Urban Planning and general Public Administration, as well as skills acquired from previous employment. Education September 2007: ➢ Master in Public Administration, California State University, San Bernardino June 2005: ➢ Bachelor of Arts, Public Administration, California State University, San Bernardino Academe Dr. Carol J. Bellis Public Service Achievement Award, June 2007 College of Business & Public Administration Departmental Honors, June 2007 Monors American Society for Public Administration, Inland Empire Chapter, Student Scholarship Award, June, 2006 Beta Gamma Sigma, National Business Honor Society, June 2005 • Department of Public Administration Honors, June 2005 Dr. Carol J. Bellis Intern of the Year Scholarship, June 2005 College of Business & Public Administration Deans Honor List: Fall 2004 - Spring 2005 Work dune 2008-('resent: Assistant to the Mayor, City of San Bernardino. Serve as an E advisor to the Mayor in the following areas: land use development, transportation, environmental, �enence intergovernmental & legislative affairs. Responsible for professional staffing for several regional boards and commissions the Mayor serves on. Serve as professional liaison to the Mayor for major capital projects in the areas of transportation, land use development and environmental initiatives. Currently managing the development of City of San Bernardino's Energy Efficiency & Conservation Block grant and development of Citywide Climate Action Plan. Serve on the Project Development Teams for several mass transit projects including the sbX BRT and San Bernardino Intennodal Transit Center. November 2006 dune 2008: Management Analyst, City Manager's Office, City of Calimesa. Administer CDBG grant funds and implement programs and projects; Prepare and submit financial and performance reports to various State agencies; Supervise and administer City's CDBG funded Housing Rehabilitation Program; Act as Project Manager for various Redevelopment, Public Works and Parks & Recreation projects; Prepare various grant applications; Monitor agency contracts and franchise agreements; Prepare and monitor several department budgets; Maintain City's Information Technology infrastructure, network, and workstations; Implement and oversee development of City's website, www.cityofcalimesa.net; Prepare Request for Proposals for competitive bidding of various professional services; Handle economic development efforts and coordination of events and facilities with Calimesa Chamber of Commerce; Engage in contract and developer negotiations; Conduct various workshops with community stakeholders and elected officials; Organize community events; Prepare staff reports and give presentations to City Council June 2005-November 2006. Graduate Management Intern, Department of Finance `Wolk City of Colton. Prepared 2006-07 & 2005-06 City of Colton Budget document, including resean Beni nce and analysis of past, current & projected economic conditions, Prepared weekly expenditure reports, cont, Documented Eden's financial database system to mine data and generate financial reports, Documented and tracked Capital Improvement Projects spending and related funding sources, Assisted in audit preparation; Documented capitalization of fixed assets, related depreciation expenses, accumulated depreciation, and net book value; Administered Transient Occupancy Tax; Prepared staff reports and written policies; Performed Research & Analysis related to Tax Revenue Projections from new developments and annexations. March 2005 dune 2005. Planning Management Intern, City of Adelanto. Research zoning & APN's, Prepare reports for City Manager, Create forms for public use, Assist citizens and developers with questions related to planning and public works, provide front desk help, develop interactive GIS maps. Reviewed plans for pool permits. Interpreted & Analyzed Municipal Code March 2003 dune 2005. Computer Technician, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry. Installation of computer hardware and software, and general troubleshooting. Analyze faculty & staff hardware equipment requirements to find the best product for their needs, maintain various inventory spreadsheets and databases, & prepare purchase order requests. Additional January 2008: Successfully completed 151 Course of National Development Council's Economi, E-Venience Development Finance Professional Certification May 2006-,dune 2008: Commissioner, City of San Bernardino Planning Commission rDecem6er 2006-June 2008: Director, Calimesa Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors August 2005-Present.- Commissioner, Cal-ICMA Professional Development Committee and Cal-ICMA's Preparing the Next Generation Working Group. Creator of Careers in Local Govemment Event. March 2004-March 2005 Commissioner, Business & Economic Development Advisory Commission, City of Redlands ofeSSioWf International Conference of Shopping Centers (ICSC) Memberships International City/County Managers Association (ICMA) Municipal Managers Association of Southern Califomia (MMASC) ANGELA M. DAVISON EDUCATION & TRAINING University of California, Los Angeles, B.A., 2000—Double Major in Political Science &Asian American Studies - Graduated Magnum cum Laude; Associated Student Body Representative Antelope Valley Community College, A.A., 1997 - Graduated Magnum cum Laude PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Director of Programs, The Energy Coalition 2008 to Present Oversee the implementation of the company's core utility funded energy efficiency and demand response programs operating statewide for a total combined budget of approximately$20 million. Manage the 2009-11 application and contracting process for refunding core programs. Support the development of new business opportunities and business operations. Program Manager, The Energy Coalition 2006 to 2008 Successfully rebuilt local government partnership program and relationships between ten Southern California cities, Southern California Edison and The Gas Company. Hired program team to exceed aggressive energy savings goals, while maintaining cost-effectiveness and managing budget of$3 million. Supported the development of various local government special projects, such as the Palm Desert Demonstration Project and San Joaquin Energy Watch Partnership. Program recognition received from League of California Cities, Green California Summit and Flex Your Power. Program Coordinator, The Energy Coalition 2005 to 2006 Supported the development and implementation of the innovative large commercial demand response program in Pacific Gas & Electric territory. Coordinated Business Member services and recognition events in San Francisco, and conducted on-site tenant demand response and energy efficiency educational training workshops. Program received 2005 PEAK Load Management Alliance Innovative Program Design Award. Project Manager/Associate, Flex Your Power March 2004 to July 2005 Managed Hard-To-Reach (HTR) & Small Business Sector marketing and outreach campaigns. Directed media consultant team through multiple concurrent outreach campaigns and print advertisements in over 100 languages. Developed vision and lead implementation of 2005 HTR Statewide Campaign involving 85 publications and Energy Partner entities. Produced over $5,000 in earned media, radio, and advertising space within statewide ethnic media markets. Served as Southern California Field Associate for Retail Marketing Campaign representing in Los Angeles County and surrounding areas, building retail partnerships and conducting market research. Freelance Journalist, Asian American Press Outlets November 2003 to February 2004 Assisted in the production and reporting of stories for print and broadcast media. Identified and built relationships with community members for story leads and research. Senior Field Representative, State Assembly Member George Nakano July 2000 to May 2003 Served as District liaison to twelve cities within the 53rtl Assembly District, City of Los Angeles and Asian American Communities with a focus on building community relations and addressing environmental and education issues. Represented Member at corporate, community and government meetings and events. Successfully managed constituent casework, legislation tracking and correspondence. Developed and supervised thriving District Office internship program. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION Philippine Consulate Community Organizer, 2003 Philippine Presidential Visit to the City of Los Angeles, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo; Board Advisor, 2004 City of L.A. Asian Pacific American Heritage Month.; Board Member, Association to Advancement of Filipino American Arts and Culture 2003; Vice President, Asian Pacific American Legislative Staff network 2000-03;Guest Speaker, UCLA Asian American Studies Department 2001 -02. CRAIG A. PERKINS EDUCATION &TRAINING California State University, Dominguez Hills, M.P.A., 1983 —Public Administration University of California, Los Angeles: M.A., 1981 — Latin American Studies; M.A., 1980 — Political Science - Foreign Language and Area Studies Scholarship recipient, 1978-1980 - Inter-American Foundation Fellowship for thesis research in Peru, 1981 University of California, Berkeley, B.A., 1975— Sociology PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE President & Executive Director, The Energy Coalition March 2008 to Present As a non-profit 501(c)3 corporation, The Energy Coalition has been developing energy efficiency partnerships with local governments, their communities and their serving utilities for almost thirty years. The mission of The Energy Coalition is to create and implement the most comprehensive, integrated and innovative approaches for reducing energy demand, increasing clean energy generation and decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Current Energy Coalition programs include the Community Energy Partnership comprised of nine Southern California cities; PEAK Student Energy Actions, an energy education effort that reaches over 50,000 California students; the Business Energy Coalition which achieves peak demand energy reductions at 120 business sites in Northern California; and the Palm Desert Partnership that will achieve a 30% reduction in Palm Desert's citywide energy use over a five year period. Director of Environmental & Public Works Management, City of Santa Monica August 1993 to March 2008 Directed operations, programs, policies and initiatives for the City's water, wastewater and stormwater systems; managed the design, engineering and construction of City capital improvement projects; managed environmental protection, resource efficiency, alternative fuels and renewable energy programs; directed the solid waste, recycling and street maintenance operations; and oversaw implementation of the Sustainable City Plan. Managed an annual operating budget of$70 million, a capital budget of$300 million and 350 employees. Environmental Programs Manager, City of Santa Monica January 1991 to August 1993 Managed programs for water and energy conservation, pollution prevention and hazardous materials management, solid waste collection and recycling, and urban runoff pollution control. Proposed and implemented new utility rate structures to increase customer equity and improve service levels. Created the Santa Monica Sustainable City Plan. Budget Director I Administrative Svcs. Manager/Senior Management Analyst, City of Santa Monica July 1983 to January 1991 Directed the City's operating and capital improvement budget process, performed fiscal and policy analyses and provided recommendations to the City Manager and City Council. Managed organizational development efforts to improve efficiency and cost-effectiveness of City operations. Created a multi-year CIP budget and developed and implemented operating and capital budgets for the Public Works Department. Research Associate, UCLA Latin American Center, September 1981 to July 1983 Conducted focused research on Latin American policy issues and assisted in development of specialized publications for the Latin American Center. PUBLICATIONS Author and co-author of articles on solar electric projects, alternative fuel vehicles, water and energy efficiency, and urban runoff management practices. AWARDSIOTHER J. Robert Fluor Award, 2002;Asian American Architects and Engineers Association Award, 2002; Heal the Bay Award, 2004; City of Los Angeles Mayoral appointee to Citizens Proposition "0" Stormwater Bond Oversight Committee Title of Position: VP,Operations Name of Person: Joe Hui Educational Degree (s): include college or university, major, and College courses, not completed dates L.C. certification from the National Council for the Qualification of Lighting Professionals License Holder—General Contracting for the following states: expiration date(s), #(s), California, Oregon, Nevada(pending), Arizona (pending), expiration date(s), if applicable: Utah, Texas (pending), Tennessee (pending) and Kansas City (pending). Electrical license holder for Nevada Specialized Training Completed. Include dates and documentation Numerous trade specific courses with certifications. of completion: # of years experience in area of 18 years service proposed to provide: Describe person's relationship to offeror. If employee,#of years. If subcontractor, describe other/past Employee— 7 years of service working relationships Responsibilities are directed toward operations, project Describe this person's development and management—overall program and project responsibilities over the past 12 oversight, customer relationship management and staffing months. oversight. Previous employer(s), positions, Regional Development Manager, ENRON Senior Project Manager, Noresco and dates Senior Project Manager,Proven Alternatives Identify specific information about Clearly identify the experience, provide dates, describe the experience in: person's role and extent of involvement in the experience ............................................................................_........... ._................................................................................................................................._................. Program Management responsibility for the following Energy Efficiency Direct Install programs provided to Southern ✓ Direct experience design California Edison(2008), LA Department of Water&Power and management of energy- (2008-present), Riverside Public Utilities (2009), Colton Public Utilities (2009-present), Harrah's Entertainment (2005-2007), efficiency programs Caesars Entertainment (2005-2007), Jet Propulsion Labs, Dept. of Forestry, Hill Air Force Base and numerous other government and private sector entities. _................................................................................. . . .. ............................................................................................... ✓ Direct experience with energy-efficiency outreach Worked with outreach programs in conjunction with utility activities programs offered to many cities and municipalities. I ✓ Direct c xp erience with Worked with city and county officials in conjunction with energy-efficiency interaction utility programs with local government leaders ..................................................._...................................................._....._..._..... __..._..._ ✓ Direct experience with Not applicable EnerPath Services is teaming...........I ... WO 4W Title of Position: VP,Operations federal grant compliance subcontractors to deliver a program that complies with federal .......................r euiremepts.............................................. _S?:ant compliance requirements...................._............................................_.......... Title of Position: VP, Technology Name of Person: Jonathan Baty Educational Degree (s): include 1990: Bachelor's Degree from University of Colorado Boulder college or university, major, and —Department of Civil Engineering-Architectural Design dates License(s)/Certification(s),#(s), expiration date(s),if applicable: Certified Lighting Management Consultant (GCMG) Specialized Training Completed. Include dates and documentation Not applicable of completion: # of,years experience in area of 19 years service proposed to provide: Describe person's relationship to offeror. If employee, # of years. If 19 years subcontractor, describe other/past working relationships Describe this person's Developing feasibility studies, lighting design, specifications responsibilities over the past 12 and analysis, daylighting design, directing technical analysis, months. program development, and product evaluation and analyses. Previous employer(s), positions, and dates 1986-1989: Day and Armantrout Architects Identify specific information about Clearly identify the experience,provide dates, describe the experience in: person's role and extent of involvement in the experience ............................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... Brought a wealth of experience developing cost effective direct installation programs for hard to reach market sectors. Worked closely with utilities serving millions of customers to create ✓ Direct experience design energy efficiency programs that showcase emerging technology and management of energy- and engage in direct installation efforts. Instrumental in efficiency programs developing over$50 million in energy efficiency programs including several emerging technology programs based upon innovative lighting technologies and most recently variable ....... : .Pu 1 x??PS........................................... . . . . flow..P..°° ✓ Direct experience with Supports local outreach efforts from EnerPath Services energy-efficiency outreach headquarters in Redlands, CA. Primarily invested in program activities development, but serves as a resource for outreach personnel when they find unusual opportunities. ...................................................._......................................... . ............. .............................................................. Worked with several municipally owned utilities to deliver cost effective energy efficiency programs, namely Los Angeles ✓ Direct experience with Department of Water and Power(2008-present), Colton Public energy-efficiency interaction Utilities(2009-present) and Riverside Public Utilities(2009). with local government leaders Jonathan has also worked with Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County, Riverside County, and many municipalities .to implement energy efficiency :......................................................... Title of Position: VP,Technoloey ✓ Direct experience with EnerPath Services is teaming with subcontractors to deliver a federal grant compliance program that complies with federal grant compliance re uireIn re uirements. 4................................................................. ....._4........................................................................................................................................__.. Laura A. Franke CLEAN ENERGY ADVOCATES, INC. 1223 Wilshire Blvd#310 Santa Monica, CA 90403 310-892-0177 Ifranke @ceadvocates.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Clean Energy Advocates, Inc., Santa Monica, CA August 2008—Present Principal Founded Clean Energy Advocates ("CEA) specifically for the purpose of providing financial advisory and administrative services for energy efficiency financing programs, as well as traditional debt issuance advisory services related to governmental clean and renewable energy projects. Targeted projects include municipal financial advisory and administrative services for implementation and funding of contractual assessment and special tax programs,analysis and structuring of power purchase agreements, project incentive matching, debt structuring and issuance for any taxable or tax-exempt municipal debt. Services include debt analysis, structuring, rating and credit presentations, debt issuance pricing analysis, refinancing and ongoing administration. Current projects under development include pooled contractual assessment programs; lease and power purchase financings for public and private users; school district program to provide 100%financing that utilizes grants, rebates and ARRA-authorized bonds for energy efficiency measures; many additional early stage projects incorporating energy efficiency and renewable energy components. Additionally, issuance of Recovery Zone bonds for public (Economic Development) and private (Facility) entities; and debt financing for school districts. Frequent speaking engagements have included State Controller John Chiang's staff, Irvine Chamber of Commerce Green Task Force, Green Valley Initiative general membership stakeholders meeting, Solar Energy Councils of Inland Empire and Orange County, California Green School Conference, and California School Boards Association annual conference. With over 22 years in investment banking, I have worked with over 500 individual issuers on municipal debt exceeding$15 billion. For 18 years, I provided underwriting and administrative management services to the California School Boards Association (CSBA) Cash Reserve Program, a pooled Tax and Revenue Anticipation Note (TRAN) Program. In addition to pooling expertise, I have worked on numerous debt issuances including Certificates of Participation, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Bonds, and lease financings. I also successfully re-vamped the CSBA's FlexFund Program into a cost- effective lease financing program for schools. This program issued 11 Lease Certificate financings in its first year. Laura A. Franke Professional Resume Page two George K. Baum& Company, Los Angeles, CA November 2006—July 2008 Senior Vice President, Investment Banking—Public Finance Responsible for new and existing client relationships leading to and resulting in the issuance of municipal bonds, including General Obligation Bonds, Certificates of Participation, Refundings, Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes and Lease Certificates. Clients included school districts throughout the State of California, and California School Boards Association (CSBA). Provided primary banking input for the development of a new security, Lease Certificates, for use by CSBA in FlexFund Program. As co- manager to CSBA Cash Reserve Program, provided credit insight and structural analysis to assure success of this annual pooled TRAN Program. Participated as lead banker on multiple debt issuances with responsibilities including, structuring oversight, credit presentation, enhancement selection, pricing strategy, investor marketing, and client management. Piper Jaffray&Co., Hermosa Beach, CA July 1987—November 2006 Vice President, Investment Banking—Public Finance Over the span of 19 years I went from an analyst to a vice president. I was the banker responsible for building the administrative infrastructure that allowed the CSBA Cash Reserve Program to grow from 90 issuers for$400 million to over 400 issuers for$1 billion. Additionally, I was an investment banker responsible for individual debt issuances providing all issuance assistance as needed and as identified above in the George K. Baum & Company responsibilities. EDUCATION Central Washington University,Ellensburg, WA Bachelor of Science, Business, 1985 PERSONAL Mother of one son,a 2008 graduate of the University of Hawaii. In my free time I enjoy interior design study, running, cycling, skiing, snowboarding, rollerblading and overall health and fitness. TitleofPosition: Vice Fresident5bft+w,areDevclo►mebt'.- ' C i` Name of Person: Paul R. Gomez Massachusetts Institute of Technology- Sloan School of Management Educational Degree (s): include MS, Master of Science in Engineering and Management 2006—2008 college or university,major, and dates Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey BS, Electrical Engineering 1987 — 1992 License(s)/Certification(s),#(s), expiration date(s),if applicable: Certified Scrum Master (Agile Software Development Methodology) December 2005 Microsoft Certified Application Developer (.NET / C#) September 2005 Specialized Training Completed. Microsoft Certified System Engineer (Windows 2000 Include dates and documentation MCSE) September 2003 of completion: Microsoft Certified Database Administrator (MCDBA) Certification on MS SQL Server 2000 January 2003 Microsoft Certified System Engineer (Windows NT MCSE) August 1996 #of years experience in area of 17 Years service proposed to provide: Describe person's relationship to offeror. If employee,#of years. If Contractor (3 months) subcontractor, describe other/past Employee (6 months) working relationships Describe this person's Responsible for the design, architecture and responsibilitief aver the past 12 implementation of EnerPath's software and services. months. Application Architect (Consultant) at Harvard Medical Previous empl -(s), positions, School February 2009 —July 2009 (6 months) and dates Designed and developed an expertise-based, social- networking web application with the goal of helping improve Title of Position: Vice President Software Development the way biomedical research is conducted across the country. The system is in production and used by dozens of participating medical schools and research organizations. Application Architect-Development Manager (Consultant) at Hewlett Packard January 2007— January 2009 (2 years 1 month) Designed an application for managing the complex interoperability relationships between enterprise Storage Area Network(SAN)components. o Information stored in this system represents the client's official product support matrix and is used by Enterprise Sales and Support to generate several billion dollars in annual sales. o Interviewed business stakeholders, built conceptual models, prototyped user interfaces, designed the supporting data model o Managed all aspects of product development Enterprise Architect (Consultant) at PC Connection May 2004— December 2006 (2 years 8 months) Planned the migration of legacy sales and marketing applications from multiple disparate platforms to a flexible, service-based enterprise architecture. o The resulting architecture is designed to simplify application development, lower maintenance costs and improve business flexibility. o The applications built using this architecture support more than 800 internal users and are responsible for generating approximately $1.4 billion in sales revenue Architect (Consultant) at Monster.com /TMP Worldwide Directional Marketing January 2003 —January 2004 (1 year 1 month) Designed the architecture for a complex order management system. o Architecture and applications support more than 700 internal users and $700 million in Yellow Page, White Page and Internet advertising orders. o The new system replaced a 12-year-old mainframe application and provides improved productivity, lower maintenance costs and enhanced business process monitoring. Senior Technology Consultant at Con Edison [ Edit] March 1995—January 1996 ( 11 months) Senior LAN Engineer at Merck/Medco [ Edit ] March 1994— March 1995 (1 year 1 month) Information Systems Analyst at Ciba-Geigy [ Edit] June 1991 —March 1994 (2 years 10 months) Identify specific information about experience in: ................._........-....._.—....._......._.__..._._................................._.._...._......................................._.......................................................-- J Direct experience design and Title of Position: Vice President Software Development management of energy- efficiency programs J Direct experience with euergy- efficiency outreach activities ..................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... J Direct experience with energy- efficiency interaction with local government leaders ✓ Direct experience with federal grant compliance requirements Title of Position: Director of Application Engineering Name of Person: Ronald H. Green Educational Degree (s): include college or university,major, and Solar Certification, Orange Coast College 1983 dates License(s)/Certification(s),#(s), Microsoft MCD (1998) expiration date(s),if applicable: Specialized Training Completed. HACCP Certification by ASQ, 2007; Weatherization Include dates and documentation Training by CBIA, 2009. of completion: #of years experience in area of Energy Efficiency and Power Development: 26 years. service proposed to provide: Describe person's relationship to offeror. If employee,#of years. If principal, 11 Years Tenure. subcontractor,describe other/past worldng relationships Describe this person's Directed IT Department, Principal Architect, Developer, responsibilities over the past 12 and Software Engineer of all products. months. Previous employer(s),positions, principal, Lifeline Power(1983-1996) and dates Identify specific information about experience in: ._..._....._•--......................................... . ..........._..__._.._.�__ __...._.... .........._.................._.............._......._................._._ J Direct experience design and Created software and acted as program manager in support management of energy- of a wide array of Energy Audit, Energy Efficiency, and efficiency programs Direct Install programs. 1999 to current. ' .....................................__._........._. . .............._..................... ..............._..._.............__........_............._..............................................._....................._...._..._. Developed third party financed solar water heating systems for large scale apartment complexes in southern J Direct experience with energy- California. Builder of largest solar systems in Orange and efficiency outreach activities San Diego Counties. Developer of first Dairy Farm cogeneration system in San Bernardino County. ........._...._........................_................_.................. ..._.. . ................................................................................................................................................... J Direct experience with energy- Energy Effi :iency and development onsultant to efficiency interaction with Governmer , of Haiti, Jamaica, St. ' `ts, Pakistan, and local government leaders Antigua, (1 88— 1994) _._.._........_ _......_.._.__...... ......._...._.._..._............ ....................___ .............. .............__._... _ ..._... . ......................_.. J Direct experience with federal grant compliance None requirements { Title of Position: CEO Name of Person: Stephen Guthrie Educational Degree(s): include college or university, major, and Not applicable dates License(s)/Certification(s),#(s), Not applicable expiration date(s), if applicable: Specialized Training Completed. Include dates and documentation Not applicable of completion: Fescrnibe xperience in area of 20 years posed to provide: rson's relationship to mployee, #of years. If or, describe oth er/past Employee/Founder&CEO: 20 years g reationships Describe this person's Responsible for overseeing all management personnel and responsibilities over the past 12 activities of the companies, which include program and project months. development, and both the consulting arm and construction arm of EnerPath Services, Inc. Previous employer(s), positions, and dates Identify specific information about Clearly identify the experience, provide dates, describe the experience in: person's role and extent of involvement in the experience ............................................................................................. ...................................................................................................................................................._. Oversaw management of following: Energy Efficiency Direct Install programs provided to Southern California Edison(2008), LA Department of Water&Power(2008-present), Riverside Public Utilities (2009), Colton Public Utilities(2009-present), Direct experience design Harrah's Entertainment(2005-2007), Caesars Entertainment and management of energy- (2005-2007), Jet Propulsion Labs,Dept. of Forestry, Hill Air efficiency programs Force Base and numerous other government and private sector entities. Instrumental in developing over$50 million in energy efficiency programs including several emerging technology programs based upon innovative fighting technologies and most ......... _recently variable flow pool.P.. Direct experience with ?Ps .................................................._ .......... Worked with outreach programs in conjunction with utility energy-efficiency outreach activities programs offered to many cities and municipalities. .................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................... Direct experience with energy-efficiency interaction Worked with city and county officials in conjunction with with local overnmeut leaders utility programs. .............................. .................................................. ..........................................................................................................._......... ........_...._..........._... Direct experience with EnerPath Services is teaming with subcontractors to deliver a federal grant compliance program that complies with federal grant compliance requirements requirements. Title of Position: Strategic Advisor Name of Person: Steven Meyers 2009: MBA and Master's in Energy Finance from the Educational Degree(s): include University of Texas at Austin college or university, major, and 1996: MS in Engineering from the University of California, dates Berkeley 1993: BS in Physics from Haverford College License(s)/Certification(s),#(s), Not applicable expiration date(s),if applicable: Specialized Training Completed. Include dates and documentation Not applicable of completion: #of years experience in area of 15 vears service proposed to provide: Describe person's relationship to offeror. If employee,#of years. If Employee/Consultant: 6 years subcontractor, describe other/past worldug relationships Describe this person's Advises on sales strategies and major marketing plans. In responsibilities over the past 12 charge of developing and presenting MainStreet Efficiency months. webinars. Serves as an ESI representative covering the Southwest states' governments, utilities and communities. 2003-Present: President&Founder, Rational Energy, LLC 2003: Vice President Product Development, Invensys PLC Previous emplover(s), positions, 1997-2003: Manager, Director, Vice President, Enron 1996-1997: Project Engineer, SuperSymmetry Services PTE and dates LTD 1993-1996: Graduate Research Assistant under Professor Arthur Rosenfeld Identify specific information about Clearly identify the experience, provide dates,describe the experience.in: person's role and extent of involvement in the experience ........._.............._....._...._.._.........................................................................................................................._........_............................. Designed an international business model around energy- efficiency for a large US ESCO. Managed that business from a J Direct experience design and concept to over$250 million in energy-efficiency investments management of energy- over a 3 year period. I have worked with foreign governments efficiency programs (e.g. New Zealand, Singapore, China)on developing EE programs, developing best-practices, and quantifying the EE potential. Worked with outreach programs in conjunction with utility J Direct experience with energy- programs offered to many cities and municipalities as well as efficiency outreach activities spoken as an invited speaker and panelist for several EnVEr menta]/Ener�y forums: _....... ... _..._....._......_......................._.._._... ....................._...._........_......_......-._._...._..._ J Direct experience with energy- Worked with city and county officials in conjunction with efficiency interaction with utility programs. local government leaders Title of Position: Strategic Advisor ! Direct experience with federal EnerPath Services is teaming with subcontractors to deliver a grant compliance program that complies with federal grant compliance .requirements requirements. Anthony Haske 1525 Montana Ave, #B Santa Monica, CA 90403 (310) 795-4963 thaske @hotmail.com SUMMARY A resourceful solar sales executive with a unique blend of experience in solar, technical sales, engineering, and environmental policy consulting. Especially talented at presenting innovative and unconventional technology to C-level management. Aggressive self-starter with proven ability to develop new prospects. Committed to customer satisfaction and building strong relationships with clients. Offer unusual versatility with analytical skills, modeling and spreadsheet capabilities along with a strong writing proficiency. PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Photovoltaic System Sales SolarCity; Culver City, California: 10/07-present, Senior Solar Consultant. Focus on selling residential and commercial PV systems in the Los Angeles area. Consult homeowners and businesses on the economics and design of photovoltaic systems as they apply to their specific electricity usage and rate schedule. Average sales volume is >30 kW per month in residential systems while working on several >100 kW commercial systems. Acted as lead consultant on SolarCity's Long Beach Community Program, which resulted in 50 residential PV systems within three months. Duties included giving several public presentations on solar, working with community leaders and attending city council meetings. (Solar Electrical Systems; Westlake Village, California: 4/07— 10/07, Solar Consultant. Within first four months, sold over 100 kW of PV residential systems. Focused on designing and selling PV systems to residential customers and small commercial PV systems in the Los Angeles area. Proficient in the CSI and DWP rebate programs and familiar with the guidelines for Anaheim, Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena and Riverside utility programs. Gained valuable experience with high-end homes and high-profile customers, including working with general contractors. Left Solar Electrical Systems to join a heavily funded company offering more opportunity and growth. Permacity Solar; Los Angeles, California: 9106—3/07, Sales Account Executive. ,Joined Permacity to enter renewables market and learn about the photovoltaic industry. Within first two weeks, achieved monthly sales quota while creating pricing catalogues for different photovoltaic module and inverter manufacturers. Involved with several designs and installations and created proposal tools for residential and commercial projects. Also initiated several sales channels with community organizations, retail businesses and engineers. Left Permacity to join larger solar company with established history. Technical Sales AuBeta Networks; Los Angeles, California: 2003—2006 (independent contractor from 2005 to 2006), Senior Account Executive. Sold wide-area-network (WAN) services to large-and medium-sized businesses across the United States. Responsible for maintaining $15,000 monthly quota of recurring monthly revenue. Initiative needed to research, identify and develop new prospects with limited company resources. Regularly presented to CIOs and CFOs. Performance: Second producer in the company, secured AuBeta's largest customer($72,000 monthly revenue), averaged 114 percent of quota. Exario Networks/Internet Connect Networks; Los Angeles, California: 1999—2002, Senior Account Executive, Direct & Indirect Channel Sales. For a New Jersey-based company, sold innovative WAN and voice-over-IP solutions to large- and medium-sized businesses, primarily in Southern California. Also built indirect sales channel through dealer distributor in the Northeastern United States. Required aggressive pursuit of new business by calling on CIOs and educating them on an innovative WAN technology. Performance: Top producer in company, averaged 105 percent of quota. Environmental Sciences and Engineering University of Arizona; Tucson, Arizona: 1992— 1994, Research Assistant. For master's thesis, designed and performed a three-month study that measured the impact of submicron (< 1 pm)atmospheric particles on Tucson visibility. Study determined that degradation to Tucson visibility is mostly attributed to man-made pollutants and not to naturally occurring particulates. ICF Incorporated; Fairfax, Virginia: 1989-1992, Policy Analyst/Environmental Engineer. Supported EPA's regulatory development in a variety of projects. Emphasis placed on strong knowledge of EPA regulations and proficient writing under tight deadlines. Examples of work include writing sections of EPA's Land Disposal regulations, Environmental Risk Assessments, and an Environmental Impact Study for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Other Employmen t AT&T Networks; Omaha, Nebraska: 1988— 1989, Manufacturing Engineer. Residentail Real Estate Developer, Seattle, Washington: 1995— 1998. EDUCATION Present, CFA Candidate 1995 M.S., Atmospheric Sciences; University of Arizona. 1987 B.S., Mechanical Engineering; University of Notre Dame. 1987 B.A., Philosophy; University of Notre Dame. SOLAR SEMINARS Solar Living Institute, Commercial Solar Economics & Financing, 4/08. CSI Survivor Seminar. One-day seminar on new CSI guidelines, 2/07. Solar Living Institute, How to Make the Financial Case for Solar, 9/06. COMMUNITY Engineers without Borders, Mali Project, Solar Technical Lead, 2008. Simonton Cancer Center, Board of Directors. Danielle Garcia 1304 Sandra Way ♦ Redlands,CA 92374♦ (951) 675-7490 ♦ Garcia.danielalQgmail.com Objective To provide the highest level customer service to residents and to motivate and lead the staff of the Quality of Life Department in achievement of its multitudinous, diverse goals using my own technical and operational knowledge of its internal dynamics. Profile • Three years experience in planning and developing regulatory documents for federal submission. • One year experience assisting in the giants planning cycle of more than$30 million dollars in federal Funds. • Experience from 2006-2009 in the development and submission of grant applications on behalf of boththe County of Los Angeles and the City of Redlands. • Experience from 2006-2009 in the drafting,execution and monitoring of grant-funded projects to ensure compliance with reporting,billing and implementation requirements. • Reputation for demonstrating outstanding teamwork/teambudding and expeditious coordination of several large projects. • Bilingual:English/Spanish. • Proven ability to thrive in deadline-driven environments. Skills Summary • Project Management • Computer Savvy • Research skills • Report Preparation • Customer Service • Regulatory compliance • Written Correspondence • Burgeoning leadership • Grant writing • General Office Skills skills • Professional Presentations • Technical supervision Professional Experience AS GRANTS PLANNING SPECIALIST,I ASSISTED IN THE CREATION OF BOTH THE ONE-YEAR ACTION PLAN AND THE FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN: • As a Grants Planning Specialist,I was tasked with properly interpreting and applying Federal regulations,laws and CDC policies;understanding and conveying technical information to CBDG partners and the general public in clear layman terms;managing multiple simultaneous priorities,being a positive/creative problem solver,and maintaining cooperative working relationships with staff,other agencies and the public. • Compiled volumes of data and literature specific to the project area designated to receive funding. • Research involving the principles of sustainable development, such as infill development,transit-oriented districts and walkable communities.Application of these concepts to the grant project proposed. • Provided sound funding recommendations for proposed projects (assessing factors such as monitoring findings,expenditures,ect.);and researched,developed,and wroteaction plans to program HUD-funded Programs (HOME,CDBG,Healthy Homes,Neighborhood Stabilization Program,etc.) AS PROJECT SPECLuis r,I HAVE PREPARED SEVERAL APPLICATIONS FOR GRANT OPPORTUNITIES AT MANY LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT;INCLUDING LOCAL,STATE,AND FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAMS: • Prepared grant applications to local agencies: the South Coast Air Quality Management District,the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee,and the San Bernardino Associated Governments. • Prepared grant applications to State Agencies:California Integrated Waste Management Board,the Department of Conservation,CAL Fire (California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection) and the Resources Agency. • Recently took responsibility for analyzing efficacy of stimulus funding opportunities tinder the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act(ARRA).Prepared grant applications to federal submission to the US Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Energy. Danielle Garcia PROJECT SPECIALIST,I HAVE BEEN T1IE LEAD ADMINISTRATOR OF SEVERAL PROJECTS: ♦ Extensive collaboration among agencies,including County of San Bernardino and City of Riverside to undertake and complete projects with limited background experience,such as the joint development of an AB-811 type program and the municipal faciltities targeted retrofit program. ♦ Prepared comprehensive analysis and summaries for each grant opportunity to advise director of the department about the status of such projects.Preparation of corresponding City Council reports.Grant submissions ranging in purpose,across many divisional and some dcpartmental lines. ♦ In charge of procurement of grant eligible activities,from professional services to contractor services; responsible for the thorough reporting,tracking and billing under several grant projects.Requisite record keeping in preparation for federal or state financial audits. ♦ Coordination and tracking of volunteer services for the City;creation of the Redlands Service Club Council,implementation of Adopt-a-Street Program for Redlands,annual planning and management of the Communitywide Clean-Up Day,coordination of Eagle Scout Projects,organization with local churches and organizations to conduct public facility improvements throughout the City utilizing volunteer efforts. Employment History CITY OF REDLANDS—35 Cajon Street,Redlands,CA Project Specialist,Match 2008 to Present COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION— 2 Coral Circle -Monterey Park,CA 91755 Grants Planning Specialist,November 2006 to Match 2008 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION—Riverside,CA Retail Communications Consultant,2005 CORCORAN LAW OFFICE— Redlands,CA Legal Secretary/Personal Assistant,2002 Education UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA—Riverside,CA Bachelor of Arts,Political Science-2006 RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE—Riverside,CA Professional Certiciate,Business Administration -2009 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY—San Bernardino,CA Master of Arts,Public Administration—present References AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST 1304 Sandra Way 0 Redlands,CA 92374 + (951)675-7490 ♦ Garcia damela I(a%yrnaii corn �idePberttoa : ?roiectCoordinator Name of Person: Mark Wasson Educational Degree(s): include A.A. Pierce College 1982 college or university,major, and B.A. Communications, Califomia State University, dates Northridge 1986 License(s)/Certification(s),#(s), Not applicable expiration date(s),if applicable: Specialized Training Completed. Include dates and documentation Not applicable of completion: #of years experience in area of 2years service proposed to provide: Describe person's relationship to offeror. if employee,#of years. If Ernployee/2 years subcontractor, describe other/past working relationships Describe this person's Coordinate all aspects of the Set to Save program in the responsibilities over the past 12 City of Palm Desert. Including customer awareness, months. marketing, P.R. and customer/client relations 1996-2007: President, Valet Audio/Video Inc. 1990-1993: Sales Representative, Bristol Meyers Previous employer(s),positions, 1987-1990: Operations Manager,RAI and dates Identify specific information about experience in: ✓ Duect experience design and Managed 10 Energy efficiency consultants with the Palm management of energy- Desert program. efficiency programs —_.-_-..............__.._..._.___._._..._._...--------. .._.._....__.._....____._...._----_--.._-.._........_._....._..__......__._._._._....._..._._.___._.. Was key liaison between Enerpath Services and Palm J Direct experience with energy- Desert. Assisted in expanding AB811 marketing efforts. efficiency outreach activities Provided marketing, education and outreach efforts to schools and community organizations _._._..__......_...._._...._.....---...._._........._._..........._.._..__......_.._......_..._..._....__...._.. _.._...._.................._........._......_.... ✓ Direct experience with energy- Coordinated with local city officials and managers in efficiency interaction with implementing the Palm Desert Set to Save,A138 I and the local government leaders Desert Cities Pool Pump programs __ ...._......__.---. ..______...___....___._... ..._..._.__.._._ _....._...._..._.___.__._......................__._._......... .......___.._._..._._.__-.- ✓ Duect experience with federal Not Applicable i odebfrosifioa: -proiectCoordinator grant compliance requirements ....._._._._.._....._�...__..___.. a