HomeMy WebLinkAbout08.C- City Manager DOC ID: 2250
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO—REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Information/Report
From: Andrea Travis-Miller M/CC Meeting Date: 01/22/2013
Prepared by: Georgeann"Gigi" Hanna,
Dept: City Manager Ward(s): All
Subject:
Oral Report from Police Chief Robert Handy Regarding RFP Received by the City of San
Bernardino from the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department for Contractual Law
Enforcement Services
Financial Impact:
N/A at this time.
Motion: Receive and file.
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
At the November 5,2012, MCC meeting the Council approved Resolution 2012-255, authorizing
the Mayor on behalf of the City Council to request a proposal from the San Bernardino County
Sheriffs Department for the provision of law enforcement services and authorizing the interim
City Manager to coordinate with the Sheriff's Department to provide the information required to
formulate the proposal.
On December 26, 2012,the Sheriff Department provided the City with an initial Proposal for
Law Enforcement Services,which was released to the public on Friday,January 11, 2013, and is
presented in the back-up for this item.
.Supporting Documents:
RFP_SBCSD 2013 (PDF)
Updated: 1/17/2013 by Linda Sutherland
STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
From: Chief Robert Handy, San Bernardino Police Department
Date: January 22, 2013
Subject: Summary Analysis of Sheriff's Department Proposal
On November 5, 2012, the Mayor and Common Council approved a resolution
authorizing the Mayor to seek a proposal from the San Bernardino County Sheriff's
Department to provide law enforcement services to the City of San Bernardino. The
City Manager and I were involved in providing information to the Sheriff's Department
for the proposal and ultimately took delivery of a preliminary proposal by the Sheriff's
Department. The proposal was delivered to the Mayor and Common Council and I was
asked to provide this summary review of the proposal in comparison to our police
department.
When the proposal was first sought, the Police Department assembled a committee of
employees to assist in the gathering of necessary data. The committee also sought to
ensure the data and any comparisons of agencies and budgets were accurate and
equivalent. In light of the financial figures in the Sheriff's proposal, the majority of the
committees work will not be presented. This summary will focus only on a few of the
main points and the financial figures of the proposal compared to our agency.
The sworn staffing levels provided on the proposal are nearly identical to our current
sworn staffing levels in total number. The numbers in fact differ however in the
supervisory and management ranks. The sheriff's proposal eliminates positions at each
rank of the organization for a savings of 19 personnel. This is accomplished by
oversight and support from current SBSO command staff assigned to the Central
Station and the costs are incorporated into the administrative fees contained in the
proposal. The number of deputies assigned per 24 hour period to patrol would be
slightly higher than our current staffing levels (approximately 10 more per 24 hour
period). The sheriff's proposal also has more deputies on the street at times due to a
two 12 hour shift configuration, whereas we currently deploy in a four 10 hour shift
configuration. The four ten hour shift configuration allows us to stack staffing during
peak periods as opposed to having the same staffing levels at 4 pm. and 4 am.
The civilian staffing levels in the proposal are reduced by 39 total positions due to
differences in duties, technology, and support from the Sheriff Department. For
example, the Dispatch, Records and Forensics sections would be reduced but
supported by SBSO infrastructure. L
G
Sheriffs Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
January 22,2013
Page 2
A direct comparison of deputy versus officer numbers does not provide a complete
comparison. There are other positions we staff which would be lost in the contract
environment proposed. The Police Department currently has four canine officers, four
police canines, and nine officers serving on various State and Federal task forces. The
Sheriff's Department does not maintain a canine program and would not support one in
a contract. The Sheriffs Department does participate in the same task forces, but the
contract does not provide for representatives for our City, which would be at an
additional expense.
The financial portion of the proposal contains many drawbacks for the City. Currently
the Police Department operates on an annual budget just under $54 million including
Animal Control. The Sheriff's proposal contains an annual cost of just over $53 million
plus an additional $8 million of expenses obligated to the City related to police service
(overtime, fuel maintenance, pension bond obligation, etc.) for a total of more than $61
million per year. The $61 million does not include Animal control or Parking
Enforcement which are both included in the City's $54 million budget. In addition, the
City would have to pay $8 million in startup capital expenses and an undetermined multi
million fee to close out the police portion of the PERS retirement system.
In summary, the Sheriff's proposal offers a few more deputies on the street in patrol
while leaving voids in other areas. Although many managerial positions would be
eliminated under the proposal, the cost to cover the necessary oversight by existing
County management is added under the administrative fees section of the proposal.
The financial impact of the proposal is significantly more expensive for the City than our
current budget. I recommend the Council take no further action on the issue of
contracting for law enforcement services based on the proposal provided by the San
Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. If the Council agrees, we will file the proposal
and thank the Sheriff's Department for producing a thorough and professional proposal
in a very short period of time.
a
LL
Ul
0.
w
t
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 0
r
0
a
INITIAL PROPOSAL FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
L
0
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
M
r
O
N
I
N
December 2012 m
a
LL
C
d
FE
L
U
auld A
a
Packet Pa. 363
,' 7 Ai2
8.C.a
J
ROD HOOPS. SHERIFF -CORONER --
December 26. 2012
Mrs. Andrea M. Miller, Interim City Manager
City of San Bernardino
710 North'D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
SUBJECT: roposal for Contract Law Enforcement Services a
U_
of
Dear M let: N
On ovember 5. 2012, the Mayor and Common Council approved a Resolution authorizing the Mayor to
request a proposal from the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department for contract law enforcement N
C
services. o
As requested, attached is a proposal for law enforcement services for the City of San Bernardino. For fifty 0
years. we have provided municipal law enforcement in vastly diverse geographic and demographic areas
throughout the County and thus have developed an expertise in tailoring services to meet the needs and
m
desires of the communities we serve 0
The San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department is dedicated to providing the best law enforcement service 0
possible as an economically viable alternative to maintaining a municipal police department We continue to
develop strategies and implement new technology to keep pace with crime trends and new methods of
policing throughout the County o
N
Our proposal, in the amount of 561.8 million, includes S8.7 in one-time and S53.1 million in ongoing costs. In of
{ addition, the City would be billed quarterly for overtime, fuel and vehicle maintenance. The City would
continue to be responsible for utilities and maintenance of its police facility as well as any existing City m
obligations related to police services. This proposal does not include Animal Control or Code Enforcement U)I
o.
services. t,_
IX
It is important to note this proposal is operational in nature and there remain a number of contractual issues
i to be resolved, including protections for the County regarding guarantee of payment as the City works
through its bankruptcy. If the City decides to further pursue contracting with the Sheriffs Department after E E
reviewing this operational proposal, those contractual issues should be discussed promptly as they may take @
a substantial amount of time and effort to address. G
It would be our goal to employ as many of the City's police personnel as possible. However. all personnel
would be required to successfully complete a full background investigation as well as a physical, polygraph
and psychological examination
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this information if you would like to discuss this proposal or explore
other law enforcement staffing options, please contact Deputy Chief Scott Mesa at (909) 387-3636 or via e-
mail at smesa s c ora
Sincerely,
Rod Hoops. Sheriff-C oner
RHISPH(wb
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT y._.__ Packet Pg. 364
6%E4w YM SWO Son Swram ,Calitorr4a 92115.OGEI Post Office Box 569•San Bcmatdino Cal�lorma 92CO2�056
fnO 9
S.C.a
San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
3ity of San Bernardino
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
History:
The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department has provided contract law enforcement service
since 1962, when the City of Victorville selected us to be their Police Department shortly aftei
incorporation. Since then, thirteen other cities in the County have chosen to rely on the establishes
patrol and investigative services of the Sheriff's Department for their police protection. Previously, twc
cities disbanded their own Police Departments in favor of lower cost and what has proven to be E
reliably reduced incidence of crime as compared to other jurisdictions. LL
tr
N
Local Control:
L
d
It is only natural for city officials to want influence over department policy, enforcement priorities anc v,
the selection/promotion of police officers. But with this control comes the assumption of significan o
civil liability, as well as ongoing personnel issues associated with collective bargaining, recruitment to
training and disciplinary action. The Sheriff's Department always assumes these responsibilities d
when handling police services for a community and works to regularly assign the same employees tc
contract city stations, thus facilitating a sense of ownership and pride in the city they serve. In fact o
many of our officers reside and/or grew up in their assigned city. o
N
N
With regard to command staff/executive accountability, city leaders can be assured the Sheriff iE =
committed to establishing and maintaining a positive working relationship with all of the cities tha o
contract with the Sheriff's Department. Station Commanders routinely attend all city counci N,
meetings, city staff meetings and community events. It's also not uncommon for Sheriffs Departmen
personnel of all ranks to be involved with many of the various civic groups found in each community. m
U)
a�
Benefits of Contract Law Enforcement:
Cities that contract with the Sheriff's Department for police protection enjoy a defined level of policE d
service that is responsive to the traditional calls for service needs, as well as other public safety z
issues that are unique to each community. Officers are also fully trained, which means cities do no 0
have to absorb costs associated with sending new-hires to a training academy. a
The extensive support that officers receive from the Sheriff's Department's specialized units hell:
many municipalities respond effectively to critical incidents that occur in their jurisdictions. Thes(
specialized units include Homicide, Crimes Against Children, Bomb/Arson, Narcotics, SWAT, Crim(
Scene Investigation, Crime Impact, Gang, Aviation and High-Tech Crime. All of these units enjoy the
highest credibility within their profession, thus cities are assured of experienced, specialize(
assistance that is built into the cost of the contract.
Page 1 of 14
Packet Pg. 365
S.C.a
San Bernardino County Shenff's Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
City of San Bernardino
Benefits of Contract Law Enforcement (Continued):
Increased efficiencies in the Sheriff's Department's other established support services keep th
overall costs down for contract cities due to economy of scale; specifically as it relates to Comman
1 Staff, Human Resources, Communications (Dispatch Services), Technical Services, Internal Affairs
Public Affairs, Training, Fleet Management, Criminal Records Management, and Volunteer Forces
As a result, the per capita cost for cities with their own police departments is consistently higher than
those who contract with the Sheriffs Department. This cost savings, combined with efficient an
effective policing, enhance the value of every dollar cities spend on public safety.
Crime Statistics and Staffing Analysis for the City of San Bernardino: a'
LL
T
The proposed Law Enforcement Services Contract (Schedule A) for the City of San Bernardino is w
primarily based on specific data provided by the San Bernardino Police Department and Sai L
Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. An initial staffing analysis was conducted to determine thi N
appropriate amount of staff required to maintain appropriate police service levels. o
0
This staffing analysis utilized the San Bernardino Police Department's 2011 and 2012 crime statistics
sworn officers per 1,000 ratios and demographics (size, population, ethnicity, etc.). This data wa! ,
compared to local, like-sized, cities with their own Police Departments (Fontana and Ontario), as we o
as select contract cities within the Sheriff's Department. As a result of this staffing analysis an( o
comparison study, it appears there are no other local cities that truly compare to the City of Sai N
Bernardino in terms of overall crime rate, call volume and service level demands.
0
I Although the geographic and population size of some of the larger comparison cities are similar to the Ni
City of San Bernardino, they vary significantly in terms of their FBI Violent/Property Crime Index, FB u°,
City Crime Rate Rankings ("CQ" Safest Cities Ranking), Part I & II Crimes, Calls for Service, Crim( co
Reports, Arrests and Traffic Collisions. ai
For example, the City of San Bernardino's 2011 Violent Crime Index (8.76) is ninety-two (92%
percent higher than the City of Ontario, one hundred forty-one (141%) percent higher than the City o 4)
Fontana, four hundred (400%) percent higher than the City of Rancho Cucamonga, fifty (50%) highe
than the City of Victorville, and one hundred thirteen (113%) higher than the State of California'; q
average (4.11). a
While San Bernardino's population is only 21% greater than Ontario and 9% higher than Fontana, it;
overall Part I Crime rate is twice as high. In fact, San Bernardino's Part I Crime rate is 92% highe
f than Ontario and 108% higher than Fontana.
I
Page 2 of 14
Packet Pg. 366
B.C.a
San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
City of San Bernardino
Crime Statistics and Staffing Analysis for the City of San Bernardino (Continued):
Despite having nearly the same population size as Fontana, the City of San Bernardino has twice the
crime rate and currently deploys about nineteen (19) additional patrol officers (154 to 173
respectively).
With regard to demographics, the City of San Bernardino is fairly consistent with Fontana an(
Ontario, especially in terms of ethnicity. However, significant differences exist when median income
percent of population on cash-aid, poverty rate and unemployment rate data is examined. In each o
these statistical categories, the City of San Bernardino varies considerably. For example, Sar
Bernardino's percent of population receiving cash aid (13.2%) and percent of population below LL
poverty (29.9%) is, on average, about two times greater than the Cities of Fontana and Ontario.
N
w
w
The following table demonstrates how much higher (displayed as a percentage) the City of Sar
Bernardino's crime rate is compared to other like-sized cities utilized in this study: U)
r
0
0
0
CL
m
2011 Data ' . . Part I Violent Property Robbery Burglary GT,4'
Crime Crime 0
Index Index o
Ontario 21% 92% 195% 36% 400% 185% 244% 151% 92% N
M
Fontana 9% 108% 141% 87% 500% 97% 199% 127% 1110/ o
N
I
Rancho 25% 122% 400% 70% 400% 492% 599% 101% 3590/ v
Cucamonga
a
Victorville 79% 85% 50% 19% 400% 108% 176% 73% 2400/ LL
c
m
E
z
U
Q
Page 3 of 14
Packet Pg. 367
8.c.a
San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
City of San Bernardino
Comparison of 2011 Demographic & Part I Crime Data:
(Sheriff) (Sheriff)
Population 210,110 173,690 192,595 99,171 168,181 117,219
City Area 59 50 42 22 37 73
White 19.0% 18.2% 15.4% 12.6% 42.7% 28.3%
African American 14.2% 5.9% 9.3% 15.6% 8.8% 16.0%
Asian 3.8% 4.9% 6.4% 2.1% 10.1% 3.7% LL
Hispanic 60.0% 69.0% 66.8% 67.6% 34.9% 47.8% w
w
Median Income $35,978 $53,224 $59,185 $49,977 $73,103 $50,496 r
% of Pop. Cash Aid 13.2% 4.9% 5.6% 7.0% 2.0% 9.7% w
c
Unemployment Rate 16.9% 12.6% 12.3% 15.1% 7.7% 14.2% C
% Below Poverty 29.9% 15.8% 14.5% 17.0% 4.4% 22.6% a
d
o:
CQ Rating(Safest Cities) 367 181 159 251 52 249
0
Violent Crime Index 8.76 2.97 3.63 4.78 1.75 5.85
LO
N
N
Viol. Crime State Ave. 4.11 4.11 4.11 4.11 4.11 4.11 ,
0
Property Crime Index 39.84 29.29 21.35 29.68 23.41 33.52 of
Prop. Crime State Ave. 25.84 25.84 25.84 25.84 25.84 25.84 N
a
Homicide 30 6 5 6 6 6 LL
C
Rape 77 27 39 18 13 37 E
r
U
Robbery 720 209 241 204 103 261 w
a
Aggravated Assault 1,034 251 435 252 171 382
Burglary 2,359 939 1,041 934 1,173 1,359
Larceny 4,446 3,057 2,411 1,524 2,381 2,086
Vehicle Theft 1,656 862 783 520 361 486
Page 4 of 14
IV
PacietPg �
San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
City of San Bernardino
2011 Workload Per Officer:
Agency Officers CFS CFS per DR DR per Arrests Arrests per
Officer (Reports) Officer Officer
Upland PD 50 46,233 925 9,773 195 4,034 81
Chino Hills 38 35,495 934 3,846 101 908 24
Apple Valley 37 51,104 1,381 8,561 231 1,675 45 0
LL
(Y
Rancho 105 108,247 1,031 13,434 127 4,300 41
Hesperia 37 54,077 1,462 9,634 260 2,262 61 in
r-
0
Victorville 64 91,304 1,426 15,888 248 3,656 57 c
Q
v
San Bernardino PD 173 207,680 1,200 35,448 205 9,924 57
`
SBPD o
Proposal 174 207,680 1,193 35,448 204 9,924 57 •
0
LO
Ontario PD 116 150,031 1,293 21,965 189 4,703 41
M
Fontana PD 154 151,691 985 20,565 133 4,151 27 N
of
E5
co
m
i
Note: The above San Bernardino Police Department Arrest and Report data excludes the workloac LL
of officers holding rank within the agency (i.e. Detective and higher), as well as follow-ui
investigations. Also, SBPD's Calls for Service (CFS) excludes Broadcast/Information Only CFS, a:
well as Administrative duties such as report writing, training, meals, meetings, etc. s
U
(6
Based on the above, the current number of proposed officers/deputies (174) results in workload pe a
officer ratios that are fairly consistent with most of the comparison cities. In particular, Sat
Bernardino's projected Calls for Service per Officer ratio of 1:1,193 and Reports per Officer ratio o
1:204 are slightly lower than most of the High Desert contract cities, which are historically some of the
busiest in the entire county. Assuming the call volume is accurate and these projections hold true, i
appears the number of officers/deputies established in this proposal will be sufficient to maintair
desired service levels and maintain workload demands within the existing margin.
Page 5 of 14
Packet Pg. 369
8.C.a
San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
City of San Bernardino
Sworn / Officer Per 1,000 Resident Ratio:
t
Officer to Officer per Safety
2011 Square Officer Safety Positions
Resident 1,000
Population Miles Positions Positions per 1,000
Ratio Population population
3
3
Upland PD 73,341 15 49 1,497 0.67 77 1.05
Chino Hills SD 75,345 45 38 1,983 0.50 52 0.69
'Apple Valley SD 69,668 74 37 1,883 0.53 51 0.73 a
U.
j ,Rancho Cucamonga SD 168,181 37 105 1,602 0.62 135 0.80
Hesperia SD 90,726 73 37 2,452 0.41 52 0.57
Victorville SD 117,219 73 64 1,832 0.55 85 0.73 d
j San Bernardino PD 210,110 59 173 1,215 0.82 270 1.29
San Bernardino Proposal 210,110 59 174 1,208 0.83 251 1.19 1
Ontario PD 173,690 50 116 1,497 0.67 225 1.30 0
Fontana PD 200,232 42 154 1,300 0.77 180 0.90
d
Rialto PD 99,171 22 77 1,288 0.78 112 1.13
L
I �
' N
N
th
r
O
N
Workload Data:
U
I m
2011 2011 to
2011 Calls 2011 2011 2011 0.
Violent Property 2011 Police Budget Cost Per u_
F for Reports Traffic Traffic
Crime Crime Arrests 2011-12 Capita
Service Taken Collisions Citations
Index Index
d
'Upland PD 2.45 29.68 46,233 9,773 4,034 683 7,543 $16,258,640 $221.65 E
L
Chino Hills SD 0.90 25.10 35,495 3,846 908 385 3,786 $10,527,800 $139.73 u
Apple Valley SD 2.24 27.91 51,104 8,561 1,675 776 4,813 $10,837,583 $155.56 Q
Rancho Cucamonga SD 1.75 2141 108,247 13,434 4,300 1,181 16,898 $27,385,770 $162.84
Hesperia SD 3.43 24.65 54,077 9,634 2,262 809 2,793 $11,902,792 $131.15
Victorville SD 5.85 33.52 91,304 15,888 3,656 1,361 7,738 $18,368,894 $156.71
San Bernardino PD 8.76 39.84 230,813 35,448 9,924 2,321 15,218 $61,915,700 $294.6£
Ontario PD 2.97 29.29 150,031 21,965 8,838 1,640 11,594 $65,467,764 $376.92
Fontana PD 2.97 21.35 151,691 20,565+4,151 2,363 17,513 $42,013,400 $209.82
Page 6 of 14
Packet Pg. 370
8.C.a
San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
City of San Bernardino
Detective 1 Clerical Workload Analysis:
2011 2011 2011 2011 Detective Officer Clerical Detective to Detective Clerical to Clerica
Part I&II Reports Posittions Positions Positions Part I&II to Officer Officer Repoi
Part I Part II Total Taken Sum Ratio Ratio Ratio Taken F
Upland PD 2,889 4,371 7,260 9,773 9 50 8 807 5.56 6.25 1,22
Chino Hills SD 1,087 2,409 3,496 3,846 4 38 9 874 9.50 4.22 427
Apple Valley SO 2,574 6,038 8,612 8,561 5 37 8 1,722 7.40 4.63 1,07 d
Rancho Cucamonga SD 4,652 8,831 13,483 13,434 15 105 19 899 7.00 5.53 707 tl
Hesperia SD 3,065 6,651 9,716 9,634 5 37 8 1,943 7.40 4.63 1,20 �
Victorville SD 5,570 10,710 16,280 15,888 9 64 12 1,809 7.11 5.33 1,32 Y)
San Bernardino PD 10,322 11,960 22,282 35,448 44 173 39 506 3.93 4.44 909
d
S8PD Proposal 10,322 1I,960 22,282 35,448 42 174 40 531 4.14 4.35 886
Ontario PD 5,376 10,000 15,376 21,965 30 116 19 513 3.87 6.11 1,15 r
Fontana PD 4,955 10,515 15,470 20,565 14 154 45 1,105 11.00 3.42 457 0
O
O.
Nate: The City of San Bernardino's overall 2012 Part I Crimes (January 1 -August 31, 2012) are nearly W
twenty-three (23%) higher than those during the same time period the previous year. To date, there
-ve been forty-five (45) Homicides in the city, which represents a 50% increase from the year-end total o
'011 of thirty (30).
LO
PROPOSED STAFFING MODEL: N
M
The proposed staffing levels, outlined below, account for the significant challenges posed by the city': N
above average crime rate and significant service demands. These staffing levels represent tht of
number of personnel required to appropriately handle the corresponding workload demand pe u
officer, while also ensuring sufficient clerical and supervisory support. The ultimate goal it mu,
establishing adequate staffing levels is to ensure public safety, deliver high quality, professiona p.
U.
service and deploy sufficient resources to maintain officer safety.
Based on the size of the city (59 square miles) the proposed contract city staffing model utilizes the E
patrol operations configuration currently utilized by the San Bernardino Police Department u
Specifically, the city is divided into four (4) Patrol Districts - Northwest, Northeast, Southwest anc a
Southeast - each having seven (7) patrol beats. Because of the high level of calls for service, as wel
as the sheer volume of other related service demands, this proposal bases its deputy staffing level
and corresponding command, supervisory and support personnel on the following calculation:
The proposed staffing level for patrol operations is thirty-five (35) deputies. Utilizing a 3/12 hour
patrol schedule and a conservative relief factor of 5.0, thirty-five deputies would enable the
deployment of seven (7) patrol positions - 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, 365 days per year - it
each for the four districts. This would enable a minimum staffing level of seven (7) beat positions it
each district (twenty-eight beats total). Note: This is one of several different beat configuratior
previously deployed by the San Bernardino Police Department prior to their recent staffing/budge-
shortfalls, which resulted in a four-beat pattern in each District.
Page 7 of 14
Packet Pg. 371
8.C.a
San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
City of San Bernardino
North-South Region Model:
This staffing model retains the four distinct Districts. However, it separates them into a North Regio
and a South Region. Under this model, the command structure is configured with one Lieutenar
assigned to the North Region and one Lieutenant assigned to the South Region. Each Lieutenant i
responsible for patrol and investigative operations in their respective Regions.
North Region:
1 Lieutenant - Station Commander, responsible for all District operations in their Region
12 Sergeants - Patrol Watch Commander— 10, Administrative — 1, Detective(Traffic — 1
12 Detectives — 6 Detectives assigned to each District
70 Patrol Deputies — 35 Deputies assigned to cover the 7 Beats in each District (14 beats total)
4 Traffic/Motor Deputies — 2 Traffic/Motor Deputies assigned to each District w
d
North Region Total Deputies = 74
0
0
North Region Total Sworn = 99 0
C
South Region:
0
1 Lieutenant - Station Commander, responsible for all District operations in their Region o
12 Sergeants - Patrol Watch Commander— 10, Administrative — 1, Detective/Traffic — 1 N
12 Detectives — 6 Detectives assigned to each District
70 Patrol Deputies — 35 Deputies assigned to cover the 7 Beats in each District (14 Beats total) o
4 Traffic/Motor Deputies — 2 Traffic/Motor Deputies assigned to each District o
South Region Total Deputies = 74 N
a
i
South Region Total Sworn = 99 LL
North-South Region Patrol Operations Grand Total: E
E
U
Deputies = 148
w
a
Sworn = 198
Page 8 of 14
Packet Pg. 372
8.C.a
San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
City of San Bernardino
Police Headquarters Sworn Personnel:
1 Captain — Serves as the city's Chief of Police
1 Lieutenant — Serves as the Executive Officer/Administration Lieutenant
STATION SPECIALIZED TEAMS:
Sergeant Detective Deputy Crime Scene Crime Total
Specialist Analyst
North Gang 1 4 4 1* 10 LL
South Gang 1 4 4 1* 10
Narcotics 1 4 4 1* 10 w
MET/POP 1 3 4 1* 9 r
Special Projects 1 1 2 1* 5
Retail Theft 1 2 3
CFMH/Sec.8 1 1 2 4 Q
SRO 1 4 5
TOTAL 7 18 26 4 1 56 0
LO
0
Police Headquarters Total Sworn = 53 N
Excludes 4 (Civilian) CSI and 1 Crime Analyst
0
N
I
O
Police Headquarters and North-South Region Patrol Operations Combined:
U
rn
in
Total Sworn = 251 0.I
LL
W
Total Deputy (only) = 174
4)
m
Sworn & Deputy per 1,000 Population Ratios:
Based on the above staffing levels and a city population of 210,110, the sworn per 1,000 residents a
and deputies per 1,000 residents ratios are as follows:
1.19 Sworn per 1,000 Residents
0.83 Deputies per 1,000 Residents
Comparatively, the San Bernardino Police Department's per 1,000 ratios are as follows:
1.29 Sworn per 1,000 Residents
0.82 Officers per 1,000 Residents
Page 9 of 14
Packet Pg. 373
tsca -
San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
City of San Bernardino
North-South Region Model
Proposed Staffing:
SWORN
PERSONNEL . -
Captain 1 1
Lieutenant 3 3 a
LL
Sergeant 24 7 31
Detective 24 18 42
c
Deputy 148 26 174 r
0
0.
m
D:
Sworn Sub-Total 200 51 251 0`
PROFESSIONAL STAFF
N
N
SSS 20 20
N
N
SOS 2 2 N
U
Secretary 2 2 U)ii
a
LL
Office Specialist 40 40 0�
c
0
Crime Analyst 1 1 r
v
Crime Scene Specialist 4 4 a
Prof. Staff Sub-Total 64 5 69
GRAND TOTAL 264 56 320
Page 10 of 14
Packet Pg. 374
8.C.a
San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
City of San Bernardino
2012 Proposed Staffing Comparison:
SWORN I I SWORN
SWORN POSITIONS (CURRENT)
(PROPOSED) DIFFERENCE
Chief 1 0 1
Assist. Chief 1 0 1
Captain 3 1 -2
Lieutenant 9 3 -6
Sergeant 39 31 -8 E U.
Detective 44 42 -2
Officer 173 174 +l
Sworn
Sub-Total 270 251 -19 w
c
0
SBPD SHERIFF SHERIFF'S c
PROFFESSIONAL PROFFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL NET v
STAFF STAFF STAFF DIFFERENCE
(CURRENT) (PROPOSED) o
Exec. Assist. 3 2 -1 0
Admin. Analysts 2 2 0 N
Office Assist. 6 40 +6
Records Clerk 28 Included above o
Crime Analysts 4 1 -3
Property/Evidence 3 -3 y
Forensic 9 4 -5 m
Parking Officer 5 -5 yi
Fleet 1 -1 LL
Asset/Forfeiture 1 1
Dispatcher 28* 32* 0 d
Dispatch Supervisor 4* 0 r
CSO 26 20 -6
PersonneUTraining 1 -1 ¢
Prof. Staff
Sub-Total 89 69 -20
GRAND TOTAL 359 320 -39
*Not included
In Total
Page 11 of 14
Packet Pg 375
8.C.a
San Bemardino County Sheriffs Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
City of San Bernardino
SCHEDULE A
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES CONTRACT
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FY 2012-13
FY 2012-13
LEVEL OF SERVICE COST
1.00 - Captain $ 282,1851
3.00 - Lieutenant 654,299 1
31.00 - Sergeant 5,812,629 1
42.00 - Detective/Corporal 6,837,650 1
162.00 - Deputy Sheriff 24,031,127 ' LL
8.00 - Deputy Sheriff-Motorcycle 1,226,897 '
4.00 - School Resource Officer 593,361 ' w
4.00 - Crime Scene Specialist It 361,559 ' w
20.00 - Shenffs Service Specialist 1,380,400 ' .4'c
2.00 - Supv Office Specialist 156,985 ' rn
1.00 - Crime Analyst 101,313 ' c
2.00 - Secretary 130,167 ' 1✓
40.00 - Office Specialist 2,595,370 ' a
94.00 - Marked Unit 1,127,920 ] �
7.00 - Crown Vic-Slick Top 81,425
65.00 - Unmarked Unit 469,755 2 m
22.00 - Full Size Pickup 116,600 2 O
1.00 - Unmarked SUV(Captain) 9,835 2 0
8.00 - Motorcycle 65,8561 N
! Dispatch Services 2,693,245 1 N-
2.00 - Radar Umt 920 r1
280 - HTs(Amortized over 7-years) 134,960 N
280 - HTs(Access&Maint Only) 174,720
20 - Additional MDCs 13,200
to
247 - Taser Replacement(Amortized over 4-years) 82,251 ro
Administrative Support 223,560 N
Office Automation 54,846 3 al
Services&Supplies 388,800 K LL
Vehicle Insurance 192,582
Personnel Liability&Bonding 751,465
County Administrative Cost(5%) 2,354,037 d
E
Vehicle Startup Costs 6,716,857 4
Startup Costs 2,025,975
TOTAL COST: $ 61,842,751 ' Q
Monthly Payment Schedule
1"payment due July 15,2012: $5,153,569
2m through 12'"payments due the 5'"of each month: $5,153,562
'Personnel costs include salary and benefits and are subject to change by Board of Supervisors'action.
1 Vehicle costs include amontzation of vehicles and equipment for replacement Vehicle costs do not include
fuel and maintenance. The City is responsible for fuel and maintenance of all contract vehicles. Any fuel
and maintenance costs charged to the Count
3 Office Automation costs are subject to change and would require an in-dept analysis to determine City's
actual requirements.
4 Vehicle Startup Costs include one-time cost to purchase vehicles and equipment for fleet. Cost may be
reduced based upon County's ability to assume City s existing fleet
Page 12 of 14
Packet Pg. 376
8.C.a
San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
amity of San Bernardino
Other Costs Not included in the Schedule A
Overtime $ 2,700,000
Fuel $ 600,000
Vehicle Lease Payments $ 845,000
Vehicle Maintenance $ 500,000
Utilities
Electric $ 291,600
Gas $ 36,000 a
Telephone $ 168,900 U_
Water/Sewer $ 6,000 N
Building Maintenance unknown
Cal-ID Assessment $ 221,630
Pension Obligation Bond $ 2,038,700 c
New World Software Contract $ 600,000 0
1=
Lease Payment Parking Lot/Lighting $ 40,000 0 CL
m
o:
Total Other Costs: $ 8,047,830
O
Sheriffs Proposal (Schedule A): $ 61,842,751
N
N_
C7
Estimated Total Cost: $ 69,890,581 0
N
QI
V)
U
4]
V)
I
City's Adopted Police Budget for 2011-12 $ 61,915,700 U_
(Less Animal Control)
c
m
f Less Estimated Total Cost $ (69,890,581) E
U
t0
i Estimated Additional Funding Required: $ (7,974,881) Q
I
Sheriffs Proposal includes $8.7 million in one-time startup costs, net ongoing cost is
$53.1 million.
Page 13 of 14
Packet Pg. 377
8.C.a
San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department
Proposal for Law Enforcement Services
amity of San Bernardino
Sources:
2011 and 2012 Data/Statistics provided by the San Bernardino Police Department's commanc
staff and Department website.
2011 San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department Annual Report and Crime Analysis Unit,
2011 Population and area size figures based on data from the State of California, Departmen
of Finance.
a
• 2010 Demographic data (Ethnicity, Median income, etc.) obtained from Wikipedia and the U.S
Census Bureau.
v
L
• 2011 Cash Aid data obtained from the 2011 County of San Bernardino Human Servicee
Report, titled "County Residents Receiving Aid." 0
r
0
0.
• 2012 Unemployment Rate figures obtained from the website "City-Data.com." and the U.S W
Census Bureau.
0
0
N
N
M
O
N
U
U)
N
IL
LL
c
m
E
s
U
R
a
Page 14 of 14
Packet Pg. 378
.rgrC.a
4
IL
LL
W
d
L
N
C
O
0
O
CL
m
A
L
O
Ln
0
N
N_
M
r
O
N
0
U
00
(n
a�
LL
It
C
d
E
L
m
W
Q
a'Packet Pg.379