HomeMy WebLinkAbout22- Parks, Recreation and Community Services Dept. ORIGINAL
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Kevin Hawkins, Director Subject: Resolution authorizing the
submittal of four grant applications to the
Dept: Parks, Recreation and California State Parks Office of Grants and
Community Services Dept. Local Services Proposition 84 funds totaling
up to $20 million for the development of
Date: January 25, 2010 new park space and renovation of existing
recreation and park facilities.
M/CC Meeting Date: February 16, 2010
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
N/A
Recommended Motion:
Adopt the Resolution
Signature
Contact person: Robert Lennox Phone: 384-5031
Supporting data attached: Staff Report& Exhibits Ward: 1, 6, and 7
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: up to $ 20 Million in grant
funding no city match
Source: (Acct. No.) Grant/CIP Accts
(Acct Description) Grant/CIP Accts
Finance:
Council Notes: we-:5-0 ao/o- 3�
Agenda Item No. 22
2-l�0-10
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO—REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report
Subject:
Resolution authorizing the submittal of four grant applications to the California State Parks
Office of Grants and Local Services Proposition 84 funds totaling up to $20 million for the
development of new park space and renovation of existing recreation and park facilities.
Background:
On November 7, 2006, California voters passed Proposition 84, approving $368 million in
funding for critically underserved communities throughout California through the development of
a statewide park grant program. In October 2009, the California State Parks Office of Grants &
Local Services announced the process and evaluation criteria for the first round of these
competitive grants. Qualifying communities that submit applications by the March 1 deadline can
receive up to $5 million per project for the development of a new park or improvements to
existing facilities. The staff recommends that the City of San Bernardino apply for Proposition 84
grant funding for the construction of one new neighborhood park and the renovation of three
existing parks.
This grant program is highly competitive, with the evaluation and ranking of proposed projects
based on several defined categories. These categories are not equally weighted; the criteria
related to the lack of park land, the level of household income, and the use of community based
planning process generate the most points. Specifically, the grant applications will be evaluated
based on the following:
I. Critical Lack of Park Space (18 points)
2. Significant Poverty(18 points)
3. Type of Project(12 points)
4. Community Based Planning(18 points)
5. Sustainable Techniques (I I points)
6. Project Funding (0 points)
7. Fees and Hours of Operation(5 points)
8. Youth Outdoor Learning Employment or Volunteer Opportunities (3 points)
9. Community Challenges and Project Benefits(15 points)
The criteria provides that projects situated within areas of communities that are under-served,
which is defined as those having less than 3.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, and those
that serve neighborhoods with the greatest number of families below the household income
poverty threshold, will be the most competitive. Also, those park projects that have been
developed using community-based planning techniques will generate more points in the ranking
process. Further, a project to develop a new park will result in more points than one that
involves the renovation of existing facilities. According to State Parks Office of Grants and
Local Services, competing agencies should be doing the following:
"Start by selecting a project location and type of project that will fit the intent of the
program. The most competitive option is to find property to create a new park in a low
income, park deficient community. The grant can pay for both acquisition and
development. If the creation of a new park is not possible, try to find an existing park that
can be expanded or improved."
The Parks and Recreation Department engaged RJM Design Group, Inc, the consultants who
completed the City's Park Master Plan in 2008, to assist in identifying potential parks projects
that would meet the grant guidelines. RJM conducted an initial review of the existing parks using
the outcomes of the Master Plan and applying the application of the grant evaluation criteria.
Further, to determine which projects would be most competitive given the grant criteria, the
Proposition 84 Parks Grant Program's"Community Fact Finder," a GIS-based tool that identifies
how potential projects would relate to the "Critical Lack of Park Space" and "Significant
Poverty" criteria, was employed.
Additionally, the tool was used to identify the optimum location for a new park project within
the City given the selection criteria. It was determined that a site bounded by E Street to the
East, D Street to the West, 8h Street to the South and 9a' Street to the North, (See Exhibit B)
presents an optimal opportunity as it meets and exceeds all grant criteria and would maximize
points for a new park development. This site, which will be referred to as the "E" Street Park, is
located in an area with minimal dedicated park space and relatively low income levels for
households within a half mile radius of the site. In addition, the proposed site is located along
the planned SBx transit corridor, which would provide access from other areas of the city and
contribute to the downtown core vision and economic development model.
A comparative chart, which highlights the ranking of potential park projects on the two most
competitive selection criteria, is attached as Exhibit A. In addition to these top criteria, projects
were reviewed based on evidence of lacking amenities, need for renovation, overuse, and
increased demand. Based on the grant evaluation criteria, there are four recommended projects:
the new "E" Street Park, a renovation project combining Encanto and 9`s Street parks, the
renovation of Seccombe Lake Park, and the renovation of Speicher Park. Table 1 provides a
summary of the ranking of the potential park projects in the City of San Bernardino.
Additionally, Exhibit B provides boundary maps for each project with result of the GIS
Community Fact Finder tool.
Among the top seven sites, three parks were not included in the recommendation for a variety of
reasons. According to the consultant, the 5t' Street Senior Center lacked the open space
necessary to fully develop a true green passive or active recreation environment. Also, the
Center for Individual Development (CID) is currently managed under a Joint Powers Authority
(JPA) with land ownership residing in a non-city agency. Finally, the La Plaza Park is fully
developed and, therefore, has a limited need for improvements.
Table 1. Summary of Ranking of Park Projects
Based on Proposition 84 Evaluation Criteria
Rank Park Ward
1 °E"Street new site 1
2 Encanto Park/;' street 1 and 6
3 Fifth Street Senior Center 1
4 CID 1
5 La Plaza Park 1
6 Seccombe Lake Park 1
7 Speicher Park/Patton South Park 7
8 Meadowbrook Park 1
9 Hernandez Center 1
10 Nicholson Park 6
11 Anne Shirells Park 6
12 Lytle Creek Park 3
13 Sierra 4
14 Lionel E.Hudson Park 5
15 Norton Gyrn/Galaxy Ballroom 1
16 Horine Park 7
17 Perris Hill 2
18 Wildwood Park 4
19 Dehnann Heights Park 6
19 Mill Park 1
20 Harrison Canyon 4
21 Nunez Park 1
22 Tom Minor 5
23 Littlefield Shultis 5
24 Sonora 4
25 Blair Park 5
26 Newberry 4
27 Al Guhin 5
*Extensive criteria ranking and score sheet attached,Exhibit A
Possible Projects as Identified by RJM from the Park Master Plan Study
The consultants are in the process of finalizing the outreach efforts and synthesizing the
community input on the desired scope and types of the parks improvements, which is necessary
to define the details of the project and complete the application. Therefore, the applications
were not available for review at the time of the compiling of this report. Given the guidelines of
the Proposition 84 grant process, each park project application will be for no more than $5
million. To provide examples of the types of projects that may be included in the City's
applications, the following are components that have been identified through the Parks Master
Plan as basic needs for new parks and for the improvement of the existing parks. As the
community feedback may provide more extensive lists of improvements that meet or exceed the
$5 million per project grant amount, it is anticipated that the applications will request the
maximum award possible:
"E"Street Park(12 acres proposed)
Acquisition costs Unknown
(1) Community Center (10,000 SF) $3,500,000
(1) Little League Field $ 500,000
(75) Parking Stalls ($4,500/stall) $ 337,500
(1) Restroom $ 300,000
(1) Skate Park $ 400,000
(1) Soccer Field $ 500,000
(1) Spray Play $ 200,000
Sub-Total for E St Park Improvements (not including Acquisition): $5,737,500
Encanto Park(8.9 Acres)/Ninth Street Park(3.62 Acres)
(1) Little League Fields - renovate $ 100,000
(2) Tot Lot - renovate & install $ 600,000
(1) Pedestrian Lighting Standards $ 55,000
(1) Picnic Area (1 shelter& 6 tables) $ 112,000
(1) Restroom — Renovate $ 50,000
(1) Tennis Courts - Renovate or remove $ 50,000
Sub-Total for Project Improvements: $ 967,000
Seccombe Lake Park(44 Acres)
Field Lighting ($200,000/field) $ 400,000
(2) Little League Fields — relocate $1,000,000
(1) Off-Leash Dog Area (16,000 SF) $ 76,000
(188) Parking Stalls ($4,500/stall) $ 846,000
(1) Picnic Area (1 shelter& 5 tables) $ 105,000
(1) Tot Lot $ 400,000
(2) Volleyball Courts - relocate $4,000,000
Sub-Total for Seccombe Lake Park Improvements: $6,827,000
Speicher Park/Patton South Park(28 Acres)
(2) Basketball Courts (1 full court & 2 half courts) $ 200,000
(5) Little League Fields - renovate existing $ 500,000
(1) Picnic Area (2 shelters & 10 tables) $ 210,000
(1) Restroom - Renovate $ 50,000
(1) Soccer Field $ 500,000
(1) Teen Center $1,500,000
(1) Tot Lot $ 400,000
Sub-Total for SpeicherPark/Patton South Improvements: $3,360,000
Although the applications are not yet completed, the consultant and staff have successfully
concluded two of three community meetings at each site and will provide a final outcomes
workshop the third week of February to finalize the scope of improvements for all four projects.
It is anticipated that the consultant will have the applications available for review the final week
of February with a special Grants Ad-Hoc Meeting called so the committee can review the
applications.
Recommendation:
Adopt the Resolution.
a
L
x
w
m
o m
o e� n r m m � O 0 o m N N c� o n r o r o n r r r o n o 0 0
CL y o In IO (U n t7 Ip o M o Cl t7 n M o f7 to o (O o N to lU (O o M o 0 0
C 17 l0 1D (O r td M T O) O O N e e e N 6 of W w t0 N N M e w
N N N N N N
m
C
Y
VC N N N
m K
a
Y O
(0
ao
N ° y ao r e tT aD M A A N M r N N MO 4
(.j � N
O V' tb tD ANN M 'D 10 MOtp N ON t0 NNMtO
Q Q O tY N ONM � A � � .- NMNN M � � (pNN '- MMOlT V p tq
M
V
Y
Om N M N V N M r t p O O a t p 0 0 O d• N f r t D N N M N
� _ � •- N � N � � N N N N N N N
mm
N a)
N J
c E
cm m
C LL 0 C N N co Am V M V t P N a D N N N _ M N
a o N N N M N V A N N r M to 0 0 t0 e M A M M N N N M M
y O
(� N N N N N c N tO ANN V O N N N ^ ry O A M r N M N
� Z
CL
a
w
CL m Y
IL E �p A 0I (p 0p N M O O N fD N r M N N e n N N N N N N N
C
V r
O M
L M
0 O v 0 0 0
V j 0
C E M 0 01 C4 C; t0 O to An O -7 (O L6 (d O MN N OfpOMANA m d
N
� Q W N lA (A �(9 W N W M4Y to (94i (9 fA flf to EA tH f9 Mdi fA t9 to Ni (A 1A >
m =
� n
E
0
U
O
d c E o
c o a c
a � m
O
Y
m 'H y a ) y c a t
CL m O m [ N � N Y c m N C O
C a y a C ` a O m Y L O y
y m Y m m WO y
J m oU m 0a 'o m c �
a am a m a ° N a N Y = E " a =
m a . a m c .� m m — m 0 Y
« y � NEm ; aotm ujC7a = o � xCCLC m c c
rn 0 cL � nm. tome 'a mcLC ?' t` crc _E CE = coa
iu c •- ,z — m m md2cS: 0a� >- m = `m � ozomm _
w Z LL U J N co = Z Q J (n J Z 1: 0 2 Z f- J (n m Z Q
0
> N N l7 C N o n N Of O " N C2 V N t0 r t0 m m N N N N N N N N
O � o
Z
Exhibit B, Page 1
California State Parks
Community 1 Report
This is your Community FactFinder report for
the project you have defined. Please refer to " ry'° '` mss' `°r
your Project ID in any future communications 4° '"" 'r
about this project. -
{
Project ID: 5012
I Z '
Date created: January 12, 2010 1
County: San Bernardino IV9JJ �-
• q
City: San Bernardino P. Union St u °.
Pine
Coordinates: 34.115251, -117.293129 J H L='mI �1 i I ,E stn
tth 5t t"`{
i Ie�rlalt� I � --» Ea
[3r Vi orli St
Total Population: 6,017 i (6f - -- t
n �� wrcn�Rhst t. a - h
Median Household $24 348 w-t5isr _510 s
Income: ' +•; vi Ki ng ma,r 5[ - t
- -- R--__—
r<''� Bth_5[ E.at ti S
Number of people o , 0.4 mt vi cau 5t ' - E °°^`
below poverty line: 2,336
Project Site
Park acreage: 2.39
Park acres per 1,000
0.40
population:
All numbers above have been calculated based on a 1/2
mile radius from the point location of your project.
Demographics are figured by averaging population
numbers over selected census block groups and using
the percent of the block group within the project circle
to determine the actual counts.
Parks and park acres are based on best available source
information but may not always contain exact
boundaries or all parks in specific locations. Parks
acreage does not include major lakes or ocean. Users
can send update information to:
parkupdates @parks.ca.gov
Data Sources:
Demographics - Claritas Pop-Facts, block group level (Apr. 2008)
Parks -Calif. Protected Areas Database v. 1.3 (Aug. 2009)
• Community FactFinder is a service of the
California Department of Parks and Recreation
"W-Parks.ca.gov
Community Factilnder meamd
7Y GrnNnfo Nawart
w.gmenmto.orq
Exhibit B, Page 2
[
i I
i
j
�
a
S8,-,- s • e • a e S7 f�• a rte• r • • • S6 T7
q
e �. ux•� I
If
Y Yip x
S,
S9 J l
w 1r .
Ir
U1
IUD w<�
s e s e S2)`W- 4- S3) • a • ..> • •`s S4 �I
SI
P
s
•
r
s
s
a
Start
e
r
e
TOUR NIAP
E STREET PARK
Cl FY OF SA\ BER\.\RDI\O.CALIFORMA
Exhibit B, Page 3
Report California State Parks
Community FactFinder
This is your Community FactFinder report for IICgrisc_ - —= w fs h5r
the project you have defined. Please refer to r_--= .rf
kt hlaq nol a 0.
your Project ID in any future communications
ltgtnia.5t E W.1 lam At 1,
about this project. w 13
t
Project ID: 3163 I �- L 1'w` n
T11
Date created: October 28 2009 L� u t? T Woa�9,s -i
r —"'W,;llin
County: San Bernardino J'c a a`A, -� L l zz
City: San Bernardino r- Ts
Coordinates: 34.117152, -117.310338 '- +
Total Population: 7,331 eesw 7tn ;1 L
2.
4 Iw,aI rla� -- J a I K1.w Gtr
Median Household
$29,000 r 3 [ -—1 -
W ruse
Income: 1 r� ; .
���� 'w.Stl)SFr 0.4 mi
Number of families 2,422
below poverty line: Project site
Park acreage: 20.59
Park acres per 1,000 2.81
population:
All numbers above have been calculated based on a 1/2
mile radius from the point location of your project.
Demographics are figured by averaging population
numbers over selected census block groups and using
the percent of the block group within the project circle
to determine the actual counts.
Parks and park acres are based on best available source
information but may not always contain exact
boundaries or all parks in specific locations. Parks
acreage does not include major lakes or ocean. Users
can send update information to:
parkupdates @parks.ca.gov
Data Sources:
Demographics- Clantas Pop-Facts, block group level (Apr. 2008)
Parks-Calif. Protected Areas Database v. 1.3 (Mar. 2009)
Community FactFinder is a service of the
California Department of Parks and Recreation
nw .. www.parks.ca.gov
GammunaY Hcerinder awp!
� by Greenlnfo Yetwvr
nvv.greenbrb.ore
Exhibit B, Page 4
California State Parks
Community FactFinder
This is your Community FactFinder report for }
the project you have defined. Please refer to = h`
your Project ID in any future communications r w tat w
about this project. ( uf, I laer� t
Project ID: 3209
Date created: October 29, 2009
3 0
County: San Bernardino ui5[_ fi' ^p ^y r.ty�Tempie 5i
City: San Bernardino Ipt1 SG
h", $--z-� , -, :i -
Coordinates: t -
34.115677, .
hn
Total Population: 7,641 _ Li � � .
th.St Y
Median Household °' 'P ,. 5
Income: $29,232 L , —
_--
Number of families
below poverty line: 2,526 Project Site
Park acreage: 21.67
Park acres per 1,000 2.84
population:
All numbers above have been calculated based on a '/2
mile radius from the point location of your project.
Demographics are figured by averaging population
numbers over selected census block groups and using
the percent of the block group within the project circle
to determine the actual counts.
Parks and park acres are based on best available source
information but may not always contain exact
boundaries or all parks in specific locations. Parks
acreage does not include major lakes or ocean. Users
can send update information to:
parkupdates@parks.ca.gov
Data Sources:
Demographics- Claritas Pop-Facts, block group level (Apr. 2008)
Parks- Calif. Protected Areas Database v. 1.3 (Mar. 2009)
Community FactFinder is a service of the
California Department of Parks and Recreation
'"°"•• www parkr.ca.gav
Commwn
Uy b,y,nrinaer crmmA
Grwnlnfo Network
wwwgrrnnfo.mq
Exhibit B, Page 5
S11
s a .
rc1._ R
`x =
'- SS "aw `•"
� •
Start S;; Finish
RIO!
_rx
= y�rt
y i F
X
a tc
.� 56 T N1i' 3 lL
r+
1� d
• 142?-:-ee-'�,:'::e�::
01/30/10 TOUR NvIAP
® JM ^ 9TH STREET & ENCANTO PARK
Cl FY OF SAY BERNARDINO,CALIFORYIA
Exhibit B, Page 6
California
Community FactFinder
This is your Community FactFinder report for 9 -
�.� `°e s
the project you have defined. Please refer to
your Project ID in any future communications
about this project. G
nim it
_ a
Project ID: 3142 9 vre>t
_'t',Si
`-
Date created: October 28, 2009
E_ t 1 5r^
6 St_
County: San Bernardino Ill
_Sth,St
City: San Bernardino [ k .E Mare .Ave
Coordinates: 34.108429, -117.284846 w,
W 3 _s r— ird_SE=-,
Total Population: 4,586 E-enydi t
EKIngS['
Median Household _ ,
Income: $16,062
N
Number of families o 9;4 mi 4 =
below poverty line: 1,943 Project Site
Park acreage: 55.25
Park acres per 1,000 12.05
population:
All numbers above have been calculated based on a r/z
mile radius from the point location of your project.
Demographics are figured by averaging population
numbers over selected census block groups and using
the percent of the block group within the project circle
to determine the actual counts.
Parks and park acres are based on best available source
information but may not always contain exact
boundaries or all parks in specific locations. Parks
acreage does not include major lakes or ocean. Users
can send update information to:
parkupdates @parks.ca.gov
Data Sources:
Demographics - Claritas Pop-Facts, block group level (Apr. 2008)
Parks- Calif. Protected Areas Database v. 1.3 (Mar. 2009)
AmCommunity FactFinder is a service of the
California Department of Parks and Recreation
nFCa w. www.parks.ca.gov
Community FaceFlnd er nrtaled
• �,Greenlnfa NNwork
vrv...q reenmfoarq
Exhibit B, Page 7
u5
i..10 Rte YrB�_.
. ,M S9
i i PU di
12 SS
,- S6
..w°9 y^..
Finish SI6 "'k S3
• ' SS
SI Start
•
•
t
•
f
f
01!30/,10
TOUR MAP
SECCOMBE LAKE PARK
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO,CALIFORNIA
Exhibit B, Page 8
California Parks
Report Community FactFinder
This is your Community FactFinder report for I
the project you have defined. Please refer to i s — E 49m s ,
your Project ID in any future communications 4zt E 5°""�`" X s 3
LAP l��'..2�R_-v 4 s-�'J di
about this project. _�
ter" 'J :i
°
Wes- aean�st c
Project ID: 3156 1 1
111 � 3 yf"•q {
Date created: October 28, 20091
gin�"drSc
County: San Bernardino >
one
i
City: San Bernardino
_ _8a Alin?4�
Coordinates: 34.12344, -117.234871a
Ferry 'aY
Total Population: 6,799
D f —
Median Household s Tempie`5't
Income: $28,341 - —_
-E
Number of families o -0 4 mt ti --
below poverty line: 2'374 Project site
Park acreage: 49.85
Park acres per 1,000
population: 7.33
All numbers above have been calculated based on a 1/2
mile radius from the point location of your project.
Demographics are figured by averaging population
numbers over selected census block groups and using
the percent of the block group within the project circle
to determine the actual counts.
Parks and park acres are based on best available source
information but may not always contain exact
boundaries or all parks in specific locations. Parks
acreage does not include major lakes or ocean. Users
can send update information to:
parkupdates @parks.ca.gov
Data Sources:
Demographics- Claritas Pop-Facts, block group level (Apr. 2008)
Parks-Calif. Protected Areas Database v. 1.3 (Mar. 2009)
Community FactFinder is a service of the
California Department of Parks and Recreation
www.parks.ca.gov
Community RctFndu vented
by.vrw p'reann n'fre.arp
Exhibit B, Page 9
Finish Starts
IJ � SIy �+ alsoa ! ! • �
S3 "
12 _
}
F>
l�
V
iC
W
S11 S5 :
10
S9
P sa
X
01130110 "FOUR MAP
SPEICHER MEMORIAL PARK
CITY OF SAN, BERNARDIVO,CALIFORMA
COPY
1 RESOLUTION NO.
2 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF FOUR GRANT
3 APPLICATIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS OFFICE OF GRANTS
AND LOCAL SERVICES PROPOSITION 84 FUNDS TOTALING UP TO $20
4 MILLION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PARK SPACE AND
RENOVATION OF EXISTING RECREATION AND PARK FACILrIUS.
5
6 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF
7 THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
8 WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the
9 responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of the
10 Statewide Park Program, setting up necessary procedures governing the Application, and
11 WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and
12
13 Recreation require applicants to certify by resolution the approval of application(s)
14 before submission of said application(s)to the State;
15 WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino will enter into a contract with the State of
16 California to complete the grant scope project;
17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of San Bernardino Mayor and
18 Common Council approves the filing of applications for the City of San Bernardino for
19
"E" Street Park, Encanto4b Street Park, Seccombe Lake Park, and Speicher Park/Patton
20
21 South Park; and
22 1. Certifies that said applicant has or will have available, prior to commencement of
23 any work on the project included in this application, the sufficient funds to
24 complete the project; and
25 2. Certifies that the applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and
26 maintain the project(s); and
27
2s ���
1 3. Certifies that the applicant has reviewed, understands, and agrees to the General
2 Provisions contained in the contract shown in the Grant Administration Guide;
3 and
4 4. Delegates the authority to the City Manager of the City of San Bernardino to
5
6 conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, including, but not
7 limited to applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests, which
8 may be necessary for the completion of the grant scope, and
9 5. Agrees to complv with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances.
10 rules, regulations and guidelines.
11 6. Accepts, if awarded, the grant amount of up to $5,000,000 for each project, for a
12
total award of up to $20,000,000 for the four projects.
13
14
15
16 ///
17
18
19
20
///
21
22 ///
23 ///
24 ///
25
26
�✓ 27
28
1 RESOLUTION NO.
2 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF FOUR GRANT
3 APPLICATIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS OFFICE OF GRANTS
AND LOCAL SERVICES PROPOSITION 84 FUNDS TOTALING UP TO $20
4 MHLION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PARK SPACE AND
RENOVATION OF EXISTING RECREATION AND PARK FACILITIES.
5
6 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
7 %layor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
8
meeting thereof, held on the _ day of
9
10 2010, by the following vote, to wit:
11 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
12 ESTRADA
13 BAXTER
14 BRINKER
15 SHORETT
16
KELLEY
17
18 JOHNSON
19 MC CAMMACK
20
21 City Clerk
22 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of 2010
23
24 Patrick J. Moms, Mayor
25 City of San Bernardino
Appro as to Fonn:
26
27 James . Penman, City Attorney
28